HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 01-10-94MINUTES
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 10, 1994
CALL TO ORDER:
7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
Present: Weil, Baker,
Stracker
Absent: None
Butler, Kasalek and
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
(Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not
on the agenda.)
At this time members of the public may address
the Commission regarding any items not on the
agenda and within the subject matter jurisdic-
tion of the Commission (NO action can be taken
off-agenda items unless authorized by law).
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY
MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS
LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR
REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING
CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO
ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL
NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALLMATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE
CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION
OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING
ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE
COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of the December 13, 1993 Planninq Commission meetinq.
Commissioner Baker asked if it was correct that Commissioner Weil
had no Commission Concerns at the December 13, 1993 meeting.
Commissioner Weil affirmed.
Kasalek moved, Butler seconded to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM CONSIDERED AT A
PUBLIC HEARING IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO
RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE
RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS
AGENDA, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED
TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE
PUBLIC HEARING.
2. Conditional Use Permit 93-018
APPLICANT/
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ROLLO S. PICKFORD, PASTOR
RED HILL LUTHERAN CHURCH
13200 RED HILL AVENUE
TUSTIN, CA 92680
13200 RED HILL AVENUE
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (P & I)
----T -1 tm 't -n---'
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 11), PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15311 OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
TO AUTHORIZE A NEW MONUMENT SIGN AND MODIFY THE
PARKING LOT AREAS OF THE RED HILL LUTHERAN CHURCH
FACILITY
Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit 93-018 by adopting Resolution No.
3225, as submitted or revised.
Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner
Staff added Conditions 2.4 and 2.5 to Resolution No. 3225, as
moved.
Commissioner Kasalek asked about the requirement limiting the
number of children in the Sunday School program.
Staff replied that the Sunday School program is operated
concurrently with the sanctuary use which has a certain number of
seats inside; that there is one parking space for every three seats
plus 15 spaces over the requirement; but they must limit their use
to one parking space per 8 children as required by the Code; that
there are now 40 children in the program and this requirement would
allow for approximately 100 children.
The Director stated that this was consistent with the parking
programs of other churches.
Commissioner Stracker stated that some churches have a drop-off
program for Sunday School children.
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:10 p.m.
David Baab, member of Red Hill Lutheran Church, stated that the
sanctuary occupancy is 581 seats, but approximately 200 attend, and
about 40 children attend the Sunday School program; that it would
be a problem if the sanctuary was filled each week, but it is
hardly ever full; and complimented staff on their involvement in
the project.
Commissioner Butler asked if they would relocate the sign.
Mr. Baab replied that it depended upon the costs involved.
Commissioner Baker stated that it was only difficult to see the
sign coming from Irvine; asked if they would be tearing down the
house adjacent to the church.
Mr. Baab replied that tearing down the house may be considered in
the future.
The Public Hearing was closed at 7:16 p.m.
Commissioner Kasalek asked if Public Works Department had any
concerns regarding visual clearance.
Staff replied that visual clearance was not a problem where it is
located now; and referred to Condition 4.1 regarding relocation and
dedication.
Commissioner Stracker asked when the dedication would be obtained.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 3
Staff replied that they hoped the applicant would relocate or
rebuild the sign at this time, but, if not, the City would take an
offer of dedication requiring them to remove it when the
irrevocable offer was called in.
Commissioner Butler moved, Baker seconded to approve Conditional
Use Permit 93-018 by adopting Resolution No. 3225 revised as
follows:
Opening paragraph, after "A NEW MONUMENT SIGN," insert "OR THE
RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN,"
I.A. after "a new monument sign" insert "or to relocate the
existing monument sign,"
Exhibit A, Page 2, Insert new items 2.3 through 2.6 to read as
follows:
"(4) 2.3
Submit for plan check complete plans for the monument
sign including the following:
a o
An elevation of the sign showing the dimensions of
the sign, the dimensions of the sign's supporting
members, the maximum and minimum height of the sign
above existing or proposed grade level, sign copy,
proposed lettering and background color.
b o
A dimensioned site plan showing the proposed
location of the sign in relation to the boundaries
of the lot upon which it is to be situated.
C o
A sign plan indicating the scope and structural
detail of the work to be done, including details of
all electrical and mechanical connections, supports
and footing and materials to be used.
(4)
2.4
In the event that the existing monument sign is relocated
to the proposed new monument sign location near the
northerly driveway, the existing monument sign shall be
reconstructed to meet the 1991 Uniform Building Code
requirements, and all requirements of the Tustin Sign
Code. Should the existing monument sign materials,
including the base or sign can, be damaged or worn, such
materials shall be replaced or repaired subject to the
approval of the Community Development.
(4)
2.5
Submit at plan check complete detailed landscaping and
irrigation plans for all landscaping areas consistent
with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation
Submittal Requirements. Provide summary table applying
indexing identification to plant material in their
actual location. The plan and table must list botanical
and common names, sizes, spacing, actual location and
quantity of the plant materials proposed. Show planting
and berming details, soil preparation, staking, etc. The
irrigation plan shall show location and control of
backflow prevention devices, pipe size, sprinkler type,
spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be
provided. Show all property lines on the landscaping and
irrigation plan, public right-of-ways area, sidewalk
widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. The
Department of Community Development may request minor
substitutions of plant materials during plan check. Note
on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping irriga-
I-'" i
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 4
(4) 2.6
tion materials is subject to field inspection at project
completion by the Department of Community Development.
Landscaping materials shall be provided on the westerly
elevation of the trash enclosure to adequately screen the
trash enclosure wall from the public right-of-way,
subject to the Director of the Community Development
Department's approval."
o
Conditional Use Permit 93-007, Design Review 93-003 and Use
Determination 93-006
APPLICANT/
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
TUSTIN,
WITNESSES
17521 ORANGE TREE LANE
TUSTIN, CA 92680
LOT 20, C AND D OF TRACT 13627
PLANNED COMMUNITY - EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY FACILITY
UNDERLYING MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
CALIFORNIA CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S
WITH
THIS PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS EIR (85-2)
FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.
AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT A CHURCH FACILITY,
MINISTER'S LIVING QUARTERS AND RELATED SITE
IMPROVEMENTS.
Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by
adopting Resolution No. 3220. 2. Approve Conditional Use Permit
93-007 and Design Review 93-003 by adopting Resolution No. 3221, as
submitted or revised.
Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner
Commissioner Kasalek referred to a typographical error on Page 12
of Exhibit A indicating a drive aisle off Patriot Way.
Staff changed, as moved.
Commissioner Stracker asked if it was reviewed as to whether there
would be any problems with fire vehicles entering and exiting
during a service; and noted that the left-turn pocket looked short.
Staff referred to the exhibit on Page 11; that the capacity was
56,300 vehicles; that they anticipated 15,000 vehicles and should
operate efficiently.
The Public Hearing was opened 7:22 p.m.
Mr. Bob Sharp, 732 S. Rosalind Drive, member of the congregation,
stated that he appreciated staff's work on the project and that it
was a fine report.
Mr. Chris Tolbert, minister from the congregation, stated that the
Kingdom Hall would be used by 150 members; that there are counsel-
ing rooms, but everyone gathers in the auditorium when the service
convenes; that there are no day care facilities, nor bingo.
Commissioner Weil commented that there were no kitchen facilities.
Mr. Tolbert affirmed and stated that they do not prepare food.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 5
Mr. Sharp referred to Page 3, stated that they would like to
construct the Hall in one weekend and asked if the quick build
program would be a problem since they are surrounded by the fire
station, an empty lot, and a proposed school site.
The Director replied that the condition referred to replicates the
Noise Ordinance; that work has been granted on weekends by the
Building Official, but since noise carries, the permit would be
revoked upon one complaint; and that they must request a weekend
work permit on the Friday afternoon before the work.
Commissioner Baker asked about Building Official inspections.
Mr. Sharp replied that they usually set up schedules and overtime
pay for inspectors.
The Director replied that the City policy allows weekend work that
does not require inspection; that this is an operational policy
that she does not recommend changing; and that the Building
Official is not allowed to work on weekends.
Commissioner Weil asked if the work is done off-site; and why the
work is done on weekends.
Mr. Sharp replied that some work is done off-site; that it is done
on weekends due to the availability of the workers who are usually
their own volunteer people.
The Director stated that the City has had numerous fast tract
projects, i.e. Micro Center.
Commissioner Stracker asked about exceptions if the applicant is
willing to pay extra.
The Director replied that they will accommodate early morning and
late afternoon call outs, but not weekends.
Mark Lahfdany, 3156 Foothill Blvd., La Crescenta, stated that there
is nothing in the Conditional Use Permit or Conditions of Approval
to preclude them from proceeding; that a Kingdom Hall used to take
12-15 months, but the Watchtower Society has organized a program
nationwide where Kingdom Halls are constructed by volunteers; that
there is nothing in 4.1 or 4.2 prohibiting the negotiation of an
agreed procedure with the Building Official; and asked if the CUP
would prohibit the Building Official from negotiating an agreement
on a case-by-case basis.
Commissioner Weil stated that City policy is not spelled out in a
CUP.
The Director replied that the Condition could not be altered to
modify the codified authorization for noise enforcement; that the
Building Official is assigned that authority; that it is open to
negotiation with the Building Official, but that the Building
Official cannot waiver from items that are prohibited; that a
determination has to be made as to whether work would be authorized
each weekend; and that the findings have to be made by Code
provision.
Mr. Lahfdany stated that the building site looks like any other
site, but is a very organized effort of labor in a short period of
time; that there might be 350-400 volunteers who are professionals
in their field, i.e. plumbers, roofers, electricians; that they do
not create a negative impact on a community. He continued with
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 6
asking for clarification of Condition 8.2 regarding water service
requirements.
The Director replied that water service is required for fire
suppression when framing.
Mr. Lahfdany stated that they have been paying property taxes for
three (3) years; that once a permit is issued for construction of
a religious facility, they can exercise their right to a tax-exempt
status and would like to secure a permit for construction in the
name of the owners.
The Director replied that the Orange County Fire Department is the
only authority over this condition.
Mr. Lahfdany asked the specific intent of the underground piping.
The Director replied that it is for on-site fire extinguishing
systems; that underground piping is required, and that the Fire
Department could reply as to how far onto the site it is required.
Mr. Lahfdany asked if this verbiage would be the same even if this
was not a Conditional Use Permit.
The Director replied that it is a standard condition for issuance
of a building permit.
Commissioner Weil asked how inspections would affect the building
if not allowed on weekends.
Mr. Lahfdany replied that there would be no work performed without
appropriate inspections; that if City inspectors are not available
on an off-hour paid basis, then they could offer to hire a State
Certified Building Inspector who would be on-site when the City
Official is not available; that there are only five (5) minor
inspections done on weekends, i.e., drywall nailing, lathing, ply-
wood nailing; that the major structural, plumbing, hydraulic fire
sprinkler tests, and electrical inspections would be done midweek.
The Director stated that the City does work with conditions where
the Building Official would agree to appoint a State Certified
Inspector that the applicant would pay for; that they do not use
City Inspector crews that are unsupervised; that there are overtime
and liability issues to consider.
Commissioner Butler asked if they work on Sundays.
Mr. Lahfdany replied that their schedule on Sundays is modified
with a break for religious services; gave a simple listing of their
schedule; that they work through the night painting the last
weekend; that noisy work would be done between 8:30 and 5:00.
Commissioner Weil asked for a definition of noisy work.
Mr. Lahfdan¥ replied that it was similar to a neighbor installing
a fence with 100 helpers.
Commissioner Butler asked when they would start.
Mr. Lahfdan¥ replied that they would like to begin as soon as
entitlement is expedited and build within this calendar year.
Commissioner Stracker asked how their maintenance is performed
after the project is built.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 7
Mr. Lahfdany replied that it is managed by the members of the
congregation on a volunteer basis; major maintenance is assisted by
his group, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York; and that
they are well maintained sites.
The Public Hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m.
Commissioner Stracker commented that a large issue for that area is
maintenance since it is a gateway to the City.
Commissioner Baker stated that it will be fascinating to see the
building constructed so quickly.
Commissioner Butler stated that he had a confidence in the Building
Inspectors and staff and that it will be done appropriately; and
wished them the best for the project.
Commissioner Baker moved, Kasalek seconded to approve the
Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution
No. 3220. Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Baker moved, Kasalek seconded to approve Conditional
Use Permit 93-007 and Design Review 93-003 by adopting Resolution
No. 3221, revised as follows:
Exhibit A - Initial Study, Page 12, Item 13, changed occurrences of
"Patriot Way" to "Pioneer Way".
Motion carried 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS:
City of Tustin General Plan Revision and Final Program
Environmental Impact Report
APPLICANT:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
CITY OF TUSTIN
300 CENTENNIAL WAY
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
92680
DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO.
92101104) -REVIEW PERIOD CLOSED
Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1. Recommend that the City Council certify Final Program
Environmental Impact Report 94-01. 2. Recommend approval to the
City Council of General Plan Amendment 94-01, updating all elements
of the Tustin Area General Plan with incorporation of the Errata to
General Plan documents.
Presentation: Rita Westfield, Assistant Director
Commissioner Kasalek noted housekeeping corrections on Page A-12
regarding energy use.
The Director responded that Page A-12 should read, "in the planning
area," since it reflects the development activity in the area.
The Assistant Director corrected Page A-12 of Exhibit A, as moved.
Commissioner Kasalek asked about Item 14 of Page 6 of the Errata.
The Director replied that originally 1537 units were reported by
the Marine Corps, but that the Headquarters of the Commander and
Assistant Commander had not been included, and must be added.
]-[!-I' I II --
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 8
Commissioner Kasalek asked if the corrections had been made in LU4
and the EIR.
The Assistant Director replied that everything will be corrected
including the final total number.
Thomas McCauley, speaking on behalf of the FCA,
permission to submit a letter from the Association.
asked for
Lois Bobak, City Attorney suggested that the letter be submitted to
staff for the City Council meeting next Monday; that she is
concerned about accepting additional evidence into the record since
the Public Hearing is closed.
Commissioner Butler asked if the letter should be identified as
received.
Lois Bobak stated that receipt of the letter has been recorded and
will be forwarded to the City Council; that the public record has
been closed offering no opportunity for other members of the public
to comment on the subject until the Public Hearing. She stated for
the record that a letter was received from Foothill Community
Association dated January 10, 1994, addressed to the chairperson of
the City Planning Commission and will be forwarded to the City
Council for their consideration on Monday, January 17, 1994.
Commissioner Stracker noted a typographical error in Condition 5.3-
5, and suggested changing "approves" to "process."
Staff made the correction, as moved.
Commissioner Stracker asked if it was usual to have a separate
Mitigation Monitoring Program as a separate document.
Commissioner Weil congratulated Cotton Beland on a good job; and
asked if larger section tabs could be included in the final
binding; and commented that the responses to comments in Section 9
of the EIR was easy to read due to the side by side comparison.
The Director affirmed.
Commissioner Butler moved, Stracker seconded to recommend that the
City Council certify Final Program Environmental Impact Report 94-
01 revised as follows:
Exhibit A, Page A-12, ENERGY/UTILITIES, delete first paragraph and
add the following:
"Siqnificant Effects - Implementation of the General Plan will
cause increases in the demand for electricity and natural gas.
Electrical use will increase by approximately nine percent in the
incorporated City of Tustin and 11 percent in the Planning Area.
Natural gas uses will increase by 27 percent in the Planning Area
and six percent in the unincorporated County area. Water service
infrastructure must be extended into presently vacant acres before
they are developed. Buildout of the General Plan will increase
daily water consumption by 27 percent in the Planning Area and two
percent in the unincorporated area."
Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Baker moved, Stracker seconded to recommend approval
to the City Council of General Plan Amendment 94-01, updating all
elements of the Tustin Area General Plan with incorporation of the
Errata to General Plan documents. Motion carried 5-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 9
NEW BUSINESS:
STAFF CONCERNS:
o
Report on actions taken at January 3, 1994 City Council
meetinq
Staff reported on the subject agenda.
Commissioner Butler asked for information regarding the video
camera program for the Police Department.
The Director replied that the cameras were funded by the asset
forfeiture funds and which could be used to expand the Police
Department's crime fighting capability.
Commissioner Kasalek asked for clarification of serious habitual
offender program.
The Director replied that a number of cities have a program identi-
fying any habitual offenders with photographs, categorization, and
keeping the pressure on to deter commission of further crimes; that
the Police Department will explore and report back to Councilman
Thomas; and that there are some civil rights issues involved.
Commissioner Weil asked if the Commission had any comments on the
information received regarding the Tustin Ranch Plaza.
Commissioner Butler asked for clarification of the Farmers' Market
licensing issue as proposed by Mayor Potts.
The Director replied that the Farmers' Market was approved; that
the current code interpretation requires each vendor to have a
business license; that Mayor Potts has requested a report of other
cities' means of handling business license fees for farmers
involved in the markets; and that it is not in the purview of the
Planning Commission's responsibility.
Commissioner Weil stated that as a small business operator in the
City, it is discriminatory against the rest of the City if the fee
is waived for special groups.
The Director suggested that comments be referred to Mayor Potts who
has been approached directly by the Farm Bureau.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Commissioner Butler
-Noted that he was glad that the General Plan was completed.
Commissioner Baker
-Thanked staff for the recent informative memos forwarded to
the Commission.
Commissioner Stracker
-Wished everyone a Happy New Year.
Commissioner Kasalek
-Inquired about the condition for the Black Angus parking; and
asked if there was a condition for one-way driving.
"-1-- - '1" IIII I I I
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1994
Page 10
Staff noted that there was but that there were different
timing thresholds identifying when certain items needed to be
completed. Staff will do an informational memo on the
thresholds.
-Thanked Kathy Beal, Code Enforcement Officer, for her follow-
up memos on code enforcement complaints.
-Complained about the poor quality of cable coverage on the
City Council meetings.
Staff will pass this issue on to the Public Works Department.
Commissioner Weil
-Inquired about a senate bill reference in letter to the
editor from Carol Bone.
Staff noted that they have reviewed the bill and have
interpreted differently. Staff will keep the Commission
informed of any changes and provide all Commissioners with a
copy of the bill.
-Inquired about Commission Stracker speaking before the City
Council as a "Commissioner" and not "a resident".
Staff noted that a Commissioner could speak as a private
citizen and also identify that they were a Planning
Commissioner. However, to represent the Commission, they need
concurrence of the Commission.
-Wished Lois Bobak, Deputy City Attorney,' a happy birthday.
ADJOURNMENT:
Commissioner Baker moved, Stracker seconded to adjourn the meeting
at 8:35 p.m. Motion carried 5-0.
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is on January
24, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 300
Centennial Way, Tustin.
~~athleen Clan~~-~
Secretary
Kathy We~lil
Chairperson