Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 Project SummaryITEM #4 Inter-Com DATE: JUNE 22, 2010 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF PROJECTS STIN fSUILUI NC; OUR fl1T URE H()NURINC OUR PA57 The following is a list of projects and activities since the 2009 Year in Review provided at the January 12, 2010, Planning Commission meeting. The list focuses on the status of projects that the Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, or Community Development Director approved, major improvement projects, Certificate of Appropriateness, and other items of interest. Think Physical Therapy (365 W. First Street): On June 23, 2009, the Planning Commission approved a Design Review application for site plan approval for an abandoned restaurant building to be remodeled and used for a physical therapy office, including associated site improvements. The project is now complete and open for business. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 2 The Cottages/Nevis Homes (1361 EI Camino Real): The project includes construction of 93 condominium units. Phase 1 is complete and Phase 2 is approaching final status in the next two to three weeks. Larwin Square (530 E. 1gt St.): Plans for minor fagade improvements to include the removal and replacement of wooden posts and painting of the center facade to match Vons and the existing office building along Centennial Way has been submitted and is currently in review. The center is also undergoing parking lot improvements. Express Carwash (3017 Edinger Avenue): Code Amendment 09-003 and Design Review 09-004 were approved by the City Council authorizing the construction and operation of an express carwash in conjunction with an existing service station and mini-mart. The applicant is working on construction documents and has not yet submitted for plan check. Massage Ordinance: On September 27, 2008, the Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 731 into law relating to massage therapy. Code Amendment 10-003 was proposed to achieve consistency with State law and codify new massage regulations and protect the public health safety and welfare. Code Amendment 10-003 (Ordinance No. 1380) would: 1) Require all massage therapists and practitioners in Tustin to be certified by the California Massage Therapy Council (CAMTC). 2) Provide a grace period to existing massage technicians and operators holding valid City of Tustin permits. 3) Require all massage owners and operators to obtain new establishment permits from the City. ~ ~ ! _ ,., ..~. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 3 4) Amend the Zoning Code to allow massage establishments as an outright permitted use in the Retail Commercial (C-1), Central Commercial (C-2), and Commercial General (C-G) zoning districts. On May 11, 2010, the Tustin Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4146 recommending that the Tustin City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1380. On June 15, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1380 and the new Ordinance will become effective on July 15, 2010. • Red Hill Lutheran Church Expansion (13200 Red Hill Ave.): Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for a school expansion for up to 500 students and construction of new fellowship hall were approved by the Planning Commission in September 2007. Construction is now complete. • Tustin Meadows Clubhouse (14751 Canterbury Drive): Construction for the new 2,974 square foot clubhouse is complete and the facility is now open to Tustin Meadows residents. • Nunos Brothers Retail Building (15761 Tustin Village Way): The project involves reconstruction of a 15,000 square foot retail center to replace a former retail center that was destroyed by fire. The project has recently continued construction and is at the framing stage. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 4 • New dental office building (740 EI Camino Real): A conditional use permit to establish amedical/dental office at 740 EI Camino Real was approved by the City Council on March 4, 2008. A Design Review application for demolition of the existing building and construction of a two-story dental office building with ground floor retail was approved by the Planning Commission on June 9, 2009. Permits have been issued and the project is under construction. • Henry's Market (Tustin Market Place): A new Henry's market has recently completed its tenant improvements. Henry's Market is occupying the tenant suite previously occupied by Comp USA. The market is now open. • Former Econo Lube Building (155 W. First St.): Design Review for demolition of the existing Econo Lube N Tune buildings and construction of a new retail building were approved in late 2008. The applicant requested and was granted an extension to November 2010 to construct the new building. The demolition of the dilapidated building was completed, and the Code Enforcement division monitors the site to ensure the site is maintained in good condition. • Old Town Mixed-Use Building (170 EI Camino Real): Conditional Use Permit 07- 014 and Design Review 07-015 were approved for the construction of a 7,650 square foot mixed use building on March 4, 2008. Construction plans are currently in plan check and permits should be issued in the next few weeks. • "The Loft" Boutique Entertainment 'Venue (2429 Park Avenue): Conditional Use Permit 09-017 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 2009, authorizing live entertainment and a Type 48 ABC License for a nightclub entertainment venue at the District shopping center. The applicant is working on construction documents and has not yet submitted for plan check. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 5 • Tustin Freeway Center (14111 Newport Avenue): A new 2,565 square foot retail building approved as part of the Phase II Tustin Freeway Center is currently under construction. Upon completion, this will be the built out of Tustin Freeway Center. • Game Star (14001 Newport Avenue): Conditional Use Permit to operate a video arcade at 14001 Newport Avenue, Suite 13, in Makena Square was approved by the Planning Commission on January 26, 2010. The Game Star video arcade is open far business. • Jalapenos Restaurant (450 E. 15t Street): On January 26, 2010, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow a restaurant expansion, increased seating, new outdoor dining area, and modified business hours for Jalapenos restaurant located at 450 E. First Street. The project was appealed and on March 2, 2010, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision. Plans for the expansion have been submitted for plan check. • Prospect Village (191-193 East Main Street): The Prospect Village project is now complete. All twelve (12) live/work units have been sold and offices on the second floor of the Main Street commercial building are 100 percent occupied. A building permit for interior improvements has been issued for a cafe (Free Soul Cafe) and the cafe is anticipated to open in the next few months. Zoning Administrator Actions • Conditional Use Permit 09-006 - On November 23, 2009, the Zoning Administrator approved a request to establish pet grooming, pet daycare, and boarding services at 14712 Franklin Avenue. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 6 • Conditional Use Permit 09-025 and Design Review 09-030 - On December 7, 2009, the Zoning Administrator approved a request for outdoor seating and exterior modifications of a new Cafe Rio restaurant at 1140 Irvine Boulevard. The restaurant is now open for business. Conditional Use Permit 09-018 -The Zoning Administrator approved a request for outdoor seating at an existing Starbucks Coffee at 552 East First Street on December 14, 2009. • Conditional Use Permit 09-031 - A request to conduct massage, yoga/pilates classes, and book workshops in conjunction with an existing bookstore and retreat center at 505 West First Street was approved on December 28, 2009. Minor Adjustment 09-001 - On February 1, 2010, the Zoning Administrator approved a request to decrease the number of required off-street parking spaces by one (1) garage space to allow for the construction of a bathroom addition to an existing single family dwelling with a NRHP status of 5D1 (a contributor to a locally designated district) at 168 North B Street. Conditional Use Permit 09-034 - On March 29, 2010, the Zoning Administrator approved a request to authorize the upgrade of the existing on-site beer and wine sales (ABC License Type 41) to on-site general sales (ABC License Type 47) in conjunction with Mimi's Cafe located at 17231 17t" Street. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 7 • Conditional Use Permit 09-032 - On May 3, 2010, the Zoning Administrator approved a request to modify a master sign program for the Mimi's Plaza Shopping Center to allow larger signs along the freeway-facing wall. • Conditional Use Permit 10-002 - On May 24, 2010, the Zoning Administrator approved a request to operate live entertainment in conjunction with the Auld Dubliner restaurant located in the District shopping center at 2497 Park Avenue. • Conditional Use Permit 10-005 - On June 2, 2010, the Zoning Administrator approved a request to permit an existing accessory building to be used as a guesthouse at 310 Pasadena Avenue. Tustin Legacy • Tustin Legacy Community Partners (Master Developer): The Master Developer is currently in material default under the Disposition and Developer Agreement (DDA) entered between the City and the Tustin Legacy Community Partners. The City Council on June 15, 2006, approved a Termination and Settlement Agreement, Joint Escrow Instructions, and General Release Agreement which indicates the terms under which the City would offer TLCP a consensual termination of the DDA. In the event that City staff and legal counsel are unable to obtain agreement from TLCP by July 6, 2010, City staff and legal counsel are authorized to pursue termination as prescribed by the DDA. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 8 • Columbus Grove: With the exception of Ainsley Park, all residential products within the Columbus Grove community have been completed and units have been released for occupancy. Ainsley Park: The project was previously approved with the master design review for Columbus Grove. Since construction never commenced on the project, the entitlement has expired. A Design Review application for 84 duplex-cluster homes was approved on October 27, 2009, and plans are currently in plan check. • Columbus Square: There are three (3) remaining undevelopable sites located within Columbus Square (Coventry Court, Astoria, and Mirabella). Coventry Court: Lennar has submitted an application to resume construction of the 240-unit senior housing complex at Columbus Square, of which only one 24-unit building was constructed prior to the project being put on hold. The developer has submitted a Design Review application for approval of the project since the prior entitlements expired, as well as a Conditional Use Permit to change the tenure of the units from ownership (condominium units) to rental (apartment units). The Design Review application does not propose any physical site or architectural design changes from the previously approved project. In March 2010, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the rental tenure request and authorize the senior condominium project as originally approved. The City Council considered this project in April 2010 and continued the project to a special City Council meeting on July 7, 2010, at 6:00 p.m. Mirabella: William Lyon Homes on behalf of Resmark Equity Partners, LLC, the property owner, submitted a Design Review application for the development of 60 attached town homes at the Mirabella site. The Design Review application is currently under review. Augusta (formerly Astoria): William Lyon Homes on behalf of Resmark Equity Partners, LLC, also has submitted a Design Review application for the construction of the remaining detached single family homes approved previously as part of the Astoria site. The Design Review application is currently under review. • The District at Tustin Legacy: The District at Tustin Legacy is built out. Target store is undergoing major remodel to accommodate groceries and produce areas within the store as part of their new national concept. The store is anticipated to close for five (5) days during the construction. Planning Commission Summary of Projecfis June 22, 2010 Page 9 Public Improvements -Public Works Department Newport Avenue Extension (CIP No. 7131): Design engineering is continuing for the Newport Extension, Phase II Project. Design input is being received from the various approving agencies, including BNSF, OCSD, OCTA, Metrotink/SCRRA, PUC, and the County of Orange. The design engineer, Dokken Engineering, is in the process of revising the plans and specifications based on these comments. • San Juan Sidewalk west of Browning Avenue (CIP No. 7198): Construction has begun on the San Juan Sidewalk project, with completion scheduled for late summer. • Red Hill Avenue Parking Bay at Pine Tree Park (CIP NO. 2063): Construction has begun on the Red Hill Avenue Parking Bay at Pine Tree Park, with construction scheduled for late summer. • Red Hill Avenue Grade Separation: Preliminary design engineering is continuing for the Red Hill Grade Separation at the OCTA/SCRRA railway crossing (CIP No. 7175). • Traffic Signals: Design is complete and the project is being advertised for the traffic signal installation on Prospect Avenue at Beneta Way/Amaganset Way (CIP No. 4077). The traffic signal is scheduled for completion in November 2010. Fire Station 37 (Relocation): The City is continuing with the design process of Fire Station 37 with Design Consultant and Orange County Fire Authority. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 10 Jamboree Road Rehabilitation near northerly City boundary (CIP No. 7194): Construction is complete except for final median landscaping work for this project which was partially funded with federal Stimulus money. Red Hill Avenue Quiet Zone at railroad crossing (CIP No. 4069): The Notice of Intent to establish a Quiet Zone has been filed with the Federal Rail Authority (FRA) and other affected agencies. Work has begun, with the most noticeable item being the new pedestrian bridge on the east side of Red Hill Avenue over the flood control channel. Underground work is progressing and construction completion is anticipated in late summer or early fall. After all improvements are complete, the Notice of Establishment will be filed with the FRA and other agencies to formally declare a Quiet Zone. Pedestrian Path between Dow Avenue and Metrolink Station: The pedestrian path design and construction was administered by the Orange County Transportation Authority. Construction of the concrete path is complete and the path is now open to commuters working within the adjacent industrial park. The path features new LED street lighting. Street Maintenance: The FY 2009-2010 Major Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair projects are complete, although there are some deficiencies to be corrected on a few streets that received slurry seal. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 11 • Citrus Ranch Park (2910 Portola Parkway): Construction of the 17-acre park is complete and the park is open to the public. The park features a themed children's playground, picnic shade structure, restrooms, pedestrian walkways, and plaza areas. • Mitchell Avenue/Utt Drive Pedestrian Enhancements (CIP No. 4073): Preliminary design plans are being reviewed. A State Safe Routes to Schools (SR2S) Funding Allocation Letter and fully executed Program Supplement Agreement was received from Caltrans. The project is scheduled to go out to bid in Fall 2010. • Mitchell Avenue Storm Drain (CIP No. 5035): Plans and specifications are being reviewed. The project is scheduled to go out to bid in Fall 2010. • Rawlings Reservoir Replacement Project (CIP No. 6136): Plans and specifications prepared by Tetra Tech are 95% complete. Public Works staff is currently working with a prospective firm to perform Construction Management Services for the construction of the project. Their services will also include an in- depth constructability review of the project. The construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2011-12 and would be completed in approximately 2 years. • Tustin Metrolink Parking Structure: The City Council approved a revised Cooperative Agreement with OCTA for Expansion of Parking Capacity at the Tustin Metrolink Station for design and construction of an 825 space parking structure. Under the revised agreement, operation and maintenance of the structure will be the Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 12 responsibility of the City. The project is in the Construction Document Phase. Plans, specifications, and calculations are nearing approval. The project went out to bid on June 1, 2010 with bid opening on July 7, 2010. Construction is scheduled to begin in September 2010. Tustin Ranch Road Rehabilitation between Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road (CIP No.7195): Plans are 50% complete, with discussion ongoing regarding pavement rehabilitation strategy. Tustin Avenue Well (CIP No. 6150): Design engineering is continuing for the Drilling of the Tustin Avenue Well at 1822 N. Tustin Avenue (CIP No. 6150). Well Drilling Design being headed by AKM Consulting Engineers and Geoscience Support Services (Hydro geologist) is ninety-five percent (95%) complete. The mitigated negative declaration (MND) for the project was approved by the City Council on May 5, 2009. The Phase I drilling of the well is scheduled to begin in FY 2011-12 and the project would be completed in 1'f2 years. Certificates of Appropriateness: ADDRESS DATE APPROVED PROJECT RATING Restore detached garage; remove 410 S. Pacific St. 10-20-09 illegal garage expansion utilities C and fixtures 265 Pacific St. 10-21-09 New 3-car garage with storage and A Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 13 workshop; detached structure 430 W. Main St. 11-2-09 Re-roof to match porch; replace B vents 445 W 2nd St. 11-16-09 New concrete driveway B 401 EI Camino Real 11-17-09 New sign, v-gutter, trash enclosure B 310 Pasadena 11-19-09 New garage; legalize 2nd unit A 210, 218, 222, 232, 238, 11-23-09 Renovate/replace exterior Non-rated 242, 250 W. Main St. stairs/balconies (Stevens Square) 460 EI Camino Real 11-24-09 Repair/replace existing attached D shed structure (fire damaged) 700 W. 2nd St. 12-3-09 Replace existing 6' high cedar dog Non-rated ear fence with same 520 W Main St 12-11-09 Install landscape irrigation backflow A , preventers and sprinkler stations 500 S. C St. 2-23-10 Tenant improvements and ADA A upgrades 435 Pacific St. 3-9-10 Install pv solar panels on flat roof D Remove rock roof on flat roof 350 Pasadena Ave. 3-11-10 portion; replace with bur. covered Non-rated by (e) parapet, no change to mansard 245 S. A St. 4-13-10 New redwood fence on north side, B side yard, less than 6' tall 130 S. A St. 6-1-10 Add 184 sq. ft. to existing bedroom Non-rated behind garage 705 W. Main St 7_7_10 Demo garage, construct new 750 C sq. ft. garage Rating System; A Obvious examples of historically significant architecture and structures that were significant in local history. B Unusual or distinctive buildings in terms of age and architecture. C Pre-1940 buildings with much of the original architectural style. D Pre-1940 buildings with substantial alteration or no significant architecture style. Planning Commission Summary of Projects June 22, 2010 Page 14 Non-contributing Buildings: Buildings that are located in the Cultural Resources District but do not fall under any of the above categories. Attachments; A. Tustin Legacy Monitoring Report B. Certificate of Appropriateness Documentation 15',lCck7WCREPORPSUMMARY REPORTS4SUMMARY B•72-t0.doc.dw TUSTIN LEGACY MONITORING REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION REPORT SUMMARY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: APPROVED UNITS JOHN LAING I 376 JOHN LAING II 189 COLUMBUS SQUARE* 1,075 COLUMBUS GROVE* 465 TUSTIN LEGACY PARTNERS 2,105 TOTAL TO DATE 2_,105 TOTAL UNITS AUTHORIZED BY SPECIFIC PLAN 4,210 MAX. UNITS AUTHORIZED FOR OCCUPANCY** 1,681 Includes Approved Density Bonus NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE VESTAR (see matrix) 1,016,000 TUSTIN LEGACY PARTNERS 6,739,042 INSTITUTIONAL USES VILLAGE OF HOPE ATEP (SOCCCD) Pha ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. OC SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY Total SQUARE FOOTAGE 123,664 14,676 56,000 57,446 TS ISSUED UNITS COMPLETE UNITS INCOMPLETE AFFORDABLE UNITS AFFORD. COMPLETE 376 376 0 78 78 189 189 0 40 40 735 735 340 266 128 381 381 84 42 42 2,105 453 0 1 681 9 681 288 879 UNDER CONSTRUCTION SQUARE FOOTAGE OCCUPIED 999,965 SQ. FT. 844,459 STATUS SQUARE FOOTAGE OCCUPIED COMPLETE 123,664 COMPLETE 14,676 COMPLETE 56,000 COMPLETE 57,446 251,786 June 17, 2010 AFFORD. INCOMPLETE 0 0 138 0 453 591 Cornmtu~ity Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 7, 2010 705 W. MAIN STREET (350 MYRTLE AVENUE) TUSTIN „~,,:, L~UfI.UING C)UR PlJ'fURL HC)N(7RINC; CUR I'FtSf The property is improved with an "C" rated residential structure in the Spanish Colonial style per the City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) and has a NRHP Status Code: 5B1 per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003). The proposed work involves the demolition of a two car garage and storage sheds, and the construction of a new 750 square foot two car garage (C10-0095). The existing garage and storage sheds are not mentioned within the City's Historical Resources Survey. The new garage would be located in khe same location as the existing garage which is to the rear of the residence and fronting along Myrtle Avenue. There is an existing fence and gate along the Myrtle Avenue side yard of the property which will screen the majority of the garage. The proposed garage will be of the same architectural style as the existing residence and garage with materials and finishes to match those existing as closely as possible. Section 925211 of the Tustin City Code requires findings to be made prior to demolishing any structures constructed prior to 1940 and located within the Cultural Resources (CR) district. The applicant has provided written and photographic evidence of the dilapidated state of the existing garage and sheds. The applicant has noted that it would be impossible to repair the damage to the structure without rebuilding the garage. Furthermore the applicant contends that the reconstruction or restoration of the existing garage is not feasible to bring it up to a functioning garage and meet building codes. In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed project meets zoning code and building code requirements. ~if10 (-:e:ntennial W~v, liiscin, CA ~)?74D • P; (i l-~) Si 3-:;11)(1 • F: I r I~) X73-31 1.3 • www tustinc~.r.>r~ Certificate of Appropriateness 750 W. Main St. June 7, 2010 B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that: the proposed work will improve the overall aesthetics of the property and is within the historical context of the site. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings in that the proposed work will enhance the appearance and functionality of the site while still maintaining the historical context. The proposed work would not cause a substantial change in the visual appearance of the site as the proposed garage would replace a garage of the same architectural style and would be in the same location. D. Reconstruction or restoration of the existing garage and storage sheds is not economically feasible or practical. The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. All new utilities shall be placed underground. 3. Prior to project final and occupancy, field inspection shall be conducted to verify consistency with the approved set of plans. . Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director ~ ~'~i~r:r~i-n~.ta~iky ~~~~~1,~r~rrannk ~~parkz~zlea-~t CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 1, 2010 130 SOUTH "A" STREET PROPOSAL: The property is a "Non-rated" structure per the Tustir~t ~ '~~ ~ r ~t~~`~~s Survey. The proposed project is a 184 square foot expansion of an existing bedroom. The addition will be constructed to match the existing home in terms of exterior wall material, setbacks, exterior color, roof pitch, and roof materials. (Building Permit No. C10-0131) In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed project meets zoning code requirements and would match the exterior colors and materials of the existing dwelling. The single-story addition would match the setbacks of the existing building and its finish height would be less than the existing building's height. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that the proposed project is a single-story addition behind the existing garage, its finish height would be shorter than the existing building, and would be minimally visible from the public right-of-way. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings in that the proposed project is a single-story addition and is proposed to match the existing structure in terms of exterior stucco, roof style and pitch, roof materials, and will not conflict with the architectural style of other surrounding structures. The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees, Any replacement or repair of any part of existing structure shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. " ~ - ~;`, ~~ i / Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director ~'Cot-second~cdd-rdalCddIEDMELYNNE~,Cert. ~~f~ppropriatness',Cert_Appropnate_13U S. /~.doc ii :~i,, it ~, ;~~. ' .., ~ ~ ,. ~~ i i ~I'(~STIi'°~( - - ~-. ~i [~ ~ ~ ar, ~yirnPnl C. 2T~' u,id„-.rryptApprn i ~RI '~rdn•. - ~ . ~ pram iS ,1 ~ ~ '~ i he pr+`.~ Kwon, , a , ~'± d }'s. ~;I hnr~ s n'r,~~ 5'ur/}.~.,~~Y Re fo ~fnMfuroje) i ~ ~ 'I1 ~ ~-,~~~4 "t"7" J f I 1 .r /~~'=,L~Sh_~,1y~~~YF,g ~o r h~. i 11 > 1 C~ t' ~ 1~1. j3~-1,• ~ n r~Carrt + e ry , '''11~ „~"^~.~.~_ I 1 gnu ,rarer,, ~ o nto. iQ01 ~ ~ ~ l~ i~ f'1 ~-' `7 . (pm. ~ ,.. ~ : ~;~~{~~ ~`~ ~"'`~ ti'e'r ~ r~ +b ~ ,,,. , t //~~ '~~~'~" I ~ ~` Cv, ~ I J/ ~ '~ I i N ~~ A y '~ r~ ~ '! „ „s nn _.-~~n~ari nnnrgn t dq~arsnly .r(i9CI fh0 f'.hargp ~~ ~,ucea wnem the ~ism,y, ~~ ti7e dufrk ' ~ a narm,.nln t,b r ,rrr•. y is with eaietrn9 turrnumn .~ ,; nTte, srzra, 1n' • In terms Of v ~ ~ ~,,.H,nnchlp lD + "7hf. plecemyr a~ r.a . rIfND9 buJOpim en ,~'reA of ~ neW eM+qures erq ,h~ ~'. _ L ~~ ~o~~"~'~~ ~~~ 1 r ~~ r r~ ~' ~ ~~ ~~~CF'1 4 ,~, ,,, y~~t~ i ' 1 ~ ,~''J ." . ~, ~ r , r , -~ '~ ~ -; ~; ~ ~ ~ -- ..1 ~ •; ~ , ti d ! ~ 'j --~--~-'~- k-- , ('i r!`. r (, ~ ~~ I t,: ---~ I~- i. I , }~ i ,~'~s'~ t ~ ~ f r,ry r~n~, 1 ~~ i ,~ I r. r ' ~.. ' ~ 1~ ~ ,' ~-- I ~ ~ i -- -. ~ ~ . Commt.mity Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPRDPRIATENESS MARCH 9, 200 435 PACIFIC STREET PROPOSAL: The property is improved with a "D" Historical Resources Survey. The photovoltaic solar energy panels me public view. BUILDING OuR FUTURE HONORLNG OUR PA5T rated Period Revival style structure per the Tustin proposed project involves the installation of a unted on the existing flat roof not visible from the In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work will not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect the resource in that the new solar panels would be located on flat portions of the roof and not visible from the street. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that no work is proposed in any area visible from the street and the street view of the house will remain unaltered. C. The proposed modifications will retain the essential elements which make the structure, site or feature culturally significant in that the proposed work is not visible from the public right-of way and would not alter the original structure. All of the elements that make the main structure and site significant will be maintained. The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to fhe start of any work, the applicant shall obtain any applicable building, electrical, or other necessary permits and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. Replacement or repair of any part of the existing structure shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. 3. The property shall be subject to final building inspection to ensure consistency with plans approved and on file with the City. Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director S.'+Cdd',Can`C~Itural Resources. Oltl Towntcertficate of Appropriateness1435 Pacific (solar).doc 311(1 Ccnt~nnial Ww; Tustin, (...~'1?;!3U • P; ~;'I~tJ ~~3-31(1!1 • F: (711 ~7y-3113 • tivww.tu5tinca.c~r~r TUSTIN Cc»7u~-tLUlity Deve~o~ment Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 23, 2010 500 S. "C" STREET TUSTI N The property is improved with an `'A" rated residential structure in the Victorian Greek Revival style per the City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) and has a NRHP Status Code: 3S per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003). The residence was converted to office use in 1999 pursuant to Conditional Use Permit 98-026. The proposed work involves tenant improvements for a dental office (C09-0484). The majority of the work will be interior tenant improvements with some minor exterior work involving upgrades to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. The existing metal railing at the front porch will be extended and clad with wood railing to match the materials and aesthetics of the building. Upgrades to the accessible ramp and deck at the rear of the building (not visible from the street) will also be completed. Two new exhaust air vents will be located along the side of the house at 12 inches above grade level and screened by an existing fence. In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed project meets zoning code and building code requirements. The majority of the proposed work will consist of interior tenant improvements. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that: the proposed work will improve the overall aesthetics of the property and is within the historical context of the site. C. The proposed work is harmonious with .existing surroundings in that the proposed work will enhance the appearance and functionality of the site 3U(1 Cenieruiial Way, Tusnn, C~'1 y278(.7 1': (71~) 57-31f.)(1 F: l%l-~l ii3~31 13 www.tustinca,r-,r I 1 LS Pl l1tY 13U1LL~ING Ol1P. fUTURF. HONORING OUR Pn~T Certificate of Appropriateness 500 5. °C" St. February 23, 2010 while still maintaining the historical context. The proposed work would not cause a substantial change in the visual appearance of the site as the majority of work is interior or not visible from the street. The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. All new utilities shall be placed underground. 3. Prior to project final and occupancy, field inspection shall be conducted to verify consistency with the approved set of plans. Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director 11Cot-second\cdd-rdalCddlRyanlCertificate of Appropriateness15~0 S, C St.doc o~ .~~ g •.' m a ~° ~ 3 N ~~ m 1 ~ F U .~ 3 ~~ 4 tD O1 M ~ [q ~ =j c v > f o a c a i~ a u c m ~ c a U '° d~- a~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ L ~~.. a ~"~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ 7 J m ~ O ~ C vN1 Q ~ ~ a 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a~~ ~ z ~ ~ ' ~~~~ ~~~~ Q ~~~~~ 8 ~ ~ ~. 3 ~ . ~ S s ~~g~~ ~~ ~Y ~ a a a a a ~~~ ~ go s ~,~ ~ ~ '~ C _o C 3 0 L ~3 _T 1 ,~ Q ~ Q... ~~ m ~ ;a ~ C O Diuu u ~ ~ `.. W ~ 0 ~ u _, ,, ~ ~ • ~ w/ lf') O 0.~ = ~ ~~ a w -a C V1 d' O L '~ ~ ~ MM ~+ > ~ ?t ~ ~ m ~~ a ~ M L .~ a~ o ~ v. a+°i C L Y - ~ `m J~J w' ~ o ' ~ ~ ~ i/O ~ L C N ~ m ~ L a ~ U ~ ~ ... . ~+ ~ _ ~ '~Lr 1 X I d 2 ..~ ~- a r~ W L.J Q Wz ` 4J / a o _J (~/ `~-' o Z Q= 0 fy~ ~~ ~l ~.I a 0 r~ CV ~~ U w a _/ 0 _Z Z ~ Qz J 1 u ~~ ~ ~ ~ m E > ~ o '~ U Q N ~ ~ ~ R3 = 7 F- N w ~~ ~ C N ~ ~~ u ~ ~o wu c .~' cn a o v f~ ~ .~ ~ L C ~ ~ ~ ~ ri m * E°- ni E 'C ? C ~~ a 3 `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ `~ ~ ~ Z L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 3' '~ 7 V y '~ ~ d ~ 4_1 ~ C ~~ 7 C ~ C ~ O~~ CC C1 `: _ _ 44 4C O O ~ a-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D C j ,O C N 1 N t~ i7 .i j~ n' .n .p p u a o c ~ C ~ ~ a ~ 1~s a~p;j° ~°n_n w o. c v u Z~ iaC~ ~ aC m Q 5~ ,ad' LL r N lrl ,.* tCy rD • • • a~ O Z 0 n N 01 CA ~ cU ~~ ~ 3 ~- oc N 3 ~ Q F- O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E V N ~ Q L x ( ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~~ y,"t i u o p L ~ ~ a~~o cd o 0 0 ~ v W CA O~ a0 00 rp O ~ ~ ~ ~ O- C ~ st C ~7 N = n h ~ ~S ~i~i~ed r r r r ~ . '. . ', . '. . '. . '. ~' . ~. u . ~ Q ~ \ ~ a: . \ ` . C ~ : \ ~ ~ c ~ . ~, U ` I I. ,. ,. r. ,. s Y ~~ C C C aa33u~.u~.a ~ r ~eM ~IIeM ~uo~~ ~, ; . I°-I°-t°-1°-FF~°- r ~. 3 v / o~~~ , y n a ~.~~~ / _> ~ ' , °. ^ o 0 0 ~ Q o 0 0 0 i~ F-Fi-F ~~ / ~, E I ~ ~ ~~ ~Q ~z ~~ . ~ ,, ~ ,. ,. V r• ~ .y p i ~ ` «f O o N ~. ~ - _ N '-' V ~ ~ 4 . , E a rn 3 g n .~ •m R _ Z Z fR 10 C N rp O ~ ~ ~ ~ . (~ Cn ~ lp ~ ~ ~ Dl O Q .~... ~ C ~~..~> v - ~ ~ ~ mZ o U Q , pza ~ o ~ ~~~_ ~,=J _ ~ n !7 ~ c4 i ~_ l~ y ro ~~ -= s ~ ~a u. o .n ~z n rn .t cj cu .. .. .. • • • • r • • • • •• ' ~ ~~~y~nb'UY'S 9rivzwa`~ ~ ~ ... .. .. .. . .... . .... . ..... . .... .. . ~ . • . • 0 c m n m Z C m ~,, ~ frnA ~~ M.o.naw.~.~ o~awK. H.• Boa rv4rr~w M+~r Th. pepperd aw., ,uraonn. a .I.~a..r,..rw•, tw.. (~ Ttr plnqu.o wro, ,w.. na b Drfprrfs4 C~rwy EWowcw 71M prvposutl +wr ~ h.nnadD p~1rGWi.IrlwaY d m~l.+~. ~a OuWYq p ar.w~or. In n1~1f0apl wirwnamQ..anp. l~gprwaa oy. . ~~~ vl 1uYW C ,., • ~~~rly~[fYd~gprtyr* Dpaftrnnl Cumm.um G.n1Uca1~ d Appi0p~44MNM ~ r~.ediar~ar«,1. u.a~.e. h p 7n.aw~,..a.~. + Gi.nata.. + wv+r o ,~.~..,w., ..o.. 0.~,,: .~ n..l v ,,,. ~ . `~ .~,.. ~ t~ . 2'~n S}-- ~aa: Vii: _ APPROVED COMMUNITY QEVELOPMENT DEPT DEC 0 3 2009 PlA NIN D1ViS BY: ~~ ~Z~~ Community Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS NOVEMBER 24, 2009 460 EL CAMINO REAL TUSTIN PROPOSAL: The property is a "D" rated residential structure per the Tustin Historical Resources Survey. The proposed project is to repair and replace afire- damaged 120 square-foot shed structure that is attached to the main residential structure. The proposed shed repair and replacement will be constructed to match the structure prior to fire damage and match the existing home in terms of style, exterior wall material, exterior color, and roof materials. (Building Permit No. C09-0442) In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed shed repair and replacement complies with the development standards for single family homes which include, but not limited to setbacks, lot coverage, open yard area, and building height. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that the proposed project is the repair and replacement of an existing attached shed structure that was damaged in a fire. The shed structure is described in the City's Historical Resources Survey Report as an attached "gabled lean-to." The shed is located to the rear of the main residential structure and is attached to it by the backdoor stair case and roof and is not highly visible from the street. As such, the proposed work maintains the character and style of the existing structure's street frontage. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings in that the design of the shed structure will match the materials and appearance of the shed prior to the fire damage and complement the exterior wall material, exterior color, and roof materials of the existing style of the house. 3(?U (:cntennial 1X~~~y, Tn~tin, C~~'~27~If.l • I': 17I~t) 7'3-3100 • F i i I tl X73-3I I i www tus(inca.r~r~l E~l11LDING OUR FUTl1RE HQNORING OUR PAST Certificate of Appropriateness 460 EI Camino Real November 24, 2009 The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. Any replacement or repair of any part of existing structure shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director 11Cot-secondlcdd-rdalCddIEDMELYNNE1Cert. of AppropriatnesslCert_Appropriata_460 EI Camino Real.doc Community Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS BUILDING OUR FUTt1RE NOVEMBER 23, 2009 HONORING OUR PAST 210, 278, 222, 232, 238, 242, AND 250 WEST MAIN STREET PROPOSAL: The subject properties are non-rated structures per the Tustin Historical Resources Survey. The proposed project involves the renovation and replacement of exterior stairs and balconies for the office buildings in the Steven Square office complex. The proposed stairs and balconies will be constructed to be compatible with the existing office buildings in terms of style and color. (Building Permit No. B09-0143) In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions. or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed renovation complies with the development standards for commercial structures which include, but not limited to setbacks, lot coverage, and building height. The proposed changes would renovate and replace existing deteriorated exterior stairs and balconies with new materials that are compatible in design and style and in the same location. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that the proposed project involves the Steven Square office buildings, which is to the rear of the "A" rated structure at 228 W. Main Street. No changes to the exterior elevations of the office buildings are proposed. In addition, no changes to the "A" rated structure on 228 W. Main Street are proposed. The proposed renovation only includes installation of new stairs, railings and balconies to the office buildings. As such, the proposed work maintains the character and style of the Cultural Resource District. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings in that the ornamental design of the proposed stairs and balconies are compatible and consistent with the exterior color and style of the office buildings. The submitted sample materials show materials that are compatible with the existing office buildings in style and color. 3110 Centennial Way, riistin, CA ~/27A0 • N: f 71 •L) 573- 31 U(> • F~ (71 •~) 573- ~)) 3 • www. tustinca.~~rg TUSTIN Certificate of Appropriateness 210, 222, 232, 238, 242, and 250 W. Main Street November 23, 2009 The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. Any replacement or repair of any part of existing structure shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director 11Cot-secondlcdd-rdalCddIEDMELYNNE1Cert. of AppropriatnesslCert Appropriate_Steven Square -1N. Main.doc '['rex Designer tieries Bailin}; fell t u res: • f1n eye-catching, distinctive rail protile • The tlexibiliiyy to mix and match colrxs • A lasting beauty with tar less maintenance than wood railing :IruNuhlc M u ronvettient, JTe.riJ71e, 11i1'eC'-17U.CR18'tF-'tjr! Faster installation with rtes157nerGolnrs Tri:xCxpresS A.selnbly , (;oil R"it ~) , > ,~~ '; ~ ~:,~ System n+ ~"'•; -c S 13ttlustcr Kit +' ' ~ 'L `~ Backed by a ZS-year limited ,~ ~ ~9.r~1 Punt Sleere or,Solitt Po.ct ~~' ~;~~ tx,.x ~"`~ ~-"`~"5 ~"L 'IYntlal Pm~l iv rrrilu4.atert irwnl )~L'SIdC'ntlal Wa173nty. Saddle Winchester Madeira Woodland Cayenne f3undshed Carey Brown Amher ~RE.~ R'TISAN SERIES RAILING"' A timeless Io Complete yoI Artisan Serie: compliments modular cons colors and ,yty Trex Artisan ` All ele~allt, • Nfoclular co unpreccden • A strong, st and feel • No vibratin (ir rattling, I railings sr-« c -~ -~'a 9,~ ~nEt~ • Quick ~nld easy assi:mbly • .~. price that. ilelivers an exceptional value • fiackcd by a ?5-year limiteil residential w~irranty. ~1ZE~, DESIGNER SERIES R!~1LING"' N;:+IS,y to install. Easy to care for. bard to ignore. Nothing completes the look of a Trex backyard quite like '1'rcx I)csigner Series Railing. Available lIl Slx Colors t0 cumpluncnt our decking. "Trex Designer Series Railing provides the elegant frame for the piece of arr that is your Trex clerk. The shaped rails and post caps create a distinctive and striking protile. And our innavtttive TrcxExpress"'Assembly System makes installation a snap. t J+rr rttrro t'a!i re TrerGrnress : lssernbl y .5'ushrtn stokes iustullutiurt rr hree::e. lizx ar'tisura 5e'r'i~s Knititt,~ pic'lttred rovkh ('olntriul ,Spisellrts. .. ----- A a 0 C C n 4~ G a~ ~~ a Cyr U J ~~+~ 1 ~ ~1~ 1 f-/ ~~ c~ u!elQ ;ol - - - aansoiau~ .._ - - - - !era ;off yse~l 6u!;six -d Z .~ ~~ ~ u, o r s ' ~ ~ £ Y v ~ W a~ ca Qs ~ ~ ~~~ U~ ~ s s ~-~~ O ~ ~ e~ ~.~: gs~° ~n °~ ~ - a r ~ ~ ~, E ~ '~ 4 Y~ 1'. ~`„ ... ` _ ~ ~ L ~ (_' i a r_7t O U ._. W W CTS ... ~ ~(. , '-. -C [.' (CS W L V -' m ~ c~ Z -7 ~ ~ o ~ ,k ~ Q o '~ U ~- ~ O Z ' ~ p C ~ ~ .Ln LL rl ~ _J u, ~ R) a ~ ~? U to p a~ a~ ~ m c U ~ C ~ ~ ~p O ~ ~ w ~ C ~ ~ `t ;~ ~ c .. .. - .. 3 ro ~ ~- • . • ~ ~ ' ~ . .. ... ~ c . ~~ ... .. (n 2 .. . . .. ... . . . . • •. • . . r '•` :.. ~-- - ~. Z6 X ~ P1elUl } • Z Q~w~ JpQ~.r aZ~~x W CnJtAU 4Uw~ •~ ~~J~~ ~o}°~ 4~?wz ~ c~ r cr w ~S'' A~ _y d u ~C: d O O (' a z_ J_ ~ ~ ~ U a U ~ U J d. RS 3 0 J -,. ..rte.. , . .~ ~.. ~ r{. ``~ ~ a U •` m ~ U ~ ~ o ~ ~ ao>~ m> ~~ ~ ~~ Q i c o pa L co LL. m ~ v a~~ a~ o x ~ o ro ~~'1~ciVo m v~ U LLI U1 ~ OC ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn Y~oUm..coo~-oc V. r ~ L Q (~ ~ ~ d ~ a j QI ~ ~'Q~X~NJLLI~cn N O N ao c O~XXo ro ca o 0 0 U2~v~-oocnuaz V ~~ . J VU t f ~:~; V] __~ O~ yC U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ _ • .. ~. ," ~; ~ ~. ~ ~ , 4 ,. -r~,, . +: ~~~~~:~~:;; , _ ti >- d ~ ~, g ~ ~ .- o ,;~ ,; o ~_°~ ~ + ' i ~' !- .C U O ~ N ' . ,• :.. `: ib "~ C ~ U ~ O . -''~' - > . ~ `-'`;ry J L op p QUA ~°'~a~co >; o 4 ;,. 3' ~W'~W'..flo~ N r X 3 :: ~ n ~~ , O~XX ~ N ~:~ ,': V 2 ~' d' ~ O (~ W Community Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS NOVEMBER 10, 2009 310 PASADENA AVENUE NEW GARAGE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND CONVERSION OF EXISTING GUEST HOUSE INTO A SECOND UNIT TUST[N PROPOSAL: The property is improved with an "A" rated Craftsman style main structure and a "B" rated Victorian - Italianate carriage house, per the Tustin Historical Resources Survey. The proposed project involves construction of a new 625 square foot two car garage and conversion of the carriage house into a second residential unit, In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and design standards as established by the City, in that the proposed garage and second unit meet all development standards for the R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. The new garage is designed to complement the existing historic structure and all exterior alterations to the carriage house will be consistent with the historic appearance of the property. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that the proposed garage is designed to be compatible with the existing historic structures in terms of roof pitch and style, exterior siding and roofing materials, and color, and the only exterior alteration to the carriage house involves replacement of the non-historic sliding glass doors with new garage doors appropriate to the historic style of the house. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings, in that the proposed garage is designed in a style consistent with the historic structure, proposed materials will complement the historic structure, and the addition of the proposed garage will not detract from the existing historic structure or the surrounding setting. In addition, all work proposed for the carriage house will be consistent with the historic character of the unit. The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 3!)fl (a_ntrnnial ~~/•rly, 1'utitin, (.A '1'~7~itl • I' ~ i 141 S%3 ~ 111O • ~- ~ ~ I t i 573- 3 1 1 3 - -- - www Uititinw.nr~ (1UILDINC UUR FUTURE H(7NC)RING OUR PAST 2. Any replacement ar repair of any part of the existing or new structures shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. 3. All improvements shall be made as shown on the approved plans, on file with the Community Development Department, and subject to field verification prior to final permit approval. i Elizabeth A. Binsack ~ Community Development Director S:1CddlCarilCultural Resources, Old TownlCertificate of Appropriateness1310 Pasadena - garage.doc ._ _.. 1 ~ w ~ J ~ w ~~pp T Q ~ F- N W x w F 2S b ~ y L i 11 ~ ~ ,.;} i~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ . ~ ~-~ ~ ;i ' :~ ~~ ~ ~ s8 ~ _ 7F ~ ~ F _ I 0 :~ Q ~~ ~o _ '~ 4 O 4 ` o. c t Ar ~oyo ,~.ris~SrtrH~X ,~ ~~1 7 O .~ ~ ~ u ~ ~~ u~ )J T S U t ~~ ~~~ ~'7 ~ L ~ nn }~ Z ~ ' V ` ~ a ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ 3 ~ s ~ y ~ g. og ~ O ~F r ~ S ~ ~~ c ti I~ ~ ~ f, ~~~ ~~ ~~. ' ~ ~ `~ O !., ~ ~l1 v~ h `~' ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~n "' X ~, W wQ cair a rww apthew~~ ,.._. *~» aovw.+ rw1aM raw ~.~ tr p nrr wr. inewwa b nn c~ ~ n.t4 Nhre~ ~w.w.n w.vrr Il~tgrt: ci q w M Yu, M~'NN ~ G3i V Ewe N ~Y NN E Rat4r~ `~Q a ~g1 M taCt70rdY10~ wM OYdYIYfq NO. 1001. the AMY (HW1pprMrM tHO+rtnMM fMa ~rld dpNrNrW NNk T}M pmpOad work oolMO/nr q M MWYGfp~l 1.t4 rrd nh011Yrd WU011 -/ +wrM~rdk ~ ~PPkMt~ lye TM propo~ worN dor not ~dNrNly Moor M dwrcwr of Mw ahUlef or ~oMprrlod (.1Alural t~toupM+MlfrNf tlN dhlrtoL 1'1» propaortl wak h Iwngrrlorr rd/r ~rhNO ftrrardnpr M 1NnN d opptoprhvr~N a moMrWR t+aMi. Mb. htlpNl, PWaonr~. and rw d ~ now huMd4q a abuctun Yr rNOtbnM/~ M ~N bd10Y1M ny IlHirttifM nd 1M ~wrauntla+q ~~rtk{p. ^ A~,,~ ~ _ p~ It 6?!a ~ 1 L= -.~'t-.~'TZ.t:Q~ }-t u v S ~ -~ Now R.~ E' Cv ^'~STE~r' (tea ~r~nrC. M•~+-t`t~'t~1-c_ /1~" b Cvi.c~ rZ G~ Y O~ ~~ ~ S RE-ROOFING PERMIT APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS JOB ADDRESS: '~" ~ © W . 'M A ~ t•s 5 'r" -T'v ST ~ Iv q i. Does this application constitute any change in type of material from existing construction? r~.18~ YES NO / ,~~ d rs ~- ~ • b-•~~ zss - 2. Indicate type of existing roofing material G ~ N1 ~ o f 1 T 1 D -~ OY~~ S ~, ~ ~ G 3. Answer the following questions (for new roof) a. Type of material `!" ,C C m w~ a ~' • 'r'te t O 1~ ''F 1 ~rtr ~ ~ S S b. Manufacturer's name and model C ~'i 7,r r`• L ev c. Testing approval agency name and approval number I (ICBO report #) ~. ~ S ~}• ti ~ d. Weight of material per square foot ~ ~ 5 t, V~ • 4. New roofing material to be installed as follows: (check one) a. Over existing roofing material YES _N01! b. Installing new underlay material YES rIVO f answer to "a" is yes, proceed to following questions. 5. Is the additional weight on roof structure more than 4 psf? (assuming existing material is 3 pfs or less such as wood shakes, shingles and composition shingles) YES_NO `! 6. Is a new built up roofing material to be applied over existing roofing in a commercial building? YES NO / 7. If the answer to question No. 5 or 6 is yes, khen provide the following: a. A drawing which shows roof slope and the framing of all rafters and roof support members. b. Size, span, and location of all supporting roof rafters and shear walls. c. Engineering calculations justifying the structure for additional weight. d. Drawing and calculations signed by California registered civil engineer, structural engineer or architect. NOTE: 1. Effective October 1, 2005, reroofing of flat roof greater that 2000 sq/ft or more than 50% of the total roof area, shall comply with the cool roof requirements of the State of California Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards.- Initial------- 2. All new roofing material shall be class B or better per City of Tustin Ordinance number 8103 (f). Except in high fire hazard zone as determined by Orange County Fire Authority and Planning Division where a minimum Class A is required. Initial------- Submitted by: W ~ V L' ~ ~'" ~ C c7 l~ tr ~ •...1 Signature: ~~~,_ ~ :~~~,r ~ - c.~L~~ ;~~ ~~ Plan Checker Date: (~ • ~ • ~ Da e PERMIT APPLICATIC?N clrr r~F rusrw COMMUNITY dEVELQPMENT DEPARTMF_NT 14157 3-3 1 3 1 Jf 71415; 3.3132 FAX: 7141 573.3129 POD Signature E30K for Issuance WOK for Plan Check Submittal PLAN CHECK # , `,~ ~ ~ • ~l rX.o ~ ""Plus ('/rcrh evil/ e~~,ire iu .fhll dut•,+••Jru,rr +r,bnrillrr! Jule**. PROJECT ADDRESS `C ~ 0 ~ • ~ ~` s ~ ~T 'T~ s Ts ~ VALUATION OF PROJECT $ '~Oe .'" +*DESCRIBE WORK TO 8E DONE ~ ~. ~e.tM O V G a~ Q S O~ t V 1 C~1 M1r1 •LT"G~'~ ?/L~ . G M ?.-T''~D'+r' 1 Z CV . z .~ . ~ r r . .1_ _ / ..., ~.~ r _ ~ ~ I APPLICANT (contact) NAME: W r L (~1 i~ hI1 G D LC. a11rp~OPERTY OWNER: [ am the: Phone Nu. '11 ~ 3 ~ g ~ ~, ~ Name ~/ ~ ~~ s A t,/~ ~ 7~ yu N ~ e~ ~ -~` 1 . , a , property Owner ^ Architect C ~ `L .~ t ^ Contractor * ^ Engineer Address ~ O ~/ • M A ~ ~.! S T "1'L ST Employee of theme~ ~1..'~-, R'O ^ DO~ ?j ` wner Contractor + ' Phone Number ~ 1 ~ ~3 ~ $ 61,E • Verilicalion of p'orker s Comp. Required "`'`Plan (`heck will e+pire iu .ihi/ JnPe %rnm sr,b-„rllrr! dale**. Email Address (n7 CONTRACTOR: Company Name Address City Suite License ~ Class Exp. State/Zip Phone ~ - M*SUB-CONTRACTOR: ^ YES ^ Vt) Email Address ~~ ARCHITECT: Company Name Address City State License r# Class Exp. State/Zip Phone ~ Email Address ENGINEER: Company Name Address City State License # Class Exp. State/Zip ~ ~ Phone # Email Address ~ Room addition/Alteration sq. ft.. Linear feet of block wall max. (i'~-R" high Garage Linear Feet of retaining wal! max. /~'-K" high wood frame sq. Ft. Linear feet of wood Fence max. 6'-K" high masonry sq. ft. Proposed Roofing Material G~ ?,Cf ~ ~~~~ ~Z„ r f Patio enclosure s ft ICBO/1CC #~QS+~"lr~of roofing '~ Q. 5' ~ q. _ . ~. 9 Patio cover _ _ sq. ft. Roof area ti 6 b O __ sq. ft. Pnol & Spa sq. Ft. /f7/bs. or over per sq. R., please provide structural analysis by a /!tensed engineer. Sign _ Sq. ft. Demolition _ sq. ft. Skylight _ sq. ft. Fire sprinklers - . --~- N 1 New Building Area - sq, tt. Grading aria -- -- - -sq. Ft. Tenant Improvement ;q. ft, Oc cupancy Class Construction Type - - ~~ w~ T .~ .: APPLICANT SIGNATUI~: .-~ ~~ PATE. I ~ ~ N , o ~' '_ ___ Carriage House ShangleTy tht ~ simple deganot of a time when adenttoa to detaiiwas every aaflsman's personal signature. Where GreatlvilK and individuality expressed itself la the details of homes on the outside;. as well as on the inside: Crewe >~pression~ versAtdle Applicatlon~ A Carnage Hoax roof i, dramaatic. Deep 8" tabs, dlmenstonal shadow Wren and wide chamfered corners wive Carriage House this design*, Cartia®e House can be applied ~ ~ ; ~ : , with gt~eater ease Mot~vver, lt'~ constructed oa '" a U.L tested fiber gigs, base for long-lastlng ,, proteedon and unbeatable durability ~ i A rich palede of colors inrlnding ~ slate gray,, `~. ~' a brick red and a warm green offer creatlvc opdons limited only by your imagtnadoQ. Whether used as an accent or on its own,. Carriage House produces a strlldng roof with a look that's timeless. Outstanding performance. UncompromisU-g defiance. A Carriage House root is built to Inst. • 1Wo-layer Super Shanglee consernaion • FaunPayer coverage when applled • Deep S" tabs • Unique chamfered catt creates a scallop-edged appearance • Disdncdve, deep shadow Imes for enrt dimension • 350 lbs. per square • Fiber glass base • U. L. Class A Fire Rating *Pai. Pend. Grand Matato: Carrlag~ Hoare Sha Hip and ridge elf -,'11v~o full tayerx, warranty;, ~ ~ If a roofing problem occurs, !<wW ustralhr ~ shag up during rite first few years altcer appllcatlan. So while a Carriage House ,roof . carries a I1feWne Wnited rranderable war ran ty (see ,, Q- warranty lbr details ~ r ~~ e ~ r~ a r 1unitadoro), we"ve provided. addidonal warrantycoverage during the Gr9t seven years following, i instaltatfon with 3ureShut protecdotl. SureSt~rtTU 7 guarantees 10l)'~ replsecernent cost for labor and materials (Luluding roof tear-oil; and disposal casu), in the event a ' manu6chuing defecx oaau~ during the first seven years fallowing installation. Certain7bed. ff o ers thLs confidently because Carriage House (~ is designed to be problem-Iz+ee. Q •r ~• '11te Carriage House R:u~ge of (:olors L'ruw'nshlne ;t;del~, BLick Soles Regions i ~ i • . '! s ;•I I ~ ~~I 7, .' Carriage House Shangle .lvailabili Caltrr Furth Ceutr;tl lake Central E;>st (;u:ut lirownsti>ne • • • Fieirlo,>m Sil~cr • • • Shenvnud Forest • • • 5t;ttely Black . • • titnne;;ate Gr;ty • • • Victr>rian Blue • • • • fit>Lr(;I;tss Based with a t;L•4tis i1 Fin Itc•sishua:e Rating Carriage House Product Specifications Fiber Glass Composition • I'. L, t;!'tssA Fire Retiistance • 15T41 Flt)4 ('lass,l ['ire Resistance • I' L. Wind Resistance Self-Sealing 115'131 DIlil) • f•ligll Tear Resistance cASTtiI I).7~i(,2) • Tµn full size, one piece h:rse shingles ~ four I;t}e'r coverage when applied) • On,Fnrms to BOlJ1 bnilclingcude rcyuin mencs W.uranty • I ,F.:rnu~ linnte,l wnrr:ulr)' .igainsl nt:undacRu"im~ „~ I~,'is. irantili:raiile ~itu•ul;{ thy: lirsr u'ven ti's :n•ti i'~,',• s:u•r:nlr, fnr,pa'rilic~Ictailsarnl linnrati~vrsl • ;;I~r~::;r,rt -im,rcctir,n cu'e.~;u'ruih, t+u~:~,rcilic• Lt,iils) L•„L i 'I": '~+ ...I '~l.P . ;9)~d,~ Clr ~ , a ~ ~ Icy I~. ',:L:~~ia. ~.~, . , ' ' a ..r"a.r ,'d l; ~ . ~ 1, ~ (:orpor:ue OIfice Consumer ticr~ice5 ~. .~! I I I The CertainTeed Roofing Collection ": Gecu;t;ian Brick Ileirlnum Silver Sherwrxxl Purest I„ri,tn (ilnc• Siunetiate Gray J ,i .~ :~~ ~~~ $ .' I W r~~ ~ ,d , I ~ Community Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 29, 200J 265 PACIFIC STREET TUSTIN PROPOSAL: The property is an "A" rated residential structure per the Tustin Historical Resources Survey. The proposed project is a new detached 824 square foot three-car garage that includes a workshop area and extra storage space. The proposed new garage will be constructed to match the existing home in terms of style, exterior wall material, exterior color, roof pitch, and roof materials. (Building Permit #C09-0349) In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adapted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed addition complies with the development standards for single family homes which include, but not limited to setbacks, lot coverage, open yard area, parking, and building height. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that the proposed project is a detached garage to be located to the rear of the existing single-family house structure. No changes to the existing residential structure are proposed. The new detached three-car garage is a single-story structure, with design and exterior materials to match the existing home and is designed to utilize the existing driveway, which is accessed from Third Street. As such, the proposed wark maintains the character and style of the existing structure. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings in that the design of the proposed garage matches and complements the exterior wall material, exterior color, roof pitch, and roof materials of the existing style of the house. The submitted sample materials board shows materials that are compatible with the existing residential structure in style and color. i(111 (..~~nicnnial VUaV, fri~tin, (.A'177;1(I • I': 171 11 ti73.ilUl1 • F~ 171 l1 ~'i-311 ~ • www.tustinca.c~rh BUILDING OUR FUTURE HoNOR1NG OUR PAST Certificate of Appropriateness 265Pacific Street October 21, 2009 The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. Any replacement or repair of any part of existing structure shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director \1Cot-secondlcdd-rdalCddIEDMELYNNE1Cert. of AppropriatnesslCert_Appropriate_265 Pacific St.doc Community Development Department CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 20, 2009 410 S. PACIFIC STREET TUSTIN PROPOSAL: The property is a "C" rated structure per the Tustin Historical Resources Survey. The proposed project is demolition of a 130 square foot, non- permitted garage conversion. The proposed project will restore the structure back to a two-car garage, install a side door, repair an existing block wall, and install utilities for washer and dryer hook-ups. The project will be constructed to match the existing home in terms of exterior wall material and exterior color. (Building Permit #C09-0377) In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20, 1988, by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny Certificates of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource District. The Community Development Department finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and any applicable design standards in that the proposed project meets zoning code requirements and would match the exterior colors and materials of the existing dwelling. The demolition work to the detached garage will remove the non-permitted garage extension, including kitchen facility, bath facility, and closet and bring the garage into code compliance. B. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the District in that the proposed project is located at the rear of the garage, behind an existing fence and gate, and is not visible from the public right-of--way. C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings in that the proposed project is a single-story addition and the new porch addition is proposed to match the existing structure in terms of exterior stucco, roof height, roof style and pitch and materials, and will not conflict with the architectural style of other surrounding structures. D. The structure is a hazard to public health and safety in that the non-permitted extension was constructed to be a studio-type residential unit with a kitchen, bathroom, closet, and is connected to the garage that was used as the living room area. Construction was done without the benefit of a building permit or inspections ~I)(1 (,~nlcnnl~rl W..iv, ~utitin. (,•~'~7i~{il • I' ~'I fl ~i ~ i If)fl • I 171 E1 5; 3 i I I i • www futitinc:,t.,,r~ BUILDING OUR rUTURE f-fONURING OUR PAST Certificate of Appropriateness 410 S. Pacific Street C09-0377 October 20, 2009 and full compliance with health and safety standards cannot be determined. The demolition work would remove only the non-permitted extension and restore the original garage. The proposed work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the start of any work, the applicant shall obtain a building permit and pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. 2. Any replacement or repair of any part of existing structure shall match the existing exterior materials, finish, and colors of the existing structure. ~~~~~~'' Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director 11Cot-second\cdd-rdalCddlE~MELYNNE1Cert. of AppropriatnesslCert Appropriate_410 S Pacific.doc - 1 i~~ ~"= rim - - .~ ~j ~Ll V ~., .` ~a .1r • (~ \ ~^ ~. -, (~ V ~J r . y: '~ / ~ f~ ~ti y ` '~, ~' N aJ '~ 'a ~~ `•• ~.,,• ,{ . ' . i- '.; ~. •M ,~~. -. •~ • .! M ' ri ti y . . . ,~ .:. .. ,- '•~' F -J: '~ ~ ~l `; ~ { , `t- V ' 0 r ~ . ~ .~ . . Y • f . • ~ ,. ~ `' ~ a r ~• ~.:.:® L. ~ ,`. '' ~~. ,~ ~ o O ~~~ ~ 1 .~-,f l • • • • • ~. ~ ~~ ~LJ~ i ~ ` ~' '~ "~. J ~ ,' `M111 ' '`J V r~'.~ ,~ ~~ .~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~:~. ~ • .. •a ~ '. ` .,,: , ` ', :~. ~ .~ .. ~ - . .~ . d ~... \ J 1 '~J • .,,~ ! 4 '• ` 1.' } . ~ ~; ~. ] , `` ~~ r'' `Cy 4-. r~ te l `` [_LI ~ ~K // r. . .. ` • ;, • ~. • N ~, ,1 ~ ~ f' • ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ , • ~ ~ . b v <J ~..' ~~` ~, , ~~ ;F -~-_. t _- - _ _ _ .__ _ _ _ __ .._ ~---- . - - ----- _ II II -I II ~, I~ r , ,-_'rl r II II I I I I I ~:-- I I I I c~-- II II II II I I I I r`~ I I I ~;AI~Ar E .~ ~-.~- ~ ~'J r ,,.,. ,,, r ,,,; / .,".. ,. .k --- --r'ZT1~1L- --- - _ r~~ ~~ PACIFIC AVENI.IE ~~ GARAC7t- 1 ~ 4 _ 1 \,l~' , ~~' 1 , l '~ - 3 i --- ~. ~ ~~~~ ~~ GARAC;E ~~ . i . . .. , ~ ~ ( l I , ~ ~} ~-- '~ . ~..~ . , ... :~- 1 7~7~~ ~ :.. ~_ i ~--- ~ I PACIFIC AVENI_lE I (;AFZAC ~ 1= 1/4» _ ,~, ~...