Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 09-25-72 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 25, 1972 The regular meeting of the City of Tustin Planning Commission was held on the 25th day of September, 1972, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., of said day in the Council Chambers, 275 South "C" Street, Tustin, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Sharp. The Invocation was given by Commissioner Larnard ROLL CALL: Present: Absent: Others Present: Curtis, Dukleth, Edelstein, Larnard, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney R. Kenneth Fleagle, Assistant City Administrator- Co~Lm~unity Development Director Pat Brown, Assistant Planning Director Mary Ann Chamberlain, Planning Commission Recording Sec. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1972 PUBLIC HEARING 1. Specific Plan - Bicycle Trails and Ways Mr. Brown summarized the Bicycle Plan and explained that the first phase would be the adoption of a specific plan, Exhibit I, which was enclosed in the report. The second phase would be to develop design criteria for the two types of systems, bicycle trails and ways. The third phase would involve the establishment of prior- ities and the fourth phase would be the procurement of the necessary funds. Chairman Curtis opened the public portion of the hearing at 7:45. Mrs. H. D. Marlett, 1972 Irvine Boulevard, commented that "no parking" signs were put up in front of her residence when the bike ways were constructed and added that she thought the street is wide enough for parking and bicycles. Frank Golledge of 1892 Irvine Boulevard, said that about ten residents in the middle of the block had to park their cars in an alley and walk around the block to reach their homes. After some discussion with the County the signs were removed. Commissioner Larnard advised the residents that were present from the Orange County Unincorporated area that they should contact the County Road Department in regards to complaints about their Bike Trails. Public portion of the hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. Mr. Fleagle stated that there has been an effort to coordinate the city plan with the county bike and trail way and offered the following alternatives. 1 - You can select streets that have rear and side property lines so as not to deny street parking and access to the front of the property. I'C '.nukes 9/25/72 Page 2 2 - You can create a lane adjacent to the curb as a bicycling lane and designate certain hours for bi~y~li~ and o~hcr hour~ £or parking. 3 - Widen the street and put in a parkway with a bicycle lane. Commissioner Larnard stated that he thought the Commission needed more information and made a motion to continue the public hearing on the Bicycle Plan until the October 24 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sharp. There was some discussion on bike lanes and Mr. Brown reported that bike ways can be as narrow as four feet'but it would be more desirable to have them twice that size, and the lanes clearly identified. Bicycle trails are by far the most preferred method of development; however, they can be extremely costly. Bicycle ways are the most economical system, however, their big drawback is from the safety angle, since the cyclist is riding in the street right-of-way. Commissioner Sharp pointed out that another danger of bicycle ways is that often the front bicycle wheel lodges itself in storm drains which throws the cyclist from his vehicle. Therefore, consideration should be given to the design of storm drain grates. MOTION CARRIED: 5-0 OLD BUSINESS 1. Procedural Rules for the Conduct of Hearings. Mr. Fleagle reported that the procedural rules, as revised, make no distinction for those speaking for or against a proposal. Add- itional instructions are provided for the purpose of expedi public hearings. Planning Commission Procedures for Public Hearings Chairman shall announce the subject of the public hear- ing as advertised. If a request is made for continuancy, a motion may be made and voted upon to continue the public hearing to a definite time and date. e The Staff shall be asked to present the substance of the application and staff reports and to answer technical questions of the Commission and members. e Individuals wishing to speak on the subject of the hearing shall be recognized by the Chairman. Persons desiring to give testimony to the Commission are requested to state their name and address for the record. If there are numerous people in the audience who would like to participate on the issue, and it is known that all represent the same opinion, it is advised that a spokes- man be selected to speak for the entire group. Your spokesman will thus have the opportunity of speaking for a reasonable length of time, and of presenting a complete case. If this arrangement cannot be made, it may be necessary for the Chairman to restrict each speaker to a limited time in order that all may be heard. Individuals speaking for groups may have those people stand or by show of hands indicate that he is their spokesman. It is the desire of the Commission to obtain the comments of all interested or affected individuals and organizations, and consideration will be given to all comments or suggestions made. Irrele- vant and off-the-subject comments will be ruled out of order. -2- PC Minutes 9/25/72 Page 3 Se The Chairman shall, upon his motion or the motion of any member, announce the close of the public portion of the hearing. The Commission shall then deliberate and either deter- mine the matter or continue the public hearing to another date and time certain. Commissioner Larnard moved to adopt the procedural rules as pre- sented and have Staff publish them. Seconded by Commissioner Sharp. MOTION CARRIED: 5-0 2. Placentia Development Standards Mr. Fleagle reported that the Planning Commission had forwarded copies of the standards to the Development Preview Commission and requested them to make recommendations. After several discussion sessions, the Development Preview Commission on September 13, 1972, unanimously directed that the following comments be forwarded to the Planning Commission: In the absence of a Development Preview Commission, development standards adopted by Council Ordinance and enforced by Staff would be essential. Standards become the minimum, whereas policy guidelines suggest direction toward maximum desirability with opportunities to gain the optimum. Standards treat all properties the same whereas there are differences between developments of raw land and redevelopment, whereby maximum feasible amenities be- come the objective. Developers are now advised of the desired amenities for landscaping and site development prior to filing plans with the Development Preview Commission. The Commission has had a considerable degree of success in securing quality improvements as opposed to quantity of inappropriate designs. It was the recommendation of the Development Preview Commission that landscaping and site development objectives be a matter of flexible policy rather than of rigid minimum standards as contained in an ordinance. Chairman Curtis stated that he thought the Commission should take another look at the Development Standards before making any kind of decision on this matter. Commissioner Sharp concurred with this thought and stated that he felt that developers are not informed early enough in the process what our minimum standards are. Chairman Curtis also suggested that there should be greater coordina- tion between the Building Official and the Community Development Department. Commissioner Sharp requested that the Staff analyze the best possible method of coordination between the Building Official and the Com- munity Development Department. It was also requested that other cities be canvassed to explore their methods of cooperation between the Building Department and Community Development. Mr. Fleagle commented that his department is in the process of pre- p~ ~ d~velopm~u guide lor developers siml±ar to tn· ~ervice Station Policy Guide. -3- PC ~'*linutes 9/25/72 Page 4 Chairman Curtis moved to continue this matter until the Developers MOTION CARRIED: 5-0 NEW BUSINESS 1. Zoning Administrator Mr. Fleagle introduced the report that will be presented to the Cit~ Council on their October 2, 1972 agenda. It is suggested that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council, by Resolution 1290, the adoption of an ordinance creating the office of Zoning Administrator and defining the duties of the office. Commissioner Sharp commented that a few years ago they had dis- cussed this matter and forwarded it to the Council. ~. Fleagle pointed out that at that particular time it was determined that the Planning Commission's load was down enough to have them handle problems of this nature. If approved, the Zoning Administrator would have juri. sdiction to hear and decide in accordance with council policy matters that in- clude applications for variances from the terms of the zoning regulations, applications for variances from the terms of the Sign Ordinance and matters relating to the conforming and non- conforming use of properties and the structures thereon. The Planning Commission would have the power to affirm, modify or reverse the findings and decision of the Zoning Administrator on appeal. Com~oner Sharp moved to adopt Resolution 1290, seconded by Commissioner Larnard. MOTION CARRIED: 5-0 2. Subdivision Processing Mr. Fleagle advised the Commission that the City Council on September 18, 1972, introduced Ordinance 551, which amends the procedure for processing Subdivision Maps. Upon adoption of Ordinance 551, the Planning Commission will have the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council on Tentative Subdivision Maps and the final authority for approval will rest with the City Council. Pending Items 1. UP-72-393 - Clyde Stockdale - to permit the temporary use of two mobile home classrooms for a one year period for Tustin's Kiddie Kollege. Location: 14851 Yorba 2. UP-72-394 - Assistance League of Tustin - to permit the retail sale of used goods in the C-2, Central Commercial District. Location: 160 E. 2nd Street 3. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance - Day Care Homes- Children 4. UP-72-395 - First Western Bank and Trust Company - to permit the development of a church and allied classrooms. (First Christian Church) Location: Southwest corner of Irvine Blvd. & Red Hill Ave. -4- PC '.nutes 9/25/72 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE 1. Letter and response - A1 Enderle Mr. Fleagle called the Commission's attention to the letter from Mr. Enderle and the response pertinent to the abandonment of a portion of Yorba Street. 2. Bryan Street Mr. Fleagle reported that Bryan Street, in the City of Irvine, is scheduled for a public hearing on Thursday, September 28, 1972, for the purpose of changing its classification to a primary arterial. STAFF CONCERNS 1. Workshop provision of Land Use Element - Tustin Area General Plan Mr. Brown informed the Commission that the Tustin Area General Plan has to be brought up to date by January 1, 1973, to be in con- formance with the Zoning Ordinance, as required by State Law. Since 95% of the land within the city is developed, some areas to be discussed are within the sphere of influence of Tustin extending northward from Irvine Boulevard and other newly acquired land. Also. the zoning on Irvine Boulevard, Newport Avenue and Warner should be updated. The County areas along Newport Avenue will also be discussed. It was decided among the Commissioners to hold a workshop session following the next regular scheduled Planning Commission Meeting on October 9, 1972. The land use element will be considered by sections to provide a detailed, yet comprehensive review of all parcels. COMMISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Sharp requested information on the latest developments on the civic center. Mr. Fleagle reported that the bond issue was passed by a 70% vote on September 19, 1972. The architect will now enter phase II which is the preparation of the working drawings for the civic center. The proposal for the library to be developed on the site, is in the discussion phase with the County Libarian and Real Property Agent. Mr. Fleagle also stated that the move-in date for the Civic Center is progrRmed for November - December 1973. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION - NONE ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Edelstein moved for adjournment at 9:45 p.m., seconded by Commissioner Sharp; unanimously carried. CIIA.~R~UtN OF PLANNING COMMISSION /? ,~ .,e, ~-?' . ~, .,:-4,_. PI'.ANN-YNG~,/CO;M>~_IS$ION RECORDING SECRETARY -5-