HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 76-40
RESOLUTION NO. 76-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO THE ORANGE
COUNTY PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange
hag under consideration alternative recommendations for the ac-
commodation, of traffic, demands for the Southeastern po'rtion of
Orange County, and
·
WHEREAS,. projected 'populations and traffic demands 'for
the study area impose traffic burdens upon the City of Tustin
beyond the capacity of the existing arterial highway systat, to
accommodate, and ~ -
}~rlERE'AS, Alternative No'. 2 'of the SEOCCS' Study does
provide traffic relief to existing developments and would accom-
modate future developments within the project., area.
._
· .
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resoved that' the .City Council of
the City of Tustin does hereby endorse Alternative No. 2 of the
Southeast Orange County Circulation Study, which would provide
. for a major traffic corridor in the foothill area to accommodate
the projected population d,mands of' the North Irvine Area, with
the further endorsement of priority status for the proposed
Jamboree Boulevard extension from its northern terminus in the
City of Irvine to an interconnection with the Foothill Corridor.
in the North Tustin area, and. -
..
.
. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any alternative. ~h.at pro-
poses to use Irvine Boulevard as the major traffic artery to
serve the North I~rine and Southeast Orange County area as a
east-west major arterial is an anacceptable alternative for the
·
City of Tustin.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, held on the 3rd
day of May, 1976.
ATTEST:
sw~wz o~ C~x ~0~ x~)
cooxw~ o~ op~x~s~ ) ss
CITY OF TUSTIN )
·
·
·
RUTH C. POE, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of. the City
Council of the City of' Tustin, California, does hereby
· certify that the whole number of the members of the City
· . Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and
· .. foregoing Resolution No. 76-40 was duly and regularly
introduced, read, passed and adopted at a regular meeting
'. of the City Council held on the 3rd day of May, 1976
1976, by the following vote: ·
AYES: COUNCILMEN" EDGAR, SALTERELLI, ~[ELSH, SCHUSTER
.
·
NOES: -- . COUNCILMEN' NONE '- ____, . ..
·
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN ' SHARP