HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 APPROVE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR RAWLINGS RESERVOIR REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CIP 60136)• Agenda Item 9
,, .
AGENDA REPORT Reviewed:
City Manager
Finance Director ---
MEETING DATE: AUGUST 3, 2010
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: APPROVE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE RAWLINGS RESERVOIR
REPLACEMENT PROJECT CIP 60136
SUMMARY
Approval of the subject Consultant Services Agreement (CSA) will enable the City to move forward
with construction management services for the Rawlings Reservoir Project, CIP No. 60136, on a
phased approach. Each phase will be initiated by specific task order. This approach will allow the
construction management services to be controlled and phased in over time as funding becomes
available.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Consultant Services Agreement (CSA) with
Butier Engineering, Incorporated for construction management services for the Rawlings Reservoir
Replacement Project CIP No. 60136 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
Agreement on behalf of the City, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT
There are sufficient funds budgeted and appropriated in this Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Capital
Improvement Program for this initial phase of service. This initial phase will include a
constructability review, stakeholder coordination, and pre-bid services at an estimated value of
$113,900.
DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND
The Rawlings Reservoir, built in 1971, is located northwest of the intersection of Newport Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard. The original, rated storage capacity of the reservoir is 4.7 million gallons
(MG), but subsequent investigation has determined the actual, nominal storage capacity to be 4
MG. The reservoir is a partially buried, rectangular, concrete-lined, earthen reservoir, covered by a
timber and sheet metal roof. The reservoir provides storage for Zone 1 of the Tustin Water Service
Area. The reservoir is located upon land owned by the City of Tustin. However, the surrounding
area is unincorporated County of Orange. Single family residences are located to the north and
east of the reservoir site and Foothill High School is located directly across Foothill Boulevard to
the south.
The reservoir has exceeded its useful life and due to a number of significant structural deficiencies,
was taken off line in October 2004 and remains out of service. Construction documents for two
new 3 MG pre-stressed concrete reservoirs have been in preparation and are in the final stages of
completion. Prior to final approval, certain due-diligence construction management services,
namely pre-construction tasks are necessary. These services are typically performed by a
Construction Management Services
Rawlings Reservoir CIP No. 60136
August 3, 2010
Page 2
professional consultant exceptionally experienced in construction management, inspection, and
contract administration on projects of similar size and complexity.
Through a Request for Proposal for professional services, proposals were solicited from ten
qualified construction management firms. Seven proposals were received. The City's consultant
evaluation and selection process is based upon Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for
professional services. Based upon the proposals, familiarity and experience with the work
required, staff short listed the top four firms for an interview. Combined results of the interviews
and the proposals were used to select the top rated firm. It was determined that Butier
Engineering, Incorporated is the most qualified firm to provide the expected construction
management services for this project.
City staff negotiated with Butier Engineering, Inc. for the desired consulting services with services
to be performed on a task order basis, specific deliverables refined and man-hours adjusted to fit
the City's exact project needs. This approach will allow the construction management services to
be controlled and phased in over time as funding becomes available. Rates presented in the
proposal are fixed through June 2012. The projected task costs are estimates only and will be
refined as the project moves forward and the construction contractor baseline schedule is
determined.
Approval of the agreement is subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.
S. Stack, P.E.
of Public Works/City Engineer
Attachments: Location Exhibit
Consultant Services Agreement
`" /
r-
Dana R. Kasdan, P. .
Engineering Services Manager
S:\City Council Items\2010 Council Items\Approval of CSA for the CM services on Rawlings Reservoir_dss.dOCX
Z
LL
0
h-
U
t
N
O
Z
® J
~.
off/
~~
QC .
~~ ~
~~
yb~) v`~ 2
\O
~~~
V
~, y~
~b
'~bp
d~j~
N
~ O ~
H
Q
0 ~~
J ~~ o~ba s
~ti
~ ~P~
W ,~~,
~ \ O ~~
\~\ ~~ >>_
~~
~~
~ ~~,
~~
¢ ~
a
~ R~
a4 a'b
Q~
~P
Jv/
a
a_
~x
e-
0
0
x
a
M
0
co
O
U
w
Q
J
c~
z
J
Q
z
W
0
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES, is made and entered into
this _ day of 20_, by and between the CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal
corporation, hereafter referred to as "City", and Butier Engineering, Inc., a California
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City requires the services of a consultant to furnish the necessary
construction management services for the construction of the Rawlings Reservoir (CIP
No. 60136) hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and
WHEREAS, City has prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) dated February 24,
2009, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is by this reference
incorporated into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, in response to City's RFP, Consultant has submitted to City a
proposal dated March 31, 2009, which has been revised and updated after discussions
with the City. A copy of revised proposal dated July 19, 2010, is attached hereto marked
as Exhibit "B" and is by this reference incorporated into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to provide the necessary services for the
Project and desires to provide said services to City; and
WHEREAS, City desires to retain the services of Consultant for said Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration and upon the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
Section 1: Scone of Consultant's Services
Consultant shall pertorm all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory
to City, the services set forth in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, and pursuant to task orders issued by the City for
individual assignments.
1
Section 2: Order of Precedence
In the event of a conflict between or among any of the documents comprising this
Agreement, the following order of precedence shall govern the provision in question:
1. This Agreement
2. City's Request for Proposal (Exhibit "A")
3. Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit "B")
Section 3: Time for Completion
The time for completion of the work to be performed by Consultant is an essential
condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the work
of this Agreement according to reasonable schedules established by the City for various
items described and as outlined within Consultant's proposal. Consultant shall not be
accountable for delays in the progress of its work caused by any condition beyond its
control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant.
Section 4: Compensation
A. Consultant shall submit detailed invoices, based upon the actual work performed
pursuant to City issued task orders accompanied by backup documentation.
B. Progress payments for work completed shall be paid by City as the work
progresses, within thirty (30) days of the date of Consultant's invoice.
C. Consultant shall provide City with a monthly itemization of all work performed, and
the fees accrued thereon, in complete and sufficient detail to fully apprise City
thereof.
Section 5: Independent Contractor
Consultant's relationship to City in the performance of this Agreement is that of an
independent contractor. Consultant's personnel performing services under this
Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control and
shall be employees of Consultant and not employees of City. Consultant shall pay all
wages, salaries and other amounts due its employees in connection with this Agreement
and shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting them, such as social
security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, worker's compensation
and similar matters.
2
Section 6: Indemnification
Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City, its officers, agents,
employees, successors and assigns harmless from any loss, damage, injury, sickness,
death, or other claim made by any person and from all costs, expenses and charges
including attorney's fees caused by or arising out of Consultant's, its officers', agents',
subcontractors', or employees' negligent acts, negligent errors, or negligent omissions or
willful misconduct, or conduct for which the law imposes strict liability on Consultant in the
performance or failure to perform this Agreement.
Section 7: Insurance
A. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement
policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance (each of
which shall include property damage and bodily injury) and each with limits of at
least $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage per occurrence.
B. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement
a policy of professional liability insurance coverage with limits of at least
$1,000,000 combined single limit coverage per claim or per occurrence. If
Consultant provides claims made professional liability insurance, Consultant shall
also agree in writing either (1) to purchase tail insurance in the amount required by
this Agreement or to cover claims made within five (5) years of the completion of
Consultant's service under this Agreement, or (2) to maintain professional liability
insurance coverage with the same carrier, or with an equivalent carrier in the
amount required by this Agreement for at least five (5) years after completion of
Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant shall also provide
evidence to the City of the purchase of the required tail insurance or continuation
of the professional liability policy by executing the attached Letter Agreement on
Consultant's letterhead.
C. Consultant shall carry and pay for such workers' compensation insurance as is
required to fully protect Consultant and its employees under California Worker's
Compensation Insurance Law. The insurance company shall agree to waive all
rights of subrogation against the City for losses paid under the policy, which losses
arose from the work performed by the named insured.
D. Other applicable insurance requirements are: (1) Name the City, its officials and
employees as additional insured on the commercial general liability and
automobile liability insurance policies. (2) The insurance shall be issued by a
company authorized by the Insurance Department of the State of California and
rated A, VII (seven) or better (if an admitted carrier) or A-, X (ten) or better (if
offered by a surplus line broker), by the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide,
except that the City will accept workers' compensation insurance rated B-, VII
(seven) or better, or from the State Compensation fund. (3) The insurance shall
3
not be cancelled, except after thirty (30) days written prior notice to the City; and
(4) The commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance shall each
be primary as respects the City, and any other insurance maintained by the City
shall be in excess of this insurance and not contribute to it.
E. Upon execution of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City certificates of
insurance and insurer endorsements evidencing the required insurance. Insurer
endorsements (or a copy of the policy binder if applicable) shall be provided as
evidence of meeting the requirements of Subsections (1)(3) and (4) of Section 7D
above and the waiver of subrogation requirement in Section 7C above. If self-
insured for worker's compensation, Consultant shall submit to City a copy of its
certification of self-insurance issued by the Department of Industrial Relations.
Section 8: Termination of Aareement
A. City and Consultant shall each have the right to terminate any or all of the services
covered by this Agreement at any time or any reason by giving ten (10) business
days written advance notice to the other party.
B. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall be paid for services
rendered by the effective date of the termination.
C. Upon termination of this Agreement or completion of the Project, all documents
relating to the Project shall become the sole property of City. Should City
terminate this Agreement pursuant to subparagraph A. of this Section, Consultant
shall within ten (10) business days of receipt of notice of termination, provide City
with all documents within Consultant's possession relating to this Agreement and
the Project, including but not limited to all completed documents and all drafts of
uncompleted documents.
Section 9: Notice
Any notice allowed or required to be given shall be effective upon personal
delivery thereof, or upon depositing thereof in the United States Postal Service, certified
mail, upon receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To City: City of Tustin
Attn.: Douglas S. Stack, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780-3715
4
To Consultant: Butier Engineering, Inc.
Attn.: Mark M. Butier
17782E 17th Street, Suite 107
Tustin, CA 92780
Section 10: Miscellaneous Provisions
A. Consultant shall proceed immediately and diligently to perform the services
provided for in this Agreement upon receipt of notice from City to proceed
therewith.
B. No part of this Agreement may be assigned by Consultant without the prior written
approval of City.
C. This Agreement shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties
hereto.
D. Consultant shall perform all services required under this Agreement using that
degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions in similar
localities, and shall be responsible for all errors and omissions for services
performed by Consultant under the terms of this Agreement.
E. Consultant certifies that there shall be no discrimination against any employee
who is employed in the work covered by this Agreement, or against any
application of such employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, or national
origin including but not limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion
or transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, lay-off or termination, rate of
pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including
apprenticeship.
F. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with California Law. The
parties agree that the Orange County Superior Court is the exclusive venue for
any lawsuits by either party regarding this Agreement.
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties on the date
and year first above written.
"CITY"
CITY OF TUSTIN
By
Jerry Amante
Title Mavor
ATTEST:
Pamela Stoker, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Douglas C. Holland, Ciry Attorney
"CONSULTANT"
BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC.
By
Mark M. Butier
Title Vice President/CFO
S:\CSA & RFP\2010\Butier Eng. - CSA.docx
6
Consultant Services Agreement
Exhibit "A"
City's RFP
TUSTI[~1
CITY OF TUSTIN
I.I, ICY
Nl1Il DING (7lIR ftlfllRF
11UNURING OUR 1'A57
300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
for
Professional Consulting Services
for
Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair and
Replacement Project (CIP No. 6 136)
February 2009
PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS: Responses to the Request for Proposal (RFP) are to be submitted to:
Mr. Dana R. Kasdan, P.E.
Engineering Services Manager
Public Works Department
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
no later than 4:00 P. M. on March 31, 2009. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted in
a sealed envelope and marked: "Proposal for Construction Management Services for the
Rawlings Reservoir Repair and Replacement Project (CIP No. 6136)." Proposals received after
the specified time will not be accepted and will be returned unopened. Fees shall be
provided in a separate sealed envelope. Questions regarding this request will be limited to
written form and shall be submitted no later than 14 calendar days prior to the deadline for
proposal submission. Verbal inquiries will not be accepted. Questions shall be directed to Mr.
Dana R. Kasdan.
INDEX
i. Project Description 2
n. Schedule of Events 2
iu. Scope of Work 2
iv. Proposal Requirements 1 1
v. General Requirements 14
vi. Consultant Evaluation & Selection Process 16
vii. Administration Specifications 16
ATTACHMENTS
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 3G)
February 2009
Page 2
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This scope of services is to provide construction management and administration services for
the Rawlings Reservoir Repair and Replacement Project (CIP No. 6136). The existing Rawlings
reservoir is a four (4) million gallon hopper bottom reservoir located at 13331 Foothill
Boulevard. The City of Tustin has plans to replace the existing reservoir with two-three (3)
million gallon circular DYK-style reservoirs. The construction of the reservoirs will require a tie-
back retaining wall to be constructed during the excavation phase and after demolition of
the existing reservoir. The tie-backs will extend beyond the City's property and into an
adjacent property. The City will obtain a Temporary Construction Easement for the tie-back
retaining wall. The upper tie-backs will be de-tensioned and abandoned in place after the
concrete for the reservoir tanks has cured and prior to back filling for the tanks.
The reservoir is located upon land owned by the City of Tustin. However, the surrounding area
is unincorporated County of Orange. Residences are located to the north and east of the
project site and a high school is located across Foothill Boulevard to the south. Tetra Tech Inc.
is the design consultant. The following are the services and producibles anticipated for this
project.
II. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
2/24/09 Issuance of Request for Proposals
3/16/09 Deadline for written questions.
3/31 /09 Proposals due at Tustin City Hall by 4:00 P.M.
4/20/09-4/27/09 Anticipated interviews (est. date)
5/19/09 City Council Approval of Consultant Contract (est. date)
5/26/09 Issuance of notice-to-proceed (est. date)
III. SCOPE OF WORK
Although the City is attempting to identify the limits and services required, this should not
unnecessarily limit the consultant in the development of a scope it believes is necessary to
meet the City's goals and objectives:
1.0 Project Description: This scope of services is to provide construction management and
administration services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair and Replacement Project (CIP No.
6136). The existing Rawlings reservoir is a four (4) million gallon hopper bottom reservoir
located at 13331 Foothill Boulevard. The City of Tustin has plans to replace the existing
reservoir with two-three (3) million gallon circular DYK-style reservoirs. The construction of
the reservoirs will require atie-back retaining wall to be constructed during the excavation
phase and after demolition of the existing reservoir. The tie-backs will extend beyond the
City's property and into an adjacent property. The City will obtain a Temporary
Construction Easement for the tie-back retaining wall. The upper tie-backs will be de-
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 36)
February 2009
Page 3
tensioned and abandoned in place after the concrete for the reservoir tanks has cured
and prior to back filling for the tanks.
The reservoir is located upon land owned by the City of Tustin. However, the surrounding
area is unincorporated County of Orange. Residences are located to the north and east
of the project site and a high school is located across Foothill Boulevard to the south. Tetra
Tech Inc. is the design consultant. The following are the services and producibles
anticipated for this project.
2.0 Pre-Bid Services
2.1 Perform a constructability review and verify the Consultant's cost estimate on the
100% complete plans, specifications, and estimate.
2.2 Schedule, attend, and provide minutes of the pre-bid meeting.
2.3 Perform a thorough review of the project design and specifications to become
familiar with the project. Assist the City with bid protests, evaluating bids, and
contract negotiations.
2.4 Prepare the Construction Management Procedures Manual for the project.
2.5 Establish project filing and other record keeping systems.
2.6 Coordinate with the design consultant and City in preparing the "Conforming"
plans and specifications
3.0 Mobilization
3.1 Pre-Construction Meetina: Schedule, notify appropriate parties, and conduct an
initial pre-construction meeting with the Contractor. Prepare and distribute pre-
construction minutes to attendees and other parties. The pre-construction
meeting shall cover, as a minimum, the overall project objectives, responsibilities
of key personnel and agencies, schedules, schedule of values (bid breakdown),
communication protocol, procedures for handling submittals, correspondence,
utility relocations, local agency permit requirements, requests for clarification,
progress payments, change orders, liquidated damages, inspection
requirements, safety issues, emergency response requirements, as-built drawing
protocol, and other pertinent topics. Provide opportunities to have the
Contractor's questions answered. Collect from the Contractor the submittal
items required to be submitted at the pre-construction meeting.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 36)
February 2009
Page 4
4.0 Correspondence, Reports, and Other Project-Related Communication
4.1 Document Standards: Prepare project correspondence and other forms of
communication in accordance with industry standard document control and
management procedures.
4.2 Document/Tracking Control: Manage the receipt, logging, control, tracking, and
timely processing of project documents, including but not limited to
correspondence and project-related communications, technical documents,
shop drawings, calculations, RFI's, submittals, manuals, and samples received as
part of the construction process, non-compliance work to be completed, and
other tracking logs as requested.
4.3 Records: Maintain records of inspections, reports, and test results received from
the Contractor, Design Engineer, manufacturers, and others.
5.0 Site Conditions and Progress Visual Documentation
5.1 Pre-Construction Video: Coordinate and review the Contractor's videotape of
pre-construction site conditions prior to beginning any construction operation.
Confirm existing conditions within the limits of the work, in adjacent areas, and
along access and haul roads. Particular attention shall be given to residences
adjacent to the project site. The Contractor's documentation shall clearly depict
the pre-existing conditions of public and private improvements, including, but not
limited to structures, street, drainage, utilities, landscaping, and irrigation
improvements. Compare Contractor's pre-construction site surveys to the site
surveys performed under this scope of work. Note any discrepancies and resolve
issues. Describe in memorandum, submitted prior to the beginning of any
construction operation, pre-existing damage identified within the limits of work, in
adjacent areas, and along access and haul roads. Meet with owners of pre-
existing damage to document and confirm existing conditions. Document any
damage to public and private improvements incurred during construction
operations and meet with owners immediately following discovery of damage to
resolve repair requirements and responsibilities.
5.2 Progress and Other Photos: Maintain a digital photographic library of significant
construction activities. Include new piping and structures, relocated utilities, and
connections to existing facilities. Take additional photographs to document
differing site conditions, change order and claim items, and any special or
unique conditions as they arise. Incorporate photographs taken by others into
the overall photo documentation record of the project.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 6 136)
February 2009
Page 5
6.0 Meetings
b.l Weekly to Monthly Construction Progress Meetings: Schedule and conduct
construction progress meetings with the Contractor and the City. Provide
meeting agendas and discuss the schedule, near-term activities, clarifications
and problems which need resolution, coordination with other Contractors, status
of change orders, submittals and RFIs, safety issues, OSHA visits and citations, and
other topics. Identify action items and assign responsibility for the action and
date action is to be completed. Prepare minutes of the meetings and include
identified action items. Review the meeting minutes with the Contractor and
obtain the Contractor's concurrence with the content. Distribute the minutes to
the attendees within five calendar days of the meeting.
6.2 Other Meetings: Attend other construction-related meetings as requested by the
City.
7.0 Shop Drawing and Submittal Reviews
7.1 Submittal Reviews: Review each submittal received from the Contractor for
conformance with the requirements of the drawings and specifications. Check
each submittal against the Contractor's schedule for potential impacts.
Coordinate required reviews of submittals with the Design Engineer and the City.
Submittals of a general nature are to be reviewed and processed by the Design
Engineer. Distribute submittals to appropriate reviewers with dated transmittal
letters.
7.2 Submittal Lop and Status of Submittals: Log, track, and monitor shop drawings,
calculations, data samples, submittals, and manuals from the Contractor.
Update the submittal log as items are received and responses given. Prepare
weekly exception reports identifying outstanding submittals and reviews. Review
with the Contractor the status of submittals at the weekly construction meeting
using the submittal log and the master submittal list.
8.0 Plan and Specification Interpretation and Control
8.1 Requests for Information (RFI~ Coordinate the RFI log. Review and respond to
Contractor RFI's. Make every effort to review and provide appropriate response
to RFI's prior to involving the Design Engineer. Distribute RFI's to appropriate staff
and coordinate timely response. Review answers and prepare formal response
to Contractor within five calendar days of receipt of response, or as needed to
meet schedule requirements. Respond to Contractor in writing on questions
based on a reasonable review of the drawings and specifications for clarification
items. Record changes in the record specifications and plans.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 3G)
February 2009
Page 6
8.2 Reauests for Chances in Design: Review and respond to requests for design
revisions by the Contractor. Responses to requests for design revisions require
prior written approval from the City and/or Design Engineer. Revisions in design
may take the form of value engineering (VE) and shall require extensive research,
evaluation, and recommendation from the Design Engineer. Provide written
recommendations, as required.
8.3 Field Orders: Initiate and review field orders when a change in the work is needed
to maintain the design intent. Issue the field order to the Contractor and monitor
the work for compliance. Track the issued field orders in a log. Record the
changes in the record specifications and plans. If required, follow-up with a
change order within 14 calendar days of mutual agreement with Contractor on
pricing and conditions.
8.4 Substitution Requests: Coordinate evaluation of "or-equal" or product substitution
requests with the Design Engineer, the City, vendors, manufacturers, and others.
Prepare evaluation and recommendation for "or-equal" or product substitution
request.
8.5 Record Drawinas and Sgecifications• Update continually the plans and
specifications as the work progresses. Incorporate modifications and changes
from all sources, such as submittals, RFI's, VE, field orders, extra work, and
contract change orders. Compare the record drawings and specifications with
the Contractor's record drawings and specifications monthly.
9.0 Construction Management Administration and Staffing
9.1 Manaaement: Oversee, perform, and coordinate construction management
services as required by the progress of the work. Prepare reports, letters, and
memoranda; conduct meetings; monitor and track the expiration of insurance
requirements and obtain updated certificates from the Contractor (City to
process through Risk Management); coordinate subconsultants, testing, and
specialty services; review daily inspection notes and identify and resolve
nonconforming items; notify the City of significant problems and discrepancies
requiring corrective actions; interpret drawings, specifications, and reference
standards; review and analyze the Contractor's monthly construction schedule
for accuracy of work completed, reasonableness of forecasted completion, and
compliance with contract duration; resolve constructability problems; coordinate
connections and operations; prepare contract change orders; review and notify
the Contractor of test results; investigate claims; perform inspections; review the
Contractor's project record drawings periodically; review Contractor progress
payments and verify measured quantities; prepare project punch list; and all
other duties related to construction management as requested by the City.
CITY VF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 36)
February 2009
Page 7
10.0
11.0
9.2 Resolution of Day-to-Day Construction Issues: Oversee resolution of day-to-day
construction issues raised by the Contractor. Coordinate with the City, Design
Engineer, and Contractor on technical issues and concerns, as well as
interpretation of the design documents. Interface with the Design Engineer for
resolution of technical issues, processing of change order requests or design
changes to reflect actual conditions encountered in the field.
Progress Payments
10.1 Monthly Review: Conduct monthly schedule and progress payment meetings
with the Contractor and coordinate and update the record drawings at this
meeting. The result of the meetings shall be the monthly progress payment
estimate and updated baseline schedule. Coordinate the review of the
Contractor's monthly progress payment request with City staff and prepare a
recommendation stating the proper amount of payment. Use the Schedule of
Values and actual quantities installed as a basis for the recommendation.
10.2 Prepare detailed monthly progress reports for City staff.
Contract Change Order Management
11.1 Identify and Track Chances: Identify and track potential changes to the work.
Prepare, log, and monitor Contractor or City initiated changes to the work, extra
work, and contract change orders.
1 1.2 Requests for Cost Proposals: Request cost proposals from the Contractor for extra
work and negotiate final cost.
11.3 Justification of Extra Work or Chance: Prepare written justification and cost
estimates for each extra work or change item. Justification shall include a
statement of the extra work or change; background leading to issue; resolution
alternatives and resolution recommendation for action by the City.
1 1.4 Prepare Contract Chance Orders: Prepare and submit contract change orders
in the City's format to the City for written approval within seven calendar days of
the finalization of negotiations.
12.0 Claims Management
12.1 Identify and Track Claims: Identify, prepare, log, and monitor Contractor
potential claims. Report verbal and written claims immediately to the City.
Coordinate claims with the City's Project Manager, Risk Manager, and City
Attorney's Office.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 3G)
February 2009
Page 8
12.2 Resolution Alternative: Prepare written explanation of each claim with full
background of issues, proposed resolution alternatives, and resolution
recommendation for action.
12.3 Negotiate and Resolve Claims: Assist and support the City in resolving claims and
disputes, including written responses to Contractor and private parties, giving
depositions, assisting with dispute resolution, arbitration and litigation, serving as
an expert witness, investigating claims for damages by private sources, design
services for replacement of damaged work, and services made necessary by
Contractor default. Negotiate claims to an agreed conclusion.
12.4 Private Party Claims: Investigate claims for damages by private parties and
respond in writing within two calendar days of receipt of the claim. Coordinate
the written response with the City's Project Manager and Risk Manager.
13.0 Quality Assurance
13.1 Inspection of the Work: Provide inspections as necessary to ensure that materials
and workmanship are in compliance with the contract documents. Coordinate
delivery, inspect for defects or missing parts, and oversee recording the receipt
and storage of equipment. Inspect construction activities, which are identified in
the contract documents to be performed at night, weekends, and/or holidays.
13.2 Reports: Prepare reports of the construction activities including weather
conditions, Contractor's equipment and manpower, work performed, materials
used, site visitors, delays in work and reasons for the delays, and deficiencies.
Prepare reports of deviations and non-conformance to specifications and
provide responses in accordance with the project specification requirements.
13.3 Revisions to Contractor's Methods: Discuss appropriate revisions to the methods
and procedures used in performing the work. Inspectors may not authorize extra
work or approve of work that deviates from the contract documents. Any
deviations must be authorized through the RFI process.
13.4 Deviations in the Work: Advise the City's Project Manager and the Contractor of
deviations in the work and document any deviations. Record deviations that are
not corrected and immediately deliver a Notice of Non-Compliance to the
Contractor. Perform necessary follow-up to resolve Notices of Non-Compliance.
Include unresolved Notices of Non-Compliance on substantial completion punch
lists.
13.5 Pipeline Shutdowns: Coordinate necessary pipeline shutdowns, with City Water
Services staff, to complete connections to existing facilities.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. C 136)
February 2009
Page 9
14.0 Geotechnical Engineering and Material Testing Services
14.1 General Requirements: Provide geotechnical engineering and material testing
services. Engineer shall show competency with tie-back design and construction.
Schedule sampling, material testing, and laboratory services in accordance with
the methods prescribed in current standards of the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM). The standards shall be applicable to the class and nature
of the articles or materials under review unless otherwise stipulated in the project
specifications, or authorized in writing by the City.
15.0 Landscape and Revegetation Inspection
15.1 General Requirements: Verify in conjunction with the City's Maintenance
Supervisor that inspection, sampling, and testing of landscape, irrigation, and
revegetation systems to ensure contract compliance of all work and the
establishment of all planting to the standards, quality, and density detailed in the
contract documents.
15.2 Landscape Inspection and Testing Verify inspections and testing of irrigation
systems for proper placement, installation, bedding and backfill, leakage, and
coverage. System components to be inspected will include but not be limited to
mainline and lateral irrigation pipe, valve manifold assemblies, backflow devices,
quick couplers, and irrigation equipment. Receive and review all soil report data
and soil amendment and fertilizer slips for conformance with contract
documents.
16.0 Startup, Closeout, and Acceptance Services
16.1 Operation Testing Plan: The operational testing plan shall be developed in
consultation with the City, Design Engineer, Contractor, and all appropriate
vendors. Review and recommend the operational testing plan. Coordinate the
testing of the equipment and facilities with the City, and assist Contractor's
personnel as required during the startup phase.
16.2 Punch List: Prepare detailed project punchlists at substantial completion of the
project. Upon correction of deficiencies, schedule, coordinate, and conduct a
final walk-through prior to the acceptance of work with the City and other
parties. Provide certification of Contractor's compliance on work items
specifically requested by the City. Verify that work, testing, cleanup, and
Contractor demobilization are complete.
16.3 Final Walk-Through: Schedule, coordinate, and conduct a final walk-through and
project review prior to the acceptance of work with the City.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RPP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. C 136)
February 2009
Page 10
16.4 Recommended Acceptance: Recommend acceptance of the work in writing in
preparation for issuance of the Notice of Completion.
16.5 Closina Out Contract: Take the lead in negotiating and closing out the
construction contract. Prepare the memorandum to the City recommending
acceptance of the project and filing of the Notice of Completion.
16.6 Final Project Records and Documents: These records must be turned over fo the
City upon completion of the project
17.0 Post Construction
17.1 Operations and Maintenance Materials: Deliver the Operations and
Maintenance Manuals and any spare parts and equipment upon acceptance of
the project by the City. The operations and maintenance manuals shall include
but not be limited to all piping and electrical conduit runs, including wiring
diagrams and PID's sufficient for facilitating the troubleshooting process;
technical data concerning corrosion control, mechanical, electrical and control
equipment installed by the Contractor, plus supplemental information clarifying
the intended operation mode of the facility as an integral part of the distribution
system; manufacturer's recommendations concerning equipment and facility
maintenance protocols; and data and maintenance instructions regarding
special architectural, engineering, or other unique features provided or used in
the project construction. The manuals shall be submitted to the City for review
and approval prior to operating any new equipment and/or facilities and
accepting the construction contract work.
17.2 Record Drawings Certification: Review and certify that the Contractor's project
record drawings are complete and accurate. Provide the drawings to the
Design Engineer.
17.3 Final Payment: Recommend final payment in the form of release of retention to
the Contractor in accordance with contract requirements. Verify that the
Contractor has made all payments to the subcontractors and vendors and that
any stop notices or liens have been released. Obtain a Conditional Waiver of
Lien from the Contractor prior to recommending final payment.
18.0 Extended Services
18.1 Extended Services: Provide other miscellaneous specialty services as required
during construction. Miscellaneous specialty services, which may be required,
include but are not limited to: mechanical, electrical, structural, and civil
supplemental engineering design; witness testing; factory inspections; and noise
and air quality monitoring services.
CITY OF TU$TIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 3G)
February 2()09
Page 11
18.2 Warranty Period Services• Provide engineering, technical support and
administrative services during the warranty phase of the project (the one year
period after the recording of the Notice of Completion). Services shall include
but not be limited to: an eleven (1 1) month walk-through of the project/project
site to identify items requiring warranty attention and compile warranty
information including Contractor's contact information and provide to the City
for coordination of all warranty repair work.
18.3 Construction Quality Control Survev Services• Provide necessary construction
field survey to verify the Contractor's survey for the proposed improvements. The
CM firm will be required to have a California licensed Land Surveyor as part of
the CM team to perform these services.
18.4 Public Relation/Community Outreach• Assist the City's Communications
Manager and project management staff in developing a comprehensive
community outreach program that provides information for residents, businesses,
and others impacted by the project. Outreach activities may include but not be
limited to: technical assistance to City staff at community meetings,
presentations, and open houses; periodic construction updates to the
Communications Manager for inclusion on the City website and/or City Scene
newsletter; construction alerts to the Communications Manager and project
management staff; and resolution of construction-related concerns from
affected City customers and/or the general public.
IV. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Although the City requires no specific format, this section is intended to provide guidelines to
the consultant regarding features that the City will look for and expect to be included in the
proposal.
1. Content & Format
The City requests that proposals submitted be organized and presented in a neat
and logical format and are relevant to these services. Consultant's proposals shall
be clear, accurate, and comprehensive. Excessive or irrelevant material will not be
favorably received.
Proposals shall contain no more than 15 typed pages using a 10 point minimum font
size, including transmittal/offer letter and resumes of key people, but excluding
Index/Table of Contents, tables, charts, and graphic exhibits. The purpose of these
restrictions is to minimize the costs of proposal preparation and to ensure that the
response to the RFP is fully relevant to the project.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. C 13G)
February 2009
Page 12
The proposal should include the following:
• Transmittal/offer letter.
• Page numbering.
• Index/Table of Contents.
• Approach.
• Team Organization including an organization diagram and time commitment
of key staff.
• Statement of Qualifications including descriptions of similar projects by key
staff to be assigned during the term of the contract.
• Brief resumes of key staff.
• Schedule of Hourly Rates and fees in a separate sealed envelope.
2. Approach
A description of the firm's approach and work program to meet the city's
objectives shall be included. It should explain the technical approach,
methodology, and specific tasks and activities that will be performed to address the
specific issues and work items.
3. Team Organization
The purpose of this section is to describe the organization of the project team
including subconsultants and key staff. A project manager and an alternate
project manager shall be named who shall be the prime contact and be
responsible for coordinating all activities with the City. An organization diagram
shall be submitted showing all key team members and illustrating the relationship
between the City, the project manager, key staff, and subconsultants. There also
should be a brief description of the role and responsibilities of all key staff and
subconsultants identified in the team organization.
4. Statement of Qualifications
The information provided in this section should describe the qualifications of the firm
and key staff in performing projects within the past five years that are similar in
scope and size to demonstrate competence to perform these services. The
projects listed should be those that the key staff named for this project were
responsible for performing. Information shall include:
• Names of key staff that participated on named projects and their specific
responsibilities.
• The client's name, contact person, addresses, and telephone numbers.
• A brief description of type and extent of services provided.
• Completion dates (estimated, if not yet completed).
• Total costs of the projects.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 6 136)
February 2009
Page 13
There should be included in the section brief resumes of key personnel who will
provide these services demonstrating their qualifications and experience. Resumes
should highlight education, relevant experience, licenses, and specific
responsibilities for services described.
5. Fee Proposal
Compensation for services provided shall be based upon the consultant's detailed
fee proposal to furnish the services detailed in their proposal.
A Fee Proposal shall be submitted in a separate, sealed envelope and marked as
"Fee Proposal" along with the name of the project.
A work program together with a breakdown of labor hours by employee billing
classification together with the cost of non-labor and subconsultant services shall be
included with the fee proposal. The labor breakdown shall be compiled based
upon a listing of work tasks that correlates with the consultant's defined scope of
work for the project proposal. This information will be used by the City staff to
evaluate the reasonableness of the fee proposal and may be used in negotiating
the final fee amounts for the contract agreement.
The fee proposal of the three top ranked consultants will be opened at the
conclusion of the consultant evaluation and selection process. Fees will not be
used to determine the ranking of the consultants. The Fee Proposals of those
consultants not ranked in the top three will be returned to them unopened upon
award of contract to the selected consultant.
The City will negotiate the final fee with the top ranked consultant.
Reimbursable expenses shall not be allowed unless negotiated prior to a contract.
Price escalations during the contract term are disfavored and will not be allowed
unless negotiated prior to execution of contract.
Although no public meetings are anticipated, the fee proposal shall include a unit
cost for a public meeting (eg, $/public meeting) in the event a meeting will be
required.
The consultant shall prepare progress billings, reflective of the project schedule and
the scope of work completed, by line item and description.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 61 36)
February 2009
Page 14
6. Statement of Offer & Signature
The Proposal shall contain a statement that the proposals are a firm offer fora 90-
day period and signed by an individual authorized to act on behalf of the firm.
V.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
I . Insurance Requirements
The consultant shall furnish with the proposal proof of the following minimum
insurance coverage. These minimum levels of coverage are required to be
maintained for the duration of the project:
A. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage - $2,000,000 per occurrence
for bodily injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general limit is used, either the general aggregate
limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit
shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
8. Professional Liability Coverage - $2,000,000 per occurrence (note: A "claims
made" policy is acceptable). If consultant provides "claims made" coverage,
consultant shall also agree in writing to either:
i. Purchase Tail Insurance in the amount required by the resulting
agreement to cover claims made within five years of completion of
consultant's services under the agreement.
ii. Maintain professional liability insurance coverage with the same carrier, or
with an equivalent carrier in the amount required by the resulting
agreement five years after completion of consultant's services under this
agreement.
The consultant shall provide written evidence of either form by executing the
attached letter agreement (Attachment B) on consultant letterhead.
C. Worker's Compensation Coverage -State statutory limits.
Deductibles, Self-Insurance Retentions, or Similar Forms of Coverage Limitations or
Modifications, must be declared to and approved by the City of Tustin.
The consultant is encouraged to contact its insurance carriers during the proposal
stage to ensure that the insurance requirements can be met if selected for
negotiation of a contract agreement. The City shall be named as Additional Insured
and no oolicv may be modified or cancelled prior to thirty (301 days written notice
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 6 136)
February 2009
Page 15
Certificates of insurance and insurer endorsements evidencing the required
insurance shall be provided.
2. Standard form of Agreement
The consultant will enter into an agreement with the City based upon the contents
of the RFP and the consultant's proposal. The City's standard form of agreement is
included as Attachment A. The consultant shall carefully review the agreement,
and include with the proposal a description of any exceptions requested to the
standard contract. If there are no exceptions, a statement to that effect shall be
included in the proposal.
3. Disclaimer
This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract, or to pay any costs incurred
in the preparation of the proposal. The City reserves the right to extend the due
date for the proposal, to accept or reject any or all proposals received as a result of
this request, to negotiate with any qualified consultant, or to cancel this RFP in part
or in its entirety. The City may require the selected consultant to participate in
negotiations and to submit such technical, fee, or other revisions of their proposals
as may result from negotiations.
4. Assigned Representatives
The City will assign a responsible representative to administer the contract, and to
assist the consultant in obtaining information. The consultant also shall assign a
responsible representative (project manager) and an alternate, who shall be
identified in the proposal. The consultant's representative will remain in responsible
charge of the consultant's duties from the notice-to-proceed through project
completion. If the consultant's primary representative should be unable to
continue with the project, then the alternate representative identified in the
proposal shall become the project manager. The City's representative shall first
approve any substitution of representatives or subconsultants identified in the
proposal in writing. The City reserves the right to review and approve/disapprove all
key staff and subconsultant substitution or removal, and may consider such
changes not approved to be a breach of contract.
5. City Business License
A city business license will be required of the consultant and any subconsultants for
services under this agreement.
CITY OF TUSTIN
RFP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. C 136)
February 2009
Page 16
VI. CONSULTANT EVALUATION & SELECTION PROCESS
The City's consultant evaluation and selection process is based upon Qualifications Based
Selection (QBS) for professional services. The following criteria will be used in evaluating the
proposals using a point value system (100 points) based upon the weighting indicated below:
1. Approach and work plan to achieve specified city objectives. (25 points)
2. Qualifications and experience of the project manager and other key individuals. (40
points)
3. Results of reference checks. (15 points) Reference checks will only be conducted
for a short list of firms or the top rated firm.
4. Clarity of proposal. (10 points)
5. Compliance with proposal requirements including the 15 page limitation. (10 points)
The City may elect to interview a short list of qualified firms or to interview only the top rated
firm based upon the proposals submitted for the project.
City staff will negotiate a contract with the best qualified firm for the desired consulting
services. Should City staff be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the firm
considered to be the most qualified, negotiations with that firm shall be formally terminated.
Negotiations will then be undertaken with the next most qualified firm. Failing accord with the
second most qualified firm, the City staff will terminate negotiations and continue the
negotiation process with the next most qualified firms in order of their evaluation ranking until
an agreement is reached and a firm is selected and an agreement is executed.
Additional information related to the consultant selection process will be made available in
the future once the City has executed this contract. Please refrain from making any verbal
inquires or requests for a formal debriefing related to the subject RFP until the City of Tustin
completes the ongoing contract process.
VII. ADMINISTRATION SPECIFICATIONS
A. The City of Tustin's Rights to Proposals
All proposals, upon submission to the City of Tustin shall become its property for use as
deemed appropriate. By submitting a proposal, the offer covenants not to make any
claim for or have any right to damages because of any misinterpretation or
misunderstanding of the specification, or because of any misinformation or lack of
information. The City of Tustin has the following prerogatives with regard to proposals
submitted:
- to accept or reject any or all proposals;
- to correct any arithmetic errors in any or all proposals submitted;
- to utilize any or all the ideas from proposals submitted;
- to change the proposal's due date upon appropriate notification;
CITY OF TUSTIN
RPP for Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir Repair
and Replacement Project (CIP No. 6 136)
February 2009
Page 17
- to adopt any or all of an offeror's proposal; and
- to negotiate modifications to the scope and fee with selected offeror prior to
contract award.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A --- Sample Consultant Services Agreement
Attachment B --- Letter Agreement
Attachment C --- Location Map
Consultant Services Agreement
Exhibit "B"
Consultant Proposal
E
t
~, ,
.,,,..~.,,~~«,,~..,„T~
3 l~' a.' ~ nl'd'~'F s-h#
.a ~
'~x.F ~w V ~S'%,' 4 .~., ! .S.§*}~` "w+~, qty,
., „i....~..~ _...,.,_ G7 f##1144Y:f11ii4sv+ . e `"~r~~b ~&A 3ke`
~,
C17Y C7FTUSTIi~
~,~ r IrE;c't+t>t ~ h1.3rt~o: fr,c~'rt Srl ,lt Eas frat ~ tin
Rar~tr`ngs R~servc~rr Reparr ~rr~d R~pl~cem~f~t Pra,~~et _~~ ~ ~ .. ::~«~~:~-~_•~^^-°
(Clf' IVv. 6136 "~
T
*Per the RFP lnstructlans, the Fee l~rapasa! has been pravlde !n a separate sealed envelap
~f~ axe v%,` t„t
July 19, 20107
Nir. Dana R. Kasdan, P.E.
EngineeringServires tY€anager
PuP~iic Worhs Department
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Wav
Tustin, California 92780
Subject: Updated i~ropasal for Professional Consulting Services far Construction Nianagerrsent Services far the
Rawlings Reservoir Repair and Replacement Project (GiP No. 613~j
Dear Mr. Kascian:
8ttutier Engineering, [Inc. is pleals(ed to scabmit f[o~ ur {4j c~~o} pies of its proposal land one copy of its fee proposal far the
$'l cl~,~'itr)gi r-~~s}~ vt}Er Fll.%rJC~}C P+~:A 1i G~~?$Ct s,.E:~li $': n~ C"rtJ~~'..i. [.J~jT.$er J ti Y'tl~..JKif,Ft $.-°.:1 t3 .. s.~ ~Z f~.`nI f j:. .:: ~'~~} t~cxj' {.f i'.'{Iw~a.. W+''. h.;2'a ri:"~V4''e .'~..'.
She City of Tustin°s Standard Form of Agreement and do not have any exceptions.
t:ilitir i btirtgs 4t. VE31<9i GiEit'nguiSP?in; qta Ff-lEtiL;~3t4CJ rt ~-; ?,3'i:i c'< Ks?"l7VE: E'1 reftJril ;"?f jJt;t i-fjr(na:'Yt r, !0 ?:nE; i;!°:.~ of Ti:Nt$i"t. l`C)i .:>-~r' i.:a:z~:-:,.
we have provided construction management and inspection services for some of tiie largest water capita{ irnprovemen+.
projects in Sor.+tt~ern California. Butler is singularly organized to provide construction nianagemerit services for public ager,-
riesand special districts, fJur history derrronstrates the focus or} water and wastewater infrastructure.
SINGULAR FGCUa. Ct7NSTRUGTION ANAEGN"i`
The current public bidding environment is creating downward cost pressures that contractors will seek to alleviate dur-
ing construction. The public la~v i~id regr.airernent does not folly equip the owner with the legal tools to preclude marginal
~:ontractors from participating. Wc: are tivitnessing a numbc;r of contractors, particularly subs, crossing aver from private to
public works. We expert to Eaxperie;ice, for the foreseeable future, a more aggressive posture ors claims and changes. Utre
have an exceptional track record representing the owner a~,'ains?: r.,iaims-oriented contractors.
GEOR~PIC ~t?CtiS
Butler services tl~~e Southern California market area excikrsivGly. 4'Vc--. are very familiar with tY7e strengths and shortcon-r
ings of the players in the focal (water] civil canst.ructio?~ m~~rkE~t. We have exceptional experience in managing Southern
California-based water infrastructure contractors.
R~C~~~° R~Sl~R1tL86R CO~i'fRtICT1tfN I~iAN~CEIS~ENT L~ 1NSP~CTIf}N EXPERIf~NC
~_ The propasecS personnel bring construction manak,~~+nEa?I, rr„I><~ctii7n, and contract administration experience for numerous
pCaJF.~_:. Gi S?tYltie~Y ,~31ES.3'' ~ C.~)!lij9J.,..,t~( 'k1+E tins: `1 i .. .._ ~. 4'.fli't~ rF:~>iEJn~l t?X(?W~rI£',n&'f. SS??IICr rte`( `SF~~t} i)` 14d~ itsjUeab~,C,1v`utfr{
infrastructure. Our most recent reservoir exp~.rk=ut ~~ $nc luFi ., k~$~t is not limited to, the following projects in Orange County:
Hidden Hiils> keservoir (Yorba Li+~da L~Nater C~E..,°I<.t~ -t .,,I°,4, s,e,Cion of a 2.0-million gallon, dual-bay hopper, buried corE-
rrete reservoir and upgrades to existingSan;E<r.;r: 1.,~~{~°~+tx f'r~rri7l~ Station located within a residential setting.
SttTiE('. r.~4~iINEF~iINC, IPSt". ~ ' 4>,~ > s, iTh S!rerit.5uite lt~~~, ~1ust€r1• C~ 9?J~-
.rty atf ;rzr~#rn
r;d"3nSft'(I(~!=0n ,~~aP)a~'erTiellt Sel'V!'CP,S for the ~i~aYi1J7£j) 7~i~"if: n-Q%Y
f?eiaair and fteptacerxtenf Prt~jecC {CIP N4. X236}
Lakeview Reservoir (Yarba Linda Water f>ic,3rict)-
Construction of an 8.0-million gallon buri:ad cast-in-
place reservoir.
PJohl Canyon Water Storage 'i'ar')it Prejeca {t;ity of
,~nailPir'n)-_g-iii;h_pYOtlie, (?0#ltlCaiiy-S?::rtSit4v~' ~.('1..{?1;1..
lion gallon buried pre-stressed concrete circr.rlar tank
located within a residential setting.
';Zan Joaquin NiBs Reservoir Conversion ,#rvine Ranch
Water [}istr'ict)-Conversion of domestic water reser-
voir to arecycled water reservoir. The open reservoir
provides nearly 1 billion gallons of seasonal storage
%r 3c ~.VC~i¢'{i `V.:1tt', r. ~`?t; ()rr)ieCt iJaS a Vi-'r v' !ti <sYt-i~r"l~ii ',
politically-sensitive project in the Newport Coast area
of Neevport Beach.
i7r~asignfBuild of Springdale Reservoir {City of
€is-.rriiingtor~ Beach)-~J-million gallon cast-in-place rein-
forced concrete reservoir.
C>vet rrtyEr Reservoir (City of Huntington Beach}-
2 L.t> i-r2illiaii gallon, partially buried, concrete walls,
)ii<,i (t~3pper i_~ottom kvith slopping sides.
T"°3~rJFSSINAL F2i~L~T(C1i~t5iP;J3li7H 7'~i Ei~ T~AtVI
`~ttt.:~>r i~, ~ , ,Iwcl+,ix:d ~a strong evorking history with Tetra
s ~ !"'.; i, ~`?~ ~~ J'<t (`>. !. r:', '!r(13 r1c2S l,~il , Lt1','{~ C.'ifl-
,Uu~tic>u IYh1i7atarslent an~i irypr;~ction services an several
iar~s:, n~tt;iti-iai7asa projects designed by Tetra Tech.
Leightart Ccrosulting, Inc: s 1.0-year relationship >,vith Tetra
Tech inciuda:;s more than 50 projects such as reservoirs,
pipelines, and road alignments. Butler and Leighton
are currently working closely with Tetra Tech's Program
Manager Tom Epperson an the City of Anaheim`s Nohi
Canyon Water Storage Tank project. Previous performance
by team member entities has been validated an other City
projects, Our long-standing relationships make the devel-
c,, )l YtF'n1'. '3f ',liar IY1 ij[ a %et';'tent appYO<3t h fY'ar;a is fi(;3e71t 8rld
cost effective,
BXf+EF2iE~iCE BNOFtNifdG ON CONiiY1UNiTY-S~NSi7iVE,
~iiCH-PftUFiLE Pf$01EC7a
'dt,(r~ fl<3t'~-,' ~.; `.t:~~lC.' ='z!}c^f 4t°riCE' ii1 I:k%?lanl;; nt-*~y ~.hf? ~/E;&z.°d
interest of the O+roner, (oval jurisdictions, state regulatory
requirements, and homeowner expectations. This balance
will be pivotal to tY~e success of the Rawlings Reservoir
project. Should any of the stakeholders' issues go unad-
dressed, ttae collateral consequences will create cost and
time pressures that the Contractor will seek to recover
from the City.
~i2SY1PdL ELA1TiUiVSi~ ~YiTFi i.t3GAL ~°f`itHOLDEiRS
Butler has been a part of the Tustin community for over 10
a L, `;~:` t'a ^ta~ :,i,t(vrat+3 vifice: located at 177n2 E. 'Lrth
Street, we are jr.rst a few minutes away from the Rawlings
Reservoir project site and City Hall. In addition, listed key
personnel are long-time residents of Tustin. This close prox-
irnity and intimate knowledge of the surrounding commr nity
will provide the City with apro-active and highly responsive
t<~am.
Butler has excellent relationships with the local associa-
tions impacted by the project. ~otr#hili Gomtnuni#tes
ssoc3a#itsn, At7l1C, T'us#in 9lnified ~chaoi #~is#ric#, ar+d
tfae t"aur~#y ex# granges 3rd ~is#ri!c# office. We believe thrat
a strong working relationship with these community grotrp~s
~Nill be one of the keys to project delivery.
~~~ R ~S
~taffrng- Butler 4~iii t)rovid~ unmatched staffint rff
cieneies-due to our proximity to the projectfCity.
Shoring ystems-Butler provided extensive input to
the designer df record on the temporary shoring systc:rz;
options. Temporary shoring wi!! be one of the highest
risk features during the early phases of construction.
I3YKTonks-Butler has performed CM and lnspectian
services on six (6) large-scale DYK tanks.
a Extensive Experience in the Analysis and t~efense r)f
Contractor Cla"sms
Cost t7ontral/Market Knowledge-The assernblc;d team
will provide unmatched cost control and estimating ser-
vices. We are currently working an projects 4vith nc~ariy
identical construction challenges.
Excellent Record of Public Outreach-Butler has
completed similar projects under identical project
conditions.
If you have any questions regarding our proposal plera=~e;
CSlreGtt}'4i'rYi t{j'llefi)r?:!'c3ri'I"iCcni:i(:?!1 at %:t~j~53?'7~~~..
Respectfully Yours,
tU'H"lEift
Construction Managers, Consulting Engineers
Mark M. Butler
Vice PresidentjCFO
t3JTii:RENC,iNE`cRING,INt. ravra ru,r..v>~~ iar~ri ~,~rrntFt
kfl ~
p,„~Y~/~ F q9 [/..y{ pp (~( /' p' ~"g( (}yy~'{F4g ylerq ~+. Jv''J .~°°a~.Y~~p. /N^'~£w){''1'y S('):_
»j G.Fgikl $~ F..~L~f Y~dE sL~J ~SfI ~/ f{.3./ iMd YY/t) ~~.',} j'3 ~~ti9Ssf VJPX
~~-~~r,~,<~ca' '~~,~tcerr~r~t ~rc?r~~et r t:"t~ tt~~; `:~.~`
,. S. {•i,~?l ".3#b't ~34..9YS €:At L~~ iiY4II#r
- e,~ ?~ >,rstl i„ ~i;~im ~ 3hnrCiugtt cortsCructabilrey
,~~ ~a.rs P. i}s, (,s~u:>tFlt~4i'itS COSt@Stln"tote on t{1@ p
„>>ry4 {'- SSq rp~. _ `i S ~, _3z t.3f~i, _eR~k G tf4S~tr
i.. Ga S'~Ti G:.`L~541 lYS3,:~'E'.f fF6~'<
i `:r' F's ~ '~:i ~i if 9c i?srY" 131 {~, (i tlltat(on YJlth C;II}r Staff, WYi~
N' , t , „ 2.ii~s it(, ;?ti[~ i,trtlt.Ut:[ a f~'r@-E31d ITleeting dUrtng
i :t~< C;PF~i Pr:~3tr~ wii! r~tvirY</ the project requirement,.
#i„ ~ .~ a/;I', frt;lztfiz ar rt~;t>rtd~t ~rtd ~nintates of the meeting
~tttti i+i ,ti 3stat^.' tir ilde ~If'ndee5 fcrYC:OtTtm@r1tS In Ordei` tl7
Hi I:, , S73i st;i-.h,
! irl t :3;s .4'!II pt?rftr33n a t1t~mugh f"eVleW of
r t. i t3..t cS, ~t:E nt iertt.. ~nojec t pfarts, technical
~. , ~ ,
it~~,st, ,,,viCC}Y~s:'tlir3t CLC:a<tsE~flf.;>. c~ll(~ permftfit~~
R ~t. P.t s t)i f:s r{s ?r_; rf titlf l+ if di51bI~UItiC ->P err01'S, On11SSiOtISe
' .:as iPis I'~r L. it+c3 5 t..tli C i~"'v' W!t?1 r)1,'
iP~, sir iy~,~,y~p,~t/~~*z*i~ti~(y3~Ci!((1~~ ~.+3~;yCl~aa,p<§~tKx~~zC~oq}n~CCapCgt n~(B*~~OtI~tIOriS.
.R....°8 iry«+(V'}Y4~Ya(.T~I Ry yV``iry,~pp^^IF Vb~~A~qpFApBiRktltiggP•ppM#}!'AiASi#C
i'T4l/9rVi;.t {[G~ ITl/4lY RlHk.
Iiti., i'Et ,, ,:I.lV~4Siitir,r"" LViI! h3.'{J~'~YFe a ~~6Y'iS1rUCtlOn Management
s i ~ ., s7 ~ ~ i~,,rt[t~ a(f C,l~,~1i'Mt t , br; approved by tY4e City'. The
~~r~~ ~ a,i. s~ i=air it4~ ~ 133e~f~t.~, .rva r~spandence and other forms of
~i>>+ i ~, ,, .~tt;, , ,3 i ~rcce,3;~.arti~~;~~ wttY~ Gity document formatting
ts;s e f r P s 3 ti R Pt i)r s.( "rv3 iPklt+,Qr 11/111 prepare a WYltten
~:f asp=;, ,,f3;ttt,altIt=ttac~tfratelydescribestheCM
,a3 s`ssst.+ s~,.~aPir~3=P~,Itt>n:>'iibiliri~s,reportingrelationships,
~.elsta~;e~a~3;3ai~3tt~r;f .artdconstructionmanagement
I i , : ,a ,t~f;aa, '3 tt vsiP! include the project delivery p{an
.r;t~ ; f tPttif <~a I , P3 Pft:>ter program (GPM} schedule,
.i i r„°: i' ~i'iil I'it V.,t~~! fii!tsl~ ?i1E:t"3~Jt~i;'s,~i;?,j'
` . ,. i r ir'~,~; ftt t?~F. ConStrl.ICt1611, mOk3111Zati0n. ai'td
z%f , } -~ , Pc~, a.1°tfnl>ariscm of as-planned to base liex;
i; i ;3: +u ,- i tllir'S(arlr> updating.
nix F~C- €~E~€C ~'T~4~~k
.pr r ,,i` + ~ r 9~Sr-; 4`ur~( .~`.5~. , .t. >f s] i j `;~ li~ t +';! [JYt >
r i cl {2 .. '"~ t "..ii ,4f: 1: s f~Fr >',sFS .ii ;.~;F..j{~t,E. vi~/
5,r, ; ,
f ~S ~' 1 F• ibl ii s„': P iIl .. ... .lsiS~f•,C' 1 ). }.~.~; C.~ :r~~:..21.
a s,
':C .r.+ "1i S.;S ~ 4 ~?i ~ r,Y. J5$ z 'P1". ~~ ..i": ~rF14 i fa%4t r:::
GC' 4 r;~,{CIE ~ rP''c.
~., ~ r t' ~ i i 1" a >~,i P~ F ~. ' t' a$ ) p s s
s~rsst c 'f ; ~ v s er d3 se !~? ' C} ° i ~+ F ~ l? ni t '..'
14PiS S t. s fi)~ r°rS!. .'s , ~ STL t'P>i~ /, fie ;., r: i~ r ;rF ! ti° ~` r.~ ij
pri )F i51i`I rC~ i{tl -z err ihj .,r l ~ st
~l i~f Sir„-ye ~fl ~, . ~, , .,! ti:}( S +~'. :.SP;r, ' fl ,! is ,., ...
n33SiS1;tJ;Tf,?P1, ?~L:~e.a..3~.r,~:; (.~,:r°C3V,..,rc^'i~t.tiSf.~'{=!ie:':~
s)T hs ~r t "5Sr('s€l 6 s3~ t £, F.;r `- S t3F r 4t .,a t 'I'i
iii 1 JsS ~f) 1 ~ f x3fr ~ ft P' 'r ei i r1~( '4 3 ASS ~,s ''tts c
=rs ~, ,C4t.f~-`.. 7a sr rs.,ih `t+ ~s.s _s t,xS_r. t .r s?v _;..C~Yirti. tt]=:.
tit3i s rt l:r--~ Pr , tt d.tE ~rE s _l 7sy1#r3s s+,.l"t
ti rl ; ° X t ~c { ~ r r _:' c Isu4ti3< St~~.~ S } tt ss :.
(H` it I, II.{F!i~S.3, +P .#~ ' ~uF f": Ii~i,it .f 'tt ,Y' Cf C~+ il~ 'l1i 'Est 3>
a'SSS ,+,r ;>bLl .,~, ~a -;Y .'} ,~' i"3~t,',1 s~:~: r .~S 4trf'IYEf.?i sE a, <e,.) I_ s;l'
~~ 1 ~P l~rr's € r r; riU t ° $ ~ a rl ' i i( ~. I s sc 1'I~i 4~ '
ri?Ia.Cs ~iu.l~ fem.. ,1t~,t ~ rY.., ;?s `,s.. 1il'fli ~r,! :i F;';i"s (. "J"i~F (; i•'
~7t -,7..~'3sfi1'E'„+,i . ~:Ies tr ):~?t}. ,',!E ~f C! s'"s -it}1~.
CF13~ t Pt iu£:7 '2r~ ket,t"' `.. t3# t,t F' 3 ( ,)f%i, s JY`8t pa: 7x to„;-fr,z:;
i35t+1 [ tP3~~P fFP 3 ., , .~ ~ s s trii. .~ .il fgt .,, .~}_di~, s. ,..
73c' "y3 l +,t.~ 2 t ssP£ ~~v ~s? ,._ ) ( .; c!s ss,ra: s::-,~ ~'it^ -,..
i~rt , ...f,~~ ..
~'dvnfTtr din
':nn5trr~ction Management Serr~iees 'for the !?awlirlf~s }t'est;r';tiir
repair and f~eptacement Project (CfP No. EiZ ~6)
~. [3C2t;l9ME~s91'/i°i~'~C~(IIVC~ ~OtV'T~2C1L
8utier will implement a Documer?t Maragement/Tracking
System scaled to meet project needs. The system
includes various forms of computerized data, reports,
document control, and various software programs
for contract administration purposes. 8utier utilizes
5~r3mavera Con#rac# Manager to track submittals and
correspondence between key parties. Primavera Contract
Manager also tracks the status of submittals, meeting
sninute items, RFIs, change orders, and potential change
~arclf~rs. Uraphical and text reports can be generated to
t i~>I:rlay the progress of certain groups of documents. The
~~r<;jera Manager will generate RFI and submittal logs.
ir~;ms can be linked to Primavera ~~ schedule activities
in Qr<9er to enhance the project-tracking effectiveness.
rar{r~iicate copies of the entire project record are housed
??3 h:~llt3f?l' #?C?rl~,, .'t''ice- {,)CiC 1T irlft `1$°,(~4.li;ta3c7 allOwS
tE ,ic:rmati+rn to be disseminated via the Web. This allows
,.~s{ ;c>,.,rative prca~ert solutiar?sand provides a secure
r:~dz,rsrl:~nt ~tr~viror?r7rent for project information.
t _ <~ ,~.;~ ,. >fe.r tt> tl?o i~ro;izc# lrsforma#iora Sys#om ~iow
f"h ax# ir.>t ~tt~d or, rl? TuH<>?<t'ing page, which shows how
[r',,anue:r?t t,'c,l=tro! 5ystr;rn is managed and tracked
l : {=;Pl~,rrt tl~lt> e tt =~ crf a project.
1"hu Project Manager will maintain records of inspections,
reports, and test results received from the Contractor,
C7esign Engineer, manufacturers, and others.
Yr ,;;{ .si, ~a~t'<; i~~~;E;93$liaits at ~~~±.$~a~ !~+)s:.#~$@TS~r3e;i~z9+"lYl
<~. P'RE-CONSTRUGTIt~N Vii3E0
The Project Manager will coordinate and review the
Contractor's videotape of pre-construction site conditions
prior to beginning any construction operation. The PM will
.7r?sr{n ~ ki~;tl1?g7 Ct. rlrirc.ICris wI`th!n thE' i+i'?+ts Ctt td lt? 4i%C?I'€t. iP?
adjacent areas, and along access and haul roads. The PM
will compare the Contractor's pre-construction site surveys to
the site surveys performed under this scope of work and will
note any discrepancies and resolve issues. The PM will meet
FJSt{? OINi`E-;Cs ~I' f:11 :-t.?C`.st3ng d (Tl'.,C.~',?•: t<) t}Ct::1,1ry?F+lit and CCin{irrn
existing conditions, document any damage to public and private
improvements incurred during construction operations, and
rrleet with owners imn`?ediately following discovery of damage
to resolve repair requirements and respor?sibilities.
."~ 3"~R(?~"iRES~ t~ND d3ThIER PI°ICiTP,~S
The CM team will provide and log construction digital
photographs on a regular basis. A digital photographic library
f ,>E~t+Siic ur?it;:t43t„~ rL4l i:it.~r`ir,! 'rrVitk?S {t t' ic''W t~31„nrs rand
structures, relocated r..stilities, and connections to facilities} will
iae maintained. TY?e photographs will be date-stan?ped and will
include the location, orientation, and narrative inforrr,atian.
r3U1'IER Ef4(il~iF.ERi~lCi, €AJt.
Additional digital photographs will be taken to sr~~,rutr~Eu
diFteringsiteconditions,changeorrJerandcl`rssn2Et'tlt =s.+.•;
special or unique conditions as they arise.
.
r'+S`s~ `~. a ~~t:~~~5
a,~. '~EbLLY TD 3V3DNTIi'~lY O'l2tPtzE~ MF T6ti"
The Project Manager will schedule: rand cr3nclt-ia
construction progress meetings wsth t#~'~~ r.,'2~2. ?r+ ~_ _~_• t
the City; and provide meeting agendas .ar„i ~ir-r!u ~.
t tlc (~t iF i';-.°<}r tF.1 m r C; kt~lt Sr'a.:% 7 {,f;(,.:3fi.Si +f i o,> !
which need resolution, coordinatiot;'~1{1i1 „~r;~~t ra~, °-
status of change orders, submittai.> ruicl `sit t~. , .
issues, CSHA visits and citatiany, arld ;~~,ril . ~ ~;::~~
wiE( identify action items and assEtst rt s!a' r ,° ,•s,
action and date action is to be c xlli ;t.t• ~ i { ~.: ; ft .
~(" r"£i,?? fl,'ritind~i =-?{'it~ inC,iUt$f'. ii~f4'I ,k."# :'sr ts,~
the meeting minutes with tyre Uan+t~ar~rcir _; ~ ,at,; ~.
~On'tYaCiOr~S COiCLIYrenCe Wfth Chi t.Cll'tiln!, .tt,.s ;i
;1Ei rr?Ii'It.IteS tQ !.(le ,a3tI:E'r'?<<, .S < ttc . ~ .. ..
the meeting.
~. t~Ti~~R MEETINGS
The PM will attend other canstru+ u~>r { rv;. t t ~ _, _ ~ : ~~
requj{ested by the City.
~fYe KA "a3. ;;~$tt3~ Cc3ta~'6Y§"y .S $'tfi ;`!+t S: Sgr a,,j ) ,. s' ,, ,
fa.9. SUGMITTAL REVIEWS
The Project Manager will review ear h _ulx: is r ,t t ~ ~' ~ •
the Contractor for conformance with t:;'<,iui=' t ~- :.t s = r
dr'iawlr?gH and S~.`Gt;{tiCairiUn~i,l ul,i~c P.,r `Gt tt .. _,.
the Contractor's schedule far pot~nht,l urt{~ +,., , ~ ,,-~ + _ ~ _'
required reviews of submittals with tYrt; %k: .,',r, t r.,;,,
the City; and distribute submittals to apiln i t: tr,= =t ~ : ~. .
with dated transmittal letters.
fa. Si,~13MITTAL I.DG AND STATUS
Using Primavera Contract Manager, a c<>rrlpt rt: rr},~, •.;
systematic tracking procedure will be e ~trsi?r, i . ~: t ? f, ~ } ,.~
Project Manager for timely submittal review ,,rt<t tu:
shop drawings with means for acceleration >>r r t 'a ~~ • ; .
tt~r` S`grlittGartt v i>IC,ai ^or tr.}I!{i i~tiilQp CIf%3ti+t s ^+ ":i sl ~ ~.
tracking will he introduced into the docurnt:nt ctinrr~ ,E , ' ,
and status of submittals will be known at. all tirn.;'~s. fi t;~.
system will be coordinated with the Contractor lx:r t;t x a+ ~ ?
document requirements. The shop drawings sufar[iitt:?I -;t ~: i
review will be logged for date of submittal, revieLV r< r`,t =t t,
and status. The PM will prepare a list of shop t~lraEV6 =; • ill-,r
will be required of the Contractor, and in canjunctu~n ~,a;'i; s? :~ •
Contractor attempt to review the submittals cansistertr ~evt;r t
the critical path requirements for approval, fabricatir>n, „{,rl
procurement.
Weekly exception reports identifying critical shop dra~,vrnyF°,
either not submitted in a timely fashion or not obtaining
~~ 3
~ ~~,,.
Cil Y C~F7t15TEN
,, c ~ ltl ~ ~t l kc7 N ` ices fr tY~ "+ `"~-~
~~ ~~~~ ~ r
R~~s~ff~t~st~e.~~,'ruairRcpar~°a~e~'ht=rz4~crrrr<:rrt~rrc~ecf/{1PN~.613~ ~<~ ~ ~~••~~-~
:,
~~
s
c!°;y
~,
::
t~.
<"a
:'
C`~..
n:
~,%~r <~t ~'aslin
t:or>structron ~larragemenE Services for the Rawt+n~s Reser~xc>ir
Pe~~airand Replacement i~rofect (GIP No. (i1:~6}
•2t C.+-f•)i.E3nl,t: t`.1" a#~provai wtli C't, i,.if:ntii'°Ct £3nci j:'i"Ot?lin"?
submittals discussed for necessary action to accelerate
approval process for non-conforming submittals. Upon review
the Contractor will be advised of reasons for rejection of any
shop drawings or submittals that may require re-submittal.
Multiple submittals and re-submittals that induce project
belays will not be considererl an excusable delay for the
Contractor under the terms of the contract.
,fl<""; 'vk~/)+-t~ r>r;agrE:'.7..r?S, ,lGrir{)iirate 7'`', C~is`~G attC is > 3P.i~l ~,3. ? ,:'; '•..
€r(3rY? ail St)I,dlCfi..S, otaCP3 a5 `t.tt)TSittalS. i?F'IS, `~#- ~^si: i~Iti~ a`.1,
extra work, and contract change orders; and r;orrr{?trr+:~ r.:~
JCi3rdalr?Jdi11~,9~rrrit,~£'t'??t,~tior~ 1{~tt;~€` t °, .^ _•
rr +,'.t7rt:i tits"Nint;S ~ $ld `>pet 1itCatfonS ? ?. r~c'I?+~.
n,'3 t4 "~~ x;1~'f ~d#~@ .: v) t~,s AA;,t S~ 2 .t a'E Y
.~. lA~IAEi1~EiVT
. e ~„ :f <~"~'$ ~ ?i ? $,~7 "°~ Y~3 t,e*~, '';~n.~a.'dG'a, ,... x,i.3ra
~,~. ?~Ql1ESTS ~tlR ~~Ft3RMAT9t7N {R~i)
Tf,e: PM will coordinate the RFI log and avill document the
srabrnittal and disposition of all the Contractor's Requests
€or Information. Ali RFis ~wili be Ire writing. Ail responses will
>e rru>nitored with suspense action dates and follow-r!p
c)rocedures implemented to ensure timely action by ail
jarties to project issues including input from City staff. The
PM will review answers and i~repare a formal response to the
t',on~"actor within 5 calendar days of receipt of response, or as
r+<'fa~~r.>d to meet schedule requirements. The PM will ensure
t ~r ri.,;;r ;F,S<7lr.:x r'..L.?rta-~.d iii (' :,,;pist3C:~`[)CillS and t7ic111;~.
7, 2EQUESTS ~C?R ~i~.~1G~5 IN i?ESiGiV
>r,ol~ira !:#7 t:,orftractor deem the Rf=1 response has created a
;' ~,;r~ in ,scope and a o#3ange order is requested, the Project
+Ji {raker will obtain written approval from the City andjor
t) 'sign Engineer prior to issuing a change order authorization.
No change orders can be issued ny the Project Manager
+~vithout prior approval. fhe Project Manager will supply the
City with written recornmendatiarjs of the Request for Change,
QSt anf~ _. ~~Ci lr.'(ilflE: ifs sr?<d=;:t, 'a r'?:~j'(3r ~i.l~tlf~...<:tiGi 4 )r _!t~(~S{ai t:?I'
't .,.`!.1?1.:~Y1L,iatfOn #~J .,Xe~:,t.'Cr< c3 ;.iiaf i.`~.f'. i f .; 1':ri i{ aLif.fi0(i t)/ C)#
any Request for Change rests ><uith the City.
7.~ ; 91"LD CDRDE~S
's'~ P?Y1 zv`iiE iriitiat< a~`;d rvvic>?v #iLkd ori,orS v+lherv a <ahan~,;?
in the work is needed to maintain the design intent; issue
}lc,' 1'fe:iCt E-`rdE'r };C? tni.-' ~Jf'.t Y";I+';'t(?I" r:)ni.~ rl"tfilllt4r t#?E' ••.:+i C)ri: ~;:~,•i~
.')I1ip)ilcinCe; I"r:af~,~ ,:Y3-:: 4SSi.lfsr:# f2e1C1 }tdt'r:3 in ~ ii?;>=,; i"E)COrti
+~'~ C~)-I~lt: +. S Sn tS'3~""-tti.S;£.)rd 3i'~'.Ci7l i~atif~!'is r7 r1d plans: grid, if
re!~iuired, follow-up .with a change order within 1A calendar
days of mutual agreement with the Contractor on pricing
and conditions.
7,~• s~3~S°tl7i3~'9C3~V ~Q33ESTS
The Project Manager will coordinate the evacuation of
"or-equal" or product substitution requests with the Design
Engineer, the City, vendors, manufacturers, and others.
Prepare evalr.lation and recommendation for "or-equal" or
product substitution request.
~,~ COQ ~?~2,Q~ilN~ 9~D 59'C39rGTl~?~i~
a+~s. .'',"v'~trJtSl .toCi%l`'i. :~.Cn:111t;tiZlti, tsi+.'p1 'nvi F3i?d Y} .afli;-'.'i..{tsi`s.S lS
The PM will oversee, perform, and roort9in.~t~, + t ~tr~:~f~ s+'~~ ~~-„
management services as required lay the pr ),+1. ~~, ::~; ' a
work; prepare reports, letters, and n~ernorant;a; t ~;=itt~,: r
meetings; monitor and track the expiration of trs,u.-,,=~~
x .`rii,IkrCrtlt?t~t_s ^CKi <7#Statf3 .1~"?ti~itC?d tt;dt.~il {r' s;? it;;.
Contractor; coordinate subconsu#IanCs. tEx r } :n<! , . ' k ;,
services; review daily inspection r~ores and r {~+~ ->~ ~ t
.. 1L}iyz;', S;onf~CflTfJrn3rng ii, sl`+~; n:.+is#r S r :, ,.
problems and discrepancies requrr"rrt~t:vrrr < t +:~-.{::!° ~, ,
Ss3'i-tprE,( _ICaw~lr9(~i, SpeC1TS( ,ttEvn`, x /f , sis,}, ~ ..
review and analyze the Contraotor ~r~x:1{j}u~ > ,
schedule for accuracy of work comp ~« !r d, ~ ! ~- .
of forecasted completion, and comr4l~rt~er~ k ,'1. ~~ ~! ~i~. ~~
duration; resolve constructability I)r ~},,,tr{ts ~~ ,
ConneCtiorlS and OperatlOr'7S; prUpst,. JgClit.h.' i.. ~? t:. , -
review and notify the Contractor ct ,-~r .,,:>,,.° ..
c{aims; perform inspections; revii>~ti ',nt~ C:r,
record drawings periadicalfy; revi~~+. k >=ntr,:.r ~- , _~ +~
paymentsand verify measured guar rtrht.~.: , tr ,l,. t
punch list; and all other duties rel+~;e+t t„ ~;+ ~ =,t1<~ :r,
management as requested by the City.
S2SLTI{71V OF ~3AY i'rJ-~tAY iSSUS
The PM will oversee resolution of r}a}x_ti~ tt ,f ,,,;,,, ,,, t ,;
issues raised by the Contractor; ~,oordlnrttka ttrnh ! .<<' „~,
Design Engineer, and Contractor orz CcCi~tnicall ;,>':~tE~ x
and concerns, as well as interpretatiarr of #k~,cx :1t ~~.~-;~
documents; and interface with the Design C a s~s~ ~:• E :x;:
resolution of technical issues, processnnx; tsf ci,.rn±>~; • ~. ,
r«'Cjt7(a. ,r5 +1r t:iF:S+gn Ci"la{"3~.;%S tiJ rF~ ~..r i?art ~t~ . ~..
er?c;~~iat~Yt ree9 in the field.
tsk .~. g~r~~f:°.s~ ~'r~~liY1~I"#C
.1 rN60~i7HLY R~~Ji~W
The Project Manager viii review project-related irruf)i~aa~. •,lx~+~
progress payments on a monthly basis and submit tr: rt:E> { at
4vith recommendation stating the proper amount Por t~:~~,~n?E ~.!
in accordance avith the schedule listed within the contrzu a
documents. The PM will use the Schedule of Values artd
actual quantities as a basis to prepare payment regt,est<s. (i,.+
pay request format will be established by the project tc<+n1 i?
expedite checking, processing, and subsequent updatin; or
project budgets and cost projections and forwarded to th=-,
City for approval and payment to the Contractor.
rSU71F.1~ F{~iCl;~IFERIiti6. S{~C. ~r ,~ ~ `.J![~"i ~. r r;;~, ~ r
i r35 (}__'~
Y.
.t, t yn-ni i .. ~?i.'t , t;r?5 rEl t`t& '~" . ~...
F,'au~it"rr~sReset'r`~?rf~e,r~~tir.rr,~ r:';;xr.a<~rtre~af~r„t`ect(~'tr"'~~ca. Es1.~~},,' ~ "~~~~~~~~~
9.~ PROGRESS REPClRTS
fYtsmthly Construction Progress Report:
? ku; f'raject Manager wil{ prepare a rnonth{y report for the City
-+~~,r~ k~. S'ie> YtYC)JeCt. atati,iS, i}fg1111~{)' z)g Si~.P}r 4,:a }Y. Liliie7z~,s i~:z:
<)rrd Issf4es, including cost status, lessons learned, and
;sr~ject progress for compilation into a pragrarrr IevaE repast.
"the report will include recana(liation of contract time. work
progress, anc3 labor usage. It will also provide current issues
us="~{?:,t F }~ .:+:~,ti~E p€lat0}",",4`3pE75 rJf w P,'~I ¢i::c)'.1. t rt~j.i.Jt fz.<#ts-#e?`.S.
F4~~~ ~.. Ca~razr~ ~: Ci~attg;w Orris ~~r~~~et,ten~.
1(9.1.. It7ENTIFY ANR TRACK CHANGES
€ ~~;y 6'raject Manager will identify and track patantiaE changes
u> ilia' evcFrk. The PM evsil uttliZe Primavera Contract Manager
r;h<rrzi~ft f>rdrr Gantroi system to prepare, kog, and monitor
Ct x ~tr.~i„tar or City initiated ek~ranges far added costs or' credits.
1~. REQUESTS I"'OR COST PROPOSALS
'Pd+st~tE rtt r +~ssL)rp, t'e~rE: PM wi€i issue; Requests far Proposals
r) .~..,i;i tF )t"'; :i"kt3 I1r~ak)a3ed chafigE' ar adCjitran to the SCO}:'@
, ~' ~,~~ t~ ° E~ t ri;-tr i €,r~ pM will prepare, an independent r..os~t
;i ti3, , < fn. ; P::'~Si'iV €1} r.,ri v SL<'?i~ prtar t~ 8nY negatlatiarl5 witl"~
_~.. i rt~,,= xz}r ,3 ; ~:~ir}' a Char;gc; Ord°s.
i r9.> tt#TII=iGA"CIC9l~ Off` E9tTRA Wt?RK OR CHANGE
>, °t t.` 1 , !>, u;t. ti I lk4y rrt{th1tE;$ CPiangE?, aC requBSt
_ ,,, tr,• .., z., „4?,' ¢t .'sL'df.}, C~~,jfr~~s ,Sl„ ~_
. I l s= k'slri tv,S ? r -,c;,, dar z a,r'4ent, and negotiate all
~_ ~ " , •}r; ; i. , t>>'; , , tt (14`C)td4a wik:h the CanStr'UCtran
.'sir<s , ,•;s Set it1 '~,'hetittiC'. fi'nj.)aftS of al"'iangeS
,; 1 } 3 `~-: ~ ; a f', + sa,~ 4Y (;ti•,,~ rz, E'~Fritabl'. Cast and tame
.. ,~.;?~ it ,a, •. 3 =t .dill€l~riIR:'ri CPlEdngeS inGiUdSng
t .~ aP., c4,„ rte ti"r ~ t~ity`'s ciirectian, the PM wits
~,.r. r'. `, t~. ~ 4.; Sil +~1,(i"; 3+,4 ~r.~p~"3F"i)ptlatE? al"tange 4rdv~r
.. ti rr.,~kyti ,;ucttie3thtf"tc31`)E',SfgnGansultata.
dfE , xi ?: t, 3t tau •Ct U3 (a'(~,
tt? t E'#tP t~fiftt" tUl~"! IdACT° CFdA~ZE OF~[9I"Rs
z"~ Q?.,f! ie>r#71L1i;.:ha3"7gf' ~}rt:1G'r5 deed
, ire ~;i ,,,t #_>r3riE#I aUthari~atlan. The FM
. -, ~s.= ~trtir ~ tF,, t~ ~~Stt}b1t5t`~ labr)r, egUiprnent
E . =: F ~ f~ f%r, .z ~•„a rsp~> that wii€ be used in futl.rre
t t „l !I~#' #~"i If'tf ANC9 TRACK C:LAINt
r<r ~ ~ r • r ~,~itE r;tirxmize the patentia€ impa.a c3P'
.., ~'# as .4 }'.i'Ft .dl}~ egtlitabie re5aiatlan w3 i} IC;"2itTi~i€
disrE.aptian to the on-going construction effort. The prima; y
mearES of ciairns rYtanagement is the prompt processing of
change orders. Change orders must be fairly reviewed against
the contract documents for validity. When deemed valid,
reasanabie and egtritabie adjustments in time and money are
to be provided. if the City and the Contractor disagree aver
the contractual merit of a change order, a claim may arise. (f
this curs, the Project Manager will coordinate claims with
the City's Project Manager, Risk Manager, and City Attorney's
< „~:
Of, yt..
11.2 RESOL!!T!O[V ALTERNATIVE
After receipt of a wrEtten claim, ttre Project Manager wii!
prepare a written ackno~viedgement of receipt of tYEe claim.
TriISC.,~rrE':~p31tUF-:r3t:.Gt;{SSif4r;>thES:a:tR,,: [IEf.'?"'„Cltc. `f+_3r
all parties to rriinimize misunderstandings about the issues
at depth. To supplement the technical and cor~traatua4
evaluation of the ciairr~, the Project Manager wii€ work closely
with the Guys staff to assess the risk of exposure and to
determine an appropriate response to tfre claim.
1.1.3 NEGOTIATE ANI7 RESOLVE CLAlIVIS
1 he eva€uation results and recarnmendations >vi;i be
forwarded to the Gitv's Project Manager. The racornmend-stir.=;
nlay Suggest a negotiatec9 settlement (it; which casf~ a
settlement strategy would need to he estalaiisf led} ar rnzay
carp i`m t%}r; >r Ott,.,, ?~~`., s; -° L~f ~ ~ rhos=.~._. c .~.~ : ) , . _
in which cans the ciai#xs would be denied anti ti)s <1+t pu ~:
acknowledged. Ti;e Project ivianager and Ci~ims Rc:v~c~rrer w;f!
aS515t and suf)part tPtA Gtt?; Irt reSOlVirlg Clalins ai `1 ti,~>i?Uje~S,
including wrstten responses to the Contractor ar~d private.
parties. grving depositFans, assisting with drspute resolution,
asbltratlon and irtlgatian. serv4ng as an expert wetness,
investigating €daims f{~r damages by private sorlrces. design
servicesfar rep[acesnent o€ damaged work, and servscei
mat9e necessary by Contractor default.
11.~ PRIVATE If'"NRTS {r 6.A~tH6
The Prajeet Manager and Claims Reviewer will investigate
claims for damages lay private parties and respond k}
writing within t~vo calendar days of receip*, of the claim, ar~d
will coordinate the vvritten response with the City`s Prn#eCt
Manager and Risk Managef.
1~.1 INSPECTION OF' THE Wt?Rlf.
The Ric-Id Inspector will provide inspections as n~ c>s5ary tip
ensLFre that materials and workmanship are ir} camp€ianc
witl1 th8 CGt"rtract daCltn'1enL5; COorifinatP, deilVeCy ~rbo,3.:'f;:=
far derecLS or messing parts. and oversee record,ngtt'}F?
_. " " F„
r:::i}rlsCructs"un rSh~rnagement Services far tf~e fZ<twti,$gs I2asrrr°r~ir
,?apair r~nrl Replacement Project (G'JP fVo. 0:1_~+6J
receipt and storage of equipment; and inspect construction
,CEIV4t1?:S,'.VhlC:fl tare idt;ntrried In .i,e t,C)s"iCrai:t C9er,,~rk.C":'.=, t<j
be perfanned at night, weekends, and/ar holidays.
L.~ 3~iL~' ~~SP~CTI(3N E~ORT
The Field Inspector will prepare daily inspection reports of
the construction activities including the date, day of week,
and weather conditions; hours of work; personnel on site;
time periods of equipment being used; idle or inoperable
,fiZ%iT tf:1 T. '~it'?t.ail.5 t)I t?r$C:i`i ~'..ttVk1:'`!; l'~lfl~{;Llit.$?:7 'nG?`?t.'r3t'.t:ti~i~;
1~ >(il {rrS ClC t'ialrnS. rP.ioitltii)r1 Jf }.°kit.s ~, `ifrtlC;ih nCtia;S <3t3C1
violations; instructions issued to the construction contractor;
S~~fEty rc,ncerns; description of accidents: major material and
=~°<}utpmer$t steiiver~ies to the site; names of visitors to the site;
t i~J$ys =~~nd extra work; and meeting minutes.
. ~lflSIONS TO CiJN"t'F2ACT{3F!'S a~d1~TH0[75
Y~i"c>russ appropriate revisions to the methods and
>r-iF~df~res used in pert"ormingthe work. Inspectors may
,rra ~ErtPf~ai>e extra s+<ork or approve of workthat deviates
~~~~~ tf,f~~ .:;n±ract dot.uments. hr~y deviations must be
fu~~$>~izf;~i ihrou~4'i t}~!e (dt=1 process,
t ~.~ t3~l1AT#C3d5 IiV Tai teVf3i$8(
J ' ~ .t_r et F C ity°s Prv}act Manager aEtd the Contractor of
#x ~,.$ti<x$.,rnt?~t~wr,rit=~rit~~docis171entanvdeviations.Reoord
i a<;viatior$_a that are not r:orrected arzd irnrnediateiy deliver
<~ Nnbc.e of 1'lon-Corxrplianee Co the Contractor. Perform
necessary follow-up to resolve Notices of Non-Compliance.
Include unresolved Notices of Non-Compliance on substantial
completion punch lists.
;3.2. IPEL3NE N~9TDOWNS
Coordinate necessary pipeline shr.rtdowns avith City N/ater
Services staff to complete cvnnectlons to existing facilities.
~?§~r~$ ~. ~.5~4.YSC;t:.91139i~;i?i ~;ii3#~ ~a~att~r'i<~~ ~'?.~ti£a
3..3,3. ~Ed~IERA! EQUIREMEN~'S
Butler has selected Leighton Consulting, Inc. to provide
geotechnicai observation and testing, f-nateriafs testing,
and geotechnicai arzd material laboratory testing services
management during construction. Based on Leighton's
geotechnicai design report, review of the plans and
~.r LC€ilGattortS, iarid cX(Sef'E~'7?L'F''rJ3th 7 fl EI<'3{- i":r~,ei'Jt131.
construction projects, their services will consist of the
foilo>.ving:
Pre-Construction Meeting: Attend apre-construction
meeting to establish points of contact and distribution
of geotechnicai results, etc.
Daily Field Reports: Daily Field Reports (DFRs) will be
lniritten and distributed to Sutler's Project M<~nager for
review and signature.
~~eoteehnicai Review and Observation of Sffc~r~~{F~:
Review the contractor's shoring designs} anz 1
desvatering plans before excavation bHgins.
a .:,e;~togic Qbservation and Engineering {Jkt:rst~',l,t'
Observe temporary cuts for the replacemr:-n? i,$;li~~..
and foundation bearing surfaces.
® ~,e-otechnicai Laboratory Testing: Perfoi~n y~,~..:>$, . ~,.._
laboratory testing of previously unencaur$iexrr~t!
onsite soils, and import soils such as ~p~st,rt~.r$,. I, ,;#~
materials.
Saciefiii Der3sityTesting: Provide ohsr,#strr~?rf ?tt,f
t~estir~g Gf €iii placement., as ftlf .. ,F s ~~$ ., . ,
grading contractor's schedule requirra-
Concrete Sampling and Testing Y <~!~; ,~ , . f_, . .
technicians will sample fresh i:oncr'~s+~. ;,~ art:', ~ ,
tests (ASTM C 1~3) and air content t« ,r~, ;A~;'r.Y1 , i
i73" (; `3~ii.)'Vnf't"7 t"{?(~,~ue;;>ted YJV ~i y,*v r'- r
representakive.
?~"ateriafsLaboratoryTesting.Trar$sf?r>rttt~;~1~ t~~t+
concrete cylinders and bars from ~;~~ ,~. t, i=, !
materials testing laboratory an irvinfs, i;".
• concrete Compression Test !7e suit°~ €t $u,rt„~ ~~. ~ ~ ;i
ar~d,~'or e-mail reports will 'r,~o proe ~t i<~ $ tr;r =' <„s~;
~: e%-~, 1<;i. ~r )Y iC!8 sl fi t~ii rsi?~3.j5 ~ s . r .. _ .
compressive strength tests to ~,~sn~ i ~~ ~ ~:vt.;
cylinders.
~eateohniral and Concrete Testing:i~iirftn.n , . ~~~~~~
t'~rt3. i'~~e a re'~Oi't SF.lt77mariz!r'Sy 4 'i i ii{' 4 ~ ?<<t~
~fi§,9#Y 'ne ~w~i<~.:~Y':IUF.r Y.~iS~# 6°~+~~~~4~#u"Y ~F'e.~$i Yx. §~ , iSa,tE
3.4,x. EN~RAL REQUlREMEN?S
Verify in conjunction with the City's Mair$t<>I~-+tf<, `;=t, s
that inspection, sampling, and testing, of iF,n~i . ;lt==
andrevegetationsystemstoensurecontr;fYt rrt,v ,~..~.,
ell work and the establishment of all pianki<~ r , t r r. F
quality, and density detailed in the contract cit?tx,fr.~.111-
3.4.E t,~DSCAPE 1NSPECT~ON °~ES79~3
"lerify inspections and testing of irrigafi<?i~ ti,~t,, '~
j:;t+:1;JEi ?JIaC='tYit',nt, InStcli3 ~t;?J! i, t"~ ' ; St -i2L = , ~ t
leakage, and coverage.~+
~i35~{ ~.~. 2~»~Y~ll~r ~.'~3'', sL'~R3~, ,y61~1 i9 ':'.3.7=;.'.414 ,_
1.1 ~'Rf~TI{3N i'ESTiNG ~~I
The Project Manager will develop an operatE~a4~~ sE `=~~ .t .
in consultation with the City, Design Engin~Y+ i. ~:~„~{f >~ ' ~~.
and all appropriate vendors; review and reeell~rr4<•:,t[ rt;,:
operational testing plan; and coordinate the t+~st;ne; <~$
the equipment and facilities with the City, ,tr=d -$ .:r,4 ,t,==
Contractor's personnel as required durir,gthf~ ~,$rlrif~, ' ` .
FiUT~IER tiN:a3NEffilitiG,1NC. __ ___~ ;+~yc_ ,
CiTYflCTtfS'EIP!
.~ :ry~x.~K~'" ~x~
t -~l tt7 1 ;~:ti (IS ~Yt~ Ll~E: 1(`t fft£~. ~~ ~~ ~ .3~ ~
& <,.<.v
Ftanrltr~~s Reserrr~E.^ F'c~p~arr . us. °Isca~it=ac r~rrr<~ru F1rq,Fac7 tC IF°,h'r~, 6I~) ~ . ~~•+~~~~~-`
15.2 PUNCH LIST
The Project Manager shall determine when the Proje:e:,t grid
the Gontracta#"`s wank is substantia'h,~ ct)rnlaleted, as defrr€eti ir`?
the City's contract documents and construction procedures.
In consultation with the City, the CM Team will prepare a
detailed project punch list that includes a list of incomplete
work or work that does not conform to the requirements of
the contract documents. The punch list will be attached to the
Certificate of Suk:}stantiai Completion.
15.3 FINAL WALK-TkiRCtUGI~
Elpo€; carrectiari of deficiencies Y~y tt?r t;csntra•^tcr, tti;? Projr.r?
tJlariageC \'J;ll f>cht;dl,Sie, i;i5i)rClirlati', anCj ;-;C?r?t1 u':? a `€ria? wi?i%i-.
through and project review prior to the acceptance cf work
with the City.
15.4 RECOMMENGEEGI ACCEPTANCE
The Project Manager will determine wt7en the project and the
C;an`traGtai~S WOriC IS finally Cari'}f)ie^te-d %:5 C:l::fins':. iri ti'?e ~~itV'c
contract documents and construction procedures. The Project
Manager will issue a Notice of Completion and wil! provide to
the City a written recommendation regarding payment.
15.5 CLOSING OUT CONTRACT'
The Project Manager will take the lead in negotiating and
nosing out the construction contract, and prepare the
memorandum to the City recommending acceptanoe of the
#:+rC)S~;cf_ar"idtii{'1~,,C}?tti~ ~sJCl~1~?C ~.:C7t',lf)i~TiQ21..
15.6 FINAL PR0IEGT REGORGES & GEClGUMENTS
i;?(=; f~i'/JfF:i:t Mc~#ncx~?^;r \$'ll! tLIS'SZ Ji,'~r "rill 7"€nc?! p€`1s°u:t. rt Ur{7 vi ~,f s,3
documents to the City upon completion of the project.
a~is#.:~ €«,. ~"~'*~Izw ~.~">{3'I`4str*s.:,cal.}z"r
16.1 OPERATIpI~S IYIAINTENANCE hilATEI~iAE.S
Uefiver the Operations and Maintenance Manuals and any
spare parts anti equipmc-;nt upon acceptance of the project by
the City.1 he manr.rals will be submitted to the City for review
and approval prior to operating any new equipment andior
f<aci6ties and accepting the construction contract eyork.
16» RECRC~ [~RWIIVCS CERTIFICATIC+I~
"Cho Pr;:>jec,t Manager will review ar7d certifythat the
Contractor's C?rofr,rt rer_;ord drawings are complete and
aeeurai€: rand w.iii C,rovic9e the drawings to the Uesign Fn~;ineer.
1,6.3 FINAL F~AYIVIEI~T
~ +' ri Esc < i f~~ c } ? 'C tol i ~ ". r;f_lllt,nenC4 'f€I si~i {?aydllFt g ? •~
t!;Yri s r1s r t it,ca c. ~~f hai ntlOn t0 the ContYaCtar trl aCc:Ordark_ti
with contract requirements; verify that the Contractor has
made all payments to the subcontractors and vendors
and that any stop notices or liens have been released; and
obtain a Conditional Waiver of Lien fi-om the Contractor prior
t0 ri~CC?n1r`r?ti'snd€ni~; fint3i ;)aymc=r;t..
~,~5 ~'~. E~t~ntl~; ;Sex vlc?w
x.7.1 ETENpEGt SERVICES
Butler's construction management team will provide other
miscellaneous services as required during construction.
Miscellaneous specialty services, tiwhich may be required,
include, but are not limited to: mechanical, electrical,
structural, and civil supplemental engineering design:
witness testing; factory inspections; and noise and air
quality monitoring services. Please refer tr? our Project
Organizational Chart located In Section ~, 7eana
Organizatiara far a listing of team members ti~iat will be
responsible far these services.
17.E WARRANTY PERIOGE SERVICES
Provide engineering, technical support, and administrative
services during the warranty phase of the project (the; one:
year period after the recording of the Notice of Corrp(etian).
Services shall include, but not be 8n.ited t{>: an 1.~. month
walk-through of the project/project site to identify iir>+i€~;
requiring warranty attention and cornt)de v,an~arity ?€ ~t~>r€r, itr i€,
Ir1CIUdingtt1e (/aCltraCtar~S CUrtl.}t;ttnfG~ss2,ie ;tl =+r? s [ ~"wits-' (~
the City for coordination of all wa4"rzanty rev'p~s?r ,viii<._
17.E CONSTRUCTION OG SURVEY SEFtVICE~F
Butler has selected Fenno Engineering, Inc. to provici€=
the necessary cnnstrucilrar~ Held survey to verify ti:e
Contractor's survey for the proposed impro~~eiYierit.s.
17.3 PUCL.IG RELATIONSjOI~Ii~IUNITY OUTREACtf
Butler's construction management tea€n \-ifili assist the
City's Communications Manager and project management
staff in developing a comprehensive carnmunity outreach
program that provides infarmatiori for residents, businesses.
and others impacted b}~ th2 project. Outreach activities
r7tay include, br.€t not be limited to: technical assistance
to City staff at corrnllunity meetings, presentations,
and open i-rouses; periodic canstr~uction updates to the
Communications Manager for inclusion on the City website
andJor City Scene Newsletter; construction alerts to the
Communications Manager and project management staff;
and resolution of construction-related concerns from
affected City customers and/or the general public.
~:
ii;iri' 33.,a~ ~rt'vE4 Rl`w ;, r'~?i_;_ _t .,.
~,
-~~+,
~~:r~tServic~s fartft~ 6~'~w1,t~',~ R~.~~rrrc~;F
7!°tt/~s'~,a"7l~Cet7iet?tfCCtf~'~~'~G'/6','~'t,~: ~`.~,~~~>'
~~1" LET, P E?.~"" t~E3_
Mr. Marti Butinr will be the Primary Point of Conta<a f`or all
corporate matters, providing cast aontrals and managing
t('ics resources to meat the reeluirernents of the projc•ol.
?~s Project director, he wiU also meet with the t;ity's
representatives at key project rrFilestones, as appropriate.
S°t Mil E"i. e i Ai6.p E4t.p ("'e.y i,r i~.d. a~
iv1r. Butler will assist the Project Manager with claim
,nanagement services, inGudsng resolution alternatives
ar~d negotiating and re5niving claims. He has been
,etained as an crpert witrFess in arbitration, litigation, and
z~va{uation of validity of ciaimsin construction contract
ulisptrtes in over 40 litigated or arbitrated disputes.
,~0.FJGPf7 f3 L. i7 d 6'-4V~~i.a# !°f.f'~#6f^1V i»
r\r'. ~i, aPit }till's ` z/:~ ct`; is 4:.~?Ylairt 7tz.id [iOfi sf til-(; i?i~iLa ?t.+' F. i";`':
r.ity al~d other project stake holders. Nis responsrbilities
svi!4 include developing a Construction Management
i`rnc:c,dures Manual; rnanagingeanstructian meetings;
t}e~,,'`t`}C; establishing contract compliance procedures
<:arx1 control systems; reviewing the submitted baseline
3.,t~F£;duie; monitoring and docur~Y?enting the progress of the
wer4r; preparing project a>rrespondenee; coordinating and
reviewing virieatape of i:,re-.ronstructian site conditions;
i£i~°:ntifying, preparing, laguing, anci monitoring all Contractor
r + ;ire y (,?' C;il<$s3j->.. ti' ~itl',~ pi'E~par's; .~ tnF; 2??Csf sTi-s!t' <:r;C] ls3"1=]!
construction progress reports. Ne has extensive experience
managing and estimatingthe aanst.ructian of reservoirs,
=,;~rtiF moving, acid rr?ass grading (110 million yards of soil).
w7 (~iC'i-41~ 1PY i~74.Y. i i,.p if"R m~ I'LL! [14Y /'9~ #'i`°a
M€e White is the Aiternatr. Project Manager and Broil) have ~Che
srFrYit~~ respor}sit}iiiti~>s mr:ntianed above. He has aver 16
y?:ar~~ f_>;p~`~i£=+u;n Fr~anaging <3nE~~ estimating the construction
,'1{ Ili;` i"l' ;i`:'ii i'! I~.,itl~:(;'i'irl~; prafeCt5.
Ms. ! ,,,}i:Fn w+ii tx r~>sporlsii'~Ee for coordinating inspection
•x.4ivii,~.~, fx~1 ifF,, t~rr>jc:ct. site, utiEity/agency eoardinatiC~n.
' s,'.it1 I.ir.s •. l~l i . ,. ~ ~i;,!/yi 1??f£.s r?nkL?/YC=A:i~.aCa i"l; a:,,p?s itF':r(... Fatc sr.?
~F~ ldl {Yj rF )r }1ti ~ij(irFnp ti Cariv ryp VrLS, and gL ne4 a~
;,: rf_ >ri.1t, ,c,~ i ,<~ wltl~t rr1~ design engineer.
':.: ...... : i i?ct t_. t: ii r :;ir; s rs +'Ci s, s}s ,~ ,, •u ,:,
c'(: .' +r% t ~ e$ ;.i? ..,~..a4 ~?°t. , ..1 ...~i ' ~. ,~C3 ti' r _.>Ofv,','C
.. ~' ~ is .,?J e , L`'. Irs t: ,!c£;i r F J ;','.y1{ ~ .ul
'.t ~ f,kU' of i a..cf t3 _ 5~lr l'rl ~. ~.1 !r; 4'i£ ~', tf ~"'>=t utr' .(a i%O ;
,-.j ., .r:ti+ i S Y.~~iF t s ( _`}?( U ~ _iP( i.,~ ...„-?v~2 f: ,i; i+~F
J" c •.~.-#Is i J'."t; „ ..F r t,.;z6,tS +i ,l.`. `1 ~ t,y i ;::i{ t , t?Y;::~
(';i tt ~f.v£+s C .,1S~ii,:,'s ss )L`i>. ~.8i~~'ltaC4 is ~~'5E" ~x`~O~£'Ci`1RiG~t
s~g~rrees of €tecearrt fcsi=this prap+*ot as a faart ref i`~tra
Ta~f~"~ c9es€gn tearrr ~ ~: rr;-; ~: .:,y , .~~._~,+
k:`~
~eigi¢trsc°a is fzrapasirr its retiginai f;~r~tr~ci~x€ic;rl te~rR=
e~ra~'sr~ ri~ssra frtan~ ~t}~ tirrouf;tr 2£1Q6 to ratrs4~itia: ~zs:r"
uuarsea grya£~chrrica€ sw'svire;~ drain cna;structir+r : •
;e,'s C;Sr~,. ~ 1i,Ti •c;ittf it' a ,. -, "+
s:Y?r7# s, , ~C}„ i ~ ". Y:, ,z ;. s~ t_''r1F ~.s~ , _
ls.l r ,'„'t;,C z; .?ri i;? i .,,az _,, ~ ,r ~s, r_ts . '1 `'sr,2-, ~€
r='+s '.. Y, 97 s LYk` 1~: .G,;tis ~ , . _, '{; `, .., ..i: .::; I ,., r .._ ..
sf + rttl ::i:3 sSs ni rS F;-l,.s t~'T; ss t ir£ r'.__`ss
',~ fi rtr-==.,` ,~f4 t: ~i%s { ~ r_.:>ii. t~. ~. ..,. J r ';s ;il . i,F ',ii...
r(; ~P Z} 7'n ;'il4iir a i, ~ i~• `c~:;i {? L,, S.c'? t~+r.-'+:::i.
tis,+.
, ., fs 1;-> ~t .,,.z.: ;? ,.~~ t.1t31 ,r<_
. a, ,
, r,~+flfl„ .3 ,,.
}~~er$~c4ainArtygyi~$a(~Crtrpr2gtn~{!tNt~3e@,~^ ~~ ~ ;
~ ~Fy#G$A(,Z VRx34s{A(A RkK~yta 4y:R4a4W CF S53 •jS lFf .~~ai
~ }N~l'€°wT4$~°pTy~,,GTIRSp!,e~gPa-ayd'tVit'i~'fz- ~,rF~ ~ +(E-r~,~ t 7 =.,~r..~~_
'' WS['IITfC"9, i4ia t~rx~Hi~Eg fe~a' .s~+~i .,CI +. ~..'.i ts,3 f ,.,
r;,;li~ F t.,,f?vt~; { ttv,. 4"FC"_
i
'~
~~~
~~.
.y
'F.
C(
}
ti
~~
a.
~i!
~~.
i.
k
?u
Y~
y~y. i a ~
l' ~i~ t
Y
~~
Vq.
{y
:K,
$~
L
'"~ Q1
+E C
W c~
irv ~ L
r~
a ~
y ~ ~
2 Y N
~ ~ ~
~ ~ 'C
C ~
4TS
$tl Q !_
.~
i4 11..1
r~
J
~,_ w
N
aw E
'n ~~ ~ U
vu m~
~ xrn
r.+ ~ ~ C
~', ~
m L N ~
O
~t UL
y V V
L
m
E
Y
f
,~ i
~ ~
C
3. L
d
L
~ Q.
m ~
aL
~ o~
n ~
n,„- L
~: a
Q)
Y
v
u p N
V V a. u_
L ,~ !° E
~"opoE
~o No
o~~aU
LUIM ON1i
u~N.Y~
lA O1C ~
a=lp 7O
~-LEa
tF. . O
11c ~~L Ey
J Q ~ O N
U
C1L L''_{_
~ L L
7 ~ p ~+
F- U~z
~a E
E
L
Q
v
V
IO
Y
a
0
J
Y
I.d
0
U
i
4
n. <x.
~ c
~
~, c~ ~.
~., z;
W l:x ':
X71 U7 U}
a
'~ ~
'-
,j
<,
~
~ .
~ ~
o u` .ri
; a.
~ '" rt
~'~ YI Fia
~) -Y
GcF}
~ `/
11~
lU
~
~
4/ 1 ~j 'f
t: ~
~~ t i St
~
CjJ t'
n l i i ~"t
.r
~,~
,
~
,. ;
i
`
,
% +~
N
i'~
~ 4
~
r-
f'
i
tF
ii
rti
~-
1 .+F
:a ii
~`j
V
7 i
L'. tii
in ~'~
"~
m
u = '~
w
u U Ui
v
~
111
x
Q z
<„~ ~:
i r
th
L
rn
a~C.
n
LT N
n
Q
10
E
~
O t;}
`~
~
%`
`a
~
iY +3;
,:
In
K,
~,
~
r~
~t1SiuRENt3lNEEftiN[,ii~C. t ~..~ rJlrr~ .~. ~.'~ n:
~•
~= ., ~ -,
r~rrr~rrt s~r~~/c.~ fc~r tft= f%~r(~~ <rrz;~;,~, Nt ~,~~>r ~i~,,~;
'~c~ft cr;7Ct' ,~„~,3~c3G~'173r?t7f ~~f"c~,fF,'t.'~ I4`;lf'I~IC~, {> J ~{'}'
~~ ~ 6
,.. 3T1~.3E si I_, Ef ~~.;. i, pa~ViEe ~3~[Fli;.~.r~~t,. ~. r,.?~r 3 ,~~r, i~~i~ ><. I7rc?F <>=<131 s~~~.Sr^C'r'
~>r! sr rvices far this $20 million .^r~ter storage tan~< proj~;:[ Tt~e pr{~}ect ecnsists of ti}e cor3-
,,trractrir2 t~f a singEr: 1C7-rni3lion gallon buried pre~s~s~ss2d cvncretFv circular tar3E<to reiaiace ti~3c
existing Olive Nifis Res2rvc?ir site in the City of Ar~~ahalm. Tire design allows for regrading the
'ti `^4li.J+i S+ tr' 3 S~1 at(r 7 ~rh3i=^ i } x 1 et ~~4:i 4" i,J "SiG,f F ei+#;{s fl a; ~,? If r (,..~.~ y'JFtI YF ca i Cs ':'
i!~ w~ <onstructivn Other irnprc>v~ments ir~rlude the rn~tal(atior~ of additional piezornetars ar~d
?a linometers, apl~ur~tenar2t (~ipf>i~rre aril ~tfrrria station lr~~~rcveinenis, and landscaping.
~ii3~£"~"~E~`.~EB~~~I1~?ii.~; ~Vt_li tt ~ <3 yl"iPt i z (li ~,~2 l)~ rf,l~. rwie e+ri'r 'a ,"s , ..ti rli n~f; i,' :..".t' t,1 tll£" ~ ~,.. ~.
3,ri,viE~nii?/ to mtdti r~ rilfiai ~ dr>!!a, fantsiy r(aid~.i~~as ancS an elern~nkary school
~:~.~~
r
Y I~RB.RI ice.
4VF9eriW [
r_ ~, 'uir~ ..~V_:., .. _
' + ..
C+~MPLE71C3P~
i4~Y S~TA~~"
r ~,t~~,<<, ; ~~~,
J? i '~ < ' r _. ,
`~.ti ~ ~ r,~:. , .
<~.~_, ~.
.A,1~~'ti{)~i~~, RtJUI' PRC37~CT EPiZI~6~
',`;`~r'.'~ ?-~. ra.. r:.v EE , °i.a rn =!„~:=Rt v .. ~asir, fhs ii tit»4
~, ~ lct~'sf is on
~ Fy~rr~~ ci,trict
6
,!i ixt~3igtrf;>t}t~j, q',Y3jjt-[n ~i;j ~LS2rC.`~ert1a,
,fit ~ ,.. ,ls ~ t ...~ (l,Y':I":
.- ._., (. !P} .r Sari ~K: t&~
'v ut3~tf ntui~(ot;
.ts '~~.. .e Y. ~-.~til-'
f'y-~~ c,€T!isrz~
..
ti;a; k 3Ui er, Praj. Dii. 5 C) i1C; Prestressed Concrete
Casey t4arrls, i3es. 6ia. (circular DYK-style
ivlar~ 6utier P.E, reservoir)
t'ri t?ci pal-in-Cl~;a rge
~YSar k ~~ p-ter, Prej. D's r. t.0 Cv~~"7 Prestressed Concrete
Ca>e;~ k Oar; is, ft~c. ~r~c}. (circular UYK-style
;~~ark t~utier: P.E, resenroir)
Frir.ciri~i r, Cl=irns
;Vrark B~,ner, Prej. r`ir. fi.~ Py'iG Prestressed Concrete
f-asey Harris, Res. E~;g. ikevc Yanks? {circular DYK-style
ivtark (~utier, t' E, CIa i n E~ reservoirs)
PA~1rK GUl~er~ Pro}. i~li. 13.1 ~fj PditlBl{y-bUr{MI W~
7 tP_h1lC'ii ~JVhltP, ~eSiGelli: VC'CYICaI LOn6C$e UlallS
~nginee-- and i-iopper Bottom
n e Enron (Leic~i~tom i J ~'~ (ircularDYK-sryl
1 t. r:oe (Leigf~~or,) (isva 1•anl~5) reservoirs
':aty .roi7xsarn
~;t3risCructfan h9anagement SNrs'icr's far f~ae tiawfu~ds +~escr~'otr
repass arir3 F?epiacernent PrajeCt (CIP ~o. 6 F.3t~}
t;csns4raeY9on of iCeufea a~eserv~ir•, 3oe PoiiYnino ~i.{).' lr.iifion Mark Butler, PYOj. Director ~.rQg
"r2sha ~~s~da r~'~tE`r t?9strioY 171! E. Ulirafeltta Ave. John Whisenhunt, RE
F'iacentia, C;4'/}2u7fl l'i~m Benson (Leighton?,
7i ~!'C31-31n~ !FUoteohnicak Engineer
r3ueier provided GM and inspecto+~ s~f 'lees rf t tl~~ r~nsiY~ic±ion of the i ake~iiew ft,rservotr. i"he ~.C ilia t~une~! ~ 3 ~t u+ , tr
CUr1CYet8 1"'35@rvUlY +NaS Sltl_IBiC(.) Nlithlil atl r'7(Q~ 6~ Utl t;olllg cGtlSt(UGt,it~i i Gf 8 ~~fJO~tcr X31.1i71(J StitUOCI c3Y~f~ 12SiiiGrltlaf t {.,~_'' 3r c f `a?S-
`~ie 5 oiae of "~Nr~!"k included the falicwirig: cof f~truct r?t~u~ing tiraii and drt~u~age stri ~c t±ires dic~rtg the =utr~Y~ an+9 v ! ~ - h>f:l+.Y
l If 5 c,U'17tYUCt V C~rLGP7 ~k)! i~; S~U:h gild West ,~r„p -ftY +k ^ A''1 1 DIY rasp ,atrt f€'t.U fE 110 ;~, :11"it,iding tn' 1"t>ft8 ~ t I1' 1 f:! as >
~i l : Z~,_i r1CY2 StGllYt t.~raiil iYl Melinda ;.:Cr2,2t~ C<,, Sti+,l;t. F. f ., ,vrSL ":~}/ Ji U`d' t ti32YVOlr UI,t.3 ~ ~i01 ~ILn C?~t~'tc; ..,c'(1'>;8r 37rtY, fl ~+ ft. ,~ + ., Il'; r-'
~.'.2p F31 (:Jikl~ Under tkl@ 1"2S?rVOli" to t~'*e ai.;tiet -diV6 S3 Slli kF ak: dci°Y tlLrfl "=1Uit:5~ d°i"YIQIISrI dnC.~ r~n~i7V2 Oi~ bOOStI t (T f ".'.O 5i '..' ',
f,.illC3i1» ail €`fljJill~ aYid cc^.r1CliictC}r e~'11')il CI?t Vr art fil°l ~.? f:OG~~" },U(Y~rF `iL,3tl0ti l5 ilU (~tlgi C IIl S°rV't.P i~olTli>ic'S 1. rift >~.+ iC
)f !{'iv? {~?I ~3.er i"Jcdj~ i?t ti12 YE~~r~: CMY, ti fCllt <1rr~t.3 I >t,1;]!{'t i~ .S.°E.'{7 t~ i:JiE?~ t!I?.~,.i ?~"i!9 Y.,;r~itiUl"" 1:~ i:rt@ JU~ic't vd{d2 3Ylf i . )31 C ' , ~u!'~
., ~'wJkF~t?C~ V_il'd'W latlliS iitlirin~ lhd i f~W t3Sct .;..{ 'tt, s~f ,~ t ..`V C.?C v>tt?" t~t,ilnL3 .~tull!ih, JUt~Phe rlt?N l2S0l ~/OII ;iltq r ~ .3 ,.t 7 1 vt~'a ~;~!'
>f fl ~l<>ucf!"jai and insir~ilr~Y~tau~~+ t<aclifTlc,~ c st i, roif~t~~ ~y rns. ,=~fir~i ,7!!t the ior~rrv! ~1~~tems into .peratlvn +c~~~r~ ~1f fi a";d
-'nR!V2 .14{; P,Xl8ttilg ~%.Q 11~Ita W~`i!~8Ci at..:,i ta!-I<n. fn~it_Ra?",~(,JYtur ,te iOC3;ld~t131"4S, ~~UI211CUtlrig lJipirlg, {~ralfl~d~i? Tcl~,iil C; :'S. -s{1(,~ <d~3
','~~(:%1"i!'ci alld Ct)ri~:C03 Vd`1rif3is 3!?%1 t.;v'rt~UCi3.
Aa`? 1m ~'".~..~w s F., o.. .e ,,.,.~ ., y D ...a _ ~ xc,d ~~ `"s' : `e{~w ~ s.,£:4~, ~r_.tn~24'~ ., ,.. ~~
5 h lot .ft v -r'
i8dc!ea~ ~i81s Z,0 ;'~Pa(i{cen t;~kian `ae'a!!s*ii^o 7...'i rniilion Mari, Butler, Proj" Director '(~%~~
~sorvaa;r, ~'zrr~a ~3~c#a ~r~a~er ~kstract 1:?1 t. ~ 'l.raf3! .a ?:e. SteF>hen White. R.E.
~ii3Cet5tl:a. ~.i1 :9 ~C'<'>r'tJ .10P. BlllITl, t~aY2dlYlg
~ii:~:~7t?i-33w~ 3`i1ar~4<f3utier, W.E_, G';ainis
Jsarna Abdel, Stri,lctuYai
.u .dt" ,.~~`..,I .:i;i cih?SiY?.3 ,'. U ! .'iG%t ,~~;3itl c'!N ~. !fl 'i Tf: ~.,~ C.Ci r2 S r ~ f.",~~ "or {:CnSirLi0i10 ri V{ f3 ~.~ MG f~Ur71 (; 3v t t f )Si° t ~ ,
iii 1 '.: rd h s iC.1 ty (,S '1 '':. i,7 rP F~V Y ni~ -y<: ikf.?J i~ir. t3oi'~1 Pl~f t0 7tdilOn ~~~.~>> 4Pl f' iklC~r~ h ~'~1fiS i) ' 'ill ,
t i~c3 i 3+1i 3G'f ti rt7 t Slf i~!? ~'~''}-af' ! "~SC,#t-f lf-tk Ckc'~>~`- C ill t~ ~.. TJ t118 ~f°{ t i~ 2i Cl ii @£' St :U 41 C.k tl(7Cit-'V°iI~~UC(,i l 3"ll lCl k~f'i ~ .` `
',]ik tf} vile. nOYtF1 ih-', 5Q>{'~ Of N1Jr„ ii~Li ~ved U3il _`. ia..tlJtl )T c] E_.~ fllNi )12 ~BilGfl CJUYl2d r,vn%i ~t2 Ye52Frl !1, S .{it, Ik; f•ffi
%fYiSrf rfo5it'~n "rYlr3it? ~r1C1~.7,.t~i~filCtl,:Sf. _rCtt .,1r~.1.~ ,7l _-ft,i U f WSJ :~~C2So f0:9d, iYl C4 U(:#Itig ~rddlilg %]11d pavi!1,~ ~a5 a C~rN(tJS~~iS
r~<t?YayifJ Ci ~'i 1-ilddt'n Hlll,S P~J"'ldi ~ ~!~ ~j.]~i ~~,.5 ~:-' Q• ~ L.:(3 i, ',!i-.~ iJ i.-tiY ;) 7~;a+In"1 iI1CiUdlrle I IeW P.l i9l`tf"ICaI ~:frCUf~~, f J(h',l~iliC,
';:iblrY.,i,~ ariG1 L`ei°il'lE3~ry' y(-~f~tro~S, F)l.Lil}) C~9'~ -~LBi; c =,..~ UI'1G ! ?Yif~U~ ,~.~CAL%R'lOrllil"lUniC3Ci0tl (~eVIC@S.
man ~t~~t#usn P3i€ls ~2es~rvoir '~1+ ~u? L~ ,r~ `39. ; .~,itlion P~Iark BLltier, i~roj. Oireetar 2fS05
',~.f3rii+e.'Y,~i39Drl; ~aS dEd'i~' .i9ikr«~1 Y~£3~£!r ~.;_7-~*J7 J~c;?i~ f;;i:tny0r:
sys`~tT#C'~ ! C` I'".2.:~A `?L01'~u
t~31.itIL'Y [ rJJ1tleLi Cf)rfSirUCt?Otl IYS~!lr~,?iT1BYii i t~ f "3":i~.°--CIO(1 53i"ViC~S dltrlil~ Cf~Y1V~'YS{Oll 6f ih° 2XiStIYI~ "Jc~i1 }G~i.~Uit1 ~+.iiS
FZ3SC-r'v9lr 170!71 US@ a5 a d0I7125+i8 srVat;rr i"(.o6EVOi(" try d r~tyCied Wi~tF'Y TPSf'YVQir.'(k7F' GOI"1VerSIfJr1 3"JrOJACt. COrfSISt@d Oi ir•!~.'e
,0{iStrtAL, ~fC rl of tt a1751Y1ib~lOn n~a31 a z+~ f;0!'tY~?rt it;? i .5 'fbt3i( ~3Y"{j bt,cstet' p4_I rft(71n~ 3tat1r1r1S tU CiIP FJIStCIGt'3 diSLYt~UriOn
,. > ,
1 ...:j -t~ t 1` s .f.. ~ .,., s i ..:. S ,( fi. i s ":''; ,pit r '.ti > ._~
1)I OkeCC fL;' tO }Fl ~!~~`". "+..'riQ il)3.~3t(`JI1 wfCCfi YI a ,~r3y tNl S.I rc3t f> ~bUtt...~~ ~}~ r7 Rtlif-iTi!lifOrl (.i04iaY f']rtiliY r...ald.'. Y1C?S. SCi1(?Oi,~, x,11 dC £.~;
;li YvfJ YSi?ip, e~YlC1 hiti~t-2nC1 .r.CiTli7iEi'Ci:~i priJF?~'!ti°S.
.rx:{. ~k :w3~,..,.nzs". vta~a r... ~... .~'i. A.c G, ~F+erw„~r, ... ~*,a.',.,a ~Y%r~''S.c1e{~?~o ._..,»a.t.., r, S,.Y .,.. .r ~_.32,c,~3& .,,c «a,. .~..., 'a3 ~._,.~"`~
~~sia/~ui#d rsf Bgrs"s~~;eia€e Ft~see~~ralr, !~,ts. Debbie ~eFsoty
ity rat i9ustkfl~~kon ~e~ch ~~ x'41 "t-?taritington St.
tii;riingto+f Beach, CA
7~ +,'S3ei ~'~25
<'s.0 n~iliir3n Mark Butler, Proj. Director 2044
Mark Butler, P.E., Princip~i
Stephen White, Resident
`engineer
>31.itier =rt~,Irlceri-1~ {~ c. uY, ic9ed i.rstriicti~rt i~~ariagernen'and inspe! tion sear! u=. i~%rtn¢ design/bui4d ofthe ~pnngdale
fir serdnr. TPtr: probe t ~ a. f>>! t5 n' ~ `3 ~1G rast .n-zs(ace rPintoi~~d cc>r~ct~t~ r~ s{~1 v~~ir sn`9 r f~tPd imprcvemei~ts recessary to
;ncr:=.as? tYi~ Df,~<a`71t~ v.~;~rF'r tciagc !~f tl;e tst.~ of Nunt!ngton Beach. Coit~pier.c! f,! ?ijt)3 f f ~ =r:<;ervoir new hl(wides u,t7tpaUbie
,;,; .~
'~. _ ~ c f`. t ~r 7 v .'r r ~ _.I, i ~ '4 r 'a l'. ~. f~ ~Ji~:.
i
t'"',>'~i3ii31il^.13 Ui 1 f°'.y t.,C)k 3i `J.i ~,.lf>`?. -. , s ~ .jl.. f~c;, L,.al ~ 1~. f?rt'rC~~ U~aH£y; f~ th,l~t~, ii ~1 LI rz', •! tl)Cf~J 17~K,1 ~f`:, dYlr~ dii ('t'Cti~a~.cd3f C.Pr$i~8
workr~l~iric,~,acc~ar~rrni<hatf<<~xi~ ,,.P~,ail,1,~.t~,r~i~u.,y>'hls~lUjecri~+t~.,art;i~rt~:cifYr~~ts,f..,t1.~~f.~I~s~;r~~olrec,m~t~t~~F{its
:YCF1i'~'.,t!.,fl>r''.;'.$-}'lE? ~UYr,~, ( i, U~Yt, , <;1r,1."ill J p -veiui~t~"::.:t<ii rj f-{i~f3-tF..C;ki i',11,11iti131r;:.
'r3t733ERENGii~EE{?i;`11s,lisiC, ~~>; ',t%i~ :, ;i .-u::~!GdS
CITY C}!' TUSTr
,;; r rr r}=gr xfs r.?i=r=ls ~ ,+,:..1 ~ r~F 'ee '
ffc7W'~111~SR4'SeYVf?IP ~G~h~3IPrNt.?1 f FR7~+1J~/~YC3f~G~~~l~/Y~, f),~.~i~3~, ~°, ~.~.,~-=.
>~; rf? ; PC
NEAR, BU"~'1~, P$2!~lE~"' ~11~~~T~
i1,lr, t£I; fc~Y SC'"tier fir, ~lera" `FSs' ^, (t,. ~{ 4 ~~iTit £,~ ii%r ~t.)S4-l O li^°Y 5 F
~Pt..~Edcnt cl .~iv 113., ~~#??&€.,.ki ~ tn~,t ~, .f Y7~, ,:w=~rtC~:
close{y 4t'?th t€1C' f?elF1 GC1r;trllCtl~n nlanagF`n"?£~rti 9t~ff ~( c`nSs t!t. c:si i,'or?tra t aUQpe rE?:~C.~re tt entS
are being; sliliy"!r(tplf,'I7YE?nted. fir, Pslitlei" ai.~Cr Sc r~VeS <34 th(3 f+?fY'~~ GF3ntc'3Ca bf twGeEl thf;' »eid Con-
struction management staff/client and the project public outreach effort, when necessary. He
has been responsible for generating, distributing, and presenting to numerous public boards
and community associations dealing ~vitYt the impact of construction activity on the local com-
munity. Mr. Butler has 20 years of varied experience as an Assistant Resident Engineer and
Inspector for municipal ar~d gov'ernrrienta( agency projects.
Noh€ Canyon Water S#orage Tank; Anahe€, CA (C€#y of Anaha€): Project Director for construe-
tion of a 10 MG buried pre-stressed concrete circular tank that includes approximately 250,000
~' 4f tv ~.3rtr11't:5rl{. ~€'{~k~-r tS Fl' ~ls~.il-(;1i..r fi+£'., 1)'=?it t,t.c~?~i}/ SC',!"!,`~. isiSrF~ {;7C'IJ ^.';'~. ClllF:' tC? tl c.~ SiZ , i1 nC( 1:'7rhXi?;l?;i' tt;
multi-million dollar family residences and an eiernentary school.
Cons#ruction of Laken€ew Reserve€r; Yarba 4inda, CA (Yorba L€nda Wa#er D€s#r€c#}: Project
Director for construction management and inspection services for the construction of the 8.0 Iv1G
buried cast-in-place concrete resererotir.
Cans#ruc#€an of N€dden H€€#s Raservair; Yarba L€nda, CA (Yorba L€n8a Water Distr€c#}; Project
Director for construction management and i?lspectiorr services far construction of a 2.0 MG, ds-ral-
bpy hopper, buried concrete reservoir foratc:d adjacent to a single-fami{y residential deveiopn-?ent.
San laaquirt H€€#s Reserve€r Canners€an; Irv€ne, CA (#rv€ne Ranch Water Die#r€c#}; Project
Uirectof during conversron of dornestfc wa,~1 reserto~i to a recycled water reservoir Thi ~ way a
h'~r.'",{'i-s7. }+,.e, pt?Sitt~..iCis~'`St Si ,, Zf Vf, j? ..+s.:Lt ::tu, t r@>t<r£i <', iC? [J~JriP Cnty t:U (t1 . ~ ~Y'slu+J4, ss..U:.,'r it92ri tr r-;:+~-
dences, schools, places of worship, and high-end commercial properties.
qtr. €3ium has enter}sine experience managing and estimating the cons#ruction of heavy civil
engirfeering projects, including reservoirs, earth moving and mass grading (110 million yards of
Still€, .,JrhXetc;° SS+iz~i;tirc;S, FtvC,)r.,l CCtItC! fu!'~(?r..~5, tats.',,?r?~ ;,(2}ril t~l?,1?,.i~" pir}<,ii,le~S, dry f?rt,:,£,
ae~et: and dry utilities, paving, city grid county road construction, highways. and bridges. ivir. Biurt~
i fns developed and implemented community outreach efforts from entitlement through post-
construction for projects {Dented within high-end residential communities in the counti°s of
C?range, Sarr Bernardino, Riverside. and 1_os Angreles.
Noh9 Canyar+Wa#er S#orag Tank; Anaha€, CA (City of Anahe€m~; Resident Eng"sneer For
eonstruetian of a 10 N1G bu?Ied pro-stressed corcrete circular tan(<that includes apz~roximateiy
r' j~1~ + ~ tc <} t as ~ > r F 3 t
i'~U',C~t1C~1 . r~` C)T C- }i S`C„ S l~1l,~ is 3 1}t; '-C~4 c r,i k?,,ik ~ d Pr-~., 3b.€,P-JQ, {~. Gi-,...t ~_:3a' ~E_ L[,. ~i~'. r~?C+ i
praxirnity tcz multi-niiiiiC;fl c+t,itar f<~)nrry resin ~~ r~ rs and an elementary school.
Construct€on of H€r#den N€#is Res+rrrvoir; Yarisa Linda. CA {Yorba L€ntka Water €~€str€ct~=
Technica€ Advi~trr (rrr (tr;1 iE+?";,i~t ?.~ +)?s.€suc{iE>rz t~f ua y.0 tv#G, dual-bay hopper, buried concr~t~ rr~s-
ervoir locatf;d arllaa;erfttr) i s,~;~;± ' t,;i?~r{y r ,~ri::r~tia; development.
Cato 1!a€€~y estates 1.C~ C Crad£ari c~servoi~• (inipravernent Distr€ct too., Santa IYiar~arita Wa#er
D€str€~#},tvir.i~i?Jtf)~1.°•~+;<+ ,rl.,,tPt ~.;~?as?t5 ,)rsJrr.;t.t+t}i,nFimillionCYofearthwork,inch~rdingal[<r~
rt;?;i ?"i s,.)'., rs",, .+s,, ~ih , ri?., ~ 2`v.,. Jfl+S+ ~,?»,s+aC.11"r"se.fl,?.lu''lt"i+~:',.C"z}+s,-dT t?r'_,
wffh ~i iPE' €3iVI .,t t f r, 'L2 ,. ji: t ,ii t(( +s' f. rif,;?1t r) r)i InC:iinOmetP.rS and p18ZOmeterS.
ti V~€~idt~rl 5tr <~I Rr}~+vrvcrlr (inrtzcElveartr~*nt fi~isY:rie.°E too. 7, Santa €Y#argar°sta Water Die#rict).
~k. E3t s21 s 4 is r=. '+ -:? +tt t <+ s t r, 3 [3s' irlndoNi4ler'S Sid@ WhlGtl IRCIUded p{rt( r-
lt,;: Ct! r €, it + 3 t si, ; f?• ..,a #. rs. .+• +2?!s.< f4t.in exhting f1C}me0wner5~ VIe4b', negi tlr}tSStf
r.t+t?tt,r- • ,_;,,, :, :..i>7; 1>+?rri SMW~F1 CeprBSentatlVe, and w<di"s'£ir?~, k°J1~.~
".1"s`~'
~~~~.~~
tiarzndltFJfE: 4i;?}p_?/ ter:
Vii'"v?GC/lte Ci%!~'L17,''.,'._; ?`{t'?'
xi", t„ (. ,.
{`rT,'C?t Ytr, 5 c"ffr
(
)
i..ii}J i($ rix/ty ~; .)t>t ,Li f_.r~
LICENSES)
GERTII`ICATIC3N
C=eon rr*t8_ i,?, s. "+. -'ZI'~s%"
Fsc ,,r c~ :_i=
frt~6r r°,., N_11
~r r , , -.
EDUC/~TIOt
C~k t'~t 12lrx ~`s'r) tc.t r•f`_~..
L?s ?< rt- ~ r~r-
Cfl t4~"I J. ~..?.C`._
MS~YE[IV~ATRb~
CERTiFICa4T1{3NS
L r~r, tr~£?f~lt3 ird''+4'.`.
~~~~~5~~8~~~~,~
• nnstraacfion tl~P,anagemenf Servlres for the Rau~frn~s Fd~servr~ir
I'~rl3air ar~d Repiacernerrt Project ;CiP No a~.3~3
~Ilr. Butier has successfully 9rlanaged over $950 million of public work improvement projects ~~.~.~
throughout Southern California and Arizona. Prior to forming Butier Engineering, Mr. Butier
sanitary, and structural
gained 10 years of experience as a civil designer designing major civil '~~~•~ ~r~rr ~ "'-~~'"'`'"~'•~_~
,
engineering projects. Additionally, he was employed as a key construction professional civil ~"rtr;; t f j .~ r!r.r~c , •_?~
engineer in heavy Class A engineering construction in Southern California for 17~ajor public ~~~~r~~c~ f
infrastructure contractors. i~lr. Butier t?as been appointed as a member to rnaior Disputes .~.~~~~~~.)~~
Paview Boards for multi-million dotlar projects as Owner"s and Contractor's appointee. He has
appeared in court or arbitration as an expert over 40 times in resoil.rtion of litigated contract >'~'~` " `'' _'
(li5pute5. ~;_rnftt~ ,.u~1~2~ . ,:r
xpanslon and Upgrade of the Henry td, Wachholx Waskewater Yreatment Paclllty; Ytscalpa,
~;A (Yucaipa Valley Water L}Istrct): Principalan-Charge and Claims Review For the expansion and S~$T?CIA7lL)Td
+Iggrade of this WWTF which included the construction of a 4.O MG pre-stressed concrete circular r,f>r ,. ~~___, , ,. ,.
Ctay Water Treatment Plant Upgrades; San Olego, CA (City of San 171ego, Water Cepartmenf}: ,. rr
Principal-in-Charge and Claims Rev"sew for construction of of two 6.5 MG treated water (cfear~veilj _ , r ;r
r aservoirs (DYK prestressed concrete reservoirs), piping. and facilities. r'~. ~~_ .~
'oVest #3asln Water Recyciing Plant Phase IV Expansion; EI Segundo, CA (Wes# Basin ~~r ~ ,_
Ylunicipai Water IAistrlct): Principal-in-Charge and Claims Review for $52 million designJbui;ci
t,=~~;er;[ involving tPSe expansion of ;ts ti^/ater recycling capabities and the construction of a 5.0 fviG
„r . ~;tressr~d ~.oncrete circular tank.
5prin1date 12eservolr DeslgnjBulld Project; Huntington Beach, ZA (City of Hun#ington
Beach}-Principal-in-Charge and Claims Review for the construction of this 9 NiG cast-ire-place
r~einfarced concrete reservoir for the City of Huntington Beach.
l 1 ~ •~
~1r. White has 16 years of experience in the construction industry as a resident engineer -and gers- ~.~.) "°
eral contractor for reservoirs, wells, ~,vater and wastewater treatment giants, desalination plants,
and residential home construction. He has ..",een with Butier for over 10 years, during which tirnc; 5 ., ` ` '
he has focused his expertise on water treatment projects. He has excellent project managerrlent '~'``
and computer skills, ar~d brings experience in contract administration, including change order ~' "` r "' ~` ` `"`
requests pay requests, preparati,sn or subcontracts, and records management as well as super- „ f%-t +.r
.
Y[Sif1n Of ii.ork CrBvJS ;ft ti2e fi~.id, C.~,2S1~t1 ~ Et,itzw, .,COy'e:Ct .>~~1~8Ch_lii rlg, and Gl,„?I`t 1f1tC1"fc:ce. r ~/f r rr,
,, 7~7t , ~ , r ± ~'
Czrns#ructlon of 2.(? IVIG lildden Hills Reservoir; Yorba Linda, CA {Yorba Linda ViJater Dlstrlct)- ,+?<' + ' , ,',• ,
Resident Engineer for construction management and inspection services for the construction
I, ~~., f r r ,, , , .. , _ ;
of a 2.0 million gallon, dual-bay hopper, buried concrete reservoir and +.Ipgrades to the existing ~
,
.,
r
t f
, f
Santiago booster Pump Station. ~~j,{~;
Springdate Ixeservo~r f~esign L~ulld; Huntington Beach, CA {City vfi l~luntington Beach;~ .9CElV5ES/
Resident Engineer for the deslgnJbuiit! of a 9 million gallon cast In place reinforced concrete ,
,
~~~
~
~~'~~~)~~
r,.,~rVr~!!. i t~,' ,.rc>lt.l,t ~s3~:t:lv~,§ n:3}£>i ^G?r!hl"Jt:;t{. +~C34'Itfes, tl£:4V 1"}!$~{nn {:;p,? 1f3CtIQrtS. n"lr?tlltiC~3ti)#"1S
to the existing booster pumping station, and installation of new isolation valves. 'isfr z f+ 'rt> > _.
Cvr;rmyer Reservoir; fluntington Beach, A (City ofi Hun#ingtcn each)-Resident Engineer , ,
a
,~
for the rehabilitation of a concrete reservoir and related improvements. The project involved new
st,~r,g:~cl~ar~= c;ti{1r{~> Y~s~'c~itiC~ailns to ~h~ ~=:i.,i~r g `~ ~ ~.>t,>r gr~lragin~stati<>r~. ar~d Insirallz~iic~n {-~f ~~f +,;, ~xr,,r , ,:
nr~w Isolation valves. Addit;vnai groj~Ut „r~rnpar~r'nts Included site drainage, paving landscaping, ~ fit. ~ 3r ' rf,:, fl , :r:
fencing, lighting improvements, and all rr~;t,~~<_~s~ar,~ ofl~slte avork to join or accol7rmodate existing ! ;;~;~ `f.. ,~ .f~ ra< ,< ~- ;s
facilities.
=;U1"IER LPlEi1NEERiNfi,1NC. aF~e ~> Tarp t n cif i_',
Mr. H<:~rris has over 28 years cif varied exf>erience as a construction manager, project manager; .
~~
~~
and resident engineer. As the on-siteJowner representative for major municipal, public agency;
and special district capital improvement projects. Mr. Harris has successfully managed the ft ` t,c> Mfr, ~ StU .t
construction of multi-miliian dollar water and wastewater treatment, reservoh", pipeline, airport, ~`'~""` ` ~"~ "`'°'"'''~ `" '~"
;~ri's 4fi VJ ;,tC i<""}ndfill, ar7i1 p;?5t fciC.lff.t:;;;, ~<ilf+~CtIVBIti., tl!!S i.rrC?~c t,~ E,:~,~e'~ (.`:?.t„? r't,l~l,:it:rit> f}V•'?C ~?t!ts+. ",,,,.}..t„), r'
$5C}Cl miilian in construction costs
. {~ sal ,utr; Sf~~t~c~a, fir ~=r
Expansion and Upgrade of the Nervy !~, Wochhaix Was#ewater Treatment FacNity; Yucaipa, 5'r~*r- Urrivtr4~
CA (Yucaipa Yaiiey Water Dis#rict}: Project Manager for the expansion and upgrade of this
;11:+JUTI sshict~ included the construction of a 4.0 MG pre-stressed concrete rircuiar tank.
(1t<`sy ~Vator Trea#ment Plant Upgrasies; San Diega, CA (City of Sau Diego, Water Department}:
t t~ ~:~ [ I ~L?r? ~b~>r for cor~structir~n o€ of two ~.5 MG treated water (clearweil} reservoirs (DYK pre-
.~,. ~, • ,i + ~xu.rt r.~. reservoirs), piping. anc# facilities.
W+>~t t3~+sit~ Water i2ecyciing Piau# Phase ill Expansion; Ei 5egnndo, GA (West Basin
tt~#~rtti~ iira~i Water District. f~rograrn Manager for $51 million design/build project involving thr.
+ ?f I4 ~4r;~i~r r~.cycii4;F, capabities and the construction of a 5.0 MG pre-sf~~essed con..
+ t is e 4t r;,
tttus~t> Aaivrrstred Water C~uaiity Assurance Laboratory; Fountain Valley, CA (f3range County
va%fat~ ~ t)t Jtrtct$ l f +: it ? * € =sr (; :c r r for r.osistruction management and inspection services for the
~rra4 " ?~v ~ ~, sf << ~ frigr?~c ~~ s~ssf,ainable (green; laboratory.
may,
;~ .`- s : t, r , # lc;r 4~t' rr~~c4 1~ }re3c~' ~ of =:xperiE'tu~ ;? ~ tht~ <,~~>r?ser.,r,t~,>,
EC3~~~~+~
r '.; _~~_ ~ hr = ~~~( lnsp~etions for water capital improverraerrt pro;-
+ + „~ ~? ++ s 4+ ~rrt tIl ants; and large diameter pipelines. Prior tolotrting ~~ , ' `+ ~; "
z s ~ +, ~ .f r ~ $_ u~f F, ,~ ~,Tt~?s <str,3 past. tension inspection services for the Ota~ ,
t s i,x .; ( f , .,. fs.= ,(+s. (?sr ~.,. E.a, r Tli£>rrias R~,~.,rvo(r" Rt.p18Cf.'I"Cletlt, and /alldraftJ
~,: +~.- 3 .r,it= ae~ ?r,z,a t ?. t~+.,+> , l'?~tte'ca i'tta`~r1s 2., ~ 8.a, and 2. ;.. ;
,
,
, ~
~
,
,;
~ rGr
~tt>trd t frr~vr+sa W.~fe~r Stc~r,~t=,~* Tank; Amite€rn, CA (City of Anaheirn$t Pield EngineerJinspertor far L's .a '-' t o I. <"
="~=I! <t ., !t7 s'v?{, t,; ,:,.a ; ?f +r?F;, + .~ ~,or~~xea~t circular tank tP~Iat incN~des approximateEy s
',
,+
.. ~;~.~.
f
, ~ _ . c~f
f i; t s I ,l? i i e 3I ¢7L faster. -,;;n~ -it'ac ~'t1U ~S. {jiIE °,.' srlt; ;"itZ_ c9 ^'t Cs gg
ryry
l
t
~
i.~irE~~E~
~;, ~ .,,., , +~ ,. ,~ ~,t ,(4,, sr.~icS tr„e ~ and G~r* lemer~ltary school CEl~'fIF[CA~"It~Fi
€ as1 1t~ttstr„a~~ /2€r~~>rvttdr F3ey~3;a€,c~+~cnt; San Diega, cA (City of San Diego)-Specialty inspeett7r ,
~? ;>; + I .Ir ~ 3 e, ,=;z~ tt ,s:,tu t 4 t}hr
,tor €or the City of San Diego Alvarado YVater ~'< rr~ r ; r ~~~.
. ~;~ ~, <~ , , ~,~ , ,,
s„ ,. ~ _ ~ , 4„ s,4 >,; ; e :,r, , i~ i rj{. , (,<:w{g des(gned post tension tank and civil design r, ,, ~,~,,,.r<. ~=r r,r~ c ,•
;; ~ ~ • +s =. ,. =a~,t r (~ 4 , .~, r ~tt }. 7t~~ic. reservoir was named as the world's largest post ten- err-,,1R, ,;z;° < , ,r< <;...
_' _~; ~ , ;; ~retas ~,~ uvr't 35 rt2iliion gallons of treated water. ~* r, r ar;~<~ , +
# ~g7~is~tiit~c9 arax~! t€grpyrrttl+ of tist~ i4€°nry P#,1~lc~chh€tix Wastewa#er Trea#men# Eaeili#yr Ytrcaiirzs; ,;> rrrls rr c
<' jtua :as~ez ~,rtit=y 1~',~€c~r Ctists°ict} f4~wid i ngincaer/inspector for the expansion and upgrade <,~fi Sys .; ~ ,~4F r< r ~.rr >_..r,~
t r i°~' ° , , , ,~ ~ ° .v.~s, , iIr ~ts~?e stt f~aci?qty The project expanded the 4.5 MU[~ zf~~3~rat, fr r n ~ r ~~ r:=
t•4 + r ; , , ,,~ , a t'r~ ~ xt~ ~ t,+on an~i ctp~;r<t~lr~ included the construction of a 4 Q ivtGL~ +~ r rF nr r .
. , a rI ~ ..-t ~..., e ,,(a , rt:~r-ivatgsteation; pr"smart' sedimentation tank; secanckary~ ~ ' , s` <r-d. , + z ,i='NS~..-'
~; +". _.. try #.,~~,°rnn. noEc~ ~a€~~I(r_.r~{a f: r.~rrtiarv hit;ra r~;i~dtl, nr~.i1~ r,(_,?t-
,. ,, t~.....,
c >r
z l t ~ ~' ~s f<t 3 _itiv> S[C`r, )wale. C,Jf[~,~at,.rr, ~.~~prES7 ,Rir, ,. _! ~...
~ ., .t .. t
. „~ t
~":'
r ~' ~
.
,.
,..,
,.:
:iE ~ ,t ?~;stin
;Ef,+~iruc~tion ~rlanagemeni 5er±~fces for tfre F,'~,wtur~ ; t~'rsart~t?ir
i~?~pair anti Repiat;ement Project (CiP No. ~,;t3£i)
iv1r. Denson brings 25 yaars of experience an a ,viric~ rar;ge of project types including commercial,
indt.rstriai, land development. and public works pr<3ject.s. ills technical experience in Southern
C;alifarnia has bi:en broad, to meet the ahailenges of ttte growing urban region. lie has been the
tr~rhnicaf lead on numerous earthwork, sharing, de4vatering, seismic, liquefaction, slope stability,
t~+nneiing, rock stabilization and soil improvement stud+es.
avviins Reservoir Repair and Repiacernen#; "~~.rstin, CA City of Tustin}-Principal Engineer for
investigation far replacement reservoir an t,iliside site. Mr. Benson veas instrumental in develop-
,7i,a e:}?;Ct:,,t",~51liSt,~t`?rL°.I,~inJ "itl '~S.t•'tiW l.,!!?,;~C>ar .1,1t;Gtf"f SIB<i~i`r,?~J4; int. :+FaiSlS ~. e. i~,3 r3 r;~ 35123{,'.`-:?s.
f.akevievv ~T.f} iViG Reservoir, Yarba Linda, CA (Yarba linda ~1later Cis#ric#}-Principal-in-Charge
responsible for geotect3r+ical design and construction services, including soil and concrete test-
ir?gduring construction. This is a cvnventioE ~aiiy reir7forced concrete dau#zie-hopper reservoir and
ac4jacer3t pump station. ConsUucted in phases, the pump station is completed reservoir construc-
tion ;vas initiated in e>arly 2048. Phased car~structian was net;essary since'the proposed reservoir
/~iii replace two steel watertanks at this site.
:dig3afand Replacement Reservoir, Yarba Linda, CA. Project t~eeteci?nicai Engineer. Ta improve
c;perational capabilities, reduce rr3ainterEar3ce acrd improve water quality. the Yorba t.inda Water
!district decidecj to replace the existing reservoir with a $11.2 mil}ic?n Ca MG underground rein-
forced rancrcyte reservoir. ~R~tr. Benson is principal far Leightan`s geologic and geotechnical engi-
r3eering s?+pportservices, ar~d rraaterials inspection and testing during canstr+.etian.
3, it #~C1c r3 14 .ti r ~ ^ ~ - ''l~ ct:1_.~.+ ;1+.,=~ ~7.~.-:. t.~Gt{Sf :~ .°,3r `5;,~;~Ui; ` Gt' it ',#dd-
cs .C~r:?°. ~r ,t'iiEZ::i{'fa?1?, In<34,~ g, •lC.ti r°E; RJR;fis„>. f,ri3`s c-,r,{:.5, a.:,s?h.3iT ; ,31 tlg, f? .tln;yS, Uiii Efi~; 177CKt"tii5>
drill lagging, rock ~,oring, test trenching, monitoring and pump w~eli installations. He l?as partici-
pated in many aspects of prU}ect developEr3ent from project pianraing, investigation, corEStruc
tion services, and project managerter3t.
i3a?neifrags Reservoir Rapair and Replacemen#; Tustin, CA {City of Tustin}-Project Manager/
Project Geologist. Prr~iect cc:x?silts of replacing existing 4.2 million-gallon (MG) evater reservoir
with two 3-PvfG r,~oncrete circular water tanks. ,,"vlain geotechnical issues consisted of failure of
existing reservoir and attempted lining repairs (by others); extsansive soils and retairair?g avail fail--
ur~es in the past; slope stability: grad prapas=~(~ cut excavations; "Shear zone" and Socalized shallow
groundwater in the ravine c9rainingta the site footprint
ahi Canyon 4tila#er Storage Tanis Projec#; Anaheim, CA {City of Anaheim)-Project geologist
irEVaived in pianr?inganci lnstitutinginvestigations to evaluate subsurface conditions far planned
addition of 1Q million ,gallon tarok, Project involved installation of an array of inrlinameters as well
as monitoring well instaiiatian and design to establish i~aseline conditions prior to cans#ructian.
Pr ,jest involved rnonti7ly monitoring of existing piezometers as tivefl as newly installed irrstru-
rnentatian, data analysis, and report preparation. Project Geologist during constructon included
xf~'r35iv~ tie:3d r7'3~ai~121t i ~ ,;f Is'3d!!iC,i< t xpr,~.r:res C3u3 E3?g kt "iding i(1 1 °i i) ?,0 13ct gc'f yr.?i.hr1S~:,~I
data used in slope stability analysis. Daily communication with engineers, client, and multiple
superintendents an the jab. Evaluated and approved stability excavations, oversaw installation of
exter?sive sub ar}d iaackdrain systems during grading operations.
P,S8CY0lr , irvine, YiA -.?c'? r~r ~:iaft {~r'{}3, i. ;±;'S r+~~ ;~i:t., ?.if;al :Feld il?al E;?ii"tE,F fai" allUViai rr:: rr?OV..
all and b±kttress piacernentfar subsurface four-miil(on gallon reservoir. Performed percolation
t, . ~ ;. -33ar?r; ilr,.a to `ss ,~:d f"'t ~i r1c'CgF'r t,y (il-::r sl=>Va, l";;~IId~ SCi'.~ CI R%r1~1c' i~Nr?ll slll~-test t0 C+£'teriT'iitlti'
s f1 3uF,iT ~r trrv}"~P,r ~f~a 3, v`i ~c t" .C <;j;'~3rr".Eii~:glErtr tr3; tli°CI .CfCSSJ Ci ~rCi.Int'~'tlc'3tGr fr61"(7 r.3C,`t*.CLit.
CC?nriC~uted percolation testing of subsa,rfsnr:e a#iuvi<~( soils in order to develop data needed in the
!.rron iJ~ ~. ~Vt3:F`i'3;1g tt &:(3Ci . iJew~tF r,rt,, t @'r'~t rY r, "i+` (1? f.i t i i ;~~ ip c t+ r,i ~ f*.?,
'.( i0 ,,;~fJ,ure 3t .IC as`. 1. f,_{?Y T"i
fractured bedrock r~psiope of the reservoir.
I313CA7iC3N
T s.. [ Nair f i(Fli r)r ~.t, r7„`,
r.:'/'tl,, 4111 tiP~jt:~ I ~7~L !.~~1
~.~c~~vs~sj
ERTIFIGATION~
('.,iil:J ('r I t~f 5rl.S`' ~fL'tI
":~'?3t.E'C'3"tt3 tl %;r~,? t ,v c'r '
.'?: `~
~:7 t`,'Q, jrtxd rf?r ~~ t tJ(i F,i L'ii
~tc!,f, Jrnz.., .,
,., ~.5~, t ....~~; ? ~'
t3UCA"i`6Ot~1
. ~ze~'r. <y ' .,r,_'. c~t,, c ti<,
! ~c~~s~sj
itT1FICA`~~$DiV5
8 `_'^
;itfCe r, 3 t r ',`,'? „lit; 3!
~,
~t~nrkE!~!{iiPlECR#j°~7Ci,?tVC.__~____m~_____A~_n__~_,_ ,~, _ ~ Tr.?1 „ vtl ;.n<i+1S
r:
~ ,1
RL ..~. t I ~,.i
kA\'YU 1 ~r "w'~~IY ~.
.`""I ~ F~~ i~!~ 11 1~~1~~5~-~~~fl~~ _~
~~~~ ~ti
"" _
-~~
~~,q
r ~~
?~
~~..s
j
;.
....
.t <r~.
~... ~:
~ - _w ~..
~ ~ aa: ~,.
,,
,;: , .. :{
. .
~.
.3 p.
r
F: ~.
~~~
i ..
i
I
~~~ ~~
•..' ~ si ,n. i I+~R'ryyii~l~ ~ ~ .:~. rE7i~AlY~~fri-
1
.~~
x
T ~ ~ 1`ii~J1~~~,V ~r•~/1
. _ _.,_._.. _.. .__ ~.._ sys.._ ar
July 21, 2010
Dana Kasdan, PE
Engineering Services Manager
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
SUBJECT: Fee Summary and Staff-Hour Allocation
Construction Management Services for the Rawlings Reservoir
Repair and Replacement Protect (CIP No. 6136)
Dear Mr. Kasdan:
We have updated the cost proposal to reflect the scope modifications discussed in our
meeting conducted in October of 2009. The man-hours for field construction management
services are based on our recent experience in constructing similar facilities with nearly
identical site constraints. It is our expectation the pre-construction services will be
pertormed on a task order basis. Specific deliverables for the pre-construction phase will
be discussed with City staff and man-hours adjusted to fit the City's current project needs.
The final field CM costs will be determined by the construction contractor's
baseline schedule. Our field staffing plan will be adjusted to accommodate oroiect
demands.
The following clarifications are necessary:
1. The rates presented in the cost proposal reflect projected costs for the
duration of the contract,lncludina escalations through June 2012.
Butler's rates are inclusive of the other direct costs necessary to support the project
scope. The included costs are as follows:
• Laptops/software for all field staff
• Digital cameras
• Electronic vaulting for project data
• Consumables for reports
• Project vehicles
• Technical support for District project management staff to Butler server
• Project safety equipment
• Field inspection (small tools)
• Cell phone/radio
17782 E. 17th St.
suite 107
Tustin
California
92780
Tel (714)832-7222
Fax (714)832-7211
The following costs are excluded from the fee schedule:
• Trailer facilities and set-up
• Installation of utilities for trailer
• Cost of utilities
• Cost of sanitary services
• Copiers, fax machines, and consumables
• Phone systems
• Broadband connections and monthly service charges
• Janitorial
• Furniture
~ '~ i114~
Construction Managers, Consulting Engineers
Extended Services
GEOVision: Pre-Construction Home & Sound and Vibration Monitoring
The attached scope of services includes pre-construction site survey of adjacent
structures {homes), and vibratioNsound monitoring during construction. The scope
defined is essential to ensure the City of Tustin is equipped with baseline data to defend
the potential of spurious claims. The final scope and hours will be modified based on a
joint evaluation by City staff, Butier and GEOvision. The cost proposed is based on a
minimum level of effort to meet the construction contract specification requirements and
current City codes.
PENCO Engineering, Inc.: Survey Services
We have attached a Fee Schedule and scope of services for PENCO Engineering, Inc.
The final fee and scope will be determined after the award of the construction contract.
The cost proposed is based on a minimum level of effort to meet the construction contract
specification requirements for the owner.
RMA Group: Materia/s Testing Services:
Based on Butler's current experience with the Nohl Canyon project for the City of
Anaheim, we have included the services of RMA Group to provide materials testing
services. RMA has reviewed the current plans and specs to develop the attached scope
and fee. Butler's proposed staff has worked with RMA on several projects and find that
due to the strong working relationship, we can minimize hours for field technicians.
Leighton Consulting, Inc.: Geotechnical
The attached scope of work includes services to address the potential for groundwater
and shoring installation observation. Leighton is the geotechnical engineer of record for
the civil design team. The estimated budget includes $71,419 to address the potential for
groundwater. Pre-construction site investigations will provide the City with updated data
on the subsurtace conditions. This will lead to the elimination of the Phase II dewatering
scope of work.
It is our expectation that the scope of services defined by our proposal and those of the
sub-consultants' will be further defined as the City completes the design documents to the
100% level. We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City on this critical project.
If you have any questions regarding the attached, please contact me directly at (714) 832-
7222.
Respectfully Yours,
BUTIER
Construction Managers, Consulting Engineers
Mark M. Butier
Vice PresidenUCFO
TABLE 1. BREAKDOWN OF ESTIMATED FEES
Leighton Consulting, Inc
• 1-E YClN TON fiROUP CO NPANY
.::i~ ~ ..7: ".a 1 ~.-]';~ ..1 _i ~.,~Ce _ ~:9 ~~ ^,.•'. _;~ .,, _, ..?a _;a77q, i;~Vi-ir ,...., ~4 J:i ,aJ ~~..' :3 .e"a ~~
Pre-Construction and Shorln¢ Meetin¢s, Shorin¢ Review Hours Rate Amount
Senior Principal Engineer (shoring design review) 8 $259 $2,072
Field Operations Manager (2 meetings) 8 $152 $1,216
Senior Geologist (2 meetings) 8 $176 $1,408
Vehicle 32 $15 $480
Underground Service Alert/OCHCA Permits 8 $176 $1,408
Subtotal: $6,584
'rasp ~r
GeoloaidGeotechnical Instrumentation Installation Hours Rate Amount
Project Geologist (6 days) 51 $160 $8,160
Senior Staff Geolgist (baseline information (3 days) 26 $138 $3,588
Vehicle (without gauge) 77 $15 $1,155
Inclinometer Installation (optional) $26,910
Monitoring Well Installation (required) $3,675
Subtotal: $43,488
Staff Geologist (Permitting OCHCA- Sampling NPDES) 10 $121 $1,210
Analytical Testing for NPDES Permit $3,500
PW Well Installation & pump gear Outside Costs +20% $32,000
Monitoring Well and Installation Outside cots +20% $17,582
OCHCA Permit Fees $1,975
Project Geologist (USA Dig Alert-Mark locations) 4 $160 $640
Pump Test Project Geo 52 $160 $8,320
Senior Geologist Well Installations 34 $138 $4,692
Vehicle (without gauge) 100 $15 $1.500
~,,,.~„~ ,,,,~~~ ; ,.~~~ ~-.....,,..:r„v~,~~,; ~,~:~. ~, ,~,:,:,.n~,~,.,~, Subtotal: $71,419
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
Yrvine, CA P60101249 Table i- Tustin -Rawlings Reservoir Replacement 8/4/2009
C1ty of Tustln Construction Management Services for the Fee Proposal
- Rawlings Reservoir and Replacement Project Butler Engineering, Inc
(CIP No. 6136
r
r
3
Task
Man-Hours Par
Category
Cost Per lahor
Category
Suu-Total
f Pre-Bitl Services: Tasks L1 thru L6
Pro act Director M Butler S 150.00 120.0 $ 18.000.00
Pro act Manager; Resident Engineer J. 9:um S 150.00 360.0 $ 5x,000.00
Field Inspector S. Lopian S 120.00 0.0 $ -
TechniCal Support-Ctxumem Review M Butler. aE S 155.00 t4n.0 $ 21,700.00
Technical Support;' Schedulin C. darns S 150.00 1 00.0 $ 15,000.00
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 I 80.0 5 5,2a0.0o $ 1 13,900.00
t
2 Mobilisation: Task 2.1
f
I PrgeCt Director M. Butior $ 150.00 I 24.0 $ ?,600.00
Project Manager; Resident Engineer J. Blum S 150.00 ~ x0.0 S 6,000.00
Field Inspector S. Lopian $ 120.00 0.0 $ -
Technical Support•Ctams Review jM. Butler, PE $ 155.00 ' OA $
Technical Support! SchaOulin C. Harns $ 750.00 ~ 0.0 $
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 j 24,0 $ 1,560.00 $ 11,160.00
3 Corres ondenCe, Re orls & Comm.: Tasks 3.1 Thru 3.3
Prnlect Dusctor M. Bulior 3 150 00 0.0 $ .
Pro'ect Mana er,!Resident Engineer J. glum $ 150.00 ' 550.0 $ 82,500.00
Field Inspector S. Lopian $ 720.00 ~ 730.0 $ iS,600.on
Technical Support-Claims Review M. Butler, PE $ 155.00 n.0 $ -
Technical SuppoN Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 I 0.0 S -
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 2x.0 $ 1,560.00 $ 99.660.00
4 Site Conditions 6 Visual Doc.: Tasks 4.1 Thru 4.2
Project Director - M. Butler $ 150.00 ; 0.0 $ -
ProjeCt ManagsrrResident En ineer J. Blum $ 150.00 o.a $
Field Inspector S. Lopian $ 120.00 ' 130.0 $ 15.600.00
Technical Su rt-Claims Review M. Butter, PE $ 155.00 o.o $
Technical Su N Scheduling
En sneering Technician C. Hartle
S. Worfgramm $
$ 150.00
65.00 0.0
0.0 $
$
- S
15.600.00
5 Meetings: Tasks 5.1 Thru 5.2
Pro act Director M. Builoi $ I SU.00 0.0 $
Pin act Mana euResWem Ennlnesr 1. Blwn $ 150.(10 400.0 g 00,000.00
f~leld Ina ecror S. Lu ion 't I2U.U0 400.0. S 48,000.00
Technical Support-Claims Review M. Butler. PE $ 155.00 0.0 $ -
Techniral SupPOrll Scheduling C. Harns $ 150.00 0.0 S
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65,00 j 2a.n $ 1,560.00 S 109,560.00
6 Submittal Log and Status: Tasks 8.1 Thru 8.2
Project Director M. 8utier $ 150.00 O.U $
Project Mana_ er/Resident Engineer J. Blum $ 150.00 0.0 E
Field Inspector S. Lopian S 120.00 130.0 $ 15,600.00
Technical Su -Claims Review M. Butler. PE $ 755.00 0.0 $
Technlwl Su ' Scheduhn L'. Harns 5 150.00 0.0 g _
[nylneeling Terhniaan ~;. WoUuramm ~$ 65.00 0.0 $ - $ 15,000.00
7 Plans 8 S acs Inter natation: Tasks 7./ Thru 7.5
Pmjacl Director M Hu!i2r ~ 150 X10 0.0 $
Project ManagegResident Engineer J. Blum $ 750.00 j 0.0 $ -
Reld Inspector ~5. Lop1an j $ t20A0' 130.0 5 15,600.00
Technical SupportClaims Review M. Butler. PE S 155-00 0.0 $ -
Technical Support' Scheduling C. Harris S ?50.00 7 0.0 S -
EngineeringTechnician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 0.0 g _ ~ $ 15.600.G0
i
8
- CM Administration and Slatting: Tasks 8.1 Thru 8.2
~
~ Pro Drector I M. O,.Ler y t50.J0 0.0 $
Pro'ect Mana errResident Engineer u. 81um I S 150.00 r i 130,0 S f 69.500.00
I~ Field Inspector
Technical Su rt-Claims Review S. Lopian
M. Butler, PE $
$ 120.00 j
155.00 X20.0
0.0
5 36,400.00
Technkal Support' Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 ~ 0.0 S
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 { 352.D S %2,aa0.00 ~ °; 2i 6.700.00
Cky of Tustin Construction Managemerrt SeMces for the Fee Proposal
Rawlings Reservoir and Replacement Project Butler Enginee-ing, Inc.
- (CIP No. 6136
;ask Man-HOUr! Per
Ceregory cost Per Labor
Category Sub-Total
9 Progress Pa ants Tasks 8.1 Thru 9.2
I Project Director M. Butier S 150.00 , u.0 $ -
Project Manager.%Resident En ineer J. Blum $ 150.00 160.0 $ 24,000.00
Fieltl Inspector S. Lopian S 120.00 ~ 130.0 5 15,600.00
I Technical Support-Claims Review M. Butier. PE $ 155.00 t 0.0 S -
I iecnnical SuppoN Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 r 0.0 $ -
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 0.0 $ - S 39,600.00
10 ContraM Chartge Order Mgmt.: Tanks 10.1 Thru 10.4 j
I ProjeM Director M. Butier S 150.00 I 0.0 $ -
I Project Manager/Residem Engineer J. Blum S 750.00 I5o.0 $ 24,000.00
Field Inspector S. Copier. S 120.00 ; u.0 s
Technical Support-Claims Review M. Butier, PE $ 755.00 100.0 $ 15,500.00
Technical SuppoN Schetlu6ng C. Harris $ 150.00 0.0 $
Engineerin Technican S. Wolfgramm S 65.00 ; 0.0 :t - S 39.800.00
11 Claims Ma amen[: Tasks 11.1 Thru 11.4
Project Director M. Butier $ 150.00 0.0 $ -
PrOject Mana er/Resident En ineer J. Blum $ 150.00 , 120.0 S 18,000.00
Field Ins actor S. Lapian $ P20.W 40.0 $ 4,800.00
Ticrmical Sup on-Claims Review M Butler, PE $ 155.00 0.0 $ -
i ochnical Su on! 3chctluhn C. Hans ~ 75000 9.0 $ -
E.^.gmeenn Technici2n ~ w~Ogramm $ ~i5.t_>U U.0 $ - S 22,800.00
12 Quality Assurance: Tasks 121 Thru 125
Project Director M. Butier $ 150.00 0.0 $
Project ManageUResitlen[ Engineer J. Blum $ 150.00 0.0 $ -
Field Inspector S. Lopian $ 120.00 ! 650.0 $ 78,000.00
Technical Support-Claims Review M. Butier. PE $ 155.00 0.0 $ -
Technical Support/ Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 U.o $ -
Engineering Technician S. WoHgramm $ 65.00 j 0.0 $ ~ $ 76,000.00
t
13 Gaotechnicel and Material Testin :Task 13.1 j
Project Director M. Butier $ 150.00 0.0 $ -
Projea Manager/Resident Engineer J. Blum $ 150.00 0.0 $ -
Feld Inspector S. Lopian $ 120.00 ! 0.0 $ -
I Technical Support-Claims aeview M. Butier, PE $ 155.00 U.0 S -
iachnical SupporU Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 0.0 $
FJiginaering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 I o.o $ - $ -
l
14 Landscape 3 Rev etadon Inspection: Tasks 14.1 Thru 14.2
Project Director M. Butier $ 150.00 ! 0.0 $ -
ProjnCt Manager/Resident Engineer J. Blum $ 150.00 0.0 $ -
Fieitl Inspector 5 Lopian S 120.00 90.0 $ 4.800.00
Technical Support-C;leims Rernew M. Butier. PE $ 155.00 j 0.0 $ -
Technical Su rt/ Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 0.0 $ -
Engineering Technician S. Wolfgramm $ 65.00 I U.0 S - $ 4.800.00
t
15 Startup, Closeout, and Acceptance: Tasks 15.1 Thru 15.8 j
Project Director M. Butler $ 150.00 0,0 $ -
PrnjgM Managec'Rseident E^ni^enr J 5krm 3 150 00 0.0 S -
I Field Inspector S. Lopian $ 120.00 40.0 S 4,600.170
Technical Support-Claims riewew M. Butier. PE $ 155.00 n.0 S -
Technical Support/ Scheduling C. Harris S 150.00 0.0 S -
Engineering Technican S Wolfgramm $ 65.00 OA $ - S 4,800.00
18 Post Construction: Tasks 10.1 Thru 18.3 j
I Project Director M. Butier $ 750.00 ! a.d S -
Project Manager/Resident Engineer J. Blum $ 150.00 ! 0,0 $
I Field Inspecof S. LOpian $ 120.00 f 40.0 ! , 0,000.00
I
~ T~hnirat Support-Claims Review M. Butier, PE $ 155.00 ! 0.0 $ -
~ Technical SuppoN Scheduling C. Harris $ 150.00 ; 11.0 $ -
I Engineering Technician I S. Wolfgramm $ 65.001 r..0 $ ~ 5 ~t.i300.t70
City of Tustin Construction Management Services for the Fee Proposal
Rawlings Reservoir and Replacement P-oJeCt Butler Engineering, inc.
(CIP No. 6136(1
Task hfamHOUn Per Cost Par La6ar
Category Category Sub-total
17 Extendsd Services: Tasks 17.1 Thru 17.3 ~
Fro ec[Pirertor M L?uti?r ~ 7~ 150.00 12.0 $ 1,200.00
Fru~act ManaceriRr_sidenl cn 1nea1 .I. Hlum 'F 150.00 U.0 $
r!Lld InS cv;lor S. Loplan 'i. 120.00 D.0 $ -
T~chr,iCal SuppurPClaimS Review r~A. Buticr, PE $ 155,00 0.0 $ -
Tachalral Support! iCllP,dtlilnr -~ H3tl13 i 150Dp 0.0 $ -
~nryneennq Technican 5. VJOifgramm '~ 65A0 0.0 $ - $ 1.900.00
Total Man-HOUrS Per Month
411 rilvii as Curr WneU 11500.0
Sub-Consultant Services
Geotechnical Services: Lei hton & Assonata~ $ 296.42 L00
Contingent Geerechnical Services: Oeav+aie~vrr
Ma[enais Testing Services: RMA 1 $ Os,0ao.00
Surveying Services: Penco 5 41,713.00
Mechanical/ElectricaUClviUStructural Engineering Services S -
Pre-Con Home & Road Inspection. Sound & Vibration Measurements: Geovision I S 96,050.00
] TOTAL SUBCONSULiAPfT3C0STS $ 460,845.00
Construction Management & Inspection Services
Project Olrectar M. Butler S 150.00 156.0 $ 23,a0o.oa
Project Mana er/Resident Engineer J. Blum S 150.00 2920.0 S 438,DOO.OD
Field Inspector S. Loplan S 120.00 258D.0 S 309,600.00
Technical Support-Claima Review M. Butler. PE S 155.00 240.0 3 37.200.00
Technical Support/ Schedulin C. Hams $ 150.00 t OD.O $ t 5.000.00
Engineering Technician S. Wolfqramm $ 65.00 504.0 S 32.76D.Uo
TOTAL CM & INSPECTION (:0575 S 055,960.00
GRAND TOTALS $ 1,316,805.00
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
A IEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY
August 4, 2009
Butier Construction Managers, Consulting Engineers
17782 East 17"' Street, Suite 107
Tustin, California 92780-1947
Attention: Mr. Mark M. Butier, Vice President, CFO
Proposal No. P601-01249
Subject: Augmented Proposal For Geotechnical Services During Construction
Proposed Rawlings Reservoir Replacement
Two 3.0-MG Prestressed-Concrete Water Tanks
133331 Foothill Boulevard
North Tustin, California
Tustin CIP No. 6136
In response to our meeting with you on July 24, 2009, Leighton Consulting, Inc. is pleased to
present this augmented proposal to provide geotechnical services during construction of the two
proposed 3.0 million-gallon (MG) prestressed concrete water tanks to replace the existing
Rawlings Reservoir, in northern Tustin. This augmented proposal is based on your request to
breakdown our approach and scope into three milestones as follows: (1) pre-demolition, (2)
demolition and shoring installation, and (3) water tank construction and backfilling. We have
also augmented our scope at your request to include instrumentation, NPDES permitting
assistance and other tasks to reduce risk, and help expedite project permitting/scheduling. Since
our qualifications have been submitted previously, this is solely an augmented scope and fee
proposal.
PR07ECT UNDERSTANDING
Specific to this project, we are experienced providing (1) geologic mapping of excavations to
look for adverse geologic conditions that may impact the project, (2) geotechnical observation
and testing during shoring and tie-back installation, (3) instrumentation and ground-movement
monitoring during excavation and shoring installation, (4) geotechnical observation and testing
during earthwork, and (5) materials testing specific to DYK pre-stressed concrete tanks. Most
importantly, as a subconsultant to Tetra Tech (designers for this project) during design, Leighton
Consulting, Inc. is the Geotechnical Engineer of Record for this project; and as such we are
i7%81 Cowsn a Irvi^z, CA 92674-6000
946.253.9836 ®Fzx 949.250.1 `: t4 i -. .
Rawlines Reservoir Revlacement. Geotechnical Testing P601-01249
uniquely qualified to provide geotechnical services for this project during construction. Our
original geotechnical team during design from 2004 through 2006 is still here to provide and
oversee geotechnical services during construction. Some of the site-specific geotechnical and
geologic hazards, including:
An existing reservoir that cracked and failed even after attempting to line the reservoir with a
membrane,
Adversely dipping sedimentary formations with several geologic discontinuities and other
geologic variations within short distances,
Highly expansive soils,
A shear zone with fractured bedrock and local shallow groundwater,
An existing tie-back retaining wall, and
A "tight" site with a residence and pool just upslope from the existing reservoir and proposed
tanks, requiring shoring to support adjacent properties and improvements.
Our field representatives will include Rodger Moore and Rick Fernandez, having over 20 years
of experience with waterworks and hillside residential projects in Tustin. Mr. Fernandez is
currently working on the Nohl Canyon Reservoir. Key team members are summarized in the
following table:
John Haertle, PE, GE Senior Project Engineer Project Manager
Thomas C. Benson, Jr., PE, GE President and CEO Principal-in-Charge, lead GE'
Joe Roe, PG, CEG Senior Geologist Geologic Lead CEG*
Rodger Moore Field Supervisor Field Coordination
Rick Fernandez Senior Technician Soils Density Testing
*Original design team member
Supporting our key staff will be our in-house geotechnical and materials testing laboratory,
which is AASHTO Material Reference Laboratory (AMRL) certified; located in our Irvine
office, immediately adjacent to the Costa Mesa (CA-55) Freeway, less-than 8 miles (typically
less-than 12 minutes) from this site. This will allow for cost-effective mobilization of
geotechnical services. For more on Leighton Consulting, Inc., such as laboratory licensing and
calibration, you can visit our website at w~.r~w.leisirtoucoosulliua.cotn .
-2-
L~ig~k~n
Rawlines Reservoir Replacement Geoteclmical Testine P601 01249
Prouosed Construction
Our understanding of this project is based on our December 15, 2006 Geotechnical Design
Summary Report for this project, and the following Tetra Tech earthwork specifications, civil
and structural plans for this project:
Specifications: Section 01010 -Summary of Work, 30 pages, Section 02140 - Dewatering, 3
pages, Section 02201 -Earthwork and Grading, 14 pages, Section 02220 -Structure
earthwork, 6 pages, Section 02223 -Trenching, Backftlling, and Compacting, 9 pages,
Section 02445 -Instrumentation and Monitoring, 4 pages and Section 03300 -Cast-In-Place
Concrete.
Civil Plans: Sheets C-4 through C-14,100% draft submittal printed February 27„ 2009, and
Structural Plans: Sheets S-1 through 5-16 and Sheet D-2, 100% draft submittal printed
February 27, 2009.
We understand that the existing reservoir will be demolished and replaced with two new 3.0-
million-gallon (MG) prestressed-concrete water tanks. Based on Tetra Tech's plans, the new
water tanks will have floors at elevation 273 feet, which is 7 feet lower than the existing
reservoir floor elevation (at elevation 280 feet). These proposed tanks will be about 33 feet in
height, 134 feet in diameter, with a design high water level at elevation 303 feet.
Existing retaining walls on the north and northeast sides of the project site are proposed to be
protected in place prior to demolition and during construction. Both tanks will be backfilled to
match existing gentle native slopes, with the northerly tank backfilled to roughly elevation 303
feet. Slopes will be graded no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical). Existing embankment
grades will be cut down behind an existing soldier pile retaining wall on the reference east side
of the site, to reduce the amount of earth supported by this wall. Proposed grading is not
expected to encompass the access road along the reference east side of the site and we
understand that offsite grading is also not proposed.
Geotechnical Settin¢
We believe it is important to provide detailed geologic observation and field mapping during all
grading and trenching for this hillside project, to detect any local adverse geologic discontinuity
that would not be detected by a few prior exploratory borings. Further, geologic input for
temporary dewatering and stormwater management is essential for this hillside site. The ability
to be able to identify and address these geologic issues in a timely manner and to work closely
with our clients is something that we take very seriously, due to our extensive experience with
hillside grading and construction.
-3-
E.~ightOrl
Rawlins Reservoir Replacement. Geotechnical Testine P601-01249
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
Site safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Therefore, we will notify the contractor's site
representative, and/or your field representative if/as directed by you for this project, whenever
we are on site, upon arrival. Although site safety is the responsibility of the contractor, we will
work with the construction team to achieve a safe work environment. All of our personnel are
provided with conventional and customary personal protection for construction sites, including
hard hats, safety glasses, safety gloves and orange vests. Any other required safety equipment
can be provided upon request at an additional cost. Please let us know in advance if any
additional personal protection is required specific to this site and project, or your contractor's
specific requirements.
Daily Field Reports (DFlts) will be written and distributed to your designated delegate(s) for
review and signature. We anticipate that you will provide a construction management
representative who will be on-site daily to schedule our personnel, supervise various contractors'
activities and respond to deficiencies in shoring and/or earthwork if necessary. Actual amount of
time we spend on site, and our associated fees, will be dependent on weather, exposed subsurface
conditions, unanticipated requests from the City and/or City representative(s), but most
importantly, the contractor's schedule, sequencing, pace and efficiency. Our proposed scope of
work will consist of geotechnical observation and testing, installation and monitoring of
geotechnical instrumentation (if requested) and geotechnical laboratory testing services during
construction. Our actual scope of work or time required may be different than outlined below.
Based on our geotechnical design report, review of the plans and specifications, and experience
with similar reservoir construction projects, our anticipated services are described in the
following three subsections.
Based on our discussions with you on July 24, 2009, we have broken-down our anticipated
services into the three major project milestones: (1)pre-demolition, (2) demolition and shoring
installation, and (3) water tank construction and backfilling, as follows:
Milestone 1: Pre-Demolition
Before the existing reservoir is demolished, we propose the following tasks:
Pre-Demolition Team Meeting: Our management will attend apre-demolition meeting to
establish points of contact and distribution of geotechnical data, etc.
Installation of Geotechnical Instrumentation: If requested. Leighton can install and
monitor geotechnical instrumentation prior to demolition and construction of the tank to
establish baseline data with respect to slope distortions. Instrumentation would consist of
approximately 295 combined linear feet distributed between five inclinometers installed on
the reference west, north and east sides of the existing hopper tank. Access to the
-4-
~ei~~ltan
Rawlines Reservoir Replacement. Geotectmical Testin¢ P601-01249
northeastern inclinometer is dependant upon permission being granted from the resident on
the reference north side of the reservoir. Depth of the inclinometers vary below current grade
but would be established in bedrock material at an approximate depth of 30 feet below
proposed finish grade of the reservoir tank bottom. Inclinometers would be installed to
detect and quantify slope distortions during demolition, shoring installation, excavation, tank
construction and backfilling. The inclinometers would be monitored on a monthly basis
prior to demolition and construction activities in order to establish baseline conditions from
which all future references will be made. For purposes of this proposal, Leighton assumes
that the instruments would be read a minimum of 25 times post baseline readings over the
course of the reservoir demolition and construction. Additional readings could be provided as
necessary.
Underground Service Alert/Well Permit: Underground Service Alert (USA) will be
contacted prior to drilling to mark underground utilities where we would propose to drill.
Each proposed boring location would be clearly marked in white paint by us prior to
contacting USA. In addition, we will obtain a well installation permit from Orange County
Department of Health Services prior to drilling for the Phase I monitoring well. We would
also coordinate drill rig access with the City. Inclinometer and groundwater monitoring
wells if requested are listed aspre-demolition tasks.
Dewatering
Dewatering of the site is critical to providing a safe working environment during construction of
the planned reservoir. During our initial geologic investigation of the site groundwater was
encountered at an approximate elevation of 282 feet msl. Groundwater at these elevations may
pose a constraint to safe construction. Our phased approach to determining current groundwater
elevations and the potential aquifer testing are defined below:
Phase I Monitoring Well Installation
Monitoring Well Installation: A 2-inch diameter monitoring well will be installed along the
reference northwest side of the reservoir within the construction easement. Purpose of this
installation is to detemune groundwater elevations north of the shear zone prior to demolition of
the reservoir. If groundwater levels are within the zone of anticipated earthwork
construction elevations and construction dewatering is determined necessary then Leighton
will proceed forward with water characterization. NPDES permitting and aquifer testing
as defined below in PHASE II of our Scope of Work. )f gromndwater levels are considered
not to pose a constraint to safe construction then the monitoring well will be left in place to
monitor groundwater levels during construction of the reservoir.
-5-
Leigiltc-n
Rawlines Reservoir Replacement Geoteclmical Testin¢ P601-01249
Phase II Aquifer Characterization
Underground Service Alert/Well Permit: Underground Service Alert (USA) will be
contacted prior to additional drilling to mark underground utilities where we propose to drill.
Each proposed boring location would be clearly marked in white paint by us prior to
contacting USA. In addition, we will amend our well installation permit from Orange
County Department of Health Services prior to drilling for the Phase II Aquifer
Characterization.
Well Installation: A 6-inch pumping well would be installed in the northwest comer of the
site within the construction easement for purposes of measuring the water levels and to
provide a point from which dewatering could take place.
Additionally, three monitoring wells would be installed along the northern side of the
reservoir and within the reservoir bottom to allow for monitoring of groundwater levels
during the aquifer testing. The wells are intended to enhance our understanding of the aquifer
conditions and evaluate groundwater elevations during site grading and construction of the
proposed tank. A monitoring well is proposed within the existing reservoir tank bottom.
Access to this location is limited through the eastern access hatch. Leighton would propose to
install this monitoring well using a hand auger to obtain adequate depth for aquifer testing.
However, if partial demolition of the tank can be done to create access for a truck mounted
drill prior to full demolition of the hopper then Leighton would coordinate with the
demolition contractor for access to the proposed monitoring well location.
NPDES Permitting: We would obtain a groundwater sample from one of the wells we
install and provide analytical laboratory testing of this sample for the purposes of filing a
Notice Of Intent (NOI) with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Boazd
(RWQCB) in pursuit of obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Discharge (NPDES) permit. A permit would be required and obtained for dewatering
generated from pem~anent or temporary dewatering operations at the reservoir site. The
results of the analysis would demonstrate that pollutant concentrations in the discharge would
not cause violation of any applicable water quality objectives for the receiving waters,
including discharge prohibitions and to determine the most appropriate permit. If deemed
necessary, the discharge would pass through a treatment system designed and operated to
reduce the concentration of contaminants to meet the effluent limitations and to comply with
the terms and provisions of the NPDES permit.
Analytical Characterization: After the monitoring well is properly developed, a
groundwater sample would be retained in laboratory-supplied containers and placed in a ice-
cooled chest prior to delivery under a completed Chain of Custody record to a California
State-certified laboratory for chemical and physical analyses. This groundwater sample
would be analyzed for the following chemical and physical parameters required by the
RWQCB for permitting temporary NPDES discharge.
-6-
~t;i~htfln
Rawlines Reservoir Replacement Geotechnical Testing P601-01249
.~
oil and grease
413.1
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) 405.1
pH 150.1
sulfides 376.1
total residual chlorine 330.1
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 160.2
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 160.1
phosphates 365.2
total Nitrogen various
Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) 418.1
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and oxygenates 8260B
Title 22, 17 metals 6010/7470
chlorinated pesticides 608
Discharge Options: Research the permit process for the City of Tustin Sanitation District
for possibility of dischazging groundwater to the sewer system for backup groundwater
discharge options if the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Santa Ana Region
(RWQCBSAR) denies the NPDES discharge permit.
Pump Test: Leighton would conduct a step drawdown test within the project limits in order
to determine the hydraulic properties of the aquifer, the spatial effects of pumping and to
assess the hydraulic behavior of the well upon pumping. We are assuming for budgeting
purposes that the proposed well configuration will be tested separately, using four
consecutive 12-hour step drawdown tests pumped at increasing flow rates. Water generated
during the pump test activities will be discharged to the storm drain assuming this is allowed
by the RWQCB. If discharge is not permitted to the storm drain system Leighton would
apply to the City of Tustin for a discharge permit to the sanitary sewer system. Data logging
instruments would be used in the observation wells to measure and record specific
parameters over time for the entire duration of the pump test. The pump test would be
conducted under the supervision of a State of California Registered Geologist. For the
purposes of this proposal, we aze assuming that a total of four tests will be conducted and
manned continuously during the pumping operation. Leighton will analyze all field and
laboratory data and prepare a report summarizing this investigation. The report would include
the results of the groundwater characterization for the NPDES pernutting process and the pump
test which would provide the data necessary for designing a dewatering system for the site.
Milestone 2: Reservoir Demolition and Cut Shorint=_
Trench Excavation: Leighton will be onsite during the excavation of the trench across the
shear zone within the tank bottom upon completion of demolition of the tank roof and
reservoir walls to the east, west and south. Leighton understands. the contractor will provide
-7-
Leightt3n
Rawlins Reservoir Replacement. Geotechnical TesfinP P601-01249
the equipment necessary to excavate two trenches across the sheaz zone within the tank
bottom in order to better define the extent of the shear zone as it has been reported. Leighton
assumes that both trenches can be excavated within two working days and that logging of the
trench at a reasonable scale concurrently with the excavation will take approximately 3-4
working days to complete. Data will be provided to the contractor and design team as it is
developed in the field. Leighton understands that approximately 120 days are scheduled for
completion of the demolition activities.
Geotechnical Review and Observation of Shoring (100 Days): We will review the
contractor's shoring design(s) and dewatering plans before excavation begins. We will also
observe all soldier pile, tie-back and/or soil nail installations, and observe and document all
tie-back and/or soil nail capacity tests. Based on information provided to us during our
meeting with you Leighton understands that approximately 100 working days will be
required to install shoring to completion at the site. Based upon the 100 working day (20
weeks) schedule you provided for shoring installation and testing, Leighton assumes that our
staff engineer will be onsite intermittently during the shoring process for a total of 480 hours
during installation to document and observe all soldier pile, tie-back and/or soil nail
installations, and observe and document all tie-back and/or soil nail capacity tests. Leighton
has assumed that we will be onsite for a portion of the 100 day schedule for shoring for a
total of 12 weeks, full time. If these hours are underestimated and Leighton will be required
to be onsite, full time during the 100 day schedule please let us know so we can adjust our
cost estimate. We will not go over the 480 hours unless directed by you. Leighton assumes
the contractor will contact us for our services during the installation of the soldier piles and
during the testing of the either the tiebacks or soil nails.
Milestone 3: Water Tank Construction and Backfillin¢
Geologic Observation and Engineering Oversight: We will observe temporary cuts
during lagging placement, replacement tanks, and foundation bearing surfaces, to check that
exposed conditions are as anticipated in our design geotechnical report. We will also
respond to geotechnical questions that may arise during construction. Leighton understands
from our meeting that approximately 44 days of grading are anticipated for the site. For
purposes of this proposal we assume our engineering geologist will be onsite a minimum of
fow hours per day during the 44 days of grading. Additional time onsite can best be
determined upon exposure of site conditions during grading operations.
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing: We will perform geotechnical laboratory testing of
previously unencountered onsite soils, and import soils such as aggregate base materials, to
determine the ASTM D 1557-07 laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture
content ("compaction curves"), and corresponding grain size distribution to match the soils
with the appropriate compaction curve. We will also provide organic content, sheaz strengths
and expansion index testing, as necessary.
Backfill Density Testing: We will provide observation and testing of fill placement, as fill
thickness and the grading contractor's schedule requires. Deeper, rapid fill placement will
-8-
L~iai~ton
Rawlings Reservoir Replacement. Geotechnical Testine P601-01249
require full time observation and testing. For purposes of this cost estimate we assume our
services will be required on a full time basis during the 44 days of grading.
Final Report: Leighton will prepare one final as graded report expected to include maps of
field density test locations, geology and cross section locations, cross sections, subdrain and
shoring location. Report to include all geologic and geotechnical data recovered from pre
construction to final constnzcrion.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Budeet Estimate Basis
We understand that the demolition period is estimated to be 100 working days and that the
preconstrucrion activity is to begin sometime after October 2009. The shoring installation and
documentation period is estimated to take 100 working days and that grading operations will
require 44 working days to complete. We expect construction to begin first quarter 2010. The
construction schedule mentioned above was provided verbally to Leighton during our meeting at
your offices on July 24, 2009.
Schedulin¢ and Dispatchine
Leighton Consulting, Inc. is prepared to begin our work immediately upon receipt of your signed
authorization to proceed. We would appreciate at least three working days advance notice for
scheduling our field personnel on the first day you require our services. Work thereafter may be
scheduled with a full (24 hours) one working day advance notice. We will rely on your field
representative to contact us to schedule all fieldwork, and to help us avoid unproductive site
visits. We anticipate our personnel will be on site periodically for both full time and part time
observation and testing, as requested by your field representative. We request that you "partner-
with-us" to manage our budget, by avoiding unnecessary trips to the site. We will work with
your field representative to reduce standby time or unnecessary trips to the site.
ESTIMATED BUDGET
Our hourly rates are based on the assumption that this is a California Prevailing Wage project.
Our fees will be reduced if this is not a Prevailing Wage project. Our fee will be chazged on a
time and expense basis in accordance with attached 2009 Professional Fee Schedule.
We have prepazed our fee estimate based on conversations we had during our meeting with you
and the construction schedule provided by you. A breakdown of our assumptions and estimated
fees is provided in the attached Table 1, Breakdown of Estimated Fees. In summary, we have
estimated a budget for these services as listed below:
-9-
~~iC,j~Jkt311
Rawlings Reservoir Replacement. Geotechnical Testin¢ P601 01249
1 Pre-Demolition Milestone 1(instntmentation, dewatering, etc.) ? '~ . ~ i
2 Reservoir Demolition and Cut Shoring , ,~
3 Water Tank Construction and Backfill Testing
TOTAL: 296,421
" If requested and/or required
Rates may increase commensurate with future mandated changes in the California prevailing
wages as determined by the California Department of Industrial Relations. Future wage and rate
escalations are likely. Actual scope and cost may vary from what was estimated, if additional
time is required on site. If actual number of site visits or hours requested aze less-than assumed,
our fee would be less-than estimated. Conversely, if there are numerous failed soil density or
extensive standby or unnecessary site visits, this budget estimate may be insufficient to complete
the project, and we will notify you that our budget needs to be augmented. This fee estimate is
also based on the assumption that our field services will be performed during normal weekday
daylight-hours and does not include overtime.
To authorize this work, we can either send you our Master Services Agreement and aproject-
specific Scope of Work Agreement, or you can send us your subconsultant agreement for our
review.
-10-
~81~~1~OC1
Rawlins Reservoir Replacement. Geotechnical Testin¢ P601-01249
CLOSURE
We appreciate this opportunity to refine our proposal. If you have any questions or information
that would update our scope of work, please call us at your convenience. The undersigned can
be reached in our Irvine office at (949) 250-1421, specifically at the extensions and a-mail
addresses listed below.
Respectfully submitted,
JAR/JEH/TCB:Ir
LEIGHTOnN- CONSULTING, INC.
`J l~
Joe Rce PG CEG
Project Geologist
Extension 4263, }rur(iylci?liy;n~mnig.nnn
Attachments: Table 1 -Breakdown of Estimated Fees
2009 Professional Fee Schedule
Distribution: (2) addressee
-11-
~.~'Ii~~ItDfi
TABLE 1. BREAKDOWN OF ESTIMATED FEES
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
A LEIfiNtON 6NOUP EOMP~ NV
.., ..~1'.~.. a .
Geoloaic/Geotechnical Observation Durint? Excavation & Shoring Hours Rate Amount
Project Geologist 8 weeks 1/2 time 160 $160 $25,600
Senior Staff Engineer (12 weeks full time) 480 $138 $66,240
Project Geologist Trench excavation 4 days 32 $160 $5,120
Vehicle (without gauge) 192 $15 2 880
Subtotal: $99,840
Bacldill Densiri Testin¢ Hours Rate Amount
Field Soil Tech (44 Days Fu11 Time) ii•:c,~i~ru~ci 396 ~~ $31,680
Field Operations Manager (2 hours per week for 9 weeks) 18 $152 $2,736
Nucleaz Denisty Gauge (44 days) 44 $88 $3,872
Vehicle 458 $15 6 870
Subtotal: $45,158
Geotechnical Laboratory Tests Iurimarily for import materials) uanti Per Test Amount
Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture (ASTM D 1557) 5 $215 $1,075
Sieve Analyses 5 $175 $875
Organic Contents 5 $63 $315
Expansion Index (EI) 5 $131 $655
Direct Shears 5 $284 1 420
Subtotal: $4,340
Final Compacted Fill and Shoring Report Preparation
and Project Manatrement and Administration Suooort Hours Rate Amount
Senior Asscoiate Engineer 54 $198 $10,692
Project Geologist 40 $160 $6,400
Senior Staff Engineer 40 $138 $5,520
Administrative Assistant/Word Processor 10 $78 $780
CADD/Drafting 20 $110 2 200
Subtotal: 25 592
GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING SUBTOTAL: $296,421
Above rates are based on California prevailing wages. Same-day cancellations will be charged as a four-hour minimum.
Our services are dependent upon the contractors work schedule. Variances to the constmction schedule resulting in additional hours, trips and/or
tests are subject to additional fees that may exceed this estimate.
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
Yrvine, CA P60101249 Table 1- Tustin -Rawlings Reservoir Replacement 8/4/2009
Leighton
2009 PROFESSIONAL FEE SCHEDULE*
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Technical Staff Hourly Rate
Technician I .......................................................................................... ................................$83
Technician II ......................................................................................... ..................................93
Senior Technician ................................................................................. ................................104
Laborer (Prevailing Wage) „ ................................................................ ................................100
SoiUFleld Technician (Prevailing Wage) " ............................................ ................................116
Materials Inspection Manager ............................................................... ..............:.................110
Staff Engineer/GeologisUScientisUField Supervisor .............................. ................................121
Senior Staff Engineer/GeologisUScientist ............................................. ................................138
Operations Manager/Equipment Operator ............................................ ................................160
Project EngineerlGeologisUScientist ..................................................... ................................160
Senior Project Engineer/GeologisUScientist ......................................... ................................176
Associate .............................................................................................. ................................198
Principal ................................................................................................ ................................215
Senior Principal ..................................................................................... ................................259
Technical Support Staff Hourly Rate
Administrative Assistant/Word Processor .............................................. ...............................$78
Information Specialist ............................................................................. ...............................105
CAD Operator ........................................................................................ ...............................110
GIS Specialist ........................................................................................ ...............................125
Miscellaneous Unit Rate
Vehicle usage ........................................................................................ ................ $15 per hour
Nuclear density gauge ........................................................................... ....................88 per day
FTP Site Set Up ..................................................................................... ........................75 each
' Effective through December 31, 2009, after which remaining work will be billed at then-current rates.
"Subject to change based upon project advertised date and changes in California prevailing wage rates.
9080 302 • t-09 Leighton 17781 Cowan ~ Irvine, CA 92614 p 866-Leighton f ,949-250-1114
Leighton ; 2009 Fee Schedule
EQUIPMENT LIST
Task Equipment, Supplies and Materials
9515 Air Compressor -portable
9563 Air Flow Meter and Purge Pump (200 cGmin) -Low Flow
9516 Brass / SS Soil Sample Tubes
9594 Caution Tape (1000-foot roll)
9564 Core Sample Boxes
9532 Core Sampler 8 Hammer
9565 Cutoff Saws, reciprocating, electric (Saws-All)
9566 D.C. Purging Pump, 3 gpm
9555 DOT 55yallon Containment Drums
9517 Disposable Polypropylene Bailers
9567 Dissolved Oxygen Meter
9537 Generator, Portable, 3,500 watts
9512 Field Truck /Day
9569 Four Gas Meter (RKI Eagle) /Day
9590 GPS Unit (Trimble), Roving Surveying Equip.
9540 GPS Station
9531 Hand-Auger Sampling System
9569 Hand-Held Electric Water Pump
9538 In-Situ Level Troll 500 (each)
9539 InSitu Troll 9500 Low Flow Water Sampling Equipment
9571 Jackhammer, electric, 90 Ib
9543 Level B Protection
9544 Level C Protection
9573 Locking Monitoring Well Cap
9574 Magnahelic Gauges, each
9533 Misc. Field Items (consumables: OVA cartridges, gloves, string, etc)
9559 Oil-Water, Dual-Stage Interface Probe
9553 Padlock, Standard #3
9554 Padlock, Oversize #5
9522 pH/Conductivily/Temp Meter
9549 Photo-lonization Detector (PID) /Day
9562 Photo-lonizafion Detector (PID) /Week
9557 Pump, 2 Stage
9558 Pump, 4 Stage w/ controller
9525 Reusable SS Bailers
9581 Slip /Treaded Cap, 2" or 4' PVC, schd 40
9593 Snow Fence (100-foot roll)
9541 Soil Sampling Tripod
9542 Soil Sampling T-handle (Encore)
9595 Survey Stakes
9526 Submersible Pump, 10 gpm, high powered Grunfos 2" & Controller
9527 Submersible Sump/Transfer Pump, 10.25 gpm
9585 Tedlar Bags
9586 Traffic Cones/Barricades
9587 Trash Pump, 3-inch 400 gpm surface pump
9556 Tubing, Clear Vinyl 3/8-Inch to 1/4-Inch
9528 Turbidity Meter
9548 Tyvek Suft
9529 Vapor Sampling Box
9545 Vacuum Gauge (Digital) /Manometer (O&M Monitoring Eq.)
9546 VelociCalc (O&M Monitoring Eq.)
9588 Visqueen, 6-mil, 20'x100' roll
9536 Water Level Indicator (electronic well sounder) 100/200/300'
9534 Tiltmeter, inclinometer and extensometer reading units
p 866-Leighton f 949-250-1114 page 1 2
SO(iL' "s02 - 1-0~ t.ewhton
Rate
$100 per day
SO per day
8 per day
15 each
15 each
25 per day
45 per day
25 per day
60 each
12 each
40 per day
75 per day
125 per day
120 per day
50 per day
150 per day
100 per day
60 per day
50 per day
120 per day
100 per day
300 per day
180 per day
25 each
10 per day
30 per day
50 per day
18 each
25 each
45 per day
110 per day
440 per week
45 per day
60 per day
20 per day
8 each
15 per day
30 per day
15 per day
5 each
160 per day
45 per day
15 each
40 per day
75 per day
.45¢ per foot
70 per day
12 each
40 per day
20 perday
35 per day
75 per roll
40 per day
210 per day
Leighton
Leighton ? 2009 Fee Schedule
EQUIPMENT LIST (Continued)
Task Equipment, Supplies and Materials Rate
9596 Water Quality Checked (pH, conductivity, turbidity, DO temp, Salinity) $110 per day
9521 Other Equipment Upon Request
6300 Skkimore-Wilhelm bolt cell 40 per day
6301 Small torque wrench 15 per day
6309 Big torque wrench 20 per day
6302 Air meter 25 per day
6303 Pachometer 50 per day
6304 Schmidt Hammer 30 per day
6307 110V, 50A generator 125 per day
6308 Brass mold 15 per day
9597 Double-Ring In8ltrometer (ASTM D3385) 350 per day
p 866-Leighton f 949-250-1114 page 2 : 2
90GC a02 - 1-08 i ei~hton
Leighton
Leighton 12009 Fee Schedule
SCHEDULE OF SERVICES -SOILS TESTING
Task Identification & Index Properties Method Per Test
8002 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 $20
8003 Moisture and Density (Ring Samples) ASTM D-2937 30
8004 Moisture Content & Density (5helby tube or requires cutting) ASTM D 2937 40
8005 Atterberg Limits (3 points) ASTM D 4318 150
8006 Single Point / Nonelastic ASTM D 4318 84
8024 Atterberg Limits (Organic) ASTM D 2487 / 4318 182
8007 Visual classification of point as nonplastlc ASTM D 2488 11
8008 Particle Size: Sieve (1'/z" to -#200) ASTM D 422 110
8023 Particle Size: Sieve (6" to -#200) ASTM D 422/C136 175
8009 Hydrometer only ASTM D 422 110
8010 Sieve & Hydrometer ASTM D 422 185
8011 Dispersive Characteristics of Clay Soil (Double Hydrometer) ASTM D 4221 89
8012 Specific Gravity: Fine (passing #4) ASTM D 854 /CTM 207 125
8013 Coarse (retained on #4) ASTM C 127 !CTM 206 100
8014 Total Porosity - On Shelby tube sample calculated from density & spec/ik gravity 137
8015 Total Porosity - On other sample 105
8016 Photograph of sample 11
8017 Shrinkage Limits (Wax Method) ASTM D 4943 126
8018 Pinhole Dispersion ASTM D 4647 210
8020 Percent Passing #200 Sieve ASTM D 1140 70
8021 Moisture & Density (Chunk Samples) 58
8022 Sand Equivalent ASTM D 2419 /CTM 217 105
Soil Chemistry Method Per Test
8050 pH CTM CA Test 532/643 $42
8051 Electrical Resistivity -single point - insitu moisture 42
8052 Minimum Resistivity (minimum of 3 points) CTM CA Test 532/643 89
8053 pH & Minimum Resistivity CTM CA Test 532/643 131
8054 Sulfate Content - Gravimetric CTM CA Test 417 Part II 68
8055 Sulfate Screen HACH kit 32
8056 Chloride Content CTM CA Test 422 68
8057 Corrosion Suite: pH, Chloride, Minimum Resistivity & Sulfate (gravimetric) CTM CA Test 532/643 245
8058 Organic Matter Content ASTM 2974 63
Shear Strength Method Per Test
8070 Pocket Penetrometer $1g
8072 Direct Shear (3 points) Consolidated Undreined - 0.05 inlmin. ASTM D 3080 mod. 285
8073 Direct Shear (3 points) Consol/dated Drained - <0.05 in/min. ASTM D 3080 345
8074 Residual Shear (price per pass after shear) EM 1110-2-1906-IXA 70
8075 Remolding or Hand Trimming of specimens (3 points) 90
8076 Oriented or Block Hand Trimming (per hour) 58/hour
8077 Daily equipment usage rate (after 2 days) 35/day
8079 Single Pant Shear 105
8080 Torsional Shear 620
Compaction 8 Bearing Capacity Method Per Test
8090 R-Value -Untreated CTM 301 $310
8091 R-Value -time or cement treated soils (<7% additive) CTM 301 338
8094 Standard Proctor Compaction - 4 points ASTM D 698
8092 4 inch mold Methods A&B 182
8093 6 inch mold Method C 215
Modified Proctor Compaction (Max Density) - 4 points ASTM D 1557
8100 4 inch mold Methods A88 220
8101 6 inch mold Method C 245
p 866-Leighton f' 949-250.1114 page 1 i 2
90uU 3G? - 1-05 L.eigheon
.__ ...............
Leighton
Leighton ~ 2009 Fee Schedule
SCHEDULE OF SERVICES -SOILS TESTING (Continued)
Method Per Test
8102 Check Point $65
8103 Relative Density (0.1 cubic foot mold) ASTM D 4253, D 4254 236
8104 California Bearing Ratio (CBR) - 3 point' ASTM D 1883 500
8105 -1 point • 1 g4
'Compaction (Max Density) should also be performed -not included in above prices
8000 Relative Compaction of Untreated & Treated Soils & Aggregates CTM 216 250
("Cal 216" - Caltrans wet density compaction curve)
Triaxial Tests Method Per Teat
8120 Unconfined Compression Strength of Cohesive Soil (with stress/strain ASTM D 2166 $135
plot)
8121 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils ASTM D 2850 168
(USAGE Q test) (per confining stress)
8122 Consolidated Undreined Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils ASTM D 4767 375
(CU, USAGE R-bar test) with Back Pressure Saturation & Pore Water
Pressure Measurement (per confining stress)
8127 Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test (CD, USAGE S test) EM 1110-2-1906(X)
with Volume Change Measurement
8123 Sand or silly sand soils (per confining stress) 375
8124 Silt ar dayey sand soils (per confining stress) 500
8125 Clay soils (per confining stress) 705
8126 Three-stage Triaxial Tests Above p rice + 75%
Consolidation tii Swell Tests Method Per Test
8140 Consolidation (11 loads up to 16 ksf & unload to .25 with Strain vs. ASTM D 2435 $195
P curve and one Time curve)
8141 Each additional Time Curve 45
8142 Each additional loadlunload w/o Time Reading 42
8143 Expansion Index ASTM D 4829 131
8145 SwelUCollapse Test - Method A (Up to 10 load/unloads w/o time curves) ASTM D 4546-A 289
8146 Single Load SwelUCollapse Test -Method 8 (Seat, load, and Inundate only) ASTM D 4546-B 105
8148 Collapse Potential of Soils ASTM D 5333 220
Hydraulic Teats Method Per Test
8162 Triaxial Permeability in Flexible-Wall Permeameter with Badcpressure EPA 9100/ASTM D 5084 $310
Saturation (at One Effective Stress) (Falling Head Method C)
8163 -Each Additional Effedive Stress 121
8164 -Hand Trimming of Soil Samples for Horizontal K 58
8169 Remolding of Test Specimens 5g
Soil-Cement Method Per Test
8106 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil-Cement Mixtures ASTM D 558 $200
8130 Compressive Strength of Molded Soil-Cement Cylinders (per cylinder) ASTM D 1633 50
8161 Remolded Specimen 236
8200 Box of Rings 125
p 866-Leighton f 1949-250-1114 page 2 2
soGO ~o. • ,-oy I_eiyh,o"
__ Leighton
Leighton i 2009 Fee Schedule
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Overtime for field personnel will be charged at 1.5 times basic hourly rates up to 12 hours per 24 hour interval, and 2
times basic hourly retes when exceeding 12 hours in 24 hours or on Sunday, and 3 times basic hourly rates on holidays.
Expert witness testimony will be charged at 2.0 times the above rates, with a minimum charge of four hours per day.
Invoices are rendered monthly, payable upon receipt.
Proposals are valid for 30 days, unless otherwise stated in the proposal.
Heavy equipment, subcontractor fees and expenses, supplemental insurance, travel, subsistence, shipping, reproduction,
and other reimbursable expenses will be invoiced at cost plus 209'0, unless billed directly to, and paid by GieM.
Client agrees to provide all information in Client's possession about actual or possible presence of buried utilities and
hazardous materials on the site, and agrees to reimburse Leighton for all costs related to their unanticipated discovery.
These rates are predicated on standard insurance coverage and a limit of liability to our fees for the project.
For "paid when paid" contracted work, Leighton shall receive payment within 10 calendar days from when our Client
receives payment for our services.
Minimum Hourly Charges for Geotechnicai and Environmental Technicians:
1. Monday-Friday ............................................~-----...........................................................2 hours
2. Saturday and Sunday ...................................................................................................4 hours
Minimum Houdy Charges for Special Inspectors or Material Field Services (field time only):
1. Cancellation of inspections not canceled by 4:00 p.m. on preceding day .....................2hnurs
2.One-half working day or less except as No. 3 below applies ........................................ 4 hours
3.Over one-half working day/or begins before noon and extends into afternoon ............. Shours
Ail soil samples should be free of hazardous materials. Standard turn-around time for test results is 10 working days.
Samples will be stored for 2 months, after which they will be discarded. Prior notification is required if samples need to be
stored for a longer time. A monthly storage fee of $10 per bag and $5 per sleeve or tube will be applied.
Cylinder Holds: After all designated 28-day breaks for a given set meet specified compressive strength, all "hold'
cylinders will be automatically disposed of, unless specified in writing prior to the 28-day break.
Cancellation of Field Services: No charge if made before 4:00 p.m. of the preceding work day. See Minimum Charge.
Parking: When not furnished, parking will be charged at cost plus 20°h.
License & Permits: Additional cost of any special licenses or permits for a project will be billed at cost plus 20 percent.
p 866-Leighton f 949-250-1114 page 1 1
9060 302 • 1-09 letghton
Leighton
RA~1/1
RECEIVED JUL 2 81009
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
12130 SANTA MARGARITA CT., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 :909-989-1751 : FAX 909-989-4287
July 28, 2009
Butier Engineering, Inc.
17782 E. 17th Street, Suite 107
Tustin, CA 92780
Attention: Scott Lopian
Subject: Proposal for Materials Testing Services
Rawlings Reservoir
Northeast of Foothill and Old Foothill Boulevards
Tustin, CA
Gentlemen:
In response to your request, we propose to perform the following materials testing for the subject
project.
INTRODUCTION
RMA Group has been continuously engaged in the practice of Soils Engineering and Material
Testing in the Riverside and San Bernardino County area since 1962. Our staff includes Registered
Geotechnical Engineers and Registered Geologists, as well as qualified technicians and inspectors.
RMA Group is approved as a soils and/or physical testing agency by the Federal Aviation
Administration, National Bureau of Standards, State of CaGfomia Office of Architecture, Los
Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Our laboratory complies with the
requirements for laboratory facilities detailed in ASTM E 329. Our laboratory is inspected
bi-annually by the Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory and the AASHTO Materials
Reference Laboratory of the National Bureau of Standards. We participate in the reference sample
program of the Bureau.
SCOPE OF WORK
Our proposed scope of work will consist of performing reinforced concrete and shotcrete
laboratory testing and asphaltic concrete compaction testing. These scopes of work as well as
our estimated costs associated with these services are further detailed herein:
RMA
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butler Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
• REINFORCED CONCRETE AND SHOTCRETE INSPECTION AND LABORATORY
MATERIALS TESTING
Our services will consist of reviewing concrete mix designs, and providing inspection of
concrete batch plant operations and testing of concrete, and shotcrete used in construction for
the project.
Our materials engineer would review mix designs submitted by the contractor. The results of
mix design review would be reported upon the completion of the work to the designated
representative of the owner and contractor.
We would also provide an inspector during concrete batch plant operations. The batch plant
inspection will consist of monitoring the batch weights and periodic inspection of the aggregate
stockpiles and cement bins. Written reports of all inspections will be provided on a daily basis
and at the completion of the work.
This scope of services would include material testing of portland concrete cement (PCC)
cylinders and shotcrete. Compression testing of concrete specimens molded by our
representative would be performed in accordance to ASTM C39. Coacrete shrinkage testing
will also be performed in accordance to ASTM C157.
• COMPACTION TESTING-ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Our services will consist of compaction testing of the backfill of the subgrade and asphaltic
concrete compaction testing within the access road for the Rawlings Reservoir. Work would be
scheduled by your representative by calling our dispatcher at 909-989-1751. Requests for
testing should be made at least 24 hours in advance.
Our services would consist of performing in place density tests (compaction tests) by either the
sand cone method (ASTM D 1556) or the nuclear gauge method (ASTM D2922), water content
tests, and maximum density -optimum moisture tests per ASTM D1557 at locations selected
by our representative. Testing would be performed after compaction has been completed by
the contractors and observation of compaction methods used by the contractor would not be
included in the scope of our work
Subgrade compaction tests within the access road would be taken at locations and frequencies
in accordance to guidelines provided by the governing public agency. If the governing public
agency does not have established testing guidelines then the following guideline shall be used.
Test locations will be selected by our technician at locations that represent the surface
appearance of the subgrade at the time of testing. Test locations would be spaced no more than
500 linear feet apart.
Services will also include in place density testing of asphalt concrete (ASTM D2950) by our
field technician and laboratory testing of Hveem stabilometer of asphaltic pavement. Tests
will be perforned on materials sampled at random locations and at frequencies based on
agency specification. The test results will be submitted upon completion of testing.
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 2
~_.._
~~
~~~ ~p MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
A written report summarizing the results of all tests performed will be prepared upon
completion of the work The report will not contain a rendering, opinion, certificate, or
warranty, of the compaction of the materials tested.
TERMS
We propose to perform the previously described services on an hourly or test rate basis in
accordance to the attached fee schedule. Our estimate is based on information obtained from
Butier Engineering, Inc. If a change in the scope of work becomes necessary due to extended
construction duration and/or other unforeseen conditions, which will increase the chazges, we will
obtain your written authorization before proceeding. Our charges are directly related to
construction duration, and therefore may vary due to unforeseen circumstances and or extended
construction duration. Our estimated charges are based on the following:
• Reinforced Concrete and Shotcrete Sampling
and Laboratory Materials Testing Approximately 85 concrete pours
• Compaction Testing 40 hours of on-call testing
The estimate of charges for the proposed services is as follows:
• Reinforced Concrete and Shotcrete Sampling
and Laboratory Materials Testing $ 91,675.00
• Asphalt Density Testing $ 6,405.00
• Total Estimated Costs $ 98,080.00
Invoices for our services will be prepared on a monthly basis for the services performed to date.
Invoices are due and payable upon presentation. In the event legal action is instituted to enforce
this agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees.
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 3
R~-ra
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICE5
Butier Engineering, lnc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
PROFESSIONAL INSURANCE
We maintain the following insurance coverage. Certificates of insurance will be provided upon
request. However, our professional liability insurance carrier (errors and omissions} will not name
any additional insureds.
• General liability $1,000,000.001imit
• Professional Liability $1,000,000.00 limit
• Worlanen's Compensation $1,000,000.00 limit
CLOSURE
RMA Group does not guarantee the performance of the contractors} by performing these services.
RMA Group's performance of these services shall not relieve the contractor(s) of his obligation to
perform the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications and in a workmanlike manner;
shall not make RMA Group an insurer of the contractor's performance; and shall not impose on
RMA Group any obligation to see that the work is performed in a safe manner.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forward to working with you on
this project and can begin our work upon receipt of your notice to proceed and receipt of a signed
copy of this proposal authorizing us to perform these professional services. If you have any
questions regarding this proposal please contact the undersigned Project Manager.
Authorized By:
Butier Engineering, Inc.
(Signature)
(Print or Type)
Very truly yours,
RM-A G/roup
C7l"~ ~ _.
Slawek Dymerski, P.E.
Vice President
(Title)
(~~)
Attachments: Estimate Work Sheets, Fee Schedule
RMA Job No.: 09-484P Page 4
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
REINFORCED CONCRETE LABORATORY MATERIALS TESTING
Field Inspection
Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
Concrete Technician (ACn 480 Hrs $82.00 $39,360.00
Special Inspector-Concrete Batch Plant 200 Hrs $78.00 $15,600.00
Supervising -Special Inspection 34 I-irs $110.00 $3,740.00
Pick-up & Delivery of Test Specimens 40 Hrs $55.00 $2,200.00
Sub-total $60,900.00
Laboratory Testing
wiwacw ~.yauuaci ~.uacu cavva wuiytc'~
Shotcrete Compression Tests
Mix Design Review -Calculation Only
Concrete Shrinkage
~ Unit Unit Price Total
00 Ea
80 Ea
3 Ea
10 Ea
Sub-total
Engineering Review and Report Preparation
Item Quantity
Principal Engineer 8 ...,.
Project Engineer 40 Hrs
Secretarial 40 Hrs
Sub-total
REINFORCED CONCRETE PLANT INSPECTION AND LAB
$25.00 $15,000.00
$55.00 $4,400.00
$225.00 $675.00
$150.00 $1,500.00
$21,575.00
Unit Unit
$175.00 $1,400.00
$155.00 $6,200.00
$40.00 $1,600.00
$9,200.00
Total $91,675.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 5
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
ESTIlVIATE WORKSHEET
COMPACTION TESTING
Field Testing and Sampling
Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Tota
Public Works Inspector 40 Hr $82.00 $3,280.00
Supervising -Public Works 4 Hr $110.00 $440.00
Subtotal $3,720.00
Laboratory Testing
Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture 3 Ea $150.00 $450.00
Hveem Stability and Density 3 Ea $225.00 $675.00
Subtotal $1,125.00
Engineering Review- Report Preparation
_ _ Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
Project Engineer 8 Hr $155.00 $1,240.00
Administrative S Hr $40.00 $320.00
Subtotal $1,560.00
COMPACTION TESTING Total $6,405.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 6
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
2009/2010 SCHEDULE OF FEES
TECHNICIAN & INSPECTOR
Description Rate/Cost
Soil Technician $ 82.00
Concrete Technician (ACI) $ 82•~
Public Works Technician $ 82.00
Special Inspector -Reinforced Concrete (ICC) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Pre-Stressed Concrete (ICC) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Fire Proofing (ICC) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Epoxy Bolting $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Roofing /Nailing $ 85.00
Special Inspector.- Masonry (ICC) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Masonry (DSA) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Field Welding (AWS CWI) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Shop Welding (AWS CWI) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Structural Steel (ICC) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -High Strength Bolting (ICC) $ 85.00
Special Inspector -Timber $ 95.00
Special Inspector -Concrete Batch Plant $ 78.00
Special Inspector -Grout Batch Plant $ 78.00
ID Reinforcing or Structural Steel $ 82.00
DSA Inspector of Record (IOR) Class I $ 100.00
DSA Inspector of Record (IOR) Class II $ 95.00
DSA Inspector of Record (IOR) Class III $ 90.00
Ultrasonic Testing - Level II Technician $ 95.00
Ultrasonic Testing -Level III Technician $ 110.00
Magnetic Particle Technician - Level II $ 95.00
Liquid Penetrants Technician - Level II ~ $ 95.00
Special Inspector -Radiographic Testing $ 125.00
Anchor Pull Tests $ 95.00
Bolt Torque Tests $ 95.00
Supervising -Soil Technician $ 110.00
Supervising -Public Works $ 110.00
Supervising -Special Inspection $ 110.00
Traffic Control Personnel $ 55.00
Pick-up & Delivery of Test Specimens $ 55.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484P Page 7
1lM14
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butter Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
LAB AGGREGATES
Description Rate/Cost
Abrasion by Los Angeles Rattler $ 190.00
Cleanness Value -Fine or Coarse $ 225.00
Deleterious Substance Determination $ 120.00
Dry Rodded Unit Weight $ 100.00
Durability Index -Fine & Coarse $ 275.00
Durability Test -Coarse $ 175.00
Durability Test -Fine $ 145.00
Fineness Modulus $ 90.00
Flat and Elongated Pieces - (per size fraction) $ 225.00
Fractured Faces - (per size fraction) $ 100.00
Light Weight Particles $ 200.00
Moisture Content $ 18.00
Organic Impurities $ 95.00
Percent Clay in Sands by Hydrometer $ 215.00
Percentage Crushed Particles $ 125.00
Potential Reactivity -Chemical Method $ 350.00
Sand Equivalent $ 95.00
Sieve Analysis-Fine & Coarse Aggregates $ 125.00
Sieve Analysis-Fine Aggregates (passing No. 4) $ 100.00
Sieve Analysis-Coarse Aggregates (Retained on No 4) $ 95.00
Soundness by Sodium Sulfate-(Coarse Series) $ 375.00
Soundness by Sodium Sulfate (Fine Series) $ 485.00
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Coarse Aggregate $ 95.00
Apparent Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregate $ 105.00
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Fine Aggregate $ 130.00
Fine Aggregate Angularity (T304) $ 125.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 8
RMA
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
LAB ASPHALT
Descriution Rate/Cost
Film Stripping $ 150.00
Kc Factor $ 125.00
ICf Factor $ 125.00
Moisture Vapor Susceptibility $ 250.00
Swell Potential (CAL 305) $ 165.00
Bulk Specific Gravity Per Specimen (ASTM Saturated Surface Dry) $ 25.00
Bulk Specific Gravity (ASTM Saturated Surface Dry Cores) $ 25.00
Bulk Specific Gravity Per Specimen (ASTM Parafilm Coated) $ 35.00
Bulk Specific Gravity (ASTM Parafilm Coated Cores) $ 35.00
Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308 Method A) $ 30.00
Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308 Method A Cores) $ 30.00
Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308 Method C) $ 25.00
Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308 Method C Cores) $ 25.00
Field Test Maximum Density (CAL 375) $ 125.00
Lab Test Maximum Density (CAL 375) $ 195.00
Lab Test Maximum Density - Hveem Method $ 195.00
Lab Test Maximum Density -Marshall Method $ 195.00
Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity -Rice $ 175.00
Marshall Stability and Flow -Lab compacted $ 225.00
Marshall Stability and Flow -Field compacted $ 175.00
Hveem Stability $ 195.00
Hveem Stability and Density $ 225.00
Moisture Content of Mix (CAL 370) $ 25.00
Moisture Content of Mix (CAL 310) $ 150.00
Tensile Strength Ratio (AASHTO T283) $ 750.00
Surface Abrasion Test (CAL 360) $ 625.00
Extraction -Percent Asphalt by Ignition Oven $ 105.00
Extraction -Percent Asphalt by Ignition Oven -Calibration $ 215.00
Extraction -Percent Asphalt by Solvents (Vacuum) $ 165.00
Extraction -Percent Asphalt by Solvents (Centrifuge) $ 165.00
Gradation of Extracted Aggregate $ 125.00
Percent Voids (CAL 367) $ 275.00
Percent Residue by Evaporation (ASTM D244) $ 175.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 9
RM~1
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
LAB CONCRETE
Description RatelCost
Mix Design Review -Calculation Only $ 225.00
Concrete Cylinder Cured and/or Compression Tested $ 25.00
Compression Test Cores-8" maximum diameter, including trimming $ 40.00
Insulating Concrete Cylinders -Compression Test $ 45.00
Insulating Concrete Cylinders -Constant Weight $ 45.00
Flexural Strength-Concrete Beams $ 95.00
Gunite Compression Tests $ 35.00
Shotcrete Compression Tests $ 55.00
Concrete Modulus of Elasticity $ 175.00
Concrete Shrinkage Test (set of 3) $ 430.00
Cement Content of Hardened Concrete $1,750.00
Splitting Tensile Test $ 75.00
Unit Weight of Cylinders $ 55.00
Air Content CAL 504 $ 70.00
Ball Penetration CAL 533 $ 70.00
Slab Moisture Test $ 95.00
Side to Side Crush (CCTI T-108) $ 21.00
Water Retention of Liquid Curing Compound - CTM 534 $ 425.00
Length of Drilled Cores CTM 531 $ 45.00
Surface Abrasion of Concrete (CT 550) $ 400.00
Density of Spray Applied Fire Proofing $ 55.00
Concrete Shrinkage (ASTM C157) $ 150.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 10
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
LAB MASONRY
Descriution Rate/Cos
Block Compressive Strength Test (set of 3) $ 65.00
Block, as Received Moisture & Absorption (set of 3) $ 40.00
Block, Lineal Shrinkage ASTM C426 (set of 3) $ 275.00
Block, Unit Weight and Dimensions (set of 3) $ 195.00
Block, Conformance to ASTM C90 (set of 9) $ 500.00
Brick, Compression (set of 3) $ 65.00
Brick, as received Moisture & Absorption (set of 3) $ 50.00
Brick, 5 hr Boil $ 95.00
Brick, Modulus of Rupture $ 95.00
Mortar Compression Test (2" x 4" Cylinder) $ 20.00
Grout Compression Test (3" x 6" Prism) $ 20.00
Masonry Cores, Compression - 8" max. diameter $ 45.00
Masonry Cores, Shear - 8" max. diameter $ 55.00
Tensile Test - CMA Method $ 65.00
Masonry Assemblage Compressive Strength 8" Block $ 65.00
Masonry Assemblage Compressive Strength 12" Block $ 80.00
Masonry Assemblage Compressive Strength 16" Block $ 105.00
Trimming of Test Specimens $ 20.00
Cube Compression Test 2x2x2 $ 30.00
Roof Tile Conformance (set of 10) $ 425.00
Mortar Strength of PCC Sand - CTM 515 $ 650.00
LAB STEEL
Descriution RatelCost
Tension & Bend - Rebaz (No. 11 or smaller) $ 55.00
Tension & Bend -Rebar (No. 14) $ 90.00
Tension 1~ Bend -Rebaz (No. 18) $ 120.00
Chemical Analysis $ 250.00
Tension Test-Rebar $ 35.00
Bend Test -Rebaz $ 40.00
Tension Test -Structural Steel $ 70.00
Bend Test -Structural Steet $ 45.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 11
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butter Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
LAB SOIL
Description Rate/Cost
Atterberg Limits $ 195.00
California Bearing Ratio -Corps. Eng. Method $ 425.00
Consolidation (no time rate) $ 175.00
Consolidation (with time rates) $ 250.00
Direct Shear $ 190.00
Expansion Index $ 150.00
Permeability of Soil $ 225.00
Hydro Collapse Potential $ 125.00
Hydrometer Analysis $ 215.00
Lab Density Determinations by Drive Tube $ 15.00
Lab Moisture Determinations $ 8.00
Matric Suction -Filter Paper Method $ 95.00
Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture (ASTM D 1557) $ 150.00
Calif Impact Max Density (CAL 216) $ 165.00
Percent Organic Materials $ 35.00
pH & Resistivity of Soils Saturated Paste $ 45.00
R-Value $ 250.00
Sand Equivalent $ 95.00
Sieve Analysis of Soils $ 125.00
Sieve Analysis of Soils -Wash Only $ 50.00
Soluble Sulfate $ 45.00
Specific Gravity of Soils $ 150.00
Swell Potential $ 175.00
Unconfined Compression Test $ 125.00
ESP -Sodium Exchange Potential $ 45.00
Soil Cement (set of 3) $ 450.00
Shrinkage factor by Resin $ 120.00
Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture Soil Cement (ASTM D558) $ 195.00
Laboratory Specimen Preparation D559 $ 65.00
Compression Test Soil Cement D1633 $ 35.00
Chloride Content (CTM 422) $ 30.00
Corrosion Testing CTM 643 $ 95.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 12
RM~1
MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
PROFESSIONAL AND OFFICE PERSONNEL
Description RateJCost
Principal Engineer $ 175.00
Principal Geologist $ 175.00
Project Engineer $ 155.00
Project Geologist $ 145.00
Project Manager $ 125.00
Staff Engineer $ 95.00
Staff Geologist $ 95.00
Drafting $ 65.00
Administrative $ 40.00
EXPLORATORY AND CORING EQUIPMENT
Description Rate/Cost
Dutch Cone Penetrometer $ 185.00
Portable Drilling Equipment $ 225.00
Backhce $ 95.00
Bucket Auger $ 225.00
Hollow Stem Auger $ 210.00
Air Rotary Drill Rig $ 250.00
Rotary Wash Drill Rig $ 275.00
Asphalt Coring $ 95.00
Concrete Coring $ 95.00
Horizontal Wall Coring $ 100.00
Assistant Wall Coring $ 75.00
Coring Bit Wear (per inch) $ 2.00
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 13
~_
~~~ ~Vp MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Butier Engineering, Inc.
Rawlings Reservoir
Tustin, CA
Proposal dated July 28, 2009
GENERAL NOTES
GENERAL CHARGES
Inspection charges start at the scheduled show up time at the job site. There will be a
minimum Two (2) hour show up charge and a minimum four (4) hour charge for all
inspections and a minimum eight (8) hours for any work over four (4) hours.
RMA requires twenty-four (24) hour prior notification for scheduling inspectors and/or
technicians.
Materials test and Inspection report mail expenses will be charged at a rate of $5.00 per report.
This charge will include the distribution of up to 4 copies of each report to various agencies
and/or consultants via U.S. Mail. Additional copies will be charged at a rate of $0.50 per
report page. Special delivery or overnight charges will be charged at cost plus 15% unless
billed directly to and paid for by client.
Preliminary Geotechnical, Investigation and Grading reports will be charged at a rate of
$25,00 per report.
Reproduction charges for plan copies will be $1.50 per page for 24" x 36" or smaller plans and
$2.50 per page for larger plans.
Outside services will be billed at cost plus I S%, unless billed directly to and paid for by client
OVERTIl~IE CHARGES
Work performed in excess of 8 hours per day and/ or on Saturdays will be charged at 1.5 times
the unit rate for the appropriate personnel.
Work performed on Sunday or recognized holidays will be charged at 2.0 times the unit rate
for the appropriate personnel.
PER DIEM ANDTRAVEL CHARGES
An $85.00 charge per day will be applied when our personnel aze required to stay overnight at
remote locations.
Travel time to remote locations will be billed at the rate for the personnel performing the work
while traveling to a remote location or a location requiring overnight stay.
NIGHT WORK
A $2.00 per hour surcharge will be added to all personnel rates for work performed during
night shifts.
RMA Job No.: 09-484-P Page 14
•17ENC0 Eng~oering, Inc.
Civil Fnginoaing
~8
B
Mr. Jce Bhim August 5, 2009
BUTTER ENGINEERING ~~ ~~
17782 East 17th Street, Suite 107
Tustin, Califaaiia 92780
RE PROPOSAL FOR SURVEYING SERVICES
QTY OF TUSTIIv
RAWLINGS RESERVOQt, CIP N0.6136
TUSTIN, CALII~RNIA
Dear Mr. Blum
Thank you for inviting PENCO Engixoa~ Inc bo submit this proposal surveying services for
Rawlings Reseradr, (~ No. 6136, located in the City of Tustin, California. We have made certain
assumptions, which we believe are appropriate and r~sonable, based on the information
provided. If airy of these aze not correct, we will be glad to review them with you, and make
any appropriate nnodifications. Our project staff is available to start work on this project as
eazly as you advise ns to proceed.
This proposal includes the following:
1. Scope of Services - outlirtirtg work to be perfomucl and assumptions made.
2. Fee Proposal - Iisti>c-g the breakdown of our fee for the Scope of Services to be provided.
3. Fee Schedule -listing onr 2009 Fees for any services that may be required and that are
determined to be out of scope.
PENCO Enginaerin& Inc will provide these Services on a Time and Materials basis for a fee not
m exceed of 40 00 Plus a Reimbursable Budget of 1 7.00.
Please contact me at (949) 753-8111 should you have any questions regarding this
proposal. Once again, thank you for this opportunity. I look forwazd to working with you on
this project
Sincerely,
PENCO Enginar~g, Inc
William E. Sawy>'; t.'jr S.. LEED AP
Vice Presid of cf ,ev
Accepted and Approved:
Butier Engineering Date
IRVIIdE
one Technolo®~ sld& J-ns
Irvine, California 92618
949-753-8111 • Fax 949-753-0775
wavwpcMOmg.com
IDtI.AND EMPIRE
2191 Fifth Street, Suite 211
Nocro, California 92860
951-736-2040 • Fax 951-736-5292
ww+wpaecoaig.com
~1C11t SUCCESS iS OIIP ~11CLC55
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SURVEYING SERVICES
BUTTER ENGINEERING
RAWLINGS RESERVOIR CIP N0.6136
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
:-, PRF-C.O1.STRUC~TION Tr~,SKS
1. RESEARCH
Obtain copies of record data maps (i.e.: Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and
Rernrds of Survey), Corner Records, Centerline Tie Notes, Benchmarks,
and utility drawings, as available with applicable governmental agencies
and utility providers, and as records are made available by Butier
Engineering.
2 CONSTRAINT MAP
PENCO Engineering Inc shall verify e~dsting and proposed street rights-
of-way with the applicable City/County departments. PENCO
Engan!erin& Inc. shall compile record data reference materials as noted
herein and with the benefit of a Preliminary Title Report to generate a Site
Constraint Map that depicts record data boundary and easement
information. Said Preliminary Title Report and copies of underlying
easement documents to be provided by others.
3. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL
PENCO Enginaerin$ Inc shall field locate existing street centerline and
property line survey monuments. A minimum of four (4) project specific
horizontal control points shall be set to benefit the project general
contractor and subcontractors during the construction process. Said
locations will be recorded on daily survey field notes.
PENCO Engineering, Inc shall verify existing project benchmark and
datum reference as identified on construction documents. PENCO
Engineerirt~ Inc shall establish a minimum of four (4) temporary project
benchmarks to be utilized throughout the construction process for survey
layout.
4. PROPERTY CORNER VERIFICATIONS
PENCO Engineering Inc shall field verify all existing property corner
monuments as exist at subject site prior to the start of this construction
P~~
P:~Z009V02722.00 - Butier, Rawlings Reservoir. Tuatin~2722.3cape of Wat08.03.09.doc
5. TOPOGRAPHIC VERIFICATIONS
PENCO Engineerin& liic shall obtain ground specific site locations and
elevations across subject site and along the property lines to ensure
compatibility with the site elevations indicated on the approved civil
design drawings. Said ground specific locations and elevations will also
include existing curbs di gutters adjacent to subject site and future project
POC's (Points-of-Connection) as indicated a~n the approved plans.
~.. _ T'OS-["-I~~.~~1C)L,JTTO~; T:~51~5
1. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL
PENCO EngineerFn& Inc shall field locate existing street centerline and
property line survey monunrnents. A m;n;mnm of four (4) project specific
horizontal control points shall be set to benefit the project general
contractor and subcontractors during the construction process. Said
locations will be recorded on daily survey field notes.
PENCO Engineerin& Inc shall verify existing project benchmark and
datum reference as identified on construction documents PENCO
Engataerat~ Inc shall establish a minimum of four (4) temporary project
benchmarks to be utilized throughout the construction process for survey
layout.
2 SHORING LAYOUT'
PENCO Engineering Inc shall provide one (1) set of offset stakes to
facilitate the installation of the project perimeter shoring walls. Said
layout shall be at an offset as requested by Butter Engineering and at a
staking interval of not more than fifty (50') feet between stakes and at wall
angle points, horizontal and vertical grade breaks.
3. SHORING MONITORING
PENCO Engbuerin$ Inc shall obtain incremental sets of monitoring data
infamnation at: (1) Initial placement of shoring; (2) Thirty (3~ days after
initial placement of shoring, and; (3) Sixty (60) days after initial placement
of shoring. The follow up rnllection of monitoring data shall be
determined jointly by Butter Engineering and the City of Tustin and shall
be based upon "project needs". The data collected at each a~f the
monitoring site visits will be compiled into a .'Monitoring Shoring Flan"
that will consist of a site .plan view plot along with a tabular data table
comparing each set of field measurements.
P:~2009102722.00 -Bader, Rawlings Reservoir, Tnstin~2722.Scope of BVoatr.08.05.09.doc
4. STORM DRAIN STAKES
PENCO Enginaring. Inc shall provide one (1) set of storm drain offset
stakes at a maximum stake interval of thirty (30~ feet, inclusive of
horizontal and vertical grade breaks, begin and end of pipes and
centerline of junction structures Stake offsets to be determined by Butter
Engineering at time of scheduling for survey layout.
5. TANK LAYOUT
PENCO Engineering Ina shall provide one (1) set of storage tank offset
stakes at an offset to be deterrmined by Butter Engineering at time of
scheduling. Said staking shall include horizontal and vertical control
reference information mazked on all stakes along with offset reference
stakes set outside of the future tank footprint area. Each offset stake to
identify: stake offset; stake elevation; a reference cut or fill to an approved
plan elevation as indicated on the civil drawings.
6. MISCELLANEOUS SITE CERTIFICATIONS
PENCO Engtnaering Inc shall perform site certifications on an "as-
requested" basis to ensure that subject site and improvements are being
constructed in conformance with the approved plans and in accordance
with the Butter Engineering. It is anticipated that PE111C0 Engln~ering
Ina will provide certifications on a Time & Material basis and in
conjunction with daily "Field Work Authorization" { FWA) comple6ed by
field crew and field verified by onsite Butter representative.
L ADDITIONAL WORK
The work to be performed is strictly limited to those items detailed in the
Scope of Work above. All work not set forth in the Scope of Work shall be
deemed additional work. Should additional work be required, it is the
responsibility of Butter Engineering to initiate negotiations far such work.
Additional Work will be charged at our regulaz hourly rates, per the
attached Fee Schedule, and includes the time for travel to the jobsite.
Additional work will not be commenced without written authorization
from Butter Engineering.
a. Items of work that are not cleazly defined prior to the authorization
to proceed will be performed on a Time and Materials (TdrM) basis
per the attached Fee Schedule or upon such lump sum addition to
the contract, as agreed upon by Butter Engineering prior to
proceeding with such items of work
P:t2009V02722.00 -Surfer, itawlings Reservoir, Tustin~2722.Scope of Worh.08.05.09.doc
2 PREMIUM TIIVIE
Work may be requested that, due to Butler Engineering builders'
schedule, requires work to be performed during non business hours. If
such work is required, a request for premium time may be made.
Premium time shall be deemed Extra Work and will apply to Scope items
or non-Scope items. Premium time will be paid at 150% of the hourly
rates, per the attached Fee Schedule, for Extra work or far items already
included in this Scope of Work, 50% of the hourly rate shall be paid.
3. SURVEY GRADE SHEETS
PENCO Engineerin& Ines survey crew will prepare grade sheets to
identify the survey layout performed each day and duplicate copies will
be provided to the project superintendent daily.
4. SURVEY CREW SCHEDULING
Butler Engineering is to provide a minimum of 48 hours notice prior to
PENCO Eng:neerbe& Inc dispatching a survey crew to subject site.
5. CONSTRUCTION STAKING
a. In the event that any item of construction is placed in an incorrect
position, the original, undisturbed survey stakes are the only proof of
evidence of any PENCO Engineertn& Inc error. ]n the event that the
original stakes aze disturbed or missing, the data contained in the
original field notes shall prevail.
b. Butler Engineering is responsible for the preservation of construction
stakes. Butler Engineering may request replacements far lost or
obliterated stakes and will be considered "Extra Work" as defined
above. Restaking will only be performed upon receipt of a written
authorization to proceed for such work.
c. All restaking shall be performed on a Time and Materials (T&NI) basis
as identified in the attached Fee Schedule.
6. CONTRACT PAYMENT AND REIMBURSABTi.,EFXPENSES
a. Payments are due and payable according to monthly billings as the
work progresses. Amounts over 30 days past due will be subject to
1.5% per month service charge.
b. Courier service, blueprinting, and reproduction costs shall be at Butler
Engineering expense and include a 15% handling fee, and shall be
invoiced on a monthly basis.
7. EXCLUSIONS
This construction staking scope does not include the setting or
replacement of any centerline or property corner monuments.
p:~2oo9W2722.00 - Holier, liawlin~a Reservoir, Twtin~2722.s~ ofwork.ott.OS.09.doc
8. ADDTI'IONAL SITE VISTTS
Each contract line item has been budgeted for a single site trip (1 "move-
in'), unless otherwise indicated. Each additional site visit will be chazged
an additional 4 hours **+~n~*num of 2man-survey crew time in accordance
with the attached fee schedule.
P:~2009~02722.00 - Butler, Rewluigs Rexrvoiy T~stin12722.Scope of Wark.08.05.09.doc
w
V
,~
VNJ
w
O
z
0
z
0
u
it
a
~~
,~ z
od
a ~
~~~~ ~
r
f "_~ 1_~ _
O P ^ ,y ~ i FI A ~ ~ ,S A
O
~ ~ :° :° &t • S Y
I O
•
n .~
I N n N n N N ~ N ~1 p
F
I
O
N n n n n n N ~ f ~
e
0
a~
0
e
a
e
v
n n n N ~ ~
O
z
3
.: N
C W. 2
+
~
w{
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ S
~rJ
• d 6 ~ N
d
{
~
~
F
~ ui .d +
Q
F
n
F8, F
tO e
PIIVCO Ea~taoaiaa, lac
~9~b
'meat Saoors~ b tArsaame'
Effective January 1 through December 31, 2009
PERSONNEL HOURLY RATE
President $ 215.00
Principal $200.00
Senior Project Manager $175.00
Project Manager $160.00
Survey Mapping Manager $148.00
Senior Project Engineer $148.00
Project Engineer $135.00
Senior Design Engineer $115.00
Design Engineer $ 105.00
Assotsate Engineer $90.00
Engineering Technidan $80.00
Project Assistant $85.00
Processor $ 95.00
Senior Project Surveyor $143.00
Project Surveyor $125.00
Senior Survey Technician $105.00
Survey Technician $85.00
3-Man Survey Crew $ 240.00
2-Man Survey Crew $190.00
2-Man Survey Crew w/ GPS $225.00
1-Man Survey Crnw $265.00
Any work performed after above effective date shall be billed under new fee
schedule rates bo be issued tm os before December 31x of each year.
• ~I I; ~~i ' •r7l~
]teproducttasu; deliveries: travel; meals and lodgic-g; facsimiles; models, renderings
and photos; mylars; and disketbee, not included in scope of work.
• All z~sable costs shall be bulled at a 15% markup.
• Mileage shall be billed at $0.55 /mile (office staff only)
• All account are due net 30 days from the date of invoice
e Oubtanding aomnnfs shall be charged 1.0% per mtmth.
• AIl required tyvertime work shall be bdl at 150% of the hourly rate
_ ,
_ ;; ~ Page 1 of 14
s.•
_ _
~` 1 ~ 1,
~.'r ~ 1 ~~~~~~1~
JrtJ~fi~JV'.rjv~~ ?J'~%i~~w LU
Monday, July 27, 2009
Proposal P09-0535
Butier Engineering
17782 E. 17th Street
Suite 107
Tustin, CA 92780
Attn: Joe Blum
Off (714) 832-7222
Cell (714) 448-0216
Subject: Pre-Construction Home & Road Inspection Services, Sound and Vibration
Measurements for the Rawlings Reservoir Project, Tustin, CA
Dear Mr. Blum:
This proposal is transmitted in follow-up to our meeting on July 24, 2009 at your Tustin office
regarding the subject project.
Per your request, this proposal includes background information supporting the proposed
methodologies.
BACKGROUND
Major construction operations are often targets for unwarranted legal action. Objective baseline
measurements are crucial toward mitigating frivolous actions and to prevail in more rigorous
litigation.
GEOVision provides expert services in the areas ofpre-inspection, sound and vibration
monitoring; producing reliable, objective data that will hold up under scrutiny.
SCOPE OF WORK
Pre-construction Home Inspection Services:
A low-cost method employed by some companies is to create a video of structures within 1000'
of the proposed work site. Unfortunately, the resolution of these surveys is generally limited.
Further, if an absolute scale is not referenced against each crack, then property owners can claim
that the crack observed in the video was exacerbated by construction activities; rendering the
videos a waste of time.
We will provide structural inspection and crack documentation services at accessible locations as
mutually scheduled with the homeowner/resident. These services will include stilt photography
using a high resolation digital camera coupled with inspection reports noting photograph
1124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 ~ (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
July 28, 2009
Butier Engineering, Rawlings Reservoir
Page 2 of 14
numbers and any other observations by the engineer/geophysicist performing the survey. The
surveys will focus on obvious areas of potential cracking, such as the comers of doors and
windows and slabs, and will record observable existing cracks. Using GEOVision's
methodology the general age of cracks can also be approxnnated by the presence of various
matter inside the cracks and the sharpness of the crack's edges.
Figure 1
3['-T ~
YlF r
o f ~'
~ ~~ a
~~ {({j{
y r.t~ y ~
I{ ~. ~
4
1~
0 ~,~
~a.'e~
~ 1
_.-
~° ;~ ~ .,~
Sample high resolution photo with zoomed in section showing accumulated debris.
If the cracks are recent, there will be sharp edges and the pieces of recent loose broken material
will still be evident in the cracks. Older cracks are worn smooth at the edges. The smaller
pieces of material that have broken away from the crack will have migrated away due to repeated
hose water, rain & wind cycles. Seeds, spider webs, dirt and other matter will, over time
accumulate in the cracks. Only high resolatioa images will provide this information. These
services will be supervised by a Registered Civil Engineer. This methodology is very effectual.
One such case documented by GEOVision in Colorado involved a homeowner who claimed that
the original cracks in her home were worsened by the operation of heavy equipment on a neazby
civil improvement project. GEOVision's scaled, close-up photographs proved the claim
baseless. Without the photos, a jury most certainly would have been sympathetic. GEOVision
was recently advised that a similaz case occurred on a project for the City of Anaheim. Again,
the GEOVision high-resolution photos were instrumental in mitigating litigation.
The deliverable will be a DVD-ROM or CD-ROM w/ copies of the forms, logs and photographic
records. An example of the form used by GEOVision is provided in Appendix A.
Pre-construction Road Inspection Services:
We will provide a videographic record on DVD establishing the initial conditions for each lane
of each roadway to be used by future construction traffic or, as otherwise directed by the project
owner's representative. GEOVision's approach is to employ two digital video recorders
mounted to the front of our survey vehicle. One recorder is focused downwazd on the roadway
and the second recorder is pointed in the direction of travel for a regional perspective. By
opening two Video player screens on the computer, and starting the files concurrently, the
observer can readily identify road discontinuities on one screen and where the discontinuity is
approximately located on the second screen. A written log with milestone locations is generated
prior to executing the survey. During video acquisition the elapsed time from the start point of
1124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 fx (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
July 28, 2009
Butier Engineering, Rawlings Reservoir
Page 3 of 14
the video survey to each milestone is logged- enabling the viewer to `skip' to the locations of
interest during video review. The survey can be executed safely without lane closures and data
is acquired at legal speeds. These services will be supervised by a Registered Civil Engineer.
The deliverable will be a DVD-ROM w/ a copy of the milestone log. An example of the video
log form used by GEOVision is provided in Appendix A.
SCOPE OF WORK
Sound Measurements to Establish Ambient Baseline Levels
TYPICAL SOUND PRESSURES AND SOUND
PRESSURE LEVELS
~ ,.t+u~ Zoo
1.E+p6 ~~"A"° 180
1.E+05 ~~ 160
1.E+04 mreee~o~a or ~" 140 ,-.
so ro sren t+oo en m
1.E+03 rnegMabhom(3fU 120 a
3 heitlo 6eoapo~ erica ~
1.E+02 Sucwey tree (2o R) 100 3
~
o ~r ~e~r O
1.E+01 rbwrtrffi+k 8U p,
a Averepe treftb ~
c 1.E+00 oomroesenoneleveeah 8U ~
~
0 rtwaee hemr,ees affte p
~ 1.E-01 < nverape eeeieeeeoe
Broetleaefn
setlo 40 (/~
1.E-02 p
'as""a~e'~°"°'ea°".e°^°aor^.."'p> 20
1.E-03 naa mresnoa of nervq cru+~u men + -+aa) 0
1
E-04
.
-20
Figure 2: Sound pressure chart.
The project plans appear to contain a noise compliance specification drawn from the City of
Tustin municipal code, Article 4, Health & Sanitation. However, GEOVision's research
indicates that the subject code under section 46I 7 EXEMPTIONS, specifically excludes
construction activities from the provisions of Chapter 6 NOISE CONTROL.
l 124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 ix (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
July 28, 2009 Page 4 of 14
Butier Engineering, Rawlings Reservoir
4617 EXEMPTIONS
The following activities shall 6e exempted from the provisions of this chapter:
(a) Activities conducted on the grounds of any public or private nursery, elementary,
intermediate or secondary school or college, public agency, and public utility...
(e) Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of arty real
property between the hours of 7.•00 a.m. and 6: 00 p.m. Monday through Friday and the
hours of 9:00 a.m. and S: 00 p.m. on Saturdays, excluding city observed federal holidays...
That said, to mitigate lawsuits, a sound survey should be conducted at sufficient locations to
establish pre-existing ambient levels followed by a sound survey to document construction
related sound levels. Often there is very little difference between the two measurements which
presents a significant challenge to claims of damage. In some cases, street traffic and residents'
own activities generate sound levels significantly in excess of the construction sound levels.
Residents are sometimes `sensitized' as the sounds generated by construction activity can
sometimes be accompanied by low level vibrations- making persons more conscious of the
sounds. Objective sound data compared with sound levels taken prior the beginning of
construction activities can help educate neazby residents about their perceptions.
We propose to perform sound measurements prior to and at the
start of construction activities. This will require about one day
on-site for each visit (two visits total). Data will be recorded at
multiple locations with sufficient spatial distribution to identify
& characterize the observed noise sources azound the proposed
jobsite.
A calibrated Sound Level Meter Type B&K 2230 or similar,
will be used for noise measurements. To permit a direct
comparison with the project specifications, we plan to use the
"A" frequency weighting setting.
NOTE: The plans call fora 24' sound wall to be erected at the
site. In the absence of a specific structure requiring this degree
of protection, we submit that the following plan wording would
more efficiently accomplish the required sound protection: "A sound wall of sufficient height,
but not less than 12', shall be erected in order to block the sounds generated by heavy
construction equipment from being directly transmitted towazd adjacent single family
residences."
Sound level measurements on either side of the wall will provide objective data for sound level
attenuation.
1124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 fx (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
July 28, 2009 Page 5 of 14
Butler Engineering, Rawlings Reservoir
Strategic & Continuous Vibration Monitoring
Vibration Analysis
We recommend using the USBM frequency based guidelines. 'The U.S. Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) has conducted extensive research on this
subject. Public Law 95-87, Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 816.67 provides
for monitoring of blasting vibrations and estab
analyzing this data. Since these criteria
are established for a broad frequency
range, they can be applied to a variety of
vibration sources, including construction
operations.
The benefit of the frequency based
analysis is that it eliminates the ambiguity
of the "upper limit" wording in some
specifications.
Strategic Monitoring
Strategic (manned) monitoring will be
fishes the necessary procedures for collecting and
SAFE LEVEL BLASTING CRfTERIA FROM OSMRE
io
-USBM q D507'F~f
Y __ usaM ra wog •N..r --
~i osMr+E
i
a - ._~__
1
6
of
1 10 100
Fnqu~nry, Hs
provided during operations known to generate appreciable vibration (pile driving, heavy
excavation and demolition). A GEOVision engineer will deploy multiple seismographs around
the site and monitor the vibration levels. If excess levels aze generated, construction operations
will be halted in order to review operafions and take mitigative measures.
Continuous Monitoring
For continuous (unmanned) monitoring we propose to install one, or more, seismograph systems
at the subject site; buried in the ground for minimal visual confrontation. The systems will
monitor vibrations continuously. ",~~ ; w., , '-; ~
Monitoring will be 24-hours per _. _'~,~'',~~~, ~ ~• .
day and seven days per week, using . ~ +""~ ~ ~ ; . ~~ . _ _ J I .
n • 1
an event triggering, triaxial . , 1...., .:
(satisfies the "any direction" _ . ~ " ' ~ ~ '
..: ~ ~ ~
requirement), digital seismograph '~~ - :..~ '~~i" ,'~,;~ d 1'Y r') ti
with uninterruptible power supply. - '"''''I~S _~ ~' '; ~ i ,~, nyk~j~
i .. .:.... ~. x!
Locations may be occupied on a
`roving' basis or continuously at
fixed locations throughout the
construction period; depending
upon the construction plan. Fees
apply for relocating instruments.
1124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 fx (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
July 28, 2009
Butier Engineering, Rawlings Reservoir
Page 6 of 14
The seismograph will be set to trigger and record any motions that could potentially cause
damage. Our purpose is to record ALL events that have potential for damage, and certainly a
good selection of the largest events each week, but not such a quantity of small events to
unnecessarily overwhehn our processing capacity or exceed the memory capacity of the
recorder;.
Data will be collected with a frequency of nominally once per week. At the same time,
discharged batteries are changed and any required maintenance is performed. Once data is
downloaded, memories are cleared. The data will then be removed to GEOVision for weekly
processing.
The final report will consist of a printout of each event that exceeds the preset threshold (see
example attached, Appendix A). This can be provided on a weekly basis or at the conclusion of
the project.
MONITORING CONCEPT
Our concept is to monitor all potentially damaging vibrations during the entire monitoring period
in the most direct and unambiguous way. This means:
1. contimuous (unmanned) monitoring, though not continuous recording. By continuous
monitoring our documentation will show 100% coverage of vibration events exceeding a
preset threshold. By limiting recording to only those events that exceed a predetermined
threshold, we can look in detail only at large events that have a potential for damage.
2. strategic (manned) monitoring of construction activities with a known potential to produce
vibration of engineering interest. By monitoring the start of these processes, the client and
contractor will know in near real-time whether the methodology is producing unwanted
vibration levels and make any necessary adjustments before damaging to adjacent structures.
3. It also means processing every recorded event and presenting the data in a way that allows
duect comparison with the objective OSMRE criteria (see above Vibration Analysis).
4. It also means placing monitoring sensors at sufficient locations to enable a reasonable
conclusion that the recordings have characterized the vibration environment for all critical
structures.
SCHEDULE
We will need about two calendar weeks advance notice to meet your schedule. More rapid
mobilization can be provided under special circumstances. A final report will be provided
within two weeks after acquisition of data.
1124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 fx (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
_ ~ „ ~ ~ - ~/~' Page 11 of 14
APPENDIX A: GEOVISION SURVEY FORMS
1124 Olympic Drive, Corona, CA 92881-3390, (951) 549-1234 fx (951) 549-1236
www.geovision.com
Page of (~ ~ ~~~~,l,.q~ 2 of 14
geophysical services C//
PRE-EVENT SURVEY FORM
Clierrt:
Contact:
Phone:
Project No:
Date:
Location name ("Smith house"): Room name:
Legal Description ("1000 A Street"):
GV Personnel Omaite:
Arohive: Digital files transferred to file server for badcupl Yes
Photo File
a~hoto Location PJuml~er Number Tima Comments
wan view sketch (it any -not required if photos are serf explanatory):
,. ,,,
,; i
_~ ~ u ~ - ~~
~.
:. __;_;
-- - -~ - --r------ - - ---
f3A -bath
1 FLR - flrst floor
I-tA -hallway
G -garage
K -kitchen
BR -bedroom
LR -living room
D -den
DR -dining room
FR -fitness room
LA -laundry
~L - doset
GEOV'~sion On-sRe Engineer
v
0
s
0
W
O
J
Q
d
C
7
C
0
v
~ ~
W O
K
C
=
N
W
J
q¢
~+
rc
i
~
7
OOt
O
OO
pp
Y
v
z
i
$
~
~
~j
$
=
$
J
~
ri
~
z
u~
py
~
W
4
~
z
®
~
!
C
z
u°~
Y
Y
a6
~
z
u~
K
G
Y
O
m
$
V
~
<
N
~
3
z
Z
<
K
N
~
3
~
L
N
S
~
d
~
N
3
°~
d
~
(
~
d
~
5
w
~
==
U
~
N
S
vmi
d
µg.
~+
s
V
~
3
3
p
~
ri
G1
~
3
~
~
»
<
as
~
i
~
w
~
C
y
~
on
pppp
3
~
~
N
o
`od
w
~
~
$
~
d
w
~
d
Y
O
Q~Q
C
$
m O
~
ZO
W
4
w
m
E
c
~
O
~
H
A
•
N
,O
1~
O
•
r
~
~
~
~
r
r
~
~
N
N (~
N
W
.. ' , is ~ Y ,.;i,'<':
DateJTime Long at 14:59:39 June 9, 2008
Trigger Source Geo: 0.200 iNs
Range Geo :10.00 iNs
Record Time 25.75 sec (Auto=3Sec) at 1024 sps
Job Number. 5286
Notes
Location: Sample
Client:
User Name: Rod Men•ill - GEOVsan
General: Southeast Location
Extended Notes
Poet Event Notes
N34 04.829
W11711.08li
Tran Vert Long
PPY 0.180 0.110 1.02 iNs
ZC Freq 30 39 51 I-Iz
Time (Rel, to Trig) 2.923 2.911 2.924 sec
Peak Acceleration 0.119 0.0795 0.795 g
Peak DhplacemeM 0.00206 0.00039 0.00738 in
Serrsoroheck Passed Passed Passed
Frequency 7.4 7.6 7.6 Flz
Overawing Ratio 3.3 3.6 3.4
Event Report rr- ~ ~~,
Seriat Number BC6831 V 8.12-8.0 MiniMate Piua page 14 of 14
Battery Level 6.7 Volts
Calibration March 26, 2008 by Instantel Inc.
File Name H831C8DO.BF0
USBM RI8507 And OSMRE
~ 1 /~/ ;~
~- ,,~ ,,
s
~~ :~
O J ) ~' (7
0. -------- `x~-4i~i~/~lr.p
e f r
Vl3 ` J (nQ ~`(~'.~ ~
0. 1~ :/~3L~~4 3 ~ ~, Sk7~h~~7
k~, ~ 1. ~ ~~ ~` 6 ,
on ~,r ~,~G~1ra o~ Cl~ ~s
n ~ '1 99
D.Ci i I ~ ~ - ~ 3 /lbPi:v.~ IJ..y.7~}3 9-.».~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ 47 ~f- ~ L
1 2 0 10 20 00 100 ~
Frequency (Hz)
Tran: Vert: Long:
Long
Vert
Tran
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tkrle Scale:1.00 sec/div Amplitude Scak:Geo: 0.500 iNsJdiv Sensorchedc
Trigger ~ -- -~
PAnOW: Jum Z,, 20001110.01 -OA7) Format COpyrIOMM 100b20041nt1aMN1nc.