HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 74-064 2
8
4
8
1i
·
18
21
2,7
29
$0
82'
RESOLUTION NO. 74-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH MONITORING AND
RECORDING CAPABILITY.
·
.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS the City of Tustin desires to undertake a certain
project designated Monitoring and Recording ~apability, to be
f,unded in part from funds made available through the Omnibus Crime
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, PL 90-355, as amended, PL 91-644,
(hereafter referred to as the Safe Streets Act) administered by the
California Council on Criminal Justice (hereafter referred to as CCCJ~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REsoLVED that tha City Administrator
of the City of Tustin was authorized, on its behalf, to submit the
attached application for Granf..Award Contract for law enforcement
purposes including any extensions or amendments thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide
all'matching funds required for said project (including any extension
or amendment thereOf) under the Safe Streets Act and the rules and
regulations of CCCJ and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration
and that cash will be ,appropriated as required thereby.
BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder
shall not be' used to supplant on-going law enforcement expenditures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a reg~lar meeting of the City Council. of
t. he City of Tustin, California, held on the 19th day of August 1974. ·
ATTEST:
C ~T¥ Cr.~RK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
RU~H C. POE, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, ca}ifornia, does hereby
"certify that the whole number of the members of the City
Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and
foregoing Resolution No. 74-66 was duly and reguiar'~
....... introduced, read, passed ~d~'-ad0Pted at a regular meeting
of the City Council held on the ~._19th _~da'y of A__~u~_us_t__.~,
1974, by the following vote-
AYES -
COUN CI LMEN ...... s~.AP~, ....SALTARELLI .~ ~ED_G._A~ .......... i ....................
NOES '
COUNCILMEN NONE
'ABSENT: COUNCILMEN LANGLEY, WELSH
C-i%y Cie'.~",- ci-ty'~ '-0'f .... TUS'tin~--~'~.alif°r~-~----
Application for a gr~nt under Section 301
~;b) of *he,. ~nibus Crime Contr6i ~nd'safe.
Streets Act of 1968 (PL-90-251), as amended
~.y ~L- 91 - 644.
?art B Part C Part
pre-A~ r'eement .... £f~6-C t i-ye .....
' - · 1: at~t Extension Approved
. Ti tle' '~ ~S~AB~SH ~.~Z~~.~ ~D ~CO~~~ C~~~~
................ , 2. Re ion: T
· ~})%~~!'icatioE Yea=- ls~ 2.~ 3=~ 12. ~plicant'
· E~ Or~.gina] (Date)
C ; Revision (DaCe)
. Year:,ls~ X 2nd
Grant Dura t i on' 6 ~nths
· te~.h )f Project- 6 Months
_~u.pport, Dol 1 ars. Percent
. Federal . __!3, 271 75%
Tust~ Police Department
135 W, 3rd St.
Tust~,. California ~2680
(7z )
]3. Project Director-
J.j. xez y
Chief of Police
135 W. ~rd St.,., TustSn~ California
·
~-4. _F'{hanCial offi'~'er-' .......
. State Buy- ! n 1,062 6%
Local P~rd Match 3,362 19¢
..
Other ~tch & In-Kind 0 , 0
Totai Project Cost
~rooram: Improve co~m~nity se~ce.
P2 ;.~ct S~m ~_
....
Dan Blankenship
145 ~. end St.
TUs~in, California 92~80
(?'z4) 4-S890
..... ~S igna ture -_____________
15 Official_ Authori~e,~ to ~gn~,'~'.pp_! ~cat~gA
-" '"- ' ........_ City Administrator
~!;5 W. end St. '
Tustin, California 92680
Date
o
The ~h~in Police Department proposes to improve' in-service training, improve citizen comotain.~o
procedu.res ~d to proxride expanded ~nvestigat, ive and prosecutorial capability by' the :i~st~._lla-
ticn and operation of recording equipment.
At present the Department has no systems available to :it, Whereby 5nco~g and ouggoing radio and
telephone 'messages may be monitored and recorded. Therefore, to improve Department efficiency
in this cr±tical area a twenty-four hour' tape logging system is needed.
The ~stallat. ion of a monitoring and recording system of'this type will result iu ~npro~ed
service t:rain..~ng of dispatchers and officers. This training will be conducted by select~ug
tape port. ions a~.d replay%ng ssnue to involved oersonne!. 2~e training w~_ll be for the purposes
of imprc~-ing co~municaticn procedures, patroi, procedures and operational procedures. The
system ;.:c.~mld .also pro,hide another c~pability currently lacking; that is, the storage of in-
vestigaSiv.e -and prosecut,:rial evidence via tape recording equipment. Fin lally, the system
aid in t. he crit±¢~3, area of citizen ccmp].aint procedures by allowing verifica%ion or nullifica-
t, ion of said comp].ainbs. '
' ~ ~ , ~.,.,~
xn h ..... se eval'uation wi!,l be made to determine the value of the contemplated training program
the effect ~. e ~_~ ....... on the investigation and orosecution of cert. aLn type crimes, and. ir..
additio:. '[,h e
, ,':~ ~_,uct of this capability on the resolution of citizen complaints. '
·
CCCJ Form 502 (}~ov. 6/73)
· .o
o ·
EN'V1ROE]~IENTAL ~4PACT STAT~I~T
NEGATIVE ~.~PACT STATEMENT
·
- ,
To' ~1]_ Interested Government Agencies 'and public Groups
Gent I em en:
.
.
In accord with the procedures for the preparation of en,~Lronmental
impact Statements, an environmental assessment has been perfoz~ed on the
proposed agency.' action below:
·
To establish monitoring and record~ug capability
The assessment process did not indicate a signific~_nt environmentsl ..
impact from the proposed action. Consequently, an environmental ~upact
statement will not be prepared.
·
An end,irc=mental impact appraisal, which summarizes the assessment and the
reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office
~ud w~ll bc av ~ailable ~o_ public scrutLuy upon request.
SiUcerely,
Chief of Police
Tustin Police Department
YES
ENVIR0~~T~ ]]~PACT APPRAISAL
NO
X
o
1. Noticeably increase noise level?
·
X
X
X
2. Disrupt historical, cultural, 'or natural aspects?
·
~o Cause signifY, cant deterioration of aesthetic or
. visual effect ?
Derogate from 5rnpo~~t recreational recreational areas?
, X
X
X
X
5. Substantially alter behavior of a n0n-hmman species?
6. Interface ~th important breeding, nesting, or feeding
grounds ?
,
7. Cause significant increase. in air or water pollution?
8. Disturb ecological balance of land or water area?
._~_X 9. Create p$ssibility of contamiuation of public water
.. supply source, treatement facility, or sewage system?
,
·
~ 10. .Be detr~ent~ to the quality of the human enw/2onmeng,
~icluding the transportation system?
. .
J.J. Kelly
~tlSTIN pOLICE~ DEPARTMt~T
ORGANIZATION -; ' ' ~ ...... : .... ' ........ -' '
209 SJOU"FT SUMMARY FOR GRANT PROJECT
anticipated . • requested for second and/or third year sof t vifill in thOse spaces o f
If i t i s anticipated that funds will. 1. be requ s
e , , , , n f r� the It First Year 'h the approved amounts for that
this appilcat.•on is for second year funding, the
period and the anticipated amounts for third year funding.
�
.
1. Budget Should
hou d be based on a grant.year
year (mon'i,i or �Z) h rter period od i f the project is less than 12 months)
rather
I faitral '�ajen.dar year or 1scyear.
2. including State Buy --Icy fends."
•'.fit SECOND YE-.
TTS Ti
RO yrAR'
TOT. FIRST-YEAR TO :.�..&Ub&
". T
e 2 Gra 1 Er A.atch 1 1 g 2
Men"-
Budget - Grant Matchr7 ng`�
Grant�atching
g
Total -yFun.,ds . .F.�u..nds• ...:,...It T:.-,o....t
,,.a�l,._.
_.. Funds Funds
Category Total Funds Funds
arwel�+Mr
W-ewaa~
Personal
.
SerV Ces
Travel
Oonsul tant .
Services
Equ i pmAnt 1"1695 x.31 271
4,424
e
Supplies &
Operating
Fxpetises r♦,; lop ,� • f�
• //, � ♦/ •♦/�% � ! w rI j °!Fr•.' J //ffrwar �! r i �/��//�� Ji'� / �•,• � / f�{� r• �0
•I/ ,� •�/ J`'Jf��
IyMpr+>e:
Total �./- fw�wr w.• • J�.r�+/�:�[rI// r • r.' v/� ' .�r . � .,'...... w• ..tL.r •��d!/wr�./•Ir..�r /. / �i� /fyt.f169 ' �r••I./!// /I'r./�'%/.'�� ' .�Jr .' . /♦Jl•%/r'�f�• ' �• 4 ,./,.j�..1.�.., ` i/ +' / fr'r' �r r. . .�..'L.••�.��`��f♦ f,�/.�/ P ,.,. ..id�..':��' ��, trJ ;.'rir���,rf,••��,�• ;rJr,r •r x
oft
rVt
r.W!.rim _w" �r 1 �.•. �l ,, ,rr ' rf / ,1•�f
l'f'
y
�'' F ,� I � • �. i r+�• J / d ! �/ •rf/rJJ/� r r/ / '` / /
r OF le
�• / d ! • !• • ,/
/ If
/ J{ • / / r� /� / r f / r
Ix
Funds 01
Reouested ;,/ % / • +' ,�,1 / .` /,./ f /. �', /
/� ��0��nG
0
100
V4F
P--"-- rp
'Ix
_Wv 4. . —
/+�,��
f f % //' // %%r f ' �/ f i / • 'r F ;Je oo
.Ar Y 4�aA f
.r /,.• ` !r/ /�r//> •,. r•�J�f ! 1 r/r�j ,,%/r 10
1 /��•'•�/!•//..f / ."`fw f'If•/ ://^,/rJ_.�.1r/• ,/� % ♦•!/{/jf/fI/'�/f d'• �,/ ♦/ / /
Gra n t e
4VF_
bution
BUDGET CATEGORY.
21. gersonal Services
~'~ A. Salaries
~one
Benefits '
None
TOTAl.
-~TOTAL~---- ..... m ..... FEDERALFuNDS
·
-6-,.
HARD MATCH j
Si;'ATE -" j ...... ' '-' LOt:AL- .... j OTHI~
BUY-iN ! HARD 1,tATCHJ
,
t
·
BUDGET CATEGORY' !1 TOTAL FUNDS I STATE - t -LOCAl ......... l
22. Travel.
23.
C°nsul'tant Services
None
· TOTAL
'_~. .........~._ . . . ~ . . _ .., .
24. Equipment
3,362
3~362'
1'. -~,~enty-four ho~ tape
' logging systern~ 17,695 13~271 1,062 i
· ,
,
o
.
.
·
·
..... . ........... TOI'^L _ . 21.7,69~ ~ 13., 271 ...... 1_, C~2 I ..
-7-
Personal Services .
·
A. Salaries
None.
B. Benefits
None.
Travel
Non~o
C_ ~.nsult ant_ Serv~..¢;es_
Eoj~ipm ep~_
One (1) twenty-four hour double deck tape logging system
with twenty (20) channel simultaneous monitoring capability
and independent three (3) channel simultaneous recall
capability. Including installation, tapes and. tax.
Detailed equipment list as follows:
1. 20 channel recorder
2. 20 channel reproducer
time code generator
time code reader
5- door see-through
6. tapes 35 at $30.t8 each
Installation and maintenance for one year;
$9,950.00
$2,789. O0 ..
$1,795.00
$~,~S~.oo
$ 21o. oo -
$1', 066.80
25.
.~'p~'~i_es and Oper..a_ting: ..EX.P.e_?.s~e~s
None.
Total: $17,695.80
.16
25.
Supplies and Operating Expenses
None
TOTAL
],.~..,,,~,,,,,,..~.,,,.i-.~,-,I..,,,-,,.,..~ ~ .......... -_~ ~:.-: ~, : -- ------ ~ ~ _ ~-.-~.---~ - - -~ .... - ---
I '
L ..... _ __2_6:_ .... I'_'~OTA!.~ PRQ.J ECT::__cosI :~ ...............
f 27, Percent of Total Project Cost
OTH' .':'~
1,062 ........ 3,362
6~ :]-9~ .........
..-8-
"" 28. B~.~.dget Narrative- Begin below and add as many co tinuation pages .
~(n~m6~red-~8-A~ 8-B etc. ) as may be ~
, necessary to , elate t. he items budgeted
to project activities and complete the required Justification and explana-
i~ion of the project budget. Explain the sources the grantee will utilize
· for its matchfng contribution' Enumerate-those' proposed expenditure items
that require prior approval, as specified in Bureau of the Budget Ci.rcular
A-87, and in CCCJ Fiscal Affairs Nanual, so prior approval may be considered
at the time application is made.
.
-9-
18
8
PROJECT MONTH
o
,~c 2nd 3r'd 4th~ __ Sth___ 6th · ?th .gt.h.... 9th loth llth_
17,695 .' . .................................. ~ ..... ~: _ ....
.
.......
.
. .
· ~ ,.
.........
, .
....... ~m r _~.' - ..... ~:~
i . '
'
~. , · , ~ , ~ .... -~. _ .,._. .... _ ,_.--_~
20.
9j~h~__Sj U rce S Om f~ Fund~i ~t~g-
DATE
AGENCY REQUESTED
~O~:,DS
REQUESTED
..
..
·
,
·
·
STATUS OF REQUEST
of,,,, the.. Probl em
At the present time the Department totally lacks any system whereby
twenty-four hour. on-going recording, of telephone, radio or selected physical.
locations might be monitored, recorded and semi-permanently retained.
There are several areas in which this absence of a desired caoability
limits the opera'l:ing efficiency of the dep~r~r, ment. '~
A review of recent court decisions reveals, that tapes which are used
for evidential and :investigative purposes are admissible in cr~_~~~ or
civil proceedLugs under, strictly controlled circumstances. In addition,
voice print analysis of suspect conversations are also fully admissible.
Prxampies of this type of evidential or investigative materials are voice
print comparisons of suspects in "bomb threat" cases, conversat±ons res'u2.t~g
in "confessions" between suspects and investigators and time sequence tapes
pro',~ing or refutSng any given sequence of events. There are a mTriad of other
situations where this generally applies as well. Because the Deoartment
currenbly, lacks the capab52.ity to record this infomation, these ~x'~remely useful
aids to investigation and prosecution are lost.
Twenty-four hour tape logging also pro-rides a permanent record of all
~.LcomSng and oug-going radio and telephone transmissions. In conjunction
wit'h the actual recording a tape' system of' this type provides a time sequence
ovarlay on this recorded :information. This can bo extremely valuable in
evslugting such areas as citizen complaints or. emergency response situations
where possible civil and/or City liability may 'be involved. The taoes ma.v also
be used to resolve issues perta~~g to l~.abi~ity arising oug of other' dive~se
situations. Again, the current lack of this capability r~ders this usage
.impossible. . .. .
- .
.
.~o%he~ area in whic~, a ~wen%y-£our hour ~e¢ording sTs%em wou_ld be in-
valuable is that of trainiug. This ability to replay, analyze and discuss
field Operations as they occurred would be very helpful iu determJnLng the '
effectiYeness of present operating procedures. In add±tion this same
ab~ity could be used to critique field operations and performance as well as
comm~.mications and investigative perfo~wnance. This would aid tremendously in
tra~aing these varied individuals. The uses of a taping system such as discussed
5n the field traSnSng are almost limitless° This tTpe of train~g~ that is,
.role playing by means of a replay of past performance is possibly the most
effective available and it is felt that in this .'area alone Department efficiency
and professionalization could be greatly :improved by' the use of such a system.
.
This type of twenty-four hour logging also might lend itself to expansion
.~nto ether unrelated areas. For example the taping of such activities as
sta£...f meet'ing$~ m±ght be £eas±ble and des±table.
· A dist±nct advantage o£ a t~en~y-£our hou~ recordSng sTsg~'n o£ this
t/~qpe is tha'~ unl:i, ke an ins[ant recall system -it, wi~ mon:i.tor and. record all
phone 21.~n..es~ radio channels and .all other areas selected $imultaneouslT.
~1~e instant recall systems are desi&~ed to record 0nly one chaunel
or one phone line at,, any given time. 2~ey are excellenb for instantaneous
replay, but are limited to this one function while the twenty-four hour tape
system is not.
The twenty-fo~ hour sys6em can be used for instant reca/2[ purposes,
however, to do so means interrupting the taping function whSle the search and
replay are accomplished, It is therefore most practical to work the twenty-
four hour taping system 5n conjunction with an 5nstant recall taping system.
-In this way the optimum, advantages of both systems are utLlized.
,
Another advantage of a twenty-four hour system is that it will monitor
trod record all phone lines within the facility. This is done by hook.~ug
those lines selected. This selection can include certain lines and leave
; others ~.mmonitored, however, those moni%ored have an. audible tone broadcast over
.. } them every fifteen (15) seconds by the system,
? 33 A~roaches Considered
· ~ ~e o~y ~te~aSive to the preset lack of monSgor~g ~d recor~g
~ capab~ity, other th~n the p~chase of the des~ed eq~~ent, wo~d be to
.; cont~ue Operat~g ~der preset condSgions w~ch as outl~ed ~ the
of ~oblem section is cle~ly ~adequate,
Proj ec_t._.O..b. J e.ctiv?_s__ _ _ ~ -
.,
A. The major Objectives of tkis p~'~oject ,are:
..
To 'improve Depa~%ment LuLs'ervice traLuLug.
2, To provide investigative and prosecutorial storage
capability, .
· :
. .
~. To L~rove citizen complaint procedu-res-
35. Methodolo~M
~_~_~_ -~ ~ ~-~.-_ .; ~ _ -
A. The proposed approach to the problem as delineated is to purchase the
described equipment, (tape logger system)~ install same and conduct the limited
· . training necessary to 0Pera~e this equipment. ·
· ~. ·
· B. The major task bo be accomplished~ here is merely the .installation of
. the described equipment, The training for personnel who are to operate this
'~ equipment, as previously noted, is. very limSged and wLll require no additional
exp endit ur es. '
~- C. The persormel who~ are to operate this equipment are already present and
' o~ additional e~sonnel are needed 'or encompassed by this proposal.
" 'r,h .... fore no P -
;
I · Pr. o___c__ur., e~m__e_.n_.t: ?mn.._c.t !_o_ n_
1') Issue purchase order
2) Receive mud inspect
3) Install equipment
&) Operational
21
II. Evalua%ion Func%ion
1) Establish evaluation criteria data
2) Collect and ~ualyze data pertaining to
3?.
Response time through advanced training
Apprehension rat es ·
Message recall rates
Prosecution rates on selected crimes
Mana_~cem ent~ Records_
· The management 'records will be maLutained by a.responsible party
,delegated by the Chief of Police. .. '
38. Evaluation
~he in-house evaluation of this project will be accomplished by maintain-.
lng records regarding the factors delineated above. This compiled information
will bo evaluated and reported on mn on-going basis.
.Data ~clll be 'recorded relative to the ratio of recall equipment use
a_53ned ~pecifically at' determining the value of the equSpment ~ the three major'
It will not be necessary to compare this data to pre-grant data since we
had no recording. Capability prior to the acquisition of the new recording equip-
ment. All post,-gr~ut data will be compared to a starting benchmark of zero
sLnce ~ applications of this equipment will be above and beyond what we had.
b~fore.
· .
.
.,
STATF OF CALIFOF~NIA
FORM
·
,
o
OFFICE OF THE GOVf..RNOI,t
OFFIrC~ 01r INTERGOCf..RN~Er/1a.L
14ANAGE~4FNT
t400 IOTw STI~E~T
(gl$) 1145-0~1 3
02 ,PROJECT TITLE 112-'/_11 _ r - ~ m m JAGmENCY~cT~ONOrAT[ 1~~'
.... ' _ __TO ?STABLI. SH_MOh!TOR.~G .~ID R~.uORD~G 'CAP}.BILi~ ... 1-o- .**. .:~
~ ~j-i2~¢I~ ...... PROJE-CT D[~C~tPT?C~ OF *ATu~E' PURPOSE B-~EFICiARI 5 -- . -, - '- ~ '- ~. - ...........
__-. t ........ ~zs--Dro2eC'b,~.__t, hrouEh the._r'~ch, ase ~d ~st.~latzon .Of ~. twenty= PROjeCT DrSC~IP-ION yogi
06 ~( 12-711 · ' · ENCOURAGED TO ATTACH Ag;lT'
fo'ali~ hol!r rage ln~~ svs~m. :.~~ _assis2 _the Degs~mant 5n Sm- AU ,NFGRMATION O~ THE PRO~[-
07 (12-71) FOR THE BENEFIT' 0F THE RE'~ '~
pro~'~n~ the 5m-set.ce tra~Sng pro,ram,' ~oro~ ~itq*~n Em ~r YOU oo. T~ S, ATS
· . iNGHOUS[ WILL NE~D 25
......... ~9mP!a~t.~ proced~es ~d w~!, ~ ...............
'¢~%h an investigative ~d Drosem~ori~ storage cagab~ty.; ~EARINGHOUSE FOR TH(IR S~5~...
..... (IZ,71 j .............................................. = ........... MISSION REQUIREMENTS.
10
- - -'- ........ "- ~ ' - -: - : ..... . -' '=~-:: :~_:~- ~
--' !g'271 ..... } ' ' .
]3 SOUPCE~o[~eOF OTHER FEDZEAL FUNOS ~12-34]j FED.j CATALOG NO. } Sm~URCEf OF STATE~O~OM'ATCH (35-57), isouRc~[O~e0F OTHER NON-FE~. FUNDS
I~~- %moro~g_, s.nd str~~hening law ~rorcem~t. ' JL ~2
:~G AGSN Y NAM~ tt2-451
15 U.S. DE~. OF JUSTICE
CONGRESSIOUAL DISTR)~T J SINAI( DI5TP'J~T
~12 ~EW (CHECK A5 MANY AS APPROPRIATE) [MV}RONMENTAL DOCUMENT, LIST THE U.S.
$URVEY QUADRANGLE HAP IN WHICH THE PROJECT
~ 13 ~CDIFICATtON IN CURRENT ~ 58 U.S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET'. LO~TED.
~ GRAHT - CUR. $CH. NO ........ __ ____ CIRCULAR A-95
.
....
_
,. ..... ~= .......
~m2 ~ CONTINUATION GRANT ~ S9 ~ODEL CITIES PLANNED VARIATION 2; -- -- : ............................ . .............
(23-301 60 ~A~IONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT 4; ==,_., .
~ ..- _,,. ,~ .......
~7 ~ 31 R[SUSMITTAL IF A P~ ~
APPLICATION- 6l CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ........ . ....................
P. RE. 5CH. NO.
,~ _
(~45) ~4ON - DAY - YEAR ACTION POLICY AND PLAN?
,
(~541 O~ ANO SAFETY CODE) ' WILL THE PROJECT REQUIRE REI. OCAmTION?
EST. PaOJCC'F DURATION U DOS. ~ 65 LEAS~ OF STATE'LANDS
~'-' ~s o,.~a: ............ _ _- ,_. YEs ~ ~* ,o ~ ~o
_ .. . =_ - .... _' .... - _, ....
~.. ~_ _~ ._- ~ : ~.~~
tK YES - IF NO-
~15 DRAFT LIN ~ 16 FINAL EIR · ~26 PROJECT EXEMPT UNDER STATE CATEGOrICAL.EXEMPTION.
~ 17 NCGATIV[ O[CLARATIO~.I AI'TACH[D
CLASS
APPROXIMATELY ..... · ........
~c, D~ T ~}-:~ - (I 9-24)
.
..... . ...........
....
..
..
..... ~. '~