Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 TPM, DR, CUP 14611 PROSPECTI USTI N Agenda Item 1 Reviewed. AGENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Directo N/A BUILDING OUR FUTURE HONORING OUR PAST MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138, DESIGN REVIEW 08-011, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 SUMMARY: Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 is a request to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel into two (2) new parcels to accommodate a single family residence on each parcel. Design Review 08-011 is to evaluate the aesthetics of and authorize the proposed new construction. Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is for a proposed guest house above a new detached garage on Parcel 2 located at 14611 Prospect Avenue. On August 24, 2010 and after public input, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. 4153, 4154, and 4155 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed project. PROPERTY OWNERS/ APPLICANTS: PROJECT LOCATION RECOMMENDATION: Tony Barkozia 17872 Theodora Dr Tustin, CA 92780 14611 Prospect Avenue That the Tustin City Council: Noel Prendergast 2510 Bungalow Place Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 1. Adopt Resolution No. 10-87 finding that the Negative Declaration is adequate for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 for the proposed project. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 10-88 approving Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 to subdivide an existing parcel into two (2) new parcels to accommodate a single family residence on each parcel. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 10-89 approving Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 to construct an addition and guest house to an existing single family historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 of TPM 2008-138 (14611 Prospect Avenue); and construct a new single family residence on Parcel 1 (14702 Iverness Way) of TPM 2008-138. City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts associated with this project. The project is applicant initiated and all applicable fees are paid by the applicant. BACKGROUND: On August 24, 2010, the City of Tustin Planning Commission held a public hearing to evaluate the application for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017. During the public hearing a number of concerns and comments were received from surrounding residents. Several of the concerns were addressed as conditions of approval in the Planning Commission Resolution during the public hearing. Questions related to the ongoing Public Works traffic signal installation (CIP No. 400077) between Amaganset Way and Beneta Way at Prospect Avenue (not a part of the project) were also addressed at the meeting. Detailed discussion for each specific comment can be found under the "Planning Commission Concerns" section of this staff report. Site and Location The project site is located on the west side of Prospect Avenue within the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district and designated as Low Density Residential by the City's General Plan (Attachment A — Location Map). The property consists of a 1.075 gross acre parcel and fronts onto Prospect Avenue with a rear entrance on Iverness Way (Figure 1). A portion of the property along Prospect Avenue includes easements for street and sidewalk purposes which results in a lower net acreage (0.938 net acres) of the project site. Figure 1 City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 3 Surrounding uses include similar low density residential housing within the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district. The majority of the homes, with the exception of the historic residence at the subject property, are of the California ranch house architectural tradition and were developed in the 1960s. Each side lot line of the subject property is abutted by the rear yards of three single family residences. At the rear of the subject property is Iverness Way which is only one street block long and terminates into Amanganset Way to the north and Westbury Lane to the south. There are three homes which front onto Iverness Way located on the opposite side of the street. Apart from these three homes there are three other residences which have side yards along Iverness Way which front onto either Amaganset Way or Westbury Lane. All homes within the immediate vicinity of the project site are single story homes. To the east of the project site across Prospect Avenue lies Columbus Tustin Middle school. There is a cross walk at the northernmost point of the subject property along Prospect Avenue which bisects the street mid -intersection into Beneta Way. The City of Tustin Public Works Department will be installing a traffic signal at this point in the immediate future (CIP No. 400077). m q It .2�...' 4!J „Y r� Figure 2 City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 4 Existing on the property is an "A" rated historical residence as designated in the City's Historical Resources Survey with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) (Attachment D). The rating scale places the "A" rating as the highest rating and includes buildings which are historically significant or notable as well as potential candidates for the National Register of Historic Places. A status code of 3S notes that the structure is eligible for separate listing on the National Register; however, the subject property is not currently listed on the National Register. The two story residence is estimated to have been constructed in 1928 and is of the Spanish Colonial Revival architectural tradition. It is described within the City's Historical Survey as "one of the finest of that style in the city." While not located within the City's designated Cultural Resources Overlay District, the property is recognized in the City's map of historic resources contained within the General Plan Conservation/ Open Space element. Original Submittal It should be noted that the original project proposal submitted in August 2008 involved the demolition of all structures on-site including the historic residence. Due to the deteriorated state of the property and structures the applicant was not inclined to maintain any existing components of the property. In addition, the original project submittal proposed two new single family residences, both of which were of a two story design. In working with staff, the applicant has made a considerable effort and investment to save and rehabilitate the existing historic residence as well as integrate the project into the context of the existing neighborhood through sensitive site selection and design. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map The proposal involves subdividing the existing 1.075 gross acres parcel essentially in half (Attachment B — TPM 2008-138). The applicant is proposing to create two new parcels each of approximately 0.427 gross acres (Parcel 1) and 0.648 gross acres (Parcel 2) in size respectively fronting onto Iverness Way and Prospect Avenue to accommodate a single family dwelling on each lot. All existing accessory structures on the site are proposed to be demolished to accommodate the new residence and an addition to the existing historic residence. Portions of the historic residence are also proposed to be demolished consisting primarily of areas that appear to have been additions over time and that are not true to the original architecture of the residence. The proposed lot line, which would create Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, jogs at one point to accommodate the required rear yard setback of the existing historic residence on Parcel 2. As previously mentioned, the property extends to the centerline of Prospect Avenue and includes easements for street and sidewalk purposes. Proposed Condition 2.3 of Resolution No. 10-88 requires that the applicant dedicate in fee title, at no cost to the City of Tustin the street rights-of-way along the Prospect Avenue property frontage. In accordance with Section 66453 of the California Government Code (Article 3 of the Subdivision Map Act), the local agency (City of Tustin) is required to transmit one (1) copy of the proposed tentative map to other local agencies having jurisdiction. As such, a copy City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 5 of proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 has been routed to outside agencies having jurisdiction over or a title interest in the subject property for review and/or recommendations. Design Review Design Review has been submitted to evaluate any aesthetic impacts associated with the proposed development of a new single family residence and addition to the historic residence. There are various unpermitted additions to the historic residence. In addition to the main residence, there is a detached garage of the same architecture that has been converted without permits to guest quarters. The garage structure has been altered and deteriorated to an extent where it diverges from the original character of the main structure and is proposed to be removed. Also existing on the site is a tennis court, swimming pool, and accessory structures; all of which are proposed to be removed. There are also numerous additions to the historic residence that diverge from the original character of the building and are not consistent with the Spanish Colonial architectural tradition. These additions are proposed to be removed. City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 6 Parcel 2 — Addition to Historic Residence The proposed addition to the historic residence on Parcel 2 fronting onto Prospect Avenue would be a 4,255 square foot two story addition with a 1,008 square foot detached garage and a 460 square foot guesthouse. The addition would be situated to the south of the existing historic residence and connected via an approximately sixteen (16) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long two story architectural hyphen. This narrow connection (hyphen) essentially divides the two structures (existing vs. new) visually and spatially while at the same time providing a literal connection of the two structures. The 1,468 square foot three car garage with second floor guest quarters is proposed to be situated near the rear of the property behind the proposed addition. Site Plan The proposed addition to the existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 would use materials and finishes which complement the architecture of the existing residence. Architectural features of the proposed addition are typical of the Spanish Colonial tradition and the existing historic residence. The massing of the addition is also similar to that of the existing residence and would be placed beside it and connected via what is essentially a hallway (architectural hyphen). The addition proposes to match the height of the existing two story residence and would project closer to Prospect Avenue creating depth and dimensionality for the building. The only alteration to the historic building visible from the public right-of-way apart from the addition would involve a window which would be changed to a pair of French doors of the same width. The proposed detached three car garage with second floor guest quarters will be located behind the proposed addition making it more than 100 feet from the Prospect Avenue sidewalk and only minimally visible from the public right of way. The existing driveway along the northern property line t _ ra W — PROPOSED I PROPOSEDZ1r WA LKri, PA1q WRE0E�LC.�' I _ OUTIER OIL 1N'7M1Ar' w {.,WI /i17m 30' YIN. r, FXISftNG GAS quo p07p T 13 PROPOSE POOL (( EMS??A, GASt I FF -146,0 FOOTPRINT1'', I VVER ��-— O 1 �� IIItl N OM0 N9170,DD'F Existin c b -PROPOSE PARCEL LINE T1 I <s I m MIN. .OUR-YARO _ '^ PATIO 1 I II 1 t I Addition """ 1 Ao' . ' A _ !N gPgROPO O I `.i �S- 7Y �" P/S7N' ' T Fi-fE67 M-1411 7 I y i SEAEP U [YJSY SEAEN kFIOCARD ?0' GARAGE UOTORCOURT ❑ T1 PROPOSEDI s' WALL 1 ( T2 SEE CRO SECTION SEE CROSS PIPOPGSFD - iROPdY GB.- D �• �"ti �..��' 5£� 10� - -�---- � � DRr�r�r n _LCAry Site Plan The proposed addition to the existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 would use materials and finishes which complement the architecture of the existing residence. Architectural features of the proposed addition are typical of the Spanish Colonial tradition and the existing historic residence. The massing of the addition is also similar to that of the existing residence and would be placed beside it and connected via what is essentially a hallway (architectural hyphen). The addition proposes to match the height of the existing two story residence and would project closer to Prospect Avenue creating depth and dimensionality for the building. The only alteration to the historic building visible from the public right-of-way apart from the addition would involve a window which would be changed to a pair of French doors of the same width. The proposed detached three car garage with second floor guest quarters will be located behind the proposed addition making it more than 100 feet from the Prospect Avenue sidewalk and only minimally visible from the public right of way. The existing driveway along the northern property line City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 7 will be relocated to the southerly property line. There is a variance (V73-3) for the existing five (5) foot high wall within the front yard setback area along Prospect Avenue. The project proposes to maintain this block wall and repair/replace portions of the wall to accommodate the driveway relocation. W, Existing -_ 5OU1Ht%rVMO4 w �I n -2 [._� M7R6 "YAWN ...v...r Parcel 2 Elevations The project complies with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties which provides guidelines for the appropriate preservation/restoration of a historic structure based on solid design principles. There are ten principles identified within the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The project architect has provided a City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 8 response to these ten principles which identify the project's compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards (Attachment C). Thirtieth Street Architects firm was selected by the City to perform independent review of the proposed project for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. Thirtieth Street offers a wealth of professional experience with historic preservation and provided input and recommendations on the project. The project architect has taken into account and worked to incorporate the recommendations from Thirtieth Street Architects within the project design. Parcel 1- New Single Family Detached Residence Construction of the new residence on proposed Parcel 1 would front onto Iverness Way and replace the existing tennis court and single story accessory structure existing there currently. The proposed residence will involve the construction of a new single story 5,008 square foot home with a 799 square foot garage. The proposed residence would be consistent with the single story nature of homes on the same street. The residence is designed in the craftsman tradition and adorned with cedar wood shingle siding. Exterior finishes and materials would primarily consist of wood, cultured stone, copper accent features and asphalt shingle roofing. Parcel 1 Elevations Overall Project Design The two proposed residences are each larger than the existing residence and would both be located on parcels in excess of 18,000 square feet. The proposed residences meet the development standards set forth for the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district. Aesthetically, the new residences would be replacing existing structures on-site. While there would be an additional residence built on the site, each of the proposed residences are on interior parcels and the proposed lots would be oversized compared to others in the neighborhood. The proposed parcel configuration would appear more ordinary to the neighborhood than the existing parcel. The majority of homes within the neighborhood are single story in design and the new home proposed on Iverness Way (Parcel 1) would also maintain a single story. The existing historic home fronting Prospect Avenue is two stories in height and had been in existence long before any of the surrounding homes were built. The proposed two story design of the addition is complimentary to the architecture of the original historic residence. Setbacks of the proposed residential structures meet the development standards and are consistent with other properties in the neighborhood. City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 9 As part of the project proposal the applicant is planning to remove and replace portions of the existing landscaping which includes two mature Oak trees located on proposed Parcel 1. A separate landscape plan would be required at the time of building plan check and the project is required to comply with the City's new Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (TCC Section 9700). Conditional Use Permit Pursuant to Section 9222b2 of the Tustin City Code, accessory buildings used as guest rooms where no cooking facility is installed or maintained are conditionally permitted uses. Parcel 2 (14611 Prospect Ave) is proposing a 460 square foot guest room above the three car garage at the rear southerly corner of the property. As previously mentioned, the guest house/garage would be located behind the proposed addition and hardly visible from the public right-of-way. The guest room facility has been conditioned to remain as a guest room and shall not become a separate unit nor shall the building be rented or leased. Pursuant to Condition 2.1 of Resolution No. 10-89, the applicant shall record to the property a deed restriction to restrict the accessory building as being used as a separate residential unit. Planning Commission Concerns A brief synopsis of concerns and responses brought up at the Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 2010 is listed below: 1. Notification Process for the Project Comment: Proper notice was not given to the public. Response: All legal notices were provided in accordance with law. Notice was provided for the required 20 day public review period for the proposed Negative Declaration from July 29, 2010 to August 18, 2010 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property were mailed notification of the public review period on July 28, 2010, a notice was published in the Tustin News on July 29, 2010, and the County Clerk was mailed a notice to post. Members of the public did come to City Hall to review the proposed project during this review period, however, no comments were received pertaining to the proposed Negative Declaration. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission on August 24, 2010 was published in the Tustin News on August 12, 2010. Property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property were mailed notification of the proposed project on the same day. A notice was posted at the subject property along the Prospect Avenue street frontage as well as along the Iverness Way street frontage on August 13, 2010. In accordance with California Government Code Section 65090, notice was provided at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. Notification of the public hearing before the City Council on September 21, 2010 was published in the Tustin News on September 9, 2010. Property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property were mailed notification of the proposed City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 10 project on the same day. A notice was posted at the subject property along the Prospect Avenue street frontage as well as along the Iverness Way street frontage on September 10, 2010. In accordance with California Government Code Section 65090, notice was provided at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. In addition to noticing property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site, posting notice at the site, and publishing notice within the local newspaper; notification is placed at City Hall on the day of publication within the local newspaper. 2. Landscaping for the Proposed Project Comment: Concerns were raised by residents and the Planning Commssion related to landscaping for the proposed project, in particular the removal of mature California Oak trees. In the public hearing the project architect noted that a number of specimen trees including the two California Oak trees would need to be removed to accommodate the proposed project. There were also concerns raised by residents which directly abut the subject property in regards to landscape screening along the property lines. Response: There is currently no state law which prohibits the removal of the specimen trees, particularly oak trees at the project site. The City of Tustin does not have a tree preservation ordinance which would prohibit the removal of specimen trees from private property. To address the concern, staff had proposed Condition 2.3 of Resolution No. 4155 which would require the applicant to submit a landscape/hardscape plan prior to the removal of any landscaping and/or issuance of a grading or building permit. After the public testimony the Planning Commission revised said Condition to include the following language: "Prior to the removal of any mature on-site California native oak trees, the applicant shall make reasonable efforts to save on-site and/or relocate said oak trees subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department. Additional landscaping shall be provided along the northern and southern property lines to buffer the structures, in particular the proposed guest house on Parcel 2, from the adjacent single family residences." 3. Massing and Layout of the Proposed Residences Comment: Questions were raised regarding the massing, size, and layout of the proposed residences including the guest house and their compliance with the City Codes. In addition there was a question as to whether or not the project was requesting any variances from the City Code. The density and lot coverage of the project and how it relates to the existing neighborhood was also identified as a concern. Response: At the public hearing, the project architect explained the decisions related to siting of the proposed residences and their massing. The designs take City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 11 into account the existing neighborhood and are sensitive to adjacent neighbors. It should be noted that the intensity of the development could be greatly increased and still be consistent with the E-4 zoning standards; however, the applicant and architect have provided a design which meets the needs of the applicant while still taking into context the surrounding area. Furthermore, the property on Parcel 1 (14702 Iverness Way) is not restricted to a single story residence; however, the residence is proposed as a single story structure and designed taking into account the context of the existing neighborhood. Concerns of residents adjacent to the proposed 460 square foot guest house above the detached three (3) car garage on Parcel 2 (14611 Prospect Avenue) were also addressed at the public hearing. The required side yard setback for a guest house is five (5') feet. The proposed side yard setback of the detached garage/guesthouse is six (6') feet from the ground floor garage wall while the second floor guest house is stepped back even further making it twelve and a half (12' 6") feet from the side property line. No windows are provided on the southern elevation of the garage/guest house facing the adjacent properties in order to maintain privacy. No variances are being requested with the project submittal. There is an existing Variance (V73-3) pertaining to the five (5) foot high block wall within the front yard setback along Prospect Avenue. The applicant is proposing to rebuild/replace this wall in accordance with Variance 73-3 due to the driveway relocation on Parcel 2. The proposed project meets the development standards as outlined in the Tustin City Zoning Code and General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential allows for a density of one (1) to seven (7) dwelling units per acre. As proposed the project would provide approximately two (2) dwelling units per acre whereas the surrounding neighborhood has a density of approximately four (4) dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the proposed project has a lower density than the existing neighborhood. The maximum lot coverage within the E-4 zoning district is 40 percent. Parcel 1 at 14702 Iverness Way proposes a lot coverage of 31 percent and Parcel 2 at 14611 Prospect Avenue proposes a lot coverage of 23 percent. 4. Construction Schedule and Duration of the Project Comment: Residents in the neighborhood of the project site questioned the construction schedule proposed for the project and listed potential noise as a concern. Response: The project architect noted that the two applicants are builders by profession and would be constructing the homes themselves. It was also noted that the applicants would be the residents within the homes and are eager to build. While the project architect could not identify an exact timeframe due to variables, he estimated that project construction is anticipated to last a year to a year and a half. City Council Report 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 12 The project would be required to comply with the City's noise ordinance and hours of construction. At the meeting, the Planning Commission added Condition 3.5 to Resolution No. 4155 as follows: "Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit the applicant shall provide a construction phasing and staging plan subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department." ENVIRONMENTAL A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project (Exhibit A of Resolution No. 10- 87). The draft Negative Declaration was made available for public review from July 29, 2010 to August 18, 2010. No comments on the proposed Negative Declaration were received during the public review period. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4153 recommending that the City Council find the Negative Declaration adequate for the project. Rya iontek Associate Planner �r^ r 7 7r -I� Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachments: A. Location Map & Fact Sheet B. Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 C. Submitted Plans & Historic Criteria D. Historic Resources Survey E. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 4153, 4154, and 4155 F. Resolution Nos. 10-87, 10-88, and 10-89 ATTACHMENT A LOCATION MAP & FACT SHEET LOCA i iCN MAP 79^ 1� e TUSTIN CITY MAP Project No. TPM 2008-138 DR 08-011 CUP 08-017 Address: 14611 Prospect Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 pp pp tY1 COLUMBUS TUSTIN ,Q,7 y yr oex p 5� qq - } TRAGT 7m SYCAMORE MAGNOLIA PLAZA PLAZA R F R R R IC R ----_-- R F � c� gg R pp gg_ RR' ppig F R E gg R 5 R 6- R qI R r, R R R R YRAC _ R pi 55 R R R (; g R - - 300 PARKEcru ur W., «a500' TU5 PARK pp pp tY1 COLUMBUS TUSTIN ,Q,7 y yr oex p 5� qq - } TRAGT 7m SYCAMORE MAGNOLIA PLAZA PLAZA R F R R R IC R ----_-- R F LAND USE APPLICATION FACT SHEET 1. LAND USE APPLICATION NUMBER(S): TPM 2008-138, DR 08-011, CUP 08-017 2. LOCATION: PROSPECT AVENUE & BENETA WAY 3. ADDRESS: 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE 4. APN(S):401-034-09 5. PREVIOUS APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS PROPERTY: VARIANCE 73-3 6. SURROUNDING LAND USES: NORTH: RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: RESIDENTIAL EAST: SCHOOL WEST: RESIDENTIAL 7. SURROUNDING ZONING DESIGNATION: NORTH: E-4 SOUTH: E-4 EAST: P&I WEST:.E-4 8. SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: NORTH: LDR SOUTH: LDR EAST: P&I WEST: LDR 9. SITE LAND USE: A. EXISTING: RESIDENTIAL B. PROPOSED: RESIDENTIAL C.GENERAL PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL D. ZONING: ESTATE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED GP: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED: ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FACTS: 10. LOT AREA: 46,827 S.F. 1.075 ACRES 11. BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: 40% MAX. PERMITTED 31% & 23% PROPOSED 12. SITE LANDSCAPING: YES REQUIRED YES PROPOSED 13. PARKING: 3 CAR GARAGE REQUIRED 3 CAR GARAGE PROPOSED 14. BUILDING HEIGHT: 30' REQUIRED 24'& 24'4" PROPOSED 15. BUILDING SETBACKS: REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT: PARCEL 1 20' 20' PARCEL 2 20' 20' SIDE: PARCEL 1 10% LOT WIDTH (15') 15' PARCEL 2 10% LOT WIDTH (15') 18'6" REAR: PARCEL 1 20% LOT DEPTH (25'3") 28'6" PARCEL 2 20% LOT DEPTH (29'10") 30' 16. OTHER UNIQUE CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED TO THE PROPERTY (I.E. SPECIAL STUDY ZONES, EASEMENTS, ETC.) HISTORIC PROPERTY ATTACHMENT B TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138 ro LES � p` p1AB 9WT E{EYAnON ruawr wAu �. srREEr carr i:E IKRIr PaE umlrr pM'MAO POMfR Utt/JY PIX£ 14x1 mz ca.a/NLR� 1 cer. aa.amu 1 .•. A� ,w�laa.er Ww pa,. �r.Na 1 1 I aAa •p' I I ORnss seAWA • . cRoss gC/1QV � fA15iJG PR04PCCT A104e.E' ETYPY•K) (Tor m )TAINT R/W� 1 R/W I—K ' I 1 I 1 I oa. aa4 w/rorLmWc.a �a 1 i X A pens sECTruv •R• FROST ¢2•n,]V (Y [Y/SnNG /1£77 WAY (DPYCAL) sass grTuv r Oro55 SECTW OF EMSiAVO 40E YARD (rRNCAL) 1-- c— aP. a— CROSS SECT aF EArSiRiC 9OE YAIQ1 (TY➢.•CAL) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2008-138 THAT CERTAIN PARCEL Or LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF TUSTAI, COUNTY OF ORANGE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING THAT PORnON OF ME LAND ALLOTTED TO LEONARDO COTA AND ANDRES YORBA AS ADMINISTRATOR OF TEDOC/O YORBA, DECEASED, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO DE SANTA ANA WHICH WAS ENTERED SEPTEMBER Ty TeGa IN BOOK TJ PAGE 410 OF ,RJOGEMENTS OF ME DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH ,AID/CTAL DISTRICT W AND FOR 105 ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA. I ®�Sfi�APxsai3JF3 m�tsx��{rl:�rnr� I I r M77 17 ��J'QA7'a- X6:7©iI4Y>f{zr �.M' IP ���I�IGI!�:tiR.Ail Dose Poem PLL£ ro w1A1 r_rrr.�j ©[1.Y l3LffIiL�{n.:rrrrlBl OEM 110I ...D...D _--" - ©0`.NJIMM jp{ar:me rman Y �Yi{Z13CTR al MINEEM 00lI9{ mm�A.LY>♦�•4Y>•iT II N I I t I F7rGiE� VA a NVl D sm IIIIIIIIIIIII!R[1tiNItil - ,.. • r �111t� III --la— ®®It1 1111F 3A(YM111�I i. a�rrTM C ' •f ��Ii1FtYatiY>f{ 1 i-� Ig�gp�p ®®i:w}1[114 cam 1 ®®iYB.sYiMI41 ®�mi9Ye!•�"{ mMEI�muuxmmI 1 ! PN15� ©��Mmllli i�ll'.il NEI®' 111IMNIMMIMLIN pIliecra�ya{tla amc�u ro LES � p` p1AB 9WT E{EYAnON ruawr wAu �. srREEr carr i:E IKRIr PaE umlrr pM'MAO POMfR Utt/JY PIX£ 14x1 mz ca.a/NLR� 1 cer. aa.amu 1 .•. A� ,w�laa.er Ww pa,. �r.Na 1 1 I aAa •p' I I ORnss seAWA • . cRoss gC/1QV � fA15iJG PR04PCCT A104e.E' ETYPY•K) (Tor m )TAINT R/W� 1 R/W I—K ' I 1 I 1 I oa. aa4 w/rorLmWc.a �a 1 i X A pens sECTruv •R• FROST ¢2•n,]V (Y [Y/SnNG /1£77 WAY (DPYCAL) sass grTuv r Oro55 SECTW OF EMSiAVO 40E YARD (rRNCAL) 1-- c— aP. a— CROSS SECT aF EArSiRiC 9OE YAIQ1 (TY➢.•CAL) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2008-138 THAT CERTAIN PARCEL Or LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF TUSTAI, COUNTY OF ORANGE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING THAT PORnON OF ME LAND ALLOTTED TO LEONARDO COTA AND ANDRES YORBA AS ADMINISTRATOR OF TEDOC/O YORBA, DECEASED, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO DE SANTA ANA WHICH WAS ENTERED SEPTEMBER Ty TeGa IN BOOK TJ PAGE 410 OF ,RJOGEMENTS OF ME DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH ,AID/CTAL DISTRICT W AND FOR 105 ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA. i I i I - .. r �N11C 910N.L e0%I I ,I 11- 1 � I I r M77 17 DEVELOPED Dose Poem PLL£ ro w1A1 NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE PROD �.-... ...D...D _--" - 1, I' OBt I}T I I .1 BILE .AIS 1f ! i ) I • �T - PpME MF fi eOWN 9 1'. II N I I t I F7rGiE� VA a NVl D r�.aslmnrk - ,.. • r wN1 U N� III --la— ' 1 s 1 PRa^OSFD 1 1I W PRpP0.ff0I _ - _.. A- io 1 \ P} rSieAWTOWArtR I I PA(M IaAe �W BARMr oolirt �5 T,m ,a � O B tOPOSED ,t• � ,t - PAno QaMrrAAo q rsr rc WALKWAY • V$ e' MK[ Ni0RO5f0 �_ I aolPNrvt till, ti 4' T�sL. ii` t}'.I 1 7 1 TEa PROPOSED PARCEL 2 0.648 AC3 416 411,1111, lim ' r �N11C 910N.L e0%I I I I r M77 17 DEVELOPED CONDITION NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE PROD 4 �N11C 910N.L e0%I I I � S�I.Ff �.�T I I r M77 17 I it �j o 1 o A1� co t r�.aslmnrk �cA'sNq I II � i• -'i C ' •f ��0• i Ig�gp�p p9D •' m , ' Au -m NOTES: ALLPROPO3D PrRarERR WAtro SNONNa9TWG PROSPECT�AWNUE TIL ee pias R�FvA, s rr Nor Tar Exlsm+c 3 a PEAWE2R EIOST. POIER � � --PtlE ro {Ew i 1 IPME mTp1N1 '- if 1 wAu ro _AAA imp tl1" 4�1 ', l' s I - I Im]- nom•, .r J m scAur•.so" a>W.T , I ;hY Nar Y."°'u e I "$ w� g EXISTING CONDITION NOTE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE EXISTING !I1 11 I I .• 11, _ 1 0. IID , ai I�T^1 OCINiTY MAP N. T.5 ADDRESS NSIINRG 9i1B0 K LEGAL DESCRIPTION' MAT CER TAW PARCEL K LINO LNA1E0 w MF SIAIT O<GLIFORUA AANCNp SANPAgJ OE SANTA ANA aC4wry tr LNANLi prc p' IUSRN DESCRwEO AS Pa1p1K awwwQ A n' W rtRSFcnm• a• rNe EASTERLY PAaamAnav a MF NxnAnRLr uA¢ fr Lor zP AS 9AOw pN A uAR RECObTD xr rMmr Iso, III A AW ar a• ansxte.wCa/s W SAmS N�� MA ra IM i MY ,LL[WG BAR a A— A' —ASS. . TIE PalOMNW CIXRS£S .� 90'30' NEST ae].OD IFFY ro A PdNI pV A AWN 4M'fNr CUAK _r uMllxisreKr xAaNc A RADnEs or 4ssao RE5 n BAaK LwF ro sAm Payr eEKrs NaaM ",',,A, EAST naNLY IIQP1NllESI£AL Y KQNC Sam aWK M9alpr A a'l1'IAK Al tf a .'A II' AND ARC MT I TORR P 1 HENCE rANCENT ro SND 1 NpeM Is'JTIO' eESr BPI PF(I ro ME BEOA1Swla ff A —1 LUCK Ca,WAK NpTnEASIERtr HA9MW A W. a 1Y>ro 2EI; INfMLE AWR)AERW Kala SAm aM WMCT I A MAS ANME IN A AAAP' AN ARC abler PAI iO SW MEALY INEa— AW MAS SNpWNWAMAO R£CbRgfD W ILYST IX PALLS rP AND rB K ARSFEiLANFp/S Y P'S IKCORa3 (y I' ORA—1,rw�oAN/AnElxa' NaeM s•w9o-EASI KQVG sam sourNEs.r Linc � nrscr Na 4r]Q A gSl�uWf a•.rE1,B> iFET ro sAm rn1IFRLwf a o1AAmKC(NIER 1MiNf mQ' pEA,s1 NTVE IIIF]/LE SWRERLY KLWc r4nm F¢T ro ME roWr a aErWZNwc NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARCELS EASEMENT NOTES: a ARNBEFED PAQ[El5 0 rA4YEN1tS) Pat mE H/APLIg(SJ .9:ONN Y0.ow A� AgiTS TK rKM1p AS ANRp M A —1TOTAL AREA, aRANrm m Dav:Nrc EY pWAnrf 4FOSS r.0>3 ACRES 5 PDA3.W3E STREET AAW MWAv PURPORT in QBm ACRE • ACMRDFu--SEPlEL16FA I] PPI. Bmae SmE PAa� , CR>M/K AECOPIIS GROSS AND NET DENSITY: Al>Fcm �3a--y—r— LAW �sMivt AflB .1 C QI AV (A'NAfOMOED £ASFYLNI FDR PqE LNfS AND ­A,OUB C PGPPOSES OKR TIE NORMERLr 1 r¢r OF SAID LANG Al CONTOUR INTERVALdSa.o er AN WSPEWraN a L EASFHOLt m eE r Poor uDEaN:Arzp PER P.a No. aooe EXISTING LAND USE: PESOEN nK ESIAn PROPOSED LAND USE: — — Y pXFlLNOS (I- -UTILITIES: SfeER: ORANGE LDUNTr sAAYrLa1KW aSlFlGi a BaK els), ramrAN v uFr, c. Pine -m:> wmnz(no Sea z4D mASN: XEADa1MTfns atR - srA+/rpv aRa 1lrsrorN AKNUF /�snrAvnx G BCWm IYAIFA: lIY40 a�iUsrm cJiAsa ml�uzr ELECIrMf/1` IxrrEAN-CA�IPDRWA ELVSLW !00 FAST r>I1/ S1REEi LbS rA afStCKWpMRA B16?1 tKtlJaS -ASST CpAMUNICAMWS t CABIE :REN51M' nK WARNER CABtf 3A10 f. MMALWA AK ANAHEw. G saes NOTES: I. Au rmsTWW slRucnNEs ro eE RFAwKn. }. BEST YAA44WO9r IRACnCEf REOARQWa EROS[w G'a'1Ra Alm APRROlEO Br ME pTr O< IIISIAV NBL LL UEED. l ALL PACP0.1r0 POO[S RNl BE LOG IEp A AP•vIYUM pr 3 FI. PAar MF NA ifRS f1N£ r0 1K PAa9ERrc UNE s Au �r uwI^Rsw rsm LRE � rzw��P.eoFosfn Pros. A srr rel Petr 1wp/ pwN ewK P&war sruL ee rxsrAutn ARowv rzE vs Prete ro eunnwe cQvsmuermr/ e 5Mar5. A NWLW FABRlC OR fE9r J+PUL Bf ARAaEO iv TIE ftWpPAFY Crl1b'IRIWMw PEAWNG OA RD > )RUC A•ECnNM'S�wLLKLW L EY M Om R .KCEnol�w+ armor nzw w•rsim/SCIR3r a6ssrcRrs IERWe'C ICaT[RwC M IML 9R MIDiBQwR1FRC OPAOWW OLEFIN SECCM STAGE SY G A(DeR AW WffN eNb N2GC/TFs FXQTO r5 YAES PER NLYIR ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.. r ar-aM-w SAM OF BEARINGS. a xERECN AAE BASED UPpy TINE CENIEFONF a WgSPECr A KAM.F SNOW As A BfAWNGI TCwM WT1'r0' eESY ON _CTNO MF 4r]I 1L W BOat 04 P CES M nRQ'/Wr pr Fq/5 wAPS w ME aRK[ pr ttWWT' RELYWpER K aR�NCE [riVNTY CAUFOR IA. BENCHMARK. M 4.OGS KaRNW BEAA>NARR dR 51 WYD SA- W' SFT W W SpLMNfSr MVNER M Y42RSECraW OCc Sm—FFT�Ar�m lets Sr �n u�onnL " 1 c—_a rwsr set ANO m FI Y-. — CE -- OFC SIHEEr. tEt£L MM 9pE W4K. EIEv.IJl.OA' (NAlmm) OWNER/SUBDIVIDER 1--A .12 maeA cA ea]m (n419os asst TIE suedaDrn rs MF PADPFarr DANfA cr AEccwp. roNr BARromna DATE PREPARED rgKNBER 11, — PREPARED BY: .Rare, NMNC ANO ENYANFEPoNO aecAR}ww GY PL— � F (]solar 9 •�Fm mz' �' CAArc W. -z2io w.IadFY PROSPECT TENTATIVEN MAP ATTACHMENT C SUBMITTED PLANS & HISTORIC CRITERIA pE w -COS r 9�h t/1... aoxx_,�Gf 7A MESA r3 r-i,,m°z- � e �..- �9 1Pi. mt�ZSC v'ym rno' "j fi'i R` ysvm,z n SrrAy µzCo s 10 w „ �a All 'ate q Rd s e n y � �' NOLs AYa RJ l pl i �aaaaaaaaaaaan }yPyj Todd 8chootar & Aaaoclataa 1 0 _ Project Location TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: = a m NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST 14602 1VERNESS WAY TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA �R1MOme4nn�Ei in v�"i [�+1< TUSTIN, CA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE L�aaxa 2 z:ygOp w. NNy�nz "E "'aP'S .0 Baa>�ooroob Todd 8chootar & Aaaoclataa 1 0 _ c �Z Project Location TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: = a m NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST 14602 1VERNESS WAY TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA TUSTIN, CA c �Z Project Location TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: . _ NORTH PRO .. _ . _._ _ SPECT AVE.-_ V A 14611 NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST 14602 1VERNESS WAY TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA TUSTIN, CA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR;CA 92625 a w # w NN ro n ' - 16, qVi pru e0 ❑ YNf/B '_1 LJIGheh i �, I ::. .. O +_ O 'Seunzaao w I f - t @ � y �y 7 o — — i 6 �\ : a i acted a9 b I � I' I I / z II i Q II, w /\jay m H z° / - -- ------ Uzi; _ ❑L 1NO ❑ $ st,isg€ tale"sge�ai P� t g1ke'u E� � n :R g , H .. 4 s co g L ;� ❑ i i I _ _— y Zvi C�00. f''f\' o/ `\ .r—=1'P r-- 1 -t== -r :._ u1 u7 7 cli O OtO t Ca. o �v ,oa sit p A4.,0t.�t.ea�t F 3nN3A V 103dW dd Project Location : -- -- — --- - ,P CSP ftM Todd 8GhoW W AA sA—WAd - TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST ` 14611 NORTH PROSPECT AVE. . 1 1 1 146021VERNESS WAY TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA TUSTIN, CA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE A CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 tl' ,11i MT "Mu 7 M Project Location : 14611 NORTH PROSPECT AVE. TUSTIN, CA Copyright Todd Sch"'*' " Aooeletes Architects & Planners G) rn < M2 rn C) A Project Location : 14611 NORTH PROSPECT AVE. TUSTIN, CA TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 ca G) rn < M2 rn C) m 31 TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 I I , I I AL IC,.a a .-'— j � .� Fes'-µ I♦ h !,TT.SIliTITI MYMr �Yt Wa t ISI s '� dill I v Via; � pp mit 5- t 1 y ... a � ,. t x E cr, oProject � Copyriobt Todd 8eh"fer i As�oeletas AreNiteeb b Pltann�rs Location : TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST i 14602 IVERNESS WAY TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA ,~t TUSTIN, CA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 z � 4 E F F 0 0 z g 3 e u Copyright Todd Sc I., • Associates s Architects 8•Plamms Project Location 14611 NORTH PROSPECT AVE. TUSTIN, CA TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 h L L TOM Sc"- ff rtS Oft m■®r I . h L L TOM Sc"- ff rtS a W Copyright Todd Soh—lar 8 Ass"latas s Architects b Plamars ■ l I TAS �(fi®Ole� ®®a I`F CoPYrlgpt Todd Seaoolsr B Asso l tm $ Arafdtsots B Planners N � Q .tgg IN Nil N4 A4 ! g"' _M N.- $�2g< R� 4" €?s In P g�c m$° 1 `zNp 2 mho 4 Ri�gZ RU Np pp N F yy bo v* aox3nd N � b b n E CI s Asexletes 3W > N _qn ZO T'+IT mm 'p PZ a - Ri m,,k00N- ' $ . .- M.otrGoor ec'zsz ... R`+ T mOSND0888` 0D0mD D 0i TfZn IyrZDA!1 _ _ .. ... _ _..-... ... , e r mmO 000 mOm mT mo D '7i 00mOOZ TT0AOSSCOpAA rD AO�( 3iypA =OF ZOA0OD <V Dp AtiA D OATr -Z�OAZm* -� Vmm<VDZOmpzO mAO �AC mZZZy z A O m z r 2>mm - - - r r 2z - - - - gN A _ , ^ 1 N -U id .tgg IN Nil N4 A4 ! g"' _M N.- $�2g< R� 4" €?s In P g�c m$° 1 `zNp 2 mho 4 Ri�gZ RU Np pp N F yy bo v* aox3nd N � b b n E CI s Asexletes om, Project Location 14611 NORTH PROSPECT AVE. TUSTIN, CA TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 PZ a - Ri m,,k00N- ' $ .ZZYVZ M4 � M.otrGoor ec'zsz R`+ 3f1N3il d 103dSOdd e om, Project Location 14611 NORTH PROSPECT AVE. TUSTIN, CA TWO CUSTOM HOMES FOR: NOEL & KIMBERLY PRENDERGAST TONY & JOCELYNE BARKHOZIA 2510 BUNGALOW PLACE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 RECEIVED TOdd �1100��� July -1 8 2010 & ASSOCIATES I N C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIV. 14611 North Prospect Avenue Tustin, California Historic Design Criteria Architects • Planners • BuNdlers • 301 East 17th Street • Suite 204 • Costa Mesa, CA • 92627.949 6468805 • i -AX 949 6468862 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site environment. In 1922 William and Eva Cheney built this Spanish Colonial home where they had planned to live. The proposed remodel and addition is designed to restore, enhance and compliment the existing structure. The old historic structure is in disrepair and in need of help. In its current condition its future is not good. We intend to restore the existing structure to it original architectural style using modern materials that in addition to matching the style of this Spanish Colonial home, promotes energy efficiency. The existing historic structure has been added to in a way that does not compliment the historic nature of the structure or follow any type of historic guidelines. We intend to remove these additions that have not been built within historic guidelines. Over the years various other accessory structures have been built that do not follow the classic version of Spanish Colonial Architecture. We intend to remove those accessory structures. The proposed addition is designed in a way to compliment and retain the three dimensional characteristic of the existing structure. These points of interest all help restore the original purpose of this 1922 Classic Spanish Colonial estate. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of materials or alteration offeatures and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Our proposal retains the existing historic structure as originally constructed. Existing undocumented additions shall be removed to help return the historic structure to its original form. We intend to follow the original detail in the restoration of the existing historic structure and the new addition. There are interior alterations proposed to the plan of the historic structure. The interiors design shall be done in a manor that match and compliment the existing historic home. All exterior openings that face the public right-of- way will not be altered with the exception of the family room decorative window that is being changed to a pair of french doors of the same width. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. We intend to follow a strict guideline of style for Spanish Colonial Architecture on both the restoration of the historic structure and the new addition. Proposed materials and architectural details are meant to match that style. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. This property has changed over time. Unfortunately the changes that have happened do not preserve the existing historic significance. The existing accessory structures were built in a manor that does not compliment the historic structure. The previous remodel and addition to the historic structure was also built in a manor that does not preserve the historic nature of the home. We intend to remove those no -conformities and restore the existing historic home. 5. Distinctive features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. Features and craftsmanship that characterized Spanish Colonial Architecture of this time and this historic structure shall be restored and matched as part of this proposal. Examples that shall be submitted are as follows. 1. Low roof pitches 2. Eave details 3. Attic/roof vents 4. Column styles & details 5. Guardrail details 6. Chimney caps & detail Finishes that characterizes this historic style that shall be submitted are as follows. 1. Smooth or smooth undulating Spanish stucco finish 2. Wrought iron color and finish 3. Metal clad windows 4. Exterior tile 3 0 (D 1 POW f.wml-..••..�...._ w�J:•)�.�' +.'F'K it �'.C�jll1�� `��'�I` � P'ir ,ax nerALLm MR ww,r. >arrr�f Q r I q� ® am. {� HALF Raw bH +• I 5 / © FXTB4ICR Firom, ®IY." lK.ri1Gm fiHY'b. Uix:'r�� ,1 WPTeR rAa.,- / !' GQaxRPFTUR Q PELT UN. UIIR7LLATM'IJT i j '• o bp --: �I"FFri !7 ...-.. a�•1 ®W -I! RBLlA7+ON nHn+l EAVE 1�1 Sfls�;. Ger :r1tR•� �,.,���.j---...yr � %r Sc;..�IrP-!.L $,k1-dt"rrV.S 44 Ifs w rrp . b IvA.f4 ��� I w�J:•)�.�' +.'F'K it �'.C�jll1�� `��'�I` � P'ir P• j�D'F:: i7•S<,!,'-�F liiiJ.'�IL 'k-h�y...i�!o.L''Y�.'-: . flys _,r�tJrp°tte..;+7n.Yalrl�a (D ALM&I-o i�-�Alp v . l J irlFrJWaP- fi♦1131'i `d} I�.iul.lul!c.. rte' M. 4 pgy (6' LAP M. @) 7AIU.1✓<c E I•iE'aL, CUPttiS UO»WF"6A 'A 51ai` bbl -L 3fT •i fvr N-.1: i21.a � i �I Viae ago-: ` Llxl!C 1 nn AeAllen 9.cak 179•!1 )aTa IN•7Df IL25-,9, am :n IU Him ,r;. rauu pn:�slri. I;n• 7.59.1ajVAD-Ei 6.9! • 7n, H fil • 244 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture and other visual qualities and, where possible materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical or pictorial evidence. This home is in a state disrepair. Over the years the type of maintenance that a home like this requires has not been done. We intend to repair many of the existing eave beams as necessary. All or most of the existing windows and doors are not useable and do not meet today's energy standards. They are proposed to be replaced with an energy efficient architectural metal clad wood window and French doors that will match the original metal windows in both style and design configuration. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Chemical or physical treatment, such as sandblasting shall not be undertaken in regards to existing wood work. More labor intensive means shall be employed. There will be areas of the existing historic structure that will require some sort of surface cleaning to the stucco in order to accept a new stucco finish coat. In areas of repair or remodel steps shall be taken to protect existing wood work to remain. 8. Significant archaeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. There are no significant archaeological resources affected by this project. 9. New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The new addition to the existing historic home is designed to attach to the home at a point that: 1. Is out of sight of the public right-of-way. 2. The part that attaches to the existing structure is minimal in area and primarily attaches in the portion of the home that is to be remodeled as a result of the undocumented and non -historic previous remodel. The new portion of the home shall be separated by a courtyard that is classic to this style of architecture, similar in style to picture on the next page. The massing of the home has been designed to be compatible in both size and scale to the existing historic home. The new portion of the home is planned to have the same detailing and architectural features as the existing historic home, making a seamless transition from OLD to NEW, preserving and enhancing the integrity of this historic property. Additionally the existing slump block wall that was added to the property has been redesigned and is planned to have a new look that is compatible with Spanish Colonial Architecture. 1 D. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the property and its environment would be unimpaired. The new addition is separated from the existing historic structure with only a small portion that attaches. If the new portion of the home is proposed to be remodel, that proposal can be undertaken in a manor that does not effect the old historic structure. In closing the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Structures states that Additions to historic buildings shall not radically change, obscure, or destroy character -defining spaces, materials, or finishes of the existing historic structure. In order to live on this property the Prendergast family requires a home the size that has been proposed. We have separated the new addition with a Classic Spanish Colonial courtyard for the following reasons. 2. The separation allows the existing historic structure to maintain its original intended massing. 2. Separating the structures with a courtyard gives a feel of two separate structures. The massing of this idea is more compatible with the existing historic structure and the neighborhood. A single large structure may obscure, or destroy character - defining spaces. 3. While the new addition has been designed to be compatible in style, detail, finishes, and massing its site planning is designed to be clearly differentiated from the existing historic building. ATTACHMENT D HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY Cr1rY OF TIISTIN HISTORICAL SURVEY ADDRESS: 14611 PROSPECT AVE DATE: 1928 STYLE: SPANISH COLONIAL REVIVAL SOURCE: RATING: E A ALTERATIONS: F HISTORICAL DISTRICT: NO COMMENT: DESCRIPTION: Two stories in height, and capped with a heavy red -clay -tile -clad roof, the stucco -clad Spanish Colonial home at 14611 prospect is one of the finest of that style in the city. A grove house, it sits in the center of a very large walled yard, contains specimen plant life, and is very well maintained. The side -facing gabled roof, ringed with closely -spaced carved brackets and accented with pipe venting at the peaks, rags north to south. A large square chimney, with a row of medallions forting a band around the center, is located near the north end. The porch roof continues across the front to become the port cochere roof. It is supported by large square stucco -clad posts which match those in the port cochere. A large single -storied red -ale -roofed wing extend toward the front (east) from the two-story section. All of the windows ate multi -paned metal -framed casement style. A cast concrete decorative panel is centered in the second floor of the front facade. An adjacent window is deeply -recessed, with a tyle sill. The window to the north of it is flanked by heavy wood shatters. The front door, which is located in the comer of the ell formed by the front -facing wing, is ornamented with molding in an intricate pattern. The front -facing wing is accented by a large pilaster with a large ornamental scroll on the top. The window which faces the north side and the window in the center of the wing are both multi -paned and fronted with ornate wrought iron galls. A courtyard with a 4 -foot wan and square piers which match those on the porch and port cochere, is located to the south side of the front wing. A large garage, topped with a red -clay -tile -clad side -facing gabled roof, can be seen at the back of the house, and has been enclosed. SIGNIFICANCE: William Cheney, the builder of this fine Spanish Colonial home, came to Orange County around the luta of the century, renting 960 aurae from his friend, lames Irvine. In addition, he operated 600 acres of h -vine's ranch for over 20 years. In 1914 he bought 10 acres of laud an the cut side of Prospect and built a home for his wife. Eva, and their family. Three years later he purchased this 20 aeras on the west side of the street from A. L. Cotan% a fruit grower who lived on Glen (Tustin) Avenue. A major 000tributor to tha Valencia industry, Mr. Cheney planted 81.5 Valencias on the east side of Prospect and 1600 trees of the same variety on the west side. In partnership with James Utt, he operated a nursery devoted to raising Valencia orange tree stock. In 1421 they had over 12,000 small Rees at their location in Tustin. On the land leased from the Irvine Ranch, he raised lima beans, blael"yed peas, barley and hay. He helped organize and was the First secretary of the San Joaquin Lima Bean Growers Assoeiatba. Th8 organization was successful in raising the price of beaus from three and one-quarter cents per pound to fourteen WA One-half cuts per pound in three years. A successful businessman, he was a stockholder in the First National Bank of Santa Ata While still living in Los Angeles, prior to 1914, he and his brother co-founded the Farmers Insurance Company. Later he was a b- o[ the Tustin Hi1L CiRns Association, which tamed a packing house on the Southern Pacific railway. As president of tha Wyana Oil Company, he was responsible for oil drilling in the state of Wyoming and Orange County. He was awarded a life rnembershtp in the Santa Ana Elks Lodge, No. 794. W. Cheney, in partnership with Lao Borchard and Guy Wilmot, owned what was considered to be the finest male in Orange County. He raised approximately 16 males a year for several years. In 1925 he was a foreman for the County Highways. He and Eva built this fine hoose of pressed brick, covered with stucco, in 1922. They had lived across the street for 6 years in the home they built on that 10 acres in 1916. The Cheneys continued to live on the 15�t9t<aar of GsT`iie t1?garftxitY. t74YPARtF:FAR A1�lII R�ATIIIi f�1F?h1 3UfLC 1Wt , T# UCTUR � DBJECfi RECORD Pagel of 2 Bl. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: B3. Original Use: Residential B4. Present Use: Residential "BS. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival "B6. Construction History: (Conwuction date, altaatiom aW date of akerations) "NRNP Status Code: 3S "Resource Name or # (143):14611 Prospect Avenue William and Eva Cheney built this two-story Spanish Colonial Revival building of pressed brick covered with stucco in 1928. A large garage, topped with a red -clay -tile clad side -facing gabled roof, has been enclosed. "B7. Moved? X No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location: "B8. Related Features: B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder. unknown •B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture, Citrus Industy Area: Area: Santa Ana -Tustin, CA Period of Significance: 1870-1899 Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: B, C (Dewy importance m terms of hiaancal or arabdedural owtaxi a defined by 4 m% period, and pognow wopa Also address may.) This house is significant as one of the finest examples of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture in Tustin and for its association with William Cheney. Mr. Cheney came to Orange County in the late 18009 and rented 960 acres from his friend, James Irvine. Additionally, for over 20 years, William Cheney operated an additional 600 ecae9 of Irvine's ranch In 1914, be bought 10 acres of land on the East side of Prospect and built a home for his wife, Eva, and their family. Three years later he purchased 20 acres on the West side of the street from A.L. Cotant, a fruit grower who lived on Glen (Tustin) Avenue. Mr. Cheney planted 815 Valencia orange trees on the East side of Prospect and 1600 trees on the West side. In partnership with James Utt, he operated a nursery devoted to raising Valencia orange tree stock. On the land leased from the Irvine Ranch, he also raised lima beans, black eyed peas, barley and hay. A successful businessman, Mr. Cheney also was the first secretary of the San Joaquin Lima Bean Growers Association, stockholder in the First National Bank of Santa Ana and co-founder of the Farmers Insurance Company. Later he became a member of the Tustin Hills Citrus Association. As president of the Wyana Oil Company, he was responsible for oil drilling in the state of Wyoming and Orange County. He also raised mules and in 1925 was the foreman for the County Highways. The building, sitting in the carter of a large, walled yard containing a variety of specimen plants, has a heavy red -clay -tile clad roof B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (HP2}—Single Family Property •B12. References: City of Tustin Historical Survey, thirtieth street architects, inc., June, 1990, Tustin: A City of Trees, Carol H. Jordan, Heritage Media Corp. 1996. B13. Remarks *B14. Evaluator.. TBAW, C. Jordan "Date of Evaluation: Oct 2002 (This space reserved for official comments.) DPR 5238 (1/95) *Required Information tSketch Map wfth north arrow required.) Maw— AMAGANAT WAY gg R JRY r i low, $430 >fml: .14?►><► WZMUAY LANE *Required Information I DPR 523L 'Required Information cuts of CaNbrnis — The PASources Agency DEPARTMENT of PARKS AND RECREATIM PRIMARY RECORD PMWy # HRI # Trinofnial NRHP stat m code Review Code Reviewer outer [me Page 1 of 2 "Resource Name or 8: (Assigned by recorder) 143 'P1a.Other identifier. *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted 'a. County Orange County and (P2c, Pte, and P2b or Ptd. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) 'b. USG$ 7.5' Quad Tustin -orange Dale T ; R 1/4 of �/s of Sec c. Address: 14611 — _ B.M. Prospect Ave. City Tustin, Ca Zip 92780 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or kwar resources) ZonemE/ mN er e- OthLocational Data: (e.g., parcel i, direction to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) see map 'P3a. Description: (Deecnbe resource and t major elements. Include design, rnaterisK condition, alterations, sae, setting, and bourderies) William Cheney came to Orange County in the late 1800s and rented 960 acres from his friend, James Irvine. He also operated an additional 600 acres of Irvine's ranch for over 20 years- In 1914, he bought 10 acres of land on the east side of Prospect and built a home for his wife, Eva, and their family. Three years later he purchased 20 acres on the west side of the street from A.L. Cour, a fruit grower who lived on Glen (Tustin) Avenue. Mr. Cheney planted 815 Valencia oranges on the east side of Prospect and 1600 trees of the same variety on the west side. In partnership with James Utt, he operated a nursery devoted to raising Valencia orange tree stock. On the land leased from the Irvine Ranch, he also raised lima beans, black eyed peas, barley and hay. (don't.) 'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attriwtes and codes) HP2 single family, property 'P4. Resources Present X Building ❑Structure 00bied ❑Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other Isolates P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph regiied for WWW. struct es, and objects.) ( , etc.) 'P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date, accession f) front view, July 2001 "P6. Date Consbuct"Age and Source: 1928 X Historic [] Prehistoric ❑ Both 'PT. Owner and Address: to be inserted 'P&Recorded by: Mame, aflilloom and mess) G. Takano, TBA west, Inc. 950 Sacramento St ►1, San 'rancisco, Ca 94109 P9. Date Recorded: August 2001 310. Survey Type: reconnaissance survey •P11. Report Citation.(Cite 'We,'rept and ogwsmirces.o►enter 'none.') see continuation sheet *Attachments: ❑NONE X Location Map X Continuation Sheet ❑Building, Structure, and Object Record 13Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record OArtifacf Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (List): DPR 523A (1195) 'Required information stag. of Ckftmla e The RaMuMes Amy. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary # . F� # Tdrtornia l Page 2 of 2 'Resource Narrie or # (Aeeigned by nx=der)14 3 "Recorded by: TBA West *Date August 2001 X Continuation X Update continued from page l: A successful businessman, Mr. Cheney also was the first secretary of the San Joaquin Lima Bean Growers Association, stockholder in the First National Bank of Santa Ana and co-founder of the Farmers Insurance Company. Later he became a member of the Tustin Hills Citrus Association, owner of a packing house on the Southern Pacific Railway, and president of the Wyana Oil Company. He also raised mules and in 1925 was the foreman for the County Mghways. The Cheneys built this two story Spanish Colonial Revival building of pressed brick covered with stucco in 1922 The building, sitting in the center of a large, walled yard containing a variety of plant specimens, has a heavy red clay the clad roof. The side facing gabled roof, with closely spaced carved brackets and pipe venting s, runs north to south. A large square chimney, g at the peak with a row of medallions forms a band around the center, is located near the north end. Large square stucco clad posts that match those in the port cochere support the porch roof, continuing across the front to become the port cochere roof. A large single story red tile roofed wing extends toward the front from the two-story section. All windows are multi -paned metal -framed casement style. A cast concrete decorative panel is centered in the second floor of the front facade. An adjacent window is deeply recessed with a tile sill. Heavy wood shutters flank the window to the north. The front door, which is located in the comer of the ell formed by the from facing wing, is ornamented with molding in an intricate pattern. The front facing wing has a large pilaster with large ornamental scroll on the top. The window, facing the north side, and the window in the center of the wing are both multi -paned and fronted with ornate wrought iron grills. A courtyard with a 4 foot wall and square piers which match those on porch and port cochere, is located to the south side of the front wing. A large garage with red clay tile clad side facing gabled roof is located in the back of the main house. DPR 523L (1/93) 'Required information ATTACHMENT E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS. 41539 41549 AND 4155 RESOLUTION NO. 4153 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138, DESIGN REVIEW 08-011, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL LOCATED AT 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE INTO TWO (2) NEW PARCELS WHICH WOULD EACH ACCOMMODATE A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 was filed by Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast requesting authorization to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. Existing at the subject property is a historic residence which will be maintained and involve the construction of a 4,255 square foot addition and a detached 1,008 square foot garage and 460 square foot guest house at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2). Construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling is proposed on the newly created parcel at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1); B. That Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is considered a "project" by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code §21000 et. seq.); C. That City staff prepared an Initial Study to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the project which concluded there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, and a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared; D. That a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was published and the Negative Declaration and Initial Study were made available for a 20 -day public review and comment period from July 29, 2010, to August 18, 2010, in compliance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the State CEQA Guidelines; Resolution No. 4153 Page 2 E. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, held for TPM 2008- 138, DR 08-011, and CUP 08-017 on August 24, 2010, by the Planning Commission F. The Planning Commission considered the Initial Study and the Negative Declaration (Exhibit A) and finds it adequate for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit A for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August, 2010. .. 7TFk)MPSONI Chair • Tern L BETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4153 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24th day of August, 2010. EL BETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary Exhibit A f t { of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4153 TUSTI N I. - 3UILU/NR OUR I I URL 11OV41RING 4-1UR PAST A. BACKGROUND Project Title: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Contact Person: Phone: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Project Description: CITY OF TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, Conditional Use Permit 08-017 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780 Ryan Swiontek, Associate Planner (714) 573-3123 14611 Prospect Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 Tony Barkozia 17872 Theodora Drive Tustin, CA 92780 Low Density Residential Estate Residential (E-4) North: Residential (E-4) South: Residential (E-4) Noel Prendergast 2510 Bungalow Place Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 East: School (P&I) West: Residential (E-4) The proposed project involves the subdivision of an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. Existing at the subject property is a historic residence which will be maintained and involve the construction of a 4,255 square foot addition and a 1,468 garage/guest house. Construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling is proposed on the newly created parcel fronting Ivemess Way. Accessory and miscellaneous structures existing at the subject property are proposed to be demolished. Other public agencies whose approval is required: ® Orange County Fire Authority ❑ City of Santa Ana ❑ Orange County EMA District ❑ City of Irvine ❑ South Coast Air Quality Management ❑ Other ❑ Orange County Health Care Agency INITIAL STUDY B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: City of Tustin The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Land Use / Planning ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities / Service Systems ❑ Air Quality ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Hydrology/ Water Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ® 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wi� not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed t6 by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Preparer. Ryan Swiontek Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director 2 1 P a g e Title Associate Planner Date 07/29/2010 C. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A t "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less -than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3XD). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance INITIAL STUDY Issues: III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 6 1 P a g e City of Tustin Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY Issues: IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and i Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, I Natural Community Conservation Plan, j or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 7 1 P a g e City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Imp t Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 8 1 P a g e ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w i ❑ ❑ ❑ 9 1 P a g e INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ii. Strong seismic ground E shaking? Seismic -related ground F failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? E b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or El El soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as El defined in Table 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately F-1 supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, E either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or El regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 9 1 P a g e INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin 101 Page Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated VIII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the 0 El F-1 El public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the El ❑ 0 public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or ❑ � handle hazardous or acutely I hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an E airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project t area? 101 Page INITIAL STUDY Issues: g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Issues: IX HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 111Page Potentially Less Than Significant Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ Potentially Less Than Significant Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ City of Tustin Less Than No Significant Impact Impact ■ ►4 Less Than No Significant Impact Impact ■ ►i 121Page INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impa Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on -or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water El quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard E area structures that would impede or redirect flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or El mudflow? f 121Page Issues: X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? XI MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 131Page INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 07 ►141 Me ❑ ❑ 07 ►141 Me INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impaa Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated XII NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 141Page ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY Issues: XIII POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIV PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ii. Police protection? iii. Schools? iv. Parks? 151Page City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ED ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impaq Impact With Impact f Mitigation Incorporated V. Other public facilities? XV RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVI TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 161Page Fol L C' U CI 101 ■❑ U NO 01 0 -3 0 A 0 INITIAL STUDY Issues: C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? XVI I UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 171Page City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑12 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVIII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? 181Page ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ ONEENEW ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ONEENEW INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Does the project have impacts that E F-1 are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have EJ environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296; Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Govt. v. City of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656. 191Page ATTACHMENT A INITIAL STUDY 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE BARKOZIA AND PRENDERGAST RESIDENCES PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project applicants, Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast, are proposing to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. The project site is located at 14611 Prospect Avenue and is designated as Low Density Residential by the General Plan Land Use element and within the Estate Residential (E4) zoning district. The project will involve the following: Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, a request to subdivide an existing parcel to create two (2) new parcels. Parcel 2 will contain the property fronting Prospect Avenue which consists of an existing historic residence. Parcel 1 will contain the property fronting Iverness Way and involve the construction of a new single family residence. Design Review 08-011 for the demolition of accessory structures on-site and portions of a single family residence listed in the City's Historical Survey and rated "A' with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S. Construction of an addition to the existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 and construction of a new detached single family dwelling on proposed Parcel 1. Conditional Use Permit 08-017 has been submitted for a proposed guesthouse above a new detached garage on Parcel 2. Existing on the property is an "A' rated historical residence as designated in the City's Historical Resources Survey (Attachment A) with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003). The rating scale places the "A" rating as the highest rating and includes buildings which are historically significant or notable as well as potential candidates for the National Register of Historic Places. A status code of 3S notes that the structure is eligible for separate listing on the National Register; however, the subject property is not currently listed on the National Register. The residence is estimated to have been constructed in 1928 and is of the Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. It is described within the City's Historical Survey as "one of the finest of that style in the city." There appear to be various unpermitted additions to the main structure. In addition to the main structure, there is a detached garage of the same architecture that appears to have been converted without permits to guest quarters. The garage structure has been altered and deteriorated to an extent where it diverges from the original character of the main structure. Also existing on the site is a tennis court, swimming pool, accessory structure and a variety of specimen trees. The site itself maintains two street frontages with the main structure fronting onto Prospect Avenue and maintaining a rear street frontage along Iverness Way. The current proposal involves subdividing the existing 1.075 gross acres parcel. There is a street and sidewalk easement in effect along Prospect Avenue which results in a lower net acreage (0.938 net acres). As a potential condition of approval the applicant shall dedicate in fee the portion of the parcel within the ultimate right of way. The applicant is proposing to create two new parcels each of approximately 0.648 (Parcel 2) and 0.427 gross acres (Parcel 1) in size respectively fronting onto Prospect Avenue and Iverness Way. All existing accessory structures on the site are proposed to be demolished to accommodate a new residence and an addition to the existing historic residence. Portions of the historic residence are also proposed to be demolished consisting primarily of areas that appear to have been additions over time and that are not true to the original architecture of the residence. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 2 The proposed addition to the historic residence on Parcel 2 would be a 4,255 square foot two story addition with a 1,468 square foot detached combined garagelguesthouse. The addition would be situated to the south of the existing historic residence and connected via an approximately sixteen (16) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long two story architectural hyphen. This narrow connection (hyphen) essential divides the two structures (existing vs. new) visually and spatially while at the same time providing a literal connection of the two structures. The 1,468 square foot three car garage with second floor guest quarters is proposed to be situated near the rear of the property behind the proposed addition. The proposed new residence will be addressed at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1) and will involve the construction of a single story 5,008 square foot home with a 799 square foot garage in the craftsman architectural style. Both sites are proposing swimming pools. This Initial Study is prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project with respect to the following categories: I. AESTHETICS Items a. b. d -11 Impact". The proposed project would involve the construction of a new residence on proposed Parcel 1 and an addition to an existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 as well as the demolition of existing accessory structures. The project is located within a low density residential area and meets the applicable zoning requirements. There is not a scenic vista that would be affected and the project site is not located within a state scenic highway. The project proposes to remove the exterior lighting sources associated with the existing tennis court which could reduce sources of light and glare at the property. New sources of substantial light or glare would not be an issue as the project involves the construction of a new residence and an addition to an existing residence. Items c "Less than Significant Impact': The project site is located in an urbanized area consisting of low density residential housing. The majority of the homes, with the exception of the historic residence at the subject property, are of the California ranch house architectural tradition. The visual character of the site would be altered due to the demolition of existing structures and new construction, however, the property is located within the Estate Residential zoning district where larger homes with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet are typical. The project consists of the demolition of existing improvements including a tennis court and accessory buildings, the construction of a new single family residence, and a substantial addition to an existing historic residence. The proposed addition to the existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 would use materials and finishes which complement the architecture of the existing residence. Architectural features of the proposed addition are typical of the Spanish Colonial tradition and the existing historic residence. The massing of the addition is also similar to that of the existing residence and would be placed beside it and connected via what is essentially a hallway. The addition proposes to snatch the height of the existing two story residence and would project closer to Prospect Avenue creating depth and dimensionality for the building. The proposed detached three car garage with second floor guest quarters will be located behind the proposed addition making it more than 100 feet from the Prospect Avenue sidewalk and only minimally visible from the public right of way. Construction of the new residence on proposed Parcel 1 would front onto Iverness Way and replace the existing tennis court and single story accessory structure existing there currently. Iverness Way Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 3 is only one street block long which terminates into Amanganset Way to the north and Westbury Lane to the south. There are three homes which front onto Iverness Way located on the opposite side of the street of the project site. Apart from these three homes there are three other residences which have side yards along Iverness Way which front onto either Amaganset Way or Westbury Lane. All homes within the immediate vicinity of the project site are single story homes. The proposed residence on Parcel 1 will involve the construction of a new single story 5,008 square foot home with a 799 square foot garage. The proposed residence would be consistent with the single story nature of homes on the same street. The residence is designed in the craftsman tradition and adorned with cedar wood shingle siding. Exterior finishes and materials would primarily consist of wood, cultured stone, copper accent features and asphalt shingle roofing. The two proposed residences are each larger than the existing residence and would both be located on parcels in excess of 18,000 square feet. The proposed residences meet the development standards set forth for the Estate Residential zoning district. Aesthetically, the new residences would be replacing existing structures on-site. While there would be an additional residence built on the site, a less than significant impact is anticipated because each of the proposed residences would only be visible from its respective street frontage and the proposed lots would be oversized compared to others in the neighborhood. The proposed parcel configuration would appear more ordinary to the neighborhood than the existing parcel. The majority of homes within the neighborhood are single story in design and the new home proposed on Iverness Way (Parcel 1) would also maintain a single story. The existing historic home fronting Prospect is two storied and has been in existence long before any of the surrounding homes were built. The proposed two story design of the addition is complimentary to the architecture of the original historic residence. Currently the subject property is not very visible from the public right of way due to extensively overgrown and unmaintained landscaping. Setbacks of the proposed residential structures meet the development standards and are consistent with other properties in the neighborhood. As part of the project proposal the applicant is planning to trim and replace portions of the existing landscaping. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: The City's Design Review process and conditions of approval for the project will ensure that the structures do not pose an impact to aesthetics of the surrounding community. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) Update to Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) City of Tustin Residential Design Guidelines — Cultural Resource District II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Items a - e - "No Impact' The project site is currently developed with a single family residence in an urbanized area. The project site is within an established tract of low density residential development. There is no Williamson Act contract associated with the property and it is not zoned for agricultural, forest or timberland use. The proposed project will not convert farmland or forest land, conflict with existing zoning for agricultural or forest land use, or cause changes to the environment resulting in conversion Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 4 of farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non -forest use. The Orange County Board of Supervisors has determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Orange County, Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Orange County Important Farmland Map 2006 A Guide to The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, 2004 Edition httn://www.conservation ca og, v/dlrp/fmmp/Documents/fmmpt�tide 2004 pdf III. AIR QUALITY Items a- e - "No Imoact' : The proposed demolition and the construction of a new residence and an addition to an existing historic residence is below the threshold criteria for construction and operation impacts as defined in Tables 6-2 and 6-3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Handbook published in 1993 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). A continuation of residential use at the subject property will not produce or involve concentrated pollutants or odors. Grading and development activities would be required to comply with all local and SCAQMD rules and regulations concerning emissions. The proposed project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, and it will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Grading Manual CEQA Air Quality Handbook IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Items a- f— "No Impact". The project site is located within an urbanized area and currently developed for residential use. There would be no change in the use of the property as a result of the project. Mature trees exist on the site and are proposed to be removed, however, there is no tree preservation policy or ordinance with which removal of trees would conflict with. The City's General Plan Conservation/Open Space Element does not identify any important natural resources at the subject property. The project proposes to install new landscaping. The project is located on a site with no wetlands and is not in close proximity to any body of water. As such, the development would not affect Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 5 The project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or an adopted habitat conservation plan. No significant impacts to biological resources are anticipated Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Department of Fish and Game, NCCP http://www.dfg.ca.govPnabcon/nccp/index.html V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Item a- "Less Than Sipnihcant Impact": The project proposes to subdivide the existing property into two lots and construct a new single family residence and an addition to the existing historic residence. Existing on the property is an "A" rated historical residence as designated in the City's Historical Resources Survey (Attachment A) with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003). The property is eligible for separate listing on the National Register, however, the subject property is not currently listed on the National Register. The residence is estimated to have been constructed in 1928 and is of the Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. While not located within the City's designated Cultural Resources Overlay District, the property is recognized in the City's map of historic resources contained within the General Plan Conservation/Open Space element. The addition to the historic residence is sited directly to the south of the existing residence and the two structures will be connected via an approximately sixteen (16) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long two story architectural hyphen. The proposed two story addition and detached garage/guesthouse comprise 5,732 square feet. Existing additions to the original historic residence that are not in-line with the original architecture are proposed to be removed which would result in a square footage of 3,572 square feet for the existing portion of the historic residence. Through the use of Spanish Colonial architecture and design features, the addition proposes to integrate with the existing historic residence. The project proposes to comply with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties which provides guidelines for the appropriate preservation/restoration of a historic structure based on solid design principles. There are ten principles identified within the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The project architect has provided a response to these ten principles which identify the projects compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Thirtieth Street Architects firm has performed independent review of the proposed project for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. Thirtieth Street offers a wealth of professional experience with historic preservation. The project architect has taken into account and worked to incorporate the recommendations from Thirtieth Street Architects within the project design when allowable. The project is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use and Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Policies: Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 6 Land Use Policy 5.5: Encourage the restoration and rehabilitation of properties in Tustin eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places according to the rehabilitation guidelines and tax incentives of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Land Use Policy 6.2: Encourage and promote high quality design and physical appearance in all development projects. Land Use Policy 6.5: Preserve historically significant structures and sites, and encourage the conservation and rehabilitation of older buildings, sites, and neighborhoods that contribute to the City's historic character. Conservation Policy 12.1: Identify, designate, and protect facilities of historical significance, where feasible. Items b. c, and d "No Impact". The project is located within an urbanized area and currently developed with residential structures. The proposed project will cause no substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource or directly or indirectly destroy a unique palentological resource or geological feature or disturb human remains. Mitigation/Monitoring Required.- The City's Design Review process and conditions of approval for the project will ensure that the structures do not pose an impact to cultural resources. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) Update to Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) City of Tustin Residential Design Guidelines — Cultural Resource District Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation hilp://www W—s goy/higML/ pabs/s ndards guidelines htm VI, GEOLOGY AND SOILS Items a -e - "No Impact".• A review of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map and the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Map indicates that the project site is not located within a known earthquake fault zone and is not in an area of potential liquefaction or landslide hazard. Submittal of a soils report and compliance with current codes will ensure that the design and construction of the proposed project reduces any potential impacts related to fault ruptures, ground shaking, ground failure, liquefaction, or unstable soils to a level of insignificance. Since the proposed development is on a relatively flat site, only minor grading will be required. Compliance with the City's Grading Ordinance and Water Quality Ordinance will reduce any potential impacts related to soil erosion to a level of insignificance. A sewer system is available to the site for disposal of wastewater and the development will be required to connect to this system. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 7 Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code, Grading Manual Seismic Hazard Zone Map February 27, 2008 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Item a- `Less Than Significant Impact": Temporary increases in greenhouse gas emissions are likely to occur during construction which would be greater than those typically experienced in the existing neighborhood. Construction will involve the demolition of accessory structures and the development of a new single family residence and an addition to an existing residence. Emissions created from construction activities are not anticipated to have a significant impact on the environment due to the scope of work and the minimal construction time anticipated. New construction will be required to comply with the latest edition of applicable codes which include energy codes related to efficiency. Materials proposed for the residences will be modem and meet high efficiency standards to reduce potential greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed residences are likely to be much more efficient than existing homes in the neighborhood which were built in the 1960's. Renovation to the existing historic residence will use replacement materials that are of a higher efficiency than those existing when allowable and in context to the architecture of the historic structure. New construction is proposed to replace existing structures on-site, however, the new construction will be of a substantially greater square footage and larger footprint than those structures which are being replaced. The proposed development is in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and General Plan which allow for the proposed lower density residential development being proposed. Single family residential use is the least intensive use allowed in the Estate Residential (E4) zoning district. Item b - "No Impact' The proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The project is not requesting any deviation or variance from the existing standards within the City Code or General Plan applicable to the property. Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Grading Manual CEQA Air Quality Handbook Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 8 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Items a- h - "No Impact": The project site is located within an urbanized area characterized by residential development. The present use of the property is for residential purposes and is proposed to continue as such. Demolition of various residential use structures will occur, however, it is not anticipated that hazardous emissions would occur. Construction of the proposed project will not involve transport or use of any hazardous materials or emit hazardous emissions. According the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the project site is not listed as a hazardous material site. The project would not alter or interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The site is not located within an airport land use plan or a private airstrip or in areas with wild land fires. Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin General Plan John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan Department of Toxic Substances Control — Hazardous Materials Sites http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Items _a_ i - "No Impact": The proposed project site is located on a relatively flat site with existing residential structures. Minimal grading would occur in conjunction with the proposed project and no substantial alteration of the site drainage pattern would occur. Residential uses as proposed by the project are existing in the area and permitted uses within the zoning district. The proposed project is not a priority project, will not require a preliminary water quality management plan (WQMP), and is exempt from the WQMP requirement. The project will be required to comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The project site is designated as Zone X — Other Flood Areas on the most recent Flood Insurance Rate Map dated December 3, 2009 prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and is not located in a 100 -year flood hazard area,. This zone is defined as "areas of a .2 percent flood chance, areas of one percent annual chance of flood with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from a one percent annual change of flood." Compliance with the City's Grading Ordinance and the California Building Code would ensure that the project is designed with adequate drainage improvements, erosion control measures, and pollution control plans. The proposed residential use would not create significant impacts to stonmwater runoff or discharge pollutants due to post -construction activities. The project is not anticipated to degrade water quality. The project is located on an existing residential site serviced by Tustin Water Operations. The scale of the project does not have the potential to impact water supplies, nor deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge or lower the local ground water table level. The project would not redirect flood waters and the site is not within an area that would expose people to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 9 MitigationlMonitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Grading Manual Flood Insurance Rate Map dated December 3, 2009 Tustin Guidelines for Preliminary WQMPs TCC Section 4900 et al. — Water Quality Control X. LAND USE & PLANNING Items a - c - "No Impact" : The subject property is within the Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use designation and the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district. The proposed subdivision would bring the site more in context with other single family residences in the neighborhood in that the lot sizes would be more compatible with other lots located in the vicinity. The proposed project is in compliance with development standards and land use intensity of the City's Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. There would be no change to the existing residential use nor would there be any physical division of the existing community. The new residence and residential addition would be located on private property which has been previously used for residential purposes. There is no established habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan within the area of the project site. The project would not conflict with any applicable conservation plan. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Zoning Map XI. MINERAL RESOURCES Items a, b - "No Impact' According to the City of Tustin General Plan Conservation/Open Space/Recreations Element (Figure COSR-2) there are no known mineral resources within the City that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. The proposed development will not have impacts on energy conservation or mineral resources with respect to adopted energy conservation plans or loss of available known mineral resources. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Submitted Plans Tustin General Plan Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 10 XII. NOISE Items a. b, c, e. and f - " No Impact 1: The proposed single family residential project is not anticipated to expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of local standards of the General Plan or noise ordinance or expose persons to excessive groundbome vibration. Construction activities would be required to comply with the City's restrictions on allowable construction hours. The project adheres to the density thresholds as identified in the City's General Plan and meets the development standards as set forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance. The project proposes one additional single family detached residence to the existing neighborhood which is not anticipated to create any noise impacts to the existing neighborhood. The project is not located within two miles of an airport or a private airstrip. Item d `Less Than Significant Impact": Development of the site would result in short-term construction noise impacts that will be minimized through adherence to the City's construction hours. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan XIII. POPULATION & HOUSING Item a - c - "No Impact": The project site is designated for Low Density Residential use by the General Plan and complies with the density thresholds. In addition, the project is in compliance with the development standards contained with the City's Zoning Ordinance. The project site is located within a built -out residential neighborhood. No persons will be displaced and population growth will not be induced as a result of the project. Only one (1) new residential use will be created as a result of the project, therefore no impacts to population or housing are anticpated. MitigationlMonitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin General Plan Tustin City Code XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES Item a - "No Impact".• There will be no increase in the demand to public services as a result of the proposed project. All public services are existing and adequate to serve the additional single family residence that is being proposed as well as the addition to the existing residence. The project site is an infill site identified for residential purposes and located within an urbanized area. The development is required to pay School Impact fees as adopted by the Tustin Unified School District, and the project will be routed to all affected agencies for review and comment. All other new development fees applicable to the Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page l l project will also be required to be paid. The Orange County Fire Authority provides fire protection services to the City of Tustin and has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with their requirements. The City of Tustin Police Department has reviewed the project and has no concerns regarding their ability to service the project. The proposed new single family residence has been identified for low density residential use by the General Plan and Estate Residential (E4) zoning district. No impact to public services requiring new or physically altered facilities such as schools, lire protection, police services, City or regional parks, or other public facilities are anticipated as a result of the project. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan XV. RECREATION Item a &b "No Impact' The project proposes the construction of an addition to an existing residence and the construction of a new single family residence. Both of the proposed lots are in excess of 18,000 square feet and have substantial private recreational area. The project would only add one (1) additional residential use thus, there would be no impact to neighborhood and/or recreation facilities as a result of the project and no recreation facilities are planned or required for the project. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan XVI. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION Item a — f "No Impact" - No impacts to traffic are anticipated as the project proposes a new single family residence and an addition to an existing single family residence located within a built -out low density residential neighborhood. The project meets the zoning and development standards of the Estate Residential (E- 4) zoning district. Proposed construction within the public right-of-way will involve the widening of an existing drive apron along Iverness Way and the relocation of an existing drive apron along Prospect Avenue to accommodate the project. The City of Tustin Public Works Department is also requiring replacement of portions of the existing sidewalk along Iverness Way and Prospect Avenue. Iverness Way is only a single block in length between Amaganset Way and Westbury Lane with three existing homes fronting onto the street. There are no known parking impacts at this location and the proposed lot would have approximately 150 linear feet of frontage providing ample on -street parking. In addition, the proposed new residence with a 3 car garage and driveway on Parcel 2 would create additional off-street parking not currently existing at the project site. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue i Page 12 3 Y� 1 Relocation of the existing driveway and apron along Prospect Avenue will enhance the functionality of the project site. The existing drive apron is located at the property's northernmost point along Prospect Avenue just south of the crosswalk to Columbus Tustin School and will be eliminated. The City of Tustin Public Works Department will be installing a traffic signal (CIP No. 400077) in this immediate location at the intersection of Amaganset Way and Beneta Way along Prospect Avenue. The new driveway and apron is proposed on the southernmost part of the property along Prospect Avenue which will be appropriate and efficient for the project site and street system. The proposed addition to the historic residence at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) will also involve the construction of a 3 car garage along with a motorcourt. The proposed single family residential project is not expected to have an effect on the existing circulation system and does not conflict with an applicable congestion plan. No change in air traffic patterns will occur as a result of the project. Emergency responders such as police and fire services have reviewed the proposed project for compliance with their criteria. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan I XVII. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS Items a — r - "No Impact". Water and sewer services and other utilities are available to the site since the project is within an urbanized area and has been previously developed The City of Tustin Water Department has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with their standards. The proposed new single family residence would replace existing structures on site and would not create a substantial draw on existing utilities. The project is not a priority project and will not require the preparation and implementation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Construction of new wastewater and/or stone drain facilities to service the project are not anticipated. Compliance with utility or service provider and City requirements identified during project review will ensure that no impacts occur. CR&R Waste Services provides solid waste collection and disposal services to the City of Tustin. The project would be required to comply with local, state, and federal requirements for integrated waste management (i.e. recycling) and solid waste disposal. The project is anticipated to have no impact on landfill capacity. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Guidelines for Preliminary WQMPs Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 13 XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Item a - "Less Than Significant Impact": The proposed project will involve the alteration of a designated cultural resource through the addition to an existing historic residence. Potential impacts are anticipated to be less than significant through the careful design and siting of the proposed addition. The project would adhere to the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties which would also reduce any potential impacts to an insignificant level. The project proposes to renovate the existing historic residence and would not eliminate an important example of California history. Aesthetically the proposed addition is in context with the existing historical structure. The newly created parcels would accommodate low density residential uses which are prevalent in the neighborhood. The proposed new residence and addition to the existing historic residence would be substantially larger than existing homes in the neighborhood, however, the proposed lot sizes are approximately twice the size of those in the area. Therefore, the massing of the proposed structures related to lot size would be appropriate and does meet the development standards contained within the City Code and General Plan. Items b & c - "No Impact". The project involves a new single family residential structure and an addition to an existing historic residence. The property is designate for low density residential uses and zoned as Estate Residential (134) The proposed development is in compliance with the applicable development standard. There are no cumulative impacts anticipated and the project is not expected to have any adverse effects on human beings. Mitigation/MonitoringRequired. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) Update to Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) City of Tustin Residential Design Guidelines - Cultural Resource District Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation h"://www.0s.p-oWWstonftgbs/standards guidefineshtm RESOLUTION NO. 4154 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL LOCATED AT 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE INTO TWO (2) NEW PARCELS WHICH WOULD EACH ACCOMMODATE A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 was filed by Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast requesting authorization to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. B. That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential and the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district; C. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density and type of development; D. That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems; E. That the parcel map or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat; and, F. As conditioned, the map would be in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Tustin City Code Section 9323 (Subdivision Code); G. That the Public Works Department has reviewed the map and determined that it is technically correct; H. That a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was published and the Negative Declaration and Initial Study were made available for a 20 -day public review and comment period from July 29, 2010, to August 18, 2010, in compliance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the State CEQA Guidelines; Resolution No. 4154 Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 Page 2 I. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said map on August 24, 2010, by the Planning Commission; J. That prior to taking action on the proposed project, the Planning Commission considered the Initial Study and the Negative Declaration and recommended that the City Council find it adequate for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August, 2010. J4 -AT 1-W,,s" F?!h PSONf -- . Tem JX-,--EVFZkBETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4154 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24th day of August, 2010. 4LBE�TH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 4154 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed Project shall substantially conform with the submitted improvement plans on file, and the Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, dated August 24, 2010, on file with the Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes. (1) 1.2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 is contingent upon the applicant returning to the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk -Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval' form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 As a condition of approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, the applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third -party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.4 Within twenty-four (24) months from tentative map approval, the subdivider shall record with appropriate agencies a final map prepared in accordance with subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and applicable conditions contained herein unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 9323 of the Tustin Municipal Code. Time extensions may be considered if a written request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODEIS (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW **' EXCEPTION Exhibit A Resolution No. 4154 TPM 2008-138 Page 2 (1) 1.5 The subdivider shall conform to all applicable requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and the City's zoning regulations. PUBLIC WORKS_ DEPARTMENT (1) 2.1 In addition to the normal full size plan submittal, all final development plans including, but not limited to: tract maps, parcel maps, right-of-way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format. The standard file format is AutoCAD Release 2007 having the extension DWG. However, drawings created in AutoCAD Release 2004 are compatible and acceptable. Likewise, layering and linetype conventions are AutoCAD - based (latest version available upon request from the Engineering Division). In order to interchangeably utilize the data contained in the infrastructure mapping system, CADD drawings shall be in AutoCAD "DWG" format (i.e., produced using AutoCAD or AutoCAD compatible CADD software). The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time the plans are approved and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be submitted once all construction has been completed. The subdivision bonds will not be released until the "as built" CADD files have been submitted. (1) 2.2 Preparation and recordation of a final subdivision map shall be required. (1) 2.3 The applicant shall dedicate in fee title, at no cost to the City of Tustin the street rights-of-way along the Prospect Avenue property frontage. (1) 2.4 Prior to approval of the final parcel map, the applicant shall provide a non- interference letter from the Utility Company for the on-site power poles. (1) 2.5 Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant is required to execute a subdivision and monumentation agreement and furnish improvement and monumentation bonds. (1) 2.6 Prior to any submittals, the applicant shall submit an 8 Y2 X 11" address exhibit to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The address exhibit shall be in portable document format (PDF) and shall include the site plan, foot print of building(s), and streets. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4154 TPM 2008-138 Page 3 s ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (5) 3.1 Prior to recordation of Final Parcel Map 2008-138, the applicant shall obtain all necessary approvals from the Orange County Fire Authority. FEES (1) 4.1 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above -noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. RESOLUTION NO. 4155 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW 08-011 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AND GUEST HOUSE TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HISTORIC RESIDENCE ON PROPOSED PARCEL 2 OF TPM 2008-138 (14611 PROSPECT AVENUE); AND CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON PARCEL 1 OF TPM 2008-138. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 was filed by Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast requesting authorization to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. Existing at the subject property is a historic residence which will be maintained and involve the construction of a 4,255 square foot addition and a detached 1,008 square foot garage and 460 square foot guest house at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2). Construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling is proposed on the newly created parcel at 14702 Ivemess Way (Parcel 1); B. That the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning designation and Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation allow for the proposed residential project. In addition, the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub -element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub - element; C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for the project on August 24, 2010, by the Planning Commission. D. The location, size, architectural features, and general appearance of the proposal will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Planning Commission has considered at least the following items: 1. Height, bulk, and area of proposed structure. 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Exterior material and colors. 4. Type and pitch of roofs. 5. Size and spacing of windows, doors, and other openings. Resolution No. 4155 Page 2 6. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, antennas. 7. Landscaping and parking area design and traffic circulation. 8. Location, height and standards of exterior illumination. 9. Physical relationship of proposed structure to existing structures. 10. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. 11. Development guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. E. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the guest house on proposed Parcel 2 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and that the location, size, architectural features, and general appearance of the proposed project will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, the occupancy thereof, or the community as a whole in that: 1. Tustin City Code Section 9222b2 allows for accessory buildings to be used as guest rooms, provided no cooking facility is installed or maintained, subject to approval of a conditional use permit. 2. The guest house would be located at the rear of the property behind the proposed addition making it more than 100 feet from the Prospect Avenue sidewalk and only minimally visible from the public right of way. 3. The guest house would be accessory to the main residence. 4. A deed restriction would be recorded to the property to ensure that the guest house on Parcel 2 would not become a second unit or rented out and no compensation in any form shall be received in conjunction with the use F. The location, size and general appearance of the proposed project as conditioned is compatible with the surrounding area in that the new residence at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1) would be a single story residence as are the majority of the residences in the neighborhood. The addition to the historic residence at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) would be a two story addition which would match the existing two story residence. G. As conditioned, the proposed addition to the historic residence on Parcel 2 would comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. Resolution No. 4155 Page 3 H. That prior to taking action on the proposed project, the Planning Commission considered the Initial Study and the Negative Declaration and recommended that the City Council find it adequate for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 authorizing the construction a 4,255 square foot addition and a detached 1,008 square foot garage and 460 square foot guesthouse at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) and construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling on the newly created parcel at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1), subject to the conditions contained within Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 24th day of August, 2010. w Chair . Tern �EL BETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Elizabeth A. Binsack, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4155 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24th day of August, 2010. ELI BETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 4155 DESIGN REVIEW 08-011 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date stamped August 24, 2010, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Community Development Director in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other applicable regulations. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become null and void unless permits for the proposed project are issued and substantial construction is underway within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may be considered if a written request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.4 Approval of Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is contingent upon the applicant and property owner signing and returning to the Community Development Department a notarized' Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signingand recording with the County Clerk -Recorder a revised, notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval' form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development Department. (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (7) PC/CC POLICY *** EXCEPTIONS SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (2) CEQA MITIGATION (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (7) PC/CC POLICY *** EXCEPTIONS Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 2 (1) 1.5 The applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.6 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the issuance of an Administrative Citation pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 1162(a). (1) 1.7 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary code enforcement action, including attorney fees, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance. PLANNING DIVISION (1) 2.1 The guest house located on Parcel 2 (14611 Prospect Ave) shall not be rented out and no compensation in any form shall be received in conjunction with the use. A deed restriction to this effect shall be recorded with the property prior to issuance of a building permit. (1) 2.2 All new utilities serving the site shall be located underground (***) 2.3 Prior to grading or building permit issuance and/or the removal of any landscaping the applicant shall submit a landscape/hardscape improvement plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department. Prior to the removal of any mature on-site California native oak trees, the applicant shall make reasonable efforts to save on-site and/or relocate said oak trees subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department. Additional landscaping shall be provided along the northern and southern property lines to buffer the structures, in particular the proposed guest house on Parcel 2, from the adjacent single family residences. The proposed pool at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) shall be of a design and detail compatible with the existing historic residence. The project shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (TCC Section 9700). Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 3 (***) 2.4 Prior to building permit issuance, site features and artifacts shall be catalogued/inventoried by the architect and reused or relocated on site when possible. (**") 2.5 The proposed addition shall be differentiated from the existing residence and be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale, and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment in accordance with Standard 9 of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. The applicant shall adjust the design of the addition to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director to comply with this standard. BUILDING DIVISION (1) 3.1 At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the California Building Code (CBC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California Plumbing Codes (CPC), California Electrical Code (CEC), Title 24 Energy Regulations, City Ordinances, and State and Federal laws and regulations. (1) 3.2 A note shall be provided on the final plans that a six (6) foot high chain link fence shall be installed around the site prior to building construction stages. A nylon fabric or mesh shall be attached to the temporary construction fencing. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the perimeter of the site for construction vehicles. (1) 3.3 Pursuant to the City of Tustin's Security Ordinance and the Uniform Fire Code, street numbers shall be displayed in a prominent location on the street side of the residence. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be of contrasting color to the background to which they are attached and illuminated during hours of darkness. (1) 3.4 The applicant shall comply with all City policies regarding short-term construction emissions, including periodic watering of the site and prohibiting grading during second stage smog alerts and when wind velocities exceed 15 miles per hour. (***) 3.5 Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit the applicant shall provide a construction phasing and staging plan subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (1) 4.1 This development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the City of Tustin Water Quality Ordinance and all Federal, State, and Regional Water Quality Control Board rules and regulations. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 4 (1) 4.2 Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all work related to this development shall be required. (1) 4.3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a final grading plan, prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Architect, shall be submitted and approved. The plan shall be consistent with the approved site and landscaping plans. (1) 4.4 A grading bond will be required to assure work is completed in accordance with approved plans prior to permit issuance. The engineer's estimated cost of grading, drainage, and erosion control shall be submitted to the City for approval. (1) 4.5 Adequate horizontal and vertical intersection sight lines shall be provided at intersections with public streets. In general, a 25' x 25' limited use area triangle provides adequate sight at typical driveways. Additional sight evaluation, however, could be required to satisfy City of Tustin Standard Drawings and Design Standards for Public Works Construction No. 510 for all affected streets. The sight lines should be shown on the grading plan and landscape plan. All landscaping within the limited use area must comply with City of Tustin Standard Drawings and Design Standards for Public Works Construction No. 510. (1) 4.6 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the Federal Clean Water Act and shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the Santa Ana Regional Board for review. The SWPPP shall be available at the project site for review. (1) 4.7 Prior to any submittals, the applicant shall submit an 8 Y2" X 11" address exhibit to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The address exhibit shall be in portable document format (PDF) and shall include the site plan, foot print of building(s), and streets. (1) 4.8 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall complete street improvements on Prospect Avenue and Iverness Way along the project frontage consisting of: Relocation of existing sewer cleanout on Prospect Avenue to private property. ii. Removal of the existing driveway on Prospect Avenue, and replacement with curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and construction of the new driveway on Prospect Avenue shall conform to the City of Tustin Public Works standards and current federal Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 5 iii. Design and reconstruction of existing sidewalk along the whole project frontage along Prospect Avenue to the City of Tustin Public Works Standards and the current federal Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements. The sidewalk appears to have been damaged by existing private trees and has an excessive crossfall along the frontage. iv. Design and reconstruction of approximately 15 linear feet of existing concrete curb and gutter, and approximately 136 square feet of existing sidewalk along Iverness Way. This portion of sidewalk, curb and gutter appears to have been damaged by existing private trees. (1) 4.9 An encroachment permit shall be required for work within the public right- of-way. Prior to issuance of an encroachment permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department 24" x 36" street improvement plans, as prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The plans shall clearly show existing and proposed surface and underground improvements, including construction and/or replacement of any missing or damaged public improvements adjacent to this development. Plans must follow the latest City of Tustin Water Standards and the American Water Works Association (AWWA) guidelines. In case of a conflict, the City of Tustin Water Standards shall prevail. (1) 4.10 Current federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements shall be met at all driveways and sidewalk adjacent to the site. (1) 4.11 Any damage done to existing public street improvements and/or utilities shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (1) 4.12 In accordance with the plans, a backflow prevention device may be required to protect the public water system from cross connections. If a building sprinkler system is required by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA), the applicant shall be required to provide a backflow prevention device at his or her expense to prevent cross contamination with the public water system. (1) 4.13 Any easements for construction and maintenance of public water facilities within private property shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recordation with the Orange County Clerk - Recorder. The applicant shall submit a legal description and sketch of the area to the Public Works Department for review and approval, as prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer or California Licensed Land Surveyor. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 6 (1) 4.14 The applicant is responsible for all costs related to the installation, upgrade, alteration, relocation or abandonment of all existing City of Tustin public water facilities affected by the proposed project. (1) 4.15 The project is within the East Orange County Water District (EOCWD) service area, a release/approval from EOCWD shall be obtained prior to receiving water service from the City of Tustin. The applicant shall submit a water permit application to EOCWD, and is responsible for all application, connection and other EOCWD fees. (1) 4.16 The adequacy of a proposed water system plan for a proposed development project, including the number, size and distribution of fire hydrants, must be reviewed by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). Plans meeting OCFA fire protection requirements must be stamped and approved by that agency. (1) 4.17 The proposed domestic water system plans must conform to all applicable regulations enforced by the Orange County Health Department. (1) 4.18 The applicant/contractor is required to submit a Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling and Reduction Plan (WRRP) to the Public Works Department. The WRRP must indicate how the applicant will comply with the City's requirement (City Code Section 4351, et al) to recycle at least 50% of the project waste material. The applicant will be required to submit a $50.00 application fee and a cash security deposit. Based on the review of the submitted Waste Management Plan, the cash security deposit will be determined by the Public Works Department in an amount not to exceed 5% of the project's valuation. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall submit the required security deposit in the form of cash, cashier's check, personal check, or money order made payable to the "City of Tustin". (1) 4.19 In addition to the normal full-size map and plan submittal, all final maps and plans including, but not limited to, tract maps, parcel maps, right-of- way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The standard file format is AutoCAD Release 2007, or latest version, having the extension "DWG". All layering and linetype conventions are AutoCAD - based. (Latest version available upon request from the Public Works Department). The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 7 plans are approved, and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be submitted once all construction has been completed. No project bonds will be released until acceptable "as built" CADD files have been submitted to the City (1) 4.20 Prior to issuance of a building permit(s), payment of the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees to the City of Tustin (through the Public Works Department) shall be required. (1) 4.21 Prior to issuance of any building permit(s), the applicant shall provide written approval from the Orange County Sanitation District. (1) 4.22 Parcel 1 (14702 Iverness Way) will require the installation of a new sewer lateral. OCSD maps indicate that there is a sewer available on Iverness for the property to connect to. The connection shall be constructed to OCSD standards and applicable connection as well as inspection fees will also need to be collected prior to the issuance of a permit. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA) (5) 5.1 The applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire Chief for all fire protection access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of the structure. The applicant may contact the OCFA at (714) 573-6100 or visit the OCFA website to obtain a copy of the "Guidelines for Emergency Access." (5) 5.2 The applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow. The "Orange County Fire Authority Water Availability for Fire Protection" form shall be signed by the applicable water district and submitted to the Fire Chief for approval. (5) 5.3 The applicant shall submit plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system in all proposed structures to the Fire Chief for review and approval. Please contact the OCFA at (714) 573-6100 to request a copy of the "Orange County Fire Authority Notes for New NFPA 13 Commercial Sprinkler Systems." Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, this system shall be operational in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. FEES (1) 6.1 Prior to issuance of any permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to, the following: Exhibit A Resolution No. 4155 Page 8 • Building Plan Check and Permit Fees • Grading Plan Check and Permit Fees • New Development Fees • School Fees • Orange County Fire Authority Fees • Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees (1) 6.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of final approval of the project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above -noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. ATTACHMENT F RESOLUTION NOS. 10-879 10-885 10-89 RESOLUTION NO. 10-87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138, DESIGN REVIEW 08-011, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL LOCATED AT 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE INTO TWO (2) NEW PARCELS WHICH WOULD EACH ACCOMMODATE A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. I. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 was filed by Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast requesting authorization to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. Existing at the subject property is a historic residence which will be maintained and involve the construction of a 4,255 square foot addition and a detached 1,008 square foot garage and 460 square foot guest house at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2). Construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling is proposed on the newly created parcel at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1); B. That Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is considered a "project" by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) (Pub. Resources Code §21000 et. seq.); C. That an Initial Study has been prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the project which concluded there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, and a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared; D. That a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was published and the Negative Declaration and Initial Study were made available for a 20 -day public review and comment period from July 29, 2010, to August 18, 2010, in compliance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the State CEQA Guidelines; E. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, held for TPM 2008-138, DR 08-011, and CUP 08-017 on August 24, 2010, by the Planning Commission. At said meeting the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4153, recommending that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017; Resolution No. 10-87 Page 2 II. The City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit A for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 21St day of September, 2010. JERRY AMANTE MAYOR PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 10-87 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 21St day of September, 2010 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 10-87 TUSTI N 3V ILL34MU UV R 1 U I URL I WWORING OUR PAST A. BACKGROUND Project Title: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Contact Person: Phone: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Project Description: CITY OF TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, Conditional Use Permit 08-017 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780 Ryan Swiontek, Associate Planner (714) 573-3123 14611 Prospect Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 Tony Barkozia 17872 Theodora Drive Tustin, CA 92780 Low Density Residential Estate Residential (E-4) North: Residential (E-4) South: Residential (E-4) Noel Prendergast 2510 Bungalow Place Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 East: School (P&I) West: Residential (E-4) The proposed project involves the subdivision of an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. Existing at the subject property is a historic residence which will be maintained and involve the construction of a 4,255 square foot addition and a 1,468 garage/guest house. Construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling is proposed on the newly created parcel fronting Ivemess Way. Accessory and miscellaneous structures existing at the subject property are proposed to be demolished. Other public agencies whose approval is required: ® Orange County Fire Authority ❑ City of Santa Ana ❑ Orange County EMA District ❑ City of Irvine ❑ South Coast Air Quality Management ❑ Other 0 Orange County Health Care Agency INITIAL STUDY B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: City of Tustin The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least ` one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Land Use / Planning ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION: ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities / Service Systems ❑ Air Quality ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Hydrology / Water Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: ® I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Preparers Ryan Swiontek Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director 2 1 P a g e Title Associate Planner Date 07/29/2010 C. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -speck factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less -than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. 'Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3XD). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance INITIAL STUDY Issues: Ili. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 6 1 P a g e City of Tustin Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ED 12 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 12 INITIAL STUDY Issues: IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 7 1 P a g e City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Issues: V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 8 1 P a g e INITIAL STUDY Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ El 0 City of Tustin Less Than Significant Impact No Imq t F r ® ❑ El 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ U F07 L'' n 0 013 INITIAL STUDY Issues: ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 9 1 P a g e City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin 101 Page Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impac! Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated VIII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the El El public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the El 1:1 El public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or []El handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is 11 El included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 101 Page INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Issues: IX HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? III Page Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ EJ E 1:1 ED INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin 121 Page Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impar Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on -or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood El [] E hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flows? i) Expose people or structures to a E] El El significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, orEl ET 11 ® I mudflow? I 121 Page INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established El F-1 El community? b) Conflict with any applicable land El EJ El use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat El El I conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? XI MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a El known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, speck plan or other land use plan? 131Page INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impaa Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated XII NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 141Page ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated XIII POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIV PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: I. Fire protection? ii. Police protection? iii. Schools? iv. Parks? 151Page ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY Issues: V. Other public facilities? XV RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVI TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 161Page Potentially Significant Impact U u C Fm— 0 F07 10 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 To ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 City of Tustin Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Impar With Impact i Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ Fm— 0 F07 10 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 To ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 INITIAL STUDY Issues: C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? XVI I UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 171 Page City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impar Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVIII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ISIPage ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ED _� ■ INITIAL STUDY City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have E environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296; Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Govt. v. City of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002)102 Cal.App.4th 656. 191 Page ATTACHMENT A INITIAL STUDY 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE BARKOZIA AND PRENDERGAST RESIDENCES PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project applicants, Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast, are proposing to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. The project site is located at 14611 Prospect Avenue and is designated as Low Density Residential by the General Plan Land Use element and within the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district. The project will involve the following: Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, a request to subdivide an existing parcel to create two (2) new parcels. Parcel 2 will contain the property fronting Prospect Avenue which consists of an existing historic residence. Parcel 1 will contain the property fronting Ivecness Way and involve the construction of a new single family residence. Design Review 08-011 for the demolition of accessory structures on-site and portions of a single family residence listed in the City's Historical Survey and rated "A" with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S. Construction of an addition to the existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 and construction of a new detached single family dwelling on proposed Parcel 1. Conditional Use Permit 08-017 has been submitted for a proposed guesthouse above a new detached garage on Parcel 2. Existing on the property is an "A' rated historical residence as designated in the City's Historical Resources Survey (Attachment A) with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003). The rating scale places the "A" rating as the highest rating and includes buildings which are historically significant or notable as well as potential candidates for the National Register of Historic Places. A status code of 3S notes that the structure is eligible for separate listing on the National Register•, however, the subject property is not currently listed on the National Register. The residence is estimated to have been constructed in 1928 and is of the Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. It is described within the City's Historical Survey as "one of the finest of that style in the city." There appear to be various unpermitted additions to the main structure. In addition to the main structure, there is a detached garage of the same architecture that appears to have been converted without permits to guest quarters. The garage structure has been altered and deteriorated to an extent where it diverges from the original character of the main structure. Also existing on the site is a tennis court, swimming pool, accessory structure and a variety of specimen trees. The site itself maintains two street frontages with the main structure fronting onto Prospect Avenue and maintaining a rear street frontage along Iverness Way. The current proposal involves subdividing the existing 1.075 gross acres parcel. There is a street and sidewalk easement in effect along Prospect Avenue which results in a lower net acreage (0.938 net acres). As a potential condition of approval the applicant shall dedicate in fee the portion of the parcel within the ultimate right of way. The applicant is proposing to create two new parcels each of approximately 0.648 (Parcel 2) and 0.427 gross acres (Parcel 1) in size respectively fronting onto Prospect Avenue and Iverness Way. All existing accessory structures on the site are proposed to be demolished to accommodate a new residence and an addition to the existing historic residence. Portions of the historic residence are also proposed to be demolished consisting primarily of areas that appear to have been additions over time and that are not true to the original architecture of the residence. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 2 The proposed addition to the historic residence on Parcel would be a 4,255 square foot two story addition with a 1,468 square foot detached combined garage)guesthouse. The addition would be situated to the south of the existing historic residence and connected via an approximately sixteen (16) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long two story architectural hyphen. This narrow connection (hyphen) essential divides the two structures (existing vs. new) visually and spatially while at the same time providing a literal connection of the two structures. The 1,468 square foot three car garage with second floor guest quarters is proposed to be situated near the rear of the property behind the proposed addition. The proposed new residence will be addressed at 14702 Ivemess Way (Parcel 1) and will involve the construction of a single story 5,008 square foot home with a 799 square foot garage in the craftsman architectural style. Both sites are proposing swimming pools. This Initial Study is prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project with respect to the following categories: I. AESTHETICS Items a. b. d - "No Impact". The proposed project would involve the construction of a new residence on proposed Parcel 1 and an addition to an existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 as well as the demolition of existing accessory structures. The project is located within a low density residential area and meets the applicable zoning requirements. There is not a scenic vista that would be affected and the project site is not located within a state scenic highway. The project proposes to remove the exterior lighting sources associated with the existing tennis court which could reduce sources of light and glare at the property. New sources of substantial light or glare would not be an issue as the project involves the construction of a new residence and an addition to an existing residence. Items c "Less than Sirnificant Impact". The project site is located in an urbanized area consisting of low density residential housing. The majority of the homes, with the exception of the historic residence at the subject property, are of the California ranch house architectural tradition. The visual character of the site would be altered due to the demolition of existing structures and new construction, however, the property is located within the Estate Residential zoning district where larger homes with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet are typical. The project consists of the demolition of existing improvements including a tennis court and accessory buildings, the construction of a new single family residence, and a substantial addition to an existing historic residence. The proposed addition to the existing historic residence on proposed Parcel 2 would use materials and finishes which complement the architecture of the existing residence. Architectural features of the proposed addition are typical of the Spanish Colonial tradition and the existing historic residence. The massing of the addition is also similar to that of the existing residence and would be placed beside it and connected via what is essentially a hallway. The addition proposes to match the height of the existing two story residence and would project closer to Prospect Avenue creating depth and dimensionality for the building. The proposed detached three car garage with second floor guest quarters will be located behind the proposed addition making it more than 100 feet from the Prospect Avenue sidewalk and only minimally visible from the public right of way. Construction of the new residence on proposed Parcel 1 would front onto Ivemcss Way and replace the existing tennis court and single story accessory structure existing there currently. Iverness Way Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 3 is only one street block long which terminates into Amanganset Way to the north and Westbury Lane to the south. There are three homes which front onto Ivemess Way located on the opposite side of the street of the project site. Apart from these three homes there are three other residences which have side yards along Iverness Way which front onto either Amaganset Way or Westbury Lane. All homes within the immediate vicinity of the project site are single story homes. The proposed residence on Parcel 1 will involve the construction of a new single story 5,008 square foot home with a 799 square foot garage. The proposed residence would be consistent with the single story nature of homes on the same street. The residence is designed in the craftsman tradition and adorned with cedar wood shingle siding. Exterior finishes and materials would primarily consist of wood, cultured stone, copper accent features and asphalt shingle roofing. The two proposed residences are each larger than the existing residence and would both be located on parcels in excess of 18,000 square feet. The proposed residences meet the development standards set forth for the Estate Residential zoning district. Aesthetically, the new residences would be replacing existing structures on-site. While there would be an additional residence built on the site, a less than significant impact is anticipated because each of the proposed residences would only be visible from its respective street frontage and the proposed lots would be oversized compared to others in the neighborhood. The proposed parcel configuration would appear more ordinary to the neighborhood than the existing parcel. The majority of homes within the neighborhood are single story in design and the new home proposed on Iverness Way (Parcel 1) would also maintain a single story. The existing historic home fronting Prospect is two storied and has been in existence long before any of the surrounding homes were built. The proposed two story design of the addition is complimentary to the architecture of the original historic residence. Currently the subject property is not very visible from the public right of way due to extensively overgrown and unmaintamed landscaping. Setbacks of the proposed residential structures meet the development standards and are consistent with other properties in the neighborhood. As part of the project proposal the applicant is planning to trim and replace portions of the existing landscaping. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: The City's Design Review process and conditions of approval for the project will ensure that the structures do not pose an impact to aesthetics of the surrounding community. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) Update to Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) City of Tustin Residential Design Guidelines — Cultural Resource District II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Items a - e - "No Impact' The project site is currently developed with a single family residence in an urbanized area. The project site is within an established tract of low density residential development. There is no Williamson Act contract associated with the property and it is not zoned for agricultural, forest or timberland use. The proposed project will not convert farmland or forest land, conflict with existing zoning for agricultural or forest land use, or cause changes to the environment resulting in conversion Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 4 of farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non -forest use. The Orange County Board of Supervisors has determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Orange County. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Orange County Important Farmland Map 2006 A Guide to The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, 2004 Edition htip://www.conservation.ca. og v/dhp/fmmp/Documents/fmmp guide 2004 pdf III. AIR QUALITY Items a- e - "No Impact ": The proposed demolition and the construction of a new residence and an addition to an existing historic residence is below the threshold criteria for construction and operation impacts as defined in Tables 6-2 and 6-3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Handbook published in 1993 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). A continuation of residential use at the subject property will not produce or involve concentrated pollutants or odors. Grading and development activities would be required to comply with all local and SCAQMD rules and regulations concerning emissions. The proposed project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, and it will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Grading Manual CEQA Air Quality Handbook IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Items a- f— "No Impact": The project site is located within an urbanized area and currently developed for residential use. There would be no change in the use of the property as a result of the project. Mature trees exist on the site and are proposed to be removed, however, there is no tree preservation policy or ordinance with which removal of trees would conflict with. The City's General Plan Conservation/Open Space Element does not identify any important natural resources at the subject property. The project proposes to install new landscaping. The project is located on a site with no wetlands and is not in close proximity to any body of water. As such, the development would not affect Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 5 The project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or an adopted habitat conservation plan. No significant impacts to biological resources are anticipated. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Department of Fish and Game, NCCP http://www.dfiz.ca.govPnabcon/nccp/index.html V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Item a- "Less Than SirniRcant Impact": The project proposes to subdivide the existing property into two lots and construct a new single family residence and an addition to the existing historic residence. Existing on the property is an "A" rated historical residence as designated in the City's Historical Resources Survey (Attachment A) with a National Register Historic Preservation (NRNP) Status Code: 3S per the Update to the Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003). The property is eligible for separate listing on the National Register, however, the subject property is not currently listed on the National Register. The residence is estimated to have been constructed in 1928 and is of the Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. While not located within the City's designated Cultural Resources Overlay District, the property is recognized in the City's map of historic resources contained within the General Plan Conservation/Open Space element. The addition to the historic residence is sited directly to the south of the existing residence and the two structures will be connected via an approximately sixteen (16) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long two story architectural hyphen. The proposed two story addition and detached garage/guesthouse comprise 5,732 square feet. Existing additions to the original historic residence that are not in-line with the original architecture are proposed to be removed which would result in a square footage of 3,572 square feet for the existing portion of the historic residence. Through the use of Spanish Colonial architecture and design features, the addition proposes to integrate with the existing historic residence. The project proposes to comply with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties which provides guidelines for the appropriate preservation/restoration of a historic structure based on solid design principles. There are ten principles identified within the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The project architect has provided a response to these ten principles which identify the projects compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Thirtieth Street Architects firm has performed independent review of the proposed project for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. Thirtieth Street offers a wealth of professional experience with historic preservation. The project architect has taken into account and worked to incorporate the recommendations from Thirtieth Street Architects within the project design when allowable. The project is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use and Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Policies: Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 6 Land Use Policy 5.5: Encourage the restoration and rehabilitation of properties in Tustin eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places according to the rehabilitation guidelines and tax incentives of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Land Use Policy 6.2: Encourage and promote high quality design and physical appearance in all development projects. Land Use Policy 6.5: Preserve historically significant structures and sites, and encourage the conservation and rehabilitation of older buildings, sites, and neighborhoods that contribute to the City's historic character. Conservation Policy 12.1: Identify, designate, and protect facilities of historical significance, where feasible. Items b, c. and d "No Impact". The project is located within an urbanized area and currently developed with residential structures. The proposed project will cause no substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource or directly or indirectly destroy a unique palentological resource or geological feature or disturb human remains. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: The City's Design Review process and conditions of approval for the project will ensure that the structures do not pose an impact to cultural resources. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) Update to Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) City of Tustin Residential Design Guidelines — Cultural Resource District Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation bilp://www.nps.vov/WstouLtpabs/standards guidelines htm VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Items a -e - "No Impact".• A review of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map and the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Map indicates that the project site is not located within a known earthquake fault zone and is not in an area of potential liquefaction or landslide hazard. Submittal of a soils report and compliance with current codes will ensure that the design and construction of the proposed project reduces any potential impacts related to fault ruptures, ground shaking, ground failure, liquefaction, or unstable soils to a level of insignificance. Since the proposed development is on a relatively flat site, only minor grading will be required. Compliance with the City's Grading Ordinance and Water Quality Ordinance will reduce any potential impacts related to soil erosion to a level of insignificance. A sewer system is available to the site for disposal of wastewater and the development will be required to connect to this system. MitigatioWMonitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 7 Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code, Grading Manual Seismic Hazard Zone Map February 27, 2008 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Item a- "Less Than Significant Im adt": Temporary increases in greenhouse gas emissions are likely to occur during construction which would be greater than those typically experienced in the existing neighborhood. Construction will involve the demolition of accessory structures and the development of a new single family residence and an addition to an existing residence. Emissions created from construction activities are not anticipated to have a significant impact on the environment due to the scope of work and the minimal construction time anticipated. New construction will be required to comply with the latest edition of applicable codes which include energy codes related to efficiency. Materials proposed for the residences will be modem and meet high efficiency standards to reduce potential greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed residences are likely to be much more efficient than existing homes in the neighborhood which were built in the 1960's. Renovation to the existing historic residence will use replacement materials that are of a higher efficiency than those existing when allowable and in context to the architecture of the historic structure. New construction is proposed to replace existing structures on-site, however, the new construction will be of a substantially greater square footage and larger footprint than those structures which are being replaced. The proposed development is in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and General Plan which allow for the proposed lower density residential development being proposed Single family residential use is the least intensive use allowed in the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district. Item b - "No Impact": The proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The project is not requesting any deviation or variance from the existing standards within the City Code or General Plan applicable to the property. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Grading Manual CEQA Air Quality Handbook Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 8 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Items a- h - "No Impact": The project site is located within an urbanized area characterized by residential development. The present use of the property is for residential purposes and is proposed to continue as such. Demolition of various residential use structures will occur, however, it is not anticipated that hazardous emissions would occur. Construction of the proposed project will not involve transport or use of any hazardous materials or emit hazardous emissions. According the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the project site is not listed as a hazardous material site. The project would not alter or interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The site is not located within an airport land use plan or a private airstrip or in areas with wild land fires. Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin General Plan John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan Department of Toxic Substances Control — Hazardous Materials Sites httl2://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Items a_ -i - "No Impact": The proposed project site is located on a relatively flat site with existing residential structures. Minimal grading would occur in conjunction with the proposed project and no substantial alteration of the site drainage pattern would occur. Residential uses as proposed by the project are existing in the area and permitted uses within the zoning district. The proposed project is not a priority project, will not require a preliminary water quality management plan (WQMP), and is exempt from the WQMP requirement. The project will be required to comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The project site is designated as Zone X — Other Flood Areas on the most recent Flood Insurance Rate Map dated December 3, 2009 prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and is not located in a 100 -year flood hazard area,. This zone is defined as "areas of a .2 percent flood chance, areas of one percent annual chance of flood with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from a one percent annual change of flood." Compliance with the City's Grading Ordinance and the California Building Code would ensure that the project is designed with adequate drainage improvements, erosion control measures, and pollution control plans. The proposed residential use would not create significant impacts to stormwater runoff or discharge pollutants due to post -construction activities. The project is not anticipated to degrade water quality. The project is located on an existing residential site serviced by Tustin Water Operations. The scale of the project does not have the potential to impact water supplies, nor deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge or lower the local ground water table level. The project would not redirect flood waters and the site is not within an area that would expose people to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 9 Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Grading Manual Flood Insurance Rate Map dated December 3, 2009 Tustin Guidelines for Preliminary WQMPs TCC Section 4900 et al. — Water Quality Control X. LAND USE & PLANNING Items a - c - "No Impact" : The subject property is within the Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use designation and the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district. The proposed subdivision would bring the site more in context with other single family residences in the neighborhood in that the lot sizes would be more compatible with other lots located in the vicinity. The proposed project is in compliance with development standards and land use intensity of the City's Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. There would be no change to the existing residential use nor would there be any physical division of the existing community. The new residence and residential addition would be located on private property which has been previously used for residential purposes. There is no established habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan within the area of the project site. The project would not conflict with any applicable conservation plan. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Zoning Map XI. MINERAL. RESOURCES Items a, b - "No Impact' According to the City of Tustin General Plan Conservation/Open Space/Recreations Element (Figure COSR-2) there are no known mineral resources within the City that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. The proposed development will not have impacts on energy conservation or mineral resources with respect to adopted energy conservation plans or loss of available known mineral resources. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Submitted Plans Tustin General Plan Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 10 XII. NOISE Items a, b, c, e, and f— "No Impact": The proposed single family residential project is not anticipated to expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of local standards of the General Plan or noise ordinance or expose persons to excessive groundbome vibration. Construction activities would be required to comply with the City's restrictions on allowable construction hours. The project adheres to the density thresholds as identified in the City's General Plan and meets the development standards as set forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance. The project proposes one additional single family detached residence to the existing neighborhood which is not anticipated to create any noise impacts to the existing neighborhood. The project is not located within two miles of an airport or a private airstrip. Item d `Less Than Significant Impact": Development of the site would result in short-term construction noise impacts that will be minimized through adherence to the City's construction hours. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan XIII. POPULATION & HOUSING Item a - c - "No Impact "• The project site is designated for Low Density Residential use by the General Plan and complies with the density thresholds. In addition, the project is in compliance with the development standards contained with the City's Zoning Ordinance. The project site is located within a built -out residential neighborhood No persons will be displaced and population growth will not be induced as a result of the project. Only one (1) new residential use will be created as a result of the project, therefore no impacts to population or housing are anticpated. Mitigation/Monitming Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin General Plan Tustin City Code XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES Item a - "No Impact".• There will be no increase in the demand to public services as a result of the proposed project. All public services are existing and adequate to serve the additional single family residence that is being proposed as well as the addition to the existing residence. The project site is an infill site identified for residential purposes and located within an urbanized area. The development is required to pay School Impact fees as adopted by the Tustin Unified School District, and the project will be routed to all affected agencies for review and comment. All other new development fees applicable to the Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page I1 project will also be required to be paid. The Orange County Fire Authority provides fire protection services to the City of Tustin and has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with their requirements. The City of Tustin Police Department has reviewed the project and has no concerns regarding their ability to service the project. The proposed new single family residence has been identified for low density residential use by the General Plan and Estate Residential (E4) zoning district. No impact to public services requiring new or physically altered facilities such as schools, fire protection, police services, City or regional parks, or other public facilities are anticipated as a result of the project. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan XV. RECREATION Item a &b "No Impact' The project proposes the construction of an addition to an existing residence and the construction of a new single family residence. Both of the proposed lots are in excess of 18,000 square feet and have substantial private recreational area. The project would only add one (1) additional residential use thus, there would be no impact to neighborhood and/or recreation facilities as a result of the project and no recreation facilities are planned or required for the project. Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan XVI. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION Item a — f "No Impact"• No impacts to traffic are anticipated as the project proposes a new single family residence and an addition to an existing single family residence located within a built -out low density residential neighborhood. The project meets the zoning and development standards of the Estate Residential (E- 4) zoning district. Proposed construction within the public right-of-way will involve the widening of an existing drive apron along Iverness Way and the relocation of an existing drive apron along Prospect Avenue to accommodate the project. The City of Tustin Public Works Department is also requiring replacement of portions of the existing sidewalk along Iverness Way and Prospect Avenue. Ivemess Way is only a single block in length between Amaganset Way and Westbury Lane with three existing homes fronting onto the street. There are no known parking impacts at this location and the proposed lot would have approximately 150 linear feet of frontage providing ample on -street parking. In addition, the proposed new residence with a 3 car garage and driveway on Parcel 2 would create additional off-street parking not currently existing at the project site. Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 12 Relocation of the existing driveway and apron along Prospect Avenue will enhance the functionality of the project site. The existing drive apron is located at the property's northernmost point along Prospect Avenue just south of the crosswalk to Columbus Tustin School and will be eliminated. The City of Tustin Public Works Department will be installing a traffic signal (CIP No. 400077) in this immediate location at the intersection of Amaganset Way and Beneta Way along Prospect Avenue. The new driveway and apron is proposed on the southernmost part of the property along Prospect Avenue which will be appropriate and efficient for the project site and street system. The proposed addition to the historic residence at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) will also involve the construction of a 3 car garage along with a motorcourt. The proposed single family residential project is not expected to have an effect on the existing circulation system and does not conflict with an applicable congestion plan. No change in air traffic patterns will occur as a result of the project. Emergency responders such as police and fire services have reviewed the proposed project for compliance with their criteria. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan XVII. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS Items a — P - "No Impact". Water and sewer services and other utilities are available to the site since the project is within an urbanized area and has been previously developed. The City of Tustin Water Department has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with their standards. The proposed new single family residence would replace existing structures on site and would not create a substantial draw on existing utilities. The project is not a priority project and will not require the preparation and implementation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Construction of new wastewater and/or storm drain facilities to service the project are not anticipated Compliance with utility or service provider and City requirements identified during project review will ensure that no impacts occur. CR&R Waste Services provides solid waste collection and disposal services to the City of Tustin. The project would be required to comply with local, state, and federal requirements for integrated waste management (i.e. recycling) and solid waste disposal. The project is anticipated to have no impact on landfill capacity. Mitigation/Monitoring Required. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Tustin Guidelines for Preliminary WQMPs Attachment A Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14611 Prospect Avenue Page 13 XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Item a - "Less Than Significant Impact": The proposed project will involve the alteration of a designated cultural resource through the addition to an existing historic residence. Potential impacts are anticipated to be less than significant through the careful design and siting of the proposed addition. The project would adhere to the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties which would also reduce any potential impacts to an insignificant level. The project proposes to renovate the existing historic residence and would not eliminate an important example of California history. Aesthetically the proposed addition is in context with the existing historical structure. The newly created parcels would accommodate low density residential uses which are prevalent in the , neighborhood. The proposed new residence and addition to the existing historic residence would be substantially larger than existing homes in the neighborhood, however, the proposed lot sizes are approximately twice the size of those in the area. Therefore, the massing of the proposed structures related to lot size would be appropriate and does meet the development standards contained within the City Code and General Plan. Items b & c - "No Impact": The project involves a new single family residential structure and an addition to an existing historic residence. The property is designate for low density residential uses and zoned as Estate Residential (E-4) The proposed development is in compliance with the applicable development standard. There are no cumulative impacts anticipated and the project is not expected to have any adverse effects on human beings. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) Update to Tustin Historical Resources Survey (2003) City of Tustin Residential Design Guidelines — Cultural Resource District Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation bU://www.Ms.izov/histonfts/Ws/standards guidelineshtm RESOLUTION NO. 10-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL LOCATED AT 14611 PROSPECT AVENUE INTO TWO (2) NEW PARCELS WHICH WOULD EACH ACCOMMODATE A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 was filed by Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast requesting authorization to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. B. That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential and the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning district; C. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density and type of development; D. That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems; E. That the parcel map or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat; and, F. As conditioned, the map would be in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Tustin City Code Section 9323 (Subdivision Code); G. That the Public Works Department has reviewed the map and determined that it is technically correct; H. That Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act. I. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for TPM 2008-138, DR 08-011, and CUP 08-017 on August 24, 2010, by the Planning Commission. At said meeting the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. 4153, 4154, and 4155, recommending that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017, and approve Resolution No. 10-88 Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 Page 2 Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017; J. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said map on September 21, 2010, by the City Council; K. That prior to taking action on this project, the Tustin City Council adopted Resolution No. 10-87 finding that the Negative Declaration is adequate for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017. II. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 21St day of September, 2010. JERRY AMANTE MAYOR PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 10-88 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 21St day of September, 2010 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 10-88 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2008-138 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed Project shall substantially conform with the submitted improvement plans on file, and the Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, dated September 21, 2010, on file with the Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes. (1) 1.2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138 is contingent upon the applicant returning to the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk -Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval' form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 As a condition of approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, the applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third -party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.4 Within twenty-four (24) months from tentative map approval, the subdivider shall record with appropriate agencies a final map prepared in accordance with subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and applicable conditions contained herein unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 9323 of the Tustin Municipal Code. Time extensions may be considered if a written request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODES (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW *** EXCEPTION Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-88 TPM 2008-138 Page 2 (1) 1.5 The subdivider shall conform to all applicable requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and the City's zoning regulations. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (1) 2.1 In addition to the normal full size plan submittal, all final development plans including, but not limited to: tract maps, parcel maps, right-of-way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format. The standard file format is AutoCAD Release 2007 having the extension DWG. However, drawings created in AutoCAD Release 2004 are compatible and acceptable. Likewise, layering and linetype conventions are AutoCAD - based (latest version available upon request from the Engineering Division). In order to interchangeably utilize the data contained in the infrastructure mapping system, CADD drawings shall be in AutoCAD "DWG" format (i.e., produced using AutoCAD or AutoCAD compatible CADD software). The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time the plans are approved and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be submitted once all construction has been completed. The subdivision bonds will not be released until the "as built" CADD files have been submitted. (1) 2.2 Preparation and recordation of a final subdivision map shall be required. (1) 2.3 The applicant shall dedicate in fee title, at no cost to the City of Tustin the street rights-of-way along the Prospect Avenue property frontage. (1) 2.4 Prior to approval of the final parcel map, the applicant shall provide a non- interference letter from the Utility Company for the on-site power poles. (1) 2.5 Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant is required to execute a subdivision and monumentation agreement and furnish improvement and monumentation bonds. (1) 2.6 Prior to any submittals, the applicant shall submit an 8 '/2" X 11" address exhibit to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The address exhibit shall be in portable document format (PDF) and shall include the site plan, foot print of building(s), and streets. Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-88 TPM 2008-138 Page 3 ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (5) 3.1 Prior to recordation of Final Parcel Map 2008-138, the applicant shall obtain all necessary approvals from the Orange County Fire Authority. FEES (1) 4.1 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above -noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. RESOLUTION NO. 10-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 08-011 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AND GUEST HOUSE TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HISTORIC RESIDENCE ON PROPOSED PARCEL 2 OF TPM 2008-138 (14611 PROSPECT AVENUE); AND CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON PARCEL 1 (14702 IVERNESS WAY) OF TPM 2008-138. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 2008-138, Design Review (DR) 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 08-017 was filed by Tony Barkozia and Noel Prendergast requesting authorization to subdivide an existing 1.075 gross acres parcel located at 14611 Prospect Avenue into two (2) parcels to accommodate a single family dwelling on each parcel. Existing at the subject property is a historic residence which will be maintained and involve the construction of a 4,255 square foot addition and a detached 1,008 square foot garage and 460 square foot guest house at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2). Construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling is proposed on the newly created parcel at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1); B. That the Estate Residential (E-4) zoning designation and Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation allow for the proposed residential project. In addition, the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub -element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub - element; C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for TPM 2008-138, DR 08-011, and CUP 08-017 on August 24, 2010, by the Planning Commission. At said meeting the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4153, 4154, and 4155 recommending that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017, and approve Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017; D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said project on September 21, 2010, by the City Council; E. That Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act. That prior to taking action on the project, the Tustin City Council adopted Resolution No. 10-87 finding that the Negative Declaration is adequate for Tentative Parcel Map 2008-138, Design Review 08-011, and Conditional Use Permit 08-017. City Council Resolution No. 10-89 Page 2 F. The location, size, architectural features, and general appearance of the proposal will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the City Council has considered at least the following items: 1. Height, bulk, and area of proposed structure. 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Exterior material and colors. 4. Type and pitch of roofs. 5. Size and spacing of windows, doors, and other openings. 6. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, antennas. 7. Landscaping and parking area design and traffic circulation. 8. Location, height and standards of exterior illumination. 9. Physical relationship of proposed structure to existing structures. 10. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. 11. Development guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. G. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the guest house on proposed Parcel 2 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and that the location, size, architectural features, and general appearance of the proposed project will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, the occupancy thereof, or the community as a whole in that: 1. Tustin City Code Section 9222b2 allows for accessory buildings to be used as guest rooms, provided no cooking facility is installed or maintained, subject to approval of a conditional use permit. 2. The guest house would be located at the rear of the property behind the proposed addition making it more than 100 feet from the Prospect Avenue sidewalk and only minimally visible from the public right of way. 3. The guest house would be accessory to the main residence. 4. A deed restriction would be recorded to the property to ensure that the guest house on Parcel 2 would not become a second unit or rented out and no compensation in any form shall be received in conjunction with the use City Council Resolution No. 10-89 Page 3 H. The location, size and general appearance of the proposed project as conditioned is compatible with the surrounding area in that the new residence at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1) would be a single story residence as are the majority of the residences in the neighborhood. The addition to the historic residence at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) would be a two story addition which would match the existing two story residence. I. As conditioned, the proposed addition to the historic residence on Parcel 2 would comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. II. The City Council hereby approves Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 authorizing the construction a 4,255 square foot addition and a detached 1,008 square foot garage and 460 square foot guesthouse at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) and construction of a new 5,807 square foot single family dwelling on the newly created parcel at 14702 Iverness Way (Parcel 1), subject to the conditions contained within Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 21St day of September, 2010. JERRY AMANTE MAYOR PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 10-89 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 21St day of September, 2010 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 10-89 DESIGN REVIEW 08-011 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08-017 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date stamped September 21, 2010, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Community Development Director in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other applicable regulations. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become null and void unless permits for the proposed project are issued and substantial construction is underway within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may be considered if a written request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.4 Approval of Design Review 08-011 and Conditional Use Permit 08-017 is contingent upon the applicant and property owner signing and returning to the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk -Recorder a revised, notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval' form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development Department. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW EXCEPTIONS Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 2 (1) 1.5 The applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.6 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the issuance of an Administrative Citation pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 1162(a). (1) 1.7 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary code enforcement action, including attorney fees, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance. PLANNING DIVISION (1) 2.1 The guest house located on Parcel 2 (14611 Prospect Ave) shall not be rented out and no compensation in any form shall be received in conjunction with the use. A deed restriction to this effect shall be recorded with the property prior to issuance of a building permit. (1) 2.2 All new utilities serving the site shall be located underground. (***) 2.3 Prior to grading or building permit issuance and/or the removal of any landscaping the applicant shall submit a landscape/hardscape improvement plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department. Prior to the removal of any mature on-site California native oak trees, the applicant shall make reasonable efforts to save on-site and/or relocate said oak trees subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department. Additional landscaping shall be provided along the northern and southern property lines to buffer the structures, in particular the proposed guest house on Parcel 2, from the adjacent single family residences. The proposed pool at 14611 Prospect Avenue (Parcel 2) shall be of a design and detail compatible with the existing historic residence. The project shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (TCC Section 9700). Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 3 (***) 2.4 Prior to building permit issuance, site features and artifacts shall be catalogued/inventoried by the architect and reused or relocated on site when possible. (***) 2.5 The proposed addition shall be differentiated from the existing residence and be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale, and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment in accordance with Standard 9 of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties. The applicant shall adjust the design of the addition to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director to comply with this standard. BUILDING DIVISION (1) 3.1 At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the California Building Code (CBC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California Plumbing Codes (CPC), California Electrical Code (CEC), Title 24 Energy Regulations, City Ordinances, and State and Federal laws and regulations. (1) 3.2 A note shall be provided on the final plans that a six (6) foot high chain link fence shall be installed around the site prior to building construction stages. A nylon fabric or mesh shall be attached to the temporary construction fencing. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the perimeter of the site for construction vehicles. (1) 3.3 Pursuant to the City of Tustin's Security Ordinance and the Uniform Fire Code, street numbers shall be displayed in a prominent location on the street side of the residence. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be of contrasting color to the background to which they are attached and illuminated during hours of darkness. (1) 3.4 The applicant shall comply with all City policies regarding short-term construction emissions, including periodic watering of the site and prohibiting grading during second stage smog alerts and when wind velocities exceed 15 miles per hour. (***) 3.5 Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit the applicant shall provide a construction phasing and staging plan subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (1) 4.1 This development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the City of Tustin Water Quality Ordinance and all Federal, State, and Regional Water Quality Control Board rules and regulations. Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 4 (1) 4.2 Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all work related to this development shall be required. (1) 4.3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a final grading plan, prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Architect, shall be submitted and approved. The plan shall be consistent with the approved site and landscaping plans. (1) 4.4 A grading bond will be required to assure work is completed in accordance with approved plans prior to permit issuance. The engineer's estimated cost of grading, drainage, and erosion control shall be submitted to the City for approval. (1) 4.5 Adequate horizontal and vertical intersection sight lines shall be provided at intersections with public streets. In general, a 25' x 25' limited use area triangle provides adequate sight at typical driveways. Additional sight evaluation, however, could be required to satisfy City of Tustin Standard Drawings and Design Standards for Public Works Construction No. 510 for all affected streets. The sight lines should be shown on the grading plan and landscape plan. All landscaping within the limited use area must comply with City of Tustin Standard Drawings and Design Standards for Public Works Construction No. 510. (1) 4.6 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the Federal Clean Water Act and shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the Santa Ana Regional Board for review. The SWPPP shall be available at the project site for review. (1) 4.7 Prior to any submittals, the applicant shall submit an 8 Y2" X 11" address exhibit to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The address exhibit shall be in portable document format (PDF) and shall include the site plan, foot print of building(s), and streets. (1) 4.8 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall complete street improvements on Prospect Avenue and Iverness Way along the project frontage consisting of: Relocation of existing sewer cleanout on Prospect Avenue to private property. Removal of the existing driveway on Prospect Avenue, and replacement with curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and construction of the new driveway on Prospect Avenue shall conform to the City of Tustin Public Works standards and current federal Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 5 iii. Design and reconstruction of existing sidewalk along the whole project frontage along Prospect Avenue to the City of Tustin Public Works Standards and the current federal Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements. The sidewalk appears to have been damaged by existing private trees and has an excessive crossfall along the frontage. iv. Design and reconstruction of approximately 15 linear feet of existing concrete curb and gutter, and approximately 136 square feet of existing sidewalk along Iverness Way. This portion of sidewalk, curb and gutter appears to have been damaged by existing private trees. (1) 4.9 An encroachment permit shall be required for work within the public right- of-way. Prior to issuance of an encroachment permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department 24" x 36" street improvement plans, as prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The plans shall clearly show existing and proposed surface and underground improvements, including construction and/or replacement of any missing or damaged public improvements adjacent to this development. Plans must follow the latest City of Tustin Water Standards and the American Water Works Association (AWWA) guidelines. In case of a conflict, the City of Tustin Water Standards shall prevail. (1) 4.10 Current federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements shall be met at all driveways and sidewalk adjacent to the site. (1) 4.11 Any damage done to existing public street improvements and/or utilities shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (1) 4.12 In accordance with the plans, a backflow prevention device may be required to protect the public water system from cross connections. If a building sprinkler system is required by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA), the applicant shall be required to provide a backflow prevention device at his or her expense to prevent cross contamination with the public water system. (1) 4.13 Any easements for construction and maintenance of public water facilities within private property shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recordation with the Orange County Clerk - Recorder. The applicant shall submit a legal description and sketch of the area to the Public Works Department for review and approval, as prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer or California Licensed Land Surveyor. Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 6 (1) 4.14 The applicant is responsible for all costs related to the installation, upgrade, alteration, relocation or abandonment of all existing City of Tustin public water facilities affected by the proposed project. (1) 4.15 The project is within the East Orange County Water District (EOCWD) service area, a release/approval from EOCWD shall be obtained prior to receiving water service from the City of Tustin. The applicant shall submit a water permit application to EOCWD, and is responsible for all application, connection and other EOCWD fees. (1) 4.16 The adequacy of a proposed water system plan for a proposed development project, including the number, size and distribution of fire hydrants, must be reviewed by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). Plans meeting OCFA fire protection requirements must be stamped and approved by that agency. (1) 4.17 The proposed domestic water system plans must conform to all applicable regulations enforced by the Orange County Health Department. (1) 4.18 The applicant/contractor is required to submit a Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling and Reduction Plan (WRRP) to the Public Works Department. The WRRP must indicate how the applicant will comply with the City's requirement (City Code Section 4351, et al) to recycle at least 50% of the project waste material. The applicant will be required to submit a $50.00 application fee and a cash security deposit. Based on the review of the submitted Waste Management Plan, the cash security deposit will be determined by the Public Works Department in an amount not to exceed 5% of the project's valuation. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall submit the required security deposit in the form of cash, cashier's check, personal check, or money order made payable to the "City of Tustin". (1) 4.19 In addition to the normal full-size map and plan submittal, all final maps and plans including, but not limited to, tract maps, parcel maps, right-of- way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The standard file format is AutoCAD Release 2007, or latest version, having the extension "DWG". All layering and linetype conventions are AutoCAD - based. (Latest version available upon request from the Public Works Department). The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 7 plans are approved, and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be submitted once all construction has been completed. No project bonds will be released until acceptable "as built" CADD files have been submitted to the City (1) 4.20 Prior to issuance of a building permit(s), payment of the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees to the City of Tustin (through the Public Works Department) shall be required. (1) 4.21 Prior to issuance of any building permit(s), the applicant shall provide written approval from the Orange County Sanitation District. (1) 4.22 Parcel 1 (14702 Iverness Way) will require the installation of a new sewer lateral. OCSD maps indicate that there is a sewer available on Iverness for the property to connect to. The connection shall be constructed to OCSD standards and applicable connection as well as inspection fees will also need to be collected prior to the issuance of a permit. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA) (5) 5.1 The applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire Chief for all fire protection access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of the structure. The applicant may contact the OCFA at (714) 573-6100 or visit the OCFA website to obtain a copy of the "Guidelines for Emergency Access." (5) 5.2 The applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow. The "Orange County Fire Authority Water Availability for Fire Protection" form shall be signed by the applicable water district and submitted to the Fire Chief for approval. (5) 5.3 The applicant shall submit plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system in all proposed structures to the Fire Chief for review and approval. Please contact the OCFA at (714) 573-6100 to request a copy of the "Orange County Fire Authority Notes for New NFPA 13 Commercial Sprinkler Systems." Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, this system shall be operational in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. FEES (1) 6.1 Prior to issuance of any permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to, the following: Exhibit A Resolution No. 10-89 Page 8 • Building Plan Check and Permit Fees • Grading Plan Check and Permit Fees • New Development Fees • School Fees • Orange County Fire Authority Fees • Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees (1) 6.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of final approval of the project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above -noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.