Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENTAgenda Item ~ • Reviewed: ,~ - - AGENDA REPORT City Manager ,, r° ~~ '~ ~~~~~ ~ Finance Director A MEETING DATE: MARCH 2, 2010 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the third and fourth quarters of 2009. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way, remained relatively constant during the third and fourth quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT No Fiscal Impact DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport (JWA) prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached are the quarterly reports for the third and fourth quarters of 2009. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows: Measured Noise Levels • During the third quarter of 2009, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS) 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, was 55.4 dB. This is 0.5 dB lower than the previous four quarters (Q-3 2008 through Q-2 2009). For comparison, the CNEL was 0.9 dB higher (56.3 dB) during the third quarter of 2008. • During the fourth quarter of 2009, the average CNEL was 54.9 dB. This is 0.8 dB lower than the previous four quarters (Q-4 2008 through Q-3 2009). For comparison, the CNEL was 0.1 dB higher (55.0) during the fourth quarter of 2008. JWA Noise Report March 2, 2010 Page 2 • All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. The decrease in noise levels are relatively minor and can be attributed to a slight decrease in the average daily jet operations at JWA over the past year. These decreases have leveled off and begun to turn around, as is reflected in the noise levels in Q-4 2008 being nearly identical to Q-4 2009. As the economy begins to improve, it can be expected that average daily jet operations will increase, which would in turn increase measured noise levels. Given the current noise levels, it can be expected that, even if increases are seen, noise levels would remain below the City, County and State criteria of 65 dB. Noise Complaints • During the third quarter of 2009, there were thirty-three (33) Tustin area complaint calls, compared with nine (9) complaints for the same period during 2008. • During the fourth quarter of 2009, there were five (5) Tustin area complaint calls, compared with three (3) complaints for the same period during 2008. • The number of complaints remained relatively level for the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. However, the number of complaints increased significantly during the third quarter of 2009 compared to both the third quarter of 2008 and the previous four quarters. Noise complaints during summer months tend to be higher as residents have their windows open more often, increasing noise levels. However, noise complaint increases during Q3 2009 were greater than have been previously seen during summer months. The increases were not isolated to Tustin. Many other communities saw a double digit increase in the number of complaints for Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008, including Balboa Island, Corona Del Mar, Laguna Beach, and Newport Beach. JWA Noise Abatement staff indicated that a number of individual aircraft were especially noisy and resulted in increased calls over the entire monitoring area during this time period. The increase in complaints in Tustin can also be attributed to a number of rainy days that forced northern departures rather than southern departures. In addition, Noise Abatement staff stated that there has been an increase in activity from Tustin community groups, which encourage residents to call the Noise Abatement Office. If these groups continue to be active, the City can expect an overall increase in complaints from Tustin residents. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Cari Meyer E Assistant Planner Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachments: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 and October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. S:\Cdd\CCREPORT\2010UWA report to council 03-02-10.doc ATTACHMENTS John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 (Q3) and October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (Q4) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 147 Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20162 S. W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-SS: 324 %2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-8N:17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2008 - September 30, 2009). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- Figure 1 Figure 2 ., ti'4~ t ~d ~a u i f' t ~ ~« " ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~~ j .' f a f fff ~ w ti ~~~ ~ r ~. PP ~ ~ - i ~~~ '! i{ ~ ~. * ~ ~ .~~ ilk h ~T' ~~ t~~,~ + ?'` r ~~ I ~ s~iL "k .. ~ ~ E ~ ~ it'' ,' .. ~; ~ ~ .~ ~` ~ j ,,.. - ,, , .~~ ~ . - 0 300 ~~ OOf ~ t~ r ~~~ '`c'` ;,~'' ~ ~ ~t- { `, ~' ,,,,1 a Q Noise Monitors Single-Family Residential 65 dB CNEL Contours ~ Multi-Family Residential ~ O H N WAYN E AIRPORT STATISTICS: 65 ~ ~ ~,,'v E ~ I t'Yl pa Ct A~G~ [ncompatible Land Use: 2.60 Acres or .004 square miles Vumber of Dwellings: 66 October 2008 -September 2009 Vumber of People: 165 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) Mestre Greve Associates, a Division ofGandrum & Brotivn -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS Julv -September 2009.. Period Air Carriers GA Jet. (1) Total Average Daily Jet Pro O erations 2 Jet O erations Jul 8,572 0 2,186 20,016 347 Au ust 8,439 0 2,136 19,297 341 Se tember 7,785 0 2,064 18,133 328 Third Quarter 24,796 0 6,386 57,446 339 Twelve Months ..10/01 /08 - 09/30/09. 93,775 ...... 0 24,210 214,057 323 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) July -September 2009 Jet Carrier Militarf~4 Prop Carrier0 GA Jet _~~ 6,386 GA Other E 24, 796 I E 26,250 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending September 30, 2009, 66 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents a decrease of one (1) 12/24/09 -4- unit in the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending June 30, 2009. Four hundred and eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. A number of residences also chose not to participate in the County's Acoustical Insulation and Purchase Assurance Programs. Specifically, 18 residences declined voluntary participation in the Programs in writing. An additional 64 homeowners did not respond to any of the participation opportunities. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (July 1, 2009 -September 30, 2009) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009, the Office received 524 complaints from citizens. This is a 133.9% increase from the 224 complaints received last quarter. It is a 26.6% increase from the 414 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY -- -- - - i X20 --.---.-___ ~ ~_.______ ~ _ ________.~ 99 100 78 80 73 70 1 60 i f ~ 24 19 25 24 33 24 ~ ~0 +~-a-=-'-~-~ i-- 14~-+-~~ ~ I +-~~ .. ~ ~~ 6 + -+- -~--~--F- -~ yea°a ~~~` ~~a .0r~~ ti`~~J~ J~~~ oaor ~~~.~` eaor a~OO ~'cz~ Pia 'c~5 y~S oy~~` ~o\~ Oa~~oa oo~ Oe Goytia os'a~~e tae \~ a°jo~a~ ~.~~~ 0~0 O~ O ~a~~a ~~.~ ,~~ J~~c fee ` Q Pia 5a Community - - -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10/08 through 9/09 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Oct 2008 __ 66.0 _ 64.6 64.2 _ 56.4 55.3 58.5 54.2 66.8 42.7 54.7 #Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 _30 __ 31 31 31 Nov 2008 _ 65.8 64.6 _ 63.5 56.6 55.8 58.1 53.5 66.4 42.4 54.7 # Da s 26 30 30 30 26 26 30 -30 29 30 Dec 2008 66.0 64.7 64.3 57.3 56.5 58.8 54.1 67.0 44.2 55.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Q-4 2008 65.9 64.6 64.0 56.8 55.9 58.5 53.9 66.8 43.2 55.0 # Da s 88 92 92 92 88 88 91 92 91 92 Jan 2009 64.5 63.2 63.8 _ 55.7 54.6 58.4 _ _ 52.5 65.6 42.4 53.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 _31 29 _ 31 Feb 2009 65.9 64.7 63.5 57.5 56.6 57.9 51.9 67.0 43.8 55.8 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 26 28 Mar 2009 66.1 65.0 64.0 _ 57.6 56.5 58.5 53.5 67.4 42.5 56.1 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 _ 31 29 31 Q-12009 65.5 64.4 _ _ 63.8 _ _ 57.0 56.0 58.3 _ 52.7 66.7 42.9 55.3 # Da s 90 90 90 90 90 90 _ 90 _ 90 _ _ _ 84 90 Apr 2009 66.2 65.1 63.9 57.9 56.9 58.2 50.0 67.5 43.2 56.6 # Da s 30 27 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 May 2009 66.6 65.3 64.3 58.0 56.5 59.0 50.2 67.7 42.3 56.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 31 28 31 Jun 2009 67.0 65.7 64.4 58.1 56.8 58.8 50.5 68.2 40.4 57.0 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Q-2.2009 66.6 65.4 64.2 58.0 56.7 58.7 50.2 67.8 42.1 56.8 # Da s 91 88 91 91 91 88 91 91 86 91 Ju12009 67.0 65.5 64.5 57.7 56.5 58.3 50.4 67.8 42.9 55.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Aug 2009 67.0 65.5 64.4 _ 57.4 56.3 58.1 53.4 67.6 42.7 55.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 27 ___ 31 30 31 Sep 2009 66.5 65.3 64.1 56.8 56.4 57.7 53.6 67.2 42.6 55.0 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 27 30 Q-3 2009. _ 66.8 65.4 64.3 57.3 56.4 58.1 52.7 67.5 42.8 55.4 # Da s 92 92 92 92 92 92 88 92 85 92 Q-4 2008 t hru Q-3 2009 Total 66.3 65.0 64.1 57.3 56.3 58.4 52.6 67.2 42.8 55.7 # Da s 361 362 365 365 361 358 360 365 346 365 Q-3 2008 t hru Q-2 2009_ (Previous 4 Quart ers) Total 66.4 65.1 64.4 57.5 56.4 58.6 53.3 67.4 42.7 55.9 # Da s 361 362 365 361 361 358 364 365 348 365 Change from Previous 4 Quarters -0.2 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.8 -0.2 __0.0 -0.2 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N` 10N 1 67.2 66.0 64.8 58.1 57.5 59.0 50.5 68.3 45.2 56.7 2 67.4 66.2 64.9 58.4 57.5 59.1 50.3 68.9 47.8 57.3 3 65.9 64.5 63.2 56.9 55.8 57.2 48.3 66.4 39.6 54.6 4 64.0 62.4 60.8 54.4 53.3 55.4 49.0 64.1 38.9 51.4 5 68.0 66.7 65.4 58.5 57.8 59.8 50.9 67.9 40.5 55.6 6 67.5 66.1 65.1 58.3 57.3 59.1 52.3 68.1 43.6 56.6 7 66.6 65.2 64.4 57.9 56.3 58.2 46.8 68.1 41.7 56.6 8 66.9 65.3 64.2 58.2 56.0 57.7 50.1 68.2 41.0 56.0 9 67.3 65.7 64.8 58.2 56.4 58.1 49.8 68.3 43.9 56.6 10 66.5 65.1 63.3 57.1 56.1 57.6 51.5 67.5 42.4 55.2 11 65.1 63.7 62.2 55.0 53.3 54.9 46.9 65.4 #N/A 53.3 12 67.0 65.7 64.7 56.3 55.3 57.0 51.1 67.5 41.0 54.9 13 66.9 65.6 64.2 56.8 55.8 57.4 51.1 67.6 44.1 55.6 14 66.7 65.2 64.6 58.1 56.5 58.2 52.7 67.4 43.4 55.5 15 67.1 65.9 65.0 57.9 57.2 59.2 51.5 68.0 41.5 56.0 16 67.0 65.6 65.0 57.4 56.6 58.3 50.0 67.8 43.5 55.2 17 67.1 65.9 64.5 57.7 56.8 58.7 48.9 68.1 44.0 55.2 18 65.6 64.1 62.9 56.3 54.6 56.4 48.6 65.5 38.8 53.2 19 67.4 65.5 64.5 57.4 56.4 58.0 48.6 67.8 44.9 55.2 20 67.5 66.1 65.3 57.6 56.1 58.2 54.0 68.0 35.9 54.8 21 66.8 65.2 64.2 57.2 55.5 57.7 49.5 67.9 35.3 55.0 22 66.9 65.5 64.8 58.9 56.7 58.8 48.8 68.3 37.2 56.2 23 68.0 66.4 65.5 59.0 57.6 59.6 46.9 68.3 #N/A 56.4 24 67.6 66.0 64.9 58.8 57.6 59.5 49.7 68.0 47.5 56.3 25 65.7 64.3 63.0 56.0 54.8 56.8 48.9 65.7 #N/A 53.3 26 67.0 65.4 64.4 57.0 56.4 58.7 53.5 68.5 47.4 55.7 27 67.2 65.7 64.7 57.4 56.5 58.2 49.8 68.1 41.7 55.6 28 67.3 65.5 64.5 58.3 56.3 58.6 47.8 68.4 43.6 56.5 29 67.4 65.3 64.8 58.6 57.3 59.1 47.9 68.2 34.6 57.0 30 68.3 66.3 65.2 59.0 57.9 59.8 52.6 68.7 36.4 57.1 31 67.9 66.1 65.2 58.5 57.5 59.4 50.4 68.4 39.9 56.7 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 _ 31 31 28 31 En.Av 67.0 65.5 64.5 57.7 56.5 58.3 50.4 67.8 42.9 55.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 65.8 64.3 63.4 56.6 55.5 57.7 49.3 65.3 #N/A 53.5 2 67.6 66.2 65.1 57.7 57.0 59.0 47.2 68.3 41.3 55.8 3 67.8 66.4 65.1 57.3 56.6 58.1 53.9 67.3 38.4 55.0 4 66.8 65.5 64.3 56.1 55.4 56.7 49.3 67.3 45.8 55.4 5 67.3 65.9 65.0 57.3 56.7 58.0 #N/A 68.2 45.1 56.3 6 67.5 66.4 65.5 58.5 58.0 59.4 #N/A 68.4 44.1 56.4 7 67.2 65.8 64.6 58.5 57.2 59.1 #N/A 68.4 44.4 56.1 8 65.8 63.9 62.7 56.7 55.1 57.1 #N/A 65.7 40.4 53.7 9 67.4 65.9 65.1 57.6 57.2 58.7 56.0 68.2 40.2 56.4 10 67.5 66.0 64.8 58.0 56.9 58.8 54.1 68.4 38.3 57.0 11 67.1 65.7 64.5 57.6 56.7 58.4 56.0 68.1 42.7 56.6 12 67.1 65.7 64.6 57.2 56.3 58.1 52.7 68.3 44.8 56.7 13 67.5 66.0 64.9 57.9 56.5 58.9 54.1 68.4 42.3 57.0 14 67.4 65.8 64.7 58.6 57.6 59.2 54.7 68.7 46.2 57.4 15 66.1 64.5 63.7 57.2 55.8 58.1 53.6 66.0 36.4 54.7 16 67.4 65.9 64.8 58.0 57.2 58.9 56.0 68.3 47.6 56.5 17 67.6 66.1 65.1 58.3 57.0 59.1 54.2 68.0 39.5 56.3 18 67.0 65.6 64.6 58.3 56.9 58.8 52.9 68.5 38.0 56.8 19 67.4 66.0 65.2 58.4 57.5 59.2 53.1 68.3 40.8 56.4 20 68.2 66.7 65.9 58.5 57.2 58.9 53.6 68.3 39.6 56.5 21 67.7 66.2 65.5 58.8 57.3 59.3 54.3 68.3 47.0 56.0 22 64.9 63.3 62.0 56.0 54.0 56.1 52.9 65.6 39.5 53.3 23 67.1 65.8 64.5 57.2 56.7 58.2 53.8 68.0 43.1 55.4 24 67.3 65.9 65.1 57.5 56.7 58.5 53.9 67.3 44.3 54.3 25 66.0 64.8 63.6 55.7 54.4 56.3 52.0 66.8 43.4 53.2 26 66.4 65.1 63.5 55.3 53.9 55.6 51.0 66.8 40.8 53.0 27 66.9 65.3 64.4 56.1 55.2 57.0 53.1 66.7 38.4 53.8 28 66.5 65.0 63.4 56.4 55.3 57.0 53.1 67.1 40.1 54.0 29 64.2 62.7 61.2 53.7 52.4 54.5 49.9 64.8 33.7 52.2 30 66.2 64.5 62.7 56.1 55.0 56.6 52.9 67.3 42.4 54.3 31 66.9 65.6 63.6 56.3 55.2 57.0 52.7 67.4 37.6 54.5 Da s 31 _ -31 31 31 _ 31 31 27 31 30 31 En.Av 67.0 65.5 64.4 57.4 56.3 58.1 53.4 67.6 42.7 55.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION _ September 2009......._ Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.1 64.6 63.6 57.1 55.3 57.6 52.3 67.3 41.3 54.3 2 66.5 65.0 64.0 56.6 56.0 57.9 53.7 67.3 42.1 55.4 3 67.1 65.8 64.3 57.0 56.1 57.8 53.9 67.8 45.0 55.0 4 67.5 65.8 64.5 57.6 56.0 58.0 54.2 67.9 46.8 55.2 5 64.5 63.2 61.8 54.8 53.3 55.1 51.7 65.3 #N/A 53.1 6 64.7 63.5 62.1 55.7 53.8 55.8 51.1 65.7 40.0 53.0 7 67.0 65.3 64.4 58.5 56.4 58.6 54.1 67.8 30.7 55.5 8 67.2 65.3 64.6 58.4 56.6 58.8 54.0 67.7 50.4 55.7 9 66.8 65.4 64.4 57.0 57.1 58.3 53.7 67.2 39.1 54.9 10 66.9 65.9 64.4 57.0 56.9 57.9 54.1 67.5 38.3 55.2 11 67.0 65.8 64.7 57.6 56.4 58.2 54.6 67.4 36.9 54.7 12 64.7 63.4 62.0 55.6 53.9 55.5 51.6 65.6 #N/A 53.8 13 66.9 65.5 64.5 58.4 56.8 58.9 54.8 68.0 29.8 56.9 14 66.8 65.5 64.5 58.3 57.1 59.0 54.6 67.7 43.4 57.1 15 66.3 64.8 63.6 57.2 57.2 57.6 54.0 67.4 41.6 54.8 16 67.1 66.4 65.9 57.6 60.7 59.5 57.7 67.1 37.3 54.7 17 68.1 67.6 65.7 57.5 58.5 58.8 54.7 67.7 37.7 55.6 18 67.2 65.7 65.1 56.6 56.7 58.1 53.7 68.1 41.6 56.0 19 64.8 63.4 62.0 54.4 54.0 55.6 51.9 65.3 39.1 52.9 20 66.8 65.4 64.5 56.7 56.5 58.0 53.4 67.8 34.6 55.1 21 67.0 65.9 64.7 56.9 56.6 57.9 53.7 67.6 45.3 55.4 22 66.5 65.3 64.1 55.6 55.9 57.3 52.4 66.3 40.2 51.6 23 66.4 65.6 64.3 55.0 55.1 56.6 52.0 66.9 44.0 51.8 24 67.3 65.8 64.6 55.6 55.7 57.1 53.2 67.3 44.9 54.4 25 67.1 65.8 64.6 56.0 56.1 57.6 53.9 66.7 38.8 53.7 26 64.4 63.1 62.3 54.4 53.8 55.0 51.1 64.4 35.2 51.7 27 65.8 64.7 63.7 55.0 55.9 56.4 52.0 68.2 #N/A 55.8 28 66.5 65.4 64.1 56.9 56.8 57.3 52.7 67.5 41.2 56.4 29 66.2 65.1 63.7 57.3 56.7 57.9 53.2 67.5 40.9 57.2 30 66.1 65.5 63.8 56.8 56.9 58.2 54.2 66.9 44.7 55.4 Days 30 _ 30 30 30 30 30 __ 30 _ 30 27 _ 30 En.Av 66.5 65.3 64.1 56.8 56.4 57.7 53.6 67.2 42.6 55.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS ........Commercial Class A .July -September 2009......... Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Alaska Air 87374. 14 Average 97.4 95.8 96.1 89.0 89.1 90.0 86.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 14 14 13 14 14 14 13 0 0 0 B7377 627 Average 93.8 92.5 88.4 80.9 82.5 82.8 79.8 76.9 #N/A #N/A Count 622 620 620 621 625 614 450 1 0 0 B7378 59 Average 97.9 96.3 95.6 87.9 87.9 88.3 84.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 59 59 59 58 59 58 20 0 0 0 American 87378 998 Average 98.6 96.5 96.0 88.1 86.9 88.7 84.1 94.6 #N/A #N/A Count 983 985 990 991 994 971 690 1 0 0 8757 219 Average 95.2 93.8 92.2 86.5 85.8 87.6 83.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 218 216 216 214 218 211 138 0 0 0 MD80 2 Average 99.6 _ 98.4 99.6 93.7 92.0 94.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 2 2 2 2 _ 2 2_ 0 0 0 0_ Continental 67377. 561 Average 96.2 94.4 93.4 85.9 85.2 87.0 83.5 95.9 81.9 81.7 Count 550 557 555 556 557 549 385 2 1 1 ~ 87378 106 Average 98.2 96.0 95.1 87.2 86.7 88.3 84.4 94.9 81.1 84.2 Count 99 99 98 97 99 92 85 7 2 3 Delta 87377 188 Average 96.6 94.7 92.4 85.1 85.2 87.0 83.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 186 185 188 185 188 185 150 0 0 0 87378 101 Average 96.1 94.2 93.0 86.7 85.9 88.1 84.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 100 99 100 98 101 99 77 0 0 0 B757 224 Average 96.7 94.8 94.5 87.2 86.4 87.2 83.2 93.4 79.1 81.2 Count 214 215 215 216 215 210 145 7 1 1 MD90 150 Average 91.3 90.2 89.9 82.5 82.7 84.9 81.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 148 150 148 139 139 148 96 0 0 0 FedEx A300 42 Average ....... 97.2 96.1 94.1 86.9 88.9 89.0 85.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 42 42 42 42 42 42 27 0 0 0 A310 23 Average 97.1 95.9 94.8 87.4 88.8 88.9 85.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 23 23 22 23 23 23 17 0 0 b Frontier Airlines A318 18 Average _ 93.0 91.6 91.6 83.6 84.4 84.7 80.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 17 17 17 16 17 17" _ 17 0 A319 346 Average 94.0 92.2 92.1 85.7 85.2 86.1 81.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 339 342 342 340 343 334 235 0 0 0 Mesa Airlines CRJ9 278 Average 91.7 90.2 92.1 83.8 83.1 85.5 79.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 277 275 272 270 269 267 155 0 0 0 Northwest A320 308 Average 95.8 93.9 93.5 86.4 85.5 86.3 82.1 93.7 #N/A #N/A Count 307 306 303 305 303 297 191 1 0 0 Southwest 87373 1 Average 93.8 93.0 91.7 87.1 85.3 87.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 87377 640 Average 90.7 89.9 85.8 80.9 80.0 81.2 78.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 635 635 636 619 604 634- 311 0 0 0 United A320 739 Average 92.4 91.0 90.8 84.7 83.8 85.6 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 732 737 732 735 736 724 556 0 0 0 B7373 19 Average _ 95.2 93.6 92.3 85.8 86.2 87.4 83.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 19 19 19 19 19 19 12 0 0 0 6757 158 Average 94.5 92.9 91,8 85.1 84.7 86.5 82.6 93.4 #N/A #N/A Count 155 154 156 157 156 154 102 1 0 0 UPS B757 52 Average 95.5 94.2 92.5 85.3 83.8 86.0 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 52 52 51 52 52 52 35 0 0 0 US Airways A320 736 Average 92.0 91.1 89.5 84.0 82.7 83.4 79.9 81.6 #N/A #N/A Count 730 729 733 725 695 717 332 1 0 0 A321 25 ...... Average 97.6 96.1 93.4 86.6 85.5 86.4 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 25 25 25 25 25 28 17 0 _0 67373 138 Average 94.0 92.4 90.6 84.3 84.1 85.4 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 137 136 137 137 135 133 114 0 0 0 6757 50 Average 95.4 94.9 91.8 85.0 83.0 85.0 80.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 48 48 48 49 50 49 21 0 0 0 Virgin America A320 396 Average 93.9 92.2 91.8 85.6 82.8 83.2 79.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 393 393 386 393 394 388 174 0 0 0 -I~- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS ........Commercial Class E__. July -September 2009 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS S ite 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Alaska Air 87377 355 Average Count 92.9 348 91.9 350 87.6 353 80.7 345 82.2 353 82.3 345 79.4 244 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 Southwest 67377 3314 Average Count 90.7 3297 89.9 3289 85.9 3286 81.1 3215 80.2 3143 81.4 3270 78.9 1667 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 -ll- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS ..Commuter July -September 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 6SA American Eagle E140 881 Average Count 86.5 875 85.4 880 88.1 873 79.4 730 78.4 430 80.9 866 79.9 10 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 SkyWest CL60 145 . Average .Count ... 85.7 .....145 . 83.1 ...143 88.0 145 78.3 32 78.5 17.... 81.0 ....142 79.3 7 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 CRJ7 484 Average Count 88.2 481 86.9 481 86.3 478 79.7 304 78.7 207 81.1 473 78.6 159 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS _ General Aviation July -September 2009 _ Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N General Aviation Jet 3193 Average Count 88.8 2536 87.4 2460 89.4 2424 83.0 1288 82.7 921 82.9 2121 82.3 445 83.6 30 79.7 1 78.7 6 -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Alaska Air AS B7374 7,130 7,188 5,072 2,114 111 87377 4,439 4,657 5,822 5,913 4,766 87378 128 2 912 1,508 1,105 Aloha AQ 87377 3,685 3,936 4,066 898 American 'AA 87378 6,896 6,737 7,322 7,649 5,687 6757 1,996 2,673 2,573 2,519 1,389 MD80 2,504 1,981 2,185 1,463 6 Continental ' CO 67373 4 4 87375 1, 767 1, 812 53 2 87377 3,529 3,711 5,537 5,274 3,273 87378 12 4 10 227 540 Delta DL 87373 1,243 7 5 24 67377 2 577 1,010 67378 131 280 97 438 541 8757 3,859 3,264 3,195 2,856 1,435 MD90 1,572 1,841 2,047 2,459 1,428 FedEx FM A300 4 98 296 368 259 A310 498 406 210 142 123 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1,114 13 9 110 74 A319 1,034 2,139 2,663 2,732 2,057 B7373 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2 2 CRJ 9 1,455 1,325 1, 301 1, 224 1,189 Midwest ' YX 8717 238 Northwest NW A319 2,793 2,073 2,071 2,076 1,745 A320 40 48 7 13 Southwest W N 87373 2 402 20 2 2 B7375 2 87377 22,022 24,146 26,944 26,414 22,216 UPS 5X 8757 476 480 500 472 322 US Airways AW A319 2,364 3,659 3,413 3,250 2,974 A320 3,050 2,132 2,864 2,964 1,926 A321 54 87373 2,746 2,271 1,244 1,138 649 8757 755 1,091 1,060 824 464 United UA A319 1,760 2,172 3,200 2,093 1,350 A320 2,086 1,399 850 1,939 1,896 67373 2 72 506 441 67375 8 88 191 379 8757 5, 800 6,126 5, 731 3, 722 1, 576 Virgin America VX A319 1,190 A320 149 -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2005 2006 2007 ' 2008 2009 A300 4 98 296 368 259 A310 498 406 210 142 123 A318 1,114 13 9 110 74 A319 7,951 10,043 11,347 10,151 9,316 A320 5,176 3, 579 3, 721 4, 903 3, 984 A321 54 8717 238 67373 3,995 2,756 1,269 1,674 1,092 87374 7,130 7,188 5, 072 2,114 111 87375 1,769 1,820 141 191 381 87377 33,675 36,450 42,371 39,076 31,265 87378 7,167 7,023 8,341 9,822 7,873 6757 12,886 13,634 13,059 10,393 5,186 CL60 2 2 CRJ 9 1,455 1, 325 1, 301 1,224 1,189 MD80 2,504 1,981 2,185 1,463 6 MD90 1,572 1,841 2,047 2,459 1,428 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY _ _ __ 45,000 __._ _.._. _... __...._ _... 40,000 - _ 35,000 ~ ~ 2005 30,000 25,000 ~ ; ~ 2006 20, 000 ~ ~ ^ 2007 15, 000 i ^ 2008 10,000 ? ''i 200911 5, 000 0 Apo ~^O ~,~0 ~,~~ ~,lo ~~~ ~,~~ ~,`3 ~,~o~ ~,~0 ~,~1 ~.~0 ~~'1 ~~O ~~0 OHO OHO P P P P P P Q> 0~ ~'~ 0~ 0~ ~~ ~ G G ~ ~ By Year -14- TABLE ll AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY I~F.PARTT TR F. NT4T(~R V Carrier AC Type Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Alaska Air AS 67374 9.770 9.838 6.951 2.883 0.201 87377 6.085 6.386 7.975 8.087 8.725 B7378 0.175 0.003 1.249 2.057 2.029 Aloha 'AQ B7377 5.058 5.386 5.578 1.230 American 'AA 67378 9.452 9.227 10.030 10.454 10.410 8757 2.734 3.666 3.523 3.443 2.546 MD80 3.433 2.721 2.992 2.000 0.011 Continental CO 67373 0.003 0.005 87375 2.436 2.490 0.071 0.004 87377 4.819 5.082 7.586 7.202 6.000 87378 0.016 0.005 0.014 0.314 0.982 Delta ' DL 67373 1.704 0.011 0.005 0.033 87377 0.003 0.787 1.850 87378 0.181 0.384 0.132 0.598 0.993 8757 5.290 4.474 4.395 3.913 2.626 MD90 2.153 2.518 2.803 3.355 2.615 FedEx FM A300 0.005 0.134 0.405 0.503 0.476 A310 0.679 0.556 0.288 0.194 0.223 Frontier Airlines ' F9 A318 1.526 0.019 0.011 0.153 0.132 A319 1.416 2.929 3.649 3.732 3.769 87373 0.003 Mesa Airlines 'YV CL60 0.003 0.003 C RJ 9 1.995 1.816 1.781 1.672 2.176 Midwest YX 8717 0.326 Northwest I NW A319 3.827 2.841 2.836 2.836 3.198 A320 0.055 0.066 0.011 0.022 Southwest W N 87373 0.003 0.551 0.027 0.003 0.004 __ 87375 0.003 87377 30.173 33.088 36.918 36.107 40.700 UPS ' 5X 8757 0.652 0.658 0.685 0.645 0.590 US Airways AW A319 3.244 5.008 4.679 4.440 5.451 A320 4.178 2.934 3.921 4.049 3.527 A321 0.095 87373 3.762 3.110 1.704 1.555 1.187 8757 1.033 1.493 1.452 1.123 0.850 United I UA A319 2.416 2.984 4.373 2.866 2.480 A320 2.852 1.912 1.181 2.639 3.462 67373 0.003 0.099 0.691 0.817 67375 0.011 0.121 0.260 0.689 6757 7.945 8.395 7.852 5.087 2.886 Virgin America VX A319 2.179 A320 0.271 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: September 9, 2009 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED• 1. Airport Statistics Silvia Zavala presented the statistics from the JWA Monthly Airport Statistics Report for July 2009, and copies were distributed to attendees. August statistics were not available at the time. There was a 3.5% increase in Air Carrier Operations when compared to the levels recorded in July 2008. Total aircraft operations (Tower Operations) decreased 8.6% in July 2009 as compared to the same month in 2008. 2. Additional tonic discussions and/or comments and questions Eric Freed mentioned that the passengers served for August was relatively level (-0.2%) as compared to August 2008. August 2009 had a 12% drop from August 2007. August 2007 marked the biggest passenger count ever at John Wayne Airport. Eric also added that the Commuter, American Eagle, will discontinue service at John Wayne Airport in November 2009. Greg Carroll asked if John Wayne Airport expects an increase in flights in the future. Eric replied that currently, we are under 9 million passengers and we anticipate about the same for the Plan Year. Don Williams inquired about the DUUKE ONE RNAV procedure, and whether American Airlines has exceeded noise levels. Eric replied that American Airlines should be following the DUUKE ONE procedure for departures to the east, if equipped, and he explained that the Commercial Carriers must comply with the quarterly average noise limits which are monitored and enforced by the JWA noise staff. Eric also mentioned that by using that RNAV procedure, aircraft should be following the Back Bay on a narrower, more precise path. Don asked about the variation of flight paths. Bonnie Frisch replied that there is a variation, all due to the execution of the procedure the pilot uses. Irma Ortega added that there are different flight management systems, thus allowing for that variation. Greg Carroll asked if a decrease in passengers translates into less impact and a smaller noise footprint. Eric replied that with the MD80 no longer operating on a regular basis at John Wayne -16- Airport, as of February 2009, this will shrink the contours a bit. -17- NAC ROSTER September 9, 2009 NAME ORGANIZATION Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Irma Ortega John Wayne Airport Jim Sugden John Wayne Airport Silvia Zavala John Wayne Airport Greg Carroll AIR FAIR Don Williams Resident -Newport Beach -18- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 148th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-~tS: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-SS: 324 `/z Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N:1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-lON:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- Figure 1 Figure 2 ~`~ ~r r -~ M_ S 3 x ~T - ~' - f , ~~ ~~.` ,~~ ~ ~ `Y., + ~ `~' Few ~`ti .~ .3~~ ~:. ., _ ir' ~'~,fr7 r /y j~,r ~!~ ~,i ~.y~ ;_ 0.,i ~`_r ~I ~.~;.~Ff ~•'~ r ~ # 7 f . JG +w -~ .. ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ _ _~ ~ ~4+ ~ ter. ..t t'• ,- ~,~' 'fix ,,.~ ; ,~ . , f r' f ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~'~ ~~'r. ~Ir a ~ ~ 4 ~~ e _ ,.' .- A' "h I ~ ~~ ~ r ~ f h ' ~. . ~ '`xn. ~ J ~ ~' N , -~ ;. ~. ~~ _ '" t r ~~ 4.f~~ ~ ~ ~ .s ~t~ ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ` 0 301 *~ OOf ~~ r y,~.° `~ ~`' -'~~1 ~ ;s; i' ~ f ~..9 f `,, - i iia'^^ ^ ~• ~ 1. ... ,~!~!' ~ _., ~~ t° ~~ lr~w ,, x ~ ~ ~ #.k ,rill • ~*` ` ~' "~„ s r-: C~ Noise Monitors `~ ~ Single-Family Residential ~ O H N WAYI~ E AIRPORT - 65 dB CNEL Contours Multi-Family Residential ~-rA-risTZCS: 65 dB CNEL Impact Area ncompatible Land Use: 3.03 Acres or .005 square miles dumber of Dwellings: 66 January 2009 -December 2009 dumber of People: 165 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) Mestre Greve Associates, a Division ofLandrum & Brown -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE I LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS October -December 2009 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Pro O erations 2 Jet O erations October 8,012 0 2,239 19,227 331 November 7,506 0 1,924 17,754 314 ecem er ourt uarter Twelve Months 01 /01 /09 - 12/31 /09 94,248 0 24,602 218,157 326 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) October -December 2009 Jet Carrier ~~~ ~~ ~ .~__u.~~-_ ~ 23,047 ~~ Milita~ s Prop Carrier 0 ~ GA Jet 6,257 GA Other 25,098 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending December 31, 2009, sixty-six dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights zi~~no -4- were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this amount is equal to the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending September 30, 2009. Four hundred and eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. A number of residences also chose not to participate in the County's Acoustical Insulation and Purchase Assurance Programs. Specifically, 18 residences declined voluntary participation in the Programs in writing. An additiona164 homeowners did not respond to any of the participation opportunities. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (October 1, 2009 -December 31, 2009) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the Office received 281 complaints from citizens. This is a 46.2% decrease from the 524 complaints received last quarter. It is a 151.8% increase from the 112 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 120 _.,~ ....~.. ~~........_.._...~ _ ._ 100 80 61 60 40 24 19 20 10 12 11 g 3 5 2 2 6 t 5 8 p ca ova a` 5a rti5 \J'~ or c~ i~~ ar °~ ca .~e ;~~ ~q` ~ yea ~~~~ O°~~ ~a~Se Rio' a5'`'~ ~°~ ~5~a ,<~~ ~°a O'`'~` ,~aQ- ~~°'c ,~JS ey~o ~a~o o Qec oo ~ Goy o~a~ ~ a°'J~~ ~~a° ~• ey~QoZ` ~a~ QSa~' ~ ~a\~ a G ` G ~ ~ ~~~~a Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 1/09 through 12/09 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Jan 2009 64.5 63.2 63.8 55.7 54.6 58.4 52.5 65.6 42.4 53.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Feb 2009 65.9 64.7 63.5 57.5 56.6 57.9 51.9 67.0 43.8 55.8 # Da s 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 26 28 Mar 2009 66.1 65.0 64.0 57.6 56.5 58.5 53.5 67.4 42.5 56.1 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-12009 65.5 64.4 63.8 57.0 56.0 58.3 52.7 66.7 42.9 55.3 # Days 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 84 90 Apr 2009 66.2 65.1 63.9 57.9 56.9 58.2 50.0 67.5 43.2 56.6 # Da s 30 27 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 May 2009 66.6 65.3 64.3 58.0 56.5 59.0 50.2 67.7 42.3 56.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 31 28 31 Jun 2009 67.0 65.7 64.4 58.1 56.8 58.8 50.5 68.2 40.4 57.0 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 Q-2 2009 66.6 65.4 64.2 58.0 56.7 58.7 50.2 67.8 42.1 56.8 # Days 91 88 91 91 91 88 91 91 86 91 Ju12009 67.0 65.5 64.5 57.7 56.5 58.3 50.4 67.8 42.9 55.7 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Aug 2009 67.0 65.5 64.4 57.4 56.3 58.1 53.4 67.6 42.7 55.5 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 27 31 30 31 Sep 2009 66.5 65.3 64.1 56.8 56.4 57.7 53.6 67.2 42.6 55.0 # Da s 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 27 30 Q-3 2009 66.8 65.4 64.3 57.3 56.4 58.1 52.7 67.5 42.8 55.4 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 88 92 85 92 Oct 2009 66.5 65.3 64.4 56.8 56.9 58.4 54.2 67.1 41.7 55.0 # Da s 31 31 31 31 28 30 31 30 30 31 Nov 2009 66.2 64.8 64.3 56.4 56.5 58.2 53.2 66.4 43.3 54.5 # Da s 30 30 30 30 28 30 30 30 30 30 Dec 2009 66.4 65.2 64.3 57.0 57.1 58.3 54.2 66.9 43.9 55.1 # Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 28 Q-4 2009 66.4 65.1 64.3 56.7 56.9 58.3 53.9 66.8 43.1 54.9 # Da s 92 92 92 92 87 91 92 91 90 89 t ru Total 66.4 65.1 64.2 57.3 56.5 58.3 52.6 67.2 42.7 55.7 # Days 365 362 365 365 360 361 361 364 345 362 Q-4 2008 thru Q-3 2009 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 66.3 65.0 64.1 57.3 56.3 58.4 52.6 67.2 42.8 55.7 # Days 361 362 365 365 361 358 360 365 346 365 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION October 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.7 65.2 64.8 56.1 55.5 57.2 52.9 67.2 40.5 53.8 2 67.0 65.4 64.0 56.9 55.7 56.8 52.1 67.4 45.9 55.5 3 65.0 63.6 62.6 56.1 55.1 56.2 52.7 66.1 44.6 54.5 4 66.5 65.8 64.3 57.3 57.7 58.8 55.3 68.5 38.1 57.7 5 67.5 66.0 65.2 58.3 58.8 59.8 57.1 67.5 40.8 55.0 6 66.1 65.1 63.6 56.9 57.0 58.0 54.3 67.5 40.6 56.2 7 66.6 65.8 64.4 57.8 57.4 59.0 54.9 67.6 44.2 56.2 8 67.3 66.1 64.8 57.9 57.9 59.3 55.3 68.2 44.6 56.3 9 67.5 66.4 65.2 58.3 58.4 59.3 55.6 68.2 41.3 55.9 10 65.2 64.1 62.5 56.0 55.4 56.6 52.3 65.7 37.4 54.2 11 66.7 65.5 64.3 57.7 57.2 58.8 55.5 67.7 29.9 55.9 12 67.3 65.8 64.7 58.4 57.1 58.8 54.9 67.9 35.8 57.0 13 66.7 64.9 64.3 58.6 56.8 58.6 55.2 68.1 38.2 57.0 14 67.4 66.2 64.5 57.2 57.3 58.7 54.9 67.9 28.3 56.5 15 68.4 66.8 66.1 57.2 58.1 58.9 55.7 67.5 42.4 55.2 16 68.0 66.7 65.7 56.6 57.4 58.5 54.9 67.2 43.6 54.2 17 65.1 63.5 62.5 54.6 54.3 54.6 51.8 64.7 #N/A 51.4 18 66.2 64.8 63.8 56.2 56.6 57.3 53.1 68.2 37.5 55.9 19 67.1 65.8 64.8 57.8 58.3 59.3 54.9 67.9 41.9 56.7 20 66.5 65.3 64.7 57.7 58.5 60.0 57.4 66.9 45.3 54.9 21 66.8 65.8 65.1 56.8 58.1 59.1 54.6 66.7 43.6 54.5 22 67.5 66.3 65.1 57.1 57.6 58.7 54.4 67.7 38.5 55.0 23 67.4 66.3 65.1 56.3 57.2 57.6 54.0 67.5 40.8 55.4 24 63.8 62.5 61.2 54.2 53.8 54.8 50.5 65.0 35.0 52.7 25 66.6 66.3 66.8 57.0 57.1 59.8 53.6 65.7 44.5 52.2 26 65.9 64.5 63.1 54.5 54.6 57.4 52.3 66.4 40.0 53.3 27 65.2 63.8 66.2 54.9 55.8 61.9 52.7 64.3 41.3 52.7 28 61.8 61.1 62.2 51.3 52.9 57.8 49.3 65.4 36.4 51.4 29 65.5 64.5 64.1 54.7 #N/A #N/A 51.8 #N/A 43.2 53.9 30 67.0 66.0 64.5 57.3 #N/A 58.1 54.1 66.9 44.7 54.6 31 63.9 62.6 61.8 54.7 #N/A 55.0 50.8 63.1 36.2 49.9 Da s 31 31 31 31 28 30 31 30 30 31 En.Av 66.5 65.3 64.4 56.8 56.9 58.4 54.2 67.1 41.7 55.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION November 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 65.7 64.5 63.0 55.4 #N/A 56.1 52.7 66.3 34.2 53.2 2 66.6 65.5 64.6 56.3 #N/A 58.0 53.5 66.6 44.7 53.5 3 65.8 64.7 62.9 55.0 54.9 55.8 51.1 66.6 43.3 55.3 4 65.4 64.4 62.8 56.4 55.5 56.1 51.8 67.5 29.9 56.6 5 67.1 66.5 65.3 57.9 58.8 59.6 54.8 67.8 35.1 57.5 6 67.3 66.2 65.1 58.9 59.2 60.4 55.5 67.7 36.2 56.0 7 64.4 63.5 62.0 54.6 55.0 56.0 52.2 64.6 37.2 54.3 8 66.7 65.4 64.7 56.8 57.8 58.2 53.8 67.4 46.1 55.5 9 66.7 65.3 64.2 56.3 57.7 57.3 52.8 67.2 37.7 56.2 10 66.4 65.1 63.8 56.5 56.8 57.2 53.5 66.6 41.2 54.2 11 66.2 64.8 63.4 55.3 54.5 55.8 49.6 67.1 36.4 54.9 12 67.3 65.5 64.7 58.1 57.5 57.6 54.5 68.1 39.8 57.5 13 67.0 65.8 64.2 57.9 57.6 58.5 54.7 67.6 46.6 56.1 14 64.7 63.0 62.3 55.3 55.9 56.3 52.7 64.3 42.9 52.8 15 66.8 65.0 63.8 56.1 55.8 57.5 53.4 66.7 40.7 49.9 16 65.9 65.1 63.7 55.0 55.6 56.9 52.2 66.0 34.4 51.5 17 66.4 64.8 63.6 56.3 55.4 56.5 51.8 66.8 44.4 54.5 18 67.0 65.7 64.6 57.7 57.5 58.5 54.1 67.5 49.3 55.9 19 67.1 65.9 64.8 56.8 57.9 58.3 54.1 67.4 51.1 54.6 20 67.8 66.2 65.6 58.1 58.2 59.6 55.1 68.0 36.1 57.3 21 67.1 63.4 67.8 59.5 58.0 61.3 55.1 64.4 43.3 53.9 22 66.5 65.3 63.6 56.9 56.9 57.6 53.8 66.9 40.8 55.4 23 66.5 64.8 66.1 56.1 56.1 61.2 52.9 64.2 43.6 50.3 24 64.9 63.0 66.3 53.3 53.8 60.9 50.3 62.0 40.7 46.6 25 65.7 63.6 64.5 55.3 54.3 58.4 51.6 64.6 42.0 49.2 26 59.5 58.3 57.8 49.3 48.7 51.2 44.7 61.2 43.9 45.9 27 64.3 63.1 61.4 55.6 54.6 55.4 51.8 65.4 29.3 55.4 28 65.5 64.5 62.7 56.0 56.4 57.4 53.7 65.4 42.2 53.5 29 65.6 64.6 65.1 55.0 55.5 60.5 53.6 66.5 43.0 51.4 30 65.0 63.3 64.0 54.5 54.4 58.4 51.7 65.8 44.5 52.0 Da s 30 30 30 30 28 30 30 30 30 30 En.Av 66.2 64.8 64.3 56.4 56.5 58.2 53.2 66.4 43.3 54.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION December 2009 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.4 65.0 64.3 57.7 57.0 57.9 53.8 67.5 39.2 57.3 2 66.7 65.6 64.3 57.5 57.7 58.3 54.6 67.0 42.3 56.5 3 67.2 66.4 64.7 57.1 57.8 58.8 54.9 67.0 45.1 53.0 4 66.3 65.5 64.2 56.5 56.9 57.7 53.1 66.8 39.5 55.4 5 63.7 62.8 61.5 55.3 54.7 55.9 51.0 64.6 34.5 54.8 6 65.9 64.5 63.3 56.8 56.8 57.8 53.9 67.1 #N/A 56.5 7 67.9 66.4 64.8 59.3 57.4 58.9 55.3 67.5 43.0 57.8 8 66.1 64.8 63.5 57.0 56.9 57.7 54.2 66.3 39.2 55.5 9 66.3 64.7 63.5 57.6 57.0 58.2 54.5 67.1 47.5 56.0 10 67.1 65.9 64.3 57.8 57.9 58.5 54.8 67.8 41.1 56.0 11 67.9 66.3 65.0 58.3 57.6 58.6 54.2 68.1 35.0 57.7 12 64.2 63.3 61.2 55.9 55.6 55.2 53.3 67.0 43.7 55.8 13 66.3 65.1 63.7 56.3 57.4 57.7 54.4 67.7 36.9 57.0 14 67.3 65.8 64.8 57.9 58.1 58.8 55.3 67.4 40.5 55.8 15 66.3 65.2 64.0 57.1 57.0 57.4 53.3 66.9 46.5 #N/A 16 67.1 65.6 64.5 57.2 58.0 58.5 54.2 66.8 47.2 #N/A 17 67.5 66.2 65.8 57.8 58.0 58.9 55.5 67.4 45.4 #N/A 18 67.6 66.1 67.1 57.1 57.7 61.3 54.7 65.2 44.9 46.5 19 63.6 62.1 62.2 53.3 53.1 56.3 50.7 64.8 46.3 47.9 20 66.4 65.0 64.0 56.4 56.6 57.8 54.0 66.9 44.9 49.2 21 67.3 65.5 65.2 57.9 57.9 58.6 55.3 68.2 45.4 52.1 22 64.8 64.1 66.7 54.8 57.6 62.7 53.8 64.4 42.8 49.9 23 66.1 65.4 63.6 56.1 56.6 57.1 54.0 67.0 48.1 53.4 24 66.3 64.8 63.7 56.1 56.1 56.9 53.3 65.6 46.0 53.3 25 65.0 63.7 62.3 55.2 55.3 55.6 52.3 66.1 46.2 54.2 26 66.2 64.9 64.1 57.2 57.1 58.0 54.2 67.1 42.5 54.8 27 66.6 65.7 64.0 57.1 57.1 58.3 54.6 67.6 42.3 53.8 28 66.0 64.9 63.5 56.7 56.4 57.4 53.7 67.0 42.7 54.4 29 66.6 65.6 64.4 58.0 57.8 58.5 54.7 67.6 44.7 56.5 30 67.2 65.9 64.8 58.5 58.2 58.8 55.3 68.3 36.8 57.6 31 65.3 64.7 63.2 55.6 56.8 57.4 54.0 66.0 40.5 52.0 Da s 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 28 En.Av 66.4 65.2 64.3 57.0 57.1 58.3 54.2 66.9 43.9 55.1 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A October -December 2009 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 2 3 4S 5 7 9 10 A aska Air 737 verage 96.9 95. 96. 9. 89.3 89.8 85.8 4.3 79.5 8 .2 Count 24 23 23 23 23 22 24 2 2 1 87377 615 Average 92.1 91.2 87.5 81.2 82.5 82.9 80.1 89.8 79.9 77.1 Count 582 571 584 575 552 559 573 24 9 6 87378 46 Average 97.6 95.9 95.2 87.7 87.4 87.8 83.7 91.3 #N/A #N/A Count (42) (43 (42) (42) (43 42) 40) 2) (0) (0) American 87378 1029 Average 98.0 96.2 95.6 86.9 88.1 88.4 84.5 91.6 78.7 79.4 Count 961 953 967 965 920 926 971 46 16 23 8757 166 Average 95.1 93.8 91.9 85.4 86.3 86.5 83.5 89.1 77.3 77.5 Count 155 154 157 156 151 151 157 8 3 4 MD80 2 Average 99.5 100.7 98.8 93.9 94.1 94.1 91.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2) 2 2 (1) 2) (2) 2) (0) 0) (0) Continental 87377 471 Average 95.6 94.0 92.9 84.2 85.8 86.0 83.1 92.0 79.8 80.6 Count 435 432 436 428 415 422 430 31 8 14 87378 169 Average 98.1 96.1 94.7 86.1 87.5 88.2 84.9 94.5 80.7 81.4 Count 127) 125) 127 (126) (120) 117 (124) 35 (26) 20) Delta B7377 349 Average 95.9 94,3 92.2 83.6 86.2 87.1 83.8 91.6 80.1 79.0 Count 324 323 327 321 311 315 326 17 8 6 87378 72 Average 95.4 93.8 92.6 87.0 86.2 88.2 85.0 91.1 79.5 79.9 Count 65 65 65 65 60 63 65 4 3 4 6757 52 Average 96.0 94.5 93.9 86.3 87.0 87.1 83.8 92.2 81.0 79.0 Count 49 49 50 50 48 49 49 2 2 1 MD90 160 Average 91.4 90.4 89.6 82.3 82.3 84.2 81.1 89.2 78.4 #N/A Count 152) (150) 153) 140) (130 (146) 139 (6 (1) (0) Fed Ex A300 55 Average 97.0 95.9 93.9 86.9 88.7 88.5 85.5 91.5 #N/A 79.7 Count 52 50 52 51 48 50 51 3 0 1 A310 9 Average 97.3 96.0 93.9 85.3 89.0 87.7 85.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 Frontier Airlines A318 80 Average 92.7 91.3 90.6 84.0 84.1 84.3 80.5 86.5 #N/A #N/A Count 79 79 79 78 73 78 64 1 0 0 A319 279 Average 93.6 92.4 91.7 85.1 85.5 85.6 81.5 87.5 76.1 #N/A Count 259 (257) (260) (261) (249) (246) (251) (13) (1) (0) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 671 Average 91.5 90.1 91.9 84.0 83.4 85.3 79.5 87.8 79.4 75.8 Count 638) (635 635) 623 (590) (610 510 (29 (1) (2 Northwest A320 259 Average 95.5 94.0 93.2 86.1 86.1 86.4 82.6 90.6 78.3 79.1 Count 238 235) 237 234 225 223 233 18 2 6 Southwest B7377 642 Average 90.8 90.2 86.0 81.2 80.7 81.7 78.8 89.2 78.3 78.4 Count 615 (611 614) 592) (562) (602) (481 (23 (6) (3) United A320 647 Average 92.2 91.2 90.6 84.3 84.7 85.6 83.8 87.4 78.4 77.1 Count 605 596 610 597 589 596 603 30 8 7 8757 247 Average 92.9 91.7 89.9 82.8 84.2 84.4 82.4 90.9 79.2 79.4 Count 228 226 229 226 210 211 225 16 3 3 UPS B757 56 Average 95.3 94.4 92.5 84.4 85.1 85.1 81.5 86.9 #N/A #N/A Count 53 52 53 52 50 51 52 3 0 0 US Airways A320 331 Average 92.2 91.6 89.7 83.9 84.4 84.4 80.7 86.4 79.4 78.3 Count 310 310 310 306 298 301 278 13 2 2 A321 10 Average 97.2 96.2 93.6 86.8 86.3 86.6 83.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 0 0 0 67373 170 Average 95.5 93.7 92.3 84.2 86.1 86.9 83.2 90.9 83.2 78.0 Count 156 154 156 155 151 151 156 11 6 6 B757 4 Average 95.1 95.1 91.0 83.2 86.5 83.4 80.9 88.5 #N/A #N/A Count 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 0 0 Virgin America A320 350 Average 94.8 93.3 92.9 86.4 83.7 83.9 79.7 88.3 #N/A #N/A Count 330) 326) (332) (329) (312 (318) (298) (14) (0 (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E October -December 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Si te 1S 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 las a Air 377 verage Count 9 .9 323 1.1 323 87.2 327 81.0 323 82.3 314) 82.7 321 80.1 318 89. 12 7 .6 3 74.1 1 Southwest 67377 3280 Average Count 91.0 3108 90.3 3106 86.2 3110 81.3 3000 80.8 2855 81.8 3026 78.9 2562 89.0 137 79.0 21 78.7 13 TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter October -December 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 American age 40 319 verage Count 86. (307) 85. (305) 8 .0 308) 79.6 265) 78.7 148) 1.2 (291) 7 .7 (14) 84. (9) A (0 / (0) SkyWest CL60 242 Average Count 85.2 229 83.3 229 87.8 230 78.8 69 78.7 60 82.3 226 79.0 11 83.7 11 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 CRJ7 372 Average Count 88.3 (358 87.4 358 86.4 358 79.7 249 79.0 215 81.2 344 78.7 232 86.8 12) #N/A 0 #N/A 0 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation October -December 2009 Carrier AC Type #Deps NMS Site 1 2 3 4 5 7 8N 9N 10N eneral Aviation Jet 3129 Average Count 89.2 2360 87.6 2319 90.0 2280 83.7 1340 83.9 1052 83.9 1994 83.0 715 87.0 128 77.8 3 77.7 7 -II- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year as a it 87377 4,439 4,657 5,822 5,913 6,687 ,1 oa American AA 87378 6,896 6,737 7,322 7,649 7,744 6757 1,996 2,673 2,573 2,519 1,722 ,4 Continental CO 67373 4 4 87375 1, 767 1, 812 53 2 87377 3,529 3,711 5,537 5,274 4,239 Delta DL 87373 1,243 7 5 24 87377 2 577 1,707 67378 131 280 97 438 688 6757 3,859 3,264 3,195 2,856 1,539 ,4 4 ,4 4 FedEx FM A300 4 98 296 368 369 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1,114 13 9 110 233 A319 1,034 2,139 2,663 2,732 2,616 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 2 2 J i wes Northwest NW A319 2,793 2,073 2,071 2,076 2,255 Southwest WN 67373 2 402 20 2 2 67375 2 ,4 4 ,4 US Airways AW A319 2,364 3,659 3,413 3,250 3,291 A320 3,050 2,132 2,864 2,964 2,272 A321 73 67373 2,746 2,271 1,244 1,138 989 United UA A319 1,760 2,172 3,200 2,093 1,741 A320 2,086 1,399 850 1,939 2,798 87373 2 72 506 441 87375 8 88 191 379 Virgin America VX A319 1,266 -12- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year A 4 9 3 A310 498 406 210 142 141 A318 1,114 13 9 110 233 A319 7,951 10,043 11,347 10,151 11,169 A320 5,176 3,579 3,721 4,903 5,864 A321 73 B717 238 87373 3,995 2,756 1,269 1,674 1,432 87374 7,130 7,188 5,072 2,114 163 87375 1, 769 1, 820 141 191 381 87377 33,675 36,450 42,371 39,076 42,691 87378 7,167 7,023 8,341 9,822 10,485 8757 12,886 13,634 13,059 10,393 6,238 CL60 2 2 CRJ9 1,455 1,325 1,301 1,224 2,533 MD80 2,504 1,981 2,185 1,463 10 MD90 1,572 1,841 2,047 2,459 1,745 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 45,000 .. _ _ _ ._..._._ _~ ~. 40,000 35,000 ~ 2005 30,000 ^ 2006 25,000 20,000 O 2007 15,000 O 2008 10,000 ^ 2009 5,000 0 pp0 ~,~0 p^0 ~^p p~0 py~ ~~•~ p~3 ~~A p~h p~1 pip ~~1 ~p0 ~~0 OHO Op0 P P P P P P ~ ~~ ~'~ 0~ 0~ ~~ 0 G G ~` ~ By Year -I3- TABLE ll AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year A aska it A 7 67377 6.085 6.386 7.975 8.087 9.159 oa American AA 87378 9.452 9.227 10.030 10.454 10.605 6757 2.734 3.666 3.523 3.443 2.359 Continental CO 87373 0.003 0.005 87375 2.436 2.490 0.071 0.003 87377 4.819 5.082 7.586 7.202 5.778 Delta DL 87373 1.704 0.011 0.005 0.033 87377 0.003 0.787 2.340 67378 0.181 0.384 0.132 0.598 0.940 6757 5.290 4.474 4.395 3.913 2.107 FedEx FM A300 0.005 0.134 0.405 0.503 0.507 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 1.526 0.019 0.011 0.153 0.318 A319 1.416 2.929 3.649 3.732 3.584 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 0.003 0.003 i wes Northwest NW A319 3.827 2.841 2.836 2.836 3.088 A Southwest WN 67373 0.003 0.551 0.027 0.003 0.003 67375 0.003 US Airways AW A319 3.244 5.008 4.679 4.440 4.510 A320 4.178 2.934 3.921 4.049 3.112 A321 0.099 87373 3.762 3.110 1.704 1.555 1.353 B .4 .4 4 United UA A319 2.416 2.984 4.373 2.866 2.392 A320 2.852 1.912 1.181 2.639 3.825 87373 0.003 0.099 0.691 0.611 87375 0.011 0.121 0.260 0.515 Virgin America VX A319 1.734 -14- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: December 9, 2009 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND OTHER ITEMS DISCUSSED 1. Airport Statistics Irma Ortega presented the statistics from the JWA Airport Statistics Report for November 2009. Copies were distributed to attendees. 2. Additional topic discussions and/or comments and questions Melinda Seely asked if any additional noise monitors were needed due to implementation of the new RNAV procedure. Eric Freed explained that existing noise monitors and their limits are part of the settlement agreement and therefore, due to ANCA restrictions, any new noise monitors would have no enforceable limits. He added that the airport has the ability to model noise based on the monitors' current locations. Greg Carroll asked if the quality of the modeling has ever been checked with additional monitors. Eric Freed explained that is has been done in the past and that the noise levels derived from the modeling were confirmed by the data gathered by the test monitors. Greg Carroll asked if the acoustical insulation program had been completed. Eric responded that the program is closed with the exception of some follow-up work. Greg Carroll asked about the nature of the military flights that occur the JWA. Eric explained that they are typically helicopter operations. -15- NAC ROSTER December 9, 2009 NAME Eric Freed Irma Ortega Bonnie Frisch Jim Sugden Silvia Zavala Phil Salisbury Greg Carroll Melinda Seely ORGANIZATION John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport Resident Air Fair Air Fair -16- 4th Quarter 2009 SNA/John Wayne Airport SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21, chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6): 3.03 acres or .005 square miles 2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 66 3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 165 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) 4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period: B7378 - 2,612 (departures + arrivals) 5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter: 54,408 6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 23.047 7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36, Stage III: (Not mandatory) 100% 8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 31,355 9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 6 r tart ~a ~-~M " . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ariyr n'~}~.~ ~' ~ ~ ~-1 k~~1~1 ~ r ~ °Y ~~ "C£" ~ ~ i1~':;.F+- Y-'fb r r' {' "i~,s • T .wa~, rsAr r'• } r ~ r ~"~~4 +-» «~' ~~'TF ~ 4 I jf ~F C'€~ ~ S .°~ ~ .4~' ~.~, ~ ~ y ~rS1''.~k ~,r r $..r tsq~ _ ~' ' '~' ~~~ t ' '" ~ ~` of ~`~ z- t ,~'~. c h ~ } f7. c.. S~ ~+~ a') ^o ~, y~~ r !/lei. saR l~ adj. ,:.~ ~~ ~~~ ~ c. { ~ 'Y~' ~_ ~,~`~#~ ~ f" -Y tr. e -!~4.w.7t~+7 `7'~2`'f~ 11 F ~ ,-6 0~ t ,gam 1m K J ~ iu r~a ~ s +~. ~ ~,~ .I W 'E°k.. _r -~~ ~ ~ ~,,, ' elI .IF R l fq:,T Jr ~~.}~ .~ r +,fstka ~~.j~- ~ ~ • ,r~,;: r~~, . ~ ,r +1: ,, +-'4 c r t : x y~~ ~k t'7'alri ~ e r- ~ ;9' ~q" ~ s r""~~,{Lx°'"rF'w++'~`c}~'. r ~ ~ ai~~ ~`~+.A'f,.~..~.. °}.1'~-'. 1~j ~,~ ~.7 ~~~('F~~~~ ~- f ,ck.....'k /_Q'" ~`'~~~~.~ ,'~,ri~;K`~'Ai'">s"~.,. r y ~..`~ ~''T ~ a x +t-. ~~ ~~~ {~j.~ r: k: Ir~'r' T~ ? _ _ r ~.le 1 : ~ }~ r t '~ ,A t ~~ ~~- ~ `. ~f ~ {~ 'iT`~' i'~ r~ r.'. ~ ~ ~ ~'".r~ ry '•+, ya r_~if'F~~~°~ ' r '~~ c,}`~~~~ r~l¢~ris rT¢-~aul`~~~-7{t ~' ~ f~~ y~~`.~q T`r--' !~ 4/"'~~.J.J v~ ~! ~L.~„r w ~~ ~-~ ~~'~ b~°'^".,~w' _.. ~~f1{k~'r''tiR ~.4'^~Y.~ r ~ x~~vci~ ~: { ;~fG~CY 4'~a~ ~' r Ma r+' ,l~!~ ~~--{{ :~ T~r~~ ~ 1 c ,r, !rg 1~C+ Ts r~ _'~~ ~-l ''f _a'` i ,ra .~ { '~ _',d''~~-•nl ~I ~ !` ~ \,~»h.~~ .'~~~± i~('~)I 4 ~, 3t~ Via; ` ~ f ` ~ ~:.n k , r` . .'' ,.~ } ti~ „~ T~s ""' k;;~ I s l _, } ~ ' a' ,,,~~, ,, J~~'L_"~~, t-y ,~3J 1~'}y"Y,~~ y~ r ]~`.~,j ~.ir~ru.~~~ ~1 ~~~ ~' R ~i'l;g~ ,,,"~~~t..,J ~~.~~ '' ~;`'h~J «S ~t,\~ ~r Y„~ _y"n ~'~ ~-~ .~ ~- aSt~,: Q f~ ..rK„ F ~r~h.i -' M.i <~ ~.- o}A ~`}~~v~kr~~~'.,<~ }=:..~ ~t;,~>~»,~.'~y~~~,~'.'~s333~~~_,t~.,,laE~~l lc~~ ~h?~'~''~`~ f F~y~trr~~p5~~~ ~~`~,l'-'~'}~``~~h~~' ~ j) t ~~?.j"~' ~ 'l. ~ I ~~..o~~''tt..- ru. ~ ~ _•,Y ~,. .. r F ',Lir ,~ ..-t L •~ ~4~ ,N ~~.~.., n f r~ '° i ~ ~ t ..~~ w ~..-.._~~•' - Lr~._.rw ~~~-ci :. ,~*~c} 1, ~ R~.f•~ 1 r t " '~ i, ~ '`"'` ~~/`~-4~'j ', ~c R~ a '~ r " '~ ~ ,~~ .t ~'f'~*.-+~L a ~~~ .~s_r ~ ~~ ~N~irr,~~ .. '~v ~ x~ ~~' ~ r',c.f, 'y~ ,~ Syr,' s~~.• ~ ~ ~X. ~ ~{jr.3 ; 5 T ~ a: ~i' ~ o t h ~- ~ _;' t nP ,~ ar.~' n ~ ~,~ .f ~ 5G`C'4 _ '~ ~',r4lf ~ ~ +t'tY~ 4 r4 ~ ~i Y^' '~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~r'Y ,. +, f. "/`4 .t(,t ~,~jr`~.~.,F R ~` qt~r ~r.~v. °r' ~~+~ ki"~sj ~o ~1' ~ f~ r~' r to 6~I r ~?~.~i~~` ~.-~.. '" t .ul v:'^~,~M~.n :r <"~.'134 rv3/ 01 ~ ti. ~"~1 ° ..tom y.~~f.' ~/~ ti} ~ ~'~ ~ ~• -yy, ~~~~sia'~:`„K ~~ c°~ ~ ~s ~ E . .. <'~~ ft `"T ~ 'i /,~*, : ti' ~ ~' y ;` 1~.. c> > ~ r` ~x 4 ^RF °a Ti ~~ei- 1.~ r,~ }~ c, ~ ''~ '+% »r ~ '- y~ % 1, r~.,,,_ •~. , ~.~j~~~w'jI,~ rK`lY4 ~'~ ~ ~i~ ~ ,~n....~ ~1.~::~1I,~~I~ - ~''-. ~~ ~,r. '#~~ .~;•.i `~~`,~~;i~~y~`" A'~"w.. ~~f ~,~.FF~~ ~ -0 „ `' - 1-I P '~4 ~ ~t t i~' - .f" , ~ w'IyIR;+`~= ;I ~ ~~'` - ~ y~i, ,~. 1 .' fi~4~S~I?i~~~r :•u z ~a~r~ °y"`s~19`~V ~~. i,~~,~ `-',~a~`' ~x.,~~t ~.. _ .--..'~ y,~.: ~ ,, v ~~~• ~ ~. ~. h~ ~- v . yak. 2 ~ ~,;. .+' . +5 1 ~~i .,5 #.,nc~+'f} a r .A.+f~y~,.~y''ti '~ ~iM' A ~`s ~' ~,~" ass r:: ~p .: ~"1 ~ - _y ~.c~.,..''~i r ._ * .. t , r}. ~. n ~ ,. ~..r•r~.t ~ ~ ,-'~. r" - ~7: of "n ~}': ;L "~ >_~'. ~ '-~ _i\r Y`'-.. _ s l T ~j;; ' "" ~'4'i~~` ~,*~;' ~`~~ ~~'_'~ ~ ''..~ ~ ~ s ~ '`pia. xt'-'#' w!ti~i ~ ~•x~ ~.4f~'-7"~ 1~~~Maa r~4y.f \~~ ~v. 4 N ~+,i ,w~. V ~~ P i yr..±• ~•~' ~J~ ~ \\Z?~ ' L ~ ~A~~ F~. ~~ ~ ~ ~~r ~rr.~ .rte' r n ~~' ~s` ~ ~..y~„:a f ~~ ~r ~ ^_ ~ ~ : '~'k ~:.f.'•i .ar~t`:~ ~ B'~ ~.•~r, !"r~~~`~ ~' 1`t~~~'.°Y „' :^t -c ~ _l_ _ __ +,~ ~ ~~,~ ~~, ~~_' ~Sr.. ~ N L Ft~ ~ ~ r " ; x,. 4r^t S.,~r , ~~y R :`t7 ~ ~ r ~ i r ~~?> ~ y"'c ~~~~'~ .1 a~ F p~y~{ ,y .';;4 f, w`f_ ~» ,~-n a-v .,j~f~~~..~. a'~`. ~ ~.~ ,~y~~' ,~SwQ~~y~'. wSj~ (~t}1~~ '"~ k~K~ y _ ~.ta ','~ `'J~~~ ~» ~ ~~ \ Y ~~~~~dG ~` SS `5. y ° " ti ' ti~ t t ~ lka s.. - ivy .. ~ v rr' ~ /'. tint xd ~ ~~ t',r Q ~ .,:, .«. ~ -. "'~ 3 v r,~!";~.,.. ~`~~''° ~ .tS pt _ _ r~ ~ ~ ....-. ~ ~ auk. ~ -"fit, .t~~,.. ~....+.x,a^r.- < ~ ter, o~~' ' l t~- ~~..d! ~_` t ~ .~~ 3 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT m ~ 2009 ANNUAL 60, 65, 70, AND 75 CNEL NOISE CONTOURS Mestre Greve ftssociates, a Division of Landrum & Brown