HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 04-27-70 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
of the
CITY OF TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 27, 1970
'The regular meeting of the City of Tustin Planning Commission
was held on the 27th day of April, 1970, at the hour of 7:35 p.m.
of said day in the Council Chambers, 275 South "C" Street,
Tustin, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Others
Present:
Edelstein, Curtis, Larnard, Mahoney, Webster
Halus, Ludwig
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Ass't. City Administrator-
Community Development Director
D. L. "Pat" Brown, Ass't. Planning Director-
Zoning Administrator
Jeannine Lindsey, Planning Commission Recording
Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 13, 1970
Moved by Mr. M~h~.n~e~, seconded by Mr. Larnard that the minutes
of April 13, 1970, be approved as corrected. '
ZC-70-210- R. T. FRENCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - (Continued from
April 13, 1970 Planning Commission Meeting)
Authority requested to rezone subject property from R-3
and R-1 to PC-C-2 and PC-R-3 to permit a planned community
development consisting of a 216 unit, one and two-story
apartment complexes and a two-story office structure.
The proposal would be the western portion of an overall
master plan of development with approximately 43 acres of
land. Orange County has approved development plans
covering the eastern portion of the total proposal.
Location:
Property is located on east side of Yorba Street
with a frontage of approximately 990' and is
approximately 300' south of the centerline of
17th Street.
Mr. Fleagle stated that the applicant had submitted revised
plans which were reviewed by the Development Preview Committee
at their April 23, 1970, meeting. The Committee felt that
further design improvements could be made such as: a 6'8" masonry
wall be installed where propose~ commercial properties abut
residential properties; tree-screening landscaping adjacent to
walls used as a buffer; private drives indicated as dead ends
should be redesigned to provide through circulation; continuous
vehicular access to County portion of overall proposal; three-
story structures not objectionable to total environment of this
area if restricted to northern portion of multiple family areal
setback of the building on the southerly ~rty line of 10';
reversal of locations of several of open parking spaces and
closed carport areas; redesign of the westcrn portion of the
multiple family area to provide parking area accessible from
¥otbm 8~rmm~ mhd ~hat ~hi ~&~king ~m¥ou~ ~0~ ~he professional
block walX.
PC Minutes 4/27/70
Mr. Fle~gle pointed out that the Staff recommendations are to
approve the concept as submittod, but to require that before
a building permit could be issued that a Use Permit would
have to be approved which would be a matter of public hearing
and all residents in the area would have a final chance to
view the plans and voice their opinion before they 'are approved
for development.
Chairman Webster opened the public portion of the hearing at
7:40 p. m.
Mr. Vinton Frost, San Juan Capistrano, represented the architects,
Burke Kober Nicolais Archuleta. He stated that they had met with
the people of Enderle Gardens and have hopefully resolved some
of their objections. He pointed out that they have designed the
216 units by replanning to achieve the same density (22.7 per
acre) without the use of any three-story buildings. As to the
rendered elevations, all of the exterior materials and colors will
be in a residential idiom-earth tones, with a tile roof using
siding and brick inserts. Mr. Frost also mentiohed that there
was a need to revise the circulation on the site which was drawn
to their attention by the Development Preview Committee.
Mr. ~ahpney inquired as to what the maximum distance a person
would have to walk from their car to their apartment unit or
where delivery facilities could be effected.
Mr. Frost stated that the figure was 500' to 600' which he felt
would have to be amended as far as the parking area was concerned.
Mr. Mah?ney felt this distance would be a burden to the tenants
and also costly.
Mr. Jack De Jries, 17351 Jacaranda Avenue, Tustin, spoke on
behalf of th~ residents of Enderle Gardens.
The Board of Directors met and the Planning Committee of Enderle
Gardens met on the subject development. Mr. De Jries stated
that there were four items of concern that they approached to
Mr. French:
That no garages will be within 10' of the property line.
If there is a change made as far as garages are concerned,
the people of Enderle Gardens would like no other garages
on a perimeter of Enderle Gardens other than those which
are to be located in the area marked #7 on the plot plan.
Re
A 16" box tree (pittasporum undulapium) be provided for
the entire property line which will help in breaking up
the wall and screening out the roof tops of the buildings.
e
That night lights or flood lights that might be on the
buildings would not be directed toward Enderle Gardens.
Wall to be 6'8" finish or higher as determined by fill
which is to be determined by the grade on the north
side of the fence. Mr. De Jries further stated that the
fence should be built first before any other construction
so that Enderle Gardens would remain separated from the
cohstruction.
Mr. Harry Wagner, 17331 Jacaranda Avenue, Tustin, inquired as to
the floor space in the proposed apartments. He didn't feel they
had enough information relative to the development.
Chairman Webster declared the public portion of the hearing closed
~t 7:55 p. m.
-2-
PC Minutes 4/27/70
Moved by Mr..~ahoney, seconded by Mr. Edelstein that Resolution
No. 1154 be adopted approving a~lication zc-70-210LR~3-and R-1
to PC-C-2 and PC-R-3, subQect to:
Compliance with the stipulated requirements of the
City Engineer for public improvements per Staff
Report dated April 8, 1970.
A maximum density of 216 residential units with
authority granted to the Development Preview Committe~
to adjust the density if determined essential to
gain the desired amenities and design criteria.
Review and approval by Development Preview Committee
and City Staff (City Engineer, Fire Chief, Building
Official and Community Development Director) of the
ultimate project design and development.
4. Submission and approval of a Use Permit by the Planning
Commission prior to development.
5. Coordination of total project review and design by
Development Preview Committee of the City of Tustin and
the Orange County Architectural Control Board.
and record be made to the Development Preview Committee of
Commission concerns for thevar~ous' development criteria suggested
~u~in~ the public hearing.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0
UP-70-340- TRI STATE ENGINEERING COMPANY ON BEHALF OF P~RCY H.
GOODWIN COMPANY.
Authority is requested to establish a drive-through dry
cleaning operation.
Location:
Property is located at the southeast corner of the
intersection of E1 Camino Real and Laguna Road.
Mr. Pat Brown commented that the property is zoned C-2-P. In
kpril, 1969, the Commission denied a variance for a take-out
restaurant with a reduction in parking on the subject site.
Plans submitted indicate a 1608 square foot structure with
drive-through facilities. Dry cleaning equipment would be
located within the proposed structure which would be used to
provide dry cleaning service for this facility only. There
would be a minimum of 8 parking spaces requirement for this
type of operation which has been complied with by the applicants.
Vehicular access would be by means of E1 Camino Real and Laguna
Road.
Mr. Brown further stated that the Development Preview Committee
at their April 23, 1970, meeting reviewed the plans and commented
they were an improvement over the ones originally submitted to
their April 16, 1970, meeting. The Committee recommended the
following:
Installation of full s~ree~ improvements including
curb and gutter, sidewalk, paving, drive approaches
and street trees in accordance with the Master Street
Tree Plan.
Installation of one street light with underground
conduit on the Laguna Road frontage.
An adequate water main ~ystem with an approved hydrant
shall be established to meet the fire flow requirements.
PC Minutes 4/27/70
de
A 10-pound ABC dry ~chem'ical extinquisher shall be
provided and located near an exit.
Specifications of the dry cleaning equipment shall
be submitted to the office of the State Fire Marshal
in Los Angeles for approval.
fe
Review and final approval of development plans by the
Development Preview Committee.
Mr. Fleagle indicated a change~on Item "c" of the Staff Report.
Due to the expense involved - $15,000 - $20,000 - to bring a
water line from 6th Street up to E1 Camino Real, the Staff feels
that this cost should not be borne solely by any one individual
firm so they are asking the applicant to post a bond of $500.00
as his share of this improvement. The bond would be for a
period of two years and would be refunded if the improvement
were not constructed within this two year period.
Chairman Webster opened the pub~.ic portion of the hearing at
8:20 p. m.
Mr. A1 Marten represented Tri State Engineering and stated that
he concurred with the Staff Report with the exception of Item
"c" and Item "b". He stated that in checking with Edison Company,
they found everything in the area was overhead powered and that
one underground light standard Would be impractical.
Mr. Harry Wagner, 17331 Jacaranda Avenue, Tustin, spoke for the
Downtown Business Association Stating that they concur with this
development coming into the area.
Chairman Webster declared the public portion of the hearing
closed at 8:30 p. m.
Moved by Mr. Larnard, seconded b~ Mr. Edelstein that Resolution
No."1155 be adopted apPro~in~ ULP-70-340 subject to:
a. The construction of full street improvements including
curb and gutter, sidewalk, paving, drive approaches
and street trees in accordance with the Master Street
Tree Plan. Specifications may be obtained from the
office of the City Engineer.
b. The installation of a street light on Laguna Road
with the signing of a covenant and agreement to be
approved by the City Attorney to underground the
light at your expense .at such time as the area is
included in an underground lighting district. The
City Engineer will furnish specifications and location
for the street light.
c. The posting of a $500.00 bond with the City of Tustin
as a pro rata share in the extension of an eight (8")
inch water main and fire hydrant to serve the property.
d. A 10-pound ABC dry chemical extinguisher shall be
provided and located near an exit.
Specifications of the dry cleaning equipment shall be
submitted to the office of the State Fire Marshal in
Los Angeles for approval.
Review and final approval of development plans by the
Development Preview Committee.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0
UNDERgRQUNDING REQUIRF~ENT WAIVER REQUEST - DOROTHY O. WILL~-
(owner) and SANTA ANA ELECTRIC,
Location: 455 West First Street, Tustin, California.
PC Minutes 4/27/70
Mr. Fleagle stated that it was requested that the under-
grounding of the service lines of this property be waived
on the provision that all service to this property be
served from the side street and there be no service lines
from First Street.
~jr.._._(_,'_.._.W_ .l?o_o.r.?.,_?.2.?_J;~..t_'j:.,.'~_go Street, Santa Ana, representative
el :;.tl~l..t Al~.t I.;I,,~:[l'~c, :;l:,lt~:~l I-I~at tJlYs' w'aiver would take
the lines out el: First Street where they now serve and m~ve
them to Mountain View.
Moved by Mr. Curtis, seconded by Mr. Larnard that Resolution
No. 1156 be granted approving the Request for Waiver of
Undergroundin? .Requirement subject to the removal of all
electric service lines from First Street and covenant and
agreemen~ from..the property owners for under,rounding at such
future date if an un~er~roundin~ pro~ect is undertaken in this
area.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0
ZC-70-209 - FISHER & FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH
Location: Southwest corner of Red Hill and San Juan Street.
Mr. Flea~le stated that it was advertised for a public hearing
for this parcel for C-2 for the southerly portion of the parcel
and C-1 for the northerly 175'. This recommendation went to
the City Council on April 6, 1970, and concern was expressed
that the northeast corner of the parcel would be used for a
service station. Also, the Council expressed concern for the
residents on the north side of San Juan Street. .It was the
implied intent of the Council that the Planning Commission
consider establishing a buffer area for the northerly portion
of the parcel thus eliminating the commercial and service
station possibility.
Moved bY Chairman Webster, seconded by Mr. Larnard, that the
Planning ~ommission recommend to the ~it~ council approval of
zc-70-209 for the north 149' to be zoned PC-C-1 to exclude
dr~ve-in facilities'and service stations, the southerly 476'
to be zoned PC-C-2 for the fo'llowi~g, reasons:
The Planning Commission feels that a residential use
of high intensity at that location would be to the
greater detriment of the property at the north.
Could cause possible traffic hazards because of the
major intersection.
Would be unable to be developed adequately because
of the two small parcels being created, and
Would not in any way be as beneficial to the development
as a controlled commercial use planned for the entire
property.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0
ZC-70-1 - SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP IRS-ii
Location: Subject properties are located on the south side of
Nisson Road between Red Hill and Browning Avenue.
~t7/70
PC Minutes 4/27/70
Mr. Brown stated that subject action was initiated by the
Orange County Planning Commission. Existing land uses on
these properties include vacant land, mobilehome park,
a swim school, a multiple family apartment complex, a service
station, a market, and duplex family residential structures.
The two parcels located at the southwest corner of Nisson
Road and Browning Avenue were approved for annexation to the
City of Tustin by City Council on April 20, 1970, although
the Secretary of State has not accomplished the certification
of this annexation'. The southern most of these two parcels
have been approved for pre-zoning to R-3(1750).
Moved by Mr. Curtis, s.e.conded by Mr. Larnard, that a minute
res61ution be adopted on application zc-70-1 to read:
1o Whereas, Alternative Exhibit "B" would create a
PA strip fronting on Red Hill Avenue with the
limited depth of 90 feet with resultant difficulties
in development due to traffic and parking accommodations,
and,
2. Whereas, the existing C-1 zoning lends itself to
strip commercial development contrary to the
highest and best use of the property and the
proposed Alternative Exhibit "A" is in keeping with
existing development and the best interests of the
City of Tustin,
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Planning
Commission of the City of Tustin endorses ZC-70-1
Alternative Exhibit "A" for a zone'change from
100-C-l-10,000 to R-3(1500), R-2(2000) and R-4
for the area bounded by Red Hill Avenue and Nisson
Road in the unincorporated area of Orange County.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0
SCHOOL DISTRICT CORRESPONDENCE
Mr. Fleagle stated that a letter' was received from F. Bert
Skiles, President of Board of Education, Orange Unified School
District requesting notification of any proposed zone changes
that may affect the school district. His letter stated that
the Orange Unified School District opposes zoning changes which
adversely influence the quality.and costs of school services.
It was pointed out by Mr. Fleagle that Staff has requested,
per a letter dated April 21, 1970, a map of the Orange Unified
School District thus enabling notification of any proposed zone
changes in that area.
PENDING AGENDA MATTERS
The following items are pending applications to come before
the Planning Commission on May 11, 1970.
UP-70-341- Swim School - Palos Verdes Peninsula
Tennis Club j R~lph Schenck
Location:
On the west side of Elizabeth W~y, approximately
173' north of Irvine Boulevard.
2. V-70-267-Santia~o Commercial Bank
To permit two roof signs in addition to an
existing free-stand.ing sign.
Location:
Southeast corner%of the intersection of First Street
and E1 Camino Real.
-6-
PC Minutes 4/27/70
Mr. Flea$1q handed the Commissioners advance registration
forms for the League of California Cities Institute for
Planning Commissioners with comments suggesting a bus
tour through parts of Tustin.
He further stated that he had received correspondence from
the City Engineer with reference to the Amendments to
Master Plan of Arterial Highways which have already been
approved by the County.
Chairman Webster suggested that we find out all the information
we can before scheduling a public hearing on the matter of
Arterial Highways.
Mr. Edelstein stated he was very much impressed with the
comments of the Development Preview Committee being incorporated
in the individual Staff Reports, thus allowing the Commissioners
to get a full picture of the proposed development.
Moved b~ Mr. Mahgne¥, seconded by Mr. Edelstein that the
~eeting be adjourned. ~..
MOTION CARRIED 5-0
There being no further business to come before the Commission,
Chairman Webster declared the meeting closed at 9:25 p. m.
4/27/70
-7-