HomeMy WebLinkAboutMA 08-002Intar-Cam
D~T~ MARCH 24, 2008
~` ~~: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
F2~J~~~: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
~~1~'J~~T: MINOR ADJUSTMENT 08-002
APPLICANT: CHRISTINA QUINTERO
ORANGE COUNTY TEACHERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
15442 NEWPORT AVENUE
TUSTIN, CA 92780
PROPERTY
OWNER: ORANGE COUNTY TEACHERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
15442 NEWPORT AVENUE
TUSTIN, CA 92780
LOCATION: 15442 NEWPORT AVE and 15222, 15332 DEL AMO AVE
GENERAL PLAN: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS
ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC)
OFFICE CENTER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
REQUEST: OCTFCU IS REQUESTING A MINOR ADJUSTMENT TO
INCREASE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF A BLOCK WALL BY
TWENTY PERCENT (20%) AND TO REDUCE THE
FRONT/STREET SIDE SETBACK BY TEN PERCENT (10%).
RECOMMENDATION
That the Zoning Administrator adopt Zoning Administrator Action 08-005 approving Minor
Adjustment 08-002.
BACKGROUND
The Orange County Teachers Federal Credit Union (OCTFCU) owns and occupies the
properties located at 15442 Newport Avenue and 15332 Del Amo Avenue. OCTFCU
recently purchased the adjacent parcel located at 15222 Del Amo Avenue this past year
and has completed tenant improvements to allow for occupancy of the building. The
Zoning Administrator
March 24, 2008
MA 08-002
Page 2
parcel located at 15332 is currently vacant and being reserved for future development.
The other two parcels located at 15442 Newport Avenue and 15222 Del Amo Avenue
each have an office building which accommodates office and research and
development activities. The three parcels are contiguous with one another and
OCTFCU is proposing to build a block wall along the rear property lines of the parcels
where they abut the BNSF railroad line.
Section 5.4 of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan allows minor modifications or
adjustments for an increase of not more than twenty percent in the maximum permitted
height of a fence or wall. The same section allows minor modifications of a decrease in
not more than ten percent in the required building or landscaping setbacks. Pursuant to
Section 9299b(1) of the Tustin City Code, the Zoning Administrator has the authority to
approve minor adjustments of an increase of not more than twenty percent in the
maximum permitted height of a fence or wall and a decrease of not more than ten
percent of a required building or landscaping setback.
PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located along Del Amo Avenue and Newport Avenue between
Edinger Avenue and Valencia Avenue within the Planned Community (PC) zoning
district and the Pacific Center East Specific Plan. The properties located at 15442
Newport Avenue and 15332 Del Amo Avenue are within the Regional Center land use
classification of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan which allows for a variety of office
and commercial uses. The property located at 15222 Del Amo Avenue has a land use
classification of Technology Center that allows for light industrial, research and
development, and office uses.
Surrounding properties to the north, east, and west of the project site are also zoned PC
and located within the Pacific Center East Specific Plan. To the south of the project site
across Valencia Avenue are Industrial (M) zoned properties. There are no residential
properties within the vicinity of the project site. As mentioned, the subject properties
abut the BNSF Railroad line along the eastern property lines.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a continuous cmu block wall along the eastern property lines
of the parcels to screen the properties from the existing railroad line. The proposed
location for the block wall is along interior parcel lines and would not run adjacent to the
street. The proposed block wall would help to alleviate noise and vibration caused by
the trains along the railroad line. There is also a substantial amount of dust and debris
generated from the trains that would be blocked by the proposed block wall. In addition,
the wall would serve as a safety barrier between pedestrians and the railroad line.
Zoning Administrator
March 24, 2008
MA 08-002
Page 3
Minor adjustments to the allowable height and required setbacks of the proposed block
wall are being requested by the applicant. Currently the Pacific Center East Specific
Plan allows for a maximum height of six (6) feet, eight (8) inches for fences, hedges,
and walls. The proposed wall would be eight (8) feet in height, making it twenty percent
(20%) taller than the maximum permitted height. The current street side setback along
Valencia Avenue is thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is proposing to have the wall
encroach into this setback by ten percent (10%) which would result in a new setback
from Valencia Avenue of thirty-one (31) feet, six (6) inches.
ANALYSIS
Due the properties' proximity to the railroad line, it is not unreasonable to request an
extension in the maximum permitted height. The twenty percent increase in wall height
as proposed (8') would help to mitigate the current noise impacts as well as dust and
debris created by the active use of the adjacent railroad. The proposed wall would also
act as a barrier to segregate pedestrians from the train traffic. It is not uncommon for
many larger developments to establish higher perimeter walls as sound barriers or
security measures to address traffic noise, dust, and pollution.
The proposed reduction in the required setback along Valencia Avenue by ten percent
(10%) is minimal and would continue the original intent of the proposed wall in
screening the OCTFCU facilities from the railroad line. The proposed encroachment
would not have an effect on visual clearance.
FINDINGS
Section 9299c(3)(a) of the TCC, the California Government Code Section 65906
requires the City to make two positive findings to approve a minor adjustment. In
determining whether to approve the Minor Adjustment for the proposed increase in the
maximum permitted height of a block wall by twenty percent (20%) and a reduction of ten
percent (10%) in the required street side setback, the Zoning Administrator must
determine that the proposed use constitutes a special circumstance unique to the land
based on hardship where the strict literal interpretation of the zoning code deprives the
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the area. In addition the Zoning
Administrator must determine that the proposed Minor Adjustment would not be a
granting of special privilege inconsistent with limitations placed on other properties in the
vicinity. A decision to approve this request may be supported by the following findings:
1. The properties are unique in that they abut an existing railroad line that
creates excessive noise and air pollution. The proposed block wall would
serve as a sound barrier and security device.
2. Approval of the proposed Minor Adjustment 08-002 would not be a granting of
special privilege in that other properties within the City experiencing hazards
Zoning Administrator
March 24, 2008
MA 08-002
Page 4
due to traffic have also erected walls and sound barriers in excess of the
requirements outlined in the City of Tustin zoning code.
3. The project accounts for three parcels which constitute 1,581 linear feet along
the railroad line at the rear property lines. The proposed block wall would
create a cohesive and aesthetically uniform solution to mitigate the effects of
the railroad line.
4. The proposed block wall would be located at the rear of the properties and
not highly visible from the public right-of-way. In addition, the encroachment
into the required street side setback would not interfere with any visual
clearance.
Staff recommends that the Zoning Administrator adopt Zoning Administrator Action No.
08-005 approving Minor Adjustment 08-002, allowing for an increase in the maximum
permitted height of a block wall by twenty percent (20%) and a decrease in the required
street side setback for the same block wall by ten percent (10%) located at 15442
Newport Avenue and 15222 and 15332 Del Amo Avenue within the Pacific Center East
Specific Plan and the Planned Community zoning district.
~'~_
Ry Swiontek
Associate Planner
Attachments:
A. Submitted Plans
B. Zoning Administrator Action No. 08-005
ATTACHMENT A
SUBMITTED PLANS
(7J
m
-, ~ VAIkHCIA AVF
Z' ~i~ P~ I rT-l'tTT^-!t f^n-'r-. r r
i'! r
f
~ ~.
~~
~ ~-
~!-L1'~L
~~
;~ '''
~3 ~+~ yam, z
~~ ~}z p
~,, ~
Fa v °~m
E
tir.?r ~'~'
6
t o{~ ~
I~?iq ~;
h3a ~
~ Y% i
T, Q u¢ z'
t
r
`"`~
-
~ ,,
a
o
A
~
~
~4
~
~
b ~
~
1 ~'
,' Z
{
b ' `
o ~
P
F
=~
j ~
F
~, _-i
- ~
~ ~ i f ? I I ~~I ~ `_
~I . [ ~! X1_1 I ~_ ~~i_ ~', f \ C 0
_ ~- - r ~i a
i
o
I d! ~ ( a
~' r a r
I
_ ~
~
_J ,/ ~~/
C!1
I (it
~ _ _
`_r~-r .4Y i ... -~
o
r-
~m
f ~
I I
~ r - I
r ,`
I~~~~ I~
_ ~ x
~
~
J ~
a ~ d `~
-~
tP
-~ r
R;
ll
~ ~' fT7
~ O
~ >~
~~
'° ~
~~ rn~
~j a
~c
r ~
~
Z m
A
O u
i I
M Z
J ~~
i
C
-~ -~
z b ~Rt,~
~ `l ~; 4~
~~~ ~1~~ Y~~~
~- ri~Q - 1
~ ~ '
~,i
nr~ /
O 1 ~•
r r.
~ i / ~/ 'Y
Ia- ~ Z
~~ ~
~.
~ -.
a I _~
M ~ ~ ~ _.~ _
~_ _
l ~ ~' ~ ~ ~I
~~ m .I
~~~ ~-~`
ro ~ ~
3
~ ~
~@
1 ~
~ ~
~
~ .....
~"
.r.s
~3
:_.,Y
~ ~D
_
~I i
I
I l i '~-.."~ S
1
~ J~\`, > m
~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~'~ s g
~ ~ ~,
~ I ~ `~ C
\ ~ ,~-~ ~ m
I i I I i11 ^~ _~-; .' _ ~i'
~~' '-U-=r-~
~n~
`~ _ ~ ~_rS,~ ~ I
,, ~ i
io a / ~
_ r
i ' ~a1 1 ~ ~
g ~ ~ '. ~~_ I ~ ~ I
,1 '~~ ~
m
_ - ~~, ~~
w~i" r fir-, i ITS-~~~l~c'
71 -[k III-
t' I~`~i
it __
~f~ ~ ~ f
,p
~~
"~ ~ ~ l ~~~
` ~ ~ I~ ~~
~_ ~ Yj
~_. ~ ~-
e~ ~ a 11l
0
- _ ~ ~
Foy
nyrt
xo,a
za
a
v
_ o
t
- tl
__ ~
' ._ a
~ d
~~_ t
~\ -
Y ~ ~ `_ ` 7 _....
{
~~'1 `r Iu
~~[~ 2~
i ~ ~,~ ,
.;
f~V VI~H3lVA
z
~_ c
o ~
~~ L
~~ ~~
w
~~ ~~
d Y~ c
~; ~. ~ ~ j
g`gg~~~
3,3;x, }-,
6~ AL ~ G,,I
t ~ l
ep -S3 j a_
k~;Yf ~ ~~
rY
zi :7~ ~,~
S ~ Y Yy
~ d YgI t~
w b~ d ' i ~Y
F-
Y ~ 7 :~
r
r-
U ~
Y">1'-0"
.:
O
I
op
#5 (~ 24" O.C.
® 16" O.C.
EN DOWELS
- #5 ®24" O.C.
16" O.C.
BOWELS
6 ~ FREE-STANDING CMU WALL SECTION 2
4'-6" WHERE "Y">6"
5-0" WHERE `1'">1'-0"
WHERE "1'">1'-0"
0
co
#5 ®24" O.C.
- ~5 ® 16" O.C.
BETWEEN DOWEtS
FREE-STANDING CMU WALL SECTION ~ 6
ATTACHMENT B
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION NO. 08-005
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 08-005
MINOR ADJUSTMENT 08-002
OCTFCU BLOCK WALL
The Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Zoning Administrator finds and determines:
A. That Orange County Teachers Federal Credit Union (OCTFCU) submitted
a proper application for Minor Adjustment 08-002 to allow for an increase in
the maximum permitted height of a block wall by twenty percent (20%) and a
decrease in the required street side setback for the block wall by ten percent
(10%), which equates to an eight (8) foot high block wall setback thirty-one
(31) feet, six (6) inches from the street. The proposed block wall would be
erected across three contiguous parcels located at 15442 Newport Avenue
and 15222 and 15332 Del Amo Avenue within the Pacific Center East
Specific Plan;
B. That pursuant to Section 5.4 of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan,
minor modifications or adjustments for an increase of not more than
twenty percent in the maximum permitted height of a fence or wall are
allowed. The same section allows minor modifications of a decrease in
not more than ten percent in the required building or landscaping
setbacks;
C. That a public meeting was duly called, noticed, and held for Minor
Adjustment 08-002 on March 24, 2008, by the Zoning Administrator;
D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for
will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed use nor be a detriment to
the property and improvements in .the neighborhood of the subject
property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin as evidenced by
the following findings:
1. The properties are unique in that they abut an existing railroad line
that creates excessive noise and air pollution. The proposed block
wall would serve as a sound barrier and security device.
2. Approval of the proposed Minor Adjustment 08-002 would not be a
granting of special privilege in that other properties within the City
experiencing hazards due to traffic have also erected walls and
sound barriers in excess of the requirements outlined in the City of
Tustin zoning code.
3. The project accounts for three parcels which constitute 1,581 linear
feet along the railroad line at the rear property lines. The proposed
Zoning Administrator Action 08-005
MA 08-002
Page 2
block wall would create a cohesive and aesthetically uniform solution
to mitigate the effects of the railroad line.
4. The proposed block wall would be located at the rear of the
properties and not highly visible from the public right-of-way. In
addition, the encroachment into the required street side setback
would not interfere with any visual clearance.
E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3) of
the California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for the California
Environmental Quality Act).
II. The Zoning Administrator hereby approves Minor Adjustment 08-002 to allow for
an increase in the maximum permitted height of a block wall by twenty percent
(20%) and a decrease in the required street side setback for the block wall by ten
percent (10%), which equates to an eight (8) foot high block wall setback thirty-one
(31) feet, six (6) inches from the street. The proposed block wall would be erected
across three contiguous parcels located at 15442 Newport Avenue and 15222 and
15332 Del Amo Avenue within the Pacific Center East Specific Plan, subject to the
conditions contained within Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin, at a regular
meeting on the 24th day of March, 2008.
DANA OGDON
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
ELOISE HARRIS
RECORDING SECRETARY
Zoning Administrator Action 08-005
MA 08-002
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Eloise Harris, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Zoning Administrator
Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Zoning Administrator Action 08-005 as
duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning Administrator, held
on the 24th day of March, 2008.
ELOISE HARRIS
RECORDING SECRETARY
EXHIBIT A
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 08-005
MINOR ADJUSTMENT 08-002
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the
project date stamped March 24, 2008, on file with the Community Development
Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Zoning Administrator in
accordance with this Exhibit. The Community Development Director may also
approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such
modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other
applicable regulations.
2. Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be
complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject
to review and approval by the Community Development Department.
3. Approval of Minor Adjustment 08-002 is contingent upon the applicant and property
owner signing and returning to the Community Development Department a
notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing
and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary
Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval" form. The forms shall be established
by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be
provided to the Community Development Department.
4. The property owner shall be required to coat and protect the proposed block wall
with a graffiti resistant finish and/or material. In addition, the property owner shall
install and maintain mature vines on both sides of the wall as a measure to cover
the wall and deter graffiti.
5. Any cleanup or costs associated with the removal of graffiti on the proposed block
wall shall be the sole responsibility of the properly owner. Should the property
owner fail to remove graffiti in a timely manner, the City of Tustin may remove the
graffiti at the cost of the property owner.
6. Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall
deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to
the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file
the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any
interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions
of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.