HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 02-49RESOLUTION NO. 02-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE
FOR THE TUSTIN LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT
The Tustin City Council does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. The County of Orange's Orange County Public Library ("OCPL")
currently operates the Tustin Branch Library at 345 East Main Street
through a lease agreement with the City of Tustin and provides library
services to the Tustin service area and the City of Tustin is a member of
the OCPL system;
B!
The current facility is only 15,000 sq. ft. in size and is one of the busiest
branches in the OCPL system. The current building is 24-years old and
is approaching the end of its usable life, unless significant renovation is
undertaken. The current size of the Tustin Branch Library is already a
significant constraint to its continued future use by the community;
C,
An Ad Hoc Library Committee has evaluated the existing library services
and the community's library needs and a facility plan was developed for
a library expansion. After analysis of three expansion alternatives, it
was determined that the removal of the existing facility and construction
of a new single stow facility was the best approach;
Do
The City of Tustin is applying for a state grant pursuant to the California
Reading and Literacy Improvement and Renovation Act of 2000 (the
"Library Bond Act") for acquisition and construction of a new
replacement Tustin Branch Library;
E,
An Initial Study and a Negative Declaration have been prepared for
this project and have been distributed for public review. The actions
necessary to implement the Tustin Branch Library Expansion project
are cumulatively defined herein to be a project under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21065 and include the
following actions with the responsible agencies noted:
1. California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Renovation Act
of 2000 grant application submittal and approval.
Resolution No. 02-49
Page 2 of 3
II.
2. Cooperative Agreement for a Joint Venture- Homework Center in
the Library (between County of Orange OCPL and local school
districts).
3. Site acquisition of privately owned properties.
4. Street Vacation of a portion of S. Preble St. between E. Third Street
and E. Main Street and certain utility relocations.
5. General Plan Amendment (GP 02-001.
6. Zone Change (ZC) 02-001.
7. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 02-003, a proposal to permit a library
use within the P& I zoning designation.
8. Design Review (DR) 02-007, design approval to permit construction
of an approximate 31,800 square foot proposed library.
9. Approval of an Operating Service Agreement with the Orange
County Public Library for operation of the proposed new Tustin
Branch Library and an interim Amendment to the current Tustin
Branch Library Lease to enhance the application as well as any
subsequent Amendments needed to reflect a new proposed Library
location.
A Final Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit A, has been
completed in compliance with CEQA and State guidelines. The City
Council has received and considered the information contained in the
Negative Declaration prior to approving the proposed Library Expansion
project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
Further, the City Council finds that approval of the Proposed Library
Expansion Project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code Section. The City Council hereby
adopts the Final Negative Declaration for the proposed Library Expansion
Project at 345 East Main Street, Tustin, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on
the 6th day of May, 2002.
PAMELA STOKER
J Id¢ F"E~Y/M. THOMAS
Mayor
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, C,-t 92780
(714) 573-3100
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title: Library Expansion Project
Project Location: 345 East Main Street, Tustin, California
Project Description: Demolition of the existing 15,000 sq. ft. Tustin Library and construction of a new 31,800
sq. ft. Tustin Library at an expanded site location. The specific actions needed to implement the Library
Expansion Project are identified within the Initial Study prepared for this project.
Project Proponent: City of Tustin
Lead Agency Contact Person: Dana Ogdon
Telephone: 714/573-3116
The Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study for the above project in accordance
with the City of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,
and on the basis of that study hereby finds:
That there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
That potential significant effects were identified, but revisions have been included in the project plans
and agreed to by the applicant that would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no
significant effects would occur. Said Mitigation Measures are included in Attachment A of the Initial
Study which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required.
The Initial Study which provides the basis for this determination is attached and is on file at the Community
Development Department, City of Tustin. The public is invited to comment on the appropriateness of this
Negative Declaration during the review period, which begins with the public notice of Negative Declaration and
extends for twenty (20) calendar days. Upon review by the Community Development Director, this review
period may be extended if deemed necessary.
REVIEW PERIOD ENDS 5:00 P.M. ON MAY 6, 2002
Date May 6. 2002
Christine A. Shingleton
Assistant City Manager
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Wa3,, Tustin, CA 92 780
(714) 5 73-3 ] O0
INITIAL STUDY
BACKGROUND
Project Title:
Tustin Library Expansion Project
Lead Agency'
City' of Tustin
300 Cemennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
LeadAgency Contact Person: John Buchanan Phone: (714) 573-3124
Project Location:
240 E. Third St., 345 E. Main Street (existing library), 330-334 S. Preble Dr.,
325-329 S. Preble Dr., 335-339 S. Preble Drive, 285 E. Main St., 305 E. Main
Street, and 300-304 E. Third St., portion of S. Preble Dr. right-of-way between E.
Main St. and E. Third St. (Exhibit 1).
Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Cit3, of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, Califomia 92780
Orange CounD, Public Library
1501 E. St. Andrews Place
Santa Aha, California 92705
General Plan Designation: Old Town Commercial
Zoning Designation:
CG "Commercial General" (300-304 E. Third St., 325-339 S. Preble Dr., 305 E.
Main St.), R-3 "Multiple Family Residential" (330-334 S. Preble Dr.), C-2/P
"Central Commercial/Combining Parking District" (240 E. Third St.), C-2
"Central Commercial" (285 E. Main St.), P & I "Public and Institutional" (345 E.
Main St.).
Project Description: Proposed construction of a new approximate 31,800 sq. foot librar3'.
Surrounding Uses'
North: Multiple Family Residential
South: Commercial
East: City' of Tustin Main Street Water Facility
West: Tustin Civic Center
Other public agencies whose approval is required:
[]]] Orange Count)' Fire Authority [-q Cky of Irvine
[--] Orange CounD' Health Care Agency [--] City of Santa Ana
[--] South Coast Air Quality Management [-] Orange Count>,
District EMA
Other: Orange County Public Library,
B. ENVIRONMENTAL.FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact tha~ is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D below.
[-] Aesthetics
[--] Air Quality
[--] Cultural Resources
[-] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
~-] Land Use/Planning
I~ Noise
I--] Public Services
[~] Transportation/Circulation
[-] Mandatory Findings of Significance
~ Agricultural Resources
[--] Biological Resources
[--I Geology/Soils
[--] Hydrology/Water Quality
[--] Mineral Resources
[--] Population/Housing
[~ Recreation
[--] Utilities/Service Systems
C. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
~] I fred that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[--] I fred that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENT.~L IMPACT REPORT is required.
I f'md that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one
effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated."
An ENrVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigatdd
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
I find that although the proposed prqiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) ha~e
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Preparer:
f.f ?a° dT 2J.
Christine A. Shii~k[eton, As 's~t-City .kSh~nager
Title Pro~ram Manaeer
Date
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
See Exhibit 2 for an Explanation of Evaluations Noted Below-
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substamial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
· would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
en¥ironmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmlan& Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, tO non-agricultural use?
III. AIR QUALITY:. Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air qualiw plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
qualiD' standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Vr~th
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
ID
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: -'Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department offish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Depm'm~ent offish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory, fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory, wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the si~maificance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the pr~ect:
a) Expose people or structures.to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
Potentially,
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
l~th
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Sign~cant
Impact
No Impact
E3
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated.on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?' Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table I8-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where
sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? '
VII.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a si~ificant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project result in
a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area?
f) For a project within the vicinity, of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safeD' hazard for people residing
or working in the project area?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
~th
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
[]
[]
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands?
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: - Would
the project:
a) Violate any water qualit3' standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area,, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-
or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted nmoft'?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality.?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
Potentially
Signi. fican!
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
.Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
D
a) Physically divide an established communiv,,? ['-]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an. agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with an), applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community, conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the residents
of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
XI. NOISE-
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c) A. substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicini~, above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project viciniw above levels existing
without the .project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excess noise levels?
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
~3th
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
X, III. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
XIV. RECREATION-
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
sm-vice standard established by the coun~ congestion
management agency for desiguated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safer3' risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a desi~ feature (e.g.
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capaciD'?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Signifl?cant
Impact
No ]mvact
g). Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or pro,ams
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS-
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require.or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause sig~aificant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or max, serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capaci~,
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. MANOATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to de~ade the quality,
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat ora fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehisto~,?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
l~th
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
ID
Exhibit 1
SECOND STREET
205
a�
M
0
215-17
1 1
0II
305. 307
225
Site
230
- '�
--
235
ri
240
O
355
245
i
250
255
m
u
n
D 215
7
n 225
z
n
1
f
M
301 303 II
1 1
0II
305. 307
213
Site
333-35 II
>
II
-
337-39 11
O
355
-
i
365 P
m
----Ali-�"-----------
215
r
1 i
215-19
397-99
u
n
D 215
7
n 225
z
n
1
r7l
468
200
213
Site
1-----
_ - ------
Z
.l-jucalion
---------
------
_ _
i
-----
----Ali-�"-----------
215
210-14
215-19
`-
22.0-24225-2s
PULICE DLPAR`I'MLN'I'
218
I3r•al>tcll Expausiou Project
.1,1*--..-----v
i 230-34
n1
235-39
--------
- '- -- -
m
-----
4240-44
0
245--49
CI'T'Y HALL
275
ca 0
LA L4 L4
-4
L Ln
tto
300
THIRD STREET
UNI'T'Y CEN'T'ER
MAIN STnEET
.r J
w -� tr a, v •� a � N w v^'i v o
0 0 0-P6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
405
C
--- cn
421 —
Z
441-43 b
445-47tq
449-51ILI
�i J
515
510
SIX111 STREET
SOUPL AN TA TION
I
65
1p" 'mss
SPOON'S
�0b
305
315
325
335
345
355
o "'
rn Ul
Vicilli(y Alap
(`Tustin Library Service Area)
* Site 1,ocation
Exhibit 2
EXHIBIT 2
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
TUSTIN BRANCH LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
(Amended April 30, 2002)
BACKGROUND
The City of Tustin is applying for a state grant pursuant to the California Reading and Literacy
Improvement and Renovation Act of 2000 (the "Library Bond Act") for acquisition and
construction of a new replacement Tustin Branch Library. The County of Orange's Orange County
Public Library ("OCPk") currently operates the Tustin Branch Library through a lease agreement
with the City of Tustin and provides library services to the Tustin service area and the City of
Tustin is a member of the OCPL system. The current Tustin Branch Library is located in the
vicinity of Main Street and Centennial Way within the Tustin Civic Center area at 345 East Main
Street. The current facility is only 15,000 sq. ft. in size and is one of the busiest branches in the
OCPL system. The current building is 24-years old and is approaching the end of its usable life,
unless significant renovation is undertaken. Through the efforts of an Ad Hoc Library Committee,
the existing library services and the community's library needs were evaluated mad a facility plan
developed for a library expansion. In summary, the participants found that the Tustin Library was
limited in its collections, programs and services by the size and inadequacies of the existing
facility. After analysis of three expansion alternatives, it was determined that the removal of the
existing facility and construction of a new single story facility was the best approach. The general
location of the current facility, however, was viewed as ideal and desired by the community
provided additional land area could be added to the library site from properties to the west to
ensure adequate space for additional square footage and the provision of adequate parking and site
amenities.
If left as is, the current size of the Tustin Branch Library is already a significant constraint to its
continued future use by the community. The Tustin library currently serves a community
encompassing the Tustin city limits and its sphere of influence within the County unincorporated
area to the north (includes the neighborhoods of North Tustin, Lemon Heights, Redhill and Cowan
Heights). As many as 1,000 persons a day currently visit the Tustin Branch Library. The Tustin
Branch Library's annual circulation in Fiscal Year 2001 was 435,061, which ranks the second
highest in the entire OCPL system. From 1980 to 2000, the population of Tustin Branch Library
service area increased by 58% from 58,491 to 92,344 persons. Redevelopment of the former
Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin, final build-out construction of the Tustin Ranch area
and in-fill development is expected to boost the library service area's population an additional 17%
to 107,899 by the year 2020. In addition, the Tustin Branch Library is an important resource that
must have capacity to support school age children. From 1980 to 2000, the TUSD student
attendance increased 45% from 11,645 to 16,925 with projected 2020 attendance anticipated to
increase an additional 35% to 23,000 students. More than half of the TUSD's students are enrolled
in the sixth' grade or below, educational levels in which students are endeavoring to learn, and
would most likely to visit a public library.
Changes in technology have also contributed to the obsolescence of the existing facility. The
existing Tustin Branch Library's current design is unable to accommodate recent technological
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 2
changes that are modifying the way people use information. The Tustin Library must support and
provide technology services including remote access, automated systems, training and
development, telecommunications, and a capability and capacity to expand current sen;ices and
systems to accommodate new emerging technologies of the future.
The Tustin Branch Library Expansion project site will involve the construction of an approximate
31,800 square foot building on up to a 4-acre site (Exhibit 3), with 125,275 volumes proposed in
the library collection as well as seating for 563, and a community room that seats 100. A summary
of the Library Space Square Footage Summary is attached as Exhibit 4.
The proposed new facility will be parallel and set back from Main Street to create a strong image
and statement for the site and to enhance the buildings appearance to the public. Book drop-off and
patron drop-off areas will be oriented at the front of the building. Site development will include
the provision of a minimum of parking for 158 cars including properly signed handicapped spaces
near the Main Street entrance, bicycle racks for locking bikes appropriately located and a bus pull-
off and turnaround area. Ingress and egress to the parking lot areas will be from Main Street. Site
development will also include landscaping and irrigation, patios including secured outdoor reading
areas and a Library Plaza, walkways, fences and gates, exterior lighting, area storm drains, back-
flow preventors and clean-outs. The perimeter of the building and all parking lots will be
illuminated with time clock controlled vandal-proof lights and manual, time over-ride buttons and
switches. The overall site plan will be integrated with the activities and design of the adjacent
Civic Center area to the north, northeast and east. In addition, landscaping along the Third Street
setback for the project will enhance the image of the project for residential uses to the west.
The actions necessary to implement the Tustin Branch Library Expansion project are cumulatively
defined herein to be a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section
21065 and include the following actions with the responsible agencies noted:
1. California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Renovation Act of 2000 grant application
submittal and approval (City of Tustin, California State Library).
2. Cooperative Agreement for Joint Venture- Homework Center in the Library.
3. Site acquisition of privately owned properties as shown on Exhibit 5 and as specifically noted
below (City of Tustin, Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency):
Assessor Parcel No. Property Address
Property Owner
a) 401-592-12
b) 401-593-04
c) 401-582-05
d) 401-593-01,02
e) 401-593-03
f) 401-592-11
g) 401-592-10
h) 401-592-13,14,15
i) Not Applicable
335-339 S. Preble Drive
285 E. Main St.
240 E. Third St.
330-334 Preble
325-329 S. Preble Dr.
300-304 E. Third St.
305 E. Main St.
Portion of S. Preble Dr.
Blanchard, William & Susan
De Nicola, Carolyn
Emery, Walter & Marilyn
Potiker, Kenneth & Lisa
Shinagawa, Ryo
Tustin Masonic Temple
City of Tustin
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 3
4. Street Vacation of a portion of S. Preble St. between E. Third Street and E. Main Street (Parcel
4i) and utility relocations (City of Tustin).
5. General Plan Amendment (GP 02-001), a proposal to change the existing General Plan Land Use
Element designation of the parcels described in item 3 and 4 above as follows: change Parcels
3a), 3d), 3e), 3f) and 3g) from High Density Residential to Public Institutional; Parcels 3b), 3c),
and 3h) from Community Commercial to Public Institutional; change the designation of parcel 4i)
(Pebble St. right-of-way from Main St. to Third Street) to Public Institutional (City of Tustin).
6. Zone Change (ZC) 02-001, a proposal to change the existing zoning of parcels described in item
3 above as follows: change parcels 3 a), 3 b) and 3 e), 3 f), 3g), 3h) from C- G (Commercial
General) to Public Institutional (P&I); change parcels 3c) from C-2 P Commercial Parking
Overlay to Public Institutional (P&I); change parcels 3d) from R-3 (Multiple Family Residential)
to Public Institutional (P&I) (City of Tustin).
7. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 02-003, a proposal to permit a library use within the P& I zoning
designation (City of Tustin).
8. Design Review (DR) 02-007, design approval for the proposed library project (City of Tustin and
Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency).
9. Construction of a new approx. 31,800 square foot one story public library and required parking
(City of Tustin).
10. Approval of an Operating Agreement with the OCPL for operation of the proposed new Tustin
Branch Library and Amendment of the current Lease to facilitate the Bond application and any
additional Amendments needed to reflect the new library location (City of Tustin and County of
Orange OCPI,).
The following information provides background support for the conclusions identified in the Initial
Study Checklist.
I. AESTHETICS
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
Items a, b, c -"No Impact"- There are no si~ificant scenic vistas, scenic resources or
state scenic highways located on the subject site or within the surrounding vicinity.
The Tustin Branch Library project is proposed to be located between public and
institutional uses to the west (Tustin Water Division Yard) and east (Tustin Civic Center),
and residential uses to the north. The project site is currently developed with residential
uses, commercial uses and a board and care facility and there is mixture of zoning
designations and building t~vpes, without a single, unified visual character. Prior to
construction, design of the project must be reviewed and approved by the Tustin Planning
Commission. In approving the project's desig-n, the Tustin Planning Commission will
consider and ensure that the project is compatible with the adjoining existing public to the
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 4
west and east and private residential uses to the north. As such the project design will
improve the aesthetics, visual character and quality in the vicinity and also provide
greater consistency with public institutional uses located on each side of the site.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?
II.
Item d - "Less than Significant Impact" - The Tustin Branch Library expansion project
proposes the construction of a public library facility, which includes a public parking area.
The public nature of the building requires the installation of adequate outdoor lighting to
ensure public safety and access to the proposed building and parking areas. For safety
reasons and as required by the City of Tustin Security Ordinance, outdoor parking and
sidewalk areas would be lighted throughout the night. The Security Ordinance requires in
part that a minimum of 1 foot-candle and .25 foot- candles of light be illuminated in the
parking areas and pedestrian areas respectively. However, pursuant to existing Tustin City
Code, all outdoor lighting will be directed downward toward the project's walkways and
parking areas and away from neighboring residential areas and public streets, eliminating
any possibility of the project generating a substantial level of light or glare that would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. In addition, the orientation of the
proposed building with parking lot areas largely facing Main Street and commercial
frontage will also serve to reduce impacts on residential uses to the north of Third Street.
Consequently, established local regulations and procedures as well as site design would
provide adequate protection and reduce the project's potential to impact aesthetics to a less
than significant impact.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout (Exhibit 3)
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 5
Items a, b. c - "No Impact" - The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion project site is
located within an urban setting with existing urban zoning and uses. Implementation of the
proposed project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance, nor will it conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a
Williamson Act contract or involve or cause changes to the environment resulting in
conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Consequently, the project will result in no
impact upon agricultural resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
Sources:
Field Verification
Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
III.
AIR QUALITY
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
c)
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Items a, b, c, d and e - "Less than Sim~ificant Impact" - The existing Tustin Branch Library
operates a 15,000 sq. ft. facility with up to 1,000 visitors per day. However, it has been
determined that the existing facility is grossly undersized. As such, it is anticipated that the
Tustin Branch Library expansion and additional parking areas will be appropriately sized to
provide adequate library capacity needed to meet the Tustin community's library needs
through the year 2020 and beyond. The project is proposed within an urban setting adjacent
to an existing Civic Center and Water Department, a location that is already a destination
point for persons seeking library sen'ices.
However, with the demolition of the existing improvements and the construction of ne,,,,'
improvements there mav be short-term air quality pollutants such as dust particulates, which
will be emitted into the air. While construction activities are required by the Tustin City
Code to comply with Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) requirements concerning dust
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 6
IV.
control, etc., conditions of approval will be also imposed for the project to minimize
construction activity dust generated as part of the project.
The project will not conflict with the AQMP, violate any air quality standard or contribute a
substantial quantity of pollutants to an existing air quality violation. In addition, the project
will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any pollutant, generate
substantial pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors. Consequently, established
local regulations and procedures would provide adequate protection and reduce to a level of
insignificance the project's potential to violate an air quality standard substantially impact
air quality resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations
will reduce impacts to insignificant levels and is not mitigation under CEQA.
Consequently, no mitigation is required. However, during construction activity on
the site, contractors shall be required to comply with the grading plan approvals
with regard to dust control, which will require the application of water to the site
as specified in the Grading Code and Grading Manual. The Building Division of
the Community Development Department will monitor this when demolition and
construction commences on the site.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
City of Tustin, Community Development Department
Tustin Grading Code and Grading Manual
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a)
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b)
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural communit3' identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or
by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c)
Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 7
Vo
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f)
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
CommuniD' Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state
habitat conservation plan?
Items a, b, c, d, e, and f-"No Impact" - The proposed Tustin Branch Library expansion
project is sited within an urban setting with an existing built environment. The existing
development includes a variety of ornamental landscaping which is in various states of
condition. There are also no natural habitats, wetlands or sensitive natural commmfities that
exist at the site nor the biological resources, flora or fauna that might be found within such
areas. Since landscaping the existing Tustin Branch Library and other buildings and
improvements on the proposed site will be demolished, new' ornamental landscaping would
be re-established on the development site to conform to the requirements of Tustin's
Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines. Consequently, the project will result in no significant
impact to biological resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as
defined in {}15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 8
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
VI.
Items a, b, c and d -"Less than Si~ificant Impact" - The proposed Tustin Branch Library
Expansion project is sited within an urban setting with an existing built environment that
does not contain known historical, archaeological or paleontological resources or a unique
geologic feature. The City's General Plan does not identify urbanized sites as sensitive
areas and there are no known archaeological resources within these sites. However, through
the City's standard procedures and policies, if buffed archaeological resources are found
during construction, a certified archaeologist would need to be retained to assess the site's
significance and perform appropriate mitigation.
Also, the subject property is not located within the City's Cultural Resources Overlay
District. Structures on properties which are immediately adjacent to the site are not
identified as pan of the Cultural Resources District. The current boundary of the Cultural
Resources Overlay District is west of Prospect Avenue and includes much of Old Town
Tustin. Prior to construction, design of the project will be reviewed and approved
pursuant to the City's design review process and ordinance. In approving the project's
design, the City must consider and ensure that the project is compatible with the
adjoining existing public and private uses. In addition, the City will consider the
proximity of the subject property with the nearby Cultural Resources Overlay District
west of Prospect Avenue. Consequently, established local regulations and procedures
would provide adequate protection and reduce the project's potential impact to cultural
resources to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance Mth existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required. Pursuant to the City's
standard procedures and policies, if buried archaeological resources are found during
construction, a certified archaeologist will be retained to assess the site's significance and
perform appropriate mitigation.
SO~IFCeS :
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 9
b)
c)
d)
e)
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
· Strong seismic ground shaking?
· Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
· Landslides?
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of wastewater?
Items a, b, c, d and e - "Less than Significant Impact" - Geotechnical hazards that may
affect the project are either related to seismic events or non-seismic events. Geotechnical
hazards not related to earthquake activity include local settlement, regional subsidence,
expansive soils, erosion, and construction soil instability. The subject site is currently
developed with an existing library building, two commercial structures, 12 dwelling units
and a Board and Care facility and is relatively flat in its topographical features. The
proposed development of the site would require the demolition of the existing improvements
on the property, as well as, minor grading activity, compaction of the soil, fill, and the over
covering of the soil to create a new building pad. Any landslide areas will not impact the
site, seethe, tsunami, volcanic action, erosion or subsidence's since none of these geological
features are present on the site or in the vicinity.
Item a - Seismic hazards include surface faulting, high-intensity ground shaking, ground
failure and lurching. The project does not lie within the bounds of an "Earthquake Fault
Zone," as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Act. However, there are a number of faults in the Southern California area that are
considered active and which could have an effect on the site in the form of moderate to
strong ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. These include, but are
not limited to: the San Andreas fault, the San Jacinto fault, the Whittier-Elsinore fault, the
Chino fault and the Newport-Inglewood fault zone. The possibility of ground acceleration
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library, Expansion Project
Page 10
or shaking at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the southern California
region as a whole.
The Tustin Branch Library Expansion project will be required by the Tustin City Code to
comply with seismic design parameters contained in the most current version of the
Uniform Building Code for seismic zone 4, Title 24 of the California Building Code, and the
standards of the Structural Engineers Association of California. Compliance with
established engineering procedures and techniques and local regulations and procedures
xvould provide adequate protection and reduce to a level of insignificance this geotechnical
hazard.
Item b - The project site (and all of Tustin) is located within an area known to contain
expansive, unstable, and subject to erosion. The Tustin Branch Library Expansion project
will be required to comply with the existing City regulations related to erosion and runoff
control to minimize the potential for on-site erosion. Compliance with established
engineering procedures and techniques and local regulations and procedures would provide
adequate protection and reduce to a level of insignificance this geotechnical hazard.
Item c- The project site (and all of Tustin) is considered moderately susceptible to
liquefaction. Consequently, site soil may become unstable as a result of' earthquake-induced
ground motion. Compliance with established engineering procedures and techniques such
as removal and reoccupation of the site soil and remedial grading and local regulations and
procedures would provide adequate protection and reduce to a level of insignificance this
geotechnical hazard.
Item d - The site is not identified as being an area containing expansive soils. However, as
part of the City's development review, the project would be required to provide
determination of the expansion potential of on-site soils and implement appropriate remedial
measures in .accordance with the City's Grading Ordinance and Manual including a
removal/replacement/mixing of the localized expansive soils with granular non-expansive
soils. Compliance with established engineering procedures and techniques and local
regulations and procedures would provide adequate protection and reduce to a level of
insignificance this geotechnical hazard.
Item e- The proposed project site is located within an urban setting. As such, the City of
Tustin requires the utilization of the local sewer system and does not permit the installation
of septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems. Compliance with
established engineering procedures and techniques and local regulations and procedures
would provide adequate protection and reduce to a level of insignificance any concern
related to the site's soil condition.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 11
VII.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable
foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area?
f) For a project within the viciniD' of a private airstrip, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Items a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h- "No Impact" - The proposed Tustin Branch Library
Expansion project would not transport or dispose of hazardous materials other than
household cleaning materials and substances typically used to maintain such facilities. The
use and disposal of these chemicals is regulated by the Orange County Health Department.
In addition, the proposed library project would not produce hazardous emissions. In the
event that any asbestos is discovered in existing buildings on the site, construction contract
provisions will include the requirement that asbestos be removed and disposed of in
accordance with Section 25163 c) of the California State Health and Safety Code.
The project site is located within John Wayne Airport's arrival and departure flight path
corridor. John Wayne Airport is the primary airport serving Orange County and is located
approximately four miles southwest of the project site. The County of Orange has adopted
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 12
an Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) that establishes land use restrictions upon
properties located within 20,000 linear feet of the end of John Wayne Airport's runways.
The project site is far to the north of the affected area and outside of the AELUP land use
restrictions. In addition, the project is proposed to be limited to one story, which would not
pose an aircraft related safety hazard to site visitors or workers.
The project site is an urban setting. As such, the proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion
project will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's Emergency
Response Plan or emergency evacuation plan. The project will not expose people or
structures to significant risk to wildland fires since there are no wildlands in proximity to the
site. Consequently, the project will result in no hazards or hazardous materials impacts.
The project site is an urban setting that is currently a built environment with an existing
libra~y facilio.,, daycare cente~; commercial office and residential uses. The project site has
been utilized for the aforementioned uses since the early to mid 1960's. All vegetation
currently at the site is utilized for decorative landscaping and not agricultural purposes as
farming activities (and commercial pesticide use) ceased in the area near the turn of the 20th
centuw. Since urbanization of the area was completed, only household
maintenance/cleaning chemicals wouM have been utilized within the project area. Nb
release of hazardous wastes/substances at the project area is expected to have occurred at
the project site, nor are any known or potentially contaminated sites within the proposed
project site. Consequently, there are no conditions at the site that would pose a threat to
human health or the environment through the implementation of the proposed project. ~
The properties located adjacent to the proposed project (also known as Old Town Tustin)
are also currently developed with residential, commercial office, and commercial retail
uses, many constructed prior to end of the 20th century. No industrial or farm activities exist
within 2000feet of the project site, although automobile service stations exist approximately
1,800 linear feet from the project site. None of the adjacent properties within 2000feet are
known or assumed to be contaminated with hazardous chemicals.2
Project construction will require soil excavation and soil filling in certain areas. On April
2, 2002, a Geotechnical Engineering Report was prepared for the project by Geotechnical
Solutions, Inc. The report identified no contaminants existing at the site. However; should
construction activities identify the presence of previously unknown contamination, all
construction activities would cease, appropriate Health and Safer), procedures wouM be
implemented and, appropriate sampling and treatment (if required) will be performed. ~
The proposedproject will require demolition of buildings potentially containing lead-based-
paint and asbestos materials. The City of Tustin will require the project contractor to take
1 Response to Corranents #1, #2, #3 and #4, DTSC correspondence dated April 19, 2002.
2 Response to Comment #5, DTSC correspondence dated April 19, 2002.
3 Response to Comments #6 and #8, DTSC correspondence dated April 19, 2002.
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 13
the proper precautions during demolition activities and all contaminants will be remediated
or disposed in compliance with California environmental regulations. 4
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
County of Orange Airport Environs Land Use Plan
Orange County Fire Authority
VIII.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-
or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?.
O Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or
redirect flood flows?
4 Response to Comment #7, DTSC correspondence dated April 19, 2002.
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 14
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Items a, b, c, d, g, h, I and j -"No Impact" - The subject site is currently developed with
numerous building and improvements that are proposed to demolished. New site
improvements would add impervious surfaces to the site, which would alter drainage and
run-off patterns within the limits of the property. The Construction of the project will not
impact groundwater in the deep regional aquifer or shallow aquifer since no groundwater
removal is proposed.
The project proposes to utilize historic drainage pattems at the site. According to the Flood
Insurance Rate Map, the property is not located within a 100-year or 500-year flood zone.
Consequently, the project will not expose people or the proposed structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury and death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam,
nor is the project susceptible to inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow.
Item e, f - "Less than Significant Impact" The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion
project demolition and construction of buildings and improvements could lead to some silt-
laden runoff due to storm events and watering to reduce dust related air emissions. While
this runoff could contain relatively high levels of total dissolved solids (TDS) and contribute
in the short-term to degrading local and regional water quality, the limited size of the project
is not expected to pose a significant impact. No long-term impacts to hydrology and water
quality are anticipated for the proposed project.
Construction operations would be required to comply with the Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) for the Newport Bay watershed that requires compliance with the Drainage Area
Master Plan (DAMP) and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (N-PDES) and
the implementation of specific best management practices (BMP). Compliance xvith state
and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and
techniques, would provide adequate protection and reduce to a level of insignificance any
hydrology or water quality concern related to the implementation of the proposed project.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required. Pursuant to the City's
standard procedures and policies, the project would be required to comply with the
Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP), the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) and the implementation of specific best management practices (BM?).
Sources;
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Map (1999)
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 15
IX.
LAND USE AND PLANNING
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any'applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
Items a, b and c -"No Impact" - The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion project is
proposed within an existing urban setting and is intended to provide additional library
capacity to address and accommodate the community's future library service needs. The
subject site currently is designated on the Land Use Plan in the Tustin General Plan and on
the zoning map a mixture of land use designations which create an irregular land use pattern
(the Background Section of this Evaluation describes the specific zoning designations of
property proposed for acquisition as part of the project- also see Exhibit 6). The property to
the east and northeast is owned by the City of Tustin and includes the Civic Center complex.
The property to the west includes the Water Department Main Street Reservoir site and
public parking for the commercial areas to the west of Prospect Avenue. The proposed
project would involve necessary amendments to the both the General Plan and Zoning Map
to redesign ate the entire library site as Public Institutional. However, ~ven the irregular
current General Plan and Zoning designations on the subject property at this time and the
fact that parcels proposed for redefinition and acquisition are also bound on each side by
large public institutional uses, it is not anticipated that these changes will physically divide
the community nor would they be significant. Conversely, the project will create a more
logical pattern of land use designations in the vicinity and also provide additional protection
to existing residential designated property north of the subject site.
Although the project includes the abandonment of a portion of Preble Drive, alternative
routes of circulation currently exist around the site to avoid dividing an established
community.
The project would not conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of mitigating an environmental effect, nor would it conflict with any habitat
conservation plan or natural community conservation plan since none apply to the proposed
site.
Mitigation/Monitoring Require. d: No mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 16
Xl
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
MINERAL RESOURCES
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a
value to the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery
site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Items a and b "No Impact"- Currently, there are no known significant or valuable mineral
resources or resource recovery sites identified w4thin the Tustin General Plan, etc. In
addition, the construction of the proposed project would not negatively impact the
availability of a known mineral resource. Consequently, the project will result in no impact
to mineral resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
NOISE
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or
ground borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 17
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Items c, e, and f-"No Impact"- The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion project
will replace existing structures within the site (including an existing 15,000 sq. fl. public
library) with a new approximate 31,800 sq. ft. public library facility. The proposed library
project will include the provision of a new on-site parking area that will be primarily
oriented toward the existing commercial uses located along Main Street, separated and away
from the existing residential areas to the north. The library's operational hours will be
limited to normal business hours that will eliminate any possibility of late-night project
noise violations.
The project site is located four miles from John Wayne Airport and is not within the
AELUP. Consequently, excessive aircraft related noises are not anticipated to affect the site
or people working at the project area.
Items a, b and d- "Less than Si~ificant Impact"- The Tustin Library Expansion project is
not expected to add new noise sources into the area as the site is presently developed with
urban uses including active commercial uses with outdoor activities which generate a certain
amount of activity.
The proposed project will involve demolition and construction activities. Noise generated
during the construction of the project will result in a certain amount of short term
construction noise during the proposed construction period, which will require compliance
with the City's Noise Ordinance. The noise level of construction equipment is anticipated to
be in the range of 70 to 90 dB from 50 feet away depending on the type of equipment being
used. As noted earlier, residential uses currently exist to the north of the project site. The
Tustin Noise Element of the Tustin General Plan has established a maximmr~ exterior
residential noise level of 65 dB. However, because construction noise is unavoidable and
temporary in nature, construction activities are exempt from the City's Noise Ordinance
during work hours. The Noise Ordinance would restrict the operation of construction
equipment to the routine work hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Nighttime or weekend construction will not be permitted except in the case of an
emergency.
When completed, the Tustin Library Expansion project will be a destination to which
vehicles will be traveling. Mobile-source "ground borne" noise is preempted from local
regulation. For mobile sources, an impact would be considered significant if project related
traffic were to increase existing local noise by 3 dB and the resultant noise exceeded the
City's noise standards, or 5 dB if the resultant noise remained below City standards. The
proposed site is oriented towards Main Street, an existing primary arterial. As noted earlier,
the existing Tustin library is an undersized facility currently serving a large number of
patrons. The proposal to increase the size or' the facility is intended to more adequately
serve the existing and future patron population, it is not anticipated to create a significant
increase in trips nor traffic as discussed in more detail in Section XV of this Evaluation. A
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 18
significant benefit of the project is the proposed building orientation which will provide
additional screening for residential uses to the north of the subject property from traffic and
noise volumes along Main Street.
The subject site is located within a John Wayne Airport approach/departure flight corridor.
Over flights of the area are currently monitored by the County of Orange with regular noise
level reports being provided to the City of Tustin. At present, over flight noise does not
exceed the levels permitted nor is aircrat~ noise expected to rise since new, quieter aircraft
continue to be developed and utilized at John Wayne Airport. Consequently, established
local regulations and procedures would provide adequate protection and reduce the project's
potential noise to a less than significant impact.
Traffic and traffic related noise associated with the adjacent roadway (Main Street) and also
potential aircratt over flights, will be taken into consideration during the city's review of the
project for compliance with any applicable provisions of the Uniform Building Code and
Tustin General Plan.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required. However, pursuant to
the City's standaru procedures and policies, including the City's Building Code standards
for insulation and interior noise levels.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
POPULATION & HOUSING
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 19
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Item a "No Impact"- The Tustin Branch Library Expansion project proposes the
construction of an expanded library facility and required parking to support the existing and
future library needs of the Tustin service area. As such, the library project will not have an
environmental impact by directly or indirectly inducing population growth.
Items b and c "Less than Significant Impact" - The Tustin Branch Library Expansion
project is an infill project located within the Town Center Redevelopment Project Area. The
current site is currently developed with three commercial properties, four tri-plexes
(containing 12 rental occupied dwelling units), and a commercial Board and Care facility.
Each of the properties are in various conditions and state of repair. Field inspection reveals
that the triplexes are over 40 years old and experiencing significant deferred maintenance
and need substantial rehabilitation and site upgrades in order to extend their useful life.
While the proposed project would require the removal of housing units on the subject site,
such removal would not be considered a significant impact. According to the 2000 United
States Census the Tustin Library service area had a population of 92,344 (68,300 persons
within the Tustin City limits, 24,044 persons within Tustin's unincorporated Sphere of
Influence). The 2000 Census also repons that them are 33,918 housing units existing at that
time within the Tustin Library service area (25,501 units within Tustin, 8,417 units within
the "built-out" unincorporated area). In addition, the Tustin General Plan anticipates that by
the year 2020 there will be 37,896 housing units within the Tustin Library service area. The
proposed removal of 12 existing dwelling units would represent less than 4/10,000 of the
total number of existing housing units within the Tustin Library service area.
The proposed acquisition and removal of dwelling units on the subject site would potentially
displace residents of the triplex units and could also result in impacts on clients of the Board
and Care facility. Although the actual number of persons that would be impacted by the
acquisition of commercial board and care facility and the triplexes is unknown at this time
(upon subsequent relocation surveying and preparation of a relocation plan the actual
number of persons impacted will be determined), current rental information in this portion
of the City would indicate that triplex units are rented at rental rates that are affordable to
those households of low and moderate income. The Tustin General Plan indicates that it can
be assumed that on average, approximately 3 persons typically occupy each th-pled unit.
When applied to the acquisition of the triplex units, a total of 36 persons could be displaced
with the demolition of the 12 existing triplex units.
The loss of housing stock within the Tustin Branch Library sen, ice area is expected to be
minimal when compared to the total number of housing units in the area. Likewise, the
proposed project's displacement of 36 individuals (assumed from the triplex units) and any
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 20
XIII.
additional business displacement caused by the acquisition of the Board and Care facility
and is not considered "substantial" in light of the number of existing units within the Tustin
Library service area. However, since the proposed project is within a redevelopment project
area, the issues related to replacement housing and affordability must be addressed
consistent with state law.. Article 9 of the California Community Redevelopment Law and
in particular Section 22410 et seq. requires a redevelopment agency that is involved in
acquisition to rehabilitate, rehabilitate, develop or construct or cause to be rehabilitated,
developed or constructed, Iow and moderate income dwelling units which are lost as a result
of a redevelopment project or when persons are displaced as a result of a redevelopment
project. The City and Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency would be required to
prepare relocation and/or displacement plans, where necessary, and would be required to
replace units displaced or destroyed and provide relocation services and benefits to
displaced households.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
California Community Redevelopment Law
Tustin Comprehensive Affordable Housing Strategy
PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 21
Item a- "No Impact"-
Fire protection. The City of Tustin contracts with the Orange County Fire Authority
(OCFA) for fire protection services. The Fire Authority maintains three stations in the
City. The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion project would result in the removal
of existing buildings and construction of an expanded Tustin Library facility. The
proposed project would not increase current demands upon the OCFA since it is located
on an in-fill site within a developed urban setting currently served by an existing OCFA
fire station. Demolition and construction activities would be required to meet existing
OCFA regulations regarding construction materials and methods, emergency access,
water mains, fire flow, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, building setbacks, and other
relevant regulations.
Police protection. The City of Tustin operates its own Police Department. The need for
police protection services is assessed on the basis of resident population estimates, square
footage of industrial uses, and square footage of retail uses. As stated above, the proposed
project would not increase population nor will it stimulate construction of additional
industrial or retail uses. The library expansion project will not increase current demands
upon the Tustin Police Department since the proposal involves the demolition of existing
commercial and residential uses and an expansion of the existing library use. The proposed
Library building program has accommodated the installation of security features that will
also minimize any potential threat of theft, and unlawful break-ins.
Schools. The City of Tustin is largely served by the Tustin Unified School District
(TUSD) and their facilities. Approximately 100 acres of over 13 square miles in the City
are located within the Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) in the vicinity of
Barranca and Redhill at the southwest comer of the City on the former Marine Corps Air
Station Tustin. Approximately 185 acres within the City are located within the Irvine
Unified School District largely at the southeast comer of the City adjacent to Harvard
Avenue. Neither the SAUSD nor TUSD have existing facilities currently located within
City of Tustin boundaries.
The subject site is located within the boundaries of the TUSD. As a public institutional
use, the expansion of the Tustin Branch Library would not induce population growth
resulting in an incremental increase in school population. The proposed Tustin Library
Expansion project involves the demolition of existing housing units and expansion of an
existing public library use. All residents (including children) directly impacted by the
project would relocate in or out of the Tustin Library service area, resulting in no net
increase/impact upon enrollment at the TUSD. However, the proposed provision in the
programming for the Tustin Branch Library Expansion project will include a Joint
Venture-Homework Center. The approximate 900 square foot facility within the
proposed Library project will provide positive benefits to school age children.
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 22
Other Public Facilities (Libraries). Implementation of the proposed project would have a
positive impact upon the community's ability to provide library services to the Tustin
Library service area. While the Tustin community with receipt of State Bond Act financial
grant revenues and other supplemental funding sources will be able to finance construction
of the new facility, the OCPL will be responsible for and is committed to operating any new
Tustin Branch Library that is developed and there will not be a negative financial impact on
the City of these operations since the City is a participant in the County Library system and
property tax revenues are collected within the City's boundaries and within the service area
of the proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion project to fund the need for continued and
expanded operations. The proposed siting of the new facility will also permit construction
phasing so that the existing library facility does not have to be demolished until completion
of the new facility reducing any temporary impact of the project on the continuity of library
services to the Tustin service area. A proposed Library Plan of Service has been prepared to
accommodate the needs and services for the expanded library.
The proposed project is immediately adjacent to the Tustin Civic Center and a Tustin Water
Services facility and public parking which is currently under construction. Project site
design will be closely coordinated between City departments and approved by the City
through design review to ensure compatibility of the project ~vith the design and operation of
the Tustin Civic Center and Water facility. No negative impact to other public facilities will
occur from the implementation of the proposed project.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
~ources :
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
Tustin Unified School District
Tustin Water Division
RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Items a and b- "No Impact"-. The proposed Library Branch Expansion project will not
result in the construction of new housing or direct/indirect population increases nor will it
impact the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities. The proposed project
will actually provide leisure-time pursuits to Tustin area residents. The proposed project
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 23
XV.
will also include a community room that can be used for special recreational use
programming when not in specific use during normal library hours.
MitigatiotVMonitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
Sources:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
Tustin Parks and Recreational Services Department
TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION
a)
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either
the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established
by the county, congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic
levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety, risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Items a. b, c, d, e, f, g- "No Impact"- The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion
project will replace existing commercial and residential uses with an expanded Public
Library and parking area. Given the current size of the Tustin Branch Library, the proposed
project would represent a net increase of approximately 16,800 sq.ft. As noted above, the
site will continue to be a destination for persons previously visiting to the existing Tustin
Branch Library. The proposed project is also intended to support future library needs of the
Tustin library service area.
Project design would orient vehicular and pedestrian site access largely from existing Main
Street with access through the Civic Center site onto Centennial Way as a secondary in-
gress and egress location. Primary access to the development including book drops and
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 24
drop-offs will be from Main Street with service access for trash and utilities to the rear of the
proposed facility from the terminus of Third Street at the site's northeast comer (this service
area will be a common area that will be shared in use with the Tustin Civic Center). The
Circulation Element of the Tustin General Plan identifies Main Street as a primary arterial
capable of carrying 33,800 average daily trips (ADT) at Tustin's acceptable Level of
Service ("LOS") of D. The primary arterial classification assumes a four-lane roadway with
a typical right-of-way width of 100 feet and curb-to-curb width of 84 feet, unless this right-
of-way is not able to be accommodated and then a lesser fight-of-way can be used to
accommodate a four lane facility (no less than 80 feet). Currently, Main Street adjacent to
the project site has a fight-of-way width of 90 feet and is operating at a traffic volume of
9,700 ADT and a LOS of A, providing significant additional potential capacity in the future.
The Circulation Element identifies Centennial Way as a local street capable of carrying
10,000 ADT. Currently, Centennial Way is operating at a traffic volume of 4,300 ADT, and
LOS of A. The noted LOS was derived from the most recent Citywide Annual Average
Daily Traffic (ADT) counts, performed in December 2001. Intersections in the vicinity of
the project include the intersection of Main Street and Prospect west of the subject site and
the intersection of Main Street and Newport Avenue to the east. These intersections are
operating at a LOS of A and B, respectively. Third Street is currently not shown on the
Tustin General Plan but by its function would be considered a local street. The portion of
the subject site proposed for a street vacation (Preble St. bep, veen Third St. and Main Street)
is also not shown on the Tustin General Plan.
Due to the reduction in the 12 dwelling traits and commercial uses on the subject site and the
net addition of only 16,800 sq. feet of new floor area for the Tustin Branch Library
Expansion project, the project would be expected to generate approximately 470 additional
vehicle trips per day above the existing condition. Given this information, the City of Tustin
Engineering Division has determined that the Prospect/Main Street and Newport/Main
Street intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the
additional minimal project trips. Consequently, implementation of the proposed project
would not cause a substantial increase in traffic in relation to Main Street or Centennial
Way's existing traffic load or exceed the established level of service for these roads.
However, policy 1.6 in the Circulation Element of the General Plan states that the City
should continue to require dedication of fight-of-way and construction of street
improvements on streets adjacent to construction projects at the expense of the development.
The proposed site plan will accommodate any necessary reservation of fight-of-way area
needed to accommodate any ultimate public improvements along Main Street as shown in
the current General Plan.
If implemented, project related construction activities would result in construction workers
and equipment traveling to the site, with possible construction activities occurring within the
roadway. However, based upon current library usage occurring at the site (up to 1,000
visitors in a day), these temporary actMties would cause far less trips to the site than
currently occur. In addition, compliance with local regulations and standards, along with
established engineering procedures would ensure that any temporary roadway work or
closures would involve adequate signing and traffic control (if needed) for m'ty alternate
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 25
XVI.
traffic routing. Consequently, construction related traffic would not negatively impact
existing traffic load on either Main Street or Centennial Way.
The proposed Library Expansion project is proposed to be a one stow in height and would
not impact existing air traffic patterns. In addition, the project proposes no changes in the
existing roadway designs for either Main Street, Centennial Way. The abandonment of the
southerly portion of Preble Drive (a collector street) will not substantially increase hazards
due to a design feature or result in inadequate emergency access since alternative traffic
routes will continue to exist for persons needing to travel in the area of the site either during
or following construction of the project.
The proposed Tustin Library Expansion project will provide all parking required by the
Tustin City Code for the proposed use of the site thus eliminating a potential for inadequate
parking capacity. In addition, the City's Traffic Engineer has concluded that ample on-
street parking is available in the vicinity of the site to accommodate temporary construction
worker parking needs. Adjacent to the project site is a proposed Water Division facility that
includes approximately 56 additional public parking spaces and there is a significant amount
of parking also available in the Tustin Civic Center Complex immediately to the west of the
site that will be available in the event that over-flow parking is needed for special
programming or events.
Also, City of Tustin residents have access to several forms of alternative transportation in
the areas surrounding but not adjacent to the project site. Bus service and bicycle paths
currently serve the nearby Newport Avenue with bus service also along Centennial Way
immediately adjacent to the proposed project site. Consequently, the proposed project will
have no impact to these existing services.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not
mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Sottrces :
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water
QualiD' Control Board?
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 26
b)
Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing
entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or
may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f)
g)
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
Items a, b, c, d, e, fig - "No Impact" - The proposed Tustin Branch Library Expansion
project is proposed at an urban site where all utility systems are currently in place and
adequate to support the project. Vacation of a portion of Pebble St. (between Third and
Main Street) will involve some abandonment and relocation of existing services. Hoxvever,
the removal of existing structures and proposed expansion project would not result in any
significant change in the current need for electricity, sexver, storm drain, water, telephone
and cable TV services given that the site is currently developed with residential uses and
three commercial properties. However, modification of service connections including
installation of transformers where needed to serve the new building would be required as is
customary with new construction. No increase in utility and service system demand is
expected. Consequently, utilities required to serve the project are existing and in the vicinity
are adequate to serve the proposed project. In addition, project and construction related
materials disposal would continue to be handled consistent with current City ordinance and
Franchise Agreements related to solid waste disposal..
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required.
Sotlrces:
Preliminary Site Layout
Field Verification
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
Exhibit 2
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Library Expansion Project
Page 27
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal communiD', reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Based upon the foregoing, the Tustin Branch Library Expansion project involves the
removal of existing uses on the site and new construction. Based upon the responses to the
categories above in this Evaluation, the review of City files, records and documents and the
nature of the project, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitats or wildlife populations to decrease or
threaten, eliminate, or reduce animal ranges, etc. As designed and subject to compliance
with existing rules and regulations, the project would not achieve short-term goals to the
disadvantage of long-term environmental goals and the project will not cause unmitigated
environmental effects that would cause substantial effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly. In reference to the project background discussion provided herein, the project
will not contribute to the demand individually and will have limited impacts cumulatively.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: All of the proposed Tustin Library Expansion project's
environmental effects have been examined and discussed above. No additional or new
mitigation measures would be required to address cumulative impacts, etc.
Sources: The determination that the proposed project will not result in any significant
adverse impacts on the environment was based upon the findings described above in items I
through XV1.
I)O,,Envir,library exhibit I 3-20-02.doc
.Exhibit 3
� -.:.: 1111111LL1_...l.11l ll1111L��� t� �-- I..
In POUCH
No r A PAR r HO r A rAR,r
U-3
EXI-StIfia
rivicry.NtER —I r
riturERI-V
_Q
I I
MMUFfirify
[All.
C:- -
mimstRE-Er
F1, f ("UHM
t>u� _ _ MAIMS
F(I I URE EXPANSION AREA 1 NEW UURARY
"IMMUND'y
M
Mir
F1
U50 PARMUC, 511ACE4
MAIMS I KrEl FA1-jU I IES 10
_ n n I I :. I.. .I �_� _�-- fi TrrFJTM'M, L 7
ITFI 1117-.;
1&Ln
---; ----------
7 M �351
'"J."USrI'.IN' LIBRARY
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
sit
m
. m .
Inc.
MURNAlIVEW
CONCE-11TUAL SITE PLAN
I M-000 SO. r- F 0. f I AQ 3119 22 MAR 92
Exhibit 4
LIBRARY DIVISION'
DIVISION
Sq. Ft.
Percent
of Total
BROWSING
CHILDREN'S LIBRARY
CIRCULATION SERXrlCES
COMMUNITY ROOM
FICTION COLLECTION
GENERAL BUILDING SERVICES
INFORMATION SER5rlCES
LIBRARY ENTRANCE
LITERACY CENTER
NON-FICTION COLLECTION
QUIET ROOM
REAl)LNG PATIO
YOUNG ADULT SERVICES
1,628
6,240
1,688
1,478
1,484
1,271
4 59
783
400
2,972
488
N/A
850
7%
26%
7%
6%
6%
5%
19%
3%
2%
12%
2%
0%
4%
Net Assignable Square Footage:
23,841
100%
Non-Assignable Square Footage (@ 25%of Gross):
7,947
Gross Square Footage:
31,788
A Llbds DESIGN Building Program
Report Printed on: 02112/'2002
Tustin Branch Library Orange County Public Library
Page t 1-1
Exhibit 5
Property .Ownership
Tustin Library
Branch. Expansion Project
'N
STREET ~ MAI^/ I_,,_._
Assessor Parcel No.
ProDerrx, Address
Property Owner
a) 401-592-12
b) 401-593-04
c) 401-582-05
d) 401-593-01,02
e) 401-593-03
f) 401-592-11
g) 401-592-10
h) 401-592-13,14,15
i) Nor Applicable
335-339 S. Preble Drive
285 E. Main St.
240 E. Third St.
330-334 Preble
325-329 S. Preble Dr.
300-304 E. Third St.
305 E. Main St.
Portion of S. Preble Dr.
Blanchard, William & Susan
De Nicola, Carolyn
Emery, Walter & Marilyn
Poriker, Kenneth & Lisa
Shinagawa, Ryo
Tusdn Masonic Temple
City, of Tustin
Exhibit 6
SPS
irr
��f�l FIRST
rfI I -11-I I l
A `' T' 5TIN 4no:Sir PU �T Fc 1I�
cit I C; 2 p
(;2 P �
`;E:CON[) Sl
.02 P 02
l 7
t
2 C2 P
l 1.
G-2
, FAIF-4
CGI SECOND- --Sl--
R-3
fL
c1 •� ���: IC _
cc
-i
AUS.•
Cm*'
I /
,
•,,�200
; r RE f_
Existing zolllllg
I'ttsti.It l�ii)racy
Branch Expausiolt Project
it
N
■■■i■i!Ar
/
Districts
R2 — Duplex Residential District
"WI113 — Alultiple Family Residential Distric
/Cl — Retail Commercial District C2 — Central Commercial District
CG -- Commercial General District
/ A1HP - Mobile Home Park
�\ PC -- Planned Community District
i 1' — Combiniug Parking District
PD — Planned Development District
tl P&I — Public and Listitutional District
"• "ti1%— Professional District
\� -- - Cultural Resource Overlay t)istric
u
■ ■ r+- Project Site Bondiry
�t Af
Ninston H. Hickox
~,gency Secretary
.California Environmental
Protection Agency
April 19, 2002
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Edwin F. Lowry, Director
5796 Corporate Avenue
Cypress, California 90630
RECEIVED
APR 2 5 2002.
8ED_ V LOPN NI AG FNC,V
Gray Davis
Governor
Mr. John Buchanan
Senior Project Manager
Community Development Agency
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE TUSTIN LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT
(SCH #2002041004)
Dear Mr. Buchanan:
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has received your Negative
Declaration (ND) for the above-mentioned Project.
Based on the review of the document, DTSC's comments are as follows:
1)
The ND needs to identify and determine whether current or historic uses at the
Project site have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances at the
Project area.
2)
The ND needs to identify any known or potentially contaminated site within the
proposed Project area. For all identified sites, the ND needs to evaluate whether
conditions at the site pose a threat to human health or the environment.
3)
The draft ND should identify the mechanism to initiate any required investigation
and/or remediation for any site that may require remediation, and the
government agency to provide appropriate regulatory oversight.
4)
If the property had vegetation or agricultural use, onsite soils could contain
pesticide residues. The site may have contributed to soil, and groundwater
contamination. Proper investigation and remedial actions should be conducted
at the site prior to its new development.
5) If any of the adjacent properties are contaminated with hazardous chemicals,
and if the proposed project is within 2,000 feet from a contaminated site, then the
The energy challenge facing Califomia is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption.
For a .li.s.t of simple ways_you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at www. dtsc. ca.gov.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Mr. John Buchanan
April 19, 2002
Page 2
proposed development may fall under the "Border Zone of a Contaminated
Property." Appropriate precautions should be taken prior to construction if the
proposed project is on a "Border Zone Property."
6)
The project construction may require soil excavation and soil filling in certain
areas. Appropriate sampling is required prior to disposal of the excavated soil. If
the soil is contaminated, properly dispose of it rather than placing it in another
location. Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) may be applicable to these soils.
Als'o, if the project is planning to import soil to backfill the areas excavated,
proper sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free
of contamination.
7)
If the project requires demolition, renovation and addition of building structures,
investigate the presence of lead paints and asbestos containing materials
(ACMs) in the currently existing buildings at the site. If the presence of lead or
ACMs are suspected, proper precautions should be taken during demolition
activities. Additionally, the contaminants should be remediated in compliance
with the California environmental regulations.
If during construction the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination are
suspected, construction in the area should cease and appropriate Health and
Safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated
soil and/or groundwater exist, the ND should identify how any required
investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and the government agency
to provide appropriate regulatory oversight.
DTSC provides guidance for the Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA)
preparation and cleanup oversight through the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP).
For additional information on the VCP, please visit DTSC's web site at
www.dtsc.ca.gov.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Johnson P. Abraham,
Project Manager at (714)484-5476.
Sinc,erely, fi ~ J(
Haissam Y. Salloum, P.E.
Unit Chief
Southern California Cleanup Operations Branch
Cypress Office
Mr. John Buchanan
April 19, 2002
Page 3
CC:
Governor's Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, California 95812-3044
Mr. Guenther W. Moskat, Chief
Planning and Environmental Analysis Section
CEQA Tracking Center
Department of Toxic Substances Control
P.O. Box 806
Sacramento, California 95812-0806
City of Tustin
RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
RESOLUTION NO. 02-49
I, PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, hereby certifies that the whole number of the members of the City
Council of the City of Tustin is five; and that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 02-
49 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 6th day of May, 2002,
by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Thomas, Worley, Bone, Doyle, Kawashima
COUNClLMEMBER NOES: None
COUNClLMEMBER ABSTAINED: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None
Pamela Stoker, City Clerk