Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 826RESOLUTON NO. 826 A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE PROPOSED $46,400,000 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE FOR 1966 · . WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer of the .0range ~County Flood Control District has prepared'an Engineers Report for the $ construction of 80 flood control and water conservation projects ? throughout Orange County, with 'an estimated cost of ~46,400,000., 8 and 0 ' WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Supervisors J.0 acting as Board. "~f Directors of the flood control d. istri~t~ has adopted said report and caused it to be placed on the June ?, 1966 1~ primary election for the issuance of ~46,400,000 in bonds, and .. ' WHEREAS, the previous flood control district bond 14 issue autborlzed, in June 1956 in the amount of ~2,620,00 has · played a vital role in the explosive growth ond expansion of J.6 0r~n~e Coung¥~ and 17 WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the new proposed 18 'bond issuo ~lll have a similar effect in the future omd will'be 10 necessary for the continued growth and development in the county, 2O 2! and WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Tustin will derive both direct and indirect benefits from the proposed 'flood control projects, and ~ WHEREAS, the proposed ~46,400,000 bond issue will not increase the district tax rate, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council · of the City of Tustin endorses s~id bond issue proposal and.' strongly recommends' the support of the issue by the voters of the county. , · 80 ' PA'SSED. AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held on the .. 16th day of May , 1966. .' 10 12 18 19 2O ~8 ~0 81 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ). COUNTY OF ORANGE o )SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) Ruth C. Poe, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City. Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing· Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, read, passed and adopted at a re~ular meeting of the City Council ~eid on thel6th day of _May ...... , 1966, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN .MACK.., ;:_KLINGEL_HOFER, COCO, ...... MI_~LER, RING NOES: COUNCILMEN NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEN NONE _