HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 09-35RESOLUTION NO. 09-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA CONFIRMING THE LEVY OF
ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE AND PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING
EXPENSES IN THE TUSTIN RANCH AREA WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tustin, California (hereinafter referred
to as the "City Council"), has adopted Resolution No. 09-05 initiating proceedings for the
annual levy of assessments for the payment of the expenses of providing and servicing
public landscaping and public street lighting in the Tustin Ranch area within the
boundaries of the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk his
report (the "Report") containing the matters specified in Section 22565 of Part 2 of
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California as amended, the "Code",
and Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the report as filed on the 19th day of
May 2009, with the passage and adoption of Resolution No. 09-26; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heretofore by Resolution of Intention No. 09-27
passed and adopted on the 19th day of May 2009, declared its intention to provide for an
annual levy of assessment for improvement, maintenance and servicing of public
landscaping and street lighting facilities within the boundaries of the territory included
within the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District; as more fully described in said
Resolution of Intention; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, in and by said Resolution of Intention No. 09-27
fixed Tuesday, June 16, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. before the City Council at the City Council
Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California, as the time and place for a hearing
on levying the proposed assessments, and provided for the notice of said hearing; and
WHEREAS, THE City Clerk has filed with the City Council an affidavit setting
forth the time and manner of compliance with the requirements for posting and
publishing set forth in Sections 22552, 22553 and 22554, of the Code and in
accordance with Proposition 218, and the City Council hereby finds the Resolution has
been posted in the time, form and manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was duly opened and held by the City Council at the
time and place for the hearing; and
Resolution No. 09-35
Page 1 of 32
WHEREAS, all verbal protests or objections made by property owners at the
hearing conducted on June 16, 2009, were formally received and reflected in the City
Council minutes of said meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received all written property owner protests
submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, said City Council proceeded to hear and pass upon any protests,
made at the hearing, and on motions duly made and seconded, granted in whole or in
part or, overruled each and all of said protests and objections, as hereinafter set forth;
and
WHEREAS, said City Council hereby finds and determines that protests and
objections were not made or signed by the owners of more than one-half of the area of
the assessable land in said assessment district; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require the maintenance,
servicing and operation of those certain public landscaping and lighting facilities within
the assessment district; and
WHEREAS, all the assessed territory within said assessment district would be
specially benefited by the maintenance of improvements described in the Resolution of
Intention.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin
as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so
finds and determines. All said protests and objections are hereby overruled by
the affirmative vote of the members of the City Council voting in favor of the
adoption of this resolution.
Section 2. The improvements consisting of the maintenance, servicing, and
operation of public landscaping and street lighting in the assessment district, as
set forth in the Report, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, are
ordered to be undertaken.
Section 3. The Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 as set forth in
the Report, copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby
confirmed.
Section 4. Passage of this Resolution shall constitute a levy of an assessment
for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment confirmed herein.
Section 5. Pursuant to law, including Article 1 of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of
Division 5 of the Code, the City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution
Resolution No. 09-35
Page 2 of 32
and the diagram and the assessment confirmed by the resolution or a certified
'' copy therefore, with the County Auditor of the County of Orange.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Tustin held on the 16th day of June 2009.
P ELA ST
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 09-35 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 16th day of
June, 2009, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Davert, Amante, Gavello, Nielsen, Palmer (5)
COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None (0)
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None (0)
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None (0)
P STO R
CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 09-35
Page 3 of 32
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2009 -10
CITY OF TUSTIN
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2009
Resolution No. 09-35
Page 4 of 32
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009-10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 1
ENGINEER'S REPORT
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
The undersigned respectfully submit the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. The
undersigned certifies that he or she is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.
DATED: May 8, 2009
'~ E. ~'~~ Harris & Associates
NO. 41965 A
D(P. 3/31/10 ~
it cNw sF~x E. Cox, P.E.
c"~'~fo R.C.E. No. 41965
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the day of
.2009.
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
By
City Clerk,
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto
attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, on the
day of , 2009.
,City Clerk,
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
By
1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was filed with the County Auditor of the
County of Orange, on the day of " , 2009.
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
By
r.UustinVy09-10\reportsU1md0910 rpt-final 8may09.doc
City Clerk,
Resolutp~~~~# ssodates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineers Report Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Submittal and Acknowledgments .................................................................................. l
Introduction ...................................................................................................................3
Report ............................................................................................................................4
Part A -Plans and Specifications ............................................................................6
Part B -Estimate of Cost .........................................................................................9
Part C -Assessment Roll .......................................................................................10
Part D -Method of Apportionment of Assessment ...............................................11
Part E -Property Owner List .................................................................................20
Part F -Assessment Diagram ................................................................................20
Appendix
Budget Detail /Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations
Budget & Assessment Comparison
Government Parcels
Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map
Assessment DiagramBoundary Map
Land Use Map
Preliminary Assessment Roll (under separate cover)
Resolution N 09-3~
g r\(ysUn11~8-~d\reporis\ md0970 rpt-final Bmay09.doc
Pa e b oT 11 ~ I Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 3
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY
The purpose of this report is to set forth fmdings and the engineering analysis to levy the assessments
in the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District for the 2009-10 fiscal year.
The District was formed on July 15, 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and
landscaping in the area bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly
Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Assessments for the benefiting
property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985-86, and each fiscal year thereafter. As
property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to annex to the District.
The current boundary is shown on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, which is included in the
Appendix.
As a result of the new procedures required by Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), which was approved on
the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, the City
re-analyzed the District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each
property in the District, for the 1997-98 fiscal year. Notices and ballots to approve the
Assessment, including a Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment, were mailed to all property
owners in the District, and a majority of the returned Assessment ballots approved the Assessment,
including potential adjustments for increases in the CPI in future years.
IMPROVEMENTS
The District improvements consist solely of parkway landscaping, trail landscaping, slope
landscaping, arterial and collector street lighting, and local residential street lighting in public rights-
of-way and dedicated easements. The District does not install or maintain parks or median islands in
roadways.
SCOPE OF REPORT
This report covers the levy of annual assessments for the 2009-10 fiscal year. The base assessment
rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be increased by the CPI for
all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any calendar year. The intent
of applying the annual CPI adjustment to the base assessment rate is to maintain the value of the
maintenance work, in relation to the increased cost of the maintenance. Therefore, the rates applied
in FY 1997-98 are equal to the maximum rates today, when you consider the increased cost of living.
In 1997, property owners within the District were noticed for and they approved, by assessment
ballot proceeding, potential adjustments in the rates based on the annual CPI. The CPI for Calendar
Year 2008 (December 2007 to December 2008) is 0.1 %. Since the notice to property owners in 1997
included a potential CPI adjustment each subsequent year, and the property owners approved the
potential range of rates, it is not necessary to hold an assessment ballot proceeding any year in which
such an adjustment is made. For the calculation of the maximum assessment for each Fiscal Year,
please refer to the Appendix.
r:\tustin\tyos-10\reportsUlmdo910 rpt-final 8mayo9.doc ReS~t'On No. 09-35
~a I~~~$afs~a?ciates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineers Report Page a
CITY OF TUSTIN
FISCAL YEAR 2009-10
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679
OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Pursuant to Part Z of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
1972 Act), Article XIIID of the California Constitution and in accordance with the Resolution of
Initiation adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin, State of California, in connection with
the proceedings for:
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Joan E. Cox, P.E., the authorized
representative of Hams & Associates, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith
the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows:
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, are on file in the
Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference.
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
An estimate of the costs of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in
connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office
of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land
within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by
reference.
Resolution~{n~N 09-3
Page\~SoT 31~~\reports\ifrr~d0810 rpt-Bnal8may09.doc ~
~ I Hams & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009-10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 5
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of
the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land
within the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such
lots and parcels.
PART E
PROPERTY OWNER LIST
A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as
shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange, is keyed to the records of
the Assessor of the County of Orange which are incorporated herein by reference.
PART F
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the
Assessment District, the boundaries of any benefit areas within the Assessment District and the lines
and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of
the City Engineer and is incorporated herein by reference.
The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District aze those lines and
dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal yeaz to which
this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records aze incorporated by reference herein and made
part of this Report.
r:\tustin1ty09-1o\reports\IImd0910 rpt-final 8may09.doc Res I ti n No. 09-35
~R~g~s~ofs3e`iciates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009-10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 6
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Tustin, and those which may be
subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows:
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2009-10
The existing facilities to be maintained and serviced include street lighting and arterial landscaping
as described herein.
• LIGHTING
The street lighting system in the District consists of 760 lights. A summary by type and size
follows:
No. Size of Lumens
375 16,000
11 9,500
374 5,800
Type of Light
High Pressure Sodium Vapor
High Pressure Sodium Vapor
High Pressure Sodium Vapor
The area is built-out; therefore no additional street lights are anticipated.
• LANDSCAPING
The arterial landscaping includes parkway, slope and trail landscaping in the Tustin Ranch area,
specifically:
• the southerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road
• the northerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting
that portion adjacent to the SCE substation
• the easterly side of Browning Avenue between the northerly corner of Tract No. 13094
(southerly of Bent Twig Lane) and El Camino Real, including area from APN 500-201-02 for
a future overcrossing, but excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation
• the westerly side of Tustin Ranch Road between the Santa Ana I-5 Freeway and Jamboree
Road
• the easterly side of Tustin Ranch Road between Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting
that portion adjacent to Heritage Park between Heritage Way and Kinsman Circle, that portion
adjacent to the Golf Course northerly and southerly of the main entrance, and that portion
adjacent to the Citrus Ranch Park site at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway
Reso`~tip 09 ~~
Pa a '~'~~ of 3~o\repo \ md0910 rpt-final 8may09.doc
9 ~ I Hams & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 7
• the southerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly boundary of Tract No. 13053 and
the easterly boundary of Tract No. 13038 (f630 feet easterly of Myford Road)
• the northerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly City limits and Jamboree Road
• the westerly side of Jamboree Road from Bryan Avenue northerly 1,100 feet to the northerly
boundary of Tract No. 13030
• the westerly side of Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and the northerly City limits,
except that portion adjacent to the Tustin Sports Park
• the slopes on the westerly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and 600
feet southerly
• the slopes and parkways on the easterly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City
limits and Tustin Ranch Road, including the slopes granted to the City by the Transportation
Corridor Agency per Instrtunent No. 1999048101 recorded January 22, 1999 (net acreage
increase of 4.11 acres)
• La Colina Drive, northerly and southerly sides, between Tustin Ranch Road and the westerly
City limits
• Portola Parkway, both northerly and southerly sides, between Jamboree Road and Tustin
Ranch Road
• Equestrian/Hiking Trail between Tustin Ranch Road/Portola Parkway and Peters Canyon
Regional Park
• Paseo for public access between Jamboree Road and Pioneer Road adjacent to Tract Numbers
14366 and 14576
The total landscaped area is approximately 51 acres. These areas are shown on the Landscape
Maintenance Facilities Map, in the Appendix.
The District will fund costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing including, but
not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other expenses
necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities. Reference is made to Part "D" of this
report for a discussion of the Benefit Areas and the facilities associated with them which are serviced
and maintained. The facilities are described as follows:
Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to: Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation
systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance resulting from landscape growth and
appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of--way, parkways, and dedicated easements within the
boundaries of said Assessment District.
rltustin1fy09-101reports\IImd0910 rpt-final 8may09.doc Resol t' n No. 09-35
~en'~1&o~s33ciates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
En~ineer''s Report Page 8
Li htin~ and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but aze not limited to: Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors, equipment
including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as
required to provide lighting in public rights-of--way and dedicated easements within the
boundaries of said Assessment District.
The public lighting system shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination. Electricity for
street lights shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company, and it shall be
adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those authorized by the California
Public Utilities Commission.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation,
maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities,
including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting
facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the
landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease
or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of
any of the public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric energy for
the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities.
The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location and the
extent of the improvements to be serviced and maintained, aze on file in the office of the City
Engineer and aze by reference herein made a part of this report.
Resolution No. 09-35
PBg~\L~(r~t0~0Veports\IImd0910 ryt-final 8may09.dw
Hams 8 Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 9
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
The City's budget for the maintenance and service costs, shown below, details the estimated costs
and fund balances for Fiscal Year 2009-10 as available at the time of preparation of this report. The
1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental
expenses. This was not changed by Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The costs can
include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs
identified with the district proceedings.
The Reserves, District Administration and Projected Fund Balance items have been prorated based
on the budget amounts.
FY 2009-10 BUDGET & ASSESS MENT
District Less Projected
Reserve Admin. Fund Balance** City Total to
Service Cate or Budget (50°/. Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30!2009 ConMbution Asmt
Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $95,694 $0 $1,705 $0 ($2,506) 594,893
*Object No. 6220
Local Residential Lighting $13,017 $0 $232 $0 ($3,149) 510,100
*Object No. 6220
Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $659,165 $0 $11,747 $0 ($214,640) 5456,272
*Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350
Totals 5767,876 SO 513,684 SO (5220,295) S561,265
Total to Assessment: S561,265
For descriptions of the object numbers, refer to the Budget Detail' table in the Appendix.
•• For FY 2008-09 the projected ending fund balance is -5184,147. [t is assumed that a City contribution will be made to
make the budget whole for FY 08-09; therefore SO fund balance is shown in the table above.
Note: District Administration Costs are prorated based on the Budget Amounts and include Orange County's
charge of 0.3% ofthe assessment for placement and collection on the property tax roll.
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District.
Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City will make
funds available to the District to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed upon receipt of
assessments. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carved over to the next fiscal year.
The 1972 Act allows a reserve for cash flow not to exceed 50% of the budget.
For a breakdown of the costs by Service Category and Benefit Area, please see "Benefit Areas" on
page 17 of this report.
rltustln\tyo9-10\reports111md0910 rpt-final 8may09.doc Resoluti n No. 09-35
~~n'~BP~ciates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 10
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
The Assessment Roll is a listing of the proposed assessment and the amount of assessment for Fiscal
Year 2009-10 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor's Office,
and contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Tustin,
which is incorporated herein by reference.
The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange
and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.
Resolution~fn~Ng o. 09-35
Page\~~ Di-S~0\reportsllknd0910 rpt-final 8may09.doc
Hams & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 11
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing
certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street
lights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities.
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according
to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among
all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The 1972 Act permits the designation of azeas of benefit within any individual assessment district if
"by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various azeas
will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act
requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on
the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the California Constitution, requires
that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit
conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City
must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that publicly
owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed.
REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT
The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the maintenance and servicing of
landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical
energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the
satisfactory operation of these services.
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Since the assessment will be levied against parcels of property as shown on the tax roll, the final chazges
must be assigned by Assessor's Pareel Number. If assessments were to be spread just by parcel, not
considering land use or parcel size, a single family parcel would be paying the same as a 50 unit
apaztment pazcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone and this would not be equitable.
The single family residential lot has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments and is
defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to calculate the
EDU's for other residential land uses and for non-residential parcels. Every land-use is converted to
EDU's: parcels containing apartments are converted to EDU's based on the number of dwelling units on
each parcel of land; commercial parcels are converted based on the lot size of each parcel of land.
r:Itustin\tyos-10\reports111md0910 rpt-final 8mayo9.doc Resolution No. 09-35
~~~i~'~~9fs~ciates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009-10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 12
The EDU method is seen as the most appropriate and equitable method of spread for landscape and
lighting districts, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of
land-use type and size.
Single Family Residential (SFR). Parcels zoned for single family residential uses are assessed
1 EDU per dwelling unit. Parcels designated as SFR land-use will be assessed 1 EDU per
dwelling unit, including vacant subdivided residential lots and vacant land zoned for single
family residential uses with a tentative or final tract map.
Multiple Family Residential. Multiple-residential (including condominiums) land use
equivalencies are determined based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel. Due to
population density and size of structure relative to the typical single family residence, each
dwelling unit defined as multi-family residential, including condominiums, would be 0.75 EDU.
The EDU's assigned to amultiple-residential parcel are calculated by multiplying the number of
dwelling units by the EDU factor of 0.75. This includes vacant multi-family residential parcels
zoned for multiple-residential uses with a tentative or final tract map.
Non-Residential. In converting non-residential properties to EDU's, the factor used is the City
of Tustin's typical standard single family residential lot area and the number of lots that could be
subdivided into an acre of land. All properties that are developed for non-residential uses are
therefore assigned 6 EDU's per acre. These include commercial, industrial, church, school and
other non-residential uses.
Vacant Parcels with No Development Designation. Vacant parcels with no development
designation or without a tentative or final map are assigned a reduced equivalency due to their
current lack of immediate development potential. Based upon the opinions of professional
appraisers appraising current mazket property values for real estate in Southern California, the
land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the total value of the
property. In Tustin Ranch, the land value portion of a single family detached residence appears
to be typically one-third or higher of the total value based on the County Assessor's tax rolls.
Therefore, vacant parcels are assigned equivalency units at the rate of one-third of improved
property which is 6 EDU/acre xone-third = 2 EDU/acre. Park parcels are also considered as
vacant with no development potential, and are assessed at that rate.
Peters Canyon Regional Park is a large, natural, open space park with very few facilities, which
straddles the cities of Orange and Tustin and a portion of unincorporated county area. The pazk has
many access points around its perimeter and one is within the Tustin Ranch area. This park
receives a very small amount of benefit relative to its size, and it seems reasonable to compare it to
other existing parks within Tustin Ranch. At the time the district was formed, there were seven
developed parks, five public parks (Camino Real, Cedar Grove, Heritage, Laurel Glen, and the
Tustin Sports Park) and two private parks, with an average park size of 6.26 acresl. Therefore, 6.26
acres have been used to estimate the relative benefit Peters Canyon Regional Park receives.
Golf Course Property. Golf Course parcels are developed commercial property, but the
development is at a very low level. Therefore, golf course parcels are assessed at a rate between
developed and vacant land, at twice the rate of vacant parcels with no development designation,
which is 2.0 EDU/acre x 2 = 4.0 EDU/acre.
BAs of FY 1997-98, when the District was approved by public owner ballot.
Resolution No. 09-35
Page tY~'nOfiA4-,10\reporisllhnd0910 rpt-final 8may09.dx
T SL ~ I Hams & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineers Report Page 13
Public Property. Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that all benefiting public
properties be assessed for their fair share of the special benefit. Public property which is
designated for residential or non-residential purposes (such as schools and fire stations) will be
assessed the same as private property with the same designation. Public parks will be assessed
the same as vacant parcels with no development designation.
Exempt Property. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public
avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public drainage,
public easements and rights-of--ways, public greenbelts and parkways. Also excepted from
assessment would be utility rights-of--way, common azeas (such as in condominium complexes),
landlocked parcels, unbuildable parcels vacated by the City, and pazcels designated on Tract or
Pazcel Maps for landscaping.
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) FORMULA
Land Use Basic Unit x EDU Factor = EDU Rates
Sin a Famil Res. SFR 1 D.U. x 1.00 = 1 EDU/DU
Multi-famil Res. includin Condos 1 D.U. x 0.75 = 0.75 EDU/DU
Commercial/Industrial and other
Non-Residential includin Schools
1 Acre
x
6.00 =
6.0 EDU/ac
Vacant includin Parks 1 Acre x 2.00 = 2.0 EDU/ac
Golf Courses 1 Acre x 4.00 = 4.0 EDU/ac
SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
STREET LIGHTING BENEFIT
Proper maintenance and servicing of the street lighting system benefits all properties within the
District by providing security, safety and community chazacter and vitality as outlined below. Street
lights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area.
BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING
Security and Safety Community Character and Vitality
• Mitigates crime • Promotes social interaction
• Alleviates the fear of crime • Promotes business and industry
• Enhances pedestrian safety • Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image
A large portion of the City of Tustin is within an Ad Valorem Lighting Maintenance District and is
paying for the operation and maintenance of street lights in a similar manner. The azea of the
District, being a recent annexation to the City, was not a part of this Ad Valorem Maintenance
District. Therefore, to fund the public street lights in the developing area, in 1985 the City
established the 1972 Landscape and Lighting District. Those properties that aze adjacent to private
streets pay for their local private street lights through their Home Owners Association fees.
r:ltustin1fy09-1o\reports\IInd0910 rpt-final8may09.doc Resolutio No. 09-35
~~ ~la~`iQ~r~sociates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 14
Arterial and Collector Lighting. Street lighting on the arterial and collector streets provides
special and direct benefits to all properties within the District, as these lighting benefits aze
directly related to the positive enhancement of the Community and therefore increase property
desirability and quality of life. All properties within the District receive a special benefit from
lighting on the arterials and collectors.
Lighting at intersections, which is defined as safety lighting, is considered to be the minimum
lighting requirement for vehicular safety; therefore, safety lighting represents the general benefit
portion of street lighting and is not assessed. Traffic Signals are also considered to provide a
general benefit and are not assessed.
Street lights which are not adjacent to the development in the District aze deemed not to benefit
the area. Street lights on the east side of Jamboree Road, north of the I-5 Freeway, which
provide benefit to the property on the east side of Jamboree, aze not included in this District and
the costs will not be assessed.
The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use
type that receive this benefit.
Arterial & Collector Lighting Benefit
FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10
B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's
Sin le Famil Res. 2,626 2,626 2,626.000 2,b26 2,626 2,626.000
Multi-famil Res. 2,974 5,100 3,825.000 2,974 5,100 3,825.000
Non-Residential 60 183.454 1,100.724 60 183.454 1,100.724
Schools 10 48.573 291.438 10 48.573 291.438
Vacant 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000
Pazks 22 72.135 144.270 22 72.135 144.270
Golf Course 12 151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964
Total 5 704 7 726 456.153 8 595.396 5 704 7 726 456.153 8 595.396
Local Residential Lighting. Many of the residential units in the District have private street
lighting systems dtrectly adjacent to their homes. This lighting is usually provided by a Home
Owners Association, and payment for the lights are usually made through association dues or
assessments. Parcels that have local residential street lighting provided by the City receive
special and direct local lighting benefit and are assessed for those local lights. There are eighty-
seven local residential 5,800 lumen lights and four 9,500 lumen lights. The cost for these lights
is assessed only to these benefiting parcels.
Reso~~ti,0(~O1r~ep9or~t11md0910 rpt-flnal 8may09.doc
Page ~ 0 2 ~ I Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 15
The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings and EDUs that receive this benefit.
There were no changes from the previous fiscal yeaz.
Local Residential Li ling Benefit
B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s EDU's
Sin le Famil Residential 369 369 369.000
369 369 369.000
LANDSCAPING BENEFIT
Trees, landscaping, hazdscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification,
shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value.
In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated:
...there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common
sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot
be determined exactly.... Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for
parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will
show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment
of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the
City,...
It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the
landscaping along side the roadway.
Landscaping along recreational trails and greenbelts, if well maintained, provide beautification and
enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value.
In Greenways for America by Charles E. Little, it is stated:
... [real estate] agents routinely advertise properties as being on or neaz the
trail....property near but not immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilman Trail is
significantly easier to sell and, according to real estate agents, sells for an average of
6 percent more as a result of its proximity to the trail. Property immediately adjacent
to the trail, however, is only slightly easier to sell....trails are an amenity that helps
sell homes, increase property values and improve the quality of life.
Additionally, the National Recreation and Pazk Association, in June 1985, stated:
The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or
near the recreation area, and is of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake in
a maximum of total assessed values.
The District enjoys a higher level of landscaping and streetscaping in their parkways and slopes than
the rest of the City of Tustin. The City provides funding for the landscaped medians in the area, so
these costs are not assessed. Additionally, a pedestrian and equestrian trail, linked with the regional
r:Uustin1iy09-10\reports111md0910 rpt-final8may09.dce Resolution No. 09-35
~~~la~rpi4~~4ssociates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineeris Report Page 16
trail system, is landscaped and beautified by the District. The landscape improvements along the
arterial and collector streets, in the pazkways and slopes, and the regional trail enhance the beauty of
the area and benefit all pazcels in the community.
Excepted from this landscaping benefit are the Tustin Marketplace, Tustin Annex, and the Tustin
Auto Center, which provide their own landscaping adjacent to their properties at an even higher level
than the rest of the District. Landscaping along roadways provides only incidental benefits to
motorists traveling to, from or through the azea.
The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use type
that receive this benefit. There were no changes from the previous fiscal year.
Landscaped Parkway, Slope & Trail Benefit
FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10
B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's
Sin le Famil Res. 2,626 2,626 2,626.000 2,626 2,626 2,626.000
Multi-famil Res. 2,974 5,100 3,825.000 2,974 5,100 3,825.000
Non-Residential 19 32.624 19
5.744 19 32.624 195.744
Schools 10 48.573 _
291.438 10 48.573 291.438
Vacant 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000
Parks
22
72.135
144.270
22
72.135 _
144.270
Golf Course 12 151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964
Total 5,663 7,726 305.323 7,690.416 5,663 7,726 305.323 7,690.416
Resolutio{n~pgN;~op 09-3~5
Page ~ CJT ;SL ~~U md0910 rpt-flnel 8may09.doc ~
ssa I Hams & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 17
BENEFIT AREAS
There are three benefit areas within the District:
Benefit Area A - pazcels that receive only Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit.
Benefit Area B - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit and Pazkway,
Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit.
Benefit Area C - pazcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit, Pazkway,
Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit, and Local Residential Lighting benefit.
The following tables provide a summary of parcels, dwellings, acres, EDU's and Costs by Benefit
Area for the District. The Service Category Costs are based on the EDU's and rates for each benefit
area.
FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10
B Benefit Area Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's
A 41 -- 150.830 904.980 41 -- 150.830 904.980
B 5,294 7,357 305.323 7,321.416 5,294 7,357 305.323 7,321.416
C 369 369 -- 369.000 369 369 0.000 369.000
Total: 5,704 7 726 456.153 8 595.396 5,704 7 726 456.153 8 595.396
Service Category Costs by Benefit Area
FY 2 008-09 FY 2009-10
Benefit
Area Arterial &
Collector
Street Li hts Local
Residential
Li htin Parkway,
Slope & Trail
Landsca in
Total to
Assessment Arterial &
Collector
Street Li hts Local
Residential
Li htin Parkway,
Slope & Trail
Landsca in
Total to
Assessment
A $9 792 59 792 $9,991 59 991
B $79,218 $435,478 $514 696 $80 828 $434 380 S515 208
C $3,992 $9,919 $21,948 535,859 $4,074 $10,100 $21,892 536,066
Totals 593 002 S9 919 5457 426 5560 47 594 893 $10 100 $456 272 5561265
rltustin5fy09-10\repoRsUlmd0910 rpt-flnal8may09.doc Resolution No. 09-35
~s4if f~ssociates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 18
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY
The tables below summarize the assessment amounts per EDU for each Benefit Area.
Service Cat o and Benefit Area FY 2009-10 ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY
ACCT -Arterial & Collector Lighting $11.04 /EDU FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10
LRLT -Local Residential Li htin $27.37 /EDU Actual Maz. Asmt Rates Actual Total
PSTL -Pkwy, Slope & Trail Landscape $59.33 /EDU Asmt Rates (incl. CPn* Asmt Rates Asmt
Benefit Area A (ACCT) $10.82 /EDU $11.04 /EDU $11.04 /EDU $9,991
Benefit Area B (ACCT +PSTL) $70.30 /EDU $70.37 /EDU $70.37 /EDU $515,208
Benefit Area C (ACCT +PSTL + LRLT) $97.18 /EDU $97.74 /EDU 597.74 /EDU $36,066
• See "Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations" in the Appendix for details on the calculation of the Max. Assessment Rates
$561,265
The base assessment rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be
increased by the annual change in CPI for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim,
Riverside Area in any calendar year by City Council approval each year. The CPI change for
Calendar Year 2008 (December 2007 to December 2008) is 0.1 %.
As discussed previously, each benefit area assessment rate is a combination of the service category
cost per EDU. The maximum assessment rates per benefit azea aze fixed rates that increase based on
CPI. The proposed assessed rates for each Benefit Area equal the maximum allowable rates.
The proposed assessment rates by land use category for each Benefit Area are shown below.
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE
FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10
BENEFIT AREA: A B C A B C
ACCT + ACCT +PSTL ACCT + ACCT +PSTL
LAND USE ACCT PSTL + LRLT ACCT PSTL + LRLT
Single Family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $70.30 / DU $97.18 / DU $70.37 / DU $97.74 / DU
Multi-family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $52.73 / DU $52.78 / DU
Non-Residential ($/ac) $421.80 / ac $422.22 / ac
Non-Res -Tustin Mazket Place ($/ac) $64.92 / ac $66.24 / ac
Golf Course ($/ac) $281.20 / ac $281.48 / ac
Vacant and Parks ($/ac) $140.60 / ac $140.74 / ac
Resolutio1n{~{~N.~o. 09-35
Pag~~~~'~Oi 3L01reportsWmd0910 rpt-final 8may09.da
Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009-10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 19
I, Joan E. Cox, P.E. the authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed
Assessment Engineer, am of the opinion that the assessments have been apportioned in accordance
with the estimated special benefit derived by each parcel and that the assessments do not exceed the
reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit.
DATED: May 8, 2009 Harris & Associates
By:
J AN E. , P.E.
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
R.C.E. No. 41965
rkustin1ty09-101reportsUlmd0910 rpt-final Bmayo9.doc Resolutil~~~~sodates
~~~ o
City ofTustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2009.10 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Page 20
PART E
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
The property owner list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or parcel, as
shown on the Assessment Diagram referenced in Part F herein, is the list of property owners within
the District boundaries as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange
and is, by reference, made part of this report.
PART F
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and
dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the
maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are
incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
Reso utlIon 09-3~
r. s~n11~d~roports md0910 rpt-final 8may09.tloc
Page 4 0 ~ I Hams & Associates
City ofTustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2008-09 May 8, 2009
Engineers Report Appendix
Appendix
r:\tustinl(y09-10\n;ports\IImd0910 rpt-ftnel 8may09.doc Resolutio No. 09-35
~~~a~s~ ~sociates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2008.09 May 8, 2009
Engineers Report Appendix
BL+D6B1'DBIAII
PY29i08-10
DIS?DIIT ANALYSIS WORlS8B8T
Ob'ect No.
Descri tion
City's
Budget ($) District
Estimate of
Costs ($)
Comments
6018
Architect/En Services
13,684
13,684 Annual Engineer's Report -Dist. Admin.;
County chazge of 0.3% for placement on
property tax bills
6028 Landsca Maintenance 375,350 375,350 Contract -Turf & groundcover maint.
6132 Tree Trimmin Contract 110,000 110,000 Contract -approx. 1,500 trees/yr
6220 Street Light Energy 108,711 95,694
13,017 Street lights -Arterial & Collector
Street li hts -Local
6335 Electric 12,815 12,815 For irrigation ui ment
6350 Water 161,000 161,000 IRWD service areas
DISTRICT TOTAL 781,560 781,560
M~irr~t Assesarrmeat date Calcoladoes
b~ ~~~'~~ ~ ~cPr~,~~~
1~i'2008-10 CPI WO~XS~T
Benefit Area A
Max Actual
Base Yeaz CPI Rate ($) Rate ($)
FY 1997-1998 7.91 7.91
FY 1998-1999 1.2% 8.00 7.87
FY 1999-2000 2.2% 8.18 8.04
FY 2000-2001 2.8% 8.41 8.04
FY 2001-2002 3.7% 8.72 8.40
FY 2002-2003 2.1 % 8.90 8.90
FY 2003-2004 3.7% 9.23 9.23
FY 2004-2005 1.8% 9.40 9.40
FY 2005-2006 4.4% 9.81 9.81
FY 2006-2007 4.5% 10.25 10.25
FY 2007-2008 3.3% 10.59 9.79
FY 2008-2009 4.2% 11.03 10.82
FY 2009-2010 0.1% 11.04 11.04
Benefit Area B
CPI Max
Rate ($) Actual
Rate ($)
50.38 50.38
1.2% 50.98 50.98
2.2% 52.10 52.10
2.8% 53.56 52.10
3.7% 55.54 55.54
2.1% 56.71 56.71
3.7% 58.81 58.81
1.8% 59.87 59.87
4.4% 62.50 62.50
4.5% 65.31 65.31
3.3% 67.47 67.47
4.2% 70.30 70.30
0.1% 70.37 70.37
Benefit Area C
CPI Max
Rate ($) Actual
Rate ($)
69.96 69.96
1.2% 70.80 70.27
2.2% 72.36 71.82
2.8% 74.39 71.82
3.7% 77.14 76.38
2.1% 78.76 78.76
3.7% 81.67 81.67
1.8% 83.14 83.14
4.4% 86.80 86.80
4.5% 90.71 90.71
3.3% 93.70 93.70
4.2% 97.64 97.18
0.1 % 97.74 97.74
ResQ+~~~~r,~~,r~~rb`~1fmd0910 rpt-final8may09.doc
Page 26 ofi 32
Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2008-09 May 8, 2009
Engineer's Report Appendix
Budget & Assessment Comparison
FY 2009-10 Budget 8ti Assessment
District Less Projected
Reserve Admin. Fund Balance** City Total to
Service Cat o Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2009 Contribution Asmt
Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $95,694 $0 $1,705 $0 ($2,506) 594,893
*Object No. 6220
Local Residential Lighting $t3,017 $0 $232 $0 ($3,149) $10,100
*Object No. 6220
Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $659,165 $0 $11,747 $0 ($214,640) 5456,272
*Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350
Totals $767,876 50 513,684 50 (5220,295) S561,265
Total to Assessment: $561,265
FY 2008.09 Budget 8~ Assessment
District Less Projected
Reserve Admin. Fund Balance** C1ty Tatal to
Service Cat o Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2008 Contribution Asmt
Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $89,557 $0 $1,796 $1,622 $0 592,976
*Object No. 6220
Local Residential Lighting $9,555 $0 $192 $173 $0 59,920
*Object No. 6220
Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $579,500 $0 $11,624 $10,498 ($144,170) $457,452
*Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350
Totals $678,612 SO 513,612 $12,293 (5144,170) $560,347
Total to Assessment: 5560,347
Lighting and Landscape District Fund Baiance Projection
Beginning Fund Balance $52,453.00 Per Mid-Year Budget
07/01/08
Projected Revenues Full Collection per Engineer's
FY 08-09 $511,000.00 Report
Projected Expenditures
FY OS-09 $747,600.00 per Mid Year budget Projections
Projected Ending Fund Balance
FY 08-09 ($184,147.00)
r:u~ss~~tyos-toueportsw~„dosto ~t-r~i a~yos.doo Resolutio No. 09-35
~~a~s ~ Il~sociates
CITY OF TUSTIN
cc gLMD - FY 2009-10
co 0
N i=
0o O
0 0
N 0 BENEFIT
APN AREA
CURRENT
LANDUSE
ACRES DWS
GOVERNMENT PARCELS
FY 2009-10 FY 2008-09
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
OWNER
03/16/09
Page 1
COMMENTS
020301
B
PRK
4.251
$598.28
$597.69
City Of Tustin
Camino Real Park
v,
50022107
B
PRK
3.600
$506.67
$506.16
City Of Tustin
Heritage Park
50022110
B
PRK
1.358
$191.12
$190.94
City Of Tustin
Heritage Park
50023302
B
PRK
3.008
$423.35
$422.92
City Of Tustin
Laurel Glen Park
50109501
B
PRK
15.275
$2,149.80
$2,147.66
City Of Tustin
Citrus Ranch Park
50109508
B
PRK
1.260
$177.33
$177.16
City Of Tustin
Citrus Ranch Park
50109509
B
PRK
0.380
$53.48
$53.42
City Of Tustin
Citrus Ranch Park
50111205
B
PRK
1.800
$253.33
$253.08
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50111206
B
PRK
1.660
$233.63
$233.39
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50111207
B
PRK
0.240
$33.78
$33.74
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50111208
B
PRK
14.230
$2,002.73
$2,000.74
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50111212
B
PRK
0.463
$65.16
$65.10
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50111214
B
PRK
1.210
$170.30
$170.12
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50111216
B
PRK
0.450
$63.34
$63.27
City Of Tustin
Tustin Sports Park
50245125
B
PRK
2.070
$291.34
$291.04
City Of Tustin
Cedar Grove Park
50245127
B
PRK
2.230
$313.85
$313.54
City Of Tustin
Cedar Grove Park
50245130
B
PRK
1.530
$215.33
$215.12
City Of Tustin
Cedar Grove Park
50245131
B
PRK
3.880
$546.07
$545.52
City Of Tustin
Cedar Grove Park
50245313
B
C/I
1.250
$527.78
$527.25
City Of Tustin
Fire Station
52502203
B
PRK
2.980
$419.41
$418.99
City Of Tustin
Pioneer Road Park
CITY OF TUSTIN
LLMD - FY 2009-10
GOVERNMENT PARCELS
03/16/09
Page 2
CD
a)
O
c_
o'
cQ �
O Z
N O
co'
O O
CD
W W
N C3i
BENEFIT
CURRENT
FY 2009-10
FY 2008-09
APN
AREA
LANDUSE
ACRES DU'S
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
OWNER
COMMENTS
10429026
B
PRK
6.260
$881.03
$880.16
County Of Orange
Peters Canyon Park
50111201
B
SCH
5.810
$2,453.09
$2,450.66
School, Tustin Unified
Tustin Ranch Elem. School
50111213
B
SCH
1.297
$547.62
$547.07
School, Tustin Unified
Tustin Ranch Elem. School
50111215
B
SCH
0.790
$333.55
$333.23
School, Tustin Unified
Tustin Ranch Elem. School
50111217
B
SCH
2.080
$878.22
$877.34
School, Tustin Unified
Tustin Ranch Elem. School
50128135
B
SCH
9.901
$4,180.40
$4,176.24
School, Tustin Unified
Ladera Elementary School
50252107
B
SCH
18.335
$7,741.40
$7,733.70
School, Tustin Unified
Pioneer Middle School
50245124
B
SCH
3.110
$1,313.11
$1,311.80
Tustin Unified School
Peters Canyon Elem. School
50245128
B
SCH
5.070
$2,140.66
$2,138.52
Tustin Unified School
Peters Canyon Elem. School
50245129
B
SCH
1.080
$456.00
$455.54
Tustin Unified School
Peters Canyon Elem. School
50245132
B
SCH
1.100
$464.44
$463.98
Tustin Unified School
Peters Canyon Elem. School
CD
a)
O
c_
o'
cQ �
O Z
N O
co'
O O
CD
W W
N C3i
CfTY OF TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR THE
2009-10 FISCAL YEAR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES MAP
_LFG_,y'D..
---- iANOS~7,PE MALNICNANCE
STOVE MAiNTENANiE
:; HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
'- SA Ezel~YwnUive tPgyor Sui'e :50
u ~b91 b°5~-3 D0~ fAX (949) 655-3995
3 0 3~
Y{ ~
~ A F
,~ ~, n Y ti
~ ~' _ <~, s
~.w
-x '~ S e 'i
S r' ~ „~
u" ~
•,_,~ ;~
,
.: „ ,
", REDUCE ~ SGACf
~~~rs\
`.. .. u ses.-o.,~,,.,
M Ifs-A' ,np4 .e
~
ypa. W .rJ
+a a l:
... r,.
..u~,:,~, .
::
r
n., .. ,., .~w
~ w ~
~
.
~$,
w
r4['
~ih
r r~'M £
.f,.x
~
~
-
W ,
.
. ?c
j !
ne~~r. ~ r
M
!~
~~
r tx a 3 { 1
W
;.~~~~Kfl s
_ Ar N~~ "~.~.. ..
_rt
~ "` ..w me
n
b
I ~M l -x J
~~\ rxn. .~u
- v
r.. ....e
_
un u.
~ ua~ ~ W \
J„ 0 ~
1I ~
1
'tK'~ ..~s
4, "~
^g
~.•
-
t
~n'vu 0~ +r
~ /
_.. ~ ~
. ~~
/
!u-v ,tr.
2
:Oi~lOi-rtl '~++ ~
.ra in Ozer,
~k
,.HI,:. „~;:~
.w ~. „~ \ ,
\~ \\
~ a y;.
/.R~yy.~'P. ~' ..
, `,b ~`.
5El-FL 4t rMV .u-~}a~.-o~, i.w i+
.i+i'~' ~Q1~4y~YiF «w
1 ~ M' £
CffY OF TUSl1N
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR THE
2009-10 FISCAL YEAR
LAND USE MAP
LfCEND
Resrdanfior
4'Om^IerCrO/
.'CUar.f
Pc~ks
Government
Cct! Loursa
LGy Bcurtdmy
:~x>~'
va. ~ s• .. a ail
~:
fi
?~',
. HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
I.«„`.. f,,,i. 34 £.eeui~ve Pork, Sui?e 75C
irWna, CA 92614
> :e {'~. (S49j 655-390C ~ fp% (949) 655-3995
,r;~, ~a~ z•. r..r.
~,; rte- , s ,:~ ~s
~~
. ~,... r.~ .,
~,
~' -rrxwu
~~
.R£DUCfO SCALE
Pag
CITY OF TUS11N
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR THE
2009-10 FISCAL YEAR
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/BOUNDARY MAP
LEGEND,
vENEE.'i 4RCA A
BENEFIT AREA R
BENEFIT 4RCA C e
CITY BOUNDARY --~ ~~ ~~ - --
HARR~}IS'~}~{&~yAyS~SOCiAT;S
3~'L ^\i/05~~ :J~fe 150
;pp9) 055-3900 ~ FA% (9A9) 655-3995
i~
Iv I
ti
I
I
~~.. ~W~~.'...
~~w w N3F xx.Li ea ~ru ~.tl .a+51. .~
~µ ~
~~
','j'
II
~~
.~ _:.-
,:.~d:, usw~-4:,„w,~,3
„ Iss. """ ,.. , w~ M, .,
,,, ~ :ss
~~~~
`~ .
i ,ra ~~=
~~
s!« ~' ``
ww .M
1',
'eiM u'''...
?° i
~. .~''
~'"` ~ ,
~E~
~~ ~ ~ '.I
~~...... .' AW~
YF Mi-,Y fYW 1