Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21 PROPOSED PARKING REGS 04-15-08AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: APRIL 15, 2008 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PARKING REGULATION SUMMARY On October 16, 2007 and March 18, 2008, the City Council conducted public workshops to review the existing off-street parking regulations, arterial parking restrictions and the existing permit parking program and consider a series of implementation actions that would improve the quality of life within Tustin and increase the efficiency of the circulation system. This report summarizes those actions and associated budget implications. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to: 1. Prepare a comprehensive parking ordinance to consolidate parking standards, establish design standards, clarify existing on-site restrictions, and provide flexibility for Old Town parking. 2. Prepare an ordinance/resolution to prohibit all public street parking from 2:00 a.m to 6:00 a.m within the City limits. 3. Prepare an ordinance/resolution to prohibit public street parking within the hours that a public street is scheduled for sweeping. 4. Prepare an ordinance/resolution to prohibit on-street parking on: a. Irvine Boulevard between Prospect Avenue and Holt Avenue. b. Newport Avenue from Sycamore Avenue to north of First Street. c. Red Hill Avenue from Sycamore Avenue to Bryan Avenue. 5. Prepare a permit parking program to address exceptions and exemptions to the nighttime parking ban (2:00 a.m. - 6:00 a.m.) and any spillover traffic from arterial parking restrictions. 6. Request the County of Orange to restripe Irvine Boulevard within their jurisdiction to 6 lanes. Summary of Proposed Parking Regulations April 15, 2008 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT The implementation of these parking regulations would necessitate the expenditure of approximately $1,046,250. This would involve one additional Police Officer, two non-sworn police personnel, a Code Enforcement Officer and two additional vehicles along with equipment. Code Enforcement Officer, vehicle and equipment $ 117,250 1 Police Officer, 2 non-sworn personnel, vehicle and equipment $ 267,000 Parking Permit Review (15 reviews C~ $3,000) $ 45,000 Arterial Signing, Striping, Detector Relocation $ 52,000 Andrews Median Closure $ 200,000 Pine Tree Park Red Hill parking bay $ 200,000 Night Time parking ban signs (100 @ $150) $ 15,000 Street Sweeping Sign (1,000 @ $150) 150 000 $1,046,250 Approximately $714,000 of the above costs are one-time expenditures with the remaining balance of $332,250 anticipated to be annual reoccurring expenses. The estimated annual costs are subject to further refinement and can be higher or lower depending upon what is expensed as the programs are implemented. There may also be an indeterminate amount of City Attorney and management staff time spent addressing the issue of parking permit requests and parking related to code enforcement matters. This might include issues that arise from complaints received that cannot be easily remedied and need to have management level interface with residents, business owners, employees and visitors as well as with staff. Legal assistance may also be required from time to time in processing, prosecuting, and providing legal representation associated with the implementation of parking restrictions. DISCUSSION Planning staff is currently working to provide an updated, consolidated, and comprehensive parking ordinance. The new parking ordinance will better organize and supplement Tustin's existing parking regulations to provide a comprehensive parking code to clarify and strengthen regulations. Specifically, the ordinance is intended to: 1. Consolidate parking development standards into one Tustin City Code section. 2. Establish enforceable parking design standards: a. Require garages to be available for parking b. Restrict vehicle parking within setbacks. 3. Clarify regulations to: a. Address recreational vehicle storage and storage of unregistered vehicles, boats, campers, etc. b. Provide regulations related to storage of commercial vehicles (i.e. overnight parking). c. Prohibit temporary canvas awnings, sunshades or carport canopies as covered parking. d. Require commercial parking lots to be used only by business owners, tenants and patrons and prohibit residential parking. e. Insure required parking spaces are accessible to homeowners, tenants and patrons and customers, etc. Summary of Proposed Parking Regulations April 15, 2008 Page 2 4. Provide flexibility for Old Town parking to; a. Include new separate parking code requirements for the commercial and mixed uses. b. Reduce parking requirements when it potentially affects modification of a historic structure. Planning staff anticipates that the draft ordinance will go to the Planning Commission for review in May and then to City Council in June of 2008. The engineering staff is currently preparing the signing and striping plans to restrict parking and provide six through lanes throughout the City on Irvine Boulevard, Newport Avenue and Red Hill Avenue (with the exception of north of Bryan). Ordinances/resolutions implementing the arterial parking and street sweepin~ prohibition along with the night time ban can be ready for Council consideration at the May 20t Council meeting. A preferential parking permit program that includes such issues as exceptions for guest parking and emergencies, exemptions due to hardships, service personnel, parking in front of your own residence number of permits and associated issuance fees will be ready for review at the same meeting. Tim D. Serlet Director of Public Works/City Engineer Elizabeth A. Binsack Director of Community Development Summary of proposed parking regulations.docx