HomeMy WebLinkAbout20 LEGISLATIVE REPT-AB 642, 1815, 3034 & SB 619 05-06-08Agenda Item ~~
,. Reviewed:
~ ~ ~~%!~ V
1`1V ~,l r ~C-1 ~1 O~~ City Manager
.,,
~~'~~,~ Finance Director NIA
MEETING DATE: MAY 6, 2008
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE REPORTS FOR AB 642, AB 1815, AB 3034, SB 619
SUMMARY
At the request of Council Member Bone, staff has reviewed AB 642, AB 1815, AB 3034, SB
619 and staff is recommending that that the City send a letter of support for AB 642 and
continue to monitor AB 1815, AB 3034, SB 619.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that that the City send a letter of support for AB 642 and continue to
monitor AB 1815, AB 3034, SB 619.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
BACKGROUND
Council Member Bone has requested staff to review the following state bills:
AB 642 (Wolk) Design-build: counties, cities, and special districts.
Existing law authorizes all counties in California to employ design-build contracting for the
construction of buildings, improvements directly related to the construction of buildings, and
county wastewater facilities. It also specifically authorizes the Cities of Victorville and
Stanton and the cities within Yolo and Solano Counties to employ design-build
contracting for the construction of buildings and improvements directly related to the
construction of buildings and authorizes the Orange County Sanitation District to employ
design-build contracting for the construction of wastewater facilities.
This Bill authorizes all cities to employ design-build contracting for projects involving the
construction of buildings and improvements directly related to the construction of buildings
only. It also authorizes cities, counties, and special districts to employ design-build
contracting for the construction of wastewater facilities, solid waste management facilities, or
water recycling facilities whose cost exceeds $2.5 million. The Bill sunsets this authorization
on January 1, 2019, unless subsequent legislation deletes or extends that date.
Current Status: 4/16/2008; From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and
re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Assembly
Committee on Local Government.
The California League of Cities supports this bill.
AB 1815 (Feuer) California Transportation Infrastructure Funding Task Force.
Existing law provides various sources of revenue to fund state highway and local road
maintenance, operation, and improvement, including astate-imposed per-gallon fuel tax of
18 cents. This bill would create, until January 1, 2010, the California Transportation
Legislative Reports for AB 642, AB 1815, AB 3034, SB 619
May 6, 2008
Page 2
Infrastructure Funding Task Force, with 14 members appointed by the Legislature,
Governor, California Transportation Commission, city and county organizations, and other
specified entities. The bill would require the task force to hold at least 3 public hearings
around the state and to report to the Legislature and Governor by January 1, 2010, on
alternatives to the current system of taxing road users through per-gallon fuel taxes. The
bill would make legislative findings and declarations in that regard.
Status: 4/14/2008; In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of
author.
The California League of Cities supports this bill.
AB 3034 (Galgiani) Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21St
Century.
Existing law provides for the submission of the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train
Bond Act for the 21St Century to the voters for approval at the November 4, 2008, general
election. Subject to voter approval, the act would provide for the issuance of $9.95 billion of
general obligation bonds, $9 billion of which would be available in conjunction with any
available federal funds for planning and construction of a high-speed train system pursuant
to the business plan of the High-Speed Rail Authority, and $950 million of which would be
available for capital projects on other passenger rail lines to provide connectivity to the
high-speed train system and for capacity enhancements and safety improvements to those
lines. This bill would make various revisions to the bond act to be submitted to the voters.
The bill would refer to construction of a high-speed train system consistent with the
authority's certified environmental impact report of November 2005, rather than with the
final business plan of June 2000. The bill would revise the descriptions of route corridors of
the proposed high-speed train system. The bill would require excess revenues from
operation of the high-speed train system beyond the amount needed for high-speed train
purposes, as determined by the authority, to be used to finance construction of the high-
speed train system, and any remaining revenue to be deposited in the General Fund. The
bill would require that not more than 10% of bond proceeds be used for environmental
studies, planning, and preliminary engineering activities, and would require the authority to
have a detailed funding plan for each segment of the system that identifies the full cost of
construction and the sources of revenues for that segment, prior to awarding a construction
contract for the segment. The bill would require the authority to give priority in selecting
segments for construction to those segments that are expected to require the least amount
of bond funds as a percentage of total cost of construction, among other considerations.
This bill contains other related provisions.
Current Status: 4/22/2008; Re-referred to Assembly Committee on Appropriations
The California League of Cities has placed this bill on its Watch List.
SB 619 (Migden) Public contracts: retention proceeds.
Legislative Reports for AB 642, AB 1815, AB 3034, SB 619
May 6, 2008
Page 2
Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services, or any other department with
authority to enter into contracts, to contract with suppliers for goods and services. Existing
law provides that in a contract between the original contractor and a subcontractor, and in a
contract between a subcontractor and any subcontractor, the percentage of retention
proceeds withheld cannot exceed the percentage specified in the contract between the
public entity and the original contractor. This bill would instead require that retention
proceeds not exceed 5% of the payment, as specified, for all contracts entered into on or
after a specified date, between a public entity, as defined, and an original contractor,
between an original contractor and a subcontractor, and between all subcontractors .This
bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.
Status: 9/11/2007; Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Bass.
The California League of Cities has taken a position of opposition to this bill.
J
Tim D. Serlet
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE
Assembly Member Lois Wolk
State Capitol Building, Room 3120
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax Number: 916-319-2108
RE: Notice of Support for AB 642 (Wolk). Design-build. Counties, Cities, and
Special Districts
Dear Assembly Member Wolk:
The City of Tustin supports AB 642, which would allow cities to use design-build
contracting for building construction projects as well as wastewater facilities, solid waste
management facilities, or water recycling facilities.
The City of Tustin believes in giving cities the option to use design-build contracting to
make public contracting more efficient. Design-build contracting has shown it is
successful in reducing project costs and expediting project completion, both of which
are important to cities and our residents.
For these reasons, the City of Tustin supports AB 642 and thanks you for your guidance
on this issue.
Sincerely,
Jerry Amante
Mayor
c: Assembly Member Chuck DeVore , 70th District
Assembly Member Todd Spitzer, 71st District
Senator Richard Ackerman, 33rd District
League of California Cities, Fax #916-658-8240