Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 74-086RESOLUTION NO. 74-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CAL!FORNIA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN CERTAIN TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND DESIGNATED RED HILL-. LANCE ANNEXATION NO. 88. The City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereb.? resolve as follows- ~ 1. Pursuna-t to the provisions of the Government Code Of the ~tate of California, application was made to the Local Agency Formation Coramission to annex to the City of Tus'tin all that territory situate in -~.he County of Orange, State of California, designated Red Hill- Lance A~exation No 88, described in Exh.:J~it .."A" attached hereto and'incorpor- ated kerein by this reference as though set forth herein by this reference as though set forth herein in full.. : 2. The Local Agency Formation Commission, in session duly assembled, on October 30, .1974, did accept the negative declaration filed by the City and did approve said proposed annexation and authorize the City Council to annex said territory without notice, hearing, or e!ection~ .. 3o Ail of the owners of land within the territory proposed to be annexed have given their written consent to the annexation of said territory"to the City of Tustin.¢. 4 The City Council desires to annex said territory to the City of Tustin for the following reasons: The territory is contiguous to the City of Tustin and its proposed annexation will contribute, to and facilitate '[:he orderly growth and development of both the City' and ~he territory .p~-oposed to be aP~hexed, will facilitate r..nd contribute to the proper and orderly layout, design and construction of streets, gutters, sidewalks and sanitary and sto~n-water sewers and drainage facilities, lwoth in the City and in the territory proposed to be annexed, and will provide and facilitate p_op~.r over-all planning and zoning of lands in said City and in said territory, in a manner most conducive to the welfare of the City and said uninhabited territory° 5. The written consent of the owners of more than two-~thirds = the value of the territory of the subject annexation has been hereto o~ filed with the City Clerk, agreeing and consenting to pay indebtedness and !iabi]..ity of the city contracted prior to., or existing at, the same tJ~q~e of the annexation. 6. The City Council of the City of Tu~-:tin does hereby approve of territory to the City the annexation the here inabove described o~. Tustin, and does hereby further resolve that the said territory be and --'~ _is t~ereby annexed to the City of Tustin, effective upon the date of the filing of the certified copy of this Resolution with the Secretary of State of the State of California° 7. The property within the annexed territory shall be taxed to pay t~e indebtedness and liability of the CJ.ty contracted prior to or e, xisting at the time of annexation. 8. Tl~e City Clerk of the City of Tustin is hereby directed without delay to 'transmit to tha Secretary of State of the State of California, a certified copy of this Resolution. 91 t, 94 4 5 .9 ~0 11 12 14 8O 82 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, held on the 4th day of November, 1974. ~2~YOR ATTEST: .. ' 92 ,-~.. . ..... RED I{ILL - LANCE AN~;!~XATION NO. , . Begin~ing at tl~e point of intersection of. the centerlines of Bryan Avenue and Red Ifill Avenue, said poi~tt of intersection also being "tJ]e ]host easterly corner of the Fairbanks Subdivision as per map ' recorded in Book 36, page 48 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California; Thence, S. 39°54'12'' W.,'along the centerline of Red Hill Avenue and along the southeasterly lille of said Fairbanks Subdivision, a distance of 660.82 feet to a point on the existing City of Tustin bounda.~-y as established by the Bryan-Red Hill Annexation, per Ordinance No. 172, passed and adopted June 4, 1962, said point also being the most southerly corner of Tract ,No. 4317, as per ]nap recorded in Book '152, pages 17 and _.8 of MisCellaneous Maps~ ~,_co~ds of Orange County, Call~ ~.ornia, said point also being the most easterly corner Of Tract No. 632, as per map .recorded in Book 20, page' 30 of }0tfscellaneous Maps, Records of said Orange County, said point also being the tr~e . 'Thence, leaving the City of Tustin boundary, continuing S. 39o54'12'' W., along the centerline of Red Hill Avenue, the southeasterly line of. the Fairbanks Subdivision and along the southeasterly line of Tract No. 632, a distance of 205.78 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 25 feet southwesterly of, as measured at right angles the southwesterly line of lot 12, Block B, of said Tract' No. 632; Thence, N. 50001'01" W., along said parallel 'line, a distance of · 165.00 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of lot 13, Block B, of said Tract No. 632; Thence, N. 39°54'30'' E., along the northwesterly line of lots 13~i2, "ii and 10 of Block B of said Tract No. 632 and the northeasterly prolongation of the northwesterly line of said lot !0, a distance of , 205.77 feet to a point on the existing City of Tustin Boundary pe~ above mentioned Bryan-Red Hill Annexation; ~ . Thence, S. 50°0i'01'' E., along said City of Tustin boundary, a distance of 165.00 feet to the 9r_ue~ ~ o_f ~egiq_nin_~. · , · EXHIBIT "A" · Resolution No. 74-86 ... 93 STA?~. ' OF CALIFORN IA) COUNTY OF OF~ANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) RUTH C. POE, CJ. ty Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Cou.acil of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number, of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 74-86 was duly and regularly introduced, read, passed ~nd ~d~Pted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ~;~ 4th day of November, 1974 , 1974, by the following vote- - ..... , AYES COUNCILMEN LANGLEY, SHARP, SALTAP~ELLI, WEISH, EDGAR __ _ ~_ ~ :_ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _- .. __ ~ _- ..... _ . ~._. ~ ~ ..... . ~ ..... _ -~ : __~,~ ._- ~_ . .... NOES - , COUNCILMEN NONE ABSENT - CO UN C I LMEN NOkrS ...... city clerk'' ~ 'of. Tu-s[ih-, .... C~;ii~~fi-i-a .....