The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC RES 02-09 6 7 9 I0 ~4 19 2- 29 RESOLUTION NO. 02-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 02-001, UPDATING THE TUSTIN HOUSING ELEMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65588. The City Council does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: That California State Law Section 65588 requires each City to review as frequently as appropriate and to revise its Housing Element as appropriate. In accordance with Government Code section 65585 (f)(1) and HCD's findings and recommendations, the City has modified the draft Housing Element Update to comply with the requirements of Article 10.6. That a public workshop was held on January 14, 2002, to familiarize the general public with the purpose and intent of the Housing Element Update. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on January 28, 2002, by the Planning Commission to consider and provide opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the proposed Housing Element Update. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on February 4, 2002, by the City Council to consider and provide further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the proposed Housing Element Update. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15153, the City of Tustin has completed an Initial Study and determined that all effects associated with the proposed project were adequately evaluated in the Program EIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin, that no new effects would occur, that no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects would occur, that no new mitigation measures would be required, that no applicable mitigation measures previously not found to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and that there are no new mitigation measures 8 9 I0 Il ]2 13 ~4 15 [ 6 ~7 18 ~9 20 21 22 2.3 24 25 26 2- 2,q 2,) Resolution No. 02-09 Page 2 or alternatives applicable to the project that would substantially reduce effects of the project that have not been considered and adopted. The findings made by the City Council on January 16, 2001 in approving GPA 00-001, are incorporated herein by this reference, including the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program. II. III. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 02-001, updating the Tustin Housing Element as identified in "Exhibit A" attached hereto. The City Council hereby finds that the environmental effects of the Housing Element Update identified in the Initial Study and described in the Program EIS/EIR for MCAS-Tustin have been substantially lessened in their severity by the imposition and incorporation of certain previously approved mitigation measures as identified in Exhibit B. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the 4th day of February, 2002. PAMELA STOKER City Clerk .4~¢r:~R'¢ M. TH~)~AS Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 02-09 PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and 2 ? II 13 15 IK i9 21 29 Resolution No. 02-09 Page 3 foregoing Resolution No. 02-09 was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 4u~ day of February, 2002. COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Thomas, Worley, Bone, COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None ~. 1,. PAMELA STOKER ,.~ City Clerk Doyle, Kawashima Exhibit A of Resolution No. 02-09 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section INTRODUCTION TO THE Pu_rvose Of The Housing Element Scope And Content Of Element Consistency With State Planning Law General Plan Consistency Citizen Participation SUM.MARY OF ISSUES, NEEDS, CO.,,mTRAIN. S AND OPPORTUNITIES Summary Of Housing Needs Preservation Of Units At Risk Of Conversion Summary Of i-lousing Issues Housing Cons~aints Housing Opport-anifies HOUSL\:.G ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES Housing Supply./Housing Opportunities .:,iaintenance And Conservation L:nvironmentai Sensitivity Related Goals And Policies 2dOUSING ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGIL~,M Five Year Quantified Obiectives 2000-2005 Identification Of Affordable Housing Resources Housing Programs Page 1 2 2 4 5 7 20 25 29 37 51 56 56 58 63 8'2 .APPENDICES A - Review of Past Performance B - A:'fordability Gap Analysis C - Public Participation Mailing List D - References "Z.i'FY O? TLrST/?,' .'4OL'Si;;G T.~kBLE H- 1: TA~BLE H- 2: T..kBLE H- 3 TABLE H- 4 T.-LBLE H- 5 T.q~_BLE H- 6 I..kBLE H- 7 T.-MBLE H- 8 TABLE H- 9 T.~BLE H- 10 TABLE H- i 1 TABLE H- 22 TABLE H- 13 TABLE H- '.'~ TABLE H- 15 TM3LE I-I- ' 6 TABI.E H- 17 TABLE H- ' 8 TABI.E H- 19 TABLE 1-I- 20 TABLE H- 2: 'I'ABL:'-; I-I- 22 T.~,I.E H- 23 LIST OF TABLES Page STATE HOUSING ELEMENT R.EQUIREMENTS POPLrLATION PROJECTIONS 8 EMPLOYIv"ENT PROJECTIONS 9 MAJOR ToST..rN EMPLOYERS 10 CITY OT TUSIIN JOBS"'HOUSING BALANCE .AZ'FORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT SLCLM.&P,Y 14 RENTAL MARKET SUMMARY 15 EMERGENCY SHELTERTRANS.[STIONAL HOUSLX'G FACILITIES 19 ASSI>: ED HOUSh-NG INVENTORY SUMMARY OF EX.qSTING HOUSING NEEDS 25 ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT AT MCAS-TUSTIN 34 LAN'D INYENTORY AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTLqL 39 PROGRESS TOWARD RI-rNA CONS !-RUCTION NEEDS VACANT AND L~DERUTILIZED WITH RESIDENTIAL DE\'"ELOPMENT POTENTIAL 45 \.'ACANT AND UNDERL'TILZED LAND 4- CURRENT LAND .~VENTORY VS. REi¥:AINING Ri-iNA CONSTRUCTION NEED 48 HOUSING P_ELATED GOALS AND POLICIES BY ELEMENT 57 NEW ,..ONSTR~ CT. ION QUA.',,'TiFIED OBJECTIVES >L%;_~,AR. : 99g-20C5 60 1LEHABILITAT]ON, PRESERVATION. AaN'D OTHER .-~FFORDABLE HOUSI'NG QUANTIFIED OB JECTIVES SL~I'MARY: 998-2005 62 Sb.-MMARY OF QUANTi-FIED OBJECTIVES 2006-20£'5 63 HOUS~.~G PROGR_&M ILLUSTRATIVE FJNDING R_ESOURCES 200C.-2005 65 AFFORDABLE HOUSING R.'-.>t..,UI,C~ 66 i-lOUSING ELE.'X:ENT PROGRAMS 2000-20'2'5 S l .................... . ...... : :..~.'..,:.=.,. i" December 2097 INTRODUCTION TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT The availabiii.ty of decent housLng and a suitable iiv'.'ng environment for ex, em,, fa.nzily has been of Lncreasing concern to all levels of government. In CaliforrJa, this concern is addressed bv the CalifomJa Gove~ament Code requirement ti,a; each Ci~, adopt a HousLng ~lem_n, as a mandato.D' part of its Gener~ Plan. State Planning Law mandates that jurisdictior~s w~ti-.in the Southern Ca2forrda Associa~on of Governments (SCAG) region adopt revisions to their H0usflng Elements by December 371, 2000. As a consequence of ~dzis due date, a series ~f Plme frames for various aspects of ~e ~ousia~g Element preparation are estab!ished. There are three relevant time periods: 1989-2000: The previor:s plmming period began on July 1, 1989, and is ' ° '~" 2000. currently scheduled to end on D~cemv~ oz, !998-June 30, 2005: a planning period for assessing short-term housing construction needs. 2000-2005: an implementation period for housLng programs. The piarming period for the Regional Housing Needs Assessrr. ent (RI-INA., prepared bv SCAG is from January 1998 to June 2005, a seven and one-ha~d ,,'ear veriod. The Lmplementaffon period covered by this element is Jul}' 2000 through iune 2005. By 2003, the City, along with other ' -' "~' ,, . ju.~scu,_~e..s 'At the SCAG reg-J_'on, again will begin prepara::ion for a revision of the housing eiement to cover the period £;'om 2005-2010. PURPOSE OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT The Land Use Element is concerned with housing ir. a spatial context wlnile the Housing Element iden~ies housing pro,ams aimed at meeting tlne identified housh~g needs of the City's population. Tustin Housing Eiement includes the identification of st.-rategdes and programs that focus on: i) housing affordabili~, 2) rehabilitating substandard housLng, 3) meeting the exis~ffng demand for new housing, and 4) come:ring the existing a_ffordable housing stock. Tne Tust~m i-lousing Technical Memorandum provides background information and supporting documentation. ]December 200 J SCOPE AND CONTENT OF ELEMENT The State Legisiature recognizes the role of the local general plan, a.nd particu_larly +.he Housing Mem~n., in implementing Statewide housing goals. Furthermore, Cue Legislature stresses continuing efforts toward providing affordable housing for aH income groups. The Legislature's major concerns wiF. n regard to tine preEaration of Housing Eiememts are: Recognition by local governments of their responsibiliW in contributing to the attainment of State housing goals; ~ .~para,on and implementation of nous,-ng elements wi,_ich coordinate with State and Federal ~':' ~ ~.to.ts in achieving State txousmg goals; Pa:-ticipa~on by local jurisdictions in determirda~g efforts reouired to aRain State housing goals; and Cooperation between local ~, · = + to oOX e~wLm..~ms address re~onal housing needs. The State Department of HousLng and CommuniQ.' Development (HCD) sets forth soecific requirements regarding the scope and content of housing elements. CONSISTENCY 14~TH STATE PLANNING LA¥~r The preparation of the Ci~"s Housing Element is guided bv and must co,erin to Section 65580 et al of the California Government Code. lr~ the introduction of ~nese Goverrmaent Code sections, the Legislatnre establishes a poiicy ~at the avafiabiH~ of housing in a suitable environment is of vital storewide irr. portance, and a priority of the h~gi~est_ _ order. It fm'ther states fi~at loca; ~:~.".~-'~--,,-~,~--~'~.~ .......... are to. address the '.'~ous~ng needs of all economic segments, v,'hiie considering the econom.ic., enviro,'tmental and fiscal factors and community goals set forth in the General Plan. The following table zites the required components for the Housing Eiement and cites ~e docmnent and page references for the required components. Table H- 1 STATE HOUSING ELEM-ENT REQUIREMENTS Required Housing Element Component Page A. Housing Needs Assessment 1. Analysis of pop,~tlation trends in. Tust'in in relation to regional trends h,~. 9 ir 2. Ana~vs:s of employment trends in 7us~n in re]at-ion ~.o regional ~.,'TM~ 23 & trends HE $ 3. ?rojec.'ion and oum~tification of Tustlns existing and proiected H£25 housing needs for aH income groups 4. ,&naivsis and documentaSon cf Tustin's housing characteristics including the £ollowing: a) level of housing cost compared to ability to pay; idTM 22 b) overcrowdin,g: ~ .--Lo. M 27 '~ housin$ stork c~ndi~on, bT.M 30 5. HE 42 An invento.,3' of land suitable for residentia! develovment including vacan*, sites and having redevelopment potential and an analysis of fire relationship o:' zoning, public ~acilities and services to these sites Analysis o£ existing and potential governmen,'al constraints uvon the mamrenance, improvement, or develo?ment of housing /or all Lncome ]eve's .-knalvsis o£ existing and votential non-goverrtmental and market HTr,'; 65 ir cons~ain~ upon maintenance, ~mp. ov,men,, or develovmen~. o,; ,hE 29 housing £or all income levels 8. Analysis of special housing need: disabled, elder'.')', large families, :dE 16 female-headed households, £armworkers 9. Analysis concerning *.he needs of homeless individuals and families HE 17 in Tus~n 10. Anah's'.'s of vppar~nities £or energ}.' conse."va,~on wi£~ respect to ?.'TM 7C residential develo?,ment B. Goals and Policies i. identification of Tus~m's goals, ouantified obiec~ives and. oollcies ii-' 5~. reiarive te maintenance, improvemen.~, and development of housm§ 2501 Table H- 1 STATE HOUSING ELEMENT REQUIREMENTS Required Housing Element Component C. Implementation Program .An tmviementation pro,ram should do the £o]]owin~: 1. identify adeauate sires which will be made available through appropriate action w'~ required public se~'ices and iacilifies for a x'ar~et3.' of housing ~'pes for all income ieveis Page HE 55-9S 2. Assist in the development of adeouate housing .~o meet the needs of ~ 58-98 iow-~md modera:e-income households 3. Identify and, wh_~n appropriate and possibie, remove governmenta! '-_'E5S-98 cons~aints to the maintenance, improvement, and deveiovment oF housing 4. Conserve and improve the condition of tlne existing and af/crdable :-tE 5~3-98 housing stock 5. Promote housing opportun~es/or all pe:'sons HE 58-98 6. Identify programs to address the pctentied conversion of assisted '-IE55-98 housmg develovments to market rate units Source: Cnlffcrnia Goven'unent Code. §65583. et al. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY While a cib,.- must consider housing needs for ail economic segments, it must also maintain Lnternal consistency among o~er elements o£ tlne General Plan as required by state !aw. Neither the Housing Element nor any other element may supersede any other required Tustin General Plan elements. The Housing Element relates to other elements in a varJet~.' of ways. The Land Use Element directly rela~es ~o the Housing Element by designa6mg areas o.5 the City in which a varieW of residenbia] ~'pes mad densities exist. t--ne Housing Element's relal-ionship to the Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation Element is conditioned by the need to serve a growing population s recreational needs in the areas of the Ci~, wihh · e highes~ densi.%'..Ago, housing needs for iow cos~ land must be balanced by the need to conserve nainral resources. C,~. ".' G? TUSTi'.c HOUSL\'G .-E£EAfE:%~~ 4 December 2007 The Circulation Element attempts to provide an efficient anJ well- balanced circulation system. This system must be desired to accommodate allowed land uses, including residential uses, and the intensity,, of allowable uses sho.p, ld.. . not exceed the ultirnate capacity, to accommodate the&., 1-ne Sa/e~' Element relates to the Housing Elernent bv designating areas that are unsafe for development such as Alauist-P.~olo Zones, floodplains, etcetera. ' * the Similar to .the SafeR' Element, the Noise E:emen, relates lo Housing Element by addressing a health related issue area. Teclmiques for reducing noise often involve buffers between land uses. The Growth Management Element overlaps the issues raised in the Housing Element in its efforts to ensure Kuat the planning, management, and imvlementafion of traffic improve:nent~ and public facilities are adequate to meet ~e current and proiected needs of Orange CounW. The Housing Element has been reviewed for consistency with the Ci~"s other General Plan elements and policy directions..,ks parts of the General Plan are amended in the futm'e, this housing element will be reviewed to ensure tha: consistency is ~mintained. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION /he Cali/ornia Gove.nu-nent Code recuires that local governments make diligent efforts to soiidt public participation from ail segmens of the corru'nunitn~ iv. ~e development of the Housing Element. Public partidpation in the Housiv. g Element Update process occurred through ~2ze fo!lowing me'&ods: A -oublic workshop was conducted on january '!4, 2002 to present the ara_f, Housing E]ement and ~rovide an opportnnity for interested persons to ask ouestions and offer suggestions. Notice of this workshop was published in the Tustin News and was also mailed to the C!~'"s list of local housing interest groups. A copy of the '~; ~ man,no ]/st is included as Appendb: C. Specific implementation programs included in the Housing Element Update were ~so discussed at various public hearings over the last 18 months in anticipation of the Housing Element Update. These hearings include the Federal Communi~, Development Block Grant Program public hearing held on May 1, 2000, adoption of the City's of .Tustin's Comprehensive Housing Affordabfli~: S~'ateg}.' for fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2009-2010 puEiic hearing held on February 7, 2000, and adoption of the Second Five-year Implementation Plan for the/own Center and South Central Redevelopment Project areas for fiscal years 2000-01 to 2004- 2005 public hearing held on March 6, 2000. Pubhc hearings were held on january 28, 2002, by the Planning Cormmission and on February 4, 2002, bx' the CJn.' CoundJ to vrovide additional opportunities for vul~lic review and comment on the Housing Element Update and supporffmg documents. SUMMARY OF ISSUES, NEEDS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES This sec,,on of the Housing Element summar~.Tes Tustm's current and projected housing needs to form. the basis/or establishing program priorities and quantif4ed objec~ves H .~he Housing Element. Th. is sect/on also: · Estimates the number of households that meet Federal or State crite:'ia for soecial consideration when discussing specialized needs; · Evaluates assisted m-it's at risk of conversion; · Describes constraints that may discourage the construction of new housing; and · Examines housing opportuni~' sites. SUMMARY OF HOUSING NEEDS A number of factors will influence the degree of demand or "need' for housing in Tust~.r.. The major "needs" categories considered ir'. En!s Element include: 7-Iousing needs resulting from. increased vovulafion and empioyment growth in the City and the surrou_nding region: Housing needs resultSng from household overcrowding; Housing needs resulting from the deteriorat/on or demolition of existing traits; '..dousing needs that result when households are ray"nS mcr:. than they can afford for housing; Housing needs resulting from the presence of "special needs groups" such as tb, e elderly, large families, fer:-..aie-headed households, households with a disabled person, and ~e homeless; amd Hous~.g ne~s res,~'dng from conversion or the housing stock to market rate. .:::Y'Y 0:'.' 7."..:'3'.: iN 2.:O',,'?iNG .:'.2F,.'~*,.E?:T December' 29.'..;: Population Growth Between !990 and !999, the Ciw's populahon grew from 50,689 to 67,153, an increase of 32.5 percent. Iustin"s growth rate (32.5 percent) between 1990 and 1999 was faster than the countTwide growth rate of 15.5 percent. The CaLifornia Department of Fknance (DOF) estimates a total population of 67,153 persons Ln the City as of January 1999~. The Ci~,'s population is expected to reach 72,735 by the year 2005. A significant amount of Tustin's population growth can be attributed to annexations that have occurred sLnce 1980. The remainder can be attributed to new resident/al cons~uctior, in East Tust/n, a changeover in population from smaller to larger families, rebuLld.ing of exist_Lng developed areas, and ird--ill develovment. Populahon projections are shown tn Table H-2. According to Orange Counw Projections (OC?l 96 .Modified data, the population in the C~' of Tust/n is expected to Lncrease by approximately 12 percent to 74,964 persorm by the year 2020. Table H- 2 Population Projection 2000 2005 2010 Iustin 66.740 72,735 75,79! 2020 Percent Change : (2000-2020} 74,964 i 12% Employment .According to 1990 Census data, the Ci~, of Tustin had 31,394 residents m the labor force, of which 27,274 were in the labor market. Of these, 81% were private wages and sala:'v workers.: The largest occupational category was adrnL-'2s~ative support occupa~ons, in which a total of 5,593 were employed. The second Housing Element Technical Memorandum Tabie i-FFM-2 ?I: _.v~--~. Housing Element Tec!~n/ca! Memorandum Table C."FY OF TZS'TI?; HOL'SLYG EL£;?'.'~:;'-- 8 December 200: largest was the executive, acL'rdnis~ative, and managerial occupa~ons, The 1990 Census also showed that 2,714 persons ','ere in ~e Armea forces. Those involved with far,g, forest, and ~,sh~g ocmpafio~ accosted for o~v 0.9%. ~ ter~ of ~dus2v, ~e ret~ and manufacturb, g sectors employed ~e largest number of persons with 4,441 (16.3%) ~d 4,008 (!4.7%) employees, respecfive]? Table H-3 provides employment projections between the },ears 2000 and 2020. According to OCP-96 Modified data, employment ~m the City of Tustin is expected to increase by appro ~xLmately 31 vercent by the year 2020. Tustin 2000 Table H- 3 Employment Projection 2005 42.097 45,988 2010 2020 49,545 Percent Change (2000-2020) 55,183 : 31% 5zurce: 9CP-96 Mod.ffie~, Prepared by Center for Demographic Research. Table 1-I-4 provides a Est of the largest private sector employers in Tustin in 1999. The list includes a varie~' of kndustries, including manufacturing, health care, retail, and tecl~noio~' sectors. · ' I -~ous~ng, ~l_m, .~ ........ ~,.al Memorandum 7'able .-; .... ~ .,~-~.~ '" Deze.'r.b~::' Table H- 4 MA.]'OR TUSTIN EMPLOYERS Company/Addre~relephone No. Emp. Product/Serrice Steelcase Inc- (7!4) 259-8000 !,100 Office Furniture I:IZ3 Warner Avenue - Tustin 92780 Ricoh. Elecu'onic$. inc. ;7]4) ,25e-"220 ~ '~38 2] 00 Valencia Aver, ue - Tustin, 92780 Sun Health, Care Group - :1714) 544-4443 985 Heal,care 2742 Dow Avenue - Tustm 92780 Texas Instrumen~ - (714) 573-6000 560 i Semiconductors 14351 Mvford Road - Tus~r 92780 5iEcon Systems - (714) 731-.,'-110 550 · integrated Circu:Is 14~52 .Mv£ord Road - Tusffn 92780 ~ o ~ .... '-" Auto Deaiers?.¥s ~ .auto Center Drive - Tustin %./8a · Pa:gain Technoio~, - (714) 832-9922 500 Telecommunications 14402 Franklin Avenue - T'astm 9278C , Cherokee iatema~ona'. - (714) 598-2000 ~ 330 Power Supphes 284~ Dow - Tus~.n 92780 Toshiba America Med,ca! Systems - (714) 730-5000 300 Distributor, Medical 2441 M~cne'.le - Tus~n 92780 Equivment Cram' Shirts - (7!4) 832-5883 245 Apparel 291"_ Dow Avenue - TustL-. 92780 Prmtrak international - (7~ 4': 238-2000 204 Fingerprintw. g ~250 N. Tus~l: - Tustin 92780 -,/1-~, ,"31-1234 200 Manu£acturer :4!92 Franklin Avenue - T;~sVi~ 92780 Tustir. Hosvital - (714) 669-5883 200 '14662 Newvort Bou}evard - Tus~n 92780 Pacii'~c Bell Mobi}e Se,-'vices - (714) 734-7300 200 ']'e]eccmmunicanons 252! Michelie Drive 2~'~ r-qoor - Tustin 9278(: F~reman"s Fund Insurance - (714) 669-09!! 199 insurance ~7542 17t~ Street - 'l'us~n o','- '~ Safeguard Business Systems - (7~.4) 73,9-8"_22 175 A:countm8 Services ] 466! Fra:'tklin - Tustir. 92780 ,30--,._{Y3 Chem~ca is Dynachem eiectronic Materiais- (714) ~ ' ~ 155 ao_,l .~.i~chelle Drive - Tus~m 9278~ \'italcom irc. - (73 4) 546-3147 239 :~ !ed:cal com.-.uter 15222 Del Arno Avenue - Tustin 9.2750 Net~vorks Smar~ex Systems inc. - (,"'34I, 838-5737 127. Electronic Assemblies ~4312 Franklin Avenue - Tustia 92780 Duncan electronics - (714', 258-7500 125 ~nsors Manu£acrur'-',~.g ~. 577q Red Hill - Tus~.". 92780 Quality Systems - (714~ 73!-717:, 3.13 Medical,.' Dental 17822 E. 17:.'. S~eet, Suite 210 - Tustir, 92780 Comvuter Svs'.ems 5ource: T~stin Chamber o£ Commerce, 1999 Jobs-Housing Bal~e ..~, ~. The "jobs-housing balance" test is a general measure of a connnunitv's employment opporturdfies with respect to its residents' needs. A balanced commurdtv would reach ecuitibrium '~ ,~,~ employment and housing opporttmities so the majorit?' of the residents could also work within the commurdt~'. The jobs-hcushng balance for {he Ci~.' of Tustin is sho~.m Ln Table 14.-5. According to ~e California Department of finance mud SCAG, there were ,~3,8,'~- ,), · employment opportunities a.nd _-~,861 households m Tus?m re$-alting in a jobs/housing ratio of 1.76. in comparison, jobs/housing ratio for Orange Count}.' was 1.59. The jobs/housing ratio for the en~-e six- count3.' SCAG region was 1.35 in 2000. 'D,~is a_nalysis demons~ates ~,at Tustin is a jo~rich community when compared to the count~' and regional averages. Table H- 5 CITY OF TUSTIN JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE 2000 ' Tustin i Oran~eCoun~' Emplovmen~ 43,873 1,536.603 Housing Units 24,861 966,086 - Jobs/Housin[ Ratio i !.76 s~-u~ces: ca!!fon'aa De.~ari-mem of Ftnance: 5CAG. .59 gCAG Re$ion 7.70~,504 1.25 Overcrowding A2ong with the Cig,'s population growth, ~ere has been an increase in unit overcrowding, as households :'double ur" to save on lnousing ._n_.n'~ ~ of one of three condific, ns: i'~ a costs. Overc~owdLng is often -~ ~~,.' .,~ .. famiiv or household is living in too small a dwelling; 2) a r'a~vJiv chooses to house extended farrdiv members (i.e., grandparents or grown children and their families living with parents, termed doub!ing~; or 3') a famiN' is renting living space to non-family members. State and Federal Ho'~hng Law defines overcrowded housing ,.mits as those in which fl~e ratio of persons-to-rooms exceeds "~.,,.'~ The rooms considered '2n this eauation exclude bathroon,~s, kitchens, and halhvays, but inciudes ember rooms such as living and dining rooms. The 1999 Reg~onai Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared by the Southern Califo.mia Association of Governments (SCAG) figures showed 2,590 (~ percent) househoids Liv,.'.ng in overcrowded conditions of whid~ 51 percent were Low-income households. Low- income hous~olds are those earning 80 percent or iess than ~ne countT~ median family income (MFI). Income levels are discussed further in the "affordabiii~'" section. Substandard Units Approximately 64 percent of the C~ty's housing stock is over 30 years old. Bv 2010, 78 percent of the City's housing Stock w~ be over 30 years. This indicates a poten~al need for rehabilitation and cent~mued maint~=nance of nearly 19,300 dweEing urdts-~. Affordabili~, State and Federal st-a_ndards for rental housing overpayment are based on an income-to-housing cost ratio of 30 vercent and above-'. Households paying greater than tlzis percentage will have less income left over for o~er necessities, such as food, cio~2zing and heal~ care. Upper income households are generally capable of paying a ia~ger proportion of their income for housk-x§, and therefore estimates of housing overvavment generaliy focus on fewer income groups. The !999 RHNA estimates show 38 per'cent (8,569) of Tus:dr, s 22,755 total households were paying more than 30 vercent of their income on housing needs. Of ~ese over-payers, 64 percent were Low-income households (<80% of MFI) of wlzich 3,446 were ciassified as Very ~<v0 .~ Low-income households ' - o, of MFi'). The distinction bebveer, renter and owner housir'.g overpayment imvort0_r,t because, while homeowners may over-extend themselves financially to afford the option of home pttrchase, the owner aIwavs · ~ Housing Element Technical Memorandum Table HTM-21. ~ Some agencies and organizations consider Moderate income households to be overpayin§ when housing costs exceed 35 percent cf gross income, with the .maxirnum -~ncome representing 110% of the median counD: raceme. Under these assumptions, over?ayment occurs in fewer households 'in the Ci~' of Tustfl~. Scurce: Strate~es for !;fanning and Dcvelovment: Ca;~i?ornia Afi~:'dabie .r-lousing ?landbooi:, Ca~orn~.a Redevelovment ,~ssociation, 2000. 'C'.T~.' 'DF 7'L~T:.~' i-iOL'.~Z"CG ~_L.E2;~I~'T 12 :December 2031 main~a~s tlne opt/on, of selii~gi,~he home, thereby generally lowering housing costs, in addition, home ownersh/p affords tax benefits to reduce monthly costs. Renters are limited to the rental market, and are generally requ.ired to pay the rent established in that market. According to the RHNA, of the total 5,494 lower income households identified as overpayers, 4,444 were renter households and 1,05~ were owner households. This discrepancy is largely reflec~ve of ~e disproport/6nate nu.mber of renta2 housing urdts in the City and the tendency of renter households to have lower incomes than owner households (see Table HTM-12 in Technical Memorandum). tv. order to understand the development para_meters under wl'dch new afforfiable units can be produced, a review of affordable housing projects assisted by Ene Orange Count~' Housing and Commu_rdD' Deveiovment Department ~rough the 1999 and 2000 NOFA/RFP was conducted (see Table _'~-6). N/_ne projects were built during this cycle wit2n a total of 841 un/ts, w~.th one of the Frojects located in the Ciq, of Tus~n. The table shows that these projects ranged in size from 5 un/ts to 220 un/ts w,_'th de~ities from 14 to over 70 units per acre. Three oi the me projects had de~iSes under 20 un/ts per acre. The weighted average density is 34 units per acre. Tne level of subsidy requ/.red ranged/-rom under S4,000 per uMt up to 558,000 per unit with a weighted average of about S14,000 per -Fnis anaivsis serves to demonsmate the feasibility of developing affordable apartment projects at densities in the 20 u_v. its/acre range. Table H-7 contains the results of a r_~nt survey ~,~ of market-rate avarWnent projects 5-~ Tusth:. These projects are all located in Tustin Ranch area and most are less than 10 years oid. Average rents for studio and 1-bedroom mn/ts were fou.nd to be wiS-tin the Low- · _- r~n~s Jn income category while ~ and 3-bedroom un/ts had average ~, ~- the Mocierate category. The densities of these projects ranged' /rom ,o to __ un/ts per acre x~fi~ a weighted average of 19 uni~ per acre. This data supports the assumvtion that affordable market rate apartmen:$ can be vr3vided with densities ir. the range of 24 units per acre. ~3 Table It- 6 AFFORDABLEHOUSING PRC)JECI' SUMMARY 1999 & 2Ut10 REQUI?S•1.' fO11 PROPOSALS AND NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY lcc'n('c fs (.canny suvs,uy oloy. ()ince, sources of tutalf(•tal subsidy may also have been pnividect. Non-Reslricled Manager's hail Source: Orang o County I lousing; & Community 1 t'velopment Deparlineid, Felrruar, 2001 CITY (.)1' T STIN W) SIA4; ISLI:r311'.Iff December 2001 1,s Density 111c:ome Subsidy Project Name Arca Project Size (units) (units./ac) Category )er unit), Villa Nlodena Apartmeiils Orang;(' 5 UnitsTolal 16.67 5 --VI.. $58,620 Large Families _ 2--2 13(lrnls _&3-3 liclrms Stanton Accessible Apartnrvnis Stanton 10 UniLs Total 14.50.- ')-VL -- $;3'i,ll(Ill - - - Sprrial N(tecls 1 lousin}; 10-113(tral- -- - - I-NKfMU Jackson aisle Apartmenis Midway City 30 Uniis Total - _ 71.1:3 ;3U -VL. _ --- $24,808 - Special Nceds !lousing;....__... 29 lsflicie.ncics & I - L 13(1rm -- Solara Court Aral(idents Anaheim 132 Units Total 35.68 131 VI. _ - $6,(►7() - �ierllU[' 11UIISIII 107-1 Mum & 24-2 Bdruls I--NRMIJ Lincoln Avenue Apariments Anaheim 82 I_JniLs'['olal 47.c)3 81-V1. - --- $9765 - ;c'niur ,lp:rrtnfr.nt _ - 82, I. I3cir111 - -- I.-NRMU__* I I(•ritaf;(' Place at'fusti►t 'Tustin - - - 54 Unit.."VoUll. 29.67---- 49 -VI. '�.I0,0;35 ' Senior I-Iousillg: -- -- - 43-113(.irnl & 1 1.2-I3(Irnls 4-1,; 1 Nl�bll)* Talog;a Jamboree Sall C'Iculente 18(1 UniL: Total 18.60 `i1 -1_.;.74 -VI.. $17,672 - Large Families- - - --._..._ _. 93-2 13drms & 93.3 Minns 60 -XI, vinlal'e Shores Sall C. l('ill('llte - 122 UnitsTotal otal --- 2%..12 -..._ 24 -VI, — x(;3,874 Senior I IUlltilllf' -- 80-.I.B 1rm &.4.2-2. 13dn.i1S 98.1 l.a(I(tl,, Ran(L 11 Mission Vx'lo 220 111117 Total 42.80 4 VI• - $2(1,t1t1(1 __.. IolaIs urllts W(',1;h1(cl bU Lx. Low Weighted 18'il av1;: :34.:3 448 VI-.; 15:3 L avl;: $13,900 180 Nit lcc'n('c fs (.canny suvs,uy oloy. ()ince, sources of tutalf(•tal subsidy may also have been pnividect. Non-Reslricled Manager's hail Source: Orang o County I lousing; & Community 1 t'velopment Deparlineid, Felrruar, 2001 CITY (.)1' T STIN W) SIA4; ISLI:r311'.Iff December 2001 1,s A.ffordability Gap Analysis: 'in addition to irfformation related to Housing Cons~aints Frovided in the Ci~"s Housing Element Technical Memorandum, a Comprehensive Housing AffordabilitT, St-rate~, has been prepared. The report contains a detailed affordab!li~, gap analysis to illusmate tlne 'gap" between the cost of developing housing for rent and ownership a_nd what households at a variety of income levels can afford to var toward their housing expenses. A Summary of Renter and O~mer A.f:'ordabiiiw Gaps for certain proto~,pical unit ~'pes and incomes are provided as Appendix "B.~-'' Special Needs Groups Certain segments of abe population may have a more difficult time finding decent, affordable housflxg due to special circun~.~tances and ma}, '~ ;~ specific accommoda.~on or assistance to meet their housing needs. Included as special needs groups are the elderly, ~amih~s, and homeless. disabled, female-headed households, large t ..,~ With ~' o m, closure of MCAS-Tustin, military personnel are no longer covered as a special needs ~oup. Additionally, there are no known "farmworkers" residing k". Tust-in and, there£ore, ~2s group is not d±scussed. Elderh': The svecial needs of many elderly households resu]t from. lower fixed incomes, vhvsicai disabiiities, and dependence needs, i2. 1990, .~,843 persons or 7.6 percent of the total population in Tustin were 65 vears ofao~,: or older, in 1990, there were -,-9 v65 elderh' households in Tustin and owner households revresented the rnajori~' at 70 percent (1,596 households). According to California State U:,3versi~' at Fullerton's Center for Demographic Research Center '.CDR), there was a slight increase in the elder!y population in 1997 at 5,214 or 7.9 percent of the total population (See Teclm~cal .Memorandum Tabie HT.M-2). As noted in the Table HTM-11 of the Tecl~nicai. Memorandum, nearl}' one-quarter of the elderly earn an annual income of less than 515,000 and 40 percent earn less ti,an $25,000 mmualh'. Thus, this popu]at4on needs housing that is affordable and located ;n close prox".mJty to public services and ~ansportation. Comvr_n.ns,~._ Housing Affordabfiiq' Strateg3.', -~ Summary based on data contained in .~' = ~ '~, . 2000-2010. December Disabled: Phvsical disabilities can hinder access to housing units of traditional design 'and poter{~i~lly limit t_he abili9, to ea_m adequate income. According to the 1990 Census, there were 2,!62 disabled people in the CID,. The disabled commtmig,, as defined by California Depaztraent of Rehabilitation Caiffornia Disab!lig' Survey, includes four classfficatiov, s of disabilities. These classifications and '._heir percentages of the total disab]ed popula~or, :an be found 'Ln the Teclmical Memorandum Table HTM-13. Svecial housing needs o£ disabled individuals include wheelchair accessib~9', railings, and spedal construction /or interior living spaces. ~e Housing Element sets forth policies to encourage the development of disabled-accessible housing. Large Families: A fanxilv household containing five or more persons, as defined by the Census, is considered a large family. Large families are identified, as groups with special housing needs because of the limited availability of adecuateh' sized, affordable housing ur, its. Large families are often of lower income, frequently resulting in the o'~'ercrowding of smaller dwelling unffs and accelerating deteriora t-ion. According to the 1990 Census, 2,033 famih' households, or I! percent of all households, had five or more persons. 1999 data from National Decision Systems shows 3,095 large households, represent~mg I.'-..6 percent of total Cid,,' households (see Housing Element Techniza! _Memorandum Table HTM-14). Female-Headed Parent Households: -l-ne housing needs of female- headed households with chiidren are generally related af,'ordabiiit~' sLnce su~, households tYvicalh' have lower than average incomes. According to the !990 Census, t_b.e CitT' o£ Tusdn had !,175 femaie-headect households wiV& children less ~an 'iS oz age. The Homeless: Measuring the extent of the homeless population specifically in Tustin remains a challenge for community leaders. To complicate the challenge of meet~.'.xg homeless versotzs', n_~os,,~o' the issue of homelessness is considered regional in nature. Norz'~adic tendencies of homeless persons make it difficult to assess :lne popu]a tion accurately on a citvwide basis. Nonethe]ess, '7 homelessness must be addressed on a counWwide conjunct/on with cities and loca! non-profit organizations. basis in According to 1999 stud/es prepared by tlne Orange Count' Department of Housing and Commurdtv Development !OCH//CDj, it is estimated that there are !4,000 homeless persons in the CounW on an}' given night. Two-thirds of the County's homeless populahon includes fan-~es with children. OC.:-!/CD also reported that within the homeless population there are sub-populations (See Techrrical Memorar, dum Table HTM-15). City of /ustin Police Department reports and windsl~e]d surveys have shown that there are no esmohsned areas where homeless oersons congregate in the Cit-y, and that most persons migrate through Tust-h~ ra~er than stay for extended periods of t~.zne. The Ci~-'s Police Devartmenff es~mates that there are currently 10-12 homeless persons residh~g in the CRv at any given time. Within the CitT, there are a varie~' of non-profit services that orovide direct housing and other services to homeless persons. These include a ~ansit/onaI housing facilit-v (Sheepfold), temporary housing for teenagers in ~is:'s (Laurel House) and a feeding pro,am affi!iared with the United Way (Feedback Foundation). Sheepfold m:d Laurel House are ~'picaliy located in R-I dis~icts amd are permitted by right under State Law related to Commumtw Care Facilities. The City's current code related to homeless, ~ansi~ona! lnvusing, bcardh~g houses are as follows: A =m'oup housing arrangement (where less than s:'x (6) residents) ir. a single family home is not subject to Ci~' perm/ts (consistent with State Law'l. A group housing arrangement of over six .'.6) residents is classified as a boarding house. 'i-ne R-3 and R-4 clis~izts would allow for boarding houses with a CcnditSonal Use Perm_it (CUP) A group ho?, .... ' ~ ..... s_.x m.% clients a rnt:lh-farrj!v dweli~g unit weuid fa_H under this defirdtion. · The ant/cipated facilities at the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan will permit transit/onal and emergency she2ers by right. A number of local c2nurches in Tustin also provide se.wlces to the homeless includhng St. Ceciiia's, Redhill Lutheran, TustLn - Officer G. \'allevienle, Tustin Police Departmen:, 2000. Deceraber 22001 C.C'," OF TL'STi.¥ HO'..'SE;3 Presbyterian Church and Aldersgate. A list of services proviJed by t&,ese organizatior~ .i.~ p.rov~d~Lu Table H-$. Facil{~, Sheepfold Laurel House St. Cecilia's Redhill Lutheran Table H- 8 EMERGENCY 5HELTER/TIL4.NS ITIONAL HOUSING FACILITIES 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN Services Provided Provides shelter, food, clothing, job-training, and ich- referral services to women wi~n children. Tempora.~:· housing for teenage~ in crisis. The fadht-y also vrov~des food, informal counseling, and access to med':ca: care and clo~in$. Distributes food suppiv to needy vovulat~ons. Operates emergent' food program where a person can receive food suvph' 3 hines a year. ~ Collects food suvvlies and distr{butes the focd ro various Tustin Presbyterian cr~ranizat~ors invoh'ed in vrovidmg homeless services. · Refers interested persons ~o Ecumenical Sam-:res A']iance kldersgate ir, Santa Aaa. 5ource: ~at~' of Tusun ConsoLidated Plan 2000-vdt0,5 A s,~affizant portion of the _Marine Corps Air Statien (MC.AS) is iocated wifi:/n ~e C,;tv. Zne MCAS Tust-i.n facility was identified by fiae U.S. Devartment of Defense for closure tn july 1999. in accordance with the Base Closure Redevelovment and Homeless Assiszance Act of 2.994 (Redevelopment Acti, the City of Tus~n was forrnailv recognized as the Local Redevelopment AuthoriW for the MCAS Tustga. The Redevelopment Act provides a process that aims to balance the needs of the home]ess with other development interests jrt the communities directiy affected by closure of the installation. ]xe Act requires the Local Redevelopment Au~ori~' to prepare a reuse plan and Homeless Assistar, ce Plan (HAP), wHc. h is submi~ed to federal DepamT~ent of Housing and Urban Development HUD reviews and determines whether the documents ba!sa~ce the needs o£ the homeless tn communities in the vicinity of the installa4don with the need for economic development. December 2001 j:.'TY :9i: 'Z,'ST.-:.' 713 :,'SI;;3 :TL ESL:£L"? A Homeless Assistance Plan has been established for MCAS, Tus~n that is consistent with ~e continuum, of care model embodied in the Consolidated Plans for the Cities of Tustin and neighboring f~'ine. The fundamental components of the continuum of care system to be implemented with the MCAS, Tustin Reuse Plan ~couid: Provide emergency shelter beds and intake assessment Offer transitional housing and servizes Provide opportunities for vermanent affordable housing by the private sector. In the .MCAS Reuse Plan, four homeZess service providers, including the 5a!vatior. A~'my, O,.'ange Coast Interfai'2~ Shelter, Fan,ales Forward, and DOVE Housk-~g have beet', approved to operate 50 family units at the former base. The Orange Count~' Rescue Mission will also operate a 192-unit transitional/emergency shelter. Numerous other agencies provide shelter ~nd other services to the homeless in the nearby cities of Santa Aw, a, Irvine, and Orange. The Orange Count~' Homeless issues Task Force, a non-profit homeless .'-~dvocacv orgawiza,-ion, maintaLns a list of these and other homeless services ~ Orange Count'. Additional discussion regarding land use regulations that apply to facilities sen'ing the homeless is found in the Housin§ Cons~air. ts section of this document and in ~e Technical A.{emorandum. PRESERVATION OF UNITS AT RISK OF CONVERSION Tustin has one project ~at contains units at risk o£ conver~4ng to unrest-r,.'cted market rate during t2ne 2000-2005 pla:'w~i_n.g period. i'usfin Gardens is a~-~...~c:" ,,~-.',..,..~,~,.c~,~ .~.~ 221(D'~!'4~, ,, , p:'o~c~.. . ~'iCn a Secfio'_.', $, con~ac.~ for 200 traits 'char ~'as due to expire on ~y 13, 2000. Projects financed under the Section 22~ (D)(4) market rate program alone have no binding income use restrictions. Current provisions under the law allow for ~.he ~ ~ ' = , .x.s,~v.o proiect to op.~ out of con,acts or for ~-~UD to terminate snch con,acts. The proiect owners of Tust~m Gardens have indicated that they intend ~.o con~.nue or to accep~, the conversion of :'.ne proiect to individual Section 8 cer~icates (household by household into:ne qualifying criteria). Table H-9 is an inventory of al! mulh-famiiv rental u_nits assisted under federal, st'.a~,' andZ0.4 local programs, including td-UD Frog-rams, state and local bond ~ro~ams, redevelopm~-~t programs, and local £n-lieu fee, inclusionary, density bonus, or direct assistance Frogram_q. The inventory includes all units ~at are eligible to c.,nvert to non-lower income housing uses due to termknafion of s'absidy contract, mortgage prepayment, or expiring nse restrictions. Various res~ictions mad Lncenfives affect the likelihood that at risk units will convert to other uses. Congress passed the Low income Housing and Residen~al Homeownership Act (LIHPRHA) in 1991. Z~t~ measure assured residents that t2neir homes would be preserved fo:' fl~eir remai.ning useful lives while owners were assured of fair- market compensation. However, modifications to the Act in 2996 restored the owners' right to prepayment, under the previsions that fi:e owner would be encouraged to sell the preper~, to resident endorsed or other non-vrofit orga~zafions. ]-nree different alterna.fves have been evaluated in addressing "at risk'" traits during the 2000-2005 planning period, inci'ading replacement of existing urdts bv means of newly cons~ucted units, acquL-ing and v~havm~atmg u~,its, and local rental subsidy assistance. Replacement: Replacement of any lost "assisted" urdts at Tusthn Gardens would cost 5125,883 per unit. Applying this figure to ~'qe Tustin Gardens project, replacing all assisted u.n?.s would cost approxirn, arel)' $12,558,390. Acquisition: Alternative]y, should these "at risk" units be acquired, the per-unit cost would be less at 5100,777 vet uz~it provid'zd rehabilitation was reouired. Accordingly, the acau'isition of ali a: Tustin Gardens would cost -~' 4 ~,~:. c.~...,:-. -,,~ ~r. prox,.rv.a....x _, ,.,., .... , Table 11- 9 ASS1S1.1D HOUSING INVIiN FORY 1 t'rojett-i Name, I Adiltvss incl. Zi 1) Owner: I Name, Ad.ln•ss, 'fel. It 1'yl)c(s) of Gov'l Assistance ypl/I,enrth of Affordability Controls (including Sec. 8) Earliest Potential ('ower- Sion Date(s) It of Units 'Tenant Type (i.e., Elderly, Iauril Bedroom Mix Date Built (if known) C'ondilion (if known) l )raI Ige (;;In I IIs I Westc Oster• Park, I Redevelo111mint 111COIne 5/2028 IR) Family I7-Ibr N/A t.iUUd lt,0.) Nis';on Rd. 1._.1'. Agency y restricted. No 93-2.111 'I Ialin, CA 927$11 1 I rent r(`strict.ions %lU=3br ilanlhtorl.`;gmliv I Fail li(-lel IZr•clevclolunent I Incurnc 10/2011 � 210 — I Family — 12,1-IIn. 1909 C;oocE 1(631 MtFadden Ast•. Itesidt`ntialCorp.I Agency 1 restritled.No t r\ 97/80E3(i-Zbr lil, 97/80I I lt'nt iustrictlt)l s - I lajncic Is I'oiulc• l uslin f\Itunlatile I KedevelopmelIt luruule 10/7.0'>') qc) Family 41-2hr (9e1e1 Good - - 1....120 �fur.lirl Villdj,r. I I lousins, Col l+. Ali `nry n•slricled. No 7-2-br ' Wav I I Il`Ill iestrit•tlorl.5 I'LlA i l t, CA 97YOU I .` _ 13 IV' /1 — IVoI elvililllllit, li)I )A -1 lisposilion and I)evelopmenl Agiveni `nl Boum•: Con lln'rlwlasivr• I luttsu g Allorclability Stialogy 2149110 r.il.l(')`• s I±t)..ili'`.•fi W1J."'. l'.i7• I )rc, I.1hrr 200 1 Rental Subsidy: An option for preservation of at-risk '.~.nJts assisted by either proiect based Secton 8 funds and/or bond financing would be a conversion of the project to a tenant based Section 8 assistance program or alternatively a local rental subsidy to the ov,.mer to benefit maLntainkng affordable rent levels for residents. Rent subsidies can also be struct,ared to mirror the tenant-based Section 8 voucher or certificate progTams. These options could be used to retain the affordable status of the urdts, by providLng assistance for residents when *,_heir affordable urdts convert to market rate. Rent subsidies using state, local (Redevelopment Agent: or Ci~', the use of HOME funds, or other funding sources) can be used to maintain the affordabfiitv of these at-risk units. ~ne cest of providing subsidies for all 100 at-risk units at Tustin Gardens to maintain subsidized rents assumes ~at none ef ~e at- risk un/ts are preserved. The cost of providing a rental subsidy for · e at-risk urdts is S10,700 per month, or 5128,403 per year, as shown in Table HTM-30 of the Tezhrdzal memorandum document. Conkract £xte~zsio~:: Tusfi_n Gardens ~ the only project based Section 8 subsidized project at-r'~sk of losing affordabfliW restrictions during the Housing Element plmnning period. However, it appears unlikely that the affordabfiiW of these urdt's v:ill be threatened based on the determination that vro~ect based Section 8 contracts can be renewed on an annual bas,:s, in fact, the owner has indicated in writing their agreement to convert the project to a tenant-based Sect-ion 8 assistance prog-ram. Programs for Preservation of At-Risk Units: The cost of acquiring and preserving t~he at-risk units is less than replacing the u_nits with new cons~ucton. As discussed earlier the total cest of replacing the project is esthnated to be $12,558,300, whereas acquiring the Tustin Gardens project wouid cost a total o.'; $10,077,700 :see Table HT*,.'.-28 and accompanying rex:i:. Ii the "/kffordabne Gap" ware subsidized, the reouired comrrdtment of resoarces for preserving the Tust:m Gardens tunits "at risk" by providing rental subsidies is much. lower, at $10,700 monthly or $?_8,400 annually. ]'he Ciw mon/tors at risk housing up. its to ensure that these u.nits will not be ]cst as Low-income housing. The Ci~' will subsidize un.its and/or work with nonprofits in the co_mmunit?.' to explore possible new construcnon ef replacement housing by nonprofits or acouisition of ''~ ' "' ex~s,.ng buildings with at ,'isk urd.ts by nonpron: ,24 orgardzafions. The Cig, wkl! m,~k. e efforts to preserve un.its "at risk" at Tust~n Gardens. Specific actions that the City will take to vrotect (or replace) at risk u.nits are '.'dentffied iv. the Hous~g Element implementation Pro,am. SUMMARY OF HOUSING ISSUES HousLng is a f-andarr'.Lenta! cornponent of land use withLn a commurLitT' necessary to support the resident popuia:.-ion. Obtaining affordable housLng has become a problem for persons of all income groups in Caiifornia. The following Tabie H-10 presents an overv,~ew of households in abe City with svecial hous!ng needs or ?roblerpz with their exis~ng housing, such as overpayment or overcrowded conditions. The following text high!ights the issues relevant to the City of Tustin, w~ch are addressed by the goals, voiides and im?Jementation plans. Table H- 10 SL-MMARY OF EXISTING HOUSING NEEDS CITY OF TUSTIN 1998-2005 Growth Needs :2 Special Needs Group Very Low tUrdts) 694 Elderly Persons '. l,ow {Units; 489 D~sabled Persons Moderate (Unit~ 775, La.r~e Idouseholds2 Above-Moderate (Uni:'$) 1,337 ' Fe:v. aie-Headed Housekolds w'2~-~ Chl]dren under 1~ veers 3,843 2.762 3.0~5 !.178 TOTAL 3,298'. Overcrowding Overpavinz Households Renmr ! 2.060 ' Renter - Total ' 5,5", 8 Owner . 330; Remer- <$5%;~.'.z: ..... :,' ca4_. ' ! Owner - To~a! ~C5~ ' C, wn~- <~'~'~ ,: .~r, 7.~50 TOTAL i 2,390; 7~tal ~ 8,569 : Regional Housing Needs .~sessment, Ci.~' of 'l'ustk",, 2999. : :-~ouseholds contai~.n g 5 or more people. : See dlsc~:ssfon op. Tus:i~ co::cerns regardfv.$ need methvclvlc~y employe'~ by $CAG. $o'a.'zes: 19~ Census. · The OCCOG recommended: 5~5 tm.i:s for :?.e Ve.w Low ,;ncome he-aseholds..~25 u.rdts One Low income households. 566 u~nirs/ct tize Mode'ram ln:ome households, and 973 ~'o:' Above M:~deraie income ho'zseho]ds for a totai of 2,~9 r, ew cons~uzSon needs. December 20.2' Ox .n3a~ m_n~. 70 percent of the Cih"s lower income house- holds (households which earn less than 80 percent o£ the Cour, a, median) are currently overpa}dng for housing (see Table HTM-12). Overcrowding. Household overcrowding has increased over the past decade as individuals and £anr~es "double up" to save on housing costs. Over 15 percent of lower ~.come households currently experience overcrowded conditions (see Table i-IE~I-8). ?iousLng Grox~-~% Needs. For the 1998-2005 plan.ping period, SCAG identities a housing grow& need of 3,298 dwelling units in Tustin. These units are allocated among the following income categories: 1,337 above-moderate income units; 778 moderate-income units; 489 low-income units; and 694 verY- low Lncome units (see Table H-10). On jul)' 26, 2999, the Cit3~ of TustLn appealed ~e draft .. N~_d methodoiog-y to the Cons~uction Need/Vacancy .'~ Orange County Council of Governments (Delegate Sub- Region) through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Process. The Alternative Dispute Resolution Board recommended approval of ~e City's appeal to the Orange County Co~ncii of Governments (OCCOG) Board. On Augus~ 19, ~.999, the OCCOG adopted Resolution No. 99-03 approving the RHNA for tl~e Orange Cormtv sub-region. 'included in that action was the recommendation that the Regional Council (SCAGii adiust the Vacancy rates for AICAS, Tustin because ~e Regional Transportation Plan (]'<TP) and the 1990 Census data vacancy ra~es ciid not accura~eh' ~ ~fle~ the base closure. The OCCOG recommended as follows: 505 units for the \:e~' Low Income households, 355 un, ts for the Low income households, 566 units fo:' the .'.Moderate income hous.~.ho]ds, and 973 for t2ne Above Moderate Income households for a total of 2,399 u_nits new construc'~on needs. On December 9, 1999 and iune 22, 2000, the Ci~' of Tustin appealed the RHNA Vacancy Need numbers t~,at were used to calculate total cons~ucfion needs for the City of Tusfin. The appeal was based on a unique si.~aation in that 9~5 housin§ mn.its ]ccated at the based were not properly co-anted as vacant housing units by the Department of Finance and are :~ot ref:ected tn the 1990 census credited vacancy .2,5 ,.?,ecernber 2001 me'thodolog~,'. T"ne SCAG Communi~,, Econon'flz, and Human ITe(~elopment"~(C£HD) Comm. i'ttee rejected both appeals despite the recommendation b)' the Orange Count~: Council of Govenu-nents. Accordingly, while ~e Cim- has prepared this Housing Element using the fi~ares determ£ned by SCAG, the Ci~,- res?ectfull)' maintair~ its concern over the RHNA Vacancy Need methodolog)'. Large Families. 13.6 percent of Ci~/s households contain 5 ,,~- o,~ household size more persons m tlne households. Zne a~ ~,ao~ Ln the Cit-v increased from 2.7 in ] 990 to 2.92, largely due to changes in the ethnic composition. This indicates a poCenP'al need for larger hous~g units to accommodate Cnese families (see Table HTM-14). Affordabiiitx' Gap. Based upon available information on rental rates Lq the City, i~ is difficult to find rental hc. using that is large enough and affordable for large, iow-income fm~lies :see Table HTM-24 a_ad Table HTM-25). Elderly. As the Ci~"s population ages, tiae number of elderly persons will increase. Tn_is underscores an increasing need to address the special houshag needs of the eider]v..,"s,~,~,_ Table HTM-2). Disabled. Disabled mdividua!s have particular hous'-.'ag needs relating to access and adaptab/2/%'. Female-Headed Parent Households. Female-headed households make up ma increas£'~g percentage of the Ci~"s population. Many of tiaese households have knzcmes below the povert), level and have svecia! hous::ng needs such access to chiidcare services. Homeless. Growing numbers of homeless persons in Southern California have created parfic-alar housing and sodal service needs. The closure of MCAS Tus.rin ~rovid es an opporturdt-y /or additional housing supply /2,, t;ne City ' n_e~,s of ~e homeiess and including acco_mn-.odafion or the ,, ..4 the need for affordable housfl~g (see Yable HTM-15). in addition, a group housing arrangement (with less fi:an s/o: (6) residents! in a sm~,~ farrdlv home ~; not subiezt to a ........................ ,,;,- Conditional Use Permit (--OhS!stent with State Law). A group housing arrangement of over six (6) residents is classified as a boarding honse. /~ne R-3 and R-4 districts would allow for boarding houses with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). First Time Homebuvers. High housing costs have put home ownership beyond tlne reach of many potential first-time homebuvers. G.x.~rnm_n,al Constraints. Governmental regnlafions, SUCh as land use controls, fees, and processing procedures, can act as constraints to the maintenance and oroductio~: of housing. Units at Risk of Conversion to Market Rate. By State law, the Cin: must identify and deveiop ?rograms and pol~cies to address affordable housing units that are at risk of convert~.mg to rp, arket rate housing. During the 2000-2005 planning period, the City of Tust~n faces the potential conversion of 100 low-income units (see Table HTM-27). Tenure. The Cia' has a high proportion of housing as compared to other jurisdic~ons in 'Orange County. in ~ ..... ~o9, 59.3 percent of the Cis"s uvdts were ~=n compared to 40.7 percent renter occu?:'ed units counWwide. Promotion of home ownershh~ ovvortnnJtJes fin .'J~e City may be necessary to maintain a balanced c',,,mrnuniW (see Table HTM-20). Housing Stock Condition. Over 64 percent of the City's housing stock ~s 30 years old or olde.- - the age at which housing t>.'pically begins to require major repairs, h~ addition, the lack of adequately sized affordable housing can lead to overcrowding and in turn, deteriorated housing condi.+ions. :Maintenance and improvement of .ex.s~n[.,~ "· hotzsing conditions over the ,o_:g ,.--...a w£i rea;rare ongoing maintenance of existing traits, rehabilitation or replacement of substandard housing and programs to maintaLn neighborhood quality (see Table bT_M-21). Historic Resources. Older neighborhoods in Tusfin zontain several i:istoric residences that should be preserved as part of the community's heritage. These historic homes were identified through an inventory of historic buildings i_n 1990. CRT',.; OF ~7STiif HOUSi~VG '28 December 205J Target Neighborhoods. A large portion of tlne Citv's lower income h~JL~siv, g "{~'" ~'concenh.ated in the southwest neighborhoods. Targeted programs such as graffiti rerrtoval, proactive code-enforcement, loan and grant l-.0us~.ng rehabilitation program, remora! of abandoned vehicles, inc:'eased police presence, removal/tTimming overgrown trees in public rf.'ght-of-way, various physical improvements for .street widening, and street lighting a_nd aF. ey imvrovements na'~. be_.. flmvlemented. Ener~, Conservation. Due to its climate, the Cig' can ,aKe advantage of solar ener~' to reduce ~,lia'~ ~'"~ .... on non- renewable ener~- supplies. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS Actual er potential cons~aints on t2ne provision and cost of housing affect the development of new housing and the maintenance of existing u_nits for all income levels. Market, governmental, infrastructure, and environmen:al cons~aints to housfiT$ development in Tustin are summarized below and discussed in greater detail in the Housing Element Technical Memorandurr. Market Constraints The high cost of renting or buying adeouate housing i~ a vrirnarv ongo;mg constraint, l-{igh cons.'uction costs, land costs and market financing constraints are con~ibuffng to increases in the cost o.; affordable housing. Construction Costs'.. The 2000,-2005 Tust-in Consolidated Plan report's fi:a: th?_ sfi:gle largest cost associated with building a new ho:'.se is ~.e cost of building materlals, usualh.' comprising between 40 to 50 vercent of the sales price of a home. These costs are Lmquenced by many factors such as th,~ cost of ' r, _ ~a~,or, building materials, and site p.?a, at~o_.. :ne International Co.~erence of Building Off$cia!s (iCBO) es2mates that the cost of resid~nplal wood frame construction avera_~eso S61.10, per scuare foot and reaches as high as S~3.90 per square foot. Therefore, the costs attributed to const-ruction alone for a n'viza! v ~0~ square foot. wood frame home would ~vo~-~-o ~ .... -~"' A reduction in ame~ties and quali~, of building materials (above a rninimum acceptabilit-y for health, safeW., and adequate performance) could result in lower sales prices. Addi~onally, pre-fabricated, factory built housing may provide for lower vriced housing by reducing constvaction and labor costs..An additional factor related to construction costs is the number of urdts built at the same time. As the nmnber of units developed increases, construction costs over the entire development are generaEy reduced based on economies of scale. ~is reduc~on in costa is of varticular benefit when density bonuses are u~zed for the ?rovision of affordable housing. Land: The scarciW of land within the developed areas of the CiU' and the prize of land on the fringes are constraints adding to the cost of housing and pricLng housing out of the reach of iow- to moderate- fl~come faro/4" les. Financing: Interest rates can have an imoact on housing costs. Some mortgage financLng is variable rate, which effe:'s an init:a! lower interest rate than fixed financing. The abiiiS' of lending in_sPltutions to raise rates to adjust for inflation will cause existing households to overextend therwseives financially, a_nd create situations where high financing costs cons~ain the housing market. An addi'donal obstacle for the first-time homebuver is the n-dr.4mum down-vavment required by lending institutions. Even if Tustin homebuvers are able to provide a 3 vercent down- ~,avment and obtain an 8.5 percent 30-year ioa_n (loan rate for FHA or VA guaranteed loans for June 2000), monffdv mortgage payments on median priced sflngie-famiiy detached homes in the Cit~,, place such homes out of the reach of moderate and lower-ir, come households in the Cf%'. At a 8.5 percent interest rate, monthly mortgage payments on median pr,~ced condor:dvJums and townhouses can place such units out of reach of Tustin:s iow and very low income households ~'see TabJes :-~T',, ~ and ' The greatest impediment to homeownership, however, is credit worthiness. According to the Federal Housing Authorit3.,, lenders consider a persoP's debt-to-income ratio, cash availabie for downpayment, and credit history, when determining a max.~mum loan amount. Many fhnancial institutions are wtEing to sigTd.f.'icantly decrease downpayment requL-err, ents and increase loan amount~ to persons with good credit rating. Deceraber 2001 Persons with poor credit ratings ma}' be forced to accept a higher interest rate or a loan amo..urlt~ ,irtsufficient to purchase a house. Poor credit rating can be especially damaging to lower-incorne residents.. who have fewer financial resources with which to oualifv for a loan. -l-he FHA is general.iy more flexibie than conventional lenders Ln its qual£~.~ing guidelines and allows manx: residents to re-establ/sh a good credit history. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), lending institut/ons are required to report ienc/hxg activity by census tract. A_nalvsis of available HMDA reports does not indicate doc..'mented cases of underserved lower income census tracts in the City. Profit, A.~rbeting and Overhead: Develover profits generagy comprise $ to 12 percent of tlne selling p~ce of single-family homes and slightly lower for condominiums. However, in communities '..ike Tustin where the market demand for housing ~ high in comvaz!son to the available housing supply, develovers are able to command higher prices and may realize greater margins of profit. Markehng and overhead costs also add tc fl~e or/ce of homes. Governmental Constraints Housing affordabilit3' is affected by factors in the private and vublic sectors. Actions by the Ci~, can have an impact on the price and availabil.itx' of housing. Land use controls, site improvement requirements., building codes, fees and other local programs intended to improve the overall quaii~' of housing may serve as a constraJ_nt to housing development. Land Use Controls: in ~':-' *' ' ' _~:or~s to protect the pubhc s health, safew, and welfare, government agencies may place adrpjrdstrative constraints on growth through the adoption and im?lementat/on 0£ land use pIans and ordinances. The General Pian may restrict gro'~c'& if only limited areas are set aside for residential land uses, a_nd if .h/gher residenfiaI densities are not accommodated. The zot~-',g ordinance may Lmpose further restr, ictior, q if d evelovment stand ara s are too rigid, or if zonLug designations do not conform to exis~ng ia,nd uses. Tustin's ~'~ ' ~ ~x.slmo zonfl--.g ordLnance allows for a range of ~'-' '4 ~ '" ~ densities from a maximum effective densita.' of approximately 4.35 units vet net acre ~. the E-4 Residential Estate District to 24.9 units per net acre in the R-3 Multiple ?amilv Residential District and 10 units per net acre ~ the M_~-IP Mobilehome Park District (see Table ?ITM-31). The Planned Commmxitv District has authorized residential subdivisions with sLngle-family lots of 3,500-5,000 square feet, which sigr~icanfly increases densit-}.' potenffa!. Witi~in +h,~ ~ Multi-Family Residential Dis~ict (R-~),, ., a 35 foot height limitation and 65 vercent cox'erage precludes the develooment of high-rise housing projects. In the interest of protecting adjoining single-family lot owners, muliifarvdlv structures above 20 feet in height require a conditior~al use pernmit when the s~:.~cmres are within 150 feet of single-famJ.Iy residen~ally zoned lots. While these height iimJts may vlace some restrictions on ' ~,'" - nc, ~sm_o develovment, these limits are designed to maintain compatib.qih.' o£ land use intensi~' and to ensure proper and effective ~ansporta~on within the commun!tv and are con~--noniv used by local governments as a d eveiovment too! to further this ideal. The Land Use Element indicates that residential develcvment that supports commercial uses may also be pertained m the Ciw's Old Town Commercial area..% market analysis o£ tine Old Town area prepared in conjunc~on wi~ comp:'ehensive !994 General Plan Amendments, indicated that new multi-£anailv residential deveiovment would be an important supportLng use for thc area's mixed-used commercial/retail development. As a result, the General Plan was amended to permit up to 291 additional residential units in the Old Town commercial area. To ensure comvatibiiit~' of residential uses with ~ne conunercial area, the location, densis', and building intensity standards for these residen~al units will be governed by pla~nned communita' reguiafions or adov~on of a specific plan. The East Tus~ Specific Plan provides for sflxgle-£an~y detaci',ecl vroducts to be developed at a varieW of densities. ~ne Low De::sitv designation requires a ma'imum lot area of 5,000 square feet while the Meal Jura-Low desigmation reouires a minimum lot area of 3,000 square feet and densities not to exceed 5 and 10 units vet acre respec~ve]y. The MCAS Tusdn Specific Plan designat4¢n provides opporturdt-ies for development of a varieD: of residential products at varied densiw rangffxg up to 25 dwel.Ltng units per acre. The Final Joint EIS./EIR for the Disvesal and Reuse of the MCAS-Tustin !'hereafter referred to as ",_'.'Z-'." OF TU£7']t~' HDL~i?,'? ::'LbZ¥'.£'A':- Program E!S/EIR for MCAS-Tustin) for the reuse of the base iden;-ifies specific improvements needed to support residen~al deveio~ment. The'buildout of'Re Reuse Plan is expected to occur incrementallv over a 20+ year timeframe. 2-ne ," ' a~t-aa, level of deveiopment within a~ny given phase will be fled to the avaEab,.".'itx' of infrastructure necessary to support suck, development. Impiementation tr,.'ggers of specific infrastructure ':mprovements are included in the E1S/EIR for the project. The anticipated timing of residential development of the MCAS- Tusti:-. project is as follows: 'fable Il- LI Anticipated Development at MCAS -Tustin Land Uses Acreagtt I By 2005 i I 200-6-2010 2011-2015 (gross) Low DmIsitY (1-7 1111 acre) I Plilnni-l8_A "f'la 4 and 21 159.7 1,015 IIMeclillln Density (8-1;t 111.1 a(rc) Planning Arta :� h21 ►kl tliuln to l ligh Pensity (16-2.5 UU/a(rv) I - Planning nri a 20I 29.4 Slit3 1 (.;olf Village (1-15 IM/acre) . r Planning nrea 15A and 1513 1(1;;.7 I ;375 ''i9 C'olllrlllllllly Core (la-25IM/at It') I+tanAreag Areis ;' 1' I 1;91 •I•ransilional/ I{Inerl;c'nc y/`;oc ial `�ervil c+sly. l Total :189.2 2,599 5:59 891 _._.... _� ...................._ ,...., l •..r• . ,, ., ..,,1,�� ,�.,,,.,rr�}� ,o ,„. ol,t•l;ucu ny valents 11,111 I+rohi s arnl Ell unit trill lgli,Ata1 housing to he ol,erated by Ihr ('uw,IV ul (.h.u,};e•. Nous: All figul,•s air eslintalvs. Fi1;un's ill h tl Tire nnuulr,l li,r di::cnssiun (nut+osos. Noulcr: Final Join[ FIS/FIR I,+r the I lis}.rsal au,f Kell:e of NIC AS l islirt, j%l('A5 I IISILll .`;I+rcili, ['Lutj l�t•usl' I`I:ut (t 11V ++('I'ttsfin ]9961+) anti f1rlala (( 1tV VI 1 LL%1111 1998). CITY Ula T11SIM H011SIN(; liLliivilsiJ"1' Decelrlbet 2001 A'11 Future market ct~m, and.,a.n~ the complexity and tirv'Zqg of environmental cleanup efforts are additional factors influencing the schedule of development C~rent li~gation surrounding the development of the base may also delay the construction of housmg u.nits. O~er than the MCAS Tustin area, a iarge proporfon of ~Ze small amount of vacant and underutilized land is located ~'it~ni-x Redevelopment Project areas w!thm the City or Old Town residential areas where infrastructure is available and ne major imvrovements would be anticipated. Limited resid~_ntiai uses are also permit~ced in azeas designated Pubiic/lnst4t-a.fional provided the intended occupants are associated with the prLmary institutional uses. Additionally, homeless faciiifies are permitted by right Ln the _MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and are allowed throughout the remainder of the Cib, e:ther as an outright use or with a conditional use permit depend&~g on the number of resi,dents ~ the project. Parking re~uirem~nts in Tustin are generally two spaces per wi~ mn addi.qonal requirement of one guest s.=ace w- every four u.v. its in multi-family development. Lu response to State mandated requirements and local needs, the Cie,' has adopted ordinmaces allowing for the development of accessory rental traits and density bonuses. Beyond local requirements, s:ate Jaw aliows developers to increase the density of a residential deveiopment bv at least 25 percent if 20 percent of the units are aliocated for lower and moderate-income housL--tg. One additional incent-ive or finandal equiv,-dent (such as modified develov~.ent stmadards or waiver/reduction application or d,x ~.o~.-n. ~nt fees'l is '~v~ .~ * ~ ~ Dt-~rct~p~' densi~' granted ro all residen~ai c~ ~lo,~ men, m~mqg ,he 20 ,~ox, ,:r income housing. bonus requiremen~ for ' in response to state-mandated requirements and local needs, the City aliows for second dwelling u_nits. Second '.mits serve to augn=ent resources for senior housing and the needs of other segments of gqe population. Second dweliing units are permitted with a Conditional Use permit (CUP) in residentially zoned properties "&at are at least !2,030 square feet in size. A two-car garage is required. The CiW's land use reguiatoU, mechanisms accommodate the development of housing at a range of densities and products and do not constrain the potential for new cons~-uction at densities suitabie to meet the needs of aH income ranges, although assistance may be required for urdts offered at prices affordable to lower income households. Fees and Improvements: Various fees mhd assessments are charged bv ~xe C'.'~' a_nd other outside agencies (e.g., school districts) to cover costs of processing permits and providing services and facilities, such as utilities, schools and infrastructure. These fees are assessed based on the concept of cost recoven- for services provided. Tustin is urbanized with mos*. of the necessary ~rastructure, such as streets, sewer and water facilities ir, ~lace. Nonelqeless, site Lmprovements caP. s,gnif.,ant..x add to the cost of producing inousi.ng. Cost-effective site planning or use of housing set-aside fu.nds for those projects within redevelopment project areas can rninimize site improvement costs. _-f'he Housing Element Technical Memorandum describes in detail required site improvements and provides a iisi of fees associated with development (Table HTM-33) Develovment fees are not considered a constraint to housing. However, fees do contribute to the total cest cf develo'oment and ,.'rp~pact the fina! purchase or rental price. Building Codes and Enforcement: ~e Ciw of TusZ-ir, adopts the U~form Construction Codes, as required by State law, which establish minimum construction standards as applied to residential buildings. The Ci~"s building codes are the mirdmum standards necessary to protect ~e public health, safe~: and welfare and ensure safe housing. Oniv local modifications to the codes are ~,sde which respond to local cli_matic or geographic condit4ons and c,'arffv a dmirkL~ ira tire pr oc edures. Although not mandated to do so, the City has adopted the State Historical COde ~&at relaxes building code reouirements ci~.~vide for historic structures./buildings. Adoption of codes reduces rehabilitation costs. Local Processing and Permit Procedures: The evaluation and review process requbed by City procedures contributes to the cost of l".ousing in that holding costs :'.ncurred by develor>ers are ultimately man/.fested Jn ~e unit's selling price. Decsmber 2002 HOUSING State law establishes maximum time limits for project approvais a_nd City policies prov'i'de for the mti~imum processing time necessary to comply with iegaI requirements and review procedures. The Community Develooment Department serves as the coordinating agency to process development applications fpr the P,,.~c~, Public approvai of other in-house departments such as Fire, ,,7' ,~ Works/Engh~ee,d_ng, and Cormmuniw Services. Ail proiects are processed through plan review in the order of submissio::. ?ne City has eliminated the potential increase is, financing costs caused by a delav in permit processing by assignfl~g priori~' to the plan -,~ ",~ · and permit issuance for low-income housing projects. If a complete application is submitted, all Desigs. Review Committee members and plan checking departments simultaneously review tee pl~s. This process provides for a "one-stop" processing system. For proiects of signff4cant benefit to the iow-income commurd~-, costs car'. be waived by the City Cou_ncfl er the use of redevelopment set-aside ~nds can reduce or eliminate these costs to tine developer. Workload: Anofi~er govern_rp, ental constraint is the numloer of staff and amount of staff time available for processing deveiopment oroiects. Since the workload is determined by outside and uncontrolled forces ,'economy and market for i~ousi_ng and availability of general fund revenue), a shortage of szaff time may occur which could lead to increased processing ~me for development projects. OPPORTUNITIES Table H-12 shows the existing and potential dwelling units verm_ihed under eaah Genera2 Plan land use category, as we]! as fi-re potential ::et mzrease withk', eazh categou'. Based on the Ciiv's Land Use _Pla.'-., Tustin has a residential holding capacity of a~nproxlmateh.'. . ,~,~ dweiiing u_pi:s, providing for a pot.',mdal ~ncrease of 7,7~7 units over the current total of 21,829 units. The Land Use Plan provides for a mix of unit tTpes ~.d densi~es, including iow-density singie-fan41y homes, rnedium density homes, higher density homes, and mixed- use projects t_hat allow for a combina~on oi commerz!aI and residentha~ uses. :Secembe~' 200:. A large portion of future residential development in the Ci~.' of Iustin w~ take place in the MCAS Iustin Reuse Specific Plan area. The other large Specific Plan comxnur./tv in Tustin, Tustin Ranch (the East Tustin Specific Pimp,) has been almost built out with li~ie development poten:ial rernaining. Between 1998 and 2000, 1,378 units were constructed in the Cit~' of Tustin. A total of !62 Low- Income, 309 Moderate-Income, and 597 Above Moderate-Income units were built in Tustin Ranch; 8 Moderate-Lncome and 30 .Above Moderate-~come 'omits were built in the Warmington project [TowTL Center Redevelopment Project Area); and 2 Moderate-income units were constzucted in Mountain View-. With the excerption of the Warmington project (8 res2icted units), none of the units are deed restricted. Since the City has no records of the householders' income level or ~e sale and rental prices of individual units, the Cig' utilized densi~, levels m determining af/ordabilib,' !'i.e. %.'em.' Low = 25alu/ac, Low = 18alu/ac, and Moderate = 8 du/ac). Since 1,378 units were built between !998 m~d 2000, they are locate~ under the .-.xaSano DU's" column in Table H-!2. These units, however, are reflected in the Quantff4ed Objectives for 1998-2005 (see Table i: 18'~. December 2003 La~d Use Caledon' Low Dens:~' ,;-, :iu.. ac) Mod:u_m De.ns!~,' Kes:denual (8-15 du./as.) :-2gl'. D.~nsi~' Resxdennal %5-25 !,':al)ge .'-i::m e .=ark "'I"' du .' cc.: I.AND INVENTORY AND (2) Existing Acres DUs Vacant 2.8'.-4 .56 37: TABLE I-I- 12 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 2000-2005 E££ective General Plan Build-out 7.38 702 'd 399 O f6': j 389.2 PC Lo','.' Dens::', 1,793 ' 3&':.3 ' . '" .1,3:4 , G , · -"' ..' g.i':.' 1,314.. 5.107 Res~den.~al ~ . 'fSi' { ' ': -.': . 3; : .'-: ,",'fed~r:.: Density I . :' t.? 91t';- 0 i. ' ..,,~.. ,:i.'09,' , ;. 9il.1 ~ an* 2,779, 96.2 ... :.-; .. ..- ' ' . :. ...... · :.:...:": '{:~f.{ ; . ... '.,::.; · ,: ~ · ' · t '- ' L ,I,356 -~- ?aah Dens:?,' 3,,29! ! 76.5 '..;. ' a'.l,Ooo:. 'd i'!?.'. .. .,.,-L 0. ' :{es~dential } I.."...'< · c~.- :'_ ~ " · ,,?"- . ',~=)1 ' " ..... , Subtotal 21,829 ! 936.32 {, · ':i':: ...:7,511,:: !1.42 i: :.. ' ar. 236}!~j".2:' ' 7,747 ' 29.57~ ;:'...::' ::~:-~...: .':. .... , '..-..:. · . ,:: 5ubtata! ;.~;... ::~ ....:..:....~.:..'. '""" ' ':"ORAL 21,829 936.321 :,?, 11.42 :.:' :. "i" ':..:L~'.9'.~;i~'":. ,.':::" T'?J:.9'.:: 29,d78 ,ant, ;l: Nu.mber of ex~st!ng ho~:a.n~ units iv. the Cir,' o! Tustm based or, Tust~m G-_~era2 ?lan Land Use =.',em. '~ ' - Table LL'-:- "F':t::re La.nd U,~e Dens]~' .':n!ensi..a- a.r,d Povulat:.ot: CavaziV,' of'Ir.._- 7..,~'~d Use Pla='.. "DUs: dv.'elF::E, am:rs .")' =3' .")-.2..--~.,~}ses o~ ~ I ;-' ' ' . a .~v. ¢. .... s,a. asDm= ay, =. ',-ac u,-u:; the grass acreage :s ore-.vented :c ne: acreage t ?~ .'. '.: {j .h e L'..r. era' re4 d~e goss a~eage by 2(2 oerzen', to azca'J.r.t ~or :b.e ~and area devoted..'o roadways. (5.' Po:canal dwe 'llmg u.-dts on rmder-~;E'.i~ed pn.reels represent net increases aver existLng u.nits .q', 2~1 dw'e!img u.mts wiri'un the Ndgh-De..nsit]:' .Residenaa] category assumed/or the Old Town Cormr, erc;.,al area. [~'! Ali of abes?.vcrant'lal dwelling '.:n:~s are h". East Tustin. De.,-.s:~es used are imm Table ~ ~,.-2 for .:as, T'4sgn ~'~,' = 4.4~5. Me-i:u:r. - '.!.5'34, High =17.39',. ?otenhal dwe2mg urats revrese=.,: '_':",:.fit out cavaci=' far T=s~n Rand-,. ,6: E×ism:g ru~ts at MC.-'.S 'i'usffn have beer. vacated as cf JuJy 29~ a_-ad units may be uninhabitable. . . I ..... aes ,9,: m-'dt,~ of emerlt~a;' i~ousmg a_nd 60 ,..u~ts o£ u-ansi.m~.--'~m'. ='ami]v house§. Sour:e: '7::~hn 3enera: ?ira-. Land ',.'se E!emenL 2iY3't. 29 De',,ember' 290! Table H-23 fliustrates Tustin's progress in achieving RHNA construction needs for the 1998-2005 planning period. As of 2000, the Ci~, has satisfied approximately 42 percent of its total Ri-LNA Construction .Need. Net RHNA Construction Need 2000-2005 Table H- 13 PROGRESS TOWARD RHNA CONSTRUCTION NEEDS 1998-2000 CITY OF TUSTIN i RHNA Construction : Need Units Added Income Categor)' 1998-2005 1998-2000 Very-Low 694 0 ~0%): 694 Low 489 !62: (33%'.. 327 Moderate 778 3i9: (42%) 459 Above Moderate 1,337 897~ (67%) 440 Total 3,298 1,378 (42%) 1,920 : This figure represents 162 up:ts built .-,: Tustm Ranck between : This fi ,g~-e represents 309 u.v'.'ts built m Tusbn Rar. ck, 8 u~rs built in Warmi~.gt:~rk and 2 uvJts built m Mountain V:ew be,~,een 1998-2000. -~ ~ figtu-e re?resents 867 ';vdts butt ir'. Tustm Ranch nn.d 30 ..u~:s b"~ilt m Warmfln~ton between 1998-2000. 5ource: Ciw of Tus.-m. fhe MCAS Tustm site presents t~he City with 339.2 acres suited for residenVlai develovment that could accormmodate an addifionai 4,049 units. Approximately half of the 7,747 potential new units in Tustin wiE be provided at the MCAS Tustin site. The MCAS Tus,ffr', site is proposed to be i.,r.p!emented through both ti~e adovtion of a SpecE/.c Plan by the City and the adoption of a Redevelopment Project Area. Based on State Redevelopment Law and the proposed Specific Plan requirements, at least !5 'percent of the units constructed at the MCAS Tustin site wi1! :-,.~ affordable to Very-Low, Low, and .Moderate-income ho'asehoids, of which at least ~ vercent must affordable to Very Low-income households (a tote1 of 607 units of which 243 units are required for Very Low Lncome househoids), ir, addition to these inclusionan,, obligation, the acreage m~d densities permitted by t2~e MCAS-Tus~dn Reuse Plan would create 232 addit-io.nal for Very Low-income households (192 tra_~.sitional housing mnits and 60 social services housing units~.. In ad4ition to MCAS Tustin, additional sites are located withir, exis:4p.g R~a_x.~opm~n, project areas and are subiect ro C.?"." OF TUSTLV HOUSLYG Redevelopment Law as well. As a means to ensure a/fordabii!~'y and the use of housing set-aside fu.fids, the Cit~, and its Redevelzvment Agent' will require developers to Frovide at least 15 vercent o£ al! units consmucted or rehabilitated at prices affordable to Very Low, Low, and Moderate Income households consistent v,'itk State Redevelopment Law affordable housing requirements. Through a joint Powers Authori~, with He California Staiewide Com.w. uni~es Development Authority, the City is also providing ~e issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the development of affordable housing within ~e Cit-v. Other means would include the Ci~,"s participation in the State and Federal programs such as !~e Low- Income Housing Revenue Bond FInancLng program, Low Income Tax Credits, CHFA financing programs, and others. Fur~ermore, a Densi~, Bonus Ordinance is available aa~d can be applied to inf!!i sites to increase allowable densitT and the Tus'dn Cin' Code also provides a ?lapmed Cormmm'd~%- Dis~izt which provides fiextb:'Lin, in site deveiopment such as the creation of srnaller lots to allow for higi:er densi~'. Smaller recycling and Ln. fil: housing pro!ec~s throughout the C~n' will also contribute to the CitT's future housing stock. ~.ne majori~' ef remaining cavaci~¢ outside of MCAS Tustm will be achieved through recvci!ng of underutilized High-Densit?' ResidenEa! land and Lrffil! on vacant High-Density Residential land iv. the Old Town Commercial area Isee Figure 1';. According to the Land Use Element, the Old Town Cormnerzial area is abie to accommodate an overall popula~on range for residential u:e of 2-54 persor~s per acre. The Land Use Element ~arther !genial_f-les ~;-,~ .... peten~a! c~.x~,mo~m~nt' -- = of 291 dweli::ng units in '-._he Old Town: Comamerzial a:'ea, which w'.'!: be facilitated bv ~e proposed adop~on of zonfl~g reg,.dations and development standards wkich wfi! allow mixed-use develo?ment ','see Table H-25 Housing Element Pro~ams).~ Th,:s development potential is supported by the market analysis of the Old Town area. 5ee fable _,..-.. - "Furore i.and Use D.nsitx/Int_nsi~, and Pooulation Ca2aci~' of ,-i,~ Land Plan' in "h,.' '~n' ~_an~ Use Element, january 16, 2001. ' ., ,. C. of'ius~ General Plan ' ~ ' Decer.".be~' 200: Table H-14 illustrates the residential development potential of the vacant and underutilized land inventory in the Ci~, of Tust-h~. Aside from the vacant lartd Lr'L the MCAS Tusdn, the table indicates there are 558.5 acres of vacant and underutilized land v, dth residential development potential. The 947.7 total acres could potentially result in the construction of 7,747 urfi~, and 7,849 units with density bonus provisions. Additionally, !,938 of these u.rfits (2,040 with densi~,,' bonus) could be affordable to iow-income households {see Tables lq-7 and H-14). Figure ] and Table H-15 detail the zo:-d_ng designations of vacant and underutilized land in Tusfin. The vacant and underutilized land inventory includes land that is cu_rrenflv zoned medium- and kigh- density residential e_v.d land tha~ could poten~a!ly be des'.'~nated as high-densit3~ residential. However, the tables do not include vacant and underutilized land to be developed '.ruder Plara~ed Deveiopment regulations or under a Svecffic. Plan desigT~a~on ti,..e..M.'CAS-Tusffn Specific Plan). TABLE II-- 14 VACANTAND UNDERU'l-ILIZ1 l.) LAND WITH RPSIDEN'1'lAl. 1)IiVI?l,()I'1V11iN'I' I'()'1'I.N'1'IA1, I I'.ffeclrve densily of 5.b1 du lar. fur I .ow lh nsily, 15.110 chi/av for Medium I )ensily, and 21.53 do/ac far I lith Deusitv. Based on'l able IAJ-2 - "D(welopmenl Inte•rrsily/I )(--mity Stmrdarels", 'I a srin G(.11 •cal I'Lrn land Lise Uh-menl, AML ' (.Cc[Iel iliun ul laild Ilse'. detlsihts and illt:ullle lvvvls bawd up011 11C') } u defines staled in this section. " Incouu• level estirnaled fused ulttm sl,ec ific: Ilan dell::ilies. Acreage nnl available fm varh invome calegory. ,;,juste: o. ily of I ustin; MCA"'-l,usliu 5pecifir Hall/Rails' Hill], 1996 and 1993 amo•udnu•111. . 'i , 'i . i• . .:'`... i h'c•rnrtlr•r ..'UO1 Vacant Land Underutilized land i A Yole- Above- Very-ColnLow ttilodrl•nle Moderate 1'(11111 Very -Low I,oru ;1ludrrate Moderate1'uln/ A(_ DU AC LAJAC: I DU I AC: DU AC: DU AC_ DU AC' AC' DU AC:' DU AC: DU Land Use Cale Bury" �C=()fVy,Lil`=,�[.UIVAlZ )1Vi1V -� _ �-b'r,.-'�-•,ti,:n�.r�>s.,._,,:�'a._.._=�_'�.. _ EDU �,,,--_,Y-�a l.osy I )vosifv Res. .56 )en�ily Ilcnnr., 115.,, t � I .... .... -- m ll :ily Res. 1`4 ediuDo �t, i (. 1 t) 2 I S I.S n (?;-15 du/ac)( II IS I 15 6# Density 11mms 7 I 1 I ligil l )onsily Res I 48 7 4 Z 1 105 )10 I I..:.3R I cl • I)ensill° Ilunus (>'.i",1,) 11i It) r l)- (1 .... 142 322 l_I 0 U ct ,vioi)ile I lone Valk — . tirrtlhrtrr( 116 46 52 IJ 1 8.12 114 83 95 118 0 11.47 296 3 *`. � ' � �N(�S;Ius�I-.w�si t:i_iir:i:r^aivk-� ' ��`•�=�y�,�'.�- '.� _ _ t��Fx_'lit-'.��.-'�-�"��dJS:�31�+L�*- � R�_�•�=_��•z �-'_�-�.1.`18'Jriia-��'4c •:�-�..). r.�--- -�, t'Ing �'�,K �1( W, Dustier 51' I 95, IMI ___ "' 22.44 � " 3,1'x) :589.10 Ie ) I : -r��- t�.}1F•-�t�'Mi > �ae'�w.�•"..-=4 ` F t •��„�.,,,�� .� �sl: •-'•� `Nfl):;C).l•114TMUN11�f:;,17,Is51GIy9�1�UNS��,�r�.��`r�,,:�_. � �,F _ , )-71-71-1- . ( . i j' I:;I1 r5 4; i 1,314 '( I )C'FlSil1' Ices. JV I r � 1'C .N1ed. Hellsilv R's. I c16.Z I cel t - ... 96.2p -- 1'C' I f il,lt I)en :ilt Res. 26.5 1,u65 I /(,.50 1'(165,- ... _. _. . Srrirt(1ilri 7(,.5 1,065 96.2 911 366.3 1,314 539.111) •1,7411 1 _ 1 I I'.ffeclrve densily of 5.b1 du lar. fur I .ow lh nsily, 15.110 chi/av for Medium I )ensily, and 21.53 do/ac far I lith Deusitv. Based on'l able IAJ-2 - "D(welopmenl Inte•rrsily/I )(--mity Stmrdarels", 'I a srin G(.11 •cal I'Lrn land Lise Uh-menl, AML ' (.Cc[Iel iliun ul laild Ilse'. detlsihts and illt:ullle lvvvls bawd up011 11C') } u defines staled in this section. " Incouu• level estirnaled fused ulttm sl,ec ific: Ilan dell::ilies. Acreage nnl available fm varh invome calegory. ,;,juste: o. ily of I ustin; MCA"'-l,usliu 5pecifir Hall/Rails' Hill], 1996 and 1993 amo•udnu•111. . 'i , 'i . i• . .:'`... i h'c•rnrtlr•r ..'UO1 Fi§u~e 1 - Convenbona[Iv. Zm~d Vacant &: Underutilized Land in ~lw City TU~TII~ ........... CITY MAI? 1 ~' anml 'Figul.,, I de:'-icls ti,~ generai I-ca!iens :'f ~t, d~vdopment sil~ and excludes I~d in Planned Colmnu~ties ~d: .,.AS Tus~n. (.'i".'".' ", ¥;' ';1.',,e'Tit; b.'O; 'Ei.¥C· .e.L ~-,~.:~!:'[' December ~.0~!1 ~5 Table H- 15 VACANT AND UNDERI.,q'ILIZED LAND6 CITY OF TUSTIN ID: Parcel Number ~ Location Acres Vacant Land 1 401-521-21 158 Mountain View 6.14 ' 401-522-22 ]60 Mountain View 0.14 ~ R-'ia 401-521-23 168 .%~ounmin Vie~ ..... 401-521-24 . Mountain View 0.14 2 C.18 ' 3 '401-543-03 401-543-10 ' 23941 Brownin.~ 240 Pasadena Avenue 220 ?asaderm Avenue 230 Pasadena Avenue C.3C' · 0.~ 8 : R-3~ 0.29I 4 · 402-333-05 15651 B Street O.~ 5 432-402-04 1776 Nisson Road 0.71 R-3~ 6 , 402-031-04 16471 bicFadden Avenue 0.52 7' ' 402-301-05, 06 16801 Me-=adrien Avenue C.60 8 · 401-623-05, 06 270 East Main Street 0.74 C-2." C-2P4 9 ' 40'I-253-04 14082 Ender]ee Center Drive 0.85 PC Corn~ 1~ : 432-14",-09 I101 Sycamore Avenue 1.76 R-3~ I1-' , 401-532-28 ., ~ 01-139 W. First S~eet 1.17 FSSP~ Total Vacant Land 8.12 Unden~tilized Land 12 I 501-081-09. 10, ' Nor'd-, Sfde o£Elizabe~, Way !.68 "~.~,12,18,!9,& ' 29 ~3 401-584-04 401-584-05 43!-584-06 40~-584-07 401-584-08 250 Prospect Avenue 0,34 155 Third Street 0.17 245 E! Camino Real 0.17 235 El Caminc R~i 0.!7 ~ El C. amino Real : 0.17 C-2/C-2P~ C-2/C-2P¢ C-2/C-?~ C-2,/ C-2P~ C-2/C-2Pg ]4 471-623-05 275 Sixti: Street ~ 2.99 C-2/C-LTM 40!-623-09 n,'a 0.45 C-2/C-~--TM 401-623-10 5!5 E1C-zmLno Rea] i 0,55 C-2/C-2P; 401-623-!1 449 El Cart, ina Rea! 0.10 C-2,.'C-Z~ 15 432-131-] 7 Tust!n Block i ~ .40 CG~ 432-i 32-18 Tustin Block I 3 Total Underutilized Land : 11,42 TOTAL VACA.Nq' & UNDERLq'ILIZED LA. ND : 19.54 : See Figure l : Low Dens~' :' M'ed~um Densi~' ~ H~gh D~nsi~' -~ $..,m!or housing ~ E×ciudes va.cant and ~nd~afihzed ian~ m Pian~ed Com~u~=es md at MC..kB-TusV~ site n., a - not available So'~ce' Cia' of TusrLn. --7 December' 2003 According to the Regional Housing Needs Assessm~-nt (RHNA), ~he Ci9' of Tustin will need 3,298 unit~ to accommodate the growth during the !995-2005 planning period. As shown in Table H-13, 1,378 units were added between 1998 and 2000, resuling tn a net remaining need of 1,920 units. Table H-16 compares the City's current land inventou, wfi~. the remaining RMNA construction need. The table indicates that the Ci~, has enough land to provide housing for all income ]evels..ks noted earlier, the closure of the MCAS has presented ~e Ci~' with a ru-Jque opportunit3.- for new housing .n. Old development., in addition, vacant and underutilized land in ~' ,, Town area may accommodate additional housing a/fordable to low- and moderate-tncome households through in.fill development. Table H- 16 CURRENT LAND IN~;ENTORY VS. REMAINING RHNA CONSTRUCTION NEED Very. Low Low 585 1,2~5 26 '7 36 24 Total with Density 694 ! 346 Bonus Net RHNA Construction Need 694 327 2000-2005 Surplus (Deficitl 0 1,019 Source: Tab]es: 5-i2, .r-MS, and :-M 4, City of Tustin Vacant Land Densi~' bonus Underutilized Land Density bonus i Above Moderate I Moderate 1,1~7 ' 4,504 i18 ' 3 0 0 Total -'.2 236 6C ,305 4,504 7,549 459 44C 2,920 846 4,064 5,929 , Although ~e availabiiit-v of vacant and un2erutillzed land for the vrovision of housing is not considered a cons~aint for the 1998-2005 plarming period, future planning periods may be marked by a lack of available frond. VvTdle the Cit?..' s Land Use Plan provides an adequate land capaciq.' to fulfill housing needs, current development costs in Tustin may vreclude the private housing market from providing affordabiiitv for Iow and very low-tncome households without subsidies. Necessary inf-rasmucture improvements and litigation cop_straints may cause some delays in the buiid-out development of the _MCA$ Tus t-Ln project. December 200i CiTY OF TU~."I?; I.!OL'SE'rG ~' "' - "- The City cannot guarantee that RHNA needs wLll be met g~ven iirr. ited resources, ikmited vacant land, the gap between housing costs and incomes, and r'luctuatio~s'in ~e local economy. Satisfaction of t2ne City's quan~died objectives through new construction will be heax.dlv dependent upon re~ estate market 2ends, coopera'.ion of pr-.'vate funding sources, and avaiiabie funding and pro,ams at the locai, cotm~', state and federal levels. This page intenffonaily ie,q biank. CiTY OF TUSTIN HOUSING ELZ3$E.','T Decers. be;- ~00 ~ E'? HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES This section of +,he Housing Element contains tlne goals and policies the City intends to imvlement to address a number of housing-related issues. 'fo implement the Housing Element, the following five maior issue areas are identified with related goals and policies: 1) ensure that a broad :'ange of housing ~'pes are orovided to meet the needs of existing a_nd fn~are residents; 2) provide equal heusing oppcr~amties for al! Cia' residents.: 3) ensure a reasonable balance be~veen rental and owner occupied housing; 4) preserve existing affordable housing; 5) promote conservation a_nd rehabilitation of housing and neighborhood iden~'; and 6) ensure housing is sensi~ve to the existing natural a_nd built environment. HOUSING SUPPLY/HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES -fusfin is home to versons requiring a varie.~' of housing oFt-ions. At different stages in 5neir byes, people reou/-e different housing azrangernents. Additionally, the City must respond to the housing needs of all econo_mic segments of the community a_nd ensure ti,at housing discrimination does not serve as a barrier. It is also imvortant, that the Ci~' maintain a balance of housing tx-,',,~s.r~ and that the Ci~"s housing stock is not over!y skewed towards the provision of one ~'pe of housing. Finally, the continuing need for affordable housing in the region requires t,he Cit~- to auemvt to ¢reserve Low- income housing units that are at risk of ',,,' ' ,, Tne corn ~. Uno to other uses. Citw used the followh~g goals and policies to achieve ~e above objectives. GOAL 1: Provide an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all communi~' residents. Policy 1.1: Promote ~e construction of additional dwelling units to accommodate Tustin s share of regional housing needs ident~died by the Southern Cai.ttorma .Association of Gox~,m-n..n.s (SCAG), 'm. accordance with adopted land 'ese voiicies. Policv 1.2: Provide for expanded affordable hcusing oppe:-turdt-ies t~hrough azquisition and rehabilitation, a~nd new residenSal development in Old Town T'astJr., on other infilJ sites, and ha :he MC:kS Tustin Svecific/Reuse Plan Area. CiTY (.)F December 200! Policy 1.3: Preserve affordable housing units, where possible, through actions such as the maintenance of a mobile home park zone, restrictions on R-3 zone uses to preserve tine multiple farni!y residential character, facilitate resident access to fu_nding sources for oreservation qf iow income and assisted housing. Policy 1.4: Promote the dispersion mid integration of housing for low- and very-low income families throughout the corm:nunitv as opposed to within a_nv particular geographic area, neighborhood, or project. Policy 1.5: Encourage the Count~, of Orange to exercise its resoonsibilities for housing accorv_modations for low- and very-Iow ir. come families within Tustin's svhere of ird'Iuence. Policy 1.6: Uthze tile Redevelopment Agency's authori~', where feasible, to assist in creating opportunities wlnich will expand opporturdties for development of affordable housing in the commtmi~'. Policy 1.7: Allow second (attached/' detached) u_nits in single- and multi-family districts subject to land use volicv and zoning ordinance res~'izfions. Folicv 1.8: ~' TM o .... . _ ~.~z~ Piamned Communi~' Dis~ic ts and ~peclnc. ,°~,_..~,-~ :o au~hcrlze and promote a variety of lot sizes and housing 9'pes. Policy 1.9: Promote cluster housing consistent with General Plan land use densi~' standards to reduce the cost of housing construction. Policy 1.10: Encourage the avaJlabili~' of affordable housing for special needs households, including large, Iow-income fan-dJdes. Svecia] needs'nousenc,ds' ' include the eider!v, la,'-~o~:~_ families, femaie-headed inousehoid, s., househoids with a disabled person., and the homeless (see discussion under Summary of ?'lousing Needs for Special Needs Groups). Policy 1.11: Encourage incentives to assist in tile presem, afion a_nd development of affordable housing such as I) reducing perrrJt processing pime a.nd waiving or reducing app]icable permit fees; on-site density bonuses when appropriate; 3) tax-exempt financing; 4) flexibility ir, zoning or development standards; and 5) other December 2001 .Zi7?' OF ?'b'$W.'; HgU2SiT;G ~,-E:.~ZA".'' inanciai incentJves using Redevelopment Agency' housing set-aside funds and special State and Federal grant and housing programs. Policy 1.12: Use tax increment housing set-aside funds of the 5outJ-, Central and Town Center Redevelo-oment Areas 'to assist in constructing, rehabiiitadmg, and preserving low and meJerate income housing within the jur'isdiction of the C!w. Policy 1.13: Encourage the design and occulzanzy of housing fer senior citizens and the disabled. Promote the construcT.:on or rehab':iitatdon and adoption of dwe!iing units accessib]e to seniors and/or the disabled. Policy 1.14: Promote, assist., a_nd facihtate the development of _m~r~,n,.> and transitional housing at MCAS Tustin as was identified h~ the MCAS Tustin reuse plarazing process and provide conLinued support for the County HomeJess Assistance Program and other homeiess assistance programs with'in Tustin and in adjacent tines. Policy 1.15: Encourage the provision of grants and techr, ical ass!stance to various orgaz'&ations and agencies who provide assistance to persons wi~ special needs such as the homeiess, disabled, low-income, and elderly persons. Policy 1.16: Partic"~ate in federal and state housing assistance and rehabi~ta~on ?rograms aimed at assist4ng households in need. Policy 1.17: Utilize design criteria in evalua~ng projects to ep, sure comvatibiii~' wi~ surrounding developments, while taking into consideration ways to rninZm!z, e housing costs. Policy 1.15: Promote and encore'age non-'orofit and for-uref:t privat2 sector interests to use available federal and state programs for new or rehabilitated affordable housing. o {: ~'~, ern. Fioyers to Policy 1.19: Support state-enabling I_g,s,a:*~,,n for contribute to the cost of housing for their employees. GOAL 2: Ensure equal housing opportunities for all existing and future CiD' residents regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, sex, aga, marital status or household composition. · ~f'7}' .0.~' F[7S7i';',' HO'..'SJ.'TG ..YL£:'~,'E.,VT' Policy 2.1: Promote equal oppornmity housing programs within the corrJrlu_nitv. Policy 2.2: Provide active support and par~cipation wi~ the Orange Coy_htr Fair Housing Comncil to provide fair housing opportu_nities. Policy 2.3: Support programs to match elderh, and iow and moderate-income individuals who want to share housing costs in a joint living arrangement. Policy 2.4: Support public and private efforts ro eliminate al] forms of illegal discrimination in housing. Policy 2.5: Minimize disviacement of lower income and special needs households, whenever possible, to ensure ~at displacernent is carried out in an equitable manner. GOAL 3: Increase the percentage of ownership housing to ensure a reasonable balance of rental and owner-occupied housing within the City. Policy 3.1: Encore-age new housing consn-uction for home-ownership in a ,mixture of price ranges. Policy 3.2: Provide favorable home purchasing assistance ovtions to ]ow- and m,.~d~a.~ mcom~ nousenole.~, such as down-vavment a:,'sisrance, mortgage credit cer~dicates, and mortgage revenue bond ~cing. Policy 3.3: Encourage rental unit conversion and alternative forms of homeownership, suck as shared equity ownership and '.'imited equiQ' cooveratives where feasible. GOAL 4: Preserve the existing supply of affordable housing in the Cit~. Policy 4.1: Continue to use Federal and State housing knitiatives available for iow-income households. Policv 4.2: ' . ,~,omtor a]l feoera., state and ]ozal funds available to preserve and/or replace iower income units at risk of convert-ing to market rate housLng, including tax credit bond financing and redevelopment tax increment funds. De. nember 205; $4 Pollcy 4.3: Assist non-profit organizations in securing the resources necessary to presen, e/replace/ower to moderate income units at risk of converting to market rate housing. Policy 4.4: Consider incentives to non-profit housing a_nd for-profit private sector interests to purchase and/or maintain ]ower income units at risk of corn, erring to non lower income housing. MAINTENANCE .A_ND CONSERVATION h.:aintenamce andp~',~o,' 'x a.,on.~ of a Cin"s housing stock w-events uruhealthv living conclittons; eliminates ~e need for future, more costly hous4mg rehabilitation; prevents neighborhood deterioration; and encourages community vride. The Ci~' enforces codes and orovJdes incentives to promote maintenance and conservation. GOAL 5: Conserve, maintain, rehabilitate, and/or replace existing housing in neighborhoods which are safe, healthful and attractive, in accordance with adopted Land Use Policy. Improve the residential character of the City with an emphasis on revitalizing neighborhoods showing signs of deterioration. Promote consen'ation of the CiO"s sound housing stock, rehabilitation of deteriorated units where they may exist Cit}~'ide, and elimination of dilapidated units that endanger the health, safety and well being of occupants. Policy 5.1: 2-nrough avaiiab]e financial incentives, encore-age owners of rental housing un,ts that are determined to be substandard, in need of reoair and a hazard to the heal~ and safety' of file oCCUFants to remove and replace or rehab/2itate the structures. Policy 5.2: Promote ;h~ avafiabili~' of funds for the rehabilitation of sLng!e-£arnti}.' dwell/.r'.gs a_nd apartments. Policy 5.3: Periodically evaluate housing condit-ior..q and, xan_n ap?rop.--'ate, address any increase in deteriorated houskng conditions. Policy 5.4: Con.hue to enforce hea]tSx,, sade~', and zonh~g codes to elLmmate condit4or'~ wh2ch are dez"menta! to 'ahe health., safe~' and -t2 £ ~.~ ~ · ~ . ~.¥ &a. ,~ o, resmenrs. ;d:7".: O.=: 7L'.~?';."..' I. i3'L'$;2;2.; .... r, Policy 5.5: Promote vreservation of historic and arc~tectura!iy significant residentiaJ properties. ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY lqousing design and land use patterns can have subs/aheM impacts on ~e natural as well as t~he built envL-onment. Ci~' pohcies and prog2-ams seek to mirdm".ze nega~ve environmental impacts. GOAL 6: Ensure that new housing is sensitive to the existing natural and built em-ironment. Policy 6.1: At:empt to locate new housing .Zaci~it~es ir'. proxi~.~Q: to services and em?]oyment centers thereby enabiing walking or bicycling to places of employment. Policy 6.2: Promote energ3' conservation measures Ln the desig-n of new housing units and the redevelopment of older housLng units. Policy 6.3: Require design review of lot vlacement in subdivisions to maxim/ze passive soiar energy and solar access. RELATED GOALS A_ND POLICIES The goa~ and policies described Ln the Housing Element are related to and support the goa]s and pohc,2es included wi~kn other Ge2~eral , m~ otlner elements Plan elements. Many goals and policies from ~: ,~ directh, or indirecth' support the goals and policies of ~e Housing Element. TI.ese supporEng goals and policies are identified in Table .'4-17. Table H- 17 HOUSING RELATED GOALS AND POLICIES BY ELEMENT RELATED GOALS AND POLICIES BY ELEMENT Housing Issue Area Housing O.vpormmties Land Use 1.8, 10.2. 13.3.13.4, 13.10 ~ Housin~ !Circulation Conservation// · Public , Open Space "Safety ] Noise Ma/ntenance i 1 .I, 4.6, 5.8, ' '.....:.'"" ' '':~:.-.~,., and Preservation [ 6.4, 6.6 I..'. .....'.: . Affordable Housing j ': ,, ..-'.t SuFpor: Sec'ice/ I Fair Hous:nf~ ~ ~. .;.. .. i 5.3 Environmental Sensitivitx- 3.6, 9.6, : 9.7, 9.8, ·!3.1 ~ 2 12, 3.1.4.1 :5.4 · 3.3.4.8,, 432 Growth Management 4.7, Dezember .T7 HOUSING ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM The Housing Element Imvlementation Program provides specific actions the intends to undertake to ach/eve the goals and policies of the Element. 'ibis section identifies ouantified objectives, available financial resources and affordable housing resources, and p?ovides a list of specific programs the Cit-;' intends to pursue. HousH, g programs include those currently in operation and new programs added to address housing needs. A description of each progr, am is provided, along with the program funding source, responsible agency, and time frame for implementation. A review of City's past verformance on housing eiement imolementation programs is contained in .Appendix A of the Housing Element. FIVE YEAR QU.&NTIFIED OBJECT1A:ES 2000-2005 State law reau~res tlne CiR' to accommodate its faL* share of the State's housing need. in doing so, the City must auantifv the number o£ homes fi'tat are projected to be buSlt and cor'~served. The following quantified ebiectives are adovted as guidelines toward meeting Tusfin's housing needs through 2005. It is important to note that while tlne quantified objectives of the RRNA are required to be part of the Housing Element and tlne will strive to a~ain fi~ese objectives, Tustin carmot gu~antee that these needs w.;12 be met given its own limited finm~cial resources and the vresent affordabili~ gap. Satisfaction of the City's regional housing needs wil! partially devend uvon cooveration of vriva:e funding sources and the fu_nding levels of Count,->', State, and Federal programs that are used to support the needs o£ tine ven'-low, iow and moderate-income persons. Add.;tiona!iVy, outside economic forces heavih' influence the housing market. New Construction Objectives The City cf Tustin promotes and encourages the development of a variea' of housing opportunit4es to accommodate current and projected housing needs which include 694 very low-, 489 low-, 778 moderate-, and !,337 above moderate-income households per the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) a11ocation. Winiie the Land Use Plan provides adequate s~tes to fulfill needs estabiished by RHNA, construction of new units will devend uvon the t~ning of the landowner and developer ir, the sub.m.iss,~on of bni!ding plans to C,'T'F DF TL'$T71',' .'-lOUSING meet market demands. Housing subsidies will depend upon the avai!abiliS~ of government funds - Ioc~J, Coun~,, State, and Federal. Redevelopment pr~ts': ?' '~'~"' ' a~'Ftto)ect to the interests of developers. The construction o£ secondary '-:nits depends upon ~e desires of the ?roperty owners as related to farrdl}.' needs for and econorrdc resources. The achievements of hhe housin§ ob~esQves are thus dependent upon the private sector and other ~overrmnental a§encies. /-he responsibgi~ o£ the City is to encou.ra§e the construcQon of affordable housin§ by providin§ propan'~ and assistance tc developers and to assist in its creation by £acilita~in~ the review and approval of development permits. ]'able i-I-IS provides new construction housing ol~ectives for ~2ne period 2000-2005. Ln addition to un/ts already constructed hn ~e 1998-2000 throe period, the City ~dll strive to ensure that newly constructed units are developed at sufficient densi~es to assist in ' fulfillment of low and very low-income needs. $9 Table' H- 18 NEW CONSTRUCTION QUANTIFIED OBJ'ECTIVES SUMMARY 1998 - 2005 CITY OF TUSTIN i Very, I Total # ' Low Low ! Moderate Upper Pro,am [ of Units (<50%) ' (<80%), (80-120%) (120°/0,-) .\'ew Construction 1998-2000 ,MCAS Tus~-m Housin~ Uni~1 MCAS Tusfin Emergency Housing MCAS Tus~n Transitional Famiiv Housing MCAS T~fin 5ocia] 5e~'ices 2 1,378 2,599 162: 3!9 897 238 2154 333~ 1,923 192 192 50 50 , 60 60 : Granny Flats : 10 ' lC New Owner Housm~ 3 '. 266 84 i 66 !16 New Senior Housing Densftv Bonus 89 102 89 62 40 . Recycling. of SFD to MFD 25 9 i 6 ~ 10 Total Quantified Oblectives 4,771 694 489 : 778 2,810 RI:INA 3,298 694. 489 : 778 1,337 Difference 1,473 0 0 ' 0 1,473 ~ Df the total-,,,qv' e -. potennal ..:.ni:s proposed at ,'v,,_AS~"' ~ Tas:m,' ....-99' -' *mJ:s are exoezted, dur:ng the p!armmg .yeti°al' : These housk',.g u.nits shown ~s sevarate hne items will se.'x,e as rrar~iuonal,.'emergen~, hous:ng/aaiites CiD, ccur.:s these mats as new cc?.struchor, as ~ey are new aidihcrm to '-he hous:ng mven:a.m'. · ~ Praiec:s at fi~e end of plar~m.-.g period. ~ includes MCAS Tus~'n addiuona2 negot::ated hnciusior, un/ts (296 units.. Source. E!iez:~veness of F~using Frograms !987 - 203C ~,' of/ustin; Five Year Imv~emc,,n:atiav. ?2an/er the 'fawn Ce_nter and Saute Centra3 Rede;'e:ovment Frc~ec: A:'eas for F-isca'. Years 2D30 - 20'3: to 20~ - 20-35. Decerr~.2r 26'0 rj.~. }, OF ..~'.,'S'.TI7 HOUSING ELE2!EXT r~ Freservation, Rehabilitationf anti Other A~£ordable Housing Program Objectives ?ne orimarv beneficiaries of Preservation and Rehab!!iiaficn and .Assistance programs are renters and low-income homem, mers. It is assumed thai above-moderate-income households will rehabilitate units as needed through private efforts. Tustin's affordable housing strategy is based on the City's housing needs, affordability gap analysis, and avaiiab!e fmancia! resources. SeveraI broad policies establish ~e ~amework for +,.he Cit)."s Housing st-ateg3~ as applied to preservation, rehab~tation, and other housing progam o~ectives. These include: 1. Conse~.'e, maintain, and rehabilitate existing housing and revitaLize existing neighborhoods; Maximize the supph- of affordable housing; 3. Increase homeownership; 4. Preserve the existing supply of affordable housing; and, Ccmsistent with the above polities the Ci~' has devised a number of programs of housing assistance to address the preservation, rehabiiitation, and other housing prooo'ram objectives. Specific details on these pro,ams can be found tn the Cinf of Tustin Comprehensive Housing Affordabilitv Strate~' for Fiscal Yeaz's 200~2001 to 2009- 2010. in addition, Table H-23 - SummaU- o£ Programs 2000-2005, out'dries ~e CiW's soecLqc housing programs dn-ing the ?iarm'-'ng pe~od. Table H-!9 r)rovides the City's r.=.habiiitation, presentation, and other affordabie housing objectives during the plmming period. Table H- 19 REHABILITATION, PRESERVATION, AND OTHER AFFORDABLE HOUSING QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES SUkIMARY 1998 - 2005 CITY OF TUSTIN ~ Total# iVeryLowi Low,' , Moderate I Upper Pro[ramCate~,o~' , of Units, (<50%) · f<80%) ~ (80-120%) , (120%+) ..... r', ........ ~' i~I',¢ -. · '' ,- .' l"'~.{l~ ' ~ '.l~ ~ ~*~' '"~'~.:,' :.a~',..g.,. ~-t~ .... '~I~E ,~ t~ .t~ .,~..., ',' ~.. .;:i'tl~, ~:~, ~i~-- ~ . v.. -. ,. ~, .- · -' .... .~..?~ .... ~g..,..._~~ .... ...... ~,~., ~.., ,u~i~..~.'. ,~.~:,~.ii~.,'~._, Owner Occupied .'-Iousing Rentnl Rehabilitation Loans/Grants Mulh-Famiiy ~ Acouisition/Rehab/Conversion/Resa~e ~ _Multi-Family Acquisition/Rehab/Renta] I Total Rehabilitation ' 40 0 10 120 100 3O i 48' 30 : 200 I 25 90 ' 82'- 460 30 i 95 198 ' 137: /ustin Gardens I00 I 100 ' Rancho Alisal 69 8 Rancho .Maderas 54 6 48 3,= 23 Rancixo Tierra Affordable Semor Iqousmg - Mitchell 51 i 20 , 12 , 8 Senior Board & Care - Bn'an Avenue "..8 ' , 18 · Did Town Residential 29 1.4 ' 15 Total Preservation , 341 ~ 164 ~ 148 : 14 15 Time Homebuver Downvavment 40 , i l0 . 3C .-'xsslstance Loa.,ls Counw Mortgage Credit Certificates Deed Resections Section 8 Rental Voucher Assistanze 620 1,500 ~.3 159 248 i Shared Housing, Referrals .500 75 5O 25 194 278' Homeless Hous:n8 Part-nership Pro,ram 242 242 Emergency Shelter ~2 252 Total Other Pro.zrams 2,,"'29 2,257 : These u.mts are r.o: redFienrs of a£fordabil;~' resn-icuons or tunchng ass:stance. Source: E£iecdvezess of Hc'-'si;'g Froh'rams 198~ - 2009, .EL'x' cf 'i'us:'..-.; F:t'e Year ]:::v'.eme~tai::m P~:~r. for ,~he 7av.'n Center a_nd South C_-.n~al Redeveio?'men: Frojert .Areas for Fisca~ X.'eam 2~96 - 2002 'c. 2004 - 2025: Cc,:r.:~rehe.-.s/ve HousL-.g Affcrdabilitv S='atew.' ."or Fiscal Years 2C~-20C.1 :o 2739-2015. December 2 O51 ~r.~v ..... OF TL'STIA' .~tOL'SI."qG .~..::.u.'%:~' ...., Summary o£ Quantified Obiect4ves Table H-20 summarizes the Ci~"s Quantified Objectives £or the 2000- 2005 retied. Table H- 20 SUMMARY OF QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES: 2000-2005 CITY OF TUSTIN ~ New Rehabilitation/ Other Income Group ! RHNA Construction Preservation Pro,,rams Vem,-Low 694 694 194 2.257 Low 489 489 243 194 Moderate 778 77,8 v'~ _~ 278 Above Modera:e ~,337 2,811 152 - Total $ourze: C'~tv of T~:st-Ln 3,298 4,772 801 2,729 IDENTIFICATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES The City has prepared a Consolidated Plan a_nd Com?rehev. sive :dousing Affordabilitv Strate~' '.'denti~.,ing and describLng all f'dndkng prog2'a_,-r'3 available to the City and Tustin Redevelopment Agency to assist :'n meeting the CitT'S housiv, g needs. Lncluded ir. the vian are ,4escriptions of a wide variety of major housing assista~ce programs available from federal and state agencies and private lending institutions. More specific informafon including detail regarding eli~le projects and activi:4es and funding ava':iabi!iU, car'. be fo,a_r,.d in the document. The following is a surr'.zr, a_rv of ~is ipdormation aieng with u~dates to reflect new state and federal programs. Table H-21 provides an i!]ustrafive example of the estbrated amount of locally identified resources that cou]d be available to finance housing program objectives on a2~ armual basis ever tlne five-year pianning period. The amounts shown are estm~ates, actual revenue amounts, and tlne timing of their availab-'i~t-v could t-e more or 1ess and would adjust over 2me. 5peci~c decisiev~s are made on an annual basis as part of the Ci.~' and '~ = ',~' ,- = ~ ~d~ _~ot, m~nL Agency budget process. Table It- 21 11OLJS1N(; 1'RUIL-RAM ILLUSTRATIVE FUNDING KGSUUKCI?S 2000-2005 Anticipated Resources ---- Combined l:uridBalatncil --_ 1.]Yh �`LT21 i ' ! luusinl; F'rc)l;raut- - - - - - l.'DBG Fut«Is - .._..-- - - - - — Slab 111.111' Flulds' - -- - - IN 00_01- — FY 01-02 IN 02-03 _ FY 03-04 FY_ 04-0_5 TOTALS 55,100,664- SO -- -$4,499,935 $1,1(x),00() �----- -- —$2,003,08(1 _ $800,67.5 ---- $1(x7,1.)0( -- --$558,811_ !�IRU,989 _ —.. $(1 $0 — 9 - $ 1, 00,62.5 (60 -- - -- $I(1ll,lxM) -- -- -- — $1,15U,1M.)U $70,1x1(1 $70,M) -- $340,UW - - $U -- --$`30,0M-$540,6M $540,0IM) $0 _— - $0 _ $1,150,M0 .`4111111 Central I lousin • fund Deposits. --- -- --- —1- -- $551,412 $562,440 _-_$O .1 $5Z $2,758,141 'futon Center I tuusiol, l'wccl Deposits - $'35(),8(X) $561,816 $573,052 $581,513 $2,8.111,181 lnvcslntrnllnterest $127,667 —_-_ $724;997 $55,174 $27,941 $9,050- $444,8'29_ Bond I'iiutrur I'rucredsc --- '$O _ '57,47.4,590 $U_ $0--- — $O $_7,42.4,590 'I•otatl Resources ___6; 304,:330 $15,590,921 _ - $4,072,112 - $1,792,24:3 $1,.4.18,2-40 - Anticipated Expendilurrs DUN Service ore Bonds' - — - ----- --- - O - - 4465,120 (M) $1,;340,0 $465,17..0 $4( !1,120 $465,120 $1,860,480 -- 011ter Allotciabilily ho tas' — -- -- _z.nt- $240,000 --- $ 1,040,625 -- ' - $240,0(x) :624(,lxx) $3,1(X),625 - Presctvalion RehatbilihtLiort - -- $5(x),(1(() - .'627.0,200 $0 $0 -- $137,/110 - $4,397,220 -- $1,487,7575 $375,531 _Nvw_C'unsltuclion _ Adminisliative Expenses ---- -- .'6344,196 $li(x_),000 $6,875,(19(1 $U $52U,2(x) -$U - - $0 $7,219,292 $"iIU,Om $_5_30,00_4_$402,884 $1,21),/04 — $2_4 63 Total {x ,ct«litnres -._.--_ - $1,804,396 $13,:87,430 _ $16,t)3,1i2U $J,611,7-5 —$18(1,989 ,-688 - .r,1r2,311__-- $ - Balance Available $4,499,')35 $2.,0113,486 _ $5;18,81 L -- _-- '61'T1,5:37 «edeveropnrertt Agency 1lousurr, set aside as of )one 30, i99y; nolo some of (hese Routs are altcad y encuntlie, ecl to (heel111. int; yuanlificd objectives. ) Awarded giant f suds ftuitt f IDI ) '- Awarded Dean( funds houtStale 4 F.Stimaled for fax exempt bond at 1.25 f)CR; 2.5. year amol lizalion; 6.25% interest bunds could be issued in M12 or Fiscal Year 7(X12-03. ` Inc lud, :s First I icor 1 ionee Buyers I'togrtuir; annurtl al.localion of $24(1,(X)(1, and I lonueless Assislauce 1'rograru. 4119W,000 of this ann)uttl unch•r Stale progl:nn guidelines could also be used for rehabilitation foog „nuns. Nc )I Ii: I %,es not iucludo any polcnfi.tl housing :rc•t aside depcecifs from tits •AS-'1'uslin project since P.edevelnptu,:nt 1'rnjrr t not yt•I adopted. (7'/'11 OF 7'f):>17ty iiOIl;;M(.; Uee_embet 2201 The City's anticipated revenue steam indicates that the bulk of housing revenues will start accruing in fiscal year 2001-2002 with a substantial infusion from an anticipated tax increment bond issue and HUD Supportive Housing Program bands. Therefore, most housing programs v~.ffll begin to assist greater numbers of households in the early years of the planning period but will begin faliJng off toward the end of the five-yea.r ~ffme frame due to a shortage of available local fm'tds. As needed and as shown on Table H-21, the Cith: and its Redevelovment Agency w-2! also use State HELP program funds and Federal CDBG ~nds. The City will also ufflize o~er Stare and Federal resources to leverage local, resources as these funding sources match the Ci~"s programmatic o~ect-ives. " ',~FI?is Iab,_ .~ a surrar, arv of affordable housing resources. Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN ! EHgible Pro,ram , Description Activit-ies Multi-Family I Assistance to owners of · Rehabilitation Residential Rehab- ~, mule-family projects Loan/Grant Program , occupied by iow- to moderate-'h~come me:sons. : First Time Low interest Rates and * First Time ?~o:nebuye: Homebuyer Program Downvavmea~t ass:stance Single-Family Assistance to owners of ~ Rehabiiimtion Residential Rehab- single-family projezm Loan/Grant Program occupied by low-fi-,come De~soF, s. New Construction Financial assistance ."or · New Construction new affordable housing oroiec:s. Rental Housing Fi::a:-.c;al assisn'.nce ,"or · Acouisitien Program affordable multi-family · Rehabiiitat~or, rental proiects. · New Construction Density Bonus · Densi~,' Bonus Y. ne Ci~' allows an increase in density.' to developers who set-aside at least 20% of their project tc low- income versons. December 20.~2 . ..a,'I;~ :~.'C,L.'Si.:;.7; 66 Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ '~ '- "'~'Cr~'~F TUSTL~ Tax-Exempt Bonds The Redevelopment · New Housing Agency and the Ci~' have Development the authoriw to issue tax- · * ' Ream: Acqmsi.~:n/" exempt bonds. The City is Rehabilitation also a mexnber ~f Caiffomm Statewide Co.-r~munities Development Authori~,'. Bond proceeds are used ro develop affordabie housing. City/Agency Owned 11' available and · .:-iousmg Land appropriate, Cig' or I · Commur, it-)' Facililies Redevelopment Agen9' owned land may be made : available CalHome California Self-Help Housing Program Granm to local public agencies and nonprofit developers to assist individual households through d,.:ferred-payment loans. Direct, for$.'vab!e loans to assist development projec~ invoMng mu!2?ie ownerskip uni~, including ~ingle-famiiy subdivis',ons. 3rants are made to svcnsor organizations that previde technical assistance to participating owner- builder families· · Predeveiopment Site development · New cons!ru etlon · Rehabilitabo:'. · Aczuisition and rehabilitation · Downpaym-'mt asslstartce · Mortgage financ:n§ , Homebuyer cormseling · Teckmzal assistance for self-help projects or shared housing. A ~hare of bands !s allocated for the rehab'.'litahon, revlacement and reva:r of manufactured Traiw.'ng and su?er¢iaon of lot,,,' and moderate income soL;- help hom~builders or repairers -o .... ; ,'-,~ 2GG.' Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES'- CITY OF TUSTIN '. Fund local planning/or '. infil] housing, ada?~./ve ; ; reuse (conversion) of : commercial ~nd indust'ial : svace into residential un/ts, . ! and ',.he deveiopment of other forms of h:'gh dens/t}' housing within existing urban/zed areas. Downtown Rebound Planning Grants Program lnfil] site inventories, develovmen*. £easibilin' studies, strategic action vlans to remove barriers and promote ir3il2 housing, mixed- use develovmen~ and h-ansit corridor development Uvda:es of general v]an$ and zoning ordinances to encourage adavtSve reuse, ~gher densi,? res:dent/al development, m/xed- use development, residential development within walking distance of :ransit nodes, employment centers and other urban Seisin.lc and structural /easibiii9' studies on can&date buildings for adavtive reuse. Emergency Housing Assistance Program (EFL~P) Grants for emergency shelters, rrav. s~fionM housing, and 5u?por~ve sem'kes ior home,ess mdi:'iduais and families. · Rehabiiitat~on, co~struc'[-ion~ renovation, expansion of existing facilities · Site itcquisiLion ~mclumng ,ease or vurchase o," an cx,s~ng site or fac_:hS') · Equipment purchase, vouchers, operational cosi:q, direct and in~irect client scm'ices · Administr. ahon of the award (i:mited to 5 percent). Jobs-Housing Balance Incentives Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ Mobilehome Park Resident Ownership Program tMPROP ?nancial incentives to cities and counties demonstrate an in.ease ir. the number 0£ new resident/.'a] units. Grant alnounts are based on an ,ncrease in the number of new housing units for which reside_nfial building ve..-rnits were issued during calendar 20C1, compared ~e average number of permi,'~ during the most recent measurab]e month vetted prior tc 2002. Funds awarded :an be used far an?' pro!oct, sen'ice, or other iocaI need determined by the ci~- to be in the commun!~'"s best interest., includn-g ~raffic imvrovemenr-~, neigkborhood parks, bike pa~s, iibrahes, school faci~h~, pie)' ~ ~5., CO~' centers, volJce and hre Loans tc .qnanze the vreserx'ation of af/crdable mobiiehome parks bx' conversion from private ownershiF to ownersh:p cr control bx' resident crgavJzat.'ons, nonprofit housing sponsors, or iozai vublic r,o ',, a~ncl~s. · Purchase (conversion) of a mobilehome park bx' a resident organ~_m~on, nonprofit enhrv or local vubli: agenc}-; rehabil:ta Lion cr relocatmn of a vurchased park · Purckase bva ]o~v raceme resident of a share or spece ir. a converted park. :~ .... ;',,' 2933 Multifamily Housing Program fMHP,, Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN Deferred payment loans to ass:'st new construction, rehabilitation and vresew,'at-ion of permanent and transitional rental housing .:or lower income househoids. ~ew cor. s tru c~.ion, rehabi]im~on, or acquisibon and rehabi]imtJon of pemanent or transi~onal housing, and the conversion of no~es)den~a] st~zv~res to ren~2 housing. E~gib)e toss inc)ude ~he cost oF child rare, after-~choo; care ~d :nte~y iL~ked to ~e ~ssisted housing uni~; real properS' acouisifion: ref~ancing to ream affordable ren~; necessam' onsite and offsite improvemen=; reasonabie fees and cor~ulbng ces~; and c~pimHzed reserves. Urban Predexlelopment Loan Pro,am (PDLP) S}'.o~-term loans to ~rov:de predeve]opment ca?~:a] to £mance the start ~f low- income housing .vro,~ezts ir. 'L1 r ~l'l Rre~s. Predeve[ovment costs ..ncJ~de, 5ut are not ]h~d:eci tc. site control. site ncqu~s~tion ~or lucre housing development, ~..~n.er.no architectural plans, appi~ca~on fees, legal s~rx'~c~s permits, b:mc~:ng an~ site preparation. i)eee~:ber C,'TY OF TL'S"'F.L': i';DU'.?i):3 ,ELE:ZENT 7~ Urban Predevelopment Loan/Presen'ation Program (PDLP-P} Urban Predevelopment Loan/Jobs-Housing Balance Program (PDLP-I) Table I-I- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES1 CITY OF TUSTIN i Short-~r-.r, loans to finance Ye initial cos~ of . preserving ex'.'stin§ ' affordable housing · deveivpmen~ for existing , tenants. Short-term loans to ~"tance the initial costs of constructing, converting, preservmg or rehabilitating assisted housing develovments near transit stations. · Capital assessmmts to establish a proje:t'$ :ond/tion and ?ten,al rehabilitaSon :~sts Purchase ovtilor agreemen~ Professional services such as consultent, architect, engineering and iegal · Permit and avv]:cation fees · Bonding fees: eta Land purchase, options :o buy land, op~dons or deposits to buy or preserve exfst~m.$ publicly assisted ren:a~ hous!:~g to z)rese:%'e t'.ue affordabilitv of the unim, vrofessional services, pe.'-m, it and application fees, bonding, sire preparation, re]~-ted water or sewer development, etc., for affordabie housmS proiects within one-ha]:' mile of ~u: exisur, g or vlanned .'-ransit static:~. ,7,17'7 OF TU3~I'I?,' :13~o...u ........... ~, December 20,9 Proposition lA Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN Proposit~on lA includes J vrovJsions to establish a . Down?ayment Assistance · Frogram and a Rent : Assistance Pro.am usiv. g : ~choo~' fees coile~ed &om ~ affordable housing projects. Poten~a] buyers or tenan~ of affordable housing ?ro!ect~ are ehgibie to receive ass/stance in the form of downpayment essistanze or rent subsidies from the State at amounts equivaient tc C~.e school fees void k,v ~e affordable housing deveiopers for that project in question. This programs sWacture and implementation strategy has no~ ye~. been determined 'w' U~e State o.: CalfforrJa · Downpavment Assistance · Rental Assistance Emergency Shelter Grants awarded to non- * Support Sen'ices Prog'ram profit organizations for shelter supvort se:'vices California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) Multiple Rental Housing Programs California Housing RehabilitaPion Program Below market rate financfl~g offered re builders and deveiopers of rr. ulPlvle family and elderly hous'.'ng. Tax-exempz bonds orovide below-market mortgage money Low interest loans for the r?habilitation of s'aO'standard homes owned and, oczupied by lower- inzcme households. Cttv and non-profits sporksor housing rehabilitation .vro!ects. · New Cvnstrucuon · Rehabilitation,,/ Accuis!tien · Rehabilita~on · P.e?a:r of Code V.'.o?~ floes · '~ro?er~' "mpr~vemenrs C;L'I%.' OF TL'SWA' '.-IO',JS!iZ? ELEMEi,'T December 2C91 72 California Housing Finance Agency Home Mortgage Purchase Program Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE'I~)U$ING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN C2-iFA sells tax-exemvt bonds to provide below- market loans to first time homebuvers. Program/s operated through participating i~-nders that originate loans purchased b~, Ci~A Californi a Housing Finance Agency HELP Program Low Income Housin§ Tax Credit (I.IHTC) County Statewide Communities Program Unsecured loan from CH[FA to vrovide affordable housing oppormni~/es ti-,rou gl-, progrnm partnership with iocal government entities. · Homebuver Assistanze Tax credits ax'affable to individuals and corporations that invest in Iow-income rentM housing. Tax credits are sold to corporations and people w~th high tax iiabili~,, of which the proceeds are utilized for housing develovment · A :qu/sit/or. · Rehabflitatmn · infil! · Predevelovmen: · Xew co?~truc',5or. · Code ErJor£ement The City of Tustin is now a direct member of the program through a joint Powers Authcritv and can parhcipnte directly. · Rehabi"imti~.n/ Acquisition · .N'ew Construcuc. n · Mu!h-famgy Housing · ?r,.vate Mortgage Revenue Bonds · Acqmsitivn · Reha~flitatmn December 2093 California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN ': Allocation of vrivate { activin' bond (mx-exempt ~ mortgage revenue bond) to single-£amily housing. Low interest loan ,"or muld- farrtily housing rekab.qitation or ~cquisifion, or Provides lin',ited term houskng assistance combined with o, se management, employment services, chi]deare and other supportive services to welfare recipient. Grant~, loans, mortgage assurance t¢ iow and moderate-income families improving property with their labor. Mortgage Credit Cer~£kate Mu/fi-fam_ily private mortgage revenue bond · Land lease Payment · New Construc~cn · ?re-develovment costs · £mpioyee Housing of .qve or more empioyees · Lufil'. · Code Enforcement · First Time ?iomebuyers · Acauisitiov. · ~eha biiitaP, er. Loans for pre-deve!opmen: or "seed" money to nonprofit corvorations and local governments. Ccnstrucficn, maintenance, usa, and occupancy of vrivatelv owned and operated emp]oyee- i~ousing facilities. ~rovides unsecured loan for affordab2e ~.:ous:-'.g vrojects. December 2002 Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE H~U$ING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN CDLAC continued Low interest lom',~ for housing cons~action ~or wi~ s~ecmi nee~. Low interest and downpayment prog'ram for iow and moderate-income £irs~. time homebuvers. ?ermanent financing for new construction, ac q uisition/reha bi]itat/on, and acquisitiou o£ mul,'-i- £amiiv projects Community Development Biock Grant (CDBG) En~tlement program awarded to ',.he Cit~- on a formula basis. objectives are to fund housing ar,~ivities and expand economic opportunities. Projects must meet one of t~-ee national objectives: bene£it low- and moderate-income · persons: aid in the vreven~on or ehn-.ination o£ si'ams or bligEt; or mee: et. her urgent needs. , · Section 108 Loan Revavmenm · ?hstoric Preserx'ati on · Admin. & Phnmng · Code Erdorcement · Public Facilities i mprovemer. Ls Housing Achvib. es · Economic DeveJo,~.'r.e~t · ."'~eha billta tien Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Federal t~,x credit .;ar iow- and moderate-income homebuvers who have not owned a home in the past 5hree years. A:loca!ion for MCC is provided by the State through the Coun,? of Orange. First Time I-lome Buyer Assistance r .... ',.- 200; 75 I{OME Investment Partnership (HOME) Program Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES'- CITY OF TUSTIN Grant Frog'ram for housing. The intent of this program is to exmmd the · suppiy of decent, safe. and sanitarw affordable housing. HOME is , designed as a partnership o program bet-ween the federal, state, and local : governments, non-profit and for-profit housing entities to finance, build/re?,abilitate and manage housLng :'or lower- income owners and renters Multi-Family Acquisifion;'Rehab Single-Family Homebuver Assistance CHDO .*ssis:ance A dministrat'icn Rearm Assurance Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) Armual grant funds are alloca~d on a formula basis. Funds are intended to assist wit. b, the prov'.'sion of shelter and sociaI seN'ices for homeless · i-lomelessness ?revention (acquisition. nel,c COnS~rtlct101%, rehabilitatiov, conversion) · 5up.votive Se~'ices · Overatin~ Exvenses Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS fHOPWA) Funds are made available countywide i'cr supportive social services, ~ffordable housing development, and rental assistance. · Renrai Assistance · S'4vvortive Social Services Shelter Plus Care Suppert4ve housing and · Renta'. :'~ssis.'anca Program (S+C) services for persons with disabi'.,ities-grants for rental assistance offered with , supportive se.wices to ', homeless with disabilities and disable~l households· Supportive Housing Grants to improve qual:::,' · Aczuisitmn Grant cf existing shelters and · F, eha bihta.-.or. transitional housing. · New Construction Increase shelters and transitional housing facilities for the homeless 75 December 2003 Section 8 Rental Assistance T~b]e H- 22 ~'~.~ ~)U$ING RESOURCES~ C~ OF TUSTIN Ren~i nss~nce pro.nm · Rental Assis~nce w~eh ~rovides ~ subsidy ~ ~o ve~"low-~come fnmiii~s, ~dJv~dua]s, ; seniors ~d ~e d~abled, , Pn~cip~n~ p~), 30 percen~ ~ of ~e~r adjusted mcome ~ ~oward rent. The Orange Count' Hous~g Au~o~.' peys ~he bMance of rent ~o propers' owners, mad ad.drifters the ~ro~nm. Section 202 Section 811 Grants to non-profit deveiovers of suppor~ve housing for the elderh' Grants to non-profit developers o£ supper2ve housing for person wi~ disabiliUes, including group homes, independent living facilities and intermediate care faci.[iP~es · Acquisibon · Rehabi:':tat~on · New Construction · Rental Ass:stance · 5uvport Sen'ices · Acquisiffon · Rehabiiitatuon · New Construction · Rental Assistanze HOPE McKinnev Act Supportive Housing Program {SI-IP) Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program (SRO-Section $) Homeownership ass:slance awarded on a com:~et~Uve basis recuires non-feder&! matching funds. · idomeowneraixi= of MuJ ~-farv. ih' (HOPE · Homeownerskip of $ingle-farr.-fiy homes ~.OPE 3) Grants te develop su?por~ve housing and sen'ices and sen'ices fixat will enable homeless people to live as independently as vossibie, '_rrarzidona! ."-iou.~ ing Permanen174,v::sing Fo: ?io:r, eiess 'Fv'i t b, D.~sabllities Support:ye Services, such as chl]d care. amployment assistance and ou~atient ser~dces for ti~e homeless .'=unds to rehabihtate sfl~gie-room uni~ within a buildmg of up to 100 uni~. The provision of suppor.five sen, ices is , opfionai. · RehabiJkafion · New Const'uchon 77 '..'ece.'Td.)e;' Small Projects Processing (5PP)- (221 (d)(4) and ~ (f) Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING CITY OF TUSTIN : Mortgage Insurance ! program for small multi- i £a.mily neg' construct/on or , substantial re:~bilitation ! (221),7d)(4)and small mu/tf- ramiiv rehabilitation Acquisi~on Rehabilitation New Cons~-azhon Section 105 Loan HUD Mortgage Insurance for Purchase/Refinance HUD Rehabilitation Loans for Multifamily Projects Provides loan guarantee to CDBG entitlement iu.'Ssdictions for pursuing large capital improvement or other projects. The jurisdiction must pledge its ."-umre CDBG allocations for iaaa repayment. Maximum loan amount can be up to five times 12'~e entitlement jurisdiction's most recent approved annual allocation. Maximum loan term is 20 tcwentv years. .Mortgage Insurance for nurchase or refinance of existing mult~am..ily projects. Provides m..or:gage insurm~ce ~or i:nvrovemen:s, repairs, or additions to multi-famiiy vroiects. · Acouisi"don · RehabiLitation · Home Buyer Assistance · Homeless Assistance · Public ~mprovement · Economic i)evelopment · Relocation. clearance, · .%zquisi,~on · New Co. nsu-uct:cn · O?erat~on .-'~ :i ministry, t-ion · EnergT Consen'ntlo,.: · Rehabi'.'ltarion Disposition of IIUD Mulitfamily Housing To disvese of muib2-familv iaousing owned or financed by HUD that is delinquent, under wcrkou/or foreclosed with mechanisms designed to vrese~'e the Iow- and moderate-income housn~ fi s:ock. · Acouisifion · New Construct:on · Operation A dministra rio,: · Preservation HUD Single-Family Propert3., Disposition Program __Ils HU D-acqu:red stag. e- family properties to expand homeownership opportunilSes and strengthen neighborhoods. Up to 10% of."-IUD-help single-family properties are made available for lease for use in homeless probwams. _ '_~%?_t is S1 per year. · Acomsition · Re. hab~iication C.TY OF T[.'ST:r.\' HC,'_;$1A:3~z.r,,,',.",,'-' ..... ~"-,. 78 Table H- 22 AF ~ USING RESOURCES: Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Provides grants to develov programs that help veterans recover ~om homelessness, mciudmg establishing transitional housing mud su?porffve sen'ices for homeless verdi'arts. · Acquisition · Operation Administration · Single Room Occupant, Hore~s · 5ocial Services · Transitional Housing Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) · CommurdB' Home Buyer Program - .';/xed rate MortgaS[es · Commumt3: Home improvement Mortgage Program - Mortgages for both vurc:~ase and rehabilita~on o£ a home · Fan.me Neighbor - Under served iow- income mino~ties are eligible for Iow down- payment mortgages for the purzhase of single ramm' llome$ Furchases/secures kigk loan to value rat/o mngie- famiiy home purrhase loan to assist iow income families Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) · Homebuver Ass:stance ', ?~omebuver Assistance/Rehab · Expand Home Ownership/or ]x ,"inorii:ies · Homebuver Assistanze · Acquisihon · RehabfiitatSon Rehabihtation Mortgages Program msured. mortgages For property accuisit-ion and rehabilitatian :71'."Y C.:: TU.S'.'7.',' i.'v_)L;'$LY~ 79 December 2002 California Commurdty Reinvestment Act (CRA} Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program Table H- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES1 CITY OF TUSTIN A~s:stance to !ow Lncome minor/ty neighborhoods, including the zenstruction, rehabilitation, bridge and acquisition finance needs of developers of affordable ran!al and ior-sale housing, as weI! as £~rst ~me, iow and moderate ir. come homebuvers. Provides l:unds to qualified ' affordable housmg projects flaat would not mae*. customary criteria or ex:sting secon'iar-,- mortgage market requirements or for which, there is no secondary market · :New Consin'uc.':ion · Rehabilitation · Acquisitnon Provides interest rate at 20 basis point be]ow i'1 m D~s.'-rict cost~ of funds. Direct subsidies to non- vrofff, and for-vrofit developers, and public agencies for affords-hie. iow-income ownership and rental vroiec:s · New Const~-uctiorx · Ex va.".d Home ©wnershi= for Lower income Persons California Organized Provides fmancing for Investment Network ' affordab!e rental or (COIN) ownersh~v housinm. McAulev Institute Revolving Loan fund and technical asmstance ro bu~d or rehabilitate houmn§. · .A~fordable housing financing · .Acouisit~on · Iiomeles$ Shelters · ,New Const.-uclion · ,",', ei~- biii ta ti o n · 5e'~f-.:-.; alp i~ousmg · Single Roam Occuvan~' ~'oteis · Transitional l-iousim~t Oenember 200f Mercy Loan Fund Neighborhood Housing Services Table H- 22 AFF.~RDAB .L.~.~[~)US ING RESOURCES: "'"'" ' '" '~F TUSTIN 1,¥orld/BRIDGE Initiative , Makes loans to projects in j which conventional , f£nancing is not avaiiabie or not affordable and vromo~es innovaiSve and effect/ve .Financing arrangemen.~. .N~H5 is a three-way parmership among neighborhood residents, local goven~ments and local businesses. Neighborhood Reinves ~nen,: Corvoration provides direct techrdcal assistance, expendable grants, and ca~ita" granL~ :o N?{S, which makes loans /or rehabilitation. Prov;des lower-interest cons.ruction financing for affordable or mixed- income renta! housing or affordab'.,e home ownershiv :krougk a consortmm of W~rld 5avi:'.gs .: Calpers." Fargo/E,:nk o£ America · Acquisition · Group Homes/ Congregate Care · i,~ras~uct-ure Development · Mobiiehome Park Purchase Assistance · New Construction · Preser,'ation · l~ehabilitation · SeLF-Help Housing · ~gle Room Occu r~ea't~' ~ote]$ · Transit/onaJ Housi,n~ _ · Ener~.. ' Censem, ation · Overahon Adminiswat/on · Rehabilfta~on · New Cons~ucuvn Rehabilftahon · Acquisition Dec:ember 2093 Non Profit Organizations Table I~I'- 22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOURCES~ CITY OF TUSTIN i According to the Scare · i Department of Housing · and Communal' · . Development, three ' nonprofit agencies in Orange Coung, have i expressed interest m ~ purchasmg and or managing a*. risk or replacement urti~s in the 'rustin area. Orange Count~' Affordable Housing Clearin?ouse AcquiMffon and rehabiJitation .Management of multf- family units Non-profit lender CC~,$o~unl · Construction Financing · .'.':errnanel:i ?inancing : The Repiacement :-Iousin$, ?lousing Rehabil',ta~on, Housing ProducEon and Land Cost Writ~Down programs al! use Cae Redeveiovment Agency's iow- to moderm~ Lncome housmg set-aside funds :o leverage other regional, state, and fedora] funding sour,~es. These sources inciude, but are not limited to: Orange Coun,? Housing .;unds. CaLifornia Housing Finance HELP funds, Department of Housing and Urban Development HOM-E funds, along with housing revenue bond financing and Iow income housing tax .~redits. Such sourc~ helm to ensure an adequate level of f'anding rc satisfy the Cit-,"s affordable housing production recutremen~s. Source: Ctty of'l-ust/n Redevelopment Agency Comprehemwe Housmg Affordabili~' St'rate~,' 2000-20~0 In addition to these resources, there are also potential public and private resources that may be available to the City. HOUSING PROGRAMS The foLlowh:g matrix identifies existing and new housing programs to be implemented du;ing the 2000-2005 period and the 1.°.98-2000 transitional veriod. Table H-23 is a ~ompr_l~nSlX, = summary .... Ciw"s cumnt4fied objectives se:- forth for each program for the plamtxg period !998-2005. The prograrns are organized according to ,.he goals described vreviousiv. 82 I Iollsillt'.Ficillefit Policies: 1.I, 1.8, 1. L I ------ ------ 1.2 Mobile Ifulnes (. onlimit, to loclinlaill mobilelioniv bark zone if I it I plocvss conditional lise I'vi-11 I it .11111 1 ivil I it) I Is its rv( vivc-d for Illaotlinchiled hurtles. I lotisilij. F.It'llicill. Policies: 1. 1, L3 . . J 1.3 Secondary Residential Units Colitilille to plovide oppol 111nities for affol-dablest-v 011(h) I Y I C.-SiCIVI It iiI I ILI WCIIiJll, Ll Ili Is in I] It.- Silll',le -In Ill ily Residmilial I )isliict Iols where feasible tbroill"11 exisling Zoning Ordinwit e. provisions. I lotisint- J-Jmnvnt Volicivs: 1. 1, 1. 7, 1.1:3 1.4 Deed Restrictions Require appropriale deed reshit-liolls to ellslin, coillifilled affordability fOl- IOW - or 1110tIVI-ilh! iTIVOIllt! 11OLISill1l, cons(ructed or rehabilitated with the assislanct, of any 11tiblic or 1-4xievc-lopment Aginicy feuds as Illay be IvJ.,,;IIIv lecluilvd. I lotishij; Mintictil. Policies: 1.1 1.5 Pre -application Colifervilices ('011(iTILIE' 10 tililize proci-ditius for pre -application Collk-l-VI)COS and 1110CPSMillY, I)FOCCNILUM to PXI,L-%.Iilv perillit processing. 1',0iI%iLg FIFLI-1011t. I'0fiCiQS: I J I V Agi-my, Cily ('0111161 Collifilill lily Developilivill Depaillilt-111, ('ily I )vVvIo I'll 101 it I h,partilleill, City Council 1)l'1,a[llllel It, RedvVelop [lei it Agenty, Cily Comicil I h-velopilivi It DvInif Ilm-fit titliv involved City General Fund; PI oceSsing Ivvs (recover cillh.) MCAS - Tustin and fillill of3,15 I units. As received l) fax-Exeutpt - k1ortgage RvVentiv Bvild', 2) Redevviop 11 (.,11 Agency I lousing; SM- Aside M-Aside Finit Is AV I'llild; City pI ocer-sing fcvs (1(,(.ovt.l "Iblo) Impose SLICII restrictions on 691 units. Colitilille Process applications as I-Ex-viveml 13 Y 2005 BY 2005 Table 11- 23 I MUSING U.I.E.MENI TROGRA NIS 2UOO-2OU5 Piogiani I Responsi life Agency I FullilingSource I Quantified Objective Goal 1: Adequate Housing. Supply .- 1.1 Available Sites (,olllllltlllity i k'itv Ge'lit'lid Fluid; Assist in Llie devil OIL-1,10h1g; units M loI Iti. I be ownor keit( by AX .3 S Spet -ilic Plans to wilhorize and MR.'Mirage mixed-ust, Al.;tnicy hinds; Cily and rental housing; developnimits (sev Zoning, Studies Program). RedvVeloplilvilt and Agency slaff fluol)jl develop:11elit in I Iollsillt'.Ficillefit Policies: 1.I, 1.8, 1. L I ------ ------ 1.2 Mobile Ifulnes (. onlimit, to loclinlaill mobilelioniv bark zone if I it I plocvss conditional lise I'vi-11 I it .11111 1 ivil I it) I Is its rv( vivc-d for Illaotlinchiled hurtles. I lotisilij. F.It'llicill. Policies: 1. 1, L3 . . J 1.3 Secondary Residential Units Colitilille to plovide oppol 111nities for affol-dablest-v 011(h) I Y I C.-SiCIVI It iiI I ILI WCIIiJll, Ll Ili Is in I] It.- Silll',le -In Ill ily Residmilial I )isliict Iols where feasible tbroill"11 exisling Zoning Ordinwit e. provisions. I lotisint- J-Jmnvnt Volicivs: 1. 1, 1. 7, 1.1:3 1.4 Deed Restrictions Require appropriale deed reshit-liolls to ellslin, coillifilled affordability fOl- IOW - or 1110tIVI-ilh! iTIVOIllt! 11OLISill1l, cons(ructed or rehabilitated with the assislanct, of any 11tiblic or 1-4xievc-lopment Aginicy feuds as Illay be IvJ.,,;IIIv lecluilvd. I lotishij; Mintictil. Policies: 1.1 1.5 Pre -application Colifervilices ('011(iTILIE' 10 tililize proci-ditius for pre -application Collk-l-VI)COS and 1110CPSMillY, I)FOCCNILUM to PXI,L-%.Iilv perillit processing. 1',0iI%iLg FIFLI-1011t. I'0fiCiQS: I J I V Agi-my, Cily ('0111161 Collifilill lily Developilivill Depaillilt-111, ('ily I )vVvIo I'll 101 it I h,partilleill, City Council 1)l'1,a[llllel It, RedvVelop [lei it Agenty, Cily Comicil I h-velopilivi It DvInif Ilm-fit titliv involved City General Fund; PI oceSsing Ivvs (recover cillh.) MCAS - Tustin and fillill of3,15 I units. As received l) fax-Exeutpt - k1ortgage RvVentiv Bvild', 2) Redevviop 11 (.,11 Agency I lousing; SM- Aside M-Aside Finit Is AV I'llild; City pI ocer-sing fcvs (1(,(.ovt.l "Iblo) Impose SLICII restrictions on 691 units. Colitilille Process applications as I-Ex-viveml 13 Y 2005 BY 2005 Table If- 23 HOUSING IiL-ENIUN1• I'RO(AKANIS 2000-2UU5 Program Responsible Agency hundiu r Source I Quantified Objective 1 uuelrant.E• 1.6 Permit Processing, for Low- and Moderate Community Cily General Fuud; Conlinttt Urt kt,iily Incolue Housing; Dt'veloptrtcr,t City processing, Iees Ensure that procrssinP of Perutils for low- and tnurll•nle- (recoverable) incoma housil,l;.irc: fast-[Iarked witlI low- al ill Irtodelaie- income housing perulits being given pliorily over ollwr pct alit applications. I ...f lousing lilcutent Policies: L [ I 1.7 Permit Coordination Continue the services of div City's Community I vvt`lopntent Depaitnx•rtt as a central cleatinghouse with individual•; assil;ned the tospon;;illilitV of expe[lilinl; devrlopmolit polmils IMIuiled front varion:: dep,ufulenL; and ate •ncies. I lousing 17.1c11lt`nt l'ulici(s:. t. t I L.8'1•ax Increment Financing PI OV ide Nous illy, SM _Iri[le L.tx increna•nl funds generaled front Ills• Redevelopment Projects, where available, to assist in providing honsi ig accouunothltions for low- and moderate-incollic houselu,lds in rehabilitation or 111-w cnnslrucliun projc•cls. I Iousint; Flement Polic-ivs: 1.6, 1.12,1.2,;.2. 1.9 Housing fur lite Disabled - Reguile rtc•w ululli.danlily housing units and aparlulenl convulsions to rondoulininntc to comply with .[irate specilirations for accunnnodaliun of the disabled. the C•ily would raid procedur('s and/ur undertake aPhruprirUe aulendunrnts to t�xistinY, standards to errsurr ac[-oo(tuolilt ion for the disabled. I lousiol, I{leruc•nl Poli(-ics: I.1:3, 1.15 C'olilt nunity - I )[•vt`loputerlt Redevelopment Agency ( on.tnuniiy 1)cvelt,Inuenl Department ('ity C;ancrat Fund; (Aly processing fens (recoverable) RP[ Il`L•'CIUI71111.1II .-..- Agency I Iomsint; SO -Aside Funds `dale and Federal prol;rane:; locally adopted liuilditll; Codt's Procctssing of approximately Ill new residential projects annually, 50 projet-ts by 2005 As:.isl 620 links by 2lMlri Rebm individuals to apnicies providirty supportive housing Ilial accommodates independent living. Add proredutes and/or undertake approprialt• iunendllivilts to exisling slandztrds to etlsure accouunodatiott to IIIA d tsablcd. 1iy 7.00s BY 2.005 -- - - On goint, Table H- 23 HOUSING t?1,1:1tt.N'!' t'HUC.;KAI✓1S 20011-2005 Program i Hes lonsible Agency Fundhi g Source Quantified Objective 'I itneframe 1.10 1-ransititlnal Housing Viu ions Nun-1'rufit Variety of private • Promote, assist, and on -pint; assisLntce. to L{nroural;e• Ill(- continuation of the She refold hontcs anti (rrg:ntizalions, funds; C I )[iG funds facilitale ille local nun profils. l.autrl 1 IUIIS(? ill 'I uslin, Whiclt I,rnvidt• }lousinl, farililies Kedevelopulclt't developntt•nt of for baltrrrd hontx•less wonwrt and children- Thesv homes Agency, C'onnnut'ity emerf;ency and :ue luc•aled iusinl;Ir-filthily iee•ighborhoo(L,and provide I I)evelopnwrtt I ttansie•nts'shelters 11111th ncrde•d .:e•r vier fur honte•Irss wontc:n vtd chilefre•n. ! h ,artnteul f Ihrouf;h runlinuc•d In addition, explutr addilional program oplions Lo assia I support of the County in the +towision and fundin • for olllel. pro ;rants such as E f, E f I L lunutlrss Assts[ancv tiansitiunal hutr::inf; and %int;Ir tonne occupancy hoe:singl'rof;ratn I luusini; Ebe9rlc•111 Policies: I.15, 1.10 !.l I Temporary I lousing; for Ilomeless The City will Also support- counlywide• effor Ls to assist approved homeless providers as Incl of the NIC:ASTuslin Kruse clforl- I lousing F.Irntrttl Politics: 1. 14, 1.15 County of (lanae, Krdrve•lopntrnl Agency C'I SIS(; funds, f Ll)U Eil ll' funds • Support local af;e•ncies Who provide hoirte less services by providing financial assisUtnce of apploxiutately $!i,01X1- $H W(1 annually. • Provide ly2 erne rf;onc y housing units to sin};Ir men and women by 2003 aL Tusf in I .exp y (l.hanF,o C'ounly Rescue Mission). • The C'ily plans lu ass -is[ 700 individuals fly means of integrating counseling,, educalion, job-Iraittinf; and ol}«•r lechrticptrt; to slop dw e•ycle• of huuwlessness. • Provide 24 turiLs of 11-ansitional housing for families (it) be operated s_ I92 enu rgortcy.-uilr::inf; I,y ?W3 By 2005. Table ll- 23 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS 2000-2005 Progra(u_ Responsible Agency Funding Source. I Quantified Objective. Cilnefizlne • Provide 6 units of transitional housing, for women and children (lo be operated fly [lumen Option -Dove I lousing) • Pi ov idl• G wlils- in lung; derin 12-24 months-lra 1Isil iona I Ilousing, for families with children (it) be operlled by Orange t'cresl Inlerfailll `;l wl tel') • hovide 14 unils of llallsitional housing to families with children who ale houudess due to a short or temporary financial hardAlip (to be uperlledl by I'alnlhes who Cule, lul luerly ll"vine' 'fenlpulary l luusinf,) • Pruvide for a (10-1111it expansion of ( hilllg.;ewoo(I 'I'masilional I lousing, for ( Ilildren (to be upela(l•d by tiles Amilty of (?rang;e) ( Il Y / Vii' i i;S1 N l i..'1 ?l A" 1'.. i ,'i i11 J.(• l:rr'rr.11 err '?001 Table H- 23 HOUSING E'Ll"MEN'1' PROGRAMS 2000-2UU5 Program Responsib.leAgency I Fundis Sut Quantified Objective 't•iweframe I Iledevelop) lent I Ilecli•ve•lupu«'nl Review Within legal time• . l Mid review of Hit, lteelrvd« l�pnvtl Agency will rt -view Ilnple•ulenlalion Agent v ! Frtnd fr•ul« s 1.12 Implementation Program flus for each pmjecl at ea and Coutprdllrnsive I Iow;ing, Afloidabilily Sln•leg;y as naluited by Redevelopment Law and adill,l as uewssaly. i Irnlci.lt; Tattle 11- 23 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS 2000-2005 Program Res ponsible A gene ' kundin Source Quantified Objective Tirnefrarne 1.15 Economic Integration within Sphere of C'ounly of Omngv City (;encial Fund; Cit F.;oing lequest to both Un-goii'l; Influence I Staff Butt• I aSrnt.it•s. Request that the UtanF,e C'utntly Planning Cotnntission suet the-, Fnvironuu•ntal Ma11ag ,item A+ ency (F.LMA) notice the City of'I'ustin of any, proposed clevelopment activities W'ithlrl I Ll.-Aill'S sphere of influence. I lousin& F.Ir,ment I'olirir•s_ I.1, 1-4, 1.5 — 1.16 Senior Cilizen Ilousing Continue to identify silts that Lore suitable I'm senior citizens Iu,usi.nF; pmjecls. l lte:c silts will be proun,led for pi ivate development and applications will bo Luaele far alts available subsidy funds. I lousing ElkIm.-III Polit ies: 1. 1, L CL, 1.15 1.17 Senior Services Program Develop a rotulue hen%ive lt,tnspor Ialton program, Last• manmyentent, in.fornrttion and relerrid, and shared housing ptuf;tiun. 1lousing Flentenl Policies:: 1.15,'2.;3 _ - 1.18 Recycling Single -Fancily Uses in R-3 Zones 11110 Multiple -Family Units ( •onli0ue to entourage developers to consolidatt• individual loll into larycr cohesive developrtn•nls. I h•11sity bonuses may be. cousidermd as an inctnliee to consolidate logs. l lousing f{leutent t'ulicits: ].1l Ret IevelopnrtIII AF;ertry; C•otn iumily Uevelopruenl Depatlmenl Park% and Rectealion Depallrtwttl Req. eMull mtttl AF;tncy F -lousing Sc L -Aside Funds; HELP; Low-Itu•oatt• I lousing; 7'ax Credits; Private Activity Bonds issued Ihy California SIattWide anti ulLets c. ity General Funds C:unn.uunify (.ily (;metal Fund Developuttrtl anti Recleveloputt•nt Depailnu•nl Agent y Funds; Staff time Ihocc•rvalion of 100 al -Tisk and 60 new units by 7.0(1°,. Assist 850 elder ly annually Respond to all requests lot density bonus per Oily codes. f3y_LUO;i Un--f,u i t tF; Ort -(;Dint; 1 'j -j'}' r 1(' "j'i ,• :! I'. � � Oi -• ..,.[ i i•�•.l'. %�-Fftir': .... j'. •e•evr•jn�i :?0(11 '!'able Il- 23 HOUSING.: F-11.1;M11"Nl' PKI.)GRAMS 2000-2005 Proarant Ices tonsilviv Agency Funding Source uanlified Objective Thueftame I.ig Onl;oinl; Iteview of Ilousing Elemevll C'onllnunily C-ily Genclrltl Fund; On going; Ott l�oiuh rrograin~ !)evc•v I lu ,null NIafI lime 1 1 I I)c'arinn•nl 1:1,illi file ci::lc c„' ;ttloplion of Ihez lousing; c cntt•nC, I prepare an annual leporl to the Planning.; Com III isxiulI assl!•:4iI Ig l,rrvious ycar:s accom Ill ishnu•r►Ls Lown! Ll nle•e•liny, I lousing Ide'nlrnl objerlives. tinhlnil the Annual Ite•pol1 Io the r;tale. I ICD. I u:;inl, FICII►cnt POIlCiVS: all 1'01icivs 1.20 Consolidated flail 'l .a• ( ily of •I islin shah prcpalo an updale of 11tc• e"orrsoliclalvcl flan that provides a eolnprrhf-lisive• a•:sessrtle•nt of housing floods, it housin[; development plan incurpor:tlilc}; Federal, `.'hale and local pul•I.ir and private resources, and a on(' year iurplullic-ntalior► plan. llousin}:, Elvins-nt Policies: 1. 15, 1. 16, 1.118, 2.1, 1.1,;1.),4.3, 4.4,5.1,5.2,5.:1,5.4., 5.5 1.21 Zoning Studies ... .. _. In order to Incililnle the new ronstruc'liort goals of till! 111108-2005 Regional Ilousing Needs Assessment, initiate sludies to consider new plogran►s to encourage and ptonlole affordable housing. •1I►ese studios it►rludc: (1) Creation of zoning provisions which will arconunodale mixed users in porlions of IIIc C ily, pauticulatly in the (?til Mown C'omnn•rrial Arca; (7) Consider n4axalior► of cei lain developrncno stall lards and ir►renlives that could be plovided fur proje c is Whit It illChnlc• affuulalde. horlsinl; uIIiIs. Ilousing 1"I'llimll Policies: 1.1 J.H Ucvrlupuu•nl l.k•par lnn•nl C-,(llll 111 it [lily -- De. Veit) pnnlnt Uepartnrent Variety of I('(al, - -- `,talc•, :na! Frdcral Ilnnlilrlt; General Dunt] and Reclevelorlivill Agency bunds Stalf tlll►C City Genelal Funel,— Itedeveloputcnl Atoncv funds l'IcpareC'onsolidal(d flan in "LOO.:. I'rcparc Action flan annu:ellr. Inilialr� )oniog Sludir•s by . January 211(12 and complole any proposed anlendu►crtt in 2Otti. Prepale coltsolicialed - Platt in 2005 Prepare Aclicnalar► annually �. Ily 2063 - - . ;�'. ,'!� , ..�i•,. ...':_. �ti;; ,�i., •.ir+, !)c�cc•rn!n•r ?rillj .:(1 Table Il- 23 1IOUSING IiI EMEN'I' PKUC:KAMS 21L)OILI-2005 Pru rant Res oiisitile Agemy AgencyFunding Suurc•e Quantified Objective 'I'iutefr.ame 1.2(1 Fnvii-o n i ntal Constraints Community Gwnetal Fund; On going; (ht --going C:onlinue to aIle-viaty LIIe nevessily of delays in I evelopnit'nl Privalee developer pruit'ssing, iu,d It,ilil Itinl; reeluirellienls incorpoi sled Dop:ulr„e111, cost ,ecovemble into ll,c' developmenl plan~ by rt'yui'ing ptul;ran[ Ret Ievelopnlrnt ettvitvutuentitl impact reports (FIR) on all major Age-ncy elevt•lopntenL projects wlit-never possible. 1 lotisinh Element. Policies: I A l 1.27 Densily Bonus Programa plontole Derhity liunuse s, to lat'ililale the construction of affordable housing;. I Inder Slate law, applicants utiry file (ur detlsily bonuses when projects iucurpurate: 20 percent of units for low-income. persons; 10 percent of units for ve,v low income units; (-,1-50 percent of units forst'nio'. rilixe•ns. 1 tousi,cg F_lenie,d Poliiies: 1.1 l Goal 2: Equal.liousirlc,�opportunity -_ 2.1 1 air 1 iuusinty "I he city shall c'ouCuucc to contract for Lhe provision of ;e'IN i( e's by IIIC Fikil- I IUIISItIt; Council of Orange C'ounly (1:11(CY)(:) to assure equal housing og,purlututles within the City. 'I ht' ( 'ily allocates approximately $15,0(X) muutally to ille FI ICOC Sur handling; tenant./ fandim it disputes, huusitlg; diSCHIllinatiun rases, counseling;. tcn;a,tl I ig;hts, lair housing educkilion, and education Within Ille City. I lousingI_lentett( Policies: 2A, 7.2, 7.A 2.2 Shared -1 lousing Corltircue to provide ioonlinat.ion and support to a home sharing; progtarn funded in earl by the Feedback Foundation, Inc. as part of'.CL.0 (Transportation Lunch and and the Orange County 1 tousin}; Authority. I louring; Llou'er,l Policies: 2.3 (.'outnuucity Gwnetal Fund, Developrnoftl Redevelopinerit Department Agency I lousing `;el Aside Funds ('onunnnil�' De•ve>lul, -- ment Uopartnu'nt, lair I loIIsiIIn( :ounciI of Otmig e C ounly 'I.I.C, Parks and Recreation tie -wires Deparin,ent, and Conuuunily Development Ovilarttrlenl 1 C`UIl(; hums Process all reynesls for. density bunuse:;. Assist approximately 4(R) TLISliu'esidenls aurtually, 2,1100 tesicleniti by 2005. �i Ott•i�uitth �--�- - ---�- 011 going, going . .. (hu going; ( : l Y ('i "i (•. l iiY i)( i.ii i g,1 1'_;Igi'.n'1' t leYY'l1111('1 was ions sehnlenls of the population. • 'fht, I'is rks aril RecreatiorlUepatIll u•nl hlovidns housing iufurlllaliorl and sic iiII service inforn]atiun to Lite senior citizen population. • TheC'unlnrll.uity I)evolopritenl I opill'tnlenl:ntd Redevelopment. Agency Inovide housing; and social :;Cl vice info[illation to all wguluds of Liw polls lilt ion during rey,ulatr city hall Ihusiness hours. The ("o]nnutnity I)cvelopmenl Uepattnunnl M -lo serves tis it cicaringhotvw lir the (:onnnunity I)cvelopmenf Block (.;rail] I'logiam and reprownts the Cily all I lousing Authority and O(:I IA Advisory ("onnuiltee i\Iccl it ll; ,. (-ily della]Imenls utilize dw following doctimenls anti ipso Make Llie%e docunleuts available to tilt• I)Llblic: • f)iteclury of Senior C'il.izen's Services prepared by the Area Agency on Aging Senior Citizen's 011ice • ` of i.11 ` e] vice Assistance Booklet. prel,arecl by C'onn(cliolt flus • Olanl;e County I ltnlsirl); Diree:toty Invl)ared by O('I IA and Ute OC'! IA Adviso] y Coil Jill itlee. I lousing I ement Policies: Z7, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 Unhoiltll RCViCW of Iluusing f.lcu►crlt Pnlgranl5 I Sec• PIol lill1.11) C'unsolidaled Plan Mee!'tuglant L.20 m Table I I- 23 HOUSING lil.liMENT PROGRAMS 2000-2005 Pro grain Responsible Agency funding Source Quantified Objective Ti ri frame 2.3 l lousi ig Referral Program Police Del)al Illlcnl; City General Fund, • R,750 referrals to sol( fill On going c:onUllue to I,lovide housing refe]rll services to lalmlies Parks and Iteclealion (T)BG Funds agencies by 200.E in lived of Ilousitig assistance and ilifornlalion.l'llis Dellartinent; ,Iu lsCy ,referini for shared�lll • , tli:::>eminatin}; infrulltiltiull Io lilt, public at all final.-;. i l evelol)uu•nt; , honsinl; by '1.(105 •lt I he Police I epilitillent Iefer6 honJv IesS peol)14 LU IZedeytllol+Il lt•l Cliffe]vIll a encips th:ll' I,rovide Sllvilen; mad food lot' I Al,ellt.y was ions sehnlenls of the population. • 'fht, I'is rks aril RecreatiorlUepatIll u•nl hlovidns housing iufurlllaliorl and sic iiII service inforn]atiun to Lite senior citizen population. • TheC'unlnrll.uity I)evolopritenl I opill'tnlenl:ntd Redevelopment. Agency Inovide housing; and social :;Cl vice info[illation to all wguluds of Liw polls lilt ion during rey,ulatr city hall Ihusiness hours. The ("o]nnutnity I)cvelopmenl Uepattnunnl M -lo serves tis it cicaringhotvw lir the (:onnnunity I)cvelopmenf Block (.;rail] I'logiam and reprownts the Cily all I lousing Authority and O(:I IA Advisory ("onnuiltee i\Iccl it ll; ,. (-ily della]Imenls utilize dw following doctimenls anti ipso Make Llie%e docunleuts available to tilt• I)Llblic: • f)iteclury of Senior C'il.izen's Services prepared by the Area Agency on Aging Senior Citizen's 011ice • ` of i.11 ` e] vice Assistance Booklet. prel,arecl by C'onn(cliolt flus • Olanl;e County I ltnlsirl); Diree:toty Invl)ared by O('I IA and Ute OC'! IA Adviso] y Coil Jill itlee. I lousing I ement Policies: Z7, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 Unhoiltll RCViCW of Iluusing f.lcu►crlt Pnlgranl5 I Sec• PIol lill1.11) C'unsolidaled Plan Mee!'tuglant L.20 m Table Il- 23 IIOUSLNG, FILE MENT PROGRAMS 2000-2005 Program Res )onsible A gene hunclin g Source QUmitifiecl Objecti rieframe Goal 3: Ownership Housing _ 3.1 Cundwuiniuut C'ouversiotts ('unununily ('ity (-eneral Fluid, Impost• lequilculents l On (-olltlllltt` it) Icquiie developer, converting apartltle11ts Io Development Red v ve to l) Ir le l l t whert. applicable_ Cunclurlliniltnt, to l,l-u('rSS 11 "M ILI l ti1,11'll 111%c -pearl"", Dep'lrllut•Ill, ( •ily Agency I IUttsil,1, pluvitty relocntiorl and/or to p,ovide Council, Sol -Aside hinds incentives and u,sisla ive for purchase of the units fly I RmIvvelopmenl IOW 11111.1 Ill0d(•1rlte-iI)C0II,c 11011SOU'lli$. Agvncy ll�using I?lcutarlt I'olii ies: 3.1, 12, 33 3.2 Slate I lume-Ownership Assistance Tl e• (: ily's Redevelopment Agency provides it Hist I'ime I It Inlabuyt•IS I)Io}piun utilizing hu ISiIIgSet' 'uside lands. The Redevelopment A};oncy also applies for and will expiote the use of other lunding opportculities such at; f II;LI', 11(.).111: fItILL IS, hied other Stale imd Vel, Iclal p rogra a Is. I lnlrsinli l{It nlc•nl Policies: 3.1, 3.:3 11o11cling Programs _ Ongoing Review of Ilousing life menl 1'rograms - Consolidated Platy Goal 4: Affordable Housing Preservation 4.1 Replacement Housing l.n,urr lehabilitation or construclion of an equal munber of replarenteut 1111ItS whelt low and nlodelate inconle ,t:tiidential units a v destroyed or,euroved from the market. as part ofit specific redevelopment project pursuant to (_'atlifornia (-onrumnily Redevelopment law. I ImisinY, hlenwitt Redevelopment Agent y tit e Program 1.20 IZrtlevclopuu•nt Agency 4.2 l lousing RellabiIitill iortl Conuuu11ily Allocate available ( •Uric, and Redev(•Itlpnlent Agoovv Uevelopnu•nl fundslo finance public improvements ruin rehabilitation Depalliltcnl, federal of Icsid(•ntial writs in larget areas. Department of Housing atld Urban f luusiul, Element Policie,: 1.2, 5. 1, 5."L Ucvelnpnrent lit�tlevc•loputent - Agency I lousing S1.•t-Aside fund,; Mato and federal SUI l rl (•S I{et ew-lopulent Agency I lousing tivt• Aside funds; I)1 ivate developers ('1)13(; and Redevelopment Agency Ilousing tie t-Asicle hunds Assist 30 Firsl lime hon,ebuye,:s hy 7005 Asr,ecessary _._. . I hl' city plans to RvItabilitate 100 lulils by 7005. The City also plans to increase loll eownt•IShip opporl,-milies, conserve, As necessaly -- Rehabilitate 100 units by 2005 lir'r•rnlluv .)UUI Table 11- 23 I [OUSING 2000-2OU5 Program Responsible Agency Funding Source Quantified Objective Timeframe XF-developitlef I I maintain, and rellabilil-niv AFyticy and ploillote cullserval-ion 4.3 1 fousing Authority ('()IjiIrIrj will, the oimige County I lousing; ALIthorily, wIlEve necessary, 1,11r the develol;Illelit and operation of federally LISSiSk.-d IOW- and DlUdt-lille. iIIC(L)IIIC 11OLISillf', Iograills. Policies: I.5, 1.f6, I.1 4.4 Renial Assistance Encourago the availability ol'Svclion 8 rmilill assislan(v Cellifit-ilIVS 'IIILI Voucher ceilfficale program assMatwe IMICIS 1111011}fll 1110 Or ill If',V C'm illy I lousing AiAhm ify.'l ci ell(mulage all. maink-nance Of e.XiStillp, and OMMINS11111f.-TIl ul'oew cel micates—suppro the Cututly's ellorLs to oblaill c onlinued Fudvial funding;. I I0USiII8 HQIIIVjII I'ORCiCS: 4.1, 4.2 4.5 Affordable Senjor.11ousing Project and Senior Board and Care Facility To Illabilain.18 tudis of affordable housiall, for `seniors localt-d at 174,12. F7447 Milchvil Avenue (20 units) and it senior cilizen buard and care facility in operation al 1162 Bryan Avenue (18 I.IllitS). I tollsilli,.. Element Pulicivs: 5.1, 5.2, 'i.3, 5.4 4.6 Preservation of Assisted 11OLIShIg Tmn[ill IMS (0111- ICIVV-iIU:(.)JIIt! 11OLISing projects with a folal of 100 units al risk of coviversimi to market rale in 2AH. If project owners choose Lu convert. IN- projects to market rate holls.1117, wordiwite the provislull of financial alld -tIliri-11ttive 1(�soujces to preserve I is as all'ordable. it) Monitor I Inils ill Risk: IN-lainlain ronfact With owlivis of ' )rallj."e County (lousing; Authority, Reclevelopillf.,111. Agency �(..C)Lljltv of Olallge `I`Imising A1.111101-ily DI-velopment I h1pal Llitt-jil Devviopmeld I )t-13,11 IF] IVIII, Ewdeveloptlivill Agency I IUD, ('IAM, Redevelopment Agency I lousing Sel Aside Fundr Rim Montt uoc'essaty CDBG Aside bunds, State and Feck-ral Vtuids (AnIlifille ISSLIC. 2.W cvI til icatc,%/ VI)III.-Ilvis annually -1,0M by 2005. I'daillfaill 38 units of affordable Sellior I lousing;. I'l i'st, r v k. 100 u I lils cult('1111y III grea(est risk Uti-piling; 611-80;11, YJ Occundict Table I1- 23 HOUSING ELEMENT 1'I OGRAMS 2000-2005 Program Ices onsiblc Agency Funding Source Quantified Objective 'Tinlefranle al risk r.rnits as potential conversion dates appium-11 to • I_e:w Inrolne Tax determine: wheilicr Seclion 8 rontrarls or affordahilily_ Credits, Private covenants have been tenewed orate platuted to be ArLivily tena!wcxl. DiSCUSS Willi tile owner of ille "at risk" projarls Mortgage ile ('ily's desire to preserves lite units as kill ordaHe. Itevemle Bonds b) lenanL Education. Wurk Willi tenants of at rink units ill danger of converting. Provide terlaattls will, inforntnlion regardhig potentiad 101-111. purrhitsc of buildinh: in- clucling written informalivtt and any related workshops. Act as a liaison between lenanls and rtonprolits polenlially involved in constructing or acduiting rc plilcernent hou,ing. If e.xisling :calf is not able to provide, w.letittiov sumiug (or this pro},raw, provide outside consultants to support the prugrani. v) Wolk Willi Nonprofits. Work will nonprofit housing providvts to explote and if appropriate, facilitate areluisitiort or Ieplarvuuatt of at risk taniLrs. d) Re•sorve Pond. I:n mark development housing• set Aside funds to :assist priority purchasers Willi tlry clown payment and closing costs associaled widi I'll u•ha:in}; p,ojrrts ill risk. ('ontinue to uuacitur outer pultmiliatl landing suut'res, such as Slala, granls and I WD 1c1r1ds. I luusingl:.lemenl Policies: 4.1, 4.2, 43, 4.4 • Variely of other suu ries Mobile HUMUS See Ihoglain I.7. Deed Resiric•lions: Sate hogram 1.4 - tax 111crement Pira nciltg Set, Program 1.9 — — - - I'ransilioual Uuusul}� `.ice 1'tul,tant 1.10 Onoing Review of housing, Hlenlenl I'r!�Lmll Swe Piograr.n 1.19 - , __, .. ..._... . _.. __... Consolidated flan See I'ru};rant 1.20 -- - Goal 5: Neigtlbortlood Conservatiotl - - - — - - --- 5.1 Iirtforcentctlt of Buildiul; and UOU-illg (_'OdeS ('unurturtily C'ily General 14111d Invesligate 150 Continue Lo enforce building, and Ixntsitir codes to Ueveloplttettt subst:utclanl Iluusnll; ensure health and safely, lerhfy Code vlolahons ane! 17ehautulettt rases annually arta 750 hereby ilupruvv the overall character of the t uuununity. rases by 2005. l{nforcc:ntvnt will inclucleidentilYinLsubst.rndard -- - - - '/j`}= (tf• f 1.', i-iif`� ; l�' .....:(: ii�.;:�ir(',!-';-i• a:r On guittg -- Table 11- 23 HOUSING Ii1 .17MFN'1' PROGRAh1S 2000-2005 Program Res urnsible Agent 1•un(fing Source I Quantified 0biective l'im,+(rnnn liuusinl• units and [hose that. are otherwise idenlif ied as a tl11-eat to the Icc•aldi and sniely of occupants. rlclions will be takc;n pucsfill at N., ll« • law to demolish, avinaild, or rorrecl the code Violations. This prul;ranl int ludo;: nolificalion of taxing, agencies upon laihlre to gain code c•onlpliance 11 (1111 the propel ty owner to allow City to 1ec•over c•nlorc•enlent cost. I lousinl7 L•lc•nu�nl l'ulicies:5.:�,.i.4 _ .9 2 C'Uli(., Funds for Commercial Kehabililatiun Conti,mv to make applications for CDBG funds. Promote tale availability of these 11111d& (or rvllabilitalion by news- paperarticles, annou11vvntenls in I•usli.nToday (a City I?ublical.ion that is mailed to all household;) 1 lousirE.Flemenl Pulic.ies: 1.2, 5.1, 5.1, _-).3, 5.4 Development Depar111uvnt C'DBIG Reccipl of $2.U,lxx) annually, approximately $I00,M) by M)5. $1( ),U(x) by 2(X).i - . !h•rrvnhc�i �11U 1 Table 11- 23 HOUSING LLl-'.MI;N'1' PROGRAMS 2000-2005 Program Responsible Agency Finding Source (quantified Objective '1'intefraniv 5.3 Cultural Resources District Community I (:01.3(:, City (:cnvral Rate• historic slruiturtr: Ch1 going; 'l'llrr(-at-(• a Inn go num[,(ar of sU ucUtres in Lite City Iat Development I I nnd, S$aty yrwlls whore applicable and worn colistructtd bviol v and allot- Cher turn of the ( tnlury. I )vl,:u Intent I process 20 cortific ales of Confiuua to utili•rc the City's C•rlhural Resources Overlay I )istrirt to ssfel;uard the Ilrrital;v of the C'ily by prescl•vint; ntil;irbolhoocls and struclurt-s that Iefltil the ('ily's hm ilago and Fast. •1 hi-mig I Iho Dislricl, promote the puhlic and Fnvnjoynitnt, Itsc and pfvservation of ultnlally sivnilicnnt neil;hborhuuds and stnlctult.s. (AmLinue to fecluily that auy alknalion of a dcsiunatod ttsourct or construction intimmmuonts in the District conform to lilt rt(luirrultnts of Cho C'uhtual Rvsourcnti Overlay Dish -id. t wirers of hisloric landutarks or ploptttivs wit] ilt flit- NMI- itLate recluirod to oblain it verlilic;ltr. of applopriatc•ness bvlole be innin}; any type of t•xtel for conslf Lisbon, uileratiorl, of dvtrlolition. A col lificalt- of applopriatcrwss ctrtifi(rs that lilt proposod changvs are, c•onsisltnl with the dersipn giticlolirlvs and are applopriale wllhill lite dish -i('1' colltmt. I Iousing iilcntcul Policie.s: 5.5 I j Ori join Review of Housing Element Pro' -ants S vv l'robraul 1.11) Consolidated flan See Program 1.7.0 Building Codes Svc I'rogratn 1.23 Goal 6: Environmental Sensitivity 6.1. Energy Conservation - C'onununity Rvcluiro all liew c•ulls[ruction to ho suhjti t to Slate (nor f;y Dovelopmvia c•onsttvation tc(luirentenls (fitlt 7.4) as it condition for tilt I )tpalIl urlt issunnct- of at building Permit. t la using Ultuu•nl I'oli(•iL.s: (t-_2 approprialenc :�s_ Nona ntcvssaIV - ; Rt-cluin' all new units - - - Chl within plaluling peliod. I )c cc wllz(v :)DU I �— '1'al)le If- 23 IIOLJSIN(: I?I,L,.ML'N't' 1'ltOC:1tAMS 2000-20(15 Pro gram Res )onsible Agency Fundis Somm Quantified Objective Titneframe 6.2 Solar t'.nergy and Conservation Collin lilt aiIV I Nolte net-essary Un-P,uiul; On-F;ninl Regiflre that knvitonutental Impart Rq) ,rls and I )evelol,ruent NLIUdivisiun 1+Ian: addre•: , energy ronscrvaliarrl Ineasnres 1)epallnra•111 and sol:ar:ercess. Indlltlr•, as nPressary, pn jerl cnndilionr; Ir, rnsaur Ila:al developers inal,leanonl the ret III itvillenls cel I luusiut- 1.{Ienlc III Polk ies: 6.2, 03 ( )agoing Review of Ilousing F.lentent 1'logralus I tiee llrol;rrut Coutiolidated Mall Nee Program I.2U I I)rrc'inirc°) .%r1Ui Appendix to Housing Element APPENDIX A REVIEW OF PAST PERFORMANCE Appendix to Housing Element This page intentionaZfy i~ blank. C~-,.' OF ?'.;.~Tt; HO.USI:¥O 2001 Appendix to Housing Element REVIEW OF PAST PERFORMA2 CE State law establishes a five-year wcle regulating housing e;em~Jt~. updates. Ln compliance with the SCAG cycle, the Tustin Housing Element was updated in 1989 '~nd 1994, and found to be kn compliance with State law. The Cit~- of Tustin vrocessed in 2000 a Housing Element am.~ndment to address the Reuse/Specific P:an for the develovment of the MC,a~S and to ensure consistency wi~h fine General Plan. In March 2000, the State HCD reviewed and found this update to be in comp~2ance with State law. Review of Past Element 1989-1997 Objectives The SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model indicated a new construction need in Tustin by 1994 of 2,085 urdts, of which 390 units were for very low-income house, holds, 488 for Iow income, 'a" ' -_~ ~ fOr moderate income and 724 upper income. The following discussion highlights the progress, effectiveness and aFpropriateness of 1989-1997 Housing Element Objectives and the pro~'ess achieved during the 1998 to 2000 time period. Table .'~T*.."- 35 in the Technical Memorandum provides a summary of the City's overall accomplishments for the years !989-2000, broken into three time periods. As indicated in Table HTM-35, the City was successful ~ accomplishLng the majori~ of the objectives established for the past planning period. According to City Staff, the following objectives were met or exceeded: New construction 3,920 units were constructed during fl~e 1989-1994 Ri-iNA period, with an adctitional 1,77! cor'~tructed between 794-1997, and 3 ~anny units, for a total o£ 5,694 units, exceeding the Cit~"s objective o£ 5,000 units for the planning period. Although the overall objecffve was exceeded, the quan~ied objec~ve for cons~uction of units affordable to Very Low-Lncome households was not achieved. Durin§ 19~8-2000, the City has achieved rite consa'uction of 2,378 units towards the new planning period. .... : 7L~S?/A' r, OuS;.v..~ .r..LEi,~EXT' i03 Appendix to Housing Element Mobile homes The objective to maintain exisling units was accomplished. Tenant protection _xc~,aea wit_h 1,700 An objective of 20 residents was significantly ~ ~' ' residents receiving assistance during 1989-1994 and" ~-- ~,=o/ residents receiving assistance during 1995-97, for a total of 3,157 residents. additional 634 tenants received assistance bet~¥een 1998-2000. Deed restricted affordable units The objective of requiri~xg 100 deed res~ictions by 1994 was met. Deed restrictions associated with the assistance of an}- public or Redevelopment Agen9' funds were imposed on an additional 23~ units during 1995-1997..~r', additional 207 deed restrictions were established between 1998-2000 towards the new planning period. Enforcement of building codes Code Enforcement activities were vigorous and approached the objective of 1,500 acfior~ over the planning period. Housing rehabilitation Utilizing CDBG and Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds, ~e 80 unit objective was exceeded by 104 u_nits in the 1989-1994 RPINA period, with an additional 201 uniS rehabilitated under fi~e Owmer Occupied, Rental Rehabilitation Loans and Grail. ts, and Multi-£amily Acquisi~on/Rehabfiitadon/Conversicn pro,ams betwee_,-. !995 to ] 997. 3 units have beet: rehabilitated durtng 1998-2000. Shared housing The Shared Housing pro,ram exceeded tlne objective of 25 cases by 1994 by 35 unim, and meeting the objec~ve of 10 cases per >,ear bet~veen 1995 through the end of 1997. There have been 25 cases during 1998-2000. .Decerr,.b~.~.r 2001 Appendix to Housing Element Use of RDA SebAside funds, provision of land cost write downs and other financial assistance Between 1989-1997, 182 households were assisted with affordable housing u~J_izing tax increment finandng in a number of projects withir, the Redevelovment Project areas. One project, Tustin Grove, was assisted by a land cost write-dog,m, although the act-aa! 2.5 M targeted arno'.mat for allocat/on during the plara~ng period was not met. However, ar, additional 2.1 M was allocated during 1993-2003 for the Warrr~v. gton Ambrose Lane project. An additiona/ 40 hou_~ehoids have been assisted between 1998-2000 towards flee achievement of the objective for the new plmming period. Retrofits for disabled households The obiectSve for 25 new and retrofitted m'tits to accorm-nodate ~,e disabled was exceeded by 10 ur. its during ~e !989 to ]997 ff..me veriod. An addh/on~ 6 ur.its have been created between 5998-2300. Preservation of units at-risk of conversion to market rate 150 of the Orange Gardens units were preserved between !989-1997. .-%lthough ~e objective was to preserve 160 un/ts of assisted housing, ate 10 urdt shortfall was due to loss of units res~rhng ~om Caltrans widen/ng of the Smata Aha (!-5) freeway. Preserver/on efforts conhnued with the preservation of 100 units at Tustin Gardens. Homeless and transitional shelter facilities Studies for assisting homeless providers have been _omp,et=c. .~, Funding has been allocated to implement the vlans wzm two seTarate ?rograrns a: the MCAS-'fusfi.n. Rehabilitation of housing in Cultural Resources District The number of rehab~tated units exceeded the 25 unit objective by !994. ,~'m additional 20 un/ts were rehabilitated bet~veen !995-98, bringing the total achieved to 49 mn.its. N:,.ne units were rehabilitated towarzts the objective of 20 units 5n the new plar~nmg period. 3'~T' "." OF 7'b'S77:,' HOUSJiC3 : ':95 Decerr'.;~o.r 2001 Appendix to Housing Element Zoning studies A densitx,' bonus ordinm~ce was adopted in 2999, and n-dxed use zoning adopted in Se Old Town d_/s~ict. Waiver of fees for projects with affordable rates Fees were waived for 25 projects bet~veen 1989-1997. One proiect has been processed with reduced fees between !998-2000. Sect-ion 8 vouchers Although the number of Section 8 vouchers utilized ~. ti~e Ciw was not available for the 1989-1994 period, 778 vouchers were implemented by the end of the 1989-2997 period. Ti-.,_'s numbar assumes ti,at the number of vouchers applied m the City increased bv at least 10 units over the total pia~nntng period. An additional 632 vouchers were/n/Sated between !998-2000 towards the obiect/ve of 1..500 vouchers by 2005. The following obiezt/ves were :-tot met: Use of CDBG funds The amount of CDBG funds received during the !989-1994 plann/ng period failed to meet the targeted amount by $464,000..~mual allocations belg.'eon 1994-2000 have also failed to meet the objective £or the new plarm/ng period. However, Znis shortfall was bridged with the allocatSon of redevelopment £unds. Second units ~ -c~,-,, .n~ 1989-1994 RHXA period. The targeted 10 units were ,a.c,.:t~d for "' ~ number fell short by $ un/ts, as 2 un/ts were constructed. A third unit was constructed in tiae 1995-97 time period. Despite incentives vrovided by the Cit?', th/s ~'pe of housing unit has vroven not to be a popular memod of supplying housing. In addition, it is difficult for the City to monitor the affordabiLi~' of such mnits as tine units are on private properB' and there is no way to guarantee whether these units are for rela2ves or are used as rentals. The tests of construction and the economic downturn of Se earh' 2990's may have also deterred proper~y owners from Far.tic!patting. Although a CUP is Deco.reSet 2001 Appendix to Housing Element recruited to implement, the zoning regulations ate flexible. The City will continue to encourage such proiects and attempt to ensure n~aintenance of affordable units through CC&Rs that guara_v, tee affordabili%, of the unit in perpetLfi~'. One m~it has been processed between 1998-2000. Monitor the implementation of the affordable housing program adopted as a part of the East Tustin Specific Plan i-he obiectives for 100 very iow and 500 low income m-fits has not been ackieved. Three income-restricted projects witln a total of 174 units, of which 52 are for very iow-income households and 122 are for Iow-income households were developed through 1994. iv. addition, a number of market-rate apar:,-a'nent units were built that the City has not tracked as to income category. Based on current market statistics, many of those are also assumed to be within ',.he lower- income categories. First time homebuyers The objective for providing homebuyers assistam, ce has been met, but not at levels anticipated. V~.'hile no households were assisted during the 1989-!997 time period, the Cits,' has :-:'..ado first time homebuyers assDtm~ce a priority in their Consolidated Plan and Redevelopment Area Five Year Plan through the movement of funds supporting the Mortgage Credit Cert~dicare Pro,am. Through the implementation of the Do~-npayrner. t Assista.nce Program., assistance was made to 8 households be~veen 1998-2000. In addition, 48 Mortgage Credit CertJ_':icates were issued t.hrougb, the County of Orange be,~.veen 1997 and 2000. Bond financed projects The studies for ar, ah'sis of available programs were completed within the plamxing period. Three projects were financed using this method. Due Ln parr to the downParn '2n ~,e housing market Jn rite early ~ 990s, the Hampton Souare Apartmentq were the onh, project financed during '.-l~e p!ann/ng period by _Mortgage Revenue Bonds in Octob.?r 1996. The project contains a total of 150 Iow-income res~icted urdts, h~ addition, the Orange Gardens and Fia:~ders ?ointe projec¢s were financed bet~,een 1998 and 2000. T'ne CiB' w/il seek ";'".' OF ....... ~" ELEMENT ...... ~ .... ;:iQ b'S. iNG Appendix to Housing Element opportunities to implement this form of financimg for ',he construction of new housing with affordabiiity components. The has also been utilizing other funding resources for assisting developers and non-profits in the generation oi housing with affcrdable units. Recycling of underutilized single-family units to multi-family units Only one unit was developed ff-a'ough the recycling of single-farniiy units m R-3 zones to multi-famih' units. ,'[-here appeared to be a lack of interest in tJ~e community to recycle land to higher densities, as vacant land was still available, and ~e economic stares in Ca;i/ornia was depressed during a large portion of the plaru,.ing period. As available vacant land diminishes, ~is wilJ become a more aParacfive option to property owners. The City should continue to promote lot consolidation and recycling potent/al. It is clear that the Cin.' was successful Jn implementing a number of prograrp3. However, the ~eatest s'.'-,ortfall in reac.h_flxg objectives occurred in the ?rovision of opportunities for re?cling of underutilized land to higher residential densities. December 2Dff ~ Appendix to Housing Element APPENDIX B AFFORDABILITY GAP ANALYSIS D~cember 2901 Appendix to Housing Element Vhis page intentionally left blank. December Appendix to I Ic.nlsink Element SUMMARY (717 PER UNITOWNERSIIII' AFFORDABILITY (;APS CITY 011''1'UST•IN 1909 ........:.)......,,,.., ililps .,,,own t.,, t,,,., t.,,.tt t .,,t" u„" ,uuauy :trllimms tree Iceaevelopmem ngr•ncy would have lu provide in other lu lcndel Iht• Ileveloptllent prnlolype eronon[it ..Illy Ic:,mhlo to devefopers.] lie gap,ISSunIeS Illal IlVlner,wllt•IS obMin pe.undnenl nnxtgat.;es (roll1 plivate lPnders at market rales. hott'Iype projects :Irt• as lollows: New t'cllt.•:II tic fioli attached ownership projec l of too units; nrw r ilistillcliun Single family delarlteti uwnPlsilip "Sutalt jut - .1", prujtx't of 45 (uti1S; r,luisilion/rehabilitation lour plex cunvt•Isiva to otvn,ership of IM tail::. oun:c. C um +rehenslve l loushily, Affordabilit • I:halr y'2(K)O-]() (IIT Ul••"11 1P I/UU.`J;i'(; l.l.1;1L11;rti'! I)ecernber 2oo1 !1I "c. ' VC11t Level 11.1 Lev('1 IV Income Level Level I .`),U?u Io 80'in of PAe(IialI liU n to 1E111", Of MC(IG111 I20% OI IVII!Cl18ll )t_'fIU1tIOlC �1(1°[, of IMediall 11.1colll(' 11lCUllle Illculnc _ IIlC(lllll! Affordable Ilousin�; 30% of 50% of Median 30" of 70'o of M]than 35", of IUU;•o of M(!t1i:(Il '35% of l Itl", of Cost Definition: Adjusted for Family Income, A(Ijw%I('(1 fur I7alllily Income, Acljltsted f(11- 1'al.nilj, Median Income'Income, size Sizes Size Adjtts(ed fol- Fanlily I7,e Af t orda 11 Ely C:a E'er Unit Pcr UnitPer - ---- tJil t IS New ('01I I'LI -Il[)Il (i f IacI ed $202,196$157,294 $57,864 $57,864. New C'onslructitnl _ . ... - — - ..... _8 ., tinlal.11ut cle4u:llyd ,... ,_. I i21,�•iG 1/ 0. $275':1 $I 68,657- 1_6 6r 2 Acyuisit.ioll/ lti'Ilal)111Iatl(11l $152,15 I $1.1(1,290 `t •b ' �a,67,� r $75,(,75 ........:.)......,,,.., ililps .,,,own t.,, t,,,., t.,,.tt t .,,t" u„" ,uuauy :trllimms tree Iceaevelopmem ngr•ncy would have lu provide in other lu lcndel Iht• Ileveloptllent prnlolype eronon[it ..Illy Ic:,mhlo to devefopers.] lie gap,ISSunIeS Illal IlVlner,wllt•IS obMin pe.undnenl nnxtgat.;es (roll1 plivate lPnders at market rales. hott'Iype projects :Irt• as lollows: New t'cllt.•:II tic fioli attached ownership projec l of too units; nrw r ilistillcliun Single family delarlteti uwnPlsilip "Sutalt jut - .1", prujtx't of 45 (uti1S; r,luisilion/rehabilitation lour plex cunvt•Isiva to otvn,ership of IM tail::. oun:c. C um +rehenslve l loushily, Affordabilit • I:halr y'2(K)O-]() (IIT Ul••"11 1P I/UU.`J;i'(; l.l.1;1L11;rti'! I)ecernber 2oo1 !1I Income Level Definition: Affordable Ilousing Crust I )efiuilion: Affurclability-Gap!_- New ("of slruclion (SeJ lJe)r) Acquisiliun/relial» lilati un Lar};e+ project uu)de�rale rehabilitation I Acquisition/ _ ..._ .... _... Itc�l)al)ililaliun 14rur rlax SUMMARY OF PGIt UNIT RENTAL. AFTI )KUAI3lL1T•Y (.:ALIS CITY OF T•USTIN 1999 Level l Below 50% of Median Income 30% of 48% u1 kle than Illcoille, Adjusted for Family size Per Unit Gap $23,583 $:3(1,:3,ms Level ll Between 50% lu 80' () of Median Lu_umr -30% of 60' of IV1eclian - Income, Adjusted for Family Per Unit_Gap-_ $4`i,99:3 $21,o2l `i>(i9,9tiU $89,783 Appendix to housing Elemult Level Ill Above 8(l;t, of Me(liarl lncome� 35% of 11111, of Me liar Income, Adjusted for Family Size Per Unlit 9 -all.. _ ...._ . $10,217 $0 $47,14.3 I The affunhibility t;al,s shown Int Inti:. chant arc the subsidy ammutts Hot. l%Vd(`vcl()puurul Ag 'nc.y would have k' pruvitle in older to n•ntlr•r file develuptueut prulotype econolnically feasible to thwelopers. To iderdify lilt' gap anlonrus fur levels 1, ant] 11 art ar.;uugdiuu i:. madc that developers ob4riu permanent uuntt;at,_s fruut private lenders at market rrles and inr•eslors eynily from the syudit-atiun of boll, h•deral and ~title low incr+rtrc huusiflg Iax crediLs. To ideulify the t;:y, auunrrals fur l.trvel 111, an assuntl,lion is made lhaf clevc•lupers ()blain pennanerrt nuafgal;es from private lenders al' market rales. 1'rolulypes arc a:; follnws: uew rurtsh uclion of a (A) unit senior housiul, I+r<.In l; huge lnuiecf at:+luisitiurr and rchahilifalion of 80()nils; and, acyuisiti()n/rch abilit.atitnt luurplex of 100 units. :Source: Cum nehensive J lousin + Allorrd.abrlity Sltale gy 20W -I0. C'IT'Y OF Tli.I.-NM HOUSTN(3 1i1.1 -•:1t•1 .,WT • Duceanber 2(lU! 112 Appendix to Housing Element A_PPENDIX C PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MAILING LIST Appendix to Housing Element This page inten~'onal'~y iefi blank. APPENDIX C PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MAILING LIST Appendix to Housing Element Ka~ieen Malonev .Mer9' Ch~u'ities I21ousing 500 S. Main Street, #I10 Orange, CA 92868 Maria i. Marquez Interim Division Manager Adult Mental Heal~ Services 405 West Fif*d~ Street, Suite 550 Santa .~na, CA 92701 .~{ aurv ~%lano 5{er~' Housing 500 ~. Mom Street #110 Orange, CA 92868 Randy Gibeaut Communi.~,' Housing Resources ~.412 North Broadway i{ ante" :xn,~. C__:~ 92706 :<ia Tang City of Garden Grove '11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove, CA 92842 .;.isa ."{ill CDFI Clearing House 238~1 El Toro Road #401 .Lake Forest, CA 92fi30 949-859-3600 ,'14-259-1236 (H) Lisa Ramirez 14901 Newvort Avenue #!43 Tustin, CA 92780 71,'--957-4647 Lyrme Fishel, CEO BiA Orange Count}., Chapter 9 Executive Circle, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 Bart G. Hess Affordable Home Owners Alliance 2 Park Plaza. Suite 100 ~rvine, CA 92614-5904 (949) 476-2242 ext. 219 David Lex~' OC Fair Housing Council 201 S. Broadway Santa Aha, CA 9270~ Jim Palmer, President Orange Count' Rescue Mission 1421 Edinger Avenue, Suite B Tustin, CA 92780 714-258_-4460 Public Law Center 600 Civic Center Drive West Santa .&ne, CA 9270~-4002 Karen Roper Homeless issues Coordinator Count}.' of Orange 10 Civic Center Plaza, 3-'~ Floor Santa .Aha, CA 92701 Paula Burrier-Lund, Director Orange Counta, Housing/Commurdty Development Devt. 1770 X. Broadway San~.a Aha, CA 92706 Appendix to Housing Element Captain Lee Lescano The Salvat/on Army 10200 Pioneer Road Tustin, CA 92780 714-832-7100 A,Iava Durme, Asst. V~ce President SJHS Foundation & Communit3, Outreach 500 S. Main St., Suite ~ 000 Orange. CA 92868 Dare Kove!, Associate D/rector Mercy Charities Housing CaJffomia 500 S. Main St., Suite 110 Orange, CA 92868 Cynthia Campbell ?Iuman Options, Inc..iDO\"E Housingi: P.O. Box 9376 Newport .Beach, CA 92658 7! 4~35-9992 Margie Wakeham Families Forward P.O. 53O93 Im'ine, CA 92619 949-552-2727 Joan B..¥fargol Orange Coas~ in.enaiLh Sh,l.er 635 Vista Bov.'-'ta Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-759-7551 Sheri Barrios, Execut-ive Director Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter ~ 963 Wallace Avenue Costa Ntesa, CA 92627 9.t9-631-77,3 !)ecember 209~ CF.'.-'." OF TUSTI;',: HOUSI.\:,~ ELEMENT :26 \:eteran~s 5erx'ice Dept. 4220 Lemon Street Rfverside, CA Davle McIntosh Center 150 W. Cerritos, Bldg. 4 Anaheim, CA 92805 Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter 1963 Wallace S_~eet, Apt A Costa Mesa, C,:. 92627 YMCA CommurdS' Counseling Service5 2 Executive Circle, Suite 280 Irvine, CA 927]4 Assistance League of Tust"m P.O. Box 86 Tustin, CA 92780 Families First 12012 Magnolia Stree~ Garden Grove, CA 92641-3346 Tusfin Area ~Ltor]cal Socien- & Museum 395 El Camino Rea! Tustin, CA 92780 Legal Aid Societ).' of Orange County 902 N. Main Street Santa Aha, CA 92701 Community Se,vices Program 16842 Von Karman, Suite 425 Irvme, CA 92714 Probation Community Action Assoc. 1111 N. Maiv. Street, #176 Saa~ta Aha, CA 92701 Mardan Center e£ Educational Therapy i Osborn ]rome, CA :~2604 Susan Alexander New Horizons ~ 3821 Newport Avenue ']'ustin, CA 92780 Helen Anderson Hunger Coalitions 14452 Wfldeve Lane 'fustin.. CA ~'w4".,;, Alien Baldwin OC CommuniD' Housing Corp. 1833 E. 17th S2eet, Suite 207 Sanfa .Kna, CA 92701 ,loan Basile .Mary's Shelter ] 7671 Ang.'dm ! ,ane Tusfin, CA 92780 3arbara Be,'zson Tusfin Area Coun.'il i~r FLne '-'.:'ts P.O. Box 145 '! ustin, CA 92781 Doug Bistro O.C. Affordable Housing 23861 El Toro Road, Suite 207 Lake Forest, CA 92640-4733 Helen Brown CMc Center Barrio 16t55 E. 4th Street, #210 Santa ,ama, CA 92702 V anessa Brunet Learn'big for L'Je 3590 Harbor Gateway North Cc:sit, Mesa, CA 92626 .[eru: Cammiti Di~abilin'.. Awareness ,_ca:mort ..... 3~3 UniversitT Drive, =~ 18 'rome, CA 92672 Patrick C~'roll Li£e Share ~ 142! Garden Grove Boulevar5 Garden Grove. CA 92643 Shirley Coi~en Feedback Foundation. inc. '~ 200 N. Knollwood Circle .-\naheim. CA 928[:! Dotma Core Meals on Wheels 1001 N. Tustin Santa Aha, CA 92707 ]ulie Damon The Seed institute 6271 Tarssa Lane Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Pat Davis Big Brothers & S!sters o'. OC 14131 Yorba Street Tustin, CA 9278'2 iohn Drew Family Solutions 203 N. Golden Circle Drive, =? 01 Santa Aha, CA 92705 ) mmffer Feldstein Women Helping Wort. eh 42~ E.: 8th Street #!4 t.,,s~a .Mesa, ,_:~ 9~6.:,-~1~ · jokn Von Gial:n Family .ge:v! 'c Asso:ia':icn 18001 Cowar., # c-.a. I:-vine, C.C. 92714-68.21 M eiind a Gu!nc id o .',.5sessment .k -l:'eam~en~ Services Center '1987 O, rzhard Road Newvort Bead:, C:'t 92660 Suzarme Gu Lhrie Four H Clubs of Orange 1045 .,%r!ington d rive Costa Me~a.. CA 92626 '..Mrv ~ Z~dlev Info Line Orange County 2081 Business Center Drive.. suite 130 irvine, CA 92715 Laz~3' Haynes Mercy House Tramifional Living P.O. Box 1905 Santa Aha, CA 92702 Colin Henderson Friendship Shelter, inc. P.O. Box 4252 Laguna Beach, CA 92652 Elmer Hothus Christian Tempora,D, Housing Facility 704 N. Glassell S~eet Orange, CA 92867 Warren johnson Salvation Arm}' 10200 Pioneer Road Tustin, CA 92780 .Iud}, ,iohnson ESA / Corporate Office 23861 El Toro Road, Suite 207 Lake Forest, CA 926404733 Beck}, ..'ohnson AIiiance for tlne Mentally Ill 621 S. "B" Street, Suite B Tustin, CA 92780 Elizabeth j ones C.O.P.E.S. 2025 X. Broadway Santa .Ama, CA 92706 )oAnn Ruden Tus~q_n Public ~hool Foundaficm 17411 Irvine Boulevard, #i Tustin, CA 92759 Susan Knopick Children's Bureau of So. Calif. 50 S. Anaheim Boulevard ?manheim, CA 92895 Robyn Class Orange Children & Parents Together 3550 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92869 Doris La Magma The Vi2a Cen~r, Inc. 910 Nor~ French Santa Aha, CA 92701 Lila Lieberthal Jamboree Housing Corp. 20871 B'~iness Center Drive !rvme, ~__~% 9_/1~ Elaine Linmer OCSPCA-Paws 5660 Avenida .A_ntigua Yorba Linda, CA 92687 Jim Lvnch Tustin Chamber of Commerce 399 El Camino Rea! Tus2n, CA 92789 'i-herasa Ma~i Legal/,id of Orange Counw 902 N. Main Street Santa/-ma, CA 9270] Wendv Marohnic Human Options Second Stev P.O. Box 9.-!45 South Laguna, CA 92677 Brenda .Martin Laurel House 137Z2 Fairmont Way Tustin, CA 92750 Rowana bicCov Easter Seal Societs,... !nc. 1661 N. Raymond ' ~ .-~v .... Suite 100 ..~naheim, CA 9'80~ Sherry McCullev Legal'Aid Socie~, of Orange 902 N. Main Street Santa Aha, CA 9~ ~.1 Pamela McGovern OC Council of Aging ~ 8552 McArthur Boulevard, ;-'4'_"7 irvine, CA ~2715 jim Miller Shelter for ~he Homeless ! 5161 Jackson Street k'Hdway Ci~', CA 92655-1432 Roo_ Moo. e Lutheran Social Srvc. of Sout2qern Calif. 704 N. Glasser! Street Orange, CA 92867 Beverly Nesta.nd e OLive Crest Homes 2130 E. Fcur~. Street, Suite 20.? Santa Aha, CA 92705 Cliff Polston Boys & Cb'Is Club o£ Tustin 580 IA:. Sixzh Street TustN, CA 92780 David Quezada Fair Housing Council of O.C. 1666 N. Main S~eet, Suite 500 Santa Aha,~_.-~ '~ ' 92701 Barbara Resnick ~\ _st~.n D_x. fen' Affordable 112; Chavman Avenue Orange, CA 92867 ,~oyce Riley L~a~ming Disabilities of Souther Calif. P.O. Box 25772 Santa ' _~.na, CA o~-zca jon Schiemmer 5t Vincent de Patti Cente:' for Recenziiiation 2525 N. Grand Avenue, 5an~_a Ara.. ,.... 92703 Orange Count' Piomeless !ssu:e'.; Force 1833 E. 17~ Street Santa ."ma, CA 92705-8629 ¥'..ary-.~ t_kinson Smith The Blind Children's Learning Center 18542-B Vanderiip Avenue Santa Aha, CA 92705 Susan Stokes Turning Point Center for Families 2101 E. 4th SWeet, #150-B Santa A_na, CA 92705-38i4 Donald Taylor Veteran C_..hari~es of Orange 201 S. Sullivan S~reet Santa .kna, CA 92704 Sister Marie Therese Lestonnac Free Clinic 1215 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92~69 Lyrme Tsuda Central Orange County YWCA 146 North Grand Street Orange, CA 92866 Jear. Wegener Se.wing People in Need 2900 Bristol St., Suite H-106 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Clyde Weinman Irvine Temporal' !-Iousing 6427 Oak Canyon Irvine, CA 92620, Karen Weisenberger Consumer Credit Counseling Service P.O. Box i~330 Santa .kna, CA 92712 Tim Wells Episcopal Sen'ire Alliance 1872 Drew Way Orange, CA 92~69 Randy Wertz Orange Count' Council 3590 Harbor Gateway North Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Thomas ~.'Vh aling Shelter for the Homeless 24621 Ridgewood Circle Lake Forest, CA 92630 K!mberlee ~-nite The Eli Home, ~c. 3~28 E. Chavman Avenue Orange, CA 92869 Carol Anne Williams Interval House P.O. Box 3356 Seai Beach, CA 90740 Bob Winandv Pilgrimage Family Therapy 27405 Puerta Real, Suite 150 Mission Viejo, CA 92691-63!4 This page intent¥onaliy le,,r-t bl~nk. Appendix to Housing Element APPENDIX D REFERENCES Appendix to Housing Element 'i-i~i~ ;~ao. intentwnaiiv le,q' biank. Appendix to Housing Element REFERENCES ..~. Documents 1. Ciw oi Tustin Comprehensive Housing A. ffordabLli~: Strategy, Yebrua~' 2000. 2. 1990 Census Report. U.S. Devar~qTnent o£ Commerce, Bureau o£ the Census. 3. Ca!ifo:-nia State Devartment of Finance, !990, 2999. 4. Demog-rapl~c Pro~.le and Survey of Homeless Persons Seeking Services in Orange CountT. ~ne Research Com_n~ttee of the Orange Count' Homeless issues Task Force, ] 999. 5. Southern Californ'.'a Associaticn of Governments, Regional :-lousing Needs Assessment, !999. C:ty o£ Tustin, Zoning Ordinance. 7. Ci~' of Tustin, General Plan, as amended Januar3.- 16, 2001. e ','."21iiams-Kuebelbeck & Associates, Old Town. ': ... :¥,a,,K~ ..'inalysis, October 'i 6, !991. 9 Second Five-Year Imvlement~tion Plan for The Town Center and Sou+~n Cen?ral Redevelopment Project Areas .~FY 2000-01 tv 2004-2005), TusP. n Contmunitv Redevelopment Agency, january 2000. .. .-~..orc~av.nv. S~ategy for Fiscal Years 2.'J0['-200! to :~ Comprehensive Housing ' '''~ : ' ~:' ' ' 200%2010, Tustkn Cmru-nu~tv R ...... ~ovm.n~ A~__.~>, :'ab:'uarv. ~.,'v !0. Final Environmental imvact Statement/Environmental impact Reoort (EIS/fiR.) for the Dispesal and Reuse of MCAS-TustLn (Program"'-*~-v-~-" EIR for MCAS-Tustin), januaq' 16, 2001. 1'.'_. Cit-v Council Staff Report, januaq' 16, 2001. 12. Response to Comments, Final Volume 2 and 3 of Fir. a', Environmental Imvact S,at_m=nt, Environment._ imvact R_'3:n': ~EIS.,:E]R~ for the '"~ ..... and R_u_~,- ~ of .MCA~Tus2n. Appendix to Housing Element 13. Marine Corps .Air Station (MCAS) Tustin 5pedfic Pla~n/Reuse Pla.n, October 1996 and September 1998 Amendments. !4. Mastervlan MarLne Corps Air Stat-ion Tusiin, DON 1989. 15. State of Califorrda, Devartment of HCD, Web-site. B. Persons and Organizations MaU, .Knrt Barajas, :X.'fanager Christian Temporary Shelter, Tus~n (714) 771-2969 Barbara Bishop, Recepdordst Aldergates (714) 544-3653 Kathy Novak The Sheepfold Shelter, TustLn (714) 669-9569 4. Susan Oakson, Executive Director Orange County Homeless Issues Task Force Christqne A. Shingleton, Assistant Ci~' ..Manage.- Tustin Corn_mu_nit?' Redevelopment Agency (714) 573-3107 Elizabeth A. Bin_sack, Commurdt-y Development Director Corrumu_rdtv Development Depar~m. ent, Tus~fl~ (714) 573-3031 Lois Jeffrey, Ci~' Attorney 701 S. Parker Street., Suite 8000 Orange, CA 92868-4760 jim Draughon, Redevelovmenz Frog-ram %,a~,ab.=. Tust4n Cormnurdn' Redevelopment Agency (714) 573-3!21 Justina Willkom, Associate Planner Co_m_muni ,ty Development Depar~-nent, Tustin (714) 573-3174 10. Grace Schu~., Receotionist Tus[-Ln Presbvter,;an Churzh (714) 544-7070 !1. Officer G. Vallevierde Tustin Police Department (714) 573-3200 12. Jean Wiliiams, Recep~mzist St. Ceciiia's Church (714) 5'.-64-3131 Appendix to Housing Element Section !NTRODUCW-ION TABLE OF CONTENTS STA'I'E L~W .a~N'D GEN'ERAL PLAN GUIDELINES SOURCE5 OF INFORMATION ,-U :~'I.k.:,-~R'5 OF HOUSING ISSUES, NEEDS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CONSTRALN'T5 Page 1 1 6 7 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSNfEN'T POPULATION/EMPLCYMEN7 '?REND5 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS HOUSING STOCK CHARACTERISTICS A£SISTED HOUSING PRESERVATUON ANA. LYSI5 .,,ON=TR.a.L'N, ~ TO TH:E DEVELOPMENT, LMPRO\;EMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF HOUSING GO\TRNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS M.-~RKE ~ CONSTRAINTS ,, ENERGY CONSERVATION 'd i.:. · ' SUM.MARY OF PREVIOUS ]-lOUSiNG ELE.k~NT PROGRAMS · .".'~', PROGRESS 1N IMPLEMENTING TH.~. 1959 GOA.r_~ AND OBJECTIVES ~' 'REVLE;¥ OF PAST PERFORMANCE REFFKENCES 9 !5 3O 40 65 70 72 CITY OF' TUSTiN .-- DP~4FT TECHNIOU5 ,~2.: :vaw .... ~v wc, zt~ HOUSff(G EL~iI~f£NT DECEM'~E_r~ 200Z LIST OF TABLES Table HTM-1 Population Growth 1980-19~9 C.~: of Tustin, Surroundh~g jurisdiz~ons and Orange Count' Table ~?~M-la ~o~u]a~on Projections Ia b]e ~M-2 A ge iran ds ~ 990 - ~ 997 Table H~'I-3 Race and Ethnicity: 1980, 1993, 1997 Table hWM-4 Empioymmt by Occupa~on 1990 Table HTNI-5 Employment by indus,, 1999 TaNe ~M-6 Household Type: 1980 - !999 Table ~M-7 Household Sfze !980 ~.toug~999 Table HTM-8 Households in Over~owded ~ndi~ons !999 Table !~M-9 Median Hous~o~d h~come: Tus~n ~d 5u~ounding Areas 1990 Table 2~M-10 Estimated Househoid Income D~s~ibufion: 1990 and !999 Table HTM-i I Estimated Household Income Dis~bubon by Age of Head of I ]ousehold 1999 Table I~M-12 Households Ove~a)'ing for She!tar !999 Cih, of']'us~. Table k~'f-~ 3 DmabiiitT Ciassificafien Table HTM-14 Household Sfze Dis~ribu~cn ?99 City of Tusfin 'fable I~FM-I 5 Homeless Sub-Population Groups 1999 Ornnge Count' Table HTM-I 6 Emergency Shelter/Transitional ] {ous~g Fazili~es ! 9~9 Table !~'M-17 2qousi~g Grow~ Trends 1980 - !999/usfin ~d Surrom~di~g Areas Table HTM-18 Tus~ Residential Unit Mix !990 - ~999 Table HTM-I 9 Vacant' rates 1999 Table h~M-2e Tenure ~99~ and 2999 Table ~R.I-21 Age of :~ousmg Stosk 'Fable 1~M-22 Dist-lbu~on of Owner-Occupied Housing Uni~ by Value 1999 Tabie ~M-23 Ra~a]e Price vi Homes and Condominiums Tusfin and Neighboring ;urisdic~ons December, 19~9 Table i~M-24 Average Renm~ Rates 20~ Table t~M-25 Maximum Rent and Purzb. ase Price b}' income CategoQ' 1999 Page 10 !4 15 16 18 2O 20 21 "A 25 26 3'3 31 3! 32 ~3 33 37 37 CITY OF TUSTIAr - DRAFT TECi= A:ICAL MEMOP~.A'DO~M HOUSLYG BLE:VIENT D'~CE?WBER ~001 'Fable L-F!'. M-26 2000-2005 Housing Needs Table HTM-27 At Risk For Conversion m 2000-2005 Table HTM-2$ Assisted i-lousing Inventor}' Table h-l'M-29 Cost of Replacing and Acquisition/Rehabilitation of Assisted Units Table i-l-TM-30 FaL- Market Value - Orange Count' Table H-J. M-3] Cost ef Providing Rer. tal Subsidy far Ve,~.' Low Income Households 'i'able .~.'T.~-32 Ge.:teral Plan Residential Land Use Categories Table H-r.¥l-33 Summary of Residential Zon~g R%~dations Ci.~: o:' Tusifn Table _'-.'TM-34 Comparative Development Fee Summa,--:': Table _;n"1~'i-35 Sum_mary Table Effec~veness of Housing Element Programs: 1959-2000 Table [-_'TM-36 EffectlYeness o£ Housing Element ?rcgrams !989 - 2090 .--able i'iT. M 37 Prog'r. ess Towards objec~ves ~989 - 2000 43 43 49 50 54 63 73 74 94 CITY OF TUSTiA' - DRAFT TECH-NICAL MEMORA.';7.~ iii HOUSING ELEA.'fENT DECEMBER 200! ~zis page intenffonaI'~y 'te; ~t o~an~:." ' C/TY OF" TUSTiN - DRAPT TECSI.~TCAL .MEMOP_,~.ND HOUS~rG ELEMENT DECEMBER 2001 INTRODUCTION This memorandum is a reference document intended to provide background data t~hat w~ serve as a partial basis for policies and programs in the Housing Element. In accordance vdth State law a significant amount of data is requ&ed in this memorandum, ll"nere possible, the data ?,as been summarized in graphic form (table, bar charts, and pie charts) for easy reference./"ne reader is urged to use the table of contents at ~/ae front of this document as a guide. Once the Housing Element has been completed, the Tecknical Memorandum w2I be appended to it. State law largely determLnes the content of th_is Technical Memorandum. Five sections follow t2ne introduf~on, l--ne Sununarv of Housing Issues, Cond/iions, Opportunities m~d Cons~ain~ provides an overview of the kev issues facing the Ci~,, which are addressed by the Goals, policies and programs of the Housing Element. i~ne HousLng Needs Assessment sect/on addz'esses housing needs. specifically, it discusses how the population has grown and changed, how households are changing (i.e., size, composition), and how the housing supply itself ~ changing. This section also analvzes Cue potential loss of assisted lower income housing units in the City. The tkird section addresses governmental and non-gove:Tu:nental constxaints, such as market condition, and natural environment, to housing development The fourth section addresses energ3, conservatior,. Finally, the fifth sec[~on sun~anarizes the housing issues, opportunities, and constraints th, at have emerged through background researdx and public meetings and which must be ~ddressed hz the . {c usmo Element. STATE LAW AND GENERAL PLAN GUIDELINES The State of Califorrda provides very specific requirements and guide:ines for preparing Housing Elements. This section describes those requirements and explains the relat~ons?,ip :--" '~,, "' element and the rest of the General Plan. Legislative Requirements The State of Califor~a requires that each jurisdiction prepare and adopt a Housing Element. The State Requirements for EIements are far stricter and more detailed thm-~ £cr any other General Pian Element. CITY OF TUSTEV - DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM HOUSi:\'G ELE:V/'EAT DEC!~MBER 2 001 State Planning law requires local governments to review their housing elements as fi.equentJy as appropriate and to revise the elements as appropriate, not less than eveQz five years. The tkird revision date for jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is December 31, 2000. The planning period for the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) as prepared by SCAG, ,.'.q fi.om January !998 to june 2005, a seven and one-half },ear period. The implementation period covered bv this element is July 2000 through june 2005. By 2003, the CAt},,, aiong with other jurisdictions in the SCAG region, again will begin preparation for a revision of the housing element to cover the period &om 2005-2010. Organization of the Housing Element Under the provisions of SecEon 65583 of the Government Code, the Housing Element shall generally consist of an identification and arah'sis of ex/sting and projected housing needs and a statement o£ goals, pohcies, quanffdied objectives, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development o£ housing. The Housing Element shall identify adequate sites for housing, including rental housing, £actory-built housing, and mobile homes, and shall make adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of ail economic segments oi the commun/5,. More specifically, tee Housing Element must meet +..he requirements outlined below. A. An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resozn'ces and constraints relevant to meeting these needs. The assessment and Lnventorv shall include the following: .., Anah'sis o~ population and employment trends and documentation of the iocali~"s existing and projected housing needs for all income levels. These e×isfing and projected needs sha~ h~clude the locaH~"s share of fine regiona~ ho-using needs in accordm~ce with Section 65584. 9 Anah'sis and documentation of household characteristics, including level of payment compared to abilit?~ to pa>-, housing characteristics, including overcrowding, and housing stock condition. 3. An hwentory o£ land suitable for residential deveioprnent, inclucting vacant sites ea~d sites having potan'.-ial for CITY OF TUSTIAr- DRAFT TECHA'ICAL MEMOZ4)iD UM 2 HOUSL~'G ELE,¥~F, NT DECEMBER .200 7 redevelopment, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. Analysis of potential a~nd actual governmen~m.l constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or deveiopment of housing for all income levels, inciudiv, g Iand use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site im_vrovements, fees and other exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures. .tmalvsis of potential and act'aa/ non-govemrnenta! constraints upon tlne maintenance, improvement, development of housing for ail income levels, includ.kng the availability, of financing, the price of iand, and the cost of conm-uction. Analysis of any spedal housLng needs, such as those of the handicapped, elderly, large families, farmworkers, families with female heads of households, and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. 7. Anah'sis of oppor~%mities for energy consem~ation with respect to residential development. A statement of tb.e cormuuz'.i~rs goals, quanPlfied objectives, and poiicies relative to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. It is recognized that the total housing needs identified pursuant to Section 65583(a) max, exceed available resources and the communit3,'s ability to satish, this need witZin the content of the general plan requirements. Under these circumstances, the quantified objectives need not be identical to ~he identified. existing housing needs, but should establish tlne maximum number of housing uni~ that can be constructed, rehabiJitated, and conserved over a five-year time frame. A program which sets forth a five-year schedule of actions the local government is underta 'king or intends to undertake L-'. order to implement the policies and achieve the goals and oNectives of the housing e!ement through t~he adrnLnistrati.'on of land use development controls, prov:sion of regulator)' concessions and. incentives, and the utiEzation 0f appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy prog-rams when available. In order to CITY OF TUSTIN - D/L4F7' ~ ..CHA:ICA~ MEMORAI\'DUM HOUSFA'G £LE,VI~NT' DECEMBER 2 O0 ! make adequate provision for the housing needs of ail economic segments of the community, the program shall do all of the following: Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and develovment standards and with public services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a varlet3., of ~'pes of housing, factory-built housing, mobile homes, emergency shelters and transitional housing in order to meet the community's housing goMs. 2. Assist irt the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low- and moderate-income households. Address and, where appropriate mhd legally possible, remove governmental consmaints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. 4. Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock. Promote housing opporturdfies for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital stat-us, ances~y, national origin, or color. The program shall include an identification of the agencies and o..-':'icia.ls responsible for the imvle,.entat/on of ',he va_dous actions and ~e means by which consistency will be ackieved with other general plan elements and communi~, goals. The local government shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of ail economic segments of the communi~, ir, the development of the housing element, and the program shall describe this effort. in addition, an amendment to housing eiernent law (Chapter 2451, Statutes o£ 1989) requires all housing elements to include additional need analyses and programs to address the potential conversion of aH Federal, State and locally assisted housing developments that are elig£oie to convert to market rate use dtu-ing the next ten-year period. Such mn/ts are considered to be "a.t risk" of being lost as part of the affordable i~ousing stock. CITY OF TUSTI,Y- D.I~,~FT TECHNICAL MEMOR_AA~DU.'.vr 4 HOUSING DEC£MBER ~00 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements The preparation of the City's,,."~.~ousing Element must conform to Section 65580 of the California Government Code. The Legislature has established a policy that the availability, of housing in a suitable em'ironment is of vital statewide imporm_nce, and a priori~ of the highest order. State poliH: requires local gove~artents to address the housing needs of all economic segments, while consider-lng the economic, envirorumental and fiscal factors and commu~ty goals set forth in the General Plan. While a ciR' must consider housing needs for all economic segments, it must also maintain interr-~d consistency among the various element~ of the General .Plan. Neither the Housing Element nor au-tv other element may supersede any other required element of the Tustin General Plan. The Housing ~ement relates to other elements in a varJet;' of ways. The Land Use Element direct/v relates to the Housing Element bv designating areas of the Cit},' in which a variety of residen~d, al t>.,pes and densities ma)' exist. The Housing Element's relationship to the Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation Element is conditioned by the need to serve a growing population's recreational needs, especially in the areas of the Cit~' with tlne highest densi~'. The Circulation Element a.+terv, pts to provide an efficient and weE- balanced circulation system. 7his system must be designed to accommodate ~lowed land uses, Lnciuding residential uses, and tine intermit;, of allowable uses must not exceed the ult,-'mate capacity of the circulatior, system. The Safe's' Elemm-tt relates to the Housing Element bv designating areas that are deemed unsafe for development, such as tlne Alquist'- Priolo Zones and floodpiains. Similar to t!:e SafeW Element, the Noise Element relates to the Housing Element by addressing a health related issue area. Tecknioues for reducing noise often involve buffers between land uses to reduce noise. The Grow~ Management Element overlaps the issues raised in the Housing Element i.n its efforts to ensure that the plato-ring, CITY OF TUSTL¥- DP,_4PT TECH.NICAL ME,¥JORA:¥DLU~r HOUSfiVG ELEME_¥T DECEMBER ~00 ! management, ar.d implementa~on of ~af/ic improvements and public facilities are adequate to meet the current and projected needs of Orange Count}.,. SOURCES OF INFORMATION A variety of sources were used to prepare th/s Technical Memorandum. The most recent source of population and housing counts is the State Department of Finance (DO~ population and housing esemates for .la_v. uary 1999. The population, household and emvlovment statistics are taken from the 1990 Census..More current estimates oi populat/gn characteristics are provided by the Center for Demographic Research at Califom/a State Urdversi%', Fullerton. IvL ~e absence of more recent data, extrapolations were rv, ade based upon 1990 Census data. The 1999 SCAG Reg/onal Housing _Needs .Assessment provided information regarding existing needs and projections regarding future housing needs. Data regarding housing costs have been obtained from local newspapers, local developers, and financial institutions. Other data sources are listed ~. the Reference section of tlnis document. CfTY OF TUSTIi~? - DRAFT TE, CHNICA_L L'~'EM'ORA,¥D~,7',~t 6 HOUSING BLE~IE'-'~'T DECEMBBR ~001 SUMMARY OF HOUSING ISSUES, NEEDS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CONSTRAINTS The following issues, needs, opportunities, and constraints have be~n iden~:ied Ln Tustm. Tenure. The City contains disproportionately large amounts oi multi-family housing units when compared to nearby jurisdictions and tZ, e CounD, overall Historic Resources. H_tstoric homes Gat add character and charm te he Ci~, may be in need o£ ongoing maintena2~ce and rehabilitation. Home Ownership Affordability Gap. Ownersb.':v housing costs are increasingly beyond the read~ o£ the C2tv's lower- and moderate-income ho,~ehokis. Housing Condition. Mare, owner- and renter-occupied units in the City need rehabiEtation, including minor and ma~or revaLrs. Landlords and owners o£ these units may need financial assist~mce in order to make necessary revairs. Units at Risk of Conversion to Market Rate. By State law, the C':~' must docament and deve';o? pro,ams to address affordable housing urdts in ~&e City that are at risk o! converting to :r'arket rate housing be~veen 2000-20~, 0. For the 3.998-2005 plarming period, the Re~onal I-iousin§ Needs Assessment h~dicates that there is a need to provide 860 housing units affordable to lower income households ".~n the Ci~~. Large Households. '_'he Hispanic popular, ion ~ Tustin has increased from about 21 percent of the population in 1990 to about 24 percent in 1997. Since :4ispanic families tend to be larger, a potential need exists for larger housing units to accommodate these fami'~es. Overcrowding. ]'he average household size in the City increased from 2.67 in 1990 to 2.92 in 1999. A. ise, overcrowding has increased si~zificantiy since 1990 iv, both owner- and renter-occurred units. C. ITY OF TUSTii'V - D I~FI' TECHArlCA1, :¥IE'~JO RA :'VD Urff 7 HOUSL¥O ELE.MIENT DECEMBER 200 ! Rental Affordabilit'y Gap. Based upon a review of rental units advertised in the Classified section o£ the local newspapers, it is difficult to find apartments in the Ci~, with more fi,an two bedrooms, and those that are available are beyond the price range of low-income households. Therefore, large families with low incomes (less than $26,000) would have difficui~' finding affordable housing in Tusfin. Housing Problems. According to the Regional Housing Meeds Assessment, in 1999 the City had 5,494 lower income households overpaying (paying more than 30% of their income) for housing. This represented about 24 percent of the City"s households. · ~Id~.~ Elderly. As tile City's povulation ages, the number of persons wLIl increase..."Vrtts underscores an increasing need to address the spedal housing needs of the elderly. Age of Housing Stock. Even though the City's housing stock is relatively young and in good condition, it'. ),ear 2000, over 64 percent of the Cits,'s housing stock was over 30 years old-the age at which housing t)-pically boo-ins ,;o req-aL-e major repairs. CITY OF TUSTIAr - DR_4FT T~CH~VICAL ivIEAfOP~.:YDL~%f 8 HOUSING ELE.~4E~T DECEMBER ~00 I HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT Since the 1960s, tlne Ciw's population has soared from about 2,000 perso~ to 67,!53. .Thus, the vast majori::y of tile City's housing stock is less than 40 years old. Unlike most of Orange Count),', where half of the housing stock consists of single- family ae~ached homes, neath: t~,o-fl-xrds of Tusffn's housings ~.oc~c' is multi-!arnily or single-family a~ached (i.e., condominiums/townhouses). Tustin also has a ?roportionate!y higher percentage of renters compared to Orange Cormtv as a whole. During the last decade, tile CiS"s population has been impacted bx.' mans' of the same trends observed regionally: a substantial increase Ln minori~' populations, especially LaP_nos; an increase in the average size of households; and, a surge in housing costs. As the Ci~' continues to grow and clna.nge, its housing poiizies must be re-examined in light of these changes. This chaoter examines the important demographic changes that have occurred Ln the City s/_nce 1990 that affect housing needs. The chapter includes four main sections: populat/on/employment trends, household characteristics, housing characteristics, and assisted housing preservation. The ?o?ulafion/Employment Trends section analyzes how the population has ~ov,-n and explores resident employment pa~erv, s. The Household Characteristics sec~on looks at changes .~n household size and composition, examines kncome and overcrowding, and evaluates housing affordabilitv and special housing needs groups, l~ne HousLng' Stock Characteristics section examines changes in the housing stock, particularly the number of u_nits, condition, and t}-pe. The fourth section concerning assisted housing preservation responds to State legislation that requires local jurisdictions to prepare an hwentorv and implememt programs to promote the preservation and/or replacemez~t of government-assisted lower- income hous~g. POPULATION/EMPLOYMENT TRENDS This section examines population growth, age characterist/cs, racial/e~2mic composition, and ernployment characteristics of Tust-in's population. CITY OF TI.~TIAr -' DP~4r'-"T T~CHNICAL MEL.fOP,.ANDUM HO USIIVG ELEIvfENT DECEMB£R 2 0 9 i Population Growth As sho~m in Table I-CIZ,f-1, be~veen 1990 and 1999 the Ci~"s population grew from 50,689 to 67,153, an increase of 32.5%. City of Tus~m's growth rate bet~¥een 1990 and 1999 was faster tha~n the conn,'wide growth rate and surrounding cities. Recent pro~ections cited in the Comprehensive Affordab!e Housing Strate~: 2000-2010, indicate that Tustir.'s population will increase by an annual rate of 1.5% during the next five years, bringing the total population to 72,735. Table HTM-1 compares the Cit~"s growth rate be~,,een 1980 and 1999 with other Orange Coun~, cities and the Count},, as a whole. A large percentage of Tustin's population growth can be attributed to annexations that have occurred since 1980. The remainder can be attributed to a varieQ, of other factors, induclLn§ shifts in farr~ly structures from smaHer tc larger families, redevelopment of existing developed areas, inffll development, a_nd new residential const-'uction in East Tustin. Substantial population and housing growth will continue during this plmnning period with the conversion of the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tust~m to civilian uses. Jurisdiction TABLE HTM-1 POPULATION GRO~AWH 1980-1999 CITY OF TUSTIN, SURROUNDING JURISDICTIONS AND ORANGE COUNTY ! % Growth 1980 '- 1990 2 i 1999 ~ 1980-90 1990-99 1.932,709 2.410556 2,788,767 Tustin 36,119 s 50,689 : 67,153 40.3% 32.5% Anaheim 219,311I 266,406 307,749 21.5% 15.5% Garden Grove 123.307 ' 143,050 157,276 !6.0% 9.9% h"vine 62,] 34 ' 13 ~,330 ~. 37.211 77.6 % 24.3 % Santa Aha 203,713 · 296,742 3~6/~57 45.7% 6.674 Orange Count,x' 2-i.7% 15.7% ~ 19B0 U.S. Census : 1990 U.S. Census, : Denar~ment of Finance ECtimates, Janua,'~' 1999 Povulation projections are shown in Table HTM-!a. According to OCP-96 Modified data, the population Ln the Cim, of Tustqn is C. FFY OF TUSTI:Y- DRAFT ' " ~ ~ TECI-t.~IC.~i. MEMOR.4:¥D L?~f i0 HOUSIA~G ELE3/IENT DECEMBER ~00I expected to increase by approximately 12 percent to 74,964 persons by lxhe year 2020. '~ ~ .' .. ,..: Tustin 2000 6~,,740 Table HTM- la Population Projection 2005 2010 72,735 73,791 2020 74,964 Percent Change (2000-20201 Source: DP-9$ .Modified Age Characteristics Table 7_-!TM-2 shows the proportions of tP~e City's population represented by age groups in 1990 and 2000. The table shows that ~e proportions of the population h~ each age group have remaLned fairly constant over time. TABLE HTM-2 AGE TRENDS 1990 - 2000 CITY OF TUSTIN Age Group ~ 1990 % Tota'.. 2000 % Total 4,464 ' 8.8% ' 5.815 I 8.6% 5-'_.4 ~ 5.926 1i.734 i 9,916 ~ 14.7% ', 1 ,=. 8 ,= 15-24 9,127 ! 18.0% 8,685 , ~ ° 25-34 12.~',4 24.2% ~3,798 ! 20.4% 23.5% 19,710 29.2% 6.3% i 4,776 . 7.] % 4.5% ~ 2,745 ' 4.1% i I 2,059 · 3.1 35-54 ~1,898 55-64 3.187 65-74 2,292 75-, 1,551 Total 50,689 3.!% 100.0%. 67,504 . 100.0% Center for D~mo~avhlc Resea:~,h tCDR]. 2001. Race and Ethnicity Ti:e CiQ"s racial and ethnic composition has changed sigrdficantiy since 19~0. As slnown in 'Fable HTM-3, file Hispmzic populatiort has CITY O? TUSTIN - DRAFT T~CPI.~'IC, a.L ' ' - '" ' ..:,It~,.'_~IOR. A.~ Dc,,v.~ HOUSIIVG EL~,£iENT DECEMBER 2 O01 increased from about 9% of the total population ir. 1980 to about 34% in 2000. Asian/Pacific Islanders and Blacks now make up about 15.1% and 2.6% of the population, respectively. These shifts in racial and ethrfic composition ma)' have important imo]_ications in terms of household characteristics and income. For example, Hispanic households are t-ypically larger than other househoids; therefore, an increase in the number of Hispanic households may indicate a need for larger housing units. Also, to the extent that minori~' populations tend to have lower incomes than ~eiz Caucasian counterparts, there ma}, be a greater need for affordable housing for these groups. CITY OF TUSTIN - DRAFT TECPINICAL M£MORAA'DUI~ 12 HOUSING ELE~ENT DECEMBER .200 TABLE HTM-3 IL&CE _~ND ETHNICITY: 1980, 1990, 2000 CITY OF TUSTIN 1980 Race and Ethnici~' i Population White i 3!,654 1990 2 i 2000 Total i Population ! Total 73.2% i 30.264 ' 44.8% Black ~ 957 5.7% !,785I 2.6% American Indian 237 0.5%; N/' A N/A 1,683 Asian/'Pacffic lsiander 19.4% { !0,!94 15.1% Other !,588 ~ 10.1% I 2.'151 3.2°,8 His,vardc 4 I 25,110 34.2% Total :- 1980 Ce..xsrrs .2 !~O Census ~ 2000 C~sus % Total I Population 87.6% 37,127 2.6 % 2,895 0.7% 274 =., ,~ 5,260 4.4% 5,133 ~8.5%) (lO.SOS) 103% 50.689 (3,085) ' 36,12~ I (20.7%) I00%1 67,50,4 103% 4 The Census con'-,ains a separate question related to whether Cae householder was of Spanish/Hispanic "origin". Origin is de.~med as the ancestu,, nabonaliq' tpx~up, "ineage, or cotmtr}' m which the po:son's ~_nces~rs were '.-,om p,-'ior to tlneir azriva2 ~o ~e United States. Pers,'.r.s of Spav'.'~h c~gtn cou:d be of ~'xv of tko five racla~ categories. 5 C-~.:er .~or Demographic R~earc?,, 20~. CDR repcrte~ ~.e k':spanic .vop-a;adon for 1998 as a di~.=: ethn:c group. I: also reported Asian and Pacific islander as one group, and included American Ind(~.n within "Other" Employment According to 1990 Census data, the Cit}.r of TusEn i~ad 3!,394 residents in the labor force, of wkic_h 27,274 were in ~e labor market. Of these, 81% were private wages and salary workers. Table HTM4 shows tlne number of employees by occupation. The largest occupational category was admL,-Js2'ative support occupation, k which a total of 5,533 were employed. T_ne second largest was the executive, administrative, and managerial occupation. The !990 Census also showed that 2,/%.4 perso:,3 were in tlne Armed Forces. Those invo!ved with farming, forestry and fish_Lng occupations accounted tot only ¢.9/c. CITY OF TUSTIN - DRA?F TECHA'ICAZ MEMOPJ~NDUM HOUSING ELE.kI~A'T DECBMBER 2 O0 ~ TAB LE HTM..4 EMPLOYMEN~f BY OCCUPATION 1990 CITY OF TUSTIN OccupationaJ Cate~,o~ Exezutive, administrative, and manage~a] occupations 4,679 Professional Specialty occupations 3,583 Technicia~ and related support occupations Sales occupations Administrative support occu.?tions, including clerical ?rivam household occupations Number 996 3,506 5,533 13.1% 3.7% 12.9% 20.3% 133 0.5% Protective service occm~ations 371 1.4% Sec'ice ocmtpations, except protective and household i 2,514 ~ 9.2% Pa..trains, forestr% and fis~dn~ occupations i ~9 ' 0.9% Precision vroducfio, crah. and repair occupations 2,850 ] 0.4% Machine operators, assemblers, a:',d insoe~ors 1.473 5.4% ~ 676 2.5% Transportation ~md material moving occuvatfions H~ndlers, eauivment cleaners, helpers, and laborers 721 2.6% Total 27,274 1 OD.0 % Sortre~_: 1990 Census in terms of indus~hg,, the retail mad manufacturing sectors employed the largest au_tuber o£ persons with 4,441 (16.3%) and 4,008 (14.7%) employees, respectively. Table H/M-5 is a surrm-~arv o£ the number of employees by industry. Due to it.~ favorable location, demographics, and business enviromnenb Tuscan is home to several best knm~m employers. ,Appendix C lists major em?ioyers in the Ci~' of Tustin. The City's top ten employers inciude: Steelcase Inc., Ricoh Electronics, Inc., Sun Health Care Group, Texas Instruments, Silicon Systems, MacPherson Enterprises, Pargain Teclmolo~,, Cherokee International, Tosl~ba America Medical Systems, mhd Crazy Shirts. CiTY OF TUSTIN- DtL. iF'£ TECHNICA. L !4 HO USING ELE3JENT DECEMBER .2 O01 TABLE HTM-5 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY 1990 CITY OF TUSTIN Industry' A~icul~re, £orest~', and fisheries Mining Construcficn .Number 267 ' 1.0g i,631 6.0% 1.446 5.3% 4,008 ~ 14.7% Manu.-'acturin$, non-durable goods Manu£acturing, durable goods Transvo.-~fion 1.0Z3~ 3.8 ~,~ Commurdcaticns and other vublic utilities 455 1.7% Wholesale ~'ade 1.531 ~ 5.6% Retail trade .,4.4.,. ~ 16.3% Firmnce, insurance, and real estate 3,026 Business and repair services 1,694 .~ 6.2% Pemonal services 949 ' 3.5?° Entertainment and recreat/on services 385 I ' o Health services 1,764 6.57~ Educational services 1,329 4.9% Off, er professim~l and related services 2..268 Public admirdstrat~on !,032 5.8% ...... 10C.0% 5o'arce: 1990 Census HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS This section addresses household composition, size, overcrowdLng, income, affordabfli~,, and svecial needs groups. Definitions The Census Bureau uses several terms with respect to housing which are important to understmxd. A housing unit ts definect as a house, apartment, mobile home or trailer, group of rooms, or single room occupied or intended for occupancy as sevarate living quarters. A household is an occupied housing unit. Househoids are barther broken do~m into family househoids and non-fami';y households. A farv21y household is a household shared bv two or more persons related by bir~, marriage or adoption. A non-famih, household is one consisting of a single individual or unrelated persons '..~.ving together. CITY OF TUSTI, T- DILZ~FT Tk~CH~YIC.4L M£MORA]V'DUM HOUSING ELE~,%~ENT DECEMBER 2 O01 Household Composition According to ~e U.S. Cev, sus, the Cit-y of Tusfi_v, contained 18,332 householcls in 1990. California Departmen~ of Finance estimates shows that the number of households increased to 22,755 in 1999, representing an increase of approximately 24 %. TABLE HTM-6 HOUSEHOLD TYPE: 1980 - 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN 1980 '- 1990 2 19993 Household No. of % of No. of % of No. of % of Type Households Total Households Total Households Total Family 8,840 61.7% 32,317 6,' .~ ,=. ,:,,-91 Non-Family 5,477 38.3 % 6,015 32.8 % 7,464 32.8 % Total 14,317 100% 18,332 !00% 22.7=-5 U.S. Depf. of Co::mm. erce, Bm-eau oi the Census. 1980 C~asus. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of t~he Census, 1990 Census Total pop-.flabons based on Department o£ .~mance estuma,'es, N~vember l, ,a99,'; percentages/or househoici t.v?e ~,e. sed on 197~' Census.. Table HTM-6 shows that 12,317, or about 67%, o£ fi~e Cits,"s households were classified as family households in 1990. The percentage of households remained the same in 1999. Moreover, as shown in Table H'I'M-7, the average household size in Tustin has increased from 2.77 persons per household in 1990 to an estimated 2.92 persons per household in 1999. This increase may be atfributed to a varie.~' of factors, including: more doub'../ng-up, or sharing, of units in order to defray increased housing costs and an increase in the supply of larger units, especial_ly new units in East Tustin. TABLE HTM-7 HOUSEHOLD SIZE 1980 THROUGH 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN Jurisdictlor~'- 1980: 1990: : 1999 Tusfin 2.43 [ 2.77 i 2.92 Orange Co.an,%. '. 2.78 i 2.87 3.04 U.S. Dev'.. o~ Commerce, Bureeu 0£ tke Census, ~980 Ce.".sus Repot',.' U.S. Dept. of Commerce, B-a~eau of the Census, 1999 Census Report. California D?aztment of Finm:ce [DD~, !.°99 HOUSIIVG ELEMENT DF. CEMBER .2001 Overcrowding Along vdth the Ci%"s poprdatioh' growth has been an increase in unit overcrowding, as households "double up" to save on housLng costs. Since 1980, overcrowding has increased from 1.2 to 4.2 percent in o,a~ner-occupied urdts, and from 5.3 to 16.2 percent i~-, renter- occupied units (1990 Census). Overcrowding is often reflective of one of ~_ree conditions: 1) eider a farrdh, or household is living in too small a dwelling; 2) a famih, chooses to house extended family members (i.e., grandparents or growm cl-didren and their fam~es living with parents, termed doubling); or 3) a famih' is renting living space to non-famih' members. Bom State and Federal Housing Law defines overcrowded housing units as those in which ~e ratio of versons-to-rooms exceeds 1.0. The rooms considered in this equation excludes bathrooms, kitchens, and hallways, but includes o~er rooms such as living and dhn_ir,.g rooms. For example, a one-bedroom apartment with living room, k~tchen, and bafftroom would be considered overcrowded ff more than ~'o persons occuvied it. The 1999 Regiorml Housing Needs Assessment (R_~,_NA) prepared by the Southen: Cahfornia Association of Governments ~SCAG) figures snowed 2390 (~ p..,em) households '.'Mng in overcrowded condiL4ov~s. Of the households livL-'.g in su~ conditions, 86°.,4 were renters., of which nearh' 38% were Extremely- or Very-Low income households. Table HTM-8 iEustrates ti~e numbers of al'.' Tus~n households liv'.Lng in overcrowded conditions. Income Household income directh' affects housing affordabilib,. In general, upper '2ncome households have more discretionary income to spend on housing, while iow and mode:'ate-,.',ncome househoids are 'more limited in the range of housing fl:er can afford. CiTY OF TL'~TI;V- ~ r~,..HA 1C..~. AfZ, MO'.~4:¥D DZ~4FT ..... , ' a r 17 HOUS!NO ELE,.VIENT DECEAfBER 2001 TABLE ITYM-8 IIOLJSI-'.1101-I)S IN OVERCROWDED COW)rriONS 1999 CITY OFTUSTIN ("ITTY 0111 11 'Usniv -- JWELlmllml� Y DRAM,'T7.,-,(31N1(.'A1, MEMMANOOMI PLEWENT 8 OCIOPEW 2001 lixtreniely Low " Very Lon — -. — LOW – – .. ..-. "To -till Moderate !L. Total Tuta.l All TNIUre Overcrowded l'ota, J Overcrowded Total Overcruwd'e-d .- Overcrowded I Total I Overcrowded Households 5172N 11862 46 2,511. 255 7,261 330 9,245 Total 308 Z8 1,505 2,022 4.71 653 366 814 915 7,450__ --- ---- 2060 13,327 _500 2,514 411 3,325 1,170 12,354 2,390 22,572 ("ITTY 0111 11 'Usniv -- JWELlmllml� Y DRAM,'T7.,-,(31N1(.'A1, MEMMANOOMI PLEWENT 8 OCIOPEW 2001 'lliis page illlnlnwurlly left blank. CITY o TII577N PRE1,111111il'A Y I X)il ti1N(1E1. EIVI1. N7' 1)RAb 1" I'M 1.1N1CAI. i9 OCR)RI IRR 2(X)1 According to ~',e 1990 Census, the median household income for the Cita; of Tusi/n was $38,433. Table HTM-9 compares median household and £amflv incomes befween ~e Ci%~ o£ Tusi/n and nearby iuzisdictions, counties, and the State of Cali/ornia. in 1990, the Cia"s median household income was about 16% lower than the median household income fo: the CountT as a whole. Table HTM-9 demonstrates that at S38,433, Tust~n's 1990 median household income was below the Orange Count),' median ($43,922). This trend was consistent as well for median farnilv income in the above- mentioned jurisdictions. TABLE HTM-9 MEDIAN' HOUSEHOLD INCOME: TUSTLN .4eND SURROUNDING Jurisdiction Tusfin .&nai~eim , AREAS 1990 Median Percent Household Abovefl3elow lncome County Median $38,433 -16.3°A· 539.620 -13.7% Median i Percent Family Above/Below Income ' Count?, Median S42.,840 . -16.3% $43.133 -15.7% Garden Grove $39,822 13.3 % Im,'ine $56,307 22.6% Santa .kna S35,'/62 Z3.4 °,~ OranFe CounW S45,922 -- State of Calffo:vJa $35,798 -22.0~. Souse: U.S. De?ztmen: of Commerce. Bu_-eau of Census, 199,3 $41,930 S64,T17 S34,760 551,167 -18.1% 26.5 % -32.1% 540.559 I -20.7% TABLE I-rTM-10 ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION: 1990 AND 1999 crl'Y oF TUSTIN Household 1990 1999 Income Range Number Percent · Number I Percen! $0,000-ff: 4,999 2,126 11.6 % !,905 i 8.4 % $!5,000-$24,999 2,706 , ~ o0.. ~ . ' $2.5.000-$34,999 3,321 '18.1% 2,742 1.2.0% $35,000-S49,999 3,636 19.8 % 4,633 20.5 % $50,000-$74,999 3,706 20.2% 4,669 20.5 % $75,ff30-599,999 1,59! 8.7% 2,806 $100.30 or more 1,252 6.8% 3,682 Total 18,338 100% 22,756 Source: Cmr. vrehen~ive Affordable Housin~ St~ate..m, 2000 - 2010. .2.3 ,~ 16.2% 100% CITY OF TUSTh'V - PRELIMIA"ARY DiL4FT TEC.~UfICAL '.'ffEMOfL4A~DUM 20 HOUS~rG £LEYI£A'T DECEMBER 2001 As illustrated in Table HTM-10, the 1999 income distribution remained somewhat slrni]ar to !990 figures, with the exception o£ the number of housekoJds e ~m'nin. g..a yearly income of $100.,000 or more. These households more than d6ub!ed, increasing from. 7% to ]6% of all households. Overall, the income distribution can be summed in ~vo categories:.,, ;~ o,/o of the households fa :ll5_ng in ~',-.nv,, income brackets of $49,999 or less; and 49 .% falling in the income brackets of $50,000 or %-"loTe. Further, households headed by the very young and the elderly comprised fl~e largest g-roups in the low-income category. In fi'ds sense, nearly one-quarter (24%) of the households headed by persons aged 65 or older eam less that. 515,000 at, nuallv, as compared to only 4.6% of the households head by persons aged 25 to 64. 'D-,e majori~, of fine 25 to 64 age gn'oup (60%) v-ere in the 535,000 to S74,999 income bracket and 42% were eami.ng S75,000 or more annualh'. Table i--tTM- 1~ is a surm~ary of income distribution by age. Household income Ran,~e $0,000-5~ 4,999 $15..000- S24,999 TABLE HTM-11 ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION BY AGE OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN Under .25 Years 25 to 44 Years 45 to 64Years i 65+ Years No. ' % i No. : % No. Total-All Households % : No. ~ % , No. ! % 6.8%; 708i 24.0% . 1,904' 8.4% : 463· 15.7%' 316 24.3% 1,036 8.7% 535 7.8% 2,320: 1C.2% $25,000- 534.999 273 21.0% 1,446 12.5% 654 9.5% 2.742. 12.1% $35,030- S49,999 267 2C.5% 2,757 23.7% 1,187 !7.2% 4.634 ~ 2~.4% 2,683 23.! %: ~,493 20.4 $50,000- 575,000- 599,999 1S2 g,666 20.5 369 12.5% i 423 ~4.3% 398 "-°' 255 8.7% 335 11.3% 1> ....... 8ur 1 23% 66 5.1% 1,445 12.4%: 1,039 -"°' $100,30 or more 39 3.056 1,704 ! 14.7% ' 1,605 23.3~ 3,683 i 16.2S'- Tom: 1,301' 100% 1.1,609 I00%~ 6,893 100% ' 2,952. 100% 22.755. 100% Sourze: Com?rehensiva Affordabie Housm~ Strate~a' 2059 - 2010. C_r"l'Y OF TUSTIN- PRELIMI.'YARY DIL~.FT TECH;YICAL MEMOi%4NDUM 2i HOUSING DECEMBER 2 O01 Housing Affordability The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (?IUD) defines the threshold of overpayment for housing as 309; or more of household iv. come. That is, when households pa}, more than 30% of their income for housing, the), have insufficient remairdng funds for other necessit/es suc. h as food, clothing, utLiities a_nd health care. HUD recognizes, however, that upper income households are generally capable of pay/ng a larger proportion of their income for housing, and therefore estimates of housing overpayment generally focus on lower income groups:. ]'he 1999 RHNA idenEfies housing overpayment for lower-income households based on income data from the 1990 Census. Lower- Lncome households are those earrdr, g less than 80°,,6 of the Count' median income. Lower-income households include verv-low-"ncome (<50% of median) a~d log'- '-'ncome (51%-80% of median) groups. Table HTM-12 reflects SCAG's 1999 report, g'hich esi.5_mates that 8,569 of Tush.n households were overpaying for housing of wMch 5,494 or 64% were ve~' Iow and Iow-income households. Among the overpaying lower income households, about 29.% were extremely log' income, 34% were very low income, m~d 37% were iow-income households. Table ~TM-12 also disting~aishes between ogmer and renter households overpaying for housing. This distinction is important because while homeo,a'ners may over-extend themselves financially to afford the opt/on of home pur~,ase, the owner maintains the option ~ see at market rate; on the other brand, renters are limited to the rental market and are generally required to pa}' the rent established -.kn that market. The table shows that among the lo,a-er income households in the Ci~' overpaying for housing, 4,444 or 8! % were renters. ; Some agencies and organizations consider Modera~ income households to be overpaying wher~ ?,ousin$ costs exceed ~5 percent of gross income, with ~he maximum income representing ~1295~- of median coun.~.- income. Under t_b, ese assumptio:~s, overpayment occurs in fewer households in tine CitT of Tust~x wixen comvared to figures presented ir, this document t2'xat are based uvon State ax'~d ~edera:. s~ndards. Source: 5ira~-egies for ?~a~:mr.g a~:d Deve;:pm.~1:t: C_.a;.!'.'ornir, A.~rdabt. e ;-:'.axdboo'r., Cnl'.'fomia Redevelopment .Amsociation, 2000. CFFY OF TUSTIN- PRELIMI3,'ARY DRAFT TECH.¥ICAL MEMORA:¥DUM 22 HOUSING EL~,.C"~ENT DECEMBER .200 Tenuze Owner TABLE HTM-12 HOUSEHOLDS OVERPAYING FOR SHELTER 1999 CITY OF TUSTLN 9,245 Renter 1,290 ' 1,505 i 1,457 I 653 1,697 I 814 i 1,074 17,4501 5.518 13.327 Total 2,048 i 3,3Z5 3,075 '12,354 ' 23..572 { I Moderate & ' I Extremely Low iVery Low I Low Above Total. Total All Overuav I Total ~ Overuav . Total Overpay i Total: Overuav ' Total Overuav Households 307 i 517 392 i 1,862 351 12,511 ! 2.00! ! 7,261 . 3.051 1,597 I 2,022 ' 1.849 I 2,514 8,569 Sou.roe: Sou~em CalJiorrda Asso'~Zai:or. o£ Goverrzments ;SCAG) Re~iorm2 HousLn~ Needs Assessment, 1 ,999'. Special Needs State ?iousing Law requires that Cue special needs of certaLn disadvantaged groups be addressed. The .needs of the elderly, d~abled, large families, female heads of household, the homeless and farm workers are important 'in relation to overall corrununi~, heal~. These groups may maintain special nee~ related to housing construction and location. The Elderly: As noted previously ~able H'IZ4-2), in !990, 3,843 versons or 7.6% of the tota/population in Tustin were 65 years of age or older. In addition, senior households represented ]2.3 percent (2,256) of total households in Tustin. According to California State University at Fullerton's Center for Demogr. aphic Research Center (CDR), there was a slight decrease in percentage in the elderly population in 2000 at 4,804 (7.2%). As noted earlier Ln Table HTM-11, nearly one-quarter of this age group earns an annual income of less than 515,000 and 40% earn less than S25,000 annually..kl~ough the senior population may often be living in a single-family home toc large for their needs, with ]i~e or no mortgage payme~nt, sellkag +2ne home and buying a smaller unit may be too expev~ive, Thus, this population needs housing that is both affordable and located in close prcximi~' to public services a_nd ~ansportation. The Disabled: According to the 1990 Census, ~dnere were 2,!62 disabled people in the Ci~-. The disabled corpantm,:~-, as defined by the California Department of Rehabilitation Caiiforn~a D:sabiiit-,' Survey, includes four classLfications of disab~tv. These classifications and ~eir percentages of the total handicapped population are as follows: CITY OF' TUSTIlV - PR..~LIMI.¥AR Y DP~4FT TECHATCAL MEMOR_¢NDUM 23 ~ r~ HOUSING/~LEM~.X l D.DC£MBER 2 O0 i TABLE HTM-13 DISABILITY CLASSIFICATION Mu$culoskelet~l or Circulatory ,59.4% Chronic, Internal (Respiratory, Digestive, Neuro]oKical) : 25.6% Sensory (\:isual, HearL'~K. SpeecJx) ] 9.1% Mental (Retardation, Emotfona!, Substance Abuse) [ 2% Not-Classified ~..9 °"~o Source: Calfforrd~ D ,, -l~nent o£.,Rehabflitnh°n According to these figures, the majori~' of people with disabilities (PWD) have musculoskeietai disabili.ties. Units for persov~ with musculoskeletal disabilities must provide access and be adaptable to their needs, such as wheelchak- accessibilit~'. Disabled persons often require specially designed dwe "li!ng units to permit access not onh' within the dwelling unit, but also to and from the unit. Special modifications to permit free access are very important in main~g independence and digr~-. Ca~omia Administra~ve Code Title 24 Requirements set for~ access and adaptabili~' requirements for the physically disabled. These regulatiov.~ apply to public buildings such as motels, and require that ramp ways, door widths, restroom modifications, etc., be designed to enable free access to the handicapped. I~"nile such standards are not mandatory for new single-family residential construction, they do apply to new m-alti-family residential construction. Most existing housiv, g units in Tustin have not been designed consideration for these requiremenm of adaptabiif~r and access. 'I~ne majori5~ of housing units are either singl~famfiy or two-story apartments wi~ no elevator access. The adaptabili~' of units to meet the needs of disabled persons remaiws a challenge for Tustiv. and other corm~unities. However, as additional housing units are provided in the East Tust'in area, accessibfli5' is considered as part of a project's design as required by law. Additionally, as units in multiple-family areas are rehabilitated, uni~ may be retrofitted to accommodate the handicapped. New construction may offer some relief because the mandatory requirements are evextiy applied to all projects. Accor 'ding to the Uniform Building Code, rental projects of 20 uzri~ or more irt size require accessibiiit-v and adaptabHi~, in at least one unit. ~:e use of m-.'.xed develovment ~'pes and higher densi~.' limits '2n the East CITY OF TUSTL¥- PRELIM,~:4RY DRAFF TECHA'ICAL ,%~EMOR~4A"DUM 24 HOUSII~'O BLEM~ENT DECEMBER .2001 Tustin area will further require development of even more handicapped-access!hie units. Large Families: Under the Census g'aidelines, a family household containing five or more persons ~ considered a large family. Large family households generally require larger dwelling units with more bedrooms to meet their housing needs. But family households with five or more persons often face limitations in being below national poverty levels, and often experience difficult, securing adequate housir'.g suitable for their expanded needs. Moreover, because multifamily rental urdts are t-ypically smaller than sing]e-family units, larger families who are also renters ~ac~ more difficulties in securing housing ~ = ,aroe enough to accommodate all members of tine household. In 1990, "~,~ °',o of Tustin households had five or more persons residing in a unit. lO99 ' ~ , aa~a shows a slight increase in t.he number of households ,Mth five or more persons at 13.6%- of total households. Table HTM-14 is a status'tory of Tustin's household sizes. TABLE HTM-14 HOUSEHOLD SIZE DISTRIBUTION 1999 Household Size CITY OF TUSTIN Number of Households % of Total Households Person 5,2ii 2.2.9% Persons 7,191 3i .6 % Persov. s 4,!41 18.2% Perso:-.s 3,1] 7 13.7% or more Persov, s 3,0,°5 13.6% Total Households Z2.755 109.0% Source: Comvrehensive, -- Affordable Housm~ St-rate~.' 2000 - ~13. The primary need bf large families is to provide enough rooms for each member of ~e farc. ilv to avoid overcrowding. In 1990, 15% of the City's housing units contained four or more bedroo:-as. Of occupied housing units, 12.9% contained four or more bedrooms. Rental-occupied units accounted for 1.6% of units wi~ four or more bedrooms. Taking into account that much of Tustin's houshag stock consists of apartments, and that ~he majority of Tustin's large , P,.:,LIMIA:-iR ~ CITY OF TUS'TL¥- ~'" ' .... DRAFF TEC?I:YICA. L ME'_'vlO~4.NDUM 25 HOU'SfJVO ELE.¥fENT DECEMBER 2 O01 families are renters, this rising trend in large families suggests a need for more specious apartment units to accommodate such £amilies. Female-Headed Parent Households: The housing needs of fertile- headed parent households are generaliy reiated to affordabiiitv s~ce such households typically have lower than average incomes. According to the 1990 Census, the City of Tusffn kad 1,178 female- headed households with children less than 18 )'ears of age. For these households, ideal housing is severely restricted. Due to financial constraints, the family is often not able to find housing that is close to needed services, schools, and public transportation. The Homeless: M. easurh~g the extent of the homeless population specifically in Tusffn remaLns a challenge for commurdtv leaders. To comvlicate the challenge of meeting homeless persons' needs, the issue oJf homelessness is considered regional in nature. Nomadic tendencies of homeless versons make it difficult to assess the population accurately on a dtvwide basis; therefore, homelessness should be addressed on a countywide basis, in conjunction with cities amd local non-profit orgar~afions. According to !999 studies prepared by the Orange Count),, Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), each night there are an estimated 14,086 homeless persons in the Count'. Six~'-six percent of the homeless population includes persons in fam~iies w'i~ c_bAldren. Orange Comet)..' also reported sta~stics on homeless populations, as shown in Table I--IZM-15. TABLE HTM-~5 HOMELESS SUB-POPULATION GROUPS 1999 ORANGE COUNTY Sub-Population Chronic Substance Abusers Estimated Number of Persons Duaih' Diasnosed 6.093 Severely N, er, rahv ,il :.539 2,482 Veterans 4,964 .AIDS Afflicted Persons 5,~ 49 Victims of Domeshc Violence and ~qeir Gnildren 5.860 Homeiess Youfla 2,168 Phvsicalh' Disabled 5.341 Estimated Total Homeless Population; 14,086 ~ Some persons ~ii within more than one identified sub-?puia~ion, ~.herefore the sum cf s-.,b-po?u'ations exceeds the total homeless estimate. Source: Counn, of C'ranee, Co::tmuum of Care Su:rurmrc, !999. CITY OF TUSTIN- PR~LIMLYARY DR_aFT TECHNICAL MBMOIL~NDUM 26 HOUSING ELF~.¥~ENT DkCF, MBER ~001 There are numero..u.s factors t,hat contribute to homelessness in Tustm and Orange Counfv. /'he 'k~o'wn causes of homelessness include unemployment, limited skills, and a breakdown in fl~.e family as a social and econore~ic unit. Additional!}', cutbacks ~m social service programs and the de-institutionalization of the mentally ill during the 1980s have contributed to the homeless population. A new trend, however, is emerging as a sigrdficant contributing element to homelessness: a fast-growing lack of affordable housing, which could exacerbate any of the above conditions, but may increasingly become a stand alone cause of homelessness. In a !999 rmtiorml study by the Center on Budget and Policy ?riorities, Orange Cormw ranked last of 45 Metropolitan Statistical .&teas in providing affordable housing oppor~rdfies. Compared to a national average of 1.7 ]ow-income renters competing for every low- cost apartment, four Orange Count' low-income renters competed for each low-cost avartment Lack of affordable housing, coupled with recent cutbacks in sodal service programs, have produced a sizable population at risk of homelessness. in 1999, the Orange Count), Department of Housing and Commurfifv Develo?mer'.t applied to HUD for Continuum of Care (COC) Homeless Assistance funds on behalf of the Count', cities and non- profit orgm'zizations. The Con~muum of Care is the Comnh,'s major umbrella funding som'ce for homeless abatement, which disperses funding to cities and non-profit groups to provide shelter mhd emergency care to the homeless. COC is ~e Coun~"s ?rirvmrv defepme against homelessness. Cik,: of iusffn po]ice reports and windshield sum~eys have shown that there are no established areas where home]ess persons congregate in tine Ci~,, and that most persons migrate fi~rough 'Fustin, ra~er than s~ay for extended periods of t~me. The City's Police Depar~h-ment estimates that tlnere are 10-12 homeless versons residing in ~e Ci~' at an)' given time. Of the shelters in Tustin, the 45-bed Sheepfold shelter vrovides shelter, food, clot ~hing, job training, and job-referral serxdces primarily to battered women and d~ildren. Guests are admitted on a first-come, first-sen'ed basis. Usually all beds are fully occupied. The shelter services a large area L,,.ciuding many portions of Orange and San BernardJno Coun~es. CITY OF TU$'T/-Ar- PRELfMI.'~:4P, Y D~4FT TECi--I~:ICA.r, _,_._,,gO. ,_4~ DL M 27 HOUSING ELE.a/IiE'fVT DECEMBER 2 O0 f Within the City of Tustin, there are a variety of Non-Profit Organ'izafions (NPOs) that provide direct housing and related services to homeless persons. These inciude 5heepfo!d, a feeding program affiliated with the United Way, and Laurel House, an emergency shelter and transitional hous,_'ng provider for homeless youth in the Cit-y. Additional programs will also be provided at the former Marine Corps .Air Station (MCAS) Tustin site. A significant portion of the MCAS is located within the Ciw. /'ne MCAS Tusffn facility was identified bv the U.S. Department of Defense for closure in Jul}' 1999. L~ accordance with the Base Closure Redevelopment and Homeless Assistance Act of 1994 (Redevelopment .Act), the Cit-y of Tustin was formally recognized as the Local Redevelopment AuthoriV (LRA) for the MCAS Tustin. The Redevelopment Act provides a process that aims to balance the needs of the homeless with other development interests in the commuv, ities directly affected by closure of the installation. The Act requires the L1L6 to prepare a reuse plan and Homeless Assistance Plan (I-bkP), wl-dch is submitted to the federal Depart-merit of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD reviews and determines whether the documents balance the needs of the homeless in communities in the vicini~, of the installation wit_b, the need for economic development. A Homeless Assistance Plan has been established for MCAS, Tustin that is consistent with the con~h~nuum of care model embodied in the Consolidated Plans for the Cities of Tustin and neighboring Irvine. The fundamental components of the continuum of care system to be imvlemented with the MCAS, Tust/n Reuse Plan would: Provide emergency shelter beds and intake assessment Offer transitional housing and services Provide opportunities for permanent affordable housing by the private sector. Ln the MCAS Reuse Plan, the LRA w~ own sites and four homeless sen'ice providers, including the Sah:ation Arm),, Orange Coast Interfait2n Shelter, Families Forward, and DOVE Housing kave been approved to operate 50 family u_nits at the former base. The Orange Count, Rescue lX.2ssion will also operate a !92-unit transitional,/emergency shelter. CITY OF TUSTII¢- PRELIMI]¥ARY DRA)T TECHNICAL MEMOP, A'.¥DUM 28 HOU$IJVG ELEMENT DF_.CEM2~ER 2002 Numerous other agendes provide shelter and other sen:ices to ~e homeless '.in the nearby cilies of Santa Aha, Irvine, a_n.d Orm~ge. The Orange County, Homeless Issue. s Task Force, a non-profit homeless advocacy organization, maintalv, s a list of these and other hon'teless services in Orange County. Table HTM-16 is a list of organiza'dons in Tustin that provide homeless sen,ices. The Sheepfold and Laurel House are located in R-I districts and are permitted by right under +.he State Law related to Co~-r~muni,%' Care Facilities. The facilities at re MCAS Tusfin will be permit-ted by special discretionary approvals such as conditional use per_mits. The City's current code related to home]ess, transitional housing, and boarding homes are as follows: · A group housing arrmngement in a single family home is not subject to Cil-y perno~ts (consistent with State Law). The R-3 and R-4 districts would allow for boarding homes with a Conditional Use Perrrdt (CUP). A gTOUV home . s~.~ ~z,s clients ix,. a mu:ff-:'amily dwelling would falI under this ddinition. Sheepfold TABLE HTM-16 EMERGENCY SHELTER/TRAN SYI'I ONAL HOUSING FACILITIES 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN FaciliP,' Services Provided i Provides shelter, food, clothing, job t-rai,"./~.g, and "jo'v-referral services to women with children. · Tempor~ug.' housing for teenagers in crts~s. The i facili~' aka provides food, informal counseling. Laurel House I and access' to medical care and clothing.. St. Cecilia's Dis."ributes food suvph' to needy ocouiafion$. Operat~ emergen,?' food progra,m where a Redhill Lutheran person can receive food supply 3 Plmes a :'ear. Collec~ food supplies and distributes the food to various organ'~zations involved in providing Tustin Presbyterian homeless se,wick. .~ddergate Source: Cih' o£ T~sS.v,. !9~. Refers intermted persons to Ecu:nerdcal Services Alliance in Santa 7ma. C£FY OF ?'USTIN- PRF_.Lf,'vIfAi4f~Y DP~,i:'T TI_;;CHNICAL ~.r~,;,rr'. :~ ~ :~:n r "~,r 2P HOUSING EL~.'Vf'ENT HOUSING STOCK CHARACTERISTICS A housing unit is a dwelling intended for occupanq, as separate living quarters. Single-family houses, apartments, condomLrdums, mobile homes, amd single room occupancy (SRO) hotels are al! types of housing units. This section examines housing unit growth, age, ~'pe, tenure (owner v. renter), and costs in Tus~.n. Housing Growth Like many other communities in Orange Count,, Tustin has seen a s:'.gnificant increase in housing mnits since 1990. The number of housing units increased from 19,300 to 24,531 during this period, representing a 27% increase in units (1990 Census, 1999 DOF estimates). Table HTM-17 compares the growth in housing units in Tustin to nearby cities and the Count, as a whole. It should be noted that much of the City's housing unit growtln is attributable to armexafions that occurred during the lgB0s a~nd !990s. J urisdiction TABLE HTM-17 HOUSLNG GROWTH TRENDS 1980 - 1999 TUSTIN AND SURROUNDING AREAS Number of Housin~ Urdts 1980 Percent Chan~e 1980-90 1990-99 30% 27% 13% 1990 2 1999 ~ 19,300 24~31 93.177, 99,351 45,957 46.606 Tustin 14,892 Anaheim 87,7~ Gnrden Grove 42.846 7% 1% i~,ine 22.514 42.221 48,764 88 % ~ 6 % Santa Ava 67,180 ~ 2% --.3 0% 75.03G 74.932 875,105 ~54,882 Orange Count' 721,514 '- C.$. De?ar~an~-~t of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1980 Census ,'Report. 21990 C~su$ Repot:. s State of ~alifornia. Department of Finance, Povulation Es~irrmtes !999. 21% 9 % Housing Unit Type Table HTM-18 demonstrates the mix of housing ~,pes in Tusffa-u The 1999 composition of housing tm.its in the Ci~' includes 30.6 percent single-farrdly detached, 10.8 percene single-famii, y attached, 12.8 percent multi-fa=dh' (24 units), 43.0 percent multi-famiIy (5,- units), and 2.9 percent mobile homes. Comvared to Orange Coun~, as a whole, Tusfin has a significantly higher proportion of mtdti-famih, housin§. According to 1999 3O HOUSING ELEMENT DECEMBER 2 O01 Department of Finance Estimates, the Count, contained 62.4 percent single-family detached/attached units and 35.2 percent mulfi-larnilv units, where as iustin contained 55.8 percent mu/ti-family units. Housing Type Sing]e-Family Detached Single-Family A~ached Multi-Family (2-4 Multi-Family (5+ Mobile Homes Total TABLE HTM-18 TUSTIN RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX 1990 - 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN Number of Housing Units 1990 ' % ! 1999 5,351 2,530 3,089 7,678 707 19,300 ' 27.7% ' 7,503 · ~.~ ,o 2,646 16.0% 3,132 39.5% 10,548 3.6% 702 99.9%* 24,531 ·/orals do not equal 10~% due te rounding error. Sou,ce: C. alil'orv, ia De=a~rment cf Firmnce 10,8% 12.8% 43.0% 2.9% Percent Change 1990-1999 40.2% 4.6% .4% 38.3 % 0% 100.1%* N/A · ' 7 .... o (1999 Department of -'-~ Tustin s current vacancy rate is ~o,, . comparafiveh', higher "'&mn the CounW, average of 5.'~%,..,. Table HTM- !9 shows the 1999 vacancy rate by tenure. The high vacancy rate, partic-alarly among rental urdts, indicates that a significant resource of housing units akeady exists to meet the housing needs of £~e Ci~'. However, available vacant units may not always meet a household's abiliw to pay the asking rent and/or ~xe size needed. TABLE HTM-19 VACANCY RATES 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN Hou$in.e Tenure Number ': Percent Vacant Rental Un/ts : 1,188 4.8% Vacant Sale Units ; 204 i 0.8% Seasonal]l' Vacant L'rdts ] 61 : 0.2% Vacant-other [ 323 I 1.3% Subtotal-Vacant Units I ~,776 : ~ vo.' .Occupied U.-.i~ ! 22,755 ' 92.8% Total Housina Units ' 24,531 : Source: Comvrehenslve Affordabie !-tousm~ Strafe? 2930 - 2910. 100% CE'Y OF TL~TL¥- PRELIMINARY DfLAFT TECH.¥ICAL ME.",(OR_AA'DUM HOUS~'O DECEMBER 2 O01 Housing Tenure ~ne tenure (o~mer versus renter) distribution of a commurdw's housing stock influences several aspects of the local housing market. Residential mobiiitT is influenced by tenure, with owners5, ip housJ, v.g Q:pically sustaln/ng a much lower 'turnover rate than rental housing. Housmg overpayment, while experienced by man}, households regardless of tenure, is far more prevalent among renters. Ownership and rental preferences are primarily related to household income, composition, and age of fl~e householder. Ln 1990, 40.9% of the City's 18,332 occupied housing mnits were owner-occupied, with the remainder renter-occuvied. Compared to ~7.~ ,o owner-occupied ur~ts and the CotmW as a whole, which had - -°' 37.6% renter-occupied urdts, the Cit-), of Tustin had a relatively high pro?ortiov, of renter occupied units. This is sign;dica~nt because renters tend to have lower incomes ~a.n ov~mers, and are more susceptible to housing cost increases. The tenure figures have remained relat~velv the same in 1999, with very slight increases of 1,757 new homeowners and 2,666 renters. Table HTM-20 is a surrumary of tenure in the Ci~'. TABLE HTM-20 TENURE 1990 AND 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN 1990 1999 Housin~ Tenure Number O;vner-Occuvied 7.504_ Renter-Occuvied 10,828 Total Occu~vied Units 18,332 S,:;urze: 199~ SCAG ~'-{NA Ex'~stin.ff Needs. Percent Number : Percent ~ 40.9% 9.261 40., ..o · 59.1% 13.494 59.3% , 100.0% 100.0% 22,755 Age and Condition of Housing Stock Housing age is a factor for determining the need for rehabilitation. Without proper maintenance, housing ur2ts deteriorate over time. Also, older houses may not be built to current housLng standards for fire and earthc~uake safeP¢. 32 HOUSI:YG ELEAJEA~T DECEr. W33ER ~001 Table H-i'M-21 in&icates the period iv. which housing u_nits were built in Tusffn based upon 1999 Department of Finance estimates, ir. 2000, approximately 64%. of the City'~:.housing stock was over 30 )'ears old. However, in 10 years, 78% of the Cib"s housing stock will be over 30 years old. T'n!s hndicates a potential need for rehabilitation and coniLnued maintenance of approximately 19,300 dwe".ding units by the year 20!0. u TABLE HTM-21 AGE OF HOUSING STOCK CITY OF TUSTIN Time Period Units Built Number of Units 1990 or Later 5,ZS/ 1980 to !989 3,40! % of Housin~ Stock 22.3 ]3.9.% 2 970 to !979 6!70 25.2~ 1960 to 1969 7,863 32.1% 1950 to 1959 1.195 4.9% 1940 to 1949 374 1.5% 1939 or earlier 297 ] .2°2 To~al 24.531 100% Source: ~omprehems.;ve Affordab'.e .:-lousing 5:ra:eg}' 2000 - 2,~; Dep~rtme.'n: Fm~r. ce, !999. Housing Costs Fhis section discusses ownerski? and rental housLng costs in Tustin and evaluates ~.e afferdab~iU, of this housing te the Cih"s vario=s income groups. 'FABLE HTM-22 DISTRIBUTION OF O1~,~'ER-OCCUP1FD HOUSING UNITS BY VALUE 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN City of Tustin Property Value Number Percent Less than $I09.000 185 2.0% Orange Countw Number ! Percent 7,33! ' 2.9% $1(>3,000 to $124.999 287 3.1% 8,064 j 2.2% $125,000-$!49,999 685 7.4 % 15,028 ! 4.1% 5153.000-199,999 !,074 1Z6% 57,179 1.5.6% $273,000-$299,999 3,445 37.20,.: 136.349. 37.2% 5300.0~3 ore More 3,585 38.7% 142,580 i 38.9'3/, Total 9,26! 100% 366,531 200% Meclian Fror. em' Value 5272,970 Sourz~:, Cempr~her~ive ;d.:or~abie, ."qouslmF S~rate{~' 20CC - 2L10. 5266,, ,--fl ' CITY OF TUSTE?- PR'ZLiMI'.'~24RY 33 HOUSING DECEMBER 2 00! Based on data derived from the National Decision Systems, 76% of the o~ner-occupied units are valued at $200,000 or higher. ~'/-he median value for the o~ner-occupied u_nits is $272,970, which is higher than the Count}, as a whole where the median val-ae is $266,771. Table I-{TM-22 is a summary of home value in the Ci~r. Ownership Housing: According to Dataquick, an on-line research firm, the December 1999 median vrice for a_n existing home ~m Orange Co,an~ was S258,000, while median price for condominiums was S159,000. The median resale home prices for zip codes in the Cia' of Tustin ranged from $210,000 to 5386,000. In comparison, the median resale home vrices for dries presented in Table HTM-23 ranged from $95,000 to $395,000. Overall, median resale home prices in Tustin were similar to those occurring flxroughout Orange Cotmty. CIiY OF TUSTIN- PR~LIMIA"ARY Dt~4FT T~CHNICAL MEMOR. AArDUM 34 HOUSING D~CEM'~ER 200 TABLE HTM-23 RESALE PRICE OF HOMES AND CONDOMINIUMS TUSTIN AND NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS DECEMBER, 1999 Med.ian Home Price- % Change Civ' Zip Code December 1999 '- 1998-1999 Tustin 92780 $210,000 -12.1% Tustin 92782 386,000 32.6% 92891 $181,003 14.69: 92802 $159,000 2.6 % A.naheim 92804_ $I 86,000 92805 $176,500 92806 5210,500 4.2%' 92840 5200,0~0 92842 $202500 1 o, o' Garden G.mve i 92843 $182,750 10.8% i 92844 . $170,000 21.9% 92845 $235.500 6.! Orange 92634 ' 5231,500 92606: S337,500 92612 5311,250 92614 ! S257,009 92620 ' $357,500 928~5 92866 92867 92868 92869 92701 927C3 92704 92705 92706 92707 $218,750 5235,000 $275,000 5159,750 S220,5ff3 595,000 5146,000 $165,500 $395,0002 5250,033 Sd 48,750 Dam inalude all b.,,)me sales, new and resale, a_nd condc_,z-_mi,a.ms. includes Lernon/Cowa, n Heights 5~urce: Datacu/ck, -13.3% 30.0% 23.6% 4.9% 13.9% -5.9°,0 19.2% ~..3% -18.2% -25.8% -2.7% 4.7% 29.7 % 39.7% 4.0 ~ Rental Housing Accord'Lng to the 1990 Census, t22e median rent for Tust-kn was $746. .'-he majority (76%) of studio and one-bedroom rental units had monthiv rents between $500 and S749. Over 60 percent of two- bedroom rentals kad monthly rents of S750 and above while nearly t~ee-quarters (74°,,;.) of-azv_':s with three-or-mote bedrooms had CITY OF TUSTIN- PR£LIMIArARY D!L4.P'J' TECHNICAL '.'.',fEMO-RA;'~Db?,f 35 HOUSING ELE.Mft~.A T DECEMBER 2 00.1 monthly rents in excess of 5750. According to RealFacts, the average rent for the Cid' of Tustin was $1,067 in Mark 2000. Table HTM-24 vresents a summary of the rental rates. The table shows that the average monthly rental rate for a s~dio was 5875 and $869 for a one-bedroom unit. Two-bedroom u.nits ranged between 5957 and 51,251 while three-bedroom units ra~nged betwe~. 51,418 and $1,641. The lowest renal rates were 5856 for a one- bedroom u.nit, 5949 for a two-bedroom unit, and 51,416 :'or a three- bedroom unit (RealFacts, .March 2000). '~'~en a household (adjusted, . for family size) pays. more than ~,~xn°',.o of '.'ts gross income for housing, it is considered an overpayment. Based on HUD's fig-utes on affordabilit3.', households in +~.e Very Low- income category have annual incomes of $3,~,~0 or 1ess. Accordingly, ~e maximum rent affordabie to such household ~ S853 per month. In Tustin, the average rent for a one-bedroom unit is S869. It is also imvortant to note that manv of the households in Cne Very-Low income categoU, are large families, thus a one-bedroom un_it at S869 would not ordy be in excess of what they could afford, but would also be inadequate in size. Households in the Low-J. ncome category (51%-80% of County median) can afford $1,366 per month for housing. The rental survey shows that ali ~'o-bedroom units but no ~.ree-bedroom urdts are affordable to tlx~s ~oup (see Table hWM-25). It is important to note, r,nta, survey co~':dered ordv large, investment- however, that the ~' ~ .. grade rental properties and did not report prices of smaller renta: properties. According to Cit-).' s~af~, smaller rental vroverties represent a large segment of the rental market and offer three- bedroom units that are affordable to iow-income households. Ln su]rtmary, the preceding information suggests that, wi41e rental housing is available in t2~e Ci~' at rents ~Tat are affordable to all income groups, certain ~'pes of rental housfl~g, such as single-family homes and condo:r, inium/townhouses, are generally not affordab!e to the City's lower- income households. Perhaps most importantly, rental rates for units with ~vo or more bedrooms are beyond the reach of the Ci~"s Very-Low-income households. T'n,~s means that a VeDa-Low income household consisting of three or more persons would have a difficult ~me fLnding affordable housLng of adequate size. Table HTM-25 ts an illustration of rent af/ordabil':tv. CITY OF TUSTIN- PRELIMINARY DRAr-'T TECHNICAI_, MEMORAI~'DOIM 36 HO USI_¥G ELEMENT DECEMBER .2001 Number of Bedrooms TABLE HTM-24 AVERAGE RENTAL RATES 2000 C][TY OF TUSTIN : Number of Average I Units Square Footage ~ 164 499 Ay erage Rent lbd / 1 ba 2,373 732 5869 2bd TH, 254 1,054 52,295 2bd./lba 736 975 5,°57 2bd / 2be 2, 080 1,019 51,251 3bd TH 56 . 1,441 ~2 i 1.202 5,915 I 897 3bd/2ba Total Source: ReaL~:acts, March 2000 $i,541 $1,067 'Rental survey revresents data ordy for large, ,-'.'~vestment grade rental proFerries. 5mailer rental properties represent a large segment of '.he ren:al market amd offer lar?r, more a~ordabie Income Cate?r?, _<Ve~- Low (50%) Low t51-80%> TABLE HTM-25 MAXIMUM RENT AND PURCHASE PRICE BY INCOME CATEGORY 1999 CITY OF TUSTIN Maximum i Annual I Income ~ i Affordable . Rent Pa.vment I 534,150 ] $853 $2 00,00 $34,141-54,640 I 51365 Maximum A£fordabie Purchase Price ,~l 6~,000 Moderate (81-127,;) $54.641-81,959 . 52.049 5250.000 Above Moderate(>120%~ >581,960 i >52.°,049 >5250,3~0 Median $68,300 : Based o.. HUD income '.".'mits, .~amuary ~999. ; Calculated as 33% ei income divided by 12 mon.'hs. ? Assumes 10% down payment, ma 8.5% in:eres: rate, 1.25% tax and homeown~s a~.d 28% debt ratio. Source: The Plar. r.i.-~z Cev.:er. ! 9,°9 Share of Region's Housing Needs Section 65584 of the Govei-m-nent Code requires each locali~"s share of the existing and fur-ute housing needs to be detertrJ_ned by Lhe appropriate council of governments. Each jurisdiction s allocation represents its fair share of the regional housLng needs. The CiW of Tuslin:s current and projected housing needs are derived from the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA.) prepared by the Southern California Association of Govewznents. CiTY OF 'i'L :S-~TL¥ - PRELIMINARY D~Ab-'T TECt-INICAL MEMORAND[,:M 37 HO U$~NO ZLE.V2{ENT DECEMBE.~ 2 00i The components of the RI-INA are divided be~veen "existing needs" and future "construction needs." Existing needs were discussed earlier in the housing dfordabilit'},, section of ~.is report. Construction needs are defined as the number of units that have to be added to accommodate hhe forecasted growth in ~e number of households by .luly, 2005, as well as the number of units that would have to be added to compewate for anticipated demolitions and to achieve an "idea/" vacancy rate. Construction need includes ail income groups (from very low to upper) and not just those househoIds ~at require assistance. The total need figure is then distributed among the four income groups. The allocations of housing needs by income group are adiusted to avoid Lower-Income "impaction" - the over-concentration of Lower-Income households in a jurisdiction. SCAG's RHNA fair-share allocation for the 1998-2005 period is 3,298 uni:s. This allocation is based on a household gro,a~ch of 3,023 units; a vacancy adjustment of 163 units; and housing m~.it loss adjustment of 112 units. The closure of the MC_KS presents ~e City of Tustin wi~ a total of 947.7 acres available for residential re-use and development. Amongst other ~pes of uses, the City vlans to add a total of 4,049 housing units of mixed densi~, and housing ~'pe throughout ~e area. The City of Tustin proposes to also create a Redevelopment Project Area for the MCAS-Tustin project. Based on State Redeveiopment Law requirements, at least fifteen (15) percent of the units constructed w,.'tlzin a Redevelopment Project Area must be affordable to Very Low, Low, and Moderate-income households. Accordi~.gly, from tlne potential new units to be buiit on the .X,ICAS s';te, the creation of a redevelopment project area would result in u? to 495 units (243 units plus 192 transitional housing units) being al_located for Very Low-income housing and an additional _~64 units be created for Low- and Moderate income households. To meet its fair share of the region's housing needs during the 1998- 2005 plan_rang period, the CiW estimates it must add 3,298 housing units (refer to Table HTM-26). Of these, 21% must be affordable to \:erv-Low-income households (earning less than 50% of ti~e County median), 15% must be affordable to Low-Income households (earnLng bet~:een 50% and 80% of the County median), and ,-o, tlne moderate and above moderate income groups. (earning over 80% of County median income). Table idTM-26 is a summary of housing need distribution for the 2000-2005 planning period. CITY O? TUST~'- PR~LIML%:4RY Dk4FT TECHi¥ICAL MEMOi~4A;DUM 38 HOUSI:¥G ELE.¥I£_¥T DECEMB£R 2OO l TABLE HTM-26 : .,2000"200$4~OUSLNG NEEDS CITY OF TUSTLN Income Cate. ?. .r), # of Units Very Low <<50% CounW Median) 694 21 ?-4 Low (50% -80% Count-;' Median) 489 !5% Moderate (80% - 129% CounW Median) 778 ~' °' Above ..Moderate (120.% Count, Median) 1,337 TotM 3,298' Source: I~-EqA allocatior. 2000. Note: Cumulative percentages do not equal to 1.90% due to roundmi;;. ' See below/or chszuss~on on Cit?s a,vp~ls o£ ~A allo~efion, ., % of Total 41% 100% On July 26, 1999, the Ci~' of Tustin appealed the draft Construction Need/Vacancy Need methodology to the Orange Count).' Council of Governments (Delegate Sub-Region) through the A2tema~ve Dispute Resolution Process. The Alternative Dis.vute Resolution Board recommended approval of the City's appeal to the Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG) Board. On August 19, 1999, the OCCOG adopted Resolution No. 99-03 approving the RHNA for the Orange Count)., sub-region, h~cluded in that actiou was the recornmendafon that the Regional Counzfl (SCAG) adjust the Vacancy rates for MCAS, Tustin because the Regional Trmusportation ?lan (RTP) and the !990 Census data vacancy rates did not accurately reflect ~e base closure. The OCCOG recommended as follows: 505 units for the Very Low J_ncome households, 3~5 units for the Low Income households, 566 units for the Moderate Income households, and 973 for the Above Moderate Income households for a total of 2,399 milts new construction needs. On December 9, 1999 and June 22, 2000, the Cit-),' of TusEn appealed the RHNA Vacancy Need numbers that were used to calcuiate total construction needs for the Cit-), of Tus.ffn. The appeal was based on a unique situation in that 985 housLng u_nits located at the based was not properly counted as vacant housing units by the Devartment of Finance and are not reflected in the 1990 census ~edited vacancy methodolo~.'. The SCAG Communi~', Economic, and !-Iurnm~ Development (CEHD) Committee rejected both appeals despite the recommendation by ~e Orange Count)., Council of Governments. Accordingly, while the Ci.~, }-,as prepared this ,_r · z ~oustug Element using the figures determined by SCAG, the Citx,' respectfully maintains its concern over ti~e Rid2x. 'A Vacancy Need me5uoziology. C?FY OF TUST~'- PRELIMLr~54RY DRAFF T£CHNICAL MEMORANDUM 39 HOUSING DECEMBER 2 O0 ASSISTED HOUSING PRESERVATION .&NALYSIS State law (Chapter 1451, Statutes of 1989) requires all housing elements to include needs analyses and programs to address the potential conversion of Federal, State, and local/}, assisted housing developments ("units at risk") to market rate housiv, g. For example, the federalh: subsidized loans provided to many low-income housing projects during the 1970s contained provisions that al/ow the owner to ':prepay" the loans after 20 years, thereby removing the low- income subsidy from the project. As part of the ':units at rbk:' mxalysis, the State requLres that local jurisdictions perform, the foLlov, fing tasks: Needs Analysis: to include an inventory of units at risk of com, erting to market rate housing during 2000- 2010; an analysis of the potential for loss of affordability controls; a cost anah'sis of prese~,ing or replacing the at-risk units; identification of agencies willing to acquire and manage these projects; and, identification of funding sources available to vreserve or replace them. Quant'flied Objectives: A quanP2fication of the up. its to be conserved, and explanation of any difference between the number of units at risk and the number to be conserved. Housing Programs: A descrivtion of programs to vreserve the urdts at risk. Tus~dn has one project that contains u.nits "at risk" of converting to market :'ate use during the 2000-2005 planning period. Tustin Gardens ~ a 101-unit Section 221(D)(4) project with a Sect4on 8 contract for 100 units due to expire before July 2000. Projects financed under the Section 221(D)(4) market rate program alone have no binding income use restrictions. The conversion of this project will have an adverse impact for the elderly who ma}' face substantial rent increase or possible displacement. Table HTM-27 lists ail of the Federal, State, and localh' assisted Iow-income housing projects located in the Cia' of Tustin due to expire by 2005. CITY OF' TUSTI~Y- PRBLIMI?¢ARY DRAFT TECI'-J,¥ICAL MEMOR_4.NDUM 4O HOUSIiCG ELE.¥IE:YT DECEMBER 2001 Table i-FI-M-28 is am inventory of all multi-family rental units assisted under federal, state, and/or local programm, including HUD programs, state and local bond programs, redevelopment pro,ams, and local Jr.-lieu £e~, inclusi0n~f?, densi~, bonus, or direct ass:stance programs. The inventory includes all units that are eligible to corwert to non-lower income housing uses due to termination of subsidy con~act, mortgage prepayment, or expirL"tg use restrizfiorm. CFI'Y OF TUSTIN - PRELI.¥IINA_R Y D~;L4F£ Ti~£CH'-YI CAL ME MO ~.N D ,.1 HO US~WG ELE,VIE:¥T DECBMBER ~., O01 This page intentiona'fiy left b'tank. CITY OF TUST~Y~: - PRELiMLYARY DiE~FT TECHNICAL MEMOP~,'~-DU",~f 42 HOUSING ELEMENT DECEMBER 200I TABLE 11TM-27 AT RISK FOR CONVITSION IN 2000-2005 UITY OF TUSTIN '.. ......:.:: '" .•:.,T 5•1ae:r TyptJl.enyth of F. _... _ •.+IL i'aal: :. ::.;�?,;_ .. ':.�, �-. '_ � 1'uaaiu c ;ardei�s (;oldrich ctr Kest 221(1))(4) 100 40 yr I.oarr Owner: 17 101 # of Afforclabilily Farliest Tenant al 8% Dale Project Dame, Nance, •1•usliu, c"A 92680 Culver l..ily, CA Seclion 8 Colillols Potential Type Built 213 2ol-20W 1 90230 Address Address, Type(s) of f.Ov,t Contracts (including Conversion # of (i.e., lilderly, Iledruour (if lucolne (incl. zip) Tel. # Assistame (if a i rlic_) Sec. 8) Dale(s) Units family) Mix known) (;roup '.. ......:.:: '" .•:.,T 5•1ae:r F. _... _ •.+IL i'aal: :. ::.;�?,;_ .. ':.�, �-. '_ � 1'uaaiu c ;ardei�s (;oldrich ctr Kest 221(1))(4) 100 40 yr I.oarr 17 101 rr Elderly lot t bd ,fir: �...-c•' ,_� . 1979 IOU very low 2•i:+ F. 0(h 5150 Clverl.ncd Ave. al 8% •1•usliu, c"A 92680 Culver l..ily, CA 213 2ol-20W 1 90230 Section 8 _- - - - July 2(1(X) I(1(l l ,;muec: r ompiehr•r sive Affordable HousingShalol;y 2000 -• 2010 (,T1T' OF 7VS7:);V PRE'LIPr1111 ARY HOUSING ELL;MI NT 1>l�:ll 1'7;sC. lltyiC'/1L JWEIIUh'ANDUAI -1:1 1.)1�;(:1_r;M.f_il_s12 ZUU1 Tustin (;Clens I (.;oldrich R Kest I 11111)57.1 (1))(•�) - - 101 1?L{E -IV 101 I-bl. 1979 (.good E. 6111 I :5150 OVE'dand 'Section 8 7/ 13/(XI I Pustirl, CA92631) I Ave. 213-'2.04-20,5(1 Oliver C'i(y, -90230 - Rancho AlinaI Tlw lrvilIC IL 0. — C.'ablumia Stalewide Income May 15, 69 Fanlily 8 I.-br 1987 !{xrlr{lent 1x300 Palkcc•rltcr 550 Irvine Or. Dr. C:oninnulity restricted. No 202`; 4) 7. -ht. 7'uslin, (.:A 92680 P.O. Box I DvVt,1 !plllc,ll tent Ieslrirtions lJ_;i-hr Niewlimt Beach, Aulllurity 1998-A Bond ("A I'Illalncrllli Fable I]TM-28 _ Rancho Maderas -- The Irvine ('o-- — ASSISTED HOUSING INVENTORY 1:1408 1 Icrilage Way 55U Irvine Car. 1)r. Community I'usLin, CA 92680 P.O. Box I Type/Lefigth of Earliest Newport Beach, 'Tenant CA l inaurint� Owner: I Affordability Potential California Statewide Type 550 Irvine C'lr. 1)r. T)afe 'I uslin, CA 92680 Project Name, I Name, 7:50-;1868 Controls Conver- 1�:l1 (i.e., f'utancin�, Built 92660 9959 Address Address, Type(s) of Gov't (includiog Sion It of filderly, Bedroom (if Condition. incl •ri 11 Tel. It Assistance Sec. 8) Date(s) Units family) Mix known) (if known Tustin (;Clens I (.;oldrich R Kest I 11111)57.1 (1))(•�) - - 101 1?L{E -IV 101 I-bl. 1979 (.good E. 6111 I :5150 OVE'dand 'Section 8 7/ 13/(XI I Pustirl, CA92631) I Ave. 213-'2.04-20,5(1 Oliver C'i(y, -90230 - Rancho AlinaI Tlw lrvilIC IL 0. — C.'ablumia Stalewide Income May 15, 69 Fanlily 8 I.-br 1987 !{xrlr{lent 1x300 Palkcc•rltcr 550 Irvine Or. Dr. C:oninnulity restricted. No 202`; 4) 7. -ht. 7'uslin, (.:A 92680 P.O. Box I DvVt,1 !plllc,ll tent Ieslrirtions lJ_;i-hr Niewlimt Beach, Aulllurity 1998-A Bond ("A I'Illalncrllli Income reslricLed. No rent rest Iit lion:: Income iestricted. No rent rEsllictions 4,1 May 15, 154 - - 7(175 i May 15, - -- 5l- 2025 l�anlily-� - 1(11 -hr 44 i :, --- - 13. I;r . . 44 2-b, 1988 I{xcE'llent _-1988 � . lixc•eldi tlt HOUSING I I,9MENT DECEMBER 200.1 92660-91959 _ Rancho Maderas -- The Irvine ('o-- — C'ali(unria `itrilewi�l� 1:1408 1 Icrilage Way 55U Irvine Car. 1)r. Community I'usLin, CA 92680 P.O. Box I 1)evelopluenl 7:3O-3700 Newport Beach, Aut}lority 1998--A Bond CA l inaurint� 92660-9959 — Rancho Tierra. — The Irvine Co. California Statewide 13202 Mylurd Rd. 550 Irvine C'lr. 1)r. Community 'I uslin, CA 92680 P.O. Box 1 Uevelopulent 7:50-;1868 Newport Beach, Aullurrity 1998-A lion.! 1�:l1 f'utancin�, 92660 9959 ` (_:1`I'y ()11'71JS771V— l-IllELIMINAR"Y DRA1,T 1 EX.TIMCAL MEMORANDUM Income reslricLed. No rent rest Iit lion:: Income iestricted. No rent rEsllictions 4,1 May 15, 154 - - 7(175 i May 15, - -- 5l- 2025 l�anlily-� - 1(11 -hr 44 i :, --- - 13. I;r . . 44 2-b, 1988 I{xcE'llent _-1988 � . lixc•eldi tlt HOUSING I I,9MENT DECEMBER 200.1 (-711Y OPTUS77N -- i ..MPLIMINARY 11UU.SlIV(i F%I,EMF,1V1' 1.)lc'l11�"1' 7T:.TI�VIC111..11?L1b1U1�1�NllliIl1 I�i DITCEMBEP 2001 'fable I I•I'M- 213 ASSIST UA.) HOUSING INVENTORY I'vpc/Length of Earliest Tenant l)wner: I Affordability I'olential I I.yP` I !late Project Name, Name, i Controls Conver- (i.c•., Built Address Address, L'ypc•(s) of Gov't (including; Sion # Of I 1?Iderly, liedroon( (if Condition (incl. zip) Tel. FF Assistance tier. 8) Vale(s) Units I Fan,il y) Mix known) (if known) A:•.:.:• - .,. ..._. _ . a 11-: ...... -... =. i"1-u• � ' :-- _ — _. – - fs....:r Tustin Glove I 'l'r;irl Ir1413 Redevelopment I )UAr N/A 21 1-1 a,uily 21. 3br - N/A Very C;oocl fl Agency Ambrose Lane l rarL 15/07 Redevelo ,eu•nl DDAI N/A 8 Fa,nily 8-;ibr N/A New Ageru�y Orange C'ard(,ns Westch(•sler lark, Redevelop lie. Iit locorne 5/2078 1!iU Family - 17 1111- N/A Guud -- 1602 Nisson Rd, L.T. Agency resiricted. No da-'Lhr fustic, (_A 92780 rrnl restrictions I 40-3111- 0{3111- Iilin,l,tollStIl,are I huliptoll StIllare ! Fairfield Redevelolnoenl lnronu' l[1/21111 210 Fumily' t'24-1b,- 1909 ;- C-00d 10 331 r?vIcFadd(,n Avv. Residential Corp. Al;ency restricted. No Tustin, CA 92'i80 rent resl,ictiuns I Flanders Poinic Tustin Affordable Redevc•IogMW[ I Income I0/2029 49 Fanlil - y � — 41-� I,1- `.._.. - I Ibb- ----- -- - 15520Tuslin Village llousinl;('orl,. Agency restricled. No 7-2-br Way' rent restrictions'l'uslin, I C A 92'/80 711 - - TOI'AI. N/A - Not available• IDDA - Disposili(m:(nd Develoinnrnl Ag,e•euu•nl ;s±U,('e: (.(,111 ,1('ileitrAve I Iousin' Afl(:rltabi&L'.`ilral(• ,y 2000 10 (-711Y OPTUS77N -- i ..MPLIMINARY 11UU.SlIV(i F%I,EMF,1V1' 1.)lc'l11�"1' 7T:.TI�VIC111..11?L1b1U1�1�NllliIl1 I�i DITCEMBEP 2001 Cost of Replacement/Acquisition and Rehabilitation Analysis: This section analyzes and compares the costs of acquirLng "at risk" proiec~ versus the cost of building replacement units, should the projects convert a_nd be lost as low-income housLv, g. L-~ the Comprehensive AHordab!e Housing Strateg}., 2000-2010, two different alternaEves in addressing "at risk" units were evaluated, including replacement oi existing units by meav~ of ne~-ly constructed m"uits, and acquiring and rehabtii~at~ng units. The replacement of lost "assisted" units wotdd cost 5125,883 per ApplyLng this figure to all four projects, replacing ail 100 assisted units would cost a?proximately 512,588,300. .~dtematively, should these "at risk" un/ts be acouh'ed and rehabilitated, the per unit cest would be less at 5100,777 per unit. Accordingly, the acquisition and rehab~/itation all 100 units would cost approxtmately $10,077,700. 'Fne costs associated the re.vlacement/acquisit/on/rehabiiitat~on are detailed in Table HTM-29. CITY OF TUSTIN- PRr~LIMI:%i~RY Dt~4_~F TrZCHNICAL ~'JEMORA!'[D. L~%f · 4 7 I¥O O-S'_, ?~t G ELE_~I£2~~ ? DEC~.¥fBER --'2 O01 TABLE HTM-29 COST OF REPLACING AIWD ACQUISITION/REHABILITATION OF ASSISTED UNITS i ' ConstmctionfReplacement (60 iAcq~isitlon/~ehab. =Lazg~ Cost Items I Units £or Seniors) : Proiect fSO Units) Total Net Souare Feet I 37,100 65.600 Ratio Net/Gross SF 85% Tom'. Gross So. Pt. Bu.ildmz Area Land and Building, Acauisition 43.647 85% 77,176 ~967,742 55,200,000 Relocation Costs D~o]/bon Cost~ Off-Site lmvrovements~ 9C,00C Site im=rovemen~ 720,000 Unit Construction Hard Costs: 2,527,882 I 77!.765 H~d Cost Contin.~enm' Arch./EnS..,' Cons. Supervision Local Permits and Fees 259,835 61,741 i 202.Z31 , 3C.8W. City Bldg Pe,--rrJrs.~ 150,000 20-3.000 Sewer, Water, Utilities~ ! 663,232 School Fees , Aim Survey 3,009 Euviroru'nenta! Phase i and :I-' 30,0'32 40,093 Softs 'i'estin~ 10,0-30 10.003 Cons='uction ~n .~ees 58,707 79,i 82 Permanent Loan Fees 9!,068 129,044 Construction," 7~ase-Un interest 500,952 357.061 Prov~w Insurance 12,639 3.859 Prever~' T~es Dunnb~ C~.Tac~on Conszruction Loan T:fle and ClcsL,'.g, Avvrmsal Fees ! 0,0,D9 5.000 15,0,,')0 25,0O0 i 0009 10.OO,9 Real ~mte Lecai 50.000 50,~%~0 Or~nizat~onai 301[)00 l 0.0 ~r~ C~chon M~{er 75.000 Develovm~t r Bond Il Fmm~dZ A dy. 25.~ 25.&33 Market Sm~v 15,0~ Pest-Cens~cfion Au dit M a rkev_n g," Lease-un.' Start-'-~v Fu,--rdture/Equipment Soft Cost Conv_,n~en~' 1OO,00C 60,000 50,0&'3. 50,(k")0 22.282 13,443 Overad.n~ Reserve 99,C00 144.000 _Operating Deficit Guarantee Fee j Develovment/Adn~n. Fee 755,296 /o'.~! Proiect Cos,, 57,552,961 Cost Per Unit I $125,883 ~Dff-site izr. provemenrs eslamared at $I ,590, ',.wd t. :includes corranurd~:' room., cests, wi:h a 2a'~O Sc. Ft. room. for '.he ~ :~e.,-mit fees esbmated at $2,590:.'mn.iL ~ No fee/or rehab~:at~or. Frojecis. s Based on $500.".a~t cost. 5curca: ~.m vr~h~mv* Al/or 4mb]. H~u~ing St.~ ,.r~ y 2'30~. 806,218 S8,062,184 Sl~,~ senior protcb.,pe. CfTY OF TUSTL¥ - PRELIMIA:tiRY DRAPT TECHNICAL MEMORAfVDbZ'I 48 f-iOLrSIA"G ELE1Vf__ENT DECEMBER ~001 Local Rental Subsidy. An ~ptlon for prese~'ation of at-risk ru-fit~ assisted by either project based Section 8 fiands and/or bond financing would be a local rental subsidy, to residents. Tkis option could be used to retain the affordable status o£ the ;inks, bv providing assistance to residents when their affordable u~ts convert to market rate. Rent subsidies using state, local (Redevelopment Agency, the use of HOME flmds, or other banding sources) cam be used to maintain the affordabfli~, of these at-risk units. Rent subsidies can be s~ructured to mirror the S~cfion 8 program.. There are several funding sources that could be used to provide subsidies to residents. Under the project based Section 8 program, H-L:D pays owners tlne difference between what tenant~ can pay (defined as 30% of household income) and what HUD and the iocal Housing AuthoriW esiimate to be Fair Market Rent (FMRj on the unit. Section S assistance is only available to veto' low-income households earning less than 50% of the Coun.~' median income. The !999 HUD median income in Orange CourtS' is S68,300. Zne anaivsis also ass-~-nes uhe average very iow-income household has an actual income of 50 % of the Count~, median income, adjusted for household size. 7-ne cost of Froviding subsidies for al! 100 a*.-rtsk units with potential to expire during fl~e planning period te maintain subsidized rents assumes that none of ~e at-risk unit~ are preserved..The cost of .providing subsidies is based on a comparison between fair rnarket rents (FMR) and rents that are affordable -"or low and ver}: iow- income families. Affordabfiitv is degreed as rents that do not exceed 30% of a household's monthly income. The 1999 FMRs for Orange CormS', which encompasses the Ci~- of Tusfin, are shown iv. Table HTM-30. TABLE HTM-30 1999 FAIR MARKET VALUE - ORANGE COUNTY Efficien?* I I Bedroom I 2 Bedroom I 3 Bedroom I 4 Bedroom S645 i $704, 58~ , 'Efficiency - 5~clio Aparh'nent ?MRs inziude u~.%.' cos~ Source: Federa! Re!~ster, Vol. 59, #~,87. Rules and ReSula,'4ons 51,212 ; $],349 A comparison of Fair _Market Rents with rents affordable to both !ow income and very low-income households indicates that a subsidy program, wouJd only apply to very ;ow-Lncome households. Tl-ds is CITY OF TUSTIN- PRELIMINARY DP,.AFT TECHNICAL MEMOP,.ANDUM 49 HOUSING ELE.~(jENT DECEMBER 2 O0 ! due to the high Lncome levels occurring in Orange Count', which create higher income limits for low and ye.w-low income households. As shown, Fair Market Rents are considered to be theoretically within the range of affordability for low-income households. Based on 1999 HCD income data for Orange Cour~t),, affordable rents for low income households would theoretically be a?proximateiy S956 for a two person household in a one bedroom unit, and $1,195 for a four person household in a two or three bedroom unit. These numbers assume that families occupy the u_nits and would be adjusted slightly for smaller or lm'ger households in the same unit size. Under fi'~at scenario, based on the 1999 income data, maximum affordabie rent a ~vo-person low income household can theoretically afford still exceeds the FMR for a two bedroom Table H2'Z,I-30 shows FMRs iv. the area for two bedroom and smaller uzxtts are well below these levels. AH 100 of the units in Tustin Gardens are offered to very low-income households and therefore are included in the subsidy analysis. Very low-income households earn less than 50% of medlar, income. Based on 1999 HUD income data for Orange Count),, affordable rents for very low income households would be approxLmately S597 for a sep~or one bedroom, S682 for a famih? one bedroom, $~54 for a ~,o bedroom, and S922 for a th_tee bedroom. To simplify t2ne analysis, ~e one bedroom -anits at-risk in Tustin Gardens (100 one-bedroom u_nits) are assumed to be senior units and comprised of one-person households. Unit FMR Rent Senior I Bedroom $704 S597 I Bedroom $704 $682 2 Bedroom 5871 S854 TOTAL : Affordable rent include~ ed1 utilities .qou~e: 199~ HUD income Lim:'ts for Ora.n? County. TABLE HTM-31 COST OF PROVIDING RENTAL SUBSIDY FOR VERY LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS Affordable ! No. I Total i Units ! Difference : Monthly i Annual j ]00 ~ 5107 510.700 I 5~28,400 ] 0 I 522 I $0 , $0 I 0 ' S17 : 50 '. $0 I $10,700 · $128,400 The costs of providing a rental subsidy for all 100 at-risk units affordable to very iow income households is shown in "fable HTA4-3! CiTY OF TUSTIN- PRELff~fIA:4RY DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 5O HO USI:Y O. ELE.rffEA'T DECEMBER 2001 to be approximately 510,700 per month and $128,400 amual~y. Actual subsidies required would vary from tlnis estimate, as some households earn below the assumed 50% of the Coun5: median and therefore require 5figher subsidies, while other households rna>' be comprised of a different number of persons and hherefoze, t~he assumed baseline affordable rent may be higher or lower, depending on household size. CITY OF Tr. ISTIN - PRF. LIMLYARY DRAF£ T~C_~YICAi. 3(EAfO,.~ANDrjM 51 This page intentional'ty 'te/t blank. C1TY OF TUSTIN- PRkLI?'~"~I.¥ARY DRAFF TECHNICAL MEMOP~-:¥DUAf 52 HOUSIIVG ELE,¥fENT DECBMBER ~ 001 CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT, IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF HOUSING Tl~s ~apter examines the various cons2aints to housing development in :ustin. These include governmental constraints and non-governmomtal constraints GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Sections 65583(a)(4) of the Government Code reomre the Housing Element to include an analvs'~s of potentiaJ and act-ual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement or development of housing for ail income levels. The following areA, sis fulfills this requirement. Land Use Controls The State Pianv&ng and Zoning Law (Sec. 65860) requires consistency of t. he zoning ordhnances with the General Plan. ?alter comvlefion of the General P.:an update, t2~e Ci~' will analyze and reconcile any la.nd use/zoning incons:stencies. The existing Land Use Element of ':.he General Plan establishes single-family, mulPi-family and plan_ned residen~al dish'icts. The zoning ordinance is consistent with the Land Use Element in that areas of the Ci~, are designated for Si,ng.'e- Farrd2y, Multi-Family, m~d Planned Commurd ,W dis~icts. ~'m a.nah'sis of residential development potential will be provided in the Housing Element. As shown ~ Table HTM-32, the City's exis~ng General Plan allows a range of resident-iai densities, from a range of I - 7 dwel"2ng units per acre in ~.e Low Densitx' Residential designation up to 25 dweli'.'ng up. its per acre in the High Densit-v Residential designation, wkich corresponds to the R-3 .Multiple Family Residential District in the Zoning Code. Up to 10 u_nits per net acre are permitted in the ~'L~P ..MobEe home Park District. The Zord.ng Code standards M tee residential zones establish a front yard setback requirement of a range bec'eon 15 and 20 feet, tZe s".de yard setback recuirement is 5 feet for interior side yards and 10 feet for corner lots, and the rear yard setback requirement ranges between 5 and 25 feet. CJTY OF TUSTIA'- PRELL~,fI~16RY DRAFT T~CHNICAL M..E/ffORA.,YDL%f $3 HOUSI.~'O DECBMBER 2 00.~ ' Designation Low Densi.? ResidenEal TABLE HTM-32 GENERAL PLAN RESIDENTIAL LA.ND USE CATEGORIES CITY OF TUSTIN Effective Dwelling } Unit per i Density, Description Acrea~,e ', Range Detached sing]e-£amfiy dwellings 5.61 1-7 Medmm Multi-family dwellings including !5.0 8-15 Density duplex, condominiums, townhomes, Residential and avartmenhs. High Densig, Multi-family dwellings including 2L53 !5-25 Residential duplex, condominiums, townhomes, and apartments. Mobile Home Mobilehomes 6.31 ~.-10 Park Planning Low, medium, and high-densi.':y ' '- See Cormmun!~- residential development~, i footnote. '- Maximu.m density Ln dwelling tm~rs p~ nde is prescribed b)' L-~chvidual Planned Co..'n_m--'.~,? Documents. Ef,~tive dwelhng uni~ per acre £or iow, me",ii,.uru and ]'.'.'gl', densig' residential are 4.49, I1.8, and 17.39, re~p~fively. Source: City o.~ TustLn, Land Use Elemen% 1994. According to the General Plan build-out table ?fable LU-3) Ln the Land Use Element, a total of 29,623 d%~-ePliv, g u_nits are antidpated ~-itl ~un the City Emits. The Department of Finance (DOF) reports 24,531 dwe -Lling units have been constructed (as of ~anuary 1999I) within the Cit~'. Affordabilit~' can be determiued by permitted de.nsi~, of development According to ',_he State Housing and Community Develovment Deoartment, affordabilitv standards are as follow: Very-Low income - minimum 25 units per acre Low-Income- minimum of 18 u_nits per acre Moderate income- mLnLmum 8 ,.mits per acre ~e General Plm'~ Land Use Element's policy plan provides goals for future land development within tlne City. ~'~ese goals and polities are reflections of the direcEon and images tlne Cig' seeks for the future. The goals and policies include: C£!'Y OF TUSTIN - PRELIMIA"ARY DRAFT TECH.~'ICAL MEMO~Z4:¥DUM 54 HOUSING ELEMENT DECEMBER 2001 ° Achieve balanced deveIopment; Ensure that compatible and complementary develovrnent OCCLLrs; Revitalize older commercial, indus~iaI, and residen.Sal development; Promote economic expansion and diversification; Coordinate development with ~e provision of adequate pubhc £acili~es and se_rvices; Strengthen the development character and .mixture of uses in the Old Town/First Street area; and Promote an integrated business park character for the Pacific Center East area. Some suggest that mw-mcom~ housing could be deveioved in the absence of land use controls related to density', it is true that ~e reduction or absence of land area requirements per housing units would result in lower land costs per unit, ff ali factors were constant. However, an analysis of development costs shows that the value of the !and is related to its potential yield. For examp]e, ax,, acre of land ~,at was authorized for four (4) dwellh~g units w~ be priced at a lower value than an acre o£ land authorized for six (6) dwelling units. '~e same analog3.' holds for muiti-familv sites whereby the !and costs are related d!recfiv to the potential yfeld in ~erms of unit densit-v. In the absence of aFDi~arv density standards of one and four acre lots, land use density controls are not accredited with being a const-rai.nt upon the development of iow- and moderate-income housing. Tustin has a high percentage of multi-family unfts where only 30.6% of the housing stock is devoted to singIe-fan"Zy detached units and 66.6% te attached and multi-fan4Iy units. Current land use controls restrict development 'in sJngle-farnily residential zones to one dwelling unit on parcels Jess than 10,000 square feet in the E-4 zone and parcels !ess fi~an 7,200 square feet Ln th::. R-1 zone. However, ~e Planned Commurdtv DistTict has authorized res~dentia! subdivisions with single-fan,ily lots of less than 5,000 square feet, which has significantly increased de,-ts!t},, potential to approxkmately 8-13 m'Jts per acre. C!TY 0£ TU."ST'IA'- ., 'R...,LI"~.Iz~,Ad,. Y D,'?AFT '?~CI.'iNrC.4L MEMORANDUM HOUSING E£E2£~KT DBCEMBER 2 O0 ~ Within the multi-farrdlj, district (R-3), a 35 foot height limitation and maximum 65 % lot coverage precludes the development of high-rise housing projects. In the interest of protecting adjoining single-famfi}' lot owners, multi-famih? structures above 20 feet in height require a conditional use ~ermit when the struct~res are witl~n 150 feet of single-fa,mily residentially zoned lots. ¥%rnile these height limits place some restrictions on housing development, these limits are designed to maintaLn compafibili .t.v o£ land use inteP, si5' and are commonly used by local governments as a development too! to ~"ar~her this ideal. Projects are also able to take advantage of the Planned Community D~trict application process where special considerations are needed. Table HT. M-33 is a sum_mary of the City's residential zonirtg regu]afiorts. CITY OF TO~TIA-- PRELIMhYARY DRA 'I:'T TE, CHArlCAL ME, MORAArDUM 56 HOUSLA:G ELEMENT DECEMBER 2001 TABU.-.' IFFNI-33 'SUNINJARY OF RLSIDENTIAL ZONIM.; RE.G.ULATIONS CITY OUTUSTIN Zoning I'viiiihimin Lot Arca 1 Lot Coverage 1311i I d i I Ig I I leighl 1 Foot( Yard 111(erior Side Yard Side Yard Rear Yard R- A 1"'r!'ifirldial Agrit uRund 7,200 ::q air /M 40 prif-rul 1 30 fet-I I 20 feel 5fict 5fie(:t, bur no less than 1,000 [)islricl I feel clear and unobrIr'ucLrd on --o o/?0I spot r 4 Re. -;nb,uhal LIlate 10,000 Ifluare 40 perccid m Ifa 1-,."t /of 10% (!f1ol 20 percent lot depill rvidth �Ie I amily Rrsidrutial I Sin1401 7,200squarr.ft,el peicei I 3u fire 1 20 /�.vl luftel 5ftet, but no less Mutt Oish Ict feel clear and unobtanicifq on -2 tear 1/3 iy'lol. Ouplex Ii,sid-c—nlial, L-Jis-II-icl 3,5,00 square Irel 407"wif-rul" 'S fte't R2. Oupha Residential Oislin. 3,500squate .1co 50 17cl celit 10fi,el 1( , )fi.el (single struclute) )1e V imnly ResuIVIIIIIII 3 Multiple 5 pen-nd 35 ftrlfi I0ftrI Iv/err I 'is I I i E I R. 4 Sliburhm ResitientIfil 2.,; to? ics (;I- 2U .(.l bfi-el 10firel 25 lert I )istricl Mm I Mol'Ilehon", Park District MilliIIII-17115 acn. sile A5 prr(�rnl, �it) kf, t Trailry-park none. I fi)r mobilchome park. I Individual lot 5 fi,cl Tifivel ltailcrslirdl not (measure from cill,l) exceed 10% of lolai I I ;11-, , """'e f space.; III mobde houlf, 11114-h f.1 ch ldrd). park. 14) 1,11111III'd M.-I'vion"neld I "f) ve To 1).f, I "1b be detei mined TO be '( yr ,, I 1"n br determined Oistrict drIermilled uff-letmined with adoplioli r p- determined f1clermilled with 11floplJoll (y, P.J.) I )islrii:t Tvillf Ivith 1) OISIrict Ivilli wills advIllion uJ adoption cy, [it loplion of adoption of P-1) l' --L) I'D I hsIrld P -D Oishirl iiy (.)i I ii.-;rii I, t_w()ti(,, jqA4i. C71TY UPTU.STIN -- PRELIMINARY 1100811R, JS%,j!-,MJ;,jvj, DRAF7'TEC.71 INIC'Al, MEMORANDUM 57'1 Dls'(_T,11413E'R 2001 77iis pi�,�r. i.nientio ball y 1(fl blank. C71TY Ula TUS'1'IN — PRT. UMINARY HOUSING ELEMENT DRAFT TEC:IINICAL a1 EM(.)liANDUM 58 DE(:'1?iVlf3ER 2001 Building Codes As requ-Lred by State law, the Ci~, of Tustin has adopted the "1997 Uniform Builc~ing Code" and the "1997 Un/form Mechar,.ical Code" published bv the international Conference of Building Officials. Other codes adopted by the Cig, include the 1997 Uniform Plumbing Code and the 1996 Electrical Code. While the codes are inten2ed to protect t_he pubhc from unsafe conditions the)' result in m~ increase in the cost of housing in various ways. The codes establish specificatior_~ for buiidLng materials and incorporate seis~.ic safetx.' standards that add to COP~tT'dCtiOn COSTS. The technical details of constract-ion, requirements for state licensed contractors to perform the work, plan check, permit processLng and f/eld inspections all contribute to the increased cost of housing, in genera/, in states and count/es where building codes have not been adopted, the cost of housing is !ess than corer>arable housing costs in California. Where individuals are permitted to consLruct sh.alter to their own specff/cations a_nd within the FL_mits of their individual constr,achon skills, there will be a much greater proport/or, of low- income housing ax'affable than in those areas which adopt a_nd enforce mfiforrn building codes. It is noted, however, in t~aose areas that have not adopted and evdorced building --odes, the Iow-cost housing has resulted in the creation of undesirable conditSons that t~[reaten the healCn a_nd safety of the residents. Unquestionably, building codes are a goverranental constraint to the cons~uct/on of iow-income housing. The ouestion to be resolved is the conflicting values between health and safe~' and iow-cost shelter. in 1988, the Ciw of Tustin adopted the State ~istoric Code as required by State law. The State Historic Code requires relaxation of Uniform Buiiding Code reouirements for historic s.,~ructures. This will reduce rehabilitation costs and may ~_rrcourage rehabilitahon of housing units which have historic value and preserve much needed housing u_nits in ~e Old Town .~rea. Site Improvements The restricted and bruited abi!itv to tax properS: in an amount equal to ~e cost of sen, ices and public improvements has shifted site nrtprovement costs to the developer who passes them on to the housing cop~sumer. The philoso?hy is expressed that no new development should h~,.pose a f"nancial liability' upon the exist/ng CFF Y 0 ? TUSTI..¥ - PREL!ML\:4R Y DR,4~;'2' i'F, CI-INIC.~-r-, M£MOP~CYD[ ~9 HO L~LYG ELE,VI.E, NT D£CE, MBER 2 O01 community residents. The voters have expressed this conviction through the adoption of growth control measures and Proposition 13. .An increased awareness of environmental amenities creates a public demand for improvements of not only the building site but o£ the surrounding environment which consists of drainage charmeIs, landscaped parkways, arterial roads to serve the area, recreation fac~ties, preservation of oven space, school facilities, and recreation amenities, all of wkich add to the cost of housing. Site development standards and requirements in the City o£ Tustin inciude clea~ug and grading the land; dedication and imvrovement of vublic fight-of-way to include pavLng, curbs and gu~ers, side,va!ks, drainage, street trees, streeflights and fire hydrant. On- site imvrovements include the under grounding of cable ~'IA.~, w'ater, sewer, gas, telephone and electric utilities. Subdivisions and rnul~- family deveiopments are required to provide landscaping, drai_r, age, perimeter walls, covered parking, landscaping, irrigation systems, and to submit materials and project design for review to assure arckitectura! compatibili~,. Multi-family structures of 20 urdts or more are required to provide housing and parking acconunodations for the disabled pursuant to State law. The review process is used ~o facilitate the land use and develo?ment compafibilit}.: objectives of the City and provide develovers the opportuni ,ty to explore project a~te~-natives, which could decrease development costs in ~e long run by avoiding costly rv~mkes. in the development of subdivisions, the developer is required to dedicate and improve roadways to serve ~e area; to provide or improve area drainage channels; to exte~nd water, sewer and other utilities to ~e site; to dedicate land or pay iv..-lieu fees for parks and open space for private use in multiple-family proiects; and to dedicate land or pay in-lieu fees for public fadiities such as schools and fire stations. Developers are allowed to construct private stree%s or to modify street standards to reduce construction cests, and this encourages and will encourage affordabilit},' of housing units in East Tustin and .MC.~$ Tusth~. Installation of private streets or on-site improvements may be authorized in other areas to encourage a~fordable development. An additional cost of site development results from the installation of noise attenuation devices a.nd materials as required by State :aw. Perimeter walls and/or berg-rs are required for subdivisions to reduce the noise levels from external surface sources such as railroads, freeways and arterial highways for s".tes that are located wiffrin 65 dB (CNEL) .Noise Leve!s. Some of CiTY OF TUSTL¥- PR.tELIMINARY DtL4FT TECH,¥ICAL MEMORAI~rDUM HO O~,.~'G ELEME.NT DECEMBER .,,~ 001 these costs can be reduced by the use of housLng set-aside funds in City Redevelopment areas and special State and Federal grant funds to produce low- and mode~ate-'tdcome housing units. Significant public facilities will be needed to accorrumodate tlne proposed housing development at MCAS Tustin. According to the MCAS Tustin Reuse Pla.n/Specific Plan, water, sewer, storm drainage, electrical, natural gas, and telephone and cable backbone systems that serve future housing sites will need to be constructed. All housing sites will also have to pay ti.e~ proportionate share for new backbone utilities, roads, and traffic improvements required m conjunction with development of the MCAS Tustin site and as mitigation for the adopted Final .Joint EnvL-orumental Impact Statement/~nvironmental Impact Report for the Disoosal and Reuse of MCA~Tustin. The constraints upon the construction of ]ow-income housing due to the cost of site improvements are a question of values. Is ~.ere a justification for infrastructure improvements and environmental control requirements that create communi~, amenities beyond the bare mir&hum necessary to protect tlne basic health, safeW and general welfare? Housing could be developed without the necessi~' of paved s~eets, but neither HUD nor vrivate financial inst'tutions would f~mance such deve]opments. Additionally, Federal and regional air quali5, standards would preclude such developments. It is contended that equity requires new developments to pay the cost of site improvements in direct proportion to the benefits received; however, ti,er should not be required to bear a~ of the cost of new comm, uni%,-wide facilities. If it is acknowledged that new developments should pay the costs of site improvemea~ts, fl~e cha!ienge is one of reducing these costs [trough more cost-effective site planning or use of housing set-aside funds for t2~ose projects witlnin redevelopment areas, or special State and Federal grant .'.'kinds. Fees and Exactions By law, the Cit}"s building and development fees are restricted to fl~e costs of performing the sen,ices. The building and planning fee schedules ef the C'.'t,' of 7usffn were last revised in 1999. These fees skill remain considerably below those of surroundkng corrm-.unities in the Count},,. The City's fee schedule is provided in Table HTM-34, which illustrates the fees and exactions that may be assessed to a CITY O? TUSTIA" - PRELIMI:\:AR?' DRA ,?I' TF__,CHNICAL MEMOFLi.¥DD]¥I 6i HOUSING ELEt~£.E, ArT D~CEMBF_,R 2 O0 2 residential building development project in comparison to other nearby cornm~nities. These fees may be waived by the Ciw Council for projects where extraordinary benefits are derived such as low- income housing projects, but are typically required to offset City expenses. As noted, fees are substantially lower than those charged by other cities and the Co-any of Orange. l~ne fee schedule adopted by tlne Cit-y of Tusfin has a minkm, al impact upon the cost of housing within the Cia'. Zne argument can be made that the cost of inspecting and serving new developments exceeds fine fees and revenues that are exacted for these developments. Tl~s is iustified as a public service to protect the public health, safe ,fy and welfare of the future inhabitants and is partially borne by the general revenues of the Ci~,. Additional revenue sources are increasingly important since the passing of Proposition !3. Recognizing that hous/ng for the elderly and iow-income families is a con'rmurdt}.? objective, the park land dedication ordLnance vrovides +_he option to the Council to waive these fees for qualif?'~g proiects. The might also consider exploring fast-~acking (preferentia] sc~heduling) or fee waivers for critical projects such as those providing affordable housing or housing wkich addresses special housing needs. CITY OF TUSTIN- PREMML'~t4RY DF~4PT TECHNICAL MEMORAA'DUM HO G ~'I:~ 0 E, LEME.r~ T DECF~MBER ~001 TABLE HTM-34 COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMF~'T FEE SU~,IARY ~ Fee Cnar~es Piannin~; Fees [ Tusfin Anaheim Costa Mesa Environmental Inkial Determina~on $95 5430 N .' A 5125 5295 N,'A Negative Dec]arafion ~ Processmg-minor EIR Processk'~.F.-rrmior Plannin~ GmerM Pl.n Amenciment N/A $2,800 [ STS/hr time and Cormul~.nt cost . $~,1~ de'o - ~aj..000 , mater-ialu - 10% : hourly rare $985 ' $2.350 + $25/ac i after l'; acre $45../~.w.'t i $2,106 dep- hourh' rate Zcne .~n. ange $950 6940 -~ $24/'ac $20,,"urtit ~ $885 -$10.,"ac after !'~ acre S:,C02 - Tentative Tract Map ff'.,295 $785 - 527./k)t $:3,,'u--~t i SZS.,'a: Des!l~t Review 6985 N ,.'A N/A S28C Planned Deveiooment Review N ,' A N,.' A $48 /-.mit N ,' A Conditioratl Use Permits and N/A $660 + $75/code N/'A N ' a Varim-.ces waiv~ ~- $27,.."~cre f>5/aares! En~neering, & Subdivision Final Tract .\Cap $43./u.~: ; $380 + S96/kr .T'~rovi deal by. Sv .--.-~'- ' - "~2,.''nr i County W-let Pi',,m Check N.,." A $54-$i 'I 2."hr ~S'.. 06,." m-J t ' $64/hr $296.9:/'~'nit [ $96/hr 5to..rmdram Plan Check $'100-$215/m'dt S54-6112,.'hr Street Plan Check $296.91/unit ! $64/~ $5-;-$112,"'r,r Surface Drama~.e Plan Check N.'A I N/A N.'A N."A Grading Plan Check I 5754/a: + N iA I $50/hr N/A 554-5112,.'hr Cavital Facilities & Connections Water (fixture mm'ts; S400/un'.'t : S663 'unit N:'A 515:~ ur.q Sewer (fixture u.nirs) ~o00/unit '. $2.3.&.D/unit S5,000/unlt S,~/urdt Savata.-ion '~srrict .t-tonex N/A , $582/u_n/t N/A Drama ge ~cne k.me ~ee to 5984/mdt S:' ,003/' acre S65C-54,657 vroverW'~ TransFor;a~ov. Corffdor $3.837t- Zone A $2,725,.'urjt 52,626/unit 52,310/~-'?Jt S2,7!5oZone 5 SiFnai Assessment N, A , S88/unit N/A Nm' A Park PadUties Fak- Market \:clue S4,316.83.,'unir 55,481.72/'twat $2,3!0 of land School Facilities S5,125 ,: ,.mit $7,012/unit $4,600/'.:_nit 55,125 / unit Tus.'in, Santa Ama, and I:~,kne (S2.05/5'Y) Unil:ied School District Oran? Count,. ' Sanitation Ii~skict $2.165/m~t N' "A N,'A N ,"A : Compazarive fees based c.n hypotheUca110 acre subdivision of 50 detached uruts at pe."xv2~ed denstq:' o55 dwellkng '.wAts per acre. "Dthe: fees" var},' consid.arabiy by iuns.4ie~on and ~re no: mcluded m t?as anah'ms Fx')urcc: Cit'v of Tusti.% =999; Building Indust.-}.' A.~so=iahcn, 2999 Land Develo'om~',t Fee 5u.-%mev for :'range Co'ar. n__', 1999. CH'Y OF TUSTI~r- PRELIMI:YARY DRAFT T~CHArICi4L :~IEMORAZCDUM 63 HOUSING BLE:VIENT DECBMBBR _QOO I Processing and Permit Procedures /-he Ci~, recogrdzes that the myriad of agencies amd permit approvals requ_ired for a development results iv. a time-consuming and expensive process. It is documented that the value of land will double when all necessan,, permits have been obtained for a construction pried. State law establishes maximum time iinfits for proiect approvals and Cia~ policies vrovide for the miv. imum processing time necessary to comply with legal recuirements and review procedures. A standard chart is provided wi~ evem,: design review application that outlines the procedures and requirements for project approvals. The Communi~, Development Department sen'es as the coordinating agency to process development applications for the approval of other in-house departments such as Fire, PoLice, Public Works/Engineering, and Parks and Recrea~on. These departments work together to simultaneously review proiects to ensure a timely response to developers and act as the Citr's Design Rexdew Committee. Pre-application conferences with the CommuniS: Development Devartment provide the developer with infonTmtion related to standards and requirements applicable to the project. For the more complicated development projects in the Special Management Areas, Svecific ?lans provide a standard Design Review Process. Application packages are provided to developers and include the processing chart and covies of pertinent ~ormation such as street nn~.ox.~m,.n, construction standards, subcEvision and landscape requirements that aid developers in the preparation of their pians. .AH projects are vrocessed through plan review in the order of submission. Recognizing that vrofit margins are reduced and risks are increased by processing delays, the Ci~, has assigned priority to plan review and pern~Jt ~ssuance for iow-income housing projects. Adctitionally, contracts for plan check services ?rovide additional staff to process projects in a timely fashion. If a comvlete application is submitted, plans are simultaneously reviewed by all Design Review Commi~ee members and plan checking departments rather than one agency reviewing pimps at a fi*ne. This process a/so pro- vides for a "one-stop" processing system which is required by State law in an efro,t to aid the devmopment process, reduce confusion and minimize development costs. Additionally, for proiects of si~fificant b~.efit to ti:e iow-income corm'aumty, such costs can be CITY OF TUSTL¥- PRt~L£JLVA?. Y DR.'~F'T TECHIVICAL MEMOP. A:¥DU,i~f 64 HOUSING E/.EMEA:T DECEMBER 200I waived by the Ci~' Council or the use of redevelopment set-aside funds can further reduce or eliminate t:hese costs for low-income projects. ' ....... Workload Another govermmental constraint is the number of staff and amount of staff i/me avagable for processing development projects. Since the workload is determined by outside forces (econom}r and market for housing), a shortage of staff time may occm.r during s~ong economic conditions which could lead to increased processing time for development projects. MARKET CONSTRAINTS The avaiiabi2ig' of housing is affected bv file interreiatfomqh.ips within the market place of price, income of buyer, a_nd interest rates. The non-gove.m_mental constraints upon the maintenance, imvrovement or development of housing in the City relate vrLrnarih' to low- and moderat~income families. High-income families have the option of selecting housing accommodations that meet the/: preferences. Since environmental amenities such as h'-'llsides wit?. views and beadn access att, act high-value developments, higk- income families gravitate to the foo~iils mad beach communities. The provision for housing opportunitT to ail ir, come segments is further emphasized iv. the East Tustin development whereby s~ngle-family aXached and detached homes are proposed for moderate- and higher-income households. Additionally, multi-family projects such as apartments and condominiums in ~ast Tust~m are provided for the low- and moderate-income groups. A potentially s:'g-rdfic.cmt cons~aint on housing prices is flae difference be~'een the cost to cons,h-'act 'mits versus ~.e actual price c~,arged tv the buyer. In Orange Count}.', where the market demand for housing is high, the price of units does not necessarily correlate to the cost to build the unit. Therefore, regardless of the decrease in land use a_nd o~er governmental con~rols, the external market ~'?ically drives the cost of housing rather than the cost of coi~3t:ruction driving the price. Fi.na_ncing mr~rest rates can have an impact on ho~smo cos~. Some mortgage ra~ finea~cing is variable ra~e, w~ch offers an iniSal lower ~terest CITY 0.? TUSTI:'V- PRELIMI3iARY DRAFT 7ECHI~fCAL J,[E.:;,IOfL4A'DDTt( ~'OUSIIV G ELEbf. EA'T DECEMBER 2 O© 1 than fixed financing. The ability of lending institutions to raise rates to adjust for inflation will cause existing households to overextend themselves financial!y, and create situations where high financing costs constrain the housing _market. An adctitional obstacle for he first-2me homebuver is the mirthmum dov~m-payment requL-ed by lending insV:tutions. Even if Tustin homebuvers are able to provide a 3 percent down- payment and obtain an 8.5 percent 30-year ]Gan (1Gan rate for FHA or VA guaranteed loans for June 2000), monthly mortgage pa,~anents on median vriced single-family detached homes in the Cit?, place such homes out of the reach of moderate and lower-income households in the City. At a 8.5 percent Lnterest rate, monthly mortgage payments on median priced condmrd_niums and tox~mhouses can place such units out of reach of Tusfin's low and very iow income households (see Tables HTM-23 and HTM-25). The greatest impediment to homeo~mershi?, however, is credit worthiness. According to the Federal Housing Authority, lenders consider a person's debt-to-income ratio, cash ax-affable for downpayment, and credit history, when determining a maxflnum loan amour& Many financial institutions are willing to signfficantiy decrease downpayment requirements and increase loan amom~ts to persons with good credit rating. Persons wi~ poor credit ra~ings may be forced to accept a higher interest rate or a loan amount insufficient to purchase a house. Poor ct'edit rating can be especially damaging to lower-income residents, who have fewer financial resources with wlfich to qualify for a loan. The FHA is generally more flexible than conventional ienders in its qualifying guide2nes and al2ows man)' residents to re-establish a good credit history. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), lending institutions are required to report lending act-ivity by census mac:. Analys~ of available HMDA reports does not i. ndicate documented cases of underserved lower income census tracts in the Ci~'. Profit, Marketing and Overhead Developer profits generally comprise 8 to 12% of the selling price of single-fa:rally homes and slightly lower for condominiums. Ho~ever, in certain areas such as East Tustin where market demand is lfigh in CITY OF TUSTI%' - PR£LN~.fI!¢ARY D~FT TECHIVICAL M~MOP~4NDUM HOUSING ?ELE.r~ENT DEC£MB~_,R .2 0 0 ! comparison to the available housing supply, developers are able to command higher prices and realize greater margins of profit. ~qising marketing and overhead costs have contributed to the :ising costs of housing. Iruflation has spurred much of ~2ne increase in marketing and overhead. Intense competition arnong developers has necessitated more ad-verfising, more glamorous mode! homes and more expensive marketing strateg/es to a~-Jact buyers. The factor having ~e greatest impact on the price of land is location. To a lesser degree, the ?rice of land is governed by supply, demand, yield, availabiiit-}', cost of the infrastructure, and the readiness for development as relate:i to governmental permits. %~:itkin the develoved infill areas of the Cf'G-, there is a scarcity of land available for residential development ihe supply of land is lazgely limited to he East Tustiv. Specific P/an area. Land zoned for co.m_mercial or indus~ial develovment is not appropriate for residenPml development The deveio?ment of additional housing accommodations within ~e urbanized area wi/l require the demolition and/'or redevelopment of existing s~h'uctures, since there are very few vacant lots remaining. Based upon recent cost information about new develovmen~ projects in East Tusiin; land costs are approximately S18 per gross square foot for single-Sami!y zoned property and S28 vet square foot for land zoned for high-densi~' (i.e., R-3) development (Source: 5-he L-vkne Company). /he unavai]abiiih' of land within the developed areas of the Ci:a' and the price of lay, d on the fringes are constraints adding to the cost of housing and prichag housia~g out of the reach of iow- and moderate- h'~come zam_ules. Cost of Construction One important mmrket-related factor iv. the ac~aal cost for new housing is construction costs. These costs are inr'iuenced by many factors such as tb.e cost of labor, building materials, and site preparation. The 1998 International Conference af B'aiiding Officials (ICBO) estimates t~hat the cost of residentia! wood frame construcEon '"1 averages So..10 per square foot and reaches as high as S$3.90 per square foot. Therefore, the costs at~ibuted to cons~uction alone for ~. 67 HOUSLYG ELE3f2ENT DECE.~BER 2 O01 t3.,pical 2,200 scuare foot, wood frame home would be at minimum $134,420. CITY OF TUSTIN - PRELIMINARY DtL,-LWT T~,CHI~'ICAL MEMOtL4NDUM 68 HOUSLYG ELEM-ENT DECEMBEN .,~,001 This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF TUSTi~'- PR£LIMLYAR V D R.4~-'T T~CH:¥ICAL HOb'SI,¥G ELEM'.ENT D~CEMBER :2 O0 ! ENERGY CONSERVATION As the price of power continues to rise, households have through necessity' bean devoting more of the household income to energ3, cost. ?his condition i~.as further eroded the affordability of housing. No relief is in sight, as one representative from Southern California Edison reinforced in a recent news article: "higher rates are necessary to assure reliable supplies of electricih' in the years ahead." There are energ?' conservation measures the Cii~~ of Tustin can promote and others that are mandated bv State laws. The State of California has adopted energT conse~'ation standards for residential building in Title 25 of the Calffor~ia Administrative Code. Title 25 applies to new residential construction or an addition to an existing housing v_nit. Active solar systems for water heating can be encouraged but they are still ra~er expensive and can only be used as a back-up to an electric or gas systerm They are cost efficient in the long run but pose a short-term impact to affordable housing. CITY OF TUSTIN - PR£LIMI_¥AR V DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMO.rL4NDUM 7O HOUSI:¥O £LEMIEKT DECEMBER ~-'his page intentionally left blank. CiTY OF TU~FI~Y- PRELI'MI-¥ARY DRAFT TEC'.'¥.¥ICA_L MEMOP, AJ~'DUM 71 HOUSLYG EL~M. EI~rT DECEMBER 2 O0 ! SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS To develop appropriate programs to address the housing issues identified ~ fi-tis Housing Element Update, the City of TustLn has reviewed the housing programs adopted as part of its 2989 and 1994 Housing Elements, and evaluated the effectiveness of these programs in delivering housing sen-ices. By reviewing the progress in implementation of the adopted programs, Se effectiveness of the last element, and the continued appropriateness of .these identified programs, a comprehensive housing program st'ateg}- has been developed. ~ne following section reviews t2ne progress in implementation of the programs, the effectiveness of the 1989 Element to date, and ~e continued appropriateness of the identified programs. The results of the analysis provided the basL~ for developing tJ~e comprehensh'e housing program strateg3.' for the fuVare planning period, as well as goals for the plarwing period in progress. PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTING THE 1989 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Table ?.'tM-35 vresents a comparison of the quantified objectives of the vrevious element and ac[-aal acbdevements since 1989. Table HTM-35 contaiv~s a list of projects by program area during the 198% 2000 veriod. Tables HIM-36 and HTM-37 summarize the performance of the 1959 Eleme~nt's goals and objectives. The time period covered in this anah, sis is Jul3' 1989 to June 30, 199~, .Tuly 1994 to December 2997, and .~anuary 1998 to January l, 2000. CITY OF TUSTIN- PRELIMIA~ARY DRAFT TF. CH.~IICAL IvIEMOF<4;;DL5¥I . 72.. HOUSING ELEA/IE.,¥T DECEMBER ~001 TABLE HTM-35 SUMMARY TABLE EFFEGTIVENESS OF HOUSING ELEMENI' PROGRAMS: 1989-2000 Income Group \.:e~'-Low New Construction I Goall Actual RehabfPreservation 5.010 i 5,694 Housing Assistance Goal: Goal; Actual 713 715 ~ .049 80 1040 4.287 201 Actual 10 1,548 Low : 2,194 556 Moderate ~ 2,0B1 31 Above Moderate ~ !,409 - Total 2,:35 : Although goals were not allocated ~c svecffiz income ~oup, the C~' a~emvted to u~e PC--iNA percentages to f-al.~ ~;-L"dA o~ectives. Source: The 3i.",.' o.t T-astiv~ Hous/n~ ~ement 1.o97; _=ffeztiveness of .:-iousL'-.,~ Element F~o,,k, rams, 2000. REVIE14r OF PAST PERFORMANCE S.~ate law establishes a five-year cvcle regulating housing element updates, in compiiance with the SCAG cycle, the Tustin Housing Element was uvdated in 1989 at which fir-re '.'t was found to be in compliance with State law, and was updated again in !994. in 1997, the City of Tustin initiated a comprehensive General Plan update, and the Housing Element was again updated to accommodate the MCAS Reuse Pian and to ensure consistency with other General Plan Elements, as well as to address recent changes Ln State law. These amendments were adopted on January 16, 2001. Review of Past Housing Element Objectives The 1989 SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model indicated a new consPruction need in Tustin by 1994 of 2,085 u.v. its, of wi-ich 390 units were for very iow income households, 488 for low income, 484 for moderate income and 724 upper Lncome. The following discussion is a brief highhght of the progress, effectiveness and appropriateness of ~e past Housing Element Objectives. CITY OF TUSTIN- PRELIMINARY .ORA~ T~CHI%YCAL MEMORANDUM 73 HOUSIzYG ELE.'~JBNT TABLE' II'I'M-36 EVITC,FIVENESS OF 11OUSING I I.F.Mi3NT PROGRAMS 1989 — 2000 Pro'lam RE'spollsible Agency laundiu Suurce Objective Effectiveness 1989-1994 1995-1097 199i12(H)U Adequate Sites Community None Nei t>ssaq A minimmit (if 5,000 lulits 3,920 tuiils 1,771 units 1, 474 units Continue to utilize flannel Development in Eilst Tustin within Ilio C'inunuulity 1)i:;ll lets and Slx :ifir Depal tnn`nl, City 1989-94 planning period. PIMP; 10 :011.1101 i7-0 auul enroural,l, C�ounc it I1llxed-use d ev l`Io I, E ILP] Its. Mobile iloules _ ComulluIlily None Necessary Malintalin exisling Illobile No applications No applications No application:; C UIItilllle to 1111-lirllairl lhE' C:itV's Ueveloptllerll I 110nes. rtx•eivv(l lereived received Illoblle ho mr, park lolls' and protess DvInid llt'nt, C itv roildilional use permit applications Council I 1 as received for nlanulailurCLI1101110:;. Seroudary Itesidenlial Units Conlnunlity City General Il) units (luri11l; 1110 1989- I (:oniilule to provide oppol tuniti0s Develul,111111t hind Jan. I, 1998 plaimine, (c_ P) �:,. Pacific - (340 W. 2ii1 St. - (1,35 A Street - lor afli,ltlablr> I,,ranny flats and sei Departun`ilt, C.1ty period. 1„1 tillil) guest lloule) 2oi1 unit) 011dalry r('3idt-lltlal dwelling lllllts In Council tae `)iugltrfallnily Residential District lots whew lea siblo Illrolll)l l-'Xlsling zoning Ordinance provisions. ('011dominium Conversions Louuuurlity City t ;encraf 70 low-i.nionlc units No upplic ations 14 units -- No applications (AlIlthillt.- to Icyuire. d0yc'lopc rs Development 1•lllid I Coll svi-vee. re'celvvd (Laguna received converting alpartlnents to Tondo. Depill tinvill, C Ily Gardens) nliniums to process a use-pelIllil, C.mili it I provide ickwaltlon al+_sistillice., and/or it, pt-ovide incentivesand wssislance- lor pin -chase of t11,' lllllts by low- and 1,1 o(1(:I'atE`-LIICUrIIe Ilollsc`llolll ti. CITY (.7F 'i'(.itiTIN -- I'hl)-:J. PWIVARY IiOUS1N(.T L'/ 9 iIMLN'1' 1.)RMY 11ECHNICAL M1.,,M(_)1?AN1.)1JM 74 MI C'L'AW131? 2001 M • ABLF. I FUM -36 FI FI{C'.1'1VENESS OF IIOIISINC: J'.Jj;Mf7NT 1'R0(;RAMS 1989-2000 Pro gram Responsible A •enc I Funding Solace I Objective Effectiveness _ 1089-1994 1995-1997 1998-2000 - Replacement !lousing; Re.developntenl kvilevelupimml. No c-ur•renl plan for 0 units removed 0 units removed 50 units The Redevelopment Agency shall Agency Agency I7u11ds dc'InoIiIiolI. removed replace housing units wheil IIIc' l Agency undertakes a projet t � l:l)rilg)IfelF'e{� C0111p eted) pllt.iliant to tIIF! ietluirenivii1s of tht` 1 California colllllllillity Rede'velopincilt Law. i i I•cnanl Protection C'ounly, CI )BG funds A minims nt of 21)exist ing 1,700 1,957 -- 634The protection of Iviia nt rlg lits is Community I or dVSil'.'LI 1 LtsLitt lesltlellls 1"1'SIIII'llt5 residents assisle d r'esldegtS invorpoi--led within State law alld Development assisted ljtroug h 1994. assisteel asslslf:tl rE'llt colllrol is believed IO be best Dellarllnt-lit • controlled by IIIc -supply and tic- �. rnand of the markel. place. Continue its contract for 1.11e pruvisiort of ct11111st ling 1111d dispute resolll Lllln I - setvlces by LIIo Fair I lousing; Agency. i I Deed Reslriclions L.'omilltllllty Low 111(0IIIe Iilx Resiri •11ons imposmi Eiji Intl 1.11lit5 231 imits -_-- '2.07 units REquire appropl ILile. dCed restrictions I )F'-Vt?10I)IIIeIL1 I dif hlortgvig,e 100 units by 1994. restricted restricted restricted to eilsulec'ontiruled afforelability tot Ih`parlun'nl, Bonet low-- Or Illo(lel"El tf-1111'ople. housing RQdevelol1111e lit i conshliciecl or rehabilitated with ll«- Agency, City C KA 2OX, I./kI assistance of any public or Ci)nnc;1 .1 Set Aside Redeveloputellt AgencyfLHICIS as � ably be legally reduht-XI by the Ltstt of :itch fulids. j CITY OF '1 US'17N .-- PRELIMINARY .l OUSIN(} ELFMf;N7' 1.)RAF7"17 (,'/INIC 111, 1b1EMORAND11111 75 1)IRCEWBER 200.1 TABLE. I ITM-36 EFFl!'CT1VI NESS OF I MUSING li1.f:MI7.NT 1'R0(;RAMS 1989-2000 Program Responsible Agency 1 u idin g Source objective _ _ Effectiveness_ 1989-1994 --- 1995-1997 1998-2(IOtl - Fliforcement of Buildingand C:onrinullily City General 300 cases per Fear; I,500 1 [7,553 84,47.3 75,50.5 Housing Codes Development Fulld cases by 19114. inspections. inspections inspec•lions Cuntintic to erlforc•c. buildio,, and I)epatinient IrICIIIdeS total Plac•t'd jtrci};nlenl lnvludes total housing voiles including notification building lien on building of taxing agencies upun failure to I inspections McFadden itl,pec•tions gain code compliance front the I including Village iucludin); inupmty owl ter. 1110chanical, Apartment ulecharlical, electrical, (referred lu electrical, and bll;ldin); taxing,a"''icy) building c•anstruclicnl. 1,443cude cunslruclion. violations idellLilied between 1989- 107 1're•application Conferences C:onunurlity t:ity (;enelal rill applicants to City 3:3 projects 10 projects 1 I projects e.'olltinue lu utilize procedutes for Development Dunce benefit from this service. Im. application conferences alit[ Uepm eluent pracessili , procedures to expedite permit processing. ' I 1.oust reg Rehabilitation Colllllllllllty (.l )]3U need 80 Illllts by 1994. 137. units 67 Illlrt5 asst sled 63 units asslstet.] Allovale available C])lit.i and Rete. 1)evelopll{ellt I Redt'velopntent assisted Witte with RDA (tellies with RI )A f1111dS velopuient Agency I1111LIS lu fllI1111 a 1)epaltlluml, Agency teepees RDA melds both public improvements, ant[ 1•edtrral rellill'lhlil LlVll of rQSldelltidl Ll11ItS Ill 1)epai Lltlent of tiuget ill "ens Within elle C Ily. I lousing alit] 1)rball Develo )Illent (;I"I'Y 0 F T1ISTIN -- PRL'I,IMINARY DOUSING I'LEMENT I)h)AKI"1'1;('1-INIC111, Mli;)b?ORANDUM 7(, D CI,'MBE3? 2001 TABLF. 11TH -36 UFFEV11VENE.SS OFILOUSING. J.'j,J7rVj FN' I' PROGRAMS 1989 —2000 Program Responsible i Agency Funding Source Objective fffectiveness 1989-1994 J995 1997 J998 -21x)0 Fair Housing Orange ('aunty Fair CLAM, funds Frocvssillg of all complaillis 911 colliplaillis 7.,391 Complaints 2,289 III additivil to IIlCSI.;ItC I)CIMI-11111-ld I IOUNiIIF, C Otlll(-il 1-t-coiwd ploct'ssed proct.ssed Complaints of, Fair Employment and I lowsing, processed (olitillue the provision of services by Fair housing C'o III Icil of Ora I I ge k.'.ojIlIIv it) the t.Aty ofbistin to assure equal housing opportlitlitic's willijil IIw CRY. Complaint..; are leferred it) Fair Housing C01.11161 (A Change ( .ounty. 41. Shared-110LISilig TI,C, and Parks & Cl )BG kinds 5 cases per year or 21; ) CRIN(js (10 CiVA's 30 cases 25 viises Continue to provide couidinaliun Rvvivatioo ;'IIILI JIV 194-1. alld support. to a home sharing ('011111111110Y I program I'mided ill part by [Ill., Developlivill p(.'.r ypil r, E-flS,S Feedback Foundation, Inc. as part of Department by 2(XI5 ,ru, (ri-ansportiltion I'Lili('ll and COUIlSelilig) ill Id 11W Orange I lotising Authority. t Housing, Authority Orillig(! Collilly 111iU Oil all No I Contl'ad was No c ontract was I ' develop T Contract; with the Orange Comity I IOLNing Authority I processe.d. I) I ocesse(f. contract 1"ith ) lousing, Authority (OCI IA) where O(.1 IA I WCOssill'y for 11le developillel I t and (FLEstin (-gardens) of federally assisted low - Mid muderate-income housing cnY 011 TUS'l IN --- 1WE1,11WIVA]") Y 1 OUISHVC11 RIXMIENT 17RAFT7E(.JJNK.'A1, MEMORAND(hil DEVEWBER 200.1 TABLE HTM-36 I.i 1 !sC"1'1V1iNl.SS 01A!.()USING I:LF.MEN'1' PROGRAMS "1989 - 2U(K) Program Responsible Agency Fundillp Source Objective .—. Effectiveness 1.989-1994 1995-1.997 ]993-2(X)(1- — pel-hill PCoressing and Coordination C-111n1r tinily Loin' necessmy Priorilr7.ation of low- and :13 py-ojects fast- 10 projects IaSt- .11 projects fasl- 15115Ure that processing, of perrnils for Development nloderale-income projecU; Irarked tracked backed low- and 1110(lelatt-irlCum0 housirlt; dcp('ncls oil number of are fast -tracked with low -and projects: plocessed. 1110derale-income housing permits brii►1; given priority over other Pei nlil applications. Central Clearinghouse I locessing of '13 projects 10 plojercls 1 l projects 0111iflUt' the Services of the C. ilyS approximately 100 new processed 7I l l('l':i:<el l I l 7 1 I l cessed (.(1111111111ntV I)eVell1p111t'(1l bast's per ye(lr asid Department as a central cases by 1994 is anticipiliml. clearinghouse Willi individuals assigned the responsibility of expediting developrtlenl. perinils required from Various departnu'nts and agencies:. Rental Assistance Connty t,f Ch -mi e I Ili I.) to new cerlific ides by i(94; -.-.- Fnc ourugv the availability of Sedion 11ousing Aulhnrlly 14fleis of support Io 750 e'er lificaly/ 773 cerhh('aty/ 632 cerlificate/ 3 rental assislatl('e cerlihcales and t 'ollllty. Vouchers issued Vouchers issued Vouchm Issm"I voucher cerlificate program assis- lance funds through [fie Orange COL111ty l:-1(IliSing Autll(lrily. To ('ll- 00111',Ige the inaintentince of existing atl l estnblishnlent Of new vertif icates, Support t11c.' County's of fol is l(7 Obtain ('olltlnllt'd l'ederill funding. i CITY ( )PTI J5' 1 N PREILI ]INARY HOUSING ELE'ME.N1' ]).:nF 1' ! Is(.'] INICAL 1ti9Lrti?U1�f1N1 J(.Ji11 <'i ULsC1 MRER 200.1 TAB H.' I IT.M-36 11"I ll(TIVE.NESS 0 IRJUSING. k1,l:M NT PROGRAMS '1989 — 2000 Program Responsible Agency funding SOUII'e Objective Effectiv(!Ilcss - --1989-1994 — - J 995-4997 1998-2000 - State fluent`. -Ownership Assistance RDA IZI A 50 cases by 1194. No assistance No assistance 8 first tittle: Provide sitppol I for Iliv I provided provided houlebuyers honu•ownel:ship Assistance program assisted by 1ZI)A used for first -lilac llolncl.n YN-S in pru};lent, nut '1�11ain. talalc Lax increment Financing I Ri-tievelopnu,ut Assistance l0 5 plolet:ts. 33 emits lur very 19 uniLc for very 18 units for vrry I)i ovitle 2. rni housing Set-aside tax 5(!1 -Aside I'llild I t)lv Income I,ow lilcolne Um Illcullle increment fluids from die South iI.WA hOasellulds households holt&.holds �('nlI':il andTown C�ell(F'r IZell(`vel- 26 unit for Low 21 imil for Lei(v 44 mut for L uw _ - Opitiv t. Projects, wheel'. ilvilllilble, to i I Ill' .Flit- Inlr )l lit` III i1IS(•I old. Income assist til providing hUUS1L7}�:: C- I llouspliolds %5 unil for 111111Seh011$ l'( nuno(ialu)ils for IOW- illl(1 IIIOd('I" i I I 73 unit for Moderate Moderate houcehold.9 I unit for Moderilu :11 C-111('UIIIC hUOSehllllfS. I hollsellolds ussisled through households l assisted throul;h housing; atisislecl Ihroug li ' horsing ,ritabilili fion housing relc,bililation progl:•Lat rellabililatiun program pIngrun lil,ergy Conservation C Oillil ly I None n(x:(s.aiy All new units ill C:ily it, - 3,571) new unit:: 1:43 new units 1,.556 new units M-cl lire (lll JWW CUr1SIRICt101L Iu be Developlllellt 11189 1994 planning period. rejulred to meet. re(1111red Ili Illeet requiret.1 to meet Subject to Slate ellergy conservation I i.)(•i)(Ir'1111e11t I Statt.! Slall(Iaids State Slit I lClard'i state Standards rl•tllliL-01I1e111S (l Ille! 24) as it condition for the issuance of a building permit. 11U1IS1[l,g for tile Disabled C._UI11I11III11lY I None necessary Z:) Millis fly 1194• 18 uniL, wel'e: 17 emits W(`I'e - _-- 6 units were - -_- RmIlllle liew lilt] 11 i-fallll ly housing Developlil@111 fell LWSU(d to reque.med to I-equestetd to uniLs and aparinle rlt (u,lversiuus to Department pruvidt! for provide for provide for ('011dominiunis to comply With Slate il('l'U171111odation accommodaLion accommodation S�1kl'l�lcillll)[l5 for 1ccullll)lodaliull of fur the disabled far Llle disabled for the disabled [lie till ill icapped. (:;1'.PY OF TUSTIN -- 1)121;1.IMIIYAI?Y I U)U.SING LsLEWENT DRA11T TI: TABLE 11TM-36 ITl EIC,1'IVENFISS 01; HOUSING 171,1;M ENTPROGRAMS 1989— 2000 Pru gralu Responsible Agency I Funding Source Objective Effectiveness 1.989-.1994 1995-1.997 '1998-2000 Affordable Senior Housing Prujecl Community None necessary Maintain 20 dwelling units 112 units "112 emits 112 louts To maintain 1.12 imits of affordable De'.ve'lopiln'rll h0ween 1989-1994 alit( ma illlaine d II ahilaineci Ilia inta llled housing forfieniors located at 179:32- Deparllnenl 20afforda1)le unilsill flit! (JR)'1'ustin (100'Cuslill (M)TI.I. fin 17,142. [ miitrllell Avenue (20 nails of board and rare facility in (1arderlc -1- 12 Gardens r 12 Guldens + 12 which 12 are Serfion 8 units) and sante tithe period. h1ilrlu 11) Mitchell) Milchell) 1 ((:illi( Gardens (I00 ulllt°i). Senior Board and care Facility 18 units '18 units - " -" " - 18 LI I' I iL,q fllainlain a senior citizen board and tnaiulained nlainfaillud maintained rale facility in ole ration at 1262 lir •an ( ) (Bryan) (13 (Bryan) Bryan Avelllle. Non-ptofit Shetllers for Homeless Various Non-Piolil Variety ul funds Retain rotten( beat counts. 3 homes for it 3 honte's fora 3 houses furl Woolen and Children thl,anizrllItMIS Iulal Of 16 bells total of 16 beds total of 16 beds lincuurage Litt! confirmation of the Maintained maintained nlafnlained `-;Ileepfuld homes in'1'usliil wiliCh plovitie housinl, facilities fur baRowd bonieless. women and children. I'lle'se hollies are IOCmIL'tl 111 single-faiuily neighborhoods and provide a nludi-rleetltxl srtvice for 11ollicieSs wolllell alld children. I IOIISIIIf, Clppurlunitles foi. all I'rivafe I h•v (Aopels None Ino low- and 500 nuuferilte- 174 units in Fast 174 tulits in l;asl 174 units ill least.C1.1111011lic 15Cllrle111lic 5el,l►lellfti 111 East l tlstlll; income tlldIs by 1999, l 11StlI1 l llstlrl Illol11ttred Tustill Monitor the implementation of the Community tuonitored affordable 11011sinl7 progrunl adopted Development manilunld as a part of the FASI Tuslio. Spevific Department Plan. C:JTY O ?'1JSI M — 1 RE3,11111NARY HOUSING ELL'Mls'1V'l' ORAFT TM31NICAL Mli"MORiL'Vl)UM 80 DIs('I BER 2001 ant Bonding; Programs `;turfy revent bonding authority legislation and entourage utilization of `.tate tic C klmity issue of these l+ontls. Its kVVI1ing, wills tilt' Cool- n11111ily goal of enroulaging, ulvllel-• .x•rupicd housing unitS, place Sg.et:inl t-•nlphasis on those Mondini; prug,rams that promote honle- ewnership, such as :B 13h2, AliJV7 arid Section 7.35 of Lha blousing,Ind urban Recovery Act of 193;3. C ul lslde•1- those prug nuns, where needed, to pi-ovide for rental - Occupied construction. Land C'ust Write -Downs -- — — Utilizo 7.0% housing; set-aside funds [IS Subsidies (i.e., land write clowns, acquisition arid rehabilitation assts t'lrlce grants and luau:, etc.) (FOUL tilt' �;ollth/Ccntral Rcdc•vclOpnlc•nl 1'1 ojert to reduce.! the affordability gap for developing; new and jella- bilitating existing; owner and rental units for low- and modt:rale-uuunle households. •TABLE UTM-3G is11 N"()I: I1OUS1N(: FLEMEN'1' PROGRAMS 1989 — 2000 Responsible City of l'ustin 1Cedevelopn«ml _ Agency Funding Source Stale anti Mu11icipal Builds IZeclevelOpuu�nt Ag cncy- I lousing Set-Asitle 1'tllld Objective C'unrplete mullysis of available plog,rams and applicabilily lu'I'ustilt by ly't�l. 1'rrpillalion of if -- - COI llprelivosivt` ;lf lordablc 1«nlsing straleg,y that identities actual funds to be allocated Iur subsidy. At Rlillinll1111, it iS o-AIINtt•t3 11L1t 2'5 million will he alluc•atetl for assistance. tlu-oug;h 1994. It is expecled that 4.2 million will bt• allocated fur ,Issistlulc_e fhrough 2005. 1989-1994 - 0 The Agency Cominitivd $229,948 fol- varioas housing tehnbililation and subsidies pl-ojecls. Effectiveness 1995-lc)97 Pi-ovess 210 restricted units to low income Iluvug,h site County bonding; prugnun. (I lumptun Scguarc -- total :150 units) 'flee Ag oncy - contlUitled $1,103,7.45 to the, Fur'l if] Grove project (140 uuils) 1098-2ttUD .. - processed 150 restridVd units to low income (Urange Gardens - tolal 150 units) Processed 49 TeSflicted units to low illc•un«• (Handers Pointe -- total 87 unils) The Ag;oncy t'01111.Ilith-LI :,42,123,1:31 to tile. Warmingturl project (38 units) �..VY ()It' 7T.It�'17JV - PRrq,11V11jVARY 11()11,�1fV(; !s'LIsM1.N'1' 1)t�l11� 1" 1't�C;I1Nlf.nl, iVt1;i1RO ANl. UNI ti 1 01i" R Mt ER 2001 '1•ABLE ll•I•M-36 liFFE'CTIVENESS O 11(_)US1NG FLEM1I:N'1' URCA;RAMS 1989- 2000 Program Responsible Ai5ency Funding Source Objective Effectiveness '1989-1994 1995-1997 .1498-2000 - CIAR; Funds for Rehabilitation City of'Tuslin CDF3(. 12BCE'Ipl of till to $421i,(XN) in No C'DBG, funds No CD__BG faults No C'Dl3C; funds Continue to make applications for 11111) Grant funds by 1094. were ulilizvd. were ulilized_ were utilized. C:I )tics Funds for the rehabililation of $ 126,710 of $ (i16,'L'i3 of 110/1 $ 3,5,41;}3 of RI)A single-family and multi-fantil - units: y RDA funds funds were funds were P[omole. the availability of Ihese were programmed fur prof;ranunetl for lu.nds for rC.11abililalioll by news- programmed for residential residential paperarticles, a1111O1rIIMillellIS 111 lesideilltill Iellabllltatimi rellablliuttioll Tustin Tod�iv (a Cily publication Ihnl rehabilitation is Ilmilml to ull 11OLISc1101dS) Economic Integration within Sphere County of Orange Nont� ('onliuue to rf(luast notices. 74 notices l7 notir.Es -10 notices — - nf Influence 1e(I11Ctite(1 rP[hl(?Sted I'e(jlll.'Stf:di Reque.-A that the Orange Coulily I Planning C.'ummissiun and the F.n- vironmetltal ,ti'lanagenlent AgvricY notice the CRY of'I'u.Stiu of any pro- posed development activities within I t1St111'S .Sphere of influl`nct! Senior Citizen Housing City of Tn:ai11, Nom- necessar • 2.'.i ["'its in llle 1939-94 ;i sites id( nlifio(1 3 sites i[lenti�l A site ole — Continue to identify sites that art, Redevelo lmelll planning peliod. for senior citizens housing Agency Sycamoresuilable prujects_'I'h(•se sites will he promoted Avenue was for private development and identified for n applications will be nladc fur ally 6U unit selliur available subsidy funds. - housing, project C .TTY OF T1 JSTIN -11RITLIMINARY H0U.SING 1_s1,EME:1V7' 1)b,'Ah 1' 7'E(,!lNIC11L M1?;1 O RAND1.Il1l DEC EMN.IER 2001 TABI.F. IITM-36 J'.j7j.'J'.'(."j'jVENj7'N S ()17 HOUSING 1989 — 2000 Program Agency Fu ndjng_Suu2 ce Objective - ------ -.- Effectiveness 1989-1994 1995-1497 1998-2000-", Subsiandaid Homing City of Tustin, City General Corrvd all killits identified 935 corrections 608 corrections 479 correrfions Continua' to identify Sillystallclaid Retlevelopulk-111. I Folld, Re cmitpleted completed ('0111pleted 110119i[%, 111IRS n1ld []lose flint are Agpitcy, developlilellf offiel-wise identified its bvilig. .1 till-cM Community Agency Funds I to the health 11.11d safety of the Development occupants. Tike actions JILArSLIalit 10 the law to demolish, rebuild or correct the code viviaLioiis. Sulu I;Iter6ry and Conservation City u!"Tustill Now, itetwssa(v All IWW LillitS ill City are 3,579 units 1,Y43 units 1,556 hails Requil-I Out . I EliviFollitiviltal Impact. I subject IoTiLle 25 lecluired to required it.) required to Reports andsubtlivisioll pkills Llllple111PntTilly. illilliumentTiLle implenielit'l itle wIdle .Ss cliergy conservation Illvas- 24 requirenivnis 24 wtjoirvinvitis 24 I't'(lLlij7Cllj(!llIs IIIVS MR] SE)Ial- ili-CeSS. 11WILIdt', IIS IKICCSS'lly, initigaLhir, measures to ensure 111,11 developers implenivill file requirt-owitis of-l'itle 24. Itecyciiiij-, Shigle-Family Uses in R-3 City of Tustin Nutic tiecessary 5 11MV Lillit- per year or 25) No additional No additional I additional unit Zones Into Mulliple-f-amily Units Units clueing 5 year I'vi-ju, I units Were units Well. at 135 A Stipet ConLijitie it) Pr coill-age tlVvcl0j)els 10 constructed collsh-lit-It'd corisfruded consolidate ilidivicloal lot!; info larger collesive developments. Density bolluses 11mv be considered .'IS Hit -olitlalle lots. incentive lo":Otij (-17'y ()177'11 jSTIN -- PREI, IMIAICRY 101-ISING ELPMENT DRAII-1, INIC/11, M".1"M0RANDUPH WE(I'MMEW 2001 TA 131.1; 11'1 M-36 1,N1 1:('1'1V1sN1:SS OF 1I0US1NG 1:L1;MI NT PROGRAMS 1989 — 2000 Program Respousible Agency Fllndin Se1L1I'Ce objective Effectiveness 1989=1994 - J995-1997 — - 19913-2WU Basic Housing City Of •Tustin Nolle necessary Support flexibility in City City vnroural;ed; City elx'uuMrk; d; 7�o Lelluc(r initial housing; cos Ls, holi%ill design ! !, enl'vllra ed; no t; 111) llalil to no t ala to I ('ont111ne to encourage the (vll- data to invasure 111e'aSllre I1ICHSLITe st'i'llclioll Of llltllsilll, imils that ill- elfectiveltuss elfectivl'lle'SS effe('tMMPSS corporate design features providing t51c opparluuity to expand habitable. Linea ie: ILunily needs change. ongoing Review of housing City of •Dustin, Non(' necessary Annual I"ellortti Reviews Reviews Reviews !:lenient Programs Community accomplielled Llcconlplished kit. Cornplislied Froin the (late of adopLion of the Developnu'nl I lousing element, prepares an annual Department letter t to the 17humillg t i1111LIUSSion aSSCSsirIr, previous Years Lll Cvlll' phsllllicills luward meetill£ Housing 1{leulenl ubjvcliveS. Submit the Annual Report to the State I ICI Consolidated Ilan (CHAS) Comity of l hinge, Val ioty of `,talo, Preparalion of a CI IAS by I Prvili n!d CI IAS Prepared Prepared - - 'l Ile CiIy Of 1 LIStlrl shall pre'pal ea C01111llllllity 1'e'delill and It-wal Fet-Itnill 1'Lmal Year 19143-94 ill 10114 Consolidaled Comolidated Consolidated flan of its own which Development funding I flan for flan for provides a cumprellei(sive Uoparinlenl I -Y IY45 W FY AMI -05. linsi'Ssniel it of llviising needs, a hollsing developnlelll plan invol•- pomlinl; Federal, Slaty and local pnblle' ilri(I pliVilh! I('SOLIr('eS, Mid it One vein' implementation plait. 7'TI.1-;7'IN'-- PRI!,L] 11NARY 11OU.SIN(7 ELI MLN`1' 11 EMUlcANDUM 84 1)1;C'I M. 13ER 2001 '.l'A1 LE, I1'1'M-36 i7l7t;ts(".l'IVFNESS OF HOUSING ElEM1;NT PROGRAMS 1989 — 2000 Program Responsible_— Alms • I'undill Soulce Objective - _ Effectiveness 1959-1994 I 1995-1.997 -- -- 1993-2UUll Temporary l lousing for I lulneless ' County of General Fund, Support where needed; CI IAS Consolidated Prepared FY The City will al so soppurl colnity- (h•ange/C:ily of C'DBG, 11Ui) cotllplele sillily of complelvol flan completed 2WO-05 wide. effort; to assist approval 'I-tlstin, lu-)x additional program options (Continuum of, ((:ontinnunl of Consotidaled ilolnel(:Ss providers as part of ill(- by IE)94(:are plan ('aro fl n Ilan. ACAS TUstin Reuss ptoc:oss in I included in included in Applied and in:plenwilling their approved ! i CI IAS) (�onsolidalcd received prol;rauls thiough le�cllnical support I flan l,um,UOU fur ill idenlifying funding resources that i$ OC Resce u Inil;hl be available. Ili addition, , I Missimiand O.Vtore. additional program options 1 $Suu,Ofor Io assist. 1n the iovisiott and fundis1 ; p � tI'i] I LS1tiol 1i11 for housing transitional hsing and single I I I t(7 (7.. 100111 0(•CU alll' . housing, 1111 llefileld I Y ?, 1 � � � owned.1 uwnrd.l�y Ule as it trial program, a homeless I I I City at Ile r 4e 1111011 eirler enc loall plo 1 -'till I ' ' -0 l; Y I 1; ` I 1 MCAS-Yllstlll. 1t)[' 111 St illlll I:lsl 1110 11111's I'elll 01Loan program security deposit). rll:utdune(I for , - lack of interest. Culitual Resources District I (:ily of •fustin, I C.:L)li( �, Cily .'i landmarks: t esi 'nates1 I }, No landmark ' - No landnlatk -- - - - No landimuk Cltcre are it larks' nunlbeer of struC- ('ouununily General I�uud, and 25 units rellabilitalcd designated dcsiY,uated dcsi};nalcel tures ill the City that were con- Developlllcnl Slalc grams, by 1994. struc•led before and after the turn of Department County Mills Act 29 units 20 Lulils 9 units ill(' cenlul•y fallowing llle Coluull'Lts rehabilitated rchabilitaled rehabilitated I tl5till �;Llbcllvision ill 1837. C011t11tUt' It) utilize the City's Oiltural Resources Overlay District to safe- guard the hclitage of ills City by pleserving I telgl lilt) rhoods and I 1 structures glilt reflect lilt.. ONS i ilctilagc and past.'1•hrough ills--- ( rl'y C)F T USTIN -- 1)P"ELIMINARY IIOUSING ELEMENT DRAT 1" IEC;14i"VIC:AL M.b.11,10RAN1)1IA1 DhVEMHE'R 2001 TABLE I ITM-36 EFF11"CHVENESS (717 1 IOUSING J.7j,L.'Mj7NTPRO(;RAMS 1989 — 2000 Program Responsible Agency Fundit!sSuurce Objective Effectiveness 1998-2000 Pist.iid, J).101110te IIIV IMI -Ai(: and priyala .11joylilt-111, LlWalld preser- it -.qejvation vationof culturally si?nificant neighborhouds Lilt([ slLructilues. ConLititic to require [fiat any altera- tion Of a designated W.SOLII-Ce M - construction improvenivilts in Lhe District conform LO till' I-MIL11l-CHIC-11tS of tile Cuillitill Rk-sources Ovel lily I lousing Refer ral Program City ofl.-Aill City G-nel-al ('oll(ilIllvSel-vI(:v 10,500 social 5,250 sovia I 4,375 social Ail lilt! it) provide housilly, leferial FLUILIS, CDRG I Services S(II'vit-CS refel-l-als; Sery ices Svi-vices to fillitilit-S ill lived of, Funds referrals; 30 Shared referrals; ljollsiog issis(aiivv and inforniati011. OU shart-d housing referrals 25 slurred 'I llif; lJF'0JFMI1 COUSists of diree City housing housing refel I it is referrals 111al.iLill to the. public at all times. Tile 1)()Iit:e Department refers homeless people to different agen- cies, which provide shelters and food for various seginvuls of the popitiritioll. The Parks mitt Recreation Depart- I-11vot provides bomsing information and Sociall Sol-vic-C inforillaliull Io the st,niorritizen population. c:rry OPTUSTIN -- PRELIMINARY I 10US11VG ELEMENT DRAPTIEGUNICAL MEWORANDUM 86 1) E C7 1,'1W R FJ? 2001 TABLE 11TM-36 FITAIX-FIVENENS OFI MUSING EN' I'PROG RAMS "1989 — 2000 Program Responsible Agency Funding Source Objective Effectiveness - . .- . . I" 1989-1994 1995-1997 1998-2000 Tht. Collinitillitv Devidolnut'llt De - pili Linent l)L0Vi'Lk'S IJOUSillg Mid I St e 111-17violl.; licape foi. social service information to all '111'(q-tivoliess (11'.1ll-ilitioll. tiEa�llla-[It.-; of OW l)Ol)Llklti0l1. 'I'ills I )el'al-blient also :;(,I vee as a t ledl-ilill,11OLISO 101- [Ile C-01111111111ily I i I)t-vejopluent Block (;rant Pioglaill -pre (-[Its the City at I loosing IL .5 i Atilhorily and OCI In Advisory I , Collullillee Mectings. Thv thret, city departmeas make till S(: (Ili('tllile1115 .1vailable to (lie public: • Diieclory of'Senior Citizi.-ii's .ervices prepared by [lie Area S Agency oil Aging Senior (JIM111 S 01 fict. • social Service Assistance Booklet prepared by Connection 1,11151COullLy of Change i I • Orallge Comity HOLISillf', Dil CC - tory piepaied by ()(.'[-[A and the I OCI IA Advisory Committee. I i • Business Livense Paillpille." • Cot le Entol-t-vulent Pillill,1110 IU T cT.VY 71V --- PRE"LIMINA R IK) -SINGELE-MENT 1)1:.A,1, 1 jAUCAL Pv11. 1V1O12APVL)i11i <s/ : DECEM13131? 2001 TABLE I1'1'M-3G L'1TE'(-F1VEN1:SS OF HOUSING I-I'LEMLN'1' PROGRAMS 1989 —2000 Program Responsible Agency Fundin g Suum, Objective __. Effectiveness 1989-1994 7995-1997 - — 1998-2000 Zoning Studies City of'I'usli,► City General C'omplelt-` studies by 1994 Designated Old Worked on Density Ihnrus In ur(ler to faciliuite the new con- Fund, as staffing peunils Town in updating'L.ur►i►►g Ordinance strucliur► };gals of the 1989-1994 Redevelopment C;eueral Ilan for C:ocle adopted in 1990 Regional housing Needs Asses- Agency funds Rr`viso Zoning Code Io mixed zoning; menl, i,►iliate stuclics to conr;ider new encourage and promote density bonus programs to encourage and pronu,tt` affordable housing, by 20115 orclinence 1 affocdable Ilot] siIIg. 'I:hese sludie, (hafted include: (1) Potential forc,enling, nixed -use zones it( Ilw City; (2) Incorporate mandatory inclusi(miay policies in the ztming pI'Ov lsltll4ti (either tnl or off site) for housing units developed or rehabilitated hv the. Redevelopint-W Agency or by other public ur private ent.ilies (sinEe I 30% of units devc-loped by 4n Age,lcy must be affordable and 15% of (nits developed or rehabilitated by other public or private onUties); and (3) C'unside-r relaxation of certain I (1CVE`lop[i►t`nl Stall[1:11't{y Elnd � incorltiVeS that could be provides{ fur projects whirl► includE` affo,dabie I 1 housing units. CITY UH' TUS7'IN --1)R1.;1.11W INARY I ICN ASM G ELEMENT 1)1.'x1111"MC1.INIC;AL M. EWORANDUA-1 88 UEC'I.s'MBEI? 2001 TABLE ,HTM-36 FIFFECIIVENESS OI ( MUSING I{I .MINTPROGRAMS '1989-2000 - -- I Program I Private Sheets I Responsible Af; may ('i1V of'I'uslin I'he (:'ity of Tustio has adopter( stall - dards for privale streets Ill now rr::iclenlial dCVCIQpmVLIb;. TO reduce rou:.11 action t o sts, (I"Velopers platy be pernlilfecl to install private rather than pllhlic slrec•t;, whatever feasillle. Preservation of Assisted Ilousing Cily of 'I'Irslill, Tuslin has utle low-inc-0111 • lunlsirll; Cull till if Ilitv I'roit•.l't (I llSlilt (1alltlallti) Will l a to lit1 1)f'VE'101111 •Ilt of 1011 units al lick of convel:siott Lu I l h•par(nu nl, ma rkel rade prior to July 2001. If Redevelopluonl prolet•t owners cI lonSe• Io c'onvel I the I Ageltt'Y projects; to uuu kel rate hou-Sing, (oordinate the provision of finanria.l `I ant( administrative resourceS tt) preserve Iht'se units as aflortlablr. housing. 1 he following lollr spec ifiv actions will be taken to protect (of i replilco) at risk Inlils: it) TvIo111tor llllik all IISk; bf PrOVItIP lt'lltlllt i e•LIucaltion; c) Vvork with nonprofits; and d) Em mark funds. The following; is it ,Hole lholoug;h discussion of :•ildl ilLUL u. i 1 !"17'Y O 1•(1,5771`x'-' 1'i.LMIXIINARY I I?ItA 1" 7XJ1N1GAL A111"MO12lA11 DUd1 FundingSource I ( 10bjec:live None nvc,e;SaryI ('Iealiort of privair: slivets, wherever feasible ('IMC, Ke(1ova•lopmen{ 1 ltllltilllf� �it•l� Aside hinds, State and Federal funds; Low Inroole Max C•rvdit Mol ll np, Financing Bond - liffel't I V enE•Rti 1 NSI) -1994 '- -" 1995-1997'--- — 1998-2000 - 176 Illivnto 55 In ivale sircelsI (i9 privale streets stIvets urealed 'willed vivateel 1'r(.!r:e,ve 160 units by 1994 Preserved all al Hilt( an midi{ional IU0 unit: risk units IIIro I I g I1 1991.) 1'l -100 units through 200 ( Mustin 16aidells) PI( servecl 150 at risk fit iLs all Ulalllf't' (Ill units lo:;l Clue to freeway widerlilll;) Monitored !'ustin G_'Irderts and preserved all al -Disk units 11(AISING ELEMENT 1.)ls(:'EMfiEW 2001 TABLE 11'1 M-36 EUTECTIVENUSS 01. 10US1NG EJIM I NT1'1 OGRAMS 1989 — 2000 Program Responsible Agency Fundin r Source Objective Effectiveness 1989-1994 1995-1997 1998-2WO a) Monitor knits at (tisk: Maintitin cx•r previous page for conlacI Willi owners of at risk unlls ellecli v('n(`s5 cle crip11 on, its potential colivrl:Sloll halt's ap- proac'h to clelvi-mine whether sa'ction 8 Coal -acts helve been renewed or are plillllle(1 to le(• rent -wed. Discuss Willi the rlwllrr of the "at risk" projects the I CiLy's desire to preserve the tinils its l affordable. b)'I'enanl Educalion- Work wills Lenalas of at risk dulls ill cliln};tT of, Converting. Proviclt' tenants Willi information legarcling potential lenlutl purchase of building's in- .-Iticllll}; wrillell irllm 11 ation anis Lilly related workshops. Act its it liaison between lemilits and nonprofils poleiltially invulved in cunsll urtilll; or uctluiring replacement housintl. if existing' staff i, nut able to provide. adequate staffing' for lltis program, l provide 01.1I51(It-' (•ullsultilnls to sup- port'lliet program. c) Work with Nonprofits. Work with nonprofit housing' providers to vx- plore anis if apprupriatE, facilitate j ilc(luisilion or Feillacrnlrnl of at risk uuil.5. CITY OF TUSTIN—PRELIMINARY HOUSING Is'LEWENT ORA("1' ?T;CI-INICAL k11 J1,101?A31�U[ifvl 90 1)Is'('[sM131s1' 2001 TABLE, I ITM-36 EFUTC, FIVI-NENS OF HOUSING . 171.1,MENTPROGRAMS 1989 — 2000 Program Responsible Agency Funding Source Objective Eff , ectiveliess .1989-1994 '1995-1.997 1.998-2011(1 d) Rererw Fmid. Earmark devel- opment housing set-aside fluids to assist priority putt'llasens Willi the LIUMI-11CIVnicut and closing tms(s . a, -chasing projects mociated Willi 13111 al risk. ColitiXILIC to monitor other poltinfial I'miding sotirces, SLIVII its State grants and I I LJD 1.11 INU JA funds. Building Codes, City ol"i'llslill, i None necessary Aillelldillelits jil.-tified U.) '85''88'")1 '91 &'94 '97 PlullibiliFl, It(. Slate of Californin has dolor- Collillitilli(v Buildin Pittillbilig, M(4-'Ii&k (ft Illill(Iti 111jit tilt- oVVI-I idi.LIg VaILIC is I )vvChIpIllent CodeMed till lit.-ItI, Ar Mechanical, and Buil Code the protection of lite health all(.[ Depalhilent Building Code Building, Code 199b liter lrictfl sClfe[v ur I-esidt'lltial occupillits. 84,'87, '90 '93 & '96 Cod" adopted Continue to adoill 1.11C Ullif01-111 E.hh:trical Codf!r 1: , lectrical Codes 1311ilililill, COLIO PLAI-SURIA to HIP Stilk' adopted adopted directives and where local amend.. meats are proposed to wflect local climatic, geologic or lopol-ralplLic ('011ditiolls, and minimize, wherever possible, impacts on provision of I tolls 1118. Site Improvements Cily of"I'llslill Devoloper Difficult to verify Crectind a public Refifulliced Converted The requil-ellwill for III(, dvVeloper to funded work, existillf, public Portions of site i III provelTwI11%of((, 'n H81(1SrIiIVIII works public works restills in pmsinj) these cosLs oil Ille districts iti East assessment assessment housilij T.These Costs ate _,, Collsillill' Tustin. district to Lake district bonds to CYTY OPTUSTIN - - PREJ111111NARY I 1C)IRSING ELEMENT DRA VP 7 ECHNICA 1, MEAR)RANDUM DEC'EMBER 2001 TABLE IITM-3(i Ii}{11,('1'1V}:N1;5fi ( )17 I1()USIN(.; IiI+MENl' PROGRAMS '1989 - 2000 Program Responsible Agency Funding Source Objective _ Fffecliveness 19594994 1995-1997 - ---1998-2000 rellcclecl in the i ost of hou!iinl, that advalttage of fixed rate to rlinlirlales an Even }water I lower- intert•sl lower costs. propolliorl of the population from 1 rate:~. firlallcially eluaLifying for the pits -chase of 11010;illfr. Tule fillalldilf', Of Ilrhlic improvelnailts by it special assessment clislri(a on it per parcel bellelil basis miry Enable it Vrenter proportion of the nlaikeL to qualify, for limising. Assessule uL di!strit.t lillallcll% Ibis beell llllpleilloiltetl in 1 Lhe f',i15t 'l'll5lill alga :!lilt is [Willy usec.l to pay for public hill), nwills. 111 couding ally elt•w as !:(":,Sul ll•1It. districts, kill evilhlkltloll Should bt' completed of Illt! dev(+ oper'S activity to advklllce pay uff bonds aL the close of escrow. ISX:lctioris and Permit City elf I llMill CitV Gencraf Respond it, kill It'a1tic'm I'eCs Wili—cl for fees wfllved for 5 fees waived for Procedures i'lold, I ltlllsing received 20 projects proj('cts 1 project Consider waiving or lilodlfyinh villi- Se'L A.^.+IIID nils feeS (,I- excic L1olis lion (ally i-mluircd where such waiver will reduce flip affordability pil) associ- ated Willi proviilillg hotlsinl; of ttic elderly and for low-income I hol lspliol IS. ()j, 1FUST1N'- PRELIMINARY 11U(IS.11V(i 1;/,LMLN'1' DRAJ,T 7'E(:11N1CY1 L ME'.i11-10MAIDUM 92 Uls'('RfblliER Zoll.! TA 131,1: I FIN -36 ETFJ.',"( - 71 V F" N K.)USING HTMUNTPROGRAMS 19.89 — 2000 c1TY OP TUSTIN -- PRF.11MINARY HOUSING ELEMENT D ECh"m f 31 U? 2001. Responsible Agency FlIndillf; SOUrce Objective I I f ectiv eness, 19894994 1995-- 1997 J9'-)8-2010 Filvirollillental Constraill1% City of,hustill Dv -,eloper 2 major plogi-flill FIRs by 33 Negative 10 Negative I I Negative 'OlLtillilt' to illit-Vilitt' OW Funded 1994 1 h-clatations Dedill-atimls Dv!vlaratiows (14 -lays III ploct'sSillf", and Illifigating adopted adupted adoptccl; jr-t-111,11is int.-orporated 1FI10 t[IC' prepared a (it-tift Ill-. it plalls by roplix-ing, 1 -lilt] final i I Prograut joint I t -pork (FAR) on all major for development projects. A program i MCAS-Titslin FIR was dvvi-loped for the FASL project TustAll Specific Plan. Dell%ily Bonus Program CRY ofTuslil( General Flatil I Adopt Policy wills )6 Lllti-."Nu application No application Density..'Bollits Applicants under `hate law may lile of an appliultiull received received Ordillati;Ee for density bonuses Wlicti pooic(ts I adc lltej '- incorporate Z0'% units fur low incollit. 1L polsoll"; IM" of units for wry low- applicalion income units; or 50'A of units for ireceived switior citiv.viis c1TY OP TUSTIN -- PRF.11MINARY HOUSING ELEMENT D ECh"m f 31 U? 2001. TABLE HTM 37 PROGRESS TOWARDS OBIECTIVES 1989 - 2000 CITY OF TUSTLN ;Quantified i Unit Type, rDescription i Obiective5 Arcomplishment~'-, Veg' Low .I Low CONSTRUCTION I Moderate , Upper Adequate Sc'res 5,0,','0, 5.546 2,187 ' 2,074 I ~..285 New Owner ,dousing Re?la:ement !-louslng I ~45 3 8 6 7 224 Subtotal 5,010 [ 5,694 110 2,1194 2.081 1,409 REHABILITATION ~ousmg ~or ffm Disabied (re,off t) 25 41 21. 20 Code Viclahons 4 1.443 288 188 967 Re~i Rehabilitation Loans./C, ran'.s Multi-~u-v..fly Acq-.:isition./Rehab/' 20 64 2 4 5 5: 50 Housin§ Rehabilitation (Single I:am/.iy) 80 Subtotal 100 3,766 ', 537 328 1,023. I 50 PRESERVATI ON =.East Tusr~n Af£ordabie '.'-iouslng 100L Program 5~M 174 Orange Gardens 160 150. I 16 ! 3.34 A~:!ordab!e S~_~dor HousL'xg 20 1!2; ~ !22 5._~;ior Board & Care 20 18 ~ ': 18 ?.u:.t-ural Resources ~ 58 i 28 30 Tt:.qtir. Gardens 3 02, ; ~ O~ Subtotal 925 5113 ! 168 I 387 25 30 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ~.,: Time Homebuyer Down ?a?,'ment 50 8 i :. 2 6 Assistance Loa.ns .Mort§age ~edit CerE£icates 48 I !4.i Section 8 Rental Voucher Assisra_nce 10 1,4~0: 2,420 Share~ Housing Referrals 25 2T5: ! ?.5 Deed Resmcficms 100 538 I 108 ! 415 15 Homeless Housing Parenersh/F Program Emer§en~' Shelter 16 Subtotal 201 2,135 I 1,548 ! 556 31 OTHER Lot Ccnso~f, aevn 25 0i N..'A I N/A N."A N."A Flcxib~:x' in Housing Design 3,641 N.'A ] N,/A N,,'A N/A 'Tenmn: Protect-ion 20 3,7~2 N.'A I N./A N./A N .'A CITY OF TUSTIN- PRE, LIMIA"'A.??.Y D.R.4.twF GEN. E,i~q.L PLAAr AMEArDMEA'T 94 HO r..,~iJvG DF~CEMBF~R TABLE HTM 37 PROGRESS TOWARDS OBJECTIVES 1989 - 2000 CITY OF*TUSTIN ! Quantified ~ i , Unit T~efDescri~tion ,{ Objectives, ,' Acco ,mpIishments '-I Verv~ Low Low P .eras.it Processing ' 500 ! 54: N/A N/A ] ! FEnerg3' Cznse. rva:ion 6,878 ! N,' A .4a-t:-.ual Reperts ~ 5: 2 N.'.a. N,,'A Fee Widv~s .A:: Reoues~s l. 26 N,'A N,.'A Subto~] N/A i N'/A To~al 6,236: ]4,]08 ~,~ "63 3,465 RHNA (19B9) 390 48~ z N~mber of UrJts. 2 ~g~na Garden. 2,085 N/'A ~ I Moderate I Upper N,'A N..." A N,' A N .." A. N,'A N.. N/A N../A 3,161 1,489 484 724 s 5hea Nomes (-i'us~n Groves]. a Represents code mspecfio:-~s; 1 }udgemmt li~~''. ~ A goal o£ 80 ..tv. its was established for all re~,abili-alion and acQvi~es, inc]rmive of single family an.5 m~ti-fa-.~v ~habilitatior.. '/herefo~, the 80 'ani~ is ovjv reflerted ~ the qua.n~tied o~t~ve tot~ one time. So,ecs: (1) Effecfiv~ess o/'?Io.,~mg Programs 1959 - 2000, ~it3' of T.as~__v4 (21, F~ve Year imvlementai~on Plan ;'or the To~21 Center and South '-entral Rede~,eiovment ?roje~ ,:~reas fcr Ftscal Years 2000 - 230i to 26,04 - 2025 CITY OF TUSTI,Y- PRELiMi,~%RY .... 5 AM~ D.~..~. , _ DR. AFT GENE, P,.A.L .or a r "'" ~'? 95 D~.~.;'~'~ ~00i APPENDIX A AFFORDABILITY GAP ANALYSIS CITY OF TUSI'/N- PRELIMI~YARY DRAFT GENERAL PL.4N AMEXDMENT 96 HOUShYG ELE;MIEA;7' DBCEMBER ~001 This page intentionaF~y Ie~ blank. CITY OF TUSTI. Y- PRELIMI:\:~RY HOUSI'.¥G .gLEMI~:YT DECEA(BER 2 O01 (,'17'Y OFIT.ILSTIN --- PRELIMINARY HOUSING" ELEMEI'V7' ME;110RANDUM D1EMBER 2001 SUMMARY OF ITR UNIT' (.)WNEKSI I.I['Al7FO11I)Al;ll,I'I'Y GAFS CJTY OF TUSTIN 1999 Level -I ' Level 11 Level 11 , I , Ievel IV Income l.evelDefinition: 50"10 of Median I I Lcu I I it- Io Income X, 80'to I M'X, 4L)f, ......-Mediall Income 12U76 of Median Income Affordable I lousing Cost 30'/In of 5011. of Nivilian Income, '30% of 70% of Mt.tfijill III(-oloe, 35% of 100% of Median 1111,t);lle, 35% of 110% of Mediml Lh.filliliolt: Adjusit-d for Family size Adjusted fUl' 1:.IllliiV.';iZe Adjusted for Family Size Income, Adjusted for Fauffly Size Affordability (;all I Ver Urd I Per Unit Per Unil Pe - r Unit New Construction111 a (;. c 11. F. d)..$57,864 11'202,190 :61';7,294 $57,864 New Construction (snuill lot/ dt.-Uldled) $,Q.4,5 36 $27:X,376 $ 1 (;8,6!)2 $108,652 Acqtii.si I toil/ Itohubililaliult 1.52,35 1 $75,071) $75,075 "I'ItC afi'01 Liability gaps shown 011 [Ili:-, ('11altalt' 1111? SUbSidy MHOLMLs 11w Redev('lopilund Agency Would have to plt)vide ill older to lujidt'r the (Ifiveloll"Ient p(itutype (XV11C.1116tAlly feasible to developers.The gap assli nw% that homeowliers obtain polulallent illolfgagvs ftom private lenders at market. raies. h otoly Ill! Ill„ jec is ale as foll()ws: 1 single 1:1"t"Y "w"ershill "M"al] lot" 1,1-(ljc-(-t (JI 45 tuliLs, ill -till i.Sit ioll/ I'MMMIJULUOU four-plex conversi(m it) omwrship of IM units. 5O1Jl,:e:TUSIill ('0111111M Lily RC(levelolimpnt Agency Comilrdwnsive Aflurdable I lousine, Strategy Am 10 (,'17'Y OFIT.ILSTIN --- PRELIMINARY HOUSING" ELEMEI'V7' ME;110RANDUM D1EMBER 2001 lncotue 1_cvcl I)eflttll UM Affordable housing Cusl Affordability Gap 1 ..._ _ -New Conslrrtclion (senior)__. Ac-tluisition/rellabiIilaLion Large project nlodet':lle rehabilitatiort �Ac(luisition/- I.vlutbililation Fuurplex SUMMARY ()17 PER LIN IT RENTAL AFFORDABILITY GAPS CITY OF'I'US'I'IN '1999 Level 1 - Below 50of Mediae Income 30% of 48% of Median Incoauv, Adjusted for Fantilt_ size - _ Per Unit Coal' 'ji: SU,;S88 $69,980 l,cvcl 11 Belweerl 50 to 8Ufut of Median WX of (1(A of Nlv(II}ul III('011lf `, Arfuslr(l fur Family Size I'er UIIif- I $45,993 $89,783 I_.eve! 111 Above 8U% of i1 edian Income i,S of 110% of Median Income, - Adjusted fur Family `iizc Per Unit Gap - - - - $10,217 $ll $47,14:5 = t 1 he affordability gap:: shuwu on Iles charl ate Ilse subsidy auunults the Redevelopuuvnt Agency would have to provide it, ortler to render the developrncnf- prototype ec(.montically feasible lu developers.'I'u idF•nlify Illf• gap amounts for levels 1, and II an assuutplion is tnadt• Ihat developets obtain permanent 1.4 mortgages from private lenders at market rales and inveslors equity front the syndication of loth federal and stale low income housirtl; tax ctetlits.'I'll idf•lll r Lhe Yap autcnulls lur Level III, an assumption is matte Ihat developers obtain permanent morigages Dont private Irlydel5 al markel rales. Pn4olypes aro as follow.-;: new cmistrurlitrtr of a 60 mul seltiur housing projot t; Ltrge projPcL ac(Iuisiliurl and rehabilitation of SU units; an(l, :n tlnisition/relt:lbiIiLllttut fomplex of 100 units. Source: Tlislin Contrruutity KedevelupmeW Agency Comprehensive Affordable I lousingStr:alegy 2WO-11). CITY OF TUS'9IN — PRF.L.IMINAhT MOUSING 1s1 EM1.'sN7' ORA 77x(:111NICA1, ME11,10RA NDI 1111 Og 01AWMBER 2001 APPENDIX B REFERENCES CITY OF TUSTL~:- PR.~LIMINARY DRA?T TECHNICAL MEMORA:¥DL:M I O0 HOUSI.¥O iYD~ CEivIBEI~° 0 0 ! This page intentionally IeJ't blank ClTY OF TUSTI:Y -. PRELIMINARY DRA. KF "' ,' r , · ~ EC7-/3; ICAZ, MEMO?_'t,YDU?:"i 2JOL'SD, rG ELE~lcr. E.¥T REFERENCES Documents 1. Ci~, of Tustin Comprehensive Housing Affordabflitv Strategy, February 2000. 2. 1990 Census Report. U.S. DeparLment of Commerce, Bureau of the Ce~us. 3. California State Depar~nent of Finance, 1990, 1999. Demographic Profile and Survey of Homeless Persons Seeking Services in Orange County. The Research Committee of the Orange Cou_nW Homeless Issues Task Force, 1999. 5. Southern California Association of Governments, Regional Housing Needs Assessment, 1999. 6. Ci~' of Tust-in, Zoning Code. 7. Cit}- of Tusfin, General Plan, as amended Ja.nuar3, !6, 2001. 8. Wiliiams-Kuebelbeck & Associates, Old Town Market Analysis, October 16, 1991. Second Five-Year implementation Plan for The Totem Center and Soufi~ Central Redevelopment Project Areas (FY 2000-01 to 2004-2005), Tustin Cemmurdtv Redevelovment Agency, January 2000. 9. Comvrehensive Housing AffordabiE~' S~ate~' for Fiscal Years 2000-2001 to 2009-2010, Tustin Co.-mmunit-3' Redevelopment Agency, February, 2000. 10. Final Envirorumen~a] Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Revert (EIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS-Tusth~ (Program, ELS.," EIR for MCAS-Tust-in), janua2T 16, 2001. 11. CiW Council Staff Revert, january 16, 2001. 12. Response to Comments, Final Moi'a.me 2 and 3 of Final Environmental impact Statemem/Envtronmenta: ~'mpac: Report (E!S/EIR) for the Disposa2 and Reuse of MCg3-Tuslin. 13. Marine Corps Air 5ta~on (MCAS) Tust~m Specific Plan/Reuse Plan, October 1996 and September 1998 Amendments. CITY OF TUSTIN- PRELIMINARY DIA4FT TECHNICAL ME.'~fOIL4NDr-Z~.( 2 02 HOUS~;O ELEB, ffE_¥T .¥Dt3C~MBEP..2 O0 2 24. Mastervlan Marine Corps Air Station Tustin, DON 1989. 15. State of CaLifornia, Department o£ HC4D, Web-site. B. Persons and Organizations A.'iar% .&~n Barajas, ' ~ .%iartager C1'u-istian TemporaQ' Shelter, Tusfin (714) 771-2969 Barbara Bishop, RecepEonist Aldergates (714) 544-3653 Kathy Novak The Sheev£old Shelter, Tustin (714) 669-9569 4. Susan Oak$on, Executive Director ,.Orange CounW Homeless issues Task Christine A. ShLngleton, Assistant C,.'~' Manager 'Tust~m Cormmurd~' Re~eveiovment Agency {'71: \ ,, .-_~ 573-3107 Elizabeth .-%. BLnsack, CommurdW Deveiovment .Director Community Development Department, T2sfin ,... 1~_; 573-3031 Lois E..J~frey 701 S. Parker St., Suite 8000 Orange, CA 92865-4760 (734) 558-7000 J!m Draughon, Redevelopment Program _.Ma~nager 'l-usfin Community Redevelopmemt Agency t.' 1~) 573-3121 o .!us~na A fi~kom, Assodate Planner Commt:nitv Development Departing. t, Tustin 573-3174 OF TUSTIA~ - PREL r. MiKAR Y TECHNICAL MkA'iORA:YDUM 1 03 HO U SflY G ELE~VI~ENT NDECEMB~R2 001 10. Grace Schuth, Receptionist Tustin Presbyterian Church (714) 5 '~4--7070 11. Officer G. Yallevienie Tusfin Po]ice Departmea'~t (714) 573-3200 12. ~ea_n Williams, Receptionist St. Cecilia's Church (714) 544-3131 CITY OF TUSTLhr- PRELIMZYARY DRAP'T TF. CHNICAL :h.IEMORA~¥DUM' 104 HO O'SI.¥G ~LEI~ENT ND~C£MBEt~200 i APPENDIX C MAJOR EMPLOYERS IN TUSTIN CITY 0t;' TUSTIN- PRE, LIM'INARY D~"~FT TECi-t. NICAL :,'IE, v.~OP~Zh'~.DU,','I 105 itOUSING Ei..EA~£NT :\rDECEMBER2 O0 ! ~his page intentionally left blank. CITY OF TL~TI.¥- PRELIMI~¥ANY D/EAFT TECHI~'ICAL MEMOP, A.~¥DO'M 106 ~.¥D~CE, MBE,r~2 001 LiST OF MAJOR EMPLOYERS IN T. USTIN, CA Company/Address/Telephone No. Emp. Product/Service 5teelcase Inc - (714) 259-8000 1,109 Office Furniture !123 Warner Avenue - Tustin 92780 Ricoh Electronics, :mc. (714) 259-1220 1,038 Manufacturer 1100 Valencia Avenue - Tustirt, 92780 Sun Health Care Group - (714) 544-4'-~43 985 Healthcare 2742 Dow Avenue - Tustin 92780 Texas Instrumen~ - (714) 573-6000 560 Semiconductors 14351 Mvford Road - Tustin 92780 Silicon Systems - (714) 731-7110 550 Lnteg-rated Circuits 14351 Mvford Road -'l-usttn 92780 MacPherson Enterprises - (714) 832-3300 540 Auto Dealerships 2 Auto Center Drive - Tustin 92782 Pargam Technolo~' - (714) 832-9922 500 Telecommunications 14402 Frankii~, Avenue - Tustiv. 92780 Cherokee Lntema~onal - (714) 598-2000 330 Power Suppiies 2841 Dow - Tusfin 92780 Toshiba .a2nerica Medical Systems - (7~ 4) 730-5000 2441 Michelle - Tus~a 92780 Crazy Shir~ - (714) 832-5853 291! Dow Avenue - Tust~m 92780 300 Distributor, Medical Equipment 245 I Apparel Printrak Intemaational - (714) 238-2000 204 FLngerpr~ting !250 N. Tus~_.n - 'rust~ 92780 Systems Revere Transducers - (7!4; 731-1Z34 200 Ma_nu£ac~rer 14192 Fran.klin Avenue - Tustin 92780 'lustre Hospital - (7!4) 669-5883 200 Hospital 14662 Newvort Boulevard - Tustin 92780 Pacific Bell Mobile Sen'ices - (714) 734-7300 203 Telecommunica t-ions 2521 M'icheEa Drive ?.a Floor - Tustin 92780 Fireman's Fund Lnsurance - (714) 669-0911 190 Insurance ~ 7542 17e S~reet - Tusf2w 92780 Safeguard Business Systems - ~714) 730-8212 ~ 75 Accounting Services 14661 Frar, klin - Tustin 92780 Dynachem electronic Materials - (714) 730-4200 135 Chem~ca:.s 2631 MicheIle D:'ive - Tusfin 92780 Vitaicom Inc. - (714) 546-0147 !30 Medical computer 15222 Del Amo Avenue - Tustin 92780 Networks Smar~qex Systems Inc. - (714) 838-8737 '_27 Electronic 24312 FrankFm Avenue - Tustin 9275C Assemblies 125 Duncan electronics - (7!4~i 258-7500 15771 Red Hill - Tus.~in 92780 Quali,? Systems - (724) 731-7171 1". 3 178~ E. 17'. Street, Suite 210 - Tusfin 92780 ~ormation providect by the Tus,~.n Chamber of Commerce, 2999. 399 E1 CamLno Real - Tustin, CA 92780 - (714) 544-5341 Sgrlsors Manufact-m'ing __ Medical/Dental Computer S,vsterns CITt' OF TU'STIiV - PRELIMIiCAR Y D?P~.FT TECH~'ICAL MEMOP.4_¥DUM 1 0 7 HOUSLYG ELE2v'~.E_'V'T zYDECEMBEN2 0 01 Exhibit B of Resolution No. 02-09 Resolution No. 00-90 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Final Joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report For the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin SCH No. 94071005 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Date Adopted by Tustin: December 18, 2000 This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21081.6. Its purpose is to provide for accomplishment of mitigation measures required by the Final Environmental Impact Statement..'Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the disposal and reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin (State Clearinghouse Number 94071005), located in the City of Tustin and the City of lrvine, in the County of Orange (sec Figure 1 ). Thc City of Tustin has adopted the mitigation measures included in the Final EIS/EI'R in order to mitigate or avoid significant impacts on the environment. Prior to approval o£ any discretionary approval in Irvine, lrvine will adopt the measures. This program has been designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. Mitigation measures and implementation measures identified in the Final EIS/EIR for thc disposal and reuse of MCAS Tustin have been incorporated into a checklist. Each mitigation measure and implementation measure is listed separately on the checklist with appropriate spaces for monitoring the progress of implementation of each measure. Implementation measures are required where environmental impacts are less than significant, but to support proposed development within the reuse plan area concurrent with demand, additional measures are required. For these purposes, both implementation measures and mitigation measures are identified in this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and are equally enforceable. Thc following information is identified for each measure listed in the checklist: The timing of implementation of the mitigation measure or implementation measure. The appropriate agency to enforce the mitigation measure or implementation measure. The mitigation measures and implementation measures in the table are listed by environmental impact area in the same order as the3' are listed in the Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Management The disposal and reuse ofMCAS Tustin is a long-term program that includes a number of mitigation measures. Some of these measures are applicable at the individual development project level, and others are applicable to the overall program or plan. In order to coordinate implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a regular review of the progress of the program is required. Annual Review of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Thc overall management of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will be managed by the City of Tustin, as applicable to the City's jurisdiction. The City will undertake an annual review of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as applicable to Tustin and prepare a brief progress memorandum based on that review. The Citv of l_rvinc will prepare a similar EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MC~tS Tustin 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Figure 1 - Reuse Plan A. rea (Figure ES-3 of the FEIS,'EIR) EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MC.4S Tustin 3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program memorandum. The memoranda from each City should be transmiaed to each respective agency's City Council for acceptance after completion. The reviewer, the Community Development Director or designee, will check each mitigation measure in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to determine whether or not that implementation measure is complete. If the mitigation measure has been completed for the project, the reviewer should line through the mitigation measure on the form, initial and date the line indicating that the mitigation measure has been completed. For measures that require a report, program, or plan, the reviewer should determine if that report, program, or plan is due based on the progress of implementing the program to date. If the report, program, or plan is timely, that fact should be reported in the review memorandum to the head of each agency. If no such program is necessa~' at this time, the memorandum should so state. For measures that are ongoing measures, the memorandum should report whether these measures are actively being pursued, and if not, what action is appropriate. If the measures are no longer appropriate or necessary because the environmental effect is no longer an issue, then that fact should be reported in the review memorandum, and the discontinuation of the mitigation measure recommended. If measures are not being implemented adequately, recommendations should be made to improve the application of the mitigation measure. For measures that apply at the project level, the memorandum should report whether or not such measures are being actively applied to indMdual projects. If thc measures are no longer appropriate or necessary because the environmental effect is no longer an issue, then that fact should be reported in the review memorandum, and the discontinuation of the mitigation measure recommended. If measures are not being implemented adequate]y, recommendations should be made to improve the application of the mitigation measure. Implementation of Program-Level Mitigation Measures Program-level mitigation measures are measures that do not apply to individual development projects, but which apply at the overall program level. They are implemented through the regular actions of the City of Tustin Community Development Department, City of Irvine Community Development Department, or other applicable departments within both cities' discretionary project review. These measures are reviewed and monitored through the annual program review discussed above. Implementation of Project-Level Mitigation Measures Project-level mitigation measures are monitored throu~ the appropriate Cit?s (Tustin or lrx, ine) planning review process and discretiona_ry project review. When a development project within the Reuse Plan Area is submitted for planning review to each City, each respective planning reviewer will have a copy of the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist including all pages that contain measures applicable to that project. Before approving plans, the planning reviewer will ensure that all mitigation measures are incorporated into building plans, sile plans, public improvements plans, etc. (i.e., those that are not project-design mitigation measures). I'J1S/'EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Project-Design Mitigation Measures A project-design mitigation measure is a measure that needs to be incorporated into the project design as part of any project approval; for example, traffic improvements or exterior lighting plans. Such measures may be normally shown on the building plans, site plans, public improvement plans, specifications, or other project documents. The mitigation monitoring checklist will be used to check off those mitigation measures required. If a mitigation measure is not shown on the appropriate plan sheets, plans will be sent back for incorporation of those mitigation measures or approved equivalents. Plans will not be approved until each mitigation measure is incorporated into the project design. After plans are approved, and before any component of design is approved as complete by thc appropriate City in its inspection, the project proponents will submit proof that each mitigation measure shown on the plans has been installed or incorporated into the constructed project. Verification of compliance will then be noted on the monitoring checklist and signed off, completing the process for this category, of mitigation measure. The monitoring pro,am for measures to be incorporated into project design is the same program that is currently used to verify compliance with applicable City codes in design and construction. No additional staffing is required, except that training may be appropriate to alert inspectors to the new requirements and the use of the monitoring checklist. In case of some specific unique or unusual mitigation measures, it may be appropriate or necessary to contract with consultants for inspection or verification of mitigation measures. Construction Mitigation .,~leasures Construction mitigation measures are measures designed to reduce the impacts of construction, and in general are required to be maintained in operation continually during construction. Monitoring will be verified by building, public works, or wading inspectors as appropriate during their regular visits to the sites during construction, and reported to the Public Works Director or designee. Reporting of compliance with mitigation measures should be required at least monthly, with reports of violations made immediately to thc appropriate department. Operational Mitigation Measures Operational mitigation measures are intended to veri~' the implementation of mitigation measures that will continue after the project is occupied and in operation. These mitigation measures should be verified on an annual basis, and if problems are noted, reinspected on a more regular basis until the measure is operating effectively. Monitoring of such measures may be certified by the applicants/operators with verification by the applicable City. In that event, each applicable City shall exercise its independent judgement in verifying compliance. Mitigation Measures Versus Implementation Measures EIS/E1R for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS 7~'tin5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The Final EIS/EIR for the disposal and reuse ofMCAS Tustin identifies both mitigation measures and implementation measures. Implementation measures are to be required where environmental impacts are less than significant, but to support proposed development within the reuse plan area concurrent with demand, additional measures are required. For these purposes, both implementation measures and mitigation measures are identified in this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Pro,am, and equally are enforceable. Availabilit3' of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ]'he completed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program checklist will be retained in each program and project file and will be available for public inspection on proper request. Monitoring Program Fees For major projects for which the mitigation monitoring effort is substantial, it may be appropriate to charge mitigation monitoring fees to support the actual costs of project-level mitigation monitoring. In such cases, the appropriate Ci~' will charge and collect from the project proponent a fee in the amount of the anticipated actual cost to the City for monitoring all mitigation measures, including consultant sen'ices and costs of administration, for a project as described in this program. A deposit mav be required by the City to be applied toward this fee, if established by City resolution or ordinance..amy unused portion of the deposit will be refunded. In the case of a project where the applicant will not be associated with the project after construction, the City will charge the anticipated cost of operation of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for an appropriate period in advance. Sanctions/Penalties The applicable City ma)' levy sanctions or penalties established by resolution or ordinance tbr violations of conditions listed in the monitoring program. These sanctions and penalties ma.,,' include: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Civil penalties/fines according to City codes. "Stop work" orders. Revocation of permits. Holding issuance of Certificate of Occupancy until completion of work. Forfeiture of performance bonds. Agency implementation of measures with appropriate charges to the applicant based on Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program agreements. EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Dispute Resolution In the event of a disa~eement between the City and project applicants/operators regarding the monitoring program, including manner of payrnent, penalties for noncompliance, and financial security arrangements, the following procedure, or other appropriate procedure as provided for in the applicable Tustin or Irvine Municipal Code, or CEQA Guidelines, will be followed: The applicable City's representative will attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved, the applicable City's representative will prepare a report documenting the source of the dispute and the City's position. o The applicable Ci~"s representative will take the report before the Community Development Director, who will determine the resolution of the disagreement. o The decision of the Community Development Director may be appealed to the City Council on pa3rment of the City's standard fee for appeal. The decision of the CiB: Council shall determine the outcome of the appeal. EI.~,."EIR./br the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MCAS TUSTIN DISPOSAL AND REUSE Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibilify Enforcement Responsibility Mitigation Measures for Land Use The City of Tustin shall amend its General Plan and Prior to a final map recordation City of Tustin ('urinnunity Development zoning ordinance to be consistent wish planned land uses. (except for financing and Depar(rnent (Tustin) Any zoning ordinance shall include site design measures reconveyance purposes) within such as buffering, landscaping, screening, and setbacks, to the RCllse Plan Arca within the ensure high quality development and compatibility city ofTustill. between land Uses. The goal is to assure flat the overall appearance of development on the site is at least srrWlar ill quality (el other mister planned areas 111 'I ustin and other adjacent cities. LU -2. The City of'Irvine shall amend its (;eneral Plan and Prior to a final map recordation City of Irvine Community Development zoning ordinance to be consistent with planned land Uses. (except Ior flilarlcmg and Department (Irvine) Any zoning ordinance shall include site design pleasures reconveyance purposes) within Such as buffering, landscaping, screening, and setbacks, to the Reuse Plan Area within the ensure high quality development and compatibility City of Irvine. between land uses. The goal is to assure that the overall appearance of development on the site is at least similar in quality to other roaster planned areas in'fastin and other adjawit cities. /:IS<TIR 1br the Dispma/ and Reum, n/;t4(A S Austin X A- itigatiun Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibilily Enforcement Responsibility Implementation Measures for Utilities (a) Tllc City of Tustin or City of Irvine, as app►opriate, shall See 'fable 4.3-1 of the Final City of'fustin alldlor Cily of Community Development ensure that infrastructure is constructed in phases as ii1SITIR ol- Table 1 at the end of Irvine, as applicable Department (Tustin and/or triggered by identified thresholds in Table 4.3-1 of the this Mitigation Monitoring and Irvine, as applicable) Final 1',ISfI'.IR (see Table I at file end of this, Mltlgallon Reporting Program for each ,Nionitornng aild Reporting Program). The Phasing Plan specific triggering mechanism. provides all organizational framework to faclhtale development of the reuse plan alfa III tandem with infrastructure necessary to S►lppot't the planned development. This Framework reflects the fact that each component of the infrastructure has its own threshold fin- accommodaling additional development toward build -out of the reuse plan arca. The triggering mechanisms that identify timing of key infrastructure provisions are summar ized in 'Fable 4.3-1 (see Table I at the end of this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). (h) Prior to a final map recordation (except filr financing and Prior to final map recordation Project developer Community Development reconveyance purposes), the development applicant shall (except for financing and Department Chistin and/or enter into all agreement with the City of'fuslin and City Ieconveyance pulposes). Irvine, as applicable) of Irvine and any appropriate- regional ufilily agencies, districts, and providers, as applicable, to dedicate all casement. rights-of-way, or other land determined necessary to construct adcquafe utility infirastruelurc and facilities to serve the project as determined by the city, agency; district, or other providers. 111.1 fi/IZ/ur' the Dispomd and Reuse uj:b1C AS h4min J MitigationL9nnirnr ink and iZrpr,r rind Program Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation ,Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (c) Prior to any filial map tecordatlon (except IOC financing Prior to filial rnap recordation Project developer ('011111llllllty D)evelopnicut and conveyance purposes), the development applicant (except tin financing and Uepatl ent ('Dustin and/ur shall enter into a secured agreement with the cities of reconveyance purposes). Irvine, as applicable) 'Dustin and/or Irvine, as applicable, to participate on a pro -rated basis in cunstnlction of capital improvements necessary to provide adequate utility facilities. (d) Prior to the issuance of permits for any public Prior to the issuance of permits Project developer Conlrmnity Development improvements or development project, a development for any public improvements or Department (Tustin and/or applicant shall submit to the City of'I'ustin and City of" development project. Irvine, as appropriate) Irvine, as applicable, information f ono IRWD which outlines required facilities necessary to provide adequate potable water and reclaimed water service to the dcvelopment. (e) Prior to the issuance of the certificates of use and Prior to the issuance of the Project developer Community Development occupancy, the project developer shall ensure (bat fire certificates of use and occupancy. Department (Dustin andlor hydrants capable of flows in amounts approved by the Irvine, as appropriate); ()(TA are in place and operational to meet fire flow ( CFA requirements. (I) Prior to the issuance of pcnnits for any public Prior to the issuance of permits Pto_ject developer Conununity Devclopnlent improvements or development project, a development for any public improvements or Department (Tustin and/or applicant shall submit to the City of Tustin and City of development project. Irvine, as applicable) Irvine, as applicable, information from 1RWD, OCSD, or the City of"Dustin which outlines required facilities necessary to provide adequate sanitary sewage service to the development. 1-.'IS11 1R %r,r the Disposal and Reuse of it-WA.S Tustin 10 Alitiiiation h1unitoring and Rc/rurtillg Pt-OAV nnr Measure '1 huhig and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation ;Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (g) Prior to the issuance of grading pernuts or approval ol'any Prior to the issuance of grading Project developer 7 ustiu Building Division or subdivision map (except for financing and reconveyance permits or approval of any the Irvine public Works purposes). whichever occurs first, for development within subdivision map (except for Department, as applicable the; 100-year flood plain, grading and drainage systems financing and reconveyance shall be designed by the project developer Such that all purposes), whichever occurs first. building pads would be sate Ironl inundation filum rulloll lion all stoinis up to and including the theoretical 100-year storm, to the satlsCaction of the tarty of'i ustiil Building Division or the Irvine Public Works Depaitinci 1, as applicable. Grading permits or subdivision snaps generated for financing and ieconvcyance purposes are exerlipt. (h) Prior to construction of regional flood control facilities. Prior to construction of'regional Project developer Public Works Departnicnt appropriate state and federal approvals, inehrditig (loud conliol facilities. ('Tustin and/or Irvine, as agreermenls and permits, shall he obtained. These include applicable) but are not limited to Regional Water (duality Control Board permits, including NPDFS permits; Scction 404 permits from the USA('OF, and Section 1601 or 1603 agreements floni the CDR; in a nuirmer meeting the approval of the City of'Tustin and the Irvine Public Works Department, as applicable. (i) Prior to issuance of any grading permit or approval of any Prior to issuance of any grading Projekt developer Tustin Building Division or subdivision snap (except for financing and conveyance permit or approval of any the Irvine Public Works purposes), tier any development that is either partially or subdivision map (except lbr Department, as applicable completely located within the 100-year flood plain of the financing and conveyance Flood Insurance Rale Map, the development applicant purposes). shall submit all required documentation to the FEMA and demonstrate that the application for a Conditional i.etter of Map Revision for changes to the 100-year flood plain is satisfied in a manner meeting the approval of each respective city, as applicable. ii/,5:.E-1R Jur the Oi wsal and Reuse of':b1CAS Tustin II Alitiga ion Monitoring and Re1wrring 1)rogram —_----_ - Measure -- 'Tinting aed 1111pleutentation Mitigation Congrlialice Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcemeul Responsibility (j) Pt for to the approval of any applicable subdivision neap Prior to the approval of any Project develupe► Public Works Depattulent (except tier li.nancirlg and conveyance purposes), the applicable subdivision neap ('Tustin and/or lrviue, as developer -applicant shall design and consU-uct local (except frit financing and applicable) drainage systems for conveyance of the 10 -year runoff. If conveyance purposes). the facility is in a local setup, it shall be designed to convey the 25 -year runoll'. (k) I's for to any grading for any new development, the Prior to any grading lily any new Project developer 'fustic I3uilding Division or following drainage studies shall be submitted to and development. Public Works Department approved by the City o1" Tustin, City of h1°ine, and/or ('Tustin audior Irvine, as 0CI'CD, as applicable: applicable) (1) A drainage study including diversions (i.e., Prior to any grading for any new Plolect developer off site areas that drain onto and/or through the development. project site), with justification and appropriate mitigation tier any proposed diversion. (2) A drainage study evidencing that proposed drainage patterns would cot result in increased 100-vcar peak discharges within and downstrearn ol'the project limits, alld WOUld not worsen existing drainage conditions at storm drains, culverts, and other street crossings including regional Ilood control facilities. The study shall also propose appropriate mitigation for any incicased runolfcausing a worsening condition ofany existing facilities within or downstream of project limits. Implementation ol'appropriate interim or ultimate flood control infiastructure construction must be inducted. 1i1.S L:111 Jur the lliyomil and Reuse of'AlCA.S Tustin 12 Alligation Xfonitnring rind Reporting l'rogni t Measure Timing and Implementation ,Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility (k) Detailed dtainage studies indicating how. in 'Tustin Building Division or (cont.) conjunction with the drainage conveyance Public Works Department systems including applicable swales, channels, (Tustin and/or llvine, as street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood applicable) water retarding, building pads are made safe front runoff inundation which may be expected fiont all storms up to and including the theoretical I00 -year flood. (1) Prior to approval of any subdivision map (except Iior Prior to approval of any City of"Dustin Tustin Public Works f naticing or conveyance purposes), an agreement will be subdivision map (except for Departrllent, 1 nstlll executed with the OCYC"D that provides for the financing or conveyance ('umn►uuity Redevelopment identificalion and contribution of a project -specific fair purposes). Agency share contribution toward the construction of' ultimate flood control facilities needed to accommodate build -nut of the afl"ccicd project. Intet int flood control facilities may be considered fir approval provided such facilities meet OCFCD requirements. Nothing shall preclude the City of"I ustill lrom transferring the obligation onto other project developers within the project area. ,'i1,5:,7illi tui the l Nsposal and Reuse of AlCAS histin 13 hligation ;tfunitaring and Reporting l'mgnirn Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility iNlitigalion Monitoring and Fi forcement Responsibility Implementation Measures lin Public Services and Facilities (m) (;e.ileral Tustin Colt►llilillity Development Department, The City of'fustin and the City of Irvine, each within its Prior to final map recordation or Police Department, or Parks respective jurisdiction, sl►all ensure that adequate lire building permit issuance. Department or the City of protection, police protection, and parks and recreation Irvine, and/01, OCTA, as facilities (including bikeways trails) needed to adequately appropriate serve the reuse plan area shall be provided as necessary. To eliminate any negative impact the project could have on each community's general fiend, financing mechanisms including but not limited to developer fees, assessment district financing, and/or tax increment financing (in the event that a redevelopment project area is created for the site), shall be developed and llsed as (leterinined appropriate by each City. Specifically; ( I) Applicants for private dcvelopment projects shall Project developer be required to enter into an agreement with City of I ustin or the City of Irvine, as applicable, to establish a lair -share mechanism to provide needed fire and police protection services and parks and recreation facilities (including hikcways) through the use of tee schedules, assessnient district financing, Community Facility District financing, or other mechanisms as determined appropriate by tach respective city. (2) Recipients ot'property through public Property recipients conveyance process shall be required to miligate any impacts of their public uses of property on public services and facilities. f:lS%Fell fru• the Di.vlrusal unrl Reuse a/•;VfC'AS Tustin 14 Mitigation Monilurim, wid Re1wrling Prr gnim Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (n) The cities of Tustin and Irvine shall jointly consult and Ongoing prior to implementation City ol" I'uslin anti City of Conmtunity Development coordinate with the OCITRD./Ilarbors, Beaches and of Peters Canyon and Barranca l,vime Department (Tustin and/or Parks, Program Manaf;ernent and Coordination Division, trails. Irvine, as applicable) in preparation of trail designs for the. Peters Canyon and Barranca trails within the reuse plan area. Improvements for each of these trails would he installed upon completion of llood control channel improvements and approval of their joint use tby the OCPFRD. (u) l iic I'rgtectiuivl:meiticuc�Medical.S.e.ryices Prior to the first final limp Projectdeveloper Insti,i (n„n,mnity recordation or building permit Redevelopment Agency and Prior to the first final Wrap recordation or building permit issuance For development (except the City of Irvine issuance flor development (except for financing and for financing and reconveyances i ,econveyances purposes), the project developer could he pill poses). rcgn►red to enter into an agreement with the pity of Tustit► or City of Irvine O(TA, as applicable, to address impacts of tlic project on fire services. Such agreement could include participation for lire protection, personnel and equipment necessary to serve the project and eliminate any negative impacts on lire protection services. (p) Prior to issuance of building pennits, the project Prior to issuance of building Project developer Community Development developer shall work closely with the 0(:I' -A to ensure permits. Department ('Dustin and./or that adequate fire ptotection measures are implemented ill Irvine, as applicable) the project. (q) Prior to issuance of huilding permits for phased projects, Prior to issuance of building Project developer Conununity Icvclopmenl the project developer shall submit a construction phasing permits fir phased projects. Department (Dustin and/or plan to the U(.'FA demonstrating that emergency veliicle Irvine, as applicable) access is adequate. EI S1AIR /in• the DisI;o.+rel and Reuse ofWA.S Tustin 15 I ilriKation Monitoring and Rrywrting I t-ogrrnn F- measure Timing and Implementation Miligation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (r) Ptiol to the issuance of building permits, the project Ptior to issuance of building, Noject developer Community Development developer shall submit a lire hydrant location plan for the permits. Department (Tustin and/or levicw and approval of file bile (thief and ensure that fire Irvine, as applicable) hydrants capable of flaws in amounts approved by the OCT'A ate in place and operational to sleet (ire flow 1 C'cl Ll 11'C l 11C Il l S. (S) Police I'rotection Prior to issuance of'building Project developer Community Development permits. Department (Dustin au(Uor Prior to issuance of building permits, the project Irvine, as applicable) developer shall work closely with the respective Police Department to ensure that adequate security precautions are implemented in the project. (t) Schools Prior to the issuance of' Project developer Conuutnrity Development certificates of use and occupancy. Department (Dustin and/or Prior to the issuance ol'certifcates of use and occupancy, Irvine, as applicable) the project developer shall submit to the respective City proof of payment of appropriate school tees adopted by the applicable school district. (u) Larks _.and _Recreation Prior to the first final map Project developer 'Tustin Community recordation (except (in financing Development Department Prior to (lie first final clap recordation (except lbr and ICConveyance purpoSCS) or and Parks and Recreation financing and reconveyance purposes) lir building perinit building pennit issuance. Department issuance for development within the City of I ustin portion of the site, the project developer shall be required to provide evidence of compliance with all requirements and standards of the. City of "Tustin Park Code. EISZEU for the Disposal and Rause of MCAS Tustin 16 Mitigation Atlunitoring and Reporting 1'ro wni Measure 'finning and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (v) Prior to the first final map recordation or building permit Prior to the first final ntap Project developer Irvine Contnnrrlity issuance within the City of lrvirtc portion of the site, the recordation (except for financing Development Department project developer shall be required to provide evidence of and reconveyance purposes) or compliance with all requirements and standards of the building permit issuance. City of Irvine Park Code. (w) Prior to the first concept plan for tentative tract map in the Prior to the first concept plan for Project developer Tustin Public Works City of" Bustin, the project developer shall file a petition tentative tract ntap. Department; Tustin f'or the creation of it landscape maintenance district for the Community Redevelopment project area with the City of Tustin. The district shall Agency include public neighborhood parks; landscape improvements, and specific trails (Barranca only), the medians in arterials, or other eligible items mutually agreed to by the petilioner and the City of Tustin. in the event that a district is not established prior to issuance of the first building permit, maintenance of items mentioned above shall he the responsihilily ol'a cannuunily association. (x) Prior to approval oI any subdivision map (e'xce'pt IDI Prior to approval of any Project developer Community Development financing or conveyance purposes), an agreement will be subdivision reap (except Im Department (Mustin and'or executed with the (irllowing agencies for the associated financing or conveyance Irvine, as applicable) frail improvements: purposes). a. Counly ol'Orange harbors, Beaches -. . identification of a project -specific iair share contribution toward the installation of necessary regional bikeway frail improvements within Peters Canyon Channel, to be installed in conjunction with the ("u►uity of Orange's other channel improvements; l:iSIF.IR for the Oi%I)osal and Reuse of.N- AS Tustin 17 Mitigation Aloniloring and R(Torting Progrnnr ----- Measure ThIling and Implementation Miligation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and h;nforeeutem Responsibility city of Tustin - file identification ora Prior to fhe first final map Project developer Tustin Community-- _-- (cont.) project -specific lair share contribution toward recordation (except for financing Development Department the installation ol'Class 11 bicycle trails through and reconveyance purposes) or and/or SCRRAUCTA, as the project site. For fhe arca of the site northeast building permit issuance. appropriate of Irvine Center Drive, a separate agreement would he required to ensure [lie provision of a bikeway right-ol-way easement, and design and construction ora bike trial along the SCRILAJOCTA rail tracks from I larvard Avenue westerly to the peters Canyon Channel. In addition, project developers of fhe areas of the site southeast of the Peters Canyon Channel would need to accommodate access to both the Peters Canyon "Frail and the trail adjacent to the SCRIMOCfA tracks in any project site design including dedication of any necessary recreational trail easements; C. City ol-"ICustin the identification ofa Prior to the first final reap Project developer Tustin Community project -specific lair -share conlrihution toward recordation (except Ior financing Development Department installation of Class I bikeway trail and reconveyance purposes) or improvements northerly of Bazranca Parkway building permit issuance. after completion of the Barranca Channel improvements. For pioposed developrnews adjacent to Barranca Channel, separate agreements would he required to ensure the establishment ofa bikeway right -of --way easement between Jamboree Road and Red IIill Avenue. F.i,Slli R Jnr ,hv 1 risposui and Reuse of A9C AS Tustin 18 Mitigation Moniluring and R(purzin Prognim Measure.I Uhning and Implementation I Mitigation Compliance I Mitigation Monilorimg and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Mitigation Measures for Aesthetics Vis -1 i lm conjunction with ally Zoning ordinance amendments to Prior to the first final map City of"l-ustin and City of ; Community Development intplenrcut the reuse plan in 'Dustin or Irvine, am wham I recordation (except for financing Irvine Department ('Tustin and/or design plan shall be adopted to provide Im distinct and and reconveyance purposes) or I I Irvine, as applicable) i cohesive architectural and landscape design, fcatutes and I building permit issuance. treatments, as well as harntcnry with adjacent landscaping. 'I he urban design plan shall have the following elements: landscaping concept and master signage plan; j • design review and approval process; • limits on dcvelopnicnt intensity for each specific land use; I j limits on height of structures and lot coverage; nritrimumt site building setbacks; • minituum on-site land%caping requirements; • buttering requirements, including bcrtrrs, i masonry walls, and landscaping; j • lighting regulations, including regulations ensuting that exterior lighting does not • negatively impact surrounding property; ! • screening regulations for mechanical equipment I I iand outside storage. and • site signage requirements, including sign petuat 1 ! approval. i 1:1.S 7i1R fbr the 11ia7rosa1 and Rouse q% , -WAS Tustin 19 Mititialion A-lonituring and Reporting Progu nt Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibi lily Enforcement Responsibility Mitigation Measures for CUItUral and Paleontological Resources list-I Ilistodc American Building Survey (IIABS) - DON will Prior to conveyance to City of Department of the'Navy Department of the Navy complete the appropriate recordation Circ hangars 28 and Tustin 29 and 1hC dISCOI1IigIIOUS historic district prior to conveyance of any propCIty within the discontiguous historic district and shall ensure that copies of the recordation are made available to SI IPO, the City of Tustiu, and any local or other archive facilities designated by SHM). l IIsi-2 t oration - within ;t) days of the execution of the MOA, Within 30 (.lays of the execution I )Cpa11111CI1t of the Navy Depattment of llle Navy Department of the Navy will Department of the Navyate of the MOA copies of plans and architectural drawings and other archival materials and records, as available, concerning; the layout and the buildings and structures that made up the original Navy lighter-than-air blimp fhcility to a local curation lacility. The City of Tustin or its designee %%ill also be provided with copies of these n>a aerials. Arch-1 Ptior to issuance of grading permits, the lour-acre parcel Prior to issuance of grading; l'roicct developer 'Tustin Connuunity cuttently outside the boundaries of the Air Station along permits. Development Department Ilarvard AveuuC shall he surveyed to delenuuhe the preseuceiabsence of archaeological resources prior to grading. EIS/1•:1K Jur the Disposal and Ream, gfAI('AS Tustin 20 iWirigalion A4unilnrdng and Rej)oning Program measure 'Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility i rifomement Responsibility Arch -2 Prier to issuance of grading permits, the cities of'Tustin Pricer to issuance of grading Project developer Community Development and Irvine shall each require applicants of individual permits. Department ('Tustin and/or development projects to retain, as appropriate, it county-• Irvine, as applicable) certified archaeologist. ifbllriCd rCS011rees are 1OLil1d during grading within the reuse plan area, it qualified mchaeologist would ticed to assess the site significance and perlorni the appropriate mitigatioil. 1 he Native Americai► view point shall be considered during this process. This could include testing or data recovery. Native American consultation shall also be initiated during this process. I list -3 As specified in the MOA; a substantive eflittt will be Ongoing, prior to making Department of the Navy and 'Tustin Community made to determine whether there is an economically substantial changes to hangar 2.8 County Of( 411110C Redevelopment Agency viable adaptive use of l langar 29 and Hangar 29. or i langar 29. 11ist•4 If the marketing effort identifies an economically viable Prior to making substantial Depatiment of Clic';Navy 'Tustin Community adaptive use of either of the complexes, that complex will changes to I langar 28 or l langar Development I )epattnient be eucutubcred by a historic preservation covenant. in file 29. case of the I langar 29 complex, these Measures shall balance the needs of the adaptive use and the needs for effective operation ofthe Federal bands to Parks or historic Monument programs. (list -i If NPS anchor SI1110 determine that, despite a marketing Prior to making substantial Department of' tile Navy NPS, SlIP0, and Department ellOrt that complies with (lie terms of the MOA or as changes to Hangar 28. ot'the Navy agreed to by the City of'I'ustin;County of Orange, NPS, and/or S11P0, au economically viable adaptive use of the I langar 28 complex was not identified, NPS anWor SHPO shall promptly advise Department of the Navy and notify the City of'I'ustiru(bunty of-Oiangethat [lie billowing measures are required. 1s1S1/i112 fur the 1 ti.%posal and Reuse of WG1S Tustin 21 Mitigation iWonilo ng oral Reporting Pi-ognim Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitorhigy and 1 Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility I list -5 Ta. Written History - The City of Tuslim `County° of Prior to mtakimg substantial Department of the Navy NPS, Sl IPO, and Department (cont.) Orange shall prepare an illustrated history report changes to I langar 28. of the Navy on MCAS 'I U'STIN, with emphasis on the initial construction of the Air Station and its World Wai- arI1 1 1Navy lighter -than --air operations. h. Fxhibit -The City of"l'ustim'County of Orange shall prepare a professional -quality illustrated interpretive exhibit with emphasis on Ute initial construction of the air station and its World War 11 Navy lighter -dean -air operations. C. Interpretive Video -The City of"TuslirJCounly 01' Orange shall prepare a prolessional-quality documentary video and shall undertake a one-time distribution and outreach program for the documentary video. Palco-1 The cities of Tustin and Irvine shall cacti require Prior to issuance of gradin , Project developer Community Development applicants of individual development projects to comply permits. Department (`Tustin audior with the requirements established in a PRIMP prepared liar Irvine, as applicable) the site, which details the methods to be used firr surveillance of consti action grading, assessing finds, and actions to be taken in the event that unique paleontological resources are discovered during construction. Paleo-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, project Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Connnunity Development applicants shall provide written evidence to each city, that permits. Department (Tustin and/or a county -certified paleontologist has been retained to Irvine, as applicable) conduct salvage excavation of unique paleontological resources if they are Found. EI VI IR liar the I) spo.trd and Reuse nl'A• CAS Tustin 22 Alitigation Monitoring and Repoi- ing Pi-ogi-am Measure Timing; and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring mud Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Mitigation Measures for Biological Resources Bio -1 'I he project proponents of any development allccting Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Mustin Community jutisdictioml waters of the U.S. or vegetated wetlands permits or any public Development Department shall obtain Section 404, Section 1001, and other permits improvements within pond turtle and/or OCFCD, as as necessary. A replacement ratio For affected wetland habitat. appropriate resources shall he determined in consultation with regulatory agencies as part of 1he permitting process. The actions proposed oil Peters Canyon Channel shall be mitigated by the OCFCD who is the project proponent I'm flood control improvements. Bio -2 Based on constiltations with CDR;, City of Tustin, or Prior to issuance of grading City of"fuslin and/or "Tustin Community pio'ject proponent as applicable, an oft -site relocation site permits or any public project developer, as Development Department firr southwestern pond turtles captured on site shall be improvements within pond lurtic appropriate identified that is as close to the muse plan arca as habitat. possible, and that is sustainable in perpetuity. (No appropriate habitat in the City of -fuslin is available firr relocation.) Potential relocation sites include but are not limited to an old pull(] (currently thought dry) located in upper Shady Canyon within the Orange County Nature Preserve that could be unproved or restored to serve as a relocation site; or San Joaquin Marsh, which is managed by I W Imine, Irvine Ranch, and the Orange County Watcr District. Some properly owners and public agencies may be adverse to the relocation of species of - special concern onto their property 01- JUrisdlction. and it would be speculative to identify actual sites prior to completion of consultation with CDf (i and with potential property owners and/or appropriate public agencies. 1.3S/1, IR fr)r the M.%pomd and Reum, of A1(.'AS Tustin 2.3 Alifigalran Monitoring amt Rcl)orlint; Pi-ogrrrrn Measure 'Timing and Implementation Mitigatiou Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Bio -3 Pennies From the CDFG shall he obtained tin' live -capture Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Tustin Coulrllunity of the turtles and tier transporting them to the relocation pennies or any public Development Department site. imlprovenlefits within pond tulle habitat. Bio -4 An agreement shall lie negotiated with the CDFG. City of Ongoing City Of I Llsllll alid Or Tustin Community munity TUStill, project proponei 1, or other agency lir organization project developer, as Development Department as appropriate, for conlribution of lilnds to improve, appropriate restore, or create the relocation site as turtle habitat. Mitigation Measures for'Traffic/Circulation IYC-1 Construction Prior to sits: development permit. Project developer Public Works Department (21'11stll or revile, as In conjunction with till' approval OI a site development applicable) perildt, tile City of Instill and the C.lty of irvine, as applicable (tier that portion of the reuse plan within Irvine), shall require each developer to provide traffic operations and control plans that would minimize Ill' traffic impacts of proposed construction activity. The plans sliall address roadway and lane closures, truck hours and routes, and notification procedures for planned short-term or interim changes ill traffic patterns. The City of"I ustin and the City of Irvine, as applicable, shall ensure that the plan would minimize anticipated delays at major intersections. Prior to approval, the City of "I'ustill or the City of Irvine, as applicable shall review the proposed traffic control and operations plans with any of ected imisdiction. /il.SflilR%;►r the 1 %isposa/ rind Reuse q 14( AS Tustin 24 Mitil; itiun Moniforim and Reporting Program pleasure 'Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility T/G 2 Development Prior to issuance of certificates of Project developer Public Works Department occupancy. ('Dustin or Irvine, as The City ol" Tustin and the City of llvine, as applicable applicable) (flor that portion of the reuse plan area within Irvine), shall ensure that the arterial intersection improvements required in 2005 and 2020 and as indicated in 'fables 4.12-7 and 4.12-9 of the Final 1_?IS/1?IR (see fables 2 and 4 and at the end of this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) are implemental for their respective jurisdictions according to the cumulative ADT thresholds identified in each table and according to the lair share basis noted. The AUT threshold represents the traffic volume which would result in an impact and the li►ir shale perccrltage reflects the percent of the traffic impact resulting from the reuse generated traffic. lu some cases, reuse traffic would generate 100 percent of the impact, thereby assuming lull financial responsibility lilt tile identified impromiieuts. In other cases, reuse traffic would generate only a fraclioll ol'thc traffic impacting the intersection and financial responsibility would correspond. '177-3 The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, as applicable See 'Fable 4.12-8 of the Final Project developer Public Works Uepartment (for that portion of the reuse plan area within Irvine), shall ITIS/I?IR or Table 3 at the end of ('I'Ilstin or Irvine, as contribute. oil a fair share basis, to improvemeIlts to the Mitigation Monitoring and applicable) freeway ramp intersections as listed in'I able 4.12-8 of the Reporting Program for each Final ITIS. HIR (see Tahle. i at the end of the Mitigation specific tliggering, ❑lechanislll. Monitoring and Reporting Program). The method of implementing inlprovenients, e.g., restriping, ramp w=idening, shall be based oil special design studies, in association with Cahrans. IiLSVEIR /br the Dispomil and Reuse a%MCAS Tustin 25 Miligatiun ,4lunitnring and Rr/►orting Program Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Respousibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility IVC -4 The City of'I'ustin and the City ol' Irvine, as applicable Ongoing (see'I`able 4.12-l0 of Project developer Public Wolks Department (lar that portion of the reuse plan area within Irvine), shall the Final EIS,' ?IR or Table 5 al (Tustin or Irvine, as ensure that all on-site circulation. system improvements the end of the Mitigation applicable) fill- the reuse plan area assumed in the 2005 and 2020 Monitoring and Reporting traffic analysis and as shown in Table 4.12--10 of the final Program fir each specific FIS/U IR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation triggering mechanism. Monitoring and Reporting Program) are implemented according to the cumulative ADT thresholds identified in the table. andel- this Phasing Plan, the City of Tustin shall monitor all new development within the site, accounting for the cumulative ADT generated by development projects. As each AIYI' threshold is ruched, the roadway improvements listed i.n Table 4.12-10 of the Final EIS/EIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Repoiting Program) shall be constructed before any additional projects within the reuse plan area would be approved. IsIVEIR finr the Disposal and Reuse of A9( S %uslin 20 A iligation:-Wonilot-ing, and Reporting Program MCaSUre Timing and limpleineutation Mitigation Compliance. Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Imforlement Responsibili(y TA' -51 Pi for to approval of a site development hermit or vesting Ongoing, prior to approval of a Project developer Public Works/Conimunity tract. except for financing or conveyance purposes. tier all site development permit or Development Departments land use designation areas in Alternative 1 with the vesting tract, except for financing (Tustin and/or Irvine, as exception of the Learning Village, Community Park, and or conveyance pLll'pOSCS, based oil applicable) Regional Park, a project developer shall enter into an the ADT generation thresholds agreement with the City of Tustin and City of Irvine, as shown in 'fables 4.12-7, 4.12-8, applicable (tor That portion of the retire plan area within 4.12-9. and 4.12-10 of (he Final Irvine) which assigns improvements required ill the HISrF.IR (sec'Tables 2 through 5 IiIS I;IR to the development site and which requires at the end of the Mitigation Participation in a fair share mechanism to design and Moniloting and Repoiling construct required on-site and ailerial inlprovenlents Program for each specific consistent with the AUT generation thresholds shown in triggering mechanism). Tables 4.12-7, 4.12-81 4.12-9, and 4.12.-10 (see Tables 2 through 5 at the end of the (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). fi('-GI 'Tile City of'fustin and the City of Irvine, as applicable Ongoing, based on the ADI' Project developer Public Works and (('()r that portion of the reuse plan arca in Irvine), will generation thresholds shown in Community Development monitor new development within the reuse plan area, 'fable 4.12-10 of the Final Departments ('Tustin and/or accounting fin- the cumulative ADTs generated by 1.I.S/F.IR (see Table 5 at the end Irvine, as applicable) development projects within the reuse plan area. As each of the Mitigation ,'Monitoring and cumulative ADT threshold shown in Table 4.12-10 (see Reporting Program fill- each Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and specific triggering mechanism). Reporting Program) is reached, the roadway improvements listed shall be constructed before any additional projects within the reuse plan area are approved. Mahle references in the mitigation measures have been changed from Final FFIS/EER to match the correct table rrunlhers in the FF?157E1R. h"1SZ7i7R Jnr the Disjmsrrl and Reuse of'A-K';tS %uslill 27 Xfiligntiun Monitoring and Relmrlin,g P?-ogrum --- — Measure .1'frning and ItllplenreltaIiou Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility T'V-7 The City of Tustin shall adopt a Irip budget for individual Within one: (1) year of project City of"Tustin Mustin Public Works and portions of the reuse plan area to assist in the u►c►nitoting approval, and ongoing thecaller. CollinlullltV Development of cumulative AD Ts and file amount and intensity of Departments pennilled non-residential uses as evaluated in the l:ISI:IIt. T/C-9 Alternative improvements that provide all CgUlValCnt ICVCI Ongoing City of"Tustin andfor City o1' Public Works and ol'nnitigation in 2005 or 2020 to what is identified ill Irvine Community Development Tables 4.12-7, 4.12-8, all(] 4.12-9 of the Pinal EASAAR Departments (Tustin and/or (sec "Tables 2 through 4) at the end of the Mitigation Irvine, as applicable) Monitoring and Reporting Program) may he identified in COUSnllation between Idle (pity of"l uslin and the (arty of Irvine, as applicable, and the rlllpacted jurlsdidioll. 'I':`('-9 The City ot" Dustin shall enter into agreements with Within one (I) year of project City of'fusliu, City of Public Warks and Caltrans and the cities of Santa Ana and Irvine to ensure approval. Irvine Community r)evelopment that the off-site roadway improvements needed to mitigate Deparinleuls (Tustin and/or the effects of the proposed alternative are constructed Irvine, as applicable) pursuant to improvement programs established by file respective jurisdiction. In ordet to properly coordinate the timing and improvements in the adjacent.iurisdictiotls, the City of "Tustin shall hold a scoping -like meeting with the respective jurisdictions. ']'lie purpose of said scoping -like meeting shall be to identify tine concerns ol'the respective jurisdictions prior to the initiation of the fair share study. The purpose of the study would he to Fully identify, with each jurisdiction, the scope and costs of feasible improvements (as determined by tile respective julisdiction). The improvements FI S1 1R Jur thr Disposal and Reuse nf'AR—AS Tustin 28 Mitigrrtinn Monitoring rind Rel►urtin,g Propmm Measure Tinting and Intplemtenlalion (Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Mouitoriug and Enforcement Responsibility Ti(' -9 would be acceptable to each jurisdiction toward fulfilling Within one (1) year of project City ol`fustin, City of Community Development (cont.) the timing and cost of the transportation improvement approval. Irvine and PubliC Works obligations as required to mitigate transportation impacts Departments of' tile t'ity of in each jurisdiction. The finding for the improvements to 'fustic and the City of Irvine be incorporated into the agreement would he utilized by the respective agency to improve the capacity of the impacted intersections;Gnks or be used for substituted improvements, as determined by mutual agreement. Prior to execution of the agreement, each juriuliction would be allowed tcn (10) working days to review the technical report prior to being provided with a copy of the proposed agreement. Each jurisdiction would then have ten (10) working clays to review and comment as to its concurrence with the improvement programs contained in the agreement. The comments of each jLit lsdictlon would be considered to ensure that the City of fustiri s responsibility ti►r fair share funding of the improvements in each jurisdiction as stated above is fully addressed. h"PU 'lR fur the Diqwal and Rcuse n% AICA.1 Tustin 29 A-filigation Monitoring and Rqorting Program Measum Tinting and Inlplementalion Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitot-ing and Enforcement Responsibility IA-I 'fable 4.12-10 of the final EIS, TIR (sec Table 5 at the See Table 4.1?.-10 of the Final (:ity of'fuslin Community Development olid of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) EIS%li1R or Table 5 at (lie card of and Public Works presents the Phasing Plan firr die on--site circulation Elie Mitigation Monitoring and Departments (Tustin an(lior system. The Phasing Plan is based upon traflic circulation Reporfing Program For each Irvine, as applicable) lIIlpact and mitigation analyses contained in the'Traflic specific triggering mechanism. Report (I inal Appendix F of are Fina] rlS/lint). under this Phasing Plan, file City of"I ustin shall monitor all new development within the Specific Plan, accounting firr the cunutlative ADT generated by development projects. As each ADT threshold is reached, the roadway improvements listed in Table 4.12-10 of the Final .'IS:`EIR (sce Tablc 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) shall he constructed before any additional projects within the Specific flan would he approved. IA-2 Table 7-3 of the Final lilS/IsIR (scc Table 6 at file end of See Table 7-3 of the Final City ol-'l'uslin -Tustin Community the Mitigation .'Monitoring and Reportitrg Program) UISiIiIR or'Table 0 at the end of Development and Public presents the'I'dii Budget which sunmtarives the square the Mitigation Monitoring and Works I )epaitments fbolagc of non-residenliai uses allocated to each Reporting Program Im- each neighborhood by Planning Area and the associate(] AD-T. specific Eriggering mechanism. (Residential uses are shown for information only, they arc not part of the bu(Iget.) Pursuant to Section 3.2.4 of the Specific Plan, the City of Tustin shall implement the trip budget by neighborhood to control Elie amount and i intensity of nun-residential uses. Trip Budget transfers between neighborhoods shall also he implemented as directed in subsection 3.2.4 of the Specific Plan. EISii":iR or the Oiaposal and Reu.%e of it -MAS Tus in 30 rl4itigarion Monitoring crud Re1wrring Program Measure 'Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility IA -3 Prior to the approval of (1) a Planning Area Concept Plan Prior to file approval of'(1) a Project developer 'Tustin Community pursuant to Section 4.2 ol'the Specific Plan, (2) a site Planning Area Concept Plan Development and Public development permit, or (3) a vesting tentative neap filr pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Works Departments new square footage: (not for financing or conveyance Specific Plan, (2) a site purposes), a project developer sliall provide traflic dcveloptnetlt permit, or (3) a information consistent with the provisions of -tile Specific vesting tentative reap for new Plan, this I.i1S!EIR and the requirements ol'the City of square floofagc (nal, for financing Tustin Traffic Engineer. The traffic information shall (a) or conveyance purposes). identify and assign trallic circulation mitigation pleasures required in the FISITAR pursuant to the Phasing Plan described in Table 4.12-10 ol'the Final EIS/FAR (sec 'fable 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program); (b) evaluate the e{'{ects of either the delay of any previously committed circulation improvements or the Construction ofcurrently unanticipated circulation improvements; and (c) utilize the circulation system and capacity assumptions within the f7l,S'FIR and wiv additional circulation inlprovelticpts completed by of ected.jurisdictions for the applicable linleframe ofanalysis. lA-4 Prior to the issuance ul'building perrllits lily new Prior to tile issuance of building Project developer Tustin Community development within plawling areas requiring a concept permits. Development all(] Public plan, a project developer shall enter into all agreement Works Depaitments with the pity of Tustin to (a) design and construct roadway improvements consistent wills the ADT generation Phasing Plan described in Table 4.12-10 ol'the Final FIS'Ii1R (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporling Program) and (b) address the impact of and specify the responsibility for any previously committed circulation itllproveil lents assumed in the I.iIS EIR which have not been constructed. F.I.S.11,"IR fin• the Oispomil and Brum, of AI AS Tustin 31 Mitigntiun Monitoring our/ Relmrting I'rogrunt Measure 'timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility IA -5 If a subsequent traffic Phasing Plan demonstrates that Ongoing ON of"l ustin tuslin Public Works and Certain Calculation 1111pl-OVelllentS SllOtlld be InClllded In a (-oriimunity Development different phase of Specific Plan development (accelerated Departments or delayed) or that a circulation improvement can be sulastituted, the mitigation Phasing Plan in Table 4.12 -IO of the Final ITIS/GIR (seeTable able 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) may be amended, subject to approval of the City olTustin and any other affected jurisdictions, provided that the same level of traffic mitigation and traffic capacity would be provided. IA -() The City oI I ustln will enter into agreements with Within one (1) year of approval City Ot'I alStlrl 1 uStm Public Works and Caltrans and the cities of'Santa Ana and Irvine to ensure of•reuse and disposal of MCAS Community Development that the off-site roadway improvements needed to mitigate "Tustin Departlueuts " the effects of (lie Specific Ilan are constructed pursuant to improvement programs established by the respective jurisdiction. 1'lti!I.1 /irr the l)i.rywsal and Reum, of rt4('AS Tustin 32 14iri) rrrinn Monitoring and !lr/rurliri�; Program Measure Timing; and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility IA -6 In order to properly coordinate the timing; and funding of Within one (1) year of approval City ol"Tustin Public Works and (runt.) fatir share obligation of'Specific Plan improvements in the uf'reuse and disposal of MCAS (.'otnrnunity Development adjacent jurisdictions, the City of'I'ustin shall hold a 'Tustin Departments ('Tustin, Irvine, scoping -like meeting; with the respective jurisdictions. and Santa Ana), and Caltrans, The purpose uf'said scoping -like meeting shall be to identify the concerns olthe respective jurisdictions prior to file initiation ol'the lair share study. The purpose of'tkre study would be to fidly identity, with each jurisdiction, the scope and costs of obligations olt.he Specific Plan as required to mitigate transportation impacts in feasible improvements (as determined by the respective Jiltisdicliun). The improvements would he acceptable to each jurisdiction toward Vullilling the timing and cost of the transportation improvement each jurisdiction, as listed above. The funding fir (lie improvements to be incorporated into the agreement would he utilized by the respective agency to improve the capacity of the impacted infersectionsilinks or be used For substituted improvements, as determined by mutual agreement. Prior to execution of the agreement, each jurisdiction would be allowed ten working days to review the technical report prior to being provided with a copy ol'Ihe proposed agreement. Fach jurisdiction would then have ten working days to review and comment as to its concutrence with the improvement programs contained in the agreernent. The comments of'each jurisdiction would he considered to ensure that the City of"lustiri s responsibility Ibr lair share funding of the improvements in each jurisdiction as stated above is fully addressed. 1:1SX 1R.(or Me Dispwal and Rcu.cr. of'XIC AS Tustitr 33 Alirigatiu►r Aluauoring and Reponing; Program I Measure Timing and Implementation ,Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility lA-7 Bach.Specific Plan pio.ject would contaui, to the Prior to issuance of grading Project developer (Onurnrnity Development satisfaction of the City of" Tustin aneUor City of Irvine, as permits Department (Tustin and/or applicable, a pedestrian circulation component showing Irvine, as applicable) pedestrian access to regional hiking trails, parks, schools, shopping areas, bus stops, and.%or other public lacilities. Mitigation Measures for Air Quality AQ- I If determincd feasible and appropriate on a Prior to issuance of grading or Project developer Community Development project -by -project basis, the City of"Fustin and the City of building permits. Department (Tustin and/or Irvine, as applicable, shall require individual development Irvine, as applicable) projects to implement one or more of the Following control measures, il'not aheady required by the SCAQMD under Rule 403: - Apply water twice daily, or chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications, to all unpaved parking or staging areas or unpaved road surfaces a( all actively disturbed sites. - Develop a construction traffic management plan (flat includes, but is not limited to, rcroutiug construction trucks off congested streets, consolidating truck deliveries, and providing dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment onsite and offsite. I 1 I - Use electricity tiom power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline powered gmerators. EIS;`EI R /nr the Diqwsal aml Re um, of MCAS Distill 34 iLirlignlion Moniloring and Reporting Pro;;ram Measure 'Hilling and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility AQ -I - Reduce traffic speeds oil all unpaved roads to 15 (Coni.) nlph or less. Pave construction roads that have a tratf IC Prior to issuance of grading or Project developer L'Ot11111llillty Development volume of mole than 50 daily trips by building; permits. Department (Tustin and/or construction equipment or 150 total daily trips Irvine, as applicable) Cor all vehicles. - Apply approved chemical soil stabilizers according lu lllamulaeturers' specilications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for lour days or Vlore). - Replace grotltld cover Ill disturbed areas as quickly as possible. Enclose, cover, water twice daily. or apply approved soil binders according to nlanufacttlrers' specifications, to exposed piles of gravel, sand, or dirt. - Cover all trucks hauling; dirt, sand, soil, or other louse materials, and maintain at least Iwo lcet of ft-ceboard (i.e.. minimum vertical distance between top of the load and top of the hailer). - Sweep streets at the end of the clay if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads (use water sweepers with reclaimed water when feasible). lilSllil R for the Nsposal and Rause gf'XICA.S Tustin 35 Mitigalion Monirorint:; and Rej7orting !'rogram Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and LResponsibility Enforcement Responsibility AQ -I - Install wheel washers where vehicles enter anc.1 (CUlil.) exit unpaved ruads onto paved roads, Or wash Off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. AO -2 Unless determined by the City of" Tustin and the City of Pi for to issuance of S,rading or � Project developer Community Development Irvine, as applicable. to he inteasihfe on a huilding permits. Department (Tustin andlor procct-by-protect basis doe to unique protect Irvine, as applicable) characteristics, cacti city shall require individual development projects to use tow VOCE architectural coatings for all interior and exterior painting operations. AQ -3 Prior to the issuance of develuplilent permits for new non- Prior to issuance of development Pro ecl developel Co111rmmity Development residential protects with 100 oI more employees, and permits For new nun -residential Department (I ustin an(Uor expanded projects where additional square footage would projects with 100 or more Irvine, as applicable) result in a total of 100 or more employees, the City of employees all(] expanded projects Tustin and the City of Irvine, as applicable, shall impose a where additional square footage mix oI'TDM Measures which, upon cstilllatiou, would would result ill a total of 100 or result in an average vehicle ridetship of at least 1.5. for more employees each development with characteristics that would be reasonably conducive to successful implementation of such TDN4 meastues. These TI)NI nieasures may include one or more of the following, as determined appropriate and feasible by cacti city Orta case-by-case basis: >'iLtiililR�r�r the Disposal and Reuse of,MCAS Tustin 30 Mitigation Monitoring and Repvrtim, Program Measure Timing and Implementalion Mitigation ('onlpliance Responsibility (Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility A(1-3 - Establish plelerential parking for carpool vehicles. PI for to issuance of development Project (ICV0011el (. 01111I1nr11tV Development (cont.) - Provide bicycle parking facilities. permits for new non-residential Department (Tuslin and/or - Provide sh(nvcr and locker facilities. projects with 100 or nwre Irvine, as applicable) Provide carpool and vanpool loading areas. employees and expanded projects Incorporate bus stop improvenlcllts into facility where additional square footage design. would result in a total of 100 or - Implement shuttles to shopping, eating, recreation, more employees and/or parking and transit facilities. Construct remote parking facilities. - Provide pedestrian circulation linkages. - Construct pedestrian grade separations. - Establish earpool and vanpool programs. - Provide cash allowances, passes, and other public transit and purchase incentives. - Establish parking fees for single occupancy vehicles. - Provide parking subsidies for ridcshare vehicles. - Inslitutc a computerized commuter ridcshare matching system. - Provide a guaranteed ride -home program Ibi- ridesharing. - Uslablislt alternative work week, Ilex -time, and compressed work week schedules. Establish telecommuting or work -al -home programs. - Provide additional vacation and compensatory leave incentives. Novide on-site lunch roomsicalelerias and con-imercial service such as banks, restaurants, and small retail. - Provide on-site day caic facilities. - Establish an employee transportation coordinator(s). F,LS%/illi fnr the I )isllusnl and Ilr rrsr nl A9( A.S 7iistin_i1 alio •utiurr ;Llnnitr�rirr� unrl lir lurnrl�� ' l+ n / n It-ogi-(1111 Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility :Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility AQ -4 It'not required uncle) each individual developnlcnt's'l DM Ongoing Project developer Community Development plan, the C'ily of Tustin and the City of Irvine, as Department (Tustin and/or applicable, shall implement the fbilowiug measures, as Irvine, as applicable) determined appropriate or Icasible by each city on a case-by-case basis: Reschedule truck deliveries and pickups lily off-peak houts. Implement lunch shuttle service limn a worksite(s) to Food establishments. - Implement compressed work week schedules where weekly work hours are compressed into fewer than five days, such as 9!90, 4%40, or 3i36. - I'lovide ou-site child care and after-school facilities or contribute to off-site developments within walking distance. - Provide on-site employee services such as cafeterias, hanks, etc. - Implerrlent a pi icing structure for single -occupancy employee parking, anchor provide discounts to ridesharers. - ('unstruct off-site pedestrian facility improvements such as overpasses and wider sidewalks. - Include retail services within or adjacent to residential subdivisions. - Provide shliltles to major rail transit centers or rlulti-modal stations. - Contribute to regional transit sy'slems (e.g., right-of-way. capllal improvements, etc'.). - Synchronize tr'afllc lights Oil streets impacled by development. EIVEIR /i,r 1/he Disposal and Reuse of NI AS Tustin 38 .44itigatioll Monitoring and Reporting I'rogranr Measure Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility AQ-`} - Constrtict, contribute, or dedicate land for the Ongoing Project developer Community DevelopnlCflt (airily provision of oll=site bicycle trails linking the facility Department ('Tustin and/or to designated bicycle commuting routes. Irvine, as applicable) - Include residential units widiin a cominelcial development. - Provide oll-site bicycle !acuity improvements, such as bicycle trails linking the facility to designated bicycle conuuuting routes, or on-site improvements, such as bicycle paths. - include bicycle parking tacilities such as bicycle lockers. - Include showers for bicycling and pedestrian employees' Ilse. - C'omstruct an -site pedc%u ian facility improvements, such as building access which is physically separated from street and parking lot traffic, and walk paths. Mitigation pleasures for Noise N-1 Prior to reuse ol'any existing residential units within the Prior to reuse of any existing Project developer Community Development reuse area (irr civilian use, the City of"Tustin or the City residential units. Department (Tustin an(Lor of Irvine, as applicable, and where necessary and Icasihle. livine, as applicable) shall require [lie installation ol'noisc attenuation barriers, insulation, or similar devices to ensure that interior and exterior noise levels at these residential units do not exceed applicable noise. standard. EIS/1-.Mfin- the Disposal and Reuse n/'Af(.,I S' Astin 39 Alitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program EISililR liir the INV)osal (incl Reim, ol'AI AS Tustin 40 111itignlivn hhoniloring (incl Re1wrting Pi-ogrnn: 1lcasure 11111ing xud Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility \-2 During, design of the glade -separated inteisection of Prior to approval of final design Project developer Tustin Public Works 'I ustin Ranch Road at fidinger Avenue, the City of'Dustin plans. Department Shall evaluate potential noise impacts oil surrounding properties to the northeast of 1 dinner Aveime and sliall incorporate into the design of this intersection noise attenuation pleasures delermitled appropriate and fi:asible by the City of Tustin, in order to ensure ilial these surrounding properties do not experience noise levels that exceed Cily of Tustin noise standards. N-3 I"or new development within the reuse area, the City of friar to issuance of bi ilding Project developer Community Development 'Dustin and City of Irvine, as applicable, shall cusure that permits. Department (Tustin and/or interior and exterior noise levels do not exceed those Irvine, as applicable) preset ibed by state requirements and local laity ordinances and gem-ral plaris. Plans denlonsuating uolse regulation coidbi lily shall be submitted for ieview and approval 1 prior to building peunits being issued to accommodate reuse. N-4 Prior to the coli ieclion of Warncr Avenue to the North Prior to approval of fltial desigli City of I usliil and City of 'I listlll Collllilurlity Loup Road or the South Loop Road, the City of Tustin plans. Irvine Development and I'uhlic shall conduct ail acoustical study to assess reuse traffic Works Departments noise impacts to existing sensitive receptors adjacent to Wainer Avenue. between ]larval-(] Avenue and ('elver (hive. If mitigation of'reusetraffic noise impacts is required, the City of Dustin and the City of Irvine shall enter into an ag.reenlent that defines required mitigation and which allocates the cost of mitigation between the City of Tustin and the City ol' Irvine on a fair share basis. i EISililR liir the INV)osal (incl Reim, ol'AI AS Tustin 40 111itignlivn hhoniloring (incl Re1wrting Pi-ogrnn: Table ] Utilities Phasing Requirements Facility General Scope General Triggering Mechanisms Domestic Water 1) lixisting housing water distribution lines 1) Upon determination by IRW D regarding acceptability ()I - f2) 2)New backbone water mains water lines 3) Aban Department of the Navyed/relocated wells 2) When backbone arterial highways are constructed 3) Upon determination by IRWI) Reclaimed (Non -Potable) Water 1) New backbone water lines; I) When backbone arterial highways are constructed; 2) Existing and new well sites. 2) upon completion or negotiations by IRWD and dcveloper(s) regarding exchange of well sites. Sanitary Sewer 1) 1{xistirtg housing sewer conveyance lines I) tipou determination by IRWI) and OC;SU regarding 2) New backbone sewer mains acceptability of the lines 2) When backbone arterial highways are constructed Storm Drain 3) Backbone storm drain channels 1,2) Armstrong storm drain 4) Regional flood control channel improvements 1.2) Generally in conjunction with arterial highway S) Retention basins construction G) flood plain mitigation 3) Upon determination ofaccep(ability as part of development plans 4) Filing of flood zone reap with 17EMA prior to any Phase —_- 11 construction Iilectticity Backbone electric distribution lines When backbone arterial highways arc constricted Natural Gas Backbone gas distribution lines When backbone arterial highways are constructed Telephone Backbone telephone lilies When backbone arterial highways are construcle(I Cable Television Backbone cable television distribution lines, fiber optic When backbone arterial highways are constructed cables „��,•�•• rcr,,.,r•r•��c., rooE,r,.,..,r rou4 liI.SYLi//l /i,r the Disposal rind Reuse u/';t4CA,S Tustin 41 tblitil;ation Monitoring and Llr•por-ting A-Ogrrurr Table 2 2005 N ifigatiou for impacted Arterial Intersectims '— ---- Soull►bouud WesWound Northbound 1{aslbound Impact Resull Implementation Croject Share( LocationThreshold L T R 1. 1' R L 1' It I: I' R AM PM AM 1'M C•unudative ADT Percent Tustin/Irvine 86. Von karn►an Base - - - 2 3 - 2 - I - 3 d & Ilarranca l)(1)tint. - - - 2 3 - 2 - 2 - � d _ p _ Ilia 102,000 100 103. JaIrlhUfeC Rc Base 2 4 f 2 3 f 2 4 f 2.5 2.5 1 4 Banranca(l '' `) N4it_ 2 4 f 2 3 1' 2 4 f 25 2..5 1 t`') - Ilia 92.000 I'') anta Ana ��---- 4. main h Warner Bate 2 3 - 1 2 - 2 3 - 1 2 1 - emit. 2 3 - 1 3 - 2 3 - 1 2 1 c - Fill) 7X.000 15 49. Main qtr D) cr Base 1 3 - 1 2 - I 2 I I 2 I Mit. 2 .i - 2 2 - 1 2 1 1 2 1 - c - [111) 78,000 17 01. Grand ;fir. Base 1 3 - 1 3 - 1 3 - 1 3 - EdifigerP) 1mit. 1 3 - I .3 - 2 .3 - 1- 3 - - 1) - Ina 32,000 100 72. Ritchey & lWinger Base 1 2 - 1 3 - I l 1 3 - Mit. 1 2 1 3 - I 2 - 1 3 - - p - Ina 70,000 100 Base - intersection Imes without mingauon; mit. - Intersection lanes with mitigation d - de facto right -turn: f - line right -turn I., T, R - fell, through, right Bold - notation indicates lane change From base scenario (without mitigation) A 0.5 or 1.5 lane designation represents lane shat iug between difrerent movements p - Project causes deficiency; c - project contributes to deficiency. n►a - Mitigated to an adequate level of service; nip - Project portion ol'impact mitigared, LOS remains less than adequate M IBC intersection I:SIA intersection Additional access from warier Awenuc %vest ol'Jamborce Road Interim improvement only, not necessary for 2020 Parr shale contribution by City of "I LlStlll lur prOlect iesporlslblllty. i:SIA funds would not he used lot -this portion of the funding. Many of the measures specified lbr mitigation of trallie%circulation impacts require fiululcial contributions on a Tarr share basis. fair share cLnitribut,ons shall be no greater than required fbi capacity iiiiprovenlents consistent with arul assumed in this EIS 'IR, as mutually agreed to by the C'itics uf'Iuslin, Irvine, and Santa Ana, as applicable. Currently unidentified (inure inlprovenlents will be made to this intersection to maintain an acceptable level of'ser•ice to be agreed to by the cities of Tustin and Irvine for baseline conditions pursuant to the TCA, Tustin and Irvine 1998 MOA. Only when these improvements are included in the ICU calculations can the impact of reuse be identilie(l. 'I'hercl"ore, impacls Irons reuse niay be overstated, diiTIClllt to quantify at this time and could be less at this location because of unknown improvements. 1;1.5',/EIR Jin- the Ui.yosul curd Re se a/J—K—:4.5 Tustin 4? Mitigation ;4lnnitnring olid Repot—ling Program '.fable 3 2005 Mitigation for Impacted Freeway (tamp Intersection Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Impact ResultImplementation Localiou 'I'I►reshol<I Project Share(') 1.'r] 1' R 1. F It L. ITR FTr]RAm PM Ali pM Cumulative Percent ADT Santa Ana — 75. SR -55 SB Ramps & BaseI f - 1 2 - 1.5 .5 f I 2 f I;din ;cr i 1)('1 t I'Mit. Fl 1 I - I 2 - 1.5 .5 f 1 3 1-c - mp 37,000 28 Base - Imelsection lanes Wilhaut nutigatlou; Mit. - 1111e1seCtioll lanes With miligation Ll - do facto right -turn; f- ficc right -tun 1-T, R - left, through, right Bold - notation indicates lane Change Iron) base SCCllall0 (WIthOL11 mitigation) A 0.5 or 1.5 lane designation replescuts lane sharing between dlllCrem movellieli1S p - Project causes deficiency; c - project contributes to deficiency. ma - Mitigated to an adequate level of service; nip - Project portion of impact mitigated. LOS remains less Than a(le(luale (1) ('MP rnonifored intersection 121 TSIA intersection ('1 Fair share contribution by City ol-Tuslnl fir project responsibility. •1 SIA kinds woul(l 1101 be LISCd Ibr this portion ul the II111di11L. Many of the nlcasutes specified li)r tniti :atu)n of traffic;circulation impacts requite financial cmmibutlons on a lair share hasis. Fair share contlibullons shall be no greater than required t.))' capacity ilea Sp enle d consistent With and assumed in Ihls FIS/EIR, as nllunally aglecd to by the Cities o1' Dustin. Irvine, and Sama Ana, as applicable. KLS EIR Jnr 1hv Disposal «rid Reuse oJ'AA AS Tu.%f n — 4.7 l4iti};nlrnrr 111nnilurinr; and Repot—ling Prngrarr► Table 4 2020 Mitigation for Impacted Arterial Intersections I Southbound Westbound Northbound Isastbound Impact Result I Implementation (6) Location Threshold 1 roject Share 1. 1' It =",r R 1.. I. li 1. '1' It AM PM[AMIN, 1'M11 Cumulative ALIT Percent Tustin 15. Newport &, Edinger(I•') Rase 2 2.5 1.5 1 3 f 2 3 d 2 3 1 Mit. 2 2.5 1.5 1 3 f 2 i (1 2 3 1 - 1) nm (7) 100 30. Red Ifill & Edinger()' `) Base 2 3 1 2 3 1 z 3 1 2 3 1 Mil. 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 p - Ilia 174,000 100 42. T(is(in Rauch & Walnut(Z) l3ase 2 3 d 1 2 1 7. 3 d 1 2 1 Mit. 2 3 d 2 2 1 2 3 (1 1 2 2 1 1 p p nm nm 122,000 100 Tustin/Santa Ana 77. fled 11111 8( Warner(') Base 2 4 I 2 3 1 2 4 1 2 3 I Mit. "2 t 1 2 3 2 2 4 I 2 3 I p - ma 2116,00(1 10(1 Tastin/Irvine _ 103-land)oree dr. Barranc•r�''') Base 2 4 f 2 3 f 2 4 1' 2.5 7..5 1 '` (0) --- _ Mit. _ 2 4 I 2 _ 3 f_ .2 4 _f 1..5 2.5 1 _ c nm- - 141,000 -4 -- Santa Alla 53.11utton Ccmre & Base 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 .5 1.5 z 3 1 MacArthur Mit. 2 1 2 2 4 - 1 .5 1.5 2 3 1 - c 20 61. (;rand K l'(inecr(') Base 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Mit. 2 3 1 2 4 - 2 4 - 2 3 1 c c nla 172,000 100 63. (;rand K Warncr(') Banc 7. 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Mit. 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 4 - 2 3 1 p n1a 195,000 100 66. (IranO & Met J31 Base 2 - I - 3 1 - - - 2 3 - Mit. 1.5 - 1.5 - 3 1 - - - 2 3 c n1a 131,000 29 70. Lyon h Edinger(`) Base I I 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 - Mit. 1.5 .5 1 1 3 1 1 1 7. 1 3 - - c - rrlp 152,000 )3 2112. Slalldilld (1C L(l1llga Base 1 2 - 1 3 - 1 2 - 1 3 - i M rt. I 1 1 2 1 - I 1 1 3 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 - 1 1 3 - e rna 1 s 1,uon 9 /;1S//;J/?R(p /r)t- the N.epusal and Reuse of ik- (-AS l}eNin 44 aliti};utiurr ;tlonitnrin}; rnandn)rtin/� Program Table 4 Continued Base - Intersection lanes without nlifigalion; Mit. - Intersection lanes Willi mitigation — AT.MS - Advanced'1'rrnlsportation Management System tl - de faeln right -turn; I'- free right -turn L,'I', R - 101, Through, right 1114t1 - notation indicates lane changes from base scenario (without mitigation) A .5 or• 1.5 lane designation represents lane sharing; between different movements p - Project causes deficiency; c - project contributes to deficiency Ilia - Nlitigated to an adequate level of service; fill) - Project porlton of impact uuugated, LOS remains less than adequate; nm - Project impact not mitigated c - I'rttlect contributes to deficiency III No lane changes; ATNIS measures (2) Lane changes and AIMS measures (') TSIA intersection (") Ili(' inrelsecfiofi 1st No identifiable miti;:afion measures Fair share contribution by City of 1lrslin for project responsibility. 'I:SIA fiords would not he used for this portion of the limdmil- Many ut'the measures specified R)r mitigation of lraflicicirculation impacts require financial contributions on a fait share basis. Fair share contributions shall be no greater than required far capacity nnprovemems consistent Willi and assumed in Ibis Els"TAR, as mutually agreed to by file cities of"Tustin, Irvine, and Santa Ana, as applicable. t't Full buildout of Reuse Alternative I IK) C.ulventh, ullidenllfled Mum 1111ptovelilemts lull be Imadc to this Illterscoom to maintain all acceptable level of service to be agreed to by the cities ol'7'ustin and Irvine for baseline condilions pursuant to the 1998 MOA between theTCA and cities of Irvine and Tustin. 'therefore, file impacts of reuse maybe overstated, difficult to quantify at this time, and could he less al this location because of unknown improvemews. F'IS-IFIR /irr the 1)ispasul rind Reuse ng MCAS Tuslin 45 A- iriwition A -If rritnring and Rr'poning /'r-ogtw r Southbound westbound Northbound Eastbound Impact Result Implementation Shar•etft I, 1' IL 1, I' R I, 1' R 1, I' R Ai41 P!!1 AM 1'�I Location Threshold Percent Cumulative AUT Irvine _ 81. Red IIill & Maifir-0g Base l 3 d 2 3 d 2 3 f 1 3 d Mit. 1 3 l 2 3 d 2 3 f 1 3 d - p - ma 157,000 100 89. Von Kanman & Base 1 2 d 1 2 f 1 2 1 1 2 d Michelson (4) Mit. 1 2 d 1 2 f l 2 1 2 2 d - c - Ilia 141,000 22 106. Jamboree & Alton") Base 7. 4 d 2 3 d 2 4 1 2 3 d Mit. 2 4 d 2 3 d 2 5 l 2. 3 d - p - lit art 100 118. 1larval d & Alton Base 1 2 1 2 3 (1 1 2 d 2 3 1 Mit. 1 2 1 2 3 d 2 2 d 2 3 1 p - uta - 181,001) 100 128. Culver & Wanner Base 1 3 d 1 2 d 1 3 1 1 2 d Mit. I 1 3 1 d 1 1 2 1 d 1 3 I 2 1 2 1 d - p - Ilia 174,000 100 Base - Intersection lanes without nlifigalion; Mit. - Intersection lanes Willi mitigation — AT.MS - Advanced'1'rrnlsportation Management System tl - de faeln right -turn; I'- free right -turn L,'I', R - 101, Through, right 1114t1 - notation indicates lane changes from base scenario (without mitigation) A .5 or• 1.5 lane designation represents lane sharing; between different movements p - Project causes deficiency; c - project contributes to deficiency Ilia - Nlitigated to an adequate level of service; fill) - Project porlton of impact uuugated, LOS remains less than adequate; nm - Project impact not mitigated c - I'rttlect contributes to deficiency III No lane changes; ATNIS measures (2) Lane changes and AIMS measures (') TSIA intersection (") Ili(' inrelsecfiofi 1st No identifiable miti;:afion measures Fair share contribution by City of 1lrslin for project responsibility. 'I:SIA fiords would not he used for this portion of the limdmil- Many ut'the measures specified R)r mitigation of lraflicicirculation impacts require financial contributions on a fait share basis. Fair share contributions shall be no greater than required far capacity nnprovemems consistent Willi and assumed in Ibis Els"TAR, as mutually agreed to by file cities of"Tustin, Irvine, and Santa Ana, as applicable. t't Full buildout of Reuse Alternative I IK) C.ulventh, ullidenllfled Mum 1111ptovelilemts lull be Imadc to this Illterscoom to maintain all acceptable level of service to be agreed to by the cities ol'7'ustin and Irvine for baseline condilions pursuant to the 1998 MOA between theTCA and cities of Irvine and Tustin. 'therefore, file impacts of reuse maybe overstated, difficult to quantify at this time, and could he less al this location because of unknown improvemews. F'IS-IFIR /irr the 1)ispasul rind Reuse ng MCAS Tuslin 45 A- iriwition A -If rritnring and Rr'poning /'r-ogtw r AWF ooO 27,000 I 82.,800 i I 26.900 39,500 40,200 Table 5 Un -site ADT 1)evelopmeiit'I'liresholds mulalivef - Roads Added Fdiugcr Avenue Landsdowne Road (27,000) North Loop Road - Red Itill Avenue to Wes( Connector Road (Build 3 lanes only) West Connector Road Bast Connector Road Marble Mountain Road Moffett Drive (1()9.800) North Loup Road - Ilill Avenue to West Connector Road (Final Buildout) Not -Ili loop Road - Hast Connector Road to Moffett Drive (Buil( 3 lanes only) Red hill Avenue/Carncgie Avenuc Intersection (Bast Leg) Red (fill Avenue/Warner Avenue Intersection (Bast Leg) Severyns Road Armstrong Avenue - North Loop Road to Barranca Parkway North Loup Road - West Connector Road to last Connector Road Notth Loop Road - Fast Connector to Moffett Drive (Final Buildout) North Loop Road - Moffett Drive to Warner Avenue South Loop Road - Warner Avenue lO TUStin Ranch Road Tustin Ranch Road - Edingcr Avenue to North Loop Road (6 lanes) Tustin Ranch Road - Wamer Avenue to Batranca Parkway (Build 4 lanes only) (136.700) Warner Avenuc Red f till Avenue to Jamboree Road (Build 4 lanes only) South Loop Road -- Armstrong Avenue to Tustin Rauch Road (176,200) -Dustin Rands Road - North Loop Road to South hoop Road (Build 4 lanes only) Widen Tustin Ranch Road to 6 lanes (Final Buildout) (216,400) Widen Warner Avenuc to 6 lanes (Final Buildout) -- /i; ;''l.'lll Jiv- the Disposal and Reuse r;f'MC'AS Tustin 46 Ellttigatiun Monitoring art(/ Reporting Program Table 6 Planning Arca Trip Budget Planning Arca No. Assumed Land Use It Non Residential Amount ADTs Amo—t AUT's(2) Neighborhood A General Commercial 27.120 sf 3,033 I Leau►ing Village 1,385,531 sf 8,479 PA I Trip Midget Subtot:►1 11,512 2 Community Park 24.1 ac 121 Tran%itional Housing 192. du 941 Neighborhood A .Square Footage Total 1,412,651 sf A'eighhorhood A Trip Budget Total 11,511 Neighborhood It 4 LI)R (1-7 (lu/ac) 304 du 2,909 5 -- 110DR (8-15 du%ac) 621 du 4,968 General ('omme►cial 315,592 sf 14,273 _ ITA 7 Tip Budget Subtotal 14,273 A'eighborhood B .Square f=ootage Total 315,591 sf Neighborhood B 'Trip Budget Total 14,27.1 Neighborhood C h Regional Regional Pmk 84.5 ac 423 General Commercial 57,500 st' 3.920 Neighborhood ('.Square Footage 'Total 57,500 , J. Neighborhood C Trip Budget Total 3,920 FLS; F1R JOY the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 47 Miligation Monitoring and Reporting Prognim I Residen tin UPa rk,; Planning; Area No. Assumed Land Use Amount AD'I's Neighborhood 1) MHDR (10-25 du..'ac) 891 du 5.907 I'launing Area No. Assumed Land Ilse Amount Non Residential AD'I's (Mice Nuk 1,915, 380 sf 14.872 Industrial Park 12633,830 sf' —181,540 13,394 Shopping Center si' 12,376 1-'A 8 Trip Budget Subtotal 40,632 Neighborhood DSquare Footage Total 3,630.7.70.vf Neighborhood D Trip Budget Total 40,632 Neighborhood E 9 General Commercial 110,990sl' 7,566 LALht Industiial 47,570 st' 386 PA 9'1'rip Budget Subtotal 7,952 10 ()(lice [lark 174,570 st' 2,317 Light Indusitial 157,110 si' 1,274 General Commercial 17,400 st' 1952, PA Whip Budget Subtotal 5,543 11 General Commercial 68,390 sf 4,662 Office Park 615.505 st' 5,042 Indusirial Park 683,990 s1' 5,602 PA I I 'hip Budget Subtotal 15,306 12 General Commercial 12,810 sl' 1.432 6encral Office 115.280 sr 1,530 PA 2'1'rip Budget Subtotal 2,902 Residential/Parks Non Residential E1S1'1-.'1Rfi)r the Disposal and Rome of MCAS Tustin 48 A-filigatio" A-1011itoring wid Reporting Program !:lS%lilR Jbr the M.%poml and Reuse of�M( A.S Justin f� ;14itigaliun A=1nrrlturirt}; rnul lZrportiir}; l'rrr�=rarer i Amount AU7's Amount AU-l-s1�1 Gellclal Colllillelclal 34,240 sl" 3,829 I; General Office 13(1,950 sl' - 1.817 Light Industrial - 513.575 sl' 4,663 PA 13 Trip Budget Subtotal 10.309 General Commercial 42,.340 sf -- 4.734 14 General Office 3.18,720 sf 3,3X7 Light Industrial 465,750 sf 4.326 PA 14Trip Rudgct Subtotal 12.,447 Neighborhood F. ,Square Footage Total 3,5.35,1.31) sf Neighborhood E Trip Budget Total 54,514 Neighborhood F 6enerat Commercial 72.930 st' 4.972 16 General Office 97,250 st.' 1,291 Light Industlial 315,950 sf 3,211 PA Whip Budget Sublotal 0,474 I' Light Industrial 284,0 10 sf 2,959 PA 17 Trip Rudgct Subtotal 2,959 IX military 40,850 sf 542 PA I X •Trip fiudgct Subtotal 542 19 Shopping (-'enter - 672,570 sf' 23,217 PA 19 Trip Budget Subtotal 23,217 ,Neighborhood F Square Footage Total 1,4$.3,5611 sf Neighborhood F Trip Budget Total 36,192 !:lS%lilR Jbr the M.%poml and Reuse of�M( A.S Justin f� ;14itigaliun A=1nrrlturirt}; rnul lZrportiir}; l'rrr�=rarer -_ — �— Planning Arca No. ,assumed Land Use Residential/Parks Non Residential — Amount ADTs Amount AU•1's(2) Neighborhood G -- Lf)it (I-7 duras) _•_-_— .--272 du 2,603 MDR (8-15 durac) 662 du 5,296 15 (;encral Conuucicial _ 62,730 sf 4,276 _.. Ilofel 12,237 500 rm 4,115 (Iolf(bW'yc 402 159.3 ac 1,7.74 PA 15 Trip Budget Subtotal 9,665 Planning Arca No. {^ - 20 Residential/!'arks Nun Residential Assumed Land Use - Anunml AUTs :lnunutl AI)'l'stZ) IMI [DR (16-25 dttiac) 588 (111 3,898 (;encral Commercial (by CUP) 23,000 Sf 2,572 PA 20Trip BLIdget Subtuts,l 2,572 21 IDR (1-7 (livas) - Tustin 71 1 6,804 I.I)R ( 1 -7 du ac) - Irr•inc 150 11436 PA 21 Trip Budget Subtotal iYeighhorhood GSquare Footage Total 8 5, 73 0 sf i1'eighborhood (: Trip Budget Total 12,237 Neighborhood 11 _ 22 MDR (8-15 duiac) 402 3,216 14eighhorhood Il and TA 21 Trip Budget Total 0 nn - hotel looms Source: Al.) I's for land use types derived From.VC.-IS hisnn .Specific PlumReuse flan 'l'rq#ir Siudv (Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. 1999) in Appendix F, bound separately. l : cnv+.7o0S%7? I :MI I-FAli.WI'U /:/.S!/i//Z fine the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS 'Tustin 50 X-fitigation A-lunitnring and Reporting Progrrtrn