HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 ADOPTION OF RETAIL WATER RATES- PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION 10-57~~ • A ends Item 1
AGENDA REPORT Reviewed:
City Manager
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: JUNE 15, 2010
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
PAMELA ARENDS-KING, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RETAIL WATER RATES -PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION
NO. 10-57
SUMMARY:
The purpose of the public hearing, under the California Constitution ("Proposition 218") is to
permit the property owners to comment upon or present objections to the proposed water rate
increases. The proposed rate increases will (1) generate the necessary revenues to meet
ongoing operations and maintenance expenses and eliminate a General Fund subsidy; (2)
generate the necessary revenues to meet ongoing operations, maintenance expenses and
debt financing for major capital projects; and meet current bond covenant requirements; (3)
expand the current rate structure from four to seven tiers; (4) establishes a capital project fee
solely dedicated for non-debt financed capital improvement projects; (5) provides for a new
pass-through provision to account for unanticipated third party charges related to the purchase
of electricity and/or imported water; and (6) establishes Water Demand Reduction Stages
(WDRS) that would enable the City to comply with wholesale water use restrictions in
response to regional water shortage conditions as necessary. The WDRS was included within
the official Proposition 218 notice of Public Hearing to ensure proper noticing and compliance.
Only upon specific City Council authorization can a WDRS be declared and put into action.
The proposed rate increases would be effective July 1, 2010 for fiscal year 2010-11 and July
1St in subsequent fiscal years. The typical residential customer (a residential user with a 5/8 or
3 / 4 inch meter and consuming about 40 units) would experience an increase of 17.8% in FY
2010-11, 14.13% in FY 2011-12, 6.31% in FY 2012-13 through FY 2014-15. Additionally, the
pass-through provision is restricted to-not-exceed 7% of the annual water charges.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council take the following actions:
Conduct a public hearing to receive testimony on the proposed water rate increases for
fiscal year 2010-2011 through fiscal year 2014-2015 pursuant to Proposition 218
requirements; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 10-57 approving the proposed water rate increases and changes
if there is no majority protest.
Adoption of Retail Water Rates
June 15, 2010
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed water rate increases will generate the necessary revenue to meet ongoing
operations and maintenance expenses; existing debt service payments and bond covenants;
pay-as-you capital improvement; major capital debt financing; establish and maintain reserves;
assurance from unanticipated third party increases; and eliminate General Fund subsidy to the
Water Enterprise Fund to cover revenue shortfalls.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Tustin's water rates were last adjusted in January 2008 (see Attachment 1 for
history of water rate increases since 1980). The current rate structure does not generate
sufficient revenues to meet operational and capital needs and therefore, rate adjustment is
necessary. In order to provide continued operation of a water system on a sound financial
basis, revenues must be sufficient enough to meet the cash requirements of operation,
maintenance, capital improvement needs, administrative, debt services payment and ensure
necessary debt coverage ratios pursuant to the 2003 Water Refunding bond. In addition,
adequate cash reserves need to be established in the event of emergencies and short term
fluctuations in revenues.
The Water Enterprise is currently operating at a loss. Attachment 2 shows the current financial
status of the Water Enterprise fund and the projected financial status with the implementation
of the proposed rate increases. The proposed water rates and charges will adequately
generate revenues to cover operating expenses, necessary repairs, capital improvement
programs, debt service payments, bond covenants, depreciation of water facilities and re-
establish cash reserves.
New seven consumption tiers were introduced to promote conversation (see Attachment 3)
and capital charge was added to ensure sufficient revenues for capital improvement programs.
The proposed water rate would enable the Water enterprise to obtain $30 million in debt
financing for the construction of the Rawlings Reservoir, Tustin Avenue Well, Simon Ranch
Reservoir and Booster Station and Beneta Well. The capital charge was previously included in
the consumption charges but now has been separated to provide a dedicated funding source
for capital projects.
A pass-through provision has been included to offset increases from third party costs.
Imported water rates are established by Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(MWD) and additional fees are added to those rates by wholesale water purveyors, Municipal
Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and East Orange County Water District (EOCWD).
Ground water rates are established by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and
electricity rates are established by Southern California Edison. The proposed pass-through
would allow the Water Enterprise to assess and recoup the costs of providing water beyond
current budget appropriation in case of unexpected supply cost increase. The pass-through is
restricted to-not-exceed 7% of the annual water charges to a typical residential user in any
given fiscal year. All water customers would receive a notification prior to the assessment of
these charges.
S:\City Council Items\2010 Council Items\Adopt Water Rate Increases Reso 10-57.docx
Adoption of Retail Water Rates
June 15, 2010
Page 3
The Water Demand Reduction Stages (WDRS) has been added to the proposed rate increase
to enable the City to comply with wholesale water use restrictions in response to regional
water shortage conditions, if necessary. The WDRS would only be declared and put into
action by explicit City Council direction. The WDRS reduces the unit allocation of each tier at
different stages. Stage 1 reduces the allocation by 10%, Stage 2 by 20%, Stage 3 by 30%,
and Stage 4 by 40%.
According to 2009 Water Rate Survey conducted by MWDOC, City's 2009 water rates were
below the median rates at the time the survey was conducted (see Attachment 4). The City's
proposed rate for FY 2010-2011 would still be below the countywide median.
~ S. Stack, P.E.
r of Public Works/City Engineer
~ ! ~~
Vicky Ki
Manage ent Analyst, Public Works
Attachment(s): Attachment 1 -History of Water Rate Increases
Attachment 2 -Water Enterprise's Financial Status
Attachment 3 -Change in Tier Structure
Attachment 4 - 2009 MWDOC Water Rate Survey
Resolution No. 10-57
Pamela Arends-King
Director of Finance
n Tran
Senior Finan ial Analyst
S:\City Council Items\2010 Council Items\Adopt Water Rate Increases Reso 10-57.docx
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF TUSTIN WATER RATE INCREASES: 1980-2008
MARCH 17, 2009
DATE OF
RESOLUTION
PERCENTAGE
AVERAGE SINGLE
NOTES
RESOLUTION
NO.
INCREASE
FAMILY USAGE*
7/6/81
81-82
Consumption charge: 12%
$24.15
Adopted single year increase.
3/15/82
82-25
No increase to rates. Added multiple
residential service charges.
1/17/83
83-7
Consumption charge: 17%
$29.94
Adopted single year increase.
Service capacity charge: 54%
Decreased service capacity charge,
and added customer service and
debt service charges.
No Increase from
1984 tol992
9/21/92
92-110
1992/Consumption charge:6%
Adopted three year rate increase.
1992/Service capacity charge:100%
1992/$42.00
1993/Consumption charge:11 %
1993/Service capacity charge:18%
1993/$48.08
1994/Consumption charge:11 %
1994/Service capacity charge:23%
1994/$56.18
5/1/06
06-054
2006/Consumption charge:13%
Adopted a three year rate increase.
2006/Service capacity charge:l4%
2007/Consumption charge:12%
2006/$58.52
2007/Service capacity charge:12%
2008/Consumption charge:10%
2007/$65.28
2008/Service capacity charge:10%
2008/$71.82
*NOTE: Average single family usage is 40 units bi-monthly, based on a 5/8" meter.
Revenues(a)
Fixed Charges
Consumption Charges
Other Revenues
Total Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses (b)
Salaries and Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Miscellaneous Capital
Depreciation Expense
Sources of Supply Costs
Production Costs
Energy Costs
Total Operating Expenses
Net Operating Revenue
Non -Operating Revenue (Expense)
Interest Income (@ 2%) (c)
General Fund Loan to Water
Debt Service - City Loan (Interest)
Debt Service - Interest Expense
Proposed Debt Service - Interest Expense
Subtotal Debt Service Interest Expense
Total Non -Op Revenues/Expenses
Net Revenues(Loss)
Beg. Retained Earnings Net of Fixed Assets
(Avallable for Captial Outlay & Debt -Principal Payments)
Capital Fee
Capital Outlay
Non -Debt Financed Capital Improvement Projects
Capital Financing
Debt Service - City Loan (Principal)
Existing Debt Service Principal Payments
Proposed Debt Service Principal Payments
Subtotal
Ending Retained Earnings Available for
Captial Outly, Principal Payment & Reserves
Target Reserve Balance(g)
Retained Earnings Available for Captial Outlay
& Principal Payments Net of Target Reserves
Annual Debt Service Coverage
Net Revenue (h)
Total Annual Debt Service Requirements
Annual Debt Service Coverage
ATTACHMENT 2
WATER ENTERPRISE'S FINANCIAL STATUS
Actual Projected
FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15
$3,968,254 $3,900,000 $4,749,966 $5,224,963 $5,747,459 $6,322,205 $6,954,425
$7,041,627 $6,480,000 $9,597,016 $11,444,926 $12,145,409 $12,882,447 $13,703,243
$459,295 $336,100 $344,503 $353,116 $361,944 $370,993 $380,268
$11,469,176 $10,716,100 $14,691,485 $17,023,005 $18,254,812 $19,575,645 $21,037,937
$2,332,684
$2,541,800
$2,618,054
$2,696,595
$2,777,492
$2,860,816
$2,946,640
$3,450,381
$3,591,700
$3,799,451
$3,913,434
$4,030,837
$4,151,763
$4,276,316
$11,931
$104,000
$104,000
$104,000
$104,000
$104,000
$104,000
$1,405,918
$1,406,000
$1,406,000
$1,406,000
$1,406,000
$1,406,000
$1,406,000
$4,705,396
$3,774,314
$4,246,379
$4,246,379
$4,246,379
$4,246,379
$4,246,379
$751,675
$1,098,018
$1,015,200
$1,015,200
$1,015,200
$1,015,200
$1,015,200
$12,657,985
$12,515,832
$13,189,084
$13,381,608
$13,579,908
$13,784,158
$13,994,535
($1,188,808) ($1,799,732) $1,502,401 $3,641,397 $4,674,904 $5,791,487 $7,043,402
$81,180
$125,700
$26,300
$43,400
$62,200
$99,300
$159,400
$0
$2,123,437
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
($86,532)
($67,455)
($60,469)
($53,362)
($46,130)
($550,385)
($530,105)
($502,705)
($474,305)
($444,705)
($413,905)
($381,905)
$0
$0
$0
($767,437)
($905,152)
($888,711)
($1,635,531)
($550,385)
($530,105)
($589,237)
($1,309,197)
($1,410,327)
($1,355,978)
($2,063,565)
($469,205)
$1,719,032
($562,937)
($1,265,797)
($1,348,127)
($1,256,678)
($1,904,165)
($1,658,013) ($80,700) $939,464 $2,375,600 $3,326,777 $4,534,809 $5,139,236
$6,282,539 $2,255,301 $1,317,001 $2,169,398 $3,110,773 $4,963,155 $7,968,960
$0 $0 $1,018,914 $1,025,592 $1,107,534 $1,114,212 $1,140,990
$1,849,225 $172,600 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
$0 $0 $395,981 $409,841 $424,185 $439,032 $454,398
$520,000 $685,000 $710,000 $740,000 $770,000 $800,000 $830,000
$0 $0 $0 $309,976 $387,743 $404,184 $609,707
$520,000 $685,000 $1,105,981 $1,459,816 $1,581,928 $1,643,216 $1,894,105
$2,255,301 $1,317,001 $2,169,398 $3,110,773 $4,963,155 $7,968,960 $11,355,082
$6,328,992 $6,257,916 $6,594,542 $6,690,804 $6,789,954 $6,892,079 $6,997,267
($4,073,691) ($4,940,915) ($4,425,144) ($3,580,031) ($1,826,799) $1,076,882 $4,357,814
$936,383 $1,855,405 $2,452,188 $4,613,501 $5,658,449 $6,804,394 $8,108,274
$1,070,385 $1,215,105 $1,212,705 $2,291,718 $2,507,600 $2,506,800 $3,457,143
87% 153% 202% 201% 226% 271% 235%
6/8/2010 3:25 PM
Attachment 3
Change in Tier Structure
Current Tier Structure:
Residential /Commercial Multi le Unit
Tiers Units
1 S Tier 0-12
2" Tier 13-40
3` Tier 41-60
4 Tier 61 +
New Tier Structure:
Residential /Commercial
Tiers Units
1 S Tier 0-10
2" Tier 11-20
3` Tier 21-30
4 Tier 31-40
5 Tier 41-50
6 Tier 51-60
7 Tier 61 +
Tiers Units
1 S Tier 0-10
2" Tier 11-32
3` Tier 33-48
4 Tier 49 +
Multiple Unit
Tiers Units
1 S Tier 0-8
2" Tier 9-16
3` Tier 17-24
4 Tier 25-32
5 Tier 33-40
6 Tier 41-48
7 Tier 49 +
ATTACHMENT 4
2009 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY SURVEY
OCWD Basin Agency 30 ccf /month 20 ccf /month
Anaheim, City of $22.75 $40.50
Buena Park, City of $22.23 $35.84
East Irabge CWD Retail $40.75 $60.75
Fountain Valley, City of $22.91 $43.31
Fullerton, City of $21.95 $41.07
Garden Grove, City of $29.12 $52.82
Golden State WC $33.97 $56.73
Huntington Beach, City of $27.75 $44.79
Irvine Ranch WD with 20 ccf
$17.81
$29.31
allocation
Irvine Ranch WD with 40 ccf
$16.85
$26.91
allocation
La Palma, City of $23.20 $43.60
Mesa Consolidated WD $32.50 $57.50
Newport Beach, City of $25.30 $46.10
Orange, City of $17.68 $26.53
Santa Ana, City of $30.23 $56.96
Seal Beach, City of $31.56 $57.96
Serrano WD $39.08 $63.98
Tustin, City of $20.31 $35.91
Westminster, City of $25.83 $45.53
Yorba Linda WD $35.40 $60.60
Non-Basin Agency
Brea, City of $29.10 $56.28
EI Toro WD $29.04 $47.94
Emerald Bay Services Distr. $40.55 $71.50
La Habra, City of $29.08 $49.18
Laguna Beach CWD $43.65 $77.70
Moulton Niguel WD $17.67 $28.87
San Clemente Summer $28.60 $54.29
San Clemente Winter $29.57 $76.82
San Juan Capistrano July $38.70 $65.70
San Juan Capistrano Jan $38.70 $73.54
Santa Margarita WD $25.41 $45.51
South Coast WD $42.46 $83.50
Trabuco Canyon WD Warm $28.10 $48.50
Trabuco Canyon WD Cool $28.25 $49.93
Median $28.82 $49.56
Tustin's Proposed Rates * 10 ccf /month 20 ccf /month
FY 2010-2011 * $25.80 $42.30
FY 2011-2012 * $28.57 $48.12
FY 2012-2013 * $30.92 $51.52
FY 2013-2014 * $32.95 $54.60
FY 2014-2015 * $35.13 $57.88
*does not include pass-through
RESOLUTION NO. 10-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING WATER SERVICE
RATES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tustin finds and determines as follows:
1. An analysis of the Tustin Water Enterprise's water supply, storage, and
distribution system improvements has been completed; and
2. The analysis revealed that major storage system improvements are required to
maintain system reliability; and
3. The analysis determined that additional funding will be required in order to
complete the necessary improvements; and
4. The Tustin Water Enterprise has experienced increase operational costs; and
5. A study of the Tustin Water Enterprise Rate Structure and Financing Plan has
been completed; and
6. The study has determined that it has become necessary to adjust water service
rates to maintain operations, meet bond covenants, and to finance the
recommended capital improvements; and
7. It will be necessary to increase rates for next five years; and
8. The revised rates as set forth herewith are reasonable and are necessary to
cover the costs of operations of the Tustin Water Service delivery for the next five
years.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The bi-monthly water usage tiers, rates, charges, and water demand reduction
stages are hereby established as follows:
WATER CONSUMPTION TIERS:
Residential /Commercial Multiple Unit
Tiers Units
1 S Tier 0-10
2" Tier 11-20
3` Tier 21-30
4 Tier 31-40
5 Tier 41-50
6 Tier 51-60
7 Tier 61 +
Tiers Units
1 S Tier 0-8
2" Tier 9-16
3` Tier 17-24
4 Tier 25-32
5 Tier 33-40
6 Tier 41-48
7 Tier 49 +
FIXED CHARGE:
Meter Size 7/1/2010 7/1/2011 7/1/2012 7/1/2013 7/1/2014
5/8" x 3/4" $24.49 $26.94 $29.63 $32.59 $35.85
1" $61.23 $67.35 $74.09 $81.50 $89.65
11/2" $122.45 $134.70 $148.17 $162.99 $179.29
2" $195.93 $215.52 $237.07 $260.78 $286.86
3" $367.36 $404.10 $444.51 $488.96 $537.86
4" $612.24 $673.46 $740.81 $814.89 $896.38
6" or Lar er $1224.48 $1346.93 $1481.62 $1629.78 $1792.76
Multi le Unit $19.60 $21.56 $23.72 $26.09 $28.70
CAPITAL CHARGE:
Meter Size 7/1 /2010 7/1 /2011 7/1 /2012 7/1 /2013 7/1 /2014
5/8" x 3/4" $10 $10 $11 $11 $11
1" $12 $12 $13 $13 $14
11/2" $16 $16 $17 $17 $18
2" $22 $23 $23 $24 $25
3" $33 $34 $35 $36 $37
4" $53 $55 $56 $58 $60
6" or Lar er $90 $93 $95 $98 $101
Multi le Unit $8 $8 $9 $9 $9
CONSUMPTION CHARGE:
Residential
Small Meter Consum tion Char a unde r 2" meter size
Tiers 1S Tier 2" Tier 3~ Tier 4 Tier 5 Tier 6 Tier 7 Tier
Units 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61 +
07/01/2010 $0.60 $1.11 $1.47 $1.83 $2.19 $2.56 $2.93
07/01 /2011 $0.71 $1.31 $1.74 $2.17 $2.61 $3.05 $3.50
07/01/2012 $0.74 $1.38 $1.83 $2.29 $2.79 $3.26 $3.74
07/01/2013 $0.78 $1.45 $1.93 $2.40 $2.99 $3.49 $3.99
07/01 /2014 $0.82 $1.52 $2.02 $2.53 $3.19 $3.72 $4.28
Multiple Unit
Small Meter Consum tion Char a unde r 2" meter size
Tiers 1 S Tier 2" Tier 3~ Tier 4 Tier 5 Tier 6 Tier 7 Tier
Units 0-8 9-16 17-24 25-32 33-40 41-48 49 +
07/01/2010 $0.60 $1.11 $1.47 $1.83 $2.19 $2.56 $2.93
07/01 /2011 $0.71 $1.31 $1.74 $2.17 $2.61 $3.05 $3.50
07/01/2012 $0.74 $1.38 $1.83 $2.29 $2.79 $3.26 $3.74
07/01/2013 $0.78 $1.45 $1.93 $2.40 $2.99 $3.49 $3.99
07/01/2014 $0.82 $1.52 $2.02 $2.53 $3.19 $3.72 $4.28
Lar a Mete r Consum tion Char a 2" meter size & reater
Tiers 1S
Tier 2"
Tier 3~
Tier 4
Tier 5
Tier 6
Tier 7
Tier
Units 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61 +
Hi h $0.72 $1.34 $1.77 $2.21 $2.65 $3.09 $3.54
07/01/2010 Normal $0.66 $1.22 $1.61 $2.01 $2.40 $2.81 $3.22
Low $0.60 $1.11 $1.47 $1.83 $2.19 $2.56 $2.93
Hi h $0.86 $1.59 $2.11 $2.63 $3.15 $3:69 $4.24
07/01/2011 Norma $0.78 $1.44 $1.92 -$2.39 $2.87 $3.36 $3.85
Low $0.71 $1.31 $1.74 $2.17 $2.61 $3.05 $3.50
Hi h $0.90 $1.67 $2.22 $2.77 $3.38 $3.95 $4.52
07/01/2012 Normal $0.82 $1.52 $2.02 $2.52 $3.07 $3.59 $4.11
Low $0.74 $1.38 $1.83 $2.29 $2.79 $3.26 $3.74
Hi h $0.94 $1.75 $2.33 ' $2.91 $3.62 $4.22. $4.82
07/01/2013 Normal $0.86 $1.59 $2.12 $2.64 $3.29 $3.83 $4.38
.Low $0.78 $1.45: $1.93 $2.40 $2.99 $3.49 $3.99
Hi h $0.99 $1.84 $2.45 $3.06 $3.86 $4.50 $5.17
07/01/2014 Normal $0.90 $1.67 $2.23 $2.78 $3.51 $4.09 $4.70
Low $0.82 $1.52 $2.02 $2.53 $3.19 $3.72 $4.28
Hi h Greater t han 110% of rior ear consum tion
Normal 90% - 110% of rior ear consum tion
Low Less than 90% of rior ear consum tion
PASS-THROUGH PROVISION:
The pass-through provision is cost per unit charge calculated based on the difference
between the projected base production cost and the actual production costs, which is
divided by total annual consumption. The pass-through provision would not exceed 7%
of the annual water charges. See projected production cost table and formula below:
The projected base production cost used. for the pass-through calculations is
$5,261,579.
Formula:
Pass-through -_ jActual Production Cost) - (ProLcted Base Production Cost)
Total Annual Consumption
WATER DEMAND REDUCTION STAGES:
Residential /Commercial
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th sth 7th
STAGES Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier
No Mandatory
Reduction 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61 +
(in units)
STAGE 1 -Water Watch
Voluntary Compliance 0-9 10-18 19-27 28-36 37-45 46-54 55+
10-20% Reduction
STAGE 2 -Water Alert
Mandatory Compliance 0-8 9-16 17-24 25-32 33-40 41-48 49+
20-30% Reduction
STAGE 3 -Water
Warning 0-7 8-14 15-21 22-28 29-35 36-42 43+
Mandatory Compliance
30-40% Reduction
STAGE 4 -Water
Emergency 0-6 7-12 13-18 19-24 25-30 31-36 37+
Mandatory Compliance
40%+ Reduction
Multiple Unit
1s 2" 3~ 4 5 6 7
STAGES Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier
No Mandatory
Reduction 0-8 9-16 17-24 25-32 33-40 41-48 49 +
in units
STAGE 1 -Water Watch
Voluntary Compliance 0-7 8-14 15-21 22-28 29-35 36-42 43 +
10-20% Reduction
STAGE 2 -Water Alert
Mandatory Compliance 0-6 7-12 13-18 19-24 25-30 31-36 37 +
20-30% Reduction
STAGE 3 -Water
Warning 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 25-30 31+
Mandatory Compliance
30-40% Reduction
STAGE 4 -Water
Emergency 0-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-24 25+
Mandatory Compliance
40%+ Reduction
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, held on the 15th day of June, 2010.
JERRY AMANTE,
Mayor
ATTEST:
PAMELA STOKER,
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council
of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 10-57 was duly
assed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 15th day
of June, 2010, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
PAMELA STOKER
City Clerk