HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 3826 2
3
4
5
7
8
9
15
17
19
2O
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
RESOLUTION NO. 3826
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING VARIANCE 02-001 TO CONSTRUCT A SIX (6)
FOOT HIGH BLOCK WALL AND THREE (3) - SIX (6) FOOT, SIX (6)
INCH PILASTERS WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK,
EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED HEIGHT OF THREE (3)
FEET.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application for Variance 02-001 was filed by Matt
Wheelwright on behalf of Standard Pacific Homes to construct a six
(6) foot high block wall and three (3) - six (6) foot, six (6) inch
pilasters within the front yard setback exceeding the maximum
allowed height of three (3) feet.
That the Planning Commission duly called, noticed, and held a
public hearing on the project on March 25, 2002.
That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location, or
surroundings, the strict applicati~)n of the Zoning Ordinance is found
to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties
in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications.
As a result of lot placement and the existing topography of the
development, the lot has an unusual configuration. The property is
located on a cul-de-sac with a significant amount of street frontage
subsequently creating a lot width that is greater than the lot depth.
In addition, the residential structure is currently being constructed
on the eastern portion of the lot, with the south, or "front", property
line located along Silverado Terrace. Since the lot has a shallow
depth on the west side due to the configuration of the cul-de-sac
road and the house is located on the east side, the lot does not
have a squared shape resulting in a typical front and rear yard
area. The only useable yard area is located to the west of the
house and adjacent to the street. Typically, other lots with the
Estate Density residential district may enclose side and rear yard
areas with fencing that is a maximum of six (6) feet eight (8) inches
in height. The strict application of the applicable zoning would
deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties within
the same zoning district.
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
15
I6
l?
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
Resolution 3826
Variance 02-001
Page 2
That any Variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will
assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other
properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is
situated.
The granting of this variance would not constitute a special privilege
that is inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the
Estate Density residential district in that the main yard area would be
enclosed with a fence that is less than the maximum six feet eight
inches (6'8") in height that would be allowed within the side and
rear yards of other properties within the same zoning district.
This Project is Categorically Exempt (Class 5) Pursuant to Section
15305 of The California Environmental Quality Act.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Variance 02-001 to construct a
six (6) foot high block wall, and three (3) - six (6) foot, six (6) inch pilasters,
within the front yard setback exceeding the maximum allowed height of
three (3) feet, subject to conditions contained in Exhibit A attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning
Commission, held on the 25th day of March, 2Q02.
Do~glas~ S. ~D~'vert
~__~~ ~~ Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the
Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. 3826 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Tus. t.,i.i~Planning Commission, held on the 25th day of March, 2002.
'~LIZ~BET~ ~. B]N~ACK '
Planning Commission Secretary
GENERAL
(1) 1.1
(1) 1.2
(1) 1.3
(1) 1.4
(1) 1.5
EXHIBIT A
VARIANCE 02-001
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The proposed wall and pilasters shall substantially conform with the
submitted plans for the project date stamped March 25, 2002, on file with
the Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as
modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor
modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be
consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable
codes.
Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be
complied with as specified or prior to the issuance of any building permits
for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Department.
The subject project approval shall become null and void unless permits are
issued within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit and substantial
construction is underway. Time extensions may be granted if a written
request is received by the Community Development Department within
thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
Approval of Variance 02-001 is contingent upon the applicant returning to
the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing and recording
with the County Clerk-Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit
Approval and Conditions of Approval" form. The forms shall be established
by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation
shall be provided to the Community Development Department.
As a condition of approval of Variance 02-001, the applicant shall agree, at
its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City,
its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or
proceeding brought by a third party against the City, its officers, agents, and
employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an
approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other
decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City
agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim or action filed
against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action.
The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of
any such action under this condition.
SOURCECODES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
STANDARD CONDITION
CEQA MITIGATION
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S
DESIGN REVIEW
(5)
(6)
(7)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
PC/CC POLICY
EXCEPTION
Exhibit A Resolution 3826
Variance 02-001
Page 2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(1) 2.1
The wall shall be painted an off-white (Dunn Edwards #51 "Birchwood") to
match the other property walls and maintained in good repair at all times.
(1) 2.2
Within the front yard setback, the three (3) pilasters shall be a maximum of
six (6) feet, six (6) inches in height measured from the finish grade, and the
wall shall be a maximum height of six (6) feet in height.
PLAN SUBMITTAL
(1) 3.1 Prior to installation, the applicant shall obtain a building permit for the wall.
(3) 3.2
At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the
1998 California Building Code (CBC), City Ordinances, and State and
Federal laws and regulations. Building plan check submittal shall include
the following:
· Four (4) sets of construction plans;
· Elevations that include all proposed dimensions, materials, colors,
and finishes; and,
· Note on plans that no field changes shall be made without prior
approval from the Building Official and architect or engiheer of record.
FEES
(1)
4.1
Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all
applicable building plan check and permit fees to the Community
Development Department based upon the most current schedule.
A. Building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development
Department based on the most current schedule.
Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project the
applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a
cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of
$43.00 (forty-three dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight
(48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of
limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.