Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 09-26-88MXNUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COlqHISSION REGULAR I"IEETT NG SEPTEHBER 26, 1988 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGXANCE/XNVOCATION ROLL CALL: PIJSLZC CONCERNS: Present: Nell, Baker, Le Jeune, Ponttous, Shaheen (Ltmlted to 3 mtnutes per person for Items not on the agenda) IF YOU NISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. Commissioner Le Jeune moved, Pontious seconded to remove Item 2 from the consent calendar for open discussion. Morton carried 5-0. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the September 12, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting Commissioner Ponttous moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve the remainder of the consent calendar. Motion carried 5-0. APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: REQUEST: Amendment to Design Review 87-18, Tentative Tract Map 13106, "Sevtlla" Project THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY 14 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 LOT 6 OF TRACT 12763 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR ARCHITECTURAL PERIMETER UNITS OF TRACT 13106. ALTERATIONS TO Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2533 approving exterior architectural alterations to the "S, villa" project originally approved by Design Review 87-18, as submitted or revised. Resolution No. 2533 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING EXTERIOR BUILDING MODIFICATIONS TO DESIGN REVIEW 87-18, A 110 UNIT PROJECT LOCATED ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12763 Planning Commission Minutes September 26, 1988 Page two Staff established that the Irvine Company design review staff instituted the request for these changes to improve the exterior views on the two exterior units. The public hearing was opened at 7:06 p.m. Molly Munch, representing the Fieldstone Company, noted that the proposed changes will enhance the architectural view of the project and make it more compatible with the surrounding projects. She stated that the cost to make the proposed changes throughout the project would be cost prohibitive and the maintenance costs to the Homeowner's Association could not be justified. She concurred with all of the other conditions imposed by staff. Commissioner Shaheen noted that if there are changes to the units specified, that all of the units should be changed to obtain some consistency in architecture. Ms. Munch noted that the porches are only decorative and the painting of the added features would be prohibited. Commissioner Well noted that she objected to the addition of extra balconies and windows on the inner units. She asked if these proposed changes would be earthquake safe. She also noted that the proposed materials and colors are consistent. Commissioner Ponttous asked what the cost of the changes would be. Ms. Munch stated that the additional building cost would be approximately $7,000 per ~6tt. Commissioner Shaheen asked what the selling price per unit would be for this project and what the square footage of the units would be. Ms. Munch noted that she thought the sales price would be around $200,000 per unit, having two units per building ranging from 1470 to 1770 square feet. Commissioner Le Jeune asked how may balconies were effected by this proposed change. Staff responded it might be as many as 36 units involved out of the 110 unit project. The Director noted that the important issue is the private street and streetscapes and to include the changes on the units immediately facing the main loop streets. Commissioner Wetl noted that she felt unless the changes requested by the builder effect the City in a health or safety way the City should not step in. She noted that if these improvements were made on all of the units, the price tag would be greatly increased. Commissioner Baker clarified that the developer was just upgrading and that there were no problems in obtaining approval of the original plans or design. The public hearing was closed at 7:21 p.m. Commissioner Ponttous noted her concern with the cost factor of imposing the changes on all units and suggested that the change be made to the exterior units only. Planning Commission Minutes September 26, 1988 Page three Commissioner Le Jeune noted that the ortglnal plan was suitable, the enhancements are good and he felt that the changes dtd not need to be throughout the project. Commissioner Well moved, Ponttous seconded to approve exterlor architectural alterations to the "Sevtlla" project originally approved by Destgn Revtew 87-18 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2533 revtsed to eliminate Sectton II. 1. Morton carrted 4-1 No: Shaheen. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Use Permit 88-19 APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: ORANGE COUNTY BUILDERS 1260 HEACOCK ANAHEIM, CA 92807 ART AND ZENY REMIGIO 65 EMERALD IRVINE, CA 92715 14752 HOLT AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92680 R-3 3000: MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT TWO-STORY ADDITION TO AN SQUARE FOOT LOT A 3,326 SQUARE FOOT, 10 BEDROOM, EXISTING SENIOR'S HOME ON A 12,220 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission either continue the heartng on thts matter, or approve Use Permtt 88-19 by the adoptton of Resolution No. 2532 wtth the conditions contained for redestgn of the second story addition, as submitted or revised. Resolution No. 2532 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING USE PERMIT 88-19 FOR A 3,326 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SENIOR CITIZEN'S HOME AT 14752 HOLT AVENUE. Presentation: Eric Haaland, Acting Assistant Planner Commissioner Wetl questioned if staff had monitored the board and care home on Bryan Avenue for parking related issues. Staff responded that they had not visited that particular facility, however, they visited other facilities with the type of use proposed by this application and found that parking requirements are reduced. The Director noted that the Bryan Avenue facility is more of an apartment complex where this proposed use is more of a rest home. Commissioner Pontious noted concern for weekend parking demands and accommodations for family visitor parking. Planntng Commission Minutes September 26, 1988 Page four Commissioner Baker asked what the total number of units will be when completed. Staff responded that there would be a total of 15, posstbly fewer if the second story is eliminated. The Director noted that a few cars could park in the front turn around area. Commissioner Shaheen asked how deep the lot is. Staff responded that the lot is 188 feet deep. Commissioner Wetl indicated that she did not like the long narrow driveway with 42 feet of blind space. The Director recommended that appropriate signage could be conditioned for installation on both ends of the driveway to caution users to be sure the drive is clear before entering. The public hearing was opened at 7:40 p.m. Elizabeth (Ptnkerton) Kltne, 25400 Cart Road, Wtldomar, noted that she owned the property directly south at 14762 Holt Avenue. She indicated that her property received water from the subject property's laundry area and that the back yard of her property is always wet due to this runoff. She indicated that she would like a block wall between the properties; that she would not object to a second story if there were no windows facing the south. She indicated that there are parking problems, and there have been problems finding syringes in their front yard from the trash of the nursing home. She noted concern about what this will do to the surrounding property values. She indicated that the subject type of facility is greatly needed, however, it should be a well run home and should not be a problem to the neighborhood. Alfred George, manager of the apartment complex at 14762 Holt Avenue, noted that there are six children in the apartment complex and was concerned about heavy construction machinery working at the site and an inadequate or non-existent fence. He also noted a step in the driveway at the site that would decrease the driveway width to ten feet. He also noted that due to the red painted curb, there are many times where the driveway to the apartments is blocked by visitor parking at the senior home. He also noted that when he built his patio there was a setback requirement of eight feet and asked if that would not also apply to the applicant. He also noted that he felt there should be three parking spots for the caretakers. Lyn Van Dyken 235 S. Main Street, responded that she felt the project needed more than a chain ~ink fence on the south side and suggested a block wall similar to the one on the north side of the project. Julius Deocampo, representing Orange County Builders, noted that the owners decided to remove the second story, install wood shingles all around, provide proper drainage and have an enclosed trash dumpster. Planning Commission Minutes September 26, 1988 Page ftve Commissioner Le Jeune confirmed that the trash dumpster would be enclosed, that the roofing material would be of a fire retardant material and that the water run off problem would be solved. Mr. Deocampo confirmed that all of those problems would be resolved. Commissioner Baker asked if a two foot step did exist, if there were gates on the property and what the distance between the house and the street is. Mr. Deocampo indicated that there would be no problem in removing the step and door that it leads to and that the gate already exists and will remain. Staff responded that the house is 35 feet from the street. Commissioner Wetl noted that she shared the roofing concern, stating that she would like to see something other than wood shingles used and have the house in front reroofed to match due to the nature of the facility. The Director noted that the materials used would have to be consistent with the Uniform Building Code and its requirements for fire retardant treatment. Commissioner Pontious indicated her concern regarding the lack of greenbelt areas and asked if one parking space could be sacrificed to obtain more greenbelt and patio area. She also asked if the second story could be removed. Mr. Deocampo noted that a parking space could be deleted to obtain more landscaping and that the second story could be eliminated. Commissioner Shaheen indicated that he would like to see a fence, to protect the privacy of both parties, that is more than just a chain link. Staff responded that a condition to Resolution No. that a 6 foot 8 inch high fence or block wall southerly property line. 2532 could be added to indicate shall be constructed along the The Director noted that one way a block wall could work would be if the neighboring property owner to the south would agree to allow access to the wall and have the wall built on the property line. Art Reml~to, applicant, noted that he did not want a block wall on the south side as it would block air circulation and that he had plans to construct a chain link fence with wooden inserts. He also noted that the residents of the senior home are quiet and would not disturb their neighbors. Commissioner Well noted that she felt the chain link fence is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood and that wood would be more aesthetic. Commissioner Baker asked what type of fence, if any, was there now. Mr. Remt~to, responded that there were just posts for a chain link fence that is not yet installed. Planntng Commission Mtnutes September 26, 1988 Page stx Commissioner Baker asked about the awnings in the driveway. Mr. Remigio said that the awnings could be removed. Commissioner Shaheen asked Mr. Remiglo how he got along with his neighbors. Mr. Remigio responded fine. Commissioner Well noted concern regarding the safety features on the inside of the building for walkers. Mr. Remigio noted that he would provide whatever facilities that were required by the State Health Department for licensing. He also noted that when the project is finished the back kitchen would be for the guest home and the front kitchen would be used for e~loyees. Commissioner Shaheen asked if the facility will be sprinklered. The Director stated that whatever is required by the Orange County Fire Department would be provided. Commissioner Well asked if all of the residents are ambulatory and if a nurse will be on duty at all times. Mr. Remigio noted that his wife is a nurse, however, the State does not require a nurse and that some residents are ambulatory and some are not. Zen¥ Remi~io, noted that she did not know if a nurse would be required but they would conform with the State requirement. Commissioner Well asked if the State inspects these facilities regularly. Ms. Remigio indicated that they are inspected regularly by the State. Mr. George, made mention of a situation that existed regarding the fence installation and height. The Director indicated that there were no existing building permits for the fence. Ms. Kline noted that there was some disagreement regarding the fence, that she would prefer a block wall but would not be against a wood fence. Commissioner Shaheen asked Ms. Kline if she would pay for one half of the block wall. Ms. Kline stated that she could not afford it and had already agreed to pay for one hal( of a 6 foot 8 inch wood fence. The public hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m. Commissioner Le Jeune stated that he would like to continue this item until the next meeting. The Director asked the Commission for some direction. Planning Commission Minutes September 26, 1988 Page seven Commissioner Le Jeune stated that if there was a block wall on the north side, there should also be one on the south side, he wanted to see the best possible use of roofing materials and to get the two roofs to match, and he was glad that the applicant had decided to remove the second story and would like to see a finished drawing on the project. Commissioner Shaheen asked if the neighbor on the south side should pay for the fence. Commissioner Le Jeune stated that he didn't feel that was necessary. The Director noted that if the applicant works with the property owner on the south to install the fence on the property line there should not be a problem. Commissioner Ponttous noted that considering the age of the house she would ltke to see it reroofed with a matertal with a higher fire retardant rating. Commissioner Well agreed that the house should be reroofed and would also ltke to see parking made available on the street. Commissioner Le Jeune asked for some background on the red curbs and new elevations. Commissioner Le Jeune moved, Wetl seconded to continue Use Permit 88-19 to the October 10, 1988 meettng to enable the applicant more ttme to work wtth staff. Morton carrted 5-0. 4. Use Permit 88-21 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: MR. JOHN REISIG ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO SAN JUAN HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION RANCHO SAN JUAN CONDOMINIUMS, 13722 RED HILL AVENUE, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED HILL AVENUE AND SAN JUAN STREET (LOT 1 OF TRACT 11330) R-3 1700 MULTI-FAMILY THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 1) FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT TO EXTEND THE HEIGHT OF EXISTING MASONRY WALL PORTIONS WITH A 24 INCH WROUGHT IRON TOP. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Use Permit 88-21 by adopting Resolution No. 2534 with the conditions contained therein. Resolution No. 2534 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 88-21 ALLOWING A TWO FOOT HIGH EXTENSION TO PORTIONS OF A WALL AT THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CONDOMINIUMS AT 13722 RED HILL. Presentation: Bernard Chase, Planner Planning Commission Mtnutes September 26, 1988 Page etght Commissioner Wet1 asked If Resolution No. 2534 1rem I. £. was an Inappropriate ftndtng. The Director noted that It was a normal condition and was not inconsistent. Commissioner Shaheen noted that he felt thts was a necessary project. Commissioner Baker asked tf the Ftre Marshal had seen thts request. Staff responded that the project had gone through the prelJmtnary revtew process and that staff w111 be sure that the plans get routed to them again durtng formal plan check. Commissioner Well noted that she had spoken with Acting Police Chief Wakefield and that he did not feel that it would be a problem. The public hearing was opened at 8:40 p.m. Commissioner Le Jeune noted that people were surprised that the security fence would not surround the property and asked what would happen around the wooden fence. Kathleen Fernandez, 13722 Red Hill, Unit 57, Vice-President of the Rancho San Juan Homeowner's Association noted that there was a misunderstanding, that there were to be driveway and sidewalk gates but that it is necessary to obtain a fence height variance before proceeding with that. She also noted that the wooden fence would be extended. The Director noted that it would be subject to the Design Review process and building permits and that the application has been submitted. She also indicated that the resolution would permit them to extend the height of the entire fence. The public hearing was closed at 8:45 p.m. Commissioner Well thanked the Homeowner's Association for bringing this to the City's attention and felt that the higher fence is necessary and that she was in favor of this project. Commissioner Pontious moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Use Permit 88-21 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2534 as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. OLO BUSIMESS 5. Sign Code Amendment - Update Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development No Planning Commission action necessary. Planntng Commission Mtnutes September 26, 1988 Page nine NE~ BUSINESS STAFF CONCERNS 6. C1t¥ Council Actions taken at the September lg, 1988 meettng Presentation: Christine Shtngleton The following actions were taken at the September 19, 1988 City Council meeting: Approval of Final Map 13556 - Market Place Approval of the Construction of Jamboree JWA Update Appointed a five member Cultural Resources Advisory Committee Density Bonus Policy continued COMMISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Shaheen asked the status of the Right-of-way between Tusttn Meadows and Peppertree homes. The Director noted that there is a storm drain easement and that the Irvine Company is doing research and will respond to the City's request as soon as they have completed their research. She assured property owners that the recommendation will not be for public use. Commissioner Le Jeune asked if the residents are noticed of a public hearing. The Director noted that the law requires the City to notice the property owner. Commissioner Le Jeune noted wheel stops in disarray in the Red Hill Plaza parking lot. Commissioner Ponttous asked if there was going to be a joint meeting with the Commission and Council regarding the color of the Market Place. The Director indicated that if the Council desires to meet a special meeting will be scheduled. Commissioner Wetl asked the procedure on weekend code violation enforcement. In particular she was concerned about someone selling rugs at E1 Camino Real and Newport Avenue. ADJOURI~IENT At 9:05 p.m. Commissioner Well moved, Pontious seconded to adjourn to the next regular scheduled Planning Commission meeting on October 10, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. Pe~nt Foley Secretary