Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 05-27-68minutes of a regular meeting tustin planning commission may 27, 1968 CAI,L TO ORDI'-'R II. ROLl, CALL III. APPROVAL OF F..INUTF. S IV. PUB]',IC tlI.;ARINGS The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M., by Cha~.rm, m Ilal. us. Present: Cormnissiouers: Oster, I,udwig, tlalus, Webster, Larnard, Nahon¢;y. Absent: Conmd. s s ioner: Bacon Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney James L. Supinger, P].anning Director Jo Ann Turner, Planning Connnission Secretary Chairman Ual.us ~.~elc~,ned }Ir. Rollin Mahoney to thc Planning Conm~ission. AMENr~.'iENT TO THE PLANNING C~'D~ISSION MINUI'ES - May 13, 1968 .Pa~.e 5~ }[earJng No. 5 - V-68-209 - JACK-IN-THE-BOX Previous action relative to V-68-209 determined that the menu- board would not be considered a ~. It was moved .by Mr. Osl:er~ seconded by Mr. Webster~ that t:be minutes of Nay 13, 1968 n'.eeting be approw;d as a,neuded. Carried 6-0. Absent: Bacon 1. ZC-68-174 - C. J. BONNER (Continued from May 13, 1968) For rezoning of six (6) acres of land from the R-1 (Single Fami].y Residential) and the C-1-P '(Retail Con~.mercial and C~nbined Parking) Districts to thc R-3 1750 (1.k:l.tip].e Residential, 1750 sq. ft. of lot area per dwelling unit) District. Locat ion: Site fronts approx~uately 70 ft., on the west side of Carroll Way and approximately 30 ft. on the north side of Medford Ave. at tl}e intersection of said streets and is bounded by the New- port Freeway on thc west, Single Family development on thc ' north and east anti vacant cm~nerctal property on the south. ~r. Sup_inger presented a brief staff report, recom~nending conditional approval stating that the proper access and street improvement plans are subject to the approval of thc City Engineer. Chairman llalus opened the public portion of thc hearing at 7:40 P.M. .}fr. C. J. Bonner, applicant, submitted exhibit:s of plans for the proposed development explaining each factor involved relative to subject appli- cation. A brief recess was declared for the benefit of the audience to review the exhibits on hand. Thc meeting rcconvcned at 7:58 P.M. ~Nr. E..Gott, 13811 Palace Way, G. I,. McDonald, 13762 Palace Way, Lloyd SJnclai.r_, 17312 I,aurie I,ane, Ge~o_:r~ge Brc'_w_e~r, 17391 Palace Way, William E. Gil,:orc~ Jr., 1.3771 Palace Way, F. Barsant:i~ 13772 Palace Way, Gordon K~;~,ber, Orange, spoke, opposTng tim proponed zone change. }fr. Go~_t, stated that their reason for opposing this application is because of the density and has; not:hSng to do with t:he prx)posed architecture and esthetics of the plans. A petition opposing subject application was submft~ed to the Ccmmission wit:h 42 signatures 1. isted. 2]~is petition is on file in the Planning Department at City }!all. /,./ There being no other co.'.::::unL.q frcr, a tho audi(~nce, declarc, d tlte public porLion of the hearing closed at 8:20 Mr. O:~ter fc, lt tlmt if this rczouing is granted, in effect it is not putt'Jng thc apartr.'..ents on the corner of Yorba but moving them in so that all the traffic would go past the ho;nos of thc; ho'-.::aowno, rs that are opposing this action. IIc: staled that w]~cn the. se pOOl)lC bou[~1~l: their hom,,~s they were.confident that it would rcm.aJn R-]. and fez' th{:se reasons was against the proposed application. It was moved by Mr. Os;ter~ sccondc, d by Mrs._I,uc.~,__th.'~t ZC-68-174 be, recon'.'.n.',~ndc~d to the CJ.I:y Coop. c:';.1 fo~: den~al. Chairman llal.us called for a vote on the call for question. Oster clarified this action as a vote to end discuss~.on. Ayes: Oster, l,udwig, Halus, Webster, l,arnard, Mahoney. Noes: None. Absent: Bacon. CarrJed 6-0. ~le motion reco.:mo..ending denial of applicat.'ion ZC-68-174 was voted by roll call. Ayes: I,arnard, I,udwig, O,qter. Noes: Webster, lIaluso Absent: Bacon. Abstained: Mahoney. Carried 3-2. 2. UP.-68-261 - BOYS C],I9~ 0]? TI!S'J:IN - W. J. Frcdrikscn To consider a Use Permit for the construction of a club buflding and ancillary facilities on property leased, from the C~ty of Tustin. Location: South s~de of Sixth Street at the intersection of Sixth St., and Pacific Street. Mr. Supi!~.~.r presented thc staff report reco::~ncnd~ng couditional approval. Chairman }Iai. us opened thc public portion of the hearing at 8:25 P.M. Mr. W. J. Fredrjkscm, representative, stated that they were in agreement with the conditions as rec~mncndcd by the Planning Staff. Chairman Ual. us declared the public portion of thc hearing closed at 8:27 P.Mo After a brief discussion among l:he C~r~nissioners, It wa:; mowxl by. l, lr. Os.','er seconded b~i }Ir. Webster that Resol~,tion Nee 978 be adopted~_c_oj~(J=it_2~=o~__¥~!__]:2i .apl)r_ovin~__Aj23,licat~on UP-68--261_~B3yp_.Cl_ul~ of Tustin) for tho; follo',.ji~i reasons and un(let the following conditions: Reasons: 1. The C~,mnission finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the usc applied for will not, under: thc circ%unstanccs of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, co:nfort and general welfare of tim persons residing or working in the neig'hborhood of the pro- posed use and it will not be injurious or dctrir, mnt~l to the property and improvements in tho neigld)or}Jood or the general welfare of the C~i:y, Condit5 ohs: a. Sidewalk and driveway appro~',ches arc Lo be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer° b. Unused driveways arc to be closed and drainage facilities crossing thc property are t:o be relocated° c. St. rcet trees to bc p].auted as per the Master Street Trcc Plan. d. Architectural and 1.andncap~:g plan~: are to be sub.'.:~it:t'cd to the Archit:cctural C~::?.:ittec for approval., -2- The above mot:ion was voted by roll call. }~ahoney, ]]alt;.~;, Webs tcr. Noes: None. Bacon. 1.lotion c'arried 5-0. Ayes: Oster, Lud¥:~ g, Abs t ained: )xn:nard. Absent: 3. UP-68-262 - ]."IS}I & CHIP BUSINESS - Jack J. Cornell To permit the establishmm~t of a Fish & Chip business in an existing bui].ding which is a part of Larwin Squore Shopping Center. Locat ion: Proposed business fronts 20 ft. on the south side of First Street:, just east of Fern:th Street and is numbered 610 E. First Street. Mr. Supingcr_ presented the staff reporL reconuncnding approval, lie stated that take-out food establishments are permitted with the parking requirements in C-1 and C-2 zones as follows: One (1) parking space/150 sq. ft. of ground floor area of building. Chairman Halus opened the publ. ic portion of the hearing at 8:30 .M.r. Jack Corn, Il_, applicant, was in attendance but made no statement. Chairman llalus declared the public portion of the hearing closed at 8:31 P.M. %~e Co:~mission concurred with the staff report. It was moved by 14r. Oster, seconded by Mrs. Ludwig,. that 'Resolution No. 979 be adopted alS.proving Application No. UP-68-262 (Fish & Chip Bnsiness) for the followin[I reasons: ~e. C~.~mission finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the usc applied for will not, under the circum- stances of thc particular case be detrhnental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use and it will not be injurious or dctr~2'.:ental to the property and improvements in t]~c neighborhood of the general welfare of the City. The above motion was voted by roll. call. Ayes: Larnard, tlalus, Mahoney. Noes: None. Absent: Ludw~ g, Webs ter, Os ter Bacon. Carried 6-0. 4. UP-68-263 - KENTUCKY PRIED CHICKEN - Frank Schneider AIA & Assoc. To permit a take-out food store (Kentucky Fried Chicken) on property fronting 110 ft. on the southwest side of First Street approxfmu%tely 220 ft. northeast of the centerline of Newport Avenue. .}ir. Snpinger presented the staff report recommending conditional approval as follows: a. Sidewalks shall be constructed by applicant. b. Completion of previou.%ly sub,nitted parcel ,nap. c. Trees are to be planted as per Master Street Tree Plan. d. Architectural and landscaping plans are to be submitted for Architectural Co:?::d. ttee's approval. Chairman Ual.us opened the pnblic portion of the hearing at 8:32 There being no. co:muents from the audience, Chairman Halus declared the pnblic portion of the hearing closed at 8:33 P.M. After a brief d,_'scussion among the Co?..niss~.oners, It was moved by Mr. }.lahoney, scco!-,_ded b_~y- Mr. Oster th,~t Resolution 'No. 980 be adopted reco~.?:.end,fn~ con:l~t~onal a~.nroval of UP-65-263 .(~_ej!tt:cl.:v Fried Chicken~ for t he fo]. l.o:...'i nf,._~o_..?_n?,__.,2,-C.f~_u!!der the fol] o...:£n,l co;:d~ t iop,.°,: -3- 1. 'fha Co;vniss~on f:inds that t:lm est.ab]L'Jslunent, ma'i~Lc, nanco and operation of tho use aj)p].icd for wi].], not, cir~u::lstanccs of tlic~ part~cu].ar c. ase. be dct:ri:::Ln'~tal [-o the heal. dh, safety, morals, cm':for[: and general welfare of thc pOt'sons rcsidin[l or Yyor]2iil~ ill thc} neSgJlbor]iood use and it will not be 5njnrious or detriulont;L1 to ~]lc~ prop:~ri:y , and iJnl)roveul.3, nEs ill tho ncigl{!)orltood or ~he general x.';~].'farc of t:he City.' Conditions of a~n'oval should be: a. S~dewalks shall 1)0. constructed by applicant. b. Completion of previously submitted parcel map. c. Trees are to be planted as per Haster Street Tree Plan. d. Architectural and landscaping plans arc to be sul)mit~cd for Architectural C~m~tt:ec's approval. Ayes: MM. us, Oster, Webster, Absent: Bacon. Carried 6--0. %~ae above motion was voted by roll ca].l. Mahoney, Ludwig, Larnard. Noes: None° 5. ZC-68-176 - georjjc, l~._ LudwJgz For rczoning fro:a E-/~ (Estat:c Residential) l)istrict to tl-3 (]4n].tiplc Family l~csidcntial) District. Location: Thc parcel of land fronts 150 ft. on thc west side, of Yorba approximat'cly 180 ft. south of the ccntcrline of Fourt:h St. }ir. S.u~.n_2jjp.~lf' presented a brief staff repm't reco~:m:endiug t:o thc City Council the rezoning of subject prop3rty from F,-4 to R-3 for'the follo;,:- lng reasons: 1. 'l~m present no~tconforL:ing usc on part: of tlm s.ul)ject: propert:y is more permitted in an R-3 zone. The remaining 1.29 acres of undevelol)ed land atmt:ting the fre. eway is more suitable for higher density develop- merit iu conron:,ity with the adjacent: zoning. %~e approw:l of the applicat:ion, however, should lm sub jo:ct to the foil.owing conditions: Dedication of right-of-way and construct:ion of street improvement:, and ,:ny necessary modification of irrigation facilities on thc north end of I4yrtle Ave. to the satSs- faction of the CS ty Engineer. Chairman lla].u~ opened the pub].ic portion of the hearing at 8:36 Hr. C. eorge Ludwig, 5373 Mountain V~ew~ Yorlm LSnda, applicant, was in attendmme. Chairn:an Hal.us declared the public: portion of Lite. hearing closed at 8:37 A It:ti:er from }Ir. CecS1 V. Cha:nbcrs, 1~89]. Yorl)a Si. rear, Tust~n was sub- mitt:ed to thc: Co;:snission requesting (].) thc bull.ding of a cc~;~.2nt block wall 6'8" in height on thc boundry l. ina bet:ween the E4 zone and 11-3 zen{ at the t~ma the proport'y is developed, (2) maintain at all t:imos t:he Santa Aha Vel]ay Irrigation wet:er line J.n usable condit'ion. Mr. S.t,_p..inFrar explained that: a block wall will be required. 981 p32oRl£yt'y fj't::u I",-4 to R-3 fo]: th(: fo].].owJ:~.~; reason:;: -4- i ,'~inu:cs -- !k:y 2'/, 1968 1. The present nouconformJug usc on part of the subject proport'): is more pcrmittt~d iu an R-3 zone. 2. 2. The remaining 1.29 acres of undeveloped land.abutting the freeway is more suitable for higher density d¢:veloir,~:':nt in . conformity with the adjacent zonini~,. Coud it: ion: Dedication of right-of-way and construction of street prowzmen[:, and any necessary modification of irrigation facilities on th~ north end of Myrtle Avenue to thc satis- faction of the City Engineer. T~]e above motion was voLed by roll cai].. Ayes: Oster, Ludwig, }Ia]ms, Webster, Larnard, Mahoney. Noes: None. Absent: Bacon. Carried 6-0. 6. ZC-68-177 - Gt, oz_z~e L. Argyros on behalf of Carl Stntsman For rezoning of approxh~ately 4,75 ace. es from the "U" (Unclass- ified) District to tho R-3 (1.[ult~l)le Family Residential) District. Locai:ic~: Site fronts 330 ft. on the northeast side of Walnut Ave., approximately 1000 ft. southeast of the centcrl, il~e of Now- port Avenue. ?!r. Supi~A.%gr presented the staff report stating that subject property is within thc bigh density designation of the General Plan, adjacent prop- ertios to the west have been rezoucd to R3-1750 (Christcson and Stutsman properties). There was no rcco.:~mndation from the staff. Chairman Ualus opened thc public portion of the hearing at 8:43 P.M. Mrs Ca.orgD~._~.rgyro_,%, 415 West Fourth St:root, representatiw~, stated that they felt that the South Tustiil Area is the best apartment rental area. Ue further explained thc proposed .plans for the development, stating that did not anticipate any problems with the proposed apartment development. Chairman }Iai.us declared the public portion of the hearing closed at 8:50 P.M The Coi,~mission discussed the density, the dwelling units per acre and other matters involved in su. bject application. It was moved by Mr. Oster: seconded by Mr. Mahoney~ that Re:solution No. 982 be adopted reco:~nandinq to City. Cow.~cil the approval of ZC-68-177 for the rezonin.%, of am~roximatel¥ 4.75 acres from tl~e "U" (Unclassified) ~ District to thc R-3 1750 (,'..[ultip!e Family Residential) District:. Thc above motion was voted by roll call. Ayes: Webster, Larnard, Mahoney, Halus, Oster, Noes: Ludwig. Absent: Bacon. Carriell 5-].. 7. PZ-68-105 - PL:\:~.~ING COi.~.M'.rSS!ON INIT!A'iU::D - Nisson Property Prezoning of approximately f~.24 acres to the R-4 (Suburban Residential) District. Location: Subject propcrt'y fronts 34.1 ft. on the southeast side of Red Hill Avenue and 540 ft. on the northeast side of Wa].nnt Avenue. M_r..Supjn__~.e~r. presented the staff report stating that the reason for this proposal is tO incorporate 4.24 acres to the 95 acres being in process of al]nox¢.t loll. -5- '/~f' PC ),iinutes - ~.i.'.ty 27, 1968 Ve OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUS I NI: $ $ lie reco::~:;~endc'd bhat PZ--68--10S be approved and reco::'.'r, en0c.d to tlm City Counc'~l for adop[Cfon of an ordinance prczoning sub jo;ct area fro:~ Al{ (Agricultural Residential, County) zoning to R-4 Suburban Resident'iai zoning for the following reasons: 1. Subject zoni~g confor,;:$ to the Tustin Area (.:eueral Plan. Thc proposed zoning'is in accordance with dcvclol):,cnt trends in the area. Chair~:~an lla].ns opened thd public portion of thc hearing at 8757~ P.M. ~crc being ~:o co:m::e~ts from thc audience, Chairman }la l. us declared the public portion of the hearing closcd at 8:55 I'.M. After a brief dSscuss~on, It: was moved l~s:_.~,~_r_.__L_~q3:.pitrd_~~ seconded bv Nr. Os ['er tt,:, t' Resolution No. 98:4 be ad o.,.'.:~, reco:'::;'.and ::?~.t:~?~:~-68~. 10B be approved a:)d reco:?:nanded to the Ci:v Council for adoption of an ordinal)ce prezonins, subjc~(:t area from AR ~Ar:ricu].tural Res:;.d(:.:~tia.l~_ Count:y). zo)]~2~_R-4 (Suburban Res:{.denl'ial) zo~)in~ for the foll. o,..:in~, 1. Sul)jcct zoning conforms to the 'lh~stin Area General Plan. 2. Rq:e t,roposed zoning is in accordance with dcvel, op:nent trends in thc area. Thc above motion was voted by roll call. Ayes: Oster, Lar~mrd, Noes: ]Iai. us, Mahoncy, Ludwig, Wel):;ter. Absent: Bacon. Motion failed l~-2.. Mr. James ]'-I~ NJsson, 14/~62 Red 11'~1]., owner of thc property, asked what: affect this would have on the Bro,,.ming-Waluut Annexatiou~ inas~.uc]~ ~s this was part of the consideration. _}ir. Sul)j/]il(.,~.-explained that there are two separate option.~; and one does not neccssari].y effect the other, lie further explained t:hat if this prop3rty is not rezoned, it will come in a "U" ])istr';.cL, per,nit- ting any us(: subject to the grant'~ng of a Use Permit. Mr. Rourke, City Attorney, stat(;d that it is the action of the City Council that will be final and that the Planning Co;mnission's decision does not necessarily mean that it is denied. The C~ty Council is thc body that ha,~ t]~e sole power to prezone this property which they can do upon or in opposition to the recommendation of this Planning Commission. NONE 1. TEN~£ATIV1''. TRACT MAP NO~ 6661 - SPROUI, I!(Y:,!ES - For Approval° Location: South of Ma~.n Street, 438 ft. cast of Lyon Street. A report was sub:nit'ted to the Plmming Co::~ission, by Mr. Orv~]].c I.;yers, City Engineer, stal:ing that if the Tcmt:a[:3v(~ >ial) is approvcd~ ~t' should be subject to the following conditions: 1. All streets within the Tract are to be develop(..,d and to remain, priw~te streets. 2. Provide water system and public sewers to serve all lots together w~th any necessary o~.f-,,~te sewer to counet't to exist:iht SanSLa[ion D5strict or C~t:y of TusLSn sewers. 3. Provide adequate st:race lSgl~t:ing on bot'h Main Street and inter,or tract streets and annex to Tustin I,ight'~ng District. (Contain.ed on next p.~-gc) -6- A1.]. public ~' , ....... ~ · ].lp~ox ~,.~.ts, sewers, drainage faci].it~es and apl)urtelmncc, s shall be constructed to CJI:), stm[dards and 'a.l!prow:d by thc City }';uginecr. 5. All public utilitic, s shall be installed Ondergrou:td in conforma]~ce with accepted standards of utility companies. Street uan;e signs and street trees shall bo provided in accordance with City ordinances on l~a'Ln Street and on in- terior tract streets. Ye Provide thc necessary casem,,mts for tim construction and maintenance of sewers, water line, street lighting and othe. r public f~:cilit~es. 8. Provide adequate drainage, facilities to serve the tract and conmmt to the existing County drainage facilities. e Estal)lisb a property-o~mer or si:nil.ar association to per- form the necessary street, recreation area, and trc:e main- tenancc op?.ra tions ~:.it'hin the. Tract. 10. '1'bose segments of existing irrigation lines conf'licting with any proposed construction shall be remo(,cd and re- located or collapsed and lmckfi].led, or otherwise, made to conform to the specifications of the City of Tustin Build- lng Cod(: and t:o the satisfaction of the City Engi~mer. 11. Remove existing buildings within the tract boundary. 12. Provide and install "No Parking" signs on one side of all interior streets and include this parking restriction ti'to covenants, con(l'i, tio~s and restrictions. After a re. view of the conditions and a brief dS.q:;eussSo]~ It: was moved ~y l, lr. O,;t'cr_ seco,'~'k,d by '.h'~ l,t',h.'~- tbal- T(,ntativc l.;ap be apl)roved ..... ' ' '2 .... 1 .......J. L.% ......... 2- _2:.~.--2~2 ;LLI.__Z ' .............. M_r.. ~_o_r..?_~i, representative of the Sproul llomes, was in attendance, stating that the conditions ¥:ere acceptable. 14r. Tom Shelton, Shelton EngSn.?,cring, was also in attendance, but gave no co.,.~ncnt. above motion carriedu,.~',".~.~r, lous 1¥..___ VIIi. CORRES- PONI)E XC E 1. COUNJ~Y CASE 1~r-6075 - LA RUE ]:'REY~, IN_C__. To permit thc construction of two, two unit: apart'merit buildings on a parcel i~ the lO0-E4 "Small t';st~:t:es" District. Location: At the northeast corner of Vanderlip Ave. hue and Cameron Lane, in the nortl) Tust-in area. Mr. Supj32Brjr presented the staff report st:ating that the General Plan calls for litpdil, l lo'.,.: density 2.5 du/ac develop;::ant for the area. Based upon this density, 1.5 units would be permitted on the subject .58 acre parcel rather than ~ units as proposed. }la added that the approval of th~s application would upset the general high quality residential char- actr:rist:ics of the area and create a precedent for further s~::dl.ar appli- cations, reco;n?.ancling that the Couut'y loc: 5nforv.:ad of our si)position. It: was norad l)v ~.i::. Oster, seconded bv :.!r l,nrnard t:hat a ].et'tar be · 2rSttc, n t.o tl,e Com'[v, o,m~;~.,o, thc a"mrow,! of A~:~licetion UV--6075 ........................ '- . . l ~.~_1 ::.'~_'_ _ :~_'~.~ ...... ~ ....... ~ ................... for t'be re~u/'jJl'ed ~':u!'-il~l.e f~i;i[.~.D'_3J~) bc~.j~er~::~t:ted in the E-.4 Distr~c~. Motion carried 6-0. Absent:: Bacon. -7- 2. COUN'L"f C/.SE UV-.6078 - SI!!;i':'.IL\..'; ])EVEI,Oi'NE.XI' CO. To perm:i.t thk? COltS t:ru,.~tiou of.' an ap?.rlmJnt' co, aplcx ]x~\-ing a tot:al OE 80 tulitg 0~{ a p;ir,.'.o], el. ].;,'.~'~cl co,uko.~nir::; less t:hJn t:hc~ rcqu:Lrcd al:eLl ill thc! ][/i-7000-(PD)-3000 "~llbllEbJll ]~r~sidcll[:~al ].)].al'~!¥.td ])c~vclop- ment" District. Local:ion: On tlie. sou['.lwast side of NeY:port Boulevard ~,pp:-o:::h:xltely 380 ft. northeast of Wass St:., Jn the nortlwa..';t Tu.q['Jn area. Mr. Sup_'.Jp. 5.c2'- prc,qc, nl:cd t:he .ql:a£f report stating, that alt:hough the densit:y of the prol)o:;cd dew~loi;:,'..e'at coinplics wil'h thai: of thc' (::cmeral 'Plan) x.:e are opi)o.~;ed, iu princ~p:tl, t'o the usc of tim llsa Varjaucc procedure as a ina [:1)o'3 of get ting around, el: amend ~ng~ the Zoniug . Ordinance regu.~at:iolts for PI) DJ. stric~s. ]lc sL'at:c.d that a more al}pro- priake procedure ¥yould bc rczmlin3 to ]~/~(3000) ¥.'],iclJ would not. l;a opposed by tim staff. }Ir. Ost'er stated that he did no[ I'hink it was the pc. rvi. c,¥; of thc Plan- ning Coi.'~nissiou t.o direct thc: Comity as to hov7 to conduct t. hair ac. tion. It'. was moved by :'.!:. Oz~t'eT__~ secoi)Oc'd l)y T,h-. 1,arnard, t:hal: no ac,.rion be takelt On t]lJr; v.l:!plJcat::ion fro,: the 'J'm;tiu ]>].a]?Yt--~.l_l. 3' C('.::!:','[ssion. Voted by roll cal].~ Ayes: Oster, ],ud::ig, Nal~ouey, Webster, I.ammrd. Noes: }talus. Absent: Bacon. motion carried 5..1. - "', 7.1.5 3. COUNTY CASE ZC-.68-17 Al,lA ]}1 DA)]IY and JOi!N ASC}!IRIES Rezoning fro:n t. lm t{4 (Subm-lm~ ]{csidential) ])Jstrict to tim CC (Colt.-.?unity Col.-.-:.Jrcial) ])J.st.i'Jct. Location: Nort:lr.;e.%t side of Newpo'."t (Adjace~lt to and south:.:est of existing 'J:cxaco Service Stat:ion). Mr. Sup~]!;~!'' present'cd the staff report: st:al:i~)g I:hat the Commission has ah:cady gone on record as feeling that this is not a propcr use for t:lm area as 5ndical:ed on t:lte Gcmeral Plait and tl)at additional, co:::.!ercial zoning 5s not needed in the area. lle suggested that the County Pla)re:Lng C(:;.nd. ssjon be 5nforl::ed of our opposition to l:he proposed zmm change for the following The proposed rezoning is contrary to thc Tu.c;tJn Area General Plan which desSgnat:es the subject area for }Ugh Density Residential Use (12 du/ac.) 2. Adequate: areas are i)resently zoned for coir..'aercial trees to serve the existing ami future needs of the area. ]~m CoF. r. iission has previously gone ou record as being opposed to commercial use for the subject' ln'Op:'rty. Aft:er a brief discussion m::ong t:he Co:,':nissJonc, rs, }ir. Osi',.'r, seco',ded l)y Hrs. l,udx2iF, tlwt' t'lm Pla~m].ng l)~rector :.'rJt'e subicct ap~)l:lcat.'.'on for tl~e al)eve renaop..qo VJ.II. 0]] ~ E R BUSi,xiESS IX. AD30Uil?.,~'- MI".NT .-r---:. :-'..-~ -' ..... ' .... ~----J ................. ~ ............................................................ _bi _q.dj?3-3 V: J., c?.'.-.:Y_;.e_~.!._t_!~.!.:'-'!.~.~ !."_.':L'f There t)ciug no fm't:her bv. ziness before tim l'lan;~ing Ce:~:.:is;sJoi't~ llalu.'; declared tlte i:',e~'.ti~'3 acljotn:u,~d at: 9:30 tI.2~ .... 1 CC[::.[[SSI 0]~ I.. ....Oi.. [,.iF': :,'., C[IA] "'" ' ........