Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 10-25-93MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1993 CALL TO ORDER: 7:04 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: Present: Absent: Kasalek, Baker, Butler, Stracker and Weil None PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdic- tion of the Commission (NO action can be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the October 11, 1993 Planning Commission meetinq. 2. Final Tract Map 14669 APPLICANT/ OWNER: LOCATION: CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES 5 CIVIC PLAZA, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 LOT 8 OF TRACT 12870 ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL THIS PROJECT IS CONSIDERED MINISTERIALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15268(B) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AUTHORIZATION TO CREATE SIXTY NINE NUMBERED LOTS AND 20 LETTERED LOTS TO ACCOMMODATE 69 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3198 recommending to the City Council approval of Final Tract Map 14669. Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 2 3. Final Tract Map 14748 APPLICANT/ OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES 5 CIVIC PLAZA, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 A PORTION OF TRACT 14381 EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC RESIDENTIAL PLAN: MEDIUM DENSITY THIS PROJECT IS CONSIDERED MINISTERIALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15268(b) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AUTHORIZATION TO RECONFIGURE TENTATIVE TRACT 14381 BY ADDING 12 ADDITIONAL NUMBERED LOTS TO ACCOMMODATE 12 DWELLINGS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3199 recommending to the City Council approval of Final Tract Map 14748. Commissioner Baker moved, Weil seconded to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM CONSIDERED AT A PUBLIC HEARING IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS AGENDA, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. 4. Variance 93-010 APPLICANT: LAND OWNER: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: GARY McGILL 13682 NEWPORT AVENUE TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 PAT WELCH 17055 SOUTH PACIFIC AVENUE SUNSET BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90742 PLANNED COMMUNITY - COMMERCIAL (PC-C) DISTRICT THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. REDUCE THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FROM TEN SPACES TO SIX SPACES TO ACCOMMODATE A 30 SEAT RESTAURANT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13682 NEWPORT AVENUE. RECOMMENDATION Pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Weil asked if there were two exits from the building. Staff affirmed that there is one onto Andrews and one onto Newport. Commissioner Stracker asked if an agreement had been received from the car wash. Staff replied that she had not seen one, as yet. Commissioner Butler asked if there had been any input from the preschool. Staff replied negatively. Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 3 The Public Hearing opened at 7:06 p.m. Gary McGill, applicant, commented on the main points of the letter he delivered to staff last week: 12 spaces are physically available for the restaurant use plus 4 spaces off-site at the car wash for employees; that they have received a letter of interest from the car wash which would be legalized upon approval from the Commission; that he surveyed the morning drop-off at the preschool; that the preschool owner uses the parking lot 50% of the time; that the City Engineers have determined that backing onto Newport would not be a problem; that the owner of the adjacent office building would be submitting a letter of approval based upon parking signage that would be installed; that customers would not encroach upon Music Plus parking; gave instances of granting of variances based upon special privileges in the area; and referred to a manual by the Institute of Traffic Engineers regarding parking ratios. Commissioner Butler asked how deliveries were planned. Mr. McGill replied that they intended deliveries to occur once or twice per week to be scheduled at any time. Commissioner Stracker asked in which areas the applicant had developed bagel type restaurants in the past; and which graph the applicant was referring to from the ITE Manual. Mr. McGill replied that this was their first foray into the bagel business, but used to own Burger King's in San Gabriel Valley, Long John Silvers in the east and Denver, Pizza and Pogo's in the midwest and southeast, and his partner has owned Marie Calendar's, and mexican food franchises over the past 20 years; and that the graph was on Page 154 of the Second Edition of Parking Generation showing parking generation rates. Commissioner Butler asked if the applicant read and approved of the conditions of approval. Mr. McGill affirmed, unless there were technical problems. Commissioner Kasalek asked if he had considered removing the south wall of the restaurant for additional parking; and stated that a letter was received from Earl Flick Insurance indicating that there is an agreement if the applicant would provide signage. Mr. McGill replied that when the preschool's lease runs out in two years, the playground could be turned into parking, based upon a conversation with the owner. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:25 p.m. Commissioner Weil asked what recourse the City had if seating was increased in the future. Staff replied that code enforcement would eliminate all unpermitted seating. Commissioner Stracker asked staff about the possibility of widening Newport Avenue to six lanes in the future; and if staff was familiar with the graph presented by the applicant. Staff affirmed that widening was possible, and that traffic could be impeded; that the City uses a fourth generation graph which is different from the second generation; and would review the applicant's if necessary. Commissioner Butler asked Condition 2.2 was necessary. ---- --w- - · r Till] 1 .....'-TI-- ' "-T-' ' Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 4 The Director replied that this is a standard mitigation monztoring condition used on almost all parking variances in the City; that if there is a parking problem, there is adequate parking at the car wash which could be used upon agreement; that the monitoring measure is critical as a stopgap to correct problems as quickly as possible; that there are a number of options available. Commissioner Baker asked if there were any conditions of approval regarding the preschool lease agreement which may expire. Director replied that as long as the nursery school continued to operate they must retain seven parking spaces; that if the day care use goes away and the tenant space was no longer needed, the parking may be able to be expanded and the applicant could request more seats; and that there could be other potential uses with more intensive parking. Commissioner Baker commented that widening of Newport Avenue would cause problems at a number of locations and should not hold the widening against this applicant. Commissioner Stracker asked if the lack of a recommendation to deny was due to change in seating requirements. The Director replied that they received no clear recommendation from the Commission after the last meeting and were not prepared to make a recommendation for the record; any action would be the pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Baker stated that he likes to see businesses coming into the City; but there would not be one space used to three seats; and that this applicant wants to be in business to be successful. Commissioner Kasalek stated that she was in favor due to the reduced number of seats. Commissioner Stracker noted his concern about the lunchtime trade; that the use is fantastic but was concerned about the congestion at this location. Commissioner Weil agreed with both Commissioners Baker and Stracker; that she thinks the project will work; that the widening of Newport may be a problem, but the preschool parking may be available. Commissioner Butler stated that the applicant was showing an effort to cooperate with the neighbors; that improvement of the building is a benefit for the City; and asked for guidance from staff regarding setting a precedent. The Director replied that the parking provisions in the area are not relevant; and that every applicant uses examples to justify their project. Commissioner Baker moved, Butler seconded to approve Variance 93-010, a request to reduce the parking requirement from 10 spaces to six spaces to accommodate a 30 seat restaurant on the property located at 13682 Newport Avenue, revised as follows: Add to Page 2 of Resolution 3194A: The approval of this variance is made for the facts and evidence presented on this particular application and shall not constitute a precedent for purposes of consideration. Any future variance requests in the vicinity are under the same zoning category. Motion carried 4-1. (Commissioner Stracker was opposed.) Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 5 CITY OF TUSTIN GENERAL PLAN, DP~AFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM APPLICANT: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 92101104) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Open the public hearing on the proposed draft General Plan and draft Environmental Impact Report. 2. After testimony, close the public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report. The Public Hearing on the Draft General Plan was opened at 7:49 p.m. Jack Mallinckrodt, 14141 Stratton, representing the Foothills Community Association (FCA) president, stated that they learned that the City was extending the General Plan into the unincorporated area at a late date; that they agree with the wisdom but have concerns; that the area was almost completely developed at up to 3.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and that the General Plan calls for 7 du/ac; that the area was essentially fully developed; that the General Plan should preserve the integrity of the neighborhood; that the baseline designation should be changed to 3.5 du/ac; that the North Tustin Specific Plan (NTSP) was set up in 1981/82 to recognize a transition buffer zone with commercial being south of 17th Street and residential to the north; that this General Plan puts the area under the Planned Community designation removing all density requirements; recommended incorporating the NTSP into the General Plan as a control measure; that most of North Tustin was only made aware of inclusion into the plan within the last two weeks and has had no time to consider the Plan; and suggested that workshops be held to involve and inform this large disenfranchised group. Neil Harkelroad, 10562 Mira Vista, extended his comments on behalf of the FCA by stating that the "need for commercial services" indicated in the General Plan has not been shown on any document; that North Tustin relies on the City of Tustin and Orange; that they like being a bedroom community; that this Plan is inconsistent with the present NTSP; that the maps shown are not the same as in the books; that the open space at Newport and 17th Street is zoned residential and would have serious traffic problems as a retail center; that the area of the NTSP has been designated PC Residential with no upper limit on density as noted in Sub Note C; that this is a direct violation of State Law which states that the General Plan must state the maximum density permitted within each category of the Plan; that the consequences of the increased densities are not addressed within the report or the EIR; that there is only a simple statement on pg 2-14 of the EIR that there will be no increase in density; that the TUSD has offered for sale two school sites in North Tustin based upon the premise that there will be no growth anticipated. He continued with suggesting that North Tustin be removed from the General Plan; or delay the Plan until the community has been involved and problems and mitigation measures identified; or remove North Tustin from the General Plan for the present and include after community involvement. Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 6 Stephen Swytek, 14141 Brenan Way, Santa Ana, 92705, stated that he was only informed this past Saturday; that he loves the rural atmosphere of the neighborhood; that Page 3 of the General Plan refers to concerns given in response to the survey; that he echoed the comments of the previous speakers; that allowing up to 18 du/ac would have devastating consequences, with additional traffic and crime; that he would hate to have the zoning changed simply in the interest of facilitating high density development; asked that the Plan incorporate something that has been studied, or allow those who have just been notified to participate in a meaningful way. Dessa Schroeder, asked if consideration had been given to incorporating the NTSP into the General Plan. The Director responded by stating that a meeting could be scheduled to help representatives from the Foothill Community Association understand the factors involved in the General Plan; that the intent is to be compatible with the County General Plan and its provisions as it relates to density and land use character; that the map insert in the General Plan newsletter is the most current; that the density categories of the NTSP were used to calculate the dwelling unit and population density maximums that would be considered as part of the environmental analysis; that the maximum densities are not identified, only as a land use category; that the Planned Communities throughout the City have their own density ranges; that they have been aggregated based upon the actual ranges and densities allowed by those implementing documents and might not be apparent to the residents. Ms. Schroeder commented that as a member of the NTSP committee, they considered the impact on the adjacent property; that taking the aggregate amount will not reflect the impact; that some of the zone changes were contingent upon consolidating; and taken out of context you lose the intent of the NTSP; that the broad brush approach will not serve or preserve the area; that she strongly urged disengagement of the North Tustin area from the General Plan until a more adequate one was designed to serve their needs. The Director replied that with two exceptions, there are no changes to anything currently regulated in the NTSP or the unincorporated area outside of the NTSP; that staff would discuss the issues with the representatives of the North Tustin community. Mr. Mallinckrodt commented that the effective density areas do correctly reflect the existing zoning; but the issue is regarding consolidation of lots to the new standard, where the issue is maximum permitted density; and asked if the density was unlimited. The Director replied that the density was not unlimited; that the issues could easily be discussed; that the site at 17th and Newport is to remain as a Planned Community residential category as directed by the City Council; that the existing density is set at the current County designation; that the area south of 17th Street has been designated as commercial as regulated by the NTSP; that the General Plan is not a zoning document; that the City is required to include the Sphere of Influence; requested a point of contact from the group present. She continued with stating that there is no intent to change what is currently regulated at the County level or the maximum densities of the NTSP, based upon policy of the Tustin City Council. Gail Michelson, 14122 Brenan Way, Santa Ana, 92705, asked if letters were received from residents; stated that she was concerned that there was a blanket designation of the area between Irvine, 17th Street, Holt and Newport as PC Residential; that every Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 7 property is zoned for low-to medium density and that PC Residential is not in keeping due to being low-high density; that people moved in with the understanding that the area would be medium density; that she was concerned that the people were not notified; that she is a member of the NTAC board; that the change was never agendized; that it would be more appropriate to change the map to reflect the areas to keep low-medium density. Commissioner Weil commented on the fear being generated. Ms. Michelson replied that the fear was based upon the NTSP being nullified with annexation. Commissioner Weil stated that it was now more difficult to annex into the City; that the Commission and the City Council are aware that North Tustin wants to retain its lifestyle; that there has been a misunderstanding that the Planning Commission and Council want to change North Tustin; that State has mandated inclusion of the Sphere of Influence; that the well-publicized workshop was not attended by the public or school district; and that they have tried hard to take North Tustin's feelings into consideration. Commissioner Kasalek stated communication was needed. that a workshop with better Ms. Schroeder stated that they want to know that the Commission empathizes with their goals and needs; that they do not want the zoning changed; that there is no aggressive annexation move, now, but they were concerned about the future. Mr. Harkleroad stated that their letter stated that they were agreeable to having the Sphere of Influence in the General Plan, but that the North Tustin area needs to retain the existing zoning. Ms. Michelson stated that the area surrounding the area in question was still low-medium density, but their area was designated PC Residential. Niles Koines, 18022 Weston Place, Tustin, 92680, stated that the only zoning changed with the NTSP was along the busy streets, otherwise the zoning is E-4 due to traffic and noise; that the areas are all well maintained and should not consider changing zoning; that the PC zone allows any density; that the General Plan does not take into account the differences in density in the area; that planned communities in the area feature small lots and large public areas which is opposite of the County; that there is a market for that type of housing, but there is a market for large lots and the Commission should reconsider. Commissioner Kasalek stated that the General Plan is not intended to change the character or density of North Tustin, but that staff could meet with residents. Betty Koines, 18022 Weston Place, Tustin, 92680, stated that she was shocked to determine that her home was placed in a Planned Community area when other areas were not; that the unincorporated areas should get the same consideration that the Tustin residents received; quoted from the Plan regarding public notification and comment; that she was informed when the map was published in the Tustin News and that the residents of North Tustin were not notified at all; and that it requires more than working with the Foothills Communities Associations. Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 8 Commissioner Weil stated that the only difference between notification of the residents of the City and the County area was the use of the questionnaire. The Director replied that with exception of the responsible agencies and parties on a permanent mailing list, almost all required noticing has been in the form of a legal ad and an invitation; that each Tustin resident did not receive mailed noticing; that the same level of noticing was provided to County as City residents; that they have had specific response from other groups in North Tustin, including the NTAC. The County EMA has also been notified of progress on the General Plan. Commissioner Weil commented that the NTAC knew that the Sphere of Influence would be reviewed. Lois Bobak, City Attorney, requested the Director read portions of the General Plan for clarification of the Administrative Record to correct the misunderstanding that the Plan is intending to change the underlying zoning, which is not the case. The Director responded by reading page 37 and referring to page 44 and 48 and the Land Use Technical Memorandum; and she stated, based on the references, that whatever the NTSP identifies as the density is the density for the purposes of this General Plan. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:55 p.m. The Director stated that the Commission should instruct staff to meet with the representatives present before the Commission's next meeting. Commissioner Weil moved, Stracker seconded to open the public hearing and continue the public hearing to November 22. Motion carried 5-0. The Public Hearing on the Environmental Impact Report was opened at 8:57 p.m. The Director noted that all testimony on the General Plan could be noted for the EIR as well as part of the second EIR. Commissioner Baker moved, Weil seconded to close the public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report. Motion carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS: o Draft Amendments to City Code Section 9299, Office of the Zoninq Administrator An open discussion was held by the Commission regarding the necessity and duties of the Zoning Administrator with the following issues: - There are advantages to having five people review an application; - More information on zoning administrators in other cities was requested; - The position would be administrated by the Director; - That the Commission does not always feel user-friendly to applicants, but an individual might; - That there might be time and cost savings to applicants. - The Commission would be notified of all decisions of the Zoning Administrator; - There was concern from Commissioner Well about the Director's workload, objectivity, and position title; and Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 9 It was suggested that the Director assume the duties of the Zoning Administrator and that the whole ordinance itself have an 18 month period sunset clause; Commission would still like to see residential satellite dishes; Commission would still like to see temporary use permits. Commission provided direction related to the proposed amendments to Draft Ordinance No. 1116 with voting as follows: Section 1, Duties: 4-1 in favor of the Community Development Director acting as the Zoning Administrator. Commissioner Well being opposed. Section 1, Minor Adjustments: For minor adjustments to various development standards such as building setbacks, heights and parking. 4-1 in favor of the specified minor adjustments being handled by the Zoning Aclmlnistrator. Commissioner Stracker being opposed to the Zoning Administrator acting on minor height adjustments only. Section 2, Conditional Use Permits: 5-0 in favor of the specified Conditional Use Permits to be handled by the Zoning Administrator, with the exception that: 1) satellite dish antenna subject to a CUP continue to be handled by the Planning Commission; and 2) soil remediation activities should be handled by the Zoning Administrator when subject to a conditional use permit. Section 3, Specified Development Applications: 5-0 in favor of the specified development applications to be handled by the Zoning Administrator, with the exception that the Planning Co=m%ission continue to review Temporary Use Permits except for soil remediation activities that may be subject to a temporary use permit. 7. Status Report Received and filed NEW BUSINESS: 8. Desiqn Review 93-028 APPLICANT/ LANDOWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES 5 CIVIC PLAZA, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 ATTN: MR. WILLIAM MOORHOUS LOTS 20 OF TRACT 12870 MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - EAST TUSTIN THIS PROJECT IS DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN GATES FOR THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT 14784 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Design Review 93-028 by adopting Resolution No. 3200, as submitted or revised; Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 10 Commissioner Weil asked if the pedestrian gates were lockable; and Exhibit A refers to submittal 1.6 and asked if the applicant will not have to duplicate plans. Staff replied that it was not determined, but that the City Council allows for lockable pedestrian gates; and that they will have to revise all public improvement, street and landscaping plans to the affected areas and will become part of original document. Commissioner Stracker asked who was responsible for maintenance of the gates; and if action could be taken on disrepair through zoning enforcement. Staff replied that it was the responsibility of the homeowners association; and that problems would be handled through the Property Maintenance Ordinance, with Police and Fire Departments verifying that the gates are in working order. The Director stated that there are maintenance provisions in the CC&R's. Commissioner Butler moved, Baker (Weil) seconded to approve Design Review 93-028 by adopting Resolution No. 3200, as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. STAFF CONCERNS: o Report on actions taken at October 19, 1993 City Council meeting The Director reported on the subject agenda. Commissioner Kasalek asked about a meeting with Irvine to be held Tuesday. The Director replied that there was a meeting last week regarding the People Mover System. Commissioner Weil asked if there would be a public hearing regarding the bus shelters. The Director affirmed and commented that a workshop might be held in advance. Commissioner Stracker asked if the lighting was to be increased at the sports park. The Director replied additional lighting. that Councilman Saltarelli requested COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Butler -Asked staff to reiterate to the Foothill Communities Association that the City is not trying to encroach on them. He also indicated that he did not necessarily see the need for changes to the General Plan. Staff indicated that there are many groups in North Tustin but that they don't necessarily agree with one another. Staff also noted that the County will need to be involved in any meeting with the residents. Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Page 11 Commissioner Baker -Inquired about the status of the lights at the synagogue. Staff noted that the lights would be changed within the next 2 weeks. -Inquired about the Pinebrook Apartments at Nisson/Browning. Staff informed the Commission that the apartments were under Cal Trans' authority. Staff also noted that there will be a Cal Trans representative at the next Tustin Pride meeting. -Asked about the election of a new chairperson. Staff will agendize the election of a new chairperson for the next meeting. Commissioner Weil -Attended an AQMD meeting and found it to be very informative. Asked the Commission if they would be interested in receiving copies of the information she received. Commissioner Stracker -Informed everyone that he was currently attending the Transcon 2000. Staff noted that Doug Anderson of Engineering had written a very informative memorandum regarding the people mover and would circulate copies to the Commission. Commissioner Kasalek -Reported a code enforcement issue with the residence at 2321 Ana Tree. Staff noted that Kathy Beal, the Code Enforcement Officer, would be working during the weekend and will be given this complaint to follow-up on. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Baker moved, Butler seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is on November 8, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. Kate' Chairperson Secretary