HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 77-12RESOLUTION NO. 77-12
RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE PRIORITY PLAN
FOR EXPENDITURES FOR JURISDICTIONS WITHIN
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FROM THE NEJEDLY-HART STATE,
URBAN, AND COASTAL PARK BOND ACT OF 1976
the "c.:jadly-}iart State, Urban and Coastal Park Bond Act of 1976 and authorized
issuance of bonds in the a~;.ount of $280 million to provide funds to acquire, develop,
and ra3tore rea" property for state and local park, beach, recreational and historical
purposes; and
WHEREAS,. approximately $6.9 million of these funds will be available for use
.
by Orange Coun%y and its cities and districts for the acquisition and development of
high priority pro~ ~'acts; and
~%~HEREAS, Section 5096.127 of ~he Public Resources Code requires that eaci~
County of the Sta~e submit a priority plan of expenditures to the State Depart~T, ent of
Parks and Recreation prior to June 30, 1978; and
WHEREAS, the plan ~,ust be approved by at least 50 percent of the cities and
districts within the County representing at least 50 percent of the population of tiaa
cities and distr-'cts, and by the County Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, similar provisions were required for State. Beach, Park,. Historical and
..
Recreational Facilities Bond Act of 1974 and after nuraerous meetings more than 50 per-
cenu of the jurisdictions and representing more than 50 percent of the population agreed
that =ha expenditure plan should provide approximately 29 percent of the available fu~ds
to Orange County in recognition of its regional park responsibility as well as its local
park rasponsibilizy and the remaining 71 percent to be made available to cities and dis-
tric--s on an a~ua~ per capita basis except that no jurisc~icuion would receive less than
$19, oD0; and
~;HE?~EAS, t/ne Orange County Divisio,~o,, League of California Cities, Ad Hoc Task
·
Fo,'cc ' or Prop ;i ~' met January 14, 1977 and °' '~ - ' -
· ~ . ~ao?ted 'cae a'ctached priority plan ~or
e:-:~?.:-:'-'Laures by unanimous vote;
NO;';, ?:"-'LZi."OFLE, BE ~'2 7~ESQLV>:D, ti",at the Ci tV~
of Tustin
..--
,:.:'. ..... :,' approves ~:ne priority p~an for expenditures for Orang'a County as idanti~--ied above
.~ .... i" an is &t~:ci~ad har,.to and made a :oart hareo~.
I.IAYOR
356
P~',)p~'~I l'r~or~!y l'[,qn ,~f i'ixl~'t~..I]t~'r~.s
1976 5! 'It':' Bot~,] Acl'
l'~t i,.,.~ t() C()~:~:y l~,;-t)l;~t it~;! aft't.r al. lo~"() i~; ~2 :n'llio~ to the Co~nty
.
t:itv l',~l~t~l:~rion Al. lt~cat ion
A,~:,i:e i~a 1'36,382 $ 562,624'
Br,.,,~ 2 I ,97_0 62,799
l;t~,',;;.?. Park 6l ,056 176,640
Cost:: ", 404 218,892
.ut. sa 76 , .
Cyt>r..'ss P;trk a:~d !~'cr~,,~t'iol~ District 46,]12 132,]08.
Fot.~li'ai~ Valley 52,8]4 151 ,308
F~I 1,.r ton 94,4 75 270,664
Garde;~ Grove 1!8,179 338,575
ituntJngton Be. ac!~ 15] ,500* 434,936
I fyi ne 35,393 lOl , 398
l. ag~na Beach 16,422 47,048
La tlabra 43,208 123,788
La l:a l~na 14,744 42,261
Los Alami t. os 10,903 31,236
Newport Beacl~ 63,101. 180,7130
¢)r a :~',c 8'~._ , 661 236,818
I'1 ace;~t ia 31 ,281 89,618
,,
Sa:~ C 1 ¢~men t e 2 ?, 100' 63,315
Sail JtIall Capistr:~no 13,658 39~129
'~52
Sat~I a Aha 179,499 514 ,,.
Seal Beach 27,671 79,275
St' :.~t o:~ 23, i 50* 66,323
·
Tt~at' in 29,799' 85,372
Villa Park 6,841 19,613
Wes! .minst er 67,437 ' 193,202
Yc, rl, a 'Jnda 23 966 66 655'
St,b--total-lncorpot':ltt-,l At-t'.a
I ,51 t), 5gl
$4,327,709
5t~b-total-Unincorporated Art. a
'l'oral Est imated C,.~t:nty Popt:lation
211,513 605,970
1,72~.'~, 094
$4,933,679
did s:ot l):;rticip,~tt, i:~ the 1970 5i~'.ci;{l C,,li:;,ts, con,"cquont'ly have sttpi~lied
197b estimated pol;ulati,')~ based o,~ :: c,;nst,.$ t~,ri'or~ed in 1973 or 1974.
'I'~, a*~,,ve doll;ir fi.~,.t~rt, s may cl~anl;e sli,..i~tlv wl~,.n tl~o state provides tl~e e..:;,ct
ar,,~:~lit t~f tl~,. ;;ll,,c"ti,,~ t,~ tl~t. c,)t~t',', '1'}~,' l~t'~'t','nt:t;~.· distribt~tj,~n wot:Id r,.-
I.:.11. · ,'..,301 .n ( I )
..
STATE OF CALIFOF~IA)
COUI~TY OF OI¥\"GE )SS
CITY OF TUSTI?; )
RUTI! C. POE, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City
Co~ncil of tl~e City of Tustin', California, does t~erc, by
certify that the whole number of the metaphors of the City
Cou~cil of tt~c City of Tustin is five; that the above and
foregoing Resolution No._ 77-12 was duly and reg~larly
i]~tr()duced, read, passed and ado[Jtcq ~tt a rcgu]ar meeting
of the City Council held on the.._ ..... 17th_~ day of January
1977, by tl~e following vote- '
AYES ·
NOES ·
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN' EDGAR, SHARP, SALTARELLI, WELSH, SCHUSTER
COUNCILMEN .__~ NONE
COUNCILMEN'
NONE
~-i~-Y Clerk',~.City of Tustin, Caii~rnia
357
........... i1!!_1[.., ii