Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 98-080t 3 6 8 9 :o ;t tz :3 14 16 17 is !9 ,0 a ,; 24 , ^s RESOLUTION NO. 98-80 A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'T 7STIN, CALIFORNLA, APPROVING .AND AUTHOI;UZLNG TRANSMITT:AL OF AIN ERRATA TO THE ACAS-TUSTLN REUSE PLAN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. The City Council does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. MCAS -Tustin is a military installation consisting of approximately one thousand six hundred and two acres. The Base is currently owned b%• the United States of America (the "Federal Government"). B. In accordance with the Base Closure Realignment and CIOSUre :pct of 1991 and 1993, the Federal Government has scheduled the closure and realignment of MCAS. Tustin no later than July 1, 1999. C. Federal Regulations which implement the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 and the Base Closure Community Redevelopment and Homeless Assistance Act of 1994 (Redevelopment .Act) require the preparation of a comprehensive redevelopment plan based on local needs and in response to specific reuse planning requirements and timelines (the reuse process). D. The City of Tustin as the designated Local Redevelopment Authority- (LRA) uthority(LRA) appointed the MCAS -Tustin Base Closure Task Force (Base Closure Task Force) as a vehicle to provide broad based participation in the reuse process for MCAS -Tustin and to recommend a Reuse Plan and Homeless Assistance Submission to the Federal Government. The nineteen member Base Closure Task Force was comprised of representatives from the cities of Irvine, Santa Ana and Tustin; the County of Orange; the Tustin .Area Chamber of Commerce; local homeowners associations; other business interests; representatives of the community at - large: and the Marine Corps. E. Public participation was an important component in developing the Reuse Plan and Homeless Assistance Submission for MCAS -Tustin. F. A Reuse Plan and Homeless Assistance Submission for 'ACAS -Tustin complying with all federal regulations was approved by the City Council, as the desienated LRA at a regular meeting on October 21. 1996 after a recommendation from the MCAS -Tustin Base Closure Task Force. . .T .. _. _. — --. . Resolution No. 98-80 Pai,,e 2 G. Whereas, the MCAS -Tustin Base Closure Task Force was disbanded on January 20, 1997 leaving all subsequent actions regarding the NICAS- Tustin project to the Ciry of Tustin, as the designated LRA. H. Federal law and regulations require the preparation of a. disposal plan and completion of the appropriate environmental docu!nen:ation under the National Environmemal Policy Act prior to disposal of property at MICAS -Tustin. A Memorandum of Understandin, between the U.S. Marine Corps and the City of Tustin permits a Joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmentally Impact Report (I:IS%E1R) to be prepared for the disposal and reuse of MCAS -Tustin. "Ihe Reuse Plan is the "Preferred Alternative" for land use dctennination to be considered in the Joint E1S/EIR. A Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. 'Marine Corps and the LRA permitted the Reuse Plan document to also include a draft Specific Plan which, under California Planning Law contains the development regulations that would ultimately constitute the zoning for the property. Local zoning can only be approved at the discretion of either the City of Tustin or the City of Irvine relative to those portions of MCAS -Tustin within their respective jurisdictional boundaries. For purposes of complying with federal requirements,. only portions of the document entitled Marine Corps Air Station Specific Plan'Reuse Plan arc considered the required Reuse Plan including Chapter 1 and 2 (excluding* Section 2.17) and Chapter 5. These portions of the plan hold the weight of "policy" only and are not considered a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act. No disposal of proper by the Navy or action on the Specific Plan, -which will constitute the zoning for the property, will occur until approval of the Reuse Plan by the Department of Defense and certification of the Joint EIS/EIR. J. Preparation of the Joint EIS/EIR is currently underway. While the comment period closed on March 2, 1998, a new Draft EIS: EIR on the project will be prepared and recirculated to adequately address comments received on the original Draft EIS/EIR document. In preparing the revised Draft E1STIR minor corrections to the MCAS -Tustin SDecific Plan/Reuse Plan -need to be made to reflect the following: 1. A federal screening decision on the Army Reserve Center; 2. The availability of more detailed engineering information regarding infrastructure right-of-way and disposal parcels; I The need to correct errors discovered in the Specific Plan and to refine certain land use parcel designations. 4 ;t L 3 a 6 7 8 9 10 u 12 13 14 0' 16' 17 18 19 20 2t 22 23 14 2; 26 27 Resolution No. 98-80 Page 3 ll. The City Council does hereby approve the Reuse Plan errata corrections dated September 8, 1998 shown in Exhibit A and authorizes their submittal to the Department of Navy and Department of Defense subject to the following conditions: A. The use of Errata corrections to Specific Plan for purposes of revising the Draft Joint EIS/EIR are also authorized. B. If, as a result of preparation of the Joint EIS/EIR prepared for disposal and reuse of MCAS -Tustin, it is necessary to revise the Reuse Plan to address environmental impacts, the LRA shall comply with all requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act (NEPA/CEQA). PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the 8th day of September, 1998. V` PAMELA STOKER CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ea -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 98-80 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 8th day of September, 1998, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: CLERK SALTARELLI, WORLEY, DOYLE, POTTS NONE NONE THOMAS , MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan ERRATA Prepared for.- City or. City of Tustin The Local Redevelopment Authority 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 Prepared by: The Planning Center under subcontract to HNTB with contributions by the City of Tustin September, 1998 Thus studV ivas prepared wader contract Hdth the City of Tustin, kith financial support from. the U.S. Marine Corps and r n: adtninistrarion sen ices fner ;he 05ce of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content re;iects tine views P.`: i:e Cit• of Tustin, and does not recessarily reflect ;he views of the U.S. Marine Corps or the 01ftce of Economic Adiusimt?::. The anached pages arc replacements for pees in the October 1996 version of the Speci; is Plan:'Reuse Plan. Only pages with corrections are provided in the errata. Editorial narrative chances are shown in bold where additions are made with strike -outs for deletions. Complete revised tables are provided and map corrections are shown with notations. :'after final action on the Reuse Plan, the Specific Plan (reuse document) will be corrected to incorporate the revised pages included in the errata package. Chapter I Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE The -Marine Corps Air Station ('_MCAS), Tustin is scheduled for realisrment and closure by 1999, in accordance with the Base Reaiigntnent and Closure Act. ACAS Tustin was originally recommended for realignment and closure by the Defense Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission in its June 1991 report to President Bush. The President accepted the BRAC recommendations in July 1991 and Congress cont•;:rted the closure in October 1991. In 1993, the BRAC Commission reconsidered its earlier recommendations to close MICAS Tustin. The Commission reconfirmed the decision to close the base but modified its realignment locations for receiving facilities and mandated closure no later than July 1999. In 1995, the BR4C Commission again modified its previous determinations concerning the proposed locations for realignment of Marine Corps assets. When t1he original decision was made in 1991 to close 'MCAS Tustin, the local community did not oppose the base's closure. Instead. the commiunity proceeded immediately with planning for reuse. The specific object -.N -es of the reuse planning effort were as follows: ■ 16 foster public understanding and inyoivement in reuse decisions: ■ To provide consistent direction in reuse efforts: ■ To be accountable to the local community: 1/C. -IIS Tustin SPe.-i is P1an4z?eus- ?;_., City of Tus.::. September 1998 � �.- y . Pace , Ch,0J1-r 1 # Introduction necessary to implement the provisions of the Pl: n within- the City of Irvine. 1.2 LOCATION AND SETTING MCAS Tustin is located in southern California near the center of Oran_e County, and is approximately 40 miles southeast of downtown Los -- Angeles (Figure 1-1). The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan project area encompasses approximately 1606 414gross acres. The majority of the Plan area, 1.511 1529 acres, lies in the southern portion of the City of Tustin. Approximately 95 So -acres, consisting of existing military family housing and vacant land, lies within the City of Irvine. The City of Santa Ana borders the site to the southwest. The Plan project area is located in an area bounded by four freeways: the Costa Mesa (SR -55), Santa Ana (I-5), Laguna (SR -133), and San Diego (1-405) free.vays. The major roadways ;high bcruler the site include Redhill Avenue on the west, Edinger Avenue and Irvine Center Drive on the north, Harvard Avenue on the east, and Barranca Parkway on the south. Jamboree Road transects the site. The project area will also be served in the future by the Eastern Transportation Corridor. John Wa}'ne Airport is located three miles to the south, and a planned Metrolink Commuter Rail station that will provide daily passenger service to employment centers in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Diego counties is located immediately to the north of the project area. This local setting is illustrated in Figure 1-2. Virtually an island in a highly urbanized location, the project area is generally bounded by single-family residential uses and business park uses to the north, light industrial and research and development uses to the west, light industrial and commercial uses to the south, and residential uses under construction east of Harvard in the City of Irvine. In fact, the site is one of the largest remaining tracts of developable land in central Orange Countv. Its locational advantages in terms of proximity to transportation facilities. community services, and regional commercial and cultural facilities makes it a prime location for urban development. The Plan project area encompasses property within the boundaries of MCAS Tustin and one privately owned 4.1 -acre site located at the northeasterly corner of the project area. passes P=epe5y '-4e histe to :-4ea= te :•,--be ngai •—ewe—base. T-�-s 30a@Fe—s=te—inelude MQk9 Tus;ip, sires :-m-e p ;-atel re;;-geed t seeks e:= -Ni _ ::.84imazely _.-, 1+"^.-"1S Tustin Spe &.- Alan/Reuse Pias City of Tusiiri September Page 1.3 Chapter i • Introduction OI !USiUi MCAS iusti.-7 S,Decifi Plan/Rause Pial) Page 1-4 Go. -Eo. September 1998 4a✓1 e -r M c,A LJ Iw riA Chapter 1 • Introduction Existing Land Use 1-AlrfleldOperatlons/AgrlcuHural 2 - Other Operations/Training 3 - Maintenance 4 - Aircraft Maintenance 5 - Supply/Storage 6 - Medlcal/Dental 7 - Administration 8 - Family Housing 9 - Bachelor Housing 10 - Community Support 11 - Recreation 12 - Agriculture 13 - Vacant Not To Scale THE PLANNING CENTER WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 1-3 Chapter i - Introduction 1.3.2 Residential Demand Several residential product types are likely to be attractive, including single-family detached and attached units, attached townhomes/condominiums, and rental apartments. Depending upon d;e allocation of land and the phasing of buildout, the site should be able to absorb roughly 100 to 125 units per product type per year. This equn:es to 300 to 375 total units per year once development has coinmcnced i'nd _-_ - occupancies are available. There are opportunities for reuse of -existing military fannily housing at MCAS Tustin, depending upon their condition and other issues. 1.3.3 Commercial Office Demand Roughly 2 percent of total Orange County demand for new cotrtmerci,l ofrice space may be absorbed by the properties. This converts to an absorption rate of roughly 100,000 to 150,000 square feet of orrice space annually after 1997. This presumes a phased construction program over a number of years, at least a decade, with top -end density approaching ranges of 3 million to 5 million square feet. This would extend tot-nl buildout well beyond the year 2010. 1.3.4 Industrial/R&D Space Demand The changing manufacturing base in the county is expected to continue its evolution. Orange County industrial space is presently in the process of reutilization for a number of flexible uses not previously planned. It is projected that more research and development space demand will occur over time and that such demand will recycle existing industrial space as well as demand construction of new space. A relatively modest industr al/ MI) development demand is projected for the subject site in the range of 75,000 to 125,000 square feet annually. Overall competitive factors, including the closure and release for civilian use of portions of MCAS El Toro, may drive down these initial forecasts. There are at least 2200,000 square feet of potentially reusable structures at MCAS Tustin which might be recycled for interim or long-term industrial and Rk.D use, as compared to the nearly 2 million square feet of all floor space which lies presen:"%- at the base. 1.3.5 RetailNisitor Accommodations Demand Orange County and central/central coast Orange Counn• retail development is presently experiencing considerable pressure ew . a . ;Ihe . rte: The dilution of retail floor space types. which has been marked 14; AS Tustin Spa-it7c Plan/Reusa Plan Ciy of T:.-s:i'; September 1998 0' teber !99 , Chapter 1 • Introduction 18. Site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Special Study "Lone. 19. Moderate to high liquefaction potential related to soils on s:e. U. Sensory Elements 1. Opportunity to design vistas in and through the site :o si2niticant on and off-site features. 2. Special planning criteria may be needed around blimp hangars if they are retained. ?Feed for landscaping or other treatment along reuse area's boundaries to create distinguishable borders for the area and improved compatibility with surrounding jurisdictions. 4. Potential to underground electrical transmission lines along Barranca, «Varner, and Harvard to eliminate visual intrusion effects. 5. Opportunity to configure portions of drainage into landscaping. buffering, etc. increasing aesthetic quality, safety, and potentially enhancing wetland areas on site. r 6. Opportunity to retain open spaces as visual and recreational amenities. 7. Site will be impacted by noise from surrounding roads, adjacent rail line, and possibly aircraft operations at John Wayne Airport. 8. Reuse of site could create noise impacts on existing sutroundi:: uses. 9. Closure of the base will eliminate military aircraft noise. 9.4.3 Land Use Alternatives ?numerous land use and circulation alternatives were developed and examined prior to selection of the proposed Land Use Plan. The two alternanves that best fulfilled the project objectives were selected for further evaluation in the EIS/EIR. These are the Arterial Grid Pattern,(Hich Residential/No Core Area alternative and the IdealArterial Loop Pattern1ow Residential alternative. M A -S rUstin S.oec f c Plant Reuse Pan Cly of 1 Usti , September199�-��:�--?-� ?age , Chapter i • Introduction CiiY of Tustin Face 1-22 Under the Arterial Grid Pattern/High Residential./'No Core Area aitema-; e. the land use pattern is defined by a grid pattern circulation syste'M nd provides for significantly more residential units than either the propo-sed Plan or other alternative. While the grid pattern maximizes design spez--s. the community core area identified in the proposed Plan is disrupted. T`.e loss of the core area limits the potential of the alternative to respond to prevailing market conditions once the parcel becomes available for ruse. Under the ki-_a4-arterial Loop Pattern/Low Residential alternative. it is assumed that the southeastern blimp hangar is removed. This allows for construction of the ideal loop roadway system which yields a more efficient traffic flow than the loop system in the proposed Plan. The co -e area of the site is retained as a single parcel to provide flexibility in fu:u:e reuse opportunities after cleanup occurs. The method for selecting a preferred Land Use Plan included a for-n-ni evaluation process of the two alternatives and the draft preferred Plan. The two alternatives and draft preferred Plan were com2ared and rated based on key planning, criteria and goals for the project. The result of th;s process was the selection and refinement of the proposed Land Use Plan. 1.4.4 Public Participation An important component of the reuse planning process was tie commitment to make the process open and accessible to the public. Public participation in the Plan preparation process occurred through the following methods: ■ All meetings of the Base Closure Task Force were open to the public. Task Force meetings were also advertised in local newspapers and through direct mailings. ■ An extensive community survey of 30,000 residents and business, -s was conducted to obtain input on 'key issues and any land use preferences. ■ Community Workshops were held at key stages in the reuse plannin= process to define issues, discuss draft land use/circulation altematives. and obtain input on draft Plan provisions. ■ A public review and comment period on the Plan was provided. well as opportunities to provide input during the public hearings. September 19-58 Cnac:-r 1 Introduction 1.6 AUTHORIZATION, CONSISTENCY AND ADOPTION 1.6.1 The Reuse Plan Federal regulations (32 CFR Parts-QQ 174 and -?I 175) wich implien-IcInt the National Defense authorization Act for fiscal year 1994 and the Bare Closure Community Redevelopment and Homeless assistance Act of 1994. require a LRA to prepare a comprehensive Redevelopirent Plan based on local needs and in response to specific reuse planning requirements and timelines. A variety of factors are involved in the preparation of a reuse plan for a federal facility that distinguish a reuse plan from traditional master planning. Reuse plans required by the Department of Defense are generally less definitive than other master plans, and more focused on the development of flexible strategies designed to respond to dynamic conditions. The federal government also does not require a reuse plan to be enforceable under state and local land use laws. For purposes of corriulying with federal requirements, portions of this Plan will be considered the required "Reuse Plan" (Chapters 1, 2, excluding Section 2.17, and Chapter 6). It is also intended that the LR.A will recognize certain Chapters as the federally required Reuse Plan by resolution adoption only. For purposes of this action, the federallv recognized Reuse Plan will hold the weight of "policy" only and shall not be considered a "project" under California law. 1.6.2 The Specific Plan California Government Code Section 65450 establishes the authority for cities to adopt specific plans either by resolution or by oruinance. Both Planning Commission and City Council hearings are required. It is intended that portions of the Specific Plan/Reuse Plan adopted by ordinance will serve as zoning for the properties involved within the City of Tustin, when finally adopted by the Tustin City Council. Development plans, site plans, tentative parcel maps, tract maps, and use permits must be consistent with the Plan. If a development agreement is sought, it must also be found to be consistent with this Plan and the City of Tustin's General Plan. Specific plans are also required to be consistent with and implement a city's General Plan. The Specific Plan/Reuse Plan has been prepared in conjunction with a General Plan amendment in the City of Tustin, and will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Tustin General Plan, as amended. A General Plan Consistencv Analvsis has been prepared and is included in the Appendix. The City of Irvine will need to amend their citv's Zoning Code as necessary to implement regulations of the Specific Plan/Reuse Plan. Irvine MOAS Tustin Plan/Re.-se Plan City or September 199- Par!-- , 2S Chapter 1 • Introduction Chapter 4 specifies `'ow the Plan provisions/re.uirements will �e adrnln.szered and ho••v development/reuse projects �� ill be 'roces5e4. Chapter 6 of the Plan. is a Reuse Implementation Strategy w't:iCh recornmends a framework for managing, rnarketing, and financing -;use of the Plan. The final chapter (Chapter 6) is an Appendix that incluces definitions of the terms used in the document, a General Plan consister c%• analysis, and relevant backjround information. 1.9 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Several supporting technical documents were produced during the Spec:tic Plan/Reuse Plan preparation process. These documents provide substanr:al background information for the Plan. The following is a list of :hose documents which are be available for review at the Community Development Department: ■ :WC.AS Tustin Historical Resources Survey, Thirtieth Street Architect:. Inc., October 1993 ■ EIS/FIR Environmental Setting Report for MCAS Tustin, Howa.d Needles Tammen and Bergendoff (HSN -IB), in association wi-h Cotton/BelandiAssociates, Inc., '.March 1994 ■ Historic Blimp Hangars Analysis for MCAS Tustin, Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff/Leighton and Associates, September 199'. ■ Base Realignment and Closure Cleanup Plan (BCP) for 111C.S Tustin, U.S. Marine Corps, March 1996 ■ 'Marine Corps Air Station Trafs Study, Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.. May 1996 ■ Community Faciiities & Infrastructure for MCAS Tustin, Howa d Needles Tammen and Bergendoff (HNTB), July 1996 ■ Fiscal Impact Program and Report, Economic Research Associates. August 1996 ■ !Market Demand Forecast for the Reuse Plan of MCAS Tus=r Properties, Final Revision, Economic Research Associates, Novemb; : 1993 Tt1'S-01'SPKP; I_N. %. Pante... 05.r25'9E ..-, - l "AS (Tustin SPecific Plan/Reusc' P,,'-:.,7 Ciy OT .._::.'. September 1998 . Pace 7-27 T Chapter 2 • Plan Description Table 2-1 LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY Land Use Designation IF Gross' Acreage Range of Dwelling Units RESIDENTIAL Low Density 181.3 1 - 7 d.u./acre Medium Density 125.1 8 - 15 d.u./acre jMedium-High Density 29.4 16 - 25 d.u.;acre Transitional/Emergency Housing I 5.1 Golf Villaae Low Density 48.5 1 - 7 d.u./acre Golf Village Medium Density 55.2 8 - 15 d.u./acre 1 SUBTOTAL 444.6 3,710 Dwelling Units Max. COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS Commercial/Business 265.2 Commercial 55.3 Golf Village 2 171.7 Village Services 20.7 jCommunity Core 225.2 116 - 25 d.u./acre SUBTOTAL 738.1 1891 Dwelling Units Max. INSTITUTIONAL/RECREATIONAL Learning village 128.0 Community Park 24.1 Urban Regional Park 84.5 i SUBTOTAL 236.6 RIGHT-OF-WAY Arterial Roadways 158.4 1 Drainage (Flood/Stormdrains) 28.5 SUBTOTAL 186.9 GRAND TOTAL 1606.2 4,601 Dwelling Units Max. j Less Federal Propel : r 16.7 Less Private Property 4.1 188 Dwelling Units Total MCAS Tustin Disposal Acreage 1,585.4 4,518 Dwelling Units N3 ; =s: :. '> oss a�ea3e for ea--'i?ratnin: A ea is an estimate-. aliccavon measure-. tro n rre eaRe & the a --:a a^e .aor se=ar. --ay ^ A•ez_ Tne noun: � ian-. roa-.ways. any oub!ic roaaway sown or Lie Land Use ?lar., and-o•:ne ooun-.ary 7. cre P.anninar oevaled to roadways is calcu:a:ez a ae. lie R:ont-0'A1Iay Designation. A_;ua! a :reape ml: De relne-. ainn; :ne sne :ow' a -z suDarvmsion process. 2 A.-eaoe figure rnduaes ? 5-.3 = es o' oa` -.ourse wni ;.1. is oar. o' the ua: ViLaoe Ranninc Area 151. Citi of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific P/an/Reuse Plan Page 2-2 Gelebef '-995 September 1998 r is E L LAIC ROA Chapter 2 • Plan Description Land Use Plan Residential Low Density Residential (1-7 d.u./acre) Medium Density Residential (8-15 d.u./acre) • _ Medium High Density Residential (16-25 d.u./acre) Transitional / Emergency Housing Golf Village (1-7 d.u./acre and B-15 d.u./acre) Commercial / Business :fih Commercial Business Commercial I� Village Services Community Core T Institutional / Recreational Learning Village Community Park Urban Regional Park Neighborhood Park** • • • Regional Riding and Hiking Trail Elementary School (K -b)•• Elementary School (K-8)** High School** -- Specific Plan Boundary n n Tustin / Irvine Boundary JK Fe 61 ei -aI Rrupee-47 1. Roadway alignments are conceptual. 2. Shaded areas represent cuno ipwal alternative roadway alignment areas for Tustin Ranch Rd and Warner Ave. extensions, and interchange locations at Tustin Ranch Rd./Edinger Ave. and Jamboree Rd./Edinger Ave. 3. Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. ` Within the City of Irvine, the density within Madium Density Residential designation will not exceed 12.5 dwelling units per acre. " See notes on Statistical Summary regarding acreages and localicn of special usesr n3 THE Not To Scale PLANNING CENTER I� MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-7 Chapter 2 e Plan Description C; y of Tustin Page 2-6 to develop due to timing of environmental clean-up, market absorption factors, probable high demolition costs associated %V:!'.� airfield operations. and high infrastructure improvement costs. ■ A Golf Village is planned that will offer prime quality golf course oriented housing around a championship goif course. A hotel and conference facility will serve business travelers. recreational travelers. and other travelers to the area. ■ The extension of Tustin Ranch Road and )Varner Avenue throu;h the Plan area will comalete significant segments of the regional arterial system. The Circulation Plan will in essence create new capacity for the region, as well as accommodate traffic generated by the Plan. ■ A loop roadway system for local circulation will provide early access to the perimeter of the site where parcels are first available for reuse. 2.2.1 Land Use Designations The Land Use Plan contains fen: teem (14) -thirteen (13) separate land use designations, which are defined below. The land use designations have been assigned Planning Area numbers, as further discussed in Chapter _. The Planning Area numbers are the basis for assigning permitted uses and establishing development regulations and guidelines. A. Residential Designations 1. Low Density- Residential (1-7 d.uJacre): The Low Densis} residential designation provides for reuse and or new development of former military residential neighborhoods with low density attached and detached dwellings and accessory uses and buildings. The land use designation provides for a wide range of accommodations including single family units, patio homes, and multiple family dwellings such as condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives and community apartments. Uses such as public/institutional facilities, child care facilities an:� others which are determined to be compatible with, and oriented towards the needs of these nei?hborhoods may also be allowed. The intent is to: 1) rehabilitate and enhance existing residential units while also providing opportunities for new development where rehabilitation would not be financially feasible and/or would provide minimal results; 2) provide a transition between the Specific Plan area and existing adjacent residential neighborhoods in Tustin and Irvine; and 3) provide homeownership opportunities in a mixture of price ranges. to MCAS Tustin PlarVReuse ?`an September 1998 Chapter 2 # Plan Description E:rployrnent Center Neighborhood; 2) concentrate regionally oriented commercial uses in the Reaionaily-Orienicd Commercial \eiahborhood; and 3) achieve quality identiticatio:t features for the Plan area along arterial highways and at key intersections. 2. Commercial: The Commercial designation provides for development of a variety of retail and service commercial uses with the intent of supporting and complementing uses within the Plan and surrounding development. The Commercial designation also provides for the accommodation of continued limited military uses in locations specified on the Land Use Plan. The intent is to: 1) provide regionally -oriented commercial uses; and 2) achieve quality identification features for the community along arterial highways and at lcev intersections. 3. r' r-eial—Reer-eaiien; The—C-em.-refeia'—Rc�-=-r 4e -s --na ie:':i.:e L �ci8p eirt---{?�-a?efs?iiiic'S— `ice a ee:nme e a? =eeFeatian use OF `• --'i?-y- of uses, -: e. rote T S 44-,, regi; _ .... '--er . ..., i -a=te 4 ea ei::a... uses in tTe�-CE�t .. •�•; and 2) Y _a be=A-een •L,_ E.....ple _ en .7 i nV�-71.. 3. Golf Village: The Golf village designation provides for development of commercial retail and service uses, a hotel and commercial recreation facilities. The intent is to provide for resort -like recreation and supporting commercial facilities within the Golf Village. 4. Village Services: The Village Services designation provides localized commercial retail and service uses to adjacent residential neighborhoods. The intent is to 1) offer convenient vehicle and pedestrian accessibility through site design; and 2) to contribute to quality entry and landmark identification features for the community. Community Core: The Community Core designation provides for development of a mix of uses, with opportunities for both commercial business and residential uses either in separate or integrated projects. Residential densities of 16-25 d.u./acre are permitted. Regulations will be designed to provide enough flexibility to accommodate a unique, large scale development complex with uses which may not clearly be identifiable until iA; -AS (Tustin Specific AlatilReuse Ran Ciry of Tustin September 199101 ., . '-995 rad z -'9 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Neighborhood A - Learning Village Neighborhood B - Village Housing Neighborhood C - Regional Park Neighborhood D - Community Core Neighborhood E - Employment Center Neighborhood F - Regionally -Oriented Commercial District Neighborhood G - Residential Core Neighborhood H - Irvine Residential neighborhood The h a graphic representation of a plonringrenglneering concept. Final design sciullau (location and song) will be proposed and revl w as port of wbsequent approvals needed by the respective agency with IuWcthn q� 0 • THE Not To scale .00 PLANNING L7���...777����JJJJ CENTER FrEWEI MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-2 u5T 1�n T ,5 1 h Chapter 2 • Plan Desci n Table 2-2 NEIGHBORHOOD SUMMARY NEIGHBORHOOD A Land Use Gross' Acreage Range of Dwelling Units Learning Village/Elementary School' - 10 acres 128.0 Community Park 24.1 Transilional/Emergency Housing 5.1 SUBTOTAL 157.2 NEIGHBORHOOD B Low Density flesidenllal 54.2 1 - 7 d.u./acre Medium Density Residential 51.7 8 - 15 d.u./acre Village Services 20.7 SUBTOTAL 126.8 925 Dwelling Units Max. NEIGHBORHOOD C Urban Regional Park 84 5 SUBTOTAL 84.5 NEIGHBORHOOD D Community Core Mediurn-l-ligh Density Residential/High School° - 40 acres 225.2 16 - 25 d.u./acre 1891 SUBTOTAL 225.2 Dwelling Units Max. NEIGHBORHOOD E Commercial Business 217.9 SUBTOTAL 2-17.9 NEIGHBORHOOD F Commercial Military - 16.7 55.3 Commercial Fiusiness 47.3 SUBTOTAL 102.6 NEIGHBORFIOOD G Golf Village Low Density Flesidenlial' - 48.5 acres Medium Density Residential' - 55.2 acres I lotel - 10.0 acres Commercial - 2.4 acres Goll - 159.3 acres Elementary School' - 10 acres 275.4 1 - 7 d.u./acre 8 - 15 d.u./acre MCAS Tustin Specific Planffleuse flan City of Tustin October -1996 September 1998 Page 2-15 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Table 2-2 NEIGHBORHOOD SUMMARY Land Use Gross' Acreage flange of Dwelling Units NEIGHBORHOOD G (C nrtlnued) Low Density Residential 5 127.1 1 - 7 dA./acre Medium-I-ligh Density Residential 29.4 16 - 25 d.u./acre SUBTOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD H 431.9 2,303 Dwelling Units Max. Medium Density Residential " - Irvine 73.4 0 - 15 d.u./acre Elementary School K-0 " - 20 acres SUBTOTAL 73.4 402 Dwelling Units Max. RIGHT OF -WAY° Roadways 150.4 Drainage (Flood Control and Storm Drains) 20 5 SUBTOTAL 166.9 GRAND TOTAL NOTES: 1606.2 4,601 Dwelling Units Max. 1. Nelphbahood A Includes an estimated 10 etre sllocellon for on Elementary School. The pr11clss acreage Jutd loealimr will be determined when the Navy's Re:ord of Decision Is Issued II the 11011896 vai6s, en adjustment will be made tothe Lown -rig village designation. 2. Neighborhood D knetudes an estimated 110 0011 alloeallon for 11,111911 School. The prscrae acresgs and location will be determined when Uu Navys Record of Decision Is Issued. If Uu aci rage vines, mi adjustment will be in ado to the Comn++rnrty Cola dssignallon. J. The medium density losldenljd use In Neighborhood O Includes ■ 5 acre Mocatlon for a neighborhood park The precise act ego and location will be determined prior 10 final subdivislon map approval. low density usldential use, however. Iliamaxinonn number or dwelling unlls would not change. Neighborhood G also Includes at ulimsUd 10 sen allocation for an Elainedary, School. The please acrea11 Ila auuge vNles, an N1,usrm6m will be mad11 to rhe g11 end location wN be determined when Ili. Navy's Record of Decision Is Issued It the acreage varies, an adjustment will be made to the Medium Density designsllon. 4. ilia low density tesldantlal use In Neighborhood G. Includes a 5 see alloceiion for a nelghbdhood perks. The precise acreego and Iocauon will be determined pda to Final subdivision map approval If Ilia &0-119• vale, an acreage adluslin—I will b6 made I the low density residential use, however. Vu maximum nurnber of dwelling units would not Increase. 5. The low density residential use in Nelghbodnood G Includes 105 5 aces In Tustin and 21 6 aaes In Irvine 8. Neighborhood 11 Includes an estimated 20 act@ allocallon for a K 5 Schod. Tin pieclse scresge and location will be delermined when Ilia Navy's Record of Decision Is issued. Nelghborhood If also Includes an 5 acre Nlxatolt Ion •rat gnbolhrwd I:Nk s•u If Ih0 acreage varies. Ilia maximum number or dwelling units would remain the sane. 7. Gross arnaga lot esch Pla+ning Also Is an estimated allocehon measured from 1110 edge of U+e adjacent alejal or secondNy roadway. Jury roadway shown on Ilia Land Use Plan, and/w Ilia L•ouridary of Ilia planning Area Trio oinou^t or land devoted to roadways Is cNculalad under Ilia Rrghbol Way designation. Actual acreage will be rented during the Ilia plan and subdivision process. 5 11imhLnl Wav Iota] Includnx rhn Srmr.{b.• pn,,,+,....r,...... Cll' till f � � MCAS luslin Specific PlanlRe. October --1996 Seplelnk, . ,d Chapter 2 • Plan Description C. Neighborhood C - Urban Regional Park: NeH,.Nbor liood C is located near the center of the site, bordered by North Loop Road (extension of Valencia Avenue) on the north and Armstrong Avenue on the west. It is adjacent to Neighborhood D on the east and south. The Urban Regionid Park will be a significant public amenity that will not only serve regional needs, but provide a buffer between the livirig environment and commercial and business areas. The neighborhood will serve a number of functions including open space conservation, recreation, community resource services, concession commercial supportive to the park, and historic preservation andior display. D. Neighborhood D - Community Core: Neighborhood D encompasses the central area of the site, bordered by Tustin Ranch Road on the east, Warner .avenue on the south, North Loop Road on the north, and both the urban Regional Park (Neighborhood C) and Armstrong Avenue on the west. This neighborhood will provide an opportunity for one or more unique, large-scale development proposals that would complete the Specific Plan area. The primary functions of :Neighborhood D include: maintaining longi range flexibility as a major opportunity area, providing opportunities for mixed-use development, revenue generation to offset especially high infrastructure and demolition costs, and special attraction to the Plan area. The ]Neighborhood map (Figure 2-2), also identifies a shaded area within Neighborhood D that represents a conceptual design area for the future alignments of Tustin Ranch Road and Warner Avenue. E. ]Neighborhood E - Employment Center: ?Neighborhood E is located in the southwest quadrant of the Specific Plan area, bordering Redhill Avenue on the west, Warner Avenue on the north, Tustin Ranch Road on the east, and Barranca Parkway on the south. This neighborhood will be an employment center for the community. It will provide a business park setting for a full range of professional offices, research & development, and commercial business uses. ft nifl aiso %..Qi1Lam pi%aLL,, L,V11u11L,1L,1a111.L,1L,aL1v11a1 t..V11L /v11..11L 111L. 1u.,U LU FLU%JLA, LUI a 1 - • \, L=Lftl Unlquc to the �L- [ a.% 1 L 1 OppulftlnitiCS1 1 L• .7 1 L,1 in L, •L.a:LIL.. Nelghbori�ood E and the Learning Village Neighborhood ('Neighborhood A) -ill hav-_ important connections potentially offering nearby on-the-job opportunities for persons attending classes in the L--arning Village. City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Saecific Pian/Reuse Pian Page 2-18 Gerte-b. '99 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description 2.3 FEDERAL PROPERTY DISPOSAL PROCESS 2.3.1 General Background Because MCAS, Tustin was a BRAC 91, BRAC 93 and BRAC 95 base closure, Federal screening was originally initiated under pre -1994 fedcnil law and regulations. The Department of the Davy had completed Department of Defense and Federal agency screening and had simultaneously completed screening for State, County and local agency interests in the property. With the adoption of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 and Base Closure Community Redevelopment and Homeless Assistance Act of 1994 ('Redevelopment Act"), a new community based reuse and screening process was initiated. Under the new Acts and their specific implementing rules and regulations (32 CFR Parts -9 0 , ,..174, 175 and 176) the screening process works in the following manner: Step 1: The Department of the Navy identifies Department of Defense (DoD) and federal property needs. Any property that DoD does not need is considered "excess" to the needs of DoD and made available to other DoD and Federal agencies. If DoD and other federal agencies do not identify a need, the remaining base property can be declared "surplus" and available for reuse. Step 2: The LRA undertakes outreach and solicits notice of interests in the base from State and local governments, representatives of the homeless and other interested parties. Federal laws and revelations allow for public benefit conveyances of surplus property at partial or full discount from fair market value. Whe.e these tapes of uses are identified as a benefit to the LRA or other eligible beneficiary, land and facilities requested for the public benefit may be obtained at no cost to the recipient. Generally, these conveyances allow for broad public uses such as: airports, education, health, historic properties, and park and recreation. The Redevelopment Act also provides for conveyance of discounted surplus property for uses supporting the needs of qualified 'homeless providers. Step 3: After considering the notices of interest received, the LRA prepares the Reuse Plan ensuring through public comment, that the Plan adequately balances local community and economic needs with the needs of the homeless. City of Tustin WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Aan Page 2-20 95°r-? September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Step 4. The LRA completed Reuse Plan is subn-iiited to the Dcp:u-t;rtect of Housing -id Urban Development (HUD) as part of an application to determine whether the LRA has adequately balanced loco community and economic development needs with those of the homeless. The completed plan is also submitted to the Department of the Navy who will notify Federal agencies th:a certain properties may become available for a public benefit conveyance and a request is made for their recommendations regarding the eligibility of a user. Step 5: The EIS for the closure and Reuse Plan must be completed within 12 months after the Department of the Navy receives t:rRc Plmnvritten notification from HUD that the community s Reuse Plan meets the requirements of base closure law and the Redevelopment Act. After completion of the L -IS and supporting documentation, the Davy will be responsible for making final disposal decisions and will issue a disposal Record of Decisions) (ROD) in accordance with the approved Reuse Plan. Because screening for the needs of the homeless had not yet been initiated under pre -1994 Federal Law and regulations including the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act, the City of Tustin as the DoD designated LRA requested participation under the new Redevelopment Act. The request was fornnally made to Secretary of Defense, William J. Petry. by letter dated November 17, 1994. A response from the DoD was received on December 15, 1994 authorizing participation under the Redevelopment Act. In June, 1995 the Department of Defense also authorized the LRA to initiate the notice of interest process prior to a determination of excess or surplus property at MCAS, Tustin. The LRA's request to utilize procedures under :lie new Redevelopment Act also necessitated readvertisement and screening of the property to state and local agencies as well as representatives of the homeless. The Reuse Plan was submitted to the Department of Defense and HUD on October 30, 1996. On 111arch 24, 1998, HUD notified the Department of Defense and City of Tustin that the community's Reuse Plan complied with all base closure requirements and the Redevelopment Act. 2.3.2 Department of Defense and Federal Agency Screening Two Department of Defense and one Federal agency expressions of interests were received for the base. ■ The 222nd Combat Communications Squadron at the Costa Mesa Air National Guard Station requested transfer of 25 acres along the north MCRS Tustin Specific Pian/Reuse Plan OcIebeF11,99-S September 1998 City of Tustin Paoe 2-21 Chapter 2 • Plan Description City of Tustin Page 2-22 side of Barranca Parkway to Include am existir.Q 10 acre a:r :'t:tfiic communication center. The LRA recommended that the Navy reject the transfer. Subsequently; the National Guard officially withdrew their request for property at MCAS Tustin. t v L _c . uicTask-Forcc iccon1111z1:Ul..11 L11a L ,11a. N --a 11.•�l.L a�,i. ,cclucst , • c Jl.11 in"C', rcaSMIS hc Isitc1. laav al,116- 11 111,�OLL1Lblll al�I1d;,l PI 'JO -L. L.l L1 LI V .11te which n 111 . ct illi. in.=:c !l. l a.. L.1\/�./:lll.11l of 11 �. L. . bPlan.1 vv b. •1 l 'StM i W1111 LLI- IXLL,.')L Plan{iIILTi l lV` 11LLi1 LL V 1 e ^ V , 1 1 -business .L.. U_. 11 .1.L1.. `L. vn . 1L 1 1. + , r 1 J V VhigL l LL 1 1 v 1.A1.. 1 Vl.i L1 L.11 ll.l cc S, u1..La Lvl 1. and !l.. 11r 4 and offici. e an L L. a.10 U11 c L]]1��_+yL.+\��.�•ej.,�_7�� 1 . L. a -National[ C01 L11 1 1 I i L. .. L l 1�.�.T. 1 crp c l) • 1 propos-'d V _ v L l 1 u L, . 1 11 L.1 11 01 11 1 1L illi 1 •l.a L• V 1 V b V - +1 V l:, 1. 1L.1. 111 \ L •1 L.L.. L L. itcis one of fvm weasn l V U. .. L.1L L 11"3 1.11. a.11 ..l J1S+ .7 L L. ' 1 e 1 t,iy 1 L L. 1 1 b V .. Lll L.. e1=1 aL V V Cliticaito • •la._l.l� plodueffig adeLluate tax 1L.111 L.11a L L.�lll ! ec ll U Ill. 11111MOV.-Melitsalld •1..1 a.1. LLU\.l U1 b. ■ The Eleventh Coast Guard District located 36 rz.iles from MCAS. Tustin requested a no cost acquisition of 274 gaits of officer family housing on 55 acres. The LK4 recommended that the Aary reject the transfer. Subsequent!►; the Coast Guard officially withdrew their request for property at MCAS Tustin. Th-- lV V 1L.Task 1 Wlib• L 1 1 a...ded L11GLl l.l.. . a \ ;CJ=Ll� 1 - LL L.1 ^ 1 L. 1 OVVIIIS IMS01-rs- T, V i 1 L.1Wilf jeopmdize tilecc . i is %;?bffity _ 1 the 1 1. • • •• • • • • • • • • 1 MICAS Tustin STecific Pia,? -Reuse Plan �e ;SSS September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description r-envc5-rorlr;ch-o-Jlhelp1 Tnr� �T ini L . L i,,,ds onhr, b c7 Tm__ ft_ %yu ___..lt i_ r.. _ _..-. ...F13�Ar`f?(3'[if3'is-f1{�1"'-:' 1 i1 ll. beming c lmgc, poition of thc infl-astructuic s-tc w —The-City'se--,o an to L1 � hip traits` r� hichcou f 1 L proceeds the V w l Of the NLa1 units affordable 1 1 - V V ovnicrship l 111.J. �if tl=.Sfiened, tZie eosEs to the L.L, - L—I,vla.. 1 Vl...8: y V ld l VIIJJJJL%J.rI,IIMLI 1 1. -536 833 it v V VL4Lrl CSC S368,256 the 1 .7 cs mid LLppT�%�111L. 11.1 3.fmillion dullw-s ffi l.J LV directly -l= TIM-CiS aISU1011CMILIVability of Ll VLa l�-JUl l�v 11 1L. LLICCCSSalyCIISMeconpatibibIty Ll th 1,1Vf l: ., L.0 nta=lt MCS OLIL 1VbZSC arid toTR'71', Vll \.11' LV Vl lTiM. ■ The Santa Ana Armed Forces Reserves Center originally reaucs-Led transfer of 21.66 acres. They currently operate on 7.5 ac~I-s of property on the base. The 21.66 acres originally requested included current property they operate as well as vacant property that tie Army Reserve Center has leased but has had no historical use of. After lengthy negotiations, the LRA and Army a=rced to accommodation of the transfer of a 1.1.E net acre/16.7 gross acre site subject to a number of conditions including the following: Ar Immediately following acceptance of a deed transfer of the Army Reserve site by the Navy, the Army has agreed to deliver a no -cost grant or dedication of required right-of-way along Barranca Parkway to the City of Tustin. N The City will complete street widening and improvements to Barranca Parkway adjacent to the Army Resen-e site and find upgrades to landscaping along the frontage of the site when improvements are completed along Barranca Parkway. MCAIS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Pian Gdobef 1199 September 1998 City o` Tustin Page 2-23 Chapier2 • Plan Description Ingress/egress from 'Tustin Ranch Road, once completed, hill be provided to the Army subject to City approval as to location. Vie Army rill provide a right of first refusal to the City to purchase the site in the event said site is no longer needed for the Army Rcscrve mission and a right of first refusal to the City to enter into an exchange agreement with the Army Reserve for the property. ff The Army Reserve will furnish a memorandum which describes the legal authorization and procedure to permit the City or private development entity to negotiate an exchange of property and/or facilities at the proposed Army Reserve site fur an equivalent alternate location which meets the needs of the Army Reserve. 'lla. BaseClosuicTask Foicc. •. sUp1juitcd1. :111 [ on, 1 1 L a•,1 a, a. a. �1 HE,, L.1 . V c 11 i IL -"S ICC0111.111cildcd tLICLtL,I- L L : a111 Lia L• 4 1. ac,c mqncst V a V thm Ll LLIL 1L.1 ulU JvVL.�a.l L..1. .l 1 1• i t of Ll V V . V Plan. lL. L., Y' l 1.11 1 66 L 1 c V 1.l V L 1 e existing g 41111 11 V RCSIMC L.l 1.1 and L Vv:u 1 1 1 1 1 L•.V planning to th,l. Bmiancaand inn1' •01 ,xt-nd 11 l..l_L.1. 11I Of _ai '2.11..12._. I L.Road, LL 1112 L.:ILI• 1 _ V L L as LCail U :1L L11r De pointtOHIL.; 1l.U.L. CLL L+C..:F11is t interseCtI011_ alItIcIpaMd LV L:L. ala.. 1.: L11L. -ith� wL V 1 l mia c ll�11 at.. Il Lil L the ...�. .. HMI.1.• r 1 V L-10.1 1 1 l 1 L ._. L. Li V 11 L' 1 iJll.`:a.: a L=, 1 L.1 L LLL 1.1 V V C—it% V 1 Tustin ' ul ll. L..a.a.U• .LJ lr 1.:11 1 c . la r ERA 1 in lia. f i Vg i . _ L.1 that a ll aJ by LLL, ...1cried to 1c ERA L y 1 V ERA ' lli L-4. L..c L a •Ll tet, VlU L.. .l1LLi 111 L L. • lla - 1. . L. 111 1.1 . L.. Il CI 'I' L V L the Rescrve EentetL uid 1l.11 L.L. L.la. '1.paoccss11 1 L.b.0 for 1 1 1 1 1 L•.V planning or c 1 Ll t 1LLLLL:v should ul Li V Lil . V enitc, cc c to _ai '2.11..12._. C.1 1 _ V L L as LCail U :1L L11r De Authui!Zati=L. 1 L—, O I- 19/6 L. 1 4 g 1 � e V 1 vLi Veity Tustin1 U U L- _ 4 v a=p-Lable to thc ERA but Lb IILA LUIICLItI3P V 1 iC-. UU-,hLI L2 LL ' 1:... 2.3.3 Outreach to State and Local Agencies and Representatives of the Homeless City of Tustin MICAS Tustin Specific pian/Reuse P;2.,-, Page 2-24 =?-36 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description ■ Prior to transfer of the properly by the Fedcral govern:hnent •and p::ar to any interim or permanent reuse of requested facilities or sites. the recipient shall enter into an agreement with and acceptable to the LRA and the Cities of Tustin or Irvine, as appropriate The purpose of the agreement is to: 1) identify the planning goals of the agency rec'eiyin'a property and the City or LRA for the site: 2) identify the scope and schedule for short range improvements and long range develor i:lent plans for the property; 3) establish a process for meaningful consultation on development and operational issues of mutual concern; 4) identify capital infrastructure improvements, roadway and existing utility and new utility right of way and casement dedications (as needed) and environmental impact report mitigation that will be required of the Agency receiving property; 5) identify necessary procedures to implement the agreement; and 6) ensure each recipient aft rn-s its commitment to return any properties not used for the slated purpose directly to the LRA, in the case of property transferred as an Economic Development Conveyance (EDC). ■ Applicant shall agree to not challenge the adequacy of the EIS[EIR for the Plan or the future creation of a Redevelopment Project Area. A. Recommended Applications 1. Orange County (Sheriff"s Department Law Enforcement Training Center): The proposal would establish a small facility which would be educational in nature (no outdoor shooting, driving courses, etc.), including classroom training, office space, obstacle course, gym, locker and shover facilities, canine training, indoor pistol range, laser village and weapons storage. The- Training heTraining Center would consist of Buildings L173 and _#?53 located within the proposed urban Regional Park site to be utilized as classroom buildings and a nearby vacant approximate 10 acre parcel within the Learning Village immediately adjacent to the proposed Armstrong Avenue. Tihe proposal is to be strictly educational in nature and would not pose any negative impact upon surrounding uses. The LRA's approval of this transfer is conditioned upon the following: ■ Standard LRA conditions for transfer nosed above. ■ The LRA would recommend transfer as an EDC transfer to the LRA and then a lease to the applicant, given the small size of this conveyance, or as an alternate a Department of Justice or Department of Education conveyance to the MCAS Tustin Specific Pian'Reuse Pian City Of Tustin October.996 September 1998 P2oe 2-29 Chapter 2 • Plan Descriation applicant. An EDC conveyance will ensure that if the t::'c chanzes it will not be necessat3• to proceed back throe611 the General Services Administration (GSA) disposal process a second time or purchase the remaining life of the conveyance from th-, sponsoring agency. 2. South Oran;e County Community College District (Learning Village) Sad -1 eommtrrrit3-£,nitcgcDist Lt-(Eduratmnni Viffag): ^J- H -I L L South Orange County Community College District (SOCCCD) has the legal authority to own and operate a community college within the Learning Village identiticd on the Reuse Plan. Bccausc of t1heteaC ' IL Ilt L d-rriLxs c 1 11 V J11 ,may 1 V " L 1 1. 1 ,.. 1 LL \.VVL JLlly , c e l 41 LL has ag 1\,1,.11 Lo .1=z ILILU MI G,`1, 11 v L l.hiJ S7ant14Z--uJ1J111 �1�1'L Bistiict __,__._�-J���� mid a 1 f V l 1 y J ,inn %id in LIm .1 1 ✓ Villan. The LRA approved proposal would transfer i-0 �5 approximately 99.7 acres and result in the creation of a unique educational opportunity involving advance education (extension and advanced degree opportunities), vocational training, business incubators, etc. They have also indic2u—d a willingness to accommodate additional educational and Job training opportunities for the homeless as desired by the community as part of the reuse planning effort and to contin•IL, to explore collaborative opportunities with the County She;�;i s Department, and volunteer and community-based organizations. The LRA's approval of this transfer is conditioned on the following: ■ leo direct additional vehicular access to the site on Red Hill Avenue will be permitted. ■ That L. , 11 ,. V V L � l l L. ' V L l and LL Rancilho Santiagog is Lu�flonn as coalition �1- L,. O v1 1 ' l- a%,illllJ KS IthlJl the 'ill gc- 6hapinan Unit-c-isityandOther colleges and college -level programs shall be encouraged to participate by the L. i ' Collegewhen said programs are determined compatible with the business development goals of the VillaEe. ■ The College C-oahtiorrprovides right-of-way easements to the Ciry of Tustin for access to the proposed communizV park site and two day care facilities and easements for City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?;an Page 2-30 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description access to the emergency/transitiorlcil housing site in tl;e Learning, Villane in land closure. ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. 3. Tustin Unified School District (Elementary and High Schools): The TUSD originally requested two 10 acre elementary schools.. a 20 acre middle school site and a 50 acre high school. After LRA discussions with TUSD, TUSD reduced and modified their request to include only the two 10 acre elementary school sites and a. 40 acre high school site to serve larger Tustin cornmunity needs. The LRA has identified concerns regarding timing and financing of the proposed school uses and do not believe the burden for school construction to serve larger community needs should be borne by the MCAS, Tustin project. They would prefer an EDC transfer of at least one elementary school site and the 40 acre high school site -t to the LRA and subsequent LRA transfer to TUSD once adequate funds have been programmed for design and construction of each facility by TU -SD. -As an alternate to an EDC transfer, the LRA would recommend an educational conveyance. The LRA's approval of this transfer is conditioned upon the following: ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. ■ leo direct vehicular access to the site on Redhill Avenue will be permitted. ■ An intended use shall be fully implemented by TUSD by the later of either 5 years from transfer of the property or when building permits are issued for 80% of the new units being proposed in the Reuse Plan within TUSD boundwies, unless a shorter period is mandated by the Federal sponsoring agency. The underlying land use designation of the Reuse Plan would a1low an alternative land use to occur without an amendment to the Reuse/Specific Plan should the District not move fom,ard with their plans to utilize the property within an agreed upon time frame. ■ As part of the agreement required to be entered into between the LRA, the City of Tustin and TUSD, TUSD shall agree not to impose a Mello -Roos Community Facility District on properties within their District boundaries for the MCAS.. Tustin project. The City and LRA will support TUSD's =ase WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Paan City of Tusiin Gel96 September 1998 Paoe 2-31 Chapter 2 • Plan Description IUSD's receipt of redevelopment tax increment, on th.'.ir ::se of cep tificates of participation. general obligation bonds. state fundr.n, etc. S. Count• of Orange Environmental Management A-encv (Urban Regional Park): 84.E acres of the 88 acre Urban Regional Park request from the County of Orange is recom.m nded for approval as part of the regional park. The boundaries of the proposed regional park would include preservation of the nonherly historic blimp hangar for reuse in support of a range of recreational activities and events, if feasible. The County would propose to operate support commercial concession activities to offset maintenance costs. In addition, the park is in close proxinvty to the City of Tustin's proposed conununity ptu-k and is situated to complement other adjacent proposed uses. The City of Tustin City Council has formally adopted a resol utlon (Res. No. 94-20) suppotting the County's submission of an Urban Park proposal to the federal Depautment of Interior. "hire proposal would provide a valuable recreation and open space opportunity, potentially preserve a National Register recognized historic blimp hangar, and would be consistent With the proposed Reuse Pian. 6. County of Orange Animal Control: A request for a four -acre animal control site was made by the County of Orange for a location at the southeast portion of the base. The LRA rejected the request for a four -acre site at the originally requested location but indicated support for an alternative location for the facility provided it was within the boundaries of the regional park. The LR.a's approval of the regional park and animal control proposal is conditioned upon the following: ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. ■ The LRA and City of Tustin agree to permit inclusion of a County of Orange Animal Control facility only within the boundaries of the regional park provided that as pa- of the agreement required to be entered into between the LRA. City of Tustin and County, the County agrees to the follo,virg: • Said facility does not exceed four acres. • The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency and Federal Department of the Interior agrees f.40AiS TusiL7 Specific Alan.'Reuse Pull Cihy 0i l us:/Jl September 1998 Pane 2 33 Chwter 2 • Plan Description ■ Approval of transfer of right-of-way to access the ha:i: (marble Mountain) is limited to a 60 foot widih. :any additional right-of-way determined after sit-, design is completed would need to be acquired by the City of In-ine through standard dedication procedures. S. City of Tustin, Circulation Facilities (257.9 158.4 acres for public right-of-way use): The City of Tustin Reuse Plan proposes extensive additional right-of-way throughout MICAS Tustin. Due to a lack of available traffic capacity on surrounding roadways and the need to extend regional arterial roadways. development and reuse of MCAS Tustin cannot occur without the proposed additional right-of-way system. The site is also in a federal air non -attainment zone which reinforces the need to enhance transportation/circulation facilities in the vicinity to reduce congestion and resulting air quality ernissions. Estimated acreage is based upon planned road%vay widths and lengths and would provide for required streets, curbs and gutters, side«•alks and required bike lanes. Most other necessary infrastructure (sewer, water, etc.) planned for the reuse of the base is to be integrated into the final roadway design prior to construction. The LRA's approval is conditioned: ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. 9. City of Tustin, Storm Drain Facilities: The x--1.8 acres for local storm drain purposes is requested b% the City of Tustin who currently owns and operates smaller storm drain facilities within the community (larger flood control systems are typically owned and operated by the Orange County Flood Control District [OCFCD]). An existing open storm drain exists immediately adjacent to the southerly extension of Jamboree Road near its intersection with Barranca Park\,\?ay. This one lencth of storfn drain has been identified by the community as necessary to support immediate interim uses and long-term development. Because it is located outside of the planned roadway system, a separate public conveyance must be secured. There is a concern that an Economic Development Conveyance may be necessitated due to restrictions on uses of the property by the federal sponsoring agency. The LRA's approval is conditioned upon: MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlReuse Plan 9etobe,=1996 September 1998 ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. City of Tusti:; Pana 2-3S Chapter 2 • Plan Description City of Tustin Page 2-36 10. City of Tustin (35-3.1.1 acres for a Community Park and two neighborhood parks): The City's application proposes the conveyance of approximately 25 acres of existing military recreational fields and facilities for use as a Community Park, including: ■ :'1 recreation center, recreation pavilion, softball field, football field, picnic shelter/barbecue pits, volleyball court, tennis court, basketball court, soccer field, indoor handball cou,-Ls children's playground and physical fitness facility. All ground and support sen ices (i.e. restrooms), infrastructure and personal property necessary for these facilities to function are also included in the request. ■ Existing youth center for youth recreation ■ Existing officers club, NCO club and enlisted club far use as community recreational purposes. ■ All grounds and support services, infrastructure and personal property necessary for the contemplated uses. The City has also requested land area for 2 neighborhood parks of acres each. The Community Park is sited in close proximity to and is intended to support the County of Orange's proposed Urban Regional Park. In addition, the park is also situated adjacent and is intended to support the recreational needs of a Tustin Unified School District elementary school, the community college, and existing and planned residential development on and off MCAS, Tustin. The LRA's approval is conditioned: ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. 11. City of Tustin (5-2-4.3 acres for Day Care/educational use): The City of Tustin has requested the conveyance of two existing day care facilities for development of an Early Learning Center. The facilities would replace the school site previously utilized by the City of Tustin for day care, which was made no longer available due to termination of the lease. The facility would support child care needs of participating individuals participating in programs within the area and provide for opportunities to support the Educational Coalition's proposed teacher development curriculum. 11,C,4S Tustin Specific Paan/Reuse Plan t9otobex ; S September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Given tete small size of this conveyance, the LRA is recommending transfer as an EDC transfer to the LRA o: as an alternative, the normal Department of Education conveyance. An EDC conveyance will ensure that if the use ever changes, it «.ill not be necessary to proceed back through the GSA dspos al process a second time or purchase the remaining life of tae conveyance from the sponsoring agency. The LRA's approval is conditioned: ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. 12. County of Orange Flood Control District (26.7 acres for Flood control and recreational uses): The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) has submitted a proposal to acquire three existing flood control easements located on MCAS T :at:n Property as follows: MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlReuse Plan ^;,`��S September 1998 ■ an approximate 50 foot wide existing flood control ease-ment for Barranca Channel: ■ an approximate 50 foot wide existing flood control eastntert for the Santa Ana/Santa Fe Channel; and ■ an approximate 170-180 foot wide existing flood control easement for Peters Canyon Channel. The County has also requested an approximate 20 foot wide strip for future improvements to Barranca Channel, a 25 foot wide sty p for the Santa Ana -Santa Fe Channel and an approximate 40 foot wide strip for the Peters Canyon Channel. The LRA supports transfer of all existing casements for all channels and the additional 40 foot right-of-way for the Peters Canyon Channel for widening and to support multi -use o:' the channel for a major regional recreational trail and bikevvay. The additional right-of-way 20 and 25 feet right for the Barranca and Santa Ana/Santa Fe channel are not approved at this time because they are not based in quantifiable design information. Rather zhan approving this portion of the conveyance request, the LRA is intending to include in the Plan the requirement that an oer to dedicate be required for the Barranca and Santa Ana/Santa Fe Channel for flood control purposes in the event said right-of-way is needed. This will ensure that negative economic impacts on :he Plan are minimized. y City of T_,s in Paov r -.t7 .—............... —... Chapter 2 • Plan Description "I'hc LRA's approval is conditioned on the ol�,ving: ■ Standard LRA transfer conditions identified above. ■ That the 40-45 foot Casement dedication east of Pc:ers Canyon Channel shall not obstruct any existing prlva:e roadways serving existing housing areas nor alnv utilities serving those housing areas Unless the County is willing to relocate these roads, subject to approval of the City of Tustin. as applicable. 13. County of Orange Social Services Agency - Children's Intermediate Care Shelter (60 -bed facility for abused. neglected children): The application requests 4 acres of land a ea to acconimodate development of a 60 bed Children's I::termediate Care Facility for abused children. The facility would be intended to address a portion of Orangewood capacity/length of stay and crowding problems, thereby having the impact of increasing the facility capacity at Orangewood by 2551c. County would intend to develop the site through selection of a private sector operator resulting in possessory interest property tax. The LRA's approval is conditioned upon: ■ The LRA requests transfer of the prope�zy from BoB- the U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser►pices (HHS) to the LR.A who will provide a no -cost leas,: to the recipient or to the County directly depending upon HHS requirements. ■ If this application does not comply with current terms and conditions normally required for a public conveyance by t -_ U.S.t uifulliall scr HHS, the. LRA will recommend to the Department of Defense that the site be transferred to the LRA as an economic Development Conveyance and then the LRA agree to subsequently lease or transfer the site to the County. In the event the County does not wish to operate the site for the intended purposes identified in their application, the proper iy :s recommended for outright transfer by die Deparment of Education to Saddkback South Orange County Community College to be incorporated into their proposal for an education facility. ■ No direct vehicular access to the site alon? Red I- ill Avenue Chi , of Tustin WAS Tustin Specific Pran,.Reuse Pian Page 2-38 Oe obe`199 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description 1. Orange County Rescue '1'Iission (192 barracks units, ;. 6.1 acre site): The Orangc County Rescue Mission submitted a proposal to convert two, three-story barrack structures near the southeast corner of Valencia and Redhill Avenue for use in serving the emergency housing needs of single men and women. The Rescue Mission has a proven track record for operating successful programs similar to the one proposed for MCAS "Dustin. The program promotes the integration of counseling, education. job training and other devices to ensure that the cvcle of homelessness is ended and that participating individuals can once again becorne productive members of society. The facilities requested are located within an area of the reuse plan previously designated by the task to support the Frnergency/Transitional housing needs of the homeless. Approval is subject to the following conditions: ■ The site location, configuration and actual metes and bounds shall be determined prior to transfer in consultation with the LRA. ■ The LRA requests transfer of the property from DoD to the LRA who will provide a no -cost lease to the recipient. 2. Salvation Army (24 family units): The Salvation Army has proposed to operate 24 existing family housing units as emergency/transitional housing in the :Northeast Housing .Area currently existing at MCAS Tustin. It is estimated that proposal would accommodate approximately 50% of the unsheltered homeless identified in the Tustin and Imine Communities. The Salvation Army operates other similar programs in the County. The proposal would provide emergency/transitional housir.z to homeless families filling an identified need "gap" in the continuum of care approach. The Salvation Army is organizationally and financially capable of providing the service proposed. The LRA's approval is conditioned upon the following* MCAS Tustin Specific Pan/Reuse Plan G,.�figbef 4-99 September 1998 ■ The LRA requests transfer of any property from DoD to the LRA who will provide a no cost lease to the recipient. ■ It is the LRA's intent to request an economic develop_mmt conveyance of existing housing and to work with a private developer to renovate the units and then to lease 24 renovated units to the recipient. The recipient will have all responsibilities for the units except for holding title with the LRA establishing maintenance and management conditions City of T ustin Pace 2-43 — - - i - - --- --T Chapter 2 & Plan Description in the lease which will apply to the units. The LRA viil retain the right to provide to the applicant an equal nurnacr of units elsewhere on the brise or off-site if develormcnt plans require the use of the building=s. In the event, an EDC application is not approved on the existing housing for the LRA, the LRA will identify with agreetnent of the Sak-6071 Army actual building numbers for transfer to the LRA t.:ii lease of the 24 units to the Salvation :army. 3. Oranbe Coast Interfaith Shelter (6 family units): Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter (OCIS) proposes to provide six family un::s of transitional housing located within the northeast Housing Area which could be located in one 6-plex. All units would lie two bedroom units. OCIS owns and operates similar facilities in :hc region and is organizationally and fiscally proven to be sound, competent and capable of operating the proposal. The provision of transitional housing to homeless families would ; 11 -.:i identified need gap in the community's continuum of care approach as identified within its HUD approved Consolida:cd Plan. Also, the program envisions linkages with education.ob training, employment and other services intended to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty. The LRA's approval is conditioned upon the same conditions :or transfer as are discussed with the LRA's approval of the transitionary units for the Salvation Army. 4. Families Forward (formerly Irvine Temporary Housing t14 family units): Families Forward h t ilm Tenn 1 1LJ >;ifffy7equested 13 transitional housing opporrunities for hom:lcss families. The LRA recommended approval of their use of 14 units to be located in one 6-plex, and two 4-plexes. Units are to be dispersed in the Southeast Housing Area at MCAS Tustin (City of Imine). Imine housing currently owns and operates several si:ailar facilities in the City of Irvine. The organization is fiscally and organizationally sound and has shown that they are capable of operating these additional facilities at this time. Although not currently anticipated to be linked to service opportunities proaosed for I ICAS Tustin, Families Forward's progratn does provide educational, housing and vocational training opportunities :o clients to ensure that the cycle of homelessness can be permanently ended and participants provided the tools to once again become contributing members of the community. Also, tie proposal would fill a need "gap" identified by the City of Irvine's City of Tustin MICAS Tustin Specific PiarrReuse ?;gin Page 2-44 Gela6e� 199 September 1998 Chapter 2 * Plan Description in the Very Low to Moderate income category. 40` c or 6`'%c of the total number of existing units would be retained within the ver), low Income category. For newly constructed units, in other new residential neighborhoods proposed in the Reuse Plan specific affordability housing requirements would be established at the time of development project approval to ensure conformity with the Housing Element of the City's General Plan and any provisions of California Community Redevelopment Law (in the event a Redevelopment Project Area is created). ■ With transfer recommended of two child care facilities to the City of Tustin, opportunities will be provided for access for all to main -stream child care facilities on the base and in Irvine (on park site), including early child care and education programs, Head Start, etc. Adult education and training opportunities on -base will be provided at a new Learning Village campus proposed by the Saddlcback South Orange County Community College DistrictJA-I «, ". D. Homeless Service Provider Requests Denied In considering homeless service provider requests, the Housing and State and Local Sub -Committee considered and recommended denial to the Base Closure Task Force of a number of applications based upon their failure to meet one or snore of articulated evaluation criteria discussed in Subsection 2.3.?. The specific reasons for denial for these homeless provider requests are identified in Appendix B. Organization California Paralyzed Veterans Jamboree Housing Onapne County Housing Corporation SBC Community Homeless Coalition Veterans Charities of Orange County Society of St. Vincent de Paul Orange County Development Council City o1 Tustin Page 2-46 Reauest Permanent housing - 100 single family units Transitional housing, affordable renting housing. market rate rental and for -sale housing - 600 units "Bridge Housing" - 30 units Transitional housing - 22 units Transitional housing - 192 bairack units Food distribution Food distribution MCAS Tustin Specific Ran/Reuse Pian O tobe11,99 September 1998 • E LANDS VP • BAR C J 0 a �1 Tuyh�n FACILmES FACILInES m g z Chapter 2 • Plan Description Preferred Conveyance Strategy Parcel Numbers Federal Agency/DOD Uses (1) Education Public Conveyance Park Public Conveyance Health/Human Services Conveyance Highway Public Conveyance Homeless Accomodation Conveyance Potential Economic Development Conveyance ELI MCAS Tustin Boundary Tustin / Irvine Boundary GENERAL NOTES: • See Table 2-3 for aRernative transfer mechanisms. •Sewer, electrical, telephone, gas, water utility systems not shown on this Figure but are assumed to be Health & Human Services, direct sale or an EDC transfer. • For Personal Property see Section 2.3.8. Th s Is a groptic apowdahm of o PbM*Vrerpineetrp concept Final dedgn wMlons rocotlon OW s rpt will be proposed and revlewad M part of arDsequ apprpAls neema b✓ the aspeC agencyw jaLdct . THE PLANNING CENTER Not To Scale WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-3 Ex 4 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Circulation Plan 8 -Lane Major Arterial 6 -Lane Major Arterial Primary Arterial Secondary Arterial Local Collector Street Local Street Existing Bus Stops/Turnout OA Proposed Bus Stops this Is a groohic representation of a plonNngtengineenng concept. Final design solutions (location and saing) will oe proposed am reviewed as pmt of s osequent apmavals needed try the respectiva agency Min P�lotlon. • THE PLANNING CENTER WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Q Proposed Bus Turnouts Dashing or Proposed Signals Grade Separated or Interchange ® Interchange/Overpass Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. yo 7n Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 2-5 1 • • Chapter 2 • Plan Description Regional Bikeway/Trail Concept Plan Tr6 Is a giophlc representatbn of a pbnNng/engheerN concept. Final design sooi Vocation and 4zing) will be focec*ea arW reNawed as pan of subsequent oplenwols needed Oy me mpective • /jo'g�e�nc(v wtln iurlwktion �! THE PLANNING CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Class If - Existing Irvine Class II - Proposed Irvine Sa County Route Number ETC Transition Area/Grade Separated Interchange ® Interchange/Overpass Base Boundary Fj Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel H is along the north side or the channel between Edinger and the Channel. Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 2-6 Class I - Existing- OGp F fLP - Existing GGEWA- OL FF F-9 Class I - Proposed GGE W OCPFFt? Class II Class I - Existing Tustin Class I - Proposed Tustin Tr6 Is a giophlc representatbn of a pbnNng/engheerN concept. Final design sooi Vocation and 4zing) will be focec*ea arW reNawed as pan of subsequent oplenwols needed Oy me mpective • /jo'g�e�nc(v wtln iurlwktion �! THE PLANNING CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Class If - Existing Irvine Class II - Proposed Irvine Sa County Route Number ETC Transition Area/Grade Separated Interchange ® Interchange/Overpass Base Boundary Fj Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel H is along the north side or the channel between Edinger and the Channel. Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 2-6 Class II - Existing GGEWA- OL FF F-9 Class II - Existing Tustin Class II - Proposed Tustin Tr6 Is a giophlc representatbn of a pbnNng/engheerN concept. Final design sooi Vocation and 4zing) will be focec*ea arW reNawed as pan of subsequent oplenwols needed Oy me mpective • /jo'g�e�nc(v wtln iurlwktion �! THE PLANNING CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Class If - Existing Irvine Class II - Proposed Irvine Sa County Route Number ETC Transition Area/Grade Separated Interchange ® Interchange/Overpass Base Boundary Fj Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel H is along the north side or the channel between Edinger and the Channel. Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 2-6 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Iha ij ogwPh�scmremolon no dngl it ce pfcelvxg an.:ePl. Groat aed as soluPan 01 It wqp n and approvals n pe d cy I ed PIW °7y ogencV as Wrl JI 5Up5egUenl pppfGv015 neeoatl W the lesph^Irve • Oga Mh 015tlIC1Un TH. l . THE Not To Scale 00 PlENTER G crirl:R MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-7 Proposed Roadway Existing Domestic Water Mains to Remain Proposed Domestic Water Backbone Connection Point LEIBase Boundary Specific Plan Boundary IrvineRustin Boundary * Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. Iha ij ogwPh�scmremolon no dngl it ce pfcelvxg an.:ePl. Groat aed as soluPan 01 It wqp n and approvals n pe d cy I ed PIW °7y ogencV as Wrl JI 5Up5egUenl pppfGv015 neeoatl W the lesph^Irve • Oga Mh 015tlIC1Un TH. l . THE Not To Scale 00 PlENTER G crirl:R MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-7 L� • Chapter 2 • Plan Description Reclaimed Water Plan Existing Features Proposed Roadway Existing Reclaimed Water U Proposed Reclaimed Water New IRWD Well Site (Exact Location to be Negotiated) Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary Irvineflustin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. 7W is a gfophic fepresenlalion d o alanninglengineenng cane,, .y Final design sclullons (Motion and wing).11 be popos ontl ieNe, a as acid of subsequenl appowls neeoeo by Ine resp -c Iw (a�genncccy wtln p risaiclien. ge • "^� THE Not To S=ale PLANNING CENTER IrTIM MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-8 1sfih �J 2 ExISTH PROPOSE (CSO -7) Chapter 2 • Plan Description • this 6 o graphic representation of a planninglengineering concept. F,nal desgn solutions llccolton 0M songl rdll be poposs and temesvea as pon of subsegwm opprovols neeceb by the resceclive agency with jur ,chon, THE PLANNING U CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlPeuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-9 Proposed Roadway Existing Sewer Proposed Sewer Direction of flow �-�- Base Boundary U Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tusfin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. this 6 o graphic representation of a planninglengineering concept. F,nal desgn solutions llccolton 0M songl rdll be poposs and temesvea as pon of subsegwm opprovols neeceb by the resceclive agency with jur ,chon, THE PLANNING U CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlPeuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-9 IA Chapter 2 • Plan description Storm Drainage Facilities Plan SANTA ANA/SANTA FE CHANNEL (FIO) (REMAIN) AO -of �7�ML ��R - ��/ 9�e,fZ is 9�r,��VALENCLIA Wa �� ?— CHA O' NE • I BARRANCA 102' 63' CHANNEL �I► fTO9REMAIN) 4--772 I I1t _......... I -•_•_-• 1 111 PKWY z EXISTING 72' RCP 25' R.C. z f ARRANCA z (T0 REMAIN) CHANNEL 0 ¢ w CHANNEL w o r F -- Proposed a (TO@EAINI .�J Roadway Existing Storm Drain Proposed Storm Drain Direction of Flow Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary ' Irvine/Tustin Boundary • Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. Figure 2-10 This a of a ping) vjM engino concept gf is lepr i rjn?d sKjn s l loos (lenlalion l onoboy Final tl n s tlogollio Door shingling be proposed r h (eNewea os pan of subsequent opptovcls nsegeo by me resp lw lolunsdicn. agencyiti1p THE PLANNING Not To Scale •III CENTER IMM MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-10 Chapter 2 • Plan Description JProposed Roadway Existing Electricity Proposed Electricity Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary * Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. This a o glopnic representwon or o pianningrengireering concepi. y nWl lesion sotulons (locolion ow sizing) roll be poposea of a4y reviewed as con or subseauenl appovols needed bV the respective ogenay wilh jurisdicfon. • THE Not To S=ale TPLANNING lCENTER MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 2-11 rcp E 4' Chapter 2 • Plan Description Proposed Roadway Existing Gas Proposed Gas r Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary *Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Pe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. i is is a graphic lepreservatirn of a planning/engineering oncepl q, rim design scii Ilccomicn am sizinl'.nn ce proposed ono °7y ,evieweo us pJn ar euosegcenl opprcvals neaoed oy me r?spc Urve agency :mh wu501suon �^ THE Not To Scale (/ PLANCENTER ff PIG FIRI7 CENTE MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City o/ Tustin Figure 2-12 'ER r L_ Chapter 2 • Plan Description Telephone Plan !� Proposed Roadway Existing Telephone rJ Proposed Telephone Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary lint ne/Tustin Boundary • Base boundary along the Santa Ana I Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. This is o graphic lepresentalion No plonningrenoirteering con-_eal. Final design sdulions (bcotion ono wing] MI be proposed and reYieveo as part of sul>sepvenl approvals needed by the respective agency will, jWSdiclian. (%-1 THE (, PLANNING L'U CENTER WAS Tustin Specific PlanlReuse Plan n4 Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 2-13 Chapter 2 • Plan Description �I�1 Proposed Roadway U Existing Cable Television Proposed Cable Television Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary * Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel This is a gromic teatesenlalion of a panrtitglenglrweting concept Fetal desgn sdNpns (focalion am sizing) still be ploposee am reVW_ W as We of sub uenl apptavals neeae1 Cy the les[P_CINe ogency.Nh Iutisdiclion. 0 M�-1• THE PLANNING Ii CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlReuse Plan N Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 2-14 Chapier 2 • Plan Description North Loop Road, South Loop Road & Armstrong Avenue Streetscape - B Informal placement of flowering deciduous trees (ie. Jacaranda trees) [8' meandering sidewalk (both sides) for Armstrong Avenue _ 5' meandering sidewalk (both sides) for North & South Loop Road 4 0 o - /yyr� Landscape setback 20' Arnmhc v >k 38' I 38' 8' 76' 20' miZ' --2--R.0.W. 30 Ni I' Notes: 1) A sidewalk easement and lands=e maintenance agreement must be recorded when sLjdewalks occur outside of street right-of-way 2) A ` foot sidewalk width is required when sidewalks extend to the curb at intersections 1H_ alone major anerials CENTER � �����etn ti��6�-�, ��<r;FS -Cti cnm 1TV`'461( 6lE MCAS Tustin Spea` is PI?n/.,Reuse Plan City of Tustin Fioure 2-23 Landscape setba( Chaper 2 • Plan Description Armstrong Avenue Streetscape - A & West Connector Streetscape Irf, shrubs, and / groundcover formal placement of -ergreen trees Notes: 1) A sidewalk easement and landscape maintenance agreement must be recorded when sidewalks occur outside of street right-of-way 2) AA foot sidewalk width is required when sidewalks extend to the curb at intersections along major a zerials 9 (+ ir= Med,4lkt µfid, %rav'c5, -j ypyv �2� �1 ' '� ptGGOLtI'l j �✓ MA PLANNING dDllplc l�=f' -�urin �an:5 ai" l�+u�5CG�1G�7 s UV cEh-R MCAS Tustin Specific P!an;Re--se Paan City .,` ;;;s:i:, �iojre 2-24 r -- Chepfer 2 • Plan Description East Connector Streetscape Turf, shrubs, and / or groundcover rmal placement rgreen trees Notes: 1) A sidewalk easement and landscape maintenance agreement must be recorded when sidewalks occur outside of street right-of-way 2) A ` 'foot sidewalk width is required when sidewalks extend to the curb at intersections along major arterials l�lt/(�ay� wiP;'� vim► -.CS rCw� �2-Z<{� f1 acc--o vl,l �r d0µ1 c �',,�THE =vm akie5 at te , onS . PLANNING L''l.) CENTER MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reusz- Plan Ciy of Figure 2-25 C7apt,ar 2 • Plan Description Redhill Avenue Edge Streetscape B Northbound from Barranca Parkway to Valencia Avenue Broad dome tree ; �zp T-14' 5' Meandering sidewalk Class 11 bikeway 1 56' _ 72' 1/2 R.O.W. Upright vertical tree* Small broad dome tree A 8'1 PIL 9 I I i 50'*• j Landscape setback' ' Palm is an exam 'ole o:iiy " A sldewc'i: c3.-),-,4landsc:cp mci;`..erionce a eameni must be recorded when sidewaks occur oU'siO�e of s.reei rio ri-'o`.-way. Noyes: Medi n ^ ,^ vG'y from 14'1:) %=' G. cari-in locations iG account for douole (ones o.I ,,.e'S3clG^s 21 A nine foo. si;,e%vGlk wid i is :iced when skew cIks exiend to the curb at iniersc T1071s olonc r Tcior or eri---;s Jj Landscape seiback is r necsU'e:- fr0rn cUro face corresoondina 70 Ulti G -,e rlgili-Oi-way .' TH= � CENTER PLANNING NTR �rVi� i✓CAS Tusiir^ S.oec rriC Flan Ci.T Of ii,;siih FoUre 2-M,, Cnapier 2 • Plan Description Edinger Avenue Edge Streetscape C rom Jamboree Road to Harvard Avenue Small broad dome tree Small broad dome tree -\ Upright vertical tree Upright vertical tree \ 9' meandering % {� 9' sidewalk with sidewalk * „ tree well at intervals L' p 4j", Class II bikeway \ Class II bikeway $ ` AL -§L1 (varies)^ -7' 18' 1 RL dL � 9' (varies) 61' to 51.66' 51' I 9' varies 70' to 60.66 R.O.W. 60' R.O.W. 30' ** I (North) (South) I 26"** Ir Landscape setback Landscape setback Sidewalk may be at curb or meonder A sidewalk and landscape mainienance ogree . ie'r must be recorded when sidewo:ks occur outside of street right.-o`-woy Based on ex?sting development tiotes: 1) Tian cavi vary from 14'10 2=' at cerain locutions c account for doubie left turn lanes at intersections 2) A nine foot sidewalk width is r-aquired when sicewoliks exsend to the curb at. in terse ctlo :s along mclor arterials R00CNERV MCAS Tustin Specific Alan/Reuse Plan Ci,y of Pioure 2- Existing channel & proposed R.C. Box - Shall broad dome tree I� I RL Cnapler 2 • Plan Description Barranca Parkway Edge Streetscape A Eastbound from Redhill Avenue to Approx. 500' East of Von Karman -'—Upright vertical tree v� �_class 12 curve linearII bike trail 6' sidewalk Varies 12' 5' 11o' ! -� I' min. R.O.W. L 30' Existing median J 1� I 30' 1 Landscape setback ;r' City of Tustin IE City of Irvine I I Notes: i -y 1) Median con vary from +-4- iO=G-Ct certain locations to account for double left U. -i lanes of in.te:secfions. 2) A nine foot sidewalk widen iS reaui:= �+ when sidewalks exrend fo the curb cf intersections along mora arferials. 31 Any placement of frees, S^iciires or improvements wi�.;in the OCFCD rignt-of-w_-:y would be subject TO OCFCD ooprovo!. Ir the event that perimeter trees cre not pe:mined by OC=C.-D, the CIl/ : 'I :v reouire an a"ern -the uprig' it Tee specimen Cs peiimerer property T. ne nt on private popery immeaicTety nOrPh Of �e OCFCD right-of-way ro creaie C cons:Sie^i Ia�CscCae perlme-e: is -o"n ent. ) Ad ernaie S_ -Ions may be c;Ji:lalzed by 'he rusii; i 'Jbiic WoMS DepC,irn-X)f. Si ;ewa!ks ., :rl be a: cu` o: m=onder. A sidewalk crid malntenonce a-m—e-me.". must be recorded if SidewO!r,S or -tie Class I bike trail occur O-_: side of a le street rig,-;. -of -way. 1 Lancsccoir shown is conceo,joi. Ine ociuoi wic,h of the lonc4sc ootid Sethock is dere=,'ned by C•hopie: 3 of the h/F..,,=AS I_,�iM.S,.Decclfic Pion/Rel-ISS aW,V,1H- ?LANNIN: %.#T -,P CENTER dL !,,,'(,-AS Tush.', Specific Ran.lPe:.se P;'an C;:✓ ✓i Tus:i- ^! " x-32_ Small broad dome tree - Chapter 2 • Plan Description Barranca Parkway Edge Streetscape B Eastbound from Approx. 500' East of Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Road Upright vertical tree "v- �- 12' curve linear class I bike trail 6' sidewalk Varies 112' i 5' 6' 30" Amin. Landscape setback I -g�- so' "I P/A 2- -3-T I 30' ity of Tustin City of Irvine T I I�— Existing median w Notes: 14 ` i ) Median can vary fia'n ;1 to mot ceroin locations to occount for double ley i„ rn i lanes (:,-. imersec5ons. 2) A ni.1le toot sidewalk wicIfth :s required when sidew--!Lz exend to the cj.b Ci I ie:s?: icn5 along major arced„ Is. 3) Alternrr"ie secitcns may be c 3i lc.Lzed by the lusiln ?j lic Works Depo inie it. 4) Sidewalks con. be at caro or. .-ne✓nder. A sidewalk londscooe mcintenance aa_ eeme ,' must be recorded it sidewalks cr Lle Class I bike troil occur ol.Rside of tne street ricnrof-W-h'. 5) LandscoPing snowy t is conce.pTJcl. The actual wici of me- Iendsca.pewd Sc'aeck :s de7e rn- ' led by Cha:,ter 3 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Pian/Reuse Plop. THE PLANNING; CENT, 'c1 I✓'Cn$ IC'Si%I] $�eC%T ?'an/Reuse ,"an Dry of ITC's:+. ?rCur e 2-322 - -T. .... — .. . _... _ .. . _..T ChaI,ter 2 • Phm 1)escr'il)tiun Table 2-3 l LRA RECOMMENDED PROPERTY DISPOSAL STRATEGY/CONVEYANCE METHODS Planning Parcel Recommended Acreage Recommended Preferred Transfer Allerrralive Transfer Area No. Recipient Proposed Use LPurpose for Transfer (gross) Mechanism Mecham.sm 1 Comments FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AGENCIES 18 9 N/A Armed Services Center/Military N/A 16.7 JEDC DoD Transfer STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES 1-A 1 6nddlebnek Learning Village/Jr. College Education 99.7 DOE- Decd transfer LDC Pursuant to L HA South Orarryo conditions of Approval courtly Community College District Tustin Unified Public Schools Education DOE Deed transfer Pursuant to LRA School District Conditions of Approva 1-A 17 1 High School 40.0 EDC 8 21 1 K-6 School 10.0 DOE 15-0 31 1 K-6 School 10.0 EDC 60.0 County of Orange Sheriff's Department Law Education EDC DOE/DOJ Deed transfer Pursuant to LRA Enforcement Training Facility Conditions of Approval- 1-B 2 10.0 Bldg. 173, 253 arc 2A Bldg. 173,253 included in Courtly Regional Nark tra; sfer and are not a Separate disposal parcel 1-C 20 County of Orange 60 -Bed facility for Abused, Special Services 4.0 1-I11S transfer to LRA EDC or DOE Pursuant to LRA Social Services Abandoned, Neglected Children and LRA lease to (Saddleback if Condilioi;s of A , ,;oval Agency provider or to County wilhdrawn by the it of Orange Count 1-D 19 City of Tustin Day Care Education 4.3 EDC DOE Deed transler Pursuant W LRA 1-r: Condiliors of Altp:cr:,a City of lustin Parks Park and Recreation EUC Pursuant to LHA �I 2 22 Conditions of Approval i 2.4.1 DOI Deed transfer 15-A 32 5.0 EDC 15-0 30 5.0 EDC II 6 18 Counly of Orange Urban Regional I'ark Park and Recrcalion 84.5 DOI Deed transfer LUC Pursuant to LRA II Environmental Condit ons of Apfr;;::;tl it h9anagentertl Animal Conl;ul Facility Public Facility 4 Acres within the 84.5 11115/001 Deed Ac erre acre ,ark silC tr,n:ICr Ij WAS Tu'. xilic 111ali lease Plan )1 lustitI Oet'ober—i _,r Sepleber 1998 rage 2-51 Chapter L) • Plan Description Table 2-3 LRA RECOMMENDED PROPERTY DISPOSAL STRATEGY/CONVEYANCE METNOUS Planning Parcel Recommended Acreage Recontnrended Preferred Transfer Alternative Translcr 1 Area No. Recipient Proposed Use Purpose forTranslcr (gross) Mechanism Mechanism Comments J 22 39 Irvine Unified Public K-8 School Education 20.0 DOE Deed transfer EDC Pursuant to LRA School District Conditions of Approval 22 38 City of hvine Public Park/Marble Mountain lransportalion/Park and 8.8 DOI-Park/Recreation EDC Pursuant to LRA Road Recreation Deed transfer Conditions of Approval N/A 40 City of Tustin Circulation Facilities Transportation 157.6 FHWA Trans. Deed EDC Pursuant to LRA transfer Conditions of Approval N/A 42 City of Tustin Storm Drain Facilities Public Facilities 1.8 HHS Deed transler EDC Pursuant to LRA Conditions of Approval N/A 41 Courtly, of Orange 1. Transfer of deed to existing Public Facilities and 26.7 HHS/D01 Deed EDC Pursuant to LRA Flood Conhol Barranca, Santa Fe, and Park and Recreation transfer Conditions of Approval District Peters Canyon Channel easellleflls. 2. Transfer of additional 40'- 45' wide right-of-way along Peters Canyon Channel. HOMELESS PROVIDERS 3 3 LRA/Orange Ernergency/Transilional housing Homeless 5.1 DOD transfer to LRA EDC Pursuant to LRA County Rescue for single men and women. accommodation and LRA lease to Conditions of Approval Mission provider 21 34' LRA/Salvation Emergency shelter and I lomeless Acreage TBD (24 family DOD transfer to LRA EDC Pursuant to LRA 21 35' Anny transitional housing for accommodation units) and LRA lease to Condiilons of Approval individuals and families. provider 21 34' LRNOrange Transitional housing for Ilorneless Acreage TBD (6 family DOD transfer to LRA EDC Pursuant to LRA 21 35' Coast Interfaith homeless families. accommodation units) arid LRA lease to Conditions of Approval Sheller provider 7.1 34' LfiNUOVE lransilional housing for Homeless Acreage. TBU (6 fancily DOD transfer to LRA EDC Pursuant to L.HA 21 35' housing homeless families. accommodation units) arid LRA lease to Conditions of Approval provider City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlReuse Plan Page 2-52 ©etobeF4996 September 1998 ('Ii.mic;r 2 0 Phm Dem-rir►liun Table 2-3 LRA RECOMMENDED PROPERTY DISPOSAL STRATEGY/CONVEYANCE METHODS P/arrrring Area Parcel No. Recommended I Recipient I Proposed Use Purpose Acreage Recommended for Transfer (gross) Preferred Transfer Mechanism Alternative Transfer Mechanism 1 Comments 22 37' LRA/Farnilies Forward (Irvine lemimmy nvusin Transitional housing for homeless families. Homeless accommodation Acrcagc TBD (14 family units) DOD transfer to LRA and LRA lease or deed transfer to provider EDC Pursuant to LRA Conditions of Ap,noval � OTHER DISPOSAL STRATEGIES 4 23 LRA Residential Housing 54.2 EDC Negotiated sale 5 24 LRA Residential Housing 51.7 EDC Negotiated sale 7 25 LRA Village Services Commercial 20.7 EDC Competitive n►t)lic sale I j 8 13, 15,16 LRA Community Core Commercial Business, Residential 185.2 EDC Competitive public sale I 9 4 LRA Commercial Business Commercial Business 10.4 EDC Compelitive public sale, 10 5 LI1A Commercial Business Commercial Business 22.9 EDC Cor;►pcUlive, public s;r:e, 11 6 LRA Commercial Business Commercial Business 78.5 EDC Com elitive public sale t 12 7 LRA Commercial Business Commercial Business 8.4 EDC Competitive public sale 13 1 14 LRA Commercial Business Commercial Business 43.7 EDC Competitive public sale 14 8 LRA Commercial Business Commercial Business 54.0 EDC Competitive public sale 15-A thru 15-E 26, 27, 28,29 LRA Golf Village Golf course, commercial, residential 255.4 EDC Competilive public sale 16 12 LRA Commercial Business Commercial Business 31.0 EDC Competitive public sale 17 10 LI3A Commercial Business Comrnercial Business 16.3 EDC Cornpetilive public sale 19 11 LRA Commercial Commercial Business 38.G EDC Corn elil,vc ublic sale MCAS Tus" cilic Plan/Reuse Plan V Tustin October—? -,eptember 1998 ige 2-53 lw of VA ' ` V U --r-- ----. .. _- . ... -- T .. . _ . _ . .. ....- - ----- - q an C�L� U ` Lo U ZZ w CL C3 ci y Lzz U rC.) f• Q U) U C I J U - 6 _ 2 u = o ow - zz - J o ctz c J Cl O O O U O + O o Cl O U y L, Vy O ^ C] 2 f 3 rJ r rr rJ ^ C.1 —_ "Z 7 U _-xO —� O U ;OJ 'J 7 U U U U 0 U 0 O G' - `T 7 �' �.- 0 0 w w w w L� v a w V N J N O N > > rJ O O U N — _ (O cz42 r = j d r U U U U cz w w > C. C3 > O CJ v O 7 G� N _ .7 TJ v w -D In �. U (y O > -_ _ .7 ca y v v r' N C� ti N a� v N Ncz v N v c• N rJ C3 rV F E o+�N a2= a� a a(' C U J U ZZ n Z n Za Zd O ZC m LnIn ry In m rNS M U 7 _U O _ C. -0 d 0 0 0 p c/7 a a a c7 C w LU] O w D I w w C.) Z v Z � Z 2 2 W V b v O � .z co Q Q < < E Om Lri •� Z Z Z Z Z :7 N m (7 N C ca O ` O N C Q O y v ro r ti CO) v v v v v Q Q Q <\ 3 ?? :2 V j N W N 0 N C.) N N O cc C O LU 2 pl .N j E O _0 Fa a N v — 7 :2 :2 J V N -..� C3 = w = N w i- C7 aO L O U < 4<< d J J r ~ < < < ~ J ycc MM --i J ci_ - - Z co m c Q < < C< W C N C C N N N N i --r-- ----. .. _- . ... -- T .. . _ . _ . .. ....- - ----- - q an C�L� U ` Lo U ZZ w CL C3 ci y Lzz U rC.) f• Q U) U C Chapter 2 • Plan Description 7. Private Street: Private streets will also be permitted and standards for their construction will be identified in the Plan. Private streets include existing streets serving existing developments as well as future streets for proposed development areas. Major and secondary arterial intersections should be designed to maximize capacity. Design features may include the need for additional right-of-way to accommodate dual left -had turn lees and designated ri`ht-turn lanes. Lane geometry for the niaJor intersections in the Specific Plan can be found in the Base Reuse Traffic Report, Appendixed to the EIS/EIR. In certain instances, it may be desirable to incorporate variations to the standard cross-sections for certain roadways or sections of roadways to satisfy intersection capacity requirements, or create visual identity and landscaping opportunities. Such variations Nvotlld be subject to approval of the Tustin or Irvine City Engineer, as applicable. An off -center or non -symmetrical design may be appropriate where conditions are different on opposite sides of the highway, par�icularly with respect to such factors as the adjacent land uses, sidewalk and landscape treatment, parkin; lanes, utilities, and bikeways. The roadways of the Specific Plan are classified as follows and shown on the Circulation Plan (Figure 2-5). B. Specific Plan Roadways 1. Major :'arterials - Eight Lanes a) Jamboree Road - Jamboree Road is classified as an eight -lane major arterial from the SCRRA/OCT.-k Railroad, north of Edinger Avenue, to Barranca Parkway. Jamboree Road, in this zone forms the transition area for the southerly terminus of the west ICE of the Eastern Transportation Corridor (ETC). Current plans include construction of a grade - separated interchange at Edinger Avenue which is currently under construction dic_'g, a ILAMne grade scixuationvPark%iaN. Consistent with its character as the Transition Area for the west leg of the ETC, sidewalks and bicvcle- lanes will be eliminated along this portion of the roadway. WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustil $efobef-1 September 1998 Paoe 2-61 MCAS Tustin Specific Pani; cause Pian ^e`v-caner 1199 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description b) Redhill Avenue The long range plan for Redhill Avenue calls for tie improvement of the roadway to eight lanes betiveen Barranca Parkway and Falencia with Class II bicycle lanes as part of mitigation improvements for the Irvine Business Center (IBC) project in the City of Irvine. The City of Tustin will request a public conveyance along the east side of Redhill Avenue between intersections of typically 22 feet (this may vary depending upon the location of existing buildings and structures on the Base with reuse potential that would be impacted by the future right -of -w. y). Additional conveyances may be required at intersections to accommodate necessary improvements. C) Barranca Parkway Barranca Parkway is an existing six -lane facility. The City of Irvine General Plan calls for the widening of Barranca Parkway to an eight -lane facility adjacent to the base. It appears that sufficient right-of-way exists between existing street right-of-way and OCFCD right-of-way such that additional tight -of -way will not be required to accommodate future widening frart Redhill Avenue to Von Karman Avenue bet%V1_;M intersections. However, additional ri,ht-of-way "ill need to be requested as a public conveyance of typically 24 feet to accommodate the widening from Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Road and from Peter's Canyon Channel to Harvard Avenue. Additional conveyances may be required at intersections from Redhill Avenue to Jamboree to accommodate intersection improvements. 2. Major Arterials - Six Lanes a) Tustin Ranch Road Tustin Ranch Road is classified as a major arte:�al from Edinger Avenue to Barranca Parkway, including an interchange at Edinger Avenue. There are eight sm interchange alternatives under consideration by tie ..... - -- City of T.-sth Paoe 2-55 Chapter 2 • Plan Description w'• City of Tustin including a double loop Interchan;:c, and an urban -arterial interchange. All current intersection alternatives are ,rade separated. The Circulation Plan also shows two alignments for Tustin Ranch Road from Valencia North Loop Road to NVarner Avenue. The reason is due to the location of the existing southerly blimp hanger (Hanger 4C). The final alignment of Tustin Ranch Road will be established once the disposition of the blimp banger is determined. b) Warner Avenue Wat-rer Avenue is classified as a major arterial facility with six lanes from Redhill Avenue to Valencia Soutll Loop Road. There are two alignments currently beim_ proposed for this segment of NVarner Avenue. Sirni'.'.r to Tustin Ranch Road, the reason for the two alignments is the existing southerly blimp hanger. If the blimp hanger is removed, NVarner Avenue can continue on a curvilinear alignment to Jamboree. If the blimp hanger remains in place, `'earner Avenue will have to be aligned southerly to Tustin Rancli Road. This would not be the preferred alignment, since two intersections of Warner Avenue with Tustin Ranch Road would be created. `'Varner .Avenue is classified as a primary arterial from Valencia Sou --'i Loop Road to Harvard with four travel lanes and Class II bicycle lanes. C) Edinger Avenue The long range plan for Edinger Avenue calls for the improvement of the roadway to Major .Arterial standards. The City of Tustin will request approximately six feet of right-of-way along the south side of Edinger Avenue from approximately 1.300 feet east of Redhill Avenue to approximately 2.400 feet west of Jamboree Road as a public conveyance. Additional conveyances may be required at intersections to accommodate necessary Improvements. City of Tustin Ma4S Tustin Specific Pla,,7,'Reuse ?age 2-66 9-_tebff" September 1998 .' % Chapter 2 • Plan Description 3. Primary Arterial a) Warner Avenue Warner Avenue is classified as a Primary Anzerial from Valencia South Loop Road to Harvard Avenue with four travel lanes and Class Il bicycle lanes. b) Harvard Avenue Harvard Avenue is classified as a Primary Arterial from Edinger Avenue to Barranca Parkway. It is anticipated that the site may need to dedicate right-of- way to accommodate the widening of intersecting streets and an additional five feet along the west side of Harvard Avenue within the City of Tustin to accommodate sidewalks. 4. Secondary Arterial a) Valencia North and South Loop Road Valencia North and South Loop Road is classified as a Secondary Arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and Class II bike lanes. Valencia 'North Loop Road starts at Redhill Avenue and extends to Warner Avenue. South Loop Road extends from Warner Avenue to Armstrong Avenue. b) Armstrong Avenue Armstrong Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and Class II bike lanes from Barranca Parkway to Valencia North Loop Road. C) West Connector The West Connector is classified as a Secondary Arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and Class II bike lanes from Edinger Avenue to Valencia ;North Loop Road. The West Connector is the roadway located west of Tustin Ranch Road. MCAS Tustin Specific PlanlReuse Plan City of Tus in ^ertebef 1990 September 1998 age 2-67 Chapter 2 • Plan Description d) liarvard Avenue Harvard Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial from Edinger to the railroad right-of-way. e) East Connector The Last Connector is proposed to be classified as a Secondary Arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and Class II bike lanes from Edinger Avenue to Valencia North Loop Road. 'The East Connector is the roadway located East of Tustin Ranch Road. 5. Local Collector a) Moffett Avenue Moffett Avenue is classified as a Local Collector Street with two travel lanes (one in each direction) and sidewalks from Harvard Avenue to Valencia North Loop Road. b) Marble Mountain Road Marble Mountain Road is an existing local street that has an existing right-of-way width of 60 feet v;•ith 2 travel lanes (one in each direction) and sidewalks. It is the City of Irvine's intention to widen the existing right-of-way to local collector standards. The street provides access to the existing base housing (south of Varner Avenue and between Peters Canyon Channel and Harvard Avenue) and will also provide access to the future neighborhood nark and school. 6, Local Street a) Landsdowne Road and Severyns Road Landsdowne Road and Severyrts Road are existing streets that will be improved to Public Street standards that will connect to Valencia :North and South Loop Road and will provide access to the Learning Village, the Community Park, future housing, as well as the existing base housing (Tustin Villas neighborhood). City o; Tustin [ACAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Page 2-58 Oeiaber-moo September 1998 MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan ^c'�9S September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description The right-of-way width will be 60 feet which inc'uc;es two travel lanes (one in each direction) and sidewa-M. b) Other Potential Local Streets Although not shown on Figure 2-5, the City of Irvine may desire the installation of a local street cornect:ng \Varner Avenue with the City of Irvine neig=hborhood located north of `'Varner Avenue, if feasible. 7: Arterial Right -of -Way Dedication a) Redhill Avenue The long ranee plan for Redhill Avenue calls for the improvement of the roadway to eight lanes between Barranea and Valencia with Class II bicycle lanes. The base will be required to dedicate typically 22 feet of right-of-way along the cast side of Redhill Avenue. b) Edinger Avenue The long range plan for Edinger Avenue calls for the improvement of the roadway to six lanes. The lase will be required to dedicate typically six feet of rizcht- of-way along the south side of Edinger Avenue. C) Jamboree Road Jamboree is an existing six lane facility bisecting the Plan area, and will ultimately be widened to eight lanes. There are two major projects that w•il be required along this section of roadway. An urban interchange is underovsimr-construction at City of TL -sin Pac.z 2-59 ---- I . --. .. . T -. ._..1 - Chapter 2 • Plan Description Edinger Avenue and the widening of Jamboree Road between Moffett and Barranca is currently being designed by "ICA. a mmade.. ;rCa"C': ;�; Bmanca Pmkrray. The base will be required to dedicate any necessary right-of-way for these projects. as well as accommodate the rizltt-of-way needed. if any, for expansion to an eight lane facility. d) Barranca Parkway Barranca Parkway is an existing six lane facility which will be an eight lane facility adjacent to trill base. The north side of Barranca Parkway will need to be improved including improvement of the Barranca Channel. The base will be required to dedicate any required right-of-way to aecomtnod,,c the improvements. e) Harvard Avenue Harvard Avenue is an existing four lane facility which will need spot widening and improvements along the west side. The base will be required to dedicate any required right-of-way necessary to accommodate the improvements. 8. Private Street Standards The following private street standards are applicable will: n the City of Tustin. Within Irvine, the City of In•ine's roadway standards shall apply. a) Private Streets • Private streets for attached and detached residential dwellings with no parallel parkin., within the travel way shall have a minimum paved width of 28 feet. • Private streets for attached and detached dwellings where on -street parallel parking will be limited to one side only shall have a minimum paved width of _32 feet. City of Tustin MuI 4S Tustin Specific Pian;'Reuse Page 2-70 robe, 99 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description The Recreational Bikeway/Trail Concept Plan provides an opportunity to complete vital links necessary for a comprehensive regional system as well as improved local system. There are three planning agencies involved in the implementation and maintenance of the bikeway/trail system for the Plan and adjacent areas: the City of Tustin, Orange County i ,,n�::� i ; , _ -Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD), and the City of Irvine. Each of these agencies have developed their own recreational bikeway and trail master plan to efficiently move cyclists within the respective cotrununities served. Ongoing interagency coordination will be required to address the issues associated with bikeway and trail implementation. The Recreational Bikeway/Trail Concept Plan calls for Class IT (on -road) bikeways on each of the Specific Plan road rays, as shown in FiVaure 2-6 The Class H system will provide a valuable link to the overall regional system as well as ensure bicycle linkages between uses within the Plan. The Class H bikeway standards a -re consistent with the City of Tustin General Plan, and are shown in Table 2-4 below. In addition to bikeways, development of non- residential land uses may involve the provision of bicycle facilities, where appropriate, in accordance with the City's Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance. These facilities may include bicycle racks or parking facilities. and shower and locker room facilities. The Recreation Bikeway/Trail Concept Plan links to adjacent on- and off- road bikeways/trails as identified in Figure 2-6. These facilities are part of a local and regional network planned by the City of Tustin, County of Orange and City of Irvine. 2.6.1 City of Tustin Bikeways The Tustin General Plan dated February 1994, proposes three Class 11 bikeways in the immediate Plan area, one facility on Valencia Avenue from Redhill Avenue to Newport Avenue, extension of the Edinger Avenue bikeway from Redlull Avenue to 'Newport Avenue, and Tustin Ranch Road bikeway from Walnut Avenue to Edinger Avenue. In addition, the General Plan follows the County's Master Plan for a proposed Class H bike route on Redhill Avenue and a Class I bikeway/trail on Barranca Parkway. The Plan also proposes to remove the existing Class H on Jamboree Road north of Edinger Avenue to just south of I-5. This is consistent with the County Master Plan of Commuter Bikeways and the immediate plans to upgrade this roadway to an eight -lane highway by the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan 9efober=1936 September 1998 City of Tustin Page 2-77 Chapter 2 • Plan Description ■ Route 53: Connect the Class II bikeway on Redhill .-venue at Barranca Parkway to Bryan Avenue. ■ Route 64: Connect the Class II bikevk•ay on Von Karinian Avenues Fustin Ranch Road at Barranca Parkway to NValnut Avenue. ■ Route 40: Develop a Regional Riding/Hiking and Bicycle Trail along Peters Canyon Wash. Grade separated trail crossings would be expected for this route at each arterial crossing for the Class I bikeway and Regional Riding/Hiking Trail. ■ Route 60: Connect to Route 40 by extending Route 60's Class I facility to Peters Canyon Wash along Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Railroad right-of-way. ■ Route 58: Develop a Class I trail along Barranca Parkway in coordination with the Cities of Tustin and Irvine. The Class I trail will connect the trail system on Barranca Parkv.'ay with San Diego Creek Channel trail. In addition, eeE�::kOCPFRD is working with Orans?e County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to develop a proposed Master Plan of Countywide Commuter Bikeways. Generally, this plan is centered on developing and refining a comprehensive commuter -oriented bikeway system. OCTA is currently circulating a draft of this plan to the cities for review. It is both the City of Tustin's and City of Irvine's positions that they will not provide funding for riding and hiking trail improvements. Tustin and Irvine will instead concentrate on bikeway and pedestrian trails due to the fact such trails will have significantly greater use than riding and 'hiking trails. 2.6.3 City of Irvine Bikeways The City of Irvine's existing Class II bikeway network is fully developed ;n the immediate area of the Plan. However. «Varner Avenue and Moffett Avenue east of Harvard Avenue have the potential to add to the Class II system. A proposed Regional Trail along Peters Canyon «Yash as well as potions of the base bikeways and trails located within the City of Irvine are dependent upon the availability of funding. MCAIS Tustin Specific Paan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin ���e,—'Cr September 1998 Pace 2-81 Chapter 2 • Plan Description facilities, as %yell as passive open space areas. :'ancillary structures, such as restrooms, will also be permitted. Pedestrian and bicycle access will also be provided to surrounding residential areas. The parks in Tustin are estimated on the Land Use Plan Summary as five (5) acres each. The minimum neighborhood park size is three (3) acres per City of Tustin standards. The final location, size, and configuration will be determined prior to final subdivision map approval. The neighborhood park in the City of Irvine will be located adjacent to a planned elementary (K-8) grade school, in the southeastern corner of the Plan. The park may contain active recreation facilities, similar to those described above for the Tustin parks and may also include child care facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle access to surrounding residential areas will also be provided. The park is estimated on the Land Use Plan as eight acres in size. 2.7.2 Community Park The Specific Plan provides for a 32-55-24.1 acre community park located in the northwestern portion of the Plan area, adjacent to housing, the Learning Village, and a proposed elementary school site. The community park will be owned, operated and maintained by the City of Tustin. The park will include the reuse of many existing recreation facilities, particularly ballfields. Upon completion, the community park will contain a wide range of recreational facilities including softball, football, soccer, tennis, basketball, racquetball, and volleyball facilities. Thep ark, will also contain picnic areas, community center buildings, multi-purpose rooms, and supporting uses. The community park is intended to serve an approximate population of 10,000 residents. which will include the Plan area as well as a sianiticant number of households in the southern and western portions of Tustin. 2.7.3 Urban Regional Park A significant open space and cultural amenity within the Plan will be an 84.5 acre urban regional park to be owned, operated and maintained by the County of Orange, Harbors, Beaches and Parks. If financially feasible to preserve, the landmark wooden blimp hanger will be the focal point of the park. "I'he hangar is listed on thcNational Register of Historic Buildings and measures 1,088 feet in length, 297 feet in width, and 178 feet in height. The federal Section 106 process requires consultation with the State Office of Historic Preservation to establish mitigation measures, including the possibility of providing an interpretive center in the park, if the hangar is not retained. In either event, the park will have an historic emphasis overall, and include MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Paan 8etaber-1-99c September 1998 City of Tustin Page 2-83 Chapter 2 • Plan Description ?,3_,S_C.I3_0SW,S outdoor recreation and the adaptive reuse of a number of existing buildings. The park is in close proximity to the community park and is situated to support and complement other adjacent proposed uses. The park may also contain general purpose turf areas, extensive tree forestation, ballfields. meandering paths for walking and bicycling, tot lots. couns for basketball, volleyball, and tennis and commercial recreational uses and concessions. Existing buildings within the park site will be reused to provide park programs, recreational classes, training, educational and interpretive programs, park maintenance/administration, park ranger office, snack bar, children's playhouse, and garage facility. 2.7.4 , Golf Course The Specific Plan/Reuse Plan will include an 18 -hole publicly accessible golf course as part of the Golf Village. Located in the northern quadrant of the Plan area, the golf course will be the focus of a master planned development that "-ill include new residential enclaves and a tourist and business -serving hotel complex. It is anticipated that the golf course -vvould be developed and owned by a private operator and may include a driving range, golf school, and club house. The golf course should also be designed to provide viev� windows from adjacent roadways and trails. Four school sites are reserved on the Land Use Plan to accommodate the student population growth estimated by the affected school districts in Tustin and Irvine. The location, size, and configuration on the Land Use Plan is generalized. The actual school sites will be determined when the land is conveyed to the school districts by the Department of the ?Navy or LRA (in the event of an Economic Development Conveyance). lWithin the Tustin Unified School District, two 10 -acre elementary schools (K-5) and one 40 -acre high school are planned. Within the Irvine Unified School District, a 20 -acre elementary school (K-8) is planned at the corner of Bar anca Parkway and Harvard Avenue. If any school shown on the Land Use Plan is not needed or if the site acreage allocated is less than the amount used for the school, then the unused acreage will be reallocated to the underlying designation, as specified in the Statistical Analysis. Should an acreage adjustment occur, the maximum number of dwelling units or City of Tustin MICAS Tustin Specific Alan/Reuse Pan Page 2-84 Gclfober- X96 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description maximum square footage identified for the affected Planning Area would remain the same. The domestic water concept plan (Figure 2-7) was developed in consultation with The Irvine Ranch 'Water District (IRNN,D). IRWD is the jurisdictional agency responsible for providing domestic (potable) water service to the Plan. IRNN'D currently supplies domestic water to the tease through a north -south 16 -inch pipeline in the center of the base. IRNND recommends abandoning the existing military water mains and providing service connections to dex-elopments through a new backbone system and from existing water mains in adjacent roadways. Distribution systems already in place in existing housing areas will be connected to the proposed backbone system as private facilities unless the existing lines are accepted by IRNVD. Acceptance %vill be based on pipe condition, location, and compliance with 1RNN,D standards. Should the existing water supply system for the base housing area south of Edinger Avenue not be accepted, the development may need to consi-der construction of new lines in Landsdowne Road and Seven -ns Road, since difficulties may ensue if repair of a private water line located beneath public stre.-ts is required. The proposed system will serve areas west of Peters Canyon Channel and will utilize Valencia Loop Road as the backbone of the loop system. Th.e proposed backbone domestic water system is shown in Figure 2-7 and is based upon design recommendations proposed in the IRNN'D Water Resources Master Plan. The Master Plan recommends that pipe systems follow a loop pattern and provide service areas with multiple sources of supply. These recommendations provide operational flexibility that will prevent loss of sen -ice to an area should a source or pipeline fail. The proposed dornestic water system adheres to both of these recommendations. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Paan Getebef',?96 September 1998 City of Tus in Page 2-105 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Water will be acquired from the following three sources: ■ The 54 -inch IR«7D Barranca NVell Line through a tie-in at Von Kaman Avenue and Barraaca Parkway. ■ An existing 12 -inch IRNVD line along Ifarvard :'Avenue through a tic -in at Moffett Avenue. ■ The 18 -inch Navy Hh h Pressure Line through a connection at OC -SS, located east of the intersection of Warner Avenue and Redhill Avenue, and at the intersection of Armstrong Avenue and NVarner Avenue. Parcels located east of Peters Canyon Channel will acquire water service from the Harvard Avenue water main. The 42 -inch diameter line will serve as the backbone domestic water conveyance system. No new backbone lines are proposed for parcels in this area. Pipe sizes were calculated by 1RV1'D based on demands, water pressure requirements, flow velocity criteria, and the fire -flow specifications of the Orange County Fire Authority. Surveys and more specific knowledge of the land uses will be required to determine the network's final pipe sizes. In addition, further studies must be conducted by IRNN, D to determine whether development of the site will require the purchase of additional water rights. This will require the development of a Subarea Master Plan by IRNVD. IRNN. D already has property and easement rights at MCAS Tustin along Redhill Avenue to construct water wells and convey the well water to its distribution system. IRNN"D has also proposed to exchange its existing rights along Redhill Avenue, including four existing abandoned wells (TIC6. TIC100, 29HI, and TIC93), for four new well sites along Barranca Parkway and an existing well site presently ]eased to Osumi farms. It is beinEl recommended that the new well sites be delineated and dedicated durin a the concept and/or development project approval stage to ensure that they are compatibly located within future land uses. A final decision on water line locations and sizing shall be determined and approved by IRNVD and Tustin and Irvine City Engineer's, as applicable. City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific PlaniReuse Plan Page 2-88 O-ebef;r9 September 1998 cd M+ i- L 1 L Ala -,All � v V llr L� lrllail 1 - (1.�.. v 1 1 1. l -iil L.. V All.. 1. 1.I 1 1 •� \ 1 v l 1ntcd toL , th, 1,LLCY 1 V 11 1.1 1 1j planningv,may c c cost rc V ... this nc. Pipe sizes were calculated by 1RV1'D based on demands, water pressure requirements, flow velocity criteria, and the fire -flow specifications of the Orange County Fire Authority. Surveys and more specific knowledge of the land uses will be required to determine the network's final pipe sizes. In addition, further studies must be conducted by IRNN, D to determine whether development of the site will require the purchase of additional water rights. This will require the development of a Subarea Master Plan by IRNVD. IRNN. D already has property and easement rights at MCAS Tustin along Redhill Avenue to construct water wells and convey the well water to its distribution system. IRNN"D has also proposed to exchange its existing rights along Redhill Avenue, including four existing abandoned wells (TIC6. TIC100, 29HI, and TIC93), for four new well sites along Barranca Parkway and an existing well site presently ]eased to Osumi farms. It is beinEl recommended that the new well sites be delineated and dedicated durin a the concept and/or development project approval stage to ensure that they are compatibly located within future land uses. A final decision on water line locations and sizing shall be determined and approved by IRNVD and Tustin and Irvine City Engineer's, as applicable. City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific PlaniReuse Plan Page 2-88 O-ebef;r9 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description determine whether development of the site will require the purchase of additional water rights. This will require the development of a Subarea Master Plan by IRNVD after the Specific Plan has been adopted. The Subarea Master Plan "•ill be funded by future connection fees and property taxes. IRNVI) has expressed interest in giving up ownership of existing well properties on the northwest side of the site at Redhill Avenue in exchange for new well sites near the site's southern border. Well sites are shown in Figure 2-8 for completeness only. Actual sites will need to be negotiated bc-tween IRNVD and the development. The exchange would provide -an opportunity to develop these sites and integrate the new sites into the planned business areas. The new well sites will be used during peak periods to provide reel-;med water. The Irvine Ranch Water District (IR«D) and Orange County Sanitation District n7 (CSD -7) are the jurisdictional agencies responsible for providing plan approval and sewer service to the Plan area. The IRIM and Sall District #7 have agreed to allow the IRTVD to be the sole responsible a; enc► for provision of sewer service for the redevelopment of the base. esB--/ and -IR` D recommends abandoning the existing sewer mains and providing sen -ice to developments from connections through a new backbone system. Conveyance systems already in place in existing housing areas will - be connected to the proposed backbone system and considered private facilities, unless the existing lines are accepted by essD—1 td—IR�'�'D. Acceptance will be based on pipe condition, location, and compliance with esB_7 wntI-IRNNI) standards. Should the existing sanitary sewer system for the base housing area south of Edinger Avenue not be accepted.. the development may need to consider construction of new lines in Landsdowne Road and Sever}ms Road, since difficulties may ensue if repair of a private sewer line located beneath a public street is required. The oroposed sanitary sewer needs of the site will be met by IR« =d 653 Conceptual plans for sewage conveyance backbone system from the site were prepared in coordination with 1R`V -, . The site's existing topography favors sewer flow towards the southeast, therefore it may not be possible to take sewage flow northerly to the existing 24 -inch sewer main in Edinger Avenue. The proposed sewer system, shown City of Tustin Ma4S Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Pian Page 2-92 ^c�9 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description City of Tustin Page 2-96 Canyon Channel will discharge through this system. For the purposes of study, flow towards the north or to the west by gravity are assumed to not be feasible. Sewage will be conveyed to either the 45 -inch IRWD Har-ard Avenue main, a proposed eSD-7 sewer in Redhill Avenue, or possibly through a new trunk system in Jamboree Road between Barranca Parkway and Main Street. Future studies, requiring accurate survey data and coordination with ~om C -SD- and -IR«'LD, will be required to determine how much sewage each district will accept, final tie-in points, and each agency's mainterance responsibilities. Parcels located east of Peters Canyon Channel will be serviced by the exis:ing 45 -inch diameter IRVJD main located in Harvard Avenue. The Harvard main will serve as the backbone system for these areas; therefore, no additional backbone sewer infrastructure is necessary for new developments. However, it will be necessary to install new sewer pipe and a lift station to trancport sewage from the existing developments located cast of Peters Canyon Channel to the Harvard Avenue main. The proposed pipe will run south along Peters Canyon Channel from the existing sewer siphon just nog:li of Warner Avenue to Warner Avenue where it will turn east until it makes a connection with the Harvard Avenue main via a lift -station. The proposed storm drain system was designed based on a 25 -year turn frequency storm. The Orange County Hydrology Manual, Rational Me:h od was used to determine the peak runoffs. The major backbone storm drain facilities within the site have been identified on Figure 2-10. The proposed backbone system is anticipated to provide a means for eliminating those areas on the site which are within the 100 -year flood plain. Final hydraulic analyses will be required to assure that all building sites conform to the City of Tustin or Irvine requirements for development within flood prone zones, as applicable. The backbone system will follow the alignments of the major ani- ail roaaways, such as Armstrong Avenue, 'Valencia North and South Loop Road. Tustin Ranch Road, and Warner Avenue. utilizing the existing storm drain system on the base was not considered a practical alternative. For the most part these pipes are undersized and will not sere the intended pur-Dose. Utilizing the existing off-site storm drain systems was Ma—',S Tustin Specific Plan!Reuse Pian 9et`obe==996 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Southern California Edison (SCE) is the jurisdictional agency currently responsible for providing electricity service to the Plan area. However, base closure law and recent utility deregulation permits provision of electrical sen -ice through the local government or through a third party provirter (Trot necessarily SCE). The site is presently served by four substations (Chestnut, Bryan, Estrella & Johanna) located off-site. The service is pI-ovlded L a network of overhead and underground electrical lines. These lines ;;ill be removed and replaced with a new underground electrical system in the Plan's arterial right-of-ways to support the new land uses. The proposed electrical backbone system is shown in Figure 2-11 and was developed in coordination with SCE. It is estimated that 51,572 kVA would be required to support the proposed land uses. According to SCE. the existing substations have sufficient capacity to meet this demand. Therefore, construction of additional substations will not be required. According to SCE. it is anticipated that most non -housing area elec.rical facilities would need to be replaced. Major facilities are antiquated and may not be acceptable. Housing areas east of Peters Canyon Channel are currently served by a combination of master and individual meters. SCE may accept the existing facilities. but they claim that this is unlikely to occur. Existing facilities will probably need to be replaced and master metered units will need to be converted to individual metering. The new facilities will bz-, integrated into the proposed roadway system in underground ducts and vaults. However, electrical facilities for the Tustin Villas (located south of Edinger Avenue) will remain in place, since they were only recently provided N;'[111 upgraded SCE service and are already individually metered. The Tus;in Villas are serviced from an underground SCE line along a portion of Edinger Avenue. City of Tustin Ma4S Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Paan Page 2-102 Bc:ebe=??S September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description City of Tustin Page 2-106 The Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) is the jurisdictional agenc\ responsible for providing natural gas service to the Specific Plan area. However, base closure law and recent utility deregulation permits provision of gas service through the local government or through a third parte provider (not necessarily SCGC). Presently, SCGC provides service to the site through gas lines located alonla Edinger Avenue, Redhill Avenue, Barranca Parkway, and Harvard Avenue. SCGC maintains the feeder lines on the perimeter of the base and provides natu-21 gas sen'tce through master meters to military -owned vas lines on tae project site. The military-ov.-ned lines are maintained by the military. SCGC recommends abandoning the existing natural vas mains along the base's perimeter and providing service connections to developments through a m-xv backbone system. Distribution systems already in place in the existirg housing areas will remain connected to their existing sources and will b-_ considered private facilities, unless the existing lines are accepted by a utility provider. Acceptance will be based on pipe condition and the ability to HILUIt current standards. The proposed natural gas system is shown in Figure 2-12. SCGC %;,II 1).L- responsible I).eresponsible for the construction and maintenance of all new facilities. The new facilities for the project site will be developed as a loop -piping system. The backbone pipe sires on the site will range from four to eight inches in diameter, and total approximately 32,000 linear feet. Service main piping (thre=e inches and under) is estimated at 25,000 linear feet. The proposed loon system will acquire natural gas from two sources: ■ An existing 4 -inch diameter high-pressure main in NVarner Avenue through a connection north of Construction Way and NVarner Avenue. ■ The existing 4 -inch medium -pressure line, in Redhill Avenue through a tie-in at Valencia Avenue. A regulator station will be required at the `T arner Avenue connection to "step down" the high-pressure gas to acceptable service levels. 14C.HS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse P;a,7 9eivbl—e-44,96 September 1998 Chapter 2 • Plan Description Pacific Bell (PacBell) is the jurisdictional agency responsible for providin�-1 telephone service to the Specific Plan area. Floxperer, base closure lax• and recent utility deregulation permits provision of telecommunications sen -ice through the local aovernment or through a third party provider (not - necessarily PacBell). PacBell currently provides telephone service to the base through a wire center located on Irvine Center Drive in the Cite of Irvine. However, the existing telephone system on base property is owned and maintained by the military. This system does not meet current PacBell standards and will not be reused. The existing telephone s}stem for the housing areas cast of Jamboree Road and in the public right-of-way is owned by Pacific Bell and will continue to serve existing developments from the II -vine Center Drive .vire center. City of Tustin Page 2-110 The proposed telephone system is shown in Figure 2-13. New substructure will be constructed in the planned roadways \vest of Jamboree Road and will be served from an existing wire center at the intersection of Edinger Avenue and Redhill Avenue. It is highly desirable that the installation of fiber optic facilities coincide with the installation of basic telephone infrastructure. According to PacBell, the existing infrastructure serving areas east of Peters Canyon Channel appears to be capable of adequately supporting the proposed developments. Dimension Cable Services (DCS) is the cable franchise responsible for providing cable television service to the entire Plan area. Cable television service is presently provided to limited areas on the project site by DCS. Thee areas include the existing housing east of Peters Canyon Channel. the Tustin Villas south of Edinger Avenue, and the existing barracks east of Redhill Avenue. Cable -TV service is provided to the areas east of Peters Canyon Channel via a fiber-optic main feeder along Harvard Avenue. The Tustin Villas and barracks are served tbrough a connection with the Harvard Avenue feeder at the intersection of Harvard Avenue and Moffett Avenue. DCS ,A•ill install cable -TV service to all new developments on the site. DCS will also be responsible for maintaining the existing and proposed facilities. The backbone cable s},stem will be installed along the proposed roadways as shown in Figure 2-14. INCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Pan ^; lobe;19 September 1998 Chapter- -3 Land Use and Development/Reuse Regulations Chapter' specifies the standards and regulations which will apply to new development, redevelopment and interim uses. Future review or concept plans, site plans, and subdivisions will assure that these standards arc realized. Unless otherwise stated, provisions of this chapter apply to both new development and reuse of existing structures and facilities. Private developers and public agencies seeking to reuse facilities or develop new uses will be able to determine their development parameters and obligations by referring to this chapter. Understanding the rationale for the provisions or this chapter may also require reference to the Plan components described in Chapter 2. The Land Use Planning Area map (Figure 3-1) and accompanying Land Us,- Statistical seStatistical Anal}sis will regulate land use and development within the Specific Plan by defining appropriate locations for certain land uses and permstued development intensities. The Land Use Plan includes (14) thirteen(13) separate land use designations as described in Section 2.2.1. Each parcel within the Specific Plan has been assigned a specific land use. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin ectobe, i September 1998 Page ;-1 r� LAND'. ROAD P, +E a Chapter 3 • Land Use and Development/Reuse Regulations 1 and Ilan Planninn Arnac r�p{J rIVI111111aNGlJIVVIIIV01 Base Boundary Specific Plan Boundary Irvine/Tustin Boundary * Base boundary along the Santa Ana / Santa Fe Channel is along the north side of the channel between Edinger and the Channel. This Is a graphic representatan of a pannIngienglneenng concept. Final design sclullons (lxation OW stung) vMl W proposed and reviewed as can of subsequent apps ors needed av the respective agency with lunsdiction. • THE PLANNING CENTER WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan a9 Not To Scale City of Tustin Figure 3-1 t4 n 'T ;.hh Transillonni/Emergency Ilousln Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Rees. Table 3-1 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ORGANIZED BY LAND USE DESIGNATION _ , illations Desi nation/Plannin Area 0 ACREAGE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES _0 RESIDENTIAL USES Planning Area 12 Gross' Net' F.A.R.' Total' Floor Area S .Fl. Existing` Floor Area S .Fl. Potential' Floor Aron Sc .Ft. DU's' Per Acro Potential' DU's Existing' DU's J_ N/A Total" Jj UU's -- 272 0 272 RESIDENTIAL Planning Area 14 54.0 48.6 0.4 846,606 Low Density 1-7 du/ac)i 846,106 0 0 J Planning Area 16 31.0 27.9 Planning Area 4 206,640 54.2 43.4 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 7" 301 Medium Density (8-55 du/ac) 274 44.2 3(14 Planning Area 2112 -Tustin Planning Area 21" - Irvine N/A 105.5 21.0 15 95.5 19.5 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7" 7" 0 0 711 150 711 1:10 Medium Density 0-15 du/ac Neighborhood Park15 Planning Area 5 51.7 41.4 N/A N/A N/A 15 621 1 133,294 0 48,079 621 Planning Area 22" Elementary School K-8" Neighborhood Park" 1,537 73.4 61.0 N/A N/A N/A 15 0 402 4012 Medium -High Density 16-25 du/ac Planning Area 20" 1 29.4 23.5 N/A N/A N/A 25 saa U 500 Transillonni/Emergency Ilousln Planning Area 3 1 5.1 1 5.1 .6 133,294 85,215 48,079 1 0 1 0 0 0 Goll Village Planning Area 15-A" 0.5 1,367,784 0 1,367,784 _0 0 U Planning Area 12 8.4 8.4 0.35 128,066 29,448 Low Density (1-7 du/ac) 48.5 38.8 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 7 272 0 272 Neighborhood Park" Planning Area 14 54.0 48.6 0.4 846,606 700 846,106 0 0 J Planning Area 16 31.0 27.9 Planning Area 15-B" 206,640 279,490 0 0 0 Planning Area 17 16.3 16.3 0.4 284,011 63,289 220,722 Medium Density (8-55 du/ac) 55.2 44.2 Planning Area 9 N/A N/A N/A 15 662 0 662 Elementary School Neighborhood Park15 SUBTOTAL 444.6 372.4 N/A 1 133,294 85,215 48,079 N/A 2,173 1,537 3.710 COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS mmercial/Business Planning Area 11 78.5 G2.8 0.5 1,367,784 0 1,367,784 _0 0 U Planning Area 12 8.4 8.4 0.35 128,066 29,448 98,618 0 0 0 Planning Area 13 43.7 39.3 0.4 684,763 0 684,763 0 0 0 Planning Area 14 54.0 48.6 0.4 846,606 700 846,106 0 0 J Planning Area 16 31.0 27.9 0.4 406,130 206,640 279,490 0 0 0 Planning Area 17 16.3 16.3 0.4 284,011 63,289 220,722 0 0 (1 Planning Area 9 10.4 10.4 0.35 158,558 13,006 145,552 0 0 0 WAS Tustin Specific PlanlRouse Plan October -4-996 September 1998 City ut hislia Paye 3-1 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations Table 3-1 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ORGANIZED BY LAND USE DESIGNATION ACREAGE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Total' Floor Area Existing' Floor Potential' Floor DU's' Potential' Existing' Total10 7 Cesi nation/Plannin Area Gross NV F.A.R. S .Ft. Area S .Ft. Area S .Ft. Per Acre DU's DU's DU's COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS CONTINUED Commercial Continued Planning Area 10" 16.7 1 M1.5 0.35 40,846 40,046 U 0 U u Maiming Aron 19 38.6 38.6 0.4 672,566 3,990 C,G0,576 0 0 q Goll Village Planninq Area 15-C" 10.0 10.0 0.5 217,800 8,106 209,694 Planning Area 15-D" 2.4 2.4 0.6 62,726 0 62,726 0 0 Planning Area 15-E" 159.3 159.3 0 0 0 U 0 U Village Services Planning Area 72( 20.7 0.36 315, 192 U 3151,592. u U r) Conununity Core Planning Area 8 Medium -High Density (gh 25 185.2 160.7 Sch ol'a I li Ir School 40.0 40.0 0.5 3,630,726 329,032 3,301,694 25 891 0 091 SUBTOTAL 738.1 686.5 N/A 1,245,507 740,947 8,504,560 N/A 091 0 891 INSTITUTIONAL/RECREATIONAL Learning Village Planning Area i" Planning Area 1-A International Learning Villago Elementary School" Planning Area 1-B Law Enlorcernonl Training Planning Area 1-C Children's Care Sheltor i Planning Area 1-D Child Care Center 128.0 108.1 0.3 1,412,651 822,556 590,095 U 0 0 u Planning Area 1-E Child Care Center Community Park Planning Area 2 2M1.1 24.1 .12' 40,531 1 40,531 1 0 U 0 0 Q I Urban Reglonal Park I'larminu Area 6 04.5 84.5 0.16 574,992 4963.008 78.924 0 U U City of Tustin. MCAS Tustin S /an/fteuse P/a; l Paye 3-8 October-l-.-ub September 1998 T;j „v 3-1 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ORGANIZED BY LAND USE DESIGNATION Desi nation/Plannin Area ACREAGE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Gross' Net' F.A.R.' Total' Floor Area S .Ft. Existing` Floor Area S .Fl. Potential° Floor DU's' Area S .Ft. Per Acre Potential' DU's Existing' DU's Tolal1O DU's INSTITUTIONAL/RECREAT10NAL(C0NTINUED) RI lit -of -Wo Arterial Roadwa s" 158.4 158.4 0 0 0 01 U 1 U 1 01 Drainage (Flood Control, Storm Drains) 28.5 28.5 U 0 0 0 0 0 U SHOTUTAL 423.5 403.6 N/A 2,020,174 1,359,155 669,019 0 0 0 0 ITOI'ALS: I 1,606.2 1,467..9 N/A 11 406 975 2 105,317 9 221 650 0 i 3 064 1 537 4,60 1 NOTES: 1. Gross acreage for each Planning Area is an estimated allocation measured frorn the edge of the adjacent future arterial and secondary roadway, any public roadway shown on the Land Use Plan, and/or the boundary of the Planning Area. The amount of land devoted to roadways shown on Ute Plan is calculated under the Right -of -Way designation. Actual acreages will be refined during the site plan and subdivision process. 2. Net acreage is an eslirnated allocation based on gross acreage reduced for internal circulation (local roads) within a Planning Area. Net acreage is estimated approximately for each Planning Area, basod on permitted use, size of the Planning Area, arid typical site planning considerations. Actual net acreages will be refined during the site plan and subdivision process. 3. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) is the gross floor area of all buildings within a Planning Area divided by Ilia riot acreage of Ilia Planning Area for purposes of this Statistical Analysis. The F.A.R. column specifies a floor area ratio dorivod from an assumed mix of uses within a Planning Aron. Tho rnix of commercial, industrial, office, or olhor uses that have been initially assigned to each Planning Arna are shown on Table 3.3. This floor area ratio has been used to calculate Total Floor Area (square footage) allocated to each Planning Arca. The maximum floor area ratio at which a particular use Call be devoloped is specified in Chapter 3. Floor area ratio specifies development intensity for non-residential uses, whereas DU's per acre specify maximum density for residential uses. 4. Total Floor Area is Ilio total square footage of rion-residential development derived by multiplying Ilia floor area ratio by Ilse net acreage. 5. Existing Floor Area is the square footage of existing buildings by Planning Area. 0. Potential Floor Area is Ilia potential square footage of now development within each Planning Area, assuming the square footage devoted to existing structure remains. 7. DU's per Acre reflects the Inaximuni density per riot acro at which dwelling units may be calculated. The density ranges for each residential land use designation are specified in Section 2.2.1. 0. Potential DU's is the maximum number of new dwellings units, based on the density per net acre for the Planning Area. 9. Existing DU's identifies the existing military family housing units within each Planning Area. The bachelor housing (or barracks quarters) is accounted for in the Existing Floor Area column. 10. Total DU's is the maximurn number of dwelling units allocated to each Planning Area. Even though actual gross and net acreages may be refined during the site plan and subdivision process, the nraxir,ulrn number of dwelling units in each Planning Area shall riot exceed Ilia number designated on the Statistical Analysis, except as specified iri Section 3.2.3. 11. The DU's per acre figure of 7.0 reflects the maximum density of development should the existing housing be replaced by new housing. 12. A portion of PA 21 (15U units) arid all of PA 22 (402 units) are located within the City of Irvine. Tho permitted density range in PA 22 shall riot exceed 12.5 dwe;lina units per acre at the h; h end. 13. PA 22 includes a 20 -acre allocation for a K-0 school. The precise acreage and location will be determiriod when lice Navy's Record o1 Decision is issued. PA 22 also includes an 8 -acre al;ocation for a Neighborhood Park site. The precise acreage and location will be determined prior to property transfer to the City of Irvine, however, the total allowable dwelling units in PA 22 will remain the same. 14. PA 15-A includes a 5 -acre allocation for a neighborhood park site. The prociso acreage and location will be dotorrninod prior to final subdivision trial) approval, however, Iho total allowable dwelling units ill PA 15-A will remain the samn. 15. IIA 1543 Includes a Mama allocation for an Elementary School. 1lin prociso acreagn and locnlion will be delorminnd whoa Ilia Navy's Record of Decision is issued. 11 1110 Actual acr0ag0 varies hurl 10 acres, throm an acreage adjustment will be made 10 Ilia Moclium Density designation, however, the maximum units shown in Ilio Statistical Analysis shall not be exceeded. PA 15-0 also includes a 5 -acre allocation for a neighborhood park site. The prociso acreage arid location will be determined prior to final subdivision trial) approval, however, the total allowable dwelling units in PA 15-8 will remain Ills sarne. 16. PA a includes a 40 -acre allocation lot a High School. 'Tile precise acreage and location will be determined whoa the Navy's Record of Decision is issued. II the actual acreage varies korai 40 arses, then the acreage adjustment will be made to the Community Core designation, however, the total allowable square feet of non-residontial development arid maximum dwelling units in PA 8 will rernaili the same. 17. PA 1 is composed of numerous public convoyance uses as specified in Section 2.3 of Ilia Spocific Plan. 18. PA 1-A includes a 10 -acro allocalion for an Elementary School. The prociso acreage and location will be determined when the Navy's fiocord of Decision is issued. If the actual acreage varies from :U acres, then an acreage adjustment will be mado to Ilia Learning Village use, however, the total allowable square fool Uf riot -residential development in PA 1-A will remain the samo. tfi. The actual amount of existing square tootago is 2,103,956. However, adjustments to two Planning Areas have been made. In PA 2, Community 40,531 existing square footage is expecled to be leusod. In PA 5, Medium Density Residential, the 39,405 existing Square footage is expected to be replaced by residential uses. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin October --1996 September 1998 Page 3-9 Chapter 3 P. Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations 20. The development intensity assigned to the Community Park is .1 FAR; however, the existing 40,531 square feet is expected to be reused. 21. Planning Area 15 is comprised of subplanning areas 15-A through 15-E, which allocates development potential by [arid use type. the subplanning areas are r;ot site specific on Ilio Land Use flan in Crow to allow for flexibility in future master planning. 22. The shaded area on the Land Use Planning Areasrnap (Figure 3-1) indicates where alternative conceptual roadway alignments for Tuslin ftanch Road and Warner Avenue could occur. 'his staleaical analysis assunies the most easterly alignment for Tustin Ranch Road arid the most southerly alignment for Warner Avenue. If either final alignment differs frorn these assumed conceptual location ,, wo provisions of Section 3.2.5 shall apply. 23. In Planning Area 20, there is 4.1 gross acres in private ownership (with 3.3 net acres estimated for development potential); Planning Area 18 is proposed to be retained in Federal ownership by the Army Reserve with 2.2 acres to be deed transferred to the City of Tustin, after the Array's acceptance of the 1G.7 acres from the Navy, for Barranca right-of-way (leaving 14.5 net acres). 1'tie total gross acreage for non-federal disposal is 1,585.4 acres. City o/ Tustin MCAS Tustin Sp In/Neuse Pull Page 3-10 October—l-,,. plember 1998 17- Chapter 3 • Land Use and Development/Reuse Regulations Neighborhoods rveiynmxriu� r - Learniny vniage Neighborhood 8 - Village Housing Neighborhood C - Regional Park Neighborhood D - Community Core Neighborhood E - Employment Center Neighborhood F - Regionally -Oriented Commercial District Neighborhood G - Residential Core Neighborhood H - Irvine Residential neighborhood This I o graphic representation of a pbnnng/englreering concept. Ho Final design sdNrcns (location orb wng) will be proposed and 7y reN*w d as port of su[seq� t approvals needed W the respective agency with prWictlan. • THE PLANNING Not 70 5 CENTER -ale MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 3-2 +7'k) T IF, Chapter 3 • Land Use ©evelopment/Reust; 13eyulations Table 3-2 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ORGAN17M RV N1=I(,14RnR114nnn I mmung Area 17. 8.4 p.4 0.35 128,066 29,446 90 6 i0 0 0 Q. MCAS Tustin Specific PlaNReuse Plan City of luslr;l October -1996 September 1998 Page 3-13 ACREAGE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES l Gross' Net' F.A.R.'(Sq. Total' Floor Area Ft. Exleting' Floor Polenllnl' Floor DU's' Potential' Exleting' To1n110 Deal Halton/Plannin Aron Area S .FI. Area Sc .ft. Per Acre DU'a DU'e DU's NEIGHBORHOOD A Planning Area 1" Planning Area 1-A 1 Inlernatlonal Learning Village 99.7 79.8 Elernenlary School'" I'InrininS7 Aron 1-13 10.0 10.0 I_nw F.nlurcomonl 'I mining Planning Area 1-C 10.0 10.0 Children's Care Shelter 4.0 4.0 Planning Area Child Care Center 2.4 2.4 0.3 1,412,651 822,556, 590,095 U 0 U 0 Planning Area 1-E Child Cnre Center 1,9 1.9 SUBTOTAL PLANNING AREA 1 128.0 108.1 N/A 1,412 651 822,556 590,095 0 0 0 0 Planning Aren 2 24.1 24.1 0 .12 40,531 40,5:31 0 0 0 0 q 11Innning Area 3 5.1 5.1 .0 133,294 85,215 1 40,079 0 U U c) SUBTOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD A 1 157.2 137.3 N/A 1 1,586,476 1 948,302 1 638,174 0 0 0 0 NEIGHBORHOOD B Planning Area 4 Low Density (1-7 du/ac 54.2 43.4 N/A N/A N/A 711 30 274 304 i Planning Area 5 Medium Densit 8-15 du/ac 51.7 41.4 N/A N/A N/A 15 621 0 621 Planning Area 7 20.7 20.7 0.35 315,592 0 315,592 U 0 ()_.I SUBTOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD B 126.61 105.5 N/A 315,592 0 315,592 N/A 651 1 274 1 925 NEIGHBORHOOD C Planning Area 6 1 84.5 84.5 0.16 574,992 496,068 78,924 0 0 0 n , SUBTOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD C 84.5 84.5 N/A 574,992 1 496,068 78,924 N/A 0 0 0 NEIGHBORHOOD D j Planning Area 8 Medium -High Density (16-25 du/ac) 185.2 166.7 0.5 High School" 40.0 40.0 3,030,720 329,032 3,301,094 25 891 0 091 SUBTOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD D 225.2 206.7 N/A 3,630,726 329,032 3,301,694 N/A 8911 0 F 891 NEIGHBORHOOD E Planning Area 9 10.4 10.4 0.35 158,558 13,006 145.552 0 0 I Planning Area 10 22.9 20.6 0.35 349,133 45,890 303,243 0 0 Planning Area 11 78.5 67..8 0.53 1,367,784 U 1,367,784 0 0 n .� I mmung Area 17. 8.4 p.4 0.35 128,066 29,446 90 6 i0 0 0 Q. MCAS Tustin Specific PlaNReuse Plan City of luslr;l October -1996 September 1998 Page 3-13 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations Table 3-2 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ORGANIZED BY NEIGHRnRHnnn Uesl rtallott/Plartrtln Area ACREAGE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Gross' Net' F.A.R.' Tolnl' floor Aroa S .Ft. Existing' Floor Area Sc .Ft. Polentlal' Floor Area S .Fl. UU's' Per Acre Potential* DU's Existlr,g' DU's f-i"IfIl'o DU's NEIGHBORHOOD E Continued Planning Area 13 43.7 39.3 0.4 684,763 0 684,763 0 0 U Planning Area 14 54.0 48.6 0.4 84G,6UG 700 840,106 0 0 U II -SUBTOTAL FOR NEIGIIBORIIODU E 217.9 109.1 N/A 3,535,110 09,044 3,446,006 0 0 0 '; NEIGHBORHOOD F ! Planning Area 18 31.0 27.9 0.4 406,130 20G,G40 279,490 0 0 U Planning Area 17 16.3 16.3 0.4 284,011 63,289 220,722. 0 0 0 Planning Area t8" 16.7 14.50.35 40,846 40,846 0 U U U ;� Planninq Area 19 38.6 38.6 0.4 672,566 3,990 668,576 0 0 C SUBTOTAL FOR NEIGHBORHOOD F 102.6 97.3 N/A 1,483,553 314,765 1 1,168,788 1 N/A 1 0 0 0 NEIGHBORHOOD G Planning Area 15-A" Low Density (1-7 du/ac) Neighborhood Park" 48.5 38.8 N/A N/A N/A 7 272 0 212 Planning Area 15-B" Medium Density (8;55 du/ac) Elementary School Neighborhood Park" 55.2 44.2 N/A N/A N/A 15 662 0 662 1 Planning Area 15-C" 10.0 10.0 0.5 217,800 8,106 209,694 0 U U Planning Area 15-D" 2.4 2.4 0.6 62,726 0 62,726 0 G U Planning Area 15-E" 159.3 159.3 N/A N/A N/A 0 U t?, Planning Area 2.0" Medium -High Density 16-25 du/ac 29.4 23.5 N/A N/A N/A 2.5 588 U 5;111 j Planning Area 21"- Tustin Low Density (1-7 du/ac) Planning Area 21"- IrvineI Low Dertsily (1-7 du/ac) 105.5 21.6 95.5 19.5 N/A N/A N/A 7" 0 71.1 150 1 / 1 t 1!iU i SUBTOTAL FOR NEIGHBURIIUOD G 431.9 393.2 N/A 280,526 1 8,106 1 272,420 1 N/A 1,522 861 2,383 I' NEIGHBORHOOD H Planning Aroa 22" MedinDonsity di/ac) Flemenlary School K-8� Noighboiliood Park" 73.4 61.0 -:: N/A N/A N/A 15 U 402 407 it I SUBTOTAL Fort NEIGHBOHN000 II _ 73.4 61.0 Nin td A N'A N A N'A 0 402 402_11 Cil of Tuslirt ` y MCLS Tustin Sp, 7/?/Reuse i'iat; page 3-14 ©elobeH1Jz�, :plember 1998 T. .3-2 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ORGANIZED BY NEIGHBORHOOD NOTES: L Gross ncronge for ench Planning Arrn i5 all astimated allocation measured from the edge of the adjacent future nrlerinl and snrondnry roadway, any public rondwny shown on the Lnnd Use Plan, arid/or the boundnry o' the f'Innning Alen. The arlaUnl of land devoted to arterial rondwnys shown on the Pion Is calculated under the l ight-of-Way designation. Actual acreages will be iofined during ilio site plan and subdivision process. 2. Not acreage is nn estinialed allocation based on gross acreage reduced for internal circulation (local roads) within n Planning Area. Net acreage is estimated approximately for each Planning Area, based on permitted use, size of the Planning Area, and typical site planning considoistions. Actual net acreages will be refined during ilia site plan and subdivision process. 3. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) is the -gross floor area of all buildings within a Planning Area divided by the net acreage of ilia Planning Area for purposes of this Statistical Analysis. Tile F.A.R. column specifies a floor area ratio derived from nn assumed mix of uses within a Planning Area. The mix of commercial, industrial, office, or other uses that have been initially assigned to each Planning Area are shown on Table 3.3. This floor area ratio ties been used to calculate Toln: Floor Area (square footage) allocated to each Planning Area. The rnaximurn floor area ratio at which a particular use can be developed is specified in Chapter 3. Floor area ratio specifies development intensity for non-residenlial uses, whereas DU's per acre specify maximum density for residential uses. 4. Total Floor Area is the total squnre footage of non-residential development derived by multiplying ilia floor area ratio by the net acreage. 5. E=xisting Floor Area is Ilia square footage of existing buildings by Planning Area. G. Potential Floor Aran is Ilia potential square footage of now development within ench Planning Area, assuming the square lootogo devoted to existing structure ronains. 7. DU's por Acre rellects the inoxinium density per net acre at which dwelling units may be calculated. The density ranges for each residential land use designation oro specified in Sect.on 2.2.1. B. Potential DU's is the maximum number of new dwellings units, based on the density per net acre for the Planning Area. 9. Existing DU's identifies the existing military lankly housing units within each Planning Area. The bachelor housing (or barracks quarters) is accounted for in the Existing Floor Area column. 10. Total DU's is the rnaximurn number of dwelling units allocated to each Planning Area. Even though actual gross and net acreages rnay be refined during the site plan and subdivision process, the maximum nurnber of dwelling units in onch Planning Area shall riot extend the number designated on the Statistical Analysis, except as specified in Section 3.2.3. 11. 1 he DU's per acre figure of 7.0 reflects Ilia mnximum density of development should ilia existing housing be replaced by new housing. 12. A portion of PA 21 (150 units) grid all of PA 22 (402 units) are located within the City of Irvine. 1 he perrrtilted density range in PA 22 shall riot exceed 12.5 dwelling units at file tiigh end. 13. IIA 22 includes a 20 -acre allocation for a K-8 school. Tile precise acreage slid location will be determined when Ilse Navy's Record of Decision is issued. PA 22 also includes an 8 -acre allocation for a ne;ghborh000 park site. Tile precise acreage and location will be determined prior to property transfer to the City of Irvine, however, the total allowable dwelling units in PA 22 wi;1 remain the same. 14. PA 15-A includes a 5 -acre allocation for a neighborhood park site. The precise acreage and location will be determined prior to final subdivision neap approval, however, the total oflowsbie dwelling units in PA 15-A will remain I::e snare 15. PA I5 -B includes a 10 -acre allocation for an Elementary School. 1 tie precise acreage and location will be determined when the Navy's Record of Dec;sion is issued. If ilia actual acreage varies from 10 acres, then an acreage adjustment will be made to the Medium Density designation, however, the maximum units shown in the Statistical Analysis sho!1 riot be exceeded. PA 15.0 also includes a 5 -acre allocation for a neighborhood park site. The pieclse ncreage and location will be determined prior to filial subdivision limp approval, however, the total allowable dwelling units in PA 15.0 will rernairi tale some. IG. PA a includrs n 40 -titre allocation for n I ligh School. 'I he precise ncrenge and location will be detemnined when Ilia Navy's Record of Decision is issued. If the actual acreaga varies from 40 acres, then the acrenge adlustnlenl w :l be made to the Community Core designation, however, the total allowable square fool of non-residential development and maximum dwelling units in PA a will rernairi the same. 17. PA 1 is composed of numerous public conveyance uses as specified in Section 2.3 of Ilia Specific Plan. 16. PA 1-A includes a 10 -arse allocation for nn Elementary School. Thr precise acreage aid location will be determined when the Navy's Record of Decision is issued. II ilio actual acreage varies from 1.0 acres, Men an oc,enge nd,usmise: will be made to the Learning Village use, however, the total allowable square feel of non-residential deveioprnenl in PA 1-A will remain the same. t9. The actual nrilalltlt OI existing SrlLrnie footage is 7.,183.A50. however, adjustments to two Planning Arens have been made. In PA 2, Corlinlun;!y Park, 14,100 square leer of Ilse total 40,531 ex+sting square lounge .s expected to be reused. In PA 5, Medium Density Residential, Ilia 39,485 existing square footage is expected to be replaced by iesiderilinl uses. 20. 'Ilia development interiorly assigned to the Community Park is .1 FAR; however, 114,1100 square feet of the existing 40,531 square feet is expected to be reused. 21. Planning Area 15 is comprised of subptanning areas 15-A through 15-E, which allocates development potential by land use type. The subplanning areas are riot site specil�c oil the Laiid Use Plan in. order to allow for flexibility ni future rnnster planning. 22. Ilia shaded area on thn Land Use Planning Areas minp (Figure 3.1) indicates where alternative conceptual rondway alignments for Tustin flonch flood and Warder Avenue could occur. This statistical analysis assumes the Most enslrr1 alignment for 1 ustin Ranch Rood and the most southerly alignment for Warder Avenue. II either final alignment differs from these assurned conceptual locations, the provisions of Section 3.2.5 shall apply. 23. In Planning Area 7.0, there is 4.1 gross ncies in private ownership (with 3.3 net acres estimated for development potentia:); Planning Aron 18 is proposed to be retained in Federal ownership by the Army Reserve with 2 2 acres to be deed transferred to the City of Tuslin, after ilia Anmy's acceptance of ilia 16.7 acres frorn the Navy, for Barranca ngtit-of-way (leaving 14.5 net acres). The total gross acreage for non-federal disposal is 1,585.4 acres WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of TusIt,i October --1996 September 1998 Paye 3-I5 ACREAGE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Total'Floor Area Existing` Floor Potential' Floor DU's' Potential° Existing' Total10 Desi nation/Plannin Area Gross' Nel' F.A.R.' =Floor Area S .Ft. Area S .Ft. Per Acre DU's DU's DU's RIGHT-OF-WAY f i Roadways" 150.4 1513.4 N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 Drainge (Flood Control, Slorin 28.5 28.5 N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 Drains SUBTOTAL RIGHT OF WAY 106.9 186.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 01 0 1 0 TOTAL S• 1,606.2 1 462 5 N/A 1 11 406 975 2,185,317" 9 221 658 N/A 3,064 1,537 4,601 NOTES: L Gross ncronge for ench Planning Arrn i5 all astimated allocation measured from the edge of the adjacent future nrlerinl and snrondnry roadway, any public rondwny shown on the Lnnd Use Plan, arid/or the boundnry o' the f'Innning Alen. The arlaUnl of land devoted to arterial rondwnys shown on the Pion Is calculated under the l ight-of-Way designation. Actual acreages will be iofined during ilio site plan and subdivision process. 2. Not acreage is nn estinialed allocation based on gross acreage reduced for internal circulation (local roads) within n Planning Area. Net acreage is estimated approximately for each Planning Area, based on permitted use, size of the Planning Area, and typical site planning considoistions. Actual net acreages will be refined during ilia site plan and subdivision process. 3. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) is the -gross floor area of all buildings within a Planning Area divided by the net acreage of ilia Planning Area for purposes of this Statistical Analysis. Tile F.A.R. column specifies a floor area ratio derived from nn assumed mix of uses within a Planning Area. The mix of commercial, industrial, office, or other uses that have been initially assigned to each Planning Area are shown on Table 3.3. This floor area ratio ties been used to calculate Toln: Floor Area (square footage) allocated to each Planning Area. The rnaximurn floor area ratio at which a particular use can be developed is specified in Chapter 3. Floor area ratio specifies development intensity for non-residenlial uses, whereas DU's per acre specify maximum density for residential uses. 4. Total Floor Area is the total squnre footage of non-residential development derived by multiplying ilia floor area ratio by the net acreage. 5. E=xisting Floor Area is Ilia square footage of existing buildings by Planning Area. G. Potential Floor Aran is Ilia potential square footage of now development within ench Planning Area, assuming the square lootogo devoted to existing structure ronains. 7. DU's por Acre rellects the inoxinium density per net acre at which dwelling units may be calculated. The density ranges for each residential land use designation oro specified in Sect.on 2.2.1. B. Potential DU's is the maximum number of new dwellings units, based on the density per net acre for the Planning Area. 9. Existing DU's identifies the existing military lankly housing units within each Planning Area. The bachelor housing (or barracks quarters) is accounted for in the Existing Floor Area column. 10. Total DU's is the rnaximurn number of dwelling units allocated to each Planning Area. Even though actual gross and net acreages rnay be refined during the site plan and subdivision process, the maximum nurnber of dwelling units in onch Planning Area shall riot extend the number designated on the Statistical Analysis, except as specified in Section 3.2.3. 11. 1 he DU's per acre figure of 7.0 reflects Ilia mnximum density of development should ilia existing housing be replaced by new housing. 12. A portion of PA 21 (150 units) grid all of PA 22 (402 units) are located within the City of Irvine. 1 he perrrtilted density range in PA 22 shall riot exceed 12.5 dwelling units at file tiigh end. 13. IIA 22 includes a 20 -acre allocation for a K-8 school. Tile precise acreage slid location will be determined when Ilse Navy's Record of Decision is issued. PA 22 also includes an 8 -acre allocation for a ne;ghborh000 park site. Tile precise acreage and location will be determined prior to property transfer to the City of Irvine, however, the total allowable dwelling units in PA 22 wi;1 remain the same. 14. PA 15-A includes a 5 -acre allocation for a neighborhood park site. The precise acreage and location will be determined prior to final subdivision neap approval, however, the total oflowsbie dwelling units in PA 15-A will remain I::e snare 15. PA I5 -B includes a 10 -acre allocation for an Elementary School. 1 tie precise acreage and location will be determined when the Navy's Record of Dec;sion is issued. If ilia actual acreage varies from 10 acres, then an acreage adjustment will be made to the Medium Density designation, however, the maximum units shown in the Statistical Analysis sho!1 riot be exceeded. PA 15.0 also includes a 5 -acre allocation for a neighborhood park site. The pieclse ncreage and location will be determined prior to filial subdivision limp approval, however, the total allowable dwelling units in PA 15.0 will rernairi tale some. IG. PA a includrs n 40 -titre allocation for n I ligh School. 'I he precise ncrenge and location will be detemnined when Ilia Navy's Record of Decision is issued. If the actual acreaga varies from 40 acres, then the acrenge adlustnlenl w :l be made to the Community Core designation, however, the total allowable square fool of non-residential development and maximum dwelling units in PA a will rernairi the same. 17. PA 1 is composed of numerous public conveyance uses as specified in Section 2.3 of Ilia Specific Plan. 16. PA 1-A includes a 10 -arse allocation for nn Elementary School. Thr precise acreage aid location will be determined when the Navy's Record of Decision is issued. II ilio actual acreage varies from 1.0 acres, Men an oc,enge nd,usmise: will be made to the Learning Village use, however, the total allowable square feel of non-residential deveioprnenl in PA 1-A will remain the same. t9. The actual nrilalltlt OI existing SrlLrnie footage is 7.,183.A50. however, adjustments to two Planning Arens have been made. In PA 2, Corlinlun;!y Park, 14,100 square leer of Ilse total 40,531 ex+sting square lounge .s expected to be reused. In PA 5, Medium Density Residential, Ilia 39,485 existing square footage is expected to be replaced by iesiderilinl uses. 20. 'Ilia development interiorly assigned to the Community Park is .1 FAR; however, 114,1100 square feet of the existing 40,531 square feet is expected to be reused. 21. Planning Area 15 is comprised of subptanning areas 15-A through 15-E, which allocates development potential by land use type. The subplanning areas are riot site specil�c oil the Laiid Use Plan in. order to allow for flexibility ni future rnnster planning. 22. Ilia shaded area on thn Land Use Planning Areas minp (Figure 3.1) indicates where alternative conceptual rondway alignments for Tustin flonch flood and Warder Avenue could occur. This statistical analysis assumes the Most enslrr1 alignment for 1 ustin Ranch Rood and the most southerly alignment for Warder Avenue. II either final alignment differs from these assurned conceptual locations, the provisions of Section 3.2.5 shall apply. 23. In Planning Area 7.0, there is 4.1 gross ncies in private ownership (with 3.3 net acres estimated for development potentia:); Planning Aron 18 is proposed to be retained in Federal ownership by the Army Reserve with 2 2 acres to be deed transferred to the City of Tuslin, after ilia Anmy's acceptance of ilia 16.7 acres frorn the Navy, for Barranca ngtit-of-way (leaving 14.5 net acres). The total gross acreage for non-federal disposal is 1,585.4 acres WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of TusIt,i October --1996 September 1998 Paye 3-I5 Chapt.pr 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations n-laxi nuln Ili -nit on the number of ADrs generated from all non-residential uses Within the Specific Plan and for each neighborhood. •That limit is shown in Table 3-3, Trip Budget, which summarizes the square rootage of non- residential uses allot: ted to each nein=hborltood by Planning Arca, and the associated ADT. Resi.iential uses are shown. for information only, but UC :lot part of the Trip Bud��et. This information is derived from ?liar;ire Cor fes .I it Sla;ion (MCAS) Tus.rbi Specific Plan/Reuse Pfau Trgf is Study (..VCa.S Tra '-7c• Surdy), prepared by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Table 3-3 PLANNING AREA TRIP BUDGET' 5 Planning Area No. Assumed Land Use I Residential/Parks Amount ADTs Non -Residential I Amount I ADTs2 NEIGHBORHOOD A PA 8 Trip Budget Total L:=Neighborhood General Commercial 1 Learning Vil:age PA 1 Trip Budget Subtotal Neighborhood D Trip Budget Total 27,120 sf 1,385,531 sf ^ 2 Community Park 24.1 ac Light Industrial 47,570 s` 3 Transitional Housing 192 du Neighborhood A Square Footage Total 1,412,651 sf Neighborhood A Trip Budget Total NEIGHBORHOOD B 4 LDR (1-7 du'ac) 304 du 5 MDR (8-15 du/ac) 621 du 7 General Commercial 1 315,592 sf PA 7 Trip Budget Total Neighborhood B Square Footage Total 315,592 Neighborhood B Trip Budget Total NEIGHBORHOOD C 5 Regional Park I 84.5 ac General Commerical 57,500 sf Neighborhood C & PA 6 Trip Budget Total 57,500 sf 11 Neighborhood C Trip Budget Total NEIGHBORHOOD D MHDR (16-25 du/a:) 891 du 8 Office Park 1,815,360 sf Industrial Park 1,633,830 sf Shopping Center I 181,540 sf PA 8 Trip Budget Total L:=Neighborhood D Square Footage Total 3,630,730 sfl Neighborhood D Trip Budget Total NEIGHBORHOOD E 9 General Commercial I 110,990 sf Light Industrial 47,570 s` PA 9 Trip Budget Total 111. SF = Square Feet AC = .Acres DU = Dwehing Unrs RM = Hotel Rooms 2 ADTs for land use types derived from Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin Specific Plan/Re---se Plan Traffic Study (MCAS Tra`ic +0 ran byAustin-=o---s,. ^ia o Ins -no r i r to adoption) City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Page 3-18 Beiobef 1996 September 1998 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations Table 3-3 PLANNING AREA TRIP BUDGET' Planning Area No. Assumed Land Use Residential!Parks Non -Residential Amount ADTs Amount ADTsZ NEIGHBORHOOD E (Continued) 10 Office Park 174,570s' Light Industrial 57,110 sf General Commerical 17,460 sf PA 10 Trip Budget Total 1f General Commercial I 55,390 sf Office Park 6.5.505 sf Industrial Park 653,590 sf PA 11 Trip Budget Total 12 General Commercial 12,310 sf General Office 115.260 sf PA 12 Trip Budget Total 13 General Commerial 3=.240 sf General Office 133,950 sf Light Industrial 513.575 sf PA 13 Trip Budget Total 14 General Commer-i'al 42.340 sf General Office 335,720 sf Light Industrial 435,750 sf PA 14 Trip Budget Total Neighborhood E Square Footage Total I 3,535,130 sf Neighborhood E Trip Budget Total NEIGHBORHOOD F 16 General Commercial 72.930 sf General Office 97.250 sf Light Industrial 315.950 sf PA 16 Trip Budget Total 17 Light Industrial 284,310 sf PA 17 Trip Budget Total 18 Military I I 40.850 sf PA 18 Trip Budget Total 19 Shopping Center I 672.570 sf PA 19 Trip Budget Total Neighborhood F Square Footage Total 1,4E3.560 sf Neighborhood F Trip Budget Total I SF = Square Fee: AC = A: es DU = Dwelimg Units RM = Hotel Rooms 2 A:) -is 10. land use types denvec from Marine Corns Air Station (MCAS) Tustin Specific Pian;aeuse Pian Tragi: Study (MCAS t r rod rin-=•+• :i - Ia- e r d i o MCAS Tustin Specific Pran/Reus. ?;an City of T: ,stin t9elebef 11996 September 1998 Page 3-79 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations Table 3-3 PLANNING AREA TRIP BUDGET' Planning Area No. Assumed Land Use Residential/ Parks Non -Residential Amount ADTs Amount ADTsZ NEIGHBORHOOD G 15 LDR (1-7 du/ac) 272 du MDR (8-15 du/ac) 602 du General Commercial 62,730 sf Hotel 500. rn Golf Course 159.3 ac PA 15 Trip Budget Total 20 MHDR (16-25 du%ac) I 588 du General Commercial (by CUP) I 23,000 s -.' PA 20 Trip Budget Total 21 LDR (1-7 du/ac) - Tustin 711 LDR (1-7 du/ac) - irine 150 PA 21 Trip Budget Total Neighborhood G Square Footage Total 85,730 sf Neighborhood G Trip Budget Total NEIGHBORHOOD H 22 MDR (8-15 du/ac) 402 Neighborhood H & PA 22 Trip Budget Total t SF = Square Feet AC = Ares DU =Dwelling u:i:5 RN = Ho:e; Rooms 2 ACTS for land use types derived from Marine Corps Air St2nan (MCAS) Tustin Specific Plan,%Reuse Plan Traffic Study (MCAS Traffic S:.,=y) owa•ed 5v Austin -Foust Associa}es I,- (to be provided prior to adootion) All Planning Areas are shown to account for the total ADT associated with developing the Specific Plan, but the trip budget applies only to non- residential uses. They are highlighted in Table 3-3. Square footage is derived from the total net acreage of the assumed ]and uses within a ]and desi_nation multiplied by the floor area ratio (FAR) assigned to the applicable, assumed land use type. The Community Development Department and Public Works Department shall maintain a current Trip Budget Tracking form depicting the maximum square footage of non-residential development in each neighborhood. The form shall specify the assumed square footage of commercial, o"fice, institutional and other non-residential uses which have been assigned to each neighborhood. In addition, the form shall specify the amount of square footage approved for development with the equivalent ADTs assigned to a development, and amount of ADT's available for remaining development or available for transfer to another neighborhood. The information shall be further allocated to each Planning Area based on Table 3-3 for administration purposes only. The essential requirement is to document ADT status as it is impacted by each development project so that sufficient roadway capacity remains to accommodate later projects. City of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Paan/Reuse Pian Page 3-20 GefeSer49955 September 1998 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations 3.3 NEIGHBORHOOD A 3.3.1 Introduction Neighborhood A is composed of Plannin; .Areas 1, 2, and 3, as shown on :he Statistical Analysis (Table 3-2) and on the Land Use Planning Are!1$ ::,: p (Figure 3-1). The Learning Village (PA 1) is an educational environment consisting of a broad mix of public -serving uses. The Learning Village is cotnpri:ed of subplanning areas 1-A through 1-E as shown on Figure 3-1. Tir-1 .:,:-r .na-z iilag" ' -A3. The Village is already well defined by virtue of h-%'111 17 been the community support and administrative core of MCAS Tustin. It is expected that many of the existing buildings in the Learning Village will provide reuse opportunities for educational purposes. L"cluded .%-;thin PA 1- A is a 10 acre elementary school site proposed for the northern corner along Re'" -hill Avenue. The Leaning Village will also accommodate 10 acres of a La,;, Enforcement Training Center (PA 1-B), and a 4 acre Children's Intc nediate Care Shelter (PA 1-C). The Learning Village,;A,111 include n% -o child care facilities (PA 1-D and E) proposed for reuse (Building Numbers 199 and 547). In addition, a more detailed description of these and o: -:r public -benefit uses is contained in Section 2.3 of the Specific Plan. The Community Park (PA 2) is located within the existing militay recreational fields and facilities. It will contain sports fields and other com,-nunity-level recreational opportunities to serve residents of the Specific Plan as well as residents to the north. The Transitional/Emergency Ho,:sipg site (PA 3) would anticipate reuse of two existing barracks (Building :umbers 553 and 5_54) and accompanying parking areas for an emergence homeless shelter or transitional housing for single homeless persons. The regulations and guidelines have been developed in response to issues raised at both the 'neighborhood and Planning Area levels. The issues involve preserving the village character through new development and the reuse of courtyards, common greens, and pedestrian paths; screening and landscape design along roadways; creation of view corridors to the northern bli Zp hangar (if retained); and trail linkages to adjacent neighborhoods. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?lan City of T (,s in ^ebbe, -=99v September 1998 Page 3-29 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations '3.3.4 Planning Area 3 - Transitional/Emergency Housing A. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted uses The following uses shall be permitted by right %where the symbol "P" occurs or by conditional use permit «here the symbol "C" occurs. • Congregate care facility P • Govemment facility C • Medical/dental clinic C • School, public or private community college/educational campus C • Single room occupancy hotel (192 unit maximum) P • I'ransitional/Emergency housing (192 bed maximum) P B. :accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures are permitted when customarily associated with and subordinate to a permitted use on the same site and would include: • Administrative offices • Caretaker's quarters • Assembly/multi-purpose buildings • Kitchen/dinina • Maintenance/storaae facilities and structures • Medical/dental clinics C. Unlisted uses Those uses not specifically listed are subject to a determination by the Community Development Director as either permitted, permitted subject to a conditional use permit or prohibited consistent with the purpose of land use designation of this Planning Area and the Specific Plan. Decisions of the Director are appealable to the Planning Commission. D. Site Development Standards 1. Minimum lot area - none Maximum building height - 35 feet �. Maximum floor area ratio -x.60 FAR 19CRS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?ran ^cue; 'y9 September 1998 City of Tustin Paoe 3-33 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations City of Tustin Page 3-38 2. A view corridor into the park at the intersection of Armstrong* Avenue and North Loop Road (extension of %alencia) shall be maintained. 3. lit cattjunctiott with Master Platt improvements in excess of $1 million dollars in valuation, a A -screening wall shall be provided along the northern boundary of park where none exists in accordance with the General Regulations Section 3.1 1. A Sunli-nary of the key design allldehilCS for the C011-11111111:ty Pilrk is provided in Faure 3-3, located at the end of Section 3.3 WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan „` '., " September 1998 ....... . T Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations B. Accessory Lases and Structures - Accessory U>CS and structures are 1):'I'Ii11iILd when (.l1StOi1ldi 11} a_Ssociatcd with and subordinate to a permitted use on the same site and \would include: • Concession commercial, gift shops (sundries, souvenirs, books, collectibles, apparel) • Guard houses, gates and other security facilities structures • Maintenance facilities and structures • Restaurant, cafeteria, food court C. Unlisted Uses Those uses not specifically listed are subject to a determination by the Community Development Director as either permitted, permitted subject to a conditional use permit or prohibited consistent with the purpose of the land designation of this planning area and the Specific Plan. Decisions of the Director are appealable to the PlanniMi Commission. D. Site Development Standards Minimum lot size - 80 acres 2. Maximum building height - 40 feet; no building height limit shall apply to Hangar :it1 3. Maximum floor area ratio - .IG FAR for Urban Re6onal Park uses including retail and conunercial uses, and .25 FAR for the Regional Law Enforcement Training Classrooms �. Minimum building setbacksi6 a) North Loop Road - 25 feet b) Armstron Avenue - 20 feet 5. Landscape setbacks 16 a) North Loop Road - 30 feet b) Armstrong Avenue - 20 feet Landscaping a) Compliance with the City of Tustin Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines 16 Lau],; -;;cape setbacks a:e measured from the back of the curb and are a combination of parkway, sidev,'alk, and planting areas. Building setbacks are measured from future right-of-way. Non- confo_rming landscape and building setbacks will be permitted to remain to accommodate existing walls or buildings not in future right-of-way. MCRS Tusti;, Specific Pianl'Rause Pian City of Tustin September 1998 ober :??S Paoe 3-67 Chapter 3 • Land Use DevelopmentlReuse Regulations C. NEIGHBORHOOD E City of Tustin ?age 3-90 1. Introduction Neighborhood E is comwised of Planning Areas 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. as shown on the Statistical Analysis (Table 3-2). PA's 11 and 14 are currently leased for agricultural production. Future uses within this neighborhood will primarily involve the development of new structures and facilities. The regulations and guidelines encourage a high quality business park development, where building orientation/site design. Darking areas, pedestrian/bicycle paths, and access points are we'll coordinated between Planning Areas and relate well to adjacent uses. The regulations also address the need for a coordinated internal circulation system within the neighborhood. 2. Planning Area 9 - Commercial Business A. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted by ri=ht where the s\•r::bol "P" occurs or by conditional use where the symbol "C" occurs. 1. Offices: • Corporate headquarters • General offices for. advertising agency, economic consultant, insurance companies, escrow companies, interior decorator, real estate, public utilities, personnel agency, management consultant, collection agency • Heliport • Medical clinics • Medical offices/healthcare centers • Professional offices for: architect, accountant, attorney, chiropractor, contractor, dentist, doctor, engineer, optometrist, land planner, and other similar professions 2—'.. Retail commercial uses: • Alcoholic beverage sales establis��ments. in accordance with the Tustin C:iN- Code • Bakeries, retail only • Books, zifts, and stationary stores • Coffee houses/cafes y Convenience stores, in accordance with the Tustin City Code • Del icatessen/cafeteria • Florist • General retail stores 0 P C P P F& C P P a C P P MCAS Tustin SDacific PianAR-ruse Plan ^mac _-September 1998 Crrpter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations • Jewelry stores P • Oitice supplies and equipment P • Photography studio, laboratory P .3-2. Sen•ice commercial uses, including incidental retail sales: • Automobile service station, in 5-5. Industrial uses (Hinited tva MaXIMLIM Of 3Fi Of ch f : • Advertising and publishing businesses P • Blue printing, reproduction and copying services, photocopies, bookbinding, photoengraving and printing P • Commercial library P • Communications businesses P • Industrial/commercial incubator (flexible) buildings P • Instructional./vocational school P • Research and development facilities (including laboratories, product development, and manufacturing) P Science laboratories P • Simulation development uses P • Software design uses P • Technology exchange/transfer service P WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?ian September 1998 9efsbe;-199S Ciy of Tustin Paoe 3-91 accordance with the Tustin Cite Code C • Banks and financial institutions with driN-e-thru window C • Banks and financial institutions without drive-thru window P • Barber, beauty shops P • Car wash C • Coin-operated self-service laundromats P • Dry cleaners (commercial) C • Emergency care facility P • Hotei :ffotel P • Locksmith P • Print shop P • Restaurants, family, specialty, and fast-food without drive-thru P • Restaurants, with drive-thru C • Small animal hospitals or clinics C • Tailor shop P • Telephone answering service P • Travel agency P 4. Public/Institutional Uses: • Churches and other religious institutions C • Nursery school or child care center C 5-5. Industrial uses (Hinited tva MaXIMLIM Of 3Fi Of ch f : • Advertising and publishing businesses P • Blue printing, reproduction and copying services, photocopies, bookbinding, photoengraving and printing P • Commercial library P • Communications businesses P • Industrial/commercial incubator (flexible) buildings P • Instructional./vocational school P • Research and development facilities (including laboratories, product development, and manufacturing) P Science laboratories P • Simulation development uses P • Software design uses P • Technology exchange/transfer service P WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?ian September 1998 9efsbe;-199S Ciy of Tustin Paoe 3-91 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations Section 2.17 of this Specific Plan. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation facilities shall provide connections within the Planning Area, to adjacent Planning Areas, and to citywide bicycle trail where applicable. 8. A portal intersection treatment shall be provided at WarnerAvenue and Redhill Avenue (see Section 2.17 for landscape guidelines). 9. Other General Development Regulations (refer to Section 3.1 1 as applicable) 10. Signage (refer to Section 3.12 as applicable) H. Off-street parking (refer to Section 3.13 as applicable) F. Special Development Requirements 1. Concept plan approval shall be required for Planning Area 9 prior to new development (refer to Section 4.2.1 of this Specific Plan). 2.. The baseline mix of uses for Planning, Area 9 is 70 percent Commercial and 30 percent Industrial, which will be administered by the Non -Residential Land Use/Trip Budget procedure specified in Section 3.2.4. The purpose is to ensure that adequate circulation capacity is available to serve the proposed project. A conditional use permit shall be required if more than 30% of development is proposed for industrial uses. 3. l✓xisting structures shall be brought into conformance with the Uniform Building Code as amended. State of California Title 24 Access Compliance (handicapped provisions), and requirements Tofr;the Americans with Disabilities ]Act (ADA). C-6 4. 14 Lmt et�m ed.fleatiens aiid-eyisioT. of indep een City erzTuar... and LIi se a-genaies-ieeeii'ing Y 6pert .'. D1..... new n, r G. Development or Reuse Guidelines 2. MCAS 'i ustin Specific Plan/Reuse !'Jan September 1998 ^c:9 Buildings shall be located to relate to Redhill Avenue with parking either in front or behind the building. Provisions for common vehicular access points and shared parking shall be encouraged and coordinated with any development plans within Planning Area 9 and the adjacent Planning .Area 10. Demolition of structures shall be considered or undertaken under the following conditions: 1) where information determines the need for demolition to eliminate public health and safety risks. 2) to improve the appearance of the Planning .Area, 3) to accommodate the completion of major roadway improvements, and 4) to properly implement the land use intent of this Planning Area. City o," i usrin Pad a . Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations 3. Planning Area 10 - Commercial Business ReeFeati A. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted by right where the symbol "P" occurs or by conditional use where the synnbol '•C" occurs. 1. Off ices: • Corporate headquarters P • General offices for: advertising agency, economic consultant, insurance companies, escrow companies, interior decorator, real estate, public utilities, personnel agency, management consultant, collection agency P • Heliport C • .1fedical clinics P • :'Medical offices/healthcare centers P • Professional offices for: architect, accountant, attorney, chiropractor, contractor, dentist. doctor, engineer, optometrist, land planner, and other similar professions P 2. Retail commercial uses: • Coffee houses/cafe P • Delicatessen/cafeteria P • Office supplies and equipment P • Photography studio, laboratory P 3-2-. Service commercial uses, including incidental retail sales: • Live performance facility, night club C • Private clubs, lodge halls, union halls P • Recreational equipment sales P • Restaurant, family, specialty and fast food without drive thru P • Restaurant, fast food with drive din.] C • Banks and financial institutions P • Dry cleaners (commercial) P • Emergency care facility C • Hotellmotel C • On-site alcoholic beverage sales establishment including bars, taverns, cocktail lounges (when not an integral part of a restaurant) C • Print or reproduction shop P • Telephone answering services P • Travel agencies P 4—'.. Commercial recreation uses: • Bowling alleys P • Driving ranges ? Family Entertainment Centers P Ciy or Tustin MCAS Tustin Sae:ific ?laNl_--use ?an ?ale „ 94 : 6 September 1998 Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations �. "For -Fee" sports such as batting, cages.. P tennis club, model airplane flying, etc. • • health Clubs P • Ice Skating Rinks/in-line or roller hockcy P • Miniature golf course P • Movie theaters P • Private/non-profit cultural facilities such as Commercial library art galleries, music halls. museums P • Sports related research facility P • Track facilities P • Training centers P • Video arcade P • Virtual -Reality facilities P ». Public/Institutional uses: • • Nursery school or child care center C • Churches and other religious institutions C 6. Industrial uses: • Advertising and publishing businesses P • Blue printing, reproduction and copying services, photocopies, bookbinding, photoengraving and printing P • Commercial library P • Coin inunications businesses P • IndustriaUcommercial incubator (flexible) buildings P • InstructionaUvocational school P • Research and development facilities (including laboratories, product development, and manufacturing) P • Science laboratories P • Simulation development uses P • Software design uses P • Technology exchange/transfer sen -ice P • Utility building/facility C B. Accessory uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures are permitted when customaril}' associated with and subordinate to a permitted use on the same site and would include: • Enclosed, screened outdoor storage • Maintenance facilities and structures WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse P,"an City of Tustin September 1998 8rtabef 4-996 Paoe 3-95 r portal Intersection troatmonl PA 1 PA boo figura 2.16 secondary community •—� Warner AVG. slrealscapo I1 Intersection Treatment \l, see IlOura 2-21 I 1� see figure 2-18 I � \ I PA 10 , \ 1 I COMMERCIAL 1 -RECREATION - PA 9 i,=.u��tnjr���; I I PA 13 COMMERCIAL t 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS design of parking 1l 1 areas and access 1 \\ points to consider L._.. ..L._....._....._._._._J \ automotive connections 1 \ \ ------- fie twean planning areas - out Loo Roa --------------------- v 4 t/ Redltlll Avo.---�;♦ \ edge condition t 1 PA 11 �` �`°\\\ PA 1 ; n sae figure 2-28b I 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS �`� �\ COMMERCIAL `\\ BUSINESS i 16 I \ ► cornmercial uses not �'" — \ I o:1 to tuo llosigned In e ¢1 ' PA 12 'strip commercial • project 1 (COMMERCIAL d I BUSINESS 2 t 1 Portal InlereeCllon ..0 —� _ J r—� _ r jj(I _ _ . treatment see figure 2.1 _ _ — Barranca Parkway — �_---� r olare opportunity to offer I r views to ito f azure I Peakl I Barranca Parkway Armstrong Ave. and on•slta faeturroe edge condition streetscape see figure 2.30a or 2-30b sea figure 2.23 t South Loop Road Slreel5cope �figure ea 2.22 78 PA 16 '#-* -primary community p intersection treatment see ngure2-18 PA 17 PA 18 Tustin Ranch Road atreetscape see figura 2.19 portal Intersection treatment see figure 2.18 r yo y� HOT 70 SCALE Chapter • Land Use and Development/Reuse Regidallons Neighborhood E V.I.n.l. A w.n..A, Yunne. Pkv i r • I I 111EPLAN NG I CENTER 7lufinStation SPociOr.!'kin/Rr•.-P;an Ciryofrusfir f figure 3.7 I I I Chapter 3 -, Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations u.. 13. Landscaping a) Areas not devoted to buildings, parking areas, hardsca e. and roads, shall be landscaped. b) Compliance with the City of Tustin Landscape and Imeation Guidelines C) Compliance with the Landscape Design Guidelines in Section 2.17 of this Specific Plan 13. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation facilities shall provide connections within the Planning Area, to adjacent Planning :'Areas, and to citywide bicycle trails where applicable. 14. Other General Development Regulations (refer to Section 3.11 as applicable) 16. Signage (refer to Section 3.12 as applicable) 16. Off-street parking (refer to Section 3.13 as applicable) G. Site Development Standards -(City of Tustin) Condominiums and N-lultiple Family Dwellings 1. 1Vaximum dwelling units - 7 dwelling units per acre 24. Minimum development site - 10 acres 3-=. Maximum building height - 40 feet -;. Maximum lot coverage - 66 percent, less the required building and landscape setbacks 5-1. Common open space - 400 square feet per dwelling unit located within common, designated recreational areas. Private attached Pround level patios may be credited if open on three sides. Areas not available for open space credit include all structures. streets, driveways, landscape setbacks, and parking lots. 64. Minimum gross floor area per dwelling unit, excluding the garage a) Bachelor - 450 square feet b) 1 Bedroom - 550 square feet c) 1 Bedroom with den - 700 square feet d) 2 Bedrooms - 750 square feet e) 2 Bedrooms or more with den - 850 square feet 7-6. Minimum building setbacks»8 a) Harvard Avenue - 42 feet b) Edinger Avenue - 40 feet c) Moffett Avenue - 10 feet d) Local public street - 10 feet f) Private street or private drive - 5 feet g) Interior side yard - 3 feet 's Building setbacks are measured from future right-of-way. Nonconforming building and landscape setbacks will be permitted to remain where existing buildings and structures are not in future right-of-way. WAS Tustin Specific PtaniReuse Rpm City of T us:i. September 1998 Qete.T� 199-5 Page . Chapter 3 • Land Use Development/Reuse Regulations Ei h) Rear yn-d - 10 feet I ) Distances between principal strictures - 10 feet J) Distances between accessory structures - 5 feet 8. Landscape setbacks -9 a) Edinger Avenue - 40 feet b) Harvard Avenue - 30 feet c) Moffett avenue - 20 feet 9. Landscaping a) Areas not devoted to buildings, parking areas, hardsca pe, and roads, shall be landscaped. b) Compliance with the City of Tustin Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines c) Compliance with the Landscape Design Guidelines in Section 2.17 of this Specific Plan 10. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation facilities shall provide connections within the Planning Area, to adjacent Planning Areas, and to citywide bicycle trails where applicable. 11. Other General Development Regulations (refer to Section 3.11 as applicable) 12. Signage (refer to Section 3.12 as applicable) 13. Off-street parking (refer to Section 3.13 as applicable) H. Site Development Standards - (City of Tustin) Patio homes 1. Maximum dwelling units - 7-1-5-- dwelling units per acre 2. Minimum lot area - none, refer to Section 3.9.4.I below 3. Building. site requirements - patio home subdivisions shall be designated as a development unit on a tentative map. 4. Maximum building height - 35 feet 5. Maximum lot coverage - 100 percent, less required building and landscape setbacks 6. Common open space - 400 square feet per dwelling unit located within common, designated recreational areas. A minimum of 150 square feet may be for private use if located on around level and open on three sides. Areas not available for o-ocn space credit include all structures, streets, driveways. landsca_ue setbacks, and parking lots. 7. 'Minimum gross floor area per dwelling unit, excluding the garage - 900 square feet 8. Maximum number of four bedroom units - 30 percent C9 Landscape setbacks are measured from the back of the curb and are a combination of parkway, sidewalk. and planting areas. Landscape setbacks may be reduced to accommodate existing walls or buildings. o; Tustin WAS Tustin Specht PlanlReuse Plan ape 152 bc._ _.1999 September 1998 golf course design to provide view windows East Connector streetscape— see figure 2-24 r I PA 15 PA 7 GOLF VILLAGE I L- -- --- --------- - NEIGH. T1 -------------- — PARK primary community— intersection treatment. see figure 2-18 golf course design to �rovide view windows Tustin Ranch Road streetscape see figure 2-19 PA 15 GOLF VILLAGE PA 8 North Loop Road- streetscape see figure 2-22 I I I I I Edinger Ave. edge condition see figure 2-29b portal intersection ! ;r.• �� detail see figure 2-1 001 , .l DENSITY 1 PA 20 less intense building massing MED,HIGH • I and lower density along _ • SITY Harvard Ave.,stair stepping' Fd. I i into the site RESIDENTIAL � ��o� ` • 1� ' sensitive site planning co • • �� ,. �� t of any convenience commercial uses PA 15 GOLF VILLAGE PA 15 GOLF VILLAGE II r NEIGH. i J r PARK I r i I r r r ELEMENTARY n / SCHOOL I � i I � r I � r I I I 7r r r / r r � I secondary community intersection treatment . see figure 2-18 I i1 i • � ar. •� aaar� 3 • PA 21 to00 � LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0- ----------------- -- ---- --------- i I• • I: PA 21 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • • • • I Tustin / Irvine city boundary ,Peter's Canyon Regional Trail I Q Icaca I= Moffett -Ave. streetscape see figure 2-25 upgrade boundary wall / streetscape to establish -- I greater compatibility with I the east side of Harvard Ave. ir-- Harvard Ave. edge condition see figure 2-31 b or c architectural and landscape improvements to existing housing to appear consistent in quality with private market housing NO 3 NOT TO SCALE Chapter 3 • Land Use and Development/Reuse Regulations Neighborhood G Key Mao s 5 x , Edinger Av Valencia A Wam•r Ar Barmnca Pkv rMM THE PLANNING CENTER Tustin Station Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin Figure 3-9 Chapter a • Implementation/Administration residential square footages for subplanning areas 15-A through 15-E. Include accommodation for schools and neisvhborhood parks where applicable; 2. Identification of buildings to be renovated and buildings to be removed, including a schedule for renovation and/or demolition. I An overall external and internal access plan including an analysis of circulation improvements and parking required as a result of development. This analysis shall address phasing of necessary improvements; 4. A design program for the Planning Area including the conceptual design features of buildings and structures, plans for renovations, and building locations and height ranges; 5. A concept landscape and hardscape plan including streetscape design, parkway and edge treatments, and buffering/screening of remaining interim uses, if applicable; 6. Conceptual utility connection plans and overall drainage plan required for development and phasing of major improvements; and 7. Other information as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. C. Review Criteria The Planning Ceinmi :'.' .. ide. :he The following criteria shall be considered prior to final action on a concept plan. -- 1. Continuity and adequacy of all circulation systems, such as roads, access points, trails, pedestrian ways, and other infrastructure systems needed to serve the project; 2. Continuity and design quality of architecture and renovations proposed, as well as landscape and hardscape theme and treatments; Satisfactory response to the urban design features speci;ied in Chapter 2 and under each Planning Area in Chapter 3; 4. Conformity with the ?ion -Residential Land Us --,,Trip Budget, including authorized adjustments; and 5. Compliance with other Specific Plan provisions. City of Tustin MCAS Tustin, Speci;ic Plan/Reuse Plan 2aa 4-4 -. September 1998 Chapter 4 • Implementation%Administration NTS"here adequate infrastructure is in place and supports anticipated development, this Phasing Plan would enable earlier response to positive market conditions and result in more rapid buildout of the Specific Plan. 'W'here a proposed development project is not supported by existing infrastructure, conditions of approval shall be established to ensure that appropriate infrastructure is constructed in accordance with this Phasing Plan, the Coininunity Facilities and Infrastructure Report, or tate joint EIi2,'EIS, as applicable. Certain phasing triggering mechanisms that relate to the, anticipated development schedule in Table 4-1 apply to all development anticipated within the Specific Plan area except for interim uses or leases and certain reuse development as defined in the Specific Plan or in the joint EIS,'EI2. 4.4.3 Phasing Requirements MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?'an Cityr of ; I;s.i.? September 1998-4s�3 i20e '- i i Table 4-1 ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULING LAND USES YEAR 1 TOTAL 1997-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2020+ RESIDENTIAL (in DU or SF) Low Densrw 278 du 887 dul 1,155 ; I.fed: Jm D?:'•5::y 1 1,023 d -i ':.'23 Medium -Koh Dens;IV 200 du 388 du 555 !Golf VIIIaae 375 du 559 du 1 _ V2= Transilio^Ho sig a: 294 s. 1 s' Communry Cxe 1 891 du Sublotall 478 dul 2,673 du 559 d.1 891 dul I4.601 du 133.294 sfl I 1I 1 133.293 sfl COMMERCIAUBUSINESS in Sr-) Commercial'Business 1 675,000 979,4081 910,130 1,504,896 235,8171 1 4.305.251 Commercial 350,000 322,566 1 672.565 Villa a Services 100,000 189,688 25,904 1 315.592 iCommunity Core 150,000 875,0001 2.646,5721 3.671.572 Golf Village 1 217,800 62,726 1 280.326 Subtotal 675,000 1,429,408 1,640,184 1,743,526 1,110,8171 2.646.5721 9.245.507 INSTITUTIONAURECREATIONAL On S LearningVillage 822.5561 590,095 1 1.355.936 Communi Park 40,531 40.531 Urban Regional Park 1 496,068 78,924 1 574.992 Subtotall 1.359,155 669,019 1.935.028 GRAND TOTAL 478 du 2,673 du 559 du 891 du 4.601 du 2.167.449 sf 2,098,427 sf 1.640,184 sf 1,743,526 sfl 1,110,817 sfJ 2.646,572 sf 11.4D6.975 sf !Source: ERA. HhTB and the City o1 Tushn. NTS"here adequate infrastructure is in place and supports anticipated development, this Phasing Plan would enable earlier response to positive market conditions and result in more rapid buildout of the Specific Plan. 'W'here a proposed development project is not supported by existing infrastructure, conditions of approval shall be established to ensure that appropriate infrastructure is constructed in accordance with this Phasing Plan, the Coininunity Facilities and Infrastructure Report, or tate joint EIi2,'EIS, as applicable. Certain phasing triggering mechanisms that relate to the, anticipated development schedule in Table 4-1 apply to all development anticipated within the Specific Plan area except for interim uses or leases and certain reuse development as defined in the Specific Plan or in the joint EIS,'EI2. 4.4.3 Phasing Requirements MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse ?'an Cityr of ; I;s.i.? September 1998-4s�3 i20e '- i i Chapter 4 • Implementation/Administration Table 4-3 ON-SITE CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS Road Limits Classification Share From To Tustin Ranch Road/Including Inlerchanae Edinger Barranca Major Arte. I 10040 I 470, I0' Warner Avenue Redhill Valencia So. Loop Jee Major Arterial 100%, Redhill Avenue Barran^. w/o Valencia Et3irteef Major A tenial NA (1) i i Edinaer Avenue E,10 Redhill w/o Jamboree � Major Arterial 10040 I Barranca Parkway Peters Carvon Harvard Major Arterial NA (1) Warner Avenue South L000 Jamboree Primary Arterial i0040 Harvard Avenue Barran: --a Edinger Primary Arterial 10040 West Connector Edjnoer North Loop Secondary Arterial 100% Armstrong Avenue North L000 Barranca Secondary Arterial 10040 Valencia Loop Road Redhill Armstrong Secoidary Arterial 100% East Connector Edinger North Loop Secondary Arterial 10040 Moffett Avenue Noah Lo:):) Harvard Local Collector Street 10040 I Landsdowne Road No: th L000 — Local Street 1 100% j Severyns Road NwIth L000 — Local Street 100°0 Marble Mountain Road Harvard — Local Collector Street 100° RedhilYGa-m-,-1'.--erser! ► *Fair Share Tustin Ranch Road;Sdinge: Avenue Interc`anoe. NA(7) Dedication of right -0i -way only. Reauirements for off-site circulation improvements are discussed in the joint _ EUR EIS. They generally consist of partial improvements to existing roadways and intersections. Improvement costs for most of them are. proportionately shared with other projects. The fair share approach attempts to define a nexus between the improvement and ultimate facility user. Funding mechanisms for off-site improvements potentially include, but are not limited to: in lieu gas taxes; Measure AZ funds; funds from the cities of Tustin, Irvine, and Santa Ana and the County of Orange; developer contributions; assessment district funding; or other similar financing mechanisms. Additional outside sources such as state or federal funds may also be used. As shown in Table 4-4, ADT Development Thresholds, average daily traffic (ADT) volume thresholds have been defined for each phase of development. These volumes establish the level of development for which certificates of occupancy or building permits can be released or issued. Once the cumulative total ADT is reached, circulation improvements must be initiated to allow subseauent development. City of Tustin WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Ran Page 4-16 ^c` 96 September 1.998 Chapter 4 • Implementation/:'fid ministration 4.4.9 Storm Drain The storm drain system will be constructed in phases which provide maximum flood protection for existing and planned development and keep improvement costs to a minimum. While retention basins may be useful in auamenting channel construction, that option will not be defined until subsequent studies are completed, so they are not identified in the phasir:a plan. Since a portion of the property is designated by the Federal Emergency 'Management Agency (FEMA) as being within the 100 year flood plain, verification of the afiecied area, determination of mitigations and filing of a flood zone map with FEMA will need to be coordinated between the Cities of Tustin and Irvine and the Orange County Flood Control District. Table 4-6, Storm Drain Phasing, indicates the anticipated phas-.d improvements to be made as the Specific Plan is developed. On-site drainage improvements will be funded by the project through a likely combination of developer contributions, assessements or other frnancin-2 mechanisms. �.:�tici ., : ,, t.to - 4. ;, m W u m ,m 1 inn : �:< < i "u Peter's Canyon Channel improvements are not mediated as the project and have already been programmed by OCFCD for design and construction. It is anticipated tht the Santa Ana - Santa Fe Channel and Barranca Channal improvements )4 -ill also be an OCFCD responsibility. Table 4-6 STORM DRAIN PHASING Phase On -Site Drainage Improvements i Limits I Armstron North of Valencia North Loop to Barranca I Valencia North Loop I Eest and' west fry -From West Armstrong channel „ to Tustin Ranch Road II Valencia North Loop West of Tustin Ranch Road to Moffett II Moffett Valencia Loop North to Peters Canyon II Northeast Connector North of Valencia Loop to the Valencia Loo.:) III Tustin Ranch Road Warner Avenue to Barranca Parkway III Warner West of Tustin Ranch Road to Tustin Ranch Road; Valencia South L000 to Peters Canyon channel I III, IV li Valencia South Loop portions in Phase IV South of Moffett to Warner; South of Warner to Tustin Ranch Road (two separate reaches) III Jamboree Valencia South Loop to Barranca Parkway' _IV Tustin Ranch South of Valencia Loop to Warner channel MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan City of Tustin 9tob-.F-V.L_9s6, September 1998 Paoe 4-21 Chapter 5 • Reuse Authority/Institutional Framework dealing with anticipated real estate assets from the base. An approach %A -III need to be developed which maximizes the benefits of the reuse process. The LRA's responsibilities will cover a broad range of issues similar to that of developing a small community. The magnitude of these efforts will require close involvement of the LRA. Table -1 is a summary of specific implementation tasks which should be undertaken during the next 5 years. Where appropriate, a more thorough discussion of certain tasks follows. Table 5-1 I IMPLEMENTATION TASKS X-- ---X Timeframe 1996 1 1997 1998 1 1999 2000 1 Beyond Tasks Responsibility MANAGEMENT/ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS ■ Task Force Recommends LRA =X PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ■ Exglore Feasibility of Reuse Plan to HUD and Navy X-- – iE X---- ---X Cooperative Agreement or ■ rxzl EIS/EIR Completed LRA,'Marine X I l Cor ps/NavV ■ Determine Initial and On -Going ■ Reuse Plan Adoo:ed Tustin/Irvine X ----X Maintenance Leve!s, ■ Adoot Specific Plan Tustin/Irvine X X iln—frames and Funding ■ Arend General P,an;Zoning Tustin/Irvine X X ■ Determine Government (as needed) X ------- --- --X Furnished Prope ;y Available ■ ROD Published Navy X X fw N,,aintenance ■ Evaluate Alternatives and LRA X- ---------- ----------- X ■ I, agreed, prepare and solicit Determine Manaoement X-- ------ – ----X i=P for Cooperative Approach and Ne::essay Agreement Services S::pport for Imp!e:,en;ation ■ If Agreed and Feasible, • Budget X– --- – ----X Negotiate Cooperative • Interim Use Program Aoreement • Long Term Development ■ Transfer of Installation Plan X--- X --X • Interim and long term marketing • Interim and management of project tasks • Financing ■ Create Redevelopment Project LRA X-- ---X ---- - -X Area I PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ■ Exglore Feasibility of LRA/Marine X-- – iE X---- ---X Cooperative Agreement or Corps/Navy Ca etaker Agreements ■ Determine Initial and On -Going Marine X ----------- ----X Maintenance Leve!s, Corps/Navy/LRA iln—frames and Funding ■ Determine Government Marine Corps.'!.avy X ------- --- --X Furnished Prope ;y Available fw N,,aintenance ■ I, agreed, prepare and solicit LRA X-- ------ – ----X i=P for Cooperative Agreement Services ■ If Agreed and Feasible, LRA/Marine X– --- – ----X Negotiate Cooperative Corps/Navy I Aoreement ■ Transfer of Installation Marine X--- X --X City of Tustin, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Page 5-4 September 1998^-'�� 199S Chapter 5 • Reuse Authority/lnstitutional Framework Table 5-1 IMPLEMENTATION TASKS Timeframe 11 Tasks I Responsibility 1 1996 1 1997 1 1998 1999 1 2000 1 Beyond 11 PROPERTY CONVEYANCES . ■ Public Conveyances • ROD Marine CorosiNavy X • Fost(s) X--- ------- ---------- ---------- -----•-- • Ciean Parcel Marine Coros/Nay X---- ----- X ---------- ---------- ----•X • Terms/ Condizions of 1 ransfers Marine Corps.."Maly X--- •------ -.-...X ---------- I ----X • Transfers Marine Cbrz.S'N2Vv X-- ------- -----X ---------- ----X ■ Economic Development Convevance Marine Cor,-s.1Na,6y • Business Deveiopmant Paan Preparation LRA --X------- ----X • Reuse Plan Adooted LRA X _ • Aoalica,ion Preoaa:ion LRA X--------- ----X • Application Sub:ni::a: to DON LRA X---- ---X • Negotiate Payment Terms!Conditions LRA!Navy/Marine Corps X --X X----- ---X • ROD Marine Corps/Navy X • Ciean-ua Na !Marine Cocas X---- ------ ------- -----X-- ---------- ---X • cos:(s) NavylMa. ine Corps X--- ------- - ------ - --------- ...X • Transfers Naw/Marine Co•as X--- ------- ------- ------- -------- ■ Neaotiated Purchases Na !Marina Co,Ds • Aoaraisals Na /Marine Coos X-- ------- ------- --X • Clean Parcel Navv/Marine Coms X--- -- -- — --- -X • Fost(s) X-- ------- ------- ------- -------- • Neootiate Terms Navy/Marine'LRA X-- — ------- • Sell/Transfer Na /Marine Cocos X--- ------- ------- ------- -------- Public Bid Sale Na !Marine Cors • ADDraisals Naw/Marine Corns X--- ------ ------- -----X • Market Prooe , Na /Marine CorDs X----- ------- ------- -------- • Solicit Offers Naw/Maine Cors X---- — ---- I -------- • Conclude Aoreemems Navy/Marine Coms X---- ------- ------- — ----- • Clean Parcel Na /Marine Corns X----- ----- ------ ----X •=ost(s) X--- -- — — — — ---------- • Sell i� ransfer Navv/Marine Co. -Ds X---- -- -------- --------- ----------- a Personal Prober Navv/Marine Coros • Inventory of Progeny Marine Corps/ Na /L=,A X------ ----------- -----X • Determination of Need for Reuse LRA/Navy! Marine Cor Ds X------ ----------- ----X • Consultation L.WNavy/ Marine Coros X-- ---- ----X • Public Conveyance/=—conomic Convevance Deer nlned X-- ----- ----X • ROD X------- X • Transfer to LRA!?ubiiC Navy/Marine Corps ----X MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Paan City of Tustin September 1998 et4-09S Page 5-5 Chapter 5 • Reuse Authority/Institutional Framework Table 5-1 IMPLEMENTATION TASKS Timeframe 1996 1997 1998 1 1999 1 2000 Be and Tasks Responsibility MARKETING • Develop Master Marketing LRA X Plan • Adopt Prospect Handing LRA X--- ------- --X and Screening Pro:ess • Coordinate with LRA X--- -------- ---------- --------- -------- ----------- Regional/State Marketing Programs • Develop Brochure and LRA ----X Marketing Materia!s • Develop and Identify LRA X ----X Incentive Program • Establish Brokerage LRA ----X Relationships DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS it Prepare Interim Use Plan LRA X---- ..--X ----X • Evaluate Site for Appropriate Interim Uses and Improvement Costs • Determine Lease Rates • Fosl X ---- --------- ---------- -----X • Master Lease from Navy on LRAb'Navy/ X-- --------- --------- --------- Individual Sites and Marine Cors Sublease to Tenants • Prepare Property for Market LRA/Navy/Marne X– --------- ---------- ---------- -------- Infrastructure Needed Corps Building/Grounds Preparation Provisions for Tenant Access/Securi, • Define Structure for LRA/Navy/Marine X--- ------- ---X Efficient Lease Negotiations Corps I and Approval Process • Create Standard Contracts, LRA'Navy/ X ---------- ----X Type Authorized Tenant Marine Corps Improvements, etc. • Establish Property LRA X------- ---X Manaaement e Long Term Development Plan • Monitor Environmental LRA,'RAB/Navy/ X------ --------- ------ ----- – - Clean-uD Marine Corps • Determine Environmental LRA,'Navy/ X------ ------- ---------- -------- ------ ------- and Demolition Issues Marine Corps Affecting Site Delive • Establish Critical Patn for LRA X -------- --------X ProDertv Deveioomen: • Determine/Manage Studies LRA Needed to ImDleme i; Plan (examples follow) _ Utility Provision X— -------- ----X Agreements/Easements L�j-------- Survevs X— --------- — — --- City of Tustin. Page 5-6 MCAS Tustin Specific Plan; Reuse Plan September 1998 Gerfebef 77,99 Chapter 5 • Reuse Authority/Institutional Framework Table 5-1 IMPLEMENTATION TASKS Timeframe _l 1996 T 1997 1998 1999 1 2000 1 Beyond Tasks I Responsibility Parcelization Plan or X----- ---------- ....X Plaster Subd'vision Plan Programma:ic Nla;ine Corps, "Navy ---X ---------- ----X Agreements on Property Transferees Historical Res:):. -.'::es • Develop Strategy for Construction and LRA X•- ----X Completion of Ph= -sed Infrastructure • Develop Packages for LRA X-------- ---------- --------- --------- Sales/Ground Leases FINANCING ■ Submit Grant .Aoplica.ions to: LRA • California Trade and X X X X X X Commerce • OSA X X X • _DA X X X • HLID X X X X X X ■ Apply for California f 151i:ay LRA ----X ---X Base Fnternrise Zone ■ Unde::ake a Comprehensive LRA X------- X ranting Feasibility Analysis for Imalementation of: • Javeloper Fee Pro o. ams • Tax =—xemD: Fi^a ;_-:na ° O:her Public Improvement and Facility Financing Pro rams ■ Explore Other Venture Capital X---- ----X O000 lunities In addition to the responsibilities noted above, it will be critical to develop an annual and long-term operating budget for the LRA. The budget wi'l allow, staff to identify in more detail the capital investments needed, assess funding requirements, and prioritize marketing efforts. A strategy %;-III also be needed to identify start-up funds needed for the LRA. 5.3 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE/COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT/CARETAKER SERVICES R' hen a military base is closed and its active duty mission concluded, the Department of Defense and more specifically the Marine Corps xvill still have an obligation to provide a certain minimum level of maintenance for the remaining buildings and infrastructure on the base until all buildings and WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Paan City of Tustin September 1998 9c�-fobef 1199 Paoe S -i Chapter 5 • Reuse Authority/Institutional Framework 5.7.2 Marketing Campaign In conjunction with the marketing strategy, a specific marketing and advertising campaign needs to be developed. Responsibilities of the LRA in regards to the marketing effort include: overall management, management of participating entities, database creation and maintenance, and creation of advertisin; and marketing materials. A typical program m1eht include: A CiN of Tustin Pace 5-14 Development of marketing materials for disseminating information including: A professionally designed sales brochure; 2. A technical package that will provide supplementary inventory information and description of facilities; 3. Basic print media advertising photos, a logo, art work, etc. for use in print media advertising the MCAS, Tustin facilities in various economic development targeted trade ;roup publications. Versions of ads with and without photos should be developed. Y. A video that highlights the base as an economic development resource, conveying the ultimate design and function of the site to prospecuve tenants. 5. A newsletter detailing LRA activity either by contributing a column to the community Redevelopment newsletter, local newspapers or by developing its own periodic newsletter to be mailed out to current prospects, corporate location offices and other interested paries. 6. The possible development of an on -base marketing center. 7. The creation of a "web" page to provide up-to-date information on development and leasing opportunities and highlights of new development or reuse activities. Contacts and Mailings to Trade and Professional Groups/Associations Trade groups undertake efforts to aid their members. These effo,—.s include providing membership lists, notin Ina members of site availability, and forwarding pertinent, useful information to members. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/R_=us= Plan September 1998 4 Chapter 5 • Reuse Authority/Institutional Framework 3. Take advantage of non -cost ad,,•er-,ising. Identify when publications schedule features on particular states, regions or issues and will accept short articles for inclusion in the publication. Write and submit favorable articles for publication. D. Direct Response Contacts and Mailings This element consis.s of traditional marketing, both as a response to inquiries generated directly by the LRA, as -well as cultivating prospects from other sources. E. Cooperative Marketing Efforts The LRA should move aggressively to integrate its marketing strategy, efforts, materials and information -with the California Trade and Commerce Agency. 2. Contacts should be established with other regional, statewide and national economic development entities, such as the Small Business Administration, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce and the Orange County Economic Development Consortium. Each of these organizations should be provided with maps, descriptions, an inventory of facilities, and the LRA's economic development incentives. 3. Explore the use of electronic data dissemination. The LRA should definitely participate in EDA's "PARCELS" and also explore other internet opportunities. 4.- Explore the availability of funds or cooperative advertising programs available to leverage the LRA's resources. F. Economic Development Incentive Programs The LRA, working in conjunction with the cities of Tustin and Irvine, should develop and identify incentive programs which can be used to attract new prospective tenants to the base. One p= : aFy pi egr .t i a r li f shoe,tntemrise Zone. The City ofTustinhas been conditionally designated as a Local Agency Military Base Recovery Area (L4MBRA) by the State of California. Similar to State Enterprise Zone designation, LAMBRA designation provides significant tax credits and other incentives to businesses which locate to and redevelop the closing base properl3•. Any air emission credits Citv of Tustin MCAS Tustin Specinc PlarVReuse Pan C Pao -z- 5-16 September 1998 .,:abc ..,,,, Appendices • It did not balance the economic and other needs of the community as it appeared that there would have been a negative impact on the property's ability to generate needed tax revenue resulting in the annual loss to the community of approximately S52,400 in redevelopment tax increment and $16,500 annually in interim lease payments for use of an existing building at the site. With the Fiscal Impacts in the early years of the Reuse Plan expected to be significant to the local community, transfers of significant portions of the base off the tax roll would create even more severe impacts and impede reuse efforts. Homeless Provider Applications Modified DOVE Housing - Dove Housing originally proposed to provide 20 emergency transitional housing opportunities for homeless families distributed within various portions of the installation's existing family housing (10 dwelling units in the base's Northeast (N/E) Housing Area, 10 dwelling units in the base's Southeast (Sit_.) Housing Area). However, due to the type of multi -family unit (apartment -style) configuration currently existing within the neighborhood, the Task Force approved Dove's use of six units to be accommodated in one 6- plex. Dove Housing is experienced in owning and operating similar facilities, especially emergency shelter programs elsewhere in the County. The proposal to serve homeless families would fill a homeless need "gap" in the continuum of care approach identified by the community. The proposed program would promote coordination with support service providers, school districts, etc., and encourages linkages With job training, employment and education opportunities provided within the proposed reuse plan and community at large. The Task Force approved the request as modified with conditions identified within the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan. 2. Families Forward (formerly Irvine Temporary Housing) - Families Forward ;r-;;,ne TeFF9erai=y Heasi:!g (ITH)—originally requested 13 transitional housing opportunities for homeless families in the installation's Southeast family housing area. However, due to the tvpe of multi -family unit (apartment -style) configuration currently existing within the neighborhood the Task Force approved their use of 14 units to bL- located in one-6plex, and two 4-plexes due to existing unit configuration within that area. units are to be dispersed in the Southeast Housing Area at MCAS Tustin (City of Lavine). Irvine housing currently owns and operates several similar facilities in the City of Irvine. The organization is fiscally a -rid organizationally sound and has shown that they are capable of operating these additional facilities at this time. Although not currently anticipated to be linked Cly of Tustin MCAS Tustin, S�,ecinc P anirteuse Ra, a?e 6-16 September 1998 -- ._. .._. T. _ ..... ._ Appendices to service oppo. mnities proposed for MCAS Tustin, IT_ LL—Fanilies Forward's program does provide educational, housing and vocational training opportunities to clients to ensure that the cycle of hopelessness can be permanently ended and participants provided the tools to once again become contributing members of the community. Also, the proposal would nil a need "gap" identified by the City of Irvine's Consolidated Plan. assisting that community in their continuum of ca e approach. The Task Force approved the request as modified with conditions identified within the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan. 3. Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter - Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter (OCIS) originally proposed to provide six family units of transitional housing located within the installation's Southeast Housing Area which could be located in one 6-plex. However, the Task Force approved the use of all six units within the Northeast Housing .area due to the Task Force's desire to avoid the possibility of over -concentration of homeless accommodation within the S/E housing area. All units would lx: two bedroom units. OCIS owns and operates similar facilities in the region and was found to be organizationally and fiscally proven to be sound, competent and capable of operating the proposal. The provision of transitional housing to homeless families would fill an identified need gap in the community's continuum of care approach as identified within its HUD approved Consolidated Plan. Also, -he program envisions linkages with education, job training, employment and other services intended to break the cycle of hopelessness and poverty. The Task Force approved the request as modified with conditions identified within the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan. 4. Salvation Army - The Salvation Army proposed to operate an emergency/transitional housing shelter consisting of 24 or 26 existing family housing units in the Northeast and Southeast Housing Areas currently existing at MCAS Tustin. In addition, the Salvation Army requested transfer of one 96 unit barracks structure. The Task Force denied the request for transfer of the 96 unit barracks structure because the request included only one of the two buildings located on the site chosen by the Task Force for this purpose; the proposal would have posed possible problems as two operators would be forced to share facilities, parking, and property; two programs at the site might be incompatible; and, another qualified applicant had submitted a proposal which would utilize both structures in a concerted fashion to provide identical 'homeless services thus avoiding the possibility of conflict with another organization. 1 S Tustin Speuffik. Rlan/Reuse Plan Civ Of September 1998 G ;cbcz ' Pao= 0-'7 Appendices 2. California Baptist College - The California Baptist Collcge submitted an application which proposed that a small evening college facility be provided for use in educating service personnel and families who may b, - displaced by the closure ofTustin or MCAS EI Toro. While a specific location was not identified by the applicant, the LRA believed that the most appropriate location for such a service was the Learning Villa�-e identified within the community's approved Land Use Plan. The Task Force denied the proposal for reasons which include: • There are existing federal pro�caratns to provide the proposed service to displaced military personnel and their families. • Approval of the request would have introduced numerous property owner interests in the Learning Village which might create problems administering the property, access, parking, property maintenance, etc., which could eventually negatively impact the community. • Due to the size of the proposal (only a 1,300 square foot space was requested), the request could be fulfilled through means other than a property transfer. Therefore, it was suggested that the applicant work with South Orange County Community College District in the Learning Village if the proposed program were found to b� beneficial to the needs of the proposed Learning Village. Chapman University - Chapman university also submitted an application which proposed that a small building be provided for use in offering night courses to members of the community. WVhile the specific location w__s not identified by the applicant, the LRA believed that the most appropriate location for such a service was the Learning Village identified within the community's approved Land use Plan. The Task Force denied the proposal for reasons which include: • Due to the size of the proposal (only a 10,000-1,000 square foot space was requested), the request could be fulfilled throuEjh means other than a property transfer. Therefore, it was suggested that the applicant work with Saddieback South Orange County Community College District in the Learning Village if the proposed program found to be beneficial to the needs of the proposed Learning Village. MCRS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan September 1998 etobe199 - City of Tusti:; Paoe 6-;? Appendices • Approval of .hc request would have introduced numerous prepei;y owner interests in the Learning Village which might create problems administering the property, access, parking, property maintenance, etc., which could eventually negatively impact the community. 4. Rancho Santir:co Cornmunity Collene District - Rancho Santia�-o Cornmunity College District (Rancho) was the originator of the Villacye" conce.Dt and was instrumental in its being included hi ;he approved Land Use Plan. Their application requested transfer of 116 Acres for this pw-pose. However, the Learning Village is located within the South Orange County Community College District. As such, Rancho has no legal authority to own property located within another community college district. Consequently, the Task Force directed Rancho to work with South Orange County Community College District through a JPA or MOU for joint use of the Learning Village. 5. Santa Ana Unified School District - Santa Ana Unified School District (Santa Ana Unified) submitted an application requesting the transfer of 75 acres of base property for use as a high school. Santa Ana Unined's district boundaries include only the small southwesterly corner of the base. The approved Land Use Plan identified a v,:rtiety of cornrnercial. light industrial and recreational uses within that district. No residential uses would be allowed within Santa Ana Unifred's district boundaries. Consequently, no student generation impacts to the district would directly result from the future development of the base as limited by the Reuse/Specific Plan for MCAS Tustin. The Task Force denied the request for reasons which include: • The proposal was inconsistent vt,ith Task Force policy direction on th, preferred Reuse Plan and it was inconsistent with the proposed Reuse Plan in that the site location requested had previously been identified for reuse in support of commercial, commercial recreational, business and light indusLial uses which is reflective of uses currentl}, existinV in locations surrounding the proposed site). • The site requested by the SAUSD is one of the most valuable land areas at MCAS, Tustin with important reuse and job creation potential w1 ich would be affected by the proposed transfer of 75 acres. The bane is already overburdened by numerous public bene:rt requests. The City of Tustin currently has integrated into its Reuse Plan a significant number of other anticipated public benefit conveyances. Given the incredibly high infrastructure costs City of Tustin MC, -S Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Aan Page 6-20`c I September 1998 Appendices C. PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY II_ PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY Bldg No. Existing Use ` I Year Built Total Area (Sq Ft) I Condition Proposed Disposition Possible Interim Use ' Ultimate Use - -,I MEDICAUDENTAL CLINIC I ' 119431 11,210 I FAIR I DEMO I YES I CHILDREN'S SHELTER 2 STATION SUPPORT 1943 12,660 1 FAIR REUSE YES " EARNING VILLAGE I II 3 1 AUDITORIUM 119431 5,700 I FAIR 1 REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 1 i1 4 1 STATION HEADOUARTERS 1119431 13,253 1 =AIR I TBD I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 5 ADMINISTRATION 119431 22,466 I FAIR I TBD 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 1 11 I SEWAGE PUMP STATION (ABAND) 1 I I POOR DEMO I NO i LAW ENFORCEMENT i RAINING FACILIT Y 12 II I SUBSTATION #1 1 19421 1,500 1 FAIR I DEMO NO LAW ENFORCEMENT I !TRAINING FACILITY �i 13 I COMBINED FIREIRESCUE 119421 3,325 1 FAIR I DEMO I NO 1 RESIDENTIAL 1 i1 16 I ADMINISTRAT ION 11.9421 7,900 1 FAIR 1 DEMO I NO 1 RESIDENTIAL 1 17MAINTENANCE SHOP 119421 6,077 1 FAIR DEMO I NO 1 R=_SIDENT:AL II 19 1 LAB VISION GOGGLES 1 19421 2,208 1 FAIR 1 DEMO 1 NO I REGIONAL PARK 20A I WAREHOUSE 119431 13,535 1 FAIR ( TBD I YES I REGIONAL PARK 1 I 20B I WAREHOUSE 11,9431 13,121 I FAIR 1 TBD I YES I REGIONAL PARK 21 I WAREHOUSE 119421 543 1 POOR I DEMO I NO REGIONAL PARK li 23A I BUNKER 119421 1,370 1 POOR I DEMO I NO 1 GOLF VILLAGE II 236 BUNKER 119421 1,370 I POOR 1 DEMO I NO 1 GOLF VILLAGE 1 I� 23C I BUNKER 119421 1,370 1 POOR I DEMO I NO 1 GOLF VILLAGE 23D I BUNKER 119421 1,270 1 POOR I DEMO I NO 1 GOLF VILLAGE 1 I 23E i I BUNKER 119421 206 1 POOR DEMO NO I NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 23F I BUNKER 119421 2,520 1 POOR I DEMO NO 1 GOLF VILLAGE 1 26 I CHAPEL 119451 3,803 1 FAIR I TBD 1 YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE II 27 1 STAND-BY GENERATOR 119421 3,242 1 POOR I DEMO 1 NO 1 REGIONAL PARK 28 1 HANGAR 119421 308,228 1 FAIR 1 TBD I YES 1 REGIONAL PARK II 28A STORAGE 1!9421 941 1 POOR I TBD I YES I REGIONAL PARK 1 '1 29 1 HANGAR 119431 298,1881 FAIR 1 TBD 1 YES 1 COMMUNITY CORE 1 29A I STORAGE 1 19421 941 1 POOR TBD 1 YES 1 COMMUNITY CORE 1 1 30 1 GEMDrTSSA 11.9421 4,666 1 POOR 1 DEMO I NO 'REGIONAL PARK 35 1 STAFF NCO CLUB 119431 6,802 I FAIR 1 TBD 1 YES 1 REGIONAL PARK II � 35A ISTORAGE 119431 1,311 1 FAIR I DEMO I YES REGIONAL PARK 1 39 WIND DIRECTION I 1 INDICATOR I - 1 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I GOLF VILLAGE 40A I STORAGE 1 :9421 233 I POOR I DEMO I NO 1 REGIONAL PARK 11 403 I STORAGE I :9421 2.33 1 POOR DEMO NO j COMMERCIAL BUSINESS I 1 41 I STORAGE 11,9421 2,712 1 POOR I DEMO 1 NO I RESIDENTIAL 42 I ADMINISTRATION 1'•9441 11,2.38 1 FAIR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 CHILDREN'S SHELTER 11 I 47 1 ADMINISTRATION 11,9421 5,381 1 FAIR 1 DEMO I NO ; RESIDENTIAL 1 41-T 1 SHOP WAREHOUSEISHED 1 19901 POOR I DEMO 1 NO I RESIDENnAL I 49 I FIREHOUSE ANNEX i ;9421 1,800 1 POOR I DEMO I NO i �'�� =NFORC ILI7Y II TRAINING FACILITY 11 City of Tustin WAS Tustin Spechl.- ?fan%=reuse Plan :r,aae 8-28 7--� Appendices PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY ! II �! Bldg II No. Existing Use Year Built Total Area (Sq Ft) Condition Proposed Disposition Possible Interim Use Ultimate Use i MOTOR TRANSPORT 53 1942 II I FACILITY I 1,970 I POOR I DEMO I i NO RESIDENT IAL I I I RE� 66 I PUBLIC WORKS SHOP 11944 3,663 I POOR I DEMO 1 NO I RESIDENTIAL II 7.A WAREHOUSE 1119451 1,650 I POOR DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK 1_713 I IWAREHOUSE -- 119451 1,650 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK it '1 71C I WAREHOUSE 119451 1,650 I POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK II 71D I WAREHOUSE 119451 1,650 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK i 71 E 1 WAREHOUSE 119451 1,650 1 POOR1 DEMO 1 NO I REGIONAL PARK i 1I 71 F 1 WAREHOUSE 119451 1,550 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK I 7.G I %V.4REHOUSE 11.9451 1,650 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK Ij 71H I WAREHOUSE 119451 1,650 1 POOR I DEMO .i I NO I REGIONAL PARK ' I! 711 1 WAREHOUSE 1 1.9451 1,650 I POOR I DEMO 1 NO I REGIONAL PARK '• 71J I WAREHOUSE 119451 1,650 I POOR I DEMO I NO 1 REGIONAL PARK II 77 1 FLAGPOLE 1 I FAIR I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE !i I80" I BACHELOR ENLISTED 119531 ' QUARTERS 14,531 I FAIR I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILL AGE II PHYSICAL FITNESS87 193 ICENTER 14,388 FAIR REUSE YES LEARNING VILLAGE !I II 88 1 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION 119531 14,388 1 FAIR 1 REUSE 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE I! Ij 89 I WAREHOUSE 119531 7,575 1 FAIR I DEMO 1 NO 1 RESIDENTIAL .1 1; 90 1 WAREHOUSE 119531 10,600 1 =AIR 1 TBD I YES I REGIONAL PARK 1i it I92 ADMINISTRATION 119421 420 IFAIR IDEMO NO REGIONAL PARK 11 h BACHELOR OFFICERS 11 93 I QUARTERS 119531 15,172 I FAIR I DEMO I YES I COMMUNITY PARK i IIPAINT BOOTH II 98 I (DECOMMISSIONED) 119541 052 I POOR I DEMO I NO I '! RESIDENTIAL II 11 103 1 TRAINING/CLASSROOM 119581 2,856 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I REGIONAL PARK I: 106 11954 I �� ��) VICE CAR "ASH II _CM 924 I POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK :1 I 128 1 SO. SALL DIAMOND r1 1 1 - 1 FAIR I REUSE 1 YES I COMMUNITY PARK I. 131 1 FOOTBALL FIELD I 1 I FAIR ( REUSE 1 YES I COMMUNITY PARK 1 BACHELOR ENLISTED 11961 II 132 OUARTERS I 30,636 I FAIR I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE j; 1 134 A'JtdIN!STRATION 1 1961 1 30,636 1 FAIR I REUSE 1 YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE II 1 142 1 PICNIC SHELTER 119601 3,072 1 POOR 1 DEMO I NO 1 COMMUNITY PARK 1I I 143 I BARBECUE PIT 1 - 1 - I POOR I DEMO 1 NO 1 COMMUNITY PARK I' 144 1 VOLLEYBALL COURT 1 - I 1 FAIR I REUSE I YES 1 COMMUNITY PARK I' 145 1 BASK -BALL COURT I 1 I GOOD I REUSE I YES 1 COMMUNiTY PARK 1 146 I BARBECUE HUT 1 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I COMMUNITY PARK 1' 148 1 SOCCER FIELD 1 1 FAIR I REUSE 1 YES 1 COMMUNITY PARK VEHICLE GREASE RACK I .90"31 517 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I COMMUNiTY CORE 1; 150 1 RACOUE i BALL COURT 19631 1 POOR 1 DEMO I NO 1 COMMUNITY PARK i 59 I BOWLING CENTER 1-9631 5,640 1 FAIR I REUSE 1 YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE 1! F 160 BASKETBALL/ I GOOD REUSE 1E I VOLLEYBALL COURT I 1 I I I YES LEARNING VILLAGE I' I jj 161 I APPLIED INSTRUCTION 119641 13.980 I FAIR I REUSE I YES 1 REGIONAL PARK 1f;�.tiS Tustin SDncinc P,an/Reus= Pian City c. T Se?tember 1998 ��:s3c-= Pace Appendices r PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY I!- Total Possible Bldg Year Area Proposed Interim IINo. Existing Use Built (Sq Ft) Condition Disposition Use I Ultimate Use I1 162 I PUBLIC TOILET 119651 245 1 FAIR I DEMO NO I COMMUNITY ?ARK 163 PUBLIC TOILET 119651 245 I FAIR I DEMO I NO I COMMUNITY PARK I164 1 SWIMMING POOL I 1 FAIR 1 DEMO NO 1 COMMUNITY PARK ICONVENIENCE 6s FOOD I 1 19651 7,520 I FAIR I REUSE I YES LEARNING VILLAGE STORE 166 1 RETAIL STORE 119661 9,600 1 FAIR I REUSE I YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE �I 167 1 CAFE ii ERIA 119661 1,800 I FAIR I REUSE YES LEARNING VILLAGE 168 1 SERVICE OUTLETS 1 19661 3,200 1 FAIR I REUSE YES ; LEARNING VILLAGE II169 READY FUEL AIRCRAFT ISTORAGE 11966 203,644 I POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK 170 III AIRCRAFT READY FUEL 1966 I 203,756 I POOR DEMO NO i REGIONAL PARK STORAGE 171 AIRCRA: ii OPERATIONS X965 I . 8,048 POOR DEMO NO :iEGICNAL ?ARK FACILITY I 172 1 BULK FUEL 119661 2,520 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I LEARNING VILLAGE 1 173 1 APPLIED INSTRUCTION 119661 26,000 1 FAIR I REUSE I YES I REGIONAL PARK I 174 I WELDING SHOP 119671 1,240 1 FAIR I DEMO 1 NO I COMMUNITY CORE I 175 I PARTS STORAGE 119671 384 1 POOR I DEMO 1 NO I COMMUNITY CORE II 176I EAF/EOD 119671 9,760 I FAIR I DEMO I YES I COMMERCIAL I1 ADMINISTRATION I1 177 BACHELOR ENLISTED (QUARTERS 1968 23,052 FAIR REUSE YES I LEARNING VILLAGE IILINE 178 MAINTENANCE_ (SHACK 1967 I 1,400 POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL ?ARK I j I I� 179 ILINE MAINTENANCE I 1,050 I POOR I DEMO I NO I R=EGIONAL ?ARK SHACK 119671 180ILINE MAINTENANCE 11967 1,050 I POOR I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS SHACK • 181 I LINE MAINTENANCE 119671 1,400 I POOR I DEMO NO COMMERCIAL BUSINESS SHACK I II' 182I LINE MAINTENANCE 119671 1,050 I POOR I DEMO I NO I I• COMMERCIAL BUSINESS SHACK I l 183I D FIRE/RESCUE I 19681 6,827 I FAIR I TBD I YES I REGIONAL ?ARK STATION j 184 I ENLISTED MESS HALL 1 1969 22.007 1 GOOD I REUSE 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 185 I AUTOMOTIVE HOBBY 11.9691 5,808 I FAIR I TBD I 1 SHERIFFS TRAINING YES II SHOP � FACILITY 1 II 186 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 119701 10,765 I FAIR I DEMO I II NO i GOLF VILLAGE SHO? 187 PAINT & BLASTING SHOP 11570 I 1.200 I FAIR I DEMO I NO COMI,/UNiTY CORE (DECOM) I 11 189 1 FLOWER SHOP ; 119591 1,080 1 FAIR I TBD YES j LEARNING VILLAGE ,I I; 190 1 HANGAR 119701 42,818 1 GOOD I TBD I YES ; COMMERCIAL BUSINESS Ij l 191 I _ I ACFTI DIRECT FUELING IS I POOR I DEMO I NO ;'_EARNING VILLAGE TATION ACFT DIRECT FUELING I I 102 I I POOR I DEMO I NO LEARNING VILLAGE II STATION I 193 I STATION FT ECT FUELING i _ I I POOR I DEMO I NO i LEARNING VILLAGE 11 II �I City of Tustin MCAS Tustin SPe--iilc PiarilReuse Pia; i Pana 6-30 0^ �September 1998 Appendices II PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY �1 Ij Total Possible' i li Bldg Year Area Proposed Interim No. Existing Use Built (Sq Ft) Condition Disposition Use Ultimate Use ' �.. 11 I DAY TANK ACFT FUEL j 104 , I POOR I DEMO I NO L:�R1iNG VILLAGE IE 1' I I STORAGE 195 I SCFii'�N ECT FUELING I I I POOR I DEMO I NO i COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II 11 ACFT� DIRECT FUELING 195I I I POOR I DEMO I NO i COMMERCIAL 'BUSINESS I; STATIvN 197 I ACS i� DIRECT FUELING I I I POOR I DEMOI NO COMMERCIAL BUSINESS STATION i 198 DAY Tr tt ANK AC=U=L ISTORAGE POOR I DEMO NO COMff=RCIAL BUSINESS 1, 199 I CHILD CARE CENTER 119701 5.853 I FAIR I REUSE I YES I CHILD CARE CENTERS f 1 201 I STORAGE 1 1971 1 960 1 POOR 1 DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK 202 I TENN;S COURTS 1 1971 1 - I GOOD 1 REUSE I YES I COMMUNITY PARK 1 II 203 1 SEWAGE PUMP STATION 1 -1 1 POOR 1 DEMO _- 1 NO 1 REGIONAL ?ARK Ij 204 1 SEWAGE PUMP STATION 1 1 1 FAIR 1 DEMO 1 YES I COMMUNITY CORE i, 205 SEWAGE PUMP STATION FAIR I DEMO I YES 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS j 207 LINE MIAIN T E NANCE I I 1,920 POOR DEMO NO REGIONAL PARK I SHACK 11971 i II 208 I SOFT5ALL FIELD t2 1 1 1 FAIR 1 REUSE 1 YES 1 COMMUNITY PARK 209 I OUTDOOR HELICOPTER I I POOR I I DEMO I NO LEARNING VILLAGE I MONUMENT II' 210 1 FUEL PUMP STATION I 1 I POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO j REGIONAL ?ARK �I ELEClCOMM I' � 212 11972 3,700 I FAIR I TBD I YES i COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MAINTENANCE SHO? I I1 213 BACHELOR ENLISTED 119731 35.424 I GOOD I REUSE I YES LEARNING VILLAGE li QUARTERS I 216 INDOOR HANDBALL 119741 1,722 I POOR I DEMO I NO I COMMUNITY PARK COURTS S 218 1 ENLISTED CLUB 119761 10,384 1 FAIR I REUSE 1 YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE 219 I EQUIPMENT STORAGE 119761 384 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II I! 220 1E TEST CELL 11981 I 675 I GOOD I TBD I YES i COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II I ADMINISTRATION I I 221 I PHYSICAL FITNESS I , I 1977 4,200 FAIR TBD YES COMMUNITY PARK II i � CENTER 'I 222 1 AUTO SERVICE CENTER 119741 4,680 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 COMMUNITY PARK I+ 1I 1 225 1 MAIN GATE HOUSE 119801 24 I POOR 1 DEMO I NO i LEARNING VILLAGE it j 226 1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR 11.9801 9,620 1 GOOD 1 REUSE 1 YES 1 REGIONAL ?ARK II 227 ( BACHELOR ENLISTED 11,981 48,960 GOOD REUSE YES I LEARNING VILLAGE QUAR ERS I! 228 1 ISSUE WAREHOUSE 1'.9801 3, i50 I FAIR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 RESIDENT;AL :1 I 1! 229 1 ACFTi WASHRACK 119601 755 1 POOR 1 DEMO I NO 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS 11 1 S.HE.RIF=S TRAINING � 230 I I ACFT WASHRACK i 1968 1,642 I POOR I DEMO I NO FAC( LlTY II 11 231 1 ENGINE TEST CELL ?AD 119681 4,022 1 GOOD I REUSE 1 YES 1 COMM=_r-t-C;AL BUSINESS II Ij 233 1 VEHICLE WASHRACK 11,9581 960 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO COMMUNITY CORE 1i Ij 234 1 VEHICLE WASHRACK 11,9581 800 1 POOR I DEMO I NO REGIONAL ?ARK II `I 236 TRANSFORMER PAD 1 1 - 1 FAIR 1 TBD 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 1i 11 237 I TRANSFORMER PAD 1 1 - 1 FAIR 1 TBD 1 YES I COMMERCIAL M, -AS Tustin Spy.-ifi- Plan/Reusz ?tar, City of September 199P �.. .. ?Pae 6-31 Appendices PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY Oity of Tustin Page 6-32 WAS Tustin Spanific Pia:; .'v -e September 1988 - � - • -T-- . .. - . r .. T—.- —, j Total Possible Year Area Proposed Interim iBldg No. Existing Use Built (Sq Ft) Condition Disposition Use Ultimate Use 238 TRANSFORMER PAD 1 I 1 FAIR I TBD ---YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 239 TRANSFORMER PAD 1 I FAIR I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILL AGE ! ILAW ENFORCEMENT 240 1 TRANSFORMER PAD 1 - 1 I FAIR 1 TBD 1 YES II I I TRAINING FACILITY j II 241 I TRANSFORMER PAD I I I FAIR 1 REUSE I YES I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS I II 242 I TRANSFORMER PAD I I FAIR I TBD I YES I REGIONAL ?ARK 244 I FLIGHT LINE SHACK 119811 1,000 1 POOR I DEMO I NO COMMERCIAL BUSINESS 245 I QUA„;LOS ENLISTED 1 19841 47,370 I GOOD 1 REUSE YES i LEARNING VILLAGE 246 1 5ACKEL OR ENLISTED 1 19841 47,370 1 GOOD 1 REUSE YES I LEARNING VILLAGE ! QUARTERS POM TESTING LAB 247 1 ADMINISTRATION 1 ON 1982 1 600 ( GOOD 1 REUSE 1 YES 1 REGIONAL ?ARK j 1 � 248 HAZ WASTE TRANSFER 119821 1,118 1 POOR I DEMO NO '• I REGIONAL ?ARK FACILITY I I 249 HEATING PLANT BLDG 119841 763 I GOOD I REUSE= I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 1 250 I WAREHOUSE 119841 66,976 I GOOD I REUSE I YES I COM4lE;iCIAL BUSINESS 2511 GROUND SUPPORT EQUIP 119841 13,770 I GOOD ( REUSE 1 YES 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS I',I SHOP II GROUND SUPPORT EQUIP 252 I� ISHED 1984 10,755 GOOD REUSE YES COMMERC:.AL BUSINESS II 253 APPLIED INSTRUCTION 119841 3,972 IGOOD IREUSE YES REGIONAL ?ARK ' I� 254 i i—i — REF.,�_� R I 984 700 POOR DEMO NO � LEARNING VILLAGE II ADMINISTRATION I' 255 1 REFELLE 11984 700 I POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I COMM_RC;AL BUSINESS 1: ADM RATION 1 256 1 FLAGPOLE 119831 0 1 FAIR I REUSE I YES I COMMUNITY PARK j i 257I RECREATION PICNIC 119831 748 1 GOOD I REUSE I YES I REGIONAL ?ARK SHELTER j I 1 258 1 NAVY RELIEF PAPER 1 19821 117 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 I. LEARNING VILLAGE COLLECTION ; j 1 259 1 STORAGE 119841 1,025 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL PARK I LINE MAINTENANCE 260 1 SHELTErR 1 1984 1,000 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 REGIONAL ?ARK lj I li 261 LINE MAINTENANCE 1 19841 1,000 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 REGIONAL ?ARK SHELTER i II 262 ILOCKER HAZARDOUSrLAM11984 300 1 POOR 1 DEMO NO REGIONAL ?ARK :I IHAZARDOUS/FLAM j 263 I 11964 300 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 REGIONAL ?ARK LOCKER lj 264 1 HAZARDOUS/FLAM 19641 300 I POOR i DEMO 1 NO i REGIONAL ?.ARK �I LOCKER i jl HAZARDOUS!FLAM i ! li 265 1 LOCKER I, ,9841 300 I POOR I DEMO I NO COMMUNITY CORE HAZARDOUS/FLAM 266 1 LOCKER ('9841 300 I POOR 1 DEMO I NO 1 COMMUNI T `! CORE i it 267 1 HAZARDOUS/FLAM I 19841 150 1 POOR 1 II DEMO 1 NO 1 COMMERCIALLOCKE Ij 268 I FILLING STATION I I - 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I RESIDENT IAL lj Oity of Tustin Page 6-32 WAS Tustin Spanific Pia:; .'v -e September 1988 - � - • -T-- . .. - . r .. T—.- —, Appendices PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY J� '^---- II Bldg No. Existing Use Total--' Year Area Built (Sq Ft) Condition Possibie Proposed Interim II Disposition Use I Ultimate Use I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II 269 I GSE LOADING RAMP 1 1 1 FAIR �1 273 I ENGINE TEST CELL 119871 2,974 1 GOOD I REUSE 1 YES I COI�!M=—.PC;AL BUSIN=SS II 278 1 BASKETBALL COURT P11 1 1 GOOD 1 REUSE 1 YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE j ! 279 ( VOLLEYBALL COURT P i 1 - 1 GOOD I REUSE I YES LEARNiNG VILLAGE II 300 1 MAG -16 HEADQUARTERS 119431 21,170 1 FAIR I REUSE 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE �I it 303 I GENERAL STORAGE LSE, I I 1,610 I POOR DEMO I NO I L EARNING VILLAGE 1j _ i+ !� 306 HAZARDOUS/FLAK! ISTORAGE 1949 100 POOR DEMO I �• NO ! E.ARNItiG VILLAGE II 502 BASEBALL FIELD I 1 1 FAIR 1 REUSE I YES 1 RE310tiAL PARK I� 503 1 SOCCER'PARADE FIELD 1 1 - 1 FAIR 1 REUSE 1 YES 1 REGIONAL PARK 1 II 504 1 BASEBALL FIELD I FAIR I REUSE I YE S REGIONAL PARK I� II 505 TELEPHONE SWITCHiNG I CEN`ER I 240 I POOR IUS REE I I YES I L EARNING VILLAGE II l 506 GENERATOPUTRANSFORM I ER BLDG 119851 360 I GOOD I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE SC7 LE WASHRACK IBLDG 1985 228 POOR DEMO NO 1 COIJ,FIUNiiY CORE 1 1• 508 I IL� j AIRCRAFT 14'ASHRACK 1'985 I 680 I POOR I DEMO I I 1 ` NO CJfJ,f.!ERC;r"+L BUSINESS 11 509 AIRCRAFT WASHRACK BLDG 1985 I 684 POOR I DEMO 1 SHERIFFS TRAINING NO I I F.AC!LiT`! li 1; 511 1 STORAGE SHED 119861 1,800 I POOR 1 DEMO I NO I REGIONAL ?ARK 1 1j 512 1 STORAGE SHED 119861 1,800 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I REGIONAL PARK 1i 513 1 STORAGE SHED 119861 1,800 1 POOR DEMO 1 NO 1 REGIONAL PARK 1' 'I 514 1 STORAGE_ SHED 119861 1,800 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO I COMMUNiTY CORE II I 4 CO�RACTOR TRAILER I I RELOC,! I DEIJA I NO I LEARNING VILLAGE5147' !! i 515 1 STORAGE SHED 119861 1,800 1 POOR 1 DEAA0 1 NO I COMMUNITY CORE II I 516 1 POLICE STATION 1191361 1,551 1 GOOD 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 TRANS;TIONAUEMERG HSG l II 517 1 AIRCRAFT II WASHRACK 119851 - 1 POOR I DEMO 1 NO 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II l520 HANGAR 119891 63,289 GOOD REUSE YES COMIIE_RCIAL BUSINESS i 523 1 APPLIED INSTRUCTION 119871 23,330 1 GOOD I REUSE 1 YES IREGIONAL PARK 11 I; 524 1 HANGAR 119871 45,959 1 GOOD 1 REUSE 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE 1' II 525 1 HANGAR 119871 45,959 1 GOOD 1 DEMO 1 YES 1 COMM.=—.R--:AL RECREATION iI Ii 526 1 UTILITY BUILDING SHED 119871 1,672 I FAIR 1 REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE ' it 527 1 FLIGHT LINE_ SHELTER 119871 2,000 1 POOR DEMO 1 NO 1 COMMERCIAL II I� 1! 528 ,BUILDING ADMINISTRATION II 19881 4,935 I GOOD I REUSE I YES 1 COMB!=:= C:AL BUSINESS Ii 1 529 SUPPLY BUILDING 119881 :5,000 1 GOOD 1 REUSE 1 YES COMIA ERCIAL BUSINESS 1I COMMJNICATIONS/MAIIv TI I; 530 BLDG 119881 5,029 I GOOD I CIAL BUSINESS 'I ' REUSE I YES COMf,!=R1 I 1 : 531 11h'=ATH R ANNEX 1 19881 800 1 FAIR 1 DEMO 1 NO COMIJ.ERC AL 1� 532 I GENERATOR BUILDING 119881 192 I FAIR 1 DEMO 1 NO I COMMERCIAL 1' ' 533 1 ARMORY 119881 5.363 I GOOD 1 REUSE 1 YES n=GIONAL PARK 1, 534 1 CRASH. CREW BURN PIT 119881 - 1 GOOD I DEMO 1 NO 1 COMM'JNI iY CORE 1i I� 535 1 AIRCRAFT WASHRACK 119881 - 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO ; COMMERCIAL RECREATION 11 WAS Tustin SDaCiii-- Alan/Reusa A`ai City of Tus i-? September 1999-6-6. ' rp9e Appendices IL PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY , l_ - --- Total Possible Bldg Year Area Proposed Interim Il No. Existing Use Built (Sq Ft) Condition Disposition Use Ultimate Use I ' WASHRACK UTILITY 36 I BUILDING 1988 1 672 I Elk I DEMO NO I COMMERCIAL RECREATION ENGINE MAINTENANCE DEMO 837 SHOP 1988 I 35,717 I GOOD I I REUSEYcS COMMERCIAL BUSINESS � BACHELOR ENLIST=Dit I 538 i I QUARTERS 119891 53.240 I GOOD I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE �1539 BACHELOR ENUSTED • IQUARTERS 1989 I 5-33.240 II GOOD REUSE I YES I LEARNING VILLAGE I I; I 11 540 I HAZARDOUS WASTE I I =A!R I I DEMO I NO I GOLF VILLAGE STORAGE TANK I� 541 I PUMP STATION r1 I 1 I FAIR DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS 1 I! 542 PUMP STATION a2 I FAIR I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS i l543 1 ACFT RINSE FACILITY 119881 - I POOR I DEMO 1 NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS i 544 1 RESTROOM FACILITY 119891 2,005 1 GOOD I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II I� 545 I SENTRY BOOTH 119,991 91 1 POOR I DEMO I NO 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESSIT it II 546 I RLECTnICAUS T OFu+G= 119891 1, 55 I GOOD I REUSE I YES I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS 1i ROOM I l, i 547 1 CHILD CARE CENTER 1-9901 13,120 1 GOOD I REUSE I YES I CHILD CARE CENTERS I' 549 1 MECHANICAL ROOM 119891 933 1 GOOD I REUSE 1 YES 1 LEARNING VILLAGE 1I 'i , i 550 I TRANSFORMER PAD 1 1 I FAIR I REUSE 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE I, I� Z51 I WASHRACK BUILDING1 i989I 1,000 I POOR I DEMO 1 NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS 1� 1i 552 1 TRANSFORMER PAD 1 1 1 --AIR I REUSE I YES 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS it .a3 BACHELOR ENLISTED I L 11991 I 40,980 I GOOD I REUSE I YES it I TRANSITIONAUEMER PSG II QUARTERS 554 I I QUA�ELOS ENLISTED 11991 40,980 I GOOD I REUSE I YES I TRANSITIONAUEMER HSG j 555 I MECHANICAL BUILDING 119901 - I GOOD 1 REUSE I YES I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS II _ .,50 HAZARDOUS/FLAM I 119901 3,840 I GOOD I DEMO NO I COMMERCIAL II STORAGE 557 1 MECHANICAL BUILDING 1 1991 1 400 1 GOOD I REUSE I YES I T RANSITIONAUEM_R HSG 11 I 558 1 FUEL ISUuND 1 1 1 POOR 1 DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS li 559 1 LOADING RAMP 1 1 FAIR 1 DEMO I YES 1 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS Ii I� 560 I VEHICLE WASHRACK 119901 1,089 1 POOR I DEMO 1 NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS 1 561 1 MECHANICAL BUILDING 119891 933 1 FAIR I REUSE I YES I LEARNING VIL LAG= i 562 I WAREHOUSE 1 1 2,363 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I COMMUNiTY CORE l 563 1 SEWER METER VAULT I I 1 FAIR REUSE 1 NO 1 LEARNING VILLAGE 564I AM I I _ I POOR I DEMO I NO I REGIONAL ?ARK I; STORAGOUS/FL i 505 I TACTICAL VAN PAD I I I GOOD I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS is COMPLEX li 565 1 LUBE RACK 119881 1,760 I POOR I DEMO I NO I COMM=RCIAL BUSINESS I HAZARDOU'S WASTE 507 I STORAGE PAD 113901 2,400 I POUR I DEMO I NO I GOLF VILLAGE i DEMO 568I IMA COMPLEX I ,991 I 19,680 I GOOD I YSE I YES i COMMERCIAL BUSINESS it 1 569 1 FPN-63 PAR SITE 1 1991 1 730 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I COMMJN!TY CORE I 570 I HAZARDOUS WASTE I - I I POOR I DEMO I NO i COMM=RCIAL BUSINESS i STORAGE is Gi-y of Tustin WAS Tustin Spe.-i,io P:a ?aye 6-34 Ee'Vie� September 1998 _ ._ .T.. _.... _. _._._.. r - — -- -T— - - Appendices PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY it ii Bldg No. ' Existing Use Year I Built Total Area (Sq Ft) Condition = Proposed Disposition Possible 1 ` Interim I Use Ultimate Use I! II 596 M,AT'L I I OCKER LOCKER 119921 200 POOR I I DEMO I NO i COMMERCIAL BUSINESS ii =a9 I HAZARDOUSrFLAM MAT L li (LOCKER 11992 100 I POOR I I DEMO I NO I COMWERCIAL BUSINESS i I H.AZARDOUS'FLAM M.ATL ! 500 (LOCKER I 1 19921 =00 I POOR I DEMO I NO _ 1 i COh'MERCIAL BUSINESS rl �! nDOUSiFI-W MAi II 601 11 OCKER L 119921 I` -OJIP EOiJi?MENT 100 1 I POOR I DEMO I NO I COMMERCIAL T _ i1 602 HAZ=ARDOUS.%FLAW M.AT L I ( I�LOCKER I 9921 100 I POOR I DEMO I NO I I LEARNING VILL AGE II 603 I TRANSFORMER PAD I - I FAIR 1 REUSE 1 YES I LEARNING VILLAGE iI 604 I ARIGMQ-13 TRANSMI I i E.R.I I - I POOR I DEMO I YES 1 COMMUNITY CORE I� 505 1.ARIGIMO-13 RECEIVER 1 I 1 POOR DEMO 1 YES 1 GOLF VILLAGE —1 I� S05 i II nN F?N-53 MTI- REFLECTOR I I POOR DEMO I YES I GOLF VILILAGE ' !I _607 I A.N."JMQ-29 I I I POOR I DEMO I YES 1 CCMh1UN7Y CORE —1 ii 608 I AN'Gh"Q-10 TRANS ."i I i ERI 1 I POOR 1 DEMO I YES I COMMUNITY CORE I Ili 609 I AN -GM 0-10 RECEIVER I I I POOR I DEMO I YES I COV.MUNI Y CORE 1 ii 610 1 GENERATOR WASHR CCK I I I POOR I DEMO 1 NO I COMMERCIAL BUSINESS i. �STCRAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL511 it I POOR DEMO NO I COMMERC;AL BUSINESS II 3000T 1 FR -EST Ii I ADMIN/CLASSROOM ? 10,800 POOR DEMO NO I COMMUNITY CORE ii 3002T I GUARD SMACK I 1 - 1 POOR I DEMO 1 NO I RESIDEN T iAL I� 3003T I GUARD SHACK 119921 25 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I RESIDEN77AL II 3005T I EQUIPMENT SHED 119901 225 1 POOR I DEMO I NO I RESIDENTIAL I'I II 6168 I SEWAGE PUMP STATION I - I I FAIR DEMO I YES I GOLF VILLAGE I. I51! E9 I SEWAGE PUMP STATION I I 1 FAIR I DEMO 1 YES I COMMERCIAL ! 6480 1 SEWAGE PUMP STATION i i - I - 1 -AIR I DEMO 1 YES I RESIDENTIAL II 5798 I SEWAGE PUMP STATION I - I - 1 FAIR I DEMO I - YES I RESIDENT IAL 6857 I SEWAGE PUMP STATION I I - I FAIR I DEMO I YES I RESIDENTIAL I A 1 OFFICERS QUARTERS 119461 2,800 I POOR I DEMO I NO I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL II B 1 OFFICERS QUARTERS 11,9461 2200 I POOR I DEMO I NO I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I C I VIP QUARTERS 119461 972 1 FAIR I DEMO 1 NO I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C3 I YOUT . CENTER 1194-31 6,552 1 POOR 1 DEMO 1 NO 1 COMMUNITY PARK I� _C4 I OF FiCERS CLUB 119431 7,548 1 FAIR I REUSE I YES 1 COMMUNITY PARK LIST OF ACRONYMS i ABAND ABANDONED HAZ HAZARDOUS i ....=i AIRCRA—i r IMF INTE9ME71ATE MAIN7ENAN; E A---,!Vi—,Y ' ADMIN ADM.iN:STRATION LAB LABORATORY 1! 3_D^u 3 11:OiNG MAG MARINE AIR GROUP I i, OMM. COMMJN!CATIONS MAT_ M.A =-RIAL 1 COT CITY OF —,CSTIN MWR MORALE WE -FARE. 8, RECREATION i I' -•E OM DEOOMWESIONEO NCO NON-COMMISSIONED OF^ICER .I DOE OE?AR-WENT OF ED'j :ATIO.'` OC ORANGE COUNTY ELEC.-IONI CS TBO TO BE Dci=RMINED I! -OJIP EOiJi?MENT 'j I: FAC FACIJTY li =-AM FLAMMABLE GROUND SUPPORT ED'v'I�MENT ahy of Tustin MCAS Tustir, P;arlR-a.'sa F;a.-, .-=^n 6-36 -: September 1990