The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09 JWA NOISE ABATEMENT REPT 05-06-08Agenda Item 9 Reviewed: AGENDA REPORT City Manager —40 Finance Director NIA MEETING DATE: MAY 6, 2008 TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the third and fourth quarters of 2007. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 1ON, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way, remained relatively constant during the third and fourth quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT No Fiscal Impact DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attachment 1 contains the quarterly reports for the third and fourth quarters of 2007. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows: Measured Noise Levels During the third quarter of 2007, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS) 1ON, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, was 57.1 dB. This is 0.1 dB higher than the previous four quarters (Q-3 2006 through Q-2 2007). For comparison, the CNEL was 0.2 dB lower (56.9 dB) during the third quarter of 2006. • During the fourth quarter of 2007, the average CNEL was 56.9 dB. This is 0.2 dB lower than the previous four quarters (Q-4 2006 through Q-3 2007). For comparison, the CNEL was 0.1 dB lower (56.8) during the fourth quarter of 2006. All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. Noise Complaints • During the third quarter of 2007, there were sixteen (16) Tustin area complaints compared with no complaints for the same period during 2006. • During the fourth quarter of 2007, there were nine (9) Tustin area complaints compared with three (3) complaints for the same period during 2006. The number of complaints increased during the third and fourth quarter compared to the same periods in 2006. This change may be attributed to the frequent Santa Ana winds experienced throughout Southern California in late 2007, which would cause an increased number of flights to depart to the north (over Tustin). This trend is not permanent, however, and should typically only occur during periods of high winds. Additionally, noise complaints generally increase during the summer months when more residents tend to leave their windows open and spend more time at home; therefore, they may be more observant of aircraft -related noise. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. /C IQ- Reina Kapadia Assistant Planner Attachments: Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. S:\Cdd\CCREPORT\JWA report to council 6-05-07.doc NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: July 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 139th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -5S: 324 'h Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -8N:17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS- I ON: 179 52 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure I shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2006 - September 30, 2007). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". se JOHN WAYN E AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING STATIONS LOCATION MAP (NMS) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles JWAdivisionPro jec t/Govt&CommRelat ion/ abnomo s t. dgn .... - AIL h _t ' r + y � � iii � � '•�`- "'iPi I i 21 Y f . f + vii I 6t vp 41 .� �{i ,F"+ w . • .fes F ,. �/ � 3y W .;� � yJ' � 2�� :#. .,i �Y i Ps�' � "' t,'_r* 4�"�. °' c fi yr �v, an.-� .� �` .. `' '}.yam•'` \'�Y" ';,�'P'`; f # � � ��V`�, +,.•.+lir ;. • �.�. w � �^� •k 4 ' �If a '' ,t V' ar'�.c .. r.+E ""_ '4. .. I r )T � •t� + �• '#iFr'; � !°' Tap .y; � .. 'q 4'#,�7"' � ' '`4rie1 oi FF .y "�." a N"Y 4 P ` '� � � .� "_t�'�'•�°' cam: • Noise Monitors• JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT f. • 65 •• CNEL Contour • •B CNEL 1 Impact• AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS hdv - SPnfzmhPr 9nn7 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Operations 2 Average Daily Jet Operations Jet Pro July 8,701 3441 3,091 28,516 380 August 8,806 3451 3,284 29,326 390 September 8,282 314 2,902 0 373 Third Quarter 25,789 1,003 9,277 57,842 381 Twelve Months 10/01/06-09/30/07 1101,130 3,987 36,131 311,703 376 Jet Carrier Military Prop Carrier GA Jet GA Other FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) July - September 2007 25,789 9,277 30,349 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending September 30, 2007, 75 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this is the same number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending September 30, 2006. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the -4- "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non -noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-1) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".) During the 3rd quarter of 2007, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 486 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIR TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (July 1, 2007 - September 30, 2007) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period July 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007, the Office received 501 complaints from citizens. This is a 45.6% increase from the 344 complaints received last quarter. It is a 6.4% decrease from the 535 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY e��`a� e��`a� ��aa e�Ar�S S1, `Gose �ea�r �o�a5� JS�.o �aaor 0a��oaoa e�cGo`Q�Oo`o� O Goy�Go�� a �o�a�J�a G Community -5- c� Pca c�a 137 5a 48 42 h76 54 31 31 4 7 11 10 4 6 5 10 8 16 e��`a� e��`a� ��aa e�Ar�S S1, `Gose �ea�r �o�a5� JS�.o �aaor 0a��oaoa e�cGo`Q�Oo`o� O Goy�Go�� a �o�a�J�a G Community -5- c� Pca c�a 5a TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10/06 through 9/07 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Oct 2006 67.6 65.8 65.4 58.5 57.7 59.5 55.9 68.7 46.4 57.2 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 2006 67.6 66.1 65.6 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.7 68.8 46.5 57.2 # Das 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Dec 2006 66.7 65.2 65.2 57.4 56.7 59.5 54.9 68.1 46.4 55.9 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 0-42006 67.3 65.7 65.4 58.1 57.4 59.6 55.5 68.6 46.4 56.8 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 92 Jan 2007 65.5 64.0 65.5 57.0 55.8 60.4 53.9 67.5 45.3 55.4 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 22 31 31 31 Feb 2007 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.1 59.7 56.3 68.9 45.1 57.5 # Das 28 28 28 28 28 28 231 28 27 28 Mar 2007 67.2 65.9 66.1 58.1 57.6 60.4 55.4 68.6 46.9 57.0 # Das 31 31 31 27 31 31 31 31 27 31 Q-12007 66.8 65.4 65.7 58.0 57.2 60.2 55.3 68.4 45.8 56.7 # Days 901 90 90 86 90 90 76 901 85 90 Apr 2007 67.5 66.1 65.6 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.1 69.0 42.5 57.8 # Das 30 30 30 30 301 30 30 30 27 30 May 2007 67.8 66.2 65.7 58.9 58.2 59.8 55.8 68.8 42.7 57.7 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Jun 2007 68.3 66.5 66.1 59.1 58.2 60.0 55.8 69.3 43.8 57.5 # Das 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 0-22007 67.9 66.3 65.8 59.0 58.2 59.9 55.9 69.0 43.1 57.6 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 85 91 Ju12007 68.2 66.4 65.7 58.7 57.9 59.6 55.6 68.9 44.9 57.3 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 29 Aug 2007 68.3 66.8 66.0 58.6 57.9 59.8 55.7 69.0 43.8 57.0 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 301 31 Sep 2007 67.8 66.3 65.3 58.4 57.6 59.2 55.5 68.7 42.2 56.9 # Das 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 Q-3 2007 68.1 66.5 65.7 58.6 57.8 59.6 55.6 68.9 43.8 57.1 # Da s 92 921 92 92 92 92 891 92 86 90 Q-4 2006 thru Q-3 2007 Total 6-7.61 66.0 65.6 58.4 57.7 59.8 55.6 68.7 45.0 57.1 # Days 1 3651 365 365 361 365 365 348 365 347 363 Q-3 2006 thru Q-2 2007 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 67.5 65.9 65.7 58.4 57.6 59.8 55.6 68.7 45.1 57.0 365 365 365 361 359 365 351 365 352 365hange rcDays from Previous 4 Quarters 0.01 0.11 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 IM TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2007 Date 1S 2S 3S 4S NMS Site 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.8 65.9 65.6 58.7 57.4 59.5 55.4 68.6 29.2 ANA 2 67.9 65.9 65.4 58.2 57.2 59.0 54.5 68.5 48.0 57.2 31 67.6 65.8 65.1 58.4 57.2 59.4 54.8 68.8 47.9 56.6 4 66.5 64.51 63.9 56.8 55.91 57.2 53.91 67.2 39.41 55.8 5 67.8 65.8 65.2 58.0 57.0 58.1 54.4 68.9 41.9 56.9 6 67.8 65.9 64.9 57.8 57.0 59.2 54.0 69.4 43.9 57.7 7 67.1 65.4 64.5 57.1 56.3 57.6 53.5 68.1 53.5 56.6 8 68.2 66.4 65.8 59.2 57.8 59.6 56.7 69.5 36.3 58.3 9 69.1 66.81 66.1 59.3 58.3 59.6 54.91 69.7 37.91 58.9 10 68.6 66.8 66.4 59.3 59.3 60.0 55.8 70.1 39.2 59.4 11 68.2 66.7 66.2 59.0 58.7 59.7 55.9 62.7 36.6 58.1 12 69.0 67.2 66.6 59.6 58.7 60.3 56.3 69.5 47.6 57.2 13 68.6 66.9 66.0 58.7 58.0 59.8 56.2 68.8 45.6 56.2 14 66.7 64.91 64.3 57.7 56.6 58.4 54.71 68.1 49.7 54.0 15 68.0 65.91 65.5 59.1 57.6 59.4 55.11 69.5 #N/A 57.8 16 68.5 66.6 65.9 58.4 57.6 59.4 54.61 69.5 41.3 58.4 17 68.1 66.5 66.0 59.4 58.7 60.3 56.1 69.1 45.2 57.5 18 68.2 67.2 66.3 58.6 58.5 59.6 55.2 69.0 #N/A #N/A 19 70.0 66.9 65.8 59.9 58.2 61.4 57.4 69.6 43.21 58.8 20 68.7 67.11 66.2 58.7 58.2 60.1 56.2 69.8 41.71 57.7 21 67.0 65.3 64.2 56.81 55.8 57.4 52.6 67.1 #N/Al 55.4 22 68.4 66.9 66.0 58.7 58.5 60.1 56.2 69.4 38.0 57.9 23 68.7 67.2 66.2 58.9 58.8 60.4 56.7 68.9 36.4 55.9 24 68.5 66.8 66.0 59.5 58.4 60.4 56.4 68.7 36.2 56.0 25 68.4 66.91 66.1 60.2 58.41 60.2 56.31 69.3 41.4 57.1 26 69.1 67.6 66.7 59.3 58.7 60.7 57.0 69.4 46.91 56.7 27 69.2 67.6 67.2 58.6 58.6 60.1 56.1 69.5 43.71 57.1 28 67.0 65.2 64.2 56.7 56.0 57.7 53.9 68.1 42.9 57.0 29 68.1 66.6 65.8 58.5 58.5 59.7 56.3 69.0 43.1 56.6 30 67.4 65.61 64.8 58.2 57.51 60.0 55.91 68.0 44.2 56.5 31 68.4 66.6 65.8 59.0 58.1 59.9 56.0 69.3 41.9 57.8 Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 311 281 29 En.Avg 68.2 66.4 65.71 58.71 57.91 59.6 55.6 68.91 44.91 57.3 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2007 Date 1S 2S 3S 4S NMS Site 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 68.3 66.8 65.7 58.4 58.2 60.0 55.6 69.6 43.4 58.6 2 68.4 67.1 66.7 58.7 58.7 61.1 56.2 69.1 42.9 57.6 31 68.4 67.1 66.0 59.2 58.4 60.1 56.4 69.6 41.6 59.4 4 66.7 65.11 64.3 58.1 56.61 58.4 55.21 67.7 43.11 55.5 5 67.9 66.6 65.9 59.3 58.6 60.4 56.1 69.7 36.1 58.3 6 68.3 67.0 65.8 59.0 58.5 60.1 56.4 69.3 41.2 58.1 7 68.8 67.4 66.4 59.8 59.4 61.2 57.0 69.8 46.9 57.2 8 68.2 67.3 65.7 59.1 58.9 59.9 56.4 69.4 44.0 57.5 9 68.6 67.21 66.1 59.6 58.6 60.7 56.71 69.7 45.7 58.7 10 68.4 67.2 66.4 59.1 58.8 60.7 56.8 70.0 46.11 57.9 11 66.8 65.5 64.4 57.1 56.4 58.1 53.7 67.7 44.11 55.4 12 68.3 66.9 66.1 58.0 57.4 59.0 54.0 68.6 37.01 56.8 13 68.4 67.1 65.6 57.9 57.21 58.6 53.41 69.0 40.1 55.6 14 68.2 66.71 65.8 58.1 57.4 58.9 54.61 69.0 52.0 56.6 15 68.6 67.2 66.2 58.7 57.9 59.9 55.4 68.6 43.9 56.2 16 68.7 67.0 66.4 59.3 58.1 60.2 56.4 69.2 42.4 56.4 17 68.7 66.9 65.9 58.8 57.8 59.8 56.3 69.3 36.51 56.5 18 65.2 65.2 64.6 57.4 56.31 58.3 55.0 67.4 41.11 54.7 19 68.3 67.21 66.2 58.5 58.0 59.5 55.31 69.4 39.61 57.2 20 68.6 67.3 66.3 57.8 57.5 59.3 54.1 68.6 41.1 55.8 21 68.1 66.7 65.4 58.0 57.4 58.8 54.0 69.5 42.9 56.3 22 68.5 66.8 65.7 59.8 58.1 60.4 55.8 69.5 41.4 57.8 23 69.1 67.4 66.7 59.8 58.41 60.9 56.1 69.5 39.0 58.6 24 69.2 67.71 66.3 59.6 59.3 60.7 56.71 69.6 46.81 58.1 25 66.9 65.4 64.2 57.0 56.3 57.9 54.6 67.4 44.4 54.2 26 68.9 67.4 66.0 58.4 57.8 59.8 55.9 68.8 39.7 56.7 27 68.3 66.7 66.7 58.5 58.1 59.7 55.8 68.7 40.9 56.2 28 67.7 66.2 65.8 57.6 57.0 59.7 #N/A 67.9 43.9 55.6 29 68.4 66.81 66.1 58.0 57.7 59.2 #N/Al 68.7 42.01 55.9 30 68.9 67.1 66.4 59.0 57.8 59.9 #N/A 69.2 42.9 56.8 31 68.8 67.0 66.7 58.2 57.6 60.3 57.1 68.4 #N/A 55.4 Das 1 31 31 311 31 31 311 28 31 30 31 En.Avg 1 68.31 66.81 66.01 58.6 57.91 59.81 55.71 57.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. in TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 2007 Date 1S 2S 3S 4S NMS Site 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N I 10N 1 66.3 64.4 63.4 55.8 54.9 56.6 53.7 66.1 45.11 51.7 2 65.5 63.7 62.6 54.8 54.5 56.4 53.5 66.7 33.91 52.2 3 68.2 66.5 65.7 57.6 57.7 59.1 55.5 68.8 44.5 55.1 4 68.2 66.3 65.9 58.81 57.4 59.6 55.21 68.9 44.8 56.1 5 67.5 65.7 65.1 59.1 56.8 59.2 55.4 69.6 41.5 58.3 6 68.0 66.5 65.5 59.5 57.9 59.6 55.9 69.6 30.1 58.0 7 68.4 67.0 65.8 58.8 58.4 60.0 56.2 68.8 43.3 56.7 8 65.7 64.61 63.6 57.0 56.01 57.5 54.1 66.2 45.9 52.9 9 68.1 66.7 65.8 58.6 58.3 59.7 56.5 69.4 #N/A 56.9 10 68.6 67.0 66.5 58.7 58.5 59.8 55.5 68.6 40.8 55.8 11 67.3 65.1 64.9 56.5 56.0 58.0 53.9 68.4 41.0 55.3 12 68.2 67.8 65.7 58.5 58.0 58.4 54.1 68.6 41.5 56.7 13 68.5 66.71 65.8 58.6 57.71 59.4 53.41 68.7 42.61 57.0 14 68.5 66.8 65.7 59.1 58.1 60.0 55.9 69.3 37.6 57.0 15 66.3 64.9 63.6 56.6 55.8 57.5 53.0 65.9 36.8 53.3 16 67.7 66.1 65.2 58.6 57.6 59.3 55.8 69.6 37.7 58.1 17 67.8 66.3 64.8 58.8 57.5 59.6 56.2 69.1 36.6 57.1 18 67.4 66.11 64.7 58.6 57.51 59.3 55.41 69.3 42.3 58.3 19 68.0 66.2 65.2 59.4 57.7 59.6 55.8 69.7 45.4 59.1 20 68.6 67.0 66.0 59.1 58.8 59.9 56.7 69.6 44.0 58.2 21 68.7 66.7 65.7 59.7 58.0 59.9 57.4 69.6 #N/A 58.2 22 66.6 64.4 63.4 57.4 56.3 57.6 54.3 66.3 41.1 55.2 23 68.6 66.91 66.0 58.9 59.2 60.3 57.11 69.3 42.51 57.8 24 68.5 66.9 66.0 58.7 58.7 60.0 56.6 68.8 38.7 56.6 25 67.6 66.2 65.0 58.3 58.0 59.2 55.4 68.9 44.0 57.0 26 68.2 66.7 66.1 58.5 57.5 59.8 55.4 68.4 43.3 56.7 27 68.3 67.0 66.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 56.4 69.6 43.7 58.0 28 68.8 67.21 66.1 59.9 59.0 60.6 56.51 69.4 39.41 58.5 29 66.4 64.8 63.7 57.6 56.8 58.4 55.5 66.1 42.01 55.6 30 68.2 66.5 65.7 58.7 57.3 59.4 55.4 69.4 39.8 58.0 Das 1 30 30 301 30 30 301 301 30 28 30 En.Avg 1 67.81 66.31 65.31 58.4 57.6 59.21 55.51 68.7 42.2 56.9 #N/A indicates insufficient data. in TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A July - September 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 3 5 7 9N ION aska Air 7 74 588 Average 5.7 94.1 92.9 5. 7.1 7.5 85. N A N A Count 568) (561) (578) (570) 573) 573 557 (0) (0 0 B7377 368 Average 93.3 91.7 88.7 81.2 83.1 83.6 80.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (353) (357) (365).(353) (364) 358) (343).(0) (0) (0 87378 196 Average 95.3 93.7 91.4 84.2 85.4 86.0 83.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (190) (189) (190) (191) (193) (191) (178) (0) (0) (0) Aloha B7377 511 Average 95.8 93.7 91.6 84.9 84.2 86.5 83.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (499) (499) (509) (498) (498) (501) (458) (0) (0) (0) America West A320 673 Average 93.2 92.0 91.0 85.3 84.0 85.0 81.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 652 648 667 651 662 639 543 0 0 0 B7373 195 Average 95.3 93.4 91.5 85.4 84.4 86.3 82.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 188 184 187 189 188 187 176 0 0 0 B757 109 Average 95.6 94.9 92.3 84.8 84.4 85.0 81.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (107) (105) (108) (106) (104) (108) (93) (0) (0) (0) American 87378 926 Average 99.0 96.8 96.2 88.5 87.1 88.8 84.3 92.9 #N/A #N/A Count 897 880 909 896 903 905 857 1 0 0 8757 334 Average 96.2 94.6 92.9 86.6 86.2 88.1 84.3 90.0 #N/A 79.0 Count 322 318 328i 0 2 MD80 228 Average 100.6 99.5 98.9 92.0 92.2 93.7 90.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (221) (220) (226) (224) (225) (221) (210) (0) (0) (0) Continental 87377 742 Average 96.4 94.4 93.4 86.0 84.8 86.8 82.9 96.0 79.2 78.8 Count (714) (705) (722) (708) (717) (704) (675) (8) (1) (2) Delta 87373 2 Average 96.4 95.6 93.7 89.0 88.9 89.0 86.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 2 (1 (2) (1) (1) (2) (2) 0 0 0 87377 1 Average 97.3 95.6 94.1 88.5 #N/A 89.6 84.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) 1) 1) (1) (0 1 1 0 0 0) 87378 14 Average 93.3 91.8 90.8 85.6 84.7 86.6 84.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (14) 14) (14) (14) (14) (14) 13) (0 0 0 B757 402 Average 96.8 94.8 94.6 87.3 86.4 87.4 83.6 93.7 #N/A #N/A Count 391 381 392 389 390 386 370 4 0 0 MD90 252 Average 91.4 89.9 89.7 82.2 82.1 84.4 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (244) (245) (250) (238) (225) (248) (221) (0) (0) (0) FedEx A300 33 Average 97.6 96.1 94.6 88.6 88.5 89.4 85.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 32 32 33 31 32 32 31 0 0 0 A310 30 Average 97.3 95.7 94.6 87.8 88.5 89.3 85.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (30) (30) (30) (30) (30) (30) (26) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A319 367 Average 93.9 91.9 92.3 86.3 85.4 86.1 81.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (358) (353) (361) (358) (361) (354) (332) (0) (0) (0) Mesa Airlines CL60 1 Average 86.2 83.4 88.4 #N/A 77.3 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 CRJ9 160 Average 92.4 90.9 92.8 84.6 83.2 86.2 79.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (153) (152) (157) (153) (153) (154) (116) (0) (0) (0) Northwest A320 262 Average 96.0 93.8 93.4 86.5 85.3 86.1 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (255) (250) (258) (255) (255) (250) (229) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B7377 364 Average 93.4 91.9 89.1 82.1 81.4 82.8 80.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (353) (353) (359) (349) (354) (356) (315) (0) (0) (0) United A320 519 Average 91.8 90.4 90.7 84.8 83.5 85.3 82.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 506 502 510 505 509 504 480 0 0 0 B7373 27 Average 94.9 93.6 92.3 86.4 86.0 87.5 84.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 25 25 26 25 26 25 24 0 0 0 B757 545 Average 94.1 92.4 91.31 84.3 84.0 85.9 82.6 95.1 #N/A 73.2 Count (535) (526) (541) (536) (536) (526) (510) (1) (0) (1) UPS B757 62 Average 96.2 95.1 93.1 86.3 84.8 86.3 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (58) (58) (60) (57) (58) (59) (52) (0) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E July - September 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N I 9N 1ON Alaska Air T737740 verage Count 91. (328) 9 .6 (322) (335) .9 (330) 8 . (332) (331) (313) (0) (0) (0) America West A320 107 Average 89.7 89.4 88.7 83.6 82.0 82.1 78.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (102) (101) (104) (101) (98) (101) (44) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B7377 3000 Average 91.9 90.7 86.9 81.6 80.7 82.0 79.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2915) (2874) (2954) (2862) (2872) (2911) (2440) (0) (0) (0) United 8757 159 Average 89.9 89.2 87.3 81.7 80.6 82.4 81.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (157) (147) (157) (151) (142) (160) (144) (0) (0) (0) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July - September 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 3 5 7 General Aviation Jet 4639JAverage 17 2S 3S 4S 5 7 1ON American agle 1 1 verage 87. 5.5 88.3 7 .7 7 1. Count (968) (956) (982) (787) (566) (958) (70) (1) (0) (0) SkyWest CL60 118 Average 86.8 84.4 87.9 78.8 78.7 80.7 79.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 116 113 114 47 23 115 21 0 0 0 CRJ7 249 Average 89.5 87.9 87.0 80.1 79.1 81.7 79.0 #N/A #N/A 78.9 Count 237 236 243 189 96 233 131 0 0 1 CRJ9 1 Average 91.3 87.9 86.5 82.6 #N/A 82.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1 (1) (1) 0) (1) (0 0 (0) (0 E120 503 Average 81.8 82.2 82.3 79.5 81.4 78.6 80.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (493) (489)_(499), (64) (223) (462) (42) (0) (0) (0) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation July - September 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 3 5 7 General Aviation Jet 4639JAverage Count 89.41 7.5 89. 83. 79.81 (3731) (3586) (3694) (2066) (1446) (3284) (962) (46) (0) (7) -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type 2003 2004 Year 2005 1 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS B7374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 3,520 87377 7,089 4,286 4,439 4,657 4,512 B7378 128 2 775 Aloha AQ B7377 2,910 3,399 3,685 3,936 3,026 America West AW A319 2,883 1,201 2,364 3,659 2,685 A320 2,955 3,390 3,0501 2,132 2,145 87373 3,184 2,559 2,746 2,271 950 B757 26 2 755 1,091 760 American AA B7378 4,6631 9,226 6,896 6,737 5,204 8757 7,612 691 1,996 2,673 1,935 MD80 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 1,821 Continental CO B7373 2 4 B7375 1,640 1,303 1,767 1,812 53 87377 3,378 3,689 3,529 3,711 4,137 B7378 4 12 4 6 B757 4 Delta DL B7373 1,016 1,243 7 5 B7377 2 87378 878 87 131 280 73 B757 2,503 4,077 3,859 3,264 2,409 MD90 2,597 1,524 1,572 1,841 1,509 FedEx FM A300 26 20 41 96 210 A310 476 481 496 405 172 a300 2 a310 2 1 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 1,114 13 9 A319 379 1,022 1,034 2,139 1,955 B7373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2,266 456 2 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 987 Midwest YX r7-17' 3021, 1 Northwest NW A319 2,790 2,814 2,793 2,073 1,545 A320 57 38 40 48 7 Southwest WN B7373 252 176 2 402 20 B7375 8,231 1,358 2 B7377 10,498 19,745 22,022 24,146 20,423 UPS 5X B757 448 472 476 480 374 US Airways US A319 895 A320 4 United UA A319 2,211 1,556 1,760 2,172 2,814 A320 2,403 3,173 2,086 1,399 658 87373 10 9 2 72 B7375 8 8 88 B757 6,492 6,4981 5,8001 6,126 3,892 -13- 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft 2003 2004 Year 2005 2006 2007 A300 26 20 4 98 210 A310 476 481 498 406 172 A318 2 70 1,114 13 9 A319 1 9,158 6,593 7,951 10,043 8,999 A320 5,419 6,601 5,176 3,579 2,810 B717 302 1,210 238 87373 3,660 4,808 3,995 2,756 975 87374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,188 3,520 B7375 9,879 2,661 1,769 1,820 141 B7377 123,875 31,119 33,675 36,450 32,100 87378 5,545 9,313 7,167 7,023 6,058 B757 17,085 11,740 12,886 13,634 9,370 CL60 2,266 456 2 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 987 MD80 1,0481 2,820 2,5041 1,981 1,821 MD90 2,5971 1,5241 1,5721 1,841 1,509 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY By Year -14- ■ 2003 ■ 2004 132005 132006 ■ 2007 TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type 2003 2004 Year 2005 1 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS B7374 6.644 10.866 9.770 9.838 6.451 B7377 9.710 5.863 6.085 6.386 8.260 B7378 0.175 0.003 1.421 Aloha AQ B7377 3.984 4.645-705-8 5.386 5.549 America West AW A319 3.937 1.6341 3.244 5.008 4.923 A320 4.047 4.634 4.178 2.934 3.923 B7373 4.373 3.495 3.762 3.110 1.740 8757 0.036 0.003 1.033 1.4931 1.392 American AA B7378 6.386 12.609 9.452 9.227 9.527 B757 10.430 0.945 2.734 3.666 3.542 MD80 1.433 3.8521 3.433 2.721 3.337 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 B7375 2.247 1.781 2.436 2.490 0.095 87377 4.627 5.038 4.819 5.082 7.579 B7378 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.011 8757 0.005 Delta DL B7373 1.385 1.704 0.011 0.007 87377 0.004 87378 1.200 0.120 0.181 0.384 0.132 B757 3.425 5.571 5.290 4.474 4.429 MD90 3.562 2.082 2.153 2.518 2.766 FedEx FM A300 0.036 0.027 0.005 0.132 0.385 A310 0.652 0.656 0.677 0.556 0.315 a300 0.003 a310 0.003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.526 0.019 0.015 A319 0.518 1.393 1.416 2.929 3.582 B7373 0.293 1.4321 0.003 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 3.104 0.6231 0.003 0.004 CRJ9 3.2381 1.995 1.816 1.806 Midwest YX B717 0.414 1.650 Northwest NW A319 3.822 3.844 3.827 2.841 2.828 A320 0.079 0.052 0.055 0.066 0.015 Southwest WN B7373 0.345 0.240 0.003 0.551 0.037 B7375 11.279 1.8551 0.003 B7377 114.378 26.975 30.173 33.088 37.410 UPS 5X B757 0.614 0.645 0.652 0.658 0.685 US Airways US A319 1.227 A320 0.005 United UA A319 3.038 2.126 2.416 2.984 5.136 A320 3.279 4.331 2.852 1.912 1.231 87373 0.014 0.011 0.003 0.099 B7375 0.011 0.011 0.161 8757 8.896 8.891 7.945 8.395 7.128 -15- FIGURE 25 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY ■ MD90 ■ MD80 ■CRJ9 40.000 ■ CL60 35.000 ❑ B757 I 30.000 25.000 ❑ B7378 ■ B7377 20.000 I 15.000 ■ B7375 10.000 ❑ B7374 5.0000 B7373 0.000 ■ B717 AS AQ AW AA CO DL FM F9 YV YX NW WN 5X US UA ■A320 ❑ A319 ❑A318 -16- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: September 12, 2007 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airuort Statistics Silvia Zavala presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for August 2007, and copies were distributed to attendees. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Greg Carroll asked why the drop in commuter flights? Eric Freed responded that the number of commuter operations often fluctuates. Homer Bludau asked what is responsible for the reduction in total operations vs the increase in passengers. Eric Freed replied that this is a result of the current high load factors. Greg Carroll asked if all 85 Class A flights are being used? Eric Freed replied that there are 89 Class A daily departures, 85 are for commercial passenger carriers and 4 are intended for cargo carriers, however due to demand and facility constraints, only 2 of 4 cargo Class A daily departures are utilized by the cargo carriers, and the other two are temporarily allocated to the passenger carriers. Greg Carroll asked if there were any near misses? Eric Freed replied, no. Nancy Alston said that she has had complaints from Balboa Island residents that the carriers are deliberately flying to avoid the monitors. Eric Freed replied that that would be hard to do based on departure procedures and the location of the monitors. Joe Deaton lobbied for another monitor on the Peninsula, citing that they can "pour it on" after they pass monitor 7. Nancy Alston said that there has been a lot of curfew flights, e.g. later than 10:45 PM. Eric Freed replied that those flights are probably private aircraft. Sarah Demont said that in the area of Prospect and Irvine, she has noticed more planes at certain times of day. Eric Freed replied that the number of arrivals over a certain area can vary by hour and by day. He also mentioned that there are no noise limits during daytime hours for the north are noise monitors. Sarah Demont said that she has lived there 4 years, and asked, are they required to follow the glide slope? Eric Freed replied that commercial flights usually follow the ILS, but if weather permits, they could get permission for a visual approach. Eric Freed continued with an explanation of the arrival flight paths. Sarah Demont asked why are aircraft louder at night? Eric Freed replied that we perceive the noise to be louder at night due to the lower ambient noise. Sarah Demont asked if there are no noise restrictions for the north monitors, and yet the community believes there are, what can be done to impose noise restrictions? Eric Freed replied that as a result of a Federal law passed in 1990, no airport can add further noise restrictions. The noise restrictions currently imposed by John Wayne Airport were enacted prior to the 1990 Federal law, and are therefore enforceable. Jim Sugden added that noise limits for General Aviation aircraft are enforced at all 10 noise monitors during curfew hours. Nancy Alston said that Costa Mesa is upset about private aviation. Melinda Seely said that their perception is that the majority of them go over their house. Nancy Alston asked for clarification on noise violation penalties for private planes, and stated her understanding of the noise violation procedure, violations 1 & 2 get letter, violation 3 aircraft is denied use of airport. Eric Freed replied that on the third violation a Denial of Use is issued which lasts for three years from the date of the third violation. Sarah Demont asked how many aircraft are denied use as a result of a third violation. Eric Freed replied that 6 to 10 aircraft, per year, are denied use. Nancy Alston asked how commercial violations are handled? Eric Freed replied that commercial noise limits are based on a quarterly average, and if that limit is exceeded then the airline is restricted from using that aircraft type, within that noise class, for a period of six months. Greg Carroll asked what aircraft qualify for stage 4 classification? Eric Freed replied that most aircraft that qualify for stage 3 also qualify for stage 4. Sarah Demont asked why does the altitude of landing aircraft vary so much, and who to contact. Eric Freed offered to do a gate test for Ms. Demont to compare previous periods, 1-2 years ago. -18- NAC ROSTER September 12, 2007 NAME ORGANIZATION Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Silvia Zavala John Wayne Airport Jim Sugden John Wayne Airport Homer Bludau City of Newport Beach Greg Carroll SAH Project/OCDA-Vice Chair PAC Nancy Alston AIR FAIR -East Bluff resident Melinda Seely AIR FAIR Sarah Demont Resident Joe Deaton Resident, Newport Beach -19- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: October 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 140th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defming "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -5S: 324 Y2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS- ION: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". SE JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING STATIONS LOCATION MAP (NMS) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles JWAdivisionProject/Govt&CommRelation/ abnomost.dgn �. Ft '.x - r. •' '°'1° � '� his y •t *R ez � �_ t .� '` r f i' � '.Ir +�� l , ,i�`+t� fir~ l� � • a � ' . i'# . -„y _ � f '.E�.,, 1.J � . n xu�.i�+":� Jf � � ,� �•t'i.�.i..,�la', +�j F r / .r 16 PikON A, 40 ID Nf op r ys a, � ><' v "gyp.`` � at Ems'>. yt "'' `` � • ar'i W� `',.a � ,• �. �• ,f,. ..,fit f�F �� `� � "�ri��' :R,�� i+it'd ! ♦ 'p ty• t.7�� `t M J • Ar} ^ ` . *7..... ! i iry� /.z Ste' • `a +�►..w.✓ 1'!F1 P 4P JA all R �� 4t f4>y ,t�� 'y .rt � •, '�� #}1 �yam` ..i$ • 1 y .` "'xrR`• `t rid,"'! 0 Noise Monitors __J Single Family Residential JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 65 dB CNEL Contour _= Multi -Family Residential STATISTICS: + :65 B CNEL 1 Impact • Incompatible • Use: 5.21 Acres or.01 AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS nrtnhar - nPrPmhPr 2007 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Operati2aLQ Average Daily Jet Operations Jet Prop October 8,650 330 2,917 26,873 373 November 8,239 310 2,888 23,936 371 December 8,3 325 75 5,71 356, Fourth Quarter 25,2491 9651,4 76,5231 Twelve Months 01/01/07 - 12/31/07 1101,439 3,953 35,759 331,452 376 Jet Carrier Military Prop Carrier GA Jet GA Other �6 965 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) October - December 2007 8,480 25,249 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending December 31, 2007, 75 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this is the same number of dwelling units 2n4/08 -4- in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending September 30, 2007. Four hundred and eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. A number of residences also chose not to participate in the County's Acoustical Insulation and Purchase Assurance Programs. Specifically, 18 residences declined voluntary participation in the Programs in writing. An additional 64 homeowners did not respond to any of the participation opportunities. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (October 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period October 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, the Office received 157 complaints from citizens. This is a 68.7% decrease from the 501 complaints received last quarter. It is a 28.3% decrease from the 219 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 48 yJ�e b. . ee�5c'k,ao,J6e�aa°re cea4- `ata�m�ee Q' ,, 6re°a"�QecP' �`Jy5�MoN °o\oa 0 �. ao 4, e "5aprcr°ro cA "11-00 O0'�p 0a& oJG° Co Co Community -5- 18 12 12 10 10 8 g 6 4 3 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 yJ�e b. . ee�5c'k,ao,J6e�aa°re cea4- `ata�m�ee Q' ,, 6re°a"�QecP' �`Jy5�MoN °o\oa 0 �. ao 4, e "5aprcr°ro cA "11-00 O0'�p 0a& oJG° Co Co Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 1/07 through 12/07 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S I 7S 8N 9N 10N Jan 2007 65.5 64.0 65.5 57.0 55.8 60.4 53.9 67.5 45.3 55.4 # Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 22 31 31 31 Feb 2007 67.5 66.1 65.4 58.7 58.1 59.7 56.3 68.9 45.1 57.5 # Das 28 28 28 28 28 28 23 28 27 28 Mar 2007 67.2 65.9 66.1 58.1 57.6 60.4 55.4 68.6 46.9 57.0 # Das 31 31 31 27 31 31 31 31 27 31 Q-12007 66.8 65.4 65.7 58.0 57.2 60.2 55.3 68.4 45.8 56.7 # Days 90 90 90 86 90 901 76 901 85 90 Apr 2007 67.5 66.1 65.6 58.9 58.3 59.9 56.1 69.0 42.5 57.8 # Das 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 271 30 May 2007 67.8 66.2 65.7 58.9 58.2 59.8 55.8 68.8 42.7 57.7 # Das 31 311 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Jun 2007 68.3 66.5 66.1 59.1 58.2 60.0 55.8 69.3 43.8 57.5 # Das 30 30 30 30 30 30 301 30 29 30 Q-2 2007 67.9 66.3 65.8 59.0 58.2 59.9 55.9 69.0 43.1 57.6 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 85 91 Ju12007 68.2 66.4 65.7 58.7 57.9 59.6 55.6 68.9 44.9 57.3 # Das 31 311 31 31 31 311 31 31 28 29 Aug 2007 68.3 66.8 66.0 58.6 57.9 59.8 55.7 69.0 43.8 57.0 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 281 31 301 31 Sep 2007 67.8 66.3 65.3 58.4 57.6 59.2 55.5 68.7 42.2 56.9 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 Q-3 2007 68.1 66.5 65.7 58.6 57.8 59.6 55.6 68.9 43.8 57.1 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 921 89 92 86 90 Oct 2007 67.4 65.9 65.4 57.9 57.2 59.8 55.1 68.4 46.2 56.8 # Days 31 30 31 31 31 31 311 31 311 31 Nov 2007 68.0 66.3 65.8 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.3 68.6 43.2 57.3 # Das 30 301 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Dec 2007 66.9 65.3 65.8 57.7 57.2 60.3 54.8 67.9 45.4 56.5 # Das 31 31 31 31 311 31 31 31 30 31 0-42007 67.4 65.9 65.7 58.0 57.3 60.0 55.1 68.3 45.1 56.9 # Das 1 921 91 92 92 92 92 92 92 90 92 Q-1 20U7 t ru 2007 Total 67.6 66.0 65.7 58.4 57.7 59.9 55.5 68.7 44.6 57.1 # Days 1 365 364 365 361 365 365 348 365 346 363 0-4 2006 thru Q-3 2007 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 67.6 66.0 65.6 58.4 57.7 59.8 55.6 68.7 45.0 57.1 # Days 1 365 365 365 361 365 365 348 3651 347 363 Change from Previous 4 Quarter 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.4 0.0 M TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION October 2007 Date 1S I 2S 3S 4S I NMS Site 5S 6S I 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.81 66.3 65.5 58.91 57.5 59.21 55.0 69.3 43.4 58.2 2 67.81 66.0 65.3 58.21 57.1 58.61 54.8 68.5 43.5 56.1 3 67.5 65.9 65.2 57.9 56.6 58.3 53.8 69.1 43.8 56.7 4 68.3 66.2 65.5 59.7 58.1 60.1 56.1 70.4 53.1 59.4 5 67.8 66.7 65.4 59.0 59.0 60.1 56.9 69.4 40.3 58.8 6 66.4 64.5 63.4 57.1 56.0 58.2 54.4 65.4 46.0 53.0 7 64.81 63.4 64.4 53.9 53.8 59.71 52.8 67.6 46.3 53.3 8 67.31 65.5 64.2 56.4 55.7 57.11 53.2 68.81 46.5 56.3 9 67.31 66.3 65.0 58.0 57.1 59.31 54.0 68.7 47.2 57.4 10 66.81 66.3 65.1 58.6 58.2 59.41 55.6 69.6 47.7 57.7 11 67.6 66.8 65.8 59.1 58.6 60.6 56.9 69.3 45.41 57.2 12 69.0 67.2 66.3 59.8 59.0 60.8 57.0 69.6 42.51 58.7 13 66.4 64.3 63.7 57.5 56.4 57.6 54.1 66.4 48.41 55.3 14 68.4 66.8 66.1 58.7 58.6 60.1 56.8 69.3 30.21 58.5 151 68.6 67.0 65.8 59.11 58.7 60.01 55.2 69.7 37.9 59.5 16 67.6 66.0 65.0 58.81 58.1 59.5 56.4 69.4 47.0 58.0 17 68.3 66.8 65.6 59.11 58.9 60.4 56.7 69.5 47.5 58.3 18 69.3 67.5 66.8 58.91 58.8 60.5 57.0 68.6 41.0 56.7 19 69.2 67.4 66.6 59.01 58.2 60.0 56.6 68.91 40.9 56.2 20 66.1 64.3 63.3 57.41 56.7 58.0 1 55.1 66.0 45.1 54.2 21 58.9 59.4 68.4 46.91 50.1 65.1 48.1 62.4 48.5 49.2 22 57.1 56.2 66.6 45.21 44.6 62.4 37.0 61.6 47.0 44.6 23 66.1 63.7 64.7 55.31 53.3 59.3 52.1 66.7 50.1 51.4 24 67.3 #N/A 64.8 56.9 56.1 58.5 54.2 68.01 48.8 55.5 25 67.6 67.8 65.3 57.3 57.0 58.91 55.2 68.6 45.1 59.5 26 68.6 66.7 66.1 59.2 57.4 59.5 55.8 69.2 45.8 57.2 27 66.31 64.3 63.6 56.6 55.2 56.7 52.7 65.6 45.8 52.6 28 68.01 66.5 65.7 57.51 57.0 58.9 55.2 68.5 42.1 56.0 29 67.81 66.2 65.0 58.0 57.8 58.8 .2 68.9 35.7 56.9 30 67.2 65.7 64.8 58.7 57.6 59.3 .5 68.9 42.9 57.3 31 67.2 65.9 65.1 58.2 57.7 59.4 .4 68.6 43.5 56.9 Das 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 155 31 31 31 En.Av 67.4 65.9 65.4 57.9 57.2 59.8 .1 68.4 46.2 56.8 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION November 2007 Date 1S I 2S 3S 4S I NMS Site 5S 6S I 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 68.61 66.7 66.0 58.1 57.3 58.71 54.2 69.5 43.2 58.3 2 68.31 66.7 67.9 58.2 58.9 63.41 55.9 67.1 39.2 57.3 3 65.5 64.0 63.1 56.3 55.7 56.3 52.6 66.7 37.7 54.8 4 68.4 66.9 65.9 58.6 58.0 59.8 55.5 69.71 38.8 58.7 5 67.9 66.6 65.4 58.11 58.0 59.3 55.2 69.01 46.3 58.5 6 67.7 66.5 65.4 58.21 57.4 59.0 55.1 68.8 42.9 57.6 7 68.11 67.0 65.9 57.9 58.0 59.21 54.0 69.6 #N/Al 59.6 8 68.91 67.5 66.6 59.4 58.7 60.5 55.5 69.9 27.5 59.6 9 68.91 67.5 66.6 59.6 59.3 61.2 57.9 69.9 40.1 58.9 10 66.41 64.7 63.7 57.6 56.8 58.3 54.8 66.4 44.8 55.2 11 68.31 66.5 65.8 59.41 58.7 60.5 57.0 69.2 45.0 57.7 12 68.81 67.4 67.3 58.4 58.7 61.11 56.4 68.51 43.7 56.1 13 67.41 65.8 65.6 57.4 57.4 59.6 55.6 66.71 46.2 54.4 14 68.31 66.7 66.4 58.5 57.3 60.3 56.1 68.0 43.7 55.9 15 68.4 66.5 66.2 58.2 57.8 60.2 55.9 68.9 48.8 57.2 16 68.8 67.0 66.0 59.01 58.2 60.0 56.2 70.1 40.0 59.0 17 67.2 65.5 64.6 58.01 57.4 58.91 55.6 66.4 37.7 55.3 18 67.9 66.2 65.3 56.51 56.2 58.01 53.0 69.81 36.1 57.4 191 68.2 66.9 66.0 58.41 57.7 58.81 53.1 69.31 26.7 59.6 20 69.4 67.4 66.4 59.6 58.6 60.6 56.5 69.7 45.01 58.9 21 69.5 67.7 66.8 60.3 59.3 61.1 57.4 69.6 38.71 58.9 22 65.7 64.1 63.3 56.8 56.3 57.9 54.4 65.3 39.8 55.6 23 65.7 64.0 66.5 56.6 55.9 61.7 53.3 64.0 30.9 51.2 24 65.3 63.4 63.7 54.01 53.6 57.21 51.0 65.9 38.4 50.4 25 68.0 65.8 65.0 58.6 56.6 58.41 54.1 68.8 37.0 56.0 26 68.2 66.4 65.8 58.1 57.2 59.2 55.1 68.71 44.2 53.9 27 67.3 65.9 65.0 57.8 55.5 57.8 53.6 68.81 42.8 55.1 28 66.9 65.0 64.7 56.7 54.7 57.8 52.9 66.9 46.0 53.0 29 66.3 64.5 63.4 56.91 54.9 57.0 53.2 68.4 45.3 56.4 30 69.9 68.3 67.5 61.2 59.9 61.81 58.1 70.8 47.6 60.5 Das 1 301 301 30 30 30 30 30 301 29 30 En.Avg 1 68.01 66.31 65.8 58.3 57.6 59.7 55.31 68.61 43.2 57.3 #N/A indicates insufficient data. in TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION December 2007 Date 1S I 2S 3S 4S I NMS Site 5S 6S I 7S 8N 9N I 10N 1 65.01 64.0 62.6 56.91 56.3 57.11 55.0 66.2 32.9 55.2 2 67.61 66.3 65.5 58.51 58.1 59.41 56.1 68.8 34.3 56.6 3 67.1 65.7 64.5 57.0 56.3 57.4 52.1 68.1 44.4 55.2 4 67.0 65.71 64.3 56.6 55.9 57.5 53.1 68.1 52.8 54.0 5 67.9 65.6 65.1 58.8 56.7 58.5 54.4 68.5 37.9 57.1 6 67.9 66.0 65.5 59.9 57.9 59.7 55.6 70.8 43.7 60.5 7 67.8 67.2 65.9 58.91 60.0 60.01 57.0 70.2 36.51 59.6 8 65.2 64.1 62.6 56.5 56.3 56.91 54.1 65.9 47.01 54.5 9 60.5 57.3 68.9 49.0 53.1 65.71 42.3 64.0 49.61 48.0 10 66.8 65.1 64.7 57.9 57.0 58.51 54.6 68.7 43.31 5771- 11 59.4 57.7 67.5 49.3 51.6 63.6 43.9 64.2 51.0 51.3 12 67.4 66.0 65.4 58.6 57.6 58.9 55.81 67.8 45.9 54.8 13 68.0 66.6 65.2 59.0 57.8 59.2 55.3 68.6 46.1 56.6 14 68.6 66.9 66.2 59.4 58.5 60.1 56.8 68.9 47.2 56.9 15 65.7 64.7 63.0 56.4 55.2 56.8 55.3 66.3 41.11 54.1 16 67.1 65.6 64.4 57.9 57.3 58.5 55.2 69.0 46.61 57.8 17 67.3 66.1 65.0 58.8 58.3 59.4 55.7 68.8 39.7 57.8 18 67.9 66.2 64.9 59.4 58.9 60.1 56.5 69.7 42.9 59.9 19 69.2 64.7 66.6 59.8 59.0 60.3 56.8 69.5 35.1 59.4 20 69.11 68.8 66.5 59.91 59.6 60.51 57.2 70.1 31.7 59.9 21 65.7 63.4 67.3 54.4 54.1 62.31 51.9 66.31 47.1 52.3 22 66.2 64.3 64.6 54.6 54.4 57.6 52.2 66.71 44.5 50.4 23 66.2 64.2 68.1 55.8 55.7 63.5 53.8 64.9 42.3 49.8 24 66.3 64.6 63.8 56.2 56.6 57.2 54.0 67.1 47.4 54.1 25 55.61 50.7 64.9 35.61 38.3 59.6 32.5 62.4 38.4 47.9 26 67.1 65.4 68.6 58.0 57.8 63.5 54.91 65.9 44.4 53.3 27 66.1 64.4 65.1 55.7 55.7 59.2 52.5 67.3 #N/A 55.0 28 68.1 66.3 65.2 59.3 58.8 59.5 57.0 69.3 39.7 58.5 29 67.5 65.9 65.0 58.6 58.7 59.6 56.3 68.1 45.31 57.5 30 68.21 66.6 66.2 59.81 58.9 60.11 56.3 68.8 43.7 58.3 31 66.0 64.2 67.1 56.3 56.3 61.3 53.4 63.0 40.5 50.3 Das 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 En.Av 66.9 65.3 65.8 57.7 57.2 60.3 54.8 67.9 45.4 56.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A October - December 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S I 7S I 8N 9N 10N Alaska Air 67374 776 Average 96.0 94.1 93.2 86.0 87.3 87.7 85.3 92.4 81.3 81.4 Count 683 670 696 692 694 684 694 74 44 42 87377 248 Average 92.9 91.4 88.4 81.4 83.0 83.3 80.8 89.7 80.3 79.2 Count 219 216 217 215 219 217 213 27 5 10 87378 68 Average 93.8 92.2 89.0 82.1 83.2 83.8 81.5 90.1 #N/A 79.9 Count 64 60 65 65 65 65 64 2.(0) 1 Aloha B7377 521 Average 95.9 93.7 91.9 85.1 84.5 86.8 83.7 91.2 81.2 80.5 Count 452 453 465 458 465 455 449 52 14 21 American B7378 1058 Average 98.5 96.3 95.6 88.4 86.8 88.3 84.1 91.2 79.9 80.0 Count 913(899)(934)(934).(934)(915)(922)(108)31 48 8757 317 Average 95.3 93.7 92.1 85.8 85.7 87.2 83.9 89.3 79.7 78.4 Count 279 277(285),(285)1287 278 287 27 5 11 MD80 181 Average 101.1 100.0 99.2 91.9 92.0 93.9 90.6 99.0 86.9 83.9 Count 159 155 158 161 160 160 157 15 15 12 Continental B7377 700 Average 95.9 93.9 92.6 85.5 84.3 86.0 82.8 91.4 80.1 79.2 Count 602 598 622 617 612 610 611 75 18 30 B7378 2 Average #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 91.0 #N/A 80.3 Count (0)(0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 2 (0) 1) Delta B7378 12 Average 94.3 92.5 91.9 86.7 85.2 87.1 84.4 92.8 77.6 81.4 Count 10 8 10 9 10 9 10 2 1 2 6757 395 Average 96.21 94.4 93.8 87.0 86.1 86.7 83.4 89.4 79.8 78.2 Count 332 337 348 346 345 342 344 43 9 24 MD90 268 Average 91.2 89.7 89.2 81.6 82.0 83.9 81.1 88.6 84.4 77.4 Count 244 236 245 228 207 241 207 20 2 8 FedEx A300 43 Average 98.0 96.3 94.9 87.8 88.9 89.3 86.0 92.3 80.3 #N/A Count 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 3 1 0 A310 19 Average 99.2 97.1 96.1 89.3 89.2 90.2 86.9 92.7 80.3 78.1 Count 17 15 16 17 17 17 17 2 1 1 Frontier Airlines A319 354 Average 93.8 91.6 92.0 86.2 85.3 86.0 82.1 87.880.8 78.5 Count (314) (307 315) (319) (317) 313) (305 34) 4 15) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 157 Average 92.2 90.6 92.6 84.5 83.3 86.0 80.0 87.4 #N/A 73.7 Count (142) (138) (142).(139) 140) (142) 108) 15 0) 1 Northwest A320 263 Average 95.8 93.6 93.2 86.4 85.3 86.0 82.2 89.3 79.4 78.6 Count 224 223 231 234 232 228 229 28 7 7 Southwest 87377 365 Average 91.0 89.9 86.2 81.1 80.5 81.4 78.8 89.0 78.9 75.8 Count 318 315 327 320 306 325 259 34 8 8 United A320 289 Average 91.7 90.4 90.3 84.6 83.4 85.1 82.8 86.9 81.0 77.9 Count 252 252(262)..261 259 260 256 27 7 5 8757 560 Average 93.2 91.7 90.2 83.5 83.1 85.0 82.5 89.8 80.0 78.2 Count 484 483 491 495 492 481 493 55 15 17 UPS 8757 62 Average 95.9 94.6 93.2 85.7 84.6 85.7 81.7 86.3 #N/A #N/A Count 59 57 57 59 59 59 58 3 0 0 US Airways A320 516 Average 93.3 91.9 90.9 85.4 84.3 85.3 81.9 86.8 79.7 78.3 Count 439 439 450 454 449 445 408 59 12 14 87373 147 Average 95.7 93.7 91.8 85.6 84.8 86.6 83.2 89.5 81.8 81.7 Count 124 122 131 131 131 130 128 15 4 6 B757 150 Average 95.0 94.5 91.2 84.2 83.7 84.8 81.3 87.6 79.4 81.0 Count 128 129 137 134 131 134 119 12 4 4 atoll TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E October - December 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S I 3S 4S I 5S 6S I 7S 8N I 9N I 10N Alaska Air B7377 408 Average 92.0 90.81 87.8 80.8 82.7 82.9 80.6 88.8 77.9 78.9 Count 358 351 64 3 359 363 361 353 40 5 11 Southwest 87377 2897 Average 91.1 90.0 86.2 81.1 80.5 81.4 79.0 88.9 80.1 78.5 Count 2569 2520 2599 2538 2472 jZ2Z±j (2049)266 52 49 United B757 360 Average 90.2 89.4 87.3 81.7 80.8 82.5 80.8 86.7 79.5 78.7 Count 322 310 328 319 308 323 315 29 3 2 US Airways A320 208 Averagel 90.4 89.91 89.0 84.1 82.6 83.1 79.9 85.7 78.8179* Count (183 (178) (183 (184) (180) (181) 126) (23) (2) (5) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter October - December 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S I 5S 6S I 7S 8N 9N 11ON American Eagle 9140 921 Average Count 87.0 817 85.3 798 88.3 818 79.7 696 78.9 528 81.2 806 78.6 52 83.2 90 80.7 1 80.1 2 SkyWest CL60 106 Average Count 86.1 93 83.8 89 87.5 90 78.2 39 78.6 22 80.5 91 78.6 10 83.6 13 #N/A 0 79.8 1 CRJ7 254 Average 89.6 87.8 87.2 80.4 79.2 81.9 79.1 87.7 80.3 79.9 Count 218 219 219 178 109 218 (155)1(27). 1 5 E120 483 Average Count 82.2 (426 82.1 (422) 82.5 430) 79.2 (83)(235) 81.5 79.7 (399)(30) 80.6181 - 3 4) 81.8 5) 78.4 2) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation October - December 2007 Carrier AC Type # Deps I NMS Site 15 1 25 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N General Aviatio Jet 4240 Average Count 89.5 87.8 3072) 2975) 89.9 83.5 83.2 83.7 83.1 (3015) (1838) (1377) 2666) 986) 86.0 (307) 81.9 82.7 (31) (51) -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type 2003 2004 Year 2005 2006 2007 Alaska Air AS 87374 4,8507,9617,130 7,188 5,072 B7377 7,089 4,286 4,439 4,657 5,822 7378 1 2 91 Aloha AU B7377 2,910 3,399 3,936 4,06 American AA 87378 4,663 9,2261 6,896 6,737 7,322 B757 7,612 691 1,996 2,673 2,573 V90- -TT49 -TF26 2,504 1,8 15 Continental CO 87373 2 4 87375 1,640 1,303 1,767 1,812 53 87377 3,378 3,689 3,5291 3,711 5,537 87378 4 121 4 10 B757 4 Delta DL 87373 1,016 1,2431 7 5 B7377 1 2 87378 878 87 131 280 97 B757 2,503 4,077 3,859 3,264 3,195 -775F7 5 4 57-T,8412,047 FedEx FM A300 26 20 4 98 296 A31 7 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 1,114 13 9 A319 379 1,022 1,034 2,139 2,663 67373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2,266 456 2 2 CRJ9 2,3751,455 1,325 1,301 Midwest Northwest NW A319 2,790 2,814 2,793 2,073 2,071 57 7 Southwest WN 87373 252 176 2 402 20 87375 8,231 1,358 2 77 19,745 US Airways (1) AW A319 2,883 1,201 2,364 3,659 3,413 A320 2,955 3,390 3,050 2,132 2,864 B7373 3,184 2,559 2,746 2,271 1,244 757 26 2 755 1,091 US Airways (2) US A319 895 A United UA A319 2,211 1,556 1,760 2,172 3,200 A320 2,4031 3,173 2,086 1,399 850 87373 10 9 21 72 87375 8 888 757 6, 5, 001 6, 2 5,7 1 (1) Effective September 26, 2007, America West merged with US Airways. This merger resulted in the name change of America West to US Airways. The figures shown in this section reflect America West's operational history. (2) The figures shown in this section reflect the operational history of US Airways which ceased operations at JWA on September 6, 2003. -13- 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 TABLE 10 ATRCR AFT CTPFR ATIONAT, HISTORY Aircraft 2003 2004 Year 2005 2006 2007 A300 6 20 4 98 29 A310 476 481 498 406 210 A318 2 70 1,114 13 9 A319 9,158 6,593 7,951 10,043 11,347 A320 5,419 6,601 5,176 3,579 3,721 B717 302 1,210 238 87373 3,660 4,808 3,995 2,756 1,269 B7374 4,850 7,961 7,130 7,1881 5,072 B7375 9,879 2,661 1,769 1,820 141 87377 123,875 31,119 33,675 36,450 42,371 B7378 1 5,545 9,313 7,167 7,023 8,341 B757 117,085 11,740 12,886 13,634 13,057 CL60 2,266 456 2 2 CRJ9 2,375 1,455 1,325 1,301 MD80 1,048 2,820 2,504 1,981 2,185 MD90 2,597 -1,5241 1,572 1,841 2,047 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY By Year -14- ■ 2003 ■ 2004 ❑ 2005 ❑ 2006 ■ 2007 TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type 2003 2004- Year 2005 2006 2007 Alaska Air A 737 6. 1=8 .77 . 8.951 67377 9.710 5.863 6.085 6.386 7.975 77g 0.7 .0 4 Aloha AQ B7377 -.984 4.645 5.058 5.38bi b.bI American AA 87378 6.386 12.609 9.452 9.227 10.030 B757 10.430 0.945 2.734 3.666 3.523 8 1. .85 33 .7 . 9 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 87375 2.247 1.781 2.436 2.490 0.071 :7377 4.627 5.038 4.819 5.082 7.586 B7378 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.014 7 7 .005 Delta DL 1.385 1.704 0.011 0.005 0.003 1.200 0.120 0.181 0.384 VB757 0.132 3.425 5.571 5.290 4.474 4.395 .5 2.W 7T 15 .5 8 2.803 FedEx FM A300 1 0.036 0.027 1 0.005 0.134 0.405 1 0 U.b*/-.65 0.679 .55 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.526 0.019 0.011 A319 0.518 1.393 1.416 2.929 3.649 B7373 0.293 1.432 0.003 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 3.1041 0.623 0.0031 0.003 rFTJ 3.238 1.995 1.816 1.781 i wes Northwest NW A319 3.822 3.844 3.827 2.841 2.836 7 5 5 Southwest WN B7373 0.345 0.240 0.003 0.551 0.027 B7375 11.279 1.855 0.003 67377 14.378 26.975 30.173 33.088 36.918 US Airways (1) AW A319 3.937 1.634 3.244 5.008 4.679 4.047 4.634 4.178 2.934 3.921 3 4.373 3.495 3.762 3.110 1.704 0. 36 EA31 • 5 US Airways (2) US 1.227 0.005 United UA A319 3.038 2.126 2.416 2.984 4.373 A320 3.279 4.331 2.852 1.912 1.181 B7373 0.014 0.0111 0.003 0.099 B7375 1 0.011 0.011 0.121 8757 I 8.896 8.891 7.945 8.395 7.852 (1) Effective September 26, 2007, America West merged with US Airways. This merger resulted in the name change of America West to US Airways. The figures shown in this section reflect America West's average daily departure history. (2) The figures shown in this section reflect the average daily departure history of US Airways which ceased operations at JWA on September 6, 2003. -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: December 12, 2007 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building 1. Airport Statistics Irma Ortega presented the statistics from the JWA Statistics Report for November 2007. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Sarah Demont asked why the JWA Plan Year goes from April to March. Eric Freed explained that this was done so that if capacity withdrawal was ever required toward the end of the Plan Year, the airport would be doing it in the January through March quarter, which is a slower time of year for the carriers than the calendar year end quarter of October through December. Sarah Demont asked why airport statistics are discussed in the Noise Abatement Committee Meeting. Eric Freed responded that airport statistics such as numbers of passengers and operations are related to noise at the airport. Sarah Demont asked why in the last Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report (for the period July 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007), Tables 6 through 8 showed no data for monitors 8, 9 and 10. Eric Freed explained that those tables show only departure data, and thus there would only be data for those monitors if departures occurred to the north during a quarter. Gregg Carroll asked about carriers departing to north when they were not required to because of weather conditions. Irma Ortega responded that flights can receive permission from the FAA to depart to the north if there is a break in the arrival traffic, but that most flights will not do so because it could delay them. Sarah Demont asked for a name of someone at the FAA she can talk to who can answer her questions. Eric Freed explained the different offices of the FAA and their functions. Sarah Demont said that one of her questions concerned why the planes are flying lower. Eric Freed noted that a study was done a year ago on the average altitude of planes entering the glide slope and it was found that the average altitude was above the glide slope. Sarah Demont asked if improvements made to the gates at the airport would change the flight patterns. Eric Freed explained that this would not impact flight patterns. -16- Sarah Demont asked if JWA collected noise data in the daytime at its monitoring sites to the north of the airport. Eric confirmed that the airport is collecting noise data 24 hours per day at those and all other sites. Nancy Alston stated that the standard of 65 dB CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) was too high [for defining a noise impact area], and expressed her view that it should be 55 dB CNEL. Reina Kapadia from the City of Tustin discussed a complaint she had received from a resident of Tustin Ranch regarding "constant departures". Irma Ortega explained that the airplanes from JWA have been taking off to north recently due to the winds. Nancy Alston said it would be good to have carrier representatives at the Noise Abatement Committee Meetings. Eric Freed explained that all the carriers are invited to attend. Nancy Alston said she wanted to clarify that AirFair is against any future expansion of JWA, not the current improvement project. -17- NAC ROSTER December 12, 2007 NAME Nancy Alston Greg Carroll Sarah Demont Reins Kapadia Eric Freed Irma Ortega Jim Sugden Silvia Zavala Bonnie Frisch ORGANIZATION AirFair AirFair Tustin resident City of Tustin John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport O iteLar'at- '4i,s �r` ac lrs _iiON ai� �'.''��.�Aj"• 'c rrr Y 3000 Feetr# • �Y >�Y z.,p ��-''4,i�? r ?�.r ��[ r 5 � x fi se .z t' '� 1< � .)r `�� -. {' '� � _ ui'• � ''may# t :. ' � i �I � �' .•� �e JT"E' 3'[w+.-_i ? t log ;"-= a a"4' ! ..a.■. : � � •,. _ �4 .r . + ..�� , l_ i^ x �►'►*s ` �r t t ; ; ri �1 j of Psz# Sr.+ rt in �'A•�a,; .,r ' ' rt e: I-■+e� �r 14, ~III f H� . F R '' (j; tIz t IW..l.•�'%+ I ri" a v �It� 1 z a ! '� // 2i�y i� • tt it °..j+.twrw '"ii- i t s+ r �ra_'�?� s- S I�� •.a...��e•, ,'>9 q�/i. T.�I � ��tFt+:'SbE 1 �+t i•-w �, Hn '. i iia r 3 A. a _�s�.rf�� wF � 4+�� Yru r �'A rf' � `� r < � y��1C„ rc t .d�,�IC��•Y� 'fii 6 �l /,�'�` ?,y ., f1 p St � ktj l rti '�- i Yt�^"I�'In& �� R+-. }�'- � 4 � ��' • i .•.� I■ i:W •br 1�N 4�p�j ,d l�"'k.�=�— �a :i� n , '�„ t�.,ati R`.. r i a i■ -�.s L RSH � •w oil, 6< !'•AL� +' � r '�. �..•..._ moi. �,tz,'� r ii '¢-�, �� i7�Cl�. ,r. � �' { }` Ellnr� •�11 Y �•' • d pL" oil All +, a 5t� ''s r # r� . ' Ile �►� ',`: i � �, R'► 9!•. � �' �' - �i.� 1 :- ,_'t- ...a ii. st "O .�.Y' .ar9�.4�w'r} � ,�' to 4 �'g 4 �.. .1_ • t. � 1 w � -�� 1 3, Rah ,l ay .v 1 V °��7r ° ♦ !Y s. r`°! � . �*+ !i i. _ i '•�.. t r r� 'A �'ts �... .yr'-<Y •,� y P.�� f� X,� +ylh J 1�`'ts. N 41 KIR e� ,r` v! •tR. �. r a �' c .Xr t t t l 9 Y # F=117". `' w r .•�� ,+yr*''�� ?. sR'r, f: ,T - a ,r.ls t �•. � _yr -q t�: ... ;'�'f�t4��- � a-F.47 t �/� � r '�, e�' +R `�� A�'i�+� - y p ��•1r�'i �j• C F tt T Y L r-'r �+ �.; ��` ��,,+�.'q y !(1 j •�• 4 �� t, 4t51 k ;a■'rY Af ♦ f F4.:..r ,^fiyrVr'p 1� �1 � � � 1 � r tf .i `•.i.�� + � y }. F � , i t G - ' �' i$.! j �"'i�.�' � t'- �. ` f-/ , �.. � I ' •i �(( . Nlellt !.� 1 ■r ' ,. .. Y Y IM ly •` tY t Y H R 1 M.Y v. 1, 4 I 1 .` ✓l 1.'. -6•_r� rr �=a • ee t z ti �y� Jt i s �� s f '' ' y; �� *.�,t ,,t�� r�� 1•r r�L��YC Joh _ y "�" a � � n r� 1 ••S. A.rya i r '4 11 es k"'� iii � ��.�'„ �� 3 j s ,sb �'', h'! ri r z 1 �• ` -i .,-£ �� _ *�-a► •- it F � .�s f� - Is.%r t� .{;h Y. t tiM r � •a tYt ,•n l -,..� a. ;�" n' :�zt �`+• l;4 �t��,k�► ¢ r7, �y }"� S�.sSc� c,y�d .:L ♦ � -r ��• ,x;, �2- Y.., ♦ ..Jt '1 r r '..`a,ly i }S;,. ,sw .y v v'� w Y v `' T -. t ^?„• -,,,.h a a -F b � r : A 1 �, � � 1. I 'k'• ''4i Y t ,/ t . y v � •T' i ,� 1 j+'fid' �,\ , .� .. „/» .;� y 4'_�y ��-,',Ilt'Jt IIO r t ,c s �, - \ .,d.. 1rr ,,� S,` _ _ w f ✓t, j _ ♦ -'SIC �. `yiF\' R it t a ' �'�!� zi s `� ,° �'�F t?� a�or�Ss' .• �r �S° - + v.+.'W" -`'_