HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 10-101RESOLUTION NO. 10-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TUSTIN RANCH ROAD
REHABILITATION PROJECT BETWEEN BRYAN AVENUE
AND JAMBOREE ROAD CIP NO. 70195, AND
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California
to contract for the construction of the Tustin Ranch Road Rehabilitation Project between
Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road CIP No. 70195; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has presented plans and specifications for the
construction of said work; and
WHEREAS, this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act; Class 1, Section 15301: Existing Facilities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City Engineer are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for:
Tustin Ranch Road Rehabilitation Project between Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road
CIP No. 70195
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for
the performance of the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications;
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Tustin on the 7th day of December, 2010
PAMELA STOKER
City Clerk
Resolution 10-101
Page 1 of 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 10-101 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 7th day of
December, 2010 by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Amante, Nielsen, Gavello, Gomez, Murray (5)
COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None (0)
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None (0)
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None (0)
v
PAMELA STOKER,
City Clerk
Resolution 10-101
Page 2 of 2