Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 JWA NOISE ABATEMENT QTLY RPTS 11-17-09Agenda Item 8 ~' Reviewed: AGENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Director tiie MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the first and second quarters of 2009. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way, remained relatively constant during the first and second quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT No Fiscal Impact DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached are the quarterly reports for the first and second quarters of 2009. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows: Measured Noise Levels • During the first quarter (Q1) of 2009, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS) 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, was 55.3 dB. This is 1.2 dB lower than the previous four quarters (Q1 2008 through Q4 2008). For comparison, the CNEL was 1.9 dB higher (57.2 dB) during Q1 of 2008. • During the second quarter (Q2) of 2009, the average CNEL was 56.8 dB. This is 0.8 dB higher than the previous four quarters (Q-4 2007 through Q-3 2008). For comparison, the CNEL was 0.3 dB higher (57.1) during Q2 of 2008. JWA Noise Report November 17, 2009 Page 2 • All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. The CNEL for Q1 of 2009 was lower when compared to both the previous four quarters and the same time period in the previous year. This decrease can be attributed to one of the noisiest planes, the MD80, no longer flying in and out of John Wayne Airport. In addition, there has been a decrease in average daily jet operations at John Wayne Airport within the past year (363 average daily jet operations in Q1 of 2008 compared with 315 during Q1 of 2009). Although the CNEL was higher during Q2 of 2009 when compared to the previous four quarters, it was lower than the same period of time the previous year (Q2 of 2008). While average daily jet operations also decreased year to year for Q2 (352 in Q2 of 2008, 330 in Q2 of 2009), the slight increase in CNEL when compared to the previous four quarters can be attributed to an increase in daily jet operations over the previous two quarters (309 in Q4 2008, 315 in Q1 2009). Noise Complaints During Q1 of 2009, there were two (2) Tustin area complaint calls, compared. with twelve (12) complaints for the same period during 2008. During Q2 of 2009, there were six (6) Tustin area complaint calls, compared with eight (8) complaints for the same period during 2008. • The number of complaints decreased during Q1 and Q2 compared to the same periods in 2008. This is consistent with the overall complaints dropped 54.3% and 44.0% during Q1 and Q2 of 2009, respectively, compared to the same time periods in 2008. Therefore, the 2009 numbers for these two quarters for Tustin are consistent with the overall decrease in the number of complaints throughout the airport "Noise Impact Area." Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Cari Meyer Assistant Planner / ... Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachments: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009 and April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009. S:\Cdd\CCREPORT\2009UWA report to council 11-17-09.doc ATTACHMENTS John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009 (Q1) and April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 (Q2) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 145th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20]62 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-SS: 324 '/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (April I, 2008 -March 31, 2009). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- Figure 1 ~... i `. ~ r - ~ __; ~ , ,. _ -. °r ~ „ .~ , ,~, r _ _. s ~.. . ~~ 4 r .. ... - - i `~~ ~ - `~ t .. ~ - i. _. ~ _ _ 1 ~ )~'~ i ~ yy f ~ a ,, .. ~ ~. .. e ,,. _. --. _.. ~ r .:~ :~. ,: ~ ~ ..:_ _ _. .. ..._ . __ _ ~ f:~w ~ ~$f }} .'ic ~3 ' ~ j I . , ~.. t .y.J 11~ J ..~, .. ~ " ' 1 v .. /-. '_ F ~.( 1 ._. __. } ~~~- t f 1 i F ~ ~ SS .., - ~ 3 ~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ __. ~_- 3 ti~~~~~~ ~. ~~ ._ _ a , ~ __ ~ . '_~ ,. . ., =. '..' ~ ...; , ., ~ ~ . _~ ~:: _, f -.~ ~i ~, t ~ ,~ t _: L ~ ~ ~ ~ N a - iV .. ~ ~s a~ ,. .: ti . .. -_.. ,, ~v W~: a - Si ~ 1 I ~j( k S 9 ~ _ - f ~ J ~~ . ~'t I i_I ~. j i 1~ 3 Figure 2 ~, ~ "~~~ ~~~, - ~ F 'f ~ R ~ a"" ~ ':1 $ 'f.~ ~ ~~ ' 3t Y, ,i, l.J ~~ , F ,~ I~ / Y~ ~ ~ * ~ ~f~ '~' ', y'" ~Y ,fit,,, ` 4 j P hMi S ~' ' ~ 9~ a p' 4. 4 ~, b~~11 ~. .f b sk ~ 1+~_'`"` ~: 'AML.. ~:a ~ ~, ` 1. r' ~'~ .r y~~yy ~ ~5''_ JJ {~:~ ~~y nf~ ,"` ,y _` ':.ly j~. ~1, 3i ~ ! a ~.~ ~^~ ~'T - ~ +~,~gyep ~!F,4y,~~ l ~ i~;'~ ~t~' ,Y.~~. ~C ~l'!F~° ~' ~ C~! '~ ~ ~ .~` Y~,:~' \ DEF. '1„ S ;~ 'y'-'- ~ ~ ~ya~. S' „~,>~ r ,~ ~~` ~'L rid .A* ~ f ~ ~ ~,~e's~f ..+ '' ' ' r ,- z.. r 3 ~ ~§+ ~r ~ ~ n`,~~~ ` yv4 ,y~ ~''~ ~ ~~' ~ 1` ~ ;Y R ~' y~ ~ y;~d. ~~. „a ~ 'er 1 ~~~ M gg, ~.r~. ~s M a ~ 'r- ,.'n ~',E~t 'F,,~ v ",a4 .~ ~~*w~7 y~ • ° ~~~ _ .~r .' ~ 4 ~, ~~"t~~, `fir ~~~5` a ~~ x~ ~:..~»,t ~ ~ ,~~ ~~ - * * ' ,4~ ~~' 'r'1+,~ j dF'" t~, try f t~ P ~+ M~' _ C ~^~. ,. . l.,'k Fix' iT f~ ~ f~ ',~, r rd t 2, { i x~~f . ~'~ J ~: III ~ /~ ~ ~E''~ ~ Y SS~~ 1t ~iµ~'. t.....~,.,~ !" ~„~ i_ ~5~ °s e , ,ut:., ~~ 4 4 r ~* r ,~~~,~ef 4~; ~ 'q~~~~ #~~~ i ~y ~ ~fia ~ i~ - ~ 'q.. ~~ ~! c.e ~ _ " - ~ry,~ a , 7 z `fig' 1 • ,y .~ llt.. 1~ ~.i( r ~ ~ ` +~y` ti ~ . -~ i~,{? .~~ h `~ ^~"'4' ~H `; f ~~.,~,~~;y.~~r ~~ ~~_ mob.. ~'~'r f+~~ ~~~'~.r~ _~/ 4 r. ~ ~ 'f ``~ t: ~~,~11^"a ~~y ~ '..' ~'. ,,,~i'1 j. ~~''. ~. ,, ~ ^y'~"yry,,i~ ~ 'k -f~, f,y ~s, ~~~ _ 1 i,~'. ~. . ,~ ~j +yk ~~ s;_ 3Q4'~ 800 F~e~t .~ ~, ~,~~ , ~, ~ ~ rr~ ~. ~,.~ r ~ „ ~~', • ~ ~ { ~,,~ ~~ f ~:~ ~~ =-' Noise Monitors Single Family Residential JOHN WAYN E AI RPO RT 65 d6 CNEL Contour ~ Multi-Family Residential STATISTICS: 65 d B CNEL Impact Area Incompatible Land Use: 3.65 Acres or .006 square miles Number of Dwellings: 64 ~r~~ 2008 -March 2009 Number of People: 160 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit} nresre ce~eAsso~tar~ -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 1 I. TABLE I LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS January - Marrh 7(1(19 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Pro O erations 2 Jet O erations Janua 7,512 0 2,092 16,692 310 Februa 6,911 0 1,915 15,461 315 arc Irst uarter Twelve Months 04/01 /08 - 03/31 /09 92,291 0 28,036 241,893 330 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) January -March 2009 Jet Carrier 22,231 Military 10 Prop CarrieA GA Jet 6,082 GA Other 22,007 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (I) GA Jet figures include.a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUNALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending March 31, 2009, 64 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents a decrease of five (5) units in sn zio9 -4- the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending December 31, 2008. Four hundred and eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. A number of residences also chose not to participate in the County's Acoustical Insulation and Purchase Assurance Programs. Specifically, 18 residences declined voluntary participation in the Programs in writing. An additional 64 homeowners did not respond to any of the participation opportunities. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (January 1, 2009 -March 31 2009) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009, the Office received 113 complaints from citizens. This is a 0.9% increase from the 112 complaints received last quarter. It is a 54.3% decrease from the 247 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 25 20 15 10 19 13 12 8 8 ~ ~ 5 4 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 e\a~a 5°\a ~~~~ eye '~°r~y °~~~ 'O~J~ aGr ~~y y~`c ~`r aye r°~ °a r~~ `~~ ~~ a ~`c` Oe ~ ~` ~e 2 ae` ~° °~` '~~ Qje G° p` ~aP e.~ ,~Jy eyti° 0a`~OO a e~ ~°~~ G°y °y'a~ ~a~ ~ ~~c~ ~°~ ~• Q°Z~ y'Q°t` 5a~ ~ ~' ~ 0`x`0° ~,° G \• A ~°~ ~e o`~P 5a Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 4/08 through 3/09 Values in d6 at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Apr 2008 67.2 65.9 65.0 58.4 57.4 59.4 55.6 68.3 43.0 57.2 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 12 30 May 2008 67.2 65.6 64.9 58.5 57.3 59.1 55.5 68.1 41.5 57.4 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Jun 2008 67.6 66.0 65.4 58.3 57.4 59.1 55.1 68.4 43.4 56.8 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 Q-2 2008 67.3 65.8 65.1 58.4 57.4 59.2 55.4 68.3 42.6 57.1 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 71 91 Ju12008 67.6 65.9 65.3 58.0 57.2 59.1 55.2 68.4 42.4 56.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2008 67.6 65.9 65.4 58.0 57.1 58.9 55.1 68.3 42.2 56.3 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Sep 2008 67.0 65.6 64.9 57.7 56.9 58.6 54.9 67.6 43.1 56.2 # Da s 30 30 30 26 30 30 30 30 29 30 Q-3 2008 67.4 65.8 65.2 57.9 57.1 58.9 55.1 68.1 42.6 56.3 # Days 92 92 92 88 92 92 92 92 87 92 Oct 2008 66.0 64.6 64.2 56.4 55.3 58.5 54.2 66.8 42.7 54.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 31 31 Nov 2008 65.8 64.6 63.5 56.6 55.8 58.1 53.5 66.4 42.4 54.7 # Da s 26 30 30 30 26 26 30 30 29 30 Dec 2008 66.0 64.7 64.3 57.3 56.5 58.8 54.1 67.0 44.2 55.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Q-4 2008 65.9 64.6 64.0 56.8 55.9 58.5 53.9 66.8 43.2 55.0 # Days 88 92 92 92 88 88 91 92 91 92 Jan 2009 64.5 63.2 63.8 55.7 54.6 58.4 52.5 65.6 42.4 53.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Feb 2009 65.9 64.7 63.5 57.5 56.6 57.9 51.9 67.0 43.8 55.8 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 26 28 Mar 2009 66.1 65.0 64.0 57.6 56.5 58.5 53.5 67.4 42.5 56.1 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-12009 65.5 64.4 63.8 57.0 56.0 58.3 52.7 66.7 42.9 55.3 # Da s 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 84 90 t ru - Total 66.6 65.2 64.6 57.6 56.6 58.7 54.4 67.5 42.8 56.0 # Days 361 365 365 361 361 361 364 365 333 365 Q-1 2008 thru Q-4 2008 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 67.0 65.5 65.0 57.9 57.1 59.2 55.1 68.0 43.8 56.5 # Days 362 366 366 362 362 362 356 366 315 366 Change from Previous 4 Quarters -0.4 -0.3 -0.4 -0.4 -0.5 -0.4 -0.7 -0.4 -0.9 -0.5 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION January 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 65.1 63.9 62.9 55.7 54.6 56.0 52.1 66.8 31.1 55.5 2 66.9 65.3 64.7 58.0 55.8 57.0 51.2 68.1 27.8 57.8 3 64.6 63.1 63.6 56.8 55.4 58.1 53.2 66.7 42.4 55.0 4 65.4 60.9 63.5 56.4 54.5 57.3 52.4 66.2 40.9 52.4 5 66.4 65.0 63.8 57.8 56.7 57.4 54.2 67.3 '44.3 55.9 6 65.9 64.7 63.9 57.8 56.7 58.2 55.2 66.8 43.8 54.6 7 65.9 65.0 63.4 57.1 56.0 56.8 55.3 66.6 43.5 55.1 8 64.6 63.7 61.9 55.7 54.9 55.8 53.6 67.6 #N/A 55.2 9 64.3 63.2 66.8 54.7 53.7 61.5 55.4 61.7 38.0 50.7 10 53.7 55.2 62.8 38.7 44.4 57.8 44.0 57.2 38.4 30.9 11 60.5 58.3 65.4 46.9 46.3 60.2 45.6 60.4 38.2 40.8 12 56.8 54.5 65.4 37.9 46.1 61.1 31.5 61.2 44.7 43.9 13 61.1 60.3 62.1 52.3 50.5 57.4 47.7 65.3 42.4 50.4 14 65.4 63.7 65.1 54.2 52.2 59.6 52.5 63.7 41.8 47.4 15 64.4 62.3 64.8 55.0 52.8 59.7 50.5 63.9 44.6 49.2 16 66.2 64.1 63.9 56.9 55.3 57.5 53.7 66.3 41.9 52.2 17 63.4 62.7 61.1 54.3 53.0 55.6 50.6 63.7 43.9 50.7 18 63.9 62.2 65.4 53.1 53.5 60.5 51.1 61.5 43.3 46.5 19 65.8 64.6 63.8 56.7 55.5 57.1 52.6 65.6 37.5 52.9 20 65.4 64.0 62.5 56.1 54.8 56.6 52.1 65.4 38.6 52.5 21 65.7 64.1 64.0 58.3 56.1 57.7 53.8 66.5 36.1 55.5 22 65.4 64.5 63.1 57.1 55.7 57.3 53.3 66.4 43.1 55.6 23 66.4 65.2 63.8 58.5 58.3 59.2 54.7 68.3 41.9 57.9 24 64.0 63.1 61.9 56.5 56.1 57.1 52.8 65.0 #N/A 54.0 25 65.0 64.1 62.8 57.1 56.5 57.7 54.2 68.1 36.0 57.1 26 65.7 64.9 62.9 57.1 56.6 57.7 54.0 66.7 45.3 56.0 27 59.4 58.5 62.2 50.8 50.2 58.2 45.1 65.6 43.8 49.7 28 66.5 64.9 64.7 56.4 55.6 59.2 52.4 65.4 39.3 51.2 29 57.2 55.8 66.0 43.8 48.4 62.3 31.7 61.5 47.4 47.2 30 63.0 61.8 62.6 54.7 53.5 57.7 49.1 65.0 44.1 51.1 31 62.8 62.1 60.1 54.3 52.6 54.0 54.6 63.1 43.8 51.0 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 En.Av 64.5 63.2 63.8 55.7 54.6 58.4 52.5 65.6 42.4 53.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION February 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 65.3 64.3 62.7 55.6 54.4 56.5 49.2 65.1 39.3 51.4 2 64.0 62.5 62.5 54.7 53.6 55.8 49.5 64.7 40.6 50.2 3 63.3 62.4 60.3 54.4 52.8 53.7 49.1 64.9 44.5 50.7 4 63.5 62.0 60.4 55.3 52.9 54.8 51.9 65.7 45.5 53.8 5 66.1 65.0 64.0 59.3 57.2 58.4 48.4 68.8 42.6 58.9 6 66.3 65.4 64.0 59.4 58.5 59.3 46.0 68.8 28.5 59.0 7 63.6 62.6 61.7 56.1 55.9 55.9 47.4 64.6 43.7 53.9 8 65.7 64.3 63.0 57.2 57.0 57.6 48.1 68.1 39.3 57.1 9 65.5 65.0 62.7 56.9 57.5 57.4 44.1 67.4 38.2 56.1 10 65.1 63.8 62.3 56.8 55.9 57.3 52.9 60.4 43.6 55.2 11 66.1 65.3 63.7 57.9 57.4 58.4 52.7 67.5 32.2 56.8 12 67.5 66.3 65.1 58.9 58.4 59.6 54.1 68.1 50.5 56.0 13 67.7 66.4 65.0 59.3 58.9 59.7 50.8 68.9 41.0 58.3 14 64.8 63.4 62.5 56.9 55.8 56.5 50.2 65.1 37.4 53.7 15 65.6 64.1 63.1 57.7 55.8 57.2 51.3 67.5 43.8 55.5 16 66.9 66.0 64.2 58.9 58.7 58.9 50.0 69.3 42.4 58.9 17 66.5 64.9 64.5 58.5 57.8 59.2 50.9 67.5 43.8 56.6 18 66.7 65.5 64.8 57.3 57.0 59.3 53.4 66.7 45.6 53.6 19 64.9 64.3 62.4 55.6 55.2 56.5 51.6 66.7 44.8 54.9 20 66.6 65.4 63.8 57.5 55.9 57.3 53.4 67.2 43.7 54.4 21 65.3 63.8 63.2 56.3 55.2 57.2 54.1 65.3 36.3 52.8 22 65.3 64.0 64.3 55.9 55.1 58.8 52.1 66.9 48.0 54.6 23 66.9 65.6 64.6 58.9 57.0 58.6 55.0 66.9 45.5 56.0 24 66.4 65.2 64.1 58.3 57.1 58.7 55.0 67.2 43.0 55.4 25 66.5 65.3 64.1 58.7 56.9 58.9 53.1 67.8 #N/A 57.2 26 66.8 65.5 63.9 58.2 57.1 58.8 54.2 68.1 #N/A 57.5 27 66.7 65.4 64.4 58.3 57.4 59.2 54.3 68.2 45.5 56.6 28 64.1 63.1 61.8 55.4 53.6 55.9 50.4 63.9 40.8 51.5 Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 26 28 En.Av 65.9 64.7 63.5 57.5 56.6 57.9 51.9 67.0 43.8 55.8 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION March 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 65.7 64.7 63.2 55.6 55.3 56.5 52.2 67.4 37.1 54.9 2 66.6 65.4 64.3 57.5 56.6 58.3 54.3 67.2 46.4 55.8 3 65.6 64.6 63.3 57.4 56.2 58.1 52.5 67.5 42.3 55.5 4 65.4 65.0 62.8 57.9 56.3 57.5 54.3 67.8 41.9 57.9 5 66.1 65.2 63.2 57.7 56.5 57.9 50.9 67.8 44.3 56.4 6 65.5 64.9 63.3 58.1 56.8 58.4 52.2 68.0 39.4 57.0 7 64.9 63.6 62.2 57.5 55.1 56.6 50.1 65.2 44.5 54.0 8 66.4 65.3 63.8 58.4 56.7 58.8 52.0 68.3 39.1 58.0 9 66.1 65.4 63.8 58.3 56.4 58.2 49.8 68.0 33.6 57.2 10 65.8 64.6 63.3 58.2 56.1 57.9 52.7 67.3 43.9 55.7 11 65.7 64.7 63.1 58.2 55.9 58.1 50.3 67.8 42.0 57.1 12 66.3 65.7 64.0 58.2 57.3 59.3 56.8 68.1 43.2 56.7 13 66.2 65.1 63.8 58.3 56.8 58.8 53.6 68.2 39.1 56.2 14 64.6 63.9 62.1 56.7 55.3 56.5 51.1 65.6 34.8 56.2 15 65.8 64.4 63.4 57.7 56.3 58.6 48.4 68.0 #N/A 56.5 16 66.4 65.6 64.4 57.9 56.9 58.8 51.7 67.4 43.3 55.3 17 66.5 65.4 64.6 57.8 57.0 58.9 53.8 67.2 36.9 55.3 18 66.7 65.4 64.9 57.7 56.6 58.5 52.5 67.3 42.9 55.9 19 66.7 65.7 64.4 57.7 56.8 58.4 54.3 68.7 29.9 57.5 20 67.0 66.1 64.6 57.4 56.3 57.8 53.2 68.7 39.3 58.1 21 65.6 64.3 63.5 57.2 56.1 57.7 53.5 65.8 41.2 55.3 22 66.0 65.4 66.6 57.7 58.6 61.9 57.0 66.0 #N/A 54.1 23 66.5 65.4 64.4 57.9 56.8 58.6 50.2 67.4 44.9 55.8 24 65.0 62.9 63.6 54.7 53.8 57.7 48.4 66.0 44.7 52.6 25 66.3 65.0 64.2 57.3 56.3 57.8 52.0 67.7 39.9 55.7 26 66.9 65.8 64.6 59.5 57.6 59.3 46.9 67.9 45.1 56.5 27 65.6 64.4 64.8 56.5 55.8 59.9 62.3 67.0 44.9 54.1 28 65.3 64.2 62.9 55.9 56.1 56.6 51.3 64.5 40.4 52.2 29 66.4 65.1 64.0 58.0 56.2 57.8 36.0 68.7 38.1 58.3 30 66.8 66.3 64.6 57.9 57.5 60.2 49.7 67.5 43.5 55.2 31 66.6 64.5 65.1 57.9 57.0 58.6 52.2 67.2 46.8 55.1 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 En.Av 66.1 65.0 64.0 57.6 56.5 58.5 53.5 67.4 42.5 56.1 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A January -March 2009 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1 4 5 6 7 9 Alas a Air 7 74 27 Average 96.7 4.9 5. 8 9.6 4. 1.7 8 .6 .5 Count 23 23 23 24 24 24 12 3 3 3 67377 351 Average 92.8 91.8 87.9 81.2 82.8 83.3 80.5 89.0 79.2 80.6 Count 300 293 305 299 304 302 218 42 8 8 87378 220 Average 97.4 96.0 95.0 87.8 87.7 87.8 84.0 93.1 81.2 81.4 Count (212 (210) (210) (206) (213) (206 (109 (7) 4 3) American 67378 907 Average 97.9 96.1 95.1 88.5 87.0 88.4 84.2 90.7 79.5 79.5 Count 809 791 812 806 819 797 512 83 25 28 6757 226 Average 93.4 92.5 90.9 85.9 85.1 86.8 82.9 88.9 79.9 78.6 Count (204) (201) (205) (204) (203) (203) (117) (19) (6) (5) Continental 67373 1 Average 94.2 92.9 91.8 86.5 86.5 87.0 82.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 67377 520 Average 95.3 93.7 92.1 85.7 84.5 86.0 83.2 91.5 79.6 79.4 Count 460 452 466 466 464 457 286 51 18 13 87378 77 Average 97.9 95.8 94.3 87.5 86.3 88.3 84.9 92.9 79.1 78.9 Count (63) (62) (62) (62) (64) (64) (58) (11) (5) (3) Delta 67377 76 Average 95.0 93.4 91.3 85.2 84.7 86.4 83.6 91.7 80.8 80.3 Count 70 72 72 72 70 69 36 4 1 2 87378 32 Average 95.2 93.5 92.8 88.0 87.0 88.8 85.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 32 31 30 32 31 32 13 0 0 0 8757 325 Average 96.0 94.4 93.6 87.4 86.3 87.0 84.0 89.7 78.7 79.8 Count 279 277 283 276 284 282 194 39 11 12 MD90 361 Average 90.9 89.7 89.3 82.2 82.8 84.4 81.7 88.5 79.1 78.1 Count (326) (317) (325) (300) (283 319) (201) 33 (4) (10) FedEx A300 46 Average 96.6 95.3 93.5 87.3 88.3 88.8 85.6 89.3 #N/A #N/A Count 44 44 45 44 43 44 34 1 0 0 A310 17 Average 96.7 96.1 93.3 87.4 88.4 88.8 85.7 93.2 77.1 #N/A Count (16) (14 (16) (16) (16) (15) (12) (1) (1) (0) Frontier Airlines A318 11 Average 92.7 90.9 91.0 86.0 84.7 85.5 85.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 11 11 11 11 11 11 5 0 0 0 A319 337 Average 92.9 91.3 91.3 86.2 85.3 86.0 82.3 88.1 78.3 78.9 Count (300) (297) (299) (300) (301) (297) (198) (33) (5) (14) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 154 Average 91.4 90.2 91.5 84.3 82.6 85.1 80.8 86.2 #N/A #N/A Count (141) (139) (141) (139) 138) (137) (56) (13) (0) (0) Northwest A320 254 Average 95.3 93.7 93.0 86.8 85.6 86.2 82.8 89.4 79.3 78.7 Count 225) (223 (229) 228 229 (225 (134 24 (2) (5) Southwest 67377 355 Average 90.2 89.7 85.8 81.5 80.9 81.2 79.3 88.6 78.5 80.2 Count 321) 313) (319) 313) (309) (318) 166 28 (5 (1 United A320 393 Average 92.2 91.2 90.6 85.4 84.2 85.9 83.9 88.4 77.8 80.9 Count 341 335 343 341 340 335 222 47 4 5 87373 246 Average 94.5 93.3 91.6 86.5 85.9 86.8 83.5 91.6 81.6 79.9 Count 219 218 221 220 222 217 144 21 7 10 8757 356 Average 91.3 90.4 88.6 83.2 82.3 84.1 81.6 88.1 79.2 76.1 Count (311) (307) (312) (312) (294) (311) (214) (40) (8) (5) UPS 8757 57 Average 94.2 93.3 91.6 85.2 83.7 85.6 81.4 86.6 #N/A #N/A Count (54) (54) (53) (54) (54) (54) (39) (3) (0) (0) US Airways A320 841 Average 90.9 90.6 89.2 84.8 83.3 83.9 81.3 86.4 79.2 81.5 Count 751 736 757 755 742 745 390 74 6 11 A321 1 Average 95.1 94.4 92.9 88.4 86.9 88.0 85.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 87373 92 Average 93.1 92.0 89.6 85.5 84.1 86.7 81.9 89.7 80.5 81.0 Count 80 77 80 80 79 75 66 8 3 4 6757 97 Average 93.3 93.1 89.3 83.6 82.5 83.7 80.4 87.6 78.6 76.5 Count (86) (84) (85) (81) (83) (82) (45) (11) (1) (2) - 10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E January -March 2009 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Si te 4 5 8 10 laska Air 377 333 verage Count 2.2 (295) 91. (290) .4 (298) 81.1 (295) 8 .5 (300) 2.5 (291) 7 .9 (200) 9.5 (32) 8.5 (8) 79. (10) Southwest 67377 3049 Average Count 89.9 (2746) 89.5 (2701) 85.6 (2743) 81.5 (2690) 80.9 (2544) 81.4 (2711) 79.5 (1365) 88.9 (276) 79.5 (51) 78.8 (37) -ll- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter January -March 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 3 4 5 7 8 1 American age 140 10 7 Average Count 6. (910) 5.3 (901) 87.8 (905) 7 (765) 7 .2 (557} 80.9 (897) 78. (61) 3.4 (88) / (0) 80. (2) SkyWest CL60 8 Average Count 85.7 6 82.3 7 86.1 6 78.4 2 77.5 1 79.6 5 #N/A 0 82.3 1 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 CRJ7 332 Average Count 88.7 (299) 87.4 292) 86.6 295 80.7 (220) 79.6 (185} 81.6 291 78.9 (106) 87.4 (32) #N/A 0) 75.0 (2) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation January -March 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 3 4 6 eneral viation Jet 3 41 Average Count 89.1 (2174) 87.6 (2103) 9. (2068) 84.4 (1261) 84. (907) 84.1 (1858) 84. (424) 8 .7 (219) 81.8 (16) 78.5 (24) -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year as a it 4 4 87377 4,439 4,657 5,822 5,913 1,367 oa American AA 67378 6,896 6,737 7,322 7,649 1,815 8757 1,996 2,673 2,573 2,519 454 Continental CO 87373 4 4 87375 1,767 1,812 53 2 B7377 3,529 3,711 5,537 5,274 1,039 Delta DL 67373 1,243 7 5 24 87377 2 577 152 87378 131 280 97 438 64 6757 3,859 3,264 3,195 2,856 651 FedEx FM A300 4 98 296 368 91 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1,114 13 9 110 23 A319 1,034 2,139 2,663 2,732 674 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2 2 i wes Northwest NW A319 2,793 2,073 2,071 2,076 499 4 Southwest WN B7373 2 402 20 2 1 87375 2 ,4 44 4 US Airways AW A319 2,364 3,659 3,413 3,250 1,027 A320 3,050 2,132 2,864 2,964 657 A321 2 B7373 2,746 2,271 1,244 1,138 184 United UA A319 1,760 2,172 3,200 2,093 291 A320 2,086 1,399 850 1,939 498 87373 2 72 506 275 87375 8 88 191 216 -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 4 A310 498 406 210 142 35 A318 1,114 13 9 110 23 A319 7,951 10,043 11,347 10,151 2,491 A320 5,176 3, 579 3, 721 4, 903 1,164 A321 2 B717 238 87373 3,995 2,756 1,269 1,674 460 67374 7,130 7,188 5,072 2,114 55 67375 1, 769 1, 820 141 191 218 87377 33,675 36,450 42,371 39,076 9,366 67378 7,167 7,023 8,341 9,822 2,474 6757 12,886 13,634 13,059 10,393 2,127 CL60 2 2 CRJ9 1,455 1,325 1,301 1,224 308 MD80 2,504 1,981 2,185 1,463 MD90 1,572 1,841 2,047 2,459 722 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 45, 000 40,000 35,000 ^ 2005 30, 000 ^ 2006 25,000 20,000 ^ 2007 15, 000 ^ 2008 10, 000 ^ 2009 5,000 0 ~~o '~~~ '~^~ ~,~0 3,tio ^~`L^ ~^'\ ~,~~ ~,~~ ~,~~ ~,~1 3•~4' ~~1 ~~O Q-~0 Oho OHO P P P P P P 0 ~~ Qj1 ~'~ ~'~ ~~ 0 G G ~ ~ By Year -14- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year as a it 4 87377 6.085 6.386 7.975 8.087 7.600 oa American AA 67378 9.452 9.227 10.030 10.454 10.078 6757 2.734 3.666 3.523 3.443 2.511 Continental CO 67373 0.003 0.005 87375 2.436 2.490 0.071 0.011 87377 4.819 5.082 7.586 7.202 5.778 4 Delta DL 67373 1.704 0.011 0.005 0.033 87377 0.003 0.787 0.844 87378 0.181 0.384 0.132 0.598 0.356 B757 5.290 4.474 4.395 3.913 3.611 4. FedEx FM A300 0.005 0.134 0.405 0.503 0.511 4 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1.526 0.019 0.011 0.153 0.122 A319 1.416 2.929 3.649 3.732 3.744 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 0.003 0.003 i wes Northwest NW A319 3.827 2.841 2.836 2.836 2.778 Southwest WN 87373 0.003 0.551 0.027 0.003 67375 0.003 US Airways AW A319 3.244 5.008 4.679 4.440 5.711 A320 4.178 2.934 3.921 4.049 3.633 A321 0.011 87373 3.762 3.110 1.704 1.555 1.022 United UA A319 2.416 2.984 4.373 2.866 1.622 A320 2.852 1.912 1.181 2.639 2.744 B7373 0.003 0.099 0.691 1.544 67375 0.011 0.121 0.260 1.189 -IS- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: March 11, 2009 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics Jim Sugden presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for February 2009, and copies were distributed to attendees. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Greg Carroll asked, is JWA anticipating an increase in daily departures this year? Eric Freed replied, yes, based on the approved 2009-10 capacity allocation which includes two new entrant Garners. Greg Carroll asked, with the recent reduction in commercial operations, will JWA be able to meet its financial obligations for the Airport Improvement Program? Eric Freed replied, while airport revenue has decreased as a result of reduced passenger traffic, the projected costs for the Airport Improvement Program have also been revised downward as a result of reduced material costs and contractor bids that have come in 20-25% less than initially projected. Additionally, I/3 of the Airport Improvement Program costs will be paid in cash from existing airport reserves. Cherie Weber asked, have airlines reduced flights at JWA? Eric Freed replied, yes, the number of commercial operations over the past several months has decreased 12%-15% as compared to the same month in the previous year. Greg Carroll asked, do touch-and-goes count in the total number of GA operations Eric Freed replied, yes. Greg Carroll stated that he has noticed noise that sounds like a large vacuum imitating from the airport, and asked if JWA staff was aware of any potential source of this noise. None of the JWA staff could identify the source for the described noise. Cherie Weber asked, do the airlines do maintenance at JWA. Jim Sugden replied, only maintenance needed to correct unforeseen mechanical issues. None of the airlines perform regularly scheduled maintenance at JWA. -16- NAC ROSTER March 11, 2009 NAME ORGANIZATION Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Irma Ortega John Wayne Airport Silvia Zavala John Wayne Airport Jim Sugden John Wayne Airport Greg Carroll SAH Projec~/OCDA-Vice Chair PAC Cherie Weber AIR FAIR -17- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 146 Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20162 S. W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-SS: 324'/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July 1, 2008 -June 30, 2009). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- Figure. l Figure 2 .- d `: s ~ ~ ~F ,~ .~. t~F~ ~ ~i ~ uy ~ ~4. } ~~c' •~ !~ ~ ` y~ ~~ '~ [l~ ,yq 'fit Y ` ~4~ ~ i4~ ~ i~ efS.-~ ~'g" >t 'y ~Y ~' ~ - r 2 ~` ,:~ { ~S'.~- .*`r~i Yyr~ ~ ,~~1.#F~p FF f .~i.~~ ~s, ~ s+~.x ~Y ,~~ ~., ~r~ x~$ F 'v }, •,• ~T JJJ"'77Y+44t ~. ~. ~r~ hm r~ 4+ ~1,°'rt" `~ (,~ ~f ;r f ~r ,mot ~ d ~~ x • } k' .~ ~Y~ t~/~~n ~~~i ,-~ - ~ `" ~t1~9/'~ ~ ~+i' .I S J~~f ~ ~ r l ~~ ~~~''yv .Uq .;~ . y . ~ °4, _ ~ - _ ate. e s~ +~ ~ ~ - T~ ~~ ,_ * ~ .. ; - ~ N a . - { . _ M ~aP~ r~! ~~py~}` ~ e '~k /y y ~ ~ ~:./ -. ~ x~ ,may ~V jSv,,•_y, ~` ~ ~ `~ Y 'ii. ~ . _ Lq€r ~ ~ .S , 's' ,~ ~•~ ~N .~.F'e,` ~ ~ :~ ~ ~~'P ~,•`Sw~ "'•F. ~ _ j ~ ~ '-~~"~" , t } ~ ~ ,~ .; s'a• ' ~ ~L ~ ~ - 4c ~~ s ~ ""..CCC E ~!~w• ~ y ak '4y,rT i 'A- ~ J~~~ i R~ "a'"'; 1t. r j ~ ~ v - `.~~ i~'~ 1i' ~., ~ ~ ` .,, y41~' ''+YY~~,~~~~ - ~i ~ i t~~!'y~~ 4- ~ i t ti ~.,f ~n ~ ~~ =.~ ~~ ' ~ ~ to ~q, '`~ tid'f ~ ~ ~T r sy~ ,. .~}"_ 5~,~ i • r+t ~~ ~ ~' ~ ~7 ~'`~1- ~~ ~ ~ ~ *, ~ ~ ,~' 'i - ~ y f~ ' ~4q'" ,~.r,- :,r `~~~ ~~ 1 r?'-ti. ~± Y~ .t~~~~. ~ ~ ~ 4~~ 1 +~~ r,,,~{ J ' , ~ !~ { 1 tf,V , r ~p p ~, i F s j{ ~ F Noise Monitors I __I Single Family Residential JOHN WAYN E AI RPORT 65 d8 CNEL Contour ~ ~ Multi-Family Residential sTATIS-rics: 65 d B CNEL Impact Area Incompatible Land Use: 3.16 Acres or .005 square miles Number of Dwellings: 67 Ju~~/ 200$ -June 2009 I Number of People: 167.5 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit} MestreGreveAssociares, aDivuionofLandrum &Brawn -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE I LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS __ Aril -June 200 9 Period __ . Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Pro O erations 2 Jet O erations A ril 7,592 0 2,041 17,643 321 Ma 8,275 0 1,982 19,129 331 June 8,307 0 1854 19,201 339 Second Quarter 24,174 0 5,877 55,973 330 Twelve Months 07/01/08 - 06/30/09 92,597 0 25,732 215,585 324 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) April -June 2009 Jet Carrier 24,174 Military 14 Prop CarrieA GA Jet ~`-) 5,877 GA Other 25,908 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA let figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending June 30, 2009, 67 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents an increase of three (3) units in the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period 10/30/09 -4- ending March 31, 2009. Four hundred and eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. A number of residences also chose not to participate in the County's Acoustical Insulation and Purchase Assurance Programs. Specifically, 18 residences declined voluntary participation in the Programs in writing. An additional 64 homeowners did not respond to any of the participation opportunities. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (April 1, 2009 -June 30, 2009) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period April I, 2009 through June 30, 2009, the Office received 218 complaints from citizens. This is a 98.2% increase from the 113 complaints received last quarter. It is a 44.0% decrease from the 400 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 7/08 through 6/09 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Ju12008 67.6 65.9 65.3 58.0 57.2 59.1 55.2 68.4 42.4 56.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2008 67.6 65.9 65.4 58.0 57.1 58.9 55.1 68.3 42.2 56.3 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Sep 2008 67.0 65.6 64.9 57.7 56.9 58.6 54.9 67.6 43.1 56.2 # Da s 30 30 30 26 30 30 30 30 29 30 Q-3 2008 67.4 65.8 65.2 57.9 57.1 58.9 55.1 68.1 42.6 56.3 # Days 92 92 92 88 92 92 92 92 87 92 Oct 2008 66.0 64.6 64.2 56.4 55.3 58.5 54.2 66.8 42.7 54.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 31 31 Nov 2008 65.8 64.6 63.5 56.6 55.8 58.1 53.5 66.4 42.4 54.7 # Da s 26 30 30 30 26 26 30 30 29 30 Dec 2008 66.0 64.7 64.3 57.3 56.5 58.8 54.1 67.0 44.2 55.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Q-4 2008 65.9 64.6 64.0 56.8 55.9 58.5 53.9 66.8 43.2 55.0 # Days 88 92 92 92 88 88 91 92 91 92 Jan 2009 64.5 63.2 63.8 55.7 54.6 58.4 52.5 65.6 42.4 53.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Feb 2009 65.9 64.7 63.5 57.5 56.6 57.9 51.9 67.0 43.8 55.8 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 26 28 Mar 2009 66.1 65.0 64.0 57.6 56.5 58,5 53.5 67.4 42.5 56.1 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-12009 65.5 64.4 63.8 57.0 56.0 58.3 52.7 66.7 42.9 55.3 # Days 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 84 90 Apr 2009 66.2 65.1 63.9 57.9 56.9 58.2 50.0 67.5 43.2 56.6 # Da s 30 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 May 2009 66.6 65.3 64.3 58.0 56.5 59.1 50.2 67.7 42.3 56.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 26 31 31 27 31 Jun 2009 67.0 65.7 64.4 58.1 56.8 58.8 50.5 68.2 40.4 57.0 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Q-2 2009 66.6 65.4 64.2 58.0 56.7 58.7 50.2 67.8 42.1 56.8 # Da s 91 86 91 91 91 86 91 91 85 91 t ru - Total 66.4 65.1 64.4 57.5 56.4 58.6 53.3 67.4 42.7 55.9 # Days 361 360 365 361 361 356 364 365 347 365 Q-2 2008 thru Q-1 2009 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 66.6 65.2 64.6 57.6 56.6 58.7 54.4 67.5 42.8 56.0 # Days 361 365 365 361 361 361 364 365 333 365 Change from Previous 4 Quarters -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -1.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION April 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.5 65.1 64.2 58.9 57.4 58.7 50.3 67.5 49.2 56.6 2 67.3 65.9 65.0 59.1 58.1 59.2 51.3 68.3 38.4 58.8 3 67.0 65.8 64.9 59.1 58.4 59.3 50.8 68.0 28.7 57.9 4 65.4 63.9 62.8 57.0 55.5 56.9 49.4 64.1 40.8 52.0 5 64.7 63.1 62.3 55.5 54.0 55.5 48.2 66.3 41.8 52.9 6 65.3 64.1 62.6 56.3 54.7 56.1 49.7 67.0 36.0 54.3 7 65.9 65.0 63.5 57.8 56.8 57.9 47.9 68.3 39.7 57.7 8 65.9 65.2 63.7 57.9 57.3 58.3 43.3 68.2 46.0 57.0 9 66.9 65.7 64.7 58.8 57.8 59.5 50.6 68.4 41.0 58.0 10 66.7 65.6 64.1 58.2 57.7 58.7 50.6 67.8 33.5 57.5 11 64.6 63.2 62.4 56.9 55.8 57.0 47.9 65.5 48.7 54.7 12 66.1 65.1 63.8 57.7 57.1 58.4 52.0 67.8 45.1 55.7 13 67.0 65.7 64.5 58.4 57.1 58.8 52.1 68.0 46.8 56.9 14 65.9 64.7 63.5 58.5 57.1 57.8 43.6 68.1 39.3 58.0 15 65.9 65.2 63.6 57.7 57.7 58.2 42.8 67.7 44.9 56.7 16 67.3 65.9 64.7 58.9 57.8 59.8 50.5 67.7 37.1 56.0 17 67.4 66.4 65.4 58.8 57.7 59.5 52.4 67.6 37.4 56.4 18 65.1 63.9 62.8 56.2 55.2 56.4 50.4 64.4 #N/A 51.9 19 66.2 64.8 63.8 55.5 54.9 56.5 51.6 66.3 36.0 53.2 20 66.1 64.4 63.7 55.3 54.7 56.2 50.5 66.1 35.2 52.5 21 65.6 64.7 63.1 56.0 54.9 56.4 47.7 67.2 45.3 54.7 22 66.6 65.2 64.6 57.8 56.7 58.0 47.8 68.3 44.2 57.7 23 67.1 #N/A 64.8 59.3 58.2 59.0 54.1 68.4 44.0 58.1 24 66.8 #N/A 64.6 58.7 57.5 59.5 50.7 68.3 37.9 58.3 25 64.3 #N/A 61.8 56.5 55.4 56.1 47.3 65.1 44.3 56.4 26 66.4 #N/A 64.2 58.3 57.1 58.7 46.8 68.4 43.5 57.4 27 66.5 #N/A 64.2 58.6 57.1 58.6 49.3 67.6 39.9 57.7 28 65.6 64.5 63.3 58.2 56.2 58.2 50.8 67.9 42.7 57.5 29 66.3 65.7 64.3 58.7 57.7 59.7 50.1 67.9 44.6 57.3 30 66.5 65.6 64.2 58.5 57.3 59.0 50.7 68.0 38.3 56.9 Da s 30 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 En.Av 66.2 65.1 63.9 57.9 56.9 58.2 50.0 67.5 43.2 56.6 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION May 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.8 65.2 66.1 57.9 57.4 61.6 52.2 66.8 41.8 54.5 2 64.2 63.2 61.8 55.8 54.4 55.8 50.6 65.2 33.0 55.0 3 66.4 65.2 64.2 58.2 57.3 60.1 52.3 68.2 46.8 57.3 4 66.8 65.4 64.1 58.5 57.2 59.0 48.6 67.5 39.1 57.4 5 66.1 64.9 63.6 58.4 56.6 58.3 47.7 67.6 43.7 56.5 6 65.3 64.4 63.3 56.9 55.9 58.6 49.6 67.7 43.3 55.9 7 67.2 65.7 64.6 58.6 57.2 59.6 47.9 67.7 37.1 57.1 8 67.2 65.7 65.2 59.1 57.3 59.3 42.6 68.2 46.5 56.9 9 65.0 63.6 62.7 56.6 54.3 57.3 44.1 65.0 38.4 54.6 10 66.3 64.8 63.6 57.1 55.9 59.2 49.5 68.2 36.4 57.1 11 67.1 65.7 64.6 58.3 56.9 59.6 49.8 68.2 40.3 57.4 12 66.3 65.2 65.6 58.5 57.3 61.1 47.6 67.6 41.3 56.6 13 66.9 65.5 64.2 58.5 57.3 58.6 48.7 68.0 36.6 57.8 14 67.9 66.3 65.5 59.3 57.3 #N/A 47.9 68.5 #N/A 56.6 15 67.8 65.9 64.9 58.9 57.2 #N/A 47.4 68.3 #N/A 57.1 16 65.5 63.8 62.8 56.2 54.5 #N/A 48.1 65.2 29.0 54.2 17 66.8 65.5 64.1 57.0 55.7 #N/A 49.8 68.1 #N/A 56.9 18 67.3 66.0 64.4 57.5 55.8 #N/A 49.7 68.5 43.1 56.9 19 66.5 65.4 64.3 57.4 56.0 58.3 49.4 67.8 43.2 56.3 20 66.9 65.6 64.5 58.5 56.5 58.6 49.4 68.1 44.6 56.7 21 67.8 66.5 65.2 59.3 57.5 60.2 52.4 68.3 41.7 57.0 22 67.7 66.4 65.2 59.4 57.7 59.7 54.1 68.8 44.2 57.8 23 65.5 64.0 63.0 57.2 55.3 57.4 53.4 65.1 42.3 53.9 24 65.1 63.9 63.4 56.9 56.3 57.6 50.6 66.0 43.3 55.7 25 67.1 65.6 64.6 58.7 56.7 59.2 51.8 67.9 33.2 56.9 26 67.0 65.6 64.7 58.5 57.1 60.0 54.8 68.5 44.7 57.7 27 66.6 65.7 63.8 57.4 55.7 57.9 49.5 67.7 46.7 57.1 28 66.9 65.5 64.5 58.0 56.0 57.7 48.7 68.6 38.2 57.8 29 67.1 66.7 64.6 58.1 56.8 59.2 49.2 68.0 37.8 57.7 30 65.1 64.5 62.6 56.5 54.7 58.3 45.2 65.1 39.3 54.5 31 66.7 65.9 64.2 57.7 56.0 59.9 50.3 68.4 #N/A 58.1 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 26 31 31 27 31 En.Av 66.6 65.3 64.3 58.0 56.5 59.1 50.2 67.7 42.3 56.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. TABLE 5 -8- DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION June 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.1 65.5 64.4 58.4 56.1 58.6 50.5 68.4 32.3 58.0 2 66.2 66.3 63.8 57.8 56.4 58.5 47.8 67.9 42.8 57.0 3 66.4 65.4 63.8 57.9 56.3 59.5 50.3 68.0 34.8 57.3 4 67.1 66.6 64.8 58.6 57.5 59.1 51.8 69.1 42.5 57.7 5 66.6 65.4 64.1 58.5 56.9 60.3 44.7 68.8 36.9 58.2 6 64.4 63.7 61.7 56.2 54.5 55.6 47.3 66.3 33.1 55.0 7 66.4 65.5 64.1 58.3 56.4 58.7 50.0 68.4 39.9 56.9 8 66.7 65.5 63.8 58.0 56.7 58.7 52.1 68.6 38.0 57.7 9 66.7 65.4 64.1 58.9 56.2 59.2 49.2 68.4 40.5 57.5 10 67.6 66.0 65.0 59.0 56.8 58.7 48.8 68.8 39.1 58.9 11 67.6 66.3 65.5 59.2 57.4 59.5 45.2 68.3 45.0 57.1 12 67.5 66.0 64.9 58.2 57.2 60.1 49.5 68.4 39.6 57.7 13 65.8 64.5 63.4 57.1 55.7 57.3 46.2 66.2 #N/A 55.5 14 67.0 65.5 64.2 58.2 56.5 58.6 47.3 68.4 27.8 57.2 15 67.4 65.8 64.4 58.7 57.1 59.1 46.4 68.9 41.7 58.4 16 66.5 65.2 64.6 58.3 56.9 58.8 53.5 68.2 43.4 56.5 17 67.6 65.9 64.9 58.8 57.8 59.2 54.2 68.8 37.4 57.2 18 67.7 66.2 65.1 58.8 58.0 59.3 55.1 68.6 38.0 55.9 19 67.4 65.7 64.9 57.4 56.5 58.1 51.7 68.6 41.2 57.1 20 66.2 64.3 62.9 56.9 54.9 56.8 45.7 65.8 36.0 56.9 21 67.0 65.4 64.1 58.3 56.8 58.8 47.0 68.3 36.1 56.6 22 67.8 66.2 65.0 58.8 57.3 59.6 50.5 68.3 44.1 56.7 23 67.4 65.7 65.2 59.1 57.9 60.2 50.1 68.6 42.1 57.6 24 67.7 66.2 65.2 58.8 57.8 60.4 51.8 69.0 43.9 57.6 25 67.9 66.7 65.2 58.2 57.8 59.2 49.2 68.7 38.8 57.1 26 67.4 66.1 65.1 57.9 57.0 57.9 51.8 68.5 34.7 56.8 27 65.9 64.2 63.3 56.1 54.7 56.8 47.3 65.7 32.1 53.6 28 67.0 65.8 64.8 57.0 56.7 58.3 52.7 67.9 40.6 55.4 29 67.1 65.7 64.7 57.4 56.6 57.7 51.1 67.9 41.9 56.1 30 66.8 65.5 64.0 57.3 56.6 58.3 51.2 68.0 42.1 55.9 Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 En.Av 67.0 65.7 64.4 58.1 56.8 58.8 50.5 68.2 40.4 57.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A April -June 2009 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 4 5 7 8 9 1 laska it 7 74 14 verage 97.4 9 .9 95. 8.6 89.6 90.3 5.6 /A / N Count 14 14 14 14 14 12 4 0 0 0 87377 373 Average 93.4 92.3 88.3 81.8 82.8 83.5 80.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 369 362 370 367 370 339 171 0 0 0 B7378 275 Average 97.8 96.2 95.3 88.1 88.2 88.1 83.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (272) (253) (274) (267) (271) (251) (74) (0) (0) (0) American 67378 937 Average 98.5 96.5 95.6 88.8 87.1 89.0 84.4 95.9 #N/A 81.6 Count 929 883 924 911 921 849 295 2 0 1 6757 250 Average 94.5 93.3 91.9 86.9 85.8 88.5 83.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 247 238 249 241 246 229 78 0 0 0 MD80 1 Average 101.2 99.7 98.2 90.2 91.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1) 1 (1 1) (1) 0) 0 0 0 0) Continental 67377 557 Average 96.0 94.2 92.8 86.5 85.3 87.1 83.3 94.3 #N/A 81.3 Count 552 530 549 548 552 501 196 3 0 1 87378 85 Average 98.3 96.2 94.8 88.0 86.4 88.3 84.4 94.8 #N/A #N/A Count (81) (77) (82) (79) (82) (70) (50) (3) (0) (0) Delta 87377 241 Average 96.0 94.0 91.8 85.8 85.2 87.3 83.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 239 228 240 240 238 219 87 0 0 0 87378 138 Average 95.4 93.5 92.7 87.5 86.4 88.6 84.1 93.9 76.3 #N/A Count 134 131 135 130 136 116 37 1 1 0 6757 168 Average 96.7 95.0 94.5 87.6 86.6 88.6 84.0 92.9 #N/A 78.9 Count 163 160 167 161 167 150 82 1 0 1 MD90 203 Average 90.9 89.9 89.4 82.8 82.6 85.2 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (202) (187 (203) 187 (172) (182 (53) 0) (0) (0) FedEx A300 42 Average 96.3 95.3 94.0 87.5 89.0 89.3 85.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 42 40 42 41 41 39 17 0 0 0 A310 21 Average 97.2 96.1 94.8 88.7 89.6 90.0 85.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (21) (21) (21) (21) (21) (21) (3) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A318 7 Average 93.5 91.1 91.7 86.2 84.5 85.1 81.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 7 6 7 7 7 6 2 0 0 0 A319 346 Average 93.6 91.8 92.0 86.7 85.7 86.6 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (344) (331) (344) (343) (343) (315) (128) (0) (0) (0) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 162 Average 91.8 90.3 92.1 84.5 82.8 87.7 80.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (161) (152) (157) (159) (160) (149) (36) (0) (0) (0) Northwest A320 317 Average 95.8 93.9 93.2 87.1 85.8 86.8 82.3 94.2 76.9 #N/A Count (313) (304) (313) (315) (315) (275) (102) (1) (1) (0) Southwest B7377 632 Average 89.8 89.2 85.7 81.7 80.6 81.9 79.5 89.0 #N/A 75.3 Count 628 (603 624 (601 (581) 582) (203) (1) 0) (1) United A320 488 Average 92.8 91.6 91.2 85.8 84.3 86.5 83.5 90.5 80.4 87.0 Count 480 459 480 470 475 435 227 5 2 1 87373 146 Average 95.4 93.7 92.3 86.8 86.0 88.2 84.0 94.7 #N/A #N/A Count 145 137 144 142 144 138 52 1 0 0 8757 274 Average 92.9 91.8 90.6 84.9 83.6 86.1 82.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (271) (259) (273) (272) (268) (249) (113) (0) (0) (0) UPS B757 51 Average 95.2 94.3 92.3 86.2 84.3 86.9 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (51) (50) (51) (51) (51) (49) (16) (0) (0) (0) US Airways A320 874 Average 91.3 90.9 89.6 85.0 83.2 84.2 80.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 868 822 864 859 836 786 217 0 0 0 67373 94 Average 93.0 92.0 89.5 85.1 84.2 85.1 81.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 93 88 94 93 92 81 54 0 0 0 8757 85 Average 94.3 94.1 90.2 84.7 83.3 85.2 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (85) (80) (84) (84) (82) (79) (30) (0) 0) (0) Virgin America A320 273 Average 93.3 91.8 91.0 85.3 82.5 83.5 79.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 273 270) (272) 271 (265 240 (67 0 0 (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E April -June 2009 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Si te 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9N 1 as a Air 7377 343 Average Count 9 .9 (340) 91. (326) 87.9 338 81.6 (336 2.5 339 2. 321) 0. 122) / (0) /A (0) (0 Southwest 87377 3121 Average Count 90.4 3094 89.7 (2967) 86.0 (3086) 81.9 (3040) 80.7 2973 82.2 2870 79.6 908 89.4 2) #N/A (0 76.1 1) -11- TABLE S MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter April -June 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 2 4 5 8 0 American agle 140 1035 Average Count 8 .7 (1030 85.7 (982) 8. (1028 80.3 892 .0 (608) 1.6 (957) 8 .2 (59 # /A (0 # A (0) 0) SkyWest CL60 80 Average Count 86.0 80 85.5 79 88.1 79 78.6 30 78.1 26 81.4 74 78.3 5 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 CRJ7 456 Average Count 88.5 (453) 87.3 (435) 86.8 (453) 80.5 (346) 80.1 (289) 82.0 (424) 79.2 (86) #N/A (0) #N/A (0) #N!A (0) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation April -June 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 3 4 5 6 1 enera Aviation Jet 0 verage Count 8 .1 2331) .7 2150) .7 (2248 84.0 1403) 8 .1 (984) 83. 1913 8 .1 (272 85.0 38) 1. (1) 8 . 9 -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year as a it 4 ,1 4 87377 4,439 4,657 5,822 5,913 2,802 oa American AA 67378 6,896 6,737 7,322 7,649 3,689 8757 1,996 2,673 2,573 2,519 953 Continental CO 67373 4 4 B7375 1,767 1,812 53 2 87377 3,529 3,711 5,537 5,274 2,155 4 Delta DL B7373 1,243 7 5 24 87377 2 577 635 87378 131 280 97 438 340 6757 3,859 3,264 3,195 2,856 986 FedEx FM A300 4 98 296 368 175 4 4 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1,114 13 9 110 38 A319 1,034 2,139 2,663 2,732 1,365 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2 2 i wes Northwest NW A319 2,793 2,073 2,071 2,076 1,129 Southwest WN 87373 2 402 20 2 67375 2 4, 4 ,4 US Airways AW A319 2,364 3,659 3,413 3,250 2,118 A320 3,050 2,132 2,864 2,964 1,316 A321 2 87373 2,746 2,271 1,244 1,138 371 United UA A319 1,760 2,172 3,200 2,093 662 A320 2,086 1,399 850 1,939 1,101 87373 2 72 506 405 87375 8 88 191 379 Virgin America VX A319 533 4 -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year A310 498 406 210 142 77 A318 1,114 13 9 110 38 A319 7,951 10,043 11,347 10,151 5,807 A320 5,176 3,579 3,721 4,903 2,444 A321 2 6717 238 87373 3,995 2,756 1,269 1,674 776 67374 7,130 7,188 5,072 2,114 83 87375 1,769 1,820 141 191 381 87377 33,675 36,450 42,371 39,076 19,903 67378 7,167 7,023 8,341 9,822 5,340 B757 12,886 13,634 13,059 10,393 3,779 CL60 2 2 CRJ9 1,455 1,325 1,301 1,224 632 MD80 2,504 1,981 2,185 1,463 2 MD90 1,572 1,841 2,047 2,459 1,127 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 45,000 - 40, 000 35,000 ~ 2005 30,000 ^ 2006 25,000 ^ 2007 20,000 15, 000 ^ 2008 10,000 ^ 2009 5,000 0 ~~p ~^O ~~0 ~^0 ~,LO ~~^ ~^'1 ~,`"~ ~.~D~ ~,~h ~.(l ~,~~ ~~1 ~~O ~~0 OHO OHO P P P P P P 0 ~~ ~'~ 0~ ~1 0~ 0 G G ~ ~ By Year -14- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year as a it 87377 6.085 6.386 7.975 8.087 7.735 1. oa American AA 87378 9.452 9.227 10.030 10.454 10.188 8757 2.734 3.666 3.523 3.443 2.630 .4 Continental CO 87373 0.003 0.005 67375 2.436 2.490 0.071 0.006 67377 4.819 5.082 7.586 7.202 5.950 4 Delta DL 87373 1.704 0.011 0.005 0.033 87377 0.003 0.787 1.751 B7378 0.181 0.384 0.132 0.598 0.939 6757 5.290 4.474 4.395 3.913 2.724 FedEx FM A300 0.005 0.134 0.405 0.503 0.486 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1.526 0.019 0.011 0,153 0.099 A319 1.416 2.929 3.649 3.732 3.773 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 0.003 0.003 .4 i wes Northwest NW A319 3.827 2.841 2.836 2.836 3.122 Southwest WN 87373 0.003 0.551 0.027 0.003 67375 0.003 US Airways AW A319 3.244 5.008 4.679 4.440 5.845 A320 4.178 2.934 3.921 4.049 3.630 A321 0.006 87373 3.762 3.110 1.704 1.555 1.028 United UA A319 2.416 2.984 4.373 2.866 1.840 A320 2.852 1.912 1.181 2.639 3.028 87373 0.003 0.099 0.691 1.127 67375 0.011 0.121 0.260 1.039 Virgin America VX A319 1.470 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: June 10, 2009 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics Silvia Zavala presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for May 2009, and copies were distributed to attendees. There was a I.4% increase in Air Carrier Operations due to start of service out of JWA for Virgin America and added flights to San Francisco by Southwest Airlines. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Greg Carroll asked about the number of flights that Air Canada plans to operate. Bonnie Frisch replied that Air Canada operations are pending due to administrative and economic issues. Greg Carroll asked about the drop in General Aviation operations. Jim Sugden commented that the percentage in General Aviation operations dropped for single engine aircraft. Bonnie Frisch added that a significant drop occurred due to the economy and fuel. Hal Marshall asked about the airlines' Year to Date (YTD) figures compared to the previous year. Bonnie Frisch replied that the airport has seen incremental improvements. Sara Gerrick discussed noise on arrivals, pilots cutting corners and flying low, and Single Event Noise levels over North Tustin. Irma Ortega suggested that Sara Gerrick use Airport Monitor on the airport's website to view operations and overflights. Sara added that all the follow up is annoying while trying to retrieve any information. Hal Marshall commented on the advantage of having these tools available for public use. Hal Marshall asked Delta Pilot, Steve Walker, if he used the visual approach coming into John Wayne Airport. Steve replied that the visual approach is his preference for efficiency purposes. Sara Gerrick asked about deploying landing gear. Steve Walker commented that landing gear is deployed on visual approach, above Irvine Lake, and as late as lemon (approx. 6-7 miles); however, every airline has different approach guidelines. Homer Bludau asked about GPS Navigation developments for new approach/take-off. Steve commented on his experience with the MD90 which has no RNAV and RNP capabilities. -16- Eric freed mentioned that JWA submitted a request on behalf of FCA to the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) to develop RNAV RNP arrival and departure procedures for JWA. Homer Bludau asked about bird strikes and discouraging birds at John Wayne Airport. Eric replied that .TWA has a wildlife mitigation program that is managed by JWA Operations. Sara Gerrick stated that years back there was talk about adding another NMS north of the runway. Eric replied that the three NMS north of the runway have been there for many years and that he is not aware of any plans to change the number or locations. Eric addressed additional questions from Sara including who reviews the noise data; the role of our noise consultant; the number and placement of the monitors; ANCA prohibitions; and JWA's "grandfather" status into the federal law since JWA had existing regulations in place. -17- NAC ROSTER June 10, 2009 NAME ORGANIZATION Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Irma Ortega John Wayne Airport Jim Sugden John Wayne Airport Silvia Zavala John Wayne Airport Greg Carroll AIR FAIR Hal Marshall FCA -North Tustin Joseph Deaton Resident -Newport Beach Sara Gerrick Resident -North Tustin Homer Bludau City of Newport Beach John Evelyn Delta Airlines Steve Walker Delta Airlines -18-