HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 03-08-65/' .
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 8, 1965
I ·
CA LL TO
ORDER
1I.
ROLL
CALL
III.
A Pr- :.{OVAL
O?
~,INUTES
IV
H EA HI NGS
Meetin~ called to or:let st 7:3.5 P-?i- by
Cha i i-man Hefner.
Present: Hefner, Eacon, Enderle, Hslus,
Brand, Sharo.
Absent: Marsters
Others Present: City Attorney, Jam=s Rourke
City Administrator, Harry E. Gill
Plannln~ Director, Edward Haworth
Planning Technician, J. Taylor.
Secretary, Ruth C. Poe
Moved by Enderle, seconded by Halus that minutes
of February 2~, 1965 be approved as mailed ~nd
received. Carried.
1. UP6~-182 - Ralphs Ind~stries
Hearin~ ooened at 7:37 P.M. to oermit an amendment
to Use Permit 6~-182 on orooerty located on north
side of 3eventeenth Street, West of Yorba Street.
Staff findln~s and recommendations ~resented by
Mr. Haworth.
Resolution of the Tustin Chamber of Commerce
suooortln~ ~mendment read by Clerk.
Those oresent soeaki,n~ in favor of a.oplication:
Mr. C.A. Nisson, attorney, spoke on behalf
of e~ooll cant.
· .
Mr. lialoh D' Ar.nell, re ore sent i'n,~._~ Chamber of
Commerce.
Those oresent objectir.~ to aoplication:
Er. A. Bollesen, Olive Tree Circle, re~resentin~
TAHOA
Mr. Cronowski, reoresentative of County area.
Mr. G. Bourret, L~uri..=. Lane.
· "l~he~ TAH CA
Mr. A ri c.b,
'Phere bein~ no further comr:'ents or objections the
hearin~ was declared closed at ~.-08 P
On reouest of the Commission, CouncJlm.on Coco came
forward and exolained that as the City Attorney advised
the Council that in limltin~ the si~n hei.zb~t to
20' and Sign Ordlrance desi~natin~ a 10' Tround
clearance, there was no reason for Council action
to delete the slgn board.
Resolution No. ?67
Moved by Bacon, seconded by Enderle that Resolution
No. ?67 be ~assed -~nd adooted anorovlng Amendment
to oP 64-182 of Ralphs Industries for sign and drive-
ways as shown on drewin~ submitted with Amendment
Application, Car.ried by roll call. Ayes: Sharo,
Helus, Enderle, Bacon, Brand, Hefner. Noes: None.
Absent: Marsters.
Moved by Halus, seconded by Enderle that this
body request the City Council to oroceed with
center divider strio on Seventeenth Street when
street i~orovements are installed and street
widened. Carried.
2. Variance 65-153
Hearing ooened at 8:26 P.M. on V65-153 of Calvin
and Dorothy Furman to oermit the construction
of a swlmmin~ pool in front yard setback and a
6' fence 2' from oroperty line on prooerty zoned
R-3 and located at 17042 Kenyon Drive.
Staff findings and recommendations presented by
J. Tr~ylor of Planning Staff.
Fir. C. Furman spoke in own behalf. There being
no further comments and no objections, the hearin~
was closed at 8:31 P.M.
Resolution No. ?68
Moved by Halus, seconded by Sharp that Hesolution
No. 768 be passed and adooted granting Variance
65-153 consistent with am~roval of the Architectural
. .
Committee for planting, sidewalk ~nd width of
planter strip. Carried by roll call. Ayes:
Hefner, Bacon, ~nderle, Halus, Brand, Sharo.
Noes :- None. Absent: Marsters.
Variance 6~-1~4- John B. Halverson
· ~ ~ ..... on 5-1.54 rmit
Hearin~ o.o..~n~.d at 8'al P ¥ V6 to ~e
reduction of minimum lot width, minimum lot area
and minimum rear yard on .oroperty zoned 100-E-5
and located on South side of Santa Clara Avenue,
140' East of Laurinda Way, Tustin.
Findings and recommendations of Plan~ing Staff
explained by Mr. Taylor.
Er. F. Zelki, er.,~ineer, s~oke on behalf of applic@nt.
Mr. W.P. Brooks, area resident, stated he had
no objections if it is the or. ly way ~ro~erty is
developed, but is concerned with ty.oe of developments
going in the area.
There being no further comments, or objections,
hearino~ declared closed at 9:01 P.M.
Resolution No. 76?
Moved by Enderle, seconded by Bacon that Resolution
No. 769 be ossssd and adooted aporoving V65-154
subject to the following recommendations of the
Planning Staff:.
1. Reduction of Lot Width Reouirements:
Parcel #3 is the one lot that does not conform
to the minimum let width requirement at the
oroaerty line. In view of the hardshio olaced
on this orooerty by the demands of accessibility,
the Staff does not feel that the lack of six
(6) feet in lot width would be detrimental to
either the subject development or to surrounding
d eve 1 opm ent s.
V.
Correspondence
VI.
.S I~HER
BUS INES S
2. Reduction of Lot Area !';e.quireme~t:
Both Parcels #2 and #3 do not contain
the mini,mum !O,O0O souare feet as
required by the zor.~..=,, ordinance.
However, by Cour. t,¥ standards, the
.,access drive need only to have been
twenty (20) feet w.~de. Under this
stan¢.~rd both n. arce!s would then
~
h3ve contained the necessary 10,000
~.~ua~~. feet. In the o~inion of the
Staff, it would be oreferable to
resuire a lsr~er anU therefore more
adequate access ,:~rive tham to require
the minimum amount of lot ares.
Minimum dear Yard Heduction:
A reduction of the ,~'ear yard setback for
the existin~ buildin~ on Parcel #1
is nec':.ss~.ry if th~. re.m. ai~in~ parcels
are to contain mor~ than n~.ne (9)
tb. ousa~.d souare feet. Since the applic!~nt
intends t~o,t this structure will
eventually be removed or modified in
s~.~ch .s manner so ss to increase this
setb-~ck, the Staff is of the oninion
that the orimary concern is to create
adjacent lots containing the hi~,hest
eossible ssusre foots,we.
Carried by roll call. Ayesr S,haro, Enderle,
~rand Hefn
~a con, -,
~arsters.
1. Zone Chan:~e 6~-~ Sectional District Mao
IR'.S...-ll, County of Orange
Eoved by Halus, seconSed by Enderle that ZC65-5
be referred to the Planning Staff for reoort at
next regular meetir~.
2. Mel Shubi.m and Vic Caronna
[~eouest for oermission to comstruct 3md o~erate
a Car Wash in C-1 zone at TM ' ~
.,ew~,~rt Ave~u.e, Ma in
Street and "H" Street.
Moved by Halus, seconded by Sharo that this body
consider a Car W,ash as a compatible use in this
area with ~rovision that 1,~nUsca~in~ s-od elevations
meet with annroval of Architectural Committee.
~oved by ~[alus, seconded by Enderle that above
motion be am,~nded to consideration of Car Wash
at this !ocat~om in C-1 be c.~rried over to next
meetin~ but that it be recommended to the Planning
Staff and City Attor.~ey that in their consideration
this body feels th~s is a comps, tibia use. Carried.
Plannin.? Staff d ir~ct~-'d to 9re,are an amalysls of
UP requirements for Service St,~tions in commercial
z one.
VII.
ADJOU HNMENT
Moved by Bacon, seconded by Enderle
that meeti'~ be adjo~rned Carried