The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPOWERPOINT -ORDINANCE 1392 (Tattoo)INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1392 Tattoo Establishments Synopsis recent Court Case NinthCircuitCourtofAppeals(Andersonv. ? CityofHermosaBeach,2010) Theprocessandbusinessoftattooingare ? pureformsofexpressionfullyprotectedbythe FirstAmendment TotalbanontattooparlorsintheCitywasan ? unconstitutionalrestrictionsonfreeexpression Itwasnotareasonable“time,placeand ? manner”restriction Tustin City Code Tattoo establishments are not listed as permitted ? uses in the Tustin Zoning Code No specific provisions regulating the location or ? operational of tattoo establishments Why Interim Ordinance TheCityhasreceivedinquiriesregardingthe ? permittingandestablishmentoftattooestablishments Tattooingifundertakeninunsanitaryconditionscan ? leadtothetransmissionofinfectiousdiseasesanda threattopublichealth,safetyandwelfare Absentspecificprovisionssuchusescouldbe ? establishedinareaswheretheyareinconsistent and/orincompatiblewithsurroundinglanduses Astudyofimpactsassociatedwithorimplicateduse ? ofthepropertyfortheoperationoftattoo establishmentstoprotectthepublichealth,safety andwelfarewouldneedtobeperformed California Government Code Section 65858 Allowsforaninterimurgencyordinancetemporarily ? prohibitingalandusewhileitstudiesrelatedlanduse regulations Requiresafour-fifthvoteforadoption ? Validfor45days ? Maybeextendedfor10monthsand15daysand ? subsequentlyforoneyearuponnoticepursuantto Section65090andpublichearing(require4/5vote) Notmorethantwoextensionsmaybeadopted ? Interim Ordinance No. 1392 AdoptionofInterimUrgencyOrdinanceNo.1392would ? establishatemporarymoratoriumontheestablishmentand operationoftattooestablishmentswithintheCityofTustinfora periodof45dayspendingthecompletionofawrittenreport describingthemeasurestakentoalleviatetheconditionwhich ledtotheadoptionoftheOrdinance. Thereportmayincludeastudyofpotentialcodeamendmentsto ? theCity’slanduseregulationsthatareneededtoaddressa currentandimmediatethreattothepublichealth,safety,and welfare. DetailedfindingsinsupportoftheadoptionofInterimUrgency ? OrdinanceNo.1392areincludedwithintheOrdinance. TheCityAttorney’sofficehasreviewedtheformandcontentof ? theproposedInterimUrgencyOrdinanceNo.1392.