HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 10-21-57 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION,
MONDAY, OCTOBER 21st, 1957.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bacon, Tadlock, Means, Mrs. Gregory and
Dr. Stanton.
ABSENT : John Siegel, ?. N. Clark.
CITY ATTORNEY : Dennis D. Hayden, present.
Chairman Bacon, called the meeting to order at 7:00 P. M.
Motion of Means, seconded by Tadlock and carried, Minutes of
last meeting were approved as mailed.
The hearing on zoning and setbacks for the proposed "Samuel Tustin
Annexation to Tustin." was opened by Chairman Bacon at 7:10 P. M.
A letter from City Engineer McBride was read containing his report
to the Planning Commission, also attached were maps showing
recommendations for zoning and setbacks.
Letters suggesting various provisions for zoning and setbacks were
received from, The Market Basket, Henry I. Padgham, Jacobson &
Young, Inc., The Rusco Co., as well as petitions with a total of
40 signers. Mr. Gilbreath, Mr. Elsner and Wm. Bowman, orally gave their
views regarding possible zoning.
John Prescott, owner of a portion of the property involved, asked
that the frontage owned by him on D Street be exempted from the
setback as shown on the map attached to City Engineer ~cBride's
letter to the Planning Commission.
C. Arthur Nisson, Jr. attorney representing Mr. Balmer and the
Mullin Lumber Co., stated that the Mullin Lumber Co. would agree
only to C-2 zoning on Laguna Road a distance of 75 feet easterly
and 119.89 feet northerly from the property line.
There being no further speakers, the hearing was closed.
After considerable discussion, a Motion was made by Tadlock,
seconded by Means that the recommendations of City Engineer ~cBride
for setbacks and zoning of the proposed "Samuel Tustin Annexation
to Tustin", be accepted as delineated on map Exhibit A, with the
exception that the setback on Laguna Road be increased to 30 feet
instead of 20 feet, from the proposed new property line and that the
setback from the center line of Sixth Street were it to be extended
Easterly, North to the present city limits, be eliminated and that
City Attorney Hayden prepare a Resolution recommending same to the
Tustin City Council. Motion carried.
Motion of Tadlock, seconded by Mrs. Gregory that RESOLUTION NO. 5Oh,
"A Resolution recommending zoning and building line requirements
for the territory within the proposed Samuel Tustin Annexation to
Tustin", be adopted. Motion carried, all Commissioners present
voting Aye.
On Motion of Dr. Stanton, seconded by Means and carried, the
Secretary of the Planning Commission was instructed to write a
letter with maps attached, to the Tustin City Council, containing
the above recommendations. Motion carried.
Chairman Bacon appointed Mrs. Gregory to take John Siegel's
place during his absence, on the Committee appointed to confer with
Willis Warner, Jr. of the County Planning Commission regarding an
area of influence map.
John Siegel was appointed to the Advisory Board of the Southern
Calif. Planning Congress.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
A. O. Fark, ~ecretary.