HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 77-0831
5
6
9
i0
11
12
15
14
15
.16'
17
18
19
~0
21
24
26
~8
~9
~0
RESOLUTION NO. 77-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA DECLARING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST
BY PROPERTY OWNERS HAS NOT BEEN MADE AGAINST THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIG-
NATED AS "RED HILL-MELVIN ANNEXATION NO. 100" TO THE
CITY OF TUSTIN.
·
BY PROPERTY OV2'~EES }lAS NOT BEE'I MADE AGAINST TIlE
A_'~'.EXATION'"' OF C--' RTATN_ UNTN}{ ~ nITED_ ?.:.. TERRITORY DES rq-_ .
NATED AS "RED !{ILL-?4ELVIN ANNEXATION NO. 100" TO TIIE
CITY OF TUS'I:IN.
The City Council, City of Tustin, California, does hereby
resolve as follows
1. That tile City Council of 'the City of Tustin did on
July 5, 1977 adopt its Resolution No. 77-69 declaring that
proceedings had been initiated with the City Council o
City of Tustin to anne:{ sai~ territory to the City, and givihg
notice of the proposal to annex said territory to the City,
which said Resolution described the boundaries of the territory.
proposed to be annexed.
2, Said Resolution No. 77-69 did set August 15, 19 77
at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at Centennial at'Main. Street
in Tustin, California, as the day, hour and place where and when
the City Council of the City would hear all persons and .would
hear all protests made by any person owning real property within
the territory proposed to be annexed, the time of said henring
being not less than forty (40) nor. more- than sixty (60) days
from the date of passage of said Resolution.
3. The territory proposed to be annexed is situated in
the County of Orange, State of California, more particularly
described as ~et forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
·
4. That the said territory is contiguous to the City of
Tustin and is uninhabited territory in the County of Orange, as
defined in the Government Code of the State of California.
5. The Local Agency Formation Commission', in session duly
assembled, on June 22, 1977, did adopt the'negative de'c!ar~tion
and approve said proposed annexation
6. On August 15, 1977, at the hour of 7-30 P.M. in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Centennial at Main Street,
City of Tustin, County of Orange, State of California, said time
and place being the day, hour and place fixed for. hearing pro-
tests to the said annexation, the City Council did hear all
persons and did hear and pass upon all protests made to the
proposed annexation and did find and determine that protest had
not been made by the owners of one-half of the value of the
privately-owned ter.ritory proposed to be annexed as. shown by the
last equalized assessment roll, nor by public owners of one-half
of the value of the publicly owned territory proposed to be
annexed as determined by said legislative body.
7. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council'of the City of
Tustin, California does hereby determine and declare tha= a
protest has not been made by the owners of one-half of the value
of the privately-'owned territory proposed to be annexed as
shown on the last equalized assessment roll, nor by the public
owners of one-half of the value of the publicly-owned territory
proposed to be
of the State-of
· 8.. The City
all as provided in the Government Code
annexed,
California.
'
Clerk shall certify .to the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
16--7A. -
Council, City of Tustin, California, held' ox the 15th day of August, 1977.
9
11
12
13
14
15
.16
17
18
19
ATTEST-
~-IT'~ CLE Rixx..~
MAYOR
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
3.0
31
32
, 'TO T}[~/ CITY OF TUSTIN,
·
Boglnning at the point of intersection of the centerllnesof Red
Avenue and Irvine Boulevard as shown on a map of Tract No. 371.5,
recorded in Book 130, pages 49 and 50, Miscellaneous Haps, Re. cords of
Oran~u County, California, said point of intersection also being
northerly corner of Lot
map recorded in. Book 1,
Orange County; -
·
·
Thence, S. 39" 54' 15"
3, Block 12 of Irvinu's subdivision, as per
page 88, Miscellan~:ouu Maps, Records of said
.
W., along, said centurlinu of Red 1{ill Avenue
and along the north~este'rly line of Lot 3, Block 12 of said Irvine
subdivision, a distance of '660.47 fe~t to the point of intersect
"~h the westerly co-n~- of T-act No. lSS', _
..... -. a~ p-r map recorded
' " Rcdowds of said Orange
k 57, pages 45 and 4~, ~iscellaneous .-.eps,
~. ~%~y, said poin= of intersection also being the true point of
.Thence, continuing S. 39' 54' 15' W., along said centerline of Red Hill
Avenue and along said northwesterly line of Lot 3, Block 12, 'a distance
of 133.61 feet to the point of inter'section with the centerline of'
}{elvin Way as shown on a map of previously mentioned Tract No. 3715;
· ·
Thence, leaving said. centerline of Red Hill Avenue and said north~est-
· erly line of Lot 3, Block 12., of Irvine's subdivision, S. 50" 05' 45"
E., along said centerline of Melvin Way, a distance of 175.00 feet
the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly .and having
raaius of 250.00 feet; ' .
· ·
Thence, continuing' along said centerline of Melvin Way,
arc o'f said curve through a central an~le of 20" 39' 10"
of 90.11 feet. to the beginning of a tangent reverse cu=ve~
northeasterly and having a radius of 250.00 feet;
·
·
Thence, continuing along said centerline of l-lelvin Way,
'arc of last mentioned curve through a-central an~jle o~.
~,-: distance of 8~.71 ~eet.~ .
·
an~ along the
an arc distance
concave
and along the
~0 ° 33' 40" an
· ~.nce, S. 50" 00' 15" E., along said centerlin~ of Melvin Way, a
distance of 184.06 feet to the p6int of intersection with the north-
easterly prolongation of the northwesterly line of Lot 10 of previously .
· ·
mentioned Tract No. 3715; . - .
·
Thence, leaving said centerl~ne of Melvin Way, S. 39' 54' 15" W., along
~a~d northeasterly prolongation and northwesterl~ line, a distance of
165.00 feet to the westerly corner of said Lot 10;
Thence, S. 50" 00' 15" E., along the southwesterly line of Lots 10 and
9 of said Tract No. 3715, a distance of 125.40 feet to the .so.ut..herly
corner of said Lot 9, said corner also. being a point on the northwest-
erly boundary of Tract No. 3857, as per map recorded in Book 13G, pages
6 and 7, Miscellaneous :-~aps, Records of said Orange County, said point
the north.~sterly line of the
Irvine's $~.bdivision;
'of intersection also being a point on
=outheasterly 1/2 of Lot 3, .Block 12,
Thence, S. 39" 54' lB" W., along said northweste=!.y boundary of Tract
..No. 3857 and said northwesterly line of the sout!_~asterly 1/2 of Lot
]~lock 12, a distance of 329.77 feet to 'westerly ~rner of said Tract
]~o. 3857, said westerly corner also being the northerly corner of
~rthwesterly 1/2 of the southeasterly 1/2
: ~ne'$ subdivision;
·
Thence, co.nttnuing S. 39' 54' 18" W., along
~&id northwesterly 1/2 of the 'southeasterly
d~stancc of 10'5.00 feet to the easterly
~er map recorded in Book 147, pages 39
..
ro¢ords of said Orange County; .
EXHI BlT A
Pag'e 1 of 2
of Lo: 14, Block 12, of
3~
th e
said
the :~.rthweste. rly line
1/2 ~ Lot 14, Block 12,
corner o~'Tract No. 4203,
and 40, f~3cellaneous Maps,
of
TO T~g CITY OF TUSTIH,
· .
Thence, leaving safd northwesterly line, N. 50'
I%ortheasterly boundary of said Tract :~o. 4.203,
feet to the northerly corner of said Tract No.
·
00' 12' W., along the
a distance of 660.38
4203;
· ·
Thence, $. 39' 54' 15" W., alonq the northwesterly boundary of -~aid
Tract No. 4203, a distance of 242.95 feet to the poin. t of intersection
.v~th the existing City of Tustin boundary as e~tabli-.;}%ed by the Bryan
Red Hill Annexa. tion No. 2, per Ordinance No. 267, passed and adopted
January- 7, 1965; . . -
·
·
'Thence, along the existing City of Tustin bound'ary, per above mentioned
·
Bryan - Red Hill Annexation No. 2 and the Br. yan - Red ~{ill Anncxatio~
~er Ordinance No. 172, passed and adopted June 4, 1962 through the ·
following courses; . ~
}~. 50" 00' :50" %;., a distance of 50.00
.& ~istance of 1008.40 feet to an angle
boundary, said angl.e point also being
4535, as pe~ 'map recorded in Book 175,
~{aps, ReCords of said Orange County;
·
·
feet; thence, N. 39" 54' 15" E
point-in said City of Ts"tin
the. easterly corner of Tract No.
pages 32 and 33, Miscellaneous
· .
· · · .
'- ..
Thence, S. 50" 00' 26"' E., along the southeasterly prolongation of
~ortheasterly boundary of said Tract No. of 50 00
:to '
45 35 a 'distance
the tru____~e po~n~t~ o~f beginning.
. .
· .e ·
' Th;s descr,p" ~'
· onnezotion ~~ mee[ the
· · opprovbl o~ the,~Srveyor's O[;;c~
'
.... . ·
. ~- z~-TT -
·
·
·
· ·
~he
feet.
STATE' OF ~%LfFOP~',~IA) ' .-
COUNTY OF OFfAl:GE ) SS '
CITY OF TUSTIN )
·
RUTII C. POE, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City'
Council of tl~e (2'21:5' of Tust±n, Cali£ornia, .does hereby
certify that: the whole number'of the members of the City
Council of tho City. o£ ?ust±n is five; that the above and
foregoin~ Resolution No. .7..7-8~ was duly and regularl7
introduced, re ad, passed ~nd adopted at: ct regular meeting
of the City Council held on tho 15th .... _ clay Of~Auqust: __. .... __
197 7, by the following vote-
AYES: COUNCIID4EN ' SHARP , WELSH. , EDGAR. _;, .~S _ALTARELLI~ ,.-~. , .... S.CHUSTER .... .
·
NOES '
COUNCILMEN ·
NONE
, · L -- ' ,_ , , _ ~ u ...... ~"
NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
~i~ty-Ci'-erk, ~i~y of-T~sti~,' Caiif'6r'ni'a