Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 3812 RESOLUTION NO. 3812 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2001-147 TO MERGE TWO EXISTING PARCELS INTO A 4.7 ACRE PARCEL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 50,275 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL MARKET AND PHARMACY BUILDING AND SITE AMENITIES AT 13270 NEWPORT AVENUE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2001-147 was submitted by Albertsons Inc. requesting approval to combine two (2) parcels into one (1) 4.7-acre parcel for development of a 50,275 square foot retail market and pharmacy building and the associated site amenities; B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said map on December 10, 2001, by the Planning Commission; C. That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan, Retail Commercial (C-1)zoning regulations, State Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Code; D. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; E That the parcel map or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat; and F. This parcel map is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15315, Class 15 of Title 14, Chapter 3, of the California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act). II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 2001-147 to create a 4.703 acre parcel for development of a 50,275 square foot retail market and pharmacy building and the site amenities, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A attached hereto. Resolution No. 3812 Tentative Parcel Map 2001-147 December 10, 2001 Page 2 -ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 10th day of December, 2001. LESLIE A. PONTIOUS Chairperson STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that l am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3812 duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 10th day of December, 200t. ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2001-'!47 RESOLUTION NO. 3812 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 (1) 1.2 (5) 1,3 (1) 1.4 (1) 1.5 (1) 1.6 (1) 1.7 Within 24 months from tentative map approval, the subdivider shall record with appropriate agencies a final map prepared in accordance with subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal. Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and applicable conditions contained herein unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 9323f of the Tustin Municipal Code. The subdivider shall conform to all applicable requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and the City's zoning regulations. The subdivider shall be required to execute Subdivision/Monumentation Agreements and provide improvement/monumentation bonds to the City prior to rocordation of. tho final map. Preparation and recordation of a final subdivision map is required prior to issuance of building permits, unless otherwise provided for in Condition No. 1.7 of Resolution No. 3813. Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall submit: Al A current title report; and, A duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8½ inch by 1t inch transparency of each map sheet prior to final map approval and "as built" grading, landscape, and improvement plans prior to Certificate of Acceptance. The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval of this project. For development of the project described in Design Review 01-018 and Conditional Use Permit 01-014, all conditions of approval shall be complied with as shown on Exhibit A attached to Resolution No. 3813 and incorporated herein by reference. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (2) CEQA MITIGATION (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (4) DESIGN REVIEW *** EXCEPTION (5) (6) (7) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES PC/CC POLICY Exhibit A Tentative Parcel Map 2001-147- Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3812 Page 2 ENGINEERING _ (1) 2.1 In addition to the normal full-size plan submittal process, all final development plans including, but not limited to, parcel maps, right-of- way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans are aisc required to be submitted to the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format. The standard file format is AutoCAD Release 13 or 14 having the extension DWG. Likewise, layering and linetype conventions are AutoCAD-based (latest version available upon request from the Engineering Division). in .order to interchangeably utilize the data contained in the infrastructure mapping system, CADD drawings must be in AutoCAD "DWG" format (i.e. produced using AutoCAD or AutoCAD compatible CADD software). The most current version of AutoCAD is Release 14. Drawings created in AutoCAD Release 13 or Release 12 are compatible and acceptable. The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time the plans are approved and updated CADD files reflecting "as buiit"'conditions shall be submitted once all construction has been completed. The subdivision bonds will not be released until the "as built" CADD files have been submitted. (1) 3.1 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of forty- three dollars ($43.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development. Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.