Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 90-073 (A)8 !) I0 II, 14 15: 1 (; i, i9', 2O 21 221, I' 23'~ .I 25' 261: 27 RESOLUTION NO. 90-73 (A) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-08, TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APARTMENT PROJECT AT 15642 PASADENA AVENUE, ADJACENT TO AND WITHIN 150 FEET OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: That an application of Feridoun Rezai for a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") to permit construction of a two and one half story, 11 unit apartment project within 150 feet of R-1 (single- family) zoned and developed properties was originally heard by the Planning Commission and the CUP granted without opposition or objections of neighboring residents. It was subsequently ascertained that the required list of names and addresses of owners of adjacent properties furnished by the applicant to the City failed to include the owners of a number of adjacent single family residences, and as a result, notices of the public hearing before the Planning Commission had not been mailed to the owners of neighboring single family properties as prescribed by law and, accordingly construction of the project was ordered by the City to be stopped and the application for CUP was set for a new public hearing before the Planning Commission, upon new and proper notices being given as prescribed by law. That a public hearing before the Planning Commission was duly called, noticed and held for said application on April 9 and 30, 1990, resulting in denial of the subject application. That an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of CUP 90-08 has been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Tustin of an application by Feridoun Rezai, to construct a two and one-half story, 11 unit apartment project at 15642 Pasadena Avenue within 150 feet of R-1 zoned and developed property. A public hearing for said appeal was duly called, noticed and held for said appeal on June 4, June 18 and July 2, 1990. Establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, (; 7 8 10 13! ,! 1 (;" 18' 20: 21 22 2;3 24 25 2~ 27 Resolution No. 90-73(A) Page 2 morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, as evidenced by the following findings: The use as applied for is in conformance with the General Plan and Tustin Zoning Code. The use applied for is a conditionally permitted use in the R-3 zoning district. The development of the proposed apartment project on the subject site, as revised, is compatible with the uses in the surrounding R- 3, R-2 and R-1 zoning districts, in that the design of the proposed apartment project, with pitched roofs and wood stucco siding, is consistent with existing apartment buildings in the surrounding R-3 and R-2 properties and with the R-1 properties by maintaining a maximum 20 foot height at the rear portion of the subject property. As designed, the project meets or exceeds all applicable standards of the R-3 zoning district, in that: the buildings meet or exceed all required setbacks; b. The project has less than the maximum allowed lot coverage; The project is at or below the maximum allowed building heights of 35 feet for two stories and 20 feet for one story; and The project meets the minimum parking requirements of the R-3 zoning district. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the naighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted, for the following reasons: 1 4 5 Resolution No. 90-73(A) Page 3 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 F. 15 16 TI. 17 18 i9 20 21 22' 231 · . MARY WYNN 9~' '. ~L~ty Clerk 27~ 28,1 The rear portions of the project have been reduced to one story to eliminate potential impacts on the privacy of the adjacent single family residences; The proposed trash enclosure shall be relocated towards the front of the site to eliminate potential noise and odor impacts; The proposed spa/jacuzzi in the southeast corner of the site shall be eliminated and replaced by at least one specimen size, evergreen tree; and Minimum 24" box evergreen trees shall be planted along the side and rear property lines of the subject site to provide additional privacy screening. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council hereby reverses the Planning Commission denial of CUP 90-08 and approves Conditional Use Permit 90-08, as revised, approving construction of an 11 unit apartment project at 15642 Pasadena Avenue that is adjacent to and within 150 feet of single family residences, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 2nd day of July, 1990. RICHARD B. EDGAR Mayor (i) (i) (i) (i) GENERAL 1.1 1.2 EXHIBIT A USE PERMIT 90-08 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REFOLUTION NO. 90-73(A) 1.3 1.4 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the revised plans submitted for the project date stamped July 2, 1990 on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development Department in accordance with this Exhibit. (i) i.5 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (i) Conditional Use Permit approval shall become null and void unless all building permits are issued within twelve (12) months of the date on this Exhibit. The applicant shall obtain, where needed, additional right of entry from adjacent property owners for work on adjacent properties. Ail required mitigation measures contained in the Final Negative Declaration for the project certified by City Council Resolution No. 90-72 shall be met. 1.6 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form prior to issuance of any permits. PLAN SUBMITTAL 2.1 At building plan check, the following shall be submitted: (3) A. Revised construction plans reflecting all modifications as shown on plans date stamped July 2, 1990, structural calculations, and Title 24 energy calculations. Requirements of the Uniform SOURCE CODES (1) (2) (3) (4) STANDARD CONDITION CEQA MITIGATION UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S DESIGN REVIEW EXCEPTION (5) SPECIFIC PLAN (6) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (7) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (8) PC/CC POLICY (9) OTHER MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENT Exhibit A Resolution No. 90-73(A) Page 2 (2) B. (3) (2) (3) Ce De (2) F. (6) Building Codes, State Handicap and Energy Requirements shall be complied with as approved by the Building Official. Technical detail and plans for all utility installations including cable TV, telephone, gas water and electricity, to reflect all modifications to buildings. Additionally, a note on plans shall be included stating that no field changes shall be made without corrections submitted to and approved by the Building Official. Revised grading and specifications and erosion control plans consistent with the modified building and landscaping plans, including berms in the front setbacks (as necessary) prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval of the Community Development Department. Said plan shall clearly indicate all grades and call outs. Any damage done to existing street improvements and utilities shall be repaired before issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project. Prior to any work in the public right-of-way an excavation permit shall be issued. Information to ensure compliance with all requirements of the Orange County Fire Chief including required fireflow and installation, where required, of fire hydrants subject to approval of the Fire Department, City of Tustin Public Works Department and Irvine Ranch Water District and compliance with all requirements pertaining to construction as follows: 1) Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in all units and garage areas as necessary. Sprinkler plans shall be revised to reflect modified building designs and shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Exhibit A Resolution No. 90-73(A) Page 3 (4) SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS 3.1 The site plan shall be modified as follows: Guest parking spaces shall be labeled as "Guest Parking" spaces (provide details for such marking and labeling) and shall be permanently retained as open guest parking with no garage door installation. The trash enclosures shall be moved in proximity to the front of the project so as to mitigate potential noise and odor impacts on adjacent residents. The new location shall not be visible from Pasadena Avenue and shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Department. The spa/jacuzzi in the southeast corner of the site shall be deleted. Any future spas/jacuzzis shall be prohibited. 3.2 Ail exterior colors to be used shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of the Community Development Department. All exterior treatments shall be coordinated with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted on submitted construction plans and elevations shall indicate all colors and materials to be used. 3.3 Automatic garage door openers shall be provided on all garages. 3.4 The developer shall modify Buildings A & B by removing the entire second floor of units 5 and 6 (two end units of Building A) and the entire second floor of units 10 and 11 (two end units of Building B). 3.5 The ends of both buildings shall have hip roofs. The one story portions of both buildings shall incorporate pitched roofs. The height of said pitched roofs shall be minimized to prevent impacts on the privacy of the adjacent single family residences; the design of the roofs shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. 3.6 The height of the wall on the rear property line shall be increased to eight feet measured from the subject site. Exhibit A Resolution No. 90-73 (A) Page 4 (7) (1) (2) (3) 3.7 No windows shall be located on the east (rear) elevations of units 4, 6, 9 and 11, and outside window screens shall be designed, compatible with the architecture, and installed the first floor windows of units 5, 6, 10 and 11, and on the second floor windows of units 3, 4 and 9. LANDSCAPING~ GROUNDS AND HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4.1 The approved landscape plans for the project shall be revised to incorporate: minimum 24" box Melaleuca and/ or Brisbane Box trees or another evergreen species and shall be densely planted at approximate 10 foot intervals or less along the north, south and east property lines to provide additional privacy and dense screening to the adjacent residences subject to Community Development Department approval as adequate at plan check and prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Trees along the north and south property line shall extend to 150 feet from the east property line. At least one major specimen size evergreen tree shall be planted in the southeast corner of the site in place of the spa/jacuzzi. Said trees shall be maintained at a maximum height of 25 feet. Dead trees shall be replaced with the same species of similar size. NOISE 5.1 Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. This shall include engine warm-ups. Construction shall be prohibited on weekends and Federal holidays. FEES 6.1 Prior to reinstatement of any building permits, payment shall be made of all required fees including: Grading plan checks and permit fees to the Community Development Department for any such revised plans. Ail applicable Building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department for recheck of revised plans and an issuance of new permits. Parkland dedication in-lieu fees in the amount of $3,300.00 to the Community Services Department. Exhibit A Resolution No. 90-73(A) Page 5 De Transportation System Improvement fees in the amount of $1.00 per square foot. In the event that the fee increases prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall pay the difference. SR: kbc City of Tustin RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) RESOLUTION NO. 90-73(A) MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 90-73(A) was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of Jul~.~__]990 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Edgar, Puckett, Pontious COUNCILMEMBER NOES: Potts, Prescott COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None Valerie Whiteman Chief Deputy City Clerk