Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 09-27-65I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION September 27, 1965 Meeting called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Hefner. Present: Commissioners: Hefner, Brand, Marsters Halus, Sharp, Oster Absent: Commissioners: Bacon Others Present: Harry E. Gill, City Administrate James Rourke, City Attorney Ken Bryant, Attorney E. E. Haworth, Planning Director J. E. Taylor, Planning Technician Lois A. Ault, Secretary Moved by Sharp, seconded by Marsters, that the minutes of September 13, 1965 be approved as mailed. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Hefner, Brand, Marsters, Halus, Sharp, Oster. Noes: None. 1. ZC 65-147 - Zqne C~..ange f~rom C-3 tq PR (Initiated by the City of Tustin), located on Newport Avenue Between Andrews Street & Laguna Rd. Hearing opened at 7:42 P. M. Staff report was presented by Mr. Haworth recom- mending that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council some other type of commercial zoning than the existing C-3 zoning that presently exists. Mrs. Harry Pederson, of Estero Apartments spoke in favor of Zone Change Application. Protesting the Zone Change Application was Mrs. Eleanor Dorsey of Skyline Realty, also representing Mr. Ralph Humphrey. Mr. Nubuo Miyamoto of 1021 WalnUt Street, Mr. Donald Goodnell of San Juan ~., Mr. John Primrose of 1021 Bonita Street, Mr. R. W. Weaver of Signal Oil Co., on the Southeast corner of Laguna Rd. and Newport Ave. Mr. Lawrence Splinter of 13472 Charloma Dr., Tustln. Mr. Hefner asked Mr. Haworth of the Planning Staff to explain the different zones as listed in our Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Halus and Mr. Marsters said that they would rather see the zone changed to C-1 instead of Pr as initiated by the City. There being no further comments, the hearing was declared closed at 8:14 P.M. Moved by Oster, seconded by Brand that Resolutim No. 798 be passed and adopted, recommending to City Council a change of zone from C-3 zoning to C-1. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Hefner, Brand, Marsters, Halus, Sharp, Oster. Noes: None. 2. UP 65-199 A. R. Builders- (continued from 9/13/65 To permit the establishment of a Plannied Devel - opment in the PD )Planned Residential) District, located on the Northwest corner of Williams and McFadden. Hearing opened at 8:40 P.M. St~ff report was presented by Mr. Haworth stating that the Applicant wishes a continuance until the October 25, 1965 meeting of the Planning Commission to enable them more time for submitting more detailed plans, etc. No one spoke in favor or against the Application. There bein no further comments or objections, the hearing was declared closed at 8:42 P.M. Moved by Sharp, seconded by Oster that UP 65-199 be continued until October 25, 1965. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Hefner, Brand, Marsters, Halus, Sharp, Oster. Noes: None. 3. AMENDI.N.G SECTIONS OF., ORDINANCE NO.. 157, PER- TAI'NING TO '~IGNS: , , , Hearing ooened at 8:45 P.M. Staff report was presented by Mr. Taylor, who explained to the Commission that additional items have been added to this Proposed Sign Ordinance. Section 6.10 on Identification for Sign and Sec- tion 6.01 concerning Advertising Sign Definition. Mr. Ed Cronin of the California Electric Sign Company, 4461 Melrose Avenue, Los Angeles offered his assistance on the Sign Ordinance, He is going to review the Proposed Sign Ordinance and submit a letter to the Planning Commission on his views and criticisms. Again, Mr. Cronin extended an invitation for the Commission and the Planning Staff to get together for a workshop. Mr. Oster asked that the word "animated sign" be defined for our Proposed Sign Ordinance. Mr. Marsters suggested that anyone in the audience wishin~ to make comments on the Proposed Sign Ordinance to submit a letter with their recommen- dations and opinions on or before the next Planning Commission meeting on October ll, 1965. Moved by Oster, secOnded by Marsters that the hearing on the Proposed Sign Ordinance be continued until the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on October ll, 1965. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Hefner, Brand, Marsters, Halus, Sharp, Oster. Noes: None. 4. TO CONSIDER. AMENDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL ZONES (R2l, R-2. 'RIB, &~'R-4), · Hearing opened at 8:55 P.M. Staff report was presented by Mr. Haworth who reviewed the letter received from the Police Depart- ment regarding lockable storage. Mr. Frank Morris state that he felt it would be im- practical to require doors on all garages. V$ OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUS I NESS Mr. Sharp'~s {h""favor of going.ahead with the parking requirements .but. waiting until a later time before going ahead on .the lockable storage. There being no further ~omments or abjections, the hearing was declared closed at 9:40 P.M. Moved by Oster that the forme~ recommendations and parking requirements in the R-l, R-2, R-3, and R-4 zones which was sent to the City Council previously with regards to parking for two bedrooms to be amended to read l~ parking spaces for each two bedrooms. Motion died for lack of second. Moved by Halus, seconded by Oster that the following standards be adopted as recommended bo City Council: A. Bachelor Unit (no bedroom) B. One Bedroom Unit C. Two Bedroom Unit D. Three or more Bedroom Units 1 Carried by roll call. Ayes: Hefner, Brand, Marsters, Halus, Sharp, Oster. Noes: None. Moved by Halus, seconded by Sharp that the following definitions for garage or carport be adopted and recommended to the City Council for approval. Garage: Private shall mean a detached accessory building or a portion of a main building on the same lot as a dwelling used primarily for the housing of vehicles of the occupants of the dwelling, having a roof and enclosed on not less thmn three (3) sides with the fourth side being a lockable door. Carport: Shall mean a permanent roof structure with not less than two (2) enclosed sides used primarily for automobile shelter and automobile storage only. Roll Call. Ayes: H~fne~-, Halus, Noes: Oster, Sharp Marsters, Brand. Motion failed. Moved by Halus, seconded by Brand that we recommend to the City Council that parking standards be in- creased to require a two car garage for all single family dwellings. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Hafner, Brand, Marsters, Halus, Sharp, Oster. Noes: None. 1. EXte. nsio..n o.f. a Use Permit for the Presbyterian Church, located a..t M. ain Street and Third S.t.., Tustin. Staff report was presented by Mr. Haworth, recommending approval. Mr. Frank Morris spoke in favor of extension ex- plaining that they would be starting the construction around the first of the year. Moved by Halus, seconded by Brand that a 6 months extension be granted. Carried. Abstained: Hefner. 2. Ame. ndm.ent, of Tract Map No. 5726 Staff report was presented by Mr. Haworth of the Planning Department. Moved by Sharp, seconded by Oster that Amendment of Tract Map No. 5726 be granted as submitted per plot p~ns. Carried. 1. Tic, Toc Market. Sign Hearing opened at 9:55 P.M. Mr. Haworth presented Staff report recommending that the height be reduced from 36' to 20' and the size be reduced from 140 sq. ft. to 40 sq. ft. per face as ou~ Proposed Sign Ordinance signifies. Mr. J. R. Cruse spoke in favor of application, stating that they have never had any trouble in any cities with regard to this size of signs. He also stated that they have already fabricated the signs at a cost of $1,500. Mr. John Kerr also spoke in fovor of said Tic Toc Market Sign. Moved by Halus, seconded by Brand that this body denies this sign and endorses the Architectural Committee's requirement for signs as stipulated in the Proposed Sign Ordinance. Carried. Abstained: Marsters. VII. CORRES- PONDENCE 1. County Case No. UV5619 To permit the establishment of a Laundromat in a Shopping Center under construction in the 10S-CI-10,000 local business district, located on the Southwest corner of WalnUt Avenue. Mr. Haworth presented the report stating there is no objection to this proposed use. Moved by Halus. seconded by Sharp that the Planning Department write a letter to the County of Orange stating that we have no objections to County case UV 5619. Carried. 2. _Tentative Tract 6071 .and _60?2 - County Case Report presented by Mr. Haworth recommending approval. Moved by Marsters, seconded by Sharp that Tentative Tract plans for 6071 and 6072 be approved as submitted. Carried. Ayes: Hafner, Brand, Marsters, Sharp, Oster. Noes: Halus. 3. Wal. t, er Foster- Proposed. Bulld.in~ Mr. Haworth of the Planning Staff recommended approval of plot plans as submitted by Mr. Putnam. representing Mr. Walter Foster. Moved by Sharp, seconded by Oster that the plot plans be approved as submitted. Carried. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Planning Staff Mr. Haworth of the Planning Staff announced that there would be a meeting for a Planning Commission Workshop on the Newport Avenue Study Wednesday, Seotember 29, 1965 at 6:00 P.M. at the Tustln Savings and Loan Building with Mr. Adair. Also, applic~nt from Associates Funding will be present. Mr. Hafner announced that he would be out of town and that Mr. Marsters would be chairman pro tern. IX. ADJ 0URN A meeting was set up for the 21st of October ~or a meeting with the County Planning Commission and City of Tustln Planning Commission. Moved by Oster, seconded by Halus that meeting be adjourned. Carried. Se~re~'~rY ' Ch~a l~ma n ~