HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 740
RESOLUTION NO. 740
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT PROCEEDINGS
HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN TO ANNEX TO SAID
CITY CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DES-
CRIBED HEREIN, AND DESIGNATED AS REVISED
SANTA CLARA ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
TUSTIN AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED
ANNEXATION.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN:
1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation
of Uninhablted Terrltory Act of 1939, proceedings have been
initiated, by the Council of the City of Tustln, on its own
motion, to annex to the City of ~astin, all' that unlnhabited
territory situate in the County of Orange, State of California
hereby designated, as "REVISED SANTA CLARA ANNEXATION" and
hereinafter described..
That the City Council hereby finds and determines
that all of said territory is uninhabited within the meaning
of Government Code Section 35303, on the date of the adoption
of this Resolution, and that said territo'ry is contiguous
to the City of Tustln.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REVISED
SANTA CLARA ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY OF TUSTIN
COmmencing at an angle point in the existing City boundary
of Tustin as established by Yorba Street Annexation No. 2 as
per Ordinance NO. 139, passed and adopted by the City Council
on September 6, 1960, said anEle point being the Northeast
corner of Lot l, Tract No. 3465'as shown on a map thereof
recorded in Book 120, pages 14 and 1.5, Miscellaneous Maps,
Records of Orange County, California, said coruer being
40 feet Southerly of, as measured at right angles to, the
surveyed centerline of Santa Clara Avenue; thence, departing
from the existing City boundary S 89o53'55'' E. along a line
parallel to and 40 feet Southerly of, as measured at right
angles to the surveyed centerline of Santa Clara Avenue,
a distance of 407.31 feet; thence N OO01 '00"' W. a distance
of 15,00 feet, to a line parallel to and 2.5 feet Southerly
of the surveyed centerllne of Santa Clara Avenue; thence
S 89°53'55'' E, along said parallel line, a distance of 353
feet, more or less, to a lim. e parallel to and 25 feet Westerly
of, as measured at right angles to the surveyed centerline of
Prospect Avenue; thence S 3o29'15" W. along said parallel li'ne
a distance of ll5 feet, more or less, to the Northerly line of
that certain parcel of land as described in a deed recorded in
Book 6861, page 368, Official Records of Orange County,
California; thence N 89°53'55" W along said North llne, a
distance of 15 feet, more or less, to a line parallel to and
40 feet Westerly of, as measured at right angles to the
surveyed centerline of Prospect Avenue; thence S 3°29'15" W
along said parallel line, a distance of 205.10 feet, to the
Northeast corner of Lot l, Tract No. 2708, as shown on a map
thereof recorded in Book 90, page 25, Miscellaneous
Maps~ Records of Orange County, California; thence
N 89~53'55'' W, along the North line of said Tract
No. 2708, a distance of 724.38 feet, to the North-
west corner thereof, said corner also being an angle
point in East line of said Tract No. 3465, said corner
also being an angle point in the existing city boundary
an a~uexed by said Yorba Street Annexation No. 2; thence
N 0OOl'00'' W, along said East line of said Tract No.
3465, also being along said existing City boundary,
a distance of 304.41 feet, to the point of beginning.
2. That the City Council of the City of Tustin
desires to annex said uninhabited territory to the City
of Tustln for the following reasons:· That the territory
is contiguous to the City of Tustin, and its proposed
annexation will contribute to and facilitate the orderly
growth and development of both the City and the territory
proposed to be annexed; will provide an area for industrial
develooment for the City of Tustin, and will provide an
adequate and broader tax base for the City; will facilitate
and contribute to the proper and. orderly layout, design
and construction of streets, gutters, sldewslks, sanitary
and storm water sewers and drainage facilities, both within
the City and within the territory proposed to be annexed;
and will provide and facilitate proper over-all planning
and zoning of lands, and. subdivision of lands in said City
and said uninhabited territory, in a manner most conducive
to the welfare of said City and said uninhabited territory.
3. That the County Boundary Commission of Orange
County, California, did, in session duly assembled, on
July 27, 1964, approve the proposed annexation boundaries
of the said REVISED SANTA CLARA ANNEXATION to the City of
Tustin, as above described, and as submitted to said
Commission by the Council of the City of Tustin,~
That November 2, 1964, at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
in the Council Chambers, Tustin Area Yout~h~ Center, 600 W.
6th Street, City of Tustin, County of Orange, State of
California, is hereby fixed aS the time and place when
and where any person owning real property within the uninhabited
territory above described and proposed to be annexed to
the City of Tustin, and having any objections to the proposed
anne×ation, may appear before the Council of the City of
Tustln, and. show cause why such uninhabited territory
should not be so annexed to said City of Tustin. Such
protests must be in writing, and may be filed at any
time prior to the final adjournment of the hearing on.
protests, and shall state the name or names of the owner
or owners of property affected, and the street address or
other descriPtion of the property sufficient to identify
it on the last equalized assessment roll.
5. The City Clerk of the City of Tustln is hereby
authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Resolution
to be published at least twice, but not oftener than once
a week, in The Tustln News, a newspaper of general eirculatlon
published in said City of Tustin, the City to which it is
proposed to annex the afore~said territory, and also in the
Orange Daily News, a newspaper of general circulation published
outside the City of Tustln, but in the County of Orange,
California, the County in wh~i. ch is located the territory
proposed to be annexed to the City of TUstin, said publication
to be complete at least twenty (20) days prior to the date
set for hearing.
6. The City Clerk is further authorized and directe8
to cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be
mailed to each person to whom land within the territory
proposed to be annexed is assessed in the last equalized
County assessment roll available on the date the above said
proceedin~s were initiated, at the addresses shown on said
assessment roll or known to the Clerk, and. to any person who
has filed his name and address and the designation of the
lands in which he has an interest, either legal or equitable,
with the Clerk, such notice to be given not less than twenty
(20) days before the first public hearing on the proposed
anne xa t i on.
7. In the event any land within the territory pro-
posed to be annexed is owned, by a county, the City Clerk
is directed to cause written notice of such porposed annex-
ation to be mailed to the Board of Supervisors of the County
such notice to .be given not less than twenty (20) days
before the first public hearing on the proposed annexation.
8. In the event there is, upon the land proposed
to be annexed, a structural improvement, owned, being
acquired or leased by a co~nty fire protection district,
the said Clerk is directed, to cause written, notice of
such proposed annexation to be mailed to the governing
bOdy of such district, such notice to be sent not less
than ten (10) days before the first public hearing upon
such proposed annexation.
9. The City Clerk is directed to cause written
notice to be given to such other persons as may be legally
entitled thereto, in the manner ~require~ by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the City
Council of the ~lty of~t he~on
in, the 8th day of
September, 1964
ATTESTs__ ~_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN ) SS.
RUTH C.: POE, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City COuncil of the City of Tustln, California, does
hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the
City Council of the City of Tustin is four; that the above and
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, read,
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
held on the 8th day of September, 1964, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEN _ Kl.!nEelhofeF,Mac.k, Co.co,~ill. er
NOES:
COUNCILMEN None
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN None
_ ~L .... _, _ i . , 11
CiTY'CLERK ~J_~Y OF TUSTIN, ~NIA