HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 04-14-69MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN PI,ANN1NG COMMISSION
APRIL 14, 1969
CALL TO
ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
III.
ROLL
CALL
IV.
i APPROVAL
OF
MINUTES
V®
PUBLIC
HEARINGS
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman
Halus. '
Led by Chairman Halus.
Present:
Commissioners:
Oster, Sharp, Webster, Ludwig, ~alus,
Mahoney, Larnard.
Absent: Con~issioners: NONE
Others Present:
Harry E. Gill, City Administrator
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
James L. Supinger, Planning Director
Jo Ann Turner, Planning Secretary
It was moved b~ Mr. Larnard, seconded by Mrs. Ludwig, that
the minutes of March 24, 1969, be approved as submitted.
Carried unanimously.
HEARING NO. 8 OUT OF ORDER
It was moved by Mr. Oste. r_,__se__co~!.d_.ed b~ Mr. Larnard that the
rules be suspended to consider Item No. 8 under Public Hear-
ings out of order. Motion carried 7-0.
8. ZC-69-193 - PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED
For rezonJng, of a ten (10) acre parcel from the U (Un-
classified) Di~frict to ~%e R-3 (1700) (Multiple Family
Residential, 1700 sq. ft. of lot area per dwelling unit)
District.
Location: Site fronts 392 ft. on the south side of Main
Street approximately 850 ft. west of the centerline of
Williams Street.
Mr. Sup~n__ger presented the staff report stating that a Use
Permit for the development of a 246 unit apartment project
in the "U" District was granted to PRC Development Company
March 10, 1969, by the Planning Commission and as a result
of this approval, the subject rezoning was initiated to con-
form with the proposed development and with the General Plan.
Mr. su~_n~ recommended approval of ZC-69-193 to the City
Council for adoption of an ordinance rezoning the subject
property from the "U" (Unclassified) District to the R-3 (1700)
(Multiple Family Residential, 1700 sq. ft. of lot area per
dwelling unit) Di%strict.
A letter was submitted' to the Planning Commission by Mr. C.. J.
Bonner, Area Manager, of PRC Development Corp. asking for a
continuance of subject hearing if any changes arise from this
zone change so that their Corporation may be represented
relative to the'changes involved.
Chairman Ha]us opened the public hearing at 7:32 P.M. There
being no objections or comments from the audience, Chairman
Halus declared the public port, on of the hearing closed at
7:33 P.M.
In answer to Mr. Oster's question, Mr. Supinger stated that
there were no changes involved.
PC MinuLes - A~n.'il 14,
Mr. Oster stated that in view of th,3 finol actJ. on on Use, Permit
'(U'ifi6-~jL'~9'i), he could see no objection to subject zone change.
It-. was moved by Mr. Oster, seconded b~ Mrs._ l,.u.c..]?~_g, that Reso-
~'~-~-6~-'-N%".-' 1-0-6-6--5-~-'~'d'~-~_~t~6_~.]- -_ja_'j~'~-i'~_~-' Z-~L'6'~J :- i 93' ~t ~ d r c c om~ ne n d i n g
to Cit,¥ Coi[ncJ ], the ado]!Lion of an ordinance rezonJ.ncj the sub-
'ect pro)erty i ti](: "U"
~. .... ~; ._ rom (Unclassified) District to the R-3
(1700) (Multiple Fa~il_y Residential, 1700 sq. ft. of ].ot area
per dwellin~ unit) District for the followi.n~ reasons:
The proposed zoning conforms to the General
Plan and to the previously approved ~se Permit
for development of a 246 unit apartment project
on the subject property.
As additional grounds, the evidence and minutes
introduced at the hearing are included by
reference and made a part of the motion.
The above motion was voted by roll call.
Ayes:
Noes:
Oster, Sharp, Ludwig, Halus, Webster, Mahoney, Laznard.
None o
Carried 7-0.
1. ZC-69-190 - RICHARD AND BILLIE KRUPPE
For rezo~ing of an 0.83 acre parcel from the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) District to the PC (Planned Community -
Multiple Family) District.
Locationi Fronts 109 ft. on the south side of Main Street,
approximately 230 ft. east of the center].ine of Pacific St.
Mr. Supinger presented the staff report stating that this was
c--~in~ed-~om the February 10, 1969 meeting, at the request
of the applicant.tQ permit the City to develop standards for
development in the Tustin City ~rea. He stated that the staff
recommends denial to the City Council of subject application,
because to it not being'in conformance with the General Plan.
Mr. Melvin Cohen, attorney, representing Mr. and Mrs. Kruppe,
requested continuance until after the Economic Study has been
completed.
Mr. Rourke recommended that the hearing be taken off the agenda
until the Economic Study'is completed and the staff could re-
schedule it when they felt they were in a position to make a
recommendation. He felt that to continue the hearing for a
period of 90 days would only constitute a representation by
those that were interested at the end of a 3 month continuance
to appear when there may not be any more available information.
Mr. Gill stated that Phase II of the Study will be completed
~y the 1st of J.un~, un~er, the agreement, but that there are
fourteen separate'area studies in Phase III and and a date
certain can not be set, but will be finished as soon as the
consultants are able to work on it.
Mr. Cohen stated that he ~referred the continuance to the
deletion of the hearing from the agenda.
It was moved by Mr. Webster, seconded by Mr. Larnard, that
A_p~,~lication No. ZC-69-190 be contin, ued to the. August 11, 1969
.P]annin_q Commission Meet].~_i.
The above motion was voted by roll call.
Ayes:
Noes:
Oster, Sharp, Lud~9, Webster, Halus, Mahoney, Larnard.
None
Carried 7-0.
PC Minutes - April. ].4, 1969
V--69-231 - COiiEN, OST].]R & MIIST.ARD ON BEIIAI,F OF
To permit signs for a proposed Jack-In-The-Box drive-in
restaurant.
Location: Sit~ fronts 160 ft. on the north side of Seven-
teenth ~treet and 150 ft. on the west side of Yorba Street
at the northwest corner o~ the intersection at Seventeenth
and Yorba Streets.
~r_Su_~.~=qe~ presented the staff report stating that this
application was originally scheduled for public hearing
February 24, 1969, but was taken off calendar after the
denial of the Use Permit for the restaurant on the subject
property. The City Council approved the permit for the
restaurant on appeal at its meeting, March 17, 1969.
M'r. Supinger recommended conditional approval.
Chairman Halus opened the public portion of the hearing at
8:00 P.M.
The Con~niss~oners discussed the hardship involved, the need
for thc height and size requested, traffic situation, the
proximity to existing apartments near the proposed structure,
the lighting from the signs and the required deminsions in
the Sign Ordinance.
Those in favor of subject application were:
Mr. Mel Cohen, attorney, representing the applicant, 444 West
10th Street, Santa Ana.
Mr. Robert C. }Iapve~. Foodmaker Inc., 6252 Telegraph Road,
Los Angeles, California 90022
Mr. Harvg3_ stated that the location of the building and the
traffic flow were two reasons for needing ali. the requested
signing plus the interpretation of the computation of sign
measurement by the Planning Staff versus their computation
of the sJ. gns did present a hardship. Mr. Harvey felt that
they could eliminate the "drive-thru" sign with very little
problem.
There being no further discussioD from the audience, Chairman
Halus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at
8:25 P.M.
It was moved by Mr. Webster, seconded by Mr. Sharp, that
Resolution No. 1067 be adopted, approvinq Application No.
V-69-231 (Jack-In-The-Box signs) to ~ermit:
1. Three (3) Polo signs:
ae
Pylon at :a hei~3ht of 21 ft., total area of
300 sq. ft. without animation.
Intercom Station Selection Display, with a
maximum height of 6'9" and a maximum area of
50 sq. ft.
Co
A Selection Display in the rear setback area with
a maximum height 8'7%" and a maximum area of 35 sq.
ft. ,
One (1) wall sign to be located on the south elevation of
the building, total square footage - 36 sq. ft. Total site
aroa of 421 sq. ft.
PC Minutes - April 14, 1969
Reasons for al)proval are:
That thc adjustm¢:nt hereby authorized will not
constJ, tu[-.e a grant of special privi].ege incon-
sisteqt with thc limitations upon other properties
in the vicinity and district in which the subject
property is situated.
That because of'special circumstances applicable to
the subject property, including size, shape, .topo-
graphy, location or surroundings, the strict apli-
cation of the Zoning Ordinance will deprive subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity and under identical zone classification.
3. As additional grounds, tile minutes and evidence intro-
duced at the hearing are include~'by reference and
made a part of the motion.
The above motion was voted by roll ca~l.
Ayes: Sharp, Ludwig, Halus, Webster, Larnard
Noes: Mahon~y '
Abstained: Oster
Carried 5-1.
3. UP-69-295 - CHRIS LINDLEY - CAR WASH
To permit an automatic car wash with outside gasoline
dispensing facilities in the C-2 (Central Commercial)
District.
I.ocation: Site fronts 105 ft. on the northwest side of Red
}Iill Avenue and is approximately 175 ft. northeast of the
centerline of L~guna Road.
Mr. Supin~er presented the staff report stating that the
proposed development takes into account the proposed re-
modeling of the adjacent Shell Oil Service Station and is
proposed to tie in architecturally with the anticipated
architectural style of the proposed remodeled Shell Station.
Chairman Halus opened the public portion of the hearing at
8:25 P.M.
Mr. Chris Lindle~, applicant, stated that he would answer
any questions that the Commissioners had.
There being no further discussion from the audience, Chairman
}Ialus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at
8:27 P.M.
After a brief discussion amonq the Commissioners, It was moved
b_2f Mr. Webster,' ~econded by Mr. Mahone¥, that Resolution No.
1068 be adopted, conditionally a_~provinq Application No.
UP-69-295 for the foliowin~ reasons:
1. The Commission finds that the establishment, main-
tenance and operation of the use applied for will
not,under the circumstances of the particu'lar case
be detrimental to the heal. th, safety, morals, comfort
and general welfare of the persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of the proposed use and it will
not be injurious or detrimental to the property and
improvements inithe neighborhood or the general welfare
of the City. ~
2. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence intro-
duced at the hearing are included by reference and made
a part of the motion.
]
PC Minutes - April 14, 1969 ·
Conditions of approw~l are:
That a permit be obtained from the Fire Department
to install the bulk sLorage underground tanks, pumps
and related plu]~)ing and apparatus. The permit appli-
cation shall include a plot plan of the installation
in relation to o'Lher appurtenances sketched on a legal
size sh%et of paper.
That the specifications for the vacuum installation
be submitted to the Fire Department.
That full sidewalk be installed alon(~ the Red Ilill
frontage to the standards of the City of Tustin.
That street trees be installed per the Master Street
Tree Plan.
That architectural plans including plot plan, eleva-
tions and detailed landscaping be submitted to the
Architectural Co~nittee for review and approval.
That a machanical or landscape screen be constructed
in front of the restroom doors to the satisfaction of
the Architectural Committee.
The above motion was voted by roll call.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstained:
Carried 5-1
L_u_d~?_ig, Halus,.. Webster, Mahoney, Larnard
Shar~)
Oster.
4. UP-69-297 - WIND AMBULANCE SERVICE
To permit the construction of a 65 ft. radio antenna in
the C-1 (Retail Co~nercial) District.
Location: Site fronts 101 ft. on the south side of First St.
and 187 ft. on the west side of Myrtle St., at the southwest
corner of the intersection of First and Myrt].e Streets.
Mr. Supinger presented the staff report stating that this
request results from the intention of Wind Ambulance to re-
locate his ambulance service and sickroom supply store from
the present facility at 736 through 740 W. First Street to
the proposed location at 700 W. First St. Proposal is to
erect the antenna at the new location.
Chairman IIa].us opened the public portion of the hearing at
8:55 P.M.
Mr. qeorge Aquino, 700 W. First Street, applicant, spoke of
the structure, the amount of cars and vehicles that park on-
site and answered questions that the Commissioners asked.
There being no other comments from the audience, Chairman Halus
declared the public port~on of the hearing closed at 8:57 P.M.
After a very brief discussion among the Commissioners, Mr. Larnaru. ·
moved that Resolution No. 1069 be adopted,, conditionall~
~n_g__A_[)plication No. UP-69-297 for the__~_o_l].owin~ reasons:
The Commission finds that the establishment,
maintenance and operation of the use applied for
will not, under the circumstances of the particular
case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
comfort and genera], welfare of the persons residing
or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use
and it W~, not b~ in~mrlou~ ~r ~t~mont~i to the
property and fmprovements in thn noi,.lhborh~)d ~)~' ~$~m
general welfare of the City.
PC Minutes - April 14, 1969
2. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence
introduced at the hearing are included by reference
and made a part of the motion.
Conditions of.approval:
1. That an additional ten (10) feet right-of-way on
First Street be granted in accordance with the
Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
2. That proposed plans for parking on the property be
subject to the approual of the Architectural Committee.
Motion seconded by Mr. Mahoney
The above motion was voted by roll call.
Ayes: Oster, Sharp, Webster, Ludwi$, Halus, Ma~oney, Larnard.
Noes: None .
Carried 7-0.
5. V-69~243 - ANGEL-MOCK & ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF PIONEER
CHICKEN
To permit: 1. A take-out food establishment in the
C-2 (Central Col~ercia].) District. 2. Reduction in
the required parking spaces from twenty (20) spaces
to nineteen (19) spaces.
Location: Site fronts on the west side of Laguna Road and
on the east side of E1 Camino Real (South D Street) at the
intersection of Laguna and E1 Camino Real.
~r._ S~_~p.~!g_e~ stated that due to an error in advertising subject
hearing, it was'suggested that' this item be continued to the
April 28, 1969 Planning Com~iss.ion Meeting. This is due to
the incorrect advertising of the requested variance for off-
street parking spaces.
Chairman Hal.us opened the public portion of the hearing at
9:00 P.M. There being no comments from the audience, the
hearing was declared closed at 9:01 P.M.
It was moved by Mr. Mahone~, seconded by ~r. Larna~d, that
Application No. V-69-243 (Pioneer Chicken) be continued to
the April 28, 1969 meeting.
The above motion carried unanimqusly.
6. PZ-69-115 - DR. DUAYNE CHRISTENSON
For prezoning of a .3.07 acre parcel to the R-3 (Multiple
Family Residential) District.
Location: Site ~ronts .approximately 314 ft. on the northwest
side of "B" Street, approximately 30 ft. northeast of the
centerline of McFadden Street in the south Tustin area.
Mr. Su~er stated that a letter has been received by the
applicant to continued this hearing to the April 28,'1969
m~ting.
It was moved by Mr. Sharp, seconded_by M_r. Mahoney, that subject.
~earin~ be continued to the April 28, 1969 meeting. Carried 7-0
PC Minutes - April
7. V-69 242 - kO~{l.kf E. WILDE - SIGNS
To permit a second free-standing sign identifying
specific businesses within a commezcial co,nplex. The
proposed si'gn would have an overall height of 61 ft.
6 in, an area of 1107 sq. ft. per side and a total area
of 2214 sq. ft.
Location: Site fronts approximately 335 ft. on the north side
of Seventeenth Street at the northeast corner of the inter-
section of Seventeenth Street and Newport Freeway.
Mr. Su_pinger. presented the staff report stating that the
Planning Commission and the Planning Department staff met
with the applicant and his representatives on the site,
April 5 to determine the necessary height., by erecting a
flag or target and driving the freeway to determine the
visibility of tile flag. IIe stated that after the flagging,
the Planning Conunission and Depar-['.ment Staff felt that the
proposed height' and area of the sign ig justified.
M_r. su~n_g~ stated that the proposal would comply with the
provisions of the proposed changes for the Sign Ordinance
which wi].], be adopted later this year.
Chairman Hales opened the public portion of the hearing at
9:05 P.M.
Mr. Roberk Wi].de, applicant, 1943 Seventeenth Street, con-
curred with the staff report, stating that it is a freeway
oriented complex and the proposed sign seems to conform with
the requirements in the proposed Sign Ordinance.
There being no further comments or discussion from the
audience, Chairman I.lalus declared the hearing closed at 9:10 P.~,.
After a very brief discussion amon9 the Commissioners, It was
moved by Mr. Oster, seconded b~ Mrs. Ludwiq, that Resolution No.
1070 be adopted, approving Application V-69-242 for the follow-
in9 reasons:
That the adjustment hereby authorized will not
constitute a grant of special privilege incon-
sistent with the limitations upon other properties
in the vicinity and district in which the subjept
proper'fy is situated.
That because of special circumstances applicable to
the subject property, including size, shape, topog-
raphy, location or surroundings, the strict appli-
cation of the Zoning Ordinance will deprive subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties
in the vicinity and under identical zone classifi-
cation.
As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence
introduced at the hearing are included by reference
and made a part of the motion.
Resolution permits:
Number Hei.~h__t Area
1. Freeway Identification Sign ].
61'6" 2214 sq.ft.
The above motion was voted by roll call.
Ayes: Oster, Ludwig, }Iai us, Webster, Mahon.e.y.3 Larnard
No¢:s: ~__~ a rp ......
Carried 6-1
PC Minutes - April 14, ].969
VI.
OLD BUSINESS
A~U.:ND74i".NT OF TIll.: ZONING O]ID]]NANCE, ORD. NO. 157, a, nd the
R'o provide for the cstablishment of a' Development Preview
Co~i ttce. '
Mr. Supi.n.g._9_r: presented the staff report stating that this would
~.eplace the Architectural. Conunitgee, that is now in existence.
}[e stated that the proposed ordinance begins with a description
of the purpose for creating the Development Preview Committee
and puts the City on record as being concerned with the visual
appearance of tile communit~ and charges the Conunittee with
maintenance of the visual appearance of the community.
This committec would consist of one (1) City Councilman, one
(1) Planning Commissioner a:~d one (1) resident of the City,
who would serve at large. The Planning Director would be an
advisor and non-~oting men, er to the Committee.
Mr. Supinger stated that J.f the p¥opo~ed ordinance meets with
the Co~mnission's approval, J.t is recommended that they recom-
mend it to the City Council for adoption·
Chairman IIalus opened the public portion of the hearing at
9:18 P.M.
Those attending and voicing opinions were:
Mr. Gared Smith, 2043 Westcliff Drive, Newport Beach.
Mr. Morris, ].8121 Fourth Strect, Tustin.
Mr. Sin'S. th and Mr; Morris felt that this type of'a Committee .
could be hazardous and were not in agreement with the proposal
of selecting one Commissioner and one Councilman to be Qn the
Board. They fe].t that it wou].d be an unfair appeal, if there
was a need for such action.' Thc. y voiced disapproval of the
Committee's rights to tell. anyone exactly what kind Of material,
color scheme and size of doors and windows they should use.
Mr. Morris felt that professional people should be on the Com-
mittee and more flexibility as to style, design and the over-
all rights should be allowed, with the Committee acting as an
Advisory Board to the Conunission.
There being no further discussion from the audience, 'Chairman
tIalus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at
9:40 P.M.
The Co~missioners discussed the possibility of soliciting
co~uents and guidelines f~om other cities to help establish
criteria and procedures for this type of a Committee. A copy
of the "Guidelines for Design Review" was submitted to the
Commission by the California Council, .The American InstituCe
of Architects, prior to the meeting. The Commissioners ex-
pressed the desire to .continue this hearing so that they would
have more time tO evaluate and study the booklet along with any
other information that may be available through contacting other
cities.
It was moved b~ Mr. Webstar, seconded b~ Mr. Sharp, ~hat subject
hea~n~ be continued to May 12, 1969, in order to allow more
time for reviewinq any a~ditional information relative to the
~e~e].oRm¢~nt Preview Committee.
Motion carried 7-0.
NONE
Minutes - A[~ril 1/~, ].969
VII.
NEW
BUSINESS
1. PARCEL MAP 1.'M--69-17 - I]AT.,],, TRAV]'S & JUANITA
Loca{:ion: Southeast corner of Second and "A" Street
To reorient l~ts to face Second Stree. t for more desirable
lot size and shape for future development.
_~!r..._~y_e._r.s., City Engineer, submJ, tted a report stating that
the applican'L', should be made aware that this area of the
City is currently under study for possible rezoning to per-
mit other than R-1 type of development.
Mr. My_e_r...s_. recommended, adoption of a m.{nut:e order approving
the parcel map subject to conditions.
It was moved by_ Mr. Oster, seconded by_ ~r... Shar.p that a minute
order be ~,dol?_tc__d..3~R¥,~_o_~v~__n.~- P__3_~rcel Mai? PM-6.9-17 subj_ect to the
following condition£::
Upon d~ve].opment of the propel-ty, full street im-
p. rovements shall be constructed irxcluding, curb and
gut[:er, sJ.dewalks, pavement and street trees on the
Parcel that is being developed. The Developer shall
also be responsible for any modifications to the
existing irrigation system necessary to permit the
required street construction.
Final approval by the City Engineer and recordation
of the map.
Motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Webster asked if the staff would direct a letter to the
applicant making him aware of the study unde~vay for possible
rezoning to per~it'other thgn R-1 type of development in this
particular area.
2. PARCEL I.IAP PM-69-18 - FIRST WESTERN BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Location: South side of First Street, from 167 to 614 feet
east of Prospect Avenue.
Mr. M~ers, Cit~__En___.qineer, submitted a report stating that
Parcel 2 of the property will be utilized for expansion of
the Post Office. Parcel 1 will be held for future sale or
development. Current zoning is C-2-P and C-1.
Mr. Myers recommended adoption of a minute order approving
the parcel map subject to conditions on both parcels.
After a brief discussion among the Co~nissioners, It was moved
BY Mr. Oster, seconded by Mr. Mahoncy that a minute order be
adopted approvJnq Parcel Map PM-69-18 subject to the following
conditions on both parcels:
Granting of additional street right-of-way for First
Street in accordance with Master Plan of Ilighways and
close any unused driveway openings on First Street.
Construction of full street improvements, where missing
on First Street including curb, sidewalks, paving and
street trees.
Installation of street lighting on First St. frontage
of Parcel 1.
Relocation of existing irrigation facilities in First
Rtr~r,{, ,~, i~.~.~r¥ %~ f~l~.it~t~ ,,~t-t..'~,et end building
cons tr uctio~%.
PC Minutes - April ]4, ].969
5. Adequate prov_'isions should be made for drainage of
Parc~:l 1, .to the public alley.
Final app,.oval by the City Engineer and recordation
of the Parcel Map.
The above motion carrie..d una_nimously
FINAL 5~AP OF TRACT NO. 5849 (Second revised Tentative Map
of Tract 5849)
Location: On the south side of Mitchell. Avenue, approximatel-
600 iee[', west of Browning Avenue.
~;r. ,Myers, City Engineer, submitted s report stating that
su~'~'~--l~i~?p is the final portion of Tentative Map No. 5849
approved August 12, ].968, and conforms with the Second Re-
vised Tentative Map of Tract 5849 approved by the Planning
Cor~hraissioD on February ?.4, ].969, prov'~.ded that Tract 6749 to
the south is recorded to provi¢le the needed sewer and drain-
age right-o.f-way. Recording of TrDct 6749 is expected prior
to April 15, 1969. By. law, tl~e Planning Commission has
power.only to approve a final map if it conforms to the
Tentative Map. It should not consider, and may not require
any new, different or modified conditions of approval.
Mr. Myer:!. recommended that the Final Map of Tract No. 5849
be approved subject to the recording of Tract 6749 and to
the final approval by the City Council and the City Engineer.
It was moved b~ Mr. I.arnard, seconded by__~ps.. Lq~wig that
Final Map of Tract No. 5849 be a~proved sDbject.to the re-
cording of Tract 6749 and to the final approval by the City
Council and the CJ. ty.~ngineer.
The above motion was voted by roll call.
Ayes: Oster, Ludw.~g, H~16s; Larnard, Shar~..
Noes: Mahone~
Abstained: Webster
Motion carried 5-1.
VIII.
CORRES~
PONDENCE
NONE
IX.
OTHER
BUSINESS
1. SEMINAR RE: FREEWAYS
It was called to the attention of the Commissioners that
there would be a seminar relative to freeways, held in
IIuntington Beach, April 22, 1969, if anyone was interested
in attending.
2. ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE
Mr. Mahonc~ will be a regular member of the Architectural
Committee begining April 16th and Mrs. Lud%fi~ will be the
alternate member.
ADJOURN-
MENT
It was moved by Mr. La.rnard, seconded by_ Mrs. Ludwi~ that
the meeti_n_g be .ad. journed. Carried 7-0.
There being no further business before the Commission, Chairman
IIa].us declared the meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M..
SEC~rARY OF TIiE PL~/qNING COMMISSIO~