Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 11-10-69CALL TO' ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA~NCE .II. :OLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 10, 1969 The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman llalus. Led by Chairman Halus Present: Commissioners: Webster, Curtis, Ludwig, Oster, Halus, Larnard, Mahoney Absent: Commissioners: None Others Present.: Mr. Harry E. Gill, City Administrator Mr. James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mr. James L. Supinger, Planning Director Jo Ann Turner, Planning Secretary It was moved by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Oster, that the Minutes of October 27, 1969, be approved as submitted. Carried unanimously. UP-69-312 - FEDERAL SIGN & SIGNAL CORP. ON BEHALF OF ZACiIARY T. PEDICINI - (Continued from 10/27/69) To permit a free-standing sign to identify tenants of a commercial complex. Proposed sign would have a height of 40 feet, identify ten (10) tenants, an area of 675 sq. ft. per side and total area 1350 sq. ft. Location: Fronts on the northwest side of Red Hill Avenue between Mitchell Avenue and Nisson Road. Mr. Supinger presented the staff report stating that because the property is within 200 feet of a freeway, such an appli- cation is permitted. He explained that because this complex is a small, neighborhood oriented shopping center, it is felt that freeway identification and the proposed increased height and area are not required. The Planning Department recommended denial of this application because of lack of justification. Such a denial would not deprive the developer from erecting one free-standing sign with a height of 22 ft. 6 inches, 150 sq. ft. per side, 300 sq. ft. total area and identification of several tenants. The City Engineer suggested that any approval of this Use Permit be subject to the install'ation of street trees on all street frontages in accordance with the Master Street Tree Plan. Chairman Halus opened the public portion of the hearing at 7:35 P.M. Those in attendance representing subject application were: Mr. John R. McDonald, Federal Sign and Signal Corp. 195.Benedict, San Bernardino. Mr. Zachary T. Pedicini, applicant, 715 North Drive. Palm -1- Mr. McD~nal~l felt that because the site is within 200 ft. ~'f--~]~--~-d~:~'ay, this request is justified. Mr. Pedicini stated that he felt, under the circumstance, ti~[s proposed sign should be approved. Because the area was annexed to the City after all plans were reviewed and approved by the County's rules and regulations, it was un- fair and creating a tremendous hardship to the development· There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman IIalus declared the public portion of the hearing closeG at 8:00 P.M. The Commission discussed the recommended condition relative to the planting of trees along the street frontages. Mr. Gill explained that the County does not require tree installation, as they do not maintain them. He stated that the City of Tustin maintains the care of trees when planted in the right-away onl~. Mr. Curtis felt that the motorist viewing the sign from the freeway will be a very small percentage of the total business and will not really be that much help to the project. >~. Mahoney concurred, but felt some consideration should be given to the size of the property and the location being within 200 ft. of the freeway. It was moved by Mr. Mahon.ey, seconded by Oster, that Resolution' No. 1116' be adopted., recommendinq conditional approval of Ap~ication. No. UP-69-312. for the f'ok'l~w'ing reasons: 1. Site location is within 200 ft. of freeway. The Commission finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use and it will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence introduced at the hearing are included by refer- ence and made a part qf the motion. Condition of approval: That street trees be installed per the Master Street Tree Plan located in the park way on Red Hill, Nisson and Mitchell. Mr. Oster stated that this is one of the difficult cases that started in the County and later became a City situation and because of this, he does not feel that it is an unreasonable request. The above motion was voted by roll call. AYE S: NOES: OSTER, LUDWIG, LA,NARD, MAHONEY IIALUS, WEBSTER, CURTIS MOTION CARRIED 4-3. 2. V-69-261 - FEDERAL SIGN & SIGNAL CORP. ON BEHALF OF ZACIIARY PEDICINI To permit installation of roof signs for 7 proposed stores in a commercial complex presently under con- struction· - 2 - Location: Site froaSs-approximately 730 ft. on the north- · .' West s--lde of Red llill Avenue, approximately 290""f't. on the northeast side of Mitchell Avenue and approximately 140 ft. on the southwest side of Nisson' Road. ~r. S~.pinger presented the staff report stating that subject application is necessary because the proposed signs are con- sidered roof signs under the terms of the Tustin Sign Ordinance. IIe explained that this application is one of the unfortunate outcomes of the annexation of this property during construc- tion and the fact that the County does not maintain the same architectural standards as the City of Tustin. He felt that the applicant has a legitimate hardship and that a compromise' is in order. He suggested conditional approval subject to: Compliance with the Tustin Sign Ordinance standards relative to area permitted for each individual store.. e Screening of roof-top equipment from the north side to the satisfaction of the Development Preview Committee. 3. Ail individual signs be of uniform color. That street trees be installed per the Master Street Tree Plan. Chairman Halus opened the public portion of the hearing at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Pedicini, applicant, concurred with the staff's recom- mendations and felt that the conditions could be worked out satisfactorily. He was reminded that Condition No. 4 (That street trees be installed per the Master Street Tree Plan.) is no longer a criteria, as it was resolved in the previous hearing. There being no further discussion from the audience, Chairman Halus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at 8:40 P.M. I.t was moved by M~. Webster, seconded by M~s. Ludwig, that Resolution No. 1117 be ~dopted, recommending, conditional approval of Application No. V-69-261 to permit: One (1) roof sign for each of the seven (7) proposed stores. Reasons for approval: That the adjustment hereby authorized will not constitute a grant of special privilege incon- sistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is situated. That because of. special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance will deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence introduced at the hearing are included by refer- ence and made a part of the motion. - 3 - PC :.'~inutcs - 11/10/69 Conditions of approval: That individual store identification on the building be limited ~o two (2) sq. ft. of sign area per lineal foot of the width of the build- ing or portion of the building in which the primary entrance to each store is located. That roof-top equipment be screened from the north side to the satisfaction'of the Develop- ment Preview Committee. 3. That all individual signs be of uniform color. The above motion carried 7-0. 3. ZC-69-198 - SCHOLZ HOMES, INC. ON BEHALF OF FIRST WESTERN BANK & TRUST COMPANY For rezoning of a parcel with a gross area of 11.1 acres as follows: a.) PC-Pr (Planned Community - Professional Offices) District for a depth of 200 ft. from the centerline of Irvine Boulevard (Fourth Street.) Proposed structures would be a maximum of four (4) stories in height and have both surface and underground parking. b.) PC-R-3 (2100) (Planned Community - Multiple Family Residential - 2100 sq. ft. of lot area per dwelling unit) District for a depth approximately 340 ft. southerly from the northerly boundary line of subject parcel. Proposed complex includes three 3-story buildings with ancillary surface and under- ground parking and recreation areas. Mr. Supin~er presented the staff report stating that the applicant has withdrawn this application and has requested that it be re-advertised to permit more flexibility in the plan, particularly in the location of parking on the site, and will eliminate the necessity of creating two parcels from the large site, one for the offices and one for the apartment area. He stated that the hearing will be advertised for November 24, 1969. Location: At the northwest corner of the intersection of Irvine Boulevard (Fourth Street) and Prospect Avenue. 4. UP-69-315 - LEONARD L. KING ON BEHALF OF C. T. GILBREATH To permit %he establishment of a family billiard and billiard supply business in the C-2-P (Central Com- mercial and Combined Parking) District. Location: 540 E1 Camino Real (D Street) in Jamestown Village Shopping Center. Mr. Supinger presented the staff report stating that adequate parking would not be available on the site to comply with the Zoning Ordinance,.recommending denial. He stated that although the staff has no objection to the use, a variance would be required to permit the use with less than the required parking. -4- PC Minutes - 11/10/69 Chairman lla].us opened tlJe public portion of the hearing at 8:45 P.M. Those verbally speaking, representing the applicant, were Mr. Leonard L. King~ 1802 W. Pendleton Avenue, Santa Ana, and Mr. C. T. Gilbreath, 520 E1 Camino Real, Tustin. They felt that a hardship has been'created, due to their not being aware that two applications were required at this time, including a parking variance application. They felt that a continuance would not solve the problem at the present time &nd asked the Commission to give careful con- sideration of this request. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Halus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at 8:55 P.M. Mr. Rourke, City Attorney, explained that the Commission could issue a temporary permit to the applicants, under the circumstances, until a variance is filed and action taken on the parking situation. It was moved by Mr. Oster, seconded by Mr. Mahone¥, that Resolution No. 1118 be adopted,.recommendin~ approval of Application No. UP-69-315 and that the staff be directed to advertise a public hearing of a variance for parking at the next regularly scheduled meeting, November 24, 1969. The Commission recommended approval of a temporary permit and license to operate the proposed business pendin~ the action taken on the parkin9 variance to be heard at the November 24, 1969 Plannin9 Commission meeting. Reasons for approval of UP-69-315: The Commission finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use and it will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence introduced at the hearing are included by reference and made a part of the motion. ABOVE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. Chairman IIalus declared a 5 minute recess at 9:00 P.M. vened at 9:05 P.M. Recon- 5. UP-69-316 - MACCO CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF TUSTIN SCHOOL DISTRICT To permit the temporary storage of building materials for the duration of construction of an apartment com- plex. Location: Site is located at the southwest end of Carfax Drive, approximately 150 ft. south of the intersection of Carfax Drive and Drayton Avenue. Mr. Supinger presented the staff report explaining that this parcel is part of a 32 acre parcel owned by the Tustin School District. Ultimate plans call for an elementary school and an intermediate school on the site with a corp- oration yard on the area which is the subject of this appli- cation. -5- 1.[/10/09 Mr Su1~Jn~:~:r r~.~;ommendcd conditional approval to permit thc u:;c .i.or a six (6) month period subject to the fol- lowing conditions: 1. That no access be permitted from Carfax Avenue. That the yard be surrounded by a six (6) foot fence. Chairman Halus opened the public portion of the hearing at 9:15 P.M. Mr. David G. Gilbert, 881 Dover Drive, Newport Beach, representing Macco Corporation, stated that there is a need for this use and would answer questions of the Com- mission. Mrs. Mary S. Enfield, 1202 Drayton Way, Santa Ana, repre- Senting families in the area, presented a petition with 46 signatures, opposing the use of Carfax Avenue as an access route to the storage and/or construction site and that the existing barrier at the southwest end of Carfax be maintained intact throughout the duration of construction. The petition stated that the builder be required to construct a chain-link fence around the storage property with gates only at access-roads called out in the petition. (Petition is on file in the Planning Department.) Those verbally expressing opinions were: Mrs. Mary S. Enfield, 1202 Drayton Way, ~ir. Duane McKenzie, 1142 Drayton Way, ~. Melvin L. Giese, 1211 Drayton Way, Mr. Stephen J. Andert, 1162 Drayton Way Mr. Gene Bustamante, 1152 Drayton Way Mrs. Bejune, 14832 Carfax The above property owners expressed concern relative to excessive noise, possible property damage by construction vehicles, hazards for the children playing in the area, etc. They strongly opposed access roads from the southern portion of the property. Chairman Halus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at 10:00 P.M. The Co~mission discussed the problems brought before them, along with an agreement for th~ best possible solution to the neighbors'concern. Mrs. Enfield stated that their main concern was to keep storage equipment as far away .as possible from their property lines. She felt that the heavy hauling of dirt and equipment creates undue hardships for the surrounding property owners. It was moved by_Mr. Oster, seconded by Mr. Larnard, that Resolution No. 1119 be adopted, conditionally ap~rovin~ Application No~ UP-69-316 as follows: 1. No access be permitted from Carfax Avenue. e That the barrier on Carfax Avenue be maintained. That the yard be surrounded by a 6 ft. fence. As soon as practicable a wall be built parallel to Drayton Avenue on the northerly property line of the property. Subject property be of approximately the same area as set forth on the plot plan of UP-69-316, provided, however, tha~ no portion of tl~e fenced PC Minutes - 11/10/69 in area which will be the subject of the permitted use, shall be closer than 170 feet from the south property line of the lots indicated as Lots 13 thru 18 and Lot 31. No access be permitted along the northerly portion of the permitted use, that is, on a line parallel with Drayton Way. Mr. Oster explained that access would be permitted along the Flood Control District or along the line that would be paral- lel with Newport Avenue. We have, in effect, precluded any access on the northerly portion. Above motion carried 7-0. 6. UP-69-317 - TUSTIN SCIIOOL DISTRICT To permit the installation of a 10 ft. by 55 ft. trailer as a temporary school office. Location: Site fronts approximately 330 ft. on the west side of Willaims Street between Main Street and Alliance Street. Mr. Supinger presented the staff report stating that the Tustin School District proposes to utilize a tem- porary building to house administrative offices at the Robert Heideman Elementary School until a permanent building for this purpose is constructed. Approval ifor a six (6) month period was recommended subject to t~e Fire Department's recommended conditions. Chairman Halus opened the'public portion of the hearing at 10:15 P.M. Mr. Archie Currie concurred with the staff's recommendation and report. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Halus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at 10:17 P.M. It was moved by Mr. Larnard, seconded by Mr. Oster, that Resolution No. 1120 be adopted, conditionally approving Application No. UP-69-3~.7 for ,the following reasons: 1. The Commission finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use and it will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. 2. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence introduced at the hearing are included by reference and made a part of the motion. Conditions of approval are: 1.' This approval is for a six (6) month period. Every exit door shall be openabLe from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. A 2% gallon pressurized water type fire extinguisher shall be locatod within 100 feet of travel from the trailer. MOTION CARRIED 7-0. PC :.:inure:; - 11/10/69 7. UP-69-318 - ,GOCAI, PI~OJI,:C'.['S To permit the establishment of a 126-bed Neuro- Psychiatric llospital in the C-1 District. Location: Site fronts approximately 330 ft. on the south- west side of Bryan Avenue and approximately 640 ft. on the north side of Main Street, southeast of Newport. Mr. Supinqer presented the staff report stating that plans for a proposed establishment of a 126-bed Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital instead of the previously approved 290-bed Conva- lescent Hospital has been submitted. Conditional approval was recommended. Chairman Ilalus opened the public portion of the hearing at 10:19 P.M. . Mr. John Siegel, 515 E. First Street, presented a petition containing approximately 500 names, opposing subject request. The petition stated that approval of this application would be detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood. Those verbally opposing subject request are as follows: ~. Herman Ballinger, 1151 Letty Lane Rosa Wilms, 13422 Elizabeth Way Mr. Frank E. Dowler, 1132 Letty Lane Mr. John F. Wilson, 1162 Letty Lane Mr. Johnson, 13412 Cindy Lane Jean G. Hitchcock, 1131 Tiki Land The above people strongly opposed subject request, feeling that this type of hospital would be better situated in an- other area away from the residential sections of the City. They felt that the property value of their homes would decrease, they objected to the "open door" policy, feeling that serious problems could and would arise. They expressed concern due to their children having to pass the site to go to school or shopping. RM. and Mrs. John H. Siegel felt that the proposed mental hospital would be a detriment due to the nature of the patients to be housed and that the facility is not compatible with its surroundings, particularly the residents and could present serious problems in the future. Mr. Rex Gaede, Brea Hospital Administrator, stated that the hospital is not the type for the ~ ill type of patient or drug addicts. He stated that although they do not have the "locked door" policy, the patients are accompanied by an attendant when outside activities are planned. He stated that after conducting a careful study with the medical com- munity, the need for the proposed facility has been definitely ascertained. He felt that the proposed use would benefit the community because it involves the treatment and care of patients in all age groups who ~esire or are in need of psychiatric care, counseling and therapy. Dr. H. Rahm, 17341 Irvine, stated that he felt it was neces- sary to have a hospital of this nature in the community. He reported that a large number of patients are taken to the Brea Hospital, as there are no other facilities close in this area for such treatment. Mr. Konsmo, Konsmo Development Company, 160 E. 2nd Street Tustin, stated that he has planned hospitals for several years and there are certain standards and codes that he has to comply with. 'He stated that it would be aesthetcally pleasing for the community and in no way, would they build anything that would be detrimental to the area. - 8 - FC Minutes ll/10/b9 Ch~lirman lfal. ur.~ closed th~; public portion of the hearing -'-' a~', 11:15 P.M~-- '-~.~'.~' The Commissioners fhl~'.'~{~h~' subject hearing should be continued to allow more time for re-evaluating the project and taking into consideration the fears expressed by the home owners. Mr. Mahoney felt that a field trip might be in order, as Mr. Gaede has previously suggested; Mr. Gaede felt that a tour of the Brea facility, for anyone that is inter- ested in viewing the operation would alleviate the concern being voiced. It was moved b% Mr.. ~a~.oney, seconded by Mrs. Ludwig. that appl.ication No. 69-318 be continued to the next regularly schedul.ed. ~e.e.t.i~g on November 24, 1969. Motion carried 7-0 8. UP-69-319 MOTEL (Harold A. & Vivian M. Lindgren) To permit the modification and enlargement of an existing 17-unit motel to a proposed motel complex containing 46 units. Location: Site fronts 145 ft. on the south side of First Street and 50 ft. on the west side of E1 Camino Real ("D" Street.) 5~r. Supinger presented the Staff Report and stated that the owners have owned this motel since 1956. They feel the need for more modern up to date units to meet competition of newer Ilotel & Motels and to meet the requirements of our present clientele. It is their feeling that they have to meet the demands of today and tomorrow. The existing unit would be moved to the new lot extending eastward out to "D" Street and would be changed from a 3 unit to a five unit. The Staff recommends conditional approval of this application subject to six conditions. Mr. Supinger continued, that the Staff would like to make a modification on the last condition as follows: Off street parking should be provided at the rate of one space for every four rooms. This is as established in the zoning ordinance for a hotel. Chairman Halus opened the public portion of the meeting at 11:20 P.M. Mr. Jim Lathrop, 125 So. "C" S~., Tustin, representing Mr. Lindgren in the Bel Air Motel stated that they were con- cerned with the parking but since it had been covered to their satisfaction that they were pleased with the conditions. It was moved by Mr. Larnard~ seconded by Mr. Oster that Resolution No. 1121 be adopted conditionally aDprovin~ Ap?lication No. UP-69-319 as follows: The Commission finds that the establishment, main- tenance and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use and it will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or general welfare of the city. - 9 - i~C :,~i:~utcs - 11/10/69 As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence intro- duced at the l]caring are included by refercnce and made a part of tl~e motion. Conditions of approval are: 1. .Two 1/2 gallon pressurized water or 10 pound AEC dry chemical extinguishers shall be provided within 100 ft. of travel from all room entrances and on both floor levels in accessible and conspicuous locations. It is recommended that they be placed in "break glass" cabinets to prevent tampering. A water main system be established to supply 2,000 gallons per minute to an approved hydrant. Installation of concrete sidewalk on all frontages where missing. (Full 8 feet width on First Street.) Installation of Street Trees in accordance with the Master Street Tree Plan. Se Approval of overall Site, Landscaping and Sign Plans by the Development Preview Committee. Provision of off-street parking at the rate of one (1) space per every four rooms. Condition No. 6 of the above motion was amended by Mr. Curtis to read "Provision of off-street parking at the rate of one (1) space per unit. The Commissioner seconding the motion concurred. Motion carried 5-1. Mr. Oster opposed. 9. V-69-262 ('Ronald W. Royce on behalf of Philip N Griset) To permit the enlargement of an existing nonconforming drive-in food establishment. Location: Site fronts approximately 160 ft. on the southwest side of Old Irvine Boulevard and approximately 190 feet on the north side of Irvine Boulevard (Fourth Street) and is ~he site of an existing A & W Root Beer stand. Mr. Supinge.r stated that the applicants justification was that the enclosure of existing table area, enlarged 6' X 18'6" overall enclosure 392 sq. ft. 'total parking 19 cars. He further stated that the Planning Departments recommendation for V-69-262 be denied due to the applicant not giving any justification for the approval of subject application. Mrs. L~dwi~ stated that she wished to abstain from comment and vote. Chairman IIalus opened the public portion of the meeting at ~1:4'0. Mr. John Jamison, Tustin Building Design, representing Phili- N. Gri~e~ stated that he would like to set the record strai~i that the original application was issued under Donald H. McX~ .ns. This was corrected at the time of the application. He further stated that the property has been in existance and one of the first pioneer type businesses that Tustin has, it was built in 1961. The parking areas are all copied persay with the excep- tion of one space in front where the dining tables will be enclosed, we took out one space· They are all being used that way at the present time. Mr. McMains has a seven (7) year lease to operate his business status quo. Since 1961, without going south of the freeway, or l?th Street and First Street and Tustin Ave. there are seventeen (17) lunch facilities similar in competition and quality. This represents a hardship as a business owner and operator to maintain his bt~r:].~ie~;~ in the best possible use and service of tl~d -10- PC Minutes - ii/10/(,9 W~: want to take the:-'a'rea...~..al.ready covered, support,:d and s.t~ructurally sound and erect a glass enclosu~:~.tt~ a door wl~ich would be for wea[~her protection. Also remove th(; hedge and replace it with a block wall. The rest of the structure would be painted and the appearance would conform to the same general outline. Harry Adams, 2873 Glenrose Drive, Anaheim, representing A & W Rootbeer Co. stated that the restaurant business was becoming more difficult and that his company was urging their operators to upgrade due to increased costs and general demands from the public for good eating facilities. By complying with the wishes of this variance it would improve the appearance of the area and be more compatible with the modern appearance. Chairman Halus: at 11:50 closed the public portion of the meeting Mr. Oster questioned Mr. Jamison as to whether or not there woul~ be no loss of parking in the remodeling plans. Mr. Jamison stated that there would be no loss, it was just enclosing the present structure. It was moved by Mr. Oster, seconded by Mr. Larnard that Resolution No. 1122 be conditionally approved for Application No. V-69-262 for the fbllowin~ reasons: That the adjustment hereby authorized will not constitute a grant of special privilege incon- sistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is situated. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance will deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. That the plans be submitted to the Development Preview Committee for their review and approval. 4. That the minutes of this meeting be introduced as evidence.. Motion carried unanimously· ~-0. VI. OLD BUSINESS NONE , VII. NEW BUSINESS PM-69-29 Tustin Medical Association (Medipal Building) To combine parcels for purposes of providing required parking for development. Location: South side of Irvine Boulevard, at the south west corner of "B" Street. It was moved by Mr. Os~e~,..sgco~ed by Mrs. Ludwic that a minute order be adopted to approye Parcel Map P~h~9-29. Motion. carried unanimously 7-0. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. ZC-69-33, R.T. FRENCH DEVELOPMENT C6MPANY, SEVENTEENTH STREET AND PROSPECT. Mr. Supinger presented a Staff Report stating that the City Council has continued a Pr.zoning Case at 17th and Yorba (PZ-69-119, Ilester Trust on behalf of Harriet Endcrle) until December 15, 1969, to allow a joint study by the County and City l"lan~in~.; Department relative to coi[¢nerci,~l u:;es on Sevcntecntl~ Street. was moved b_~ Mr. O.qter, seconded .by Mr. Larnard t}ir~t a .]]~t~-~]]? ]3-c s(~nt ko 't-~6--~,-a]]'~i__n.~ Coimn, ission of. thc; Co~:r,t¥ of Orang(~ stat.i, nq that no recommendation will be made at this t--line-bccabse ['hey ha'v'e not had the benefit of the amore ~d]~tione'd s ruby. The Commissioners also requested that they be sent a copy of the Planning Department staff report on ZC-69-33 as soon as it is available. The above motion carried unanimously~ It was moved by Mr. Larnard, seconded by Mr. Mahoney that the meetinq be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 12:45 A.M. SE~CRETARY OF THE PLANNING COF~4ISSION - 12 -