HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 41RESOLUTION NO. 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULT
OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN
ON THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 1933, ON THE PROPOSI-
TION WHETHER SAID CITY OF TUSTIN SHALL DISIN-
CORPORATE, AND DECLARING THE PETITION FOR
DISINCORPORATION, UPON WHICH SAID SPECIAL ELEC-
TION WAS CALLED, DENIED.
:~HEREAS, a special election was held and conducted in the
City of Tustin on Wednesday, the 26th day of July, 1933, on the
proposition, whether said City of Tustin, a municipal corporation
shall disincorporate,
AND '~?HEREAS, it appears that said special election was
called as a result of a petition for disincorporation filed with
the City Council on June Bth, 19JJ, duly certified by the City
Clerk of the City of Tustln and had been properly signed by more
than one-half of the qualified electors thereof, as shown by the
vote cast at the last municipal election held therein,
AND WHEHEA$, it appeard that notice of said election was
duly and legally given, that voting precincts were properly
established, that election officers were properly and duly
appointed and elctlon supplies furnished, and that in all re-
spects said election was held and conducted, and the votes cast
thereat received and canvassed, and the returns thereof made
and declared, in time, form, and manner as required by the gen-
'eral laws of the State of California governing elections in
Cities of the Sixth Class, and as well as the general laws of
the State of California governing elections upon the porposition
of' disincorP~oratlon of municipal corporations,
AND ~HEREAS, the City'Council of the said City of Tustin
met at the Council Chamber of the City Oouncil on Monday, the
31st day of July. 1933, at the hour of .7.30 o'clock P. M., to
canvass the returns of said election, as a ~eult of which the
.,
City Council finds that the whole number of votes cast in the
City, the proposition voted upon, the number' of votes given at
each precinct for and against such proposition, and the number
of votes given in the City for and against such proposition
voted upon, to be ~s hereinafter stated, NOW, THEREFORE:
B~ IT !~ESOLVED as follows:
That said Special Municipal Election was held and con-
ducted in the City of Tustin on Wednesday, the 26th day of July,
1933, in time, form,, and manner as required by law;
That there was one voting precinct established for the
purpose of holding said special election, Consl?ting of a con-
solidation of the regular election precincts established in said
City for holding General, State, and County elections, as fol-
lows,' "Consolidated. . Voting. Precinct A", comprising State and
County Precincts numbers, Tustin City Number l, and Tustin City
Number 2.
That the whole number of votes cast in said special
elect ion was
-, ,~. - _ - _ _ ~_ _
That there was one proposition voted upon at said special
municipal electi'on, to-wit; the proposition, whether said City
of Tusttn, a munictlaal corporatton, shall disin¢orporate, at
which special election the qualified voters of the .Oity of
Tustin were invited to vote upon said proposition as indicate~
upon the ballot used thereat, either "~or Disincorporation", or
.
"Against Disincorporat ion" ', those in favor of disincorporation'
to place upon their ballot a cross after the words "For Dis-
incorporation", and those not favoring disincorporation tG nlaceo~
a cross upon their ballot after the word,s "Against Disincorporation"
..
That the number of votes voted at said "Ooncolidated
-1-
Voting Precinct E", for and against said proposition were as
follows:
~or DiSincorporat ion
Against Dis incorpo rat i on
Void Ballots
Total Votes in said
"Consolidated Voting Precinct A"
That the rot'al number of votes given and' voted in said
Otty for and against said proposition were as follows, to-wit;
~or Disincorporat ion
A~ainst Di'sincorporation ....
·
Void Ballots
That by virtue of, and by reason of the fact that the
votes in f~vor of,, or for dieincorporation, were le~ than.the ~
two-thirds majority required ~y law, and the fact that .the votes
against said proposition, or to-wit; against' disincorporation
were in number greater than the number Of the vote8 cast tn favor
of said proposition, the Oity Council finds, and declares that,
as a result of said Special Election sa~id prop6sition to dis-
incorporate the Oity of ~ustin has 'been defeated by the vote of
the qualified electors o£ the City of Tustin, as aforesaid; and
as a result of the outcome of'said ~pecial Election' upon said
proposition to distncorporate the City of Tustin, the City
Oouncil h~reby declsros the petition for d. tsincorporation pro-
sente, d to, and filed with the ~ity Oouncil on 'the.~th day of
June, 1933, denied,
,
This Resolution to take effect immediately.
-3-
I Hereby certify the foregoing Resolution duly and
regularly passed by the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, at a meeting thereof hald on July 31st., 1933, at
the City Hall in said City of Tustin, as required by the general
laws of ~he State of California, said meeting being hald for the
purpose of canvassing th$ vote .of the Special Election held
in said City on the 26th day of July, 1933, sa~d July 31st,
being the Moz~day next succeeding the date of said Special
Election,
and said Resolution being passed by the following
vote, to-wit:
AYE~ ·
Oouncilmen,
,
~oe8 '
Absent:
(SEAL)
Councilmen ..... . ........ ~_ . .None .... _
Councilmen. =.:~ .............. ,.._..None
...
ATTEST:.: ....... . ~. ~
. ,
A~PROVED this 31st .day of july,
193S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
it
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
MORRIS CAIN
ATTORN6Y•AT-LA W
lANTA ANA, CALIF
RESOLUTION A0. '~~1 _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUPCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUS?I1~ CALIFORNIA, D~7CLARIAG TFiE REBtTLT
OP' BPECIA~. ELRCTION HELD IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN
ON THE 26th DAY OF JULY 1933 ~~ THE PROpoel-
TIOA WH]CTHER RAID CITY 5F TUB~'IN SHALL DI9IA-
OOAPORATE, AND DECLARING THE PETI?ION FOR
DISINCORPORATION,UPON MICA SAID 8P~lIAL '~LEC-
T70N WA8 CALL'~£D, DEAI~;D.
WfIEREAB, a speoial eleotion was held and oonduoted in the
City of Tustin on Wednesday, the 26th day of July, 1933. oa the
proposition, whether said City of Tustin, a munioipal oorporation
shall disinoorporate,
AND ~AEREAS, it appears that said speoial eleotion was
oalled as a result of a petition for disinoorporation filed with
the City Counoil on June 5th, 1933, duly certified by the City
Clerk of the City of Tustin had been properly signed by more
than one-half of the qualified eleotors thereof, as shown by t'1ss
vote asst at the last munic~inal eleotion held therein,
AND~FiEA.EAB, it appears that notioe of said eleotion was
duly a.nd legally given, that voting preoinots were properly
I
established, that eleotion officers were properly 2nd duly
appointed and eleotion supplies furnished, and that in a.ll re-
speots said eleotion was held and oonduoted, Pnd the votes oast
thereat reoeived and canvassed, and the returns thereof made
f+..nd deolared, in time, form, and manner as required by the gen-
eral laws of the State of California governing eleotione in
Cities of the 81zth Class, and as well as the general laws of
the State of California governing eleotione upon the proposition
of disinoorporation of munioipal oornorations,
A24D u~HEREAS, the City Counoil of said Ci tq of Tustin
met at the Counoil Chamber of the City Counoil on Monday, the
31st day of July, 1933, at the hour of 7630 O'olook P. M., to
oanvaas the returns of said eleotion, as a result of whioh the
i
1
City Oounoil !lads that the whole number o! votes oast in the
2 City, the proposition voted upoa, the number of votes given at
3 eaoh Areoinot !or and against eaoh proposition, and the number
4
o! votes given in the City for a.nd against eaoh proposition
S
voted upon, to be as hereinafter stated, NO;., TH~:R~FORE;
e B~ IT RE8OLV~ as followas
7
That said Qpeaial ;dunioipal Election was held and ooa-
8 the 26th dap o! Julq,
ducted in the City of Tustin on ~-edneeday,
9
1933, in time, loan, and manner as required by law;
l0
That there was one voting preoinot established for the
it
purpose o! holding said speoial eleotion, consisting o! a con-
12
solidation of the regular eleotion precincts established in said
13
City for holding ~3eneral, State, and County elections, as Yol-
14
!owes "Consolidated Voting preoinot A", comprising State and
15
County preoinot$ numbers, Tustin City Number 1, and Tustin City
18
Aumber 2.
17
That the whole number of votes oast in said speoial
18
eleotion was •
19
That there was one proposition voted upon at said speoial
20
municipal eleotion, to-wit; the proposition, whether said City
21
o! Tustin, a municipal corporation, shall dieincorporate, at
22
which speoial eleotion the qualilled voters of the City o!
23
Tustin were invited to vote upon said proposition ae indicated
24
upon the ballot used thereat, either "For Disinoorporation", or
25
"Aga.inst Disincorporation"; those in !aunt o! disincornoration
28
to place upon their ballot a cross after the words "For Dis-
27
incorporation", and thoao not lavoring disincorporation to plane
28
a cross upon their ballot after the ~-ords "Against Disincorpora-
29
tion".
30
31 That thQ (umber of votes voted at said "Consolidated
32
MORRIS CAIN
AT70RNtY•AT-LAW
•/1NTA ANA. CALIF
. ~'2~
1
2
3
4
S
e
7
8
9
l0
11
12
13
14
i
1S ~
16 !
17 ~
18
19
20
21
22
2S
24
ZS
28
27
28
29 '
30
31
32
MORRIS CAIN
ATTORN[Y-AT•LAW
fANTA ANA, CALIF.
Qoting Preoinot A", for and againf3t said proposition were as
follows:
For Disinoorporation
Against Disinoorporation
Void Ballots .
Total votes oast in said
"Consolidated Voting Preoinot A"
That the total number of votes given and voted in said
City for and against said proposition Were as follow, to-wits
For Disinoorporation
Against Disinoorporation
Void Ballots
That by virtue of, and by reason of the feat that the
votes in favor of, or for diaineorporation, were less than the
two-thirds majority required by law, and the faot that the votes
against said proposition, or to-wit; against disinoorporation
~~were in number greater than the number of votes oast in favor
of said proposition, tr.e City Council finds and deolaree that,
as a result oY said Speeia.l Election said proposition to dis-
,incorporate the City of Tustin has been defeated by the vote of
~' the qualified electors of the City of Tustin, e.s aforesa.id; Ind
as a result of the outcome of said Special Election upon said
proposition to disinoorporate the City of Tustin, the City
Council hereby declares the petition for dis3lncnrnoration pre-
sented to, and filed with the City Council on the 5th day of
June, 1933, denied.
This Re$olution to take effect immediately.
-~
1
2
3
4
S
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 '~
21'
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
32
MORRIS CAIN
ATTORN[Y•AT-LA W
•ANTA ANA. CALIF
I hereby oertify the foregoing Resolution duly and
regularly passed by the ~'ity Council of the City of Tustin,
Cali.*ornia, at a meeting thereof held on July 31st, 1933, at
the City Rall in ,said City of Tustin, as required by the general
laws of the State of California, said meeting being held for the
purpose of oanvassing the vote of the 3peoial Eleotion held
in Said City on the 26th day of July, 1933, said July 31st, 1933,
being the Monday next suooaading the date of said 3peoial
Tleation, and said Resolution being passed bq the following
vote, to-wits
AYES: Counoilmen~
- -~1-~~-
NO^a8a Counoilmen, ______„,_ Aone
AB8ENTt Counoilmen, _-
ATTESTS ,) ~, ~ /
~cEAL~ q, er o e y o s n.
ti~~~'~
~~~~
APPROVED this 31st day of July, 1933•
Mayor of t e Ci y o Test n.
~~