Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 11-09-87MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COI~IISSZON REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious ABSENT: Puckett PUBLXC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of October 26, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting 2. Final Tract Map 12855 APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: CAL PAC DEVELOPMENT MR. FRANK WU 14151 NEWPORT AVENUE TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 14572, 14582, 14592 HOLT AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 6 A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN WITH TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12855 TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL FINAL APPROVAL OF TRACT 12855 CONJUNCTION Resolution No. 2455 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12855 Commissioner Well moved, Baker seconded to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried 4-0. Planntng Commission Minutes November 9, [987 Page two PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Use Permit 87-26 APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: STEVEN R. CRAM 13832 RED HILL AVENUE TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 EDGAR E. PANKEY 320 WEST MAIN STREET TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 13832 RED HILL AVENUE C-1: RETAIL COMMERCIAL CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 1 AUTHORIZATION FOR A TYPE 41, BEER AND WINE LICENSE RESTRICTED TO ON-SITE CONSUMPTION IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 981 Resolution No. 2446 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING A BEER AND WINE LICENSE FOR ON-SITE SALES AT 13832 RED HILL AVENUE. Presentation: Joel Slavtt, Assistant Planner The public hearing opened at 7:40 p.m. Anita Ju~y, 13722-39 Red Hill Avenue, noted concerns about the alcoholic beverage license at this location. Currently there are a lot of young people that continue their partying and fighting in the parking lot, which disturbs the people at the Rancho San Juan Condos. Denise Young, 13722-37 Red Hill Avenue, spoke in opposition to the license and was concerned that more people would congregate in the parking lot to continue their partying after the food establishments close. Steven Cram, agreed with the above complaints but would employ no minors and the operation is looking to cater to a more mature clientele. In addition, they would not have any arcades or facilities that would draw children to the establishment. The public hearing was closed at 7:44 p.m. Commissioner Le Jeune inquired if there were any police reports regarding the fighting. Staff responded that the Police Department had no comments on the application. Commissioner Baker asked for clarification of the number of allowed seating. He also asked what the closing time was for Barro's. He also asked if this use would be the same type of permit as Barro's has. The audience responded that Barro's closed at 9:30 p.m. Planntng Commission Mtnutes November 9, 1987 Page three Commissioner Well asked if there were brawls in the parking lot after 9:30 and also asked if Parents Who Care had responded to the application. Staff responded that Parents Who Care had no comments; that the maximum allowed seating per the Zoning Code was 39 seats, upon receipt of a signed parking agreement from the owner of the center. Barro's received their permit before the City annexed this property. Therefore, there is no permit issued by the City and enforcement must be done through ABC. Commissioner Baker moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Use Permit No. 87-26 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2446. Motion carried 4-0. Commissioner Well asked staff to ask the Police Department to watch more closely to alleviate the problem for the neighbors. am Use Permit 87-22 APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: MR. JEFFREY BORDOCK ON BEHALF OF LA ESQUINA 14841YORBA STREET, SUITE 103 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES 17251E. SEVENTEENTH STREET; SUITE D TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 17245 E. SEVENTEENTH STREET CG: COMMERCIAL GENERAL CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 1 AUTHORIZATION FOR ON-SITE SALES OF GENERAL NO. 47) IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE LIQUOR (LICENSE TYPE Resolution No. 2444 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING USE PERMIT 87-22 FOR ON-SITE SALES OF GENERAL LIQUOR (TYPE 47) IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE AT 17245 E. SEVENTEENTH STREET Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner Commissioner Baker clarified that there would be food (prepared on the premises) served while liquor would be sold. The public hearing was opened at 7:50 p.m. Jeff Bordok, 14841 Yorba, Suite 102, part owner of the restaurant, spoke in favor of the project. He noted that the bar is designed with a taco/appetizer bar to remain open after the kitchen closes at 11:00 p.m. The public hearing was closed at 7:52 p.m. Commissioner Baker moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Use Permit 87-22 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2444. Motion carried 4-0. Planning Commission Minutes November g, 1987 Page four APPLICANT: & OWNER: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: Amendment No. I to Zone..ChaQge 84-4 GOLDRICH, KEST AND ASSOCIATES 15233 VENTURA BOULEVARD; SUITE 816 SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403 1262 BRYAN AVENUE THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CLASS I - EXISTING FACILITY WHICH CONSISTS OF THE OPERATION OF APRIVATE FACILITY INVOLVING NO EXPANSION OF USE BEYOND THAT PREVIOUSLY EXISTING AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TUSTIN ROYALE TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF SIX {6) NON-AMBULATORY, WALKER ASSISTED, SENIOR RESIDENTS Resolution No. 2448 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 OF ZONE CHANGE 84-4, FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS TUSTIN ROYALE, 1262 BRYAN AVENUE Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Commissioner Baker inquired if these non-ambulatory residents would all be located on the f(rst floor. Lloyd Dick, Building Official, responded that the State Social Services, Fire Code and Building Code require that non-ambulatory residents be located on the first floor. The public hearing opened at 8:01 p.m. Mann¥ After, ut, 15233 Ventura Blvd. Suite 816, Sherman Oaks, representing Goldrich Kest and Associates, spoke in favor ~f the project noting that it has become a strong community asset. He confirmed that the non-ambulatory residents will be housed on the first floor. Commissioner Le Jeune asked for the measurement on existing exit door clearances. Mr. After,ut did not know the measurement. He did note that the doors were the standard size of that used in an apartment complex. Commissioner Wetl noted that Tusttn Royale is an excellent facility. The public hearing was closed at 8:06 p.m. Commissioner Baker noted that at first he did not like the project, however, now it is a welcome addition. Commissioner Baker moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Amendment No. 1 to Zone Change 84-4 by the adoption of Resol"ution No. 2448. Motion carried 4-0. Planning Commission Mtnutes November 9, [987 Page ftve APPLICANT: LOCATION: REQUEST: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Tentative Tract Map No. 13052 and Design Review 87-33 J. M. PETERS COMPANY LOTS 3, I AND J OF TRACT 12763 1) AUTHORIZATION TO SUBDIVIDE 24.359 ACRES INTO 118 NUMBERED AND 3 (THREE) LETTERED LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, 2) APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT FOR FRONT SETBACKS THE PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS EIR (85-2) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED Resolution No. 2449 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13053 AND DESIGN REVIEW 87-33 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. Resolution No. 2450 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 87-33 AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT FOR A PROJECT WITH 118 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON 24.359 ACRES ON LOT 3 OF TRACT 12763 Resolution No. 2451 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13053 Presentation: Jeffrey S. Davis, Senior Planner Staff made revisions to the resolution which will follow. The public hearing was opened at 8:27 p.m. Mr. Gene Htrao, representing J. M. Peters Company, noted that he enjoyed working with staff. He had these issues 1) the location of the bike paseo doesn't seem to benefit the whole project (Resolution 2450, Exhibit A, Condition 1.14); 2) the submittal and approval of the CC&R's not be required until prior to release of certificates of occupancy {Resolution 2451, Exhibit A, Condition 5.1); and 3) they concur with the new wording regarding the traffic signal on Park Center Lane and Bryan Avenue. Jerry Feldman, representing Bellwtcke Community Association, met with The Irvine Company and J. M. Peters Company. He is pleased and has received no negative comments on the project. He had two concerns 1) that the paseo be adequately lighted; and 2) he questioned the power given the Community Development Department in Resolution 2451,Exhibit A, Condition 5.1L. Lois Jeffrey, Deputy City Attorney, noted that the involvement of the Community Development Department is to place the enforcement of the CC&R's on the Homeowner's Association and that the City will not pass judgement on anything the homeowners might want to do. Planning Commission Minutes November 9, 1987 Page stx Commissioner Wetl clarified with Lois Jeffrey that there is a requirement of possibly 75~ association member approval to change the CC&R's. The public hearing was closed at 9:42. Commissioner Pontlous noted that she would like to see that adequate lighting be provided along the paseo and that location of the paseo adjacent to a controlled signal was very beneficial. Commissioner Well noted that she was concerned with the security of the paseo being like a long narrow tunnel. Commissioner Baker stated that he wants the access but feels the long tunnel is a concern regarding litter and security. He asked if anything could be done about this situation. Staff responded that the proposed location for the pedestrian/bicycle paseo was intended to provide access within the interior of the project for children instead of along Tusttn Ranch Road. Staff would be willing to look at alternative locations which provide direct access in proximity to Park Center Drive and Tustin Ranch Road. The Police Department has required lighting for the paseo and direct line of site for security purposes. The EIR requires pedestrian and bicycle circulation be provided during project review. The pedestrian/bicycle paths is also a major policy direction provided by the City Council. Commissioner Baker questioned the possibility of a Bike Trail along Tustin Ranch Road. Staff noted that the existing bike trails are on Irvine Boulevard and Bryan Avenue. Other neighborhood activity nodes and facilities include the elementry school, access to Tustin Ranch Road and the community park. Staff cannot overlook school children walking on a secondary highway when they can be provided with an internal walkway within the project. Jenntngs Pierce, representing the Irvine Company, noted that the Tusttn Ranch Road improvements are out to bid and under construction. He believes that Tustin Ranch Road will have a striped bikeway and a meandering six foot walkway. Commissioner Baker noted that within the tract the sidewalk would be five foot wide, unobstructed and immediately next to the curb. He asked for clarification of the Post Office situation. A discussion ensued between the Commissioners, Mr. Htrao and staff clarifying that the Post Office requires that boxes be next to the street with possibly four boxes to a post. The conditions of approval will ensure that the design and configuration of said boxes will be compatible with the proposed architecture for the project. Commissioner Baker asked if there was a problem with changing the CC&R's to accommodate the developer's request. Planning Commission Minutes November g, [g87 Page seven Staff responded that the City is issuing building permits on model units and construction can begin regardless of the filing date of the Final Map. Lois Jeffrey noted that it is appropriate for the CC&R's to be approved at the Final Map stage. There has been no reason given from the applicant as to their problem with the CC&R'S. Staff responded that CC&R's are normally recorded concurrently with the Final Tract Map as a standard procedure. Commissioner Wetl questioned the delay. Mr. Htrao that typically the CC&R's are recorded prior to the white report from the Department of Real Estate. His concern is the amount of time anticipated for the City, the City's Attorneys and the Irvine Company to review the CC&R's. He noted that the City of Irvine has allowed the requested timing. Commissioner Wetl questioned Resolution 2450, Exhibit A, Condition 1.11 and clarified that the original solar heating requirements were in regard to swimming pools. She also asked that Condition 2.4 be explained and the reference to the paseo be deleted. She also asked that Condition 3.13 be changed to alleviate the responsibility of individual damage from the Homeowner's Association. Commissioner Le Jeune asked if the problem of Individual damage wasn't unique to the CC&R's and not a problem that the City would be concerned with. Commissioner Baker wanted to ensure that the Homeowner's Association would not be held responsible for damage done by an individual homeowner. Commissioner Wetl noted that she did not like the City dictating the type of trees to be put onto private property (Resolution No. 2451, Exhibit A, Condtton 1.15). Commissioner Le Jeune asked if the landscape design wasn't a standard guideline previously set by the Commission. Staff responded that this condition was requested by the Public Works Department in lieu of the standardly provided street/parkway trees in order to create a streetscape. The review of planting materials by City staff is not necessary and the condition can be rewritten. Commissioner Wetl questioned if there were any provisions in the CC&R conditions that would 'e~tablish long term reserves. Lois Jeffrey noted that the long term reserves were a provision of law for Homeowner's Associations. The Commission might want to require the Association to have a long term reserve but cannot put a dollar value on it. Planning Commission Minutes November 9, 1987 Page eight Commissioner Wetl asked If the law has a mechanism to establish who actually establishes the long term reserve. In the case of an emergency are there provisions for the developer to make a loan to the association? Lois Jeffrey stated that she was not certain of the legal requirements and would research the matter and report back to the Commission. Commissioner Wet1 moved that Resolution 2450, Exhibit A, Condition 1.14 be deleted. Morton was not seconded. Commissioner Wet1 moved that Resolution 2451, Exhtblt A, Condition 1.13 be deleted. Motion was not seconded. Commissioner Le Jeune, Ponttous seconded moved to approve the E[R determination for the project by adoptton of Resolution No. 2449 as submitted or revtsed. Morton carrted 4-0. Commissioner Ponttous moved, Baker seconded to approve Destgn Review 87-33 and Administrative Adjustment by the adoptton of Resolution 2450 to tnclude the following revisions (wtth only changes noted): 1.1! Consideration shall be gtven to rough plumbtng to retatn future solar heattng opttons. Copper shall be Installed from hot water closet and the hot water closet Increased tn stze to accommodate a solar water heater and addttton of allOv electrical outlet. 3.13 (deleted from Resolution 2450). Morton carrted 4-0. Commissioner Baker moved, Le Jeune seconded to recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map [3053 by the adoptton o'f Resolution No. 245[ to tnclude the revisions as follows: 1.15 Where sidewalk ts constructed adjacent to curb, each residential lot shall have planted, tn the front yard area, on prtvate property at least one (1) ftfteen gallon tree. 1.19 Obligation for 25~ share of total traffic signal installation at Bryan Avenue at Park Center Lane. A cash deposit or bond will be required for a five (5) year period after map recordation with a return clause if funds are not utilized or needed based on traffic warrant information. 5.1 Prior to approval of the final map, all organizational documents for the project including any deed restrictions, covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department and City Attorney's office. Costs for such review shall be borne by the subdivider. A copy of the final documents shall be submitted to the Community Development Department after their recordation. CCR's shall include but not be limited to the following provisions: Planntng Commission Minutes November 9, 1987 Page nl ne G. Any construction repair, modification, or alteration of any buildings, equipment, structures, or improvements on the property shall be subject to the approval of the Homeowner's Association and the City of Tustin Community Development Department. K. The perimeter project block wall shall be constructed on private property. The exterior and structural integrity of the wall shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. This shall not preclude the Homeowner's Association from assessing a property owner for damage determined by the Board of Directors to be the responsibility of a property owner. 6.4 Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall provide the City with a schools notification statement which shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Con~nuntty Development: (Items B, C, and D have been deleted) Item E is renumbered as Item B. Motion carried 4-0. e APPLICANT: LOCATION: REQUEST: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Tentative Tract Map No. 13080 and Design Review 87-14 BREN OSGOOD COMPANY LOTS 4, L AND K OF TRACT 12763 1) AUTHORIZATION TO SUBDIVIDE 14.65 ACRES INTO 100 NUMBERED AND EIGHT (8) LETTERED LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, 2) APPROVAL- OF THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL THE PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS EIR (85-2) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED. Resolution No. 2452 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13080 AND DESIGN REVIEW 87-14 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. Resolution No. 2453 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT (DESIGN REVIEW 87-14) FOR A PROJECT WITH 100 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON 14.65 ACRES ON LOT 4 OF TRACT 12763 Planning Commission Minutes November 9, 1987 Page ten Resolution No. 2454 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13080 Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner Staff noted revisions to follow. The public hearing was opened at 9:35 p.m. Matt Osgood, representing Bren Osgood Company, noted their concern with the paseo. They are selling their units based on security and privacy and feel the public would get more use of the paseo than the people in the specific project. They feel the paseo would be more negative than possitive for this community. Commissioner Well confirmed that the paseo would be for bicycle and pedestrian traffic only. The public hearing was closed at 9:38 p.m. Commissioner Le Jeune indicated that he agreed with the paseo due to the density of the project. He also noted concern about the Homeowner's Association's ability to enforce the fine and tow away provisions in regard to Plan 2. He would also like to see the paseo on Bryan Avenue. Commissioner Baker asked that staff clarify the responsibility of the maintenance of the wall in respect to the zero lot line. Staff responded that the wall is the responsibility of the property owner who actually owns the property. The CC&R's put specific restrictions on access, limits, facade treatments and things that are restrictive to the individual that has the easement in the stdeyard area. There are rights of access for maintenance purposes that are assigned in the CC&R's. Commissioner Baker clarified the solar plumbing revision and noted that the paseo is sixteen feet wide with a serpentine walkway and lights. Staff noted that a chain could possibly be installed to deter any vehicles from driving thru with the exception of emergency vehicles only. Commissioner Pontlous moved, Baker seconded to approve the EIR determination for the project by adoption of Resolution No. 2452 as revised. Motion carried 4-0. Commissioner Baker moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve the Design Review and Administrative Adjustment by the adoption of Resolution No. 2453 with the following revisions: Planning Commission Minutes November 9, 1987 Page eleven 1.11 Consideration shall be given to rough plumbing to retain future solar heating options. Copper shall be installed from hot water closet and the hot water closet increased in size to accommodate a solar water heater and addition of a 110v electrical outlet. 3.13 (deleted from Resolution No. 2453) Motion carried 4-0. Commissioner Well moved, Baker seconded, to recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 13080 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2454 as revised. 1.12 The developer shall provide obligation for 25% share of total traffic signal installation at Bryan Avenue at Park Center Lane. A cash deposit or bond will be required for a five {5) year period after map recordation with a return clause if funds are not utilized or needed based on traffic warrant information. 1.16 Where sidewalk is constructed adjacent to curb, each residential lot shall have on private property at least one {1) fifteen gallon tree. 5.1 Prior to approval of the Final Map, all organizational documents for the project including any deed restrictions, covenants, conditions, and restrictions CC & R's shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department and City Attorney's office. Costs for such review shall be borne by the subdivider. A copy of the final documents shall be submitted to the Community Development Department after their recordation. CCR's shall include but not be limited to the following provisions: G. Any construction repair, modification, or alteration of any buildings, equipment, structures, or improvements on the property shall be subject to the approval of the Homeowner's Association and the City of Tustin Community Development Department. O. Project perimeter block wall shall be constructed on private property. The exterior and structural integrity of the wall shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. This shall not preclude the Homeowner's Association from assessing a property owner for damage determined by the Board of Director's to be the responsibility of a property owner. 6.3 Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the Subdivider shall provide the City with a copy of the approved aircraft/helicopter noise statement which shall contain a disclosure document on aircraft notification. Said document must be signed by each tenant/homeowner prior to occupancy of any unit. The content of the statement shall be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to circulation. Planning commission Mtnutes November 9, 1987 Page twelve (Items B, C, and D have been deleted) Morton carried 4-0. OLD BUSINESS 8. Item E is now B. Hours of Operation for Restaurant Tenants in the Tustln Pavtllton Cafe LOCATION: 17245 E. SEVENTEENTH STREET AT CARROLL WAY Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner Chairman Well moved, Baker seconded to approve the hours of operation for Tony Roma Restaurant and Shelly's Seafood and Oyster Bar by Minute Order. Motion carried 4-0 NEW BUSINESS STAff CONCERNS 9. Report on Ctt¥ Council Actions taken on November 2, 1987 meetin9 Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development 10. Status Report on San Remo Italian Deli Presentation: Christine A. Shingleton Commissioner Ponttous wants to encourage the live entertainment but wants to see It done under the proper forms to ensure public safety. Commissioner Le Jeune agreed on the concept but also agreed that rules should be enforced. Staff noted that Mr. Masstmtno has been informed that he cannot operate the live entertainment without the proper authorization. Commissioner Baker noted his concern for the City's liability. Commissioner Well encouraged enforcement of the Zoning Code. Planning Commisston Mi nutes November 9, 1987 Page thirten Received and filed. COIMISSIOM r. ONCERNS Commissioner Le Jeune asked about the status of the alleyway behind the Greinke 0tl Cardlock facility and inquired about the revised schedule of the Downtown Ordinance. Staff responded that the Public Works Department is reviewing this item. The preliminary review is recommending one way to the east and they are proceeding with the notification process to establish the one way designation. The Downtown Ordinance is under revision and the meeting will be scheduled around the end of November. Commissioner Baker noted that there is a no right turn sign exiting the Cardlock facility onto Bonita Street. He is also interested in seeing banner sign enforcement. He also noted the desire for more enforcement on the supermarket baskets parked on the sidewalk. &DdOURI~qEIlT At 10:15 p.m. the Commission adjourned to the November 23, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting at 7:30 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. ~ennt Foley Secretary Chairman