HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 76-15RESOLUTION NO. 76-15
A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THAT PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN
INITIATED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, TO ANNEX TO SAID CITY CERTAIN UNINHABITED
TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "MARINE
CORPS AIR STATION (HELICOPTER) ANNEXATION NO. 71B TO
THE CITY OF TUSTIN" AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED
ANNEXATION.
The City Council of the city 'of Tustin, California, does hereby
resolve as follows'
1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited
Territory Act of 1939, proceedings have'bean initiated by' .the Cou.ucil of
the. City of Tustin, on 'its o~ motion, to Jnnax to the City of Tustin
\
all that un_inhabited territory situate in the County of .Orange, State of
California, her'eby designate~ as "Marine Coz-ps _A_ir' Station (Kelicopter)
·
. ..
·
.
Annexation ~No. 7lB 't° the City of Tustin'" an~ describe~' in Ex_hibi~ "A"
. . ...
att'achea hereto and incorp0rate~ herein'by this reference, a'n~ shown on
a 'map attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" and' inc'orp0ratad herein by this~
reference .....
...
..
_
· ..
2. The City c~unCil' hereby 'fin~s 'an~ determines .... ' --~
..
(a) that:, all of. said territory i~ uninhabited. as 'defined ia
said ACt' and within the meaning, of Government Code Section 35303, on 'the
-'~ate of the adoption of this Resolution;. .. .... '...
·
.. (b)". that said t~rrit0ry is".contiguous to the City.of Tustin;
..
· . and. .' '
the City of Tustin.
assembleR, on January 28, 1976, did adopt a negative .declaration finding
_
o
·
and determ.~ing-~:hat:..approval of. said. armexation would.. not hav~'.a significant
._
:
.. . .
impact On' the envir0~e~t' and-did approve said-proposed, annexation to ......
.o.
The Local Agen.cy..Formation. Commission, iu session duly
._
· -
·
3 That· the Council of the City of Tustin des~s to ~ =~t
- --- ~nn_,~ said
uninhabited territory to the Cit. y of Tustin for hhe following reasons:·
·
.
the terri~6,ry is coatiguous to the City of Tustin, and iks
..
annom~on'~£11 contribute to and faci'litate the use.of ti~e ~err£kory
.. ..
proposed to be annexed; will contribute to '-an~ facilitate the 'preservatioa
of" t2~e assigned mission of -~h.e United States Marine Corps on'
·
·
territory; will facilitate and contribute to the pro~er'~nd, orderly use,.
laYout, design and construction of Street's, gutters, sidewalks', sanitary.
·
and' s~orm water sewers, and drainage faci.lities~, both wi.thin the .city, . ... -. . .
..
adjacent to and, at 'such time' in the future as shid ~= "~ "
· ~rrluory may no
..
.
long=.--r be used' by' the military, within the territory' proposed to be
..
..
..
anneX~; and will provide' and facilitate proper overall _Dia=nni=~.g'and '
..
..
· .
zonLag' Of lands, in' said City, adjacent .to and in .said uniruhabited ..
..
territory, i'n: 'a manner conducive to. the welfare of s=_id City and said
: ..
..
uninhabited territory.." .. ' -.. .'-- ..' : ..
-." 4' 'Tha~ 'the 'major-~ortion of Said. territory is now and'will upon "
..
'annexatiOn'be a part'Of the Tustin Unified' SchoOl Districk and tho"be'lance'
..
. .
·
is .in and will.be in th_e Irvine Unified School District and. the Santa
..
·
·
·
..
Aha.. Unified School District.
..
· - .. .
..
·
.. ... .
· ... ..' 5....That..the L..o. cal Agency' Formation 'Commission, California, did iri
..
·
session.duly ~ssembled. on-January 28, 1976 approve 'tP~e proposed annexation
· .
.
bOundaries of said. "Marine Corps Air Station (Helicopter) Annexation' ........ "'..'
NO 7.1B"to the City' Of Tustin" 'as above described, ~nd-as-suhmitt-ed to'
..
.....
·
. said 'Commission by' the Council of the City of ~cstin. '. -.'
6. .That March 25, 1976, at the hour of 7':30 p.m., in the
...
..
Coundil Ch'aimbars in 'the' City Hall-in the-CitY of.-Tustin,. County-of'
.
· .
· .
.
·
Orang-=, California,' is hereby fixed as the t~'2. e a_~.d ~,ac~ ~,~h~_o. =_~d x~here
· :
any' persOn owning real 'property within, the.uni~habited territ°~3 above
described-and proposed to be annexed to the City of. Tustin,. ~.-.d having
any objection to the proposed annexation, may appear 'before the Council
of the City of Tustin and protest said annexation and may show cause why
such Uninhabited territory should not be so annexed to said City o~
Tustin.' Such protest m,u~t be in writing, may be .filer at any time at or
before tlne hour set for hearing objections tO tile Pr0p0~ed an~exa.tio=,
" ' = the owner or owners of property
and shall, state the name or names o~ .
affected, amd.the' description and area of. such property, in geaer~al
terms. Any and 'all other parsons shall also be heard on-said annexation
·
...
at said time and place,' If it is foun~ and determiner that', a majority~
· . o
·
protest has not been made as definer in said Ac~,, and that said.annexat, ior~
..
.
is otherwise PrO'per and desirable, ·further proceedings shall be taken to
complete said annexation... " " '
..
·
.
7. The City Clerk:of the City of Tustiu-is haneby authorized and
.
..
..
directed tO cause a' copy of "this. r. esoiutio~ to be publishad"at" least..'.
.. .
·
. .
twice, but not oftener than once a wae~, in the Tustim News, a newspaper" .
-. .
.
of general...~irculation printed and '°ublished' in aaid...City of.·T~stin, .
- :
·
County of Orange, State' of..California, .the City.to which it. is proPosea
·
.
to'annex the 'aforesaid' tarrito~y, ~-nd {~ The' Register,' a' newsPaPer... Of _
..
..
. .
general Circulation printed and pu'olished in the.'City of .Santa Aha,
·
-.
· -_
· . .
.
.
outside the city of Tustin,. but in the County of Orange, State of CalifOrnia,
.
the county in'whiCh is located the territory proposed to be annexe~, to.
..
· ' .
, uolzca~zon to be . .
the City of Tustin said p ' ' '~' s complete at least twenty
·
.
·
.
·
· (20)' days' prior to..the date set .for. hearing..-.-
·
.
8. The City Clerk is further authorizer and directed. ~o cause., .
.
.
written notice of such .proposed annexation to. be mailed to each person
· .
· ..
·
to.whom land .within.the territory proposmd, t° be anne-xed ia asses, sad in
..
..
_
the last equ-alized County"a'ssessmamt r~ll a~ai!able on 'the date the-"
.
...
..
·
'..
·
· .
486 .
·
above said proceedings were initi'ated~ at the addresses shown On said
·
assessment roll or 'known "to the Clerk, and to any person 'who has filed.
·
.
his name ~nd address 'and the designation.of the.., lands in which he'-' has an
interest, either legal or equi. table~ with the .Clerk, such notice, to be
. .
given no't less than twenty (20)'days before the first public hearing on
the proposed anne_xatiom. "'
t=.(,, to cause ~ritten notice, to 'be given
9- The City Clerk is direc e':
·
to such other persons'as may be l'egally entitled thereto, in the manner
required by law.
·
.
· ' 10.' .. The City Clerk shall certif~ the adoptioa of this Resolution.
PASSED AzNiD ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council, City
..
o.f Tustin, California, held on theg 9th day of February, 1976.
..
.
·
.
.- L
TS.17
JGR- sl
o.
487
division ~?; per map record.~d
Records o50rang~ '.County, Ca
49°19'58'' W., 1320 feet more
10 of said Irvine's Subdivis
point on the existing City o
~ill. oAv~-Como Rd. Annexation
and' adopted Februar~y 19, 19,6
' ~2t '---e ........ z] '. '-
]., page :.'.g 'of :-l is ce l laneous blaps,
said corner being distan~ ~!.
or less from the easterly corner of block'
ion, said northerly corner also being a
f Tustin Boundary as established by the Red
(revised) per 0rdindance No. 386, passed
8; ·
in book
1.[fornia,
Thence, along the existing City or Tushin Boundary as
above m.,entioned Red }[ilt Ave.-Com..a. Rd. Annexation (revised.), the
Hi!l-Lo'wane Housin'g .A~nnexation No. 63 per Orange County Board of
· Supervisors Resolution No. 70-1266, passed ar'~d adopted N0ve~.mber
and the Warner-Sycamore Annexation per Ordinance. No. 245, passed
adoated December 2, 1963, through' the following courses-'
· .
o
S. 40042' 11'" Ij., a diseaxice of 1320. 15 feet;
.
·
a distance of' 1320
a distance of
1320
:
30.00
·
es ~ab!ished by
Red
feet more or '~ess;
.
.
·
.
feet- more or less;
25,
and
Thence, N' 49°19'58" W'.,
-,
·
Thence,. S. 40 °39.'12" W.,.
·
·
.
.
. .
Thence, N_ 49°30'43" W.,
"dis tance of
feet;
· . .
f.eet more o~
said angle
· .
the
Thence, S..40°39'12'' W.· a distance of 2640 less to an
angle point in said City of Tustin Bonn. dali, point also
beihq an angle point in the existin~ City of Santa Aha Boundary as
'established bY ~he Irvine's 'Su~.'division Annexation. Noi" 1 'revised per-
Ordinance No. NS- 696; ' ..-. ' -' .
· .
o ·
Thence, leaving said City of Tustin Boundary_, and continuing S~ " -.
40°39 '12" W., along said City of Santa A~a' Bo~..ndary, a distance of
26'40 feet'more or-less ~o the point of inte 'section with the norris-
westerly prolongation of the southwesterly' boundary of that. 'certain
1606.49 acre' parcel 'as per m=-p filed in book .12, page 43 of Records
of Surveys, Records of said Ormnge County, said point of intersection
also being an angle point in the existing City of Irvine Bou~ndary as ' ........
established by incorporation .per Orange County Board of Supez-~isors
Res...No. 71-1472; .- .. ~ -- '
..
·
Thenco, 'leav;~ng said' City of Santa Aha Bo~ndarz, along said" prolongation '
and southwesterly bo,unda~ of said 1~06.49 acre parcel and' along said
City of. Irvine Boundary through tke following courses-.
-.
.o
.
· .
S. 49°19'43'' E.,. a distance of 6636..45 ~eet; .- '
..
.
..
Thence, N. 40°37'51" E., a distance of 3.21.0.97 feet; ..
Thence, S. 49019'55" E.., a distance of 3215'.10 feet;
. -
·
·
· Tkence., -N. 85°3.7'25"
E., along .the southerly boundary_· of. said 1606.'49-.
acre parcel and. along said City of Irvine Bounda-~t, a distance .of
10~0.39 feet to .t~he point of intersection with the southeasterly line
of lot 196, block 62, of said Iz?;ine's Subdivision, .said point of inter.-
sec'tion also being, an angle point in the sou~neast, er!y bounaa~f o".2 said
1606.49 acre parcel and also being an angle point in said City of' .. '
o
Irvine Boundary; . .. .
..
Thence, N. 40°37'25'' ~., along th=~ southe~ster!~ _line of said' lot 19'6
and along the southeasterly boundary of said 1606.49 .acre .parcel 'and
along said City of Irvine Bounda~I, a distance of 1319.67 feet, to the
most southerly corner of lot 189, bloc'-.~ 62, .of said 'Irvine's Subdivisio'
Thence, N. 40o37'52'' E., along the-southeasterly line of said lot 189
'and along the southeasterly boundary and nor~heaster!y prolongation
of. said southeasterly boundary of said 1606.49 acre parcel and along
said City of Irvinc Boundary, a distahce of 2¢-%4.5'4 feet, to the
southerly corner of lot 18.8, block 63, of said irvine's Subdivision;
·
-1-
_.. N 40 °3 8 "0'1" -
Th. an~',~, . ~., along the sou~haastar!y 'line of said lot 133
and '-along said City o~ Irvine Boundary', a distance of 50.00 feet, to the
point of ~n~ersection wit_h ~ ~ ~ _
- ~.~e no tk~aster!y right-o~-:-;ay llne of the
Atckiscn;.. Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, as described in a dee-d
recorded in book 2,1$,pa~e ~23 of Deeds, Records of Los Angeles County,
.California; . . .'~
Thence_, N. 49~90_ '40" W., along said northeasterly ~ghh-o._=-w-~y_ ' -~ine and
along said City of Irvine Boundary, a distance of 1617.87 feat, ~o an
angle point in ~e' existing city of .?ustin Bounda~f as established by the
Tus tin- industrial Transfer o~ Territory from the City of irvine to the
~.ity .oe Tustin Annexation No. 86 'per Res. No. 7~-71, pa~sed and adopted
~.obo 91, .;
~_ _r _ 197~'
Thence, leaving the existing City of Irvine Boundary and a!cng .the
· ,--~ng City o~. Tu$~. .......
exist_ . ~ ~in Bo,,~~y as es~Jol~$b.e~ by th'e above mentioned
~ln Industrial Transfow; Th~ U S Marine Corps Irvin_ Annexation.
.. ~lO. 7!-A p_=r Res. No.. 71-79. . passed and adopted Dece~..-/~. er 6',. 1971; the
Red ?!i!l-Walnut Annexation per Ordinance No. 343,. passed and adoDt=~d ·
'.' March 20, 19 67; and the.previously mentioned Red Hitl Ave~-Como
' "~' fo
A_~nexation (revised) through ~.e liowing coursos:
·
·
·
·
1'~,. 49°20'40" ~i.~., a distance of 5199.65 feet7
.
..
Th~hce,. N.. 49°19'58'' W., a distance of 2429 feet more or less;
Thence, S.
beginning:.
- .
..
· .
.
o
;
.. o
· o
o.
40°42:11"· W., a distance of 50.00 feet to 'the
.
· .
·
·
.
Resol'ut lion No.
EXHIBIT
ll~i. II
76'-15
point of
-.
-2-
STATE OF CALIFOP~NIA)
COUNTY OF ORA~NGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
RUTH Co POE, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby
· certify that the whole n~ber of the members of the City
Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and
foregoing Resolution No. 76-15 was duly and regularly
introduced, read, passed and adopted at a special meeting
of tke City Council held on the 9th day of February ,
1976,. by the following vote-
AYES-
COUNCIL~IEN -_._S.~A~L~TA. PJE~LLi, ':WELSH_~ ..... EDGAR, SHARP SUT.C..'.L!.FF
·
NOES' COUNCII~LEN · NONE
..
ABSENT -
COUNCIL~,LEN-~ N...ONE _ ..__.
· .
......... i 11 ............ I .... · ....... lu_± .............. I ii