HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 73-514
5
6
8
10
11
12
13
15
.16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
147
RESOLUTION 73-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN
CERTAIN TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND DESIGNATED
YORBA-MEDFORD ANNEXATION NO. 80.
The City Counci'l of the City of Tustin, California,
does hereby resolve as follows:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code
of the S'tate of California, application was made to the Local
Agency Formation Commission to annex to the City of Tustin all
that 'territory situate in 'the County of Orange, State of California
designated Yorba-Medford Annexation No. 80, described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as
though set forth herein in full.
2. The Local Agency Formation Commission, in session.
duly assembled, on June 27, 1973, did approve said proposed
annexation and authorize the City Council to annex said territory
without notice, hearing or election.
3. Ail of the owners of land within the territory
proposed to be annexed have given their written consent to the
annexation of said territory to the City of Tustin.
4. The City Council desires to annex said territory
to the City of Tustin for the following reasons: The territory
is contiguous to the City of Tustin and its proposed annexation
will contribute to and facilitate the orderly growth and develop-
ment of both the City and the territory proposed to be annexed,
will facilitate and contribute to the proper and. orderly layout,
design and construction of streets, gutters, sidewalks and sanitary
and. stor?.,,-water sewers and drainage facilities, both J.n the City
and in the territory proposed to be annexed, and will provide
and facilitate proper over-a].l planning and zoning of lands in
said City and in said territory, in a manner most conducive
to the we.lfare of the City and said uninhabited territory.
5. The written consent of %he owners of more than
two-thirds of the value of the territory of the subject annexation
has been hereto filed with the City Clerk, agreeing and con-
senting to pay indebtedness and liability of 'the city contr'acted
prior, to or existing at, the same time of the annexation.
6. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby
approve the annexation of the territory hereinabove described to
the City of Tustin, and does hereby further, resolve that the
said territory be and it is hereby annexed to the City of Tustin,
effective upon the date of the filing of the. certified copy of
this Resolution with the Secretary of State of the State of
California.
7. The property within the annexed territory shall be
taxed to pay the indebtedness and liability of the City contracted
prior to or existing at the 'time of annexation.
8. Th,e City Clerk of the City of Tustin is hereby
directed witl~out delay to transmit to the Secretary of State"of
the State of California, a certified copy of this Resolution.
148
4
.
10
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
}15
~5
~6
~7
~9
5O
31
· .
PASSED AND ADOPTED 'at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, held on the 2nd.
day of July, 1973.
ATTEST
CITY
TO Tlrig C'j[rr~g OF TU:~iTIi,]t ~-~hlFOI~Ia
........ ., 149 ....
Be~ttnning'at ~he northwest corner of the southerly one-half of lot 15, " .7'."'
Block B, of thc A. B~ Clxapman Tract, as per map recorded in Book 102,
page 15, of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County~ California,
said corner b~ars N. 00o 04' 00" E.,. distant 676.54 feet from the
intersection of ~e c~nterlines of 17th Street and Yorba Street, said
intersection also being the southwesterly corner of said Lot 15 and
also being a point on the existing City of Tustin bounda~ as established
by the Tree Haven Annexation No. 67, per Resolution No. 70-60, passed
and adopted January 4, 1971, said corner also being a point on the
existing centerline of Yorba Street.'
.
.
.
.
Thence, S. 89o20'56" W., along said City of Tustin bo~da~, a
~distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point in ~e existing City of ......
Tus'tin boundary, as established by the above mentioned Tree Haven
~nexation No. 67 and the Yorba Street ~nexation No. 2, per Ordinanc~
No. 139, passed and adopted Septe~er 6, 1960;
'.
Thence, N. 00o04'00" E., along ~e existing City of Tustin bounda~,
..as per last mentioned annexation, a distance of 394.20 feet to the
intersection of the westerly prolongation of ~e sou~erly boundary
of Tract No. 6082, as per map recorded in Book 234, pages 1 and 2 ..
of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of said Orange County;
.
.
Thence~ leaving said City of Tustin bounda~, S. 89°49'01"'E.~
along said westerly prolongation, a distance of 20.00 feet, to '~
angle point...in the westerly boundary of said Tract No. 6082;
Thence, continuing S. 89049 ' 01" E., along the southerly bo~dary 6f
said Tract No. 6082, a distance of 440.00 feet to an angle point
in said southerly bo~dary; "
..
Thence, S. 00o04'00'' W., along the westerly boundary' of said
Tract No. 6082, a distance of 387.50 feet, to an angle point in the
westerly boundary of said Tract No. 6082, said angle point also
being' a point on the existing City of Tustin boundary per first '
mentioned Tree Haven Annexation No. 67, and a point on the northerly
-"tine of .the southerly one-half of lot... 1.5, Block B of said A. B.
~.hapman Tract; ~ .
Thence, S. 89°20'56'' W., along said .City of Tustin boundary and
along said northerly line, a distance of 440.04' to the point..of
beginning. ....... .. . ..': :.,. ,~ . -. . .. ,-
.¢
150
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN · )
RUT}! C. POE, City Cl~erk and ex-officio Clerk of
Council of the City of Tustin, California, does
certify that the whole nu~er of the members of
Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the
foregoing Resolution No. 73-51 was duly and
introduced,
of the City
1973, by the
the City
hereby
the City
above and
regularly
read, passed a-=n~d ad~6p~.'d at a regular meeting
Council held on the 2nd day of July
following vote-
AYES o
COUNCILMEN SALTARELLI, LANGLEY, MILLER, WELSH~ WOODRT.~F
~_~ ...... - . _ .. _ .~ .~ _ . ......
NOES:
ABSENT -
COUNCILMEN NONE
COUNCILMEN NONE
City Cler~.y of Tustln, ~~