HomeMy WebLinkAbout03 APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER LEVYING FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 ASSESSMENTS• Agenda Item
~~.-. - ~ AGENDA REPORT Reviewed:
;~=:
City Manager
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: MAY 4, 2010
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
3
N/A
SUBJECT: APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING DISTRICT AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER LEVYING
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 ASSESSMENTS
SUMMARY
At the February 16, 2010 meeting, the City Council ordered the preparation of an Engineer's
Report for the Levy of Annual Assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The
Engineer's Report has now been completed and is ready for City Council approval. Additionally, it
is requested that the City Council declare its intention to levy annual assessments and set a public
hearing for June 1, 2010.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolutions:
Resolution No. 10-38 approving the Engineer's Report for the Tustin Landscape and
Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2010-2011; and
2. Resolution No. 10-39 declaring its intention to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year
2010-2011 and setting a public hearing for June 1, 2010.
FISCAL IMPACT
The landscape maintenance and public street lighting expenses within the Tustin Ranch area are
typically recovered through the levy of the annual assessments for the District. However, in order
to meet the district's budget needs, the City must consider additional funding for a shortfall of
$214,515 from other sources during the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 budget. The
proposed assessment on City parkland within the District is $8,865.43 and will be paid through the
City's Fiscal Year 2010-2011 property tax expense fund.
DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND
The Tustin Landscape and Lighting District was formed in 1985 to install and maintain certain
street lighting and landscaping in the area generally bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine
Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin.
Assessments for the benefiting properties were first confirmed for Fiscal Year 1985-1986 and each
fiscal year thereafter. As property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was
required to annex to the District.
Tustin Landscape and Lighting District
May 4, 2010
Page 2
As a result of procedures required by the passage of Proposition 218 on the November 1996
Statewide ballot, which added Article XIID to the State Constitution, the City re-analyzed the
District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each property in the
District, commencing with Fiscal Year 1997-1998. Notices and ballots to approve the assessment
including future adjustments based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) were mailed in
the spring of 1997 to all property owners in the District. Subsequently, at the conclusion of a public
hearing on July 7, 1997, the majority of returned ballots, weighted by assessed amount, approved
the annual assessments.
Based on the results of the ballot proceedings, the base assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1997-
1998 may be increased in subsequent years by no more than the increase in the CPI for all urban
consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, and Riverside area. The percentage increase in the CPI
for calendar year 2009 is 1.8%. The District's budget for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 has been
increased per the maximum allowed by Proposition 218 to offset anticipated increases in operating
expenses.
Each year, the City estimates the cost to provide the street lighting and landscape maintenance
services in the Tustin Ranch area. This total cost is divided among the parcels on a proportionate
share, based on a report prepared by consultant engineers. The precise method used to establish
each parcel's special benefit may vary according to land usage and benefit area, but similar
parcels with equal benefit from the District pay equal assessments.
There are 5,704 parcels within the District for Fiscal Year 2010-2011, which remains unchanged
from the previous fiscal year.
The District includes three separate benefit areas based upon the special benefits received.
Benefit Area "A" Properties located in Benefit Area "A" pay only for Arterial and Collector
Street Lighting (ACCT).
Benefit Area "B" Properties located in Benefit Area "B" pay for Arterial and Collector Street
Lighting, plus Parkway, Slope, and Trail Landscaping (ACCT +PSTL).
Benefit Area "C" Properties located in Benefit Area "C" pay for Arterial and Collector Street
Lighting, plus Parkway, Slope, Trail Landscaping, plus Local Residential
Street Lighting (ACCT +PSTL + LRLT). Those parcels that pay for local
residential street lighting are located within the residential tracts that have
public streets.
Typically, owners of single-family residential parcels in each area pay an equal share. The
proposed assessments to be paid by single family residential parcels in each of the following
benefit areas are:
Benefit Area "A" (ACCT) ........................................ $11.24 per year
Benefit Area "B" (ACCT +PSTL) ............................ $71.64 per year
Benefit Area "C" (ACCT +PSLT + LRLT) ................ $99.50 per year
The total costs to be assessed for lighting and landscape maintenance for Fiscal Year 2010-2011
are $106,893.00 and $464,501.00, respectively, for a total operating and maintenance assessment
of $571, 394.00.
Tustin Landscape and Lighting District
May 4, 2010
Page 3
The Engineer's Report prepared by Harris & Associates has been filed with the City Clerk and
contains the following proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 along with a
comparable listing to last year's assessment.
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE
FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
BENEFIT AREA A B C A B C
ACLT + ACLT+PSTL ACLT + ACLT+PSTL
LAND USE ACLT PSTL +LRLT ACLT PSTL +LRLT
Single Family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit)
$70.37/DU $97.74/DU $71.64/DU $99.50/DU
Multi-family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit)
$52.78/DU $53.73/DU
Non-Residential ($/ac)
$422.22/ac $429.84/ac
Non-Res -Tustin Market Place
($/ac) $66.24/ac $67.44/ac
Golf Course ($/ac) $281.48/ac $286.56/ac
Vacant and Parks ($/ac) $140.74/ac $143.28/ac
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the two attached resolutions. These resolutions
provide for the following:
• Resolution No. 10-38 approves the Engineer's Report for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting
District for Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
Resolution No. 10-39 declares the City Council's intention to provide for an annual levy of
assessment for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District to levy and collect assessments
pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Resolution No. 10-39 also sets the date,
time, and place for a public hearing concerning the annual levy of assessment for the District.
The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, June 1, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers,
300 Ce n ial Way, Tustin, California.
~~ ~~
I I~ S. Stack, P.E. Dana R. Kasdan, P.
t of Public Works/City Engineer Engineering Services Manager
Attachments: Resolution No. 10-38 and No. 10-39
Engineer's Report for Tustin Landscape and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2010-2011
S:\City Council Items\2010 Council Items\Set a Public Hearing for TL&LD 10-11 & Reso 10-38 & 10-39.docx
RESOLUTION NO. 10-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10-23, the City Council initiated proceedings for the
2010-2011 Fiscal Year for the levy of annual assessments and ordered the Engineer to prepare a
report in accordance with Section 22565 of the State of California Streets and Highways Code and
Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer has filed the report with the City
Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has submitted the report to the City Council and the City
Council now has reviewed and examined the report as so submitted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin that it
determines and orders as follows:
Section 1: That the report entitled "Engineer's Report for Tustin Landscape and Lighting District,
Fiscal Year 2010-11" prepared by the Engineer, Harris & Associates, dated April 19, 2010,
including description of improvement, estimated costs and diagram, as filed with the City Clerk, is
hereby approved.
Section 2: A copy of this report shall remain on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin
held on the 4th day of May 2010.
Jerry Amante
Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela Stoker
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above
and foregoing Resolution No. 10-38 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of May, 2010 by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
PAMELA STOKER,
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 10-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL
LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING FACILITIES IN THE TUSTIN RANCH AREA
WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND PROPOSITION 218
AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF
WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 10-23 initiated proceedings for the
annual levy of assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets
and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, by said Resolution No. 10-23, the City Council ordered the City Engineer to
prepare a report pursuant to Section 22565 of said Code and Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer did prepare and file such a report and it was approved by
the City Council on the 4th day of May 2010, with the passage and adoption of Resolution No. 10-
38.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin that it
determines and orders as follows:
Section 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council
of the City of Tustin to order the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 and to levy
and collect said assessments pursuant to the provision of said Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of said Streets and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218.
Section 2: That the improvements to be undertaken consist of the installation, maintenance,
servicing and operations of those certain public landscaping and lighting facilities located within the
Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The Assessment District designated as Tustin Landscape
and Lighting District generally encompasses the portion of the City known as East Tustin, being
north of the I-5 Freeway and east of Browning Avenue except the areas of all public streets,
avenues, lanes, alleys, and rights-of-way provided, however, notwithstanding property owned by
the railroad and public utility companies not used for public purposes shall be included in the
district and not be excluded pursuant to the aforesaid exceptions.
Section 3: That reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and
open to inspection for a fully detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the
Assessment District and any areas therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots
and parcels of land within the District.
Section 4: That said proposed maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting, in
the opinion of the City Council of the City of Tustin will be to the benefit of the property lying within
the described boundaries of the Assessment District as said Assessment District is described and
defined in said Engineer's Report.
Resolution 10-39
May 4, 2010
Page 2
Section 5: Notice is hereby given that Tuesday, June 1, 2010, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Tustin
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 is hereby fixed as the time
and place where all interested persons may appear before the City Council and be heard
concerning the annual levy of assessments of the District, and extent of the District, the services to
be performed, and the proposed assessment and all other matters relating thereto.
Protests must be in writing and must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the
hearing. Any such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and, if filed by the property owner,
shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property.
Section 6: The City Clerk shall cause notice of the hearing to be given by causing the Resolution of
Intention to be posted and published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets
and Highways Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin
held on the 4th day of May 2010.
Jerry Amante
Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela Stoker
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above
and foregoing Resolution No. 10-39 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of May, 2010 by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
PAMELA STOKER,
City Clerk
Engineer's Report
for
Tusti n
Landscape and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2010-11
Presented to the
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
April 19, 2010
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 1
ENGINEER'S REPORT
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
The undersigned respectfully submit the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. The
undersigned certifies that he or she is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.
QROFESSIpy DATED: April 19, 2010
~~~~~~°PN e~ °°+~Fti~ Harris & Associates
~ a
~ m
a N0. 41965 ~
* EXP. 3/31/12 1k ~'"- /
~~' ClV11. ~~P BY ~ Joan E. Cox, P.E.
\F °F CALF°~ R.C.E. No. 41965
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the day of
.2010.
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto
attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, on the
day of , 2010.
City Clerk,
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was filed with the County Auditor of the
County of Orange, on the day of , 2010.
City Clerk,
City of Tustin
Orange County, California
By
r:ltustin1fy10-11VeportsUlmd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doC ~ I Harris & Associates.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Submittal and Acknowledgments ..................................................................................1
Introduction ...................................................................................................................3
Report ............................................................................................................................4
Part A -Plans and Specifications ............................................................................6
Part B -Estimate of Cost .........................................................................................9
Part C -Assessment Roll .......................................................................................10
Part D -Method of Apportionment of Assessment ...............................................11
Part E -Property Owner List .................................................................................19
Part F -Assessment Diagram ................................................................................19
Appendix
Budget Detail /Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations
Budget & Assessment Comparison
Government Parcels
Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map
Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map
Land Use Map
Preliminary Assessment Roll (under separate cover)
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc iiiii I Harris & AssoClates-
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 3
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY
The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the engineering analysis to levy the assessments
in the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District for the 2010-11 fiscal year.
The District was formed on July 15, 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and
landscaping in the area bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly
Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Assessments for the benefiting
property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985-86, and each fiscal year thereafter. As
property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to annex to the District.
The current boundary is shown on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, which is included in the
Appendix.
As a result of the new procedures required by Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), which was approved on
the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, the City
re-analyzed the District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each
property in the District, for the 1997-98 fiscal year. Notices and ballots to approve the
Assessment, including a Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment, were mailed to all property
owners in the District, and a majority of the returned Assessment ballots approved the Assessment,
including potential adjustments for increases in the CPI in future years.
IMPROVEMENTS
The District improvements consist solely of parkway landscaping, trail landscaping, slope
landscaping, arterial and collector street lighting, and local residential street lighting in public rights-
of-way and dedicated easements. The District does not install or maintain parks or median islands in
roadways.
SCOPE OF REPORT
This report covers the levy of annual assessments for the 2010-11 fiscal year. The base assessment
rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be increased by the CPI for
all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any calendar year. The intent
of applying the annual CPI adjustment to the base assessment rate is to maintain the value of the
maintenance work, in relation to the increased cost of the maintenance. Therefore, the rates applied
in FY 1997-98 are equal to the maximum rates today, when you consider the increased cost of living.
In 1997, property owners within the District were noticed for and they approved, by assessment
ballot proceeding, potential adjustments in the rates based on the annual CPI. The CPI for Calendar
Year 2009 (December 2008 to December 2009) is 1.8%. Since the notice to property owners in 1997
included a potential CPI adjustment each subsequent year, and the property owners approved the
potential range of rates, it is not necessary to hold an assessment ballot proceeding any year in which
such an adjustment is made. For the calculation of the maximum assessment for each Fiscal Year,
please refer to the Appendix.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports111md1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 4
CITY OF TUSTIN
FISCAL YEAR 2010-11
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679
OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
1972 Act), Article XIIID of the California Constitution and in accordance with the Resolution of
Initiation adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin, State of California, in connection with
the proceedings for:
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Joan E. Cox, P.E., the authorized
representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith
the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows:
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, are on file in the
Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference.
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
An estimate of the costs of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in
connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office
of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land
within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by
reference.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & AssoClates~
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, ~'Y 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 5
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of
the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land
within the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such
lots and parcels.
PART E
PROPERTY OWNER LIST
A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as
shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange, is keyed to the records of
the Assessor of the County of Orange which are incorporated herein by reference.
PART F
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the
Assessment District, the boundaries of any benefit areas within the Assessment District and the lines
and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of
the City Engineer and is incorporated herein by reference.
The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and
dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal year to which
this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made
part of this Report.
r:ltustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc i I Harris & Associates,.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 6
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Tustin, and those which may be
subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows:
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-11
The existing facilities to be maintained and serviced include street lighting and arterial landscaping
as described herein.
• LIGHTING
The street lighting system in the District consists of 760 lights. A summary by type and size
follows:
No. Size of Lumens Type of Light
375 16,000 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
11 9,500 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
374 5,800 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
The area is built-out; therefore no additional street lights are anticipated.
• LANDSCAPING
The arterial landscaping includes parkway, slope and trail landscaping in the Tustin Ranch area,
specifically:
• the southerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road
• the northerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting
that portion adjacent to the SCE substation
• the easterly side of Browning Avenue between the northerly corner of Tract No. 13094
(southerly of Bent Twig Lane) and El Camino Real, including area from APN 500-201-02 for
a future overcrossing, but excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation
• the westerly side of Tustin Ranch Road between the Santa Ana I-5 Freeway and Jamboree
Road, excepting that portion between the northerly boundary of Tract No. 16782 0350 feet
northerly of Rawlings Way) and Portola Parkway.
• the easterly side of Tustin Ranch Road between Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting
that portion adjacent to Heritage Park between Heritage Way and Kinsman Circle, that portion
adjacent to the Golf Course northerly and southerly of the main entrance, and that portion
adjacent to the Citrus Ranch Park site at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway
r:\tustin1fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates„
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 7
• the southerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly boundary of Tract No. 13053 and
the easterly boundary of Tract No. 13038 (±630 feet easterly of Myford Road)
• the northerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly City limits and Jamboree Road
• the westerly side of Jamboree Road from Bryan Avenue northerly 1,100 feet to the northerly
boundary of Tract No. 13030
• the westerly side of Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and the northerly City limits,
except that portion adjacent to the Tustin Sports Park
• the slopes on the westerly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and 600
feet southerly
• the slopes and parkways on the easterly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City
limits and Tustin Ranch Road, including the slopes granted to the City by the Transportation
Corridor Agency per Instrument No. 1999048101 recorded January 22, 1999 (net acreage
increase of 4.11 acres)
• La Colina Drive, northerly and southerly sides, between Tustin Ranch Road and the westerly
City limits
• Portola Parkway, both northerly and southerly sides, between Jamboree Road and Tustin
Ranch Road
• Equestrian/Hiking Trail between Tustin Ranch Road/Portola Parkway and Peters Canyon
Regional Park
• Paseo for public access between Jamboree Road and Pioneer Road adjacent to Tract Numbers
14366 and 14576
The total landscaped area is approximately 51 acres. These areas are shown on the Landscape
Maintenance Facilities Map, in the Appendix.
The District will fund costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing including, but
not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other expenses
necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities. Reference is made to Part "D" of this
report for a discussion of the Benefit Areas and the facilities associated with them which are serviced
and maintained. The facilities are described as follows:
Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to: Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation
systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance resulting from landscape growth and
appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of--way, parkways, and dedicated easements within the
boundaries of said Assessment District.
r:\tustin\fy10-111reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates,.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 8
Li;;htin ag nd Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to: Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors, equipment
including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as
required to provide lighting in public rights-of--way and dedicated easements within the
boundaries of said Assessment District.
The public lighting system shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination. Electricity for
street lights shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company, and it shall be
adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those authorized by the California
Public Utilities Commission.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation,
maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities,
including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting
facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the
landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease
or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of
any of the public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric energy for
the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities.
The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location and the
extent of the improvements to be serviced and maintained, are on file in the office of the City
Engineer and are by reference herein made a part of this report.
r:\tustin\fy10-111reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & AsSOClatesw
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 9
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
The City's budget for the maintenance and service costs, shown below, details the estimated costs
and fund balances for Fiscal Year 2010-11 as available at the time of preparation of this report. The
1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental
expenses. This was not changed by Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The costs can
include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs
identified with the district proceedings.
The Reserves, District Administration and Projected Fund Balance items have been prorated based
on the budget amounts.
FY 2010-11 BUDGET & ASSESSMENT
District Less Projected
Reserve Admin. Fund Balance City Total to
Service Category Budget (50%Max.) (*No.6018) 6/30/2010 Contribution Asmt
Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $101,200 $0 $1,793 $0 ($6,380) $96,613
*Object No. 6220
Local Residential Lighting $13,800 $0 $245 $0 ($3,765) $10,280
*Object No. 6220
Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $657,215 $0 $11,646 $0 ($204,360) $464,501
*Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350
Totals $772,215 $0 $13,684 $0 $214,505 $571,394
Total to Assessment: $571,394
* For descriptions of the object numbers, refer to the'Budget Detail' table in the Appendix.
Note: District Administration Costs are prorated based on the Budget Amounts and include Orange County's
charge of 0.3% of the assessment for placement and collection on the property tax roll.
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District.
Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City will make
funds available to the District to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed upon receipt of
assessments. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.
The 1972 Act allows a reserve for cash flow not to exceed 50% of the budget.
For a breakdown of the costs by Service Category and Benefit Area, please see "Benefit Areas" on
page 16 of this report.
r:\tustin\fy10-111reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 10
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
The Assessment Roll is a listing of the proposed assessment and the amount of assessment for Fiscal
Year 2010-11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor's Office,
and contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Tustin,
which is incorporated herein by reference.
The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange
and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates,.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 11
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing
certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street
lights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities.
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according
to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among
all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The 1972 Act permits the designation of .areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if
"by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas
will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act
requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on
the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the California Constitution, requires
that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit
conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City
must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that publicly
owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed.
REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT
The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the maintenance and servicing of
landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical
energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the
satisfactory operation of these services.
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Since the assessment will be levied against parcels of property as shown on the tax roll, the fmal charges
must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be spread just by parcel, not
considering land use or parcel size, a single family parcel would be paying the same as a 50 unit
apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone and this would not be equitable.
The single family residential lot has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments and is
defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to calculate the
EDU's for other residential land uses and for non-residential parcels. Every land-use is converted to
EDU's: parcels containing apartments are converted to EDU's based on the number of dwelling units on
each parcel of land; commercial parcels are converted based on the lot size of each parcel of land.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & ASSOCiates-
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 12
The EDU method is seen as the most appropriate and equitable method of spread for landscape and
lighting districts, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of
land-use type and size.
Single Family Residential (SFR). Parcels zoned for single family residential uses are assessed
1 EDU per dwelling unit. Parcels designated as SFR land-use will be assessed 1 EDU per
dwelling unit, including vacant subdivided residential lots and vacant land zoned for single
family residential uses with a tentative or fmal tract map.
Multiple Family Residential. Multiple-residential (including condominiums) land use
equivalencies are determined based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel. Due to
population density and size of structure relative to the typical single family residence, each
dwelling unit defined as multi-family residential, including condominiums, would be 0.75 EDU.
The EDU's assigned to amultiple-residential parcel are calculated by multiplying the number of
dwelling units by the EDU factor of 0.75. This includes vacant multi-family residential parcels
zoned for multiple-residential uses with a tentative or fmal tract map.
Non-Residential. In converting non-residential properties to EDU's, the factor used is the City
of Tustin's typical standard single family residential lot area and the number of lots that could be
subdivided into an acre of land. All properties that are developed for non-residential uses are
therefore assigned 6 EDU's per acre. These include commercial, industrial, church, school and
other non-residential uses.
Vacant Parcels with No Development Designation. Vacant parcels with no development
designation or without a tentative or final map are assigned a reduced equivalency due to their
current lack of immediate development potential. Based upon the opinions of professional
appraisers appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the
land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the total value of the
property. In Tustin Ranch, the land value portion of a single family detached residence appears
to be typically one-third or higher of the total value based on the County Assessor's tax rolls.
Therefore, vacant parcels are assigned equivalency units at the rate of one-third of improved
property which is 6 EDU/acre xone-third = 2 EDU/acre. Park parcels are also considered as
vacant with no development potential, and are assessed at that rate.
Peters Canyon Regional Park is a large, natural, open space park with very few facilities, which
straddles the cities of Orange and Tustin and a portion of unincorporated county area. The park has
many access points around its perimeter and one is within the Tustin Ranch area. This park
receives a very small amount of benefit relative to its size, and it seems reasonable to compare it to
other existing parks within Tustin Ranch. At the time the district was formed, there were seven
developed parks, five public parks (Camino Real, Cedar Grove, Heritage, Laurel Glen, and the
Tustin Sports Park) and two private parks, with an average park size of 6.26 acres'. Therefore, 6.26
acres have been used to estimate the relative benefit Peters Canyon Regional Park receives.
Golf Course Property. Golf Course parcels are developed commercial property, but the
development is at a very low level. Therefore, golf course parcels are assessed at a rate between
developed and vacant land, at twice the rate of vacant parcels with no development designation,
which is 2.0 EDU/acre x 2 = 4.0 EDU/acre.
lAs of FY 1997-98, when the District was approved by property owner ballot.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfina119apr10.doc
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 13
Public Property. Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that all benefiting public
properties be assessed for their fair share of the special benefit. Public property which is
designated for residential or non-residential purposes (such as schools and fire stations) will be
assessed the same as private property with the same designation. Public parks will be assessed
the same as vacant parcels with no development designation.
Exempt Property. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public
avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public drainage,
public easements and rights-of--ways, public greenbelts and parkways. Also excepted from
assessment would be utility rights-of--way, common areas (such as in condominium complexes),
landlocked parcels, unbuildable parcels vacated by the City, and parcels designated on Tract or
Parcel Maps for landscaping.
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) FORMULA
Land Use Basic Unit x EDU Factor = EDU Rates
Sin le Famil Res. SFR 1 D.U. x 1.00 = 1 EDU/DU
Multi-famil Res. includin Condos) 1 D.U. x 0.75 = 0.75 EDU/DU
CommerciaUIndustrial and other
Non-Residential (includin Schools
1 Acre
x
6.00 =
6.0 EDU/ac
Vacant (includin Parks) 1 Acre x 2.00 = 2.0 EDU/ac
Golf Courses 1 Acre x 4.00 = 4.0 EDU/ac
SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
STREET LIGHTING BENEFIT
Proper maintenance and servicing of the street lighting system benefits all properties within the
District by providing security, safety and community character and vitality as outlined below. Street
lights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area.
BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING
Security and Safety Community Character and Vitality
• Mitigates crime • Promotes social interaction
• Alleviates the fear of crime • Promotes business and industry
• Enhances pedestrian safety • Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image
A large portion of the City of Tustin is within an Ad Valorem Lighting Maintenance District and is
paying for the operation and maintenance of street lights in a similar manner. The area of the
District, being a recent annexation to the City, was not a part of this Ad Valorem Maintenance
District. Therefore, to fund the public street lights in the developing area, in 1985 the City
established the 1972 Landscape and Lighting District. Those properties that are adjacent to private
streets pay for their local private street lights through their Home Owners Association fees.
r:ltustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates-
ii
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 14
Arterial and Collector Lighting. Street lighting on the arterial and collector streets provides
special and direct benefits to all properties within the District, as these lighting benefits are
directly related to the positive enhancement of the Community and therefore increase property
desirability and quality of life. All properties within the District receive a special benefit from
lighting on the arterials and collectors.
Lighting at intersections, which is defined as safety lighting, is considered to be the minimum
lighting requirement for vehicular safety; therefore, safety lighting represents the general benefit
portion of street lighting and is not assessed. Traffic Signals are also considered to provide a
general benefit and are not assessed.
Street lights which are not adjacent to the development in the District are deemed not to benefit
the area. Street lights on the east side of Jamboree Road, north of the I-5 Freeway, which
provide benefit to the property on the east side of Jamboree, are not included in this District and
the costs will not be assessed.
The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use
type that receive this benefit.
Arterial & Collector Lighting Benefit
FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDUs Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's
Single Family Res. 2,626 2,626 2,626.000_ 2,626 2,626 2,626.000
Multi-family Res. 2,974 5,100 _ 3,825.000 2,97_4 _5,100 _ 3,825.000
Non-Residential 60 183.454 1,100.724 60 183.454 1,100.724
Schools 10 48.573 291.438 10 48573 291.438
Vacant 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000
Parks 22 72.135 144.270 22 72.135 144.270
Golf Course 12 151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964
Total 5 704 7 726 456.153 8 595.396 5 704 7 726 456.153 8 95396
Local Residential Lighting. Many of the residential units in the District have private street
lighting systems directly adjacent to their homes. This lighting is usually provided by a Home
Owners Association, and payment for the lights are usually made through association dues or
assessments. Parcels that have local residential street lighting provided by the City receive
special and direct local lighting benefit and are assessed for those local lights. There are eighty-
seven local residential 5,800 lumen lights and four 9,500 lumen lights. The cost for these lights
is assessed only to these benefiting parcels.
The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings and EDUs that receive this benefit.
There were no changes from the previous fiscal year.
Local Residential Lighting Benefit
B Land Use Parcels Dwellin s EDU's
Sin le Famil Residential 369 369 369.000
369 369 369.000
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates,.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 15
LANDSCAPING BENEFIT
Trees, landscaping, hadscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification,
shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value.
In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated:
...there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common
sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot
be determined exactly.... Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for
parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will
show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment
of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the
City,...
It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the
landscaping along side the roadway.
Landscaping along recreational trails and greenbelts, if well maintained, provide beautification and
enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value.
In Greenways for America by Charles E. Little, it is stated:
... [real estate] agents routinely advertise properties as being on or near the
trail....property near but not immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilman Trail is
significantly easier to sell and, according to real estate agents, sells for an average of
6 percent more as a result of its proximity to the trail. Property immediately adjacent
to the trail, however, is only slightly easier to sell....trails are an amenity that helps
sell homes, increase property values and improve the quality of life.
Additionally, the National Recreation and Park Association, in June 1985, stated:
The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or
near the recreation area, and is of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake in
a maximum of total assessed values.
The District enjoys a higher level of landscaping and streetscaping in their parkways and slopes than
the rest of the City of Tustin. The City provides funding for the landscaped medians in the area, so
these costs are not assessed. Additionally, a pedestrian and equestrian trail, linked with the regional
trail system, is landscaped and beautified by the District. The landscape improvements along the
arterial and collector streets, in the parkways and slopes, and the regional trail enhance the beauty of
the area and benefit all parcels in the community.
Excepted from this landscaping benefit are the Tustin Marketplace, Tustin Annex, and the Tustin
Auto Center, which provide their own landscaping adjacent to their properties at an even higher level
than the rest of the District. Landscaping along roadways provides only incidental benefits to
motorists traveling to, from or through the area.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc !`.'' I Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 16
The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use type
that receive this benefit.
Landscaped Parkway, Slope & Trail Benefit
FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
B Land Use Parcels Dwelli s Acres EDU's Parcels Dwelli s Acres EDU's
Si le Famil Res. 2 626 2 626 2 626.000 2 626 2 626 2 626.000
Multi-famil Res. 2,974 5,100 3,825.000 2,974 5,10.0 3,825.000
Non-Residential 19 32.624 195.744 19 32.624 195.744
Schools 10 48.573 291.438 1.0 __ _ _48.573 291.438
_
Vacant 0 _ _
0.000 0.000_ 0 ____ 0.000 0.000
_ __
Parks 22 72.135 144.270 22 __ 72.135 144.270
Golf Course _
12 ____
151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964
Total 5,663 7,726 305.323 7,690.416 5,663 7,726 305.323 7,690.416
BENEFIT AREAS
There are three benefit areas within the District:
Benefit Area A -parcels that receive only Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit.
Benefit Area B - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit and Parkway,
Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit.
Benefit Area C - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit, Parkway,
Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit, and Local Residential Lighting benefit.
The following tables provide a stunmary of parcels, dwellings, acres, EDU's and Costs by Benefit
Area for the District. The Service Category Costs are based on the EDU's and rates for each benefit
area.
FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
B Benefit Area Pat~cels Dwellin s Acres EDVs Parcels Dwellin s Acres EDU's
A 41 -- 150.830 904.980 41 -- 150.830 904.980
B __
5,294 7,357 305.323 7,321.416 5,294 7,357 305323 7,321.416
C 369 369 -- 369.000 369 369 0.000 369.000
Total: 5,704 7,726 456.153 8,595.396 5 704 7 726 456.153 8 95396
Service Category Costs by Benefit Area
FY 2 009-10 F'1' 2 010-11
Benefit
Area Arterial &
Collector
Street Lights Local
Residential
Lighting Parkway,
Slope & Trail
Landscaping
Total to
Assessment Arterial &
Collector
Street Lights Local
Residential
Lighting Parkway,
Slope & Trail
Landscaping
Total to
Assessment
A $9,991 $9,991 $10172 $10172
B $80,828 $434,380 $515,208 $82,293 $442,214 $524,507
C $4,074 $10,100 $21,892 $36,066 $4,148 $10,280 $22,287 $36,715
Totals $93,002 $9,919 $457,426 $560,347 $96,613 $10,280 $464,501 $571,394
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & 14550C1ate5„
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 17
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY
The tables below summarize the assessment amounts per EDU for each Benefit Area.
Service Category and Benefit Area FY 2010-11 ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY
ACLT -Arterial & Collector Lighting $11.24 /EDU FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
LRLT -Local Residential Li htin $27.86 /EDU Actual Max. Asmt Rates Actual Total
PSTL - Pk , Slo e & Trail Landsca e $60.40 /EDU Asmt Rates (incl. CPn* Asmt Rates Asmt
Benefit Area A ACLT $11.04 /EDU $11.24 /EDU $11.24 /EDU $10,172
Benefit Area B (ACLT +PSTL) $70.37 /EDU $71.64 /EDU $71.64 /EDU $52_4,507
Benefit Area C (ACLT +PSTL +LRLT) $97.74 /EDU $99.50 /EDU $99.50 /EDU $36,715
$571,394
* See "Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations" in the Appendix for details on the calculation of the Max. Assessment Rates
The base assessment rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be
increased by the annual change in CPI for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim,
Riverside Area in any calendar year by City Council approval each year. The CPI change for
Calendar Year 2009 (December 2008 to December 2009) is 1.8%.
As discussed previously, each benefit area assessment rate is a combination of the service category
cost per EDU. The maximum assessment rates per benefit area are fixed rates that increase based on
CPI. The proposed assessed rates for each Benefit Area equal the maximum allowable rates.
The proposed assessment rates by land use category for each Benefit Area are shown below.
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE
FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
BENEFIT AREA: A B C A B C
ACLT + ACLT +PSTL ACLT + ACLT + PST
LAND USE ACLT PSTL +LRLT ACLT PSTL +LRLT
Single Family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $70.37 / DU $97.74 / DU $71.64 / DU $99.50 / DU
Multi-family Res. ($/Dwelling Unit) $52.78 / DU $53.73 / DU
Non-Residential ($/ac) $422.22 / ac $429.84 / ac
Non-Res -Tustin Market Place ($/ac) $66.24 / ac $67.44 / ac
Golf Course ($/ac) $281.48 / ac $286.56 / ac
Vacant and Parks ($/ac) $140.74 / ac $143.28 / ac
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rpt final 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates,.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 18
I, Joan E. Cox, P.E. the authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed
Assessment Engineer, am of the opinion that the assessments have been apportioned in accordance
with the estimated special benefit derived by each parcel and that the assessments do not exceed the
reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit, per the assessment apportionment methodology
approved by the City Council and the property owners within the assessment district via a property
owner balloting proceeding in 1997 per the provisions of Article XIIID of the California Constitution.
DATED: April 19, 2010 Harris & Associates
/Q~pFESS/p4,
~ ~ Z B
~ Z AN E. X, P.E.
oWC W0. 41965 ~ ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
* EXP. 3/31/12 >rt R.C.E. No. 41965
~~q~, CI V 1L ~~~~
\F OF CA4~F~
r:\tustin1ty10-11VeportsVlmd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doC ~ I Harris & Associates.
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010.11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Page 19
PART E
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
The property owner list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or parcel, as
shown on the Assessment Diagram referenced in Part F herein, is the list of property owners within
the District boundaries as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange
and is, by reference, made part of this report.
PART F
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and
dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the
maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are
incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Hams & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Appendix
Appendix
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Appendix
BUDGET DETAIL
FY 2010-11
DISTRICT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Object No.
Description
City's
Budget ($) District
Estimate of
Costs ($)
Comments
6018
Architect/Eng Services
13,750
13,750 Annual Engineer's Report -Dist. Admin.;
County charge of 0.3% for placement on
property tax bills
6028 Landscape Maintenance 375,400 375,400 Contract-Turf& groundcovermaint.
6132 Tree Trimming Contract 110,000 110,000 Contract- approx. 1,500 trees/yr
6220 Street Light Energy 115,000 101,200
13,800 Street lights -Arterial & Collector
Street lights -Local
6335 Electric 12,815 12,815 For irrigation equipment
6350 Water 159,000 159,000 [RWD service azeas
DISTRICT TOTAL 785,965 785,965
Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations
by Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases
FY 2010-11 CPI WORKSHEET
Benefit Area A
Max Actual
Base Year CPI Rate ($) Rate ($)
FY 1997-1998 7.91 7.91
FY 1998-1999 1.2% 8.00 7.87
FY 1999-2000 2.2% 8.18 8.04
FY 2000-2001 2.8% 8.41 8.04
FY 2001-2002 3.7% 8.72 8.40
FY 2002-2003 2.1% 8.90 8.90
FY 2003-2004 3.7% 9.23 9.23
FY 2004-2005 1.8% 9.40 9.40
FY 2005-2006 4.4% 9.81 9.81
FY 2006-2007 4.5% 10.25 10.25
FY 2007-2008 3.3% 10.59 9.79
FY 2008-2009 4.2% 11.03 10.82
FY 2009-2010 0.1% 11.04 11.04
FY 2010-2011 1.8% 11.24 11.24
Benefit Area B
CPI Max
Rate ($) Actual
Rate ($)
50.38 50.38
1.2% 50.98 50.98
2.2% 52.10 52.10
2.8% 53.56 52.10
3.7% 55.54 55.54
2.1% 56.71 56.71
3.7% 58.81 58.81
1.8% 59.87 59.87
4.4% 62.50 62.50
4.5% 65.31 65.31
3.3% 67.47 67.47
4.2% 70.30 70.30
0.1% 70.37 70.37
1.8% 71.64 71.64
Benefit Area C
CPI Max
Rate ($) Actual
Rate ($)
69.96 69.96
1.2% 70.80 70.27
2.2% 72.36 71.82
2.8% 74.39 71.82
3.7% 77.14 76.3 8
2.1% 78.76 78.76
3.7% 81.67 81.67
1.8% 83.14 83.14
4.4% 86.80 86.80
4.5% 90.71 90.71
3.3% 93.70 93.70
4.2% 97.64 97.18
0.1% 97.74 97.74
1.8% 99.50 99.50
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports111md1011 rptfina119apr10.doc
i~'i I Harris & Associateso
City of Tustin -Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2010-11 April 19, 2010
Engineer's Report Appendix
Budget & Assessment Comparison
FY 2010-11 Budget & Assessment
FY 2010-11 BUDGET & ASSESSMENT
District Less Projected
Reserve Admin. Fund Balance City Total to
Service Category Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2010 Contribution Asmt
Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $101,200 $0 $1,793 $0 ($6,380) $96,613
*Object No. 6220
Local Residential Lighting $13,800 $0 $245 $0 ($3,765) $10,280
*Object No. 6220
Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $657,215 $0 $11,646 $0 ($204,360) $464,501
*Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350
Totals $772,215 $0 $13,684 $0 $214,505 $571,394
Total to Assessment: $571,394 I
FY 2009-10 Budget & Assessment
(from previous Engineer's Report)
District Less Projected
Reserve Admin. Fund Balance** City Total to
Service Cat o Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2009 Contribution Asmt
Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $95,694 $0 $1,705 $0 ($2,506) $94,893
*Object No. 6220
Local Residential Lighfing $13,017 $0 $232 $0 ($3,149) $10,100
*Object No. 6220
Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $659,165 $0 $11,747 $0 ($214,640) $456,272
*ObjectNos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350
Totals $767,876 $0 $13,684 $0 $220,295 $561,265
Total to Assessment: $561,265
Lighting and Landscape District Fund Balance Projection
(per Mid Year Projections)
Beginning Fund Balance, 7/01/2009
Contribution to make budget whole
Projected Expenditures, FY 2009-10
Projected Revenues, FY 2009-10
($77,734) per Mid Year Budget
$77,734 Contribution from RAD 95-1
$791,600 per Mid Year Budget Projections
$561,265 Annual Assessment District Revenues
Contribution to make budget whole $230,335 Contribution from RAD 95-1
Projected Ending Fund Balance, 6/30/2010 $0
r:\tustin\fy10-11\reports\IImd1011 rptfinal 19apr10.doc ~ I Harris & Associates.
O ~ ~ L L
L ~
U
~ ~ f!1 (!~ (11 (n ~
~ a
O Y
N Y Y Y Y E i ~ sY Y i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~'
W (0 Y N (Q (0 ~
(U
(0 ..
(0 ..
(6
(0 N
t0 ~
(d N N
,...
c a ~ ~ ~ ~ w a a a a a w ~ w a w ~
(n T ~ i ~ d L L L U ~ ~ ~ 'C ~ U ~ U ~ U E
d a ~ C C C ~ O O O O O ~ O O O ~ ~
Z (0 ~ N N (V N a a Q Q Q (0 Q N Q (0 W
W U rn rn U ~ ~ ~ ~ (n cA (n fA (n ~ (n ~ fn ~
O ~
~ 't. L ~ L
' L
' L
' fA fA fn UI UI f/1 UI UI Ul (A f/1 ~
O N (0 N N ~ - ~ ~ 7 7 7 7 7 O 7 7 7 7 7 (0
U d. U 2 2 J U U U F- ~- F- H 1- H H H {- F- H J
N N N N N
;~ w= ~ ~ 4-
~ C C C C C
O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C
~ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
fA N U U N N N ~ fn fA N N N 3 fn ~ N 7 7
O 7 ~ 7 ~ 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ~ 7
Y O O O O O O O ° O O O O O o O O O o 0
c o 0 0 0 0
7 T >, T T T T T L T T >, T >+ L >+ L >+ L L
U U U U U U U U fn U U U U U (n U !n U (n Cn
N ~- M M ti N ~ O M o0 O M M O M CO N O ~ ~ N O
'
J O Z O N CO ~ M oD M ~ O M CO 1~ ti r' (O
~ M ~I) M N ~
W r W ~ a0 Cfl ~ M O ti M M M M M N ~ I
' O M M a0
~ O
M
~ ~ 00 O O O N d' f~ ~ ~ O M M O CO ~ f~ M CD I
V oo ~ ~() r ~ r r EA ~ N N b4 O EA l0 ~ M EA M ~
a/ ~ N 69 fA b4 EA yg N 69 N M• Ef-? N E!} d4 fA EA ~
Q N W ~} b4 69 ER
a ~- ~
~ wN
z a
w
Z f- M CO ~ 00 O O M ~ ti O ~ O N ~ O ~ O M ~ d'
o0
~ Z O O M ~ O O ~ ~ M O M M O M ~ M ~ ~ O
r W CO O O ~ O O O ~ ti ~ ti ~' O O ti M O ~ ~' LL~
'
~ O O ~ O M CO 00 ~ O ~ M M M (O Lf ) f~ M CO O LL~
O O CO ~ ~ ~ ~- r- d4 d' N N EA O fA ~ ~ M EA oD N
O N W E!-T EA EA EA
~ ~
LL (n
Q
~ O ~ O OO OD ~ O O O O O O O M I~ O O O O ~
W CO ~ O t1') O I~ M M ~ O (fl d' M (D O •-- O ~ 00 O
~ N N (O M O N N M QO 00 (~ N N ~ N N I` ~ O O
V (p ~ M ~ cM ui r O u7 ~ ~ O ~ O ~- ~ O O N O
~ r r
H W
Z N
~ ~ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2 Y Y Y Y Y 2 Y 2 Y 2 2
~ Q a a n. a a ~ a o. cn a a a a a cn a cn ~ cn cn
V J
H
~ ~ Q
Z ~ Z~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
~-- r W Q
(~ N m
H
LL~ O ~ ti O N ~ O O ~ ~ CO I~ O N M ~ ~ CO I~ ~
~ N O O ~ O O O O O O O O O ~-- ~ ~ ~ r- ~ M
O O M ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N ~-
0 ~ O N N M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •-- ~ ~ ~ c- 00
}~ Z N N N N N O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r- N
~ ~ O O O O r r r r r r ~- r r r r r r r r
J a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U .J Q ~ ~n ~n ~ ~n ~n ~ ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~ ~n ~n
0 0 0 0
O N ~ ~ ~ ~
~
(
O N (A fn (A (n
\ ~
a L
O ~
W Y
~ Y
~ ~
W ~
W Y
~ Y
~ ~
W U
fn L
c
p.
d
C
c
a
a
c
N ~
c~ ~, a~ m ~, ~, ~ ~ ~, .c ca
Z (0 OL ~ tQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
W U ~ U U U (~ (~ U ~ ~
N
~
~
N
N
~
~
N
~
c ~
c
L
O a~ a~i a~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
V ~ U U a a U U a ii a
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ~
U
U
U
U _
C
~
~ ~ ~ ~
"O C C ~ 'O C C ~ C C C
N
~_. ~.
fA :~.
fn N
w N
w +~
(A ~
N ~
~_ : +
N ~
~ :_.
N
C ~ ~--' C C ~ ~- C ~--' ~ I-
W C 0 p C C Q ~ C ~ O
j
O H U U ~ H U U I U (A U
H ~- d' ~ CO O M I~ ~ M O r
Z r M 00 C4 O M O ~ I~ ~ ~
W ~ W M r M O (O
' ~ (~ ~T I~ r O
V r
M O r ct L!
) r ~ CO N ~
~ r
O N
O (n
r ~ b4 r
N ~ ~} f!-} ~ b4
~ ~
Q N W EA Ef} d}
a ~N
~ ~~
z a
w
Z F-
Z O
OO O
L(~ ~-
Ln O
N M
N r
N N
O N
O O
M r
r t~
O
W r
~ W
' co co rn rn v rn ~ N ti r co
> M
M O
N r
M f~
r CD
~ r
~ ~
~ I~
~ M O N
~
O O N
N r EA EA N (A ~
O N W b4 b~} 6H
~ ~
~ ~
Q
~ O O O O O O O O O l1~ O
W r ti M ti O M 00 O l!') M 00
r O N O O L[1 OD r N M O
U M N N ~ ~- r M r r M N
Q r
H W
Z y
~ ~ 2 Y Y 2 = Y Y 2 2 Y
~ a om U U a s v U a
~ Q n
. c
n c
n c
i~ v c
n
VJ
H
~- ~ Q
Z o Z~ m m m m m m m m m m m
~~ wa
(/) N m
I-- ~
L ~
L ~ L(7 f` 00 O O r N M I~ M
P
O ~ N
.-- N
r N
r N
~- N
r M
.- M
r M
r r
M O
r O
N
~
Z ~
~ t1')
~ to
~' ~
~' ~
~ ~
~ tf)
~ t[)
~ to
~ N
tf) N
O
H
J
d N N N N N N N N N N ~
~ J
a O
~ O O O O O O O O O N
REDUCED SCALE
525-161-01 TNRU 31
MS-i61-58 iN9V b
523-i]I-iB iH9U b
]25-I>T-0) MRU 3] y
TRACT Nx t^
11)91
1511a
~
S
15119
Q~
JJ
I
4W
m
4Qy szs-ou-w
~
~
CffY OF TUSTIN ~ 5rs91 525-151-01 TNRU lS
]IGCi
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT PETERS 1R1Ci ISfiel
~
3
CANYON "' °""~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM REGIONAL sss-laz-DI MRU u
szs-la3-01 TNRU J9 5 -0
szs-laa-a1 MRU Js
~
1
PARK 5 -a~
9
FOR THE
2010-11 FISCAL YEAR „wn 515-011-01 RIRU 2], 11 TNRU 6Z
E
TRAC
515-061-0I TNRU 06, 6J TNRU QO
Mo.a IIJdI
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES MAP °~ "'"
I ,m wn SPS-061-I1 TNRU 11
I 515-021-01 TNRU S!
TRACT
Nx. 11.56]
u wrs 958-11-301 ]NRU 500
fR1Cf 616 TNRU 61!
w lino
m wrs
~~~~,,rtrt \
51 iNFU1501 N~vr~ N
MRU U
~
525-091-01
LEGEND SP MRU 651
r2i?. INALi No. I599J 515-Ill-01
RN
1
j
16
~
MRU 15,2
i
5
I~12-~ N^a uz'a
501-451-45 uwn 513
~
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE sDP-ul-s3 ~~
A
~ 101 ~
~
-< SLOPE MAINTENANCE
~'>~°
~
,YJM 14 Vyfi
@ACi Nn. 161N 1~1-u `
sr wls ~~^ZY,Jz
502-631-w TNRU 12 OZ-451- -1al-DI rNRU Ja
501-631-01 TNRU 28 23,1].50,!1 W 191-DI iHRU Q
501-655-01 MRU 22 Qxw 502 1-01 TNRU 11
502-6S/-Of TNRU IB •~ rRACT
a.,a C No. 135N
.a wn
502~n:m,IS 502-453-IT
omlxn o.ww
,an
IRACf Ne. 1556,1 Ci
uwrs ,rmC N~~~9 f02-111-Ja rNRU ]6
soz-ssl-07 wz-ul-m rxRU zR
501-512-01 TNRU 16 Npp~ iRAQ ~z ISSp3 502-a6t-TJ LxXO !9
am m soz-al-s] rxeu w
iRAr~~yyrslssD7 soz-ls2-o1 rxRU ze
11GCy SDT-a61-22 TNRU 1Y
a IJ627 iR.1CI 302-•61-51 LXRU 69
I~Sw 501-1fi1-01 iXRU 31
My7RalrNn
a
IRACf No. 1556! r1._ rRACi
'ztI
1SSOZ
MACr
xo 13601
~ 501-095-01.00.09
504-511-0f 1aln C
iXRU N ~lo
~~ ~ ~ rNR
`~
"
501-Ill-D
~ ~
~ eDe I
INRI1 M ~ .br- '~ waz
I
TRACT vrnm pyt 501-III-
llae r DI,DI,w
xa. l
w
n n ra7a1 .$0 501-093-IY, IPACI
uro3
;415 No. 1570.6
501-1a1-01
MRV sl 501-III-pl n C n w
TNRU D1 ~
fR1Cf
n ruW sDl-D9s-w
Ta- 501-09)-01 nm C 958-IJ-iA5
w
-
IRALi No. ISI20 OI6V 229 MIIU SI TM's /99 I
~
)D
R
~
nwrs No. I
S
a Na
eT1 I
l]
501-211-OI INRV7 mwrs wrs
501 1-D1 _
iRICi xm C
Mo. llla8 mas
9lhOB-111
mw
n
501-111-01
TNRU 511 wwrz rww 501-IIS-IS
I TNRU 61 301-III-0I
aaz C
MRD aB rR.ILi Nn. iJ)96 ~~ ~ IJ SOT-NIl
-18
C
I
iRIC/ Nn. IJ9w SDI-Iw-w I
um m. 911-u-I6Y n2Re zss
aa. 95a-zP-Sol MRU sae I
501-151-01 mlws I-113-141 IRACi Na 111E uW
TNRU !0 xa1C MR.110.31
501-191-01 xOR za wrs
501-IIJ-Oa
MRV 52
O>r AaC 501-113-0]
IWCT IS7S1 mus uC
wn
n
501-101-01 301-IIS-O9
501-109-0I
TNRU 70 MRU ~ Sla C r41Cr N9.a Bass
I SI-Ie-215 Ontl 153]!
rrucr MRU ,ss,1 SDI-zal-01
im C
931-08
550 LHRU 819
I
-
Na. IP01
MNU 11, 11 za wn
rsN17 931-OB-6a] MRU 611
OZ tRALU w
rown eM1Aii10 1-I~
~
a
9ST-)1-051 501-114-05
MRU 219 mrff i11RU W.
501-108-01 IRACi N9. IIMJ II, 14 I6
TNRU sa w mm. C
rrucr sDl-Iw-o7 °O B:"'
Jrs90 = an C IRACi No. IJ]!! vnw' •~ru
I Nri
Y
w
9N-N-S)3 D° °i°°1
I i
501-101-01 MRU 514 SOI-111-01. IJ
MRU 1! ~ ,v I5, t I7
un m
iLLT Nn. ISQt: 500-J11-J] LHRII 5T (I6 LWOS) 938-14503 TNRU QPO
~~rsnN yn
]RA A
l
TRACE Ne. Isl]5: 500-111-01 iNW xt (zl W0S) IS }},Q ISl)a
,
TRACT Na. 1512): 500-311-59 TNRU ]I (I6 UNOS) MFU I
151]5, MACE Me
IISM
.
500-231-M 5111 500-551-01 TNRU 11 .'^i$
'
u u na wars R
~
~ rrucr
Mm~i 11s° soD-IZ1 ~' £
Ya
1
o
~ S)
-O) t 10 Nn. IJ03B
462-01 ~w J ~n~ Si°~HRU 1141 xmC
I 9 d nt aw...
RGCi 9,
e
A
No. 13161
B
023
-
9N-O
-yJ_ iRICi Mqq ~IW ,u,~p ^p
I4 Nn. 1SDW P~ TRACT ]R.1CT
1 500-1>1-OI ,A+} ^Y 500-IN-OP 951-O6-In No. IJw0
TRACT ~~ 9L-18-)6] MRU 111 500-2N-01
""in m~wa
~ Nn. ISI06 MRV 060 xn rvvRao TNRU IO
1: 500-IJI-w a wARr.
SOD-]11-06. IS MW 16 SM-111-0/ i 500-T]Y-DI ]N141 N iR.1CT Na 11)aY
TNRU 33
NaRO
C
]wCi Nn. ryAR Ma
IIB6d 11)JT TRACT N9. IKIO ~ ~ I 0 rNRU7W
~OnMYV°~S I 957-II-119 ~-~}1y~ ~ ~ 1f91C
TNRU S>6
xx wn
-lit-01
a
3 500- 500- 5W-
300- IBJ- 10.1-
1ahOS
IY- 01 OS
~s
e ~ror :a 01
~,~
G<
0
iRIC1 ~
SW-~IBY-w la1-
IRACr xw IJ356
TRACT 14759 01 500-291-0Z 11API1 IL, 16
No. ISON 300-191-11 13MtC
y
500-107-01 ym wn ~- 300- 6
MRU 1) 181-
IN-0I 101- i9
500-406-01 U 1
TNRU d0 SOD-
Tel-01
~_ ~-
Inwrs
500-IBI-I 181-0J >DI-03
Iw-J52-
D1.az,m Iw-JSY-w soo-3D1-as.
r6.2NRn t6,6w» Da toR1.n
SW-501-w s00-491-13.11
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
34 Executive Park, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 655-3900 ~ FAX (949) 655-3995
R \tusfn\MD-Ii\diDP9'0s\06m1do0 T01o-n bn0aapo.aq w/12/1010
REDUCED SCALE
s15-161-01 MAU 31
sxs-161-se rxau 6e
SRS-111-td LNRU b
323-112-OJ iXRU S3 L
~ ~ t^
i1G
I L1 Ho
s191
~
I
OP
5{Td
~.
,9
~
$
I '
SAJO `J
\...
.
b
~
~Za ~ ~. ~ 515-022-0.S
fm~,Fby
..
~1''1~7/ ~ I
C. ^ ^ OF ^ VS~N ~ ~
Nem~i R9x ~ 525_131-01 JNR11 75
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT PETERS iMCi 13681
CANYON "' °"'~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM R EGIONAL 6~-I!l 01 THR 59
-0 01
525-1a1_pI iXRU 3l ~
PARK di of
FOR THE i
2010-11 FISCAL YEAR
us-ou-ol IXRU n, 11 rxxu u
°""' ''
U 98
~
1WCi szs-OSi-01 INRU 10, 1S TNR
STS-061-01 THRV O6, 63 TNRU 6d
Noa I4N1 ;
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/BOUNDARY MAP
rw Wrs
°"° ""°
061-IS INRU I1
I
I 515-
525-011-01 TNRU 3S
IRACt
Nf. 14561
c wrs 95d-II-701 i14RU 500
)RACt 616 THRU 623
x9. wlo
`
LEGEND _..rtrt 1
\
-121-01 ~136rs ~
,
525
~
~
sT5-09i-01 INRU N
~
STS-RSI501
~
BENEFIT AREA A
lENi, IRACI No. 15 INRU 6s
\
995 525-III-01
76
_ _ _
a iHRU 17.21 ~Sy
/~
w.rs
2
e
-
30x-451-IS 5
J U4 \
30 "
iHRU
BENEFIT AREA B w z-ul-s3
BENEFIT AREA C ~
°~m ~
~
~
~
~
w4N m
~~
CITY BOUNDARY - - ~oi_
TmfcT x.. Ifila
zize u/•
x wrs "~!
Z
502-631-01 MRU I2 552_131_ ~ -UI-01 1XAU Jfi
501-631-01 IXRU 1B 23,27.70,51 / SO 191-01 ixRU u
502-6JS-01 INRU 12 s9x- 1-01 INRU u
502-6Shp1 INRU IB ~p11R ~~
.rw K No. 15568
rm W rs
i5
SOT
-43J
e
~m
M
,5-IY
502y
mst a auwr
A
mACr x.. Iss6J d
N vers rxioC °' N~ 302-411-34 INRU 36
SOx-Sxi-01 d 302-411-0I iHRU I6
502-522-01 INRU 46 mwis~im " iR1f~~iSSW SOT-461-1] INRU a9
~
SOT-411-51 iXRU 6a
140 AC
'tS501 302-463-01 INRU xa
~"SE
S~r
I
s
1RAC1 sot-U1-21 iXRll u
- -
-.....
~.~~1 IRAC) 302-491-K MRU 89
'I6. Na ISSOt 302-461-0I iXRU xt
m4cr xa Iss6s ry
~
Na ISAII
mACr m wn
Na 13601
N Wrs 501-09l-OI,Od.09
502-511-01 ~ rurs 4C.
TXRU U
~f
~
d
501-2BI-JS valet
•
fbrr vb f
501-096-
s0
~
01 MRU ~
~ T6 uor+A .b/- ~•
"~
1Ap0 SOI-141- I
fRALT °Aim
/
01,0205
Mo. Illdd CJ
fr wrs 'd~61 ~ ~~ 501-0-5-IT. ryAC1
u
301-IBI-01 ~ 11,13 M9. IJ)d6
~- r.n 4a mWrs
INIU 71 1501 FU I-UI
I iX
'
IN1C!
wnW 501-095-01
u
9Sd-IS-183
954-38 I-O9J-01 11.n K TMRU /99
IRACt N0. 1 5120 INRU f19 INRU SI I
m
AIB
i""Ct
n wrs No.
I S
d
I
Na 1~1
301-x11-01 T Wrs
NRB 1 roJOI- 1-OI
IWCt SWK m
"o luvrs~ 834-OB-l17
501-121-01 INRI1514 rwv~rt v.W 501-IIS-IS
I INRU 61
I 501X~ 19Y i iRAC1 Nf. IJ196 W K
~ SOw~ IS 50lANIAa Id
RGCi Ha~15
f -OB / 30iu X04 974-u-18x iNRU 253 I
9SB-IT-001 MRJ 99d I
501-ISI-01 / mi
°Y°% I-IIS-10,1 lRICi xa 11)d1 9ntl
% SN Aa
THRU 30 ~ Wn
Im
SOTM
9~ i 301-I IS-0d
RI
tw fc 501-113-Ol
RNCi o. IS)3l mAn[ f.w K
~
501-109-01 501-z01-01 351-IIS-O9
MRU 68 1raK
INRU ]0 iRAOn W.f ISa36
iR1Ct 971-28-xf5 tl 155)1
501-161-01
MRU S6S
I
01
No tm Aa
MIIU 11, I4 914-0a-530 MAU 61a
m wn
eap
ID9e ~rs
ro IRACi iRACi Ne. 11141 93a-OB-6l] iHRU ail
N~. µ41I0 01-~0~ as Wrs
93T-11-051 Q 501-IIT-OS
tHRU x19 MRU Od,
501-109-01 TRACT No. IASBJ Ix. 11, 16
JNRU 68 ~ fv burs xi~m.
l
IS990 ~
r
No.
n Wn ssn 4u IRACr Ng
lillJ
~~ ~ •wvm
b
xi
~
1 € /~" 5H_ X13 301-IIT-0I
S.
. I
/
~NRU 2S I5, t Il
Un Ac
I
iPAti No. t3uk 500-311 -31 MRU 52 (1fi UN03)
FI M
Iv I TRACT 93tl-13-005 INNU dx0
I
IJ)16
°j4 IRAGi No
~W'
TRACT Xe. 15!15: 500-311 -0I INRU T1 1R1 UNI16) I .
i
ne Wrs /
LRACI Xe. IS4R): 500-311 a ~OSS
-39 INRU ]4 (T6 UXIf6) rs i
~ I
1 i 15111.
~I154)5, }RALi No. ISJ50 ay,~v
~
$
i 300-451-01 \`SII1 500-351-01 INRU 11 m
'~
I
461-0
INRU 11 500-T11 Wrs -~C~i i~ )R.ICI b
26
dos No. 130.58 ~
W~ 5
1
-01 ° to
i
R
/
I
4
16T-01
V IRN 4G
~'~
•
IB
I ~ RV
~
~a^
I
~ SJ .
vi rw.wl.
S
y ~'~
h
I ^+ 3
4
' RIAtI
No. IJI61
695 ~
9
~
'
_, L
i r y I
2tl3 i,iAGi
IC
iH~
uwu ~
,
•
iR
1Ct
p
U T! Ne.
500 e
.
_
IJOW WIS
-
Z>I~ I ,N~h~ 500-235-02 951-Oa ,)5~ xa.~IJ0S0
~
w+15
I ~
ixRUUI soo-zu-o1
m Wn
INRU 10
•1~
~ 9
0d1
~
~
an m..mo
H
SI06 '•
a6
i
NM1
s0llxil-O6, IS MRV 16
(~r sWr-TIT-a
E
1- - 300-x11-ol 'c tipR~6e iRACovx~ lodx
~mrtu 33 ~
e-,,~ - -- ~.I .~
-
r"ize
', 500 ~ se °' I
>9 1 - RALT Na #~= rRACr xe. IJSA
11>lT iRAC1 Ne. 14610 h A SOPJIS-01 IHRU 09
sam Ac
3 ~ 3RD 1 ssMOv' ~IRI1 06 ~
~ I
I .
iIIM/ 718
Ne Wrs - 300-SII-01
r i SC1N 500- 4 B~0
soo- I&1- Iv- lu of ~ `°'a
4
e~/ 6 l01- or a '# J
g~ 5°°-~~'''
TRACT Nf. 500-lax-06 191- RLfLT Me. IJ556
'U IR .1C1 1x)59 Ox 500-x91-01 IXRU 12, 16
No.
y 300 ISOU 50
-101-01 0-191-I4 I auN 4a
Wrs ~- 300-
4
e
M
o ~ 1500 RU Il
-206-01 m
l Idl- IH-01 1-
IS
$'. n ~ ~
w>~ ~
Id1-011 5W_ 500_
I
II 18 104a5z-500-f8i-I 181-05 301-0x
JI OI,OT,OS t0a-SST-04 SW-301-0;
(gcuv7) xr~ 06 '~'xv~
SW-701-Oa 500-191-17.14
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ~~
34 Executive Park. Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 655-3900 ~ FAX (949) 655-3995
R: \fustn\INO-II\dnYamf\Asmfb'Rq 2010-11 bovndmy.df9 120)/iYN9
,. ~ REDUCED SCALE
\~ '~,
Szs-181-01 MRU 31
su-161-sfi M9u se
515-111-18 ixpU 18
`Wy szs-nz-m Mqu ss ~
MACr Na "F
~
IQ9J
`c
Islza q
15119 's tr "°'
S/J0 / ~,r \ a-
t
a
wrs i yb~ \.. 515-011-0.S
VV o
\~ t •o.'
C, ^ , OF ~S~N q° ~yqy •..., /515_151_0, i1WU )5
rs f.
iRACT
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT PETERS T4LT 15661
S
No
CANYON ,11 RNI19
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM REGIONAL 515-'62-0i Twu 1z
s8-163-01 iHRU 39 I
01'
0
-
I
U
545-Ifi1-01 MRU SS
R
FOR THE PARK . 5 -~ mi
li
2010-11 FISCAL YEAR i':~=; 315-0{I-61 MRU 1), {I rNRU 6z
~
^~J~
I ~` 525-051-01 MRU w. )S MRU 95
I !-
~
IR.1Cr
525-061-01 MRU 06. 6I MRU 60
Nos 145BI "1 '.,
LAND USE MAP °" "'"
I 'm """ szs-osl-IS MRU n
1 -szs-on-ol MRU 35
]RACr ~f~.....
ub)
.
xo
T
.
~ ~
958-11-
U
$01
16 M
P
6
23
6
lwcr
N9. 1410
~~
LEGEND '"wrs
~
~
5 ~
\
\
~
1~µ3
N
545-121-OI
\ No. W'R
MRU 50
513-IJI-01 M \ i~515-091-01 ]NRV N
Residential MRU 65 ~ ,
~
\ 525-I{1-01
1EM, iRACf No. 15993
Commercial MRU 13,41 15516 ~ ~~
501-151-AS avers \ 51
NOa iPaR
1NRU 50
501-/.61-53
_ _ __
~ ~ x
Parks :"
r°"`
. MACr N°. 16161 z~z-u.
_
Government s.A~` N~a zazRiz _ i.
1
502-6JI-01 MRU IP 502-451- MI-01 iXRU S6
C01/ COIdrSe 502-652-01 MRV 28 I5.1J,SO,S1 ~/50 101-01 LXRU I)
- 502-6JJ-01 INRU S2 ~ I 502- t-Ot iHRU 1)
~
lRACI
City Boundary - - - - s6s-631-01 MRV 18 0'~ P"p1
a.rw K N ~ 13566
wrs
' _ SOZ~uS~IS 502-ISS-IZ ~.
m+va c..z* -
im .~r` ; ~
nxlcr x°. 1536r ~ =
'
C
~~
wz-al-31 Mau u
"43 ~6 -
'1 ""°
s9z-sv-w ~
~
302-1]I-01 MRU 26
501-511-01 MRU /6 W P°'~ ~" rRA~~iS505~,' .502-161-)3 TNRU 69
n1Y K s02-1)1-5] rXRU 69
~
781$~I350> 503-162-01 LXRU 20
/~~
.~SOx-161-11 iX(IU I2
¢ I~ J /rRlt) ~ 302-Nf-31 LxgU 59
I
I
NOi w~rsd 502-161-01 tNRU 21
'9F~
RC
l
~
~
~
]RAC! No. 15585 "_ hNy~ ry.IC! "
~ 1
~
'
Ha Iµ301 I
RUC! n u rs
l ~
.. „`-I
N
5601
\
M
501-093-01,06,09
302-s11-O1 \ iun K.
TNRU N F 1°
f ~
\501 1r a
~8 r 601-016-
11-~
691- YH~ J0J- 1°' ~ 01 MIBI ~ _ 1
7~1.P
s
SOI-IIh 1
J~
OI,OL~ I
~
)
~Jg+4~/ / u'y,s 501-093-IL M,SL]
~,rl
two- n-91 .a ~1,;';c w In96
M~91 i- .v wrs l
IP
S!
/
w~ 501-099-OI
'951-15-0!1 WI-M)-0I 1I.mK 938-IS-183
TNRU 199
1
NGCI No. ISIIO MIN f19 MRU 61
IWC] mA[r
n wrs /fleet 15168 Xp IYTI I
/
~ sb1-nrm MRU J ///\\\ w
01-f1-011 sr wrs
_
5
tlGCi
un K
"
~
w w1n65
/
951-OS-II)
501-121-01
$01-zd1-1I hIRU $1t T~''Irs 1A11 301-11s-1s
s°K
I MRU 6) t
/
,NpV 6y
rRA ~N°. 11196
I1~16
I1~-IS 501
311
-
`
1
~
unB
w
I
ISp09 /50 IIOS~Od
IR.ICI N~.
~ OSh11-182
rs
~
938-PI-SOI I
0,1
iA1ClN IIJM
50f-151-01 '01-11
~Y
'11
MRU 30 '1 IVO.I/df/''_;'
1501-191-0I SD
-113-08
i
MRU 51 w ~
Y15
01
SOI
e
~
HALT No. SAS!
9
501-109-OI _ 501-201-OI 501-IIl-09
~~
lHRU )0 II
MRU 66 )ia K iRACi N
15835 I
~
I
.
o.1
I 95{-28-P33 M 195)1
y,
iR.ICi MRU S6S 301-161-01
1
/
I Na II)Of 10K
MAU II, IL vw wrs 9N-W-5301XRU 610
e~ ro wrs ~ A ~f~10 01-10.1-OZ ]IGC! No. 14U) 931-06-6I) MRU 931
.. w.~ m wrs
1 ~' ~ 9IS-ll-OS> mT
501-111-OS `
'~
-
MRU SJ9
MNV OB.
501-106-01 I MAL! N°. 11835 11, 11, I6
`! va wrs )1NIImK
/
MACr ii°I 501-IM-0> \~rswx1/
I N fl. ~I990 i u rs K MAC! N°. IS>SI ~m nAVw
n
I
sroa
951-Id-J13
501 -10]-0I MRU 512 / 501 112-01, 15,1 I
TNRU IJ ~x w~
n¢
M~
INR1 831 '
ipACi No 151)4 500 311 A MRU 52 (16 UNNS)
\ ~~ 956
MN
~
1R.1C) No.
~-anw
O.a
Li
TaAtT N°. 151)5: 500-111-0I MRU 21 (21 UNIR)
As wn
~
' ~
\
ISOSJ
15114
I
iMCI No. 1512]: 500-N1~59 MRU )1 (26 UNI15) ny. iNaU I ili,. 1
95, rRACT No. 13350 S `sy„_~ ~
w.
1
300 131-0i 1 500-551-01 MRU II
AS
'
n wrs k
1
~
I
~
M
PWU I!
\~'G 210
~
IIOlB 1500 141-16
o
. N
ry
1 iHRU 51
ry
~¢'
~
ww*
1M K
~~~ 362-01
~~
f
`
~
1
~^t
UA
l
~R1
18
ApAp
~
\
.w.kr
s39~el-m-
i
~
I
Y`~
e/ ~ " xn_~61 _T. ~~3~~. ~ ",
1 9
~~~~
5 / ~
~ .C1
uRV I6Y
E61
~
~
0
U 31 N IJO90
.w \ ~ UGCr RGCT ~ „.
-01 \~~" ~ SW-IA-OZ
-~ I
/ /50
2
B>~ N° ISOSO
n
~
\ 9.U-N-
(t1 ! tl d~ 9N-T~~ 1 TNRU {11 500-11/-01 ?
uWR
'Y Q°
~'
MRU firo ' ~ v' mvoars ~NII l0
13116
I (
w..e
~
~
y~gyy~~ s96 n: 61 , I
1300 Ptl-04 I3~ ~~ ss g IRACr N~.nI1IR1
300-111-06, IS Mau 16
1~ .,,
5 rwcr xo.
1 ZJU ! rvACr x.. Iwlo S ~ SOo-SI1-011n W'99
/11RU 06
O
I
300-~
-
~ g~K
V
K
D
~
9.T)-II-129
MRU s16
S°w' '. - 16-s11-11
a
Soo- 161- Id>- a os "wo
18J- az w
q
a.a. a4
_ ~~~ ~- ~
,~ ~ 01
~~
~ $
~~ ~2
Y F
I / 500-
\~ 4 iRACi No. 500-161-06 la- 0 IR1LT xo. IJ336
/
_ II4.GT ~
12J59 02 500-P91-0P MIfU IL 16
N. IS6H 500_10!-Il u1uK
.500-201-01
' 300-
/
300- 6
~ MRU Il { 19 wrs / 191- 39
1300-206-01 ~/ IJ 191-01 '-
500-
!~~: MAU BO ~
I9I-01 Spp_ s99-
j „ _ Iwas1- soo-rol-1 191-65 Sor1P
JI 01,01,05 101-551-04 s00-SO1-O5. I
ran reo>rPO os (exRU=o
500-l01-08 '6F191-11,11
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
34 Executive Park, Suita 150
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 655-3900 ~ FAX (949) 655-3995
R \fustin\lyl0-it\W'o9mms\osmtd'a9 2010-tl lmd usadxq 11/0)/1009