HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 92-066 1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
15
1G
17
18
19
21
22
9.5
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 92-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 91-048 A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS AND VARIANCE 91-019 A REQUEST TO
REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR TWO FLAG LOTS TO
5 FEET AND TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR ALL
FOUR LOTS TO WIDTHS BETWEEN 14 AND 45 FEET.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The city Council finds and determines as follows:
ae
That proper applications, Design Review No. 91-048
and Variance 91-019, were filed by J. P. Greubel
Company requesting approval of the development plan
for a four-lot subdivision including a reduction in
the required front yard setback and minimum lot
width.
That a public hearing was duly noticed, called and
held on said application by the Planning Commission
on March 23, 1992, and the item was continued to
April 13, 1992, whereby the Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council denial of the
subject request. Whereas, a public he~ring was
duly noticed, called and held on said application
by the City Council on May 4, 1992, and the item
was continued to May 18, 1992.
Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal
Code, the Commission finds that the location, size,
architectural features and general appearance of
the proposed development will not impair the
orderly and harmonious development of the area, the
present or future development therein, the
occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the
Council has considered at least the following
items:
1. Height, bulk and area of buildings;
2. Setbacks and site planning;
3. Exterior.materials and colors;
4. Type and pitch of roofs;
Size and spacing of windows, doors and other
openings;
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1(;
17
18
19
9_0
21
22
9.3
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 92-66
Page 2
Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles,
radio and television antennae;
Landscaping, parking area design and traffic
circulation;
Location, height and standards of exterior
illumination;
Location and appearance of equipment located
outside of an enclosed structure;
10. Location and method of refuse storage;
11.
Physical relationship of proposed structures
to existing structures in the neighborhood;
12.
Appearance and design relationship of proposed
structures to existing structures and possible
future structures in the neighborhood and
public thoroughfares;
13. Proposed signing; and
14.
Development Guidelines and criteria ~s adopted
by the City Council.
That the variance authorized will not constitute a
grant of special privileges inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity
and district in which the subject property is
situated and because of special circumstances
applicable to the subject property, including size,
shape, topography, location or surroundings, the
strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found
to deprive the subject property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and
under identical zone classification as evidenced by
the following:
There are definition constraints in the City
code regarding front property lines and yards
which, if strictly interpreted in this case,
result in the need for a variance; however,
the intent of these definitions are met.
2. The subject property is unusually configured.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
'I
12'
13
14
15
16
17
9.0
211
2,t
9.5
26
9.7
28
Resolution No. 92-66
Page 3
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this
project pursuant to the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
II.
The City Council conditionally approves Design Review 91-
048, authorizing construction of four single-family homes
and related improvements; and Variance 91-019, reducing
the front-yard setback for two flag lots (Parcels 2 and
4) to five feet and reducing the minimum lot width for
all four lots to widths between 14 and 45 feet, subject
to conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City
Council, held on the 18th day of May, 1992.
Lesl/~- Anne 'Pontious
May~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF TUSTIN
CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 92-66
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify
that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing
Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of
May, 1992, by the following vote:
COUNCILPERSONS AYES: Ports, Puckett, Saltarelli, Thomas
COUNCILPERSONS NOES: None
COUNCILPERSONS ABSTAINED: None
COUNCILPERSONS ABSENT: Pon~ious
(1)
(1)
(i)
(i)
EXHIBIT A
DESIGN REVIEW 91-048 & VARIANCE 91-019
RESOLUTION NO. 92-66
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
GENERAL
1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the
submitted plans for the project date-stamped May 18, 1992
on file with the Community Development Department, as
herein modified, or as modified by the Director of
Community Development Department in accordance with this
Exhibit.
1.2
Unless otherwise specified, all conditions contained in
this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance
of any building permits for the project, subject to
review and approval by the Community Development
Department.
1.3 Design Review and Variance approvals shall become null
and void unless building permits are issued and
substantial construction is underway within eighteen (18)
months of the date of this Exhibit.
1.4 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to
Conditions Imposed form prior to issuance of any building
permits.
PLAN SUBMITTAL
2.1 At building plan check, the following items shall be
submitted:
(3) A.
(2) B.
(3)
Provide construction plans, structural
calculations, and Title 24 energy calculations.
Requirements of the Uniform Building Codes, State
Handicap and Energy Requirements shall be complied
with as approved by the Building Official.
Preliminary technical details and plans for all
utility installations including cable TV,
telephone, gas, water and electricity.
Additionally, a note on plans shall be included
stating that no field changes shall be made without
corrections submitted to and approved by the
Building Official.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
*** EXCEPTION
(s)
(6)
(7)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
PC/CC POLICY
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
Resolution No. 92-66
Page 2
(2)
(3)
(2)
(3)
Ce
Final grading and specifications consistent with the
site plan and landscaping plans and prepared by a
registered civil engineer for approval by the
Community Development Department.
A precise soils engineering report provided by a
soils engineer within the previous twelve (12
months.
(4)
(1)
(4)
(1)
(4)
(z)
(1)
SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS
3.1 The following information shall be included in the final
working drawings:
ao
Provide exact details of exterior door and window
types and treatments (i.e., framing color, glass
tint).
Be
Meter enclosures shall be decorative; comparable
with building architecture.
C. Show downspouts and gutters.
3.2
Ail exterior colors to be used shall be subject to review
approval of the Director of Community Development
Department. All exterior treatments must be coordinated
with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted
on submitted construction plans and elevations shall
indicate all colors and materials to be used.
3.3
Exterior elevations of the buildings shall indicate any
fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the
building, equipment heights and type of screening. All
roof-mounted equipment shall be located in a mechanical
well and shall be a minimum of six (6) inches below the
existing parapet.
3.4
Note on final plans that a six-foot high chain-link fence
shall be installed around the site prior to building
construction stages. Gated entrances shall be permitted
along the perimeter of the site for construction
vehicles.
3.5
Ail plans shall be in substantial conformance with
Condition Nos. 2.3; 4.1 through 4.3; and 5.1 through 5.5.
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
Resolution No. 92-66
Page 3
HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS
*** 4.1 Provide letter of acceptance from the U.S. Postmaster for
the mailbox location and design.
(4)
4.2
Indicate locations of al exterior lights and types of
fixtures, which shall be a decorative design. No lights
shall be permitted which may create any glare or have a
negative impact on adjoining units. The location and
types of lighting shall be subject to the approval of the
Director of Community Development.
4.3 Location of project perimeter wall and finish materials
shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development consistent with Exhibit B attached
hereto.
LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS
(7)
5.1 Submit at plan check complete detailed landscaping and
irrigation plans for those landscaping areas depicted on
Exhibit B attached hereto. These plans shall be
consistent with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and
Irrigation Submittal Requirements. Provide summary table
applying indexing identification to plant materials in
their actual location. The plan and table must list
botanical and common names, sizes, spacing, actual
location and quantity of the plant materials proposed.
Show planting and berming details, soil preparation,
staking, etc. The irrigation plan shall show location and
control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size,
sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all
equipment must be provided. Show all property lines on
the landscaping and irrigation plan, public right-of-way
areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall
locations. The Department of Community Development may
request minor substitutions of plant materials or request
additional sizing or quantity materials during plan
check. Note on landscaping plan that coverage of
landscaping irrigation materials is subject to field
inspection at project completion by the Department of
Community Development.
(7)
5.2
The submitted landscaping plans at plan check must
reflect the following requirements:
Turf is unacceptable for grades over 25%. A
combination of planting materials must be used,
groundcover on large areas alone is not acceptable.
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
Resolution No. 92-66
Page 4
Be
Ce
De
Ee
Fe
Ge
He
Provide a minimum of one 15-gallon tree for every
30 feet of property line on the property perimeter
and five, five-gallon shrubs.
Groundcover shall be planted between eight to 12
inches on center.
When one-gallon plant sizes are used, the spacing
may vary according to materials used.
Up along fences and/or walls and equipment areas,
provide landscaping screening with shrubs and/or
vines and trees on plan check drawings.
Ail plant materials shall be installed in a healthy
vigorous condition typical to the species and
landscaping must be maintained in a neat and
healthy condition. This will include but not be
limited to trimming, mowing, weeding, removal of
litter, fertilizing, regular watering or
replacement of diseased or dead plants.
A thickly-planted landscape shall be installed
along the edge of the project.
Landscape adjacent to the right-of-way shall be
coordinated with parkway landscaping. Perimeter
walls should be treated with vines in order to
reduce large expanses of walls by adding greenery
and color. Vines should be informally grouped with
training devices installed.
FEES
Payment of the following fees prior to the issuance of
any building permits shall be required:
ae
Ail applicable plan check and building permit fees
to the Community Development Department.
B. Ail fees identified in Resolution No. 92-68.
AEB:nm
SITE P LAN
Architecture · Planning · Engineering
12821 Newport Avtnue · Tusdn · California 92680
714/731-6033 · 714/731-6371