Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 05-14-84 MINUTES OF A REGULAR I~ETING OF ltlE PLANNING COI~ISSION OF lllE CITY OIr TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA May 14, 1984 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Pro Tern White at 7:36 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ainslie and the Invocation was given by Commissioner Puckett. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Also present: Ronald White, Chairman Pro Tem Mark Ainslie Charles Puckett Kathy Weil James Sharp, Chairman Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development Alan Warren, Senior Planner Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Janet Hester, Recording Secretary MINUTES Minutes for the meeting of April 23, 1984 were approved, 3-0, Ainslie abstaining, with one correction: Commissioner Well stated the report regarding financing of the bullet train had been referred to James Rourke, City Attorney, and not to Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney, as recorded. PUBLIC CONCERNS None. CONSENT CALENDAR None. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. USE PERMIT 84-8 Applicant: Location: Request: Daugherty & Hart Architecture on behalf of James S. Beauchamp 13181-13195 Gwyneth Drive Authorization to add three (3) two-story buildings {a total of eighteen (18) units) to the existing complex. Alan Warren presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated May 14, 1984. Mr. Warren responded to Commission questions stating the height of the new two-story buildings would be 22'; the minimum dimension from the new buildings to an R-1 property line was 56', plus another 25' to 30' to the nearest R-1 residence; that present development did not meet current parking standards but the proposed project would bring the complex into conformance with current requirements. Chairman Pro Tem White opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. following persons spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-8: The Mr. James Beauchamp, applicant, stated that with the following exceptions, he was in agreement with the proposed conditions of approval as contained in Exhibit "A" of staff's report: he stated Condition I which would require a perimeter block wall would mean removal of some wooden fences which some neigtT6-6~-~ had expressed a desire to retain; Condition 2 which would require a security gate at the easterly most open space/recreation area would restrict tenant access; Condition 13 was unnecessary as the project met Fire Deparmtent requirements. He responsed to questions from Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 1984 Page 2 Commissioner Alnslte by stating the length of the drive aisles and the existing turn-around points met Fire Department standards. Commissioner White asked if the grade difference between the easement and the existing development would be corrected. Mr. Beauchamp referred the question to his architect, Mr. Noel Hart, who stated a grading plan had not yet been prepared but any grading requirements would be met. Mr. Daniel Lawton, 13187-D Gwyneth Drive, Mr. Hugh Daschback, 13189-C Gwyneth Drive, Mr. James Gloub, 13181-D Gwyneth Drive, Mr. Timothy Hawthorne, 13183-A Gwyneth Drive, and Mr. Bernard Maye-O'Brien, 13181 Gwyneth Drive, all residents of Georgetown Manor, spoke in favor of the project, stating the rehabilitation of the existing units, increased security, and additional recreation area would enhance the entire complex. In addition, Mr. Daschback read a letter from another tenant, Mr. Terry White, also in favor of the project. Mr. Michael Marchese, 1282 Olwyn Drive, and Mr. James Long, no address given, stated they felt the present owners had improved the quality of tenants and the proposed addition would improve the entire development. The following persons spoke in opposition to Use Permit No. 84-8: Mr. Ted Ondracek, 1342 Olwyn Drive; Chris Gorman, 1421Mauna Loa Road; James Colonna, 135101wyn Drive; Mr. Marshall Anderson, 1362 Olwyn Drive; Mr. James McKohan 1392 Olwyn Drive; Deon Kelly, 1312 Olwyn Drive; Alice Anderson, 1362 Olwyn Drive; and Mr. Paul Deshler, Olwyn Drive, expressed concerns regarding increased traffic and noise, increased density, lack of privacy, additional lighting, development of the easement and potential for reduction of property values. Mr. Beaucha~ responded to some of the concerns by stating the density of the project would be increased from 12.7 units per acre to 15.4 units per acre; that only 50-70 additional trips per day would be generated and would not have a significant impact; the lighting was being installed for security and safety; and they (the developers) would try to be conscious of the neighboring property owners' concerns. Mr. Beauchamp answered questions from Commissioner Ainslie stating that the mature trees would be retained, but trimmed as necessary, and depending on City requirements, the wall could possibly be built to "meander" and therefore retain more trees. Commissioner Well asked what would be planted in the three-foot-high planter along the base of the wall. Mr. Beauchamp stated that, where necessary, trees to block vision and protect privacy would be planted, also shrubs and ground cover where maintaining privacy was not a factor. Mr. Beauchamp responded to Commissioner White and stated actual construction time would be approximately four months, the recreation area would be dedicated to "passive" uses such as picnicking. Commissioner Weil asked if a second entrance from Red Hill Avenue would be possible. Mr. Beauchamp stated they did not have easements rights to Red Hill Avenue therefore a second entrance was not possible. Commissioner Puckett asked how much upgrading of the existing units would take place and if it would be part of the construction of the new units. Mr. Beauchamp replied they would be doing extensive rehabilitation of the existing units and would try to tncoporate it into the new construction. Commissioner Anslie asked if they had contacted the party responsible for the fuel line. Mr. Hart, architect stated they had made contact with the responsible party and were very aware of the necessary approvals. Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 1984 Page 3 Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Pro Tem White closed the public hearing at 8:53 p.m. Commissioner Well asked that Exhibit "A" include a condition that trees planted in the three-foot planter be 10-15' feet high in areas that are close to the back yards of the adjacent R-1 properties in order to protect the privacy of the residents. In response to Chairman Pro Tem White, Commissioner Well also requested that a landscaping plan be submitted to, and approved by, staff. Commissioner Well also asked that Condition 8 be amended to include that the pipe line be shown on the final site/grading plan and that a written statement from the pipeline company be included. Commissioner Atnslte stated he felt the applicant had done an excellent job of trying to work with the neighbors. He suggested that meandering the wall could save some of the trees and add a buffer. Moved by Atnslte, seconded by Well approval of Use Permit No. 84-8, with the amendments as suggested by Commissioner Weil. Chairman Pro Tem White requested the following amendments to the motion: 1. That Condition i be clarified to reflect that the 6' height of the fence be measured from the highest side of the property; 2. That the site have a continuous 6' perimeter wall for security; 0 Condition #22 be added that before building permits are issued, the applicant provide the Director of Community Development with adequate proof of financing to complete the project within a reasonable amount of time. Donald Lamm requested the Commission consider adding a condition to require the applicant to complete the following renovations to the existing buildings prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy; 1. paint all existing building exteriors as necessary; 2. repair all roof structures as necessary; 3. repair all carport interiors as necessary; 4. complete renovation of existing landscaping; and 5. repair and/or replace driveway surfaces as necessary. Chairman Pro Tem White recognized the applicant who stated that in many cases lenders would not commit to financing without issuance of building permits. Chairman White stated if the applicant had difficulty to return to the Commission to resolve the problem, perhaps a letter of intent could be obtained. After discussion among the applicant, staff and the Commission, the applicant agreed to the conditions as stated by Mr. Lamm. Mr. Lamm suggested that a condition be added that would require renovation of the interiors of the units. The applicant requested that this condition not be considered. The maker of the motion and the second agreed to all amendments except the condition regarding interior renovation. Motion carried, 4-0, Sharp absent. Chairman Pro Tem recessed the meeting at 9:17 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:22 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 1984 Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO USE PERMIT NO. 79-15 Applicant: Location: Request: Jeen Bennett on behalf of First Baptist Church of Tustin 12881 Newport Avenue Authorization to expand the maximum student population of the existing preschool from 75 to 135 and to permit classes for students in grades beyond preschool Jeff Davis presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated May 14, 1984. In response to Commissioner Ainslie, Mr. Davis replied that the Tustin Unified School District did not respond the the public hearing notice, nor did any residents within a 300' radius of the church. Chairman Pro Tem White opened the public hearing at 9:20 p.m. following person spoke in favor of the application: The Rev. Henry Sellers, pastor of First Baptist Church of Tustin, stated the goal of the church was to provide quality education and requested the Commission's favorable consideration. Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Pro Tem White closed the public hearing at 9:22 p.m. It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Ainslie, approval of Amendment No. 2 to Use Permit No. 79-15 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2153. Motion carried, 4-0, Sharp absent. 2. USE PERMIT NO. 84-10 Applicant: Location: Request: Steelcase, Inc. 1123 Warner Avenue Authorization to construct a 30,000 square foot office addition to the existing facility Mary Ann Chamberlain presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated May 14, 1984. Chairman Pro Tem White opened the public hearing at g:26 p.m. following person spoke in favor of the application: The Mr. Klaus Sarrach, Steelcase, Inc., presented himself to the Commission and requested favorable consideration of the application. Commissioner Weil asked if the addition meant any retail sales would be generated from this facility. Mr. Sarrach replied it would not. Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Pro Tem White closed the public hearing at 9:27 p.m. It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Well, approval of Use Permit No. 84-10 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2154. Motion carried, 4-0, Sharp absent. ADNI#ISTRATIVE IdlA'rTERS A. Old Business None. B. New Business Design Review #10-84 - Speculative Industrial Buildings Birtcher Pacific - Red Hill Avenue at Bell Avenue Mary Ann Chamberlain presented staff's report and recommendations as contained in the Report to the Planning Commission dated May 14, 1984. Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 1984 Page 5 Commissioner Weil asked if the monolith shown on the elevations would present a danger in the event of an earthquake. Ms. Chamberlain replied that the structure would have to meet all building and seismic codes. After Commission and staff discussion regarding sidewalks in the industrial areas, the Commission directed staff to solicit a report from the City Engineer regarding placement of pedestrian sidewalks in the industrial areas. It was moved by Well, seconded by Ainslie, to receive and file staff's report. Motion carried, 4-0, Shar~ absent. STAFF CONCERNS 1. Department Staff Report Alan Warren presented staff's report. By unanimous informal consent, the Commission received and filed staff's report. 2. Report on Council Actions - May 7, 1984 Donald Lamm presented staff's report. Donald Lamm suggested the report from the City Engineer regarding sidewalks could be incorporated with the June 11, 1984, 7:00 p.m. presentation to the Commission regarding circulation issues in the City of Tustin. Chairman Pro Tem White directed Staff to solicit comments from the Tustin Unified School District and the Juvenile Division of the Tustin Police Department regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages near public schools. By unanimous informal consent, the Commission received and filed staff's report. 3. Inverse Condemnation Suzanne Atkins noted that the report had been distributed to the Commission prior to the meeting and if the Commissioners had any questions to call her at her office. COMMISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Well thanked Suzanne Atkins for the report regarding inverse condemnation. Commissioner Ainslie commended Alan Warren for his report on Use Permit No. 84-8, Gwyneth Drive. Donald Lan~n responsed to questions from Commissioners Puckett and Ainslie concerning the proposed Nuisance Abatement Ordinance under consideration by the City Council. ADJOURNgENT: at 10:02 p.m. to the next regular meeting on May 14, 1984. Ronald White, Chairman Pro Tem Recording Secretary