HomeMy WebLinkAbout00 CC AGENDA 6-15-10
CITY OF TUSTIN JUNE 15, 2010
JOINT REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER
CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT 300 CENTENNIAL WAY, TUSTIN
AGENCY AND TUSTIN PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY
John Nielsen, Mayor Pro Tem William A. Huston, City Manager
Doug Davert, Councilmember Douglas Holland, City Attorney
Jim Palmer, Councilmember Jerry Amante, Mayor Pamela Stoker, City Clerk
Deborah Gavello, Councilmember George Jeffries, City Treasurer
CLOSED SESSION MEETING
5:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
– Meeting #2238
ATTENDANCE
PUBLIC INPUT
– Members of the public may address the City Council on items on the
Closed Session Agenda.
CLOSED SESSION ITEMS -
The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain
matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice
from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will
prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION
[Govt. Code § 54956.9(b)] – Two Cases
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION [Govt.
Code § 54956.9(a)] – Three Cases
• Tustin Unified School District v. City of Tustin et al., Case No. 30-2010-
00345476, Orange County Superior Court
• City of Newport Beach and City of Tustin v. City of Irvine et al., Case No.
30-2008-00228855-CU-WM-CXC, Orange County Superior Court
• Marble Mountain Partners, LLC v. City of Tustin et al., Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 30-2008-.0011668
NOTE: As required by Senate Bill 343, any non-confidential writings or documents
provided to a majority of the City Council members regarding any item on this
agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office
located at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA during normal business hours.
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION [Govt.
Code § 54956.9(c)] – Two Cases
JOINT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
TUSTIN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
MEETING
7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER – Meeting #2238
INVOCATION – Councilmember Palmer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Davert
ROLL CALL – City Clerk Stoker
CLOSED SESSION REPORT – City Attorney Holland
PRESENTATIONS
?
2010 Tustin Community Pride Student Essay and Poster Contest Winners
ORAL COMMUNICATION / PUBLIC INPUT – At this time, any member of the public may
address the City Council on matters which are listed on this agenda or under the
jurisdiction of the City Council. If the item you wish to speak on is a public hearing item,
you may wish to wait until the Council considers that item.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
A public hearing provides individuals the opportunity to be
heard regarding an intended action related to land use or
fees. (Agenda Item 1)
1. ADOPTION OF RETAIL WATER RATES - PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION
NO. 10-57
The purpose of the public hearing, under the California Constitution
("Proposition 218") is to permit the property owners to comment upon or present
objections to the proposed water rate increases. The proposed rate increases
will (1) generate the necessary revenues to meet ongoing operations and
maintenance expenses and eliminate a General Fund subsidy; (2) generate the
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 12
necessary revenues to meet ongoing operations, maintenance expenses and
debt financing for major capital projects; and meet current bond covenant
requirements; (3) expand the current rate structure from four to seven tiers; (4)
establishes a capital project fee solely dedicated for non-debt financed capital
improvement projects; (5) provides for a new pass-through provision to account
for unanticipated third party charges related to the purchase of electricity and/or
imported water; and (6) establishes Water Demand Reduction Stages (WDRS)
that would enable the City to comply with wholesale water use restrictions in
response to regional water shortage conditions as necessary. The WDRS was
included within the official Proposition 218 notice of Public Hearing to ensure
proper noticing and compliance. Only upon specific City Council authorization
can a WDRS be declared and put into action.
The proposed rate increases would be effective July 1, 2010 for fiscal year
st
2010-11 and July 1 in subsequent fiscal years. The typical residential customer
(a residential user with a 5/8 or 3 / 4 inch meter and consuming about 40 units)
would experience an increase of 17.8% in FY 2010-11, 14.13% in FY 2011-12,
6.31% in FY 2012-13 through FY 2014-15. Additionally, the pass-through
provision is restricted to-not-exceed 7% of the annual water charges.
Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take the following
actions:
1. Conduct a public hearing to receive testimony on the proposed water rate
increases for fiscal year 2010-2011 through fiscal year 2014-2015
pursuant to Proposition 218 requirements; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 10-57 approving the proposed water rate increases
and changes if there is no majority protest.
RESOLUTION NO. 10-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING WATER SERVICE RATES
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered
to be routine and will be enacted by one motion without
discussion. Persons wishing to speak regarding Consent
Calendar matters should file a “Request to Speak” form with
the City Clerk. (Agenda Items 2 through 12)
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING OF THE JOINT CITY
COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD ON JUNE 1, 2010
Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the
Joint City Council and Redevelopment Agency held on June 1, 2010.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 12
3. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL
Recommendation: Approve demands in the amounts of $2,155,510.53,
$15,864.86, $474,333.55, and Payroll in the amount of $677,828.59.
4. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF JACOB SOUTSO, CLAIM NO. 09-37
The Claimant sustained personal injuries and property damage as a result of an
auto vs. motorcycle accident that occurred on April 15, 2009 at the intersection
of Tustin Ranch Road and EI Camino Real. The claimant is alleging that the
City created and/or maintained a dangerous condition at the intersection,
including but not limited to a dangerous traffic signal. The claimant/motorcyclist
was found at fault in the accident, as opposing traffic still had a yellow signal
and he did not wait for the intersection to clear before entering it.
Recommendation: That the City Council deny Claim Number 09-37, Jacob
Soutsos, and direct Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
5. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF ALEX NAGHIBI, CLAIM NO. 10-04
The Claimant alleges that roots from a City tree created blockage in his sewer
lateral.
Recommendation: That the City Council deny Claim Number 10-04, Alex
Naghibi, and direct Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
6. SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS (PHGs) 2007-2009
REPORT
The California Health and Safety Code requires that water utility agencies with
more than 10,000 service connections prepare a report every three years and
conduct a public hearing to provide information to consumers on the levels of
contaminants in the City's drinking water.
Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council set a public hearing for
July 6, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. to receive and respond to public comments on the City
of Tustin 2007-2009 Public Health Goal Report.
7. APPROVE A LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR LEMON GROVE MAINTENANCE
AT CITRUS RANCH PARK
In order to preserve the lemon grove at Citrus Ranch Park, staff has negotiated
a license agreement with a qualified vendor to maintain the grove and the
agreement is now ready for City Council approval.
Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council approve a license
agreement between the City and Garcia Farming, Inc. for lemon grove
maintenance at Citrus Ranch Park and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 4 of 12
8. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 4 FOR SPECTRUM CARE
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT
Staff is requesting the City Council to approve a contract amendment with
SpectrumCare Landscape and Irrigation Management, Inc. (SpectrumCare) to
provide a one (1) year extension to the existing landscape maintenance contract
for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The proposed amendment will
result in a 4% decrease from the existing contract fee and will also require the
performance of additional maintenance by the Contractor at no additional cost
to the District.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve contract
amendment No. 4 to the existing contract with SpectrumCare Landscape and
Irrigation Management, Inc., to provide a one (1) year extension from July 1,
2010 through June 30, 2011 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the contract amendment, subject to final budget approval for FY 2010-2011.
9. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5 FOR SPECTRUM CARE
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN THE GENERAL FUND AND TUSTIN LEGACY
AREAS OF THE CITY
Staff is requesting the City Council to approve a contract amendment with
SpectrumCare Landscape and Irrigation Management, Inc. (SpectrumCare) to
provide a one (1) year extension to the existing landscape maintenance contract
for the General Fund and Tustin Legacy areas in the City. The proposed
amendment will result in a 4% decrease from the existing contract fee and will
also require the performance of additional maintenance by the Contractor at no
additional cost to the City.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve contract
amendment No. 5 to the existing contract with SpectrumCare Landscape and
Irrigation Management, Inc., to provide a one (1) year extension from July 1,
2010 through June 30, 2011 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the contract amendment, subject to final budget approval for FY 2010-2011.
10. APPROVE THE ANNUAL MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY SUBMITTAL PACKAGE,
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
In order to maintain Measure M eligibility, the City is required to annually submit
a compliance package to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take the following
actions:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 10-65 concerning the City's Circulation Element for
Master Plan of Arterial Highways consistency; and
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 5 of 12
2. Adopt the attached draft Measure M Growth Management Program
Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program (Fiscal Year 2010-2011
through Fiscal Year 2016-2017); and
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to submit the City
of Tustin's Measure M eligibility package to the Orange County
Transportation Authority.
RESOLUTION NO. 10-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA CONCERNING THE STATUS OF THE CIRCULATION
ELEMENT FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN
11. STATUS REPORT ON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECTS
Redevelopment Agency staff provides on a monthly basis an update of
redevelopment related projects.
Recommendation: Receive and File.
12. CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM CONTRACT RENEWAL
The crossing guard contract with All City Management Services, Inc. is up for
renewal for the 2010-2011 school year.
Recommendation:
Approve and execute an amendment to the existing contract entered into on
August 4, 2009 between All City Management Services, Inc. and the City of
Tustin, in order to provide 14,148 hours of school crossing guard service for the
2010-2011 school year.
REGULAR BUSINESS ITEMS
Matters listed under Regular Business are generally
proposals for new legislation or items requiring discussion.
(Agenda Items 13 through 20)
13. RESOLUTION NO. 10-67 & RDA RESOLUTION NO. 10-06 APPROPRIATING
FUNDS FOR VARIOUS CITY BUDGETS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011
The City Council is requested to approve the attached Resolution adopting the
budgets for the City and the Water Enterprise for Fiscal Year 2010/2011.
Recommendation:
1. Approve Resolution No. 10-67 adopting the City budget and
appropriating from the anticipated revenues of the City for fiscal year
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 6 of 12
2010/2011 Governmental Funds of $62,595,361; Special Revenue
Funds, $30,233,156; and the Water Enterprise Funds, $11,612,543; and
the City's FY 2010/2011 Classification/Compensation Plan; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. RDA 10-06, a Resolution of the Board of Directors
of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, adopting
the Agency's 2010/2011 Budget of $28,026,327.
RESOLUTION NO. 10-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING
FROM THE ANTICIPATED REVENUES OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 2010- 2011
RDA RESOLUTION NO. 10-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET
AND APPROPRIATING FROM ANTICIPATED REVENUE OF THE
AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
14. APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011
Article XIII B of the State Constitution requires each City to annually adopt a
limit on appropriations for all governmental funds. The following
recommendation and attached worksheets are based on the Proposed Budget
as presented to the City Council.
Recommendation:
1. Select the change in the California per Capita Personal Income as the
price factor for adjusting the 2010/2011 appropriations limit.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 10-68 setting the appropriation limit for Fiscal Year
2010/2011 at $63,179,627.
RESOLUTION NO. 10-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING AND ADOPTING AN APPRPRIATION LIMIT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE
XIII B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND
SECTION 7910 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
15. SALARY RESOLUTION FOR THE ELECTED CITY CLERK
Adoption of the attached Resolution will authorize compensation and benefits
adjustments for the elected City Clerk in accordance with Council direction.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 10-
66 to amend compensation and benefits provided to the elected City Clerk.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 7 of 12
RESOLUTION NO. 10-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS FOR THE
ELECTED CITY CLERK
16. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES AMENDING COMPENSATION AND
BENEFITS PROVIDED TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Adoption of the attached Ordinances will amend compensation and benefits
provided to members of the City Council pursuant to Council direction.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council introduce by title only
and waive reading of the following Ordinances:
1. Ordinance No. 1383 amending the compensation and benefits
provided to Council Members; and
2. Ordinance No. 1384 amending the compensation provided to Council
Members for serving as members of the Community Development
Commission.
ORDINANCE NO. 1383
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1303 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL COMPENSATION AND ADDING SECTION
1308 RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS
ORDINANCE NO. 1384
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9503 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
RELATING TO COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES OF MEMBERS OF
THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
17. APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER
William A. Huston, the City Manager since 1981, has provided the City Council
with his intent to retire in July. The City has initiated a process to begin an
executive search for a new City Manager. We anticipate a limited period of time
between the City Manager's retirement and the appointment of his replacement
and suggest Mr. Huston remain as a part-time employee continuing to serve as
City Manager.
Recommendation:
Authorize the appointment of William A. Huston as City Manager on a part-time
basis effective July 19, 2010 through September 30, 2010.
18. SECOND READING OF CODE AMENDMENT 10-003 (ORDINANCE NO.
1380), MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 8 of 12
On September 27, 2008, the Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 731 into law,
relating to massage therapy. Code Amendment 10-003 is proposed to achieve
consistency with State law, codify new massage regulations, and protect the
public health, safety, and welfare.
Proposed Code Amendment 10-003 (Ordinance No. 1380) would:
1. Require all massage therapists and practitioners in Tustin to be certified
by the California Massage Therapy Council (CAMTC).
2. Provide a grace period to existing massage technicians and operators
holding Valid City of Tustin permits.
3. Require all massage owners and operators to obtain new establishment
permits from the City.
4. Amend the Zoning Code to allow massage establishments as an outright
permitted use in the Retail Commercial (C-1 ), Central Commercial (C-2),
and Commercial General (C-G) zoning districts.
On May 11, 2010, the Tustin Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
4146, recommending that the Tustin City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1380,
relating to the regulation of massage establishments and massage therapists
and practitioners.
Recommendation:
Have second reading by title only and adoption of Ordinance No. 1380 (roll call
vote).
ORDINANCE NO. 1380
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING PART 2 OF CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE 3 OF
THE TUSTIN CITY CODE, ADDING PART 6 OF CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE
3 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE, AND AMENDING ARTICLE 3 AND
ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATING TO REGULATION
OF MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS AND MASSAGE THERAPISTS AND
PRACTITIONERS
19. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
At this time, the City Council may take the opportunity to discuss current
legislation of interest.
20. CONSIDER ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO CITY REMEDIES FOR MATERIAL
DEFAULT UNDER THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARTNERS, LLC., THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, AND TUSTIN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY.
The City and Tustin Public Financing Authority ("Authority") previously entered
into a Disposition and Development Agreement (Master Development) ("DDA")
with Tustin Legacy Community Partners, LLC ("TLCP" or the "Developer"). The
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 9 of 12
DDA established the parameters of development and conveyance of certain
property at Tustin Legacy to TLCP. TLCP has not performed under the terms of
the DDA. As a result, the City found the Developer in Material Default under the
DDA. Since the Material Defaults have not been cured by TLCP or the
Developer's Permitted Mortgagee, the City and Authority are being asked to
consider certain actions in response to the uncured Material Defaults. A
Termination Agreement has been prepared which would permit TLCP to
consensually terminate its obligations under the DDA and Development
Agreement 06-01 and to voluntarily re-convey 335.76 acres of land back to the
City. Absence execution of the Termination Agreement by TLCP, certain
additional actions in response to the uncured Material Defaults with regards to
the DDA and Development Agreement 06-01 are identified for City Council and
Tustin Public Financing Authority consideration.
Recommendation:
The following are two alternative optional approaches available for City Council
and Tustin Public Finance Authority consideration depending on TLCP's
response to the City's offer of a consensual Termination Agreement:
Option 1
It is recommended that the City Council and Tustin Public Finance Authority, as
applicable:
1. Approve a Termination and Settlement Agreement, Joint Escrow
Instructions, and General Release Agreement (the "Termination
Agreement") which indicates the terms under which the City would offer
TLCP a consensual termination of the DDA, and authorize the City
Manager and Executive Director of the Tustin Public Finance Authority, to
execute the Termination Agreement and take all actions necessary to
implement the Termination Agreement including the execution of all related
documents and instruments, subject to any non-substantive modifications as
may be determined necessary as may be recommended by the City Attorney
or City's special counsel. Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, the Phase
I Property would be re-conveyed to the City in lieu of exercise by the City of
its Right of Reverter and foreclosure of an existing Notice of Deliquency and
Claim of Lien (the "Lien") recorded against the Phase 1 Property by the City
on April 6, 2010.
In the event that City staff and legal counsel are unable to obtain agreement
from TLCP to the Termination Agreement within seven (7) days, City staff
and legal counsel are authorized to pursue actions identified under Option 2.
2. Issue to TLCP a written Notice of Non-Compliance under Section 4.2 of the
Tustin Legacy Development Agreement ("DA") 06-02 specifying the grounds
and facts demonstrating TLCP's non-compliance with the terms of the
Development Agreement and all other non-compliance procedures
contained in the Development Agreement.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 10 of 12
Option 2
It is recommended that the City Council and Tustin Public Financing Authority,
as applicable:
1. Terminate the DDA and license granted to TLCP pursuant to Section 5.2 of
the DDA with respect to any and all portions of the Developer Parcels as
defined in the DDA (the "DDA Termination"), effective immediately, and
inform TLCP and TLCP's mortgagee, KeyBank, in writing of the DDA
Termination. The foregoing termination shall not be deemed to terminate or
to effect any rights or obligations of Permitted Mortgagees under the DDA,
including, without limitation, Article 16 thereof.
2. Instruct the City Attorney to take such steps as are necessary to cause the
City to re-enter the 335.76 acres that have been previously conveyed to
TLCP (the "Phase I Property") and to revest title thereto in the City (the
"Right of Reversion", as described in the DDA), such title to be subject to
the lien of any Permitted Mortgage, ,but also subject to any provisions of the
DDA which take precedence over the rights of a Permitted Mortgage.
3. Instruct the City Attorney to pursue on behalf of the City recovery of the
amount of the Developer's deficit in the Fair Share Contribution to the City in
the amount of $269,479,445, and certain attorney fees and consultant fees
in the amount of $39,532 due and owing to the City contained in the Lien
recorded against the Property, including recovery of any additional costs
associated with such Lien recovery, including authorization to foreclose on
such Lien.
4. Instruct the City Attorney to exercise the City's rights under its performance
bonds for certain work not yet completed within the Project, including, but
not limited to:
a. A $353,000 Faithful Performance Bond for required Tract 17144, Warner
Avenue Storm Drain improvements from Red Hill Ave. to Armstrong
Avenue (Safeguard Insurance, No. 5034354).
b. A $176,500 Labor and Materials Bond for the required Tract 17144,
Warner Avenue Storm Drain Improvements from Red Hill Ave. to
Armstrong Avenue (No. 5034254).
c. A $500,000 Faithful Performance Bond for required Tract 17144,
Neighborhood E, Phase 1 Local Storm Drain Improvements (Safeguard
Insurance, No. 5034271).
d. A $250,000 Labor and Materials Bond for the required Tract 17144,
Neighborhood E, Phase 1 Local Storm Drainage Improvements (No.
5034271).
e. A $50,000 Maintenance Bond for required Tract 17144,Neighborhood E,
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 11 of 12
Phase 1 Loca Storm Drain Improvements not completed (Safeguard
Insurance, No. 5034272).
e. A $3,435,500 Faithful Performance Grading Bond for mass grading for
Tract 17026 (Safeco Insurance Company of America, No. 6409181).
f. A $1,020,400 Faithful) Performance Grading Bond for rough grading for
Tract 17144, Neighborhood E (Safeco Insurance Company of America,
No. 6409186)
5. Instruct the City Attorney to review and, as appropriate, exercise all other
rights and remedies under the DDA for non-performance and report back to
the City Council to ensure adequate recovery from TLCP of all damages
incurred by the City due to Developer's failure to perform its obligations under
the DDA.
B. It recommended that the City Council issue to TLCP a written Notice of Non-
compliance under Section 4.2 of the Tustin Legacy Development Agreement
(DA) 06- 02 specifying the grounds and facts demonstratging TLCP's non-
compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement; and all other non-
compliance procedures contained in the Development Agreement.
OTHER BUSINESS/COMMITTEE REPORTS – City Manager, City Attorney, City Council
ADJOURNMENT – The next regular meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 6, 2010 at
5:30 p.m. for the Closed Session Meeting followed by the Regular Business Meeting at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010
Meeting Agenda Page 12 of 12