HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 06-25-84 MINUTES OF A REGULAR )I~ETIMG
OF TilE PLANNING ~O)~ISSIOM
OF ll4E CITY OF ll~STIN, CALIFORNIA
June 25, 1984
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 7:35 p.m. in the
Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Commissioner Well and the Invocation was given by
Commissioner Puckett.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners
Present:
Commissioners
Absent:
Also present:
James Sharp, Chairman
Ronald White, Chairman Pro Tem (arrived 7:38 p.m.)
Mark Ainslie
Charles Puckett
Kathy Well
None
Donald D. Lamm, Dtrector of Community Development
Ed Knight, Associate Planner
Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney
Janet Hester, Recording Secretary
MINUll!S
Moved by Puckett, seconded by Well to approve the minutes of the meeting of
June 11, 1984, with one correction: to reflect the testimony made by Steve
Markel, Tustin Homeowners Association, with regard to General Plan
Amendment No. 84-2. Motion carried, 4-0, White absent.
PUBLIC CONCERNS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Resolution No. 2162 - General Plan Amendment No. 84-3d
1262 Bryan Avenue - Goldrich, Kest and Associates
Moved by Wetl, seconded by Puckett, to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried, 4-0, White absent.
Commissioner White arrived, 7:38 p.m.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-2
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Matt Ntsson
14462 Red Hill Avenue
Authorization to change the designation of the Land Use Element
from Professional Office to Commercial
Edward Knight presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in
the Report to the Planning Commission dated June 25, 1984. Commissioner
Well stepped down from the dias. Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing
at 7:38 p.m. The following person spoke in opposition to General Plan
Amendment No. 84-2:
Rosemary Rookers, address given as Copperfield Drive, read into the
record a petition signed by neighboring property owners opposed to the
introduction of multiple-family and/or commercial uses into the area.
The petitioners requested that the Commission allow the property be
designated for single-family residential use.
The following person spoke in favor of General Plan Amendment No. 84-2:
Matt Nisson, applicant requested the Commission's favorable
consideration of his application.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 25, 1984
Page 2
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Sharp closed the public
hearing at 7:44 p.m.
It was moved by Atnslie, seconded by Puckett, adoption of Resolution No.
2156, recommending to the City Council General Plan Amendment No. 84-2,
Commissioner White stated he would find the motion difficult to support
unless it included some provision for requiring the property to be
developed under a specific plan.
Don Lamm, in response to Chairman Sharp, said it would be difficult to
condition the General Plan Amendment in such a manner. He suggested the
Commission, after taking the vote on the amendment, initiate a zone change
to the Commercial General-Planned Unit Development zone, which requires use
permit approval. He also suggested the Commission institute a requirement
that a specific plan be required on any portion of the property prior to
development.
Motion carried, 4-0, Well abstaining.
Moved by White, seconded by Puckett, to direct staff to initate a zone
change to the Commercial General-Planned Unit Development zone, and
require a specific plan. Motion carried, 4-0, Well abstaining.
2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 83-4A - HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA
GENERAL PLAN
A revised Housing Element of the General Plan consisting of statistics
and programs specifically designed for the improvement of housing and
provision of adequate sites for housing. This element is designed to
accommodate the housing needs of all economic segments of the
community.
An environmental assessment of the Housing Element proposal is included
and referenced within the document.
Edward Knight presented staff's report and recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 2163, recommending adoption of the Housing Element to the
City Council, as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated
June 25, 1984. Mr. Knight responded to Chairman Sharp's questions
regarding what action's the State could take against the City if the State
determined the Element was inadequate.
Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Seeing no one
wishing to speak, Chairman Sharp closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m.
It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Well, adoption of Resolution No 2163,
recommending adoption of the Housing Element to the City Council.
Commissioner White requested the following amendments to the Housing
Element:
Section on energy conservation measures as relating to future
development of the East Tustin area: That not only would developers be
encouraged to utilize energy conservation measures, but that the
Housing Element encourage retrofitting of existing residences.
Commissioner Puckett extended his thanks to the Housing Element Advisory
Committee for the time they gave to review and comment on the Element.
The maker of the motion and the second agreed to the amendment to the
motion. Motion carried, 5-0.
3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3B - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT
OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN
A combined and revised Open Space and Conservation Element that
addresses the conservation, development and utilization of the natural
resources for the City of Tustin. Programs and plans are proposed that
Planntng Commission Minutes
June 25, 1984
Page 3
will conservate, maintain and assure the continued availability of land
for the production of food and fiber, for the enjoyment of scenic
beauty, for recreation and for the use of natural resources.
An environmental assessment of the Open Space and Conservation Element
is included and referenced within the document.
Edward Knight presented staff's report and recommendation to continue as
contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated June 25, 1984.
Chairman Sharp opened the hearing at 7:59 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to
speak, it was moved by White, seconded by Well, to continue the hearing to
the next regular meeting on July g, 1984.
Motion carried, 5-0.
3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-3c - RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN
AREA GENERAL PLAN
Shows a comprehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation.
Programs are proposed that address the community-wide needs and
requirements for recreational areas.
An environmental assessment of the Recreation Element is included and
referenced within the document.
Edward Knight presented staff's report and recommendation to continue as
contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated June 25, 1984.
Chairman Sharp opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. Seeing no one
wishing to speak, it was moved by White, seconded by Well to continue the
public hearing to the next regular meeting on July 9, 1984. Motion
carried, 5-0.
Don Lamm responded to Commissioner White regarding the relationship of the
Element to the East Tustin Specific Plan. Motion carried, 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None,
ADMI#ISTRATIVE MAl-~ERS
A. Old Business
1. Land Use Study Concerning Sale of Alcoholic Beverages
Donald Lamm presented staff's report as contained in the Report to the
Planning Commission dated June 25, 1984.
The organization, Parents Who Care, made an oral presentation to the
Planning Commission, expressing their views on the sale of alcoholic
beverages in the City of Tustin and their recommendations for dealing with
the problems they perceived.
After Commission and staff discussion with Parents Who Care
representatives, the Commission directed staff to advertise a workshop
July 23, 1984 at 6:30 p.m. for discussion on the land use related concerns
of the sale of alcoholic beverages in the City of Tustin.
B. New Business
1. Parcel Map 83-1026
Southwest corner "B" Street and Sixth Street
Donald Lamm presented staff's report and recommendation as contained in the
staff report dated June 25, 1984.
Planntng Commission Minutes
June 25, 1984
Page 4
[t was moved by Whtte, seconded by Wet1, adoption of Resolution No. 2166,
recommending approval of Final Parcel Nap No. 83-1026 to the City Council,
with the added condition that the easements and reciprocal parking
agreements be recorded with the map. Morton carried, 5-0.
After discussion regarding review of final parcel maps, it was moved by
White, seconded by Puckett, that approval of final maps be accomplished as
a part of the consent calendar. Motion carried, 5-0.
STAFF CONCERNS
1. Report on Council Actions - June 18, 1984
Report by Donald Lamm received and filed.
COI~ISSIOM CONCERNS
Donald Lamm responded to Commission questions regarding submittal of
applications for Planning Commission appointment, the bullet train, and the
widening of the Santa Ana freeway.
ADJOURNMENT: At 9:28 to the next regular meeting on July 23, 1984.
~anet Hester'
Recording Secretary
James B. Sharp, Chat~man