HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 3650l0
20
24
RESOLUTION NO. 3650
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-034
AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DRIVING SCHOOL
OFFERING ON-SITE CLASSES AND OFF-SITE DRIVING LESSONS AT
205-215 W. FIRST STREET, SUITE 201,210, 211 AND 212.
The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A.
That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit 98-034 was filed by
Oscar Montalvo of American Driving School to request authorization to
establish a driving school at 205-215 First street, Suite 201,210, 211 and
212, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel No. 401-531-13, 14.
Bo
Ac'cording to Use Determination 98-001, approved by the Planning
Commission on January 25, 1998, professional, instructional, motivational
or seminar schools are conditionally permitted in the Office as Primary Use
designation of the First Street Specific Plan (FSSP).
C.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application
on January 25, 1999, by the Planning Commission.
Do
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the driving school
will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or
working in. the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or
detrimental to the property and improvements in the neight)orhood of the
subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as
evidenced by the following findings:
1)
The proposed use, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to
surrounding properties in that the driving school classes will take
place during the day, approximately four months of the year, and
during the daytime on weekends during the remainder of the year.
2)
The proposed use, as conditioned, will not have a negative effect on
surrounding properties, or impact traffic or the availability of parking
in that sufficient parking will be provided and no potential traffic or
noise impacts are anticipated. No parking impacts are anticipated
since participants are not authorized to drive vehicles and Condition
2.2 would preclude students from using on-site parking. No noise
impacts are anticipated since Condition 2.3 would prohibit
participants from congregating outside the tenant space.
Resolution No. 3650
Page 2
I!.
3)
E.
The proposed' use, as conditioned, is compatible with uses in the
surrounding area. The project site is located in the Office as Primary
Use of the First Street Specific Plan in an office building Occupied by
retail and professional office uses. As conditioned, the type and
scale of the operation with proposed hours and the small number of
the students is appropriate for the proposed location.
That this project is a categorically exemption pursuant to Section 15301
(Class 1) of the California Environmental Quality Act.
The Planning. Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 98-034 to
establish a driving school on the property located at 205o215 W. First Street, Suite
201,210, 211 and 212, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A'attached
hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular
meeting on the 25th. day of January, 1999.
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
-- COUNTY OF ORANGE )
_,; CITY OFTUSTIN )
LESLIE PONTIOUS
Chairperson
, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning
Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. 3650 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin
Planning Commission, held on the 25th day of January, 1999.
27
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-034
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 3650
(1)
(1)
GENERAL
1.1
The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans
for the project date stamped January 25, 1999, on file with the Community
Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by the
Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The
Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications
to plans if such modifications are consistent with the provisions of the Tustin
City Code.
1.2
Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be
complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project,
subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department.
13
Approval of Conditional Use Permit 98-034 is contingent upon the applicant
and property owner signing and returning an "Agreement to Conditions
Imposed" form as established by the Director of Community Development.
1.4
The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all
claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval for this
project.
1.5
This Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Director of Community
Development' within six (6) months after the date of this approval and at six
(6) month intervals thereafter, or more frequently if necessary, to determine
if the operations are conducted in accordance with .this approval, if the
Director of Community Development determines that the method of
operation is inconsistent with any of the conditions of this approval or other
applicable .regulations, the applicant shall, upon notice, cease all violations.
The Director of Community Development may also impose additional
conditions or modifications to the existing conditions or facilities as part of
such review to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.
(2)
(3)
(4)
SOURCE CODES
STANDARD CONDITION
CEQA MITIGATION
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S
'DESIGN REVIEW
EXCEPTIONS
(5)
(6)
(7)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
REQUIREMENTS
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
PC/CC POLICY
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 3650
January 25, 1999
Page 2
(1) 1.6
As determined by a City code enforcement officer, any violation of any of
the conditions imposed by this Resolution is subject to the imposition of a
civil penalty of $100.00 on the property owner and/or operator for each
violation and each day the violation exists.
(1) 1.7
The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary
code enforcement action.
USE RESTRICTIONS
The number of students shall be limited to 20 students per day at any one
time.
2.2
Students shall arrive at the school in a manner that does not require use of
on-site parking. If students arrive by passenger vehicles, vehicles shall not
use on-site parking and shall drop off and .pick up students from the
location.
2.3
No congregation in the parking area or outside walkways are allowed in
.association with the proposed use.
2.4
The subject property shall be maintained in a safe, clean and sanitary
condition at all times. The applicant is responsible for collection of any trash
associated with the driving school or its participants.
2.5
All activities related to practical driving lessons (other than registration)
including pick up and drop off of students shall take place off-site. No'
vehicles used for driving lessons shall be parked or stored on-site at any
time.
2.6
No ternporary signs or other forms of advertising or attraction may be
placed on the site without approval from the Community Development
Department.
2.7
The number of company owned passenger vehicles parked on-site shall be .
limited to four (4). All passenger vehicles shall be stored on site in
designated stalls shown on Exhibit B. Passenger vehicles shall not' be
picked up or returned to the site before 7:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday and before 9:00 a.m. 'and after 5:00 p.m. on Saturday.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 3650
January 25, 1999
Page 3
FEES
Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant
shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check
payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty-&ight
dollars) to enable the City to file-the appropriate' environmental
documentation for the'project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the
above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to
challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.
J
0 ' ;~'" O'.
Z uJ! u~:
_.e Z~ ~
~ Z
> -
0 ~
Z 0
0 Z
o 0
0 0
Z