HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 PSEC® Agenda Item 11~
,- ~ AGENDA R E PCB RT Re~,ewea: , ;;
City Manager _
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2011
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, INTERIM CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO A CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND PSEC, INC. FOR TUSTIN LEGACY ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
SUMMARY
Approval is requested of Amendment No. 3 to a Consultant Services Agreement between the
City and Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc. ("PSEC"} for additional environmental
assessment services at Tustin Legacy. The Amendment will provide additional services
related to groundwater modeling within the ~IFOC area requested by the Navy for
underground storm drain and sewer installations as well as work required for existing Navy
well modifications in the work area for the Tustin Ranch Road Extension Project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approve Amendment No. 3 to a Consultant Services Agreement between the City and
PSEC for additional environmental support services, increasing the not to exceed amount
by $68,$00 to $221,585, and authorize the City Manager andlor Assistant City Manager to
execute the Amendment; and
2. Appropriate $68,800 from unappropriated funds in CFD 06-01 Fund (434) to the Tustin
Ranch Road Extension CIP No. 70206 to cover associated expenses.
FISCAL IMPACT
The additional consulting services will be compensated on a time and material basis with a
not to exceed cost of $68,800. Approval of the proposed contract amendment will require
appropriation of $68,800 from unappropriated funds in CFD 06-01 Fund (434). Out of this
amount, it is expected that $31,500 would be reimbursable from IRWD for groundwater
modeling of their capital facilities pursuant to a future Capital Facilities Reimbursement
Agreement between the City and IRWD which will be brought back to the City Council at a
future meeting.
.~
DISCUSSION
On November 16, 2010, the City Council approved a Consultant Services Agreement with
PSEC to provide environmental support services related to assessing various
Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc. Contract Amendment No. 3
September 6, 2411
Page 2
environmentally-related tasks at Tustin Legacy previously started by the former master
developer, Tustin Legacy Community Partners, LLC ("TLCP").
A number of subsequent amendments have been necessary and unforeseen as follows:
• On April 5, 2011 Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement was approved for additional
environmental support services related to bid specification language and investigations
for the Tustin Ranch Road rough-graded area as well as technical support for
completion of reports related to previously completed TLCP clean-up efforts in
Neighborhood E.
• On June 21, 2011 Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement was approved for additional
environmental support services from PSEC related to bid specification language for
underground utility installation work, soil sampling, and groundwater modeling for the
Tustin Ranch Road Project and technical support for soil import criteria and Navy PERF
approvals.
In response to the submittal of construction plans and documents for the Tustin Ranch Road
project affecting current property at Tustin Legacy still owned by the Navy and leased to the
City under a Lease In Furtherance of Conveyance ("LIFOC), the Navy has imposed conditions
as part of the approvals of work within the LIFOC limits which required the City to undertake
additional ground water modeling as environmental remediation well modifications and
protections. Subsequently, additional environmental support services from PSEC was
requested related to groundwater modeling for underground storm drain and sewer
installations as well as work required for existing Navy well modifications in the work area for
the Tustin Ranch Road Extension Project.
Based upon its familiarity and experience with the work required, its vast knowledge of the
project, and its current working relationship on the Tustin Ranch Road Project, PSEC was
determined to be the most qualified to provide the required services at this time.
An itemized list of approved Tustin Legacy agreements for professional consulting services,
including pending approvals, is attached for reference.
~;
Christine A. Shingleton
Assistant City Manager
~?ouglas S. Stack, P.E.
~~eo~~r of Public WorkslCity Engineer
Attachment A: Proposed Contract Amendment No. 3
Attachment B: Tustin Legacy Agreements Summary
S:1City Council Items12011 Council Items~Approval of Amendment No. 3 to Legacy Contract with PSEC_City.dOCX
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT NO. 3 to CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
("Amendment No. 3") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF TUSTIN, a
municipal corporation ("City") and Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc., a
California Corporation ("Consultant"), pursuant to Section 1.6 "Additional Services" and
Section 2.3 "Changes", of the Consultant Services Agreement.
WHEREAS, City and Consultant entered into a Consultant Services Agreement
on November 16, 2010, to provide consulting services to the City for environmental
assessment services at Tustin Legacy, and
WHEREAS, the City requested certain additional environmental assessment
services related to groundwater modeling for underground utility installations as well as
work required for existing Navy well extensions in the work area for the Tustin Ranch
Road Extension Project; and
WHEREAS, Consultant submitted an authorization request for additional
environmental support services dated July 29, 2011, attached hereto as Exhibit "A";
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that the Original Agreement be amended as
follows to reflect the modifications requested by Consultant and authorized by the City
of Tustin:
Modification of Compensation. Section 2 entitled "Compensation" is
amended to provide additional environmental assessment services as
identified in Exhibit "A" of this Amendment No. 2 up to an additional amount
not to exceed $68,800.
2. General Requirements. All other provisions contained in the Original
Agreement shall continue to apply.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Amendment No. 3 as of
the date stated below.
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
"City"
City of Tustin, a municipal corporation
City Manager or Assistant City Manager
By:
"Consultant"
Pacific States Environmental
Contractors, Inc., a California
corporation
Harry J. Takach
Program Director
By:
2
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSAL
Attached hereto is Consultant's Proposal dated July 29, 2011
~~ I'~cific S~~tes
PROPOSAL
DATE: July 29, 2011
ATTN: Doug Anderson, Public Works Manager
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780-3715
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: CSA Addendum 3 for Environmental Support Tasks at MCAS Tustin
Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc. (PSEC) is pleased to submit this contract addendum
proposal to conduct selected environmental tasks at the former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin.
SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET
The following is a task listing of the scope of services that PSEC will provide to the City of Tustin, atime-
and-material, not-to-exceed budget, and schedule for the City's approval.
Task 1 -Response to 2D Groundwater Model Comments
During a conference call on July 12, 2011 involving the City, PSEC, Avocet Environmental {Avocet) and the
Navy's representatives regarding a review of the 2D Groundwater Modeling Report by Avocet dated June
10, 2011, the Navy requested additional modeling effort to assess impacts to the IRP-5S(a) (CO-9) plume
as well as the IRP-3 {CO-6) plume that is under active remedial action. The Navy is concerned that
construction dewatering could disrupt its hydraulic control efforts in IRP-3 and possibly cause contaminant
migration toward dewatering extraction points and possibly unimpacted areas. To address this new
request, the modeling team will evaluate the capability of the 2D model and also the 3D MODFLOW mode(
to answer the Navy's concerns for both trichloroethene (TCE) plumes.
The output from the 2D model using a range of hydraulic conductivity reported in Navy reports will be
reinterpreted to estimate whether construction dewatering from the storm water box may impact the CO-6
groundwater extraction system. This effort will also include 3D groundwater modeling to assess impacts to
both TCE plumes and preliminary contaminant transport modeling. Results and a revised draft report will
be available in less than two weeks following authorization to proceed. The estimated budget for this
additional monitoring work is atime-and-materials not-ta-exceed without authorization cost of $8,640. This
budget includes the subcontractor construction of the 2D and 3D models, modeling of different
groundwater hydraulic and contaminant scenarios, and drafting and reporting efforts. No professional time
from PSEC is included in this task.
City of Tustin
July 29, 2011
Page 2 of 4
Task 2 - 3D Groundwater Modeling for Sewer Installation
The installation of sewers and utilities along Tustin Ranch Road (TRR) will involve construction dewatering
from the shallow aquifers that have been identified in numerous investigations by the Department of the
Navy (DON). DON has stated in a Project Environmental Review Farm (PEKE} letter that the City shall
include an evaluation of the potential adverse impacts from dewatering activities near groundwater
contamination in Operable Unit {OU) 1 B (Carve Out-6) and OU 4B (CO-9) in the dewatering plans
supported by groundwater modeling. Groundwater is found in the area near TRR and Warner Avenue at
approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) in a low permeability silty-clay layer. The subject sewers
will be installed approximately 16-18 feet bgs and possibly extend into a mare permeable, silty sand
second water bearing zone.
The decision regarding how to dewater will be left up to the selected contractor. Regardless of the method,
evaluation of the construction dewatering for the deeper sewer trench requires a more complex, three-
dimensiona( (3D) modeling approach. PSEC and its subcontractor, Avocet Environmental, will develop a
Visual MODFLOW 2010.1 3D model to evaluate short-term construction dewatering for the sewers focused
on two water-bearing zones with different hydraulic characteristics. The model will cover approximately the
first 350 feet of the TRR installation, north of Warner Avenue. The hydraulic characteristics of the aquifer
will be based on parameters used in the assessment of CO-6 by DON (ERRG,2007). Avocet has
evaluated the model provided on a disc earlier this week for OU-1 B from the DON and found that it was not
useful. The model used was a 1990s outdated version and some data files were missing such that
construction for MODF~OW inputs are still necessary.
After the model is created, it will be calibrated using DON data to simulate groundwater extraction for an
extended period of time, greater than two years, using average pumping rates to replicate steady-state
drawdown conditions in the two water-bearing zones. The model is considered calibrated when the
predicted capture zones and drawdowns approximate the DON results published by their remediation
contractor {ECS, 2010).
Once calibrated, the model will be run to simulate rate and duration of dewatering. MODFLOW can
simulate extraction from either a linear feature or a series of extraction wells. The construction dewatering
duration will be based an a conservative estimate of the time required to dewater, excavate and backfill
approximately 350 linear feet of the sewer trench starting from TRR and Warner through the Special
Construction Zone. For this model, 30, 60 and 90-day dewatering periods will be assumed.
The output from the 3D model will be interpreted to estimate whether, and to what extent, construction
dewatering from the deep sewer trench may influence the CO-6 groundwater extraction system and either
of the trichloroethene plumes, CO-6 and CO-9. Results will be available in three weeks following
authorization to proceed and a draft report issued within 2 weeks later. The estimated budget for this work
is atime-and-materials not-ta-exceed without authorization cost of $31,50Q. This budget includes the
subcontractor construction and calibration of Visual MODFLOW model, modeling of different groundwater
extraction scenarios, and reporting efforts, and 224 hours of senior professional time from PSEC and our
subcontractor to provide technical expertise and respond to City and DON reviews and comments.
Task 3 -Well Extensions in CO-9 Area
The City of Tustin`s grading contractor will overexcavate and recampact the top 5-feet of soil in the CO-9
area, north of blamer Avenue between Tustin Ranch Road and Park Avenue, and then bring the whole
area up to rough grade. This action will increase the soil elevations approximately 4- to 7- feet above
existing grade except for some bermed areas along the perimeter to the east and south. The scope of
work has been developed to identify and protect the groundwater monitoring wells within the planned
PSEC:BD/Tustin/Adden3 Prp 7-11
City of Tustin
July 29, 2011
Page 3 of 4
overexcavation and grading area in the CO-9 area. There are six monitoring wells and two piezometers
within the work area. The wells are labeled 1005MW01 S, 1005MW03S, 1005MW05SR, 1005MW07S,
1005MW115, and 1005MW12S. The two piezometers are named 1005-EX025 and 1005-PZ01-EX025.
The following tasks will be completed to protect the existing well features within this area:
• Prepare a Work Plan to provide the steps and procedures to adjust the elevations of the existing
wells and piezometers within the construction area.
• Existing concrete pads and other surface features at each monitoring well or piezometer will be
demolished and the well pipe will be cut below former depth of concrete.
• Add a PVC coupling and a 2-inch, schedule 40 PVC riser to a height greater than the planned
finished rough grade. No glue shall be used.
• Protect the wells with K-rail guards.
• Upon completion of rough grade fill, return to site and install a 12-inch flush mounted well box in a
2-foot by 2-foot concrete pad
• Survey the well to the nearest 0.01 feet from mean sea level using a licensed land surveyor or
registered civil engineer.
• Prepare an installation report to summarize field activities and well construction information.
This work will be scheduled fallowing completion by the DON of the third quarter 2011 groundwater
monitoring for this remedial site and before the start of the field soil overexcavation step. The estimated
budget for this work is atime-and-materials not-to-exceed without authorization cost of $22,900. This
budget includes the drilling subcontractor's two site visits far two days each during well demolition with
debris removal and then well finishing. The project elapsed time will be separated by the field time to
averexcavate the site and then finish the rough grading of the site.
PSEC will provide the planning, agency and DON communication, and reporting efforts. In addition to the
costs far the well subcontractor, 72 hours of project professional and 74 hours of senior professional time
from PSEC is included to provide technical expertise and field supervision to prepare an approved Work
Plan, install the extensions then the flush-mounted well boxes, prepare a well installation report, and assist
the City's surveying contractor, RBF Consulting, in the final survey of the elevations for the finished wells.
Task 4: Technical Support
As the planning for the design and construction of TRR and the subsurface utilities continues under City
direction, PSEC staff has been asked to become involved in several technical tasks requiring input from
senior professional staff. These tasks include: 1.) Design Review Meetings, 2.} Project Conference Calls,
3.) Development of Soil Import Criteria, 4.) Technical evaluation and contribution for insurance and agency
comment and 5.) Plan reviews, such as, grading, utility installation, and dewatering issues. The estimated
budget for this work is atime-and-materials not-ta-exceed without authorization cost of $7,800. This
budget includes 60 hours of senior professional time to provide technical expertise and direct project
support.
PSEC:BD/TustinlAdden3 Prp 7-11
City of Tustin
July 29, 2011
Page 4 of 4
COST SUMMARY
The estimated total cost far completing the above scope of work is $68,800. Activities and costs will be
collected an a specific Task Basis. Charges and fees will be invoiced on a Time and Materials basis, not to
exceed the total authorized amount. Vendors, supplies, and subcontractors will be billed at actual cost plus
an administrative cost as agreed in a negotiated contract. PSEC wili invoice the City of Tustin monthly
based on the amount of work completed. Insurance and Payments terms shall be in accordance with the
contract.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, need additional information, or request a meeting to
discuss our scope of work, please contact me at 714-379-6160 or 949-302-5535. Pacific States..
Environmental Contractors looks forward to working with the City of Tustin to continue our support of the
redevelopment of MCAS Tustin.
Respectfully Submitted,
Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc.
s }
a ~,
~~ ~_ ~_ _ _
Harry J. Takach, Ph. D.
Program Director
PSEC:BDITustiniAdden3 Prp 7-1 t
Attachment B
TUSTIN LEGACY AGREEMENTS
EXISTING AGREEMENTS WITH CITY OF TUSTIN
Monday, August 29, 2011
Master
Development Approval by
Task Order
Consultant/Contractor Type of Services Footprint
City Council Work Item Cost
Issued
including TRR
Extension
RBF Engineering & y 8/3/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 75,000 y
Planning
Engineering y Armstrong Ave. $ 66,800 y
Engineering y Valencia Ave. $ 87,700 y
Engineering y Tustin Ranch Road $ 313,200 y
Engineering y Warner Ave. $ 61,700 y
Engineering y Barranca Parkway $ 166,600 y
Engineering y Red Hill Ave. Median $ 112,000
Engineering y Detention Basin Improvements $ 428,000
Engineering y Red Hill Ave. Widening (see amend. #3) $ 114,900 y
Sub-Total $ 1,425,900
RBF -Amend. #1 Engineering y NAl Tustin Ranch Road -Parkway Landscaping $ 8,800 y
Sub-Total $ 8,800
RBF -Amend. #2 Engineering y Nq~ Tustin Ranch Road -WQMP $ 9,200 y
Engineering V Tustin Ranch Rd - Bioswales $ 4,000 y
Engineering y Tustin Ranch Rd -Tract Maps $ 11,600 y
Sub-Total $ 24,800
RBF -Amend. #3 Engineering & y NA1 TR 17144 Revisions {Task 16) $ 3,000
Plannine
Engineering y TRR/Valencia (Tasks 1-4} $ 11,500 y
Engineering y TRR/Warner North (Task 5) $ 3,000 y
Engineering y TRR Bridge (Tasks 6-7) $ 9,500 y
Engineering y TRR/IRWD (Tasks 8-11) $ 10,500 y
Engineering y TRR/Legacy(Tasks 16-18) $ 9,000 y
Engineering y TRR/Walnut (Tasks 19-27) $ 58,000 y
Engineering y TRR Misc. (Tasks 12-14} $ 15,000 y
Engineering y Delete Red Hill Ave. Widening (see above) $ (114,900) y
Sub-Total $ 4,600
RBF -Amend. #4 Engineering Y NAl Revise TRR Onsite & Offsite Plans $ 10,000
Engineering y TRR Survey $ 4,000
Engineering y Topo Survey $ 2,500
Engineering y SCRRA Topo Survey $ 2,500
Engineering y Temp. Construction Easements $ 2,200
Engineering y Revise IRWD Capital Domestic Water Plans $ 1,000
Engineering v IRWD Reimbursement Agreement Exhibit $ 800
Engineering y IRWD Water Invasion Line $ 800
Engineering v Design Development Services $ 4,100
Engineering y Utility Consulting/Coordination Services $ 11,200
Engineering y Utility Composite Services $ 6,500
Engineering y Electrical Design Services $ 9,800
Engineering y Revise WQMP $ 6,000
Engineering y Revise Specifications $ 6,000
Engineering y TRR/Walnut Grading Plans $ 4,000
Engineering v Additional Agency Approval/Permits $ 15,000
Engineering y Additional Meeting Budget $ 5,000
Engineering y Eliminate Optional Retaining Wall $ (31,000}
Engineering y Eliminate Structural for TRR/Walnut Retaining Wall $ (8,000)
Engineering v Eliminate Pothole Subsurface Utility $ (4,000)
Sub-Total $ 48,400
TOTAL $ 1,512,500
Developer`s Research Financial y 9/7/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 75,000 y
TOTAL $ 75,000
SMS Architects Planning and y 9/7/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 75,000 y
TOTAL $ 75,000
Page 1 8/29/2011
TUSTIN LEGACY AGREEMENTS
EXISTING AGREEMENTS WITH CITY OF TUSTIN
Monday, August 29, 2011
Master
Development Approval by Task Order
Consultant/Contractor Type of Services Footprint
City Council Work Item Cost
Issued
including TRR
Extension
NMG GeoTech y 9/7/2010 Armstrong Ave. $ 7,700 y
GeoTech y Valencia Ave. $ 6,300 y
GeoTech y Tustin Ranch Road $ 22,300 y
GeoTech y Warner Ave. $ 7,300 y
GeoTech y Barranca Parkway $ 5,100 y
Sub-Total $ 48,700
NMG -Amend. #1 GeoTech y 2/1/2011 Tustin Ranch Road $ 29,000 v
GeoTech y Valencia Ave. $ 4,500 y
GeoTech y Overall Grading, SWPPP, Walls, Demo $ 35,000 y
Sub-Total $ 68,500
NMG -Amend. #2 GeoTech y 7/19/2011 TRR Pre-construction Servites $ 23,085
GeoTech y TRR -Rough Grading & Verdura Wall $ 122,120
GeoTech Y TRR -Backbone Storm Drain Construction $ 51,095
GeoTech y TRR -Access Road Construction $ 4,415
GeoTech y TRR -Settlement Monitoring $ 4,918
GeoTech v TRR -Lab Testing $ 7,875
GeoTech Y TRR -Certifications/Report Preparation $ 14,000
Sub-Total $ 227,508
TOTAL $ 344,708
Hunsaker Engineering y 9/7/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 25,000 y
Engineering y Mapping/PERF/Water Quality $ 60,000 y
Engineering y Tustin Ranch Road $ 129,600 y
Engineering y Valencia Ave. $ 40,800 y
Sub-Total $ 255,400
Hunsaker -Amend #1 Engineering y 11/2/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 72,500 y
Engineering y Tustin Ranch Road -Homeowner Mitigation $ 12,050 y
Sub-Total $ 84,550
Hunsaker -Amend #2 Engineering y 2/1/2011 Tustin Ranch Road $ 103,200 y
Engineering y Valencia Ave. $ 17,000 y
Engineering y Park Ave. & Legacy Road $ 106,500 y
Engineering y IRWD Capital Plans $ 38,600 y
Engineering y Reimbursables $ 17,500 y
Sub-Total $ 282,800
Hunsaker-Amend #3 Engineering y 5/3/2011 Tustin Ranch Road Grading and Drainage $ 42,700 V
Engineering v Disposition Strategy -Mapping $ 59,000 y
Sub-Total $ 101,700
Hunsaker-Arnend tt4 Engineering y Pending' Pre-construction and Field Meetings $ 16,000
Englneering y ReldSupport5errices $ 36,000
Eng~meering Y Certifications and Verifcations $ 32,000
6igllreering y Record DfaWInKS $ 12,000
Englneering , Reimbursables $ 2,000
Sub-Total $ 98,000
TOTAL $ 822,450
Psomas Mapping both in the MD Npi Mapping of activities including LIFOC parcels and $ 31,000 y
footprint and SOCCCD land swap
outside the
footprint
TOTAL $ 31,000
John Burns Real Estate Residential Market y 11/2/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 29,400 y
Consultine Analysis
TOTAL $ 29,400
Page 2 8/29/2011
TUSTIN LEGACY AGREEMENTS
EXISTING AGREEMENTS WITH CITY OF TUSTIN
Monday, August 29, 2011
Master
Development Approval by Task Order
Consultant/Contractor Type of Services Footprint City Council Work Item Cost
Issued
including TRR
Extension
Vandermost Consulting Environmental y 11/2/2010 Regulatory Agency Consulting $ 20,000 y
TOTAL $ 20,000
The Concord Group Non-Residential y 11/2/2010 Disposition Strategy $ 42,000 y
Market Analysis
TOTAL $ 42,000
Pacific States Environmental y 11/16/2010 Environmental Consulting $ 10,000 V
Sub-Total $ 10,000
Pacific States -Amend Kl Environmental y 3/15/2011 Tustin Ranch Road - Specifitations $ 32,385 y
Environmental y Tustin Ranch Road - OCSD & IRWD Permits $ 8,000 y
Environmental y Tustin Ranch Road -Potholing & Sampling $ 9,500 y
Environmental y Tustin Ranch Road -Well Relocation $ 18,800 y
Environmental y Technical Support $ 10,300 y
Sub-Total $ 78,985
Pacific States -Amend #2 Environmental y 6/21/2011 Tustin Ranch Road -Specifications $ 4,000 y
Environmental y Tustin Ranch Road - CO6 & CO9 Soil Sampling $ 38,500 y
Environmental V Tustin Ranch Road -Groundwater Modeling $ 13,500 V
Environmental y Technical Support $ 7,800 v
Sub-Total $ 63,800
PaciflcStates-Amend ;t2 Envlronmei~tal y Pending` TRR-Response to 2D GroundwaterMOdelConunents $ 6,600
Environmental v TRR-3D GroundwaterModelinRforSewer $ 31,SOD
Environmental V TRR -Well Extensions in CO-9 Area $ 22,900
Environmental v TRR-Technical Support $ 7,800
Sub-Total $ 68,800
TOTAL $ 221,585
Vista Environmental Environmental V 12/7/2010 Tustin Ranch Road -Homeowner Mit. Assessments $ 9,828 Y
TOTAL $ 9,828
David Taussig & Associates Financial n 1/4/2011 Disposition Strategy intluding refinement of $ 47,500 y
infrastructure backbone fees
TOTAL $ 47,500
So CaI Sandbags Maintenance & y 12/7/2010 Maintenance of undeveloped portions including erosion $ 547,524 y
Erosion Control control
TOTAL $ 547,524
Spectrum Landscaping - Maintenance n 6/15/2010 Maintenance of sites outside Master Developer $ 71,208 y
Amend NS footprint
TOTAL $ 71,208
Moffatt & Nichol On-Call Plancheck y Ongoing a Public Works, Bridges & Structures, and Rail & Transit $ 30,000 y
Engineers Engineering
Hartzog & Grabill, Inc. On-Call Plancheck y Ongoing 3 Traffic Engineering $ 30,000 y
Engineering
DSL Consulting, Inc. On-Call Plancheck y Ongoing s Hydrology & Hydraulics, Street, Mapping, and Landscape $ 30,000 y
Engineering
Parsons Transportation Construction y 5/3/2011 Tustin Ranch Road - CM $ 1,882,075 y
Group Manaeement
TOTAL $ 1,882,075
Page 3 8/29/2011
TUSTIN LEGACY AGREEMENTS
EXISTING AGREEMENTS WITH CITY OF TUSTIN
Monday, August 24, 2011
Master
Development Approval by Task Order
Consultant/Contractor Type of Services Footprint
City Council Work Item Cost
Issued
including TRR
Extension
Paleo Solutions. Inc. Archeo/Paleo v 7/19/2011 Tustin Ranch Road -Archeo & Paleo Monitoring S 6,600
Archeo/Paleo v Tustin Ranch Road -Nat. American Monitoring $ 3.300
Archeo/Paleo v Tustin Ranch Road-Archeo & Paleo Oversight $ 1,500
Archeo/Paleo y Tustin Ranch Road -Archeo & Paleo Reports $ 3,360
Archeo/Paleo y Tustin Ranch Road -Meetings & General Admin. $ 640
Sub-Total $ 15,400
Archeo/Paleo y N-E-Archeo & Paleo Report $ 8,500
Archeo/Paleo y N-E-Archeo lab $ 3,080
Archeo/Paleo y N-E -Meetings, Mapping, & General Admin. $ 1,550
Sub-Total $ 13,130
TOTAL $ 28,530
Sandoval Pipeline Construction y 8/2/2011 Tustin Ranch Road Ph.l Grading and Storm Drain $ 12,623,788
Engineering
TOTAL $ 12,623,788
TOTAL CONTRACTS $ 18,474,096
TOTAL TASKS ORDERED $ 4,836,070
NOTES:
1. "NA" are items in which funding was appropriated through the adoption of the 2010/2011 Budget and were authorized by staff through a Purchase Order
or within contract amendment limit (lOl of total amount) that could be amended by staff, with greater were within the appropriation amounts of the City
Manager.
2. "Pending" are items anticipated to be brought to the City Council for approval in the near future.
3. On-call services established by Public Works operating budget for traffic engineering, development review and special plan check
Page 4 8/29/2011