Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 09-28-92MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: 7:01 p.m., Tustin Senior Center PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: Present: Absent: Baker, Kasalek, Stracker and Weil Butler PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the September 14, Planninq Commission meetinq. Commissioner Weil moved, Kasalek seconded to approve the Consent Calendar with the minutes revised as follows: Page 16, first line, change the word "tract" to "track". Motion carried 4-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit 92-031 and Sign Code Exception 92-006 APPLICANT: LAND OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: MUSIL PERKOWITZ RUTH, INC. 911 STUDEBAKER ROAD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90815 RREEF- IX INC. 1630 SOUTH SUNKIST, SUITE A ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92806 TUSTIN HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTER 1076-1222 IRVINE BOULEVARD RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-l) DISTRICT THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 11) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15311 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. (CEQA). Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 2 REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR TUSTIN AND A SIGN CODE EXCEPTION TO PERMIT STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING POLE SIGN. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission 1) approve Conditional Use Permit 92-031 by adopting Resolution No. 3093, as submitted or revised; 2) Provide direction to staff on the Sign Code Exception. Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner The Public Hearing was opened at 7:06 p.m. Larry Musil, Musil, Perkowitz and Ruth, 911 Studebaker Road, Long Beach, stated that they will replace the two (2) existing Ralph's signs with one (1) sign; that they are performing the remodeling voluntarily without use of Redevelopment funds; that they wish to dress up the pole sign and make wall signs more proportionate to the buildings; that no structural changes are proposed for the pole sign; that they cannot afford replacement of the pole sign due to economy; and requested extension of completion date to December 31, 1993 as noted in Item 1.6 of page 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No.3093. Commissioner Stracker asked if the pole sign is needed for financial reasons; and the cost of a new sign. Mr. Musil replied that the tenants want to retain the pole sign; that it is also for financial reasons; and it would require $20- 22,000 to replace it. Francine Riqhter 1262 Olwyn, stated that she was concerned with the new lighting proposed; that the neighbors dislike the pole sign, that it is a nuisance; that it is one of the only non-standard pole signs remaining; that two (2) years ago, the Planning Commission was intending to standardize pole sign heights, but now has been informed that this sign is grandfathered into the center; would like to see it lowered for modernization; and that she refuses to shop at Ralph's as a protest to the sign. Mr. Musil replied that there are no plans to modify the lighting; and that channel letters are intended for the building signs. Guy Riqhter, 1262 Olwyn, stated that the sign was installed in 1965 and has always been a mess; that the lights are on all night long; asked if the sign would become brighter; and asked why it cannot be lowered. Mr. Musil replied that the sign would be subdued with architectural features, but same wattage. The Director replied that the sign is not automatically grand- fathered; that the applicant is requesting a sign code exception to the non-conforming standard; that the applicant has the right to request a variance; and that staff is looking for direction from the Planning Commission on this matter. Vickie Dewey, RREEF Management Company, 1630 N. Sunkist, Anaheim, representing the owner of the center, stated that the variance is requested because the tenants like the sign and they are leasing the space; that they would like to keep the tenants happy and the neighbors; and that they are proposing to improve the sign. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 3 Commissioner Stracker suggested the Righters see the proposed design; asked if additional landscaping was proposed and requested representation from the applicant; and suggested it be conditioned. Staff replied that the applicant has been requested to provide additional landscaping. The Director responded that the Commission can propose conditions, but they need to be related to the request and that this is for a master sign plan; and that since it is unrelated, discouraged that approach. Mr. Musil replied that they plan on additional landscaping and to redo the existing. Commissioner Baker asked the intent of the tall trees that block the pole sign. Ms. Dewey replied that they are on City property. Commissioner Weil suggested that the applicant request trimming. The Director suggested that the request could be transmitted to Public Works. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:20 p.m. Commissioner Weil stated that she was on the Planning Commission in the early 1980's when the Commission gave the owner of the property an exception to the pole sign with the understanding that it would be lowered upon the next remodeling; that all other centers have complied and would like to see this center conform; that she agreed with larger signs on the facade. Commissioner Kasalek agreed and stated that it was out of balance with the City, even being higher than freeway signs; that monument signs are at driver's eye level; but agreed with the larger wall signs. Commissioner Stracker congratulated the applicants for voluntarily improving the center; stated that he would like additional landscaping; agreed that the pole sign should conform. Commissioner Baker asked the maximum pole sign height allowed. Staff replied that 20 feet was the maximum. Commissioner Baker replied that it would not be seen from blocks away; that they should be looking for the ability to attract people into the center; that the pole sign is difficult to see due to the trees; and that he agreed with the other Commissioners. The Director suggested that the items be separated; and that the Commission has the right to request modification of the pole sign. Commissioner Baker moved, Weil seconded to deny a Sign Code Exception to permit structural alterations to an existing pole sign. Motion carried 4-0. Commissioner Kasalek moved, Baker seconded to approve Conditional Use Permit 92-031 by adopting Resolution No. 3093 revised as follows: Exhibit A, Page 2, Item 1.6: December 31, 1993. change date of June 30, 1993 to Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 4 Insert Item 1.8 to read as follows: (5) 1.8 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 92-031 for the Master Sign Plan for Tustin Heights Shopping Center is contingent upon the requirement that the existing non-conforming sixty (60) foot pole sign on the subject site be brought into conformance with the City of Tustin's current Sign Code. No sign permits consistent with the new Master Sign Plan for the shopping center nor structural alterations to the facade of the shopping center shall be approved prior to one of the following conditions being met: a. The existing, non-conforming pole sign is removed; or b. A Conditional Use Permit for a new pole sign or modification of the existing pole sign is submitted and approved by the Planning Commission, authorizing a pole sign which meets all requirements of Tustin Sign Code Section 940462 including that the sign be compatible with the project design and not exceed twenty (20) feet in height and fifty (50) square feet in copy area (encompasses the extreme units of copy with any frame or trim forming an integral part of the display such as sign cabinet); or c. A monument center identification sign is installed which meets the requirement of Tustin Sign Code Section 9408. Motion carried 4-0. 3. Code Amendment 92-006 APPLICANT: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: THE IRVINE COMPANY 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, 6TH FLOOR NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 ATTENTION: MR. LARRY WILLIAMS CITYWIDE INDUSTRIAL (M) DISTRICTS A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AMEND THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO ALLOW SELF-STORAGE MINI WAREHOUSES IN THE INDUSTRIAL (M) DISTRICT, CITYWIDE Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No.3090; and 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of Code Amendment 92-006 allowing mini warehouses as permitted uses in the Industrial (M) District by adopting Resolution No.3091-A; or 3. Recommend to the City Council approval of Code Amendment 92-006 allowing mini warehouses as conditionally permitted uses in the Industrial (M) District by adopting Resolution No.3091- B, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Daniel Fox, Senior Planner Commissioner Weil asked if the staff was aware of any problems with code enforcement. Staff replied that there has been no recent code enforcement action. The Director responded that historically there has been a problem with PM located facilities, but not currently. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:32 p.m. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:33 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 5 Commissioner Stracker noted that traffic and fire department concerns have been a problem in the past in other cities; and that these uses should be continued as a Conditional Use Permit and brought before the Commission. Commissioner Weil disagreed, and stated that her personal experience indicates that they are well designed; that due to the hard economic times, she feels that staff should approve the applications, instead of charging a CUP fee; requested that the storage facilities allow storage only, and nothing like band rehearsal. Commissioner Kasalek stated that she was comfortable with staff's decisions and would maintain the quality needed for Tustin. Staff replied that it is implied in the use as a self-storage and mini-warehouse that no band rehearsal is allowed; and would be handled through the code enforcement process if needed; and that some facilities allow a caretakers unit, which would come to the Planning Commission for review. The Director suggested that a definition could be added to the use to eliminate confusion. Commissioner Baker asked if there was a parking problem at U-Haul which has storage units with parking outside and walking in; and that a CUP might be an appropriate mechanism for review. Staff replied that U-Haul is a commercial property which today's code would not allow; that it is a non-conforming use which cannot be expanded without a variance; and that some cities require a CUP in commercial districts, but allow in the industrial district. The Director suggested that this is an opportunity to identify this as a permitted use and add development standards; suggested re- opening the hearing to determine the applicant's time constraints. The Public Hearing was re-opened at 7:39 p.m. Larry Williams, Irvine Co. stated that they would not oppose the condition of a Conditional Use Permit for this type of use. Commissioner Baker outstanding. asked if the applicant had a project Mr. Williams replied that they have opportunities in the market place for that type of property; and would like to make the use an available opportunity. Commissioner Weil asked if there are other Industrial (M) Districts that could be affected. Staff replied that there is an area on Valencia towards Warner, an area east of the Barn Restaurant, and near Parkway Loop on the east side of Red Hill. Commissioner Stracker stated that he was confident with staff's decisions, but that these are the types of facilities that have problems and would like the items to come before the Planning Commission. Commissioner Weil moved, Stracker seconded to approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No.3090. Motion carried 4-0. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 6 Commissioner Weil moved, Stracker seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of Code Amendment 92-006 allowing mini warehouses as conditionally permitted uses in the Industrial (M) District by adopting Resolution No.3091- B, as submitted. Motion carried 4-0. 4. Code Amendment 92-007 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: CITY OF TUSTIN 15222 DEL AMO AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92680 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTENTION: MR. DANIEL FOX CITYWIDE C-1 (RETAIL COMMERCIAL), C-2 (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL), C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL), CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) AND M (INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICTS IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN PREPARED. AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ZONING CODE TO: 1. AUTHORIZE, AS A PERMITTED USE, OFF-SITE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES ESTABLISHMENTS WITH FLOOR AREA OF AT LEAST 15,00 SQUARE FEET; AND AUTHORIZE, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, OFF-SITE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES ESTABLISHMENTS WITH LESS THAT 15,000 SQUARE FEET. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 3088; and 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of Code Amendment 92-007 by adopting Resolution No. 3089, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Daniel Fox, Senior Planner Commissioner Baker asked if there was any further investigation made regarding the percentage of usage. The Director replied that the Commission could identify the percentage of square footage that would be allowed for alcoholic sales. Commissioner Weil asked who was noticed and if there was any response. Staff replied that an eighth (1/8) page display was placed in the newspaper only; and that no members of the public inquired. Commissioner Stracker asked for a clarification of the ABC requirements with a CUP application. Staff replied that Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) cannot issue a license until the City of Tustin approves the Conditional Use Permit; that the distance requirements require so many feet be satisfied before an application can be submitted; that a new supermarket or one that moves cannot apply for a license if within the restricted use areas; that the license could be transferred to the new owner; that code requirements do not allow issuance if distribution requirements are not met. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 7 Commissioner Kasalek asked if there was an option to allow the applications to be reviewed individually. Staff replied that it could be set up as a development standard subject to the variance process. The Director stated that findings would have to be provided for other than economic reasons. Staff commented that it would also be open to the small convenience market which staff needs discretion over. Commissioner Weil asked the City Attorney if this proposal would create discrimination. John Shaw, City Attorney, stated that there would be no legal problem due to the broad authority the courts give to creation of zoning classifications. Commissioner Stracker asked if this proposal would allow a store like Liquor Barn to open. Staff affirmed. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:51 p.m. Rob Balen, LSA Associates,1 Park Plaza, Irvine, representing DIHO Market at 11112 Walnut, stated that the owners are interested in the amendment passing so that the market can offer liquor for outside sales; that they were informed that the previous owner took the liquor license after they purchased the market; that the Code's prohibitions disallowed them to appeal; that their success as a full service market depends upon alcoholic beverage sales; that the center relies on foot traffic and benefits from a market; that they would be selling specialty beers and wines as well as food; that their clientele must go to other cities; and that the Code is overly restrictive and should be changed to reflect a more common sense approach to alcoholic beverage sales; and that they fully support the code amendment. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:56 p.m. Commissioner Weil provided a history of the ABC guidelines and took exception to the applicant's comment that the code is outmoded. She continued with stating that one of the reasons cited for the Los Angeles riots was the proliferation of alcoholic beverage stores; that she understands the size difference of small liquor stores and larger markets; that she understands it from an economic point of view; that she feels that the code could be adjusted to allow equal competition among equal size businesses; that the way the ordinance is set up, a store like Liquor Barn could open without a protest, and must be changed. Commissioner Baker suggested that where the primary purpose of the store is to sell other products with a limited amount of floor area for liquor products may be a way of conditioning the matter. The Director stated that that was a possible approach, and suggested continuing the item until the next meeting to allow staff to look at existing supermarkets so as not to create non-conforming situations; and to allow for analysis of their records. Commissioner Stracker suggested a certain square footage with a percentage of sales related to alcohol sales. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 8 The Director responded that it would be difficult to monitor; and that staff would provide information at the next meeting. Commissioner Weil stated that City Council is in favor of making this a workable situation; and that two (2) Council members are willing to work with two (2) Commission members. The Public Hearing was re-opened to continue the item at 8:03 p.m. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:04 p.m. Commissioner Weil moved, Kasalek seconded to continue the item to the October 12, 1992 Planning Commission meeting to allow staff the time to research existing alcoholic beverage sales establishments. Motion carried 4-0. 5. Conditional Use Permit 92-03 and Variance 92-007 APPLICANT: APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: PROPERTY OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: DR. VICTOR P. VALDEZ, JR., D.M.D. 18755 WINNWOOD LANE SANTA ANA, CA 92705 MR. TULLI0 VIGANO TARBELL REALTORS 128441 NEWPORT AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92680 MR. AND MRS. GORDON R. LAWRENCE 17421 LAURIE LANE TUSTIN, CA 92680 181, 183 and 185 EL CAMINO REAL CENTRAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) DISTRICT AND CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3) PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. 1. TO ESTABLISH PROFESSIONAL OFFICES WITHIN THE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) DISTRICT WHICH EXCEED 50% OF THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. TO ALLOW A VARIANCE FROM TUSTIN CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACE PROVIDED ON SITE FROM 19 SPACES TO 15 SPACES. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3094 approving Conditional Use Permit 92-032 and Variance 92-007, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Joann Perry, Associate Planner Commissioner Kasalek asked why parking would not be assigned; and was concerned that workers would utilize priority spaces. Staff replied that there are so few spaces needed that they did not want any business to monopolize a certain amount. The Public Hearing was opened at 8:06 p.m. Tullio Vigano, 12045 Arroyo, Santa Ana, Tarbell representing the applicant, introduced himself. Realtors, Commissioner Stracker asked who owned the property to the rear. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 9 Staff replied that it was possibly owned by the dry cleaners. Commissioner Baker asked for a clarification of the operatories needed and cleaning procedures. Mr. Vigano replied that they are requesting six (6) operatories; and that SB198 as adopted by OSHA requires each room to be disinfected after each use which takes approximately 30 minutes. Commissioner Baker asked if Dr. Valdez would be the only dentist; and noted that with six (6) operatories he would be capable of handling three (3) dentists plus a hygienist. The Director responded that Condition 3.4 restricts the maximum employees to four (4) including the dentist. Marissa Valdez, dentist's wife, 18755 Winnwood Lane, Santa Ana, stated that the employees would be (1) full-time dentist, (1) full- time front office person, herself, and Dr. Valdez; that he would be the only dentist and there is no additional hygienist; and that it was difficult to maintain the business with three (3) operatories due to the disinfecting procedures. Commissioner Weil noted that this was an expensive answer to the problem of disinfecting. Commissioner Stracker asked if Item 3.1 was reviewed regarding a parking demand study; what would trigger a study; and what other uses could be located in the center. The Director replied that a parking problem affecting either the off-site or on-site condition would trigger the study; that it would be identified by the Public Works Department and concurred by Community Development; and that it is a mechanism under CEQA monitoring to impose a condition requiring it be addressed with other alternatives. Staff replied that it is commercially zoned allowing a variety of retail establishments with a higher parking ratio. The Director stated that this is an appropriate location for office and support; that they brought in an economist for the RU/DAT report who identified this area as transitionary support area which should encourage uses for daytime employment providing support to the downtown retail core. Commissioner Kasalek asked about 20 minute curbing in the front and if there was an option to remove if more spaces are needed. The Director replied that limited time spaces are placed at the request of the property owner and removal could be requested by the property owner through the Public Works department; and that the process requires noticing of other tenants. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:16 p.m. Commissioner Stracker noted that the dental use would not be as significant as other uses if the newspaper moves. Commissioner Baker commented that hopefully the area would become fuller, as it is so vacant. Commissioner Kasalek was confident that the conditions would alleviate any parking problems. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 10 Commissioner Weil stated that she was comfortable with the proposal; and that a customer base is needed to create retail business in the downtown area. Commissioner Stracker suggested that a parking demand study be made if other uses move into the center. Commissioner Weil moved, Kasalek seconded to adopt Resolution No. 3094 approving Conditional Use Permit 92-032 and Variance 92-007, as submitted. Motion carried 4-0. OLD BUSINESS: 6. Status Reports Recommendation - Receive and file. Commissioner Weil asked if the report included Phase I information. Staff referred the Commissioner to Page 4. Commissioner Baker asked the difference on Shadowbrook. Staff replied that there is a reservation lot for drainage and a freeway overcrossing, and a potential for 16 more units. The subject report was received and filed. NEW BUSINESS: 7. Use Determination 92-002 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: MARTIN PRICE, PRESIDENT ELITE FINISH PRODUCTS, INC. 621 SOUTH B STREET, SUITE D TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 621 SOUTH B STREET, SUITE D PM (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL) THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 05) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15305 OF THE CALIFORNIA EQUALITY ACT (CEQA) REQUEST: TO DETERMINE THAT WHOLESALE BUILDING PRODUCT SHOWROOMS AND INTERIOR STORAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT ARE PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission determine by Minute Motion whether wholesale building product showrooms and interior storage for construction materials/equipment should be a permitted use within the Planned Industrial District. Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner Commissioner Kasalek asked how many shipments would be going out each week. Staff replied that the purchasers could take items upon purchase. Commissioner Weil asked if there would be storage of non-flammable construction equipment; and the hours of operation. Martin Price, Elite Finish Products, applicant, replied that there would be no finished wood; construction equipment would be saws, Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 11 wheelbarrows, etc.; hours of operation would be 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and that shipments are made approximately once every two weeks, with most material being delivered to the job. Commissioner Stracker asked about the type of trucking used for delivery; and if it would park on-site. Mr. Price replied that it was usually a pick-up flat bed or a bobtail (small semi) truck; and affirmed that there is enough room to unload at a large door at the rear of the building. Staff pointed out the site plan and traffic flow for the Commission. Commissioner Stracker moved, Weil seconded to determine by Minute Order that wholesale building product showrooms and interior storage for construction materials/equipment should be a permitted use within the Planned Industrial District. Motion carried 4-0. 8. Siqn Code Exception 92-005 APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: WATKINS COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES 17251 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE D TUSTIN, CA. 92680 ATTENTION: MR. BARRY WATKINS MICHAEL D. BROOMELL GEORGE A. BROOMELL 440 PACIFIC TUSTIN, CA. 92680 17245 SEVENTEENTH STREET CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT) THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 11) PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15311 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AN EXCEPTION TO SIGN CODE SECTION 9408(C) TO ALLOW FOR A COMBINED MONUMENT SIGN FOR INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION OF TWO BUSINESSES WITHIN ONE BUILDING, ONE OF WHICH HAS LESS THAN 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA; AND, 2. INCREASE THE COPY AREA FROM 32 SQUARE FEET TO 36 SQUARE FEET. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Sign Code Exception 92-005 by adopting Resolution No. 3092, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Anne Bonner, Associate Planner Commissioner Stracker asked how the sign corresponded with the real estate sign across the street. Staff replied that it would be of similar design. Barry Watkins, Tustin Properties, 17251 17th Street, Tustin, introduced himself to the Commission. Commissioner Kasalek moved, Stracker seconded to approve Sign Code Exception 92-005 by adopting Resolution No. 3092 as submitted. Motion carried 4-0. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1992 Page 12 STAFF CONCERNS: 9. Report on actions taken at September 21, 1992 City Council meeting Staff reported on the subject agenda. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Baker -Inquired about the seating of a new Chairman and Vice Chairman Staff answered that the item would be agendized for the next meeting. Commissioner Kasalek -Asked about the status of her inquiry on Walnut Street. Commissioner Weil -Informed staff that the parking standards are not adequate for an area on B Street. -Inquired about the date of receipt of a letter from an applicant and the timing of approval. Commissioner Stracker -Asked about the status of the Chevron station on Nisson. -Inquired about a property in the County area. -Asked staff for an update on the ETC in the near future. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Well moved, Baker seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:46 p.m. Motion carried 4-0. A Housing Set-Aside Workshop has been scheduled for 6:00 p.m. preceding the next Planning Commission meeting. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is on October 12, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. at the Tustin Senior Center, 200 South "C" Street, Tustin. -Mar] ~r i~Ka sallie]( -- ~-~ Chairmah-- ~ K~thleen Clancy Secretary