HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 285RESOLUTION NO. 285
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN EXPRESSING OPPOSITION AND DISAPPROVAL
TO PROPOSED CHANGE IN TOWNSHIP BOUNDRIES IN
CONNECTION WITH REORGANIZATION OF INFERIOR
COURTS
WHEREAS, the inferior court system in the State of
California has. been reorganized by law, which reorganization
is to go into effect on o~ about January 1, I952; and'
WHEREAS, in connedti.on wi.th said .... reorganization the
Board of Supervisors of' the County of Or. ange...ha.s...proposed to
consolidate the Townships of Orange, Sauta Aha and Tustin .into
one Judicial district and thereby eliminate the Justice Courts
of the Townships Of Orange, Santa Ana,.. and 'TuStin and replace
said courts by one Municipal Cour. t si. tting.~in the City of Santa
Aha; and
WHERFAS, the City C o~uncil of "the .'City of ~TUstin be-
lieves that said p~oposed ~eorg~d~zation will'.be detrimental to
the City of Tustin 'and to the people', residing .in the Township
of Tustin as it is now bounded, because the matters originat-
ing within said a~ea now encompassed in the ~.Township 'of Tustin
are largely rural in that said area is almost exclusively de-
voted to agricultural and farming pursuits... That 'by consolidat-
ing said area with an area having a...greater, population whose
primary concern is urban, that the interests and problems or-
iginating in the Township of TUsttn will be subordinated to
those originating in the urban area. of .said .proposed new Ju-
dicial district. That the delay in obtaining Judicial deter-
mination will be of great duration and will be unduly and un-
necessarily burdensome.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED':
~That the City Council of the City of Tustin does
put itself on record as Opposing .the. pro.po, seal consolidation of
the Townships of Orange, Santa Aha and. Tustin..into one Judicial
district and thereby abolishing said.T.ownshtps and the JUstice
Courts serving said ToWnships, because it will~.be detrimental to
..
the best interests of the people of Tusttn and the people re-
·
siding in the Township Of Tustin; and"
BE IT' 'FURTHER RESOLVED that Mayor Vincent L. Humeston
be authori zed and directed to make said .opposition known to the
Board of Sure,visors of the County of 0~auge.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regula~ meeting of the City
Council of the City of Tustin held on the 7th day of May, 1951.
ATTEST:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
F.:~SOLUT IO: :TO . 285
A i~SOLU+IUiv OF ~I-iv CIT`T COUi;CIL G T;_:~ CITY
0"r' TUSTIv ~XPn:~~SSI~G OPPOSI`i~IOI~ Ai•~D DISAPPROVAL
TO PROPO SAD CHAiiG.~. IN IO t;•. SL IP BOUI~IDARI~,S I~? ..1 m
COi3P~~CTICN '.:I~H Rr,ORGA:IZATIG ::F IF/F.IG~ CCS..S
L'I~P,F.AS, the inferior court syste:;l in the State of
California has been reor. ga.nizec:_ by la.~:~, ~~rhich ^eo_~~-aniza_tion is
to go intc effect on or about January 1, 1952; and
:.'HFR jAS, in connection t~,ith said reor~^anizatior. the
Hoard of Supervisors of the Ccunty of ONan~e has ,-~ro~osed to
consoliac.te the -otnships of Oran~~e, S^.nta. An^. and `fuctin into
one ,judicial c-istrict anc~_ thereby eliminate the Justice Ccu^ts
of the `ioti•rnships of Oran:~e, Santa Ana an~_ Tustin anc. replace said
courts by one y~1unicipal court sitting in the City of Sant~~. An^; snd
',iH~Rr~AS, the City Council of the City of lustin believes
that said pronosec. reorganization ?°ill be detrimental to the City
of Tustin and to the people residing in the ~o~,mship of lustin a.s
it is noc•r bounded, because the r_latters origir_atin~ within ssic.
area now encompassed in t'r_e ~1oe~nship or lustin 2.re l~ r ~el~' "oral
in that sale. area is al~:ost exclusively de~rctec_ to a~ricultui~Fl
end far~?i.n~ pursuits. Thrt by consolidating s~i~. are< <~ith an
area haying a. greater _r,o~ul~ation t•rhose primary concern is urban,
thst the interests and ~,roblems ori~~inatina in the 'lot-nshir, of
Tustin trill be subordin~ ted. to trose cri`~inatin~ in ':;he u_~ran area
of saic_ --,ronosed r.et~r ,judicial district. ih^t the dela.~~ in ob-
taining iuc,ieia.l c,-etermina_tion trill be of great c~.urs.tior. and frill
be unduly 2nd unnecessarily burdensome.
1C~, l;-,r~R:~rCR:., EL IT '~.FSGLVHD;
~h^t the City Counci7_ of the City of Tustin does ?:ut
itself on record a.s oprosin~~ the proposed consolidation of the
`i'o~~rnshins of Orange, Santa Ara ~:?c?. lustin into one judicial
district anct thereby abolishing sale y'oti°nships anc~ the Just' ce
Courts serving sai~~. =ct•mships, because it ~-rill ;~e detrimental to
1.
1 I
i
I
I~
1 the best interests of ';he reople of Tustin and the neo~,le residjn~:
2 in the `lo~•mship of =ustin; ~ne1
3 BL IT 'L~'.T:~R z~SCL~ ~D that- I~.ayor Vincent L. Nu~eston 'oe
4 authorized and directed to m~1~e said onroeition 'cnoT~n to the
5; hoard of Supervisors of the County of Orange.
6 ~ PASSED Ai°D A~OP~~D at ~_ re~:ular :l:eetin~ of the City
7 ~ Council of the City of ~'ustin held on the 7th day of Play, 1951.
i
8 ,~ ,
~~ F- __
'' ay r
10
11 ' A' i~ST:
i
12 ~/~ ~ ,
~j'
13 i
City Cle
14
15
16 ~ I
17
18
1J ~
20 ~
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
~ ~
~.